Selected quad for the lemma: nature_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
nature_n humane_a law_n positive_a 2,470 5 10.9031 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A26184 Three letters to Dr. Sherlock concerning church-communion wherein 'tis enquired whether the doctor's notion of church communion be not too narrow and uncharitable, both to dissenters, and men of larger principles / by a lay-man of the Church of England ... Atwood, William, d. 1705?; Sherlock, William, 1641?-1707. 1683 (1683) Wing A4183; ESTC R11681 18,335 41

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

has wrote on this Subject unless you will avow all that they have said on the necessity of the intention of the Priest to concur with his Acts or otherwise Your last Discourse occasions only my adding this farther Query Whether if the nature of Catholick Communion requires a readiness to communicate with any sound Church and yet a Church obliges us to communicate with that alone while distance does not hinder the occasional and frequent communion with others Is not that Church guilty of Schism in such an Injunction contrary to the nature of Catholick Communion Or at least is it not impossible that he who communicates sometimes with one True Church sometimes with another can be a Schismatick or any more than an Offender against a positive humane Law Be pleased to send me your thoughts upon the particulars of my enquiry to c. directed to SIR Your Servant Anonymus Feb. 4. 1682 3. The Third LETTER Feb. 19. 1682 3. SIR SInce it is more than probable that I have occasioned the speedy printing of your Discourses concerning Church-Communion I am now become a Debtor to the Churches of God to publish those Objections which arose in my mind and which you have not yet thought fit to answer though earnestly press'd thereunto And me-thinks you who have heretofore been a zealous Patron for universal Grace should be very ready to clear your self from the least imputation of stinting it more than our most gracious God nay than your most narrow principled Adversaries have ever done Though he who questions the Dictates of his Spiritual Guids had need run to the protection of Obscurity yet one would think that he who prints in the dark what he publish'd on the House top before the Face of the Congregation brings a foul suspition upon his Doctrine 'T is well known that the Pulpit is more licensed from Contradiction than the Press wherefore the former is most properly assigned for a Clergy-mans Recantation Nor indeed did I think you far from making publick satisfaction when you own'd in your Sermon preach'd Feb. 11. on Luke 12. vers 4 5. That the Censures of the Church are formidable only when duly applied and that God Almighty has not trusted fallible Men with a power of shutting out those whom he will receive Keep to this and make good your Notion of Schism if you can If Schism be as you say a very great Sin and such as will damn us as soon as Adultery and Murder God forbid that it should consist in such ticklish Points as would place many thousands of truly charitable and pious Men within the fatal Roll. But to my thinking while you blame Men for having no Notion at all of a Church or no Notion of one Church and that they know not wherein the Unity and Communion of this Church consists you remove their Guilt and grant that their Schism is involuntary and only an Error of their Understandings Alas mistaken honest Men how unhappy is your condition who must be damn'd for not understanding Dr. Sherlock when he fancies that he puts Matters past all doubt tho others may think he only amuses People with equivocal Words and Terms I beg of you to consider whether you do not impose upon your self or would not upon others by a confused notion of the Church and of separation from it wherein you make Schism to consist Great is Diana of the Ephesians and great is the use of the word Church when good Crafts-masters have the handling of it and of all Men those of Rome have succeeded best at this play of words By the using it indefinitely as you do the Pope keeps the Kevs of Heaven and Hell at his Girdle and truly this in some Cases comprehends things as different as Heaven and Hell are such as shall be sav'd and such as are already under the dominion of Satan If you use it for several purposes I hope for the future you will define what you mean by the Church when you are to consider it as Catholick and Universal what when you take it in a more restrain'd sence otherwise you speak not like a Minister of the Gospel but as one that would pervert that use of words which in you especially God Almighty designed for instructing us candidly in the Truth Indeed you may play a little more securely with the word Schism because unless it be taken to lie wholly in want of Charity People may not so well understand what it is how distinctly soever the Notion of Churches be taught them surely 't is much a question whether it lies wholly in causless separation from a sound part of the Catholick Church To my thinking St. Paul when he speaks of it supposes a continuance still of the same Body and ascribes it to Christians continuing such nay and communicating with each other Thus writing to the Corinthians of whom he says Ye are the Body of Christ and Members in particular He tells you to this effect that there is but one Spirit which communicates it self amongst them in various Dispensations and enables them according to their different Capacities and Attainments to promote each others growth in Grace And then having compared them to the several parts of a natural Body God saith he hath tempered the Body together having given more abundant honour to that part which lacked That there should be no Schism in the Body but that the Members should have the same care for one another Which seems no more than that God obliges the Members of his Church to live together charitably and to be ready to assist each other from the consideration of the distribution of his Gifts and Graces in such manner that even the meanest and most despised Christian may administer Aid and Comfort to those that are in the highest Station But all this was written to the Church at Corinth that Body of Christ there which assembled together in the same place and yet the Apostle charges them with real Schism for says he Whereas there is among you envying and strife and divisions are ye not carnal and walk as Men But from the Apostle's Notion of Schism I shall come to yours as you have jumbled it together with the equivocal word Church of which you would make one believe that there can be no true Idea but as particular visible nay and that national too wherefore be pleased to weigh a little with your self 1. Whether you do not appropriate that to the National Church which belongs to the Catholick visible and invisible As where you say No Man has a right to any Act of Christian Communion but he who is in a state of Communion with the Christian Church that no Man is in Communion with a Church which he is not a Member of And that he is no Member of the Church who is not at least visibly admitted into God's Covenant by Baptism Now I would ask you this plain Question Whether