bloud hath not reuealed this to thee but God and in another place it is said when his Disciples were going to Emaus he opened their hearts And for the ministery which is a meanes to call men 1. Cor. 12.6.8 it is said to be the worke of God and Eph. 4.11.12 it is said Christ gaue some to be Apostles some Pastors c. for the worke of the ministery and the repairing of the Saints Thirdly remission of sinnes and iustification is the worke of God as it is said Esa 40.29 It is that holy one that giueth strength vnto him that fainteth that is it is God that forgiueth sinnes and Mat. 9.6 the some of man as sonne of man hath this power to forgiue sinnes and Stepheâ— Act. 7.60 praieth Lord Iesus lay not this sinne to their charge Fourthly sanctification is onely the worke of God Iohn 1.13 We are not borne of the will of man but of God and vers 12. As many as receiue him he giues prerogatiue to bee the sonnes of God and Mat. 3.11 Christ will baptize you with the holy Ghost and againe himselfe saith Without me you can doe nothing which is true onely of God and Ephes 5.26 Christ gaue himselfe for his Church to sanctifie it and Heb. 10.10 We are sanctified by the offering of the body of Christ Fiftly to giue glory is the worke of God and this doth Christ as appeareth by the speech of the theefe vpon the Crosse Luke 23.42 Lord remember me when thou commest into thy kingdome and Iohn 10.28 I doe giue eternall life vnto my sheepe Now for the fourth that he is knowen to be God by the diuine worship is to be giuen vnto him and worship is due onely to Iehouah Prov. 16.4 the Lord hath made all things for his owne sake And for this worship first it is not lawfull to serue any so much as God now Christ is to bee serued only for as himselfe saith I have the keyes of life and of death Secondly it is not lawfull to beleeue in any but God and Iob. c. 5. c. 6. Christ saith He that beleeueth in we hath eternal life Thirdly â—im whom we ought to loue aboue all things is God Christ Mat. 16. saith Loue me better then thine owne soule Fouthly â—hom we ought to obey in all things is God and Mat. 17.5 〈◊〉 is said This is my beloued Sonne heare him speaking of Christ â—iftly it is not lawfull to sweare by any but by God and S. Paul â—â—m 9.1 sweareth by Christ and saith I say the trueth in Christ 〈◊〉 not Sixthly inuocation or praier is for none but God as Daâ—id saith Psal 50.15 Call vpon me in the day of trouble and I will heaâ— you and Stephen Act. 7.60 when he was stoned praied to Christ Lord Iesus receiue my soule and with praier to Christ end most 〈◊〉 S. Pauls Epistles Seuenthly Iehouah onely must be blessed foâ—euer and S. Paul Rom. 9.5 saith Christ God blessed for euer anâ— in the Reuelation it is said Reuel 19.7 All praise and glorie be to the Lambe and 2. Pet. 3.18 Grow in the grace of Christ to whom be praise fâ—â—euer Eightly God onely is to be bowed vnto and it is said 〈◊〉 Christ Heb. 1.6 Phil. 2.10 Let all the Angels in heauen adore him and by S. Paul Hâ—â— hath a name giuen him whereat euery knee must bow And thus bâ— these many parts of Gods worship it doth appeare that Christâ— God equall with the Eather For the second point which is the reall distinction of theâ—â— two natures wee say they be not confounded against the thiâ—â— heresie of Eutiches who held that the person eternall of the woâ—â— of God was turned into flesh for by this it followeth that â—ther there must bee an abolition of the Godhead or a permiâ—â—â—â—â— of both the natures both which were blasphemous but 〈◊〉 say according to the scripture Phil. 2.6 that Christ became thâ—â— he was not before namely man and retained that he was befoâ—â— namely God and he was man not that it was transfused inâ—â— his Deity or any property of the Deity transfused into his hâ—manity but by assuming the flesh and so by personall vnion bâ—came both and albeit the humanity of Christ be much magnaiâ—â—ed by the Diuinitie yet is the Diuinitie nothing altered by 〈◊〉 humanity For the third point which is the personall vnion of both the natures from hence hath arisen that fourth heresie of Neftâ—â—us who sayd that Filius Maria was not onely Aliuâ— but Aliâ—â— that is that as there were two natures in Christ distinct so 〈◊〉 there also two persons We say that the same person that 〈◊〉 the sonne of Mary was the sonne of God so as the greaâ— matter heere iâ— whether Christ be one person wherin let vs â—â—derstand these two things first what a personal vnion is seconâ—ly what is the fruit and effect of this vnion For the first 〈◊〉 is a person in Christ Is it a thing compounded of Deity 〈◊〉 humanity God forbid Nay Christ by his humane nature â—â—perly considered is not a person but the Diuinity assuming his flesh his humanitie subsisteth and staieth it selfe in his Diuinity for his humanity neuer vpheld it selfe till it was vnited to the Diuinity It was a nature before but no person his Diuinitie was both a nature and a person before so as out of them neither compounded nor confounded doeth arise Christ Iesus out Emanuel And as in the Trinity there be three persons and but one nature so in Christ there is but one person and two natures vnion of nature in the vnity of his Deity For the second which is the fruit and effect of this vnion it is two folde first the exaltation of his humane nature by being ioyned to his Deitie secondly the communication of his properties For the first that the Deity that vnited the flesh did so glorifie the flesh that by vnsearchable degrees it hath made it farre aboue all Angels is proued by three priuiledges which it hath first by the dignity of his personall vnion as he was the sonne of man he was naturally the sonne of God and he that was God was borne of the woman for Christ is one sonne of God in two respects first by generation eternall secondly according to his humane nature not as man nor by adoption for hee was neuer the sonne of wrath but by personall vnion for he was the sonne of God The second priuiledge is that all gifts that can be in any of the creatures Col. 2.9 are powred without measure vpon the flesh of Christ namely all that can be giuen to any creature or to any nature that keepes it a nature still and doth not defie the creature for as hee is man hee knoweth not the day of iudgement Mark 13.32 nor is not in euery place for these bee essentiall to the Godhead but his humane nature was so beautified by the Godhead dwelling in it bodily as that Heb. 1.6
all graces and so truely is it sealed vnto our soules that wee eate Christ though not corporally By the word we eate the flesh of Christ continually by faith and in the Sacrament it is only more plaine that we eate it because two senses are satisfied by it the eare hearing the word and the eie seeing the bread For the third testimony There comes a voice from heauâ—â— by the former miracles the Lord onely prouided for the witnesse of the eye but now hee prouides for the eare also Where wee learne the wonderfull wisedome and loue of God to exercise all our senses that thereby we might be brought to a certaine perswasion of these mysteries Among the Philosophers is a great question whether the sense of sight or of hearing bee better in it selfe True it is that sight in nature is more excellent as for celerity and quickenesse so for perspicuity and sharpnesse but if the doubt bee made of the profit of these two then hearing excelleth for we can see nothing but that is visible but many more things are to be heard of which thereby may be conueied to the heart to iudge of so the largenesse of hearing is greater in the profit Besides no man profiteth by sight vnlesse he vnderstand it by hearing for which cause it pleased God to apply both in the mystery of saluation that thereby we might be sure of it we neuer doubting of that we both see and heare Faith commeth by hearing Rom. 10.17 and the holy Ghost bores the care Psal 40. and leades the eye to satisfie it setting before it in Baptisme water and in the Supper bread and wine so as it is prouided that the hearing might haue the word and the eye the sacraments Now in the voice consider what it doth expresse namely thâ— that flesh which stood there before them was the naturall sonne of God and this he is two waies first as he is the sonne of God by nature of the eternall substance of his Father howbeit let no man thinke fleshly of the matter for hee departed with no substance nor had any manner of change secondly as he was the sonne of Mary not by nature or adoption for then there had beene a time when he was not the Sonne of God but by personall vnion the man Christ being neuer a person by it selfe vntill it was personally vnited to the Godhead so as he was borne the sonne of God not by nature for he was of the nature of his mother so Mary is said to bee the mother of God not that she brought forth God but brought foorth that man that was God and this in respect onely of the personall vnion In that it is said my welbeloued Sonne vnderstand that all loâ—â— comes from him that comes to vs and wee are beloued only for Christs sake as Châ—â—◠〈…〉 praieth Iohn 17. I beseech thee good Father that as 〈…〉 â—â—â—d me so thou wilt loue them and giue them the same glory thou guest me This is God required to doe by his owne Sonne who can aâ—ke nothing shall be denied him With the same loue loue thou them as I am in them so are they in me And this ministreth singular consolation that when we consider Christ to be beloued we may withall remember that with the same loue the Lord loueth his natural son with the same doth he loue vs that are adopted so as when he beholds the beauty of his sonne in whose fore-head as in a golden plate are written all our names hee turneth from our filthinesse and embraceth vs as his owne sonne and the Father and sonne are all one in desire The Lord grant we may be able to comprehend it and be willing to entertaine it that this loue may constraine vs to loue him againe otherwise it brings foorth no effectuall fruit in vs. Againe since the Father tooke all delight in this Sonne Christ Iesus and that the whole Trinity was heere at his baptizing and that the father saith in another place Sonne I will glorifie thee still Iohn 12.28 let vs learne to magnifie the Lord Iesus let him bee our ioy for who is there in heauen or earth in whom wee can set our delight better then on him which thus pleaseth the father Let vs loue him that God loueth he is the only Priest to sacrifice for vs the only Aduocate to plead for vs the onely Prophet to instruct vs the only King to gouerne vs the onely shield to defend vs we shall be made rich through his grace only righteous through his obedience onely safe through his protection onely and saued through his mediation only He that glorifies the Sonne glorifies God and he that resteth vnder the wings of the Sonne shroudeth himselfe vnder the shadow of the most high then accursed be that man or that religion that holds Christ but as the chiefe Sauior and would haue other helpes ioyned to him for we must only haue Christ and wholly Christ and assure ourselues to bee â—aued onely in him our praiers to bee heard onely through him and our wounds to be healed onely by the sight of him and to what end should we ioyne others with him since all are beloued onely for him That there is a Trinity appeâ—◠〈…〉 â—â—er in this place aâ— namely the fathers voice 〈…〉 â—esence in the Done and Christ manifested and 〈…〉 flesh and these bee seuerall yet but onâ—â—e hoâ—â—â— and all and euery of them is leâ—â—â—uah It is a mystery only to be adored yet in some measure iâ— to be knoâ—en that they should be three persons yet but one God as for example take three men Paul Iames and Iohn heere be three persons and three men but it is not so in God for in things that bee created wee must consider they are onely limited therefore the same nature in Iohn is not the same natuâ—â—â— singular and in specie that is in Paul because they bee not onely two persons but diuided in quantity and that particular nature in particular that is in Iohn cannot be in Paul So for Angels take Raphael Gabriel and Michael supposing him to bee a created Angell the same particular angelicall nature that is 〈◊〉 one is not in another for they be not onely two persons of Angels but two natures not distinct but separate Now in God 〈◊〉 make a common essence which is Iehouah wherein doth consâ—â—â— three Elohims yet are they not three Iehouahs because his nature is simple and the selfe same is in them all and the same being is in God the Father that is in the Sonne and is tota to 〈◊〉 in euery one and the same in Vnity And if wee will haue thâ—â— Gods then must we make a substance diuided which cannot be but there is onely a distinction Angels are separate one from another and are one without another but in the Trinity it is otherwise The Sonne is in the Father the holy Ghost in theâ—â— both and they are all one The Sunne
such a maner as they do not profit by it but onely maketh them the more without excuse because they haue seen the light and yet haue loued darknes more then light And if it be asked why this mercy of the Lord hardneth them and not mollifieth them and why the Lord doth not pull them out of the fire it is because he found them corrupt in Adam But if it be asked why they are appointed to damnation here we stop our mouths and haue refuge to no other cause but to the Lords eternall purpose After the same sort doe we faie of saluation for to such as shall be saued he giueth mercy and maketh this mercy to worke vpon their hearts and finding them falne in Adam he raiseth them vp in Christ but why he doth this is not knowne to any but to himselfe Howbeit in this his purpose to saue vs he hath ordained we should find mercy in Christ by the degrees heere set downe by calling by iusufying by glorifying vs and yet to speake properly this fore knowledge 〈◊〉 God is not the cause of any thing for Adam did not fall because God foresaw iâ— but Adam fell therefore God foresaw it For the second point what is meant by this Like to the iâ—age of his son some expound it that shall be made like and conformable to his crosse which is very comfortable though not 〈◊〉 apt and fit for the place it selfe Heb. 2.10 For if the Prince of the Gentiles was consecrated through afflictions if by this meanes the Sonne himselfe learned obedience as it is Heb. 5.8 much more must we not that we shall be afflicted in the same measure or for the same cause that Christ was for he suffered for our soules and felt the smart for our sins yea and sustained the very wrath of God to his extreme anguish and horror Reu. 19.15 2. Tim. 3.12 but thus far we must resemble him that if we wil liue godly we must suffer persecution Howbeit this likenesse conformitie to Christ his image here spoken of must bee vnderstood of his glorie because of the words that follow mentioning the steps and degrees that lead to this glorie he calleth he iustifieth he glorifieth euen as he did his Son for wee are ordained to the same glory Ioh. 17.22 signified by the praier of Christ for his Apostles and al that should beleeue that his father would loue them with the same loue and crowne them with the same glorie he crowned him which is the most ioyfull message that can come to the eare of a Christan hart to be assured we shal hereafter be lifted vp and aduanced far aboue the third heauen For the third point namely that he is the first begotten among brethren consider three things first how he is our brother secondly what priuiledge he hath being eldest thirdly what priuiledge we haue aboue all other creatures by this brotherhood For the first he became our brother by this that the eternal word of God did assume take vpon himself our flesh Ioh. 1.1.2 that we might be his brethren For as to be a Mediator to God for vs he must haue a diuine humanitie and an humane diuinitie so to make vs brethren that we might haue his spirit could not be but by taking our flesh Betweene God and man euer since our first fall there hath bin enmity such and so great as none can see him and liue for Exod. 24.17 it is said that the sight of the glorie of the Lord euen in the mountaine of Sinai was like a consuming fire Esa 33.14 and as the Prophet Esay speaketh Who shall dwell with euerlasting fire This fire therefore must bee quenched and an entrance must be made for vs to the mount of God which is onely in Christ our elder brother howbeit we are become his brethren not by incarnation nor by his humane nature for then the reprobate should bee his brethren as well as wee for hee partaketh of their flesh as well as of ours But as this brother-hood commeth by the flesh in some respect so principallie by being mystically engrafted naturally into his bodie so as we are one flesh with him euen like man and wife Ephes 5.30 who are so tearmed and called in respect of a speciall and sanctified vnion and fellowship that is betweene them otherwise all men and all women are one flesh So then our brother-hood with Christ commeth not by anie grosse coalition or mixture of our natures but by spirituall regeneration as the Apostle to the Hebrewes said He that sanctifieth and they that are sanctified Heb. 2.11 are all one so that we are his brethren not by his flesh simply but because wee are sanctified by his flesh Whereby we learne to reuerence and adore the infinite and euerlasting loue of God toward vs that he would thrust as it were his Sonne out of heauen that he might descend to draw vs thither that he must come downe in such basenesse to be clothed with our nakednesse and to put on our infirmities For the second point which is the priuiledge he hath being eldest obserue that the first begotten vnder the law had two priuiledges first he was the worthiest person secondly he had a double portion As Ruben Gen. 49.3 the eldest of Iacobs sonnes should haue had but that the dignitie of his person was translated to Iuda and the priuiledge of his portion to Ephraim and Manasses This likewise appeareth Deut. 21.17 where it is commanded that the first borne of a mans strength shall haue a double portion for it is his right This then we must allow to Christ who hath two titles giuen him first he is called the first begotten of all creatures Col. 1.15 because he was before anie cerature being from eternitie according to his diuinitie Secondlie he is called the first begotten among the brethren because he was the first in mans nature that God loued after the fall of Adam Heere know that Christ as he is the Sonne-man is the naturall Sonne of God not according to his humanitie but as he is Christ-man for though his humane nature was not taken from God yet as one person being man licèt non ratione humanitatis he is the Sonne of God euen as Mary is said in the Scripture to be the mother of God in respect of the vnion of his person Another priuiledge further Christ hath that hee as sonne of man hath receiued all power from God to iudge the world Ioh. 5.22 The father hath committed all iudgement vnto the Sonne not that his manhood alone shall iudge but Christ God and man shall giue the iudgement euen so wee praie and list vp our hands to the man Christ Iesus not to his man-hood non humanitati sed homini for the humanitie separated from the diuine person of Christ is but a creature Againe Christ as our elder brother is the head of Angels not as God only but as man Heereupon also it is
name as a thing that Ioseph could not be vnmindefull of And this indeed is the duty and ought not to be the labour of euery trembling Christian to lodge as it were with the booke of God in their bosome and with the Noble-men of Beraea Act. 17.11 to receiue the word with readinesse and to search the Scriptures daily which is the garden of the Lord where runneth the riuer of wisedome to resolue all doubts and where is to be had the oile that softeneth all our afflictions Now in the testimony it selfe heere alleaged consider two things first the person that should beare a virgine secondly the person that should be brought foorth Emmanuell consubstantiall with vs in nature for both these the Prophet beginneth with a word of wonder Behold as of a miracle neuer performed but once If it be asked how it was possible a virgine should conceiue we must beleeue it was so and rest in this nothing to bee impossible with God Mat. 19.26 For as it was possible at the first to make a woman out of a man without the helpe of a woman as wee may see in the first creation Gen. 2.22 so was it possible for him in this new creation to make a man out of a woman without the helpe of a man Which was done to this end because if there should haue beene any corruption of the seed of man in Christ he could not haue sanctified others Concerning the person that should be brought forth it is Emmanuel the same that Iesus and they both imply one thing for he that is Emmanuel is God with vs as Iesus is God sauing vs. Now he is God with vs many waies and albeit in the Arke vnder the law the Lord was alway speaking through the Cherubins insomuch as the very enemies of God the Philistims 1. Sam. 4.7 could say when the Arke came that the God of Israel came and therefore cried woe vnto vs yet is he farre neerer with vs namely in such a spirituall manner as the Prophet speakes heere a God not onely present and fauourable to vs but connaturall to vs and vpon which did depend all the graces of God formerly giuen to his Church Therefore if Moses did say in admiration of the Lords goodnesse Deuter. 4.7 Looke if euer the like came to passe that God from heauen should speake vnto his people and shew his glory so to appeare on earth much more may we breake foorth into the like astonishment to whom God is come so neere as to be of the same nature with vs and to speake vnto vs not in the publication of the killing law but in the manifestation of the quickening Gospell whereby we may receiue comfort in the deepest dangers that gathering our selues vnder his wings and seeking rest and refreshing at his hands he will first giue vs a generall charter of grace for the pardon of out sins And because pardon of our sinne will not saue vs from hell but our iudgement shall be iust vnlesse we yeeld full obedience to the law hee will secondly impute and lay all his obedience and righteousnesse vpon vs so as in him we shall fulfill it And yet because we are still sinners as carying about vs the orignall vncleanenesse we brought with vs Ephes 5.30 the third rest he will giue vs is so to sanctifie vs as we shall be bone of his bone and flesh of his flesh not that we are absolutely sanctified in this life but that that which this our Christ brings vs is al-sufficient to saluation And being sure of this we need not to be dismaide for the waters of trouble are but a bath to cleanse and purge vs from those corruptions we gather by walking in this dirty world Further let vs consider heere why it was necessary that he that should be Iesus should also be Emmanuel first it was necessary he should be the Emmanuel that is the strong God for when wee were all enwrapped in sinne and shut vp vnder death then was there neede of remedy And what shall that be Mercy No God is iust and we hauing smitten his Maiesty by our sinne must bee smitten againe by his punishment Shall it then be iustice No for we haue need of mercy Heere so to be mercifull as not to disanull his iustice and so to be iust as not to forget his mercy and to make a way both to appease his wrath that his iustice might be satisfied and yet so to appease it as his mercie might be magnified in forgiuing there must needes come a mediation and if all the world should be offered to God for satisfaction it is nothing for it is his owne the worke of his owne hands If Angels should step in before the Lord it were nothing for they are engaged to him for their creation and being but temporally good they cannot satisfie for an infinite sinne howbeit he that must satisfie must bee infinit to suffer infinite punishment for an infinite sinne committed against an infinite Maiesty therefore he must be God he must be also Emmanuel with vs for how can there bee satisfaction for our apostasie but by humility nor procurement of life but by death Now when God comes to obey hee must needes bee humbled and when he comes to deserue hee must needes serue which God alone cannot doe and when he comes to die he must needes be mortall which God cannot be Therefore hee was man to be himselfe bond God to free others man to become weake and God to vanquish man to become mortall and God to triumph ouer death The situation also of the Ladder spoken of Gen. 28.12 is an euident demonstration of the two natures of this Emmanuel for the word must bee vnderstood of the second person in the Trinity By the foot to satisfie his Fathers wrath as being of our nature that he might stand close to Iacobs loines and to his Church militant and by the top to expresse his diuinity which toucheth the seate and reacheth to the bosome of God that he might in time bring thither his Church triumphant Now euery ladder is a Medium or meane whereby weascend to some place that otherwise we could not reach vnto which this Emmanuel is to vs for wee being euill debters and God a seuere creditor Colos 2.14 Christ is the meane to cancell this debt and to set it on his owne score and we being ignoant clyents and God a skilfull Iudge not able to vnderstand our tale Christ must be our aduocate 1. Ioh. 2.1 to pleade our cause for vs. And as betweene God and vs so betweene the diuell and vs he is a mediator for he casteth fierie darts against vs which we onely driue backe by the shield of faith in Christ Ephes 6.11 Further in the word Emmanuel obserue three things first the truth and verity of the subsistance of both these natures in Christ secondly the reall distinction of them thirdly the personall vnion of them And these three points wisely and
his innocencie wherein he was created and therefore now since the Lord recouered vs being lost he hath more care of vs then to trust vs with the cariage of our owne righteousnesse and therfore hath committed it to him whose loue faileth vs not and of whose abundance euery of vs are filled Now this the Iesuites doe greatly scorne and call it a new no righteousnesse if we be not iust in our owne persons and they say that God cannot be iust if he make a man iust through the righteousnesse of another and not in himselfe Take heed say they of the glosse of the Caluinists who hold that our righteousnesse is a thing onely inherent in Christ which is a fantastical imputatiue new no righteousnesse whereby we conceiue that to be in vs which cannot bee found in vs and they say the Iesuites count it more to Gods honor to take him to be iust that is not so then for God to make him iust through his grace that was wicked Further the Iesuites say that God at first iustifieth meerely by grace but after so qualifieth a man as after his conuersion he hath righteousnesse inherent in him and so not imputed and this is mans righteousnesse because it is in man but Gods righteousnesse because it commeth from God To this we answer and agree that God iustifieth the wicked but it is blasphemie to say that hee iustifieth the wicked continuing wicked and we hold that wee are made iust through the obedienceof Christ communicated to vs and as Christ for vs was made sinne who of himselfe had no sin so we in Christ are made righteous being of our selues vniust And wheras they say that God after a mans conuersion doth qualifie him with some habituall matter whereby he is in himselfe iust before God we say that he iustifieth no man but after his calling when he giueth him the spirit of regeneration whereby he is chaunged in his affections and reformed in his life which is as water where bloud hath gone before by bloud to cleare him from the guiltinesse and by water to cleanse him from the filthinesse of his sinne so as we say he is not wicked after his calling 1. Ioh. 5.6 but God then maketh him partaker of the first fruites of the spirit witnesse his conuersation and by this effect he is declared to be iustified in the bloud of Christ Yea but say the Iesuites your opinion cannot be sound since righteousnesse giueth a denomination that such a man is righteous before God and it is such a qualitie as a man cannot be said to be iust in the iustice of another no more then to liue by another mans health Now this is true of formall qualities but not of iudiciall imputation for as a payment made by another dischargeth the obligation and maketh the principall partie no debter so the iustice of God being satisfied in the death of Christ wee are freed from that penaltie we had incurred and acquitted of that debt we did owe which we should haue paied had not Christ done it Hereupon the righteousnesse of Christ is called a garment which we haue not by birth but as a thing that commeth from without so as the righteousnesse of Christ confisting in the couering of our nakednesse as a garment prooueth that that whereby we are imputed righteous is not a thing abiding in vs but a thing laied vpon vs in the loue of Christ Yea but say the Iesuites what iustice is this in God to accompt a man righteous in anothers righteousnesse or to account him a sinner that had no sinne True it is it is another mans righteousnes if we speake of the inherencie but yet our righteousnesse and not his onely as he is our person our Christ and our Sauiour Ioh. 17.23 and it is ours since wee haue him whose it is and this maintaineth Gods iustice to punish Christ in our person and to iustifie vs in his in respect that he is in vs and we in him and so doth he neither punish the innocent nor iustifie the wicked And for this cause it is said that we are flesh of his flesh Ephes 5.30 and bone of his bone which must not be vnderstood of any incarnation grosse naturall coalition and mixture of his flesh and ours for then the reprobate should haue this righteousnesse aswell as the elect But as it is said in mariage man and wife are but one flesh not meaning thereby any coniunction of natures but still they remaine seuerall but onely because by couenant and promise they are to separate their bodies one for another so is it to be vnderstood not that we with Christ are conioyned in substance but yet more nearely conioyned then any naturall or artificiall vnion and more truely but yet spiritually then the husband is to the wife the members to the body the branch to the tree or the meat to the body that it nourisheth which must alwaies bee taken mystically And in this respect when wee know that Christ is truely ours that God giueth life and this life is in the Sonne and this Sonne is in vs it followeth that wee are not saued by his righteousnesse but by our owne his person being made one person with vs not really in substance but spiritually and yet not subiect to fantasie onely for wee are indeed in Christ and not partakers of his spirit onely but of his flesh also according to that of Christ Iohn 6.50 Vnlesse ye eat my flesh and drinke my bloud yee haue no life in you not that wee eat the verie flesh of Christ with our mouth but leauing the grossenesse of substance we do truly feed on him by faith spiritually and we are made not onely partakers of his benefites but of Christ himselfe as it is said He that hath the Sonne hath life not the benefits of his life but life it selfe so as we are ingrafted not into Christ his death but into Christ himselfe and Christ dwelleth in vs as himselfe speaketh Iohn 6.56 And wee are made not one soule with Christ in desire nor called spirituall because we are ioyned to him in spirit for wee are ioyned to him in bodie allso yet is it called spirituall because it is wrought by the power of the holy Ghost by faith in this life and in the life to come by the very aspect and beholding of God and the irradiation of the blessed Trinity And although we are not able to conceiue and vnderstand this it is no maruell for it is a great mystery a mystery of all mysteries surpassing the excellency of an Angels conceipt only adore it and beleeue it and labour not to compasse it by the weaknesse of thine vnderstanding which shall neuer be truly vnderstood till we see God face to face Heere may be demanded how Abraham could bee one flesh with Christ seeing that he died long before Christ was borne Notwithstanding this be so yet Abraham and all the rest of the Fathers through their
all the Angels must worship him and yet as man no essentiall quality of the Deity rested in him The third priuiledge is this that his Diuine nature hath giuen the participation of his office to him as man that as God is Mediator so is man as God hath deserued saluation so hath man and that hee as man shall iudge the quicke and dead not that he shall iudge by his manhood but Christ-man shall iudge the world The second fruit of this vnion is the communication of properties not that the properties of the one are communicate to the other but that one may bee attributed to both as Christ God died Christ man is eternall and this is either when we giue that to the humanity which is proper to the diuinity or giue that to the diuinity which is proper to the humanity as God by his bloud redeemed his Church yet God had no bloud but Christ God had bloud so this man Christ forgiueth sinnes not that this power is in his manhood but hee doeth it meerely as God for these and such like speeches be true in Concreto not in abstracto as they be both ioyned together and not as they be separate one from the other Lastly in the word God with vs obserue that Christ is not only God with vs in nature but in person for the reprobate are of the same nature with him and he with them yet is he not God with them but against them but we as the Apostle speaketh are flesh of his flesh Ephes 5.30 and bone of his bones euen as man and wife which are not onely one in nature as all other men and women are but one person by speciall couenant and euen so are wee one person with Christ by the couenant of grace being one with him we are also one with the whole Trinity as himselfe saith I and my Father will come and sup with him and according to his last praier Iohn 17. Father I beseech thee that as I am one with thee and thou with me so these speaking of the faithfull and pointing at them may be one with vs both which bringeth great comfort to Gods children that through Christ we haue the whole Godhead reconciled to vs and dwelling in vs. And Ioseph did as the Angell had commanded him This is the third generall part spoken of before namely the obedience of Ioseph according to euery thing that was prescribed out of which gather generally that when we are acertained it is Gods pleasure wee should doe such a thing that wee stand not still consulting with our owne peruerse natures nâ—â— inclining too much to tender our owne frailties but that knowing it to be the voice of God we admit of no contradictions but we are to constraine our affections to bee pacified and perswaded according as the Lord hath disposed This was the infirmity of Sara Genes 18.12 who laughed when the Angels promised to come againe according to the time of life she râ—â—â—â—ting rather the order of nature then beleeuing the promise of God And this likewise was Lots fault Gen. 19.16 who prolonged the time when the Angels bad him arise and be gone for the which hee might iustly haue beene destroied in the punishment of the City But the contrary to this we see in Abraham Gen. 22.3 who when he was commanded to sacrifice his sonne than which what could be more contrary to nature than for a father to be the butcher to his owne sonne yet being assured that it was the voice of God speaking by the Angell he presently commended his affection and rose vp early to execute that bitter message Wherein obserue that all the children of Abraham must be children of obedience which must be shewed by walking in euery thing according as it is written For now seeing onely the voice of the Lord is the voice of the scripture Luke 16.29 which is as certaine as if Christ were to speake immediatly from heauen so farre as is commanded so farre is to bee performed howsoeuer it may cost vs deare and crosse vs much yea though it bee with Ioseph to embrace her for a wife whose honesty we might iustly suspect And if Ioseph did this at the first word of the Angell what shall bee said to vs who haue heard the voice of God so often beating vpon vs that we should forsake our sinnes and yet we spread curtaines ouer them But that as his obedience is heere recorded for his praise so our stubburnnesse and disobedience be regestred in our punishment that it may be as a hissing and astonishment to other nations Further obserue hence that the obedience of a Christian standeth not in a generall subscribing to the truth of that is taught them no nor yet in a verball confession of it but the commendation of a Christian resteth in his works of obedience as it is said â—eere Ioseph did as he was enioyned 1. Ioh. 3 1â— so that the hand and the mouth must goe together as our Sauiour Christ teacheth Not euery one that saith Lord Lord Mat. 7. â—â— but he that doth the will of the Lord shall be an heire of heauen Whereby we must learne that the calling of a Christian is noidle but a painfull calling wherein we must striue daily to plucke vp some weedes or other that ouergrow our godlinesse and to liue as children in the sight of our Father alwaies doing what hee commendeth vnto vs. For if Ioseph after this time had no more suspected his wife yet if hee had not taken her againe and dwelt with her as his wife he had failed in his obedience and had been like Lots wife Gen. 19.22.26 who beginning well in going out of Sodome and yet forgetting halfe her obedience to the commandement in looking backe behind her is left as a monument to this day for vs to take heed by And he knew her not till she had c. Though it be said he knew her not till shee had c. yet it doth not follow necessarily he knew her after for the word till in the Hebrew tongue signifieth as well that a thing shall not come to passe in time to come as that it came not to passe before as Mat. 28.20 I am with you vntill the end of the world not that he will leaue vs then but that he will by his spirit be with vs then and euer after Like to this is the phrase vsed 2. Sam. 6.23 Michol had no children till the day of her death and it is certain she had none after So in the speech following Christ was her first begotten Sonne it doth not therefore follow shee had any more sonnes for the phrases only exclude the time before And this we are to beleeue vpon our saluation that Ioseph knew her not till Christ was borne and that Christ was the first borne And it is very probable agreeable to the best churches that he knew her not after nor that she had any more