Selected quad for the lemma: nature_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
nature_n ghost_n person_n trinity_n 2,519 5 9.7833 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A15824 A modell of divinitie, catechistically composed Wherein is delivered the matter and method of religion, according to the creed, ten Commandements, Lords Prayer, and the Sacraments. By Iohn Yates, Bachelour in Diuinitie, and minister of Gods word in St Andrewes in Norvvich. Yates, John, d. ca. 1660.; Yates, John, d. ca. 1660. Short and briefe summe of saving knowledge. aut; Richardson, Alexander, of Queen's College, Cambridge. 1622 (1622) STC 26085; ESTC S103644 253,897 373

There are 4 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

the third day then by his ascending into heauen and sitting at the right hand of God his coming to Judge quicke dead holy Ghost of the Church which is holy Catholicke whose benefits are in this life Communion of Saints foriuenesse of sinnes in the life to come Resurrection of the body Life euerlasting The workes of faith The Law the rule of holinesse which is the worship of God Table 1. who is to be worshipped alone Commandment 1. with his owne worship 2. which must be handled with all reuerence 3. leanred with all diligence 4. Iustice which is our dutie to man Table 2. In speciall our Parents Commandement 5. general when we must preserue life Commandment 6. then his chastitie 7. and goods 8. good name 9. with the whole man 10. and prayer where there is a reuerend place whose parts are eyther petition where we craue graces Spiritiall The Hallowing of his name 1. or the enlargemēt of his kīgdome 2. doing of his will as in heauen so in earth 3. Temporall the giuing of vs our daily bread this day 4. deprecation Forgiuenesse of sinnes as we orgiue others 5. Not to be deliuered into temptation but deliuered from euill 6 thankesgiuving wherein we acknowledge that to God belongeth for ever The gouernment of all things for thine is the kingdome as also power glory the shutting vp thereof Amen Sacraments Baptisme The Lords Supper ❧ The Catechisme defined and distributed CHAPTER I. Of Faith in God Question WHat inducements to Religion are prefixed before your Catechisme Answere Foure first the giuing vp of my name to God in Baptisme and that in the dreadfull name of Father Sonne and holy Ghost Secondly that being not able to giue it vp my selfe it was done by others according to the auncient custome of the Church ever conioyning Baptisme and confession together Math. 3.6 Aug. epist 24. Papists would haue it to contract spirituall kindred but surely it maketh honest loue amongst neighbours Thirdly they that gaue it vp for me did promise in my name that I should liue according to Religion Fourthly I beleeue in conscience that I am bound to performe what they haue promised Thus because I am Gods and bound to him by sureties vowes promises and Conscience it selfe It is my dutie being now come to yeares of discretion to learne to beleeue in him and obey him Q. What then is Religion A. It is the acknowledgement of the truth which is after godlinesse Tit. 1.1 Q. What are the parts A. Faith and workes the summe of the one is contained in the Creed of the other in the ten Commandements Lords Prayer and the Sacraments Tit. 3.8 Q. What is Faith A. A confidence in God grounded vpon knowledge Ioh. 16.30 We know and by this beleeue Q. How is faith grounded vpon knowledge A. In regard of God and his Church the maker of the Covenant and the people with whom it is made Ier. 31.33 Q. How in respect of God A. As we beleeue in one God and three persons for our happinesse Ioh. 14.1 Q. How in one God A. In respect of nature essence and being Deut. 4.35 Q. How in three persons A. Three in regard of divine relation or reall respects in that one most pure essence Math. 28.19 Q. What is the essence A. That whereby God is of himselfe the most absolute and first being Isa 41.4 Q. What is a person A. That one pure God with the relation of a Father Sonne and holy Ghost 1 Ioh. 5.7 Q. Doth the relation adde any thing to the essence A. Nothing but respect or relation as Abraham the Father of the faithful hath the same nature as he is a Father and as he is a man Q. What is the Relation A. It is either to send or be sent and both these are done either by nature or counsell Ioh. 15.26 the spirit proceedeth from the Father and Sonne by nature and is sent to vs by counsell Q. Is there no other Relation A. Yes either to beget or be begotten and the Father begets his onely Sonne by nature and the rest of his children by Counsell Heb. 1.3 Iam. 1.18 A man hauing the relation of a Father is said to beget Children by nature or counsell as adopted children are freely begotten not of the bodie but the will Iam. 1.18 Of his owne will beget he vs not so his onely Sonne who is as naturall to his Father as burning to the fire and as Isaac to Abraham Q. What then is the first person A. God the Father who by nature begets his Sonne and by his counsell creats the world Heb. 1.2.5 Q. What is the propertie of the Father A. To beget and not to be begotten Ioh. 3.16 Q. What is his manner of subsisting A. To be the first person for the begetter is before the begotten and yet being Relatiues they are together in nature for no man is a Father before he haue a sonne though in order the Father be first Q. What is the Fathers worke A. Creation for I beleeue in him as maker of heauen and earth and the reason is because he is the first person to whom the first worke belongs Q. What is Creation A. A worke of the Father who of himselfe by his sonne and spirit makes the world of nothing exceeding Good Gen. 1.31 Heb. 1.3 Q. What is giuen to the Father in respect of Creation A. Almightie power for the Father in himselfe is pure act which act is power as it may be felt of his creatures which are in power to be Q. What is omnipotencie A. It is that whereby the Father is able to doe all that he doth and more then he doth if it contradict not his owne nature or the nature of things Q. How is Creation divided A. Into heauen and earth Gen. 1.1 Q. What meane you by heauen A. The third heauen with the Angels both which were made perfect in the very first beginning of time Gen. 1.1 Q. What meane you by earth A. All that matter which was closed and compassed about with the third heauen and was made at the same instant with it to prohibite keepe out vacuitie or emptinesse and fill vp the whole compasse of it otherwise the parts of themselues would haue fallen together to haue kept out that enemy of nature Gen. 1.1 Q. Are we to vnderstand no more by earth then that first matter A. Yes wee are to vnderstand the forming of it into the foure elements fire ayre water and earth as likewise the filling of it and them with inhabitants both aboue and below as also the providence of the Father in preseruing and governing of them all to their ends and vses for the Father carries the worke according to his proper manner of working vntill we come to Redemption and there the Sonne takes it vpon him in a peculiar manner Q. What is the second person A. The Sonne who is begotten of the Father by nature and by counsell redeemes mankind Q. What is the Relatiue
in his workes Iudg. 2.10 They neither knew the Lord nor his workes Psal 78.7 That they might set their hope in God and not forget his workes Exod 6.3 God is first sufficient to performe his promises and then efficient of them Rom. 3.20.22 Abraham beleeued God to be willing and able to doe what he promised Heb. 11.6 God in himselfe all-sufficient and for vs are warder Seeing this is so let vs never prescribe his wisedome hasten his mercy His grace for the present shall be enough for vs his glory will bee more then enough With men the rule is good first try and then trust but with God we must first trust him as sufficient to helpe vs and then try him in his workes and wee may be assured that it is as possible for him to deceiue vs as not to be Either now distrust his being or else confesse thy happinesse and with patience expect his promised consolation Thus may we well hearten and harden our selues for all attempts Q. What is Gods sufficiencie A. Whereby be being all-sufficient in himselfe bee is also all-sufficient for vs. Gen. 17.1.2 Cor. 12.9 Hope of advantage is the Load-stone that drawes the iron hearts of men why then should not God that is rich in mercy haue more suters Alas shall a little absence in performance breede a lingring consumption of friendship Can wee part with earthly things in present possession for hope of better in future reversion and giue the all-sufficient no time for the reture of his promises No age afforded more parasites fewer friends we flatter with God when we say we loue him and leaue him for delay The most are friendly in sight serviceable in expectation hollow in loue trustlesse in experience they will giue God a glad welcome whilst he is a doing for them and as willing afarewell when hee doth desist nay a little withdraw for triall but hee that truely knowes the sufficiencie of his God will wait vpon his efficiencie without grudging Rats and Mice runne to the full Barne leaue it when it is emptie So dung-hill creatures for their bellies serue God and flintch from him in their want Q. What followes from hence A. The consideration of the name Shadai which is compounded of Sha a Relatiue contracted of Asher signifying which or what and Dai a Noune signifying sufficiencie So that the name by this reckoning is thus much he which is sufficiency it selfe Or as others would haue it from Shadh a Pappe all as it were sucking their happinesse from God Others againe of Shadhadb to penetrate or goe through euery thing and so signifies Almightie The Grecians translate it by Antarkees or Pantocrator God being sufficient to blesse his owne and destroy their enemies Gen. 28.3 El-Shadai God which is sufficiencie it selfe blesse thee Ioel. 1.15 As a destruction Mi Shadai from the Almightie who can crush the proudest and stoutest of his enemies Hence may we learne to humble our selues vnder his mightie band and to cast our care vpon him 1. Pet. 5.6.7 Remembring that all our safetie and sufficiencie hangs vpon him Wo then when God our sufficiencie is pleased to try vs with any woe or want then remembring our selues to be but wormes Het vs not turne againe when he treads vpon vs. If hee call for his owne or cut short ours desires it is not for vs to storme or startle but quiet our selues with our trust in him I haue seene ill debters that borrow with prayers and keepe with thankes repay with enmitie Wee certainely mis-take our tenure if we thinke our selues owners when we are but Tenants at will Or take that for absolute gift which our God intends as loane It is Gods great bountie wee may haue right to any thing though not Lordship over it of our very liues we are but keepers no commanders Wee may all say as the poore man did of the Hatchet alas master it is but borrowed Out of Gods sufficiencie comes all ours and therefore it is not for vs to be proud of any thing no more then for vaine whifflers of their borrowed chaines or silly groomes of the Stable of their masters Horses Q. Wherein consists the all-sufficiencie of God A. In essence and subsistence one God three persons He that is sufficient to make vs happei must haue a being to giue being to our happinesse and subsisting that it may exist in vs. Iehovah may giue vs being and yet better not to be then be miserable And surely hee that apprehends no more then the divine essence knowes but himselfe to bee wretched and sure to smart by the hand of divine iustice Iohn 17.3 Eternall life is in knowing the Father the onely true God and Iesies Christ whom he hath sent 2. Cor. 13.13 The loue of the Father to begin the grace of the Senne to dispence and the communion of the of spirit to finish are all necessary to saluation Math. 28.27 Baptize them in the name not names of the father sonne and holy Ghost one name one nature yet with this threefold relation of Father Sonne and Spirit and here our thoughts must walke warily the path is narrow the conceit of three substances or one subsistence is damnable The breaking of Relatiues is the ruine of Substantiues herein if ever heavenly wisedome must bestirre it selfe in directing vs that wee may so sever these apprehensions that none be neglected and so conioynethem that they be not confounded The Sonne is no other thing from the Father and yet another person and so the holy Ghost is no other thing from them both and yet another person And here the gagling geese I meane the Rhemists are worthy to haue their tongues pulled out of their heads and as Hierome sayd of his Vigilantius made into gobbets who not contenting themselues like Shemeies to raile on Caluin and rattle vp our English Students for reading him blaspheme in confuting his blasphemies as they call them That Christ is of God his Father is most true as his eternall essence is taken personally but as the simple nature is considered in it selfe without relation of persons there the essence is the same in all three and not placed all in the first person and borrowed of him by the other Neither shall they nor any other hereticks once bee able to hisse at the reasons or stand before the face of them as the spirit of God layes them downe Exod. 3.14 I will bee could not be predicated of Ghrist if he were not God of himselfe Ioh. 1.2 Christ in regard of his person is said to be with God and in regard of his essence to bee God and therefore as his person is from or with another so his essence is of himselfe Ioh. 17.20 All that is Christs is the Fathers and all that is the Fathers is Christs The Father therefore hauing the Godhead of himselfe it followeth that the Sonne hath it likewise of himselfe Againe it is contradiction of say God of himselfe and God of another
the spirit Ioh. 15.26 I will send from the father the Comforter even the spirit of truth The same is said to proceed Gal. 4.6 God hath sent forth the spirit of his sonne into your hearts Ioh. 16.8 As the sonne comes from the father to take our nature vpon him so the spirit comes from them both to apply Christ effectually vnto vs and vs vnto Christ But this comming sending proceeding is a worke of counsell not of nature for the Spirit by an imminent act as he comes from father son so he hath his residence in them both and no creature is capable of him but as by a transient act hee passeth the worke of Redemption to vs by application hee is sayd to come to vs and we receiue him in graces and operations By nature he comes from the same persons and rests in them by counsell not by command he comes to vs and is said to dwell with vs and that in spite of Satan all his temptations As fierce Mastiues tyed in a chaine which although they both barke and haue perhaps a good will to bite yet they can make no neerer approach then the chaine doth permit so that Cerberus of hell is chained vp of God and though his malice be great to labour to enter where he is expulsed yet the spirit keepes him out by his presence and safegards our hearts in peace against all his molestations Q. What is the Father A. The first person who by nature begets his sonne who must needs be an onely sonne because the Father cannot haue many images of himselfe Christ is the first begotten Heb. 1.6 and the onely begotten Ioh. 3.16.18 1 Ioh. 4.9 Ioh. 1.14.18 And therefore the relation betwixt the Father and Christ is a speciall and peculiar respect Heb. 1.5 I will be to him a father and he shall be to me a sonne Man was made in the image and likenesse of God and of the three persons by a divine consultation but Christ is the image of his Father or first person by an eternall and everlasting generation Luk. 3.38 Adam is called the sonne of God which is a most free and voluntary act of the Creator in producing man in his owne image This I insist vpon the more that wee may be wary in our conceits in apprehending Gods act vpon vs and the fathers act vpon his sonne It is happinesse enough for vs to come so neare God that his onely sonne may stand betwixt vs him and that wee may be called his brethren by the Fathers choice of vs in him Q. What is the Fathers relatiue propertie A. To beget and not to be begotten and therefore he is the first person in order Psal 2.7 Thou art my sonne this day haue I begotten thee Heb. 1.5 The same words are repeated to proue Christ aboue the Angels who Iob. 2.1 are called the sonnes of God and therefore in another sense that is in regard of Creation and grace both which they obtained by the will and counsell of their Creator who made them and ordained them to stand in that favour from which the reprobate Angels fell but Christ is a naturall and an eternall sonne Prov. 8.25 And therefore to day is as some Fathers expound it put for eternitie seeing all times are present to God to whom a thousand yeares are as one present day Or rather this day being the day of Christs resurrection and exaltation in which he was mightily declared to be the sonne of God Rom. 1.4 is the manifestation of that eternall generation by which hee is preferred before all creatures His conception and natiuitie as he was man belong to his humiliation which as S. Augustine speakes of his passion was the sleepe of his divinitie as his death was the sleepe of his humanitie Yet as the fathers of Chalcedon say truly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 indivisibly inseparably is the God-head of the second person with the whole humane nature and euery part of it still and for ever one and the same person The soule in the agony and vpon the Crosse feeles not the presence of the God-head the body in the graue feeles not the presence of the soule yet vpon the third day both bodie and soule did feele the power of his divine nature death being too weake to dissolue the eternall bonds of this heauenly coniunction And therefore vpon the day of Christs resurrection was there a manifest declaration of the eternall generation of the second person Q. What is the Sonne A. The second person begotten of his father Ioh. 1.14 We beheld his glory the glory of the onely begotten of the Father Vers 18. No man hath seene God at any time the onely begotten sonne which is in the bosome of the father he hath declared him Q. What is the relatiue propertie A. To be begotten and not to beget and because he is from the father alone therefore the second person in order 1. Ioh. 4.9 God sent his onely begotten sonne into the world Heb. 1.5 I will be to him a father and he shall be to me a sonne therefore by the force of relation he must be begotten no begetter otherwise contrary things should bee the same Q. What is the holy Ghost A. The third person proceeding from the Father and the Sonne Ioh. 14.26 The comforter which is the holy Ghost whom the father will send in my name Ioh. 15.26 When the comforter is come whom I will send vnto you from the father c. Ioh. 20.22 Christ breathed on them and saith vnto them receiue yee the holy Ghost he that hath power to breath on his members the gifts of the holy Ghost according to his owne will and counsell hath by nature together with his father an ineffable manner of breathing the spirit for as the three persons worke by counsell so they subsist in the divine essence by nature Q. What is the spirits relatiue propertie A. To proceed and because he is both from the Father and the Sonne therefore the third person in order of subsistence Ioh. 15.26 even the spirit of truth which proceedeth from the father c. Ioh. 16.7 It is expedient for you that I goe away for if I goe not away the comforter will not come vnto you but if I depart I will send him vnto you till the second person haue fully dispensed the worke of Redemption the third person cannot so fully apply it no marvaile then if the times before the death of Christ had more weake meanes of application then now we haue the spirit being more fully giuen Ioh. 12.32 And I if I be lifted vp from the earth will draw all men vnto mee Peter Act. 2.41 conuerted more at one Sermon then Christ did all his life not because he was the better or more powerfull Preacher but because the spirit was then more fully sent both from the father and the sonne to accomplish that which they had begun for the redemption both of Iew and Gentile Q. What is
a separation of his two natures though body and soule parted for a while Wee must therefore hold that neither the God-head is at any time changed into the manhood nor yet the manhood into the God-head Luk. 24.39 1 Pet. 4.1 Furthermore we are to learne that Christs humane nature is like vnto ours in all things but in sinne and manner of subsisting Phil. 1.7.8 Heb. 2.17 and 4.15 Q. What is the personall vnion of these two natures A. Whereby the nature assuming and nature assumed make one Messias or Mediator betwixt God and man the nature assuming is infinite and his action is incomprehensible yet this we may safely affirme that the second person in Trinitie immediately assumes and then the God-head so that our flesh is first taken by a person and hence our nature assumed is without all personall subsistence in it selfe and is inseparably conioyned with the divine nature and doth wholly subsist that is the whole manhood subsists in the whole God-head for whole God is in heauen whole God is on earth because the divine nature hath no parts and so our flesh is not in a part of the God-head but wholly in the whole And yet not euery where with the whole For the assumption is not by way of extension as a forme extends his matter but of ineffable vnion humane nature hauing no standing of it selfe but by the divine nature It is locally circumscribed as hauing quantitie and consists as a finite thing within the limites of essence being truely compounded of matter and forme And yet it hath neither parts nor passions essence or accidents which are not assumed vnto the divine nature when body and soule were asunder and locally in diverse places then were both of them inseparably knit vnto the God-head Ioh. 1.14 Colos 2.9 The Papists say Christ was Mediator according to his humane nature which is contrary to this personall vnion for as the person assuming giues the nature assumed subsistence so action and it is not able to doe any thing without it Therefore according to both natures Christ redeemes and the worke is not to be devided Furthermore we say the second person assumes not the first for he is principally offended not the third for he is to testifie of the reconciliation yet such is the vnion that wee come by it both to the Father and the Spirit For immediately the second person assumes then the Deitie and hauing fellowship with that wee haue it also with the Father and Spirit Now if the divine nature should first assume then would the action be the Fathers or if the Spirit then should the Father haue two Sonnes c. CHAPTER XXIII Of Christs humiliation Question VVHat are the parts of Redemption Answere Two His humiliation and his exaltation Psal 110.7 Isa 53.12 Rom. 8.34 Eph. 4.9.10 Phil. 2.8.9 And the reason is giuen by S. Luke chap. 24.26 Christ must of necessitie both suffer and be glorified c. Q. What is his humiliation A. Whereby he was made subiect to the iustice of God to performe whatsoever the same might require for the redemption of man Rom. 10.4 Gal. 4.4 Heb. 7.22 Christ became our Suretie and so bound himselfe to pay all our debts Papists say Christ is a Mediator betweene himselfe and vs but they are ignorant how a sinne may more peculiarly be against one person then another as the manhood it selfe is more properly vnited to the second person then any other Christ doth principally mediate betwixt the Father and man and yet the justice of the whole Deitie and consequently of euery person is satisfied Q. What did the iustice of God require A. Two things Satisfaction for the trespasse or payment of the forfaiture and righteousnesse answerable to the law for the payment of the principall The one frees vs from death the other brings vs to life By the first wee are made no sinners by the second wee are made iust The law stands still in force for death and life sinne and die is by Christs death satisfied doe and liue is by his life fulfilled Dan. 9.24 Christ reconciles to God by suffering and of enemies makes vs friends but wee neither deserue nor can iustly desire any thing vntill he bring his owne righteousnesse for vs. Rom. 4.25 Q. Wherein consists all this A. In the conformitie of himselfe both for himselfe and vs to he image of God and the law its performing perfect obedience thereunto as also in vnder going for his such death and dolors as were requisite As Adam was made in the image of God and bound to keepe the law for himselfe and vs so Christ must be conformed in nature to Gods image and in all his actions to his Pathers will He is holy and iust both for vs and himselfe but his sufferings are onely for vs and not himselfe And here two questions arise first whether his originall righteousnesse and actiue obedience were onely for himselfe his passiue onely for vs and sufficient for our saluation It may be obiected by his bloud we are saued c. Ans Here a part is put for the whole for we are saued as well by his life as by his death and they are both of them both actiue and passiue Christ suffered in being concelued and he was no looner made man made vnder the law but he began to pay for vs for as Adam dyed as soone as he had sinned so Christ suffered as soone as he became our suretie therefore his whole life death are for vs and our payment He that dies by the law is not acquitted or iustified but condemned He that makes false Lature may be pardoned or punished but not iustified Euery law acquits when men are found to haue done nothing against it but it moreouer rewards when subiects are found to performe the vtmost required by it Christ therefore is to suffer and satisfie but that will not iustifie vs except further be found in him that he hath done nothing against the law nay also that he hath to the height and ful measure fulfilled it We haue need both of originall and actuall righteousnesse to bring vs to heauen and out of him it is not to befound The second controuersie is about the second death which is the punishment of the damned and therefore not fit for Christ to suffer Concerning this we acknowledge that Christ did not neither could truely and properly suffer the second death which is a casting out and banishment from blessednesse and the fauour of God God forbid that any Christian should haue such a thought of our Lord Christ who euer since his conception was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and could not be other for any moment of time He and his Father were neuer separated in loue and affection because Christ even in vnder going of this obeyed his Father yet were they for a time separated in apprehension and representation God punishing his Sonne iustly for vs in as much as he stood in our stead