be obiected that this honor is proper vnto Christ to be the image of god Coloss 1. and Hebr. 1. it is well knowen that Christ is after an other sort the image of god than other men For hee is in respect of his Diuinitie the image not of himselfe neither of the holy Ghost but of his eternall father coeternal and consubstantiall and coequall with his Father in essence essential properties and workes and is that person by which the Father doth immediatly reueal himselfe in creating and preseruing all thinges but chiefly in sauing the elect Secondly In respect of his humane nature he is the image of God that of the whole Trinitie because the three persons together bestowed on Christs humanity these giftes properties maiestie which are the image of God Now albeit this image of God is created finite not immense yet doth hee by many degrees and in number of gifts as in wisedome righteousnes power glorie far excell al Angels men after a peculiar maner resembleth the fathers nature and wil vnto vs in doctrine vertues actions because as the human nature which he took vnto him so all the properties actions thereof are proper vnto the Substantiall coeternall word of the eternall father Iohn 14. Philip hee that hath seene me hath seene my father Beleeuest thou not that I am in the father the father in mee The wordes that I speake vnto you I speake not of my selfe but the father that dwelleth in me he doth the workes Angels holy men are termed the image of god as wel in respect of the son the holy ghost as of the eternal father as it is said Let vs make man in our image according to our likenes that not for the likenes or identity of essence or some equality but for the agreeing of some properties not in degree or essence but in kind imitation which are essential infinit in god but in the creatures finite accidental that is qualities motions framed in thē by god to represent in some sort his nature They also who as in time past the Anthropomorphitae will haue the image of god to be the forme of mans body Adam not the image of God according to his bodie but according to his soule say that whole Adam was made to the image of God and therefore according to his body also But they perceiue not the vsual maner of speaking of a person composed of diuers natures which is called The communicating of properties when that is communicated to the whole person in the concrete which is onely proper to one of the natures as in the same place Adam was made a liuing soule Now as the scripture mentioneth the nature of the soule so also doth it mention such an Image of God as agreeth not vnto the bodie Again they obiect Christ is the image of god The faithfull not in al thinges like vnto the diuinitie in which they are like Christ because Christ himselfe in his body was not like vnto God but vnto man But the faithfull beare in their bodie the Image of Christ Heb. 2. 4. Philip. 4. Therefore the body also is the image of Christ There are 4. terms in this Syllogism because christ is not in his body but in his Diuinity the image of his father in soul or in the gifts or properties thereof actions he is the image of the whole Diuinity or godhead Wherefore the image of god is in the faithful the same which the image of god is in Christ neither are they in all thinges like vnto the godhead in which they are like Christ because there is somewhat in Christ besides his Diuinity the image of the Diuinity which is in the soul that is his body which hath an affinity not with the diuine nature but with the nature of our bodies Again they say The frame of mans body is made with admirable skil cunning wherefore there shineth in it is beheld as in an image the wisedom of the creator But it foloweth not hereof that the body is the image of god For so should al things be made to the image of god seing that in al gods works his power wisedome goodnes doe appeare which yet the scripture doth not permit which setteth out onely the reasonable creatures with this title commendation placeth the image of god in those things which belong not to the body but to the soul Here also question is made concerning the place of the Apostle 1. Cor. 11. Man is the image glory of god How man is said of S. Paul to be the image of god and not the woman but the woman is the glory of the man where Paul seemeth to attribute the image of god onely to man and to take it away from the woman But the Apostle meaneth that man only is the image of god not in respect of his nature being partaker of diuine wisedome righteousnes ioy neither in respect of his dominiō ouer other creatures for these are common to man woman but in respect of ciuil domestical ecclesiasticall order Gen. 3.1 Cor. 14. 1. Tim. 2. in which he wil haue the publick gouernmēt administratiō to belong vnto the man not to the womā Quest Seing that mā was made to the image of God it is demanded whence came this state in which now we see all things contrary Ans From the sinne of our first Parents OF THE FIRST SINNE Next vnto the place of the image of god is adioyned the place of the first sinne For seeing man was created to the imade of God that is perfectly wise perfectly righteous perfectly blessed the questiō hath been not without cause in all times whence this present estate of man commeth wherein he except he be born again by the holy ghost cannot do other than sin and be obnoxious to calamities of all sortes and at length to death it selfe To this question answere cannot be made but out of the doctrine of the Church onely which is that all this confusion and miserie floweth from the first sinne of our first Parents We must see therefore what that sinne is concerning which fower thinges especially come to bee considered 1 What it was 2 What the causes thereof 3 What the effectes 4 Why god permitted it 1 What that first sinne of Adam and Eue was The manifoldnes of the first sinne 1 In pride against God IT was diuers and manifolde and many and most grieuous sinnes are seene in that first sinne 1. Pride against god ambition and an admiration of himselfe For man not content with that state wherein god had placed him desired to bee eequal with God This doth God charge him with when he saith Behold the man is become as one of vs to know good and euill 2 In incredulitie contempt of Gods iustice 2. Incredulitie and vnbeliefe and contempt of Gods iustice and mercie because
exercised Ioseph and taken vengeaunce on his brethren that shoulde then haue beene the best It foloweth therefore that God will no other thing after hee hath once decreed what hee will haue done but that he was able from euerlasting to haue decreed some other thing For whatsoeuer he would that from euerlasting hee woulde most freely 4 Obiection Moreouer some places of scripture seeme to intimate that the will of God may bee sometimes hindered by his creatures As Ezech 33.11 I desire not the death of the wicked Math. 23. How often would I haue gathered thee and thou wouldst not Ans These and the like places onely shew with what God is delighted to what he inuiteth calleth al but not what by his mercie spirit he hath purposed to work in euery one Wherefore this doctrine of the libertie and free will of God let vs diligently maintaine that both the glorie of god may bee vindicated from stoicall blasphemies and in vs faith hope inuocating on god and sedulitie and earnestnes in performing our duety may be established if acknowledging god most freely to gouerne all hir creatures we be neither secure in prosperitie nor in aduersitie doe cast away hope and good indeuours Lastly in the description of gods nature is put The anger of God against sinne that he is angrie and wrath with offences and sinnes Which horrible anger and wrath of god whereby hee detesteth and punisheth all sinnes although al the wicked at length too late perceiue haue experience of when they rush into eternall dispaire yet such his displeasure and indignation as god will haue to be knowen they cannot so much as conceiue who are without the Church seeing they neither iudge all those euils to be sinnes which god in his lawe threatneth hee will punish with euerlasting tormentes neither knowe the death and punishment of the sonne of god than which god could not shewe a greater token and Argument of his anger against sin The elect and chosen alone are throughly moued by a right and sauing knowledge thereof gathered out of gods punishments and threatninges to conuersion and the feare of god But the greatnes of it no man can fully conceiue according as it is saide Psal 90. Who knoweth the power of thy wrath How the conceiuing of the whole nature of God he that is instructed by the spirit goeth beyond him whom nature informeth Out of the description therefore of God before deliuered wee may vnderstand how the true God is discerned from false Gods Likewise what the knowledge of God reueiled in his word differeth from that which the heathen haue beeing deriued from the light of nature The difference consisteth first In the attributes or properties of God now expounded Secondly In the persons Thirdly In the workes of these two is to be spoken afterwardes These thinges are fullie and rightly vnderstood in the Church onely Because they are made knowen by reuelation from GOD onely wherefore they who are not of the Church doe not knowe and worship of the true GOD but an idole in steede of the true GOD. For they erre First in the attributes or properties of GOD who either knowe not and professe all or doe not rightly and fully expounde them as they are declared in the worde or else corrupt them The Heathen therefore know not the omnipotencie wisedome goodnes iustice truth mercie bountifulnesse of GOD shewed in the sauing and restoring of men by the sending of the Sonne and the holie Ghost They knowe not the death and punishment of the Sonne of GOD therefore they knowe not the grieuousnesse of GODS anger against sinne euen that hee will punish all sinne yea the least with eternall punishment Wherefore also they know not the iustice of GOD punishing all sinne with eternal pains in the wicked or with that which is equiualent to eternall in his Sonne They knowe not the Wisedome Mercie Truth of god freeing vs sinners from death and receiuing vs without breach of his iustice into fauour Iustifiyng vs sanctifiyng and glorifiyng vs in his Sonne by the holie ghost according to his promises Neither further doe they ascribe vnto god fullie and wholy his Omnipotencie Wisedome goodnesse which shineth in the creation of thinges and in the continuall preseruing of the same For of manie things they haue either none or but a darke knowledge many things they subtract and withdrawe from the prouidence and gouernement of god and attribute it to their owne wisedome industrie vertue and strengh or ascribe it to fortune and chaunce The like we are to conceiue of other attributes of god in which they are alike blinde Secondly The Church acknowledgeth three persons of one and the same Diuine Essence that is that the true god is an Essence so in number one eternall and infinite that notwithstanding it is the same and whole substaunce of the three persons to wit the eternall Father and his Coëternall Sonne and the Coëternall holy ghost But the Heathen and Pagans and other sectes doe not acknowledge three persons but as the Essence so also the person of the Godhead they professe to bee onely one Thirdly They which are not of the Church are altogether ignorant of the works of the Churches saluation namely the reconciliation of men with god iustification sanctification and full deliuerie from all sinne and miserie by the Sonne and the holie ghost Neither doe they wholy acknowlege or professe the woorkes of Creation For they doe not thinke all thinges to haue beene created of nothing by the woorde of god onely they denie all generally and each in particular euen the least to bee administred power-fullie by the Omnipotencie of God but ascribe very manie to Chaunce Fortune and humane Wisedome Wherefore seeing out of the woorkes of god as his proper affectes are made knowen both the properties or nature of the true god as also the Trinitie of persons in one godhead and therefore god and eache of the persons take their names from them and seeing those woorkes are both all and chieflie extant in the Church and are by the Church rightly and sufficiently vnderstoode hereof is necessarily concluded that hee alone who is made knowen in the woorde and the Church is the true and naturall god and that hee is to bee knowen and discerned from Idols by the woorde onely and by his benefites and reuelations exhibited to the Church as the sending of the holy ghost the redemption of mankinde regeneration sanctification and glorification concerning the which Pagans and many other sects know nothing at all 3 Whence it may appeare that there is but one god Whence first sprang the multitude of Gods ALbeit god in the beginning did as certainely declare vnto mankinde that he is but one onely as what he is yet the world by the guile and deceit of the Diuel going about to spoile god of his honour and to beare and vaunt himselfe for god and to destroy mankinde for the hatred hee beareth vnto
or moe substaunces of the same nature and essence So two men are vnited in naturall properties and perfections because they haue the same in kinde or the like and therefore are of the same humane nature The Aire in the Chimney which getteth the perfections or qualities of the fier as beeing nowe become a flame and the fier of the burning coales which fiereth and inflameth the Aire next vnto it are two substaunces of the same properties and fierie nature and therefore are saide to bee vnited in nature and essentiall properties that is they are two fiers in number but in kinde and nature they are one Likewise the three diuine persons are vnited in essential properties that is haue the same essentiall properties which is nothing else but that they are one essence one and the same God 2 WHAT IS TO BE VNITED IN PERSON THOSE things are said to bee vnited in person which are one person that is which although they differ in naturall properties yet exist in one and the same indiuiduall subsistence or haue altogether the same subsistence So the soule and bodie of man are vnited and concurre vnto one person because they beeing vnited doe make one person or one subsistent incommunicable not susteined in another or of another The Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost are not vnited in person or personall properties because they haue these not the same but distinct By this which hath beene saide it is manifest That the Vnion in nature and naturall perfections is an equalitie of properties and nature but the personall Vnion is when two vnlike natures are coupled so that each reteineth his naturall properties and operations whole and distinct but yet haue both one and the same subsistence wholie or it is the ioining of two natures different in properties to constitute the substaunce of one indiuiduall or person that is such a connexion and knitting of them together as that they are one indiuiduall subsisting by it selfe or the substaunce of one indiuiduall But that in Christ the Vnion of the flesh with the Woorde is not essentiall made in the nature or anie essentiall propertie of the God-head is shewed by these reasons First Of the God-head and the fleshe assumpted there ariseth not anie third Essence but eache is and abideth an Essence so perfect and whole as neither especiallie the Diuine as beeing in it selfe a person and simplie voide of all change commeth into the composition or compounding as wee properlie take this Word of the other Secondly Jf the Vnion of the fleshe with the Word were essentiall it would follow that the humanitie once assumpted and taken was equalled with the Godhead in essentiall properties and so by a consequent to bee made of the same nature essence with the Word So Vigilius in his fourth booke sheweth that the Eutychians held two substances to be in Christ of the same nature Wherefore they who will haue the essential properties of the Godhead to be reallie communicated and common with the fleshe so that the fleshe shoulde truely and reallie bee and bee called omnipotent omniscient and whatsoeuer else the God-head is they indeede howsoeuer in woordes they mightily stand against it holde this Vnion to bee made in essentiall properties and in nature and both with Eutyches and Schwenckfield they confounde both natures and take away the difference betweene the creature and the Creatour and also with Nestorius they frame and make two persons and so bring in a quaternitie For albeit they say that they in that their confusion or as themselues call it with their Master Schwenkfield Deifiyng and Maiesticall exaltation of the fleshe doe retaine the substance of the fleshe yet two substaunces hauing reallie the same and like perfections are two Subsistents or persons of one nature as are two men and whatsoeuer other indiuiduals of the same kind or nature Lastly with Sabellius and the Patripassians they incarnate the whole Trinitie For there is one and the same Essence in number of the diuine persons and the same essential properties Wherefore that which is vnited and equalled with one of these three according to essence must needes be also vnited and equalled with the rest Wherefore the Vnion of both natures in Christ is personall or according to the subsistence proper vnto the Word both natures keeping and retaining in that vnion their properties whole and vnconfounded For the Word did not by vniting humane nature vnto it make the same the Godhead or GOD and omnipotent immense and infinite but it tooke the manhood which reteineth still the properties belonging vnto it and so did ioine and knitte it vnto it selfe as to bee one person with it and the substaunce of one Christ Neither is it absurd that a thing which neither is made or is one with another in kinde neither any Homogeneal part thereof shoulde yet exist in the same subsistence with it or shoulde subsist in it selfe where-with it is vnited For a graffe hath his subsisting in a tree of another nature or kinde The same is the subsistence both of the sprig engraffed and of the tree susteining the sprig that is they are one and the same indiuiduall tree yet haue they and so doe retaine natures in properties most diuers The like reason is there in the two natures of Christ both subsisting in or of the same person of the sonne Obiection The humane nature is vnited with the Word in person but not in nature Therefore the person is diuorced and sundered from the nature Againe The person onelie of the sonne is vnited with the humane nature therefore not the diuine nature it selfe of the Word Aunswere In both these Arguments is a fallacie from that which is no cause as if it were a cause and both offend in this for that they who so reason against the maintainers of true doctrine and men sounde in faith either knowe not or are not willing to distinguish betweene these two Phrases of speech To bee vnited in nature and to be vnited too or with a nature when notwithstanding the difference is very great and most familiar and knowne vnto the schoolemen For to bee vnited in nature is to bee equalled that is to bee made one essence or nature with another To bee vnited too or with a nature is to bee coupled and ioined therewith to one subsistence or personalitie Wherefore the fleshe is vnited to or with the the Woorde not in nature or in Essentiall propertie that is it is not made with the Woorde one essence neither made equall vnto it in omnipotency wisedome and nature for so shoulde the whole Trinitie bee incarnate Yet is it vnited to the omnipotencie wisedome nature and essence of God not simplie but of god the Worde Now this is nothing else than the flesh to be vnited to the person of the sonne or to the Worde in person which person is the verie diuine nature or essence omnipotent wise and whatsoeuer else is proper to the Godhead But albeit
the flesh taken or assumpted is truely vnited both to the person and to the nature of the Word For the person is not any seuerall thing or reallie differing from the essence but is the essence it selfe yet is it well saide that the flesh is vnited to the Word in person only and Likewise that the person onely of the Word is incarnate The reasons hereof are 1. Because not the Father nor the Holy Ghost were incarnate but the sonne onely 2. Because the first and neerest terme of this vnion is the person onely of the Word assuming and taking the flesh but not the Godhead For the person onely is proper vnto the Word the essence of the Godhead is common to him and the same with the Father and the Holy Ghost This is plainely taught by the 6. Toletan Councel Cap. 1. in these wordes The son onely tooke the humanitie in singularity of person not in vnitie of diuine nature that is in that which is proper vnto the son not which is common to the Trinitie And Rusticus in his dialog against the Acephalists Not god the Word by the diuine nature but the diuine nature by the persō of god the Word is said to be vnited to the flesh And a little after Wherefore both God the Woorde and his nature is incarnate hee by him selfe in that he is himselfe his nature not so but by the person God the Word then as touching himselfe is vnited to the flesh for he is made one person and one subsistence with the flesh but as touching his nature hee is conioyned rather than vnited because there remaine still two natures Wherefore either foule shamefull is the follie or notorious the malice and slaunder of certaine smatterers that of this verie orthodoxall and sound position not of the schoolmen onely but of Councels also and auncient Fathers The flesh is vnited to the Word in person onely or according to subsistence and this onely maketh the proper difference of personall vnion they inffer that by this meanes the diuine nature of the Woorde is drawen away from the personall vnion But let them againe and againe looke vnto it least by that their reall communicating of the essentiall properties of the Godhead which are the verie diuine essence common to the sonne with the Father and the holy Ghost which communication they will haue to bee the personall vnion which they define by it they ouerthrowe as well the eternall Godhead of Christ man as also the manhood it selfe and withall plainlie incarnate the whole Trinitie That then one and the same Christ is and is called truly and reallie the verie eternall God immense omnipotent creatour and true naturall man finite weake subiect to passions and sufferinges and a creature the onely cause is the vnitie of person subsisting in two natures perfect whole and reallie distinct diuine and humane For euerie indiuiduall and person is denominated or named of the natures or formes and their properties and operations cōcurring or subsisting in it Wherefore seeing in the same indiuiduall person of the Word doe truely subsist and belong to the substance of one Christ these two most diuers natures vnto one and the same Christ of which soeuer nature he be called do agree are affirmed of him all the attributes and properties both diuine and humane but after a diuerse manner For the attributes which agree to Christ in respect of the personall vnion are of two sorts some are attributes or properties of the natures others of his office The naturall attributes are those which are proper to ech nature whether the same bee essentiall belonging to the essence of the thing or which necessarily followe accompanie it without which the nature can not consist or accidentall which may bee away and wanting without the destruction of the nature The essentiall properties and perfections of the Godhead are to be eternall vncreate immense euerie where present not to be circumscribed in place omnipotent omniscient and the like which are the verie essence of the Godhead as also to create to giue the Holy Ghost to regenerate The essentiall attributes of the humanity are to haue a soule vnderstanding immortall and a body compounded of elements consisting of skinne bloud flesh bones veines and sinowes hauing a certaine and definite greatenesse figure proportion and collocation or localnes of partes and therefore to be circumscried in one place to be solid visible palpable and such like These Christ reteineth for euer because without these nothing can bee a humane nature The accidental properties of the humanitie are those infirmities which ensued vpon sinne which infirmities Christ together with the humane nature it selfe assumed and tooke without sinne For he tooke the forme of a seruant which by his resurrection and ascension hee laide down againe The attributes of his office are called those which agree not to one nature onely but to both together that is it agreeth to the whole person according to both natures as being the compound of both A rule to be obserued as touching the attributes or properties of both natures in Christ BOTH natures and their properties are truely and reallie affirmed of the person and of themselues interchangeably in concrete termes or voices yet so that the proper predicate which is proper vnto one nature is attributed to the person not according to both natures but according to that onely to which it is proper The reason is for that one and the same person subsisting in two natures hath and reteineth for euer reallie the properties of both natures and also because one and the same person is signified by the concrete voices of both natures As therefore one the same man is liuing and corporeal according to diuerse natures and the corporeal is liuing by the soule onely and contrarilie the liuing is corporeall by the bodie onely For both soul and bodie are of the substance and essence of the same man So likewise one the same Christ is God eternal immense omnipotent according to the God-head onely is man the Virgines sonne created finite infirme and did suffer according to his humanity onely So likewise God is man borne of a Virgine annointed with the holy Ghost and suffered according to the flesh And man is God eternal creatour omnipotent giueth the holie Ghost not according to the humane nature but according to the diuine For the sense and meaning of these speaches is The person which is God creatour of thinges omnipotent by reason of the God-head the selfe-same person is man a creature infirme by reason of the flesh subsisting in it But notwithstanding one nature and the properties thereof whether they bee vttered in abstract or in concrete voices cannot be affirmed of the other nature or forme truly and really The reason is Because the vnion is not made in the nature that is two natures are not made one nature and because in neither nature the properties of the other doe reallie exist neither can exist
argument The Lawe sheweth our punishment because it bindeth vs either to yeeld obedience or to suffer punishment But no man performeth that obedience Therefore it bindeth vs to suffer punishment Furthermore the Law sheweth that al euils happen vnto vs because of our sins Againe it sheweth the iustice of God the greatnes and heauines of the wrath of God against sinne Hence ariseth a question whence sinne commeth especiallie since that the Lord made man good and to his owne image To this question apperteineth the common place concerning sinne the creation of man and free wil which three places we wil discourse of in order THE COMMON PLACE OF SINNE THE questions here to bee obserued are these 1 Whether sin be or whence it appeareth to bee in vs. 2 What sinne is 3 How manie kindes of sinne there are 4 What bee the causes of sin 5 What hee the effectes of sinne That sinne is not onely in the world but in vs also We know that sinne is in vs. 1 Out of the Law of God wee know 1. Out of the Law of God that is by comparing our selues and the Law together in considering what the Law requireth and what we haue performed The Law requireth whole and perfect obedience both inward outward But this we find not in our selues Obiect That which teacheth vs to seeke for righteousnes elsewhere then in our selues doth shew vs to be guilty of sin by that we haue knowledge of our sin But the Gospel willeth vnto to despair of ourselues Ob. We know it by the Gospel also Ans Not principally to seeke for righteousnesse elsewhere Therefore by the Gospel we haue knowledge of our sinne Answere I grant that we haue after some sort knowledge of our sinne by the Gospel but not principally For this is the principal vse of the Law But the Gospel presupposeth that which the Law hath proued that is that we are sinners before it sendeth vs to Christ So also sciences which are in order directlie one vnder another take their principles o◠chiefe groundes from the sciences next aboue them and proceed according to them not prouing them but taking them as graunted Againe the Gospel doth onelie in generall accuse vs of sinne but doth not in speciall declare what and which be our sinnes But this is the principall and proper function of the Lawe therefore doe wee not put the Law as excluding the Gospel 2 By the Law of nature 3 By testimonies of Scripture 4 By punishments ensuing 5 By sermons which treat of repentance as if by the Law alone we had knowledge of our sin but chiefly and properly 2. We knowe that wee haue sinne in vs by the Lawe of nature or by that iudgement of conscience which is in al men 3. By the testimonies of the holy Scripture as Psalme 14 and 53. Esaie 59.4 By the punishments and miseries which follow sinne 5. By the sermons which treat of repentance Now this question is sette downe 1. against the Libertines 2. for the exercise of repentance And here the question is not whether sinne be in some thing or in some men but whether it bee in all men And because that without the knowledge of those things neither dew honour can bee giuen to God nor saluation befall to vs God wil haue the nature and causes of sinne and the punishmentes thereof to be knowen and searched out of vs. But euen as of the beginning of mankinde so also of his corruption and restoring none know the certaintie besides the Church which is instructed by the voice of God concerning these so weightie matters And therefore the Philosophers doe erre about the verie definition and declaring the nature of sinne while they iudge either outward actions onely or purposes and desires which agree not with honest discipline to bee sinnes but not corrupt inclinations and affections ignorance errors and doubtings of God and his will and in a woord whereas they doe not vnderstand wholly the law of God it cannot be but they must make account of manie most hainous sinnes as of no sinnes They erre also about the cause of sinne for because whereas they are ignorant of the falling away of the diuels from God of the seducement and corruption of mens natures in our first parentes they imagin that sinne was not borne together with vs but that all as they grow in yeares so by their owne will they doe fall into it Last of all they erre about the effect of sinne because both they are ignorant of the euerlasting punishments neither are they able sufficientlie to conceaue of the horrible wrath of God against sinnes no not though they were taught it out of the word of God The Apostle Rom. 7. I had not knowen lust except the Law had said Thou shalt not lust Iohn 16. The holie Ghost shall reprooue the world of sinne because they beleeue not in mee Psal 90. Who knoweth the power of thy wrath For according to thy feare is thine anger WHAT SINNE IS IT is agreed on of all men The nature of sinne that sinne is a thing displeasing God contrarie to righteousnes deseruing punishment as it is said Psalm 5. Thou art not a God that loueth wickednes As therefore the rule of righteousnes is the wil of god so of the cōtrary we are not otherwhere to know what sinne is then by the same rule of mans life actions Therefore the definition of sin in the 1. Epist of Iohn cap. 3. is the truest and plainest Sinne is a transgression of the Law or what soeuer is repugnant to the Law But because here mens mindes seeke further what those euils are which are forbidden and condemned by the law of God we must adde an explication of this definition out of the Sermons and declarations of the Law scattered throughout the whole Scripture to wit That sinne is a defect or an inclination or action repugnant to the law of God offending God making him that sinneth togither with al his posterity guiltie of temporal eternall punishments except remission bee graunted for the Sonne of God our Mediatour The * The Logicians cal it Genus which is the more common nature of a thing or the matter of it general nature of sinne is a defect Likewise an inclination or action Now there are called defectes in the minde ignorance and doubtfulnes of God and his will in the hart a priuation of the loue of God and our neighbour of ioy in god and of an earnest desire and endeuor to obay God according to al his commandementes and an omitting of inward and outward actions which are commanded by the Law of God Or This defect is an absence 1 Of good inclinations in our minde 2. Of the knowledge of God 3. Of motions to obay the Law of God 4. Of inward actions which are required in the Law 5. Of outward actions which follow the inward Now corrupt inclinations are said to bee
the euerlasting anger of God neither can they doe any thing pleasing and acceptable to God except remission be graunted for the Sonne of God the Mediatour and a renewing of their nature by the holy Ghost A more briefe definition of the nature of Original sinne is this Original sinne is a wanting of that original righteousnes which ought to be in vs. Now original righteousnes is a conformitie and perfect obedience as wel inward as outward according to the whole Law of God because man at first pleased God by that conformitie The formal cause of sinne as it hath respect to punishment The formal cause of sin is the guilt Now the guilt is to be obnoxious to punishment and to be ordained to euerlasting torments and to bee worthie of these because of the offending of God That the cause of this guilt was the fall of Adam is proued 1. By testimonies of Scripture As by one man sinne entred into the world and death by sinne Rom. 5.12 and so death went oueral men By one mans disobedience many were made sinners 2. It appeareth also by this antithesis or contrarietie As deliuerie from sinne is not to bee guiltie because of the satisfaction of Christ so of the contrarie Originall sinne is the guilt which for the fal of our first Parents was deriued vnto al their posteritie That the priuation or want of the knowledge of God is sinne The priuation of the knowledge of God is sinne is proued by this argument Whatsoeuer is contrarie to the Law is sinne The priuation of the knowledge of God is contrary to the Law Therefore it is sinne Now that priuation of the knowledge of God is contrarie to the Law the reason for it is 1. Because the Law of God requireth in men gifts and faculties opposite to these defectes and inclinations For Accursed be euery one that abideth not in al. But there is commanded in the Law the true knowledge of God a correspondence of al the powers in mans nature with the wil of God when he saith I am the Lord thy God Thou shalt haue none other Gods before me Likewise Thou shalt loue the Lord thy God with al thy hart Whosoeuer therfore do roue and swarue in opinions concerning God not acknowledging him accordingly as he is manifested in the Scriptures and they whose harts do not so turn with the loue of god that nothing may withdraw them from him these as much as lieth in them are fallen from aeternall life and are subiect vnto the curse 2. To this belongeth all the sayinges of the Scripture which tax our ignorance of God Yee erre not knowing the Scriptures The gospell is said to bee hid to those which perish Ignorance of the Gospel is sinne That a corrupt inclination to disobey the Lawe of God is sinne A corrupt inclination is sinne is proued 1 By the tenth and last commandement Thou shalt not couet For the Law requireth inward outward obedience and that we haue an inclination to loue God That corrupt inclination therefore is a defect sin Sin is the transgression of the Law 2. By other testimonies of Scripture The frame or imaginatiō of mans hart is euil Gen. 8.21 euen from his youth We were by nature the children of wrath 3. By death other punishment which followed The wages of sin is death Inclinations therefore to wil or doe il are sinne 1 Obiection That which is not voluntarie neither can be auoided is not sinne Inclinations are not voluntarie Therefore they are not sinne Answere It is true in ciuil matters that that which is not voluntarie is not sinne but not in spirituall matters For the Scripture teacheth both that the wisedome of the flesh cannot be subiect to the Law of god and that al who are not subiect vnto the Law are subiect to the wrath of God Wherefore the iustice of God requireth that euerie creature who is endewed with reason be condemned and punished of God whensoeuer he is disobedient vnto his Lawe whether willing or vnwilling whether he bee corrupted by his owne fault or by the fault of his auncestors For so great and so inuiolable is the maiestie of God so great euil is there in sinne that the defection of one man from God is sufficient to prouoke the anger of God toward al his posteritie 2 Obiection Punishments are not sinnes These inclinations and defects are punishments of the first fal therefore they are not sinnes Aunswere It is true that punishmentes are not sinnes if we respect the course of ciuil iustice but not so if we respect Gods iustice For God oftentimes punisheth sinnes with sinnes Which is speciallie shewed Rom. 1. and 2. Thessa 2. For God hath power of depriuing his creatures of his spirit which power his creatures haue not 3 Obiection Priuation is sinne God inflicteth it creating in vs a soule not adorned with those gifts which he would haue had bestowed vpon vs if Adam had not transgressed Therefore God is the autor of sinne That is priuation being an accident and hauing a diuers nature according to the diuers respect as it is of God inflicted and as it is by vs receiued in the obiection deceitfully this diuersity is dissembled Aunswere It is a fallacie of the Accident For as God inflicteth it it is Gods iustice but as it is drawen on vs by the fault of our Parents and our selues also do willinglie receiue it it is sin Replie But God should not haue punished this fault with such a punishment seeing hee did know that so great euil would ensue Aunswere Let God execute his iustice and let the world perish Therefore he should doe it because it was iust 4 Obiection The desires of things that are obiect vnto them are natural therefore they are not sinnes Aunswere True ordinate desires of their proper obiects which God hath ordained for them but not inordinate and such a◠are against the Lawe For to desire of it selfe is not sinne But the desire is of it selfe good But a desire against the Law is sinne 5 Obiection Nature is good Therefore there is no Original sin Aunswere 1. True it is that Nature is good if you consider it before the corruption All thinges were verie good which God made 2. Euen now also Nature is good in respect of the substance and being of it and as it was made of God but not in respect of the qualitie of it and as it is corrupted That these euils are not onelie drawen by imitation but also are borne with vs whiles our corrupt nature is propagated from our first Parents vnto al their posterities these testimonies doe manifestlie shew Iob. 24. Who can bring a cleane thing out of filthines Iohn 1. Which are borne not of blood nor of the wil of the flesh nor of the wil of man but of God Rom. 5. By one man sinne entered into the world and death by sinne and so death went ouer all men for
as much as al mē haue sinned cap. 7. We know that the law is spiritual but I am carnal sold vnder sinne Eph. 2. We were by nature the children of wrath as wel as others Last of al seeing infantes also are subiect to sinne whereupon also they die and are to be baptised as before time they were circumcised and they cannot as yet sinne by imitation it must needs be that sinne is bred in them as it is said Genes 8. The cogitation of mans heart is euill euen from his youth And Isaie 48. I called thee transgressor euen from thy womb Against this doctrine it is obiected first Obiect Of the deriuation of the soule from the soul of the parents If sinne bee propagated from the Parents vnto their posterity either the soul stained with originall sinne is deriued by deduction out of the soule of the Parents or is created by God of nothing infected with sinne and is infused into the bodie or els being created pure by God it draweth corruption and naughtines of the body vnto which it is vnited But since that a spiritual substance may not be cut into parts soules are not propagated by deduction out of the soule of the Parentes neither are they created corrupt of God because God by this meanes should be made autor of sinne contrarie to that which hath beene said God saw al which he had made they were verie good neither are the soules depraued by the bodies partly for that it would be against both the end vnto which man was created euen to life euerlasting and also against the goodnes of god for a pure and innocent soul to be ioined with a bodie of which it should be depraued partlie for that sinne can not be propagated by the bodie which ◠senseles neither exerciseth any action on the soule but by the soul Wherefore the children are not borne corrupt of corrupt parentes 1 Answere The souls are corrupted by the bodies To this the answeare is double First they can not proue that which in the third place in their Minor they affirme That the soules can not draw naughtines corruptiō from the bodies For our first Parentes also were created to eternall life and yet were depraued falling from god Wherefore as the creation of our first parentes and their triall by temptation and in temptation their falling away which being put their corruption was certainly to followe so also the vniting of the soules with their bodies in which certainlie they shall be corrupted is not contrarie to the goodnes of God partly because God is so good as also he will shew foorth his anger against sinne and his iustice togither with his mercie in his woorkes partly because he hath appointed a remedie in his sonne vnto the which who flie are deliuered from this hereditarie and necessarie corruption and from the danger of damnation neither is it disagreeing from his goodnes rather to saue men freed from sinne and death by the death of his onele begotten Son then if they had neuer fallen into these miseries Neither is it absurd that the nature or temperature of the bodie though it bee senseles yet should be prone to euill and no fit instrument for the good actions of the soule and that the soule not being established in that puritie in which it was made should follow the inclinations and corrupt temperature of the bodie and should fal from that integritie in which it was as soone as it is vnited vnto the bodie and seeing that the bodie proceeding from sinful and guiltie parentes is one part of a man that God should be offended with the whole man for that part of his which is guiltie and should withdraw the grace of his spirite that the other part also that is the soule being depriued of spiritual giftes may fall into wickednes and malediction But be it that they were able to prooue that Minor proposition 2 Answere The souls are togither created and vnited to their bodies yet there is another sufficient answere to the Maior so that wee haue no neede to enter into any doubtfull dispute about the deducting of the soule from the soule of the parentes by generation neither of the maner how Originall sinne is propagated For although wee graunt that the soules of all men as soone as they begin to liue are created of god yet it is not to be imagined that the soules haue a beeing some time before they are vnited to the bodies For at one and the same time they are both created and vnited to their bodies as it is said The soule of man is at the same time both created and vnited to the bodie Hee breathed in his face breath of life But as the substance also of bodies though it be taken out of the substance of the parentes yet is rightly said to be created of God that is framed by him and the substances both of men and diuels who both are sinfull are preserued of God neither is yet God the autor or maintainer of their sinne or malice so also the substance of the soules and their naturall faculties God togither both createth and bereaueth of his giftes which giftes hee gaue of that condition to Adam that hee would also giue them to his posteritie if himselfe did keepe them but would not giue them if hee by his vnthankfulnes should cast them away Now the soule being destitute of the spirite and spirituall light although it bee inclined to desires and operations yet is it blinde not inclined to such desires and actions as the law of God requireth And by this meanes the inclinations being despoiled of their rightnes are become of their owne accord euill and are repugnant to the lawe of God And those defectes in the minde and will and heart of our first parentes are the iust punishmentes of sin committed by our first parentes and by their seed in them as they are inflicted by God but the inclinations corrupted by these defectes and the defectes themselues because they are a cause that man neither is nor can bee conformable to the law of God they are sinnes as they are drawen by men sinning vpon themselues and their seede and as they haue from them and their seede their being 2 Obiection That which the Parents themselues haue not they cannot deriue vnto their posteritie Original sin is taken awaie from the godly Therefore at the leastwise these doe not deriue it to their posteritie Aunswere Original sinne is taken away from the godlie and saints of god as concerning the guilt of it that is so as it is remitted them for Christs sake But as it is a sinne repugnant to the Lawe so it abideth in them For although they be withal regenerated by the holie ghost vnto whomsoeuer their sinne is forgiuen yet that renewing is not perfected in this life Wherefore the godlie also doe deriue such a nature to their posteritie as themselues haue that is a corrupt one
hand than the other 3 Obiection It is said Mat. 12. Euerie sinne and blasphemie shal be forgiuen vnto men but the blasphemie against the holy Ghost shal not be for-giuen to men neither in this worlde nor in the world to come Hence they will gather That some sinnes are for-giuen in this woorlde some in the worlde to come that is in purgatory and some are neuer for-giuen of which these be mortall but the others veniall in their owne nature But first neither heere neither else-where doth Christ teach that some sinnes are forgiuen in the worlde to come Sins are remitted in this world onely For that all other sins are forgiuen not in the woorld to come but in this woorlde both Christ signifieth in this place and the Scripture elsewhere teacheth because it is certaine that sinnes are not remitted but only to those who repent No sinne which may not be remitted except the sin against the holy Ghost But he denieth that the sinne against the holy Ghost is remitted either in this world or in the worlde to come that hee might more significantly expresse the deniall of pardon to it Secondly Whether they say for-giuenesse to bee in this woorld or in the woorlde to come yet this standeth immoueable that it commeth not of the nature or corruption of the sinne but of free mercy for Christs sake And if euery sinne be so grieuous that it could not be purged but by the blood of the Sonne of God then doubtles they do great despite contumelie vnto that blood who so extenuate any sin as to deny that it deserueth eternall punishment vnto which the death of the Sonne of God is equiualent Farther euen by their owne confession There are manie mortal sins which notwithstanding are forgiuen in this life Wherefore either they must make all these to be euen in their own nature venial or they wil neuer proue out of this place that the smalnes of the sin is the cause of forgiuenes 4 Obiection It is said Rom. 1. The wrath of God is reueiled from heauen against al vngodlinesse And 1. Cor. 6. Know yee not that the vnrighteous shall not inherit the kingdome of God Out of these and the like places they gather that seeing they are mortal sinnes which shut men out of the kingdome of God and all sinnes do not so therefore there are some sinnes which in their own nature are not mortall But they conclude more than followeth by force of reason For that some sinnes are venial there is no doubt but that commeth by grace remitting those sinnes which without remission would shut men doubtlesse from the kingdome of God 5 Obiection It is said 1. Cor. 3. If anie mans worke burn Al sinnes shut men out of the kingdom of gods were they not remitted by the grace of God he shal loose but he shall be safe himselfe neuerthelesse yet as it were by fire Therefore say they some sinnes cast men into fire that is into some punishment but not eternall This also we grant not in respect of the nature of sin but in respect of pardō which befalleth to those who hold the foundatiō which is christ For to build on the foundation wood stubble that is to parch the word of god with vnnecessary questiōs humane opinions traditions which oftē are occasions of schisms in the Church often of Idolatry and errours it is not so light a sinne as they deeme it who do it but deserueth eternall malediction except remission be made for the Sonne of God as it is declared in the Reuelation Chapt. 22. 6 Obiection It is said Heb. 5. A high priest taken frō among men is bound to offer for sins as wel for his own part as for the peoples This place sheweth that the sinnes of the priest are not venial by themselues or of their own nature but for the sacrifice of Christ which was signified by the typicall sacrifices therfore it quite clean ouerthroweth the opinion of our aduersaries For if al sins euen of a righteous Priest are in the sight of God so great that they cānot be purged but by the death of the Son of God it necessarily foloweth that they of their own nature deserued euerlasting death 7 Obiection It is said Iam. 1. When lust hath conceiued it bringeth forth sin sin when it is finished bringeth forth death Here say they Iames saith that there is one sin finished when as the wil vpon deliberation consenteth to euil lust Actual sinne is an effect of Originall sinne a cause of death which though purchased by Originall yet is aggrauated by Actuall another not finished when a man sinneth without deliberation to sin finished he ascribeth that it bringeth foorth death We answere that the consequence of this is not of force because that a property which belongeth to diuerse kindes when it is ascribed to one kind it foloweth not thereof that it is to be remooued frō the other For S. Iames distinguisheth the kindes or degrees of sins Original Actual saith that death foloweth after Actual not as if death did not follow after Original but because that Actual is a middle between Originall sin death as a cause of this an effect of that and doth aggrauate death or punishmēt which already was purchased by originall sinne Neither doth he chiefly speak of the degrees of punishmentes but of the cause and originall of them to be sought in the corruption of our own nature 8 Obiect It is said Iam. 3. In manie things we sin al. Hence our aduersaries wil proue that the sins of the iust are venial because they fal either into few sins or into no mortall sins To this as also to most of that which hath gone before we answer that the sins of the iust who by faith retein or receiue righteousnes are venial not of their own nature but by grace Gods iustice is not at variance with his mercie though it iudge the least sinne worthy of eternall death 9 Obiection God is not cruell but mercifull neither light in his loue but constant Wherefore he doth not for euerie light sin iudge a man worthie of eternall punishments But they imagine that the iudgement of God concerning sin is at variance with his mercy which are not at variance but do very well agree For God is in such wise merciful as he is also iust Now the iustice of God requireth that he iudge all euen the least offence and contempt of his maiesty worthy of eternall damnation This iudgement against euery sin the mercy constancy of Gods loue doth not take away but for the shewing and declaring thereof it is sufficient that he reioiceth not at the destruction of them that perrish that for testimony thereof he inuiteth all to repentance forgiueth them who repent their sinnes which by thēselues were worthy of euerlasting death that is he punisheth them causeth satisfaction for them not in
They are shut from pardon who are shut from repentance so that they who so sinne neuer returne to God by true repentance Now they who are excluded from repentance are also necessarily excluded from remission of sinne Christ Mat. 12. calleth this kind of sinne The sin or blasphemy against the holy Ghost when he saith Wherefore I saie vnto you euerie sinne and blasphemie shall bee forgiuen vnto men They are shut from repentance who sinne against the holie Ghost Why it is called in special a sinne against the holie Ghost but the blasphemie against the holie Ghost shal not be forgiuen vnto men But it is not therefore called the sinne against the holie Ghost as if the holy Ghost might be offended by any man and not the father also the Son but because the reuealing of the heauēly truth is the work of the diuinity which is immediatly wrought by the holy ghost And therefore they who witting willing resist this are blasphemous indeede against al the persons of the Godhead but in a more singular and special maner against the holy ghost that is against his proper immediate operatiō working in their minds That this kind of sin is signified by this name it hereby appeareth for that none can after a peculiar maner sin against the holy ghost but they on whom he hath bestowed a peculiar proper benefit that is a benefit immediatly giuē by himself appertaining to his sanctifieng or office which he exerciseth in the Church which is the very light of truth kindled in their minds The same appeareth by the speech of Christ Marke 3. plainly declareth whē he saith For they said he had an vncleane spirite that Christ did attribute this sinne vnto them who being conuicted as cōcerning the doctrin of Christ and his diuine works yet notwithstanding did against their conscience ascribe these thinges to the diuel The same is shewed by other places where this sin is described As Heb. 6. For it is impossible that they which were once lightned and haue tasted of the heauenlie gift and were made partakers of the holie Ghost c. if they fall awaie should be renued againe by repentaunce And 2. Pet. 2. If they after they haue escaped the filthinesse of the woorlde thorough the knowledge of the Lorde and of the Sauiour Iesus Christ are yet tangled againe therein ouercome the latter end is worse with them than the beginning Who sinne against the holie Ghost Out of which sayings first we vnderstand that not al the reprobate who perish not obtaining remission of their sinnes doe sinne against the holie Ghost but that this sinne falleth only on them who are lightned by the holy Ghost with certaine knowledge of the truth that which hapneth not to al the reprobate although so much neuerthelesse is reuealed to al of them concerning God as may suffice for the iust condemning of them and their posterity For the holy ghost is not giuen but to them who are endued with the knowledge of the heauenly doctrine as it is said Iohn 14. whom the world cannot receiue because it seeth him not neither knoweth him Likewise Luk. 12. The seruaunt that knoweth the wil of his master Wherefore some perish vnto whom the holy Ghost hath not giuen this light of truth and therefore they doe not commit this peculiar sinne against the holy Ghost If it be obiected The difference between other sinnes not pardoned and this sin against the holie Ghost That euerie vnpardonable sinne is a sinne against the holie ghost because Christ saith that the sinne against the holie ghost is vnpardonable But final perseuerance in whatsoeuer sinne without repentance is remitted to no man And therefore it is a sinne against the holie ghost and by a consequent all that perish sinne against the holie ghost The ambiguity of vnpardonable sinne maketh four termes in this Syllogisme For in the Maior it signifieth that kind of sinne which is neuer remitted to any because whosoeuer commit it whether at the end or before the end of their life they perseuere in it euen to the end without repentance But in the Minor it signifieth not a certaine kind of sinne but al their sinnes who repent not which indeede are not remitted to them because they perseuere in them to the end without repentance and they are vnpardonable not before the end but in the very end of their life yet are they remitted to others who perseuere not in them but repent For perseuerance in sinnes is nothing else than the sinnes themselues which are continued vnto the end therfore this is the meaning of the Minor Sinnes in which men perseuere without repentaunce vnto the end are not pardoned them who perseuere in them But now all men doe not perseuere in them as they perseuere in the sin against the holy Ghost euen whosoeuer once fal into it And christ in this speech sheweth not for what sins men are punished with euerlasting death For it is certaine that it befalleth for all sins of which men repent not but he sheweth what sins are such as whosoeuer doe commit them they do neuer repent This he affirmeth of no kind of sin but only of blasphemy against the holy Ghost Secondly out of the testimony alleadged we gather that the sinne against the holy Ghost is not euery Raigning-sinne The peculiar nature of the sin against the holy Ghost making it differ from al other Raigning sinne whether committed against our conscience or against the knowen truth but a sinne against the whole first table of the Law and not one onely part of it but a defection from al religion or godlinesse and such a denying or oppugning or contumelious handling of the true doctrine of God and his will as proceedeth not of weaknes or terrour or fear or torment but of a purposed and stubburn maliciousnes For the obedience of the first table is after a man hath once tasted of the word of God reuerentlie to obey and subscribe vnto it Neither depart they from a part of doctrine but from all religion who so fall that they crucifie againe to themselues the sonne of God and treade him vnder foote count the bloode of the testament as a profane thing and despite the spirit of grace Neither doe the Iewes sin of weaknes in ascribing the works of Christ to the diuel or hereticall men after they are once conuicted of their errours by certaine and manifest testimonies of the woord of God neither they who vnder the name and shew of Christ remaine stil dogs swine returning at length to their vomit wallowing in the mire from which for a while in outward profession and hypocrisie they abstained And hereby may be esteemed and iudged in some sort the grieuousnes of this sin whereas it commeth nearest to the sin of the diuels who knowing the truth yet stood not in it but doe despite it with hatred and horrible fury and endeuour vtterly
Crosse and of all his benefites Because Christ hath commaunded me and all the faithfull to eate of this breade broken and to to drinke of the cup distributed in remembrance of him with this promise g Mat. 26.27.28 Mar. 14.22.23.24 Luc. 22.16.20 1. Cor. 10.16.17 11.23.24.25 12.13 adioined First that his bodie was as certainly broken and offred for me on the Crosse and his bloud shed for me as I behold with my eies the bread of the Lord broken vnto me and the cup communicated to me and further that my soul is no lesse assuredly fed to euerlasting life with his bodie which was crucified for vs and his bloud which was shedde for vs than I receiue and tast by the mouth of my bodie the bread and wine the signes of the bodie and bloud of our Lord receiued at the hand of the Minister 76 What is it to eate the bodie of Christ crucified and to drinke his bloud that was shed It is not onely to imbrace by an assured confidence of minde the whole passion and death of Christ and thereby to h Ioh. 6.35.40.47.48.50.51.53.54 obtain forgiuenes of sins and euerlasting life but also by the holy Ghost who dwelleth both in Christ and vs so more and more to bee a Ioh. 6.56 vnited to his sacred bodie that though he be in b Act. 3.21 Act. 1.9 c. 1. Cor. 11.26 heauen and we in earth yet neuerthelesse are wee flesh of his flesh and bone of his c Eph. 5.29.30.32 1. Cor. 6.15.17.19 1. Ioh. 3.24 4.13 Ioh. 14 23. bones and as all the members of the bodie are by one soule so are wee also quickened and d Io. 6.56.57.58 Io. 15.1.2.3.4.5.6 Eph. 4.15.16 guided by one and the same spirite 77 Where hath Christ promised that he will as certainely giue his bodie and bloude so to bee eaten and dronken as they eate this breade broken and drinke this cup In the institution of his supper the wordes whereof are these e 1. Cor. 11.23 c. Mat. 26.26 c. Mar. 14.22 c. Luc. 22.19 c. Our Lord Iesus Christ in the night that he was betraied tooke bread And when he had giuen thankes he brake it and said Take eate this is my bodie which is broken for you this doe you in remembrance of me Likewise also he tooke the cup when he had supped and saide f Exod. 24.8 Heb. 9.20 This cup is the Newe Testament in my bloud g Exod. 13.9 this doe as often as yee shall drinke it in remembrance of me For as often as ye shal eat this bread and drinke this cup ye shewe the Lordes death till he come This promise is repeated by Saint Paul when he saith The cup of thankesgiuing wherewith we giue thankes is it not the Communion of the bloud of Christ The bread which we breake is it not the communion of the bodie of Christ h 1. Cor. 10.16.17 For wee that are manie are one bread and one bodie because wee all are partakers of one bread 78 Are then the bread and wine made the verie bodie and bloud of Christ No verily But as the water of baptisme is i Math. 26.29 Mar. 14.24 not turned into the bloud of Christ but is only a sign and pledge of those thinges that are sealed to vs in Baptisme So neither is the bread of the Lords Supper the verie bodie of k 1. Cor. 10.16 c. 11.26 c Christ Although according to the manner of Sacramentes and that i Gen. 17.10 c. Exod. 26.27.43.48 13 9. Act. 7.8 Exo. 24.8 Le. 16.10 17.11 Isa 6.6.7 Tit. 3.5 Act. 22.16 1. Pet. 3.21 1. Cor. 10.1 forme of speaking of them which is vsuall vnto the holy Ghost the bread is called the body of Christ 79 Why then doth Christ call breade his bodie and the cup his bloud or the new Testament in his bloud and Paul also calleth bread and wine the Communion of the bodie and bloude of Christ Christ not without great consideration speaketh so to wit not onely for to teach vs that as the bread and wine sustaine the life of the body so also his crucified body and bloudshed are indeed the meat drinke of our soul whereby it is a Iohn 6.51.55.56 nourished to eternall life but much more that by this visible signe and pledge he may assure vs that wee are as verily partakers of his bodie and bloud through the working of the holy ghost as wee doe b 1. Cor. 10.16.17 perceiue by the mouth of our bodie these holie signes in remembraunce of him and further also that his suffering and obedience is so certainely ours as though we our selues had suffered punishments for our sinnes and had satisfied God 80 What difference is there betweene the Supper of the Lord and the Popish Masse The Supper of the Lord testifieth to vs that we haue perfect forgiuenesse of all our sinnes for that only Sacrifice of Christ which himself once fully c Heb. 7.27 9 12.26.28 10.10.12.14 Iohn 19.30 Mat. 26.28 Luc. 22.19.20 wrought on the Crosse Then also that we by the holie Ghost are graffed into d 1. Cor. 6.17 10.16 12.13 Christ who now according to his humane nature is onely in heauen at the right hand of his e Heb. 1.3 8.1 c. Father and there will be f Ioan. 4.21.22.23 20.17 Luc. 24.52 Act. 7.55.56 Col. 3.1 Phil. 3.10 1. Thes 1.9.10 worshipped of vs. But in the Masse it is denied that the quicke and the dead haue remission of sins for the onely passion of Christ except also Christ bee daily offered for them by their Sacrificers Further also it is taught that Christ is bodilie vnder the formes of breade and wine and therefore is to bee a In canone Missae item de consecrat distin 2. worshipped in them And so the verie foundation of the Masse is nothing else than an vtter denyall of that onelie Sacrifice and passion of Christ Iesus and an accursed Idolatrie 81 Who are to come vnto the Table of the Lord They onely who are trulie sorrowfull that they haue offended GOD by their sinnes and yet trust that those sinnes are pardoned them for Christes sake and what other infirmities they haue that those are couered by his passion and death who also desire more and more to go forward in faith and integritie of life But hypocrites and they who doe not truely repent do eate and b 1. Cor. 10.21 11.28 c. drinke damnation to themselues 82 Are they also to be admitted to this supper who in confession and life declare them-selues to bee Infidels and vngodlie No. For by that meanes the couenaunt of GOD is profaned and the wrath of GOD is c 1. Cor. 11.20.34 Is 1.11 c. 66.3 Ier. 7.21 c. Ps 50.16 c. stirred vp against the whole assemblie Wherefore the Church by the
vnto the end among which none is so little that deserueth not euerlasting death and all of them are so euill and grieuous that they cannot bee expiated or doone away no not by the eternall punishment of any creature The third is That he may restore by his forcible operation power the Image of God in vs. The fourth is That he should make knowen vnto vs the secret wil of God concerning the receiuing of mankind againe into fauor For of this except he were God himselfe should bee ignorant so should not be able to reueale it vnto others Ioh. 1.18 No man hath seene God at anie time the onlie begotten Sonne which is in the bosome of the Father hee hath declared him The fift is That he might giue the holie ghost by whome hee might bestowe on vs mantaine and perfect in vs the benefits purchased by his death to wit remission of sinnes righteousnesse new obedience and life euerlasting For it is not sufficient for our Mediatour to make intercession for vs to be made a sacrifice to open and manifest the decree of God but it is necessarie also that he promise in our behalfe that wee shall embrace the decree concerning our redemption by our mediator and cease at length to offend God through our sinnes which is the other part of the couenant made betweene God and vs and is performed by vs that the couenant may remaine firme and ratified But this by-reason of our corruption could bee promised of no man in our behalfe except hee haue the power also of giuing the holie ghost by whom he might woorke in vs to assent and to be more and more conformed to the Lawe of God But to giue the holy ghost and by him to woorke forcibly in the harts of men faith conuersion and saluation belongeth to god alone whose also is the spirit Ioh. 15.26 Whom I wil send you from the father Obiection The partie offended cannot bee Mediatour Christ as he is God is the partie offended Therefore as hee is God hee cannot bee Mediatour Aunswere The Maior proposition is true if the partie offended be such a one in whom there are not more persons But a most cleare Testimony whereby are taught in few words those three to wit That the Mediatour is both true man and perfectly iust and true God is extant Act. 20.28 when it is said God hath purchased the Church with his blood For he is true man who sheddeth his owne blood He is perfectly iust who sheddeth it for the redemption of others He is true God to whom both the name and properties of true god are giuen which is to be a redeemer both by his merit and also by his efficacy and power and that of the church that is of the elect and chosen 5 Who is and may be that Mediatour OF the person who should be that Mediatour mention hath beene made by the way in the former question but the handling of it dooth chiefly appertaine vnto this The Mediatour was to bee God yet not the father nor the Holy Ghost That Mediatour who must be both very god and very man is not neither can be any other than the naturall sonne of god who also is the sonne of Mary that is Iesus Christ 1. Our Mediatour must be true god But god the father could not be Mediatour because he worketh not by himselfe or immediatly but mediately by the Sonne and the holy Ghost though yet he dooth all things of himselfe neither is hee the messenger or is sent but he sendeth the Mediatour Neither yet could god the holy ghost be Mediator because he was to be sent of the Mediator into the harts of the elect Therefore necessarily the sonne was to be our Mediatour 2. That which a man imparteth to others he must needes haue himselfe first But it belongeth vnto the Mediatour to conferre and bestowe grace and the name of the children of God vpon vs that is to woork that through him we might be adopted of God to bee his sonnes now this the holy Ghost doth not giue for hee is not the Sonne neither had the father it because hee was to adopt vs by his Sonne to bee his Sonnes Therefore the Mediatour himselfe was to haue the right and name of a Sonne and that not by grace onelie but by nature that is hee was to bee a Sonne by nature that hee might make vs the Sonnes of adoption Iohn 8.36 If the Sonne shall make you free yee shall bee free indeede Iohn 1.12 As manie as receiued him to them hee gaue power to bee the Sonnes of GOD. Ephes 1.5 Who hath predestinate vs to bee adopted thorough Iesus Christ vnto himself vers 6. With his grace he hath made vs accepted in his beloued 3. The Sonne alone is that person by which the father openeth his will concerning our redemption giueth his holie spirit maketh vs new creatures Therefore is the sonne called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the price ransome of our redemption and the scripture ioineth the first creation with the second sheweth that we are again to be created by him by whom we were created of God 2 Cor. 5.17 Gal. 6.15 Eph 2.10 Ioh. 13. But this was proper vnto the Mediatour to be a messenger truceman betweene God vs to remake or regenerat vs by his spirit Therefore the sonne must be this Mediatour 4. It belongeth to the Mediatour to send the holy Ghost But the son sendeth the holy Ghost Therefore the sonne is Mediatour The father also indeede sendeth the holy Ghost but mediately by the Sonne the Sonne immediatly 5. It belongeth to the Mediatour to suffer die for vs. But the son is he who taking our flesh vpō him hath suffred in it died Therefore he is the Mediator 6. That the son is the Mediatour is proued by conference of reuelations prophecies in the old testament by the fulfilling of the same in the new 7. The same is proued by the works miracles which Christ wrought Ioh. 5.36 The works that I do beare witnes of me that the father sent me Ioh. 1.38 Beleeue my works 8. This is also apparant by the office of the son His office is to declare the counsail of his father whence he is called the word Ioh. 1.18 The onely begotten son which is in the bosome of the father he hath declared him Hee hath also opened vnto vs the true knowledge of god his secret wil concerning our redemption 9 By testimonies of Scriptures both others this of the Apostle 1. Cor. 1.30 Christ is made of god vnto vs wisedome righteousnes or iustice sanctification redemption Here are put the * That is wisedome is put for the maker of vs wise Iustice for our Iustifier sanctification for our sanctifier redemption for our redeemer abstracts for their concrets Iustification and Sanctification in vs before the fall were one the same thing as in the holie Angels
appointeth nor will nor speaketh thinges repugnaunt and contradictorie 2. Corinth 1.19 The Sonne of GOD Iesus CHRIST who was preached among you by vs was not Yea and Naie but in him it was Yea. Thirdly that hee faineth nothing nor deceiueth anie man but this is in trueth and indeede his will which hee openeth vnto vs. Roman 3.4 Let GOD be true and euerie man a liar Fourthly that hee neuer changeth his minde Psalm 89.34 My couenant will I not break nor alter the thing that is gone out of my lips Fiftly that it certainly commeth to passe whatsoeuer god auoucheth shal come to passe which experience also witnesseth many sayings of holy Scripture as Matth. 24. Heauen and earth shall passe but my word shall not passe Sixtly that he is the louer autor and preseruer of the truth in the reasonable creatures and an enimie to all lies dissembling and hypocrisie Therefore Iohn 14.15 and 16. The holy Ghost is called the spirite of trueth who shoulde teach vs all trueth Prouerb 12.12 The lying lippes are an abomination vnto the Lord but they that deale truelie are his delight Mat. 24.51 He wil giue him his portion with hypocrits Seeing then the trueth of God is to bee considered out of his woorde and woorkes albeit men by nature confesse that GOD is true yet are they ignoraunt wherein his trueth consisteth For it is saide Iohn 17. Thy woorde is trueth and Psalm 89.5 Thy trueth in the congregation of the SAINTES Neither doth the conscience or the priuie knowledge of anie mans sinnes suffer him who knoweth not CHRIST the Mediatour to put any confidence in Gods promises For as 2. Corinth 1. it is said Al the promises of God in him are Yea and in him Amen vnto the glorie of God God dissēbleth not when hee saieth hee will doe that which yet he doth not But if sometimes god foretold that hee would doe those things which he neuer decreed to doe he did not therein dissemble For what hee threatned that hee meant with this condition should so come to passe except the conuersion of men and praiers came betweene and what he promised hee meant with this condition if they repented either persisted in godlinesse or needed not affliction and chastisement Wherefore he would indeede haue punished the Niniuits if they had persisted in their sinnes And Christ Luke 24. was indeed departing except his disciples had desired him to stay in the Inne at Emaus How God is saide to deceiue a deceiued Prophet As for that which God saith Ezech 14 9. And if a Prophet be deceiued and hath spoken a thing that he hath deceiued him he signifieth not thereby that hee deceiueth by instilling lies into false Prophets but that they are by him in iust iudgement deliuered and giuen to bee seduced by the Diuell as 1. Kings 22. GOD is saide to haue giuen a lieng spirite in the mouthes of all the prophetes of Achab. Replie But yet GOD would that the false Prophetes should tel a false tale Aunswere Hee would but in diuerse respects and to a diuerse end God foretolde victorie to Achab by an ironie and that a sharpe and bitter one thereby to recall him from making his expedition to warre and to punishe him for not obeying by deliuering him to bee seduced by the Diuell The false Prophets foretolde victorie to flatter him the Diuel to destroy him and to die Why chastitie is one of Gods properties There is made also mention of Chastitie in the former description of God because amongst his especiall and most notable differences whereby he may be discerned from Diuels he wil haue truth to be and chastitie For as God will bee acknowledged to bee true and will haue trueth loued of vs that it maie certainelie appeare that he is and what hee is that men may think and speake the truth of him and through his knowledge be partakers of euerlasting life so the Diuell attēpteth to fil the worlde with lies that he may both darken the glorie of God and by forging lies of God destroy mankinde Whereupon the holy Ghost is called the spirite of trueth But the Diuell a liar and murtherer from the beginning the father of lies Ioh. 8. And as God both by reason of the exceeding puritie of his nature as also because hee will haue the spousal loue and coniunction of mariage to be the image of the vnspeakeable loue and spirituall coniunction betweene him and the Church as wee may see Ephes 5. Ezech. 16. Osee 2. and therefore will haue it accounted sacred and holy amongest men As God then in these respectes is the louer and author of chastity and dooth most seuerely detest and punish al vncleannes both internal externall which is repugnaunt to this order as the examples of the Sodomites of the tribe of Beniamin and others of all other ages and nations testifie So the Diuell both for his impurity as also because whatsoeuer God woulde haue helde most holie and venerable that for the hatred hee beareth to God hee studieth most to depraue and most foulie to defourme endeuoureth with obscenitie and filthinesse horriblie to pollute al mankinde and to withdrawe them from GOD. Therefore it is said 1. Thess 4.3 This is the wil of god euen your sanctification and that yee should abstein from fornication that euery one of you should know how to possesse his vessell in holinesse and honour The mercie or fauourable and inclinable will of GOD to preserue his creatures and especiallie mankinde The mercie of God in preseruing his creatures the Scripture proposeth vnto vs opened by these degrees First that hee taketh delight in the saluation of all but in the destruction of none Ezech. 33.11 As I liue saith the Lord god I desire not the death of the wicked but that the wicked turne from his way and liue Secondlie that he differreth mitigateth and taketh away punishmentes inuiting all men by his long suffering to repentaunce if not one waie yet by the testimonie of their conscience Heereof Exod. 34. and often elsewhere hee is saide to bee slowe to anger Thirdly that hee debaseth himselfe to relieue our infirmitie both by inwarde and outwarde supplies as by his spirit worde oathes Sacramentes and miracles Fourthly that he embraceth with singular loue his chosen so that he saueth and deliuereth them for euer from sinne and all euils and comforteth them also in afflictions Reuelat. 7. and 21. God shall wipe awaie all teares from their eies Isaie 49.15 Though a woman shoulde forgette her Childe yet will I not forgette thee Fiftlie that hee chose rather to bring to passe this our deliuery euen by the incarnation and death of his onelie begotten Sonne than that all mankinde shoulde perish Iohn 3. So god loued the woorlde that he gaue his onelie begotten Sonne Sixtlie that hee promiseth and perfourmeth all these thinges of his owne free goodnesse Exod. 34.19 I will shewe mercie to whome I will shewe mercie
diuers manner in god As when we speake of god the father that being is of it selfe not from another The sonne is the father The Sonne is the same being or Essence but from the Father The holie ghost likewise is the selfe same diuine being which the father is and the sonne but from the father and the sonne So the wisedome power iustice goodnes bountifulnes mercie c. of these three are the verie diuine being or essence which is in number one and the same in these three But to be of himselfe or from another likewise to be from one or from two that is to haue that one Essence of himselfe or to haue it communicated from an other either from one or from two is the manners of being which are three to wit The eternal father and the sonne and the spirite of them both And this is it that Iustine Martyr saith There is one existence or essence of the three which is from none but of it selfe because it is but one but the manners of the existence are three Wherefore as concerning existence Being or essence it selfe the three persons are of themselues as concerning the maner of existing or beeing the father is none but of himselfe The sonne of the father the holie Ghost from both The sonne begotten the holy Ghost proceeding The summe of the difference between the Essence and person is the essence is absolute and communicable the person respectiue and incommunicable This may bee made more manifest by exemplifiyng in a man It is one thing to bee a man an other thing to bee a Father or a Sonne and yet one and the same is both a man and a Father but hee is a man absolutely or in himselfe or according to his owne nature he is a father to another or in respect of another namely of his sonne Semblablie it is one thing to be God another thing to be the father or son or holy ghost and yet one and the same is both God and father god in respect of himselfe or his own nature father in respect of the sonne Again the essence of a man who begetteth another is communicated to him who is begot but the person or indiuidual is not communicated For the begetter bringeth forth not himselfe but another distinct from himselfe the same essence notwithstanding being communicated vnto him And no relatiue is his correlatiue or any part thereof Therefore the sonne is not the father nor the father the sonne although both bee true man So in like sort the eternall Father hath by eternall generating communicated to the Sonne his Essence but not his Person that is hee begot not the Father but the Sonne neither is the Father the Sonne or the Sonne the Father albeit each is true God God and man communicate both their Essence to another but their maner of communicating is most different and is much to be obserued Now although this be like in God and man that both doe communicate to an other not his Person but his Essence yet is there an exceeding dissimilitude in the maner whereby the diuine Essence being infinite and the humane being created and finite is communicated to another Which dissimilitude is diligently to be obserued For first in men in the father the Sonne the Essence is as distinct as the Persons themselues The father and the Sonne are not onely two persons but also two men distinct in essences So that the father is not that man which is the sonne But in God the persons are so distinct that yet the essence remaineth common one and the same and therefore there are not three Gods but the Sonne is the same God in number which is the Father and the Sonne Secondlie In persons created hee that begetteth and generateth doth not communicate his whole essence to him that is begotten For then hee should cease to be a man but only a part which being alotted and seuered out of the essence of him that begetteth is conueied or deriued into him that is begotten and is made the essence of another indiuiduall or person distinct from the essence of the indiuiduall who begetteth But in vncreated persons he that begetteth or inspireth communicateth his whole essence to him that is begotten or proceedeth or is inspired yet so that he who communicateth doth reteine the same and that whole The reason of both differences is that the essence of man as also of other creatures is finite and diuisible the essence of God infinite and indiuisible and therefore the Deity may beeing the same and whole or entire bee together both communicated and reteined Wherefore the eternall Father and Sonne and holy Ghost are that one true GOD and yet the Father is not the Sonne or the holy Ghost neither is the holy Ghost the Sonne that is they are one God not three Gods but three persons subsisting in one God By the name of Trinity are vnderstoode the three maners of beeing in God that is three not essences but persons of the same diuine Essence Now Trinity and triplicitie as also Trinal and triple differ That is said to be Triple which is compounded of three essences or is distinct by three essences Trinall is that which in essence is but one and most simple but hath three manners of beeing God therefore is not Triple because there are not mo essences but Trinall because he beeing one according to his essence is three according to his persons This difference of essence and person is to be obserued and held 1 Least the vnitie of the true God be distracted 2 Least the distinction of the persons be taken awaie 3. Least another thing be vnderstoode by the name of person than the truth of gods woorde declareth For person in this place doth not signifie only a relation or office as the Latines are wont to speak Principis personam tueri to defend the person of the Prince as of olde Sabellius falsely taught muchlesse doth it signifie the countenance or visible shape as in these daies Seruetus sported and trifled with the word person representing the forme or gesture of another such as is the person of a stage plaier but it signifieth a thing subsistent truely distinct frō others vnto whom it hath a relation respect by an incommunicable property that is it signifieth that which begetteth or which is begotten or which proceedeth not the office or dignity or degree of him that begetteth or is begotten or proceedeth Furthermore the persons are not anie thing separated from the essence but each of them are the verie selfesame whole essence of the Diuinitie But the difference is in this that the persons are each distinct from the other but the essence is common to them three And that the person is no other thing subsisting or other substaunce than the essence may be vnderstoode in some sort by the example of a man One and the same man or one and the same substaunce is a father and a man or
a sonne and a man and yet the manhoode or to be a man is one thing the fatherhoode or to bee a father another but there is not one subsistent which is the father and another subsistent which is a man but one and the same subsistent is both because both manhoode and fatherhoode is in him manhood absolutely fatherhood respectiuely as in regard of his Sonne Of the worde essence also it is furder to be noted that God or the Deitie or diuine essence is not in respect of the persons the same which the matter in respect of the effect because God is vnchaungeable neither is compounded of matter and forme Therefore we cannot say wel Three persons are or consist of one essence Neither is it as the whole in respect of the parts because God is indiuisible Wherefore it is not well saide that the person is a part of the essence or the essence consisteth of three persons for euery person is the whole diuine essence one and the same Neither is it as the general to the speciall because the persons are not specials but indiuiduals Neither is it simplie as the special to the indiuiduals because the diuine essence it selfe is indiuiduall or one in number and the persons are not another or a diuerse or a separated thing from the essence but euery person is that essence Therefore it is well said God or the Diuine essence is the father is the sonne is the holy ghost Likewise The three persons are one God or in one God Againe they are one and the same essence nature diuinity wisedome c. They are of one or the same essence nature diuinitie c. Yet it cannot bee saide well they are of one God Wherefore the diuine essence is in respect of the persons as a thing after a rare and singular maner communicated in respect of those things vnto which it is common For neither is there the like example of community in any created things For a generall is a certain thing common to manie specials a general and special to manie indiuiduals but yet so that they are affirmed of those manie plurallie not singularlie as that the father and the sonne or this father and sonne are two liuing creatures two men But wee maie not speake after this sort of God and the diuine persons as to saie the father and the sonne are two Gods two spirites two omnipotentes c. Because there is but one GOD one spirite one omnipotent c. Wherefore that affirmation the father is God the Son is God the holy Ghost is God is a true affirmation affirming that which is more common of a thing which is more restrict that is affirming the essence of the indiuidual which hath in some sort an analogy and proportion only with the speciall affirmed of his indiuiduall but is not at al the same nor of the same kind 6 Whether these names are to be vsed in the Church THese names are to be vsed and reteined in the church Obiection But these names namely Essence person and Trinitie are not in the Scripture therefore they ought not to be vsed and reteined in the Church Answere These names which are not in the Scripture neither the words themselues nor the sense of them are not to be vsed but both the names them selues of essence and person are found in the Scripture and the thing also or the doctrine it selfe concerning them The name Essence is expressed by the name of Iehoua which is frequent in the Scripture Likewise by the name of Beeing which often also offereth it selfe in the Scripture Exod. 3.14 I am that I am Reuel 1.8 Which is and which was and which is to come The woorde Person is expressed by the greeke woord 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Heb. 13. which woord is there interpreted Person The ingraued forme of his person The name of Trinitie is signified 1. Iohn 5.7 There are three which beare recorde in heauen the father the woorde and the holie ghost and these three are one And this for the names themselues Now for the thing As often as is mentioned one Iehoua so often is mentioned one essence As often as the Father the Sonne and the holie ghost is called Iehoua so often the three persons of the Diuinitie are expressed that is three subsisting three vnderstanding c. And this aunswere yeeldeth the first cause why these woordes ought to bee reteined in the Church because namelie they are extant in the holie Scripture either in woordes or in sense and meaning The Second cause is because they are fit to expound the phrase and speech of the Scripture vnto the vnlearned And furder if no woordes were to bee vsed but such as are extant in the Scriptures all interpretation shoulde bee taken away For interpretation requireth that the words of Scripture bee expounded to the vnlearned by such words as being more vsual in other languages or matters doctrines are more easie for them to vnderstand paueth and maketh plaine away vnto them for the vnderstanding of the speech and phrase of Scripture The third cause is that the sleights and sophismes of heretiques which for the most part they goe about to cloake and couer with the woords of holie Scripture are more easily espied and taken heede of if the same things bee expounded in diuerse woordes and those especiallie short perspicuous and significant So the sectaries and followers of Seruetus do confesse that the Father the Sonne and the holy ghost are one God but not one in essence but by propagation that is that they are not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the same in substance but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 like in substance Likewise they graunt the Sonne to be true God but they deny him to bee the same in substance with his father But therefore is it that heretiques will none of the Churches phrase speech because they dislike the thing it selfe For if there were a consent an according in the thinges we shoulde easily come to an agreement about the woordes 7 How many persons there be of the Diuinity or God-head IN one diuine essence are subsisting three persons Three persons are one God and one God is three persons and those truely distinct one from another by their properties namely the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost each of which three persons notwithstanding are one and the same God eternal infinit most perfect in himselfe And these persons are consubstantiall and coeternal without any confounding of their properties and respects as also without anie disparagement or inequalitie betweene them And that there are three persons each of which are that one true God creatour of all thinges is prooued first by testimonies of Scripture which are taken partly out of the olde Testament and partly out of the newe The old Testament yeeldeth vs many testimonies Gen. 1.2 The spirite of God mooued vpon the waters Then God said let there be light Exod. 3.2 The Lorde is
saide to haue appeared vnto Moses in a flame of fire out of the middest of a bushe Steuen Acts. 7.30 calleth him the Angell of the Lorde which is Christ the Sonne of God euen that Angell of the great counsaill Isay 61.1 The spirite of the Lorde God is vpon me therefore hath he annointed mee he that sent me to preach good tidinges vnto the poore to binde vp the broken hearted Heere the spirite is discerned both from him that annointeth and from him that is annointed Hee is discerned also by his giftes because he saith Vpon me that is dwelling in me sanctifieng me Therefore these be three diuerse persons subsisting But yet there are both mo and more cleare testimonies in the newe Testament Mat. 28.19 Teach all nations baptising them in the name of the father and the Sonne and the holy Ghost Iohn 14.26 The comforter which is the holy Ghost whom the father will send in my name Ioh. 15.26 When the Comforter shal come whom I wil send vnto you from the Father euen the spirite of trueth which proceedeth of the Father 2. Cor. 13.13 The grace of our Lord Iesus Christ and the loue of God and the communion of the holie Ghost be with you al. In this saying of the Apostle inuocation is ioyned with an application distinction of the 3 persons By grace he meaneth the benefites of Christ by Loue the acceptation whereby GOD for his Sonnes sake doth receiue vs into fauor by the communion of the holie ghost his gifts which are common vnto the godly 1. Iohn 5.7 There are three in heauen which beare record Tit. 3 5 God saued vs by the washing of the new birth and the renewing of the holie ghost which he shed on vs aboundantlie through Iesus Christ our Sauiour Heere hee maketh three authors of our saluation Ephes 2.18 Through him we haue an entrance vnto the father by one spirite Gal. 4.6 God hath sent forth the spirit of his sonne into your harts Therefore it is one spirit which the father the Sonne sendeth Secondly The same is proued by those places of Scripture which giue vnto these three the Father the Sonne and the holie Ghost the name of Iehoua and true God In like manner those places wherein those thinges which are spoken of Iehoua in the old Testament are in the newe referred expressely and most plainly to the Sonne and the holy Ghost Thirdlie those places which attribute the same whole diuine essence to the three and shew that the Sonne is the proper Sonne of the father most truly begotten of him and that the holy ghost is the spirit of the father and the Sonne and that so proper and peculiar as that he is and proceedeth of God which is the father and the sonne The sonne therefore and the holie Ghost haue the same and that whole essence of the Deity which the Father hath The Sonne hath it communicated of the father by beeing borne of him and the holy Ghost of the father and the sonne by proceeding from them Fourthly those places which giue vnto the three the same attributes or properties and perfections of the diuine nature namely eternity immensity omnipotency c. Fiftly those places which attribute to the three the same effects or works proper vnto the Deitie namely creation preseruation and gouernment of the world as also miracles and the saluation of the Church Sixtlie those places which yeeld to the three equall honour and worshippe and such as agreeth to the true god alone By this consent therefore of the olde and newe Testament it is confirmed that one GOD is three persons truely distinct and those three persons are one God By this also we vnderstand that it is truly said that the father is other from the sonne and the holie ghost and the holie Ghost other from both but not truly that the father is another thing from the sonne the sonne another thing and the holy ghost another thing For to be another thing betokeneth a diuersitie of essence to be other a diuerse manner of existing or a distinction of person Nowe the three distinct persons haue not a diuerse Deity but one and the same in number 8 How the three persons of the godhead are distinguished THese persons are distinguished two waies The three persons distinguished by their inwarde workes mutuallie directed towardes one another by their inward woorkes and by their outward woorkes Their inwarde works are those which the persons haue and exercise one towardes another By these then they are distinguished in that the father is and existeth of himselfe not from another Hee begot the Sonne inspired the holy Ghost by communicating his essence vnto them after an vnspeakable manner The sonne hath his beeing from the father beggotten of him from euerlasting that is he hath the same essence with the father but communicated vnto him from the father The holie ghost proceedeth from euerlasting from the father and the Sonne that is hath the same essence but communicated vnto him from the father and the Sonne Obiection That which is not vnderstoode cannot be discerned or distinguished the manner of the begetting and generating of the Sonne and of the proceeding of the holie ghost is not vnderstoode Therefore they cannot bee discerned or distinguished Aunswere Those things cannot be discerned which are not at all vnderstoode neither in respect of the proper causes thereof nor in respect of the effects But that the son is begotten of the father and the holy ghost proceedeth from the father and the sonne we know out of the holy Scriptures We vnderstand also in some sort what this is namely the sonne to be begotten of the father For to bee borne or to be begotten is to be produced out of his essence who begetteth to haue his essence communicated vnto him of him who begetteth Albeit the maner whereby the eternal father communicated his essence the same whole and entire vnto his son we conceiue not The like also is to be vnderstood concerning the proceeding of the holy ghost Here is to be obserued also that it is truly said The son is begotten The holie ghost proceedeth Likewise The diuine person is produced begotten proceedeth of the essence of the father or of the father and the son But not truly The diuine essence is produred or begotten or proceedeth Yet truly it is said The diuine essence is giuen communicated to another receiued of another The reason hereof is for that to bee giuen communicated receiued The person not the essence of the Sonne is begotten stretcheth further than to bee produced begotten or to proceede For not whatsoeuer is giuen communicated receiued is also begotten Further that is said to bee begotten not which is communicated to the thing begotten but that vnto which the substaunce of him that begetteth is communicated So the essence of GOD the father is not begotten or produced from another and yet the selfe same essence of it selfe subsisting is giuen and
communicated to the Sonne and the holy Ghost and receiued of the Sonne and the holy GHOST Iohn 5.26 The father likewise hath giuen to the Sonne to haue life in himselfe Neither dooth it followe The person is begotten therefore the Essence is begotten For that which is affirmed truely of a thing respectiue is not necessarily to bee affirmed of a thing absolute in his owne nature For although euerie father hath a Sonne yet not euerie thing of which it maie bee truely affirmed that it is a father maie bee said to haue a Sonne Albeit then the person of the Sonne is begotten yet whatsoeuer is the Sonne is not begotten The persons distinguished by their outward works extended vnto the creatures Another difference of the persons is in the order of their outwarde actions which they exercise towardes the creatures in them and by them The Father woorcketh createth sanctifieth of himselfe by the Sonne and the holie Ghost Hee sendeth them and is not sent The Sonne woorketh from the Father by the holie Ghost hee is sent of the Father hee sendeth the holy Ghost The holie Ghost woorketh and is sent from both His working is said to bee from another who woorketh anothers will and pleasure going before his owne accompanieng and following it not in time but in the order of woorking The persons therefore differ not in the woorkes themselues but in the manner onelie and order of working The work is not distinct the manner of working is distinct The father is called the first person because the Deity is communicated vnto him from none The Sonne the second person because the Deity is communicated vnto him from the Father The holie Ghost the third because the essence of the father and the son is communicated vnto him from the father and the son Now the first and last are here said not as in degree or dignity or time but onely in order of existing and working This eight question together with the former shall be more at large explicated in the Articles of the sonne and the holy Ghost 9 Wherefore this doctrine is to be held and maintained in the Church THis doctrine of the Trinity is to be learned and held in the Church 1. In respect of the glorie of God The doctrine of the Trinity to be tuaght in the Church 1 In respect of Gods glory 2 In regard of our saluation that God maie be discerned and distinguished from Idoles For God will not bee matched with Idols but will haue himselfe to bee woorshipped and celebrated and therefore knowen and agnised for such a one as he hath declared himselfe to bee 2. In regard of our owne saluation and comfort No man is saued who knoweth not the father and the father is not knowen without the sonne 1. Iohn 2.23 Whosoeuer denieth the sonne the same hath not the father Againe no man is freed and saued from sinne and death without beleeuing the Mediatour Christ But no man reposeth trust and confidence in the sonne when as yet he is not knowen vnto him Therefore we must first know the sonne and then for the son we must know the father that we may beleeue in him Likewise no man is sanctified and saued by the holy Ghost who knoweth not the holy Ghost For he who receiueth not the holy Ghost is not saued But no man receiueth him whom hee knoweth not Therefore who knoweth him not is not saued That no mā receiueth him whom he knoweth not is proued by those words of Christ Iohn 14.17 The spirite of truth the world cannot receiue because it seeth him not neither knoweth him Ioh. 3.5 Except a man bee borne againe of water and the spirit he cannot enter into the kingdome of heauen Hence it manifestly appeareth that they which wil be saued must necessarily know the father the sonne and the holy ghost And they must knowe that the sonne and the holy ghost are distinct from the father but yet cōsubstantial with the father equal in perfections honor worship therefore the same true God which is the father For except God be known of vs to be such as he hath declared himselfe to be he doth not communicate himselfe to vs neither may wee looke or hope for euerlasting life from him And what he hath shewed himselfe to be wee haue heard namely that he is the eternall Father coeternall Sonne and coeternall holie Ghost But among al points there is none more sharply oppugned by the aduersaries of the truth than this doctrine of the three persons in one godhead especially since the son of god was manifested in the flesh It is not harde to espie the causes of this strife for that indeede no part of Doctrine is more vnknowen and vnsearchable to mans reason as also for that the diuell in hatred of God and men attempteth with horrible fury to darken and extinguish the glory of the Sonne of God incarnate Certaine obiections against the Trinitie aunswered 1 Obiection One Essence is not three persons Iehoua is one essence Therefore he is not three persons Answere One finite essence is not three persons But God is infinite Obiection 2. That which hath a beginning is not eternall But the sonne and the holy Ghost haue a beginning Therefore they are not eternall Aunswere That which hath a beginning of essence and time is not eternal But the sonne and the holy ghost haue onely a beginning of person or order or maner of beeing and so the Scripture teacheth Christ both to bee Iehoua and to haue a beginning namelie as touching his manner of being He gaue vnto the sonne to haue life in himselfe Obiection 3. Our vnity with God is a consent But the vnity of the son with the father is like to ours Therefore it is the vnitie not of essence but of consent which the sonne hath with the father Answere The conclusion of this reason hath more in it than was in the former propositions For the conclusion is general of al kind of vnitie whereas the Minor was particular of the vnity of consent For there is another vnitie of the Sonne with the Father namelie of essence Obiect 4. In whome the whole Deitie is besides him there it no other in whome the whole Deitie is But the whole Deity is in the father Therefore not in another Aunswere The Maior is false because the same Deity which is in the Father is whole also in the Sonne and whole in the holy Ghost Obiection 5. The diuine essence is not begotten But the Sonne is begotten Therefore he is not the diuine Essence Answer Where al be particulars nothing can be concluded And the first proposition or Maior cannot bee expounded vniuersallie For it is false That whatsoeuer is the diuine Essence is not begotten Obiection 6. Where are distinct operations at leastwise internall there also are distinct essences But the internal operations of the father and the sonne and the holy Ghost are distinct Therefore also their essences are
distinct Answere The Maior is true of finit persons but not of infinite Obiect 7. The diuine Essence is incarnate The three persons are the diuine Essence Therefore the three persons are incarnate Aunswere Here also are meere particulars whereof nothing can be concluded For the Maior speaketh not of the Diuine Essence generally but particularly as it is the Sonne Obiection 8. The Sonne is Mediatour vnto Iehoua But the Sonne is Iehoua Therefore hee is Mediatour to himselfe Aunswere Here also are meere particulars and therefore nothing concluded For not all that is Iehoua is Mediator Obiect 9. Christ hath a head aboue him Therefore hee is inferiour to GOD and by a consequent hee is not of one and the same essence with GOD. Aunswere Hee hath indeede a Head but that first in respect of his Mediatourshippe secondly in respect of his manhoode Obiection 10. This is saith Christ life euerlasting that they do know thee to bee the onelie verie God Therefore the Sonne and the holie Ghost are not true God Aunswere In this place is opposed not the father to the son and the holy ghost but God to Idoles and creatures Moreouer the particle onelie dooth not belong to the subiect thee but to the predicate God which the greeke Article sheweth Obiection 11. Iehoua is the Trinity The father is Iehoua Therefore he is the trinity Aunswere Iehoua is not taken for the same but varieth in this Syllogisme For Iehoua in the Maior is meant of all three persons in the Minor of one only Reply The father is Iehoua one in number Therefore the father is the Trinitie Heere those diuerse manners of beeing are of no force Aunswere He is one in number of essence not of persons Obiection 12. Where are three one there are four But in god are three one namelie three persons and one essence Therfore there are four in God Aunswere Where there are three and one reallie distinct there are foure But in God the persons are not really distinct from the essence for the three persons of the Diuinity are one and the same essence Obiection 13. The same works are atributed to the Father and the Sonne and the holy Ghost in the Scripture Aunswere This hindereth not the distinction of persons For mo persons may concurre to one action the distinct order of woorking beeing obserued Obiection 14. Christ saith Iohn 14. He that seeth me seeth the father Aunswere Christ meaneth not hereby that he is the father but that he sheweth and resembleth the person wisedome omnipotency goodnes and wil of the father in his doctrine and woorkes as it is saide The Sonne which is in the bosome of the father hee hath shewed Againe Who is the inuisible image of GOD. And as himselfe addeth here The father in mee and I in the father Obiection 15. The wisedome and power of the father are not distinct persons from the father but are the father himselfe as also mercie goodnesse chastitie trueth and other properties of God But the Sonne and the holie Ghost are the wisedome and power of GOD Therefore they are not persons distinct from the father but the father himselfe wise and powerful Aunswere There is an ambiguity in the woordes wisedome and power which in the Maior signifie the wisedome and power whereby not only the father but the Sonne also and holy Ghost is wise and forcible or effectuall that is the common nature or essence of the father and the Sonne and the holy Ghost But in the Minor they signifie the persons of the Sonne and the holy Ghost the Son beeing called the wisedome and the holy Ghost the power of GOD because by them the Deitie sheweth foorth and declareth the wisedome and power thereof OF CREATION NEXT vnto the Doctrine concerning God the Doctrine of the woorkes of GOD is most fitly placed as we see to be done also in the Creede The woorks of God are of two sortes Generall and Speciall The general are diuided into the works 1. Of creation the works whereof are read in Genesis to haue bin accomplished in 6. daies are by daily increase furthered and multiplied in the world 2. Of preseruation whereby God still susteineth the heauens and earth and the things that in them are that they fal not to ruine and decay 3. Of administration whereby through his immense and great wisdome he administreth and gouerneth all things These two latter are comprehended vnder the name of his prouidence And therefore next vnto creation is annexed the place concerning Gods prouidence The Special woorkes of GOD are those which are wrought in the Church and company of his elect and chosen to iustifie sanctifie and glorifie them and are either works of Reparation or restoring whereby hee repaireth al things which for the sinne of man are subiect to corruption or of perfection and accomplishment whereby hee bringeth all things to their certaine appointed end The principall questions of creation are these 1 Whether the world were created of God 2 How it was created 3 For what cause it was created 1 WHETHER THE WORLD WERE CREATED OF GOD. THE name of the world is diuerslie vsed in the Scripture 1. It signifieth the vniuersal frame of all thinges namelie Heauen and Earth and al thinges which are them visible and inuisible besides God himselfe 2. Woorldlie concupiscences 3. All mankind 4. The wicked or those that are not regenerate in the world 5. The elect Here we consider it in the first sense To create signifieth 1 to ordaine or constitute as the latines vsed it creare Consulem to create a Consul 2 To make something of nothing without any motion with a becke or woorde only So is it taken in this place 3 The continuating of creation or creation continued Which is the prouidence of God That the worlde hath not beene from euerlasting but had when it seemed best to the creatour according to his eternal counsel and wil a beginning once and was created of that only true God who hath manifested himselfe in the Church that he is the eternal Father and Sonne and Holy Ghost we know First by testimonies of holy scripture as by the whole historie of the creation set downe by Moses Likewise out of other testimonies of Scripture verie many Psalm 33 6.9 By the woorde of the Lorde were the heauens made and all the host of them by the breath of his mouth Ps 104.113.124.136.146 Isay 44. Act. 4. 17. He spake and it was doone he commaunded and it stood or was created There are other places also in the Psalmes where more largely and amply the wonderfull woorkes of God and the principall partes of the woorlde created by God are proposed to be considered of vs that through the consideration thereof wee may learne to put our trust and confidence in God For to this purpose did the Lord himselfe propose vnto Iob his marueilous and incomprehensible woorkes conspicuous in heauen Iob. 38. 39. and earth other thinges also
made of God vnto vs wisedome and righteousnesse and sanctification and redemption So is hee often called the Angell of the couenant sent of olde vnto the Church 2. Hee is called annointed in respect of the giftes of the holie GHOST which were poured on him thicke aboundauntlie and most perfectlie that is al the giftes and graces whatsoeuer are in all the blessed Angels and men and those in the most excellent and high degree that hee might bee sufficient for the restoring ruling preseruing of his Church and for administering the gouernement of the whole woorlde and for the directing thereof to the safetie and saluation of his Church Iohn 3.34 God giueth him not the spirite by measure Hebr. 1.9 Wherefore God thy God hath annointed thee with the oile of gladnesse aboue thy fellowes Isaie 61.1 The spirite of the Lorde is vpon mee therefore hath the Lorde annointed mee The annointing therefore is of the whole person yet with this difference that it is so applied to both natures as it signifieth the ordaining of him to the Mediatourshippe For hee is Mediatour according to both natures who was alwaies present with his Church euen before his fleshe was borne Christ anointed in respect of his humanitie not of his Godhead in respect wherof he is annointer But as his annointing designeth the communicating of the giftes of the holie GHOST so his humane nature onelie is meant to bee annointed For his Godhead because it is alwaies in it selfe goodnesse most perfect and passing measure is not annointed but annointeth filleth with giftes and graces both his owne humanity which his God-head dooth personally inhabite as also all the elect and chosen Wherefore one and the same Christ in respect of his diuerse natures is both annointed and annointer as raiser and raised For the father annointeth with the holie Ghost but by the Lorde so that Ireneus said pretilie that by the name of annointing was comprised and vnderstood the three persons of the godhead The annointer the annointed and the annointing Obiection But it is no where reade Christ annointed spirituallie that Christ was annointed Aunswere Christ was not annointed typicallie ceremonially or sacramentallie but reallie and spiritually that is hee receiued the thing it selfe which was prefigured and signified by the ceremonial annointing which was the holy Ghost as it is said Psalm 43.97 and Heb. 1.9 Wherefore God thy God hath annointed thee with the oile of gladnesse aboue thy fellowes Isaie 61.1 The spirite of the Lorde is vpon mee therefore hath the Lorde annointed mee As therefore it was meete that Christ shoulde bee a Prophet a Priest and a King not typical but the verie signified and true that is the great and high Prophet Priest and King so it was necessarie that hee should be annointed not with typical oile but with the signified and true oile which was the holy Ghost For such as the office was such should the annointing be But the office was not typical but the very thing it selfe Therefore such also should the annointing be Hence wee learne and vnderstand these two thinges The first is That Christ hath this name not from the ceremonial annointing but from the thing it selfe which was thereby signified because he is that chiefe and high Prophet Christ hath his name not from the ceremonial annointing but from the thing thereby signified Priest and King whom as types the Prophetes Priestes and Kinges of the olde Testament which were wont to bee annointed with external oile did represent The name therefore of the signe or type that is Annointed is transferred to the thing it self euen to the High-Priest Prophet King Iesus Another thing that wee learne is The difference between Christ Annointed and the Annointed of the old Testament That there is a great difference between this Iesus Annointed and the Annointed of the olde testament For 1. There were only certaine types and shadowes of this onely chief and true Christ that is of this King Prophet Priest Wherefore necessary was it that they should yeeld giue place to him being once exhibited For the thing it selfe being come exhibited the types cease 2. The annointing that is the communicating of the gifts of the Holy Ghost in the typicall Annointed was imperfect weake But in Iesus christ it is perfect exceeding great For in him dwelleth the fulnes of the Godhead personally so that he is both the Annointed the Annointer 3. He onlie hath receiued all the giftes of the holie Ghost and those manie waies more excellent than they are to bee found in all the Angels and men Because hee had them in the highest both number and degree 1. Iohn 1.16 Of his fulnesse haue all wee receiued But the Annointed of the old testament receiued neither all the giftes neither in the highest degree but diuided and according to the measure of the gift of christ some more some fewer some greater gifts than some 1. Cor. 12.11 Ep. 4.7 Much lesse were they able by their own power and vertue to worke the same in others Replie 1. GOD cannot bee annointed christ is GOD. Therefore he coulde not be annointed no not with the prefigured or signified oile Aunswere In some respect wee graunt this whole reason For Christ as touching his God-head cannot be annointed with the giftes of the holie GHOST First because not one iot of the giftes of the holie Ghost can bee added to the God-head because of the exceeding perfection thereof And further because the holie Ghost by whome the annointing is immediately administred is the proper spirite of christ no lesse proceeding from him than from the father Wherefore he as he is God hath not any thing from the holy Ghost neither dooth hee receiue him which is alreadie his owne from any other but giueth him vnto others whom it pleaseth him As also no man can giue thee thy spirite which is in thee because that which thou already hast cannot bee giuen vnto thee Reply 2. According to which nature christ is annointed according to the same he is Mediator that is the Prophet Priest and King of the church But according to his humane nature only he is annointed Therefore according to that only he is Mediatour The Minor is thus proued To be annointed is to receiue the gifts of the holie Ghost But according to his humane nature onlie hee receiued these giftes In what sense Christ may bee saide to bee annointed accoding to his Godhead therefore according to that onelie he is annointed Aunswere The Maior of the former reason is made of a bad and faultie definition because the definition is of too strait and narrowe a compasse For to bee annointed is not onely to receiue the giftes but also to bee designed to some certaine office In the former sense Christ is annointed according to his humanitie only in the later according to both natures Or we may aunswere that the whole reason is faulty because of an ambiguity
in the word annointing For in the Maior it is taken either for the whole annointing or for that part which is an ordeining to an office but in the Minor it is taken for the other part onely which is the participation of the giftes of the holie Ghost Nowe then according to which nature christ is not annointed that is neither seuerally by a designement to an office neither by both a designement to an office a receiuing of the giftes of the holie Ghost according to that nature he is not Mediatour Christ according to his Godheade is not annointed both with a designement to an office and a receiuing of giftes yet is hee according to his Godheade annointed by an ordaining or designement to an office Therefore hee is Mediatour also according to his Godhead Christ therefore is Mediatour that is the Prophet Priest Christ Mediatour according to both natures and King of the church in respect of both natures For vnto the office of a Mediatour doe mo actions concur whereof some he executeth by his Godhead some by his flesh yet so that they are don performed together the properties of both natures being as it were coÌ„municated Wherefore that we er not here nor coÌ„ceiue amisse these two rules ar to be obserued The first the properties of the one nature in the mediator are attributed to the other in the concrete that is to the person yet still in respect of that nature whose properties they are This is called the communicating of the properties it is a certaine kind of Synecdoche The second The names of the mediatorship are attributed to the whole person in respect of both natures yet reseruing still the properties of each nature and the differences of actions For to the perfourming of the Mediatourship the properties of faculties and operations both of the diuine and of the humane nature are required 2 WHAT IS CHRISTS PROPHETICALL FVNCTION The signification of the name Prophet THE worde Prophet commeth from the Grecke word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which signifieth to publish abroade things either present or to come A Prophet in general is a person called of god who publisheth and expoundeth vnto men the will of God concerning things either present or to come which without some reuelation from God remain vnknowne to vs as being such to the knowledge wherof men were not able by themselues to come A Prophet is either a minister or the head and chiefe of the Prophets which is Christ Of Ministerial Prophets some are of the old some of the new Testament Of the new Testament some are specially so called some only in generall What the Prophets of the old Testament were The Prophets of the olde Testament were persons immediatlie called and instructed of God himselfe either by instinct or by dreams or by diuine visions or by speeches had by God with them that they should declare to men to whom they were sent the true doctrine concerning God and his worship and cleanse and cleare it from errors and corruption that they should recount illustrate the promise of the Messias to come and his kingdome and benefits of remission of sinnes and eternal life by and for him to bee giuen to all beleeuers that they should foretell future euents good and bad and rewards and punishments that they should guide administer and order many counsels and offices politicke or ciuil hauing diuine and certaine testimonies to warrant them that they could not erre in such Doctrine precepts and counsels as they propounded in the name of God Those testimonies were especially these 1 The continuall consent of the Prophets in Israell of Moses and the Patriarcks both one with another and with those first diuine reuelations which were giuen at the creation in Paradise 2 Miracles certainly comming from God 3 The euents of things exaâ—tly aunswering to the sacred oracles and predictions of the Prophetes 4. The Testimony of the holy Ghost thoroughlie perswading and conuincing mens minds concerning the truth of Propheticall doâ—trine Such Prophets were Adam Seth Noa Abraham Isaac Iacob Ioseph and other and afterwards Moses they who succeeded him among the people of Israel A Prophet of the new testament specially so called What a Prophet of the new Testament is both in generall and in special is a person who by diuine instinct and through speciall reuelation of the holie ghost doth certainly foresee and foreshewe thinges to come As were the Apostles Agabus Acts. 11.28 cap. 21.11 and the Disciples telling Paul through the spirite that hee shoulde not goe vp to Ierusalem Acts. 21.4 c. A Prophet of the newe Testament in general is called anie whosoeuer hath the gift of vnderstanding expounding and applying the Prophecies and writinges of the Prophets who are properly so called to the present vse of the church So is this word vsed 1. Cor. 14.3.4.5.29 This function gift of prophecying that is of expounding applying the Scriptures of the Prophetes and Apostles to the vse of the Church is at al times necessary That other of foretelling things to come not so and therfore is it but temporary and for a time The great and chiefe Prophet which is Christ Christ a Prophet from the beginning of the church to all eternitie is a person immediatelie ordained of god euen from the beginning and cradel of the Church in paradise to al eternity sent of the father to declare the wil of god towards mankind to institute and appoint a ministerie to teach by the woorde and Sacramentes the holy ghost working together with him and lastlie in the fleshe to preach the gospel and to make knowen that hee is the Sonne consubstantiall and of the same substaunce with the father and author of the Euangelique doctrine kindling it in the harts of men and not only preaching it as a Minister And therefore Christ is called the WORDE not onely in respect of the father of whome in cogitation beholding himselfe and considering the image of himselfe not vanishing but subsisting consubstantial coequal coeternall to the father himselfe hee was begotten but also in respect of vs because hee is that person which spake to the fathers and brought foorth the liuing and quickening woorde or Gospell out of the bosome of the Father What Christ according to his propheticall fuâ—ction was to doe Wherefore the propheticall function of Christ is 1 To open declare vnto men God his secret will of sauing beleeuers by and for him shewed vnto him immediatly from God himselfe 2 To refine and purifie the Lawe and woorshippe of God from corruptions Mat. 5.67 he interpreteth the Lawe Ioh. 1.18 The sonne which is in the bosome of the Father he hath declared him Iohn 8.26 The things that I haue heard of the Father those speake I to the woorld 3 To open the promises of the gospell concerning himselfe to bee borne to suffer and to die concerning remission of sinnes our reconciliation vnto God
and to make intercession for themselues and others Wherefore though all the Leuitical priestes were a type of Christ yet the most notable type was the High-Priest for that he in mo thinges represented Christ our very true celestial perpetual high-Priest Obiection But it was the Prophets office to teach The difference between the Priestes and prophetes in the old Testament Therefore the Priestes differed nothing from the Prophetes Answere Both of them both the Prophets and the Priestes did teach the people and it might so fal out also that the same was both a Priest and a Prophet as it is reade of Ieremie But this was not perpetual but accidentarie Because 1. the Priestes were ordained out of one certaine tribe namelie the Leuiticall but God raised vp Prophetes out of anie tribe 2. There is a great difference found betwixt them as touching their function of teaching For the Prophets were called extraordinarilie and and immediately by God himselfe and so receiued from him the doctrine which they were to declare vnto men 3. They were so guided by the special motion of the holie ghost that they coulde not er in that doctrine which they vttered vnto men in the name of god But the Priestes as Priests 1. were ordinarie ministers of the oulde Church 2. were appointed by men 3. were tied to the doctrine of Moses and the Prophetes which they learned not from GOD immediatelie but mediatelie by men 4. They might erre in doctrine and counsels and did erre often when they departed from the rule of the Prophetes Wherefore as touching their function of teaching the Prophetes differed from the Priestes of the oulde Testament after the same sort as in the new Testament the Apostles from other ministers and teachers of the Church The signified and true and onelie High-Priest Christ the true and prefigured high priest Christs Intercession is the Sonne of GOD immediatelie ordained by GOD the Father himselfe and annointed by the holie GHOST to reueile vnto vs the secret will of GOD his counsell towardes vs by assuming humane nature to offer himselfe a Sacrifice propitiatorie for the sinnes of all man-kinde to obtaine for vs by his intercession vnto the Father remission of sinnes and eternall life and lastlie to applie effectuallie his Sacrifice vnto vs both by imputing it and also by illightening and moouing the elect by his woorde and spirit to receiue it with a true faith hauing this testimonie that he is certainly heard of his heauenly father for all those for whom he maketh intercession and withall hauing power to collect and gather his Church Wherefore there are foure principall parts of Christes Priesthoode First To teach men both outwardly by his voice and the voice of his ministers and inwardly by the efficacy of his spirite Secondly To offer himselfe a sacrifice and ransome full-sufficient and acceptable vnto GOD for the sinnes of the woorlde Christs Intercession Thirdly To make continuallie intercession for vs vnto the father For this intercession is proper vnto the Sonne First not onelie beecause himselfe liuing on earth in the time of his flesh was made a suppliant and a Sacrifice for vs vnto his Father Secondly but also because he earnestly and desirously wil according to both natures that the Father for his sacrifice once accomplished on the Crosse remit vnto vs our sins and restore vnto vs righteousnesse and life Thirdly that the Father looking vpon the sacrifice and wil of his onely beloued Sonne receiueth all beleeuers into his grace and fauour Wherefore the Sonne in respect both of his merite will to saue vs of his fathers continual beholding looking thereon hath from euerlasting made intercession and also doth nowe and for euer in heauen appearing before his Father make intercession for all the elect chosen To praie for the people is a thing common to all priestes but to make intercession both in heauen and earth vnto the Father for vs that our sinnes may bee pardoned vs is onlie belonging to this high and onelie Priest Fourthly to apply his sacrifice vnto all those for whom hee praieth Christs applying of his merit vnto vs. And hee applieth it First when hee procureth by praier the Father to impute it vnto vs that is to receiue vs for it into fauour and for it to loue vs Secondly when himselfe also for the same his sacrifice sake dooth receiue vs into fauor Iohn 17.19 Father for their sakes sanctifie I my selfe Thirdly hee endueth vs with true faith whereby wee also may apply his satisfaction vnto our selues that is maie bee assured and thinke that it is our righteousnesse whereby wee may stande in the presence of the Lorde Heereby also it is cleare in what other Priestes differ from Christ 1 These teâ—ch onlie by their outward voice â—n difference â—eâ—â—een Christ and â—ther Priests and not by the inwarde woorking also of the holie Ghost 2. They doe not make continual intercession neither do they alwaies obtaine what they aske 3. These applie their benefits vnto no man 4. They offer not them-selues a Sacrifice for the sinnes of others For all these thinges can bee and are perfourmed by CHRIST alone WHAT IS CHRISTES KINGDOME A King is a person ordained by God A King in generall to gouerne in a people and beare rule alone according to honest Lawes and to haue power to reward the good and punish the bad to defend his subieâ—tes against their enimies hauing no superiour gouernuor aboue him The King of Kings CHRIST Christ a King is a person immediatelie ordeined of GOD to gather and rule by his woorde and spirite his church purchased by his blood and to defend her beeing subiect vnto him and seruing him against all her enimies both corporall and spirituall and to rewarde her with eternall rewards but to cast her enimies into euerlasting paines and torments Wherefore CHRISTES royall office is First Christs Kingdome to rule by his woorde and spirite his Church gathered out of all nations from the beginning of the woorlde For that it may go â—ell with vs vnder this King it is not enough if hee outwardly teach vs what hee wâ—uld haue vs his subiectes to perfourme vnlesse also by his spirit he moue our heartes and cause vs to bee obedient to his commaundements Secondly To defend and preserue this his Church in this life against al both inward and outward domesticall and forraine foes which also he dooth perfourme while not onlie by his power-ful hand hee is euer present with vs but furnisheth vs also with those weapons wherewith our selues also may constantlie and happilie enter the combat against our most mighty foes and vtterly vanquish and discomfit them This sacred haâ—nesse and war-like furniture is described Ephese 6.13 Thirdly To make his church partaker of the blessings of his kingdome and to adorne her raised vp from dead with euerlasting glorie blisse Fourthly To ouercome rule his enimies by his
member maie doe this function Thirdly as the head is placed in the highest place and therefore is of more worthinesse and the fountaine of all life So Christ hath the highest roome and degree in the church as in whome the spirite is without measure and of whose fulnesse all receiue but in the members that is in christians are certaine measures of giftes which are deriued into them from the onelie head and fountaine christ Christ is our heade in three respectes First Christ is our Head in three respectes In respect of his perfection because hee is both God and man and in gifts as touching his humane nature excelleth all creatures Coloss 2.9 In him dwelleth all the fulnesse of the God-head bodilie c. Hee alone giueth the holie Ghost Matth. 3. This is he who baptizeth with the holie Ghost Secondly In dignitie or order glorie maiestie power authoritie which in his humane nature glorified he nowe openlie sheweth foorth and declareth For as GOD created all thinges by him so hath hee made him heire of all thinges Hebr. 1.2 and the ruler of his house Heb. 3.6 Thirdly In respect of his office For hee is ouer euerie member of the Church hee ruleth gouerneth quickeneth nourisheth and confirmeth them so as they continue ioined in him with the rest of the members We are also in three respectes the members of christ First Wee are in three respects Christ members because by faith and the holie Ghost wee are ioined vnto him and also are knit together amongest our selues as the members to the head and one with another And this coiunction of the members of this bodie amongest themselues is no lesse requisite and behoouefull for the safetie of the Church than the coniunction of the whole bodie with Christ the head For if thou separate the arme from the hand thou shalt separate it also from the head and so it shall no more haue life Secondly Because wee are quickened guided of him from him as the fountaine wee drawe all good thinges so that except we continue in him we haue not eternall life in vs as neither the members sundered from the bodie retaine life anie longer Thirdlie Because as in mans bodie are diuerse faculties and functions of the members so are the giftes and functions diuerse of the members of CHRIST in the church And as all the actions of the partes of the bodie are emploied and referred to the preseruation thereof so all the members of Christ whatsoeuer they purpose or doe that ought they to imploy and refer to the profit and vtilitie of the Church 2 WHAT IS THE PROPHETICALL FVNCTION OF CHRISTIANS that is in what sense they are and are called Prophetes Christians are prophetes in knowledge In confession CHRIST maketh vs partakers of his Prophetical honour or office not only in this that himselfe Prophecieth vnto vs that is effectually instructeth vs by his word and spirit but also because hee will and bringeth to passe that we may also prophecy by professing and celebrating God According as it is said Act. 2.17 I will poure out of my spirite vpon all flesh and your Sonnes and your Daughters shall prophecie Mat. 10.32 whosoeuer shal confesse me before men him will I confesse also before my father which is in heauen Our Prophetical office therefore is 1. rightlie to vnderstand and embrace the doctrine perfect and necessarie to saluation concerning god and his wil. 2. That euery one in his place and degree professe the same being vnderstoode faithfullie boldlie constantlie in woorde and life thereby both to celebrate god and to bring manie scholers and disciples vnto Christ The difference between Christs Propheticall function and our is 1. That Christ hath the spirite without measure wee by measure For it is the proper spirite of Christ which floweth from him and is powred into the heartes of men wee haue him by gift He being but one hath all the giftes of the holy Ghost and those in the most excellent degree all wee haue but onely some and those farre inferiour 2. That Christ effectuallie teacheth by moouing the heartes of men to accord and assent the sound and voice of others without the inward sound and voice of the holie ghost doth only strike the ears neither pearceth it vnto the hart 3 WHAT IS THE PRIESTHOODE OF CHRISTIANS Christians are pricâ—â—es CHRIST maketh vs partakers of his Priesthood not onely because hee sanctifieth himselfe for vs. Iohn 17.19 imputeth giueth his sacrifice vnto vs â—â—y the imputation of Christs merit that for it we may be receiued of him God the Father into fauour and maie be endowed with the holie Ghost and eternall life euen as if in our selues that Sacrifice were accomplished and satisfaction made for our sinnes but furthermore because hee maketh vs also Priestes vnto GOD. Which hee dooth after a double manner 1. When by the efficacie of his spirit he worketh in vs those things which we maie offer vnto god for a Sacrifice 2. 2 By offering the sacrifice of thankes giuing When by his merite and intercession vnto his father hee causeth our Sacrifices albeit vnperfect stained with our sins to be notwithstanding pleasing and acceptable vnto him Wherefore the Priesthoode of Christians is to inuocate on GOD knowen aright to offer vnto GOD all our life certaine Sacrifices namelie Eucharisticall euen Sacrifices of thankesgiuing sanctified by the Sacrifice of CHRISTT These Sacrifices of praise or thankesgiuing are 1. That wee offer vp our selues wholie vnto GOD to obeie him that is that wee mortifie the oulde man in vs and beginne newe obedience both inwarde and outwarde according to all the commaundementes of the Lawe 2. Euerie one to doe the duties of his owne vocation 3. To instruct others 4. To praie for themselues and others 5. To giue almes to others 6. To vndergoe and suffer cheerefullie manfullie and constantlie the crosse that is calamities persequution contempt banishmentes and euen death it selfe for the confession of the truth and the glorie of god In summe The Priesthoode and Sacrifices of Christians are the worshippe of God commaunded in his Lawe or all good workes doone of those who are reconciled to God to this end as thereby to obey God and doe him honor Wherefore the Priestes of the newe Testament are all Christians both teachers and hearers as they beginne newe obedience in the knowledge and faith of the sonne of GOD. Roman 6.13 Giue your members as instruments of righteousnesse vnto god Againe 12.1 I beseech you that yee giue vp your bodies a liuing Sacrifice holie acceptable vnto god which is your reasonable seruing of GOD. Againe 15.16 Grace is giuen me of god that I shoulde bee the Minister of Iesus christ towardes the Gentiles ministering the gospell of god that the offering vp of the Gentiles might bee acceptable Luke 22.32 When thou art conuerted strengthen thy bretheren Phil. 2.17 Though I bee offered vp vpon the Sacrifice and seruice of
manie waies men are called sonnes 2 How Christ is and is called the sonne of God 3 Why his onelie begotten and first begotten 4 Whether the sonne be coeternal with god the father 1 HOW MANIE WAIES MEN ARE CALLED SONNES EVery sonne is a sonne either by nature or by grace A natural sonne A son by nature or a naturall and proper son is hee who is partaker of his fathers nature and essence or who hath the essence or nature of him whose sonne he is communicated vnto him and that either wholie as Christ in respect of his Godhead for vnto him the father by begetting him communicated his essence whole and the same or in part as men vnto whom is communicated some little seuered portion of their fathers essence Wherfore a naturall sonne beginneth at one and the same time both to be and to be a sonne A son by grace is he who hath the right and name of a sonne A sonne by grace not by nature that is not that he was procreated out of his substance whose sonne he is called but onelie by a free gift of his and by fauour So is he said the son of God by grace who not by nature but by Gods gift is called his sonne Nowe the sonnes of god by grace are of three sorts some by grace of creation The sonnes of God by grace of creation some by grace of adoption some by grace of vnion The sonnes of God by grace of creation are Angels and our first Parents before their fall For that God shoulde create them and conforme them vnto himselfe that is make them righteous and blessed and that now also he maintaineth those blessinges in them it is his benefite and gift proceeding of his grace And therefore God created them that hee might account them for his sonnes and they againe acknowledge and magnifie him as their bountiful and benigne father And although they were not borne of the substance of God yet neither were these at any time not his sonnes but at one and the same time beganne both to bee and to bee the sonnes of GOD. A sonne by grace of adoption or an adopted sonne is he Sonnes by grace or adoption who not by birth but onelie by the law and will of the adopter receiueth the right and name of a sonne so that hee is in the same place with him as if he had been borne of him whereas before hee had beene no sonne Wherefore an adopted sonne beginneth not at the same time to be to be a son but he sometime was when yet he was not a sonne After this sort that is by adoption are our first Parents after their fall so also are all the regenerat the sonnes of god For these by nature are the childrē of wrath but are adopted to be the sonnes of god are made Christs brethren not by any merite of their owne Our fraternitie and brotherhood with Christ but freely by for Christ Eph. 2. Furdermore our fraternitie brotherhood with Christ consisteth in these fower thinges 1. In the likenes and similitude of our humane nature For hee is true man procreated of the bloude of Adam the common father of vs all 2. In the fatherlie loue and bountifulnes of god towards vs who for Christs sake embraceth vs as his sonnes heapeth vpon vs his benefites 3 In our conformitie correspondence with Christ which is wrought by the holy Ghost whom hee bestoweth on vs. 4. In the consummation and accomplishment of his benefites that is in perfect eternal righteousnes blessednes and glorie In respect of the three latter we are the sonnes of God by adoption The sonne of God by grace of conception or vnion is Christ alone The sonne of God by grace of vnion in respect of his humane nature which by the special working of the holy ghost being conceiued formed and sanctified in the Virgins wombe was personally vnited vnto the word A TYPE OR FIGVRE OF THE SONNES OF GOD. Euerie Sonne of God is ether By nature and proper as is the WOORD onelie who hath by birth his fathers nature and substance communicated vnto him whole and the same By Grace either of Creation as Angels and Adam before his fall Conception and vnion as Christ according to his humanitie Adoption as Adam after his fall and all the regenerate 2 HOW CHRIST IS THE SONNE OF GOD. CHrist is the sonne of God according to both natures Christ is the sonne of God by nature according to his Godhead but in diuers respects According to his Godhead hee is the sonne by nature and his natural or proper and onely begotten sonne because according to this nature he alone was from euerlasting begotten of the substance of his father after a manner altogether ineffable beeing of the same nature and essence with him Ioh. 5.26 As the father hath life in himselfe so likewise hath he giuen to the sonne to haue life in himselfe The eternall father therefore hath communicated vnto his sonne the life whereby both himselfe by himselfe necessarily is and maketh all other things to be which life is that one eternal Deitie creatresse and defendresse of all thinges Christ is the sonne of God by grace of vnion according to his manhood According to his humanitie hee is not the naturall and proper sonne of god because his humanitie as touching it selfe is not the person and it issued from the substance of his mother not from the substaunce of GOD But he is the sonne of god by grace not of adoption because he was at no time not his sonne as that hee shoulde bee made of no sonne or of the sonne of wrath the sonne of God but by grace of conception by the holie ghost and of vnion with the word For his humanitie was from the very wombe sanctified and vnited to the Godhead of the Word which Godhead is the sonne by nature That Christ according to his flesh was a sonne by grace not by merit of his humane nature And that a masse of fleshe in so maruelous manner by the power of the holy Ghost shoulde bee seuered out of the fleshe of the Virgin and that thereof beeing sanctified shoulde bee formed a true humane bodie that is quickened with a humane soule the same to be vnited to the verie sonne of god into one person subsistence was not the merite of his humane nature as which had not as yet any being is in it selfe but a creature but the speciall free gift or benefite of God as Paul in plaine woordes declareth Colos 1.19 It pleased saith hee the Father that in him should all fulnesse dwell And Phil. 2.9 God hath giuen him a name aboue euerie name Christ therefore as touching his humane nature was as the Sonne of GOD by grace euen presently from that very moment when hee beganne to bee borne man and that therefore because by the vertue of the holy Ghost
he was borne of the substance of the Virgin pure from al stain or corruption and so was personally vnited with the Word Obiection Euerie sonne is either natural or adopted Christ according to his humanitie is not the naturall sonne of god hee is therefore the sonne of god by adoption Aunswere The Maior of this reason albeit it may be graunted according to ciuil constitutions yet is it false in diuinitie because it compriseth not a perfect and sufficient enumeration of the sonnes of God For there are sonnes of God by grace as the Angels Iob. 1.6 likewise Christ according to his humanity which yet are not adopted sonnes Replie Grace is adoption Christ according to his humanitie is the sonne of GOD by grace therefore hee is the sonne of GOD by adoption Answere The Maior of this reason either is particular and so nothing is inferred thereby or if it be generallie taken it is a fallacie For grace is more large in signification then is adoption and is in respect of adoption as a generall in respect of a speciall For besides the grace of adoption there is also the grace of creation in respect of God creating and conforming Angels and men vnto himselfe the grace of conception and vnion in respect of God the Father the sonne and the holy Ghost forming and fashioning after a singular maner the flesh of CHRIST in the wombe of the Virgine and vniting it vnto the sonne 3 Why Christ is called the onelie begotten and first begotten sonne of God Christ is the onely begotten sonne of God according to his Godhead onely CHrist is called the onelie begotten sonne of God according to his diuine nature Because according to this he alone onely was from euerlasting begotten of the substaunce of his father and therefore hath no brethren of this generation and nature For of no other it is saide that the father giueth him to haue life in himselfe and again that in him dwelleth all the fulnes of the godhead bodilie Obiect He that hath brethren is not the onelie begotten Christ hath brethren Therefore he is not the onelie begotten sonne of god Aunsw The Maior is to be distinguisted He that hath brethren to wit of the same generation and nature hee is not the onely begotten Christ hath brethren but not of the same generation and nature because not any haue been begotten from euerlasting of the substance of God the father Therefore he is the onely begotten son of God in respect of his Godhead Replie He that hath a generation or begetting vnlike to the generation of other sonnes is in respect thereof said to be the onelie begotten Christ according to his humanity hath a generation vnlike to the generation of other sonnes of God Therefore Christ is called not in respect of anie eternall but of this temporall and miraculous generation the onelie begotten Aunswere The Maior is true of such a son as hath a generation vnlike in the whole kinde that is both in nature and in the manner of the generation But Christ according to his humanitie hath a generation diuers from vs not as concerning his nature the terme or ende of his generation but onely in respect of the manner For hee is true man Why Christ according to his manhood cannot bee called the onely begotten hauing a humane nature the same altogether with ours in kinde but borne after a singular manner of the virgin by the operation of the holy Ghost Wherefore according to his humanitie hee cannot bee called the onely begotten sonne of GOD. 1. Because according to this nature hee hath brethren of the same generation and nature Heb. 2.11.14 2. Because neither the scripture neither the Church vseth anie such forme of speech 3. Because the word onelie begotten doth not designe the peculiar manner of his conception and generation but the verie nature or essence it selfe which by generating that is by begetting and by waie of birth is produced The first begotten not the first created hee is called according to both natures Christ called the first begotten according to both natures According to his godhead both in respect of time and of worthines because he before all was begotten from euerlasting of the father and is perfect God and all were made by him and by and for him are deliuered and receiue the right of sonnes According to his humanitie also he is called the first begotten in respect of his worthinesse onelie and right 1. Because he was begotten after a singular manner 2 Because he hath his subsistence in the person of the Word to the vnitie whereof the humanitie was assumed 3. Because he hath by his merite purchased the right of sonnes for others 4. Because in gifts workes maiestie authoritie he vnspeakablie excelleth all the sonnes of God euen Angels themselues and it Lord and head of thē all Vnto Christ therefore in respect of his humanitie agreeth this which of old was signified by the type of the first born For after the decease of the father the first-born took two portiōs of his fathers goods when as the rest had each but one Now the cause of that right was his office and function For hee succeeded into the roome of his father so that hee had authoritie ouer his family and the rest of his brethren and did beare rule ouer them Gen. 27. 29. 37. So Christ the sonne of GOD hath also right according to his humanitie ouer the rest of his bretheren and all the sonnes of God and he but one hath receiued moe and more excellent giftes than haue all the rest because hee is the Lord of his fathers house the rest are his ministers Nowe because wee cannot beleeue that Christ is the only begotten son of God and much lesse can beleeue in this only begotten son of God vnlesse withal we beleeue that Christ is true God euen that euerlasting Word of the same substaunce dignitie power and nature with the father it remaineth therefore that herein brieflie we deale against the heretiques who impugne it 4. WHETHER CHRIST BE THE SONNE COETERNAL WITH GOD THE FATHER OR OF CHRISTS DIVINITIE WHen the question is made whether Christ be the eternall sonne of god or Whether he be that one true and eternall god these sower thinges are demaunded The first is whether the sonne of god or the Word be a subsistent or hipostasis or person in the flesh before the flesh that is whether in christ man there be besides his soule and body a spiritual nature or substaunce which was also existing before Christ borne of the Virgin and wrought and accomplished the workes of god and is the sonne of god and is so called in scripture That he is a subsistent the church beleeueth and proueth against Samosatenus Photinus Seruetus and others The second is whether hee bee a person truely distinct from the father Wee are to holde that the Word is a person distinct from the father against Noetus and Sabellius who
2 Obiection Christ man is and is called God in the new testament Therefore they corrupt the Scripture who saie that in this visible man Iesus is besides the fleshe an inuisible nature which was existing also in the olde peoples time without flesh For to say this is as if a man in steede of this Thou art a Scholer should say In thee is a scholer Aunswere That Christ man is true and by nature God in respect of the nature or Essence of the Godhead in him personally vnited to his manhoode is no corruption but the very voice minde and meaning and interpretation of the scripture Colos 2.9 1 Proued by testimonies Jn him that is in Christ Iesus dwelleth all the fulnes of the Godhead that is the very full and perfect Godhead which is but one bodilie that is personally or substantially so that it is of the substance of the visible man Christ In Christ therefore there is one thing which dwelleth namely the godhead another thing in which it dwelleth euen the manhood which is the temple of the godhead Iohn 2.19.21 and was shadowed and figured by the Mosaicall tabernacle Heb. 9.11 Again Rom. 1.3 Made of the seede of Dauid according to the fleshe and declared mightilie to be the sonne of God touching the spirite of sanctification Againe Phil 2.6 Beeing in the forme of GOD and equall with GOD hee tooke on him the forme of a seruaunt By him all thinges were made and doe consist both visible and inuisible hee giueth the holie Ghost lighteth euerie man that commeth into the world he alone kneweth the father and he to whom he reueileth him c. Isa 7.14 Isa 9.6 Iere. 23.6 Isa 25.6.7.8 c. 2 By contrarie properties Lastly that there is a double nature or substaunce in Christ both a finite and an infinite is conuinced and prooued by the diuersitie and repugauncie of those properties which are attributed to the same Christ but cannot possiblie be together in one and the same nature Wherefore CHRIST man is GOD not created and made in time by reason of the fulnesse and excellencie of his giftes but eternall subsisting before the flesh borne of the Virgin and before all worlds by reason of the eternall Godhead of the Word dwelling in his Maiestie personally Christ the proper sonne of God To the second classe or order of Reasons are referred those testimonies which shewe CHRIST to bee the proper or naturall sonne of GOD. The Argument or proofe is this The naturall or proper sonne of GOD is of necessitie partaker of the diuine nature or essence or substaunce But Christ man is the proper sonne of GOD. Therefore there is in CHRIST besides his humane nature which hee tooke of our kinde a nature or substaunce Diuine in respect whereof hee is and is called the Sonne of GOD that is CHRIST is by nature the sonne of GOD and therefore subsisting and that before the fleshe from euerlasting because hee is the sonne of the eternall father hauing the essence of the Father in number the same and whole communicated vnto him from the father Iohn 5. The place is necessarily to bee vnderstood and so was taken of the Iewe of a natural sonne The Maior is manifest by the definition of a proper or naturall sonne For a proper sonne is hee who is procreated out of his substance whose sonne hee is or hee who is partaker of his Fathers nature or substaunce The Minor is prooued by these testimonies of holy Scripture Iohn 5.17.18 My Father worketh hitherto and I woorke Therefore the Iewes sought the more to kill him not onely because he had broken the Sabboth but saide also that GOD was his Father and made him-selfe equall with God Because CHRIST called himselfe the Sonne of GOD not adopted or by grace onlie but naturall begotten of the substaunce of the Father and therefore equall with GOD the Iewes did thereof gather First That he challenged vnto himselfe the workes of God the Father And therefore because they deemed him to bee a mere man they woulde haue him slaine as a blasphemer and robber of Gods glorie both in this place and Iohn 19 7. And if Christ had meant that hee was the Sonne of God by grace onlie as are the Angels and men elected the Iewes verilie woulde not haue reprehended that as blasphemie and treason against the maiestie of God for then they shoulde haue condemned themselues of the same crime because Iohn 8.41 they saie vnto CHRIST we haue one father which is GOD. Secondly Christ also dooth not reprehend this collection of the Iewes or repel it as a slaunder but defendeth it as beeing good and necessarilie true in his aunswere presentlie following wherein hee auoucheth that whatsoeuer thinges the Father dooth the same dooth hee also together with him as beeing his Sonne that by the same authoritie libertie power hee raiseth the dead and quickeneth them who beleeue in him by which the Father dooth that as the father hath life in himselfe so also hath hee giuen vnto him as beeing his Sonne to haue life in himselfe c. Wherefore the man Iesus affirmeth that which of it selfe and demonstratiuely dooth thereof followe and the Iewes called blasphemie namelie that hee is the Sonne of God not by grace only but proper and equall with God that is that there is in him besides his humane nature a diuine also which is the Sonne communicated vnto him by an vnspeakeable generation or begetting frō the Father and according to which he is equall with the Father and the same God which the Father is For where the same power operations and woorkes are there also is necessarily inferred the same nature or substaunce to be and that equal So Christ is called the proper Sonne of God Rom. 8.3 God sending his owne Sonne that is borne of his owne substance For we are otherwise also of God beeing renued by his spirit And in the same Chapter ver 32. who spared not his owne Sonne Christ the naturall and coeternal sonne of God which is expressed in scripture 1 Obiection It is not found anie where in Scriptures that Christ is the naturall and coeternall Sonne of God Therefore it is but an inuention of men imagining in him besides his flesh another substance according to which hee should be the eternal sonne of God Aunswere Although these very words are not in the very same Syllables extant in the Scripture yet there are found the like and equiualent or such as signifie the same which these doe For the wisedome of God which is Christ and the Sonne Prou. 8.22 is described to bee such as was with GOD from euerlasting before his works were made And further Iohn saith that the Woord whom he called the Sonne was euen then in the beginning of the world and was God creating and preseruing all thinges But God is eternal and before thinges were created together with which also time began eternity only existeth and may be imagined
belong those sayings which teach the man Christ to be the onlie begotten Sonne of god Iohn 3.16 So god loued the woorld that he gaue his onelie begotten Sonne Ioh 1.14 We saw the glorie thereof that is of the worde incarnate as the glory of the onelie begotten Sonne of the Father For the onely begotten is he who hath not any brethren of the same generation and nature But Christ as touching his humane nature hath brethren Heb. 2.14 For asmuch as the children were partakers of the flesh and bloode hee also himselfe likewise tooke part with them And a little after He in no sort tooke the Angels but he tooke the seede of Abraham Wherfore in al things it became him to be made like vnto his bretheren And a litle before He that sanctifieth they which are sanctified are all of one that is of the same nature humane Wherefore hee is not ashamed to call them bretheren Wherefore there is in CHRIST another nature according to which hee is the onely begotten Sonne of the Father besides his humanitie according to which both he hath many bretheren and is sprung not of God but of the seede of Dauid Christ is called the onely begotten by nature not in respect of the manner of his generation Obiect The man Iesus is called the onely begotten because he onely was begotten of the Virgin by the Holy Ghost Aunswere It is a misconstring and corrupt interpretation of the word 1. For hee is so the onely begotten that hee is also the proper or naturall sonne Now such a one is saide to be the onely begotten not for the special manner onely of begetting but because he onely was begotten of his substance whose sonne hee is called or because hee onely hath his essence issuing from the substaunce of the Father 2 Because hee the verie same by whom all things were made and are preserued who is in the bosome of the Father euen from the beginning of the world reueiling God vnto the chosen who being sent from heauen into the woorld tooke flesh came in the fleshe c. hee is called the only begotten sonne of the father Ioh. 1.18 1. Ioh. 4.9 Iohn 1.14 We saw the glorie thereof that is of the Worde but not of the man Iesus as hereticks would haue it For there is no other antecedent in that place but the Woord For these words go before The Woorde was made fleshe and dwelt among vs then it followeth and we sawe the glorie thereof If then the Woorde it selfe be called and is the onely begotten then Christ is called the only begotten in this place not in respect of the manner of his generation of the virgin but in respect of his generation from euerlasting of the Father 3 The Words generation of the father is often in scripture discerned and distinguished from christes generation of the virgin The Euangelist as wee see calleth the Woord the only begotten of the Father Of wisedome it is said Prouerb 8.25 that before the mountains that is from the beginning it was formed or as the Chaldee paraphrast interpreteth it begotten but we reade in Matthewe that Iesus who is called Christ was borne of Marie 4 The only begotten is opposed to Angels men But Angels and men are the Sonnes of God either by creation or by adoption or by sanctification after what sort soeuer this be wrought by the holy ghost Therefore Christ must needes bee called the onely begotten for this cause euen for that he is his Son by nature For after this manner he is the Sonne of God onely and truely and simply seuered from other Sonnes Wherefore to this second ranck or classe those places also should be referred which shew that we are the Sonnes of God by adoption by and for that only begotten Sonne For seeing grace is opposed to nature and we are Sonnes by Grace it must needes be that Christ is the Sonne by nature To the third classe belong those testimonies of Scripture God is and is called the sonne which attribute the name of sonne manifestly to the other nature also in christ which subsisted by it selfe before and besides the flesh assumpted and did woorke all thinges And seeing Seruetus others are hereâ—n an vprore as it were and fight for this that onely the man Iesus borne of the Virgine but not God or the God-head is called the Sonne in Scriptures and that therefore before Iesus was borne there was not any Sonne of God subsisting wee are diligently to gather and collect those testimonies wherein the name of Sonne is not attributed to the humane nature only but also to the diuine The third argument therefore is this That which subsisting before the flesh borne of Marie created the woorld and from the first beginning hitherto woorketh the same thinges with the Father the same is a person and that without the flesh and before it But the sonne of god is called that which subsisting before the flesh created the woorld and from the first beginning hitherto worketh the same things with the father Therefore the sonne is a person and subsisting euen without the fleshe and before it that is Christ Iesus borne of Marie hath another nature besides his humane nature in respect whereof Christ euen before his humane nature was truly existed is is called the Sonne of God The Maior of this reason is manifest For that which worketh all woorks and that with the same authoritie liberty and power wherewith the Father doth must needs be a liuing and vnderstanding substance that is a person Nowe the Minor is prooued by testimonies of Scripture For the very same who is before all thinges for whome and by whome all thinges were created and doe consist who dooth all thinges likewise himselfe which the Father dooth is called the beloued sonne of God the first begotten of all creatures by whome god spake vnto vs in the last daies Coloss 1.16 Hebr. 1.1.2 Hebr. 2.10 Iohn 5.19 c. But the fleshe or humanity of CHRST is not before all thinges is not creatresse but created in the last times doth not vpholde or sustaine all thinges with his woord beck and effectuall will but is it selfe sustained and vpheld by the Woorde who did assume and take it Therefore in Christ besides his flesh is another nature which also before the flesh was miraculouslie conceiued in the Virgins wombe was subsisting did woorke and is the Sonne of God Againe John 3.17 God sent not his Sonne into the world to condemne it The Father sent the Sonne into the woorlde but the humanity of the Sonne was borne in the woorlde Therefore he was his Sonne before he was sent into the woorlde Ioh. 5.21 The sonne quickneth whom he wil. Matth. 11.27 No man knoweth the Father but the Sonne and hee to whome the Sonne wil reueile him But in the old Testament before Iesus was borne of the Virgine some were raised from the dead and quickened for there were some from the
of any qualities but of the very humane nature when as he sheweth that therefore Christ was necessarily to haue beene true man because men were to bee deliuered by him through his sacrifice The word full of grace and truth And the word dwelt among vs full of grace and truth Christ fulfilled all the promises and types and figures of the law and did truely performe the office of a redeemer and Mediator not only by his merit but also by his power and efficacie as afterwardes is added out of Iohn Baptists sermon That this truth and grace befell vnto vs through Christ and of his fulnes all who euer are saued haue receiued Which S. Paul saith euen that we are consummated and made perfect in him which would not be except the fulnes of the Godhead did dwell in him personally And wee sawe the glorie thereof as the glorie of the onelie begotten sonne of the father This glorie is the diuine power which he shewed in his miracles in his transfiguration vpon the mount in his resurrection from death his ascension into heauen his sending of the holie Ghost his power and efficacie by his ministerie Now thus far they also agree confesse the same But when we say further The glorie of the onely begotten This glorie testifieth him to be the onelie begotten sonne of God that is the sonne of God by nature begotten of the substance of the father who is also himselfe the true eternal God maker of all thinges here they shake handes with vs and dissent For they say that he is called the onelie begotten not because hee is the sonne of God by nature but because hee was borne after a singular manner namely of a Virgin conceiued by the holie Ghost But this reason is not sufficient First because if he bee not a sonne of the substaunce of the father but either by creation or by adoption or by conformation with God either from the wombe as in Christ conceiued by the holie Ghost or afterwards as in other men he shall not be the onelie begotten For so are others also the sonnes of God both Angels men though not in that degree of gifts yet in the manner of generation Wherefore it remaineth that he bee the onely begotten sonne by nature after which manner no other is the sonne of God Secondly because for that which he is here said the onelie begotten he is otherwhere said to be the proper sonne of God Iohn 5.18 Rom 8.32 And he is the proper sonne who is of the substance of his father he that is of an other substance is no proper son Thirdly he is said to be such a sonne of the Lord who is also himselfe the Lord which as it is manifest by other places of both Testaments so namely by Mat. 4. and Luke 1. where of Iohn Baptist it is saide that he shall goe before Christ who is called of the Angel Gabriel the sonne of the most high and the Lord God of the children of Israell whose hearts Iohn Baptist should turne vnto him and shoulde goe before his face And of Zacharie hee is called the most high whose Prophet and forerunner Iohn Baptist should bee whose waies hee should prepare and vnto whose people he should giue knowledge of saluation NOw let vs returne vnto those orders classes of arguments reasons whereby we proue the eternall subsistēce of christ The wisedome of God is a subsistent or persō And Christ is that wisedome Vnto the fift classe whereof are referred those testimonies which testifie Christ to be the wisedome of God The argument is this The wisedome of god Prou. 8.22 is eternall and subsisting before Iesus was borne But the sonne is that wisedome of god Therefore the sonne is eternal and subsisting before Iesus borne of the Virgin The Maior of this reason Salomon confirmeth in the place afore signified where he ascribeth those thinges to wisedome which fall not into any but which is subsisting liuing and working as that it subsisted in God before things were created that it was begotten and so foorth The Minor wee prooue 1. because Salomon saith that that wisedome was begotten of God And to be begotten when it is spoken of such a nature as is intelligent and vnderstanding is nothing else than to bee a sonne For although it bee true that there is made an exhortation there to the studie of heauenly Doctrine yet notwithstanding the name of wisedome to bee doublie there vsed and a transition to be made from the doctrine which is the wisedome or light created in the mindes of men that thereby authoritie might bee gotten to this wisedome with them to the vncreated wisedome that is to God himselfe the author and fountaine of the other those things which are there attributed vnto it doe manifestly conuince 2. Christ the son of god is called Wisedome and the person which teacheth vs wisedome Luke 11.49 Therefore saide the wisedome of god J will send them Prophets Apostles 1. Cor. 1.24 But vnto them which are called wee preach Christ the power of god and the wisedome of god 3. The same proper functions are attributed by Salomon to wisedome which elsewhere are attributed to the Word and are more at large declared in the booke of Wisedome cap. 7.8.9.10 To the sixt classe beelong those places of Scripture which speake of the of the of the Mediatour The Argument is this The Mediatour without whose merite and present efficacie there coulde bee no friendship or amitie ioined betweene God and sinfullmen The Mediatour hath alwaies beene must needes haue beene alwaies in the Church from the verie beginning of the woorlde This proposition those thinges confirme which haue beene before spoken of the Mediatour and his office But the sonne of God onelie not the Father nor the holie ghost is that Mediatour by and for whom the faithful also of the old Church were reconciled vnto god Therefore the sonne of god was subsisting from the verie beginning of the world The olde Church might haue beene receiued into fauour for Christ to come but by him it could not except hee was then beeing for there can bee no efficacie or force of him that is not Whence it is necessarily prooued that Christ was before his incarnation for there cannot be friendship betweene God and men without a Mediator now existing or being But in the old Testament there was friendship betweene God men that is beleeuers Therefore either he or some other was Mediator of that Church there was no other but he only because there is but one Mediator between God and man the man Christ Jesus 1. Tim. 2.5 But that there cannot bee any amitie betweene God and men without a Mediator now alreadie being shall also appeare by that which foloweth For it is the office and function of the Mediator not onely by deprecation or intreaty sacrifice to appease pacifie the father but also to conferre bestow al the benefits which
attributed vnto Christ can not bee wrested to any other meaning If therefore wee fence and gard our selues with such testimonies the aduersaries of this Doctrine cannot consist or stand but will they nill they they shall bee forced to confesse that Christ was before hee tooke fleshe And if hee were before hee tooke fleshe hee was either the Creator or a creature But he was no creature both because he created all thinges and because also hee is called creator Wherefore seeing the true GOD hath beene from euerlasting his Godhead also which is true God must needes be subsisting from euerlasting The Minor is likewise confirmed by the former Argument 1. The nature which tooke flesh is GOD and the Sonne of GOD. For neither the Father nor the Holy Ghost tooke flesh Therefore the Sonne otherwise the Sonne of God is not by nature GOD. 2. The humane nature in Christ is not the naturall sonne of GOD. Therefore the Diuine nature must bee that sonne 3. The Diuine nature in Christ is the Worde 4. Jt is Wisedome 5. According to it Christ is Mediatour 6. The Deitie of Christ is the Angel and messenger of the Lord sent of olde vnto the Church Therefore the Deitie of Christ is the sonne of God THE SECOND CONCLVSION The sonne of God Christ is a person reallie distinct from the Father and the holie Ghost THat the Worde or sonne of GOD is diuers and distinct from the Father and the Holie Ghost not in office onelie but also in subsistence and Person is prooued by foure Arguments No one person can be both Father and sonne in respect of him selfe 1 None is the same person with him whose sonne hee is or with him who proceedeth or floweth from him Otherwise the same thing in one respect shoulde bee relatiue and correlatiue But the Word is the sonne of the Father and from the Word the Holy Ghost proceedeth and is giuen therefore the Word is neither the Father nor the Holy Ghost 2 Christ himselfe expresselie calleth himselfe another from the Father and the Holie Ghost Iohn 5.32 Christ another from his Father There is another that beareth witnesse of mee namely the Father in the same Chapter vers 37. And John 7.16 My Doctrine is not mine but his that sent me Iohn 14.16 J wil pray the Father and hee shall giue you another comforter 3 The scripture dooth plainelie affirme that the Father Three persons expressed in scripture the sonne and the holie Ghost are three 1. Iohn 5.7 There are three which beare witnesse in heauen the Father the Word and the Spirite and these three are one Gen. 1.26 Let vs make man in our image Iob. 10.30 I and my father are one hee dooth not say am but are Iohn 14.26 The comforter which is the Holie Ghost whom the Father will send in my name hee shall teach you all thinges Ioh. 15.26 When the comforter shall come whom I will send vnto you from the father euen the spirite of truth which proceedeth of the Father hee shall testifie of mee Matthew 28.19 Teach all Nations baptizing them in the name of the Father the sonne and the Holie Ghost 4 The attributes or properties of the Persons namely The properties of the persons are distinct and diuers sending reueiling and their offices are diuers The Argument is this Whose properties are distinct they are in them-selues distinct But the properties of the Father the sonne and the Holie Ghost are distinct therefore the sonne is neither the father nor the Holie Ghost The Minor is prooued because the sonne onely and not the father or the Holie Ghost was begotten of the Father conceiued by the Holie Ghost made flesh sent into flesh manifested in the flesh made Mediatour baptized did suffer and died The Father of himselfe woorketh by the Sonne The Sonne not of him-selfe but of the Father by the Holy Ghost the Holy Ghost of the father and of the sonne Matthew 11.27 No man knoweth the sonne but the father neither knoweth anie man the father but the sonne These words cannot be expounded after this sort No man knoweth me but I and no man knoweth me but I. Iohn 10.15 As the father knoweth me so knowe I the Father The sense of these words cannot be this As I knowe mee so I knowe mee The sonne of GOD therefore Christ is another from the father and the holy Ghost THE THIRD CONCLVSION The Word is equall with the Father THat the Word or the sonne of God Christ is no made god or inferiour to the father but by nature true eternal God and equall vnto the father in Godhead and in all essential perfections of the Godhead is confirmed first by testimonies of scripture 1. Iohn 5.20 We are in him that is true that is in his sonne Iesus Christ This same is verie God and eternall life Iohn 16.15 All thinges that the father hath are mine Colos 2.9 In him dwelleth all the fulnes of the god-head bodilie Iohn 5.26 As the father hath life in himselfe so hath he also giuen vnto the sonne to haue life in himselfe Phil. 2.6 Who being in the forme of god thought it no robberie to be equall with god Iohn 5.19 Whatsoeuer thinges the Father doth the same thinges doth the sonne also that all men shoulde honour the sonne as they honour the father But the father is to bee honoured as God Therefore Christ is God equall in honour with the father Christ hath the whole Godhead entirely cōmunicated 2 He that hath the whole Essence of the godhead is necessarilie equall with the father But the sonne of god hath the whole Essence of the godhead communicated vnto him For this because it is infinite is indiuisible Therefore the whole must needes be communicated vnto whomsoeuer it is communicated Therefore the Word or the sonne of god is equall in all thinges with the eternall father in the god-head The minor is prooued Generation or begetting is a communicating of the Essence the Word was generated or begotten of the Essence of the eternall father because he is his sonne proper naturall and onelie begotten Therefore the whole Deitie was communicated vnto the Word 3 The Scripture giueth the same proprieties and perfections of Diuine nature vnto the Sonne which it dooth vnto the Father Hee hath the same properties of the godhead as namelie eternitie omnipotencie immensitie omniscience the searching of the hearts and reines 4 The same woorkes are attributed to the father Hee worketh the same diuine workes and to the sonne as that he is creatour preseruer gouernour of all thinges that he susteineth all thinges by his powerfull woorde Heb. 1.3 that hee is the authour and woorker of miracles Lastly that hee is the giuer of the holie ghost and that he saueth his Church that is hee ordaineth and maintaineth his ministerie and by it through the vertue of the holie ghost is effectuall and forcible in moouing the heartes of men These diuine woorkes
attributed vnto the sonne differ so from the diuine properties which are attributed vnto him as the effectes from their causes so that then his properties woorke them 5 The equalitie of honour and woorshippe Hee hath equal honour giuen him dependeth of the equalitie of Essence properties and woorkes Isai 42.8 I will not giue my glorie to anie other But the Scripture giueth equall honour and woorshippe to the Father and the Sonne therefore they are truelie equall in God-head and in all the perfections thereof The Minor is confirmed first by Testimonies Psalm 97. Heb. 16. Let all the Angels of god woorshippe him Iohn 5.23 That all shoulde honour the sonne as they honour the father Reue. 5.13 c. Secondly Hee is called God absolutelie and simplie as is the Father Psalm 45.7 and Hebrews 1.8 Acts. 20.28 1. Timothy 3.16 Thirdly the Epithets or titles of Diuine honour which are euerie where in the scriptures attributed vnto the sonne As God blessed for euer The great god and Sauiour The Lord himselfe from heauen The Lord of glorie The Lord of Lords and King of Kings Power and eternall kingdome Sitting at the right hand of the Father The Bride-groome husband head of the Church god of the temple which are all the elect Trust and Beliefe in him Inuocation for hee is woorshipped of the Church as GOD and Bride groome of the Church at all times and in all places Thankesgiuing for his Diuine benefites Furthermore albeit the name of GOD especially beeing put absolutely and without restraint dooth euidently prooue the sonnes equalitie with the Father as it hath beene saide yet seeing that signifieth moe thinges and is also applied to others who are not by nature God wee are diligently to collect and haue in a readines those Testimonies in which thinges proper to the true God only are attributed to the sonne which agree to none else who are called Gods and whereby God himselfe discerneth himselfe and will haue him selfe discerned from other creatures and forged Gods For vnto whom the essential properties of any nature or essēce doe truely and reallie agree vnto him the essence it selfe must needes bee giuen The sonne hath all thinges from the Father not by grace but by nature 1. Obiection He that hath all things of another is inferiour to him of whom hee hath them The sonne hath all thinges of the Father Therefore hee is inferiour vnto the Father Aunswere The Maior holdeth and is true of such a one as hath any thing by the grace and fauour of the giuer for hee might not haue it and therefore is by nature inferiour but it is false of him who hath al those thinges by his owne nature which hee himselfe hath of whom hee receiueth them For seeing he can not not haue them it can not be that he should bee inferiour or should haue lesse than hee of whom hee receiueth them But the sonne hath all thinges of the Father which the Father hath and that by nature and absolute necessitie that is in such sort as that the Father can not but communicate vnto him all thinges which him selfe hath belonging to his diuine nature and maiestie Therefore hee is equall vnto the Father in all thinges The sonne doth all thinges with the consent of the Father in like manner as the Father doth 1. Obiection Hee that doth whatsoeuer he doth by the will of another interposed and going before is inferiour vnto him The sonne will and doth all thinges by the will of his Father going before Therefore he is not equal vnto the Father in vertue dignitie and essence Aunswere The sonne doth all thinges his Fathers will going before not in time and nature but in order of persons so that hee will or doth nothing which the Father also will not and doth and whatsoeuer the Father will and doth the same also the sonne will and dooth likewise that is with equall aucthoritie and power Wherefore the societie order of the diuine operations doth not take away but doth most of al settle establish the equalitie of the Father and the sonne as also of the holy Ghost THE FOVRTH CONCLVSION The word is con-substantial with the Father THE woordes con-substantiall and like-substantiall differ For * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 like-substantiall signifieth mo persons and like essences as three men are like-substantial For they are both three persons and three essences of like nature that is agree in humane nature But * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 con-substantial signifieth one essence mo persons In the god-head is not like-substantial because there are not three gods but con-substantial because there are three persons of one and the same diuine essence For there is but one Iehoua that is one diuine essence which is the same is wholy in euery of the three persons therefore euery of thē are that one God besides which essence whatsoeuer is it is a creature not God The Latine church turneth the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 con-substantial taking substance for essence It is therefore the same that coessentiall that is of one and the same essence Furthermore these three thinges beeing declared and set downe namely that the Sonne is subsisting or a person that he is distinct frō the Father that he is equall with the Father the fourth is easilie gotten and obtained against the newe Arrians to wit that he is con-substantial with the Father which is also in like manner to be vnderstood concerning the holy Ghost For either this must be granted or of necessity there are made three gods which they though in words they deny it yet in very deede affirme when they frame and faine three essences and spirits The Arguments which shew The Father the Son to be of one the same essence are these 1. Iehoua is but one essence The English translations reteine not the worde it selfe IEHOVA but vse the Lord in steed thereof which is the signification of IEHOVA and therfore in effectuall one or one god Deut. 6.4 But the eternal Father and the Sonne coeternal with the father are that Iehoua Therfore these two are one essence and one God The Minor is proued first by those places of Scripture which cal the sonne Iehoua Ier. 23.6 This is the name whereby they shal cal him Iehoua or the Lord our righteousnes Isai 25.6 The expected God and Sauiour is called Iehoua But Messias is the expected god Sauior Therefore Messias is that Iehoua whereof the Prophet speaketh Za. 2.8 The deliuerer of the Church sent from Iehoua which is the Messias onely is called Iehoua Mal. 3.1 He is called Jehoua whose fore-runner was Iohn Baptist. But Iohn Baptist was the fore-runner of the Messias or the Sonne of God Christ Hee therefore is called Iehoua Hither belong al the places in which are giuen to the Angell or messenger of Iehoua both the name of Iehoua the diuine properties and honours But that Angell was the Sonne of
Againe A superlatiue or exclusiue speech vsed of one person dooth not exclude the other person of the god-head but creatures and faigned gods vnto whom the true god either in one or in mo persons is opposed The Father is greater than all that is than all creatures not than the Sonne or the holie Ghost I giue eternall life vnto them that is no creature dooth giue it For both the Father also and the holy Ghost doe quicken and giue life The father onelie knoweth the daie of iudgement that is no creature and so forth 7 They wrest the phrase of Scripture to another sense as The Sonne shal deliuer vp the kingdome vnto the Father 1. Cor. 15.24 The rule for aunswere to this is Of the phrase of Scripture we must iudge according to the whole Scripture that is by marking circumstances of the text alleadged and by conference of other places with it The Sonne shall deliuer the kingdome vnto the Father not by laying it downe but by manifesting it or chaunging the forme thereof For the Father also raigneth now neither shall the Sonne euer cease to raign Likewise he shall deliuer it by subiecting all thinges vnder him So the Father also deliuereth the kingdome vnto the Sonne neither yet doth he forgoe it Other Rules whereby the obiections of the Arrians are dissolued 1 NOthing hindereth why they who are equall in nature may not be in degree of office vnequall 2 That which the father hath giuen vnto the Sonne that he should euer haue it he will neuer demand of him againe but that which was but for a certaine time giuen committed vnto him the same he must needes depart from and resigne 3 That consequence dooth not holde in reason which is brought from a thing that is respectiue to a thing that is absolute 4 â—hat is said of the person in the concrete which is proper only to one nature but no otherwise than in respect of that nature vnto which it is proper 6 There is a double wisedome one existing in the creatures which is the order of thinges in nature wiselie disposed and the doctrine or knowledge aswell of nature and the Lawe as also of the Gospell Another wisedome is subsisting in God which when it is opposed vnto the creatures is the verie diuine minde or eternall decree as touching this order of thinges in the Father the Sonne and the holie Ghost that is it signifieth the three persons but when it is distinguished from God then is it taken for the Sonne of God the second person onely The former wisedome existing in the creatures is created the other subsisting in god is vncreate 7 God absolutelie named in the scripture is neuer meant but of verie God himselfe 8 Whereas the sonne and the holie ghost are of the Father and the Father worketh by the sonne and the holie ghost neither was humbled as the sonne the scripture doth oftentimes especially in Christs speaches vnderstand by the name of the father the sonne also and the holy ghost 9 When god is considered absolutelie or by himselfe or is opposed to the creatures the three persons are comprehended but when he is opposed to his sonne the first person of the godhead is vnderstood which is the Father 10 The name of God beeing put simply or absolutely is essentially taken that is for the godhead it selfe and compriseth all three persons but when the propertie of any person is ioyned therwith it is taken personallie 11 The Scripture distinguisheth the persons when it opposeth or compareth them among themselues or expresseth their personal properties whereby it restraineth the name of God common to them all to one certaine person it meaneth them al together when it opposeth the true God to creatures or false gods or considereth him absolutely according to his owne nature 12 That which began at some certaine time to be manifested may not thence be concluded neuer to haue beene before 13 The sonne is woont to refer that to the Father which yet he hath common with the Father not making any mention of himselfe when he speaketh in the Mediatours person 14 The sonne is said to see learne heare and woorke as from the Father in respect of both natures yet not without a difference still remaining For vnto his humane vnderstanding the will of God is made knowen by reuelation But his godhead dooth by it selfe of his owne nature know and behold from euerlasting most perfectly the Fathers will 15 The externall operations of the three persons if they were distinct they should make verily distinct essences because one woorking another ceasing there would be diuerse essences but the internall operations because they are the communicating of one the same whole essence make not a diuersitie but an vnity of essence 16 When God is called the Father of Christ the faithfull it doth not hereof folow that he is after the same manner their father and his 17 The Father was neuer without the sonne nor the father the sonne without their spirit in asmuch as the godhead can neither be augmented nor lessened nor changed The principal arguments against the Diuinity of the Sonne and the holy Ghost together with the Aunswere vnto them 1 ONE essence is not three persons for one to be three doth imply a contradiction God is one essence Therefore there cannot be three persons of the godhead Aunswere The Maior is true of an essence created finite that can not beeing one be the same and whole substance of three or bee three but it is false of the infinite most simple and indiuiduall essence of the Godhead For this as it existeth one and whole together in many nay in infinit places and thinges so may it be remaining one the same and whole essence of moe yea and moreouer it is necessarie so to be seeing the generation of the Sonne and the proceeding of the holy ghost is the communicating of the essence of the Father 2 Whose operations are distinct their essences also must needes be distinct The internall operations of the father the son and holy ghost are distinct Therefore they haue also distinct essences Answere The Maior of this reason is true of persons hauing a finite essence but being vnderstood of the diuine persons it is false if it be ment of those internal operatioÌ„s whereof the Minor speaketh Wherefore inuerting the Maior we return it back vpon the aduersaries themselues For whereas the internal operations namely the generatioÌ„ of the son the proceeding of the holy ghost are the coÌ„municating of the fathers essence whole the same in number it must needs be that there is not a diuerse or distinct but one diuine essence of al three persons 3 That which hath a beginning is not eternal But the son and the holy ghost haue their beginning or originall from the father therefore they are not eternal Aunswere That is not eternall which hath a beginning of essence or nature and time But
but hee furthermore keepeth and gardeth vs as his owne flocke and proper people whome hee hath purchased with his bloode hee gouerneth vs also and guideth vs by his spirite hee woorcketh in our heartes faith and obedience that wee maie doe things acceptable vnto him and so fenceth vs against all the temptations of the Diuel and the flesh that we may neuer fal from him Therefore he is our Lord after a farre other sort than the Diuels and the reprobates 2 By right of redemption 2 Hee is our Lorde by right of redemption For hee alone paying the raunsome for vs deliuereth vs from the power of the Diuel by his spirit regenerateth vs and causeth vs to beginne to serue him and in this liberty whereunto hee hath brought vs by his merite and power hee also preserueth vs against al both outward and inward enemies euen to the end and being raised from the dead he fully enfreeeth and deliuereth vs from all sin and miserie and endoweth vs with eternal blisse and glorie And seeing hee hath deliuered freed vs it is manifest that we were Seruants and truely so wee were and are by nature Seruantes and bound-slaues of the Diuell from whose tyrannie Christ hath deliuered vs and heereupon nowe are wee the Seruants of Christ because vs who were by nature his enimies and deserued to be destroied of him hee notwithstanding preserued and deliuered For * The reason of this deriuation of the name Seruant could not be expressed in English as it is in latine from whēce our English word commeth Serui which signifieth seruants commeth from Seruando that is saued or preserued serui or seruants were first so named by the Romans from seruando which is in signification preserued bicause whē in the wars they might haue bin slain of their enemies they were preserued But this dominion of Christ ouer vs is speciall that is extendeth it selfe onely to the Church Obiection Jf we bee redeemed from the power of the Diuel therefore a ransome hath bin paid him for our redemption For from whose power wee are redeemed vnto him is the price and ransome due But God gaue not him the raunsome Therefore wee are not redeemed from the power of the Diuel Answer From whose power we are redeemed as hauing bin supreme Lord ouer vs and holding rightly his dominion ouer vs vnto him the price ransome is due But the diuel is no supreme Lord but the executioner of the supreme lord Wee are saide to bee redeemed in respect of god wee are deliuered in respect of the Diuel which is God who alone hath and holdeth by right dominion ouer vs. Wherefore in respect of God Christ redeemed vs for vnto him he hath paid the price But he hath deliuered vs or set vs at liberty in respect of the Diuell For wee are giuen vnto Christ our redeemer to bee his owne neither hath the Diuell nowe anie more right or power ouer vs. And this christs dominion and power ouer vs cost him enough who therefore also hath care of it and preserueth it Of that Dominion we dispute especiallie in this place For the Diuell dooth not acknowledge Christ to bee such a Lorde vnto him as wee confesse him to bee vnto vs because hee hath redeemed vs and because hee guideth vs with his spirite 3 In respect of our preseruation Christ is our Lorde 3 By right of preseruation because he defendeth vs vnto the end keepeth safegardeth vs to eternall life not only by defending our bodies from enimies but our soules also from sins Of this Dominion himselfe speaketh None of them are lost which thou gauest mee No man shal pluck my sheepe out of my hands He keepeth the wicked to destruction and defendeth their bodies only 4 In respect of Gods ordinance 4 In respect of Gods ordinance because the Father ordeined the woord and this person Christ vnto this that by him hee might woorke all thinges in heauen and in earth The Father gaue vs vnto him manifested him vnto vs to bee our Prince King Head hath made him heire of al. Now whereas he is our Lorde after a farre more excellent manner than others we also are far more bound to his allegeance obedience For he is so our lord that he doth indeed with vs what he wil and hath full right and power ouer vs but yet he vseth that his power to our saluation only For wee receiue dailie of this Lord moe and by infinite partes more excellent benefites than doe any other thoroughout the whole world And therefore wee ought alwaies to acknowledge the dominion and power which Christ hath ouer vs. Which acknowledging of his dominiō is 1. A profession of so great a benefit of christ as that he hath vouchsafed to be our lord to set free vs his enimies into this so fruitfull glorious a liberty 2. A confession of our bond duty For christ being so merciful a Lord vnto vs we ought both in word and life to professe our selues as his seruantes to bee bound to faithfull subiection and obedience vnto him in all thinges that he may bee magnified of vs for euer WHICH WAS CONCEIVED BY THE HOLY GHOST BORNE OF THE virgin Mary In the conception three thinges to bee obserued 1 The forming of Christs flesh First christ is said here to haue bin conceiued by the holy ghost Whereby three thinges are signified 1. That the masse of his humane nature was created or formed in the wombe of the Virgin miraculouslie and beside the order of thinges disposed of God in nature by the immediate working operation of the holy Ghost without the seede and substance of man Obiection But we are also formed and made of God Answere We mediately Christ immediately 2 The sanctifieng of his flesh 2. That the Holy Ghost did in the same moment and by the same operation cleanse this masse and from the verie point of the conception sanctifie it that is he caused that originall sinne should not issue into it and that for these causes First that hee might bee a pure sacrifice and a sufficient ransome for our redemption 2. Cor. 5.12 He hath made him to be sinne for vs which knew no sinne that we should be made the righteousnes of god in him Secondly That he might also sanctify vs by his sanctitie and holynesse For if Christ had beene a sinner hee could not haue satisfied for vs but himselfe should haue remained in death Therefore could he not haue bin our sanctifier neither by merit nor by his power and efficacie Heb. 2.11 For he that sanstifieth and they that are sanctified are all of one Heb. 7.26 Such an high Priest it became vs to haue which is holy harmelesse vndefiled separate from sinners Thirdly Iohn was not agreeable vnto the Word the eternall sonne of god to vnite personallie vnto him humane nature being stained defiled where in hee dwelleth as in his owne temple For God
is a consuming fire Fourthly That wee might know that whatsoeuer this sonne speaketh it is the will of God and the truth For whatsouer is borne of flesh which is sinful and not sanctified is flesh falshood and vanitie Obiection But he was borne of a Mother which was a sinner Why then should not Christ haue sinne Aunswere The Holy Ghost doth best know how to seuer sinne from mans nature for sinne is not of the nature of man but came else-whence euen from the Diuel Mary therefore was a sinner but that masse of flesh which was taken out of her substaunce was by the operation of the Holy Ghost at the same instant sanctified when it was taken The third thing which is signified 3 The vniting of his flesh vnto his Godhead in that Christ is saide to bee conceiued by the holie Ghost is the vnion of the humane nature with the Woorde For the fleshe of Christ was together both created or formed and also sanctified and vnited to the Sonne of the holy Ghost immediatelie but of the Father and the Sonne by the spirite It is added furder in the Creede Born of the Virgin that he was borne of the Virgine Mary that is of the Virgins substance and that cheifely for these causes 1 That we might know 1 The seede of Dauid Christ our Mediatour to be the true seede of Dauid that is to be true man and our brother who hath humane flesh made not of nothing neither else-whence but issued from the seede of Dauid Isaack and Abraham of whome also the virgine Mary hir selfe came yea of the selfe same masse of Adam whereof both they and we are 2 That it may certainly appeare vnto vs 2 Messias That this Iesus borne of the Virgine is that Messias promised vnto the Fathers For it was foretolde by the Prophets that the Messias the redeemer of mankind should be born of the stocke of Dauid and that by a miraculous conception birth hauing a Virgin for his Mother Wherefore seeing both that is both the prophecies and the miracles are in this Iesus fulfilled there can bee no doubt but that this is the Messias true Man and true God the reconciler of GOD and man 3 That this Christes birth of a Virgin might be a testimonie that he is pure and without sinne 3 Without sinne sanctified in the wombe of the Virgin by the vertue of the holy Ghost 4 That it might bee a figure of our regeneration 4 A figure of our new birth which is not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the wil of man but of God Iohn 1.13 Wherefore to beleeue in Christ which was conceiued by the Holie Ghost â—â—d borne of the Virgin Mary is to beleeue That this naturaâ— Sonne of God conceiued and borne after this maner is made true man after a marueilous order and the same to bee one Christ hauing two natures vnited by personall vnion one to another which are his diuinity and his humanitie and to beleeue farther that he was holy from his mothers wombe to redeeme sanctifie me and that I for this Sonnes sake so conceiued and born haue the right of the adoption of the Sonnes of God For he cannot be Mediatour betweene God men who is not himselfe man who is not righteous who is not vnited with the Woorde that is true and by nature God man of sufficiencie and abilitie to bestowe his purchased saluation for vs on vs. Next after this article of the conception and Natiuitie of Christ for the better vnderstanding thereof followeth not vnfitly the common place Of the incarnation of the Sonne of God or Of the two natures in Christ THE COMMON PLACE OF THE TWO NATVRES IN CHRIST The Questions here to be obserued 1 Whether there be two natures in the Mediatour 2 Whether they be one or two persons 3 If they be one person what maner of vnion that is of them and how made 4 Why this personall vnion was necessarie to be made 1 WHETHER THERE BE TWO NATVRES IN CHRIST OVR MEDIATOVR Two natures in Christ WHAT there are two natures in Christ this one reason doth shewe by good demonstrance Essentiall properties which are opposite caÌ„not be in the same nor be affirmed of the same thing in respect of the same nature or cause Vigilius lib. 4. One nature dooth not receiue in it selfe a thing contrarie diuerse But in one and the same Christ are are affirmed of him properties diuerse contrarie diuine and humane finite infinite passible impassible and such like Therefore there must needes be diuerse natures in him humane and diuine And that the very diuine nature creatresse of all thinges is in Christ Christ true man and of our kinde and nature hath bin alreadie proued It remaineth that we shew a true humane nature to be in him that such as ours is and perfect consisting of a bodie and a reasonable soule of which as of essentiall parts is made a third substance to wit this particular humanitie which the Word hauing taken once into the vnity of person doth neuer laie awaie againe Which we are to holde against heretickes both oulde and newe whereof some deny Christes fleshe to haue bin formed of the Virgins substance but will haue it brought down from Heauen into the Virgin or begotten in her of the substance of the holy Ghost Others fancie Christ to haue in steede of true fleshe the likenesse semblance and appearancie of a mans bodie Others acknowledge indeede that hee hath a true bodie but not a humane soule the roome whereof is supplied by the Woord vnited vnto the body Against these the like errors the sentence doctrine of the church is confirmed First by plaine places of scripture which testify christ Maries son to haue bin made like vnto vs in al things that is in essence in properties in infirmities sin only excepted Lu. 1.31 Loe thou shalt coÌ„ceiue in thy womb bear a son Seeing then the Virgine conceiued this her sonne in her womb bare it vntil the vsual time of deliuery and was deliuered of it as other weomen vse to bee of their children it followeth that his flesh was not brought from heauen or elsewhere taken which should but passe only through the womb of the Virgin but was formed in the Virgins womb of her seed substance Heb. 2.11 He that sanctifieth and they which are sanctified are al of one wherfore he is not ashamed to cal theÌ„ Bretheren And a litle after For asmuch as the children were partakers of the flesh and blood he also himselfe likewise took part with them Again In al things it became him to be like to his brethren Therfore he hath a humane nature of the same kind wholy with ours Heereof hee is called the fruite of Maries womb Luk. 1.42 the first begotten son of Mary Luk. 2.7 made of a woman Gal. 4.4 The seed of Abraham Gal. 3.16
passed his substaunce into the flesh begotten but because in miraculous sort hee formed in the Virgins wombe of her substance the body of Christ so that it should not be contaminated or polluted with original sinne For neither could Christ bee in that sort conceiued by the holy Ghost as that his fleshe shoulde issue from the spirits substance and that for these causes 1. Because if this were graunted then were he not borne man of the Virgin or propagated of the Virgins substance 2. Because God is not changed into flesh 3. Because the Word tooke the flesh but was not changed into it 3 Obiection Jn God are not two natures Christ is God Therefore there are not two natures in him Aunswere Meere particulars doe enforce nothing For if the Maior bee taken vniuersallie it is false whosoeuer is God in him are not two natures this generall proposition is false The Maior therefore is true as touching God the father and God the holy Ghost but not as touching God the sonne incarnate Replie 1. But nothing can bee added vnto God by reason of the great perfection and simplicitie of his nature Christ is God therefore the humanitie could not be added vnto his diuine nature Aunswere Nothing can be added to God whereby his essence may bee changed and perfected But in that God the Word ioined the humane nature vnto him personallie there came no chaunge or great perfection thereby to the Word which tooke it but to the nature which was taken Replie 2. Humane nature cannot come vnto him who dwelleth in the light that none can come vnto 1. Tim. 6.16 Aunswere This is true if so God doth not assume and take it vnto him Replie 3. But it is ignominious for God to be a creature Christ man is God Aunswere The chaunging of the Godhead into a creature woulde haue beene ignominious and reprochful vnto the Word but that the godhead shoulde bee vnited vnto a creature is is most glorious vnto god as who by that meanes hath demonstrated and made knowen his infinite both goodnesse and wisedome and iustice and power to the whole world 2 Whether Christ be one person or mo IN Christ are two perfect natures whole and distinct and double properties also and operations naturall but one person which subsisting in both these natures diuine and humane is truely designed by the concrete termes or voices of both natures For it was requisit that one the same should be Mediator both by merit by power But they who make two persons make also two Christs with Nestorius the one a man passiue and crucified the other God not crucified and onelie assisting the man Christ by his grace 1 Obiection Jn whom are two things which in themselues make two whole persons in him also are two persons But in Christ are two things which make two whole persons namely the Word which is by it selfe a person subsisting from all eternitie and the bodie and soule which beeing vnited make likewise a person Therefore in Christ are two persons Aunswere We denie that part of the Maior to wit That the bodie and humane soule doe as in other men so also in Christ concurre to make a created person of the humane nature and diuers from the person increate and eternall of the Woordc For albeit the humane nature in Christ compounded of a bodie and a reasonable soule is an indiuidual and particular or singular substance as being from other indiuiduals of the same nature distinguished by certaine properties and accidents yet neither was it or is it a person or subsistence For first A person is that which is not onelie a particular or singular thing but also it selfe consisteth and subsisteth in it selfe and by it selfe not susteined in or of anie other But CHRISTS humane nature now from the verie first beginning thereof dependeth and is susteined by the person of the Word For it was at once both formed and assumed of the Word into vnitie of person and made proper vnto the Word before and without which assumption or personal Vnion it neither was nor had beene nor shoulde be so that this Vnion being dissolued and loosed it must needes follow that that this flesh and this soule should be brought to nothing Therfore Christs humane nature hath not any subsistence or person proper vnto it selfe Secondly Jt belongeth to the nature or definition of a person that it be an indiuidual incommunicable and also no part of another But the nature which the Word took and assumed belongeth to the substance of one Christ a part also of whom it is after a sort Therefore in it selfe and by it selfe it is no person Reply That which appertaineth to the substance of a person and is a part thereof cannot be a person The word appertaineth and belongeth to the substaunce of Christ and is after a sort a part of him as well as the humanitie Therefore neither shall the word be by this reason a person Ans The Maior proposition if it bee vnderstood simplie or vniuersally is false For a reasonable soule existing in the bodie is not a person but a part of an humane person which the soule together with the bodie doth make yet notwithstanding the same soule being loosed from the bodie is a person by it selfe not that compound and mortall person whereof it was a part that is an humane person but a person most simple and immortall such as are the Angels because it subsisteth out of the bodie by it self neither is part of another So may it be said of the Word if it be constred aright with indifferencie that the Word in it selfe and by it selfe is not the whole person of Christ or the Mediatour as he is Christ and Mediatour that is is not that whole thing which is Christ who is not onely God but also man and yet is in it selfe and by it selfe the perfect and whole person of the Godhead truelie subsisting before the flesh was that is the onelie begotten sonne of God For this selfe same person existing in it selfe from euerlasting and remaining for euer most simple and vncompound is by the assuming of humane nature made in time after a sort compound that is the Word incarnate Wherefore in respect of the person considered in Vnion or incarnate the Word is rather considered as a nature and both it selfe and the humane nature may be called as it were the parts of whole Christ are so called also of many of the auncient Fathers which were sound in faith not that the flesh assumpted did adde any part to the subsistence of the Word or as if of the Persons of the Word and the humane nature as being vnperfect parts was made another perfect person of a certaine third Essence consubstantiall with neither of those natures of which it is compounded but because the person of the Word altogether one and the same which before the flesh was taken consisted in the diuine nature onely doth now after the taking
For the natures doe not communicate each to other their essentiall properties as neither doe these impart their essence that is one nature doth not receiue the properties of both natures Wherefore these kindes of speaches are false The Godhead is the manhoode or man was conceiued borne did suffer was dead and againe these The Man-hoode is the God-head or God is eternal immense vncircumscribed in place omnipotent giueth the holie Ghost dooth regenerate For al these are no more true and to be admitted than those A soule is a bodie or corporeal mortal visible and a body is a soul or a spirit inuisible immortal 1 Obiection The whole person of Christ is really omnipotent euerie where eternal c. The humanitie and the God-head are the whole person of Christ. Therefore both are reallie omnipotent euerie where eternal c. Aunswere This argument the Vbiquetaries who most of all ground vpon it and often vse it haue borowed from Schwenkefieldeans who commonly in their bookes reason thus Whole Christ is the natural onelie begotten Sonne of God is the true and the same GOD of the same infinite power and maiestie with the eternall Father conceiued borne of the Virgine suffered was dead rose againe ascended into heauen sendeth the Holie Ghost But both natures belong to the whole person of Christ Therefore Christ according to his humanitie also is the natural Sonne of god begotten of the substance of the Father from euerlasting and con-substantiall with the Father and the same GOD with the Father who is Creatour of all If then the Vbiquetaries collection bee lawfull and sound this doubtlesse of the Swenkefieldeans is lawfull also and sound but if the Swenkefieldeans collection bee corrupt and smelling of Eutyches heresie then that of the Vbiquetaries cannot bee at all good and sound But indeede both collections are Eutychian and Sophisticall they are Eutychian because two natures which are made equall in properties essentiall or which get and haue the same or equall essential properties are indeede made one nature and substance or are two substaunces of one nature Both opinions take cleane away the nature of the humanitie transform it into the God-head but the latter dooth further make two persons in Christ of the same nature It is also Sophisticall because whether the person of Christ be considered in it selfe as it was a person being but one and perfect that before the incarnation subsisting in one nature onely or whether it bee considered as it is incarnate and now subsisting in two natures yet stil the transition and passing from the person to the natures is faultie and Sophistical For neither is it necessary that what is truly in and attributed vnto a person the same also should bee reallie in al things concurring in that person and bee affirmed of all The reason is because the parts or natures though vnited in the same person yet retain their properties operations vnconfounded Wherefore that which is proper vnto the godhead cannot agree vnto the person in respect of the flesh also but only in respect of the godhead Whole man vnderstandeth discourseth and hath motion of wil ye◠he doth not this by his finger or body but by his mind only whole man is mortal and doth go eat and drink yet none but a mad man or an epicure will therefore say that the soule also is mortal or doth goe eat and drink So not halfe but the whole person of Christ was before Abraham and from euerlasting did create and dooth preserue all thinges and tooke flesh But the fleshe neither was from euerlasting neither did create nor dooth preserue all thinges nor tooke flesh but was created and being assumpted and taken is susteined of the Word and in it So whole christ was wounded dead yet not his Godhead nor his soul This is wel learnedly declared explicated by Damascene lib. 3. ca. 7. in these words Whole christ is perfect GOD but not THE WHOLE of Christ that is not both natures are God For he is not god only but also man And WHOLE christ is perfect mā but not THE WHOLE of christ is man For he is not man only but god too For THE WHOLE signifieth the nature WHOLE the person Wherefore if the Vbiquetaries wil at al haue the illation enforcing of their conclusiō on these premisses to be necessary The Maior propositiō must be expoūded after this sort The person is god creator omnipotent eueriwhere whole that is as concerning all that which it is or in which it dooth subsist or which doth belong vnto it But the Maior taken in this sense is false most absurd as was shewed a litle before For the true sense thereof is this The person is euery where whole that is without diuision or sundering of natures or subsisting vndiuidably in two natures But the humanity is not that whole subsisting in two natures Not euery thing then that agreeth really to the person agreeth also really to the flesh And albeit the person doth subsist in the humanitie the God-head mutually vnited one to the other yet as it hath beene said it is not hereof enforced that because the person is euery where therefore the humanity should be in proper substance present euery where For this is proper to the godhead neither is it really communicated to any creature or is in any Reply The diuinity is one present in al pleces but especially with the church The diuinity is but halfe christ Therefore only halfe christ is present with the church Answere 1. ther is an ambiguity doubtfulnes in the words halfe christ For if by halfe christ they vnderstād one nature which is vnited to the other in the same person the whole reasō may be granted namely that not both but one nature onely of christ though vnited to th' other that is his godhead is present with vs al things in his proper substance in al places at al times But they by halfe christ vnderstand craftily sophistically the one nature separated from the other as if the godhead were made to be with vs bare naked not incarnat But in this sense the Minor is false the Vbiquetaries own inuētiō For the same Word by reasō of the immēsnes infinitie of his essēce is whole euerywhere without his manhood yet so that he withall is abideth whole in his manhood personally vnited thereūto Wherefore the Word nether is nor worketh any where not vnited to the flesh albeit the flesh because it hath not an infinit essence but reteineth it circūscribed in place is not made to be present substātially in al those places in which the word incarnat or the word mā is 2. There is an ambiguity also double significatiō in the word present For the presēce wherby christ is presēt with his church is not of one kind Wherefore if the Maior be vnderstood of the presence of his substance in al places of his being amongest
is communicatings or such as make thinges common the properties and operations of natures are to be distinguished from the office of the person froÌ„ the honor which in respect of the office is due vnto the person Likewise one effect or act theandricall that is both of god and man or woorke or benefite from one operation or action as the whole from a part The office is common to both natures but the natures proper faculties of woorking and actions in exequuting that office are not common to both natures For that the same shoulde bee both proper and common doth implie a manifest contradiction So the worke and benefite of whole Christ is a certaine whole thing and is as it were compound and common to both natures but there are two partes heereof and diuerse operations proper to each nature which are wrought yet iointlie and belong to the same person which is Christ God and man that is both are wrought of one person according to diuerse causes and originals of woorking or according to diuerse natures but not by one and the same nature By these groundes it is easie to dissolue assoile most of the Sophismes and cauils with which at this time both the Schwenkefildians and Vbiquetaries are woont to glose and blanch that their real communicating of essential properties in natures and their Eutychian deifieng of Christs flesh to thrust the same vpon the simple for the true glory maiestie of Christ himselfe For thus they reason The offices benefits of the Mediatour his redemption intercession purging froÌ„ sins quickning sitting at the right hand of the Father his dominion and Lordlie power ouer al creatures his presence with the church beholding ruling al things raising the dead iudging both quicke and dead al these agree to Christ according to both natures Therefore the humanitie as wel as the diuinitie is also it selfe reallie omniscient searcher of harts omnipotent present in the substance of his bodie at the same moment in al places doth of it selfe know al things hear our coÌ„plaintes praiers giue the holie ghost work by him in the hearts of the chosen faith and conuersion to conclude in respect of these things the humanitie it selfe also is for it selfe adorable to be adored as wel as the godhead To these and the like there is one and a readie aunswere namelie That it is ill going from the person and from the office honor of the person to the properties operations of the natures Or The societie and coniunction of the office and honor dooth not cause or inferre the same properties or operations of both natures Or In the affirmation of the office honor are not signified the same properties of both natures nor the working of the same operations but the coniunction or concurrence of distinct operatioÌ„s proceeding froÌ„ distinct properties to the same effect or action theandrical that is of god and man The reason is because of redemption quickning adoration the like which are the functions benefits worship of the whole person there are moe and diuerse manners and parts which all agree reallie to one the same person but not to one the same nature but some to the god-head onlie some onlie to the manhood Wherefore this Maior of the reason is false Whatsoeuer thinges agree vnto Christ god and man according to both natures the same also doe agree after the same manner and as touching all parts to both natures For it doth not followe because the godhead is redemptresse therefore also it suffered and was dead Now that those things which in the person office of the Mediatour are and abide proper vnto one nature neither are made nor are by reason of the vnion common to both natures maâ—â— be shewed at large but now let these few suffice First Such as is the vnion of the natures such is the communicating of the properties But the vnion of the natures was not made in the natures or into one nature but in the person or vnto one person Therefore the communicating of the properties was made in the person not in the natures that is the vnion maketh the properties of both natures common not to one nature but to one person For not one nature but one person hath truly as two natures so also double properties and operations and those infinitely differing created and increate finite and infinite Wherefore as by vnion the man-hoode was not made the God-head or God so neither is it immense infinit and omnipotent But contrariwise man neuerthelesse is trulie and reallie as God eternal so omnipotent also and eueriewhere and giuer of the Holy Ghost The reason is Because not the manhood but the Man Christ hath indeed in his substance the eternall and immense God-head Secondly That which is proper to one can not bee common to moe that is can not exist or be found together in other subiects also of diuers nature For to be proper and to be common are contradictory therfore in fardest repugnancie Thirdlie There can not be made one omnipotencie and one omnipotent operation to be of both natures whereby as well the manhood as the Godhead should be reallie omnipotent and worke diuine thinges but there must needes be also one essence of both whereby the manhood also must bee reallie God For the omnipotency which they wil haue one and the same to be communicated vnto the flesh is the Godhead it selfe Fourthly If Christs humanitie in the office of the Mediator doth it selfe reallie effectuallie perfourme not onely that which belongeth vnto the flesh but also those thinges which are proper vnto the Godhead then either his Godhead shall bee idle and doe nothing in the woorke of our redemption or surelie the fleshe assumpted shall doe more and more shall be due and yeelded vnto it than to the Word which assumed and tooke it Fiftly Jf the flesh because it is saide to bee quickning is also omnipotent and doth by proper vertue regenerate mens hartes after the same sort also may it bee saide that the God-head also because it is redemptresse is subiect to suffering and did suffer For both quickning and redeeming are properties of the office common to both natures but not after one and the same manner Sixtly The whole maiesty of the God-head is that it is an essence existing not of another but of it selfe and subsisting by it selfe spirituall or incorporeal eternall immense vnchaungeable of infinite power wisedom goodnes c. That is the whole Maiesty compriseth all the perfections and operations proper vnto the Godhead But omnipotencie is the whole maiestie of the God-head according to the supposition of the Vbiquetaries For so Schmideline writeth in the 142. conclusion of his disputation of the Lords Supper of the communicating of the properties had at Tubinge in the yeare M.D.LXXXII In the word omnipotencie I comprise the whole maiestie of the godhead And in his 143. conclusion Omnipotencie is
the verie essence it selfe of the God-head c. Therefore if Gods omnipotencie bee really communicated to Christs humanitie so that this also is by reason of the omnipotency communicated vnto it reallie omnipotent of necessity then by reason of the same omnipotency really communicated Christes humanitie shall bee indeed an essence subsisting of it selfe and by it selfe incorporeall eternall immense creatres of all thinges that is God himselfe blessed for euer and so by consequent the diuine person For an essence intelligent subsisting by it selfe which also is God must needs be the person And these are the fruits of reall communicating of properties in natures The participation of the God-head exaltation and maiestie of the flesh and such like is not a real communicating of the essentiall properties of the God-heade made into the humane nature or an omnipresence omniscience omnipotency that is a God-head of the man-hood For such a communicating should not perfect but destroy the man-hoode and conuert it into the God-head and dissolue the personal vnion of distinct natures but it is First the verie vnion of the humanitie with the Word in such sort as it being created finite doth together with al the essential properties therof subsist not in a created person of the same humane nature but in the increate and eternal person of God the Word by reason of which vnion God the Word but not the God-head is is called trulie man and contrarie man but not the manhood is and is called truly eternall God No dignitie eminence can be imagined greater than this neither doth it agree to anie but to the flesh of Christ onely Secondly Jt is the excellencie of gifts For these christs humanitie receiued without measure that is all whatsoeuer and most great and most perfect that maie fall into a created and finite nature Thirdly The office of the mediator to the perfourming whereof the vnited but yet distinct properties and operations of both natures doe necessarily concur Fourthly The honor and worship which by reason of the Mediatorship agreeth is giueÌ„ to whole christ according to bâ—th natures keeping still as was before saide the difference of properties and operations in natures Now whatsoeuer testimonies some bring either out of the Scriptures or out of the Fathers which were sound in faith thereby to proue that their Eutychian transmutation and a third kind of communicating forged by themselues that is exequation or equalling of natures all those testimonies indeed belong either to the grace of vnion of the natures which is signified by the communicating of properties or to the grace of Christes Headship which compriseth the office and honour of the Mediatour which are affirmed of whole Christ by waie of communicating or to the habituall grace that is the created giftes which Christ receiued without measure which are properly affirmed of the flesh or humanitie These giftes which are also called graces are not properlie effectes of the personal vnion as are the attributes or properties of the natures and office First because they are communicated to the manhoode as well of the Father and the Holie Ghost as of the Word or Sonne For he is said to haue receiued of the Father the spirite without measure that is aboundauntlie likewise to be annointed with the Holy Ghost And if the giftes were effects of the vnion it would follow of necessity that the flesh was vnited not to the Son only but to the Father also and the holy Ghost Secondlie The vnion of the flesh with the Woord was from the verie moment of the conception alwaies most perfect But the consummation and perfection of giftes was not vntil the accomplished time of his resurrection ascension For hee was indeede humble weake and contemned he was indeede ignorant of some things he did indeede encrease in wisedome stature and in fauour not with men onely but also with God himselfe Thirdly The flesh when it was in the state of humility had not immortality or a nature not subiect to sufferings or the like and yet remained it alwaies vnited with the Woorde Wherefore the habitual giftes or graces of the humanitie for which it is also in it selfe reallie wise mighty iust holie follow not the personal vnion in respect of dependency as the effect followeth and dependeth of this cause but onely in respect of order Because namely the humane nature was first to subsist and bee before it were enriched with giftes and it subsisteth vnited to the Woord in the very first moment of the conception But after what maner the humanitie is vnited vnto the Sonne of God hath beene said before For by the special and miraculous working of the holy Ghost in the womb of the virgine of her blood was the flesh of christ formed sanctified and vnited according to subsistence or personally vnto the Wâ—ord 4 Why it was necessarie that the two natures should bee vnited in the person or subsistence of the sonne of God FOR what cause Christ our Mediatour was to bee together both a true and perfect iust man and true that is by nature GOD hath beene declared of vs before in the common place of the Mediatour in the 4 question pag. 237. For the woorke of our redemption could not haue bin compassed and finished by the Mediator without the concurrence of diuers natures operations in the same person For albeit he suffred died in the flesh yet his passion and suffering would not haue that force and efficacy to redeeme iustifie sanctifie vs neither could christ haue applied those benefites vnto vs except he had bin withal true and natural God Of the Incarnation of the Word the confession made by the Fathers of Antioch against Paulus Samosatenus TAKEN OVT OF THE ACTES OF THE FIRST EPHESINE COVNCEL VVEE confesse our Lord Iesus Christ begotten before all worlds of his Father but in the last times borne according to the flesh of the Virgine by the holy Ghost subsisting in one person onely made of the celestiall God-head and humane flesh Whole God and whole man Whole God also with his bodie but not according to his body god Whole man also with his God head but not according to his God head man Againe whole adorable also with his bodie but not according to his bodie adorable Whole adoring also with his Godhead but not according to his godhead adoring Whole increat also with his body but not according to his body increated Whole formed also with his Godhead but not according to his godhead formed Whole consubstantial with god also with his body but not according to his body consubstantiall as neither also according to his Godhead he is coessentiall with men but hee is according to the flesh consubstantiall vnto vs existing also in his Godhead For when wee say hee is according to the spirit consubstantiall with God wee doe not say hee is according to the spirit coessentiall with men And contrarily when wee affirme him to bee according to the
flesh câ—nsubstantiall with men we doe not affirme him to bee according to the fleshe consubstantial with God For as according to the spirit he is not consubstantial with vs For according to this he is consubstantial with God So of the other side he is not according to the flesh coessentiall with god but according to this he is consubstantiall with vs. And as wee pronounce these to bee distinct diuerse one from the other not to bring in a diuision of one vndiuided person but to note the distinction and vnconfoundablenes of the natures and properties of the Word and the flesh so we affirme and worship those as vnited which make to the manner of the vndiuided vnion or composition Vigilius Lib. 4. against Eutyches IF there be one nature of the Word the flesh how then seeing the Word is euery where is not the flesh also found euery where For when it was in the earth it was not verily in heauen and now because it is in heauen it is not verily in the earth and in so much it is not as that as touching it wee looke for Christ to come from heauen whom as touching the Word we beleeue to bee in the earth with vs. Wherefore according to your opinion either the Word is coÌ„teined in place with the flesh or the flesh is euery where with the Word where as one nature doth not receiue any contrarie or diuers thing in it selfe and it is a thing diuerse and far vnlike to be circumscribed in place and to be euerie where and seeing the Word is euerie where and the flesh is not euerie where it is apparent that one and the same Christ is of both natures and is euerie where as touching the nature of his Godhead but is not euerie-where as touching the nature of his manhood is created and hath no beginning is subiect to death and cannot die the one he hath by the nature of the Word whereby hee is god the other by the nature of his flesh whereby the same God is man Wherefore that one son of God and the same made the sonne of man hath a beginning by the nature of his flesh and hath no beginning by the nature of his Godhead was created by the nature of his flesh and was not created by the nature of his godhead circumscribed in place by the nature of his flesh and not conteined in any place by the nature of his Godhead is lower also than the Angels by the nature of his flesh and is equal with the father according to the nature of his God-head died by the nature of his flesh and neuer died by the nature of his Godhead This is the Catholique faith and confession which the Apostles deliuered the martyrs established and the faithfull hitherto holde and mainetaine Now haue wee in few wordes expounded those articles of the Apostolique creede which intreate of the person of Christ and haue withall declared in the exposition thereof those things which are necessarie for vs to knowe both of the diuinitie of Christ and of his humane nature which was taken by the Word of the seede of Dauid vnited personally with the Word by the vertue of the holy ghost and begotten in maruelous nanner of the Virgines substance And it was requisite not to suffer that any sinne should passe or bee deriued into his substance 1. Because hee was to satisfie for sinne 2. Because it was not conuenient or meet that the Woorde the sonne of God should take a nature defiled with sinne To beleeue then in the son of God conceiued by the holy ghost is to beleeue 1. That he was made man after a marueilous manner and that hee was made one Christ of a diuine and an humane nature 2. That hee being so holily conceiued and borne doth purchase for vs the right and power to bee the sonnes of God Because this person is sufficient able to recouer for vs our lost righteousnes and to bestowe it on vs. For hee is vnited with the Worde that is hee is true and naturall God and man such as the Mediatour ought to bee Hee will also performe this because he was borne to this end euen to sanctifie vs. Of al these euerie one of vs may certainlie collect and conclude That this Christ is our Mediatour And the reason of this collection and consequence is Because by this that he is the only begotten Sonne of God it is manifest that Christ is true God consubstantial coeternal and equall with the Father By his holy conception and natiuitie it is also manifest that hee is true man and that perfectly iust and vnited with the God-heade or Woord and such a one was it requisite our Mediatour should be OF CHRISTES HVMILIATION THE course of order requireth that now consequentlie we expound and declare those Articles which treat of the office of Christ and first of al of his humiliation or humbling which is the former part of Christes office whereunto belong these Articles Hee suffered vnder Pontius Pilate was crucified dead buried descended into hel After we haue expounded these we wil come vnto the rest of the Articles which speake of his glorification which is the other part of Christs office HE SVFFERED VNDER PONTIVS PILATE I Beleeue in Christ which suffered that is I beleeue 1. That Christ froÌ„ the verie moment of his conception susteined calamities mesâ—ries of al sorts for my sake 2. That at that his last time he suffered all the most bitter tormentes both of bodie and soule for my sake 3. That he felt the horrible and dreadfull wrath of God thereby to make recompence for mine and others sinnes and to appease his ire and wrath against mankind These two are different To beleeue that christ suffered and to beleeue in Christ which suffered For that is to haue onely an historical faith of Christes passion neither to repose anie confidence in him but this is to beleeue not onlie that Christ suffered but also to repose and place our trust and confidence in Christs suffering and Passion OF CHRISTES PASSION THE Passion of Christ onelie doth followe next his conception and natiuitie 1. Because in his Passion consisteth our saluation 2. Because his whole life was a Passion suffering and calamitie Yet notwithstanding many things maie and ought to be obserued out of the storie of the whole race of his life on earth For that 1. doth shew This person to be the promised Messias seeing in him concur and are fulfilled all the Prophecies 2. That storie is a consideration or meditation of that humility or obedience which hee perfourmed vnto his Father The chiefe questions of Christes Passion are these 1 What Christ suffered 2 Whether he suffered according to both natures 3 What was the impellent cause of Christes Passion 4 What the final cause or end thereof 1 WHAT CHRIST SVFFERED BY the name of Passion is vnderstoode the whole humiliation or the obedience of his whole humiliation all the miseries
tormentes ignominies paines and grifes vnto all which Christ was subiect and obnoxious as wel in soule as in body from the point of his natiuity vntill the howre of his death resurrection Mat. 26.38 My soul is very heauy euen vnto the death Mat. 27.46 My God my God why hast thou forsaken me Isa 53.4 Surelie he hath carried our sorrowes But principally by the name of Passion is signified the last act of the humiliation and pains of Christ the chiefe part of which his pains and dolours was in his soule wherein hee felt the ire and wrath of God against sinne which also was the cause why he so trembled and shooke at death was so faint-harted in his death whereas other Martyrs of Christ haue susteined stoutlie and couragiouslie extreme torments For the torments punishments of others haue no proportion with the torments and punishments of Christ For others as Stephen Laurence and the like susteined only corporall paines and torments but were vpheld within by the holy ghost But Christ suffered the paines both of body soule For he suffered first our infirmity that is the infirmities of humane nature he hungered thirsted was wearie was stroken with sadnesse and griefe 2 Hee suffered pouertie Luk 9.58 The sonne of man hath not whereon to lay his head 3 He suffered infinite iniuries contumelies slaunders layings in wait for him backbitings reproches blasphemies annihilating and contempt Psalm 22.7 I am a worme and not a man Isay 53.2 He hath neither forme nor beutie when wee shall see him there shall bee no forme that we should desire him 4 Hee suffered the Tentations of the diuel Mat. 4.1 He. 4.15 He was in all thinges tempted in like sort 5 Hee suffered the death of the bodie and that reprochefull and contumelious euen the death of the Crosse 6 He suffered the most grieuous torments of soule that is he found the sense and feeling of the wrath of God against sinne to be laide on him Hereof it was that he cried with a loude voice My God why hast thou forsaken me as if he should saie why doost thou not driue and put away from me so great torments For he signifieth by those words not a diuulsion or separation of his Godhead from his manhood but the differring and delaying of help and succour We see then what and howe great thinges Christ hath suffered for vs which are therefore proposed vnto vs and sette before our eyes to giue vs to consider 1. The history it selfe of Christs passion agreeing with Gods sacred oracles and prophecies 2. The cause or fruites of Christes Passion 3. His example that wee are also to enter into eternal life and heauenlie glorie by death as did Christ and these three thinges are especially to be considered in Christs Passion Obiection There is no proportion betweene temporal punishment and eternal Christ suffered only temporal paines and punishmentes Therefore he could not satisfie gods iustice Aunswere There is no proportion betweene temporall and eternall punishment if they bee considered as beeing both in the same degree and in the same subiect Question But how may the raunsome of one person answere for the sins of an infinit number of men Aunswere It may and that for these two causes 1. Because he is true God which suffered Obiection But god cannot die and suffer Aunswere God cannot suffer in that he is God Or further we graunt that Christ was not God in that he suffered died Obiect Christ is not God in that he suffered Therefore it is false which is saide Acts 20.28 That God hath purchased the Church with his owne bloode Ans This was spoken by a communicating of the properties but this was in the person not in the nature that is That person which is God and man purchased the Church The communicating of properties is to attribute that to the whole person which is proper vnto one nature and this is attributed in a concrete voice not in an abstract because the concrete voice signifieth the person in which are both natures and the property of that nature whereof some thing is affirmed But the abstract name signifieth the nature which is in the person but not the person And therefore it is that nothing hindereth why that which is proper to one nature may not bee affirmed of the whole person so that propertie it selfe be in the person But contrarie of the abstract name onely the properties of that nature are affirmed vnto which they properly belong As of the God-heade which is the abstract name no propertie of the man-hoode maie be affirmed but onelie the properties of the God-heade because the God-heade signifieth not the person which hath both natures but onelie the diuine nature it selfe But of God which is the concrete name the properties not of the God-head only but of the manhood also may be affirmed because God signifieth not the diuine nature but the person which hath both the diuine nature and humane The second cause why the raunsome of one person may aunswere for the sinnes of an infinite number is the grieuousnesse of his punishment because hee suffered that which wee should haue suffered for euer His Passion therefore is equiualent to euerlasting punishment yea it surpasseth it For that God should suffer is more than that all the creatures shoulde perish euerlastinglie 2 According to which nature Christ suffered CHRIST suffered not according to both natures neither according to his God-head but according to his humane nature onely both in body and soule For his diuine nature is immortal Now he so suffered according to his humanity that by his death and Passion he made satisfaction for infinite sinnes of men Question But why could not his God-head suffer Answere Because it is not changeable neither can that which is life it selfe dy This susteined vpheld the humane nature in paines after death restored it to life Obiection God purchased the Church with his owne bloode Actes 20.28 Therefore the god-head suffered Aunswere It doth not follow because an argument from the concrete which is God to the abstract which is the God-heade is if no consequence Againe the kind of affirmation is altered God is said to haue died by a figure of speech which is Synecdoche vsed whē we signifie the whole by a part as whole Christ by God and by a communicating of the properties But when it is said The god-head died that admitteth no figure as beeing a meere abstract The concrete signifieth the subiect or person hauing the nature or forme But the abstract signifieth the bare nature and forme onelie Wherefore the argument doth not follow A man is compounded of the elementes and is corporeal Therefore his soul also is corporeal This cannot follow Because al things agree not to the forme which agree to the subiect the soule is the forme of man man is the essentiall subiect of the soule Wherefore neither doth it follow Christ God died Therefore Christs God-heade died For
presently For so had hee perished for euer Wherefore the Sonne offered a mitigation and lenifieng raised him vp to a new life that stil notwithstanding he should remaine subiect to the corporal death which yet should not be deadlie and pernicious vnto him 3 In respect of the promise made to the fathers both by words as in Isa 53.7 He is brought as a sheepe to the slaughter and as a sheepe before the shearer is dum so openeth he not his mouth by sacrifices wherby god promised that christ should dy dy such a death as should be an equiualēt price for the sins of the whole world This could not be the work of any meere creature but of the son of god only and therefore it was requisite necessarie that the Sonne of God should suffer so grieuous a death for vs. Obiection Then they doe not satisfie gods iustice who are punished because their punishment is endlesse and eternall Answere They satisfie by eternal punishment Replie So then might we also be deliuered from the curse by our selues Aunswere So then shall wee neuer bee deliuered but shall susteine punishment eternall which is without ende Out of this which hath beene saide we may draw this doctrine 1 That sinne is most of all to bee eschued of vs which could not bee expiated but by the death of the sonne of god 2. That wee ought to bee thankefull to the sonne of god for this his so great a benefit of vnspeakable grace fauour bestowed vpon vs. 3. That all our sinnes how many how great and how-greeuous soeuer they be are expiated and done awaie by the death alone of Christ 3 The fruit of Christs death THE fruite cōmoditie of Christs death is the whole work of our redemption 1. Iustification or remission of sinnes because the iustice of God requireth that God should not punish a sinner twise but hee hath punished our sinnes in Christ Therefore hee will not punish againe the same in vs. 1. Iohn 1.7 The bloud of Iesus Christ purgeth vs from all sin as well originall as actuall as well of fact or doing what we should not as of omission or not dooing what we should The cause of this effect is the death of Christ 2. The gift of the Holy ghost through his working regeneration a new life because Christ by his death hath not onely obtained for vs pardon for our sinne and reconciliation with god but also the gift of the holy Ghost that by his working and vertue the old man might bee crucified with Christ that is that by the Holy Ghost through the efficacie of Christs merite our engraffing into him our corrupt and as yet not regenerated nature might bee abolished in vs and that of the contrarie righteousnesse might be begunne in vs the image of God destroied by the Diuel in vs might bee restored and wee by the same spirit moued to shew yeelde all thankefulnes for so great a benefite 1. Cor. 1.30 Christ is made vnto vs righteousnesse wisedom sanctification and redemption Col. 2.10 Ye are compleat in him The death of christ is the impellēt or motiue cause in effectuating our regeneration in two respectes 1. In respect of god because for the death of christ god pardoneth vs our sinne and giueth vs the holie ghost Galat 4.6 Because yee are Sonnes god hath sent forth the spirite of his Son into your harts which crieth Abba Father 2. In respect of vs also it is an impellent cause because they who apprehend Christs merit by a true faith and apply his death vnto themselues for them it is vnpossible to be vnthankfull For all after they are once iustified prepare and addresse themselues to do those things which are grateful vnto God for regeneration or the desire and endeuour of obeying God cannot bee separated from the applying of his death vnto vs nor the benefite of regeneration from the benefite of iustification All who are iustified are also regenerated and sanctified And all who are regenerated are also iustified Obiection 1. Pet. 1.3 The Apostle attributeth our regeneration to Christes resurrection why then is regeneration here attributed to his death Aunswere It is attributed vnto Christes death as touching his merite for hee merited regeneration for vs by dieng And it is attributed to Christes resurrection in respect of the applieng of it for by rising from the dead he applieth vnto vs regeneration and giueth vs the Holie Ghost 3. Eternal life is also the fruit of Christs death Ioh. 3.16 God so loued the woorld that he gaue his onely begotten Sonne that whosoeuer beleeueth in him should not perish but haue euerlasting life 1. Iohn 5.11 GOD hath giuen vnto vs eternall life and this life is in his Sonne Obiection Jf Christ died for vs why then die we too For hee should not die for whom another hath alreadie died otherwise the satisfaction would seeme double Aunswere He for whom another hath died should not dy as thereby to satisfie that is so that his death should be any merite or satisfaction but there are other causes why we must die For wee die not to satisfie the iustice of God but by death as a meane to receiue those giftes which Christ by his death hath merited for vs. For this our temporal death is 1. An admonition of the greatnesse of sinne 2. A purging and cleansing of vs. For by death are purged out the reliques and remaines of sinnes in vs. 3. A translating into eternal life For by corporal death is the passage of the faithfull made into eternall life Reply If the cause be taken away the effect is takē away but the cause of death in vs which is sin is taken awaie by Christ therefore the effect also which is death it selfe ought to be taken awaie Ans Where al cause is taken awaie the effect also is taken awaie but in vs all cause of death is not taken awaie as concerning the purging out of sinne albeit it bee taken awaie as touching the remission of sinne Or we maie aunswere vnto the Minor proposition That sinne is indeede taken awaie as touching the guilt but it is not taken away as touching the matter of sinne which as yet remaineth AND BVRIED THE causes of Christes buriall are 1 That we might knowe that hee was dead indeed For the liuing are not buried but the dead only And hither belong some parts of the storie penned by the Euangelists as that christ was pearced with a launce that he was taken downe from the Crosse that he was annointed wrapt in linnen clothes For as by the touching feeling of him by his eating appearing after his resurrection we gather that he did indeed rise again so of the other we collect that he was indeede dead 2 That the last part of his humiliation whereby hee did debase himselfe for our sakes might bee accomplished That was his burial in which his body was as well cast into the earth as any other
not adorned with diuine properties it followeth that there is no difference betweene christ and other saints For no other difference can bee found but the equalling of his manhood with his god-head For the difference betweene christ and the Saints either is in substance essence or in properties But not in substance Therefore in properties Answer We deny that there is any difference between Christ and the Saints either in substance or in properties or giftes for this enumeration or reckoning is not perfect complete There is wanting a third difference whereby Christ is distinguished from all the Saintes namely the secret personall vnion of both natures Reply Phil. 2.9 It is said God hath giuen him a name aboue euerie name Aunswere 1 God hath giuen him such a name that is together with his godhead For as the godhead so the properties of the godhead were giuen him of the Father 2. God gaue such a name to him that is to christ man by personal vnion not by anie exequation or equalling of both natures By these three obiections it appeareth that the Vbiquetaries of whome these thinges are brought fall into foule errors First into the errour of Nestorius because they sunder the vnited natures in christ Secondly into the error of Eutyches because they confound the same natures Thirdlie They disarme vs of those weapons wherewith we shoulde fight against Arrians and Sabellians For they doe fouly eneruate and weaken all those places which prooue Christes diuinity by drawing them to the equalling of his humane nature with his diuine But wee are to obserue in how many respectes Christ is said to be present with vs. First he is present with vs by his spirite and God-head Secondly he is present as touching our faith and confidence wherewith we behold him Thirdlie he is present in mutual dilection and loue because he loueth vs and we him so that he doth not forget vs. Fourthly he is present with vs in respect of his vnion with humane nature that is in the coniunction of the soule with the body For the same spirit is in vs and in him who ioyneth and knitteth vs vnto him Fiftlie hee is said to bee present with vs in respect of that hope which wee haue of our consummatiō that is that certain hope which we haue of comming vnto him 3 Wherefore christ ascended into Heauen CHRIST ascended first for his owne and his Fathers glorie For 1. He was to haue a celestiall kingdome therefore hee might not abide in earth Eph. 4.10 He that descended is euen the same that ascended farre aboue al heauens that hee might fill all thinges 2. It was meete that the Head should be glorified with excellencie of giftes aboue all the blessed as being the members of that Head which could not haue bin done in earth Secondly Hee ascended in respect of vs and that for foure causes 1. That hee might gloriously make intercession for vs namely by his vertue efficacie and wil. For it is the will of the Father and the Son that his oblation and sacrifice shoulde bee for euer of force for vs and so by making intercession for vs he should apply his benefites and the merites of his death vnto vs vnto which application was required his whole glorification the partes whereof are his Resurrection Ascension and Session at the right hand of the Father Obiection He made intercession for vs also on earth Aunswere This intercession was made in respect of the intercession to come For of that cōdition he made intercession before that hauing accomplished his sacrifice on earth he should present himselfe for euer a Mediatour in the celestial Sanctuarie 2. That we might also ascend and might be assured of our ascension Ioh. 14.2 I wil prepare you a place In my fathers house are manie dwelling places that is places to abide for euer for hee speaketh of continuing 3. That hee might send the holy Ghost and by him gather comfort and defend his church from the Diuel vnto the worldes end Iohn 16.7 If I goe not awaie the comforter will not come vnto you Obiection Hee gaue the holie Ghost both before and after his resurrection Wherefore hee went not for that cause awaie as to send the holie ghost Aunswere Hee had giuen him indeede before but not in such plentifull manner as in the daie of Pentecost Againe that sending of the holy ghost which was from the beginning of the world in the church was done in respect of christ to come who shoulde at length raigne in humane nature and giue largelie and in aboundaunt manner the holie Ghost Before his Ascension hee gaue him not in such plentie because of the decree of God who purposed to do both by man glorified And the sending of the holy Ghost was the chiefe part of Christes glorie Therefore it is said As yet was not the holie ghost that is the woonderfull and plentifull sending of the holy Ghost because Christ was not as yet glorified 4. That he might promise for vs in the sight of God that he would bring to passe that we should no more offend 4 What is the difference between christs Ascension ours CHrists ascension and ours agree Both in that it is to the same place and in that also it is to be glorified But they differ 1. Because christ ascended by his owne power and vertue wee not by our own but by his Ioh. 3.13 No man hath ascended into heauen that is by his owne proper vertue but the Sonne of man We shal ascend by and for him Iohn 14.2 J goe to prepare you a place And Iohn 17.24 I wil that they which thou hast giuen me be with mee euen where I am 2. He ascended to be Head We to be his members Hee to glory agreeable for the Head and we shall ascend to glory fit for members He ascended to sit at the right hand of the Father we to sit indeede in his and his Fathers throne but that onely by participation not in the same degree and dignity with him Reuelat. 3.21 To him that ouercommeth will I graunt to sit with me in my throne euen as J ouercame and sit with my Father in his throne Christ therefore ascended as Heade of the Church wee shal ascend as members of this Head that we maie be partakers of his glory 3. Christs ascension was the cause of our ascēsion but it is not so of the contrarie 4. Whole christ ascended but not the whole of christ Because hee ascended as touching his humane nature onely and not as touching his diuine which also is on earth But the whole of vs shall ascend because wee haue onely a finite nature and that but one 5 What are the fruits of christs ascension THE chiefe fruites of christes ascension are First His Intercession which signifieth 1. The perpetual vertue and strength of christes Sacrifice 2. Both wils in christ both humane and diuine propitious and fauourable vnto vs whereby he will that for his Sacrifice
of the angels said hee at any time sit at my right till I make thine enimies thy foot-stoole Muchlesse will God speake this vnto man Obiection But it is said Reuel 3.21 To him that ouercommeth will J grant to sit with me in my throne Auns We shall sit there by participation where this must bee also granted that the same is the throne of the Father and the Sonne In the same throne many may sitte but not in the same dignitie And so christ will not giue that chiefe dignitie and glorie giuen him of his Father vnto any other Reply But to sit at Gods right hand is also to liue gloriouslie and blessedlie But this agreeth to vs. Therefore wee shall sit there Aunswer This is not a ful and sufficient definition because a blessed life agreeth both to vs Angels but the sitting at gods right hand doth not Whereupon these two articles are well adioined together He Ascended into Heauen he sitteth at the right hand of God the Father Now let vs in few wordes expound the definition which wee brought of Christes sitting at the right hande of the Father Christ sitteth then at the right hande of God the Father that is he is that person omnipotent by which the Father gouerneth al things immediatly But especially by which he defendeth the church against her enimies That this definition may be more ful and clear let vs briefly sift euery part thereof The Session therefore of Christ at the right hande of the Father is 1. The perfection of Christes diuine nature that is the equality of the Word with the Father which he did not receiue but euer had 2 The perfection of christes humane nature This perfection or excellency of Christes humane nature compriseth First The personall vnion of the humane nature with the Woord Coloss 2.9 In him dwelleth all the fulnesse of the godhead bodily Secondlie The collation or bestowing of giftes farre greater and more in number than are bestowed on al men or Angels and therfore in which he far excelleth both men and Angels Ioh. 1.16 Of his fulnesse haue al we receiued And cap. 3.34 God giueth him not the spirite by measure 3 The perfection or excellencie of the office of the Mediatour that is the Propheticall Priestly and Roiall function which christ now as the glorified Head of his church doth in his humane nature gloriously exercise in heauen This excellency of christs office is the very exalting of Christ in his Propheticall Priestly and Princely function that is the laying down of the infirmity of Christs humane nature and the perfection of glory which was due vnto Christ both in respect of his office as being a Prophet King and Priest in respect of his person as beeing God 4 The perfection of christs honour that is the adoration worship and reuerence which is yeelded vnto Christ both of men and Angels Heb. 1.6 Let all the Angels of God worship him Phil. 2.9 Hee hath giuen him a name aboue euerie name By these the like speeches are signified the partes of Christs sitting at Gods right hand But the name whereof is spoken in the wordes of the Apostle before aleaged is the excellencie of the person and office of Christ and a declaration of both by his visible maiestie that all may bee forced to confesse that this is the King by whom God ruleth all thinges So also did Stephen see him adorned with visible maiestie and glorie Christ had some partes also before of his excellency both of his office and of his person but he then came to the full perfection of all when being taken vp into heauen he was placed at the right hand of the Father By these partes nowe of christs sitting at the right hand of the Father the definition of his sitting may bee made more full in this wise when christ is said to sit at the right hand of the Father hee is saide to haue the same and equal power with the Father to excel all men and Angels in his humane nature both in giftes bestowed on him more and greater than on them as also in visible glorie and maiestie to shew himselfe Lord of men and Angels and of all things that are created In the name of the Father to rule and administer immediatly his kingdome in heauen and the whole world chiefely to gouern by his power immediately the church lastly to bee acknowleged and magnified of all as chiefe Lord and Head Many Obiections are by this definition refuted As 1. The Holy Ghost also is equal with God Therefore wee may truely say that hee also sitteth at the right hand of God Aunswere It doth not folow because the reason is grounded of an ill definition For although the Holy Ghost bee as well as the Father and the sonne Head and Lord and ruler of the Church yet doth it not agree to the Holy Ghost but to christ alone to sit at the right hand of the Father Because hee alone tooke humane nature was humbled dead buried rose againe ascended and is Mediatour And furder the Father woorketh immediately by the Sonne onely but by the holy Ghost the Father doth not worke immediatly but through the sonne For the same order is to be kept in their operation and working which is in the persons The Father worketh by him selfe but of himselfe because he is of none The Sonne worketh by himselfe not of himselfe because he is begotten of the Father The holy ghost worketh by himselfe but from the Father and the Sonne from whom he dooth proceed Therefore the father woorketh immediately by the Sonne because the Sonne is before the holy ghost yet not in time but in order but mediately the Father woorketh by the holy Ghost and therefore the Sonne is rightly saide to sitte at the right hand of the Father but not the holy Ghost 2. Obiection Christ before his Ascension was alwaies the glorious Head and King of the Church Therefore he cannot now be first after his ascension said to sitte at gods right hand Aunswere Againe this reason also is grounded vpon a bad definition Christ was alwaies glorious but hee was not alwaies aduaunced and exalted in the office of his Mediatorshippe to wit in his kingdome and priesthood Now first he began to haue the consummation and perfection of glory which before hee had not that is gloriously to rule and administer his kingdom and Priesthood in the Heauens Christ is called our Head 1 In respect of his perfection excellencie both as God and man And as concerning his godhead there is no doubt of it And as concerning his humane nature it is true because Christs humanitie is adorned with far greater gifts than is any creature especially by reason of the vnion thereof with the Word 2 Jn respect of his office and that 1 in regard of his merite then by reason of his power and efficacie For as the Head is the seat of al the exteriour and interiour senses wherein are seated
the vnderstanding will and whence the vitall spirites flow So from Christ as the Head flowe downe into vs the giftes and graces of the Holy Ghost 3 Whether Christ did alwaies sit at the right hand of God THIS Question shoulde not bee needefull except mens curiositie had made it such To the explication thereof is required the distinction first of natures then of time Now as coÌ„cerning Christs Diuinitie 1 That alwaies sitteth at the right hand of the Father as sitting signifieth an equal power and honour which Christ hath euen the same with the Father For Christs diuine nature was from euerlasting equal with the Father in honor and power Likewise as To sit at the right hand of the Father signifieth to be the Head of the Church For by the Woorde the Father did from the beginning alwaies preserue the Church as also by him hee created all thinges In this sense Christ was placed by his eternal generation at the right hand of the Father 2 Christ according to his diuinitie also dooth so sitte at the right hand of the Father as he was ordained to this his office from euerlasting 3 He dooth alwaies sit according to his diuinity at the right hande of God in that hee begunne from the verie beginning of the world to execute hath executed this his office And christ according to his diuinity was in this respect after his asceÌ„sion into heauen placed at the fathers right hand in that his diuinity then began to shew it selfe glorious in the body which in the time of his humiliation had hid it selfe froÌ„ being openly manifested declared For in the time of his humiliatioÌ„ which was wheÌ„ christ liued on earth his God-head also had humbled it selfe not by making it selfe weaker but by hiding it selfe onely and not shewing it selfe abroad Therefore thus Christ also according to his diuine nature was placed at his Fathers right hand namelie by laieng downe that humility which he tooke on him for our sake and by shewing foorth that glorie which hee had with his Father before the foundations of the woorlde were laide but had hid the same in the time of his humiliation not by adding any thing vnto it which it had not before neither by making it more bright powerfull neither by manifesting and declaring it before God but vnto men and by vsing fully and freely his right and authoritie which right and authoritie Christes diuinitie had as it were laid downe in the taking vp and assumption of humane nature Therefore he saith Iohn 17.5 Now glorifie mee thou Father with thy owne selfe with the glorie which J had with thee before the world was This glorie he had not with men Therefore he praieth that as hee had it alwaies with the Father so he might manifest it vnto men Wherefore this is not to be taken as if the Word receiued any change or alteration of his God-head but in that sense only which hath been said Now as concerning christes humane nature according to it hee was then first placed at the right hand of the Father when he asceÌ„ded into heauen then he attained to his glorification when he receiued that which before he had not Obiection Hee that sitteth at Gods right hande is euerie where Christ sitteth at Gods right hand Therefore he is euery where Aunswere This reason wee graunt in respect of the communicating of the properties to the person But if it be further concluded that according to the flesh he is euerie where there wil be more in the conclusion than was in the premisses Againe wee denie the consequence of the whole reason because the right hand of God and to sit at the right hande of God is not all one Neither yet is it simply true that hee which sitteth at Gods right hand sitteth euerie where For a part of the sitting at gods right hand is also that visible glorie and maiesty wherewith Christes humane nature was endowed and wherewith Stephen beheld him endued in heauen This is not euerie where but only in that placc where his body is seated and remaineth Obiection Hee ascended into heauen to fill al thinges that is with the presence of his flesh Aunswere It is a fallacy in misconstring the word He ascended to fill all thinges that is with his giftes and graces not with his flesh bones and skinne These are the monsters and dotinges whereby the Diuell carrieth Gods glory into derision Reply That nature which hath receiued omnipotency is euerie where christes humanitie hath receiued omnipotency Therefore it is euerie where Answere That nature which hath receiued omnipotency by a reall transfusion and communication of the properties is euerie where but not that which hath receiued it by personall vnion onely as the humane nature of Christ But yet notwithstanding manie thinges haue beene bestowed by reall transfusion on Christes humanitie to wit other qualities than which hee had on the crosse and in his humiliation Likewise far more and greater giftes than those which are bestowed either on Angels or on men and in respect of those giftes bestowed on him Christ is placed according to his humane nature at the right hand of his father but according to his diuinitie he is placed at the right hand of the Father as he being glorified and taken vp into heauen hath shewed forth the same hath attained vnto the perfection of glory or to the highest degree of glorification as touching his humanity 4 What are the fruites of Christes sitting at the right hand of the Father THE fruites of Christes sitting at the Fathers right hand are all the benefites of the kingdome and Priest-hoode of christ glorified As 1. His intercession for vs. 2. The gathering gouerning and garding of his church by the Worde and spirit 3. His defending of the church against her enemies 4. The abiection and destruction of the churches enemies 5. The glorification of the church The fruites or benefites of the kingdome of christ glorified â—â—e that he ruleth vs by the ministery of the Word and the holy Ghost that hee preserueth his ministery that hee giueth his Church resting places and is forcible by doctrine in conuerting the chosen that hee will at length raise vp from the dead his chosen and elect abolish all their infirmities glorifie them wipe away all teares from them enthronize them in his throne and make them Priests and Kings vnto his Father The fruite of the Priesthoode of Christ glorified is that he appeareth presenteth himselfe and maketh request and intercession for vs in heauen that forcibly so that the father denieth vs nothing through the vertue and force of his intercession Hence ariseth that consolation and comfort Because our Head our flesh and our brother sitteth at the right hand of the father he shall at length glorifie and quicken vs and that both in respect of his brotherly loue as also in regard of his office who is our Head Because also we haue such a High-Priest which
All other proofes and arguments may be referred vnto these 2 What is the last iudgement IN euerie iudgement are the Accused the Accuser the iudge the cause examination hearing of the cause the Law according to which iudgement is giuen the sentence of absolution and condemnation and the execution thereof according to the Lawes Judgement then in generall is an inquisition or examination of a cause by an ordinarie and lawfull iudge according to iust Lawes and a pronouncing of sentence and the exequution thereof according to iust Lawes Nowe is it easie to define this iudgement of God This iudge hath no neede of inquisition or examination of the cause or of witnesses and accusers seeing he is himselfe the searcher of harts Therefore there shal be only the iudge men of whom sentence shall be giuen the law according to which sentence shal be giuen execution The definition of it is this 1 The last iudgement is a iudgement which God shal exercise in the end of the world by christ who should then visiblie descend froÌ„ heauen in a cloud in the glorie maiesty of his Father Angels by whom also then shall be raised from the dead all men which haue died since the beginning of the world vnto the end thereof but the rest who are then liuing shal be sodainly chaunged and all presented before the tribunall seate of Christ who shall giue sentence of al and shal cast the wicked with the diuels into euerlasting tormentes but shall receiue vp the godlie vnto himselfe that they maie with him and blessed Angels enioie eternal happinesse and glorie in heauen It may be defined more brieflie on this wise The last iudgement shall bee a manifestation or declaration and separation of the iust and vniust who euer haue liued or shall liue from the beginning of the woâ—ld vnto the end proceeding from God by christ and a pronouncing of sentence on these men and an execution thereof according to the doctrine of the Law and Gospel The partes of this definition wee wil now in few wordes confirme 1. That iudgement shall be a manifestation of the iust and vniust For Reuel 20.12 The books shall be opened that the secrets of hartes may bee laied open 2. There shall bee a separation of the iust and vniust For Mat. 25.32 Christ shall place the sheep on his right hand but the goats on his left hand 3. This manifestation and separation shal be wrought of God by Christ If of God then shal it bee a most diuine and iust iudgement Rom. 3.6 Jf God bee vnrighteous how shall hee iudge the world Jt shall bee made and wrought by christ because Iohn 5.22 The Father hath committed all iudgement vnto the Son And Act. 17.31 God hath appointed to iudge the worlde by a man 4. Jâ— shall bee a pronouncing of sentence Mat. 25.34 Come yee Blessed of my Father We are Blessed of God not in Adam but in his seed and therefore the sentence shall bee giuen according to the gospel For by nature wee are subiect vnto the wrath of God Therefore also shall the godly say When saw wee thee hungering or thirsting They shall confesse that the retribution of rewardes commeth not by their merit but by his grace Furder after this manner the wicked and the godly shall bee iudged according to the Lawe and Gospell Absolution shall bee principally according to the Gospel but shal be confirmed by the Law Condemnation shal bee principally by the Lawe but shall be confirmed of the Gospel Sentence shal bee giuen on the wicked according to their owne merite Sentence shall be giuen on the godlie according to Christes merite applyed vnto them by faith a testimonie and witnesse of which faith shal be their workes Now to be iudged is to bee declared iust before the tribunal of Christ and to enter into euerlasting life and that with a respect and condition of faith which is required in the Gospell Obiection But vnto euerie man shall be giuen according to his workes Therefore iudgement shall be giuen on al according to the doctrine of the Law Aunswere In this sense shal be giuen also vnto the elect according to their works not that their works are merites but in that they are the effects of faith Wherefore vnto the elect shal be giuen according to their woorkes that is they shal be iudged according to faith to be iudged according to faith is to be iudged according to the Gospel But the iudge maketh mention of our woorks and not of faith First because he wil haue it knowen to others why he so iudgeth least the vngodly condemned persons might obiect that hee giueth vs eternal life vniustly Wherefore he wil shew them our workes and will bring them forth as testimonies to refute them that we haue in this life applyed vnto vs Christes merit Secondly That wee maie haue comfort in this life that we shall hereafter according to our works stand at his right hand 3 Who shall be iudge CHrist shall bee the iudge Iohn 5.22 Hee hath committed all iudgement vnto the Son Neither yet are the Father the holie Ghost remoued from this iudgement But Christ immediatly shal speake and giue sentence and that in his humane nature And when he speaketh God shal speake not onely because he himselfe is God but because the Father shal speake by him The iudgement then shall belong vnto all three persons of the God-head as concerning their consent and authority but vnto Christ as touching the publishing and exequuting of the iudgement For Christ shall visibly giue sentence of all which sentence he shal also together execute The church also shal iudge as touching the approbation and allowing of this iudgement as Christ saith Luk. 22.30 That the Apostles shal sit on twelue seates and shall iudge the twelue tribes of Israel that is they shall subscribe vnto Christes iudgement and approoue his sentence The causes why Christ man shall bee iudge are these 1. Because the church is to bee glorified by the same Mediatour by whom and for whom it was iustified Act. 17.31 God wil iudge the woorld in righteousnesse by that man whome hee hath appointed Matth. 24.30 They shal see the sonne of man come in the cloudes of heauen with power and great glorie Ioh. 5.27 The Father hath giuen power to the Sonne to execute iudgement in that hee is the Sonne of man 2. That we maie haue comfort knowing him to bee our iudge who hath purchased vs with his bloode and who maketh vs his brethren yea his parts and members For he is 1 Our brother and our flesh 2 He hath promised and saide Ioh. 3.36 He that beleeueth in the Sonne hath eternall life cap. 6.24 Verilie verily I say vnto you hee that heareth my word beleeueth in him that sent me hath euerlasting life and shall not come into condemnation but hath passed from death vnto life The third cause why he commeth is to deliuer his Church
desire of him in the Elect. For hee is giuen to them that desire him Luk. 11.13 Hence is drawen a forcible argument to prooue the God-head of the holy ghost For to worke effectuallie by the ministerie is proper to God onely 1. Cor. 3.7 Neither is he that planteth anie thing neither he that watereth but God that giueth the encrease Matth. 3.11 J baptize you with water to amendment of life but hee that commeth after mee will baptize you with the holie ghost and with fire Rom. 1.16 The gospel is the power of god because the holie ghost is forcible in working by it whereupon also the gospell is called the ministration of the spirite 2. Corint 3.8 Now the holy ghost is receiued by faith Eph. 1.13 Wherin also after that yee beleeued yee were sealed with the holy spirit of promise The world cannot receiue the spirit of truth because it neither seeth him nor knoweth him Obiection But faith is the gift and fruite of the holie ghost Ephes 2.8 By grace are yee saued through faith and that not of your selues it is the gift of god 1. Corinth 12.3 No man can saie that Jesus is the Lorde but by the holie ghost Aunswere 1. The woorking of the spirite is in order of nature before faith but in time both are together because the first beginning of faith is the receiuing of the holy ghost 2. Faith beeing once begun the holy ghost is more and more receiued who woorketh afterwardes other thinges in vs by faith As it is saide Galat. 5.6 Faith worketh by loue Actes 15.9 By faith mens heartes are purified 7 How the holy ghost is reteined THE holie ghost is receiued and kept 1. By meditation in the doctrine of the gospell and by studying to profit therein Psalm 1.2 He that doth meditate in the Law of the lord daâ—â— and night shall bee like a tree planted by the riuers of waters that wil bring foorth her fâ—uite in one season Coloss 3.16 Let the woorde of Christ dwel in you plenteouslie in all wisedome teaching and admonishing your selues 2. Hee is kept by encrease and continuaunce of repentaunce and amendment of life that is by a desire of bewaring to offend against our conscience Matth. 13.12 Vnto him that hath shal be giuen Reuelat. 22.11 He that is righteous let him be righteous still Ephes 4.30 Grieue not the holie spirit of god by whom yee are sealed vnto the daie of redemption Hither maie bee referred a desire of auoiding euill companie and sinne For hee that wil auoide sinne must auoide al occasion of sinning 3. Hee is reteined by dailie and earnest praieâ— and inuocation Luk 11.13 Howe much more shall your heauenlie Father giue the holy ghost to them that desire him The same wee maie see in that panoplie or complet harnesse which the Apostle describeth Ephes 6.14 Likewise it is confirmed by the example of Dauid who praieth Psalm 51.11 That god wil not take his holy spirit from him 4. He is reteined by applieng gods giftes to their right vse that is to his glorie and to the safetie of our neighbour Luke 22 32. And when thou art conuerted confirme thy Bretheren Matth. 25.29 Vnto euerie man that hath it shall bee giuen and from him that hath not euen that he hath shal be taken away 8 Whether and how the holy Ghost may be lost HEE may be lost of Hypocrits and reprobates Of the Elect he is neuer wholy lost but onely as touching manie giftes because they alwaies reteine some giftes Neither is hee finally lost of the Elect because at length they returne to repentance But of the reprobate he is altogether or wholy lost and finally so that they neuer receiue him Obiection But the holy ghost departed from Saul Therefore he may also depart from the Elect. Aunswere Hee departed from Saul but not the spirit of regeneration for he neuer had him Reply Yea but the regenerating spirite also departeth because Dauid praieth Psal 51.12 Restore to me the ioy of thy saluation Answ He is lost oftentimes as concerning some giftes of regeneration but not wholy For it cannot possibly bee that the Godly should reteine no remnants seeing they doe not sin to death A man saith Bernard neuer abideth in the same state either he goeth backward or forward For this difference is to be obserued held for the assoiling of that question How namely the perseuerance of the Elect may be notwithstanding certaine albeit they leese the holy Ghost which is because they are neuer wholly and finally destitute of the holy Ghost Now the holy Ghost may be lost fower waies and those contrarie to those other meanes whereby he is reteined 1 By neglecting the Woord and Doctrine For Paul willeth Timothie to stirre vp the gift of God which was in him also teacheth him how that may be doone 1. Tim. 4.15 By giuing attendance to his reading to exhortation and doctrine 2 He is lost by carnall securitie and by giuing ouer our selues to commit wickednesse against our conscience 3 By neglect of praier 4 By abusing the giftes of the holie Ghost as when they are not imploied to his glorie to the safety of our neighbor Luk. 8.18 Vnto him that hath shal be giuen from him that hath not euen that he hath shall be taken awaie 9 Wherefore the holy Ghost is necessarie HOW necessarie and needefull the Holy Ghost is and for what causes doth clearely appeare by these places of Scripture Ioh. 3.5 Except that a man be borne of water and of the spirit he cannot enter into the kingdome of Heauen 1. Cor. 15.50 Flesh bloud cannot inherit the kingdome of God 2. Cor. 3.5 Wee are not sufficient of our selues to thinke anie thing as of our selues but our sufficiencie is of God Hence we may thus conclude without whom we cannot thinke much lesse doe ought that is good and without whom we can neither be regenerated nor know God neither attain vnto the inhetaunce of the celestiall kingdome without him we cannot be saued But without the holy Ghost these things cannot be done by reason of the corruption blindnes of our nature Therefore without the holy Ghost it cannot be that we should be saued so it followeth that he is altogether necessarie for vs vnto saluation 10 How we may know that the holy Ghost dwelleth in vs. WEE know that wee haue him by the effectes or by his benefits and blessings in vs as by the true knowledge of God by regeneration faith and the inchoation or beginning of new obedience or by a readinesse and willingnesse to obay God Rom. 5.1 Beeing iustified by faith wee haue peace towards God The loue of god is shed in our harts Againe we know it by the testimony and witnesse which hee beareth vnto our spirit that we are the Sonnes of god Moreouer most certaine testimonies and tokens of the holy Ghost dwelling in vs are Comfort in the midst of death ioy in afflictions a purpose to perseuere in
13.14 When thy sonne shal aske thee to morrow saying what is this Thou shalt then saie vnto him With a mightie hand the Lord brought vs out of Aegypt out of the house of bondage 6 To bee the bondes of mutuall Charitie The sixt and last end is that they may be the bonds of mutual dilection and loue because they who are entred into an association or confederacie with Christ the head of the Church ought not to bee at difference among themselues 1. Cor. 12.13 By one spirite are we all baptized into one bodie In like manner the Sacramentes are the bonds of publique meetinges and congregations in the Church 1. Cor. 11.33 When ye come together to eate tarrie one for another 1. Cor. 10.17 For wee that are manie are one bread and one bodie because we are all partakers of one bread Eph. 4.5 One God one Faith c. But we can not settle among vs this communion neither maintaine and continue it being once setled neither profitablie annunciate and shewe forth the death of the Lord as long as we dissent iarre among our selues contentiously about the institution of the Sacramentes The Sacraments are pledges of that communion which Christians haue first with christ and then between themselues 3 Jn what Sacraments differ from sacrifices WE must hold and obserue a difference betweene Sacrifices and Sacraments Sacraments sacrifices differ in their chiefe end that we may knowe what to do when we come vnto them Now they differ in the principal chiefe end For sacraments are only ceremonies Sacrifices may be ceremonies moral works also as the sacrifices of thanksgiuing are our works towards God whereby wee yeeld due obedience and honour vnto God such are the sacrifices of praise and thankfulnesse A sacrament is gods work toward vs wherein he giueth some thing to wit the signes and the things signed wherein he testifieth of his offering bestowing his benefits vpon vs. Or the distinction betweene them may be giuen thus A sacrifice is a woork in which we yeeld some obedience and worship vnto God But a sacrament is a work in which GOD giueth somewhat vnto vs First outward signes Secondly Thinges signified by them The same thinges may bee sacrifices and sacramentes A sacrament and a sacrifice may be sometimes together in one and the selfe-same thing but they are sacramentes in respect of God in respect of vs sacrifices and those onely eucharistical and of thanks-giuing For there is but one only sacrifice propitiatorie by the raunsome of Christ offered for vs on the crosse Obiection The Passouer and other ceremonies of the oulde testament were both sacrifices and sacramentes Therefore sacramentes doe nothing differ from sacrifices Aunswere More is in the conclusion than in the premisses Because this onely followeth That the same thing may be a sacrament a sacrifice So Baptism the Lords Supper are sacraments sacrifices They are sacraments and that principally because they are the worke of god who giueth vs some thing in them and dooth therein testifie his gift vnto vs. For in them he reacheth vnto vs certaine Symbols and tokens by his ministers as also by his ministers hee speaketh by his mouth vnto vs according as it is said Luk. 10.16 He that heareth you heareth mee So therefore euerie minister reacheth with his hand the sacramentes vnto vs and wee receiue them at their handes as at the handes of God if so wee take them with reuerence but much more God giueth and as it were reacheth with his hande vnto vs in the lawful and right vse of the sacramentes the things themselues which are signified by the sacramentes Furthermore Baptisme and the Lordes Supper are sacrifices not indeede principally but as they are our woork which we perform to God that is as we receiue these signes as it were from the hand of God and so declare our obedience towards God 4 Jn what sacramentes agree with the Word and in what they differ from it The sacraments aâ—d the word agâ—â—e In exhibiting the same things vnto vs. THE SacrameÌ„ts agree with the Word in these things 1. Both exhibite the same things vnto vs. For by both god doth testifie vnto vs his will and by both he proposeth the same benefites the same grace and the same Christ vnto vs neither doth God confirme or represent by his SacrameÌ„ts any other thing than he hath promised in his word and they who seek for any other thing in the Sacraments than is prescribed in the word of god frame make Idols 2. Both are from the holie Ghost and so both also confirme and establish faith 2 In proceeding 〈◊〉 the Holy Gâ—ost 3 In being instituâ—â—â— offered by God 4 In being accoÌ„pâ—â—â—hed by God 3. God instituteth both God offereth both 4. God accomplisheth both by the Ministers of his Church For hee speaketh with vs in his Woorde by the ministers and by the Ministers hee offereth and giueth vs these signes in his Sacramentes But the thinges them-selues which are signified by these signes the sonne of God immediately offereth vnto vs. Hee saith Joh. 20.22 Receiue the Holie Ghost And Iohn saith of him Matth. 3.11 Indeede J baptize you with water to amendment of life but hee that commeth after mee will baptize you with the holie Ghost and with fire The Sacraments differ froÌ„ the word in these things 1. In substance nature They disagree 1 In substance and nature For first Words signifie according to the appointment of men whoÌ„ it pleased that things should so be expressed signified Signes signifie according to a similitude which they haue with the thinges by them signified Secondly Words wee heare and reade Signes wee perceiue also by feeling seeing and tasting Thirdly Words signifie onelie Symboles and signes confirme also 2. The Woorde of the promise and commaundement is proposed without anie difference 2 In the persons 〈◊〉 they are offered to al. To the vnregenerate that they may either begin to beleeue and be regenerated or may bee left without excuse to the regenerate that they may the more beleeue and bee confirmed The Sacraments are giuen onelie to the members of the Church whose faith is by them confirmed and preserued The Word is preached to all at once The Sacraments are giuen to euerie member of the Church seuerallie one is baptized after another and the supper is ministred to one after another 3. The Woorde is the instrument of the holie Ghost by which he beginneth and confirmeth our faith 3 in their vse and therefore the Sacraments must follow the Word The Sacraments are the instruments of the holie Ghost by which he beginneth not but onelie confirmeth our faith and therefore the Word is to goe before them The reason of this difference is because the Sacraments without they be vnderstoode neuer mooue There is no desire after a thing which is not knowen But yet in Infants the case is diuers For in them faith
the Charter promise the same also Semblablie God perfourmeth his benefites after the same manner and vnto the same persons after which manner and vnto which persons hee promised them But vnto the wicked hee hath promised nothing so long as they remaine in their vnbeliefe 3. Wee receiue spiritual thinges by faith The wicked haue not faith Therfore neither do the wicked receiue spiritual things 4. To be wicked and to receiue the sacraments entirelie implieth a contradiction 11 How manie sacraments there are of the new Testament IN the newe Testament are onelie two sacramentes But two Sacramentesâ— the new Testament the vse whereof in the Church is perpetuall vniuersall by the consents of Ambrose Austine Baptisme which succeeded in the place of circumcision and other purifiynges of the law and the Lords supper which the Paschal Lambe shadowed and prefigured These two and no more did Christ institute For those are onelie sacraments of the new Testament which are 1. Ceremonies 2. Jnstituted of Christ for the whole Church 3. Hauing the promise of grace adioined vnto them But there are onelie two such sacraments as appeareth by their definition Wherefore Pennance priuate absolution matrimonie The Papists other fiue Sâ—craments are no Sacramentâ— vnction and laying on of hands are no sacraments For it is certaine that pennance and priuate absolution are onely the declaration and preaching of the Gospell But the preaching and publishing of grace must not bee confounded with the annexed seals of the promise of grace Vnction and laying on of hands are indeede ceremonies but neither were they instituted of Christ for the whole Church neither haue they the promise of grace adioined The thing signified by extreme Vnction hath ceased in the Church Matrimonie is no ceremonie but a moral worke The Papists recken it among sacraments because the old latin translation translateth the Greeke woorde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a mysterie by the woorde Sacrament Ephes 5.32 where the Apostle speaketh of marriage But Paul himselfe is to be heard rather than the latin interpreter No man is ignorant that mysterie is of as large ample extent in signification with the Grecians as arcanum which signifieth any secrete or hidden thing is with the Latins Wherefore they must confesse and graunt all arcane and secrete thinges to bee sacraments And so if Matrimonie bee the seuenth sacrament the will of God shall bee the eight sacrament and the calling of the gentiles the ninth For so doth the same interpreter in the same Epistle interpret the same greeke word Eph. 1.9 and 3.9 But Saint Paul in that place cap. 5.32 vseth the woorde mysterie to designe and signifie the coniunction of Christ and his Church and not the coniunction of man and wife Certaine Conclusions of the Sacraments in generall 1 GOD hath alwaies adioined vnto his promise of grace and eternal life some signes and rites which the church calleth sacraments Circumcision was commaunded and enioined Abraham By Moses the sacrifices and rites were encreased which endured vnto Christ who instituted Baptisme and the supper 2 Sacraments therefore are the signes of the eternal couenant betweene God and the faithful that is they are rites commaunded prescribed to the church added vnto the promise of grace whereby as by visible and certaine testimonies God might signifie and testifie that hee communicateth and imparteth Christ and his benefites to al those that vse and receiue these tokens and symboles with a true faith according to the promise of the gospel and that hereby also hee might confirme in them a full perswasion and trust of his promise that the church also of the other side might by the participation of these symboles and tokens professe publiquelie their faith and thankefulnes towardes God and binde themselues vnto it preserue and propagate the memorie of christes benefites be discerned from all other sects and obliged and stirred vp to a mutual dilection and loue vnder one head christ Jesus 3 Rites and ceremonies which are not commaunded of God or are not instituted to this end as to bee signes and tokens of the promise of grace are not signes and tokens of the church for a signe can confirme nothing but by his consent and promise from whom the thing promised and signified is expected and looked for No creature therefore can institute anie signes or pledges of Gods will 4 Two thinges are to be considered in all sacraments the visible terrene and corporal signes which are the rites and ceremonies and the visible and corporal thinges which God exhibiteth vnto vs by his ministers and we receiue corporallie that is by the parts and senses of our bodies And the things signified inuisible celestial and spiritual that is christ himselfe and all his benefits which are communicated vnto vs of God by faith spirituallie that is through the vertue and working of the holie ghost 5 The mutation and change of the signes is not natural but respectiue and in relation neither is wrought as touching their nature or substance which remaineth still the same but as touching their vse whereby they are resemblances of other things 6 The coniunction also or vnion of the signes and the thinges signified is not natural or local but respectiue by the ordinaunce and appointment of God whereby thinges inuisible and spirituall are represented by visible and corporal things as it were by visible words and are exhibited and receiued together with the signes in their right vse and administration 7 The names and properties of the things signified are attributed to the signes and contrarie the names and properties of the signes vnto the things in respect of the similitude or of the signification of the thinges by the signes and in respect of the ioint exhibiting and receiuing of the thinges with the signes in the right vse 8 The right vse of the sacraments is then when as the faithful keepe those rites which God hath commaunded to those ends for which the sacraments were instituted by God The institution consisteth in the rites persons and endes the violating whereof breedeth an abuse 9 Jn this vse the things signified are alwaies receiued together with the signes Therefore the signes are not emptie or voide and without the thinges although the thinges are receiued after one manner and the signes after another 10 Without the vse instituted by God neither are the ceremonies anie sacrament neither are the benefites of God which are signified by them receiued together with the signes 11 The signs are receiued of the godly to saluation of the wicked to condemnation But the things signified onely the godly can receiue to their saluation 12 In the Elect notwithstanding after they are conuerted the fruit also of the sacrament vnworthily receiued doth at length follow And in them also that vnworthinesse which by reason of their defectes concurreth in their receiuing albeit they are sometimes chastised for the same yet neuerthelesse is it pardoned them so that that
to become his members 2. They differ in their speciall vse because Baptisme is the testimonie of our regeneration and of the couenant made betweene vs and God and of our receiuing into the Church But the Lords supper testifieth that wee are euer to bee nourished by Christ remaining in vs and that the couenant made betweene God and vs shall euer be established and ratified vnto vs and that we for euer shall abide in the church and bodie of Christ 3. They differ in the persons to whom they are to be giuen Baptisme is giuen to all those who are to bee accounted for members of the church whether they be of yeares and vnderstanding or infants The Lords Supper is to bee giuen to them onely who are able to vnderstand and celebrate the benefits of christ and to examine themselues 4. They differ in the often celebrating of them Baptisme is to bee receiued but onc◠onely because the couenant of God being once made is alwaies firme and of force to the penitent But the Supper is often to bee receiued because an often renewing and recalling of that couenant to our remembrance is necessarie for our faith 5. They differ in the order which is to bee obserued in vse of them Because Baptisme is to bee giuen before the Supper and the supper may not be giuen vnto any except hee be first baptised 14 They come worthily to the Lords Supper who examin themselues that is are endewed with true faith and repentance They who finde not this in themselues ought neither to come without it least they eate and drink their owne iudgement nor to differ repentance wherewith they should come least they draw vpon themselues hardnes of hart and eternal pains 15 The church ought to admit all those vnto it who professe themselues to embrace the ground and foundation of christian doctrine and to haue a purpose to obey it but those must bee repelled who wil not desist either from their errors and blasphemies or from manifest sinnes against their conscience beeing admonished by the church and conuicted of error 16 The Pope hath corruptlie taken awaie the breaking of the bread from the rite of the supper and bereaued the people of the vse of the cup Corruptly also hath hee deformed the supper of the Lord with adding so manie ceremonies not deliuered by the Apostles into a theatricall or pageant-like Masse that is into a Iewish superstitiō stagelike rounds conueiances But more wicked idolatrous inuentions are these That the Masse is a propitiatory sacrifice wherein christ is offered by the Masse-priests for the quick and dead and is by the force of consecration substantiallie present and abideth so long as those formes of bread and wine remaine vncorrupted and further dooth bestow the grace of God and other benefits vpon them for whom he is offered of whom also he is eaten with the mouth of their body yea though they haue no good inward motion in them and lastly is being treasured and laid vp and carried about vnder those formes to be worshipped Jn respect of these foule monsters it is necessary that the Masse be quite and cleane abolished out of the christian church In summe they are these 1. Transubstantiation 2. Bread-worship 3. Sacrifice 4. Maiming of Christes Supper THE APPENDIX OR ADDITION ADIOINING VNTO THE FORMER TREAtise of the Supper Certaine principal arguments of the Consubstantiaries against the syncere doctrine of the Lordes Supper the Sacramentaries as they cal them together with a refutation of them 1 THE errours of the Sacramentaries say they are that there are but bare signes and Symboles onelie in the supper Answere We teach that the things signified are together with the signes in the right vse exhited and communicated albeit not corporally but in such sort as is agreeable vnto sacramentes 2. The Sacramentaries saie That christ is present onlie according to his power and efficacie Aunswere Wee teach that he is present and vnited with vs by the holy Ghost albeit his bodie bee farre absent from vs like as whole Christ also is present with his ministerie though diuerslie according to the one nature 3. The Sacramentaries say they affirme that an imaginarie figuratiue or spiritual bodie of christ is present not his essentiall bodie Answere Wee neuer spoke of an imaginarie bodie but of the true flesh of Christ which is present with vs although it remaine in heauen Moreouer wee say that wee receiue the bread and the body but both after a maner proper to ech 4. The Sacramentaries saie they affirme that the true bodie of Christ which hung on the crosse and his verie bloud which was shed for vs is distributed but is spirituallie receiued of those onelie who are worthy receiuers as for the vnworthy they receiue nothing besides the bare signes vnto their condemnation Aunswere Al this wee graunt as beeing agreeable vnto the woorde of God the nature of sacraments the analogy of faith the communion of the faithful Certaine arguments of the Consubstantiaries whereby they goe about to ouerthrow our doctrine of the Lords Supper together with the refutations of them 1 THE words of the institution are open and plain This my bodie this is my bloud Answere They alleadge these woordes against them-selues For they saie That the bodie of Christ is receiued reallie in vnder with the bread when christ saith that the very bread is his body Wherefore they doe a double iniury vnto the church first while they thrust vpon the church their owne words for Christs Secondly while they imagine that the church perceiueth not these speeches to be diuerse In the bread is my body and The bread is my bodie They accuse Christ also for a lier for they deny that the bread is his body but that his body is in the bread Let them looke therefore vnto it how they wil aunswere Christ at the last iudgement for this blasphemy and reproch The Papistes also doe more retaine the very words of Christ But these retaine not the woord but follow the sense and meaning We must see therfore which part followeth it Ours shal be prooued in the end Replie Christ addeth an exposition of his minde Which is giuen for you and Which is shed for you Answere First this is a begging of that which is in question For they take as graunted that the bread is properly called the bodie which yet lieth vpon them to prooue For it is a sacramental maner of speaking Secondly we returne their own reason vpon them by inuerting it thus The bodie of Christ properly so called was giuē for vs. But the bread was not giuē for vs Therfore the bread is not the body properly so called Likewise as the bread is the body broken so the breaking of the bread is the breaking of the bodie But the breaking of the bodie is the crucifieng thereof Therefore the breade broken is but sacramentally and by representation the bodie broken 2 They reason from the autor who said
in outward appearance and imagination 4. Hee ascended not truely into heauen but it shall be saide to haue beene onely a vaine and imaginarie and phantasticall spectacle if hee were in his bodie substantiallie there before hee visiblie ascended thither and after he was ascended thither he remained yet in the substantiall presence of the same bodie no lesse truely than before on the earth yea and in the verie bodies also of the faithfull If these thinges so fel out in the truth of the thing it will follow that the same bodie of Christ was indeede at once and together both weake and omnipotent base and glorious subiect to sufferinges and not subiect dead and aliue limited and vnlimited which is horrible to affirme For auoiding therefore of these prodigious and impious absurdities they will except that he was not as touching his body otherwise than limited weak subiect to passions and mortal in the time of his humiliation because he had debased himselfe and would not shew forth that maiestie communicated vnto his bodie before his resurrection Aunswere They interpret amisse that debasing of himselfe of all the glorie and maiestie of his humanity hidden and kept close for a time whereas it is to bee vnderstoode in respect of the diuinitie of the Worde in that hee woulde take the forme of a seruant that is the masse of our nature and become man Moreouer it will folow that christ did shew forth the communicated power and maiesty of his flesh euen then when he was indeed weak and limited or circumscribed in bodie as when shedding teares he raised Lazarus from the dead and when being apprehended by the Iewes hee healed Malchus whom Peter wounded Now what is it else to raise the Marcionites vp againe from hell or in the greatest matter of all others impiously to blaspheme if this bee not THE SECOND ARGVMENT THE blasphemie of Samosatenus Arrius the late Antitrinitaries is this That Christ man is not properlie and by nature God but onlie by an accidental participation of diuine properties maiestie honour power and vertue The Vbiquitaries also maintaine the same consideration of the God-heade of Christ man while they define the personall vnion by his communicating alone of properties whereby the flesh of Christ is made omnipotent and euerie where So that now that man is and is called God not that he is properlie by nature God but because infinit power maiestie and glorie is giuen him from God and all the gifts of the holie Ghost are bestowed on him without measure Now this accidentall bestowing of the Godhead and all the properties doth not make christ to be properlie and by nature God but onelie by diuine grace or God vnproperlie so called Because it is not the verie essential God-head of the Word but a certaine participation thereof in vertue and effâ—cacie And therefore was it obiected by the sounder Fathers vnto the Arrians that they tooke awaie the true and eternall God-head of christ when they made him a God not by nature but by grace by participation onlie of dignitie and maiestie Therefore seeing the Vbiquitaries also equalling our Immanuel with God by participation of properties onlie take awaie his true and eternal God head wee doe disclâ—me and accurse this their doctrine as blasphemous and heretical And that they doe this Brentius in recog p. 20. Andrae Thes 20. disp Tubing and Thes 25. and 26. And Apol. Ing. 26. their owne words and opinions witnesse as Brentius and Iacobus Andraeas and others of them in their writings Whence wee conclude that the Vbiquitaries holde the same opinion with the Arrians and Antitrinitaries of the God-head of Christ manâ— that is that all these esteem him for God not by nature but onely by grace of participation new temporarie created adopted If these thinges bee true Christ shal not bee God and man but a diuine man such as the Vbiquitaries also repute him who as Seruetus Lib. 1. de Trinicate hold this opinion That God can communicate the fulnes of his God-heade giue his diuinitie maiestie power and glorie vnto man But wee execrate and detest the same blasphemie of both THE THIRD ARGVMENT NEstorius taught That the vnion of God the Word with man was wrought by the participation onelie of equality as touching maiesty honour power vertue and operation Neither doth he make the differeÌ„ce of the dwelling of the Word in mans nature which himselfe tooke and in other Saintes to consist in anie other thing than in those giftes and graces bestowed by God on man The selfe same also doe the Vbiquitaries teach because they crie that there is no difference betweene the inhabiting and dwelling of the God-head in Peter and in Christ except it bee taken from the communication of the giftes or properties of the God-heade And they contend that by this means this man which was takeÌ„ by the Word is God because the Word doth nothing without him but al things by him This is nothing els than to make christ man onelie God by an accident Wherefore the doctrine of Vbiquitie is altogether the same with Nestorius heresie Tertullian saith Tertul. lib. de Trinit p. 610. Jf Christ be man onlie how then is he present eueriewhere being called vpon and inuocated seeing this is not the nature of man but of God to be able to be present in al places By this testimony is refuted the Vbiquity of the human nature in Christ Obiect But the vnion of the diuine human nature in Christ is vnseparable Therefore wheresoeuer the diuine nature is there is also the humane nature Aunsw It is true which is said that the vnion is vnseparable The Worde neuer forsaketh the nature once assumed and taken But the Word is not in the humane nature as the soule is included in my bodie Wheresoeuer my bodie is there must my soule needes be neither is my soul at the same time without my bodie But the Worde is not so in Christ man but hee is so vnseparably and personally in the humane nature as that he is together also without the humane nature in all the partes of the world as hee filleth al and in holy men and Angels by his special presence The personall vnion of both natures dooth not euert the general action and woorking of his presence and maiestie neither doth it let or hinder the speciall woorking of his presence because the Word is effectual and worketh forcibly in the regenerate The generall points wherein the churches which professe the Gospell agree or disagree in the controuersie concerning the Lordes Supper They agree in these points FIRST that as wel the Supper of the Lord as Baptisme is a visible pledge and testimonie annexed by Christ himselfe to the promise of grace to this ende chiefly that our faith in this promise might be confirmed and strengthned Secondly that in the true vse of the supper as well as in al other sacraments two things are giuen by god vnto vs
1. A griefe both for sin past and present which is called Sorrowe and also for sinne to come which is called Feare 2. An hatred of sinne committed both of present sinne and of sinne to come 3. An auerting from sinne committed both present and future sinne 4. A flying of sinne to come The griefe is in the heart The flieng is in the will in that we wil not here after commit sinne The auerting is in the hart and wil and it is an auerting vnto somewhat to wit an auerting from euil vnto good This former part of conuersion is called mortification 1. Because as dead men can not shew foorth the actions of one that is liuing so our nature the corruption thereof beeing abolished doth no more shew forth or exercise her actions that is doth no longer bring forth actuall sinne originall sinne beeing repressed For the dead bite not 2. Because mortification is not wrought without griefe and lamenting The flesh rebelleth against the spirite and for this cause mortification is also called a crucifieng Quiâ—â—ening Quickâ—â—â—â—g comprehendeth those thinges which are contrarie vnto mortification 1. The knowledge of Gods mercie and the applieng thereof in christ 2. A ioifulnesse thence arising which is for that God is pleased and for that newe obedience is begun and shal bee perfected 3. An ardent or earnest endeâ—â—ur and purpoâ—â— to sinne no more arising from thankefulnes and because we reioâ—â—e that we haue God appeased and pacified towardes vs a desire also of righteousnesse and of reteining gods loue and fauour That ardent desire both of not sinning and also of righteousnesse and of reteining Gods loue and fauour is newe obediencâ— it selfe This latter part of conuersion is called quickening for a cleane contrarie respect vnto that for which the former part was called mortification 1. Because as a liuing man doth the actions of one that liueth so quickening is a kindling of newâ— faculties and qualities of working in vs. For the loue of God is kindled in vs and the holy Ghost is giuen vs by whom we doe good woorkes By nature the vnregenerate are dead astouching good works The regenerate begin to doe good woorkes 2. In respect of that ioie which the conuerted haue in God which is a most pleasaunt thing This ioie in God which is the other part of quickening ariseth from hence to wit in that we know God now to be pacified towardes vs and that we are able to performe the Law and bee conformed and correspondent vnto the Law and God 4 What are the causes of conuersion THE principal efficient cause of conuersion is the holie Ghost Conuert vs and we shal be conuerted The instrumentall causes or meanes are first the Lawe then the Gospell and after the doctrine of the Gospel hath beene preached Lamen 5 2â— againe the doctrine of the Law For the preaching of the Law goeth before preparing vs to the preaching of the Gospel because without the Lawe there is no knowledge of sinne and therefore no griefe or sorrowe for sinne Afterwardes followeth the preaching of the Gospell because without the Gospel there is no faith after the preaching of the Gospel againe followeth in the church the preaching of the Law that it maie be the squire of our actions So doe the Prophets first accuse threaten and exhort and then promise and lastlie exhort againe Such was also Iohn Baptistes preaching And such is the preaching doctrine of repentance which comprehendeth the Law the gospel The next instrumentall cause is faith because without faith there is no loue of God and except wee knowe what the wil of God is as namely that hee wil remit vnto vs our sinnes by and for Christ conuersion will neuer be begunne in vs neither in respect of the first part thereof which is Mortification neither in respect of the second part which is Quickening For by faith are the harts of men purified without faith there is no true ioying iâ— God neither can wee without faith loue god And whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne All good works flow from faith as from their fountain We being iustified by faith haue peace with god The furthering causes of conuersion are The crosse chastisementes as also punishmentes benefites and examples of others The subiect or matter of conuersion which belongeth to the mind will and hart is 1. Jn the minde and vnderstanding a right iudgement concerning god his wil and workes 2. In the wil an earnest and ready desire and purpose to obey god according to al his commaundementes 3. In the hart a good reformed affection The obiect of conuersion is 1. Sin or disobedieÌ„ce which is the thing from which we are conuerted 2. Righteousnes or new obedience which is the thing whereunto we are conuerted The formal cause of conuersion is the conuersion it selfe and the properties thereof The chiefe finall cause of conuersion is gods glorie The next and subordinate ende is our good euen our blessednes and fruition of euerlasting life There is another end also of conuersion which is lesse principall to wit the conuersion of others When thou art conuerted confirme thy brethren Let your light so shine before men that they may glorifie your heauenly father which is in heauen 5 What are the effectes of conuersion THE effectes of conuersion are all good woorkes and an earnest desire both to obey God according to all his commandements without exception also to conuert and recall others into the way The conuerted or beleeuers sinne indeede oftentimes but they defend not their sinnes but endeuour more and more to shun and auoide them OF GOOD-WORKES THE chiefe Questions 1 What good-workes are 2 How they may be doone 3 Whether the works of Saints be perfectly good 4 How our woorkes though not perfectlie good please God 5 Why we are to doe good-workes 6 Whether good-woorkes merit any thing in the sight of God 1 WHAT GOOD-WORKES ARE. GOOD workes are such as are done according to the prescript rule of Gods Lawe with a true faith to the glorie of God onlie Three things are heere to be considered 1 The conditions cirumstances required for the making a woorke good 2 The difference betweene the woorkes of the regenerate and the vnregenerate 3 Jn what sort the morall woorkes of the wicked are sinnes 1 That a work which we do may be good these conditions are required necessarily vnto it 1 That it be commaÌ„ded of God Matt. 15 9. Jn vaine they woorshippe mee teaching for doctrines mens precepts No creature hath the right or wisedome and vnderstanding to institute and ordaine the worship of God But good woorkes wee speake of morall good and the worship of God are all one Nowe Morall good is farre differing from naturall good in as much as al actions as they are actions euen those of the wicked are good that is naturallie but all actions are not good morally that is agreeing with the iustice of God And thus is
wil vs to desire it But God willeth vs to craue in this life and to desire the perfect fulfilling of the Law 1. Because he wil at length effectuate it in those that desire it therefore hee will giue it vs after this life if wee desire the same here truly and from our heart 2. That we may now goe forward in godlinesse and that the studie of liuing according to the prescript of Gods law may bee daiely more and more kindled and confirmed in vs. 3. That by this desire of fulfilling the Lawe God maie exercise vs in repentance and obedience OF PRAIER THE chiefe Questions hereof are 1 What praier is and howe many sortes there are of praier 2 Why praier is necessary 3 What is required to true praier 4 What is the forme of praier by Christ prescribed 1 WHAT PRAIER IS AND HOW MANY SORTS OF PRAIER THERE ARE. PRaier is a petition ioyned with an ardent and earnest desire whether vttered in woords or not vttered whereby wee aske of the true god reueiled in the word those things which he hath commanded to be asked of him proceeding from an acknowledgement of our necessity and neede with humilitie and repentaunce and confession of our owne vnworthinesse made in true conuersion vnto God in a confidence and sure trust in gods promises for christs sake our Mediatour Saint Paul maketh mention of three sortes of praier 1. Petitions for good thinges 2. Deprecations against euill things 3. Jntercessions and requestes for others The General of these specials is Praier Likewise Jnuocation and Adoration But praier differeth notwithstanding from Inuocation Adoration For Adoration is often times taken for the whole worship of god because whō we woorship him we account for the true God But praier is a part of Inuocation for Jnuocation compriseth these two as a general his specials namely Petition or praier and thankes-giuing For Inuocation or to Inuocate on God is to craue of the true God any thing that is necessary both for the soule and body and to giue thanks for benefits receiued of him Thankefulnes or Thankesgiuing is an acknowledgement of a benefit receiued and a voluntary binding to the performaunce of duties mutuall possible and lawful Thankefulnes conteineth two things to wit truth and iustice 2 Why Praier is necessarie THE causes for which praier is necessary are these 1 The commandement of God because God hath commanded that wee call vpon him and will this way chiefely and principally be worshiped and magnified by vs. Psa 50.16 Call vpon me in the daie of trouble Luk. 11.2 When ye praie say Our Father c. By these wordes of Christ it furder appeareth that the tongue also is required to praier which we may proue also by other reasons 1 God wil haue himselfe magnified with the tongue which hee created chieflie to this end 2. Out of the aboundance of the heart the mouth speaketh 3 Wee are to doe it that others may follow our example 2 Our Necessitie and Want For wee receiue not of God those blessings which are necessarie for our safety and saluation except we aske them of him For God hath promised them to such only as aske them Nowe what wee speake of the necessitie of praier the same is also to bee saide of the necessitie of Thankesgiuing For without giuing of thanks we leese those thinges that are giuen receiue not such thinges as are to be giuen and are necessarie The necessitie of both will easily appeare whether we consider the effects of faith or the cause of faith and so also faith it selfe Faith is kindled or encreased in no man who doth not aske it no man hath faith who giueth not thankes for it and they which are endued with true faith aske the grace of God and they who haue tasted of gods grace shew themselues thankfull vnto God for it and doe more and more craue and desire it Rom. 5.5 The loue of God is shed abroade in our hearts by the holy Ghost which is giuen vnto vs. And the holy ghost himselfe also is obtained by petition or praiers For the holie Ghost is giuen to none but to him that desireth him 1 Obiection But we see the wicked also to receiue the gifts of the holie Ghost Therefore not onlie they that desire him receiue him Aunswere The wicked verily receiue manie gifts but not those principall giftes neither those that are proper to the Elect such as are faith repentance remission of sins regeneration and furder what giftes the wicked receiue those are not auaileable vnto them neither doe they receiue them to saluation Reply Jnfants craue not the holie ghost and yet they receiue him Aunswere The holy ghost is not giuen but to those that aske him that is to those of yeares and vnderstanding who are able to aske him But euen Infants also aske and craue the holy ghost after their manner hauing to wit in possibilitie an inclination to faith and therefore potentially they aske the holy Ghost or haue an inclination to aske him 2 Obiection The Effect is not before his cause But praiers are the effects of the holie Ghost in asmuch as no man can aske the Holie Ghost who hath not the holie Ghost and hee alone woorketh praier in vs Therefore the Holie Ghost is not receiued by praier but is in vs before praier and so by consequent he is not giuen to them onlie that aske him 1 Aunswere Whosoeuer hath not the holie ghost cannot aske him that is as concerning the encrease of him 2 The Effect is not before his cause that is in order and nature but in time they are both together For the holy Ghost is in vs according to nature before praier because we then first begin to desire him to aske him of God when he is giuen vnto vs. But albeit the Holie Ghost is according to nature or order first in vs yet he is not first in vs according to time For as soone as the holy Ghost is giuen we begin to desire his presence When God giueth his spirit at the same time they aske him vnto whome hee is giuen And the Holie Ghost is giuen to none but to him that desireth him for no man desireth him but he who hath in himselfe the beginning of him Whereas then it is said of Christ Luk. 11.13 How much more shall your Heauenlie Father giue the holie Ghost to them that desire him this must not be vnderstood of the encrease onely but also of the beginning of his giftes and graces 3 What is required to true praier THE conditions and circumstaunces of true praier are 1 A direction of it vnto the true God that wee make our praier vnto the true God manifested in the Church by his Prophetical and Apostolique word by his workes of creation preseruation and redemption of the Church As wee haue receiued so are we baptized and as we are baptized so we beleeue and as we beleeue so wee adore and worship the
endeuour to obserue al these conditions in their praying the wicked contrarily either omitte and neglect them all or keeping one or two conditions erre in the rest Some er in the knowledge of the nature and wil of God therein omitting the first condition some erre in the thinges which are to bee asked when they aske either euill thinges or vncertaine or not approoued by god Some aske these hypocriticallie some without a feeling of their want some not with a confidence in the Mediatour some persisting in their wickednes thinke yet that God heareth them some desire things necessarie to saluation with a distrust and diffidence some lastly aske not thinking of Gods promise and therefore not according to faith 4 What is the forme of praier by Christ prescribed THE forme of prayer prescribed by Christ vnto vs is recited by the two Euangelists Matthewe and Luke Which forme Christ deliuered vnto vs not that we should be tied to these woords but that we might know both how and what to aske Obiection We may not be wiser than Christ Therefore seeing hee hath appointed vs a certaine forme of praier we must hold vs contented therewith and therefore we doe amisse when wee vse other formes of praiers Aunswere Wee maie not depart from that forme if Christ will haue vs tied vnto it but he will not haue vs tied to these words because his purpose was when he taught his disciples to pray to deliuer a briefe summe of those things which we are to ask of God Replie That is to be reteined than which no better can be inuented Wee cannot inuent a better forme and better woords than are these of Christ himselfe Therefore wee must retaine also the forme and woords Aunswere Wee can not inuent better woordes neither a better forme that is to expresse this summe of such thinges as are to bee desired which is as it were the general of al thinges that are to be desired These generals of gods benefits which Christ in this forme hath prescribed vnto vs to be desired cannot bee proposed in a better forme but Christ will haue vs also to descend to the specials to aske particular benefits according to our necessitie For that forme prescribed by Christ is nothing else but a set or course of certaine heads or generals whereunto al benefites as wel corporal as spiritual may be referred And whē christ willeth vs to desire the generals he willeth vs also to desire the specials And furder also those things which are here put in general we are in like maner for this cause to declare in special that we may be lead into a consideration of our necessity to a desire of making our petition vnto God to help our necessity Now that we may do this we haue neede also of special formes of praieng For to the explicatiō of generals by their specials we haue need of another form But yet al other forms of praier must agree with this form prescribed by christ although we be not tied vnto this form of Christ as being a thing altogether indifferent as appeareth by these places of Scripture Ioh. 14.13 Whatsoeuer ye aske of the father in my name whether ye aske it in general or in special he wil giue you Wherefore Christ hath not tied vs to a certaine forme Jam. 1.5 Jf any of you lack wisedome let him aske and it shal bee giuen him Likewise Matt. 20.24 Pray that your flight be not in the winter But this as touching the woordes is not in the praier prescribed by Christ There are also examples of praiers both in the New and old Testament Wherefore the forme of praier deliuered vnto vs by Christ is wholy a thing indifferent Nowe this praier of christ hath three partes a Proeme a Petition and a Conclusion The Proeme is Our Father which art in heauen The Proeme hath two partes 1. Our Father 2. which art in heauen And the Lord vsed this kind of Proeme because he wil be called vpon with due honor This honor consisteth 1. In true knowledge 2. Jn true confidence 3. Jn obedience Obedience compriseth 1 True loue 2. True fear 3. Hope 4. Humiliation 5. Patience The first part of the Proeme Our Father God is called Our Father 1. Jn respect of our creation Luk. 3.38 The sonne of Adam the sonne of God 2. In respect of our redemption and receiuing into fauour by his sonne our Mediatour Christ is the only begotten sonne of god we are not his sons by our owne nature but are adopted for christs sake 3. In respect of our sanctification or regeneration by the holie Ghost in Christ Obiect 1. We Jnuocate the Father according to the prescript of his own son Therefore we must not inuocate the son and the holy Ghost Aunswer The consequence of this reason is denied because the consequēce holdeth not from the attributing of some property vnto one person of the god-head to the remouing of the same from another person of the god-head Again the name of Father as also the name of god when it is opposed to all the creatures is taken essentially not personally but when it is put with another person of the God-heade it is taken personallie Wherefore in this place the name of Father is taken essentially the reasons hereof are manifest 1. Because the name of Father is not here put with another person of the God-head but with the creature of whom he is inuocated So also by the Prophet Isaiah cap. 9.6 Christ is called The euerlasting father 2. The Jnuocating of one person doth not exclude the others when mention is made of their external outward works 3. We cannot consider God the father but in the sonne the Mediatour And the Son hath made vs Sons by the holy ghost who is called the spirit of adoptiō 4. Christ teacheth vs that we must inuocate him also saying Verilie verilie I say to you whatsoeuer yee shal aske of the father in my name he shal giue you 5. Christ giueth the holie Ghost Therefore it is hee himselfe of whom wee aske him Obiect 2. Christ is called and is our brother Therefore he is not our father Aunswere He is our brother in respect of his humane nature But hee is our father in respect of his diuine nature Ob. 3. If he be called the father who hath receiued vs into fauor for Christs sake then is not Christ vnderstoode by the name of father because he that receiueth vs into fauour for christs sake is not Christ himself But the father whō we here so cal receiueth vs into fauor for christs sake Wherefore he is not christ Answ Hee that receiueth vs into fauour for Christs sake is not Christ himselfe that is not in the same sense and respect Christ as he is our Mediatour is hee through whom we are receiued but as he is god he is he that receiueth vs. Christ wil haue vs to call God Father and so to inuocate him 1. In regard of the true
From what euils he saueth vs 433 How he saueth 434 VVhom he saueth 437 Of Christ What is signified by the name of christ 437 What Christes vnction or annointing is 438 What his Prophetical function 444 VVhat his Priesthood 448 VVhat his kingdome 451 Of the communion of the faithful with Christ vvhat the Annointing of Christians is 452 In what sense christians are called prophets 456 vvhat is the Priesthoode of christians 456 vvhat is the kingdom of christians 458 Of Christ the Sonne of God How manie waies men are called sons 461 How christ is the son of God 463 vvhy christ is called the only begotten and first begotten sonne of God 464 Of Christs Diuinitie The sonne of God is a subsistent in the flesh borne of the virgin and before the flesh 467 The sonne of God Christ is a person reallie distinct from the Father and the holy Ghost 498 The Worde is equall consubstantial with the Father 500 503 Other rules whereby the obiections of the Arrians are dissolued 507 The principall arguments against the Diuinitie of the Sonne and the Holie Ghost with the answeres vnto them 509 Of Christ our Lord. In what sense christ is called Lord 514 For what causes he is our Lorde 515 Of christs conception by the holy ghost and birth of the Virgin Marie 518 The common place of the two natures in Christ vvhether there be two natures in christ our Mediatour 520 vvhether christ be one person or moe 525 vvhat maner of vnion this is of the two natures in christ and how made 529 A rule to bee obserued touching the proprieties of both natures in christ 536 A rule to bee obserued touching the proprieties of christ the Mediatour 544 vvhy it was necessary that two natures should bee vnited in the person or subsistence of the sonne of God 550 Of Christs humiliation that is of his Passion vvhat Christ suffered 554 According to which nature christ suffered 556 The causes impellent or motiues of christes Passion 55â— The final causes oâ— ends of his Passion 558 Of Christs death How christ is said to haue beene dead 561 vvhether it was requisite and necessary that christ should die 562 The fruit of christs death 564 His burial 566 His descension into hel 567 Of Christs glorification that is of his Resurrection vvhether christ rose againe 571 How christ rose 571 For what cause he rose 572 vvhat are the fruits of christes Resurrection 576 Of Christs Ascension into heauen vvhither christ ascended 580 How wherefore christ ascended into heauen 582 587 vvhat is the difference between christs Ascension and our 588 vvhat are the fruits of christs AscensioÌ„ 589 Of Christs sitting at the right hand of GOD. vvhat the right hand of God signifieth 591 vvhat is to sit at Gods right hand 591 vvhether christ did alwaies fitte at the right hand of God 595 vvhat are the fruites of christes sitting at the right hand of the father 597 Of Christs comming to iudgement vvhether there shal be any iudgement 599 vvhat the last iudgement is 601 vvho shal iudge 603 vvhence and whither christ shal come 604 Howe christ shall come to iudgement 605 vvhom christ shal iudge 605 vvhat shall be the senteÌ„ce executioÌ„ 606 For what cause that iudgemeÌ„t shal be 607 vvhen it shal be 608 vvherefore God woulde haue vs certaine of the last iudgement 608 For what causes God would not haue vs certain of the time of iudgement 609 For what cause GOD differreth that iudgement 609 Whether the last iudgement be to bee wished for 610 The third part of the Creede of the Holie Ghost the sanctifier What the name spirite signifieth 610 Who and what the holie Ghost is 611 What the office of the holy gost is 617 Of whom the holie Ghost is giuen and wherefore 621 To whom the holie Ghost is giuen 622 How he is giuen receiued 624 How the holie Ghost is reteined 625 Whether and how the holie ghost may be lost 625 wherefore the Holie Ghost is necessarie 626 Howe wee may knowe that the holie ghost dwelleth in vs. 627 Of the Church What the Church is 627 How many waies the Church is taken 629 What are the tokens and markes of the church 631 Why the church is called Holy Catholicke 633 In what the church differeth from the common weale 634 Whence ariseth the difference of the church from the rest of mankinde 635 Whether any one may be saued out of the church 636 Of Predestination Whether there be Predestination 636 What Predestinâ—tion is 641 What are the causes of Predestination or Election and of Reprobation 642 What are the effects of Predestination 644 Whether Predestination be vnchangeable 645 How far forth Predestination Election and Reprobation are known vnto vs. 645 Whether the elect be alwaies meÌ„bers of the church the reprobate neuer 646 Whether the elect may fall from the church and the reprobate abide alwaies in the church 648 What is the vse of this doctrine 649 Of the communion of Saints 649 Of the remission of sinnes What remission of sinnes is 651 Who giueth remission of sinnes 652 For what remission of sinnes is graunted 653 Whether remission of sinnes agreeth with Gods iustice 653 Whether remission of sinnes be freely giuen 654 To whom remission of sins is giuen and how 655 Of the Resurrection of the flesh What the Resurrection is 656 The Errours concerning the Resurrection 656 Whence it may appeare that the Resurrection shall certainely be 657 For what end the Resurrection shall be 659 By whom the Resurrection shal be 660 How the Resurrection shal be 660 When the Resurrection shal be 661 What bodies shal rise 661 Whether the soule be immortall 662 Of euerlasting life What euerlasting life is 670 VVho giueth euerlasting life 672 To whom euerlasting life is giuen 673 For what cause euerlasting life is giuen 673 VVhen how euerlasting life is giuen vnto vs 674 675 VVhether wee can bee assured in this life of euerlasting life 675 Of Justification VVhat iustice or righteousnes is in generall how manifold it is 677. 678 In what iustice differeth from iustification 679 VVhat is our iustice 680 How Christs satisfactioÌ„ is made our iustice and righteousnes 681 VVhy Christs satisfaction is made ours 683 VVhy Christs satisfaction is made ours by faith onely 684 Obiections against this doctrine of iustification aunswered 685 Of Sacraments VVhat sacraments are 694 VVhat are the ends of sacraments 697 In what sacraments differ from sacrifices 699 In what sacramentes agree with the word and in what they differ from it 700 How the sacraments of the old new Testament agree how they differ 702 VVhat the sacramentall vnion is 703 In what the thinges differ from the signes 704 VVhat phrases and formes of speaking of the sacraments are vsuall vnto the church and scripture 705 VVhat is the right and lawful vse of sacraments 705 VVhat the wicked receiue in the vse administration of the sacraments 706 How
the holie ghost proceeding from the Father and the Sonne Euen as it hath bin manifested from aboue certain worde thereof beeing deliuered by the Prophets Christ and the Apostles and by diuine testimonies tâ—at the eternall Father together with the Sonne and the holy ghost hath created heauen and earth and all creatures and worketh all good things in all that in mankind he hath chosen vnto himselfe and gathered a Church by and for the Sonne that by his Church this one and true Deitie may be according to the word deliuered from aboue acknowledged celebrated and adored in this life and in the life to come lastly that he is the iudge of the iust and vniust The description of God according to philosophie Philosophically he is described on this wise God is an eternall minde or intelligence sufficient in himselfe to all felicitie most good and the cause of good in nature So is hee defined by Plato in his book of Definitions likewise in his Timaeus And by Aristotle Lib. 12. Metaph. Cap. 7. and Lib. de Mundo c. The Theological description of god In what the former descriptions differ which the church deliuereth differeth from this Philosophical description because that is pefecter than this 1 In the number of parts whereof it addeth manie by nature vnknown vnto men as of the Trinity of the RedeÌ„ption of man c. 2. In the vnderstanding declaration of those parts which are common to both for the Theological description declareth them more certainlie and fullie 3. In the effect or fruite By Philosophie or the light of nature men are not able to bee brought to the true knowledge of God both because it is maimed and false by mens corruption as also because it doth not stirre vp in vs Godlines that is the loue and feare of God seeing it teacheth not those things whereby this is effectuated and brought to passe An explication of the description of God deliuered by the Church GOD is an essence That is a thing which 1. hath his being from none but from himselfe 2. is preserued or sustained of none but subsisteth by himselfe 3. is necessarilie 4. is the only cause vnto all other things of their being Wherfore he is called Iehoua as if you would saie beeing by himselfe and causing other things to be to wit according to his nature and promises Spirituall 1. Because hee is incorporeal as being infinite and indiuisible most excellent 2. Insensible For first experience teacheth this Secondly God is without sensible qualities which are the obiects of the senses and Thirdly hee is immense The eies perceiue onely thinges finite and which are within a certain compasse 3. He is spirituall because both himselfe liueth and is the author of all life both corporall and spirituall Obiection Against this opinion manie places of scripture haue beene heretofore by some alleadged How God and Angels appeared vnto men in which it is written that God and Angels did appeare and were seen thereby to proue that their nature is corporeal and visible But we are to know that not the very substances of God and Angels but created shapes and bodies were beheld of men made carried and moued by the will and vertue of God or Angels that by them they might make knowen their presence and vse their ministerie and seruice in instructing men of those thinges which seemed good vnto them And these were sometimes by imagination represented to the interiour senses of men which also somewhere may somewhere cannot be gathered out of the circumstances of the histories As the Angels appearing to Abraham Lot were inuested with true bodies as which might bee toucht and handled Whether Micha before Achab saw with the eies of his bodie or of his mind the Lord and his Angels is a matter of doubt But that those visible shapes were not the very substaunce of God is hereby manifest for that the scripture with great consent teacheth that God is seene of no man neither can be seene and incomprehensible and vnchangeable But those visible shapes were not alwaies the same How God is saied to be seene face to face 2 Obiection To these they adde that which is saide that God was seene of Iacob face to face Gen. 32. And of Moses Exod. 33. and Deut 34. And of all the people Deut. 5. And that all of vs shall see God face to face in the life to come 1. Cor. 13. By which metaphor or borrowed speeche is signified a cleare and conspicuous manifestation and knowledge of God which is perceiued not with the eies of the bodie but of the minde either by meanes as by the word by his woorkes and outwarde tokens and such as runne into the the senses whence the minde may gather somewhat of God Or without meanes by inwarde reuelation And albeit in the life to come shall bee a farre more bright knowledge of god than nowe yet to knowe god most perfectly is proper to god onely as it is saide Iohn 6.46 Not that any man hath seene the father saue hee which is of God hee hath seene the father So farre is it that the inuisible infinite and euerlasting Deitie may euer be conceaued by bodilie eies whose nature is not to perceiue any obiectes but such as are finite and limited How the partes of mans bodie are attributed vnto God 3 Obiection They haue alleaged also those sayinges wherein the parts of mans bodie are attributed to God But these also are not properly but by a Metaphor spoken of god whereby is signified to vs a power in god working after an incomprehensible manner his workes a certaine shadowe whereof are those actions which men doe by the ministerie and helpe of their bodily partes as the eies and eares signifie the wisedome of god whereby hee vnderstandeth all thinges the mouth the publishing of his worde the face the declaration tokens and feeling of his diuine goodnesse grace or seueritie anger The hart his loue the hands and armes his power the feete his presence 4 Obiection They haue affirmed also The image of God in man doeth not argue a bodily shape in God because man was made according to the image of god that therefore god hath a humane shape not marking that the image of god consisteth not in the shape and figure of the bodie but in the mind integritie of nature in wisedome righteousnes and true holines Eph. 4. As for Tertullian whereas he reasoneth that god is a bodie that he speaketh vnproperly therein and abuseth the word bodie in steed of substance not only Austine witnesseth in his Epistle to Quoduultdeus but this is also an argumeÌ„t proofe thereof because he termeth also the soules and Angels oftentimes bodies Wherefore let vs know that therefore wee are taught the nature of god to bee spirituall Why wee must knowe God to bee spirituall that wee may not conceiue of god anie thing which is grosse terrene carnall
death of the onely begotten Sonne of God 2 That it might be an exasperating of the punishment and so wee so much the more confirmed in a true faith when wee consider Christ by this kinde of punishment to haue taken vpon him our gilt euen our punishment also and curse according to that Cursed is euerie one that hangeth on tree Deut. 21.23 Gal. 3.13 3 That the trueth might answere according to the types and figures so we might know the types to be fulfilled in Christ For 1 The sacrifices which shadowed the sacrifice of Christ were hung vpon trees thereby to signifie that Christ should be fastned on a tree and accomplishing his sacrifice offer a holy sacrifice vnto his Father 2 The sacrifices being lifted vp on high before they were burned did signifie the exalting and listing vp of Christ on the Altar of the Crosse 3 The same was shadowed in Isaack who being laid on wood was to haue beene sacrificed of his Father 4 The brasen Serpent which Moses set vp vpon a pole in the wildernesse depainteth this kind of punishment Christ himselfe interpreted of himselfe this type of the brasen Serpent Joh. 3.14 DEAD I Beleeue in Christ dead that is I beleeue Christ not onely to haue suffered extreame torments for my sake but also death it selfe hath by his death obtained for me remission of sinnes and reconciliation with God consequently also the holy Ghost who beginneth in me a new life that I may againe bee made the Temple of God and at length attaine vnto euerlasting life wherein I shall woorship and magnifie God for euer OF CHRISTS DEATH THE chiefe Questions hereof are 1 How Christ is said to haue bin dead 2 Whether it was requisite and necessarie that Christ should die 3 What are the fruits of Christs death 1 HOW CHRIST IS SAID TO HAVE BEENE DEAD IT is needful to moue this question because of the heretikes who haue depraued the sense of this article Marcion denied that hee died indeed as also hee affirmed the whole ordinarie dispensation and ministerie of the humane nature in Christ and all those thinges which hee did vndergoe for vs to haue bin but imaginarie and that hee onely seemed to bee as a man Nestorius separated the two natures in Christ neither would haue the sonne of God but man onely to haue died Doe not boast thou Jewe saieth Nestorius thou hast not crucified God The Vbiquitaries beleeue that the humanitie of Christ from the moment of his incarnation was so indowed with all the properties of the Godhead as that only in this the humanitie differeth from the Godhead that the humanitie hath by an accident whatsoeuer the Godhead hath by and of it selfe Hereof it commeth that they imagin that Christ was in the time of his death yea when hee was inclosed in the Virgins wombe in heauen and eueriewhere not onely as touching his Godhead but with his bodie too This is it which they call the forme of God Wherefore against all these wee affirme that Christ died truely and corporallie euen by a true diuulsion separation of his soule from his bodie so that not onely his soule and body were not together euerie where but were not together in one place Mat. 27.50 Thē Iesus cried again with a loud voice yeelded vp the Ghost Mar. 15.37 Iesus cried with a loude voice and gaue vp the Ghost Luk 23.46 Father into thy hands I commend my spirit And when hee had saide these words hee gaue vp the Ghost Iohn 19.30 Hee bowed his head and gaue vp the Ghost But yet this is further to be added that although his soule was separated from his bodie yet the Word notwithstanding did not forsake neither bodie nor soule but remained neuerthelesse ioyned both to bodie and soule and therefore the two natures in Christ were not diuelled or sundered by that diuulsion of the soule and bodie Obiection Why then cried hee Mat. 27.46 My God my God why hast thou forsaken mee Aunswere Because of his delay and differring of help and succour For the two natures in Christ ought not to haue beene diuelled or sundered because it is written God hath purchased the Church with his owne bloude And hee was to be the sonne of God who shoulde die for our sinnes that hee might bee a sufficient price for them Hereby also it doth clearely appeare that The vnion of both natures in Christ is no Vbiquitie For the soul being separated from the bodie was not in the graue with the bodie and by a consequent not eueriewhere because that which is euerie where can neuer bee separated Obiection But as vertue that is his diuinitie is saide to haue gone out of him so also hee gaue vp the Ghost Aunswere There is a dissimilitude in these Because the diuinity remaining vnited with the humane nature yet did worke abroade without it The soule did depart from the bodie The reason of this dissimilitude is because the act of his diuinitie is increate and infinite but the act and power of his soul finite and created 2 Whether it was requisite and necessary that Christ should die IT was requisite and necessarie that Christ should die 1. In respect of the iustice of God that so his iustice might be satisfied which required the death of men by whom it was violated For the hurting offending of the greatest good is to bee expiated with the greatest punishment or with the vtmost destruction of nature that is with the death of the giltie condemned for sinne according to that Rom. 6.23 The wages of sinne is death Now it was requisite that the sonne of God should die that hee might bee a sufficient ransome for our sinnes For no creature coulde haue sustained such a punishment as should haue beene equiualent to eternall punishment and yet withall should haue beene temporal Obiection They haue deserued eternall punishment whosoeuer are not reconciled to God by Christ. Therefore the soules ought not to be separated from their bodies that they might suffer eternal damnation Aunswere It dooth not followe but this rather That therefore both bodie and soule must bee together that they maie suffer it which at length shall so come to passe 2 Jn respect of gods truth that the truth of GOD maie bee satisfied For GOD threatned and denounced death when euer wee sinned which denouncing was to bee fulfilled after sin was once committed And this is that commination or threatning pronounced by God himselfe Gen. 2.17 In the daie that thou eatest thereof thou shalt die the death Obiection But Adam did not presently die Aunswere Truely he died spirituallie eternal death and now was dead I hard saith he Gen. 3.10 thy voice There was a terrour in him and a feeling of Gods wrath a strife with death the losse of al the giftes both of body and mind But there followed the equity moderation and lenitie of the Gospell For God had not expressely saide that hee shoulde certainelie die wholy and that
shall deliuer me from the bodie of this death Reu. 22.17 The spirit the Bride say Come Lord Jesu which they say not who are not ready to receiue the Lorde For the wicked tremble and shake at the mention of that iudgement THE THIRD PART OF THE CREED Of the holy Ghost the sanctifier IN this last part of the Apostolike confession are cōteined six articles whereof the first speaketh of the person of the holie Ghost the next of the Church which is gathered confirmed and preserued by the holy Ghost the foure articles following are of the benefites bestowed by the Holy Ghost on the Church and first of the communion of Saints Secondly of remission of sinnes Thirdly of the resurrection of the flesh Lastly of euerlasting life The chiefe Questions of the holy Ghost or holy spirite 1 What the name spirit signifieth 2 Who and what the Holie Ghost or spirite is 3 What is the holy Ghosts office 4 Of whom the holy Ghost is giuen and wherefore 5 To whom he is giuen 6 How he is giuen and receiued 7 How he is reteined and kept 8 Whether he maie be lost and how 9 Wherefore he is necessarie 10 How we may know that he dwelleth in vs. 1 * It is here to be noted that this Questiō serueth more properlie for the latine which vseth this name Spiritus only when as we in English vse as much or more rather the word Ghost than Spirit when wee speake of the third Person WHAT THE NAME SPIRIT SIGNIFIETH THE name spirite is taken sometimes for the cause sometimes for the effect When it is taken for the cause it signifieth a nature incorporeall and liuing of a spirituall essence wielding moouing and stirring some thing So first God essentiallie and personallie is a spirit that is incorporeal without any bodilie dimensions or quantitie inuisible Secondly The Angels also whether good or bad are in this sense spirites Thirdly after the same manner the soules of men are called spirits Gen. 2.7 Hee breathed in his face breath of life that is he sent in a spirit or soule into him When the woorde spirit is taken for an effect it signifieth 1. The aire moued 2. The mouing it selfe and motion of the aire 3. The wind and moouing vapours 4. Spirituall effects or motions good or bad So is it said The spirit of fear And contrary The spirit of Princes that is courage likewise The spirit of fornication 5. New spirit signifieth the giftes of the holy spirit In this doctrine which we haue in hand Spirit signifieth the cause stirring and moouing namely the third person of the God-head which is forcible in the mindes and wils of men And this third person of the God-heade is called a spirit 1. Because he is a spiritual essence or substaunce incorporeall and inuisible 2. Because he is inspired of the Father and the son that is because is the immediate stirrer and moouer of diuine works The Father and the Sonne mooue but by this spirit 3. Because himselfe inspireth and immediatly worketh motions in the harts of the Elect whence he is called Luk. 1.35 The power of the most high 4. Because hee is God equall and the same with the Father and the Son And god is a spirite This third person of the God-head is called Holie 1. Because he in himselfe by himselfe and of his owne nature is Holie 1. Because he is the hallower or sanctifier that is he immediatly halloweth or sanctifieth and maketh holie others The father and the sonne sanctifie by him and therefore mediatelie 2 Who and what the holy ghost is THE holie ghost is the third person of the true and onelie god-head proceeding from the Father and the Sonne and coeternall coequal and consubstantial with the Father and the Son and is sent from both into the harts of the Elect to sanctifie them vnto eternal life Here are we to say the same thinges of the Godhead of the holy Ghost which haue bin spoken before of the Godhead of the son For this definition is also to be prooued and confirmed by the proofes of the same foure partes 1 That the holy Ghost is a person 2 That he is the third person or that he is other distinct from the father and the Sonne 3 That he is true God with the Father and the Sonne or that he is equall to the Father and the Sonne 4 That he is of the same God-head with the Father the Sonne or that he is consubstantiall vnto both FIrst therefore that the holy ghost is a person is prooued 1 By his apparitions Because he hath appeared visible Luk. 3.22 The holy ghost came downe in a bodilie shape like a Doue Act. 2.3 And there appeared vnto them clouen toungs like fire and it that is the fire or the holie ghost sate vpon each of them Seeing then the holy Ghost descended in bodilie shape vpon Christ and sate vpon the Apostles it followeth that he is subsisting For no qualitie or created motion of minds or hearts is able to doe in like manner For an accident doth not only not take vpō it any shape but standeth in neede of some thing else in which it selfe should consist and bee Neither is the aire the place or subiect of holinesse godlinesse loue of God and other spiritual motions but the mindes of men 2. He is proued to be a person because he is called god 1. Cor. 3.16 Know yee not that yee are the temple of god and that the spirite of god dwelleth in you Acts 5.3 Why hath satan filled thine hart that thou shouldest lie vnto the holie Ghost And in the next verse he saith Thou hast not lied vnto men but vnto god See also Isai 40.7.13 Actes 28.25 Ephes 4.4.30 Howesoeuer then the aduersaries of this doctrine gtaunt the holy Ghost to be God yet this cannot bee but he must be a subsistent or person seing God is a being but our godlinesse goodnesse Godly motions and other diuine affections cannot be called God 3. He is a person because he is the author of our Baptisme and we are baptized in his name that is by his commaundement and wil. But wee are not baptized by the commaundement and wil of a deade thing or of a thing not existing neither are wee baptized in the name of the graces or giftes of God 4. Because the properties of a person are attributed vnto him as that hee teacheth that he distributeth giftes euen as he wil that he comforteth confirmeth ruleth raigneth likewise that hee sendeth Apostles that hee speaketh in the Apostles Luke 12.12 The holie Ghost shall teach you in the same houre what yee ought to saie So also he declareth the thinges to come Ioh. 16.13 The spirite of truth wil shewe you the thinges to come Hee giueth prophecies he commaundeth and willeth that the Apostles be separated and lastlie he appointeth teachers in the church All these are thinges proper vnto a person existing intelligent endued with a wil working
the son and the holy ghost haue a beginning or original of person or order or of the maner of existing but not of essence For this they haue one the same in number with the father from euerlasting that is void of al beginning and original and existeth necessarily from no other but of it selfe Reply But he who hath his originall of person from another is not Iehoua But the son and the holy ghost haue their original of person from the father Therefore they are not Iehoua Answere The Maior is a false ground For the scripture dooth plainly teach both of theÌ„ namely both the son the holie ghost to be Iehoua Ioh. 5.26 As the father hath life in himself so hath he giuen likewise to the son to haue life in himselfe yet the scripture withall affirmeth that both haue their originall of person froÌ„ the Father For the Father begot not the essence but the person by communicating vnto him his owne essence the same and whole 4 The faithful are one with God not in essence but in consent of wils But the Father and the Sonne are in such sort one as the faithful are one with god Iohn 17.11.21 Therefore the Sonne is one with the Father in coniunction of wils onelie not in vnitie of essence Answere There is more in the conclusion than in the premisses For the particle ONLIE which is stitched to the conclusion is not in the Minor proposition Wherefore of a Minor which is but particular an vniuersal coÌ„clusion is ill inferred after this maner There is a certain vnity between the father the son such as is between god and the faithful Therefore al vnitie which is betwixt them is such Wherefore we saie That the faithfull are one with God among themselues in will onelie or conformitie or coniunction of mindes The Father the Sonne are one both in wil furdermore in vnitie of essence Wherefore if a wider and more ample coniunction be put a streiter coniunction is not thereby excluded 5 He that is the whole God-head is not any one person of the God-head or there is not anie one besides him in whom likewise the whole God-heade is But the Father is the whole God-heade Therefore the Father is not anie one but euen al the person that is of the god-head neither are there mo persons wherein that godhead is Aunswere Wee denie the Maior Because the same god-head which is in the father is whole also in the son the holy ghost For by reason of the immensity and vndiuidablenes thereof that is communicated of the father euen the same entire and whole both to the son to the holy ghost so that there is neither more nor lesse of the godheade in euery person than either in two or in al three 6 The diuine essence is neither begotten nor proceeding of another But the Sonne is begotten and the Holie ghost proceedeth Therefore they are not the same diuine essence which the Father is Answere Of meere particulars nothing can follow or be concluded The Maior cannot bee expounded generallie For it is false that whatsoeuer is the diuine essence hee is not begotten or proceeding 7 The Diuine essence is incarnate The three persons are the Diuine essence therefore the three persons are incarnate Aunswere Of meere particulars there followeth nothing The Maior speaketh onely of the sonne For it is false being taken generally as Whatsoeuer is the diuine essence is incarnat This general proposition is false For the diuine essence is incarnate only in one of the persons which is the sonne not in al three 8 The sonne is Mediatour with Iehoua But the son is Iehoua Therefore Iehoua is Mediator with himselfe Answer Nothing followeth of mere particulars For the Sonne is not Mediatour with al that is Iehoua but the father Reply Therefore the Father only is pacified towardes vs and by a consequent he alone is true GOD not the Sonne or the Holie Ghost For hee is the true GOD who is pacified by the Mediatour Aunwere We denie this Sequele For there is but one will of the three persons and that agreeing in al thinges Wherfore the father being pleased pacified for the sons satisfaction in our behalfe the sonne also and the holie ghost are pacified and receiue vs into fauour for the same satisfaction 9 Christ dooth euery where discerne and seuer himselfe from the father he hath a Head he hath a God hee is lesse than the Father Therefore he is not the same God which the Father or he is not equal and consubstantial with the Father Answere He discerneth and distinguisheth himselfe from the Father 1. in person 2. in office as he is Mediator but not in God-head So hee hath a Head and a God and is lesse than the Father First as touching his humanitie in nature and office then as touching his Godhead not in nature but in office onlie and in the manifestation of his godhead For they which are in nature equal may bee vnequal in degree of office 10 This is saith Christ Ioh. 17.3 life eternall that they knowe thee to bee the onely verie god Therefore the sonne and the holie ghost are not verie god Aunswere First in this place are opposed not the Father and the Sonne or the holy Ghost but God and Idols and creatures Therefore these are excluded not the Sonne or the holy Ghost And Secondlie there is a fallacy in transferring the particle ONELY vnto the subiect THEE vnto which it dooth not belong but vnto the predicate God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which the Greeke Article in the originall dooth shew For the sense is that they knowe thee the Father to bee that God who onely is verie God Reply But this Argument followeth Maximilian is Emperour â—herefore Rodulph is not Why theÌ„ doth not this folow The father is God Therefore the Sonne is not god Ans These persons are finite and their essence cannot belong to moe but the Father and the Sonne are persons infinite and their essence may be of moe namelie of three persons 11 Jehoua or the true God is the Trinitie The Father is Jehoua Therefore the Father is the trinity that is all three persons Answer Meere particular propositions conclude nothing And if the Maior bee expounded generallie after this manner Whatsoeuer is Iehoua is the Trinitie it is false For that which is Iehoua maie be some one person of the trinitie The whole Syllogisme therefore is faulty because Iehoua is not taken in the same signification in both the premisses For the name Iehoua in the Maior is taken absolutelie essentially for the three persons For one and the same Iehoua or true God is The Father and sonne and holy Ghost iointly But in the minor it is taken personallie for one person of the Godhead that is the Father who is Iehoua of himselfe Replie Iehoua is one in number Therefore it is alwaies taken in scripture after the same maner Answer