of rest and quiet so that Motion must be put in them by some Impulse or other Matter after it has pass'd through the highest Refinings and Rectifyings possible becomes only more capable of Motion than it was before but still it is a Passive Principle and must be put in Motion by some other Being This has appeared so necessary even to those who have tried their utmost Force to make God as little needful as is possible in the Structure of the Universe that they have yet been forced to own That there must have been once a vast Motion given to Matter by the Supreme Mind A Third Argument for the Being of a God is That upon some great Occasions and before a vast Number of Witnesses some Persons have wrought Miracles That is they have put Nature out of its Course by some Words or Signs that of themselves could not produce those extraordinary Effects And therefore such Persons were assisted by a Power superior to the Course of Nature and by consequence there is such a Being and That is God To this the Atheists do First say That we do not know the secret Virtues that are in Nature The Loadstone and Opium produce wonderful Effects therefore unless we knew the whole Extent of Nature we cannot define what is Supernatural and Miraculous and what is not so But though we cannot tell how far Nature may go yet of some things we may without hesitation say they are beyond Natural Powers Such were the Wonders that Moses wrought in Egypt and in the Wilderness by the speaking a few Words or the stretching out of a Rod. We are sure these could not by any Natural Efficiency produce those Wonders And the like is to be said of the Miracles of Christ particularly of his raising the Dead to life again and of his own Resurrection These we are sure did not arise out of Natural Causes The next thing Atheists say to this is to dispute the Truth of the Facts But of that I shall treat in another place when the Authority of Revealed Religion comes to be proved from those Facts All that is necessary to be added here is That if Facts that are plainly Supernatural are proved to have been really done then here is another clear and full Argument to prove a Being superior to Nature that can dispose of it at pleasure And that Being must either be God or some other Invisible Being that has a Strength superior to the setled Course of Nature And if Invisible Beings superior to Nature whether good or bad are once acknowledged a great Step is made to the Proof of the Supreme Being There is another famed Argument taken from the Idea of God which is laid thus That because one frames a Notion of Infinite Perfection therefore there must be such a Being from whom that Notion is conveyed to us This Argument is also managed by other Methods to give us a Demonstration of the Being of a God I am unwilling to say any thing to derogate from any Argument that is brought to prove this Conclusion but when he who insists on this lays all other Arguments aside or at least slights them as not strong enough to prove the Point this naturally gives Jealousy when all those Reasons that had for so many Ages been considered as solid Proofs are neglected as if this only could amount to a Demonstration But besides this is an Argument that cannot be offered by any to another Person for his Conviction since if he denies that he has any such Idea he is without the reach of the Argument And if a man will say that any such Idea which he may raise in himself is only an Aggregate that he makes of all those Perfections of which he can form a Thought which he lays together separating from them every Imperfection that he observes to be often mixed with some of those Perfections If I say a Man will affirm this I do not see that the Inference from any such Thought that he has formed within himself can have any great force to persuade him that there is any such Being Upon the whole it seems to be fully proved That there is a Being that is Superior to Matter and that gave both Being and Order to it and to all other things This may serve to prove the Being of a God It is fit in the next place to consider with all humble Modesty what Thoughts we can or ought to have of the Deity That Supreme Being must have its Essence of it self necessarily and Eternally for it is impossible that any thing can give it self Being so it must be Eternal And though Eternity in a Succession of Determinate Durations was proved to be impossible yet it is certain that something must be Eternal either Matter or a Being superior to it that has not a Duration defined by Succession but is a simple Essence and Eternally was is and shall be the same There is nothing contradictory to it self in this Notion It is indeed above our Capacity to form a clear Thought of it but it is plain it must be so and that this is only a defect in our Nature and Capacity that we cannot distinctly apprehend that which is so far above us Such a Being must have also necessary Existence in its Notion for whatsoever is infinitely perfect must necessarily exist since we plainly perceive that necessary Existence is a Perfection and that contingent Existence is an Imperfection which supposes a Being that is produced by another and that depends upon it And as this Superior Being did exist from all Eternity so it is impossible it should cease to be since nothing that once has actually a Being can ever cease to be but by an Act of a Superior Being annihilating it But there being nothing superior to the Deity it is impossible that it should ever cease to be What was self-existent from all Eternity must also be so to all Eternity and it is as impossible that a simple Essence can annihilate it self as that it can make it self So much concerning the First and Capital Article of all Religion The Existence and Being of a God which ought not to be proved by any Authorities from Scripture unless from the Recitals that are given in it concerning Miracles as was already hinted at But as to the Authority of such Passages in Scripture which affirm That there is a God it is to be considered that before we can be bound to submit to them we must believe Three Propositions antecedent to that 1. That there is a God 2. That all his Words are true 3. That these are his Words What therefore must be believed before we acknowledge the Scriptures cannot be proved out of them It is then a strange Assertion to say That the Being of a God cannot be proved by the Light of Nature but must be proved by the Scriptures since our being assured That there is a God is the First Principle upon which the Authority
of Proceeding The Fourth Head in this Article is concerning the Power Wisdom and Goodness of God that he is Infinite in them If he can give Being to things that are not and can also give all the possibilities of Motion Size and Shape to Beings that do exist here is Power without bounds A Power of Creating must be Infinite since nothing can resist it If some things are in their own nature impossible that does not arise from the want of Power in God which extends to every thing that is possible But that which is supposed to be impossible of its own nature cannot actually be Otherwise a thing might both be and not be and it is peâ—ceptible to every man that this is impossible It is not want of Power in God that he cannot lye nor sin It is the Infinite Purity of the Divine Nature that makes this impossible by reason of his Infinite Perfection Nor is it a want of Power in God That the Truth of Propositions concerning things that are past as that Yesterday once was is unalterable Among Impossibilities one is To take from any Being that which is essential to it God can annihilate every Being at his Pleasure for as he gave Being with a Thought so he can destroy it with another And this does fully assert the Infinite Power of God But if he has made Beings with such peculiar Essences as that Matter must be extended and impenetrable and that it is capable of peculiar Surfaces and other Modes which are only its different Sizes and Shapes then Matter cannot be and yet not be extended nor can these Modes subsist if the Matter of which they are the Modes is withdrawn The Infinite Power of God is fully believed by those who acknowledge both his Power of Creating and Annihilating together with a Power of disposing of the whole Creation according to the possibilities of every Part or Individual of it though they cannot conceive a possibility of separating the essential Properties of any Being from it sâ—lf that is to say That it may both be and not be at the same time since an essential Property is that which cannot be without that Substance to which it belongs The Wisdom of God consists first in his seeing all the possibilities of things and then in his knowing all things that either are or ever were or shall be The former is called the knowledge of simple Intelligence or Apprehension the other is called the knowledge of Vision The one arises from the Perfection of the Divine Essence by which he apprehends whatever is possible the other arises from his own Decrees in which the whole Order of things is fixed But besides these two Ideas that wâ— can frame of the Knowledge of God some have imagined a third Knowledge which because it is of a middle Order bâ—twixt Intelligence and Vision thâ—y have called a middle Knowledge which is the knowing certainly how according to all the possibilities of Circumstances in which Free Agents might be put they should chuse and act Some have thought that this was a vain and needless Conceit and that it is impossible that such Knowledge should be certain or more than conjectural and since Conjecture implies Doubt it is an Impâ—rfect Act and so does not become a Being of Infinite Perfâ—ction But others have thought that the Infinite Perfection of the Divine Mind must go so far as to foresee certainly what Free Creatures are to do since upon this Foresight only they imagine that the Justice or Goodness of God in his Providence can be made out or defended It seemed fit to mention this upon the present occasion but it will be then proper to enquire more carefully about it when the Article of Predestination is explained It is necessary to state the Idea of the Goodness of God most carefully for we naturally enough frame great and just Ideas of Power and Wisdom but we easily fall into false Conceits of Goodness This is that of all the Divine Perfections in which we are the most concerned and so we ought to be the most careful to frame true Ideas of it It is also that of all God's Attributes of which the Scriptures speak most copiously Infinite Goodness is a Tendency to communicate the Divine Perfections to all created Beings according to their several Capacities God is Original Goodness all perfect and happy in himself acting and seeing every thing in a perfect Light and he having made Rational Beings capable of some degrees of his Light Purity and Perfection the first and primary Act of Goodness is to propose to them such Means as may raise them to these to furnish them with them to move them oft to them to accept and to assist their sincere Endeavours after them A second Act of Goodness which is but in order to the first is to pity those Miseries into which men fall as long as there is any Principle or Possibility left in them of their becoming good to pardon all such sins as men have committed who turn to the purposes of becoming seriously good and to pass by all the fralities and errors of those who are truly and upon the main good though Surprize and strong Temptations prove often too hard for them These two give us as full an Idea as we can have of perfect Goodness whose first Aim must be the making us good and like to that Original Goodness Pity and Pardon coming in but in a subsidiary way to carry on the main design of making men truly good Therefore the chief Act and Design of Goodness is the making us truly good and when any person falls below that possibility he is no more the Object of Pity or Pardon because he is no more capable of becoming good Pardon is offered on design to make us really good so it is not to be sought for nor rested in but in order to a further End which is the reforming our Natures and the making us Partakers of the Divine Nature We are not therefore to frame Ideas of a feeble Goodness in God that yields to importunate Cries or that melts at a vast degree of Misery Tenderness in Human Nature is a great Ornament and Perfection necessary to dispose us to much Benignity and Mercy But in the common Administration of Justice this Tenderness must be restrained otherwise it would slacken the Rigor of Punishment too much which might dissolve the Order and Peace of Human Societies But since we cannot see into the truth of mens hearts a charitable Disposition and a compassionate Temper are necessary to make men sociable and kind gentle and human God who sees our hearts and is ever assisting all our Endeavours to become truly good needs not this Tenderness nor is he indeed capable of it for after all its Beauty with relation to the State wherein we are now put yet in it self it implies Imperfection Nor can the Miseries and Howlings of wicked Beings after all the Seeds and Possibilities of Goodness
Frame of Nature must go out of the Channel into which God did at first put it The Order of Things on this Earth takes a great Turn from the Wind both as to the Fruitfulness of the Earth and to the Operations on the Sea and has likewise a great Influence on the Purity of the Air and by consequence on mens good or ill Health and the Wind or the Agitation of the Air turns so often and so quick that it seems to be the great Instrument of Providence upon which an unconceivable variety of things does naturally depend I do not deny but that it may be said that all those Changes in the Air arise from Certain and Mechanical though to us unknown Causes which may be supported from this That between the Tropicks where the Influence of the Heavenly Bodies is stronger the Wind and Weather are more Regular though even that admits of great Exceptions Yet it has been the common Sense of Mankind That besides the Natural Causes of the Alterations in the Air they are under a particular Influence and Direction of Providence And it is in it self highly probable to say no more of it This may either be managed immediately by the Acts of the Divine Mind to which Nature readily obeys or by some subaltern Mind or Angel which may have as Natural an Efficiency over an Extent of Matter proportioned to its Capacity as a Man has over his own Body and over that compass of Matter that is within his reach Which way soever God governs the World and what Influence soever he has over Mens Minds we are sure that the governing and preserving his own Workmanship is so plainly a Perfection that it must belong to a Being infinitely perfect And there is such a Chain in things those of the greatest consequence arising often from small and inconsiderable ones that we cannot imagine a Providence unless we believe every thing to be within its Care and View The only difficulty that has been made in apprehending this has arisen from the Narrowness of Mens Minds who have measured God rather by their own Measure and Capacity than by that of Infinite Perfection which as soon as it is considered will put an end to all further doubtings about it When we perceive that a vast Number of Objects enter in at our Eye by a very small Passage and yet are so little jumbled in that Crowd that they open themselves regularly though there is no great space for that neither and that they give us a distinct apprehension of many Objects that lye before us some even at a vast distance from us both of their Nature Colour and Size and by a secret Geometry from the Angles that they make in our Eye we judge of the distance of all Objects both from us and from one another If to this we add the vast Number of Figures that we receive and retain long and with great order in our Brains which we easily fetch up either in our Thoughts or in our Discourses we shall find it less difficult to apprehend how an Infinite Mind should have the Universal View of all things ever present before it It is true we do not so easily conceive how Free Minds are under this Providence as how Natural Agents should always move at its direction But we perceive that one Mind can work upon another A man raises a sound of Words which carry such signs of his inward Thoughts that by this Motion in the Air another Man's Ear is so struck upon that thereby an impression is made upon his Brain by which he not only conceives what the other Man's Thought was but is very powerfully inclined to consent to it and to concur with it All this is a great way about and could not be easily apprehended by us if we had not a clear and constant Perception of it Now since all this is brought about by a Motion upon our Brains according to the force with which we are more or less affected it is very reasonable for us to apprehend that the Supreme Mind can besides many other ways to us less known put such Motions in our Brain as may give us all such Thoughts as it intends to impress upon us in as strong and effectual a manner as may fully answer all its purposes The great Objection that lies against the Power and the Goodness of Providence from all that Evil that is in the World which God is either not willing or not able to hinder will be more properly considered in another place at present it is enough in general to observe That God's Providence must carry on every thing according to its Nature and since he has made some Free Beings capable of Thought and of Good and Evil we must believe That as the Course of Nature is not oft put out of its Channel unless when some extraordinary thing is to be done in order to some great End so in the Government of free Agents they must be generally left to their liberty and not put too oft off of their Biass This is a hint to resolve that difficulty by concerning all the Moral Evil which is generally speaking the occasion of most of the Physical Evil that is in the World A Providence thus setled that extends it self to all things both natural and free is necessary to preserve Religion to engage us to Prayers Praises and to a dependence on it and a submission to it Some have thought it was necessary to carry this further and so they make God to be the first and immediate cause of every Action or Motion This some Modern Writers have taken from the Schools and have drest it in new Phrases of General Laws Particular Wills and Occasional Causes and so they express or explain God's producing every Motion that is in Matter and his raising every Sensation and by the same parity of Reason every Cogitation in Minds This they think arises out of the Idea of Infinite Perfection and fully answers these words of the Scriptures That in God we live move and have our being To others all this seems first unnecessary for if God has made Matter capable of Motion and capable of receiving it from the Stroke or Impulse that another piece of Matter gives it This comes as truly from God as if he did immediately give every Motion by an act of his own Will It seems more suitable to the Beauty of his Workmanship to think that he has so framed things that they hold on in that course in which he has put them than to make him perpetually produce every new Motion And the bringing God immediately into every thing may by an Odd Reverse of Effects make the World think that every thing is done as much without him as others are apt to imagine that every thing is done by him And though it is true that we cannot distinctly apprehend how a Motion in our Brain should raise such a Thought as Answers to it in our Minds
Grace of Christ and the Inspiration of his Spirit are not pleasant to God forasmuch as they spring not of Faith in Iesus Christ neither do they make men meet to receive Grace or as the School-Authors say deserve Grace of Congruity Yea rather for that they are not done as God hath commanded and willed them to be done we doubt not but that they have the nature of Sin THere is but one Point to be considered in this Article which is Whether Men can without any inward Assistances from God do any Action that shall be in all its circumstances so good that it is not only acceptable to God but meritorious in his sight though in a lower degree of merit If what was formerly laid down concerning a Corruption that was spread over the whole Race of Mankind and that had very much vitiated their Faculties be true then it will follow from thence That unassisted Nature can do nothing that is so good in it self that it can be pleasant or meritorious in the sight of God A great difference is here to be made between an external Action as it is considered in it self and the same Action as it was done by such a Man An Action is called good from the Morality and Nature of the Action it self so Actions of Justice and Charity are in themselves good whatsoever the Doer of them may be But Actions are considered by God with relation to him that does them in another light his Principles Ends and Motives with all the other circumstances of the Action come into this Account for unless all these be good let the Action in its own abstracted nature be ever so good it cannot render the Doer acceptable or meritorious in the sight of God Another distinction is also to be made between the Methods of the Goodness and Mercy of God and the strictness of Justice For if God had suchregard to the feigned Humiliation of Ahab 1 Kings 21.29 as to grant him and his Family a Reprieve for some time from those Judgments that had been denounced against them and him and if Iehu's executing the Commands of God upon Ahab's Family and upon the Worshippers of Baal procured him the Blessing of a long continuance of the Kingdom in his Family though he acted in it with a bad design 2 Kings 10.30 31. and retained still the old Idolatry of the Calves set up by Ieroboam then we have all reason to conclude according to the Infinite Mercy and Goodness of God that no Man is rejected by him or denied inward Assistances that is making the most of his Faculties and doing the best that he can but that he who is faithful in his little shall be made Ruler over more The Question is only Whether such Actions can be so pure as to be free from all sin and to Merit at God's hand as being Works naturally perfect for that is the formal Notion of the Merit of Congruity as the Notion of the Merit of Condignity is That the Work is perfect in the Supernatural Order To establish the Truth of this Article beside what was said upon the Head of Original Sin we ought to consider what St. Paul's words in the 7 th of the Romans do import Nothing was urged from them on the former Articles because there is just ground of doubting whether St. Paul is there speaking of himself in the state he was in when he writ it or whether he is personating a Iew and speaking of himself as he was while yet a Iew. But if the words are taken in that lowest sense they prove this That an Unregenerate Man has in himself such a Principle of Corruption that even a good and a holy Law revealed to him cannot reform it but that on the contrary it will take occasion from that very Law to deceive him and to slay him Rom. 7.12 13. So that all the benefit that he receives even from that Revelation is Ver. 14. that sin in him becomes exceeding sinful as being done against such a degree of Light by which it appears that he is carnal and sold under sin and that though his Understanding may be enlighten'd by the Revelation of the Law of God made to him so that he has some Inclinations to obey it yet he does not that which he would but that which he would not And though his Mind is so far convinced 16 17 18 that he consents to the Law that it is good yet he still does that which he would not which was the effect of sin that dwelt in him and from hence he knew that in him that is in his flesh in his carnal part or carnal state there dwelt no good thing for though to will that is to resolve on obeying the Law was present yet he found not a way how to perform that which was good the good that he wished to do that he did not but he did the evil that he wished not to do which he imputed to the sin that dwelt in him He found then a Law a Bent and Biass within him 21 that when he wished resolved and endeavoured to do good evil was present with him it sprung up naturally within him for though in his rational Powers he might so far approve the Law of God as to delight in it yet he found another Law arising upon his Mind from his Body 23 which warred against the law of his mind and brought him into captivity to the law of sin which was in his members 24 25. All this made him conclude that he was carnal and sold under sin and cry out O wretched man that I am who shall deliver me from the body of this death For this he thanks God through our Lord Iesus Christ And he sums all up in these words So then with the mind I my self serve the Law of God but with the flesh the Law of Sin If all this Discourse is made by St. Paul of himself when he had the Light which a Divinely-inspired Law gave him he being educated in the exactest way of that Religion both zealous for the Law and blameless in his own observance of it we may from thence conclude how little reason there is to believe that a Heathen or indeed an unregenerated Man can be better than he was and do Actions that are both good in themselves which it is not denied but that he may do and do them in such a manner that there shall be no mixture nor imperfection in them but that they shall be perfect in a Natural Order and be by consequence meritorious in a Secondary Order By all this we do not pretend to say That a Man in that state can do nothing or that he has no use of his Faculties He can certainly restrain himself on many occasions he can do many good works and avoid many bad ones he can raise his Understanding to know and consider things according to the Light that he has he can put
Arguments to perswade us that there is somewhat that is highly necessary to the Purity of Christians of which Christ has not said a Word and concerning which his Apostles have given us no Directions We do not deny but it may be a mean to strike Terror in People to keep them under awe and obedience it may when the management of it is in good hands be made a mean to keep the World in Order and to guide those of weaker Judgments more steadily and safely than could be well done any other way In the use of Confession when proposed as our Church does as matter of Advice and not of Obligation we are very sensible many good ends may be attained but while we consider those we must likewise reflect on the mischief that may arise out of it especially supposing the greater part both of the Clergy and Laity to be what they ever were and ever will be depraved and corrupted The People will grow to think that the Priest is in God's stead to them that their telling their sins to him is as if they confessed them to God they will expect to be easily discharged for a gentle Penance with a speedy Absolution and this will make them as secure as if their Consciences were clear and their Sins pardoned so the remedy being easy and always at hand they will be encouraged to venture the more boldly on Sin It is no difficult matter to gain a Priest especially if he himself is a bad Man to use them tenderly upon those occasions On the other hand corrupt Priests will find their account in the dispensing this great Power so as to serve their own ends They will know all Peoples Tempers and Secrets and how strict soever they may make the Seal of Confession to draw the World to trust to it yet in Bodies so knit together as Communities and Orders are it is not possible to know what use they may make of this Still they know all themselves and see into the weakness the passions and appetites of their People This must often be a great snare to them especially in the supposition that cannot be denied to hold generally true of their being bad Men themselves Great advantages are hereby given to infuse fears and scruples into Peoples minds who being then in their tenderest Minutes will be very much swayed and wrought on by them A bad Priest knows by this whom he may tempt to any sort of Sin And thus the good and the evil of Confession as it is a general Law upon allMens Consciences being weighed one against the other and it being certain that the far greater part of Mankind is always bad we must conclude that the evil does so far preponderate the good that they bear no comparison nor proportion to one another The matter at present under debate is only Whether it is one of the Laws of God or not And it is enough for the present purpose to shew that it is no Law of God upon which we do also see very good reason why it ought not to be made a Law of the Church both because it is beyond her Authority which can only go to matters of Order and Discipline as also because of the vast inconveniences that are like to arise out of it The next part of Repentance is Contrition which is a sorrow for Sin upon the motives of the Love of God and the hatred of Sin joined with a renovation of Heart This is that which we acknowledge to be necessary to compleat our Repentance but this consisting in the temper of a Man's Mind and his inward acts it seems a very absurd thing to make this the matter of a Sacrament since it is of a Spiritual and Invisible nature But this is not all that belongs to this head The Casuists of the Church of Rome have made a distinction between a perfect and an imperfect Contrition the imperfect they call Attrition which is any sorrow for Sin tho' upon an inferior motive such as may be particular to one act of Sin as when it rises from the loss or shame it has brought with it together with an act formed in detestation of it without a resolution to sin any more Such a sorrow as this is they teach does make the Sacrament effectual and puts a Man in a state of Justification tho' they acknowledge that without the Sacrament it is not sufficient to Justify him Trid. Sess. 14. c. 4. This was setled by the Council of Trent We think it strikes at the root of all Religion and Vertue and is a reversing of the design for which Sacraments were Instituted which was to raise our Minds to a high pitch of Piety and to exalt and purify our Acts. We think the Sacraments are profaned when we do not raise our Thoughts as high as we can in them To teach Men how low they may go and how small a measure will serve turn especially when the great and chief Commandment the consideration of the Love of God is left out seems to be one of the greatest corruptions in practice of which any Church can be guilty A slackness in Doctrine especially in so great a Point as this in which human nature is under so fatal a biass will always bring with it a much greater corruption in practice This will indeed make many run to the Sacrament and raise its value but it will rise upon the ruins of true Piety and Holiness There are few Men that can go long on in very great sins without feeling great remorses these are to them rather a Burthen that they cannot shake off than a Vertue Sorrow lying long upon their thoughts may be the beginning of a happy change and so prove a great blessing to them all which is destroyed by this Doctrine For if under such uneasy thoughts they go to Confession and are Attrite the Sacrament is valid and they are Justified Then the uneasiness goes off and is turned into joy without their being any thing the better by it They return to their Sins with a new calm and security because they are taught that their Sins are pardoned and that all Scores are cleared Therefore we conclude that this Doctrine wounds Religion in its Vitals and we are confirmed in all this by what appears in Practice And what the best Writers that have lived in that Communion have said of the abuses that follow on the Methods in which this Sacrament is managed among them which do arise mainly out of this Part of their Doctrine concerning Attrition All that they teach concerning those Acts of Attrition or even Contrition is also liable to great abuse in Practice for as a Man may bring forth those Acts in Words and not be the better for them So he may force himself to think them which is nothing but the framing an inward Discourse within himself upon them and yet these not arising genuinely from a new Nature or a change of Temper such Acts can
particularities of this Confession of our Faith There were some steps made to it in K. Henry's Time in a large Book that was then published under the Title of The Necessary Gruâ—ition that was a Treatise set forth to instruct the Nation Many of thâ— Errors of Popery were laid open and condemned in it but none were obliged to assent to it or to Subscribe it After that the Worship was Reformed as being that which pressed most And in that a Foundation was laid for the Articles that came quickly after it How or by whom they were prepared we do not certainly know By the remains of that time it appears that in the alterations that were made there was great precaution used such as indeed matters of that Nature required Questions were framed relating to them these were given about to many Bishops and Divines who gave in theit several Answers those were collated and examined very carefully all sides had a free and fair hearing before Conclusions were made In the fermentation that was working over the whole Nation at that time it was not possible that a thing of that nature could have passed by the methods that are more necessary in Regular Times And therefore they could not be offered at first to Synods or Convocations The Corruptions complained of were so beneficial to the whole Body of the Clergy that it is justly to be wonder'd at that so great a number was prevailed with to concur in Reforming them But without a Miracle they could not have been agreed to by the Major part They were prepared as is most probable by Cranmer and Ridley and published by the Regal Authority Not as if our Kings had pretended to an Authority to judge in Points of Faith or to decide Controversies But as every private man must chuse for himself and believe according to the convictions of his Reason and Conscience which is to be examined and proved in its proper place so every Prince or Legislative Power must give the publick Sanction and Authority according to his own Persuasion this makes indeed such a Sanction to become a Law but does not alter the Nature of Things nor oblige the Consciences of the Subjects unless they come under the same Persuasions Such Laws have indeed the Operation of all other Laws but the Doctrines Authorised by them have no more truth than they had before without any such Publication Thus the part that our Princes had in the Reformation was only this that they being satisfied with the Grounds on which it went received it themselves and enacted it for their People And this is so plain and so just a consequence of that liberty which every man has of believing and acting according to his own Convictions that when the one is well made out there can be no colour to question the other It was also remarkable that the Law which stood first in Iustinian's Code was an Edict of Theodosius's who finding the Roman Empire under great distractions by the diversity of Opinions in Matter of Religion did appoint that Doctrine to be held which was received by Damasus Bishop of Rome and Peter Bishop of Alexandria such an Edict as that being put in so conspicuous a part of the Law was a full and soon-observ'd Precedent for our Princes to act according to it The next Thing to be examined is the Use of the Articles and the Importance of the Subscriptions of the Clergy to them Some have thought that they are only Articles of Union and Peace that they are a Standard of Doctrine not to be contradicted or disputed that the Sons of the Church are only bound to acquiesce silently in them and that the Subscription to them amounts only to a general Compromise upon those Articles that so there may be no disputing nor wrangling about them By this means they reckon that though a man should differ in his Opinion from that which appears to be the clear sense of any of the Articles yet he may with a good Conscience subscribe it if the Article appears to him to be of such a nature that though he thinks it wrong yet it seems not to be of that consequence but that it may be born with and not contradicted I shall not now examine whether it were more fit to leave men to the due freedom of their thoughts and that the Subscription did run no higher it being in many cases a great hardship to exclude some very deserving persons from the Service of the Church by requiring a Subscription to so many particulars concerning some of which they are not fully satisfied I am only now to consider what is the Importance of the Subscriptions required among us and not what might be reasonably wisht that it should be As to the Laity and the whole Body of the People certainly to them these are only the Articles of Church-Communion so that every person who does not think that there is some proposition in them that is Erroneous to so high a degree that he cannot hold Communion with such as profess it may and is obliged to continue in our Communion For certainly there are many Opinions held in Matters of Religion which a man may believe to be false and yet he may esteem them to be of so little Importance to the chief design of Religion that he may well hold Communion with those whom he thinks to be so mistaken Here a necessary distinction is to be remembred between Articles of Faith and Articles of Doctrine The one are held necessary to Salvation the other are only believed to be true that is to be revealed in the Scriptures which is a sufficient Ground for acknowledging them true Articles of Faith are Doctrines that are so necessary to Salvation that without believing them no man has a foederal Right to the Covenant of Grace These are not many and in the Establishment of any Doctrine for such it is necessary both to prove it clearly from Scripture and to prove its being necessary to Salvation as a mean setled by the Covenant of Grace in order to it We ought not indeed to hold Communion with such as make Doctrines that we believe not to be true to pass for Articles of Faith though we may hold Communion with such as do think them true without stamping so high an Authority upon them To give one Instance of this in an undeniable particular In the days of the Apostles there were Judaisers of two sorts some thought the Iewish Nation was still obliged to observe the Mosaical Law but others went further and thought that such an Observation was indispensably necessary in all men to Salvation Both these Opinions were wrong but the one was tolerable and the other was intolerable Because it pretended to make that a necessary condition of Salvation which God had not commanded The Apostles complied with the Judaisers of the first sort 1 Cor. 9.19 to 23. as they became all things to all men that so they might gain
is to be believed  Pr. so also is it to be believed Art 4. MS. Christ did truly arise again  Pr. Christ did truly rise again  MS. until he return to judge all men at the last day  Pr. until he return to judge men at the last day Art 6. MS. to be believed as an Article of the Faith  Pr. to be believed as an Article of Faith  MS. requisite as necessary to Salvation  Pr. requisite or necessary to Salvation  MS. In the name of holy Scripture  Pr. In the name of the holy Scripture  MS. but yet doth it not apply  Pr. but yet doth not apply  MS. Baruch  Pr. Baruch the Prophet  MS. and account them for Canonical  Pr. and account them Canonical Art 8. MS. by most certain warranties of Holy Scripture  Pr. by most certain warrant of Holy Scripture Art 9. MS. but it is the fault  Pr. but is the fault  MS. whereby man is very far gone from his original righteousness  Pr. whereby man is far gone from original righteousness  MS. in them that be regenerated  Pr. in them that are regenerated Art De Gratia non habetur in MS. Art 10. MS. a good will and working in us  Pr. a good will and working with us Art 14. MS. cannot be taught without arrogancy and impiety  Pr. cannot be taught without arrogancy and iniquity  MS. we be unprofitable Servants  Pr. we are unprofitable Servants Art 15. MS. sin only except  Pr. sin only excepted MS. to be the Lamb without spot  Pr. to be a Lamb without spot  MS. but we the rest although baptized and born again in Christ yet we all offend  Pr. but all we the rest although baptized and if born in Christ yet offend Art De Blasphemia in Sp. Sanct. non est in MS. Art 16. MS. wherefore the place for Penitence  Pr. wherefore the grant of Repentance Art 17. MS. so excellent a benefit of God given unto them be called according  Pr. so excellent a benefit of God be called according  MS. as because it doth fervently kindle their love  Pr. as because it doth frequently kindle their love Art Omnes Obligantur c. non est in MS. Art 18. MS. to frame his life according to the Law and the light of Nature  Pr. to frame his life according to that Law and the light of Nature Art 19. MS. congregation of faithful men in the which the pure Word  Pr. congregation of faithful men in which the pure Word Art 20. MS. The Church hath Power to decree rites or ceremonies and authority in controversies of Faith And yet   These words are not in the Original MS.  MS. ought it not to enforce any thing  Pr. it ought not to enforce any thing Art 21. MS. and when they be gathered together forasmuch  Pr. and when they be gathered forasmuch Art 22. MS. is a fond thing vainly invented  Pr. is a fond thing vainly feigned Art 24. MS. in a Tongue not understanded of the People  Pr. in a Tongue not understood of the People Art 25. MS. and effectual signs of grace and God's good will towards us  Pr. and effectual signs of grace and God's will towards us  MS. and extream annoyling  Pr. and extream unction Art 26. MS. in their own name but do minister by Christ's Commission and authority  Pr. in their own name but in Christ's and do minister by his Commission and authority  MS. and in the receiving of the Sacraments  Pr. and in the receiving the Sacraments MS. and rightly receive the Sacraments  Pr. and rightly do receive the Sacraments Art 27. MS. from others that be not christned but is also a sign  Pr. from others that be not christned but it is also a sign  MS. forgiveness of sin and of our adoption  Pr. forgiveness of sin of our adoption Art 28. MS. to have amongst themselves  Pr. to have among themselves  MS. the bread which we break is a partaking Communion of the body of Christ.  Pr. the bread which we break is a partaking of the body of Thrist  MS. and likewise the Cup of blessing is a partaking Communion of the blood of Christ.  Pr. and likewise the Cup of blessing is a partaking of the blood of Christ.  MS. or the change of the Substance of bread and wine into the substance of Christ's body and blood cannot be proved by holy Writ but is repugnant  Pr. or the change of the substance of bread and wine in the supper of the Lord cannot be proved by holy Writ but it is repugnant  MS. but the mean whereby the body of Christ is received  Pr. and the mean whereby the body of Christ is received  MS. lifted up or worshipped  Pr. lifted up and worshipped Art 31. MS. is the perfect redemption  Pr. is that perfect redemption  MS. to have remission of pain or guilt were forged Fables  Pr. to have remission of pain and guilt were blasphemous Fables Art 33. MS. that hath authority thereto  Pr. that hath authority thereunto Art 34. MS. diversity of countries times and mens manners  Pr. diversity of countries and mens manners  MS. and be ordained and appointed by common autority  Pr. and be ordained and approved by common authority  MS. the consciences of the weak brethren  Pr. the consciences of weak brethren Art 35. MS. of Homilies the Titles whereof we have joined under this Article do contain  Pr. of Homilies the several Titles whereof we have joined under this Article doth contain  MS. wholesome Doctrine and necessary for this time as doth the former book which was set forth  Pr. wholesome Doctrine necessary for these times as doth the former book of Homilies which were set forth MS. and therefore are to be read in our Churches by the Ministers diligently plainly and distinctly that they may be understanded of the people  Pr. and therefore we judge them to be read in Churches by the Ministers diligently and distinctly that they may be understood of the people  MS. ministred in a tongue known  Pr. ministred in a known tongue Art De Libro Precationum c. non est in MS. Art 36. MS. in the time of the most noble K. Edward the Sixth  Pr. in the time of Edward the Sixth  MS. superstitious or ungodly  Pr. superstitious and ungodly Art 37. MS. whether they be Ecclesiastical or not  Pr. whether they be Ecclesiastical or Civil  MS. the minds of some slanderous folks to be offended  Pr. the minds of some dangerous folks to be offended  MS. we give not to our Princes  Pr. we give not our Princes  MS. or of Sacraments  Pr. or of the
Deity But to this Two things are to be opposed 1 st That those who first discovered these Countries and have given that account of them did not know them enough nor understand their Language so perfectly as was necessary to enable them to comprehend all their Opinions And this is the more probable because others that have writ after them assure us that they are not without all sense of Religion which the first discoveries had too hastily affirmed Some prints of Religion begin to be observed among those of Soldania though it is certainly one of the most degenerated of all Nations But a 2d Answer to this is That those Nations of whom these Reports are given out are so extremely sunk from all that is wise or regular great and good in human Nature so rude and untractable and so incapable of Arts and Discipline that if the Reports concerning them are to be believed and if that weakens the Argument from the common consent of Mankind of the one hand it strengthens it on another while it appears that Human Nature when it wants this Impression it wants with it all that is great or orderly in it and shews a brutality almost as low and base as is that of Beasts Some men are born without some of their Senses and others without the use of Reason and Memory And yet those exceptions do not prove that the imperfections of such persons are not irregularities against the common course of Things The monstrousness as well as the miseries of persons so unhappily born tend to recommend more effectually the perfection of human Nature So if these Nations which are supposed to be without the belief of a God are such a low and degenerated piece of human Nature that some have doubted whether they are a perfect Race of Men or not this does not derogate from but rather confirms the force of this Argument from the general consent of all Nations A Second Exception to this Argument is That men have not agreed in the same Notions concerning the Deity Some believing Two Gods a Good and Bad that are in a perpetual contest together Others holding a vast number of Gods either all equal or subaltern to one another And some believing God to be a corporeal Being and that the Sun Moon and Stars and a great many other Beings are Gods Since then though all may acknowledge a Deity in general they are yet subdivided into so many different conceits about it no Argument can be drawn from this supposed Consent which is not so great in reality as it seems to be But in Answer to this we must observe That the constant sense of Mankind agreeing in this That there is a Superior Being that governs the World shews that this fixed Persuasion has a deep Root Though the weakness of several Nations being practised upon by designing men they have in many things corrupted this Notion of God That might have arisen from the Tradition of some true Doctrines vitiated in the conveyance Spirits made by God to govern the World by the Order and under the Direction of the Supreme Mind might easily come to be lookt on as subordinate Deities Some evil and lapsed Spirits might in a course of some Ages pass for evil Gods The Apparitions of the Deity under some Figures might make these Figures to be adored And God being considered as the Supreme Light this might lead men to Worship the Sun as his chief Vehicle And so by degrees he might pass for the Supreme God Thus it is easy to trace up these mistakes to what may justly be supposed to be their first Source and Rise But still the Foundation of them all was a firm belief of a Superior Nature that govern'd the World Mankind agreeing in that an occasion was given thereby to bad and designing men to graft upon it such other Tenets as might feed Superstition and Idolatry and furnish the Managers of those Impostures with advantages to raise their own Authority But how various soever the several Ages and Nations of the World may have been as to their more special Opinions and Rites yet the General Idea of a God remain'd still unalter'd even amidst all the changes that have happened in the particular Forms and Doctrines of Religion Another Argument for the Being of God is taken from the Visible World in which there is a vast variety of Beings curiously framed and that seem designed for great and noble ends In these we see clear Characters of God's Eternal Power and Wisdom And that is thus to be made out It is certain that nothing could give Being to it self so the things which we see either had their Being from all Eternity or were made in time And either they were from all Eternity in the same State and under the same Revolutions of the Heavens as they are at present or they fell into the Order and Method in which they do now rowl by some happy chance out of which all the Beauty and Usefulness of the Creation did arise But if all these suppositions are manifestly false then it will remain That if things neither were from all Eternity as they now are nor fell into their present State by chance then there is a Superior Essence that gave them Being and that moulded them as we see they now are The First Branch of this That they were not as now they are from all Eternity is to be proved by two sorts of Arguments the one Intrinsical by demonstrating this to be impossible the other Moral by shewing that it is not at all credible As to the first it is to be considered that a successive duration made up of Parts which is called Time and is measured by a successive Rotation of the Heavens cannot possibly be Eternal For if there were Eternal Revolutions of Saturn in his course of Thirty Years and Eternal Revolutions of Days as well as Years of Minutes as well as Hours then the one must be as infinite as the other so that the one must be equal to the other both being infinite and yet the latter are some Millions of times more than the other which is impossible Further Of ev'ry past duration as this is true That once it was present so this is true That once it was to come This being a necessary affection of every thing that exists in time If then all past durations were all once future or to be then we cannot conceive such a Succession of Durations Eternal since once every one of them was to come Nor can all this or any part of it be turned against us who believe that some Beings are immortal and shall never cease to be for all those future durations have never actually been but are still produced of new and so continued in being This Argument may seem to be too subtile and it will require some attention of mind to observe and discover the force of it but after we have turned it over and over again it will
be found to be a true demonstration The chief Objection that lies against it is That in the Opinion of those who deny that there are any indiviâ—â—ble points of Matter and that believe that Matter is infinitely divisible it is not absurd to say That one Infinite is more than another For the smallest crumb of Matter is Infinite as well as the whole Globe of the Earth And therefore the Revolutions of Saturn may be infinite as well as the Revolutions of Days though the one be vastly more numerous than the other But there is this difference betwixt the Succession of Time and the Composition of Matter That those who deny Indivisibles say That no one Point can be assigned For if Points could be assigned or number'd it is certain that they could not be Infinite For an infinite Number seems to be a contradiction but if the Series of Mankind were Infinite since this is visibly divided into single Individuals as the Units in that Series then here arises an Infinite Number composed of Units or Individuals that can be assigned The same is to be said of Minutes Hours Days and Years Nor can it be said with equal reason that every portion of Time is divisible to Infinity as well as every parcel of Matter It seems evident that there is a present time and that past present and to come cannot be said to be true of any thing all at once Therefore the Objection against the assigning points in Matter does not overthrow the truth of this Argument But if it is thought that this is rather a slight of Metaphisicks that intangles one than a plain and full conviction Let us turn next to such Reasonings as are more obvious and that are more easily apprehended The other Moral Arguments are more sensible as well as they are of a more complicated Nature and proceed thus The History of all Nations of all Governments Arts Sciences and even instituted Religions the peopling of Nations the progress of Commerce and of Colonies are plain Indications of the Novelty of the World No sort of Trace remaining by which we can believe it to be Ancienter than the Books of Moses represent it to be For though some Nations such as the Egyptians and the Chineses have boasted of a much greater Antiquity yet it is plain we hear of no series of History for all those Ages so that what they had relating to them if it is not wholly a Fiction might have been only in Astronomical Tables which may be easily run backwards as well as forward The very few Eclipses which Ptolomy could hear of is a remarkable instance of the Novelty of History since the observing such an extraordinary Accident in the Heavens in so pure an Air where the Sun was not only observed but adored must have been one of the first effeâ—ts of Learning or Industry All these Characters of the Novelty of the World have been so well considered by Lucretius and other Atheists that they gave up the Point and thought it evident that this present frame of Things had certainly a beginning The Solution that those men who found themselves driven from this of the World 's being Eternal have given to this difficulty by saying that all things have run by chance into the Combinations and Channels in which we see Nature run is so absurd that it looks like men who are resolved to believe any thing how absurd soever rather than to acknowledge Religion For what a strange conceit is it to think that Chance could settle on such a regular and useful frame of things and continue so fixed and stable in it and that Chance could do so much at once and should do nothing ever since The Constancy of the Celestial Motions the Obliquity of the Zodiack by which different Seasons are assigned to different Climates the Divisions of this Globe into Sea and Land to Hills and Vales the Productions of the Earth whether latent such as Mines Minerals and other Fossils or visible such as Grass Grain Herbs Flowers Shrubs and Trees the small beginnings and the curious Compositions of them The Variety and curious Structure of Insects the disposition of the Bodies of perfecter Animals and above all the Fabrick of the Body of Man especially the curious Discoveries that Anatomy and Microscopes have given us the strange beginning and progress of those the Wonders that occur in every Organ of Sense and the amazing Structure and Use of the Brain are all such things so Artificial and yet so regular and so exactly shap'd and fitted for their several Uses that he who can believe all this to be Chance seems to have brought his mind to digest any Absurdity That all Men should resemble one another in the main things and yet that every Man should have a peculiar Look Voice and way of Writing is necessary to maintain Order and Distinction in Society By these we know men if we either see them hear them speak in the dark or receive any Writing from them at a distance without these the whole Commerce of Life would be one continued course of Mistake and Confusion This I say is such an Indication of Wisdom that it looks like a Violence to Nature to think it can be otherwise The only Colâ—ur that has supported this monstrous Conceit That things arise out of Chance is That it has long passed current in the World That great Varieties of Insects do arise out of corrupted Matter They argue That if the Sun 's shining on a Dunghil can give Life to such Swarms of curious Creatures it is but a little more extraordinary to think that Animals and Men might have been formed out of well-disposed Matter under a peculiar Aspect of the Heavens But the exaâ—ter Observations that have been made in this Age by the help of Glasses have put an end to this Answer which is the best that Lucretius and other Atheists found to rest in It is now fully made out That the Production of all Insects whatsoever is in the way of Generation Hâ—at and Corruption do only hatch those Eggs that Insects leave to a prodigious quantity every where So that this which is the only specious thing in the whole Plea for Atheism is now given up by the Universal Consent of all the Enquirers into Nature And now to bring the force of this long Argument to a head If this World was neither from all Eternity in the state in which it is at present nor could fall into it by Chance or Accident then it must follow That it was put into the state in which we now see it by a Being of vast Power and Wisdom This is the great and solid Argument on which Religion rests and it receives a vast accession of strength from this That we plainly see Matter has not Motion in or of it self Every part of it is at quiet till it is put in motion that is not natural to it for many Parts of Matter fall into a state
are utterly extinguished in them give any Pity to the Divine Being These are no longer the Objects of the Primary Act of his Goodness and therefore they cannot come under its Secondary Acts. It is of such great Consequence to settle this Notion right in our minds that it well deserves to be so copiously opened since we now see in what respects God's Goodness is without bounds and Infinite that is it reaches to all men after all Sins whatsoever as long as they are capable of becoming good It is not a Limitation of the Divine Goodness to say that some Men and some States are beyond it no more than it is a Limitation of his Power to say that He cannot sin or cannot do Impossibilities For a Goodness towards Persons not capable of becoming good is a Goodness that does not agree with the Infinite Purity and Holiness of God It is such a Goodness that if it were proposed to the World it would encourage men to live in Sin and to think that a sew Acts of Homage offered to God perhaps in our last Extremities could so far please him as to bribe and corrupt him This is that which makes Idolatry so great a Sin so often forbid by God and so severely punished not only as it is injurious to the Majesty of God but because it corrupts the Ideas or Notions of God Those Ideas rightly formed are the Basis upon which all Religion is built The Seeds and Principles of a new and a Godlike nature spring up in us as we form our selves upon the true Ideas or Notions of God Therefore when God is proposed to be adored by us under a Visible Shape or Image all the Acts of Religion offered to it are only so many pieces of Pageantry and end in the flatterings and the magnifyings of it with much Pomp Cruelty or Lasciviousness according to the different Genius of several Nations So the forming a false Notion of the Goodness of God as a Tenderness that is to be overcome with Importunities and Howlings and other Submissions and not to be gained only by becoming like him is a Capital and Fundamental Error in Religion The next Branch of this Article is God's creating and preserving of all things and that both Material Substances which are Visible and Immaterial and Spiritual Substances which are Invisible God's creating all things has been already made out If Matter could neither be Eternal nor give it self a Being then it must have its Being from God Creating does naturally import Infinite Power for that Power is clearly without bounds that can make things out of nothing A bounded Power which can only shape and mould Matter must suppose it to have a Being before it can work upon it We cannot indeed form a distinct Thought of Creation for we cannot apprehend what nothing is The nearest approach we can bring our selves to a true Idea of this is the considering our own Thoughts especially our Ideas of Mathematical Proportions and the other Affections of Bodies Those Ideas are the Modes of a Spiritual Substance and there is no likeness nor resemblance between them and the Modes of Material Substances which are only the occasions of our having those Ideas and not in any wise the Matter out of which they are formed Here seems to be a sort of Beings brought out of nothing but after all this is vastly below Creation and is only a faint resemblance of it With the Power of Creating we must also join that of Annihilating which is equal to it and must necessarily be supposed to be in God because we plainly perceive it to be a Perfection The recalling into Nothing a Being brought out of Nothing is a necessary consequence of Infinite Power when it thinks fit so to exert it self There is a common Notion in the World That things would fall back into Nothing of themselves if they were not preserved by the same Infinite Power that made them But without question it is an Act of the same Infinite Power to reduce a Being to Nothing that it is to bring a Being out of Nothing So whatever has once a Being must of its Nature continue still to be without any new Causality or Influence This must be acknowledged unless it can be said That a Tendency to Annihilation is the Consequent of a Created Being But as this would make the Preservation of the World to be a continued Violence to a Natural Tendency that is in all things so there is no more reason to imagine that Beings have a Tendency to Annihilation than that Nothing had a Tendency to Creation It is absurd to think that any thing can have a Tendency to that which is essentially opposite to it self and is destructive of it The Preservation of things is the keeping the Frame of Nature and the Order of the Universe in such a state as is suitable to the Purposes of the Supreme Mind It is true Natural Agents must ever keep the Course in which they are once put and the great Heavenly Orbs as well as all smaller Motions must ever have rowled on in one constant Channel when they were once put into it so in this respect it may seem that Conservation by a special Act is not necessary But we perceive a Freedom in our own Natures and a Power that our Minds have not only to move our own Bodies but by them and by the help of such Engines as we can invent we make a vast change in this Earth from what it would be if it were left unwrought In a course of some Ages the whole World by the Natural Progress of things would be a Forest Both Earth and Air are very much different from what they would be if Men were not Free Agents and did not cultivate the Earth and thereby purify the Air. The working of Mines Minerals and other Fossils makes also a great change in its Bowels it gives Vent to some Damps which might much affect the Air and it frees the Earth from Earthquakes Thus the Industry of Man has in many respects changed both Earth and Air very sensibly from what it would have been if the World had not those Inhabitants in it Nor do we know what Natural Force other Spirits inhabiting in or about it or at least using subtiller Bodies may have or in what Influences or Operations they may exert that Force on Material Substances Upon all these accounts it is that the World could not be preserved in a constant and regular state if the Supreme Mind had not a direction both of mens Wills and Actions and of the Course of Nature For unless it is thought that Man is really no Free Agent but aâ—ts in a Chain as certainly as other Natural Agents do it must be acknowledged that by the Interposition of mens Minds together with their Power over Matter the Course of the first Motion that was given to the Universe is so changed that if there is not a constant Providence the
yet it seems more reasonable to think that God has put us under such an Order of Being from which that does naturally follow than that he himself should interpose in every Thought The difficulty of apprehending how a thing is done can be no prejudice to the belief of it when we have the Infinite Power of God in our Thoughts who may be as easily conceived to have once for all put us in a method of receiving such Sensations by a general Law or Course of Nature as to give us new ones at every Minute But the greatest difficulty against this is That it makes God the first Physical cause of all the Evil that is in the World Which as it is contrary to his Nature so it absolutely destroys all Liberty and this puts an end to all the distinctions between Good and Evil and consequently to all Religion And as for those large Expressions that are brought from Scripture every word in Scripture is not to be stretched to the utmost Physical sense to which it can be carried It is enough if a sense is given to it that agrees to the Scope of it Which is fully Answered by acknowledging That the Power and Providence of God is over all things and that it directs every thing to Wise and Good Ends from which nothing is hid by which nothing is forgot and to which nothing can resist This Scheme of Providence fully agrees with the Notion of a Being Infinitely perfect and with all that the Scriptures affirm concerning it and it lays down a firm Foundation for all the Acts and Exercises of Religion As to the Power and Providence of God with relation to Invisible Beings we plainly perceive that there is in us a Principle capable of Thought and Liberty of which by all that appears to us Matter is not at all capable After its utmost Refinings by Fires and Furnaces it is still passive and has no Self-Motion much less Thought in it Thought seems plainly to arise from a single Principle that has no Parts and is quite another thing than the Motion of one subtle piece of Matter upon another can be supposed to be If Thought is only Motion then no part of us thinks but as it is in Motion So that only the moving Particles or rather their Surfaces that strike upon one another do think But such a Motion must end quickly in the Dissipation and Evaporation of the whole thinking-Substance nor can any of the quiescent Parts have any Perception of such Thoughts or any Reflection upon them And to say that Matter may have other Affections unknown to us besides Motion by which it may think is to affirm a thing without any sort of Reason It is rather a flying from an Argument than an Answering it No man has any reason to affirm this nor can he have any And besides all our Cogitations of Immaterial Things Proportions and Numbers do plainly show that we have a Being in us distinct from Matter that rises above it and commands it We perceive we have a freedom of Moving and Acting at pleasure All these Things give us a clear Perception of a Being that is in us distinct from Matter of which we are not able to form a compleat Idea We having only four Perceptions of its Nature and Operations 1. That it thinks 2. That it has an inward Power of Choice 3. That by its Will it can move and command the Body And 4. That it is in a close and intire Union with it That it has a dependance on it as to many of its Acts as well as an Authority over it in many other Things Such a Being that has no Parts must be immortal in its Nature for every single Being is immortal It is only the Union of Parts that is capable of being dissolved that which has no parts is indissoluble To this Two Objections are made One is That Beasts seem to have both Thought and Freedom though in a lower Order if then Matter can be capable of this in any Degree how low soever a higher Rectification of Matter may be capable of a higher Degree of it It is therefore certain That either Beasts have no Thought or Liberty at all and are only pieces of finely Organised Matter capable of many subtile Motions that come to them from Objects without them but that they have no Sensation nor Thought at all about them or since how prettily soever some may have dressed up this Notion it is that which Human Nature cannot receive or bear there being such evident Indications of even high degrees of Reason among the Beasts it is more reasonable to imagine That there may be Spirits of a lower order in Beasts that have in them a capacity of Thinking and Chusing but that so intirely under the Impressions of Matter that they are not capable of that largeness either of Thought or Liberty that is necessary to make them capable of Good or Evil of Rewards and Punishments And that therefore they may be perpetually rouling about from one Body to another Another Objection to the belief of an Immaterial Substance in us is That we feel it depends so intirely on the Fabrick and State of the Brain that a Disorder a Vapour or Humour in it defaces all our Thoughts our Memory and Imagination and since we find that which we call Mind sinks so low upon a disorder of the Body it may be reasonable to believe That it Evaporates and is quite Dissipated upon the Dissolution of our Bodies So that the Soul is nothing but the livelier Parts of the Blood called the Animal Spirits In Answer to this we know that those Animal Spirits are of such an Evanid and Subtile Nature that they are in a perpetual Waste new ones always succeeding as the former go off but we perceive at the same time that our Soul is a Stable and Permanent Being by the steddiness of its Acts and Thoughts We being for many Years plainly the same Beings and therefore our Souls cannot be such a Loose and Evaporating Substance as those Spirits are The Spirits are indeed the inward Organs of the Mind for Memory Speech and bodily Motion and as these flatten or are wasted the Mind is less able to Act As when the Eye or any other Organ of Sense is weakned the Sensations grow feeble on that side And as a Man is less able to work when all those Instruments he makes use of are blunted so the Mind may sink upon a decay or disorder in those Spirits and yet be of a Nature wholly different from them How a Mind should work on Matter cannot I confess be clearly comprehended It cannot be denied by any that is not a direct Atheist That the Thoughts of the Supreme Mind give Impressions and Motions to Matter So our Thoughts may give a Motion or the Determination of Motion to Matter and yet rise from Substances wholly different from it Nor is it unconceivable That the Supreme Mind should
full and clear proofs of it in the New Testament And they had need be both full and clear before a Doctrine of this Nature can be pretended to be proved by them In order to the making this Mystery to be more distinctly Intelligible different Methods have been taken By one Substance many do understand a Numerical or Individual Unity of Substance and by Three Persons they understand Three distinct Subsistences in that Essence It is not pretended by these that we can give a distinct Idea of Person or Subsistence only they hold it imports a real diversity in one from another and even such a diversity from the Substance of the Deity it self that some things belong to the Person that do not belong to the Substance For the Substance neither begets nor is begotten neither breathes nor proceeds If this carries in it somewhat that is not agreeable to our Notions nor like any thing that we can apprehend to this it is said That if God has Revealed that in the Scripture which is thus expressed we are bound to believe it though we can frame no clear apprehension about it God's Eternity his being all one single Act his Creating and Preserving all things and his being every where are things that are absolute riddles to us We cannot bring our Minds to conceive them and yet we must believe that they are so because we see much greater Absurdities must follow upon our conceiving that they should be otherwise So if God has declared this inexplicable thing concerning himself to us we are bound to believe it though we cannot have any clear Idea how it truly is For there appear as strange and unanswerable difficulties in many other things which yet we know to be true so if we are once well assured that God has Revealed this Doctrine to us we must silence all Objections against it and believe it Reckoning that our not understanding it as it is in it self makes the difficulties seem to be much greater than otherwise they would appear to be if we had light enough about it or were capable of forming a more perfect Idea of it while we are in this depressed State Others give another view of this Matter that is not indeed so hard to be apprehended But that has an Objection against it that seems as great a prejudice against it as the difficulty of apprehending the other way is against that It is this They do hold That there are Three Minds That the first of these Three who is from that called the Father did from all Eternity by an Emanation of Essence beget the Son and by another Emanation that was from Eternity likewise and was as Essential to him as the former both the first and the second did jointly breathe forth the Spirit and that these are Three distinct Minds every one being God as much as the other Only the Father is the Fountain and is only self-originated All this is in a good degree Intelligible but it seems hard to reconcile it both with the Idea of Unity which seems to belong to a Being of Infinite Perfection and with the many express Declarations that are made in the Scriptures concerning the Unity of God Instead of going farther into Explanations of that which is certainly very far beyond all our apprehensions and that ought therefore to be let alone I shall now consider what Declarations are made in the Scriptures concerning this Point The First and the Chief is in that Charge and Commission which our Saviour gave to his Apostles to go and make Disciples to him among all Nations baptizing them in the Name of the Father the Son and the Holy Ghost Mat. 28.19 By Name is meant either an Authority derived to them in the virtue of which all Nations were to be Baptized Or that the Persons so Baptized are Dedicated to the Father Son and Holy Ghost Either of these Senses as it proves them all to be Persons so it sets them in an equality in a thing that can only belong to the Divine Nature Baptism is the receiving Men from a State of Sin and Wrath into a State of Favour and into the Rights of the Sons of God and the Hopes of Eternal Happiness and a calling them by the Name of God These are things that can only be offered and assured to Men in the Name of the Great and Eternal God and therefore since without any Distinction or Note of Inequality they are all Three set together as Persons in whose Name this is to be done they must be all Three the True God otherwise it looks like a just Prejudice against our Saviour and his whole Gospel That by his express Direction the first entrance to it which gives the Visible and Foederal Right to those great Blessings that are offered by it or their Initiation into it should be in the Name of Two Created Beings if the one can be called properly so much as a Being according to their Hypothesis and that even in an equality with the Supream and Increated Being The plainness of this Charge and the great occasion upon which it was given makes this an Argument of such Force and Evidence that it may justly determine the whole Matter A Second Argument is taken from this That we find St. Paul begins or ends most of his Epistles with a Salutation in the Form of a Wish Rom. 1.7 Rom. 16.20 24. 1 Cor. 16.23 1 Cor. 1.3 2 Cor. 1.3 Gal. 1.3 Gal 6.18 Eph. 1.2 Eph. 6.23 Phil. 1.2 Phil. 4.23 Col. 1.2 1 Thes. 1.1 1 Thes 5.28 2 Thes. 1.2 2 Thes. 3 18. 1 Tim. 1.2 2 Tim. 1.2 Tit. 1.4 Philem. 3.25 2 John 1.3 which is indeed a Prayer or a Benediction in the Name of those who are so Invocated in which he wishes the Churches Grace Mercy and Peace from God the Father and the Lord Iesus Christ which is an Invocation of Christ in conjunction with the Father for the greatest Blessings of Favour and Mercy That is a strange Strain if he was only a Creature which yet is delivered without any mitigation or softning in the most remarkable parts of his Epistles This is carried further in the Conclusion of the Second Epistle to the Corinthians The Grace of the Lord Iesus Christ the Love of God 2 Cor. 13.14 and the Fellowship of the Holy Ghost be with you It is true this is expressed as a Wiâ—h and not in the nature of a Prayer as the common Salutations are But here Three great Blessings are wished to them as from Three Fountains which imports that they are Three different Persons and yet equal For though in order the Father is first and is generally put first yet here Christ is first named which seems to be a strange reversing of things if they are not equal as to their Essence or Substance It is true the Second is not named here The Father as elsewhere but only God yet since he is mentioned as distinct from Christ and the
called God God's Throne his Holiness his Face and the Light of his Countenance They went up to the Temple to worship God as dwelling there bodily that is substantially so bodily sometimes signifies or in a Corporeal Appearance This seems to have been a Person that was truly God and yet was distinct from that which appeared and spake to Moses for this seems to be the Importance of these words Behold Exod. 23.20 I send an Angel before thee to keep thee in the way and to bring thee to the place which I have prepared Beware of him and obey his voice provoke him not for he will not pardon your transgressions for my Name is in him These words do plainly import a Person to whom they belong and yet they are a pitch far above the Angelical Dignity So that Angel must here be understood in a large sense for one sent of God and it can admit of no sense so properly as That the Eternal Word which dwelt afterwards in the Man Christ Jesus dwelt then in that Cloud of Glory It was also one of the Prophecies received by the Iews That the Glory of the second Temple was to exceed the Glory of the first 2 Hag. 7. The chief Character of the Glory of the first was that Inhabitation of the Divine Presence among them from hence it follows that such an Inhabitation of God in a Creature by which that Creature was not only called God but that Adoration was due to it upon that account was a Notion that could not have scandalized the Iews and was indeed the only Notion that agreed with their former Ideas and that could have been received by them without difficulty or opposition This is a strong Inducement to believe that this great Article of our Religion was at that time delivered and understood in that sense If the Son or Word is truly God he must be from all Eternity and must also be of the same Substance with the Father otherwise he could not be God since a God of another Substance or of another Duration is a Contradiction The last Argument that I shall offer is taken from the beginning of the Epistle to the Hebrews To the apprehending the Force of which this must be premised That all those who acknowledge that Christ ought to be honoured and worshipped as the Father must say that this is due to him either because he is truly God or because he is a Person of such a high and exalted Dignity that God has upon the consideration of that appointed him to be so worshipped Now this second Notion may fall under another distinction that either he was of a very sublime Order by Nature as some Angelical Being that though he was created yet had this high Priviledge bestowed upon him or that he was a Prophet illuminated and authorized in so particular a manner beyond all others that out of a regard to that he was exalted to this Honour of being to be worshipped One of these must be chosen by all who do not believe him to be truly God And indeed one of these was the Arian as the other is the Socinian Hypothesis For how much soever the Arians might exalt him in words yet if they believed him to be a Creature made in time so that once he was not all that they said of him can amount to no more but that he was a Creature of a Spiritual Nature and this is plainly the Notion which the Scripture gives us of Angels Artemon Samosatenus Photinus and the Socinians in our days consider our Saviour as a great Prophet and Lawgiver and into this they resolve his Dignity In opposition to both these that Epistle begins with Expressions that are the more severe because they are Negative which are to be understood more strictly than Positive words Christ is not only preferred to Angels but is set in opposition to them as one of another Order of Beings Made so much better than angels Heb. 1. as he hath by inheritance obtained a more excellent name than they For unto which of the Angels said he at any time 4 5 Thou art my Son this day have I begotten thee When he bringeth in the first-begotten into the world 6 he saith And let all the angels of God worship him 7 Of the angels he saith Who maketh his angels spirits and his ministers a flame of fire 8 But unto the Son he saith Thy throne O God is for ever and ever And Thou Lord in the beginning hast laid the foundation of the earth 10 and the heavens are the works of thy hands Thou art the same 12 and thy years shall not fail But to which of the angels said he at any time Sit on my right hand till I make thine enemies thy footstool 13 14. Are they not all ministring spirits sent forth to minister for them who shall be heirs of salvation This opposition is likewise carried on through the whole second Chapter one Passage in it being most express to shew both that his Nature had a Subsistence before his Incarnation and that it was not of an Angelical Order of Beings since he took not on him the nature of Angels Chap. 2. but the seed of Abraham Thus in a great variety of Expressions 16. the Conceit of Christ's being of an Angelical Nature is very fully condemned From that the Writer goes next to the Notion of his being to be honoured because he was an Eminent Prophet on which he enters with a very solemn Preface inviting them to consider the Apostle and High-priest of our Profession Chap. 3. Then he compares Moses to him 12. as to the point of being faithful to him who had appointed him But how eminent soever Moses was above all other Prophets and how harshly soever it must have sounded to the Iews to have stated the difference in terms so distant as that of a Servant and a Son of one who built the house and of the House it self yet we see the Apostle does not only prefer Christ to Moses but puts him in another Order and Rank which could not be done according to the Socinian Hypothesis From all which this Conclusion naturally follows That if Christ is to be worshipped and that this Honour belongs to him neither as an Angel nor as a Prophet That then it is due to him because he is truly God The Second Branch of this Article is That he took man's Nature upon him in the Womb of the Blessed Uirgin and of her Substance This will not need any long or laboured Proof since the Texts of Scripture are so express that nothing but wild Extravagance can withstand them Christ was in all things like unto us except his miraculous Conception by the Virgin He was the Son of Abraham and of David But among the Frantick Humours that appeared at the Reformation some in opposition to the Superstition of the Church of Rome studied to derogate as
those Particulars that are mentioned in this Article so it was not possible for any that should have had the wickedness to set about it to have corrupted the New Testament by any Additions or Alterations it being so early spread into so many hands and that in so many different places When all this matter is laid together it appears to have as full an Evidence to support it as any Matter of Fact can possibly have The Narration gave great scope to a variety of Enquiries it raised much Disputing Opposition and Persecution and yet nothing was ever pretended to be proved that could subvert its Credit Great Multitudes received this Doctrine and died for it in the Age in which the Matters of Fact upon which its Credit was built were well attested and in which the Truth or Falshood of them might have been easily known which it is reasonable to believe that all men would carefully examine before they embraced and assented to that which was like to draw on them Sufferings that would probably end in Death Those who did spread this Doctrine as well as those who first received it had no Interest beside that of Trutâ— to engage them to it They could expect neither Wealth nor Greatness from it They were obliged to Travel much and to Labour hard to wrestle through great Difficulties and to endure many Indignities They saw others die on the account of it and had reason to look for the like usage themselves The Doctrine that they preached related either to the Facts concerning the Person of Christ or to the Rules of Life which they delivered These were all pure just and good they tended to settle the World upon the Foundations of Truth and Sincerity and that sublime Pitch of Righteousness of doing as they would be done by they tended to make men Sober and Temperate Chaste and Modest Meek and Humble Merciful and Charitable so that from thence there was no Colour given for suspecting any Fraud or Design in it The Worship of God in this Religion was Pure and Simple free from Cost or Pomp from Theatrical Shews as well as Idolatrous Rites and had in it all possible Characters becoming the Purity of the Supreme Mind When therefore so much concurs to give Credit to a Religion there ought to be evident Proofs brought to the contrary before it can be disbelieved or rejected So many men forsaking the Religion in which they were born and bred which has always a strong Influence even upon the greatest Minds and there being so many particular Prejudices both upon Iews and Gentiles by the Opinions in which they had been bred and the Impressions which had gone deep in them it could be no slight matter that could overcome all that The Iews expected a Conqueror for their Messias who should have raised both the Honour of their Law and their Nation and so were much possessed against one of a mean Appearance and when they saw that their Law was to be superseded and that the Gentiles were to be brought in to equal Privileges with themselves they could not but be deeply prejudiced both against the Person and Doctrine of Christ. The Philosophers despised Divine Inspiration and secret Assistances and had an ill Opinion of Miracles And the Herd among the Gentiles were so accustomed to Pomp and Shew in their Religious Performances that they must have nauseated the Christian Simplicity and the corruption of their Morals must have made them uneasy at a Religion of so much strictness All sorts of men lay under very strong Prejudices against this Religion nor was there any one Article or Branch of it that fâ—attered any of the Interests Appetites Passions or Vanities of Men but all was very much to the contrary They were warned to prepare for Trials and Crosses and in particular for a severe and fiery Trial that was speedily to come upon them There was nothing of the way or manner of Impostors that appeared in the Methods in which the Gospel was propagated When the Apostles saw that some were endeavouring to lessen them and their Authority they took no fawning ways They neither flattered nor spared those Churches that were under their care They charged them home with their faults and asserted their own Character in a strain that shewed they were afraid of no discoveries They appeal'd to the Miracles that they had wrought and to those Gifts and Divine Virtues of which they were not only possessed themselves but which were by their Ministry conferred on others The demonstration of the Spirit or Inspiration that was in them appeared in the power that is 1 Cor. 2.4 in the Miracles which accompanied it and those they wrought openly in the sight of many Witnesses An uncontested Miracle is the fullest Evidence that can be given of a Divine Commission A Miracle is a Work that exceeds all the known Powers of Nature and that carries in it plain Characters of a Power Superior to any Human power We cannot indeed fix the bounds of the Powers of Nature but yet we can plainly apprehend what must be beyond them For Instance We do not know what secret Virtues there may be in Plants and Minerals But we do know that bare words can have no Natural Virtue in them to cure Diseases much less to raise the Dead We know not what force Imagination or Credulity may have in Critical Diseases but we know that a Dead man has no Imagination We know also That Blindness Deafness and an Inveterate Palsey cannot be cured by Conceit Therefore such Miracles as the giving Sight to a Man born Blind Speech to the Deaf and Dumb and Strength to the Paralytick but most of all the giving Life to the Dead and that not only to Persons laid out as Dead but to one that was carried out to be Buried and to another that had been four days Dead and in his Grave all this was done with a bare Word without any sort of External Application This I say as it is clearly above the Force of Imagination so it is beyond the Powers of Nature These things were not done in the dark nor in the presence of a few in whom a particular confidence was put but in full day-light and in the sight of great Numbers Enemies as well as Friends and some of those Enemies were both the most enraged and the most capable of making all possible Exceptions to what was done Such were the Rulers of the Synagogues and the Pharisees in our Saviour's Time And yet they could neither deny the Facts nor pretend that there was any Deceit or Juglary in them We have in this all possible reason to conclude That both the things wâ—re truly done as they are related and that no just Exception was or could be made to them If it is pretended That those wonderful things were done by the Power of an Evil Spirit That does both acknowledge the Truth of the Relation and also its being Supernatural This Answer
or Descendents that is Parents and Children that by an Eternal Reason can never marry for where there is a Natural Subordination there can never be such an Equality as that state of Life requires But Collateral Degrees even the nearest Brothers and Sisters are not by any Natural Law barred Marriage and therefore in a case of necessity they might marry Yet since their intermarrying must be attended with vast Inconveniences and would tend to the Defilement of Families and hinder the Conjunction of Mankind by the Intermixture of different Families it becomes therefore a fit Subject for a perpetual Law to strike a horror at the thought of such Commixtures and so to keep the World pure which considering the Freedoms in which those of the same Family do live could not be preserved without such a Law It is also the Interest of Mankind and necessary for the careful Education of the rising Generation that Marriages should be for Life for if it were free for married Persons to separate at pleasure the Issue of Marriages so broken would be certainly much neglected And since a Power to break a Marriage would naturally inflame such little quarrelings as may happen among all Persons that live together which will on the contrary be certainly repressed when they know that the Marriage cannot be dissolved and when by such a Dissolution of Marriages the one half of the Human Species I mean Womankind is exposed to great Miseries and subject to much Tyranny it is a fit Subject for a perpetual Law so that it is Moral in a Secondary Order It were easy to give Instances of this in many more Particulars and to shew That a Precept may be said to be Moral when there is a Natural Suitableness in it to advance that which is Moral in the first Order and that it cannot be well preserved without such a Support It will appear what occasion there is for this distinction when we consider the Ten Commandments which are so many Heads of Morality that are instanced in the highest act of a kind and to which are to be reduced all such acts as by the just Proportions of Morality belong to that Order and Series of Actions The Foundation of Morality is Religion The Sense of God That he is and that he is both a Rewarder and a Punisher is the Foundation of Religion Now this must be supposed as Antecedent to his Laws for we regard and obey them from the persuasion that is formed in us concerning the Being and the Justice of God The two first Commandments are against the two different sorts of Idolatry which are the worshipping of False Gods or the worshipping the True God in a Corporeal Figure The one is the giving the Honour of the True God to an Idol and the other is the depreâ—â—ing the True God to the resemblance of an Idol These were the two great Branches of Idolatry by which the true Ideas of God were corrupted Religion was by them corrupted in its Source No body can question but that it is Immoral to worship a False God it is a transferring the Honour which belongs immediately and singly to the Great God to a Creature or to some Imaginary Thing which never had a real Existence This is the robbing God of what is due to him and the exalting another thing to a degree and rank that cannot belong to it Nor is it less immoral to propose the Great and True God to be worshipped under Appearances that are derogatory to his Nature that tend to give us low Thoughts of him and that make us think him like if not below our selves This way of worshipping him is both unsutable to his nature and unbecoming ours while we pay our Adorations to that which is the work of an Artificer This is confirmed by those many express Prohibitions in Scripture to which Reasons are added which shew that the thing is Immoral in its own nature It being often repeated that no Similitude of God was ever seen And to whom will ye liken me All things in Heaven and Earth are often called the work of his hands Which are plain Indications of a Moral Precept when Arguments are framed from the Nature of Things to enforce Obedience to it The Reason given in the very Command it self is taken from the Nature of God who is jealous that is so tender of his Glory that he will not suffer a diminution of it to go unpunished and if this Precept is clearly founded upon Natural Justice and the proportion that ought to be kept between all Human Acts and their Objects then it must be perpetual And that the rather because we do plainly see that the Gospel is a refining upon the Law of Moses and does exalt it to a higher pitch of Sublimity and Purity And by consequence the Ideas of God which are the first Seeds and Principles of Religion are to be kept yet more pure and undefiled in it than they were in a lower Dispensation The Third Precept is against false Swearing For the Word Vain is often used in the Scripture in that sense Ex. 23.1 Lev. 19.12 Mat. 5.33 And since in all the other Commandments the Sin which is named is not one of the lowest but of the chief Sins that relate to that Head there is no reason therefore to think That Vain or Idle Swearing which is a Sin of a lower Order should be here meant and not rather false Swearing which is the highest Sin of the kind The Morality of this Command is very apparent for since God is the God of Truth and every Oath is an Appeal to him therefore it must be a gross Wickedness to Appeal to God or to call him to vouch for our lies The Fourth Commandment cannot be called Moral in the first and highest sense for from The Nature of Things no reason can be assigned Why the Seventh day rather than the Sixth or the Eighth or any other day should be separated from the common business of Life and applied to the Service of God But it is Moral that a man should pay homage to his Maker and acknowledge him in all his works and ways And since our Senses and sensible Objects are apt to wear better things out of our Thoughts it is necessary that some solemn Times should be set apart for full and copious Meditations on these Subjects This should be universal lest if the Time were not the same every where the Business of some men might interfere with the Devotions of others It ought to have such an eminent Character on it like a cessation from Business Which may both awaken a curiosity to enquire into the reason of that stop and also may give opportunity for Meditations and Discourses on those Subjects It is also clear That such days of rest must not return so oft that the necessary Affairs of Life should be stopt by them nor so seldom that the Impressions of Religion should wear out if they were too
from the Scope of the whole Epistle and the beginning of that Chapter understand only of the state that St. Paul represents himself to have been in while yet a Iew and before his Conversion Whereas others understand it of him in his converted and regenerated state Very plausible things have been said on both sides but without arguing any thing from words the sense of which is under debate Gal. 5.17 Rom. 8.13 there are other places which do manifestly express the struggle that is in a good Man The flesh is weak though the spirit is willing The flesh lusteth against the spirit as the spirit lusteth against the flesh We ought to be still mortifying the deeds of the body and we feel many Sins that do so easily beseâ— us that from these things we have reason to conclude that there is a Corruption in our Nature which gives us a biass and propensity to Sin Now there is no reason to think that Baptism takes away all the Branches and Effects of Original Sin It is enough if we are by it delivered from the Wrath of God and brought into a State of Favour and Acceptation We are freed from the Curse of Death by our being Entitled to a Blessed Resurrection And if we are so far freed from the Corruption of our Nature as to have a foederal right to such Assistances as will enable us to resist and repress it though it is not quite extinct in us so long as we live in these frail and mortal Bodies here are very great Effects of our Admission to Christianity by Baptism though this should not go so far as to root out all Inclinations to Evil out of our Nature The great Disposition that is in us to Appetite and Passion and that great heat with which they Inflame us the Aversion that we naturally have to all the Exercises of Religion and the Pains that must be used to work us up to a tolerable Degree of Knowledge and an ordinary Measure of Virtue shews that these are not natural to us Whereas Sloth and Vice do grow on us without any care taken about them so that it appears that they are the natural and the other the forced growth of our Souls These ill Dispositions are so universally spread through all Mankind and appear so early and in so great a Diversity of ill Inclinations that from hence it seems reasonable and just to infer That this Corruption is spread through our whole Nature and Species by the Sin and Disobedience of Adam And beyond this a great many among our selves think that they cannot go in asserting of Original Sin But there is a further step made by all the Disciples of S. Austin who believe That a Covenant was made with all Mankind in Adam as their First Parent That he was a Person Constituted by God to represent them all and that the Covenant was made with him so that if he had obeyed all his Posterity should have been happy through his Obedience but by his Disobedience they were all to be esteemed to have sinned in him his Act being Imputed and Transferred to them all S. Austin considered all Mankind as lost in Adam and in that he made the Decree of Election to begin There being no other Reprobation asserted by him than the leaving Men to continue in that state of Damnation in which they were by reason of Adam's Sin so that though by Baptism all Men were born again and recovered out of that lost state yet unless they were within the Decree of Election they could not be saved but would certainly fall from that state and perish in a state of Sin But such as were not Baptized were shut out from all hope Those words of Christ's Except ye be born again of the water and of the Spirit Joh. 3.3 5 ye cannot enter into the kingdom of God being Expounded so as to Import the Indispensable Necessity of Baptism to Eternal Salvation All who were not Baptized were reckoned by him among the Damned Yet this Damnation as to those who had no Actual Sin was so mitigated that it seemed to be little more than an Exclusion out of Heaven without any Suffering or Misery like a state of Sleep and Inactivity This was afterwards dressed up as a Division or Partition in Hell called the Limbo of Infants so by bringing it thus low they took away much of the horror that this Doctrine might otherwise have given the World It was not easy to Explain the way how this was propagated They wished well to the Notion of a Soul's propagating a Soul but that seemed to come too near Creation So it was not received as certain It was thâ—refore thought That the Body being propagated defiled the Soul was created and infused at the time of Conception And the though God did not Create it impure yet no time was interposed between its Creation and infusion So that it could never be said to have been once pure and then to have become impure All this as it afforded an easy Foundation to Establish the Doctrine of Absolute Decrees upon it no care being taken to shew how this Sin came into the World whether from an Absolute Decrâ—e or not so it seem'd to have a great Foundation in that large Discourse of St. Paul's where in the 5th of the Romans he compares the Blessings that we receive by the Death of Christ with the Guilt and Misery that was brought upon us by the Sin of Adam Now it is confessed That by Christ we have both an Imputation or Communication of the Merits of his Death and likewise a Purity and Holiness of Nature convey'd to us by his Doctrine and Spirit In opposition then to this if the comparison is to be closely pursued there must be an Imputation of Sin as well as a Corruption of Nature transfused to us from Adam This is the more considerable as to the Point of imputation because the chief design of St. Paul's Discourse seems to be levelled at that since it is begun upon the Head of Reconciliation and Attonement Upon which it follows That as by one man sin entred into the world Rom. 5.12 to the end and death by sin and death passed upon all men for that or as others render it in whom all have sinned Now they think it is all one to their Point Whether it be rendered for that or in whom For though the later words seem to deliver their Opinion more precisely yet it being affirm'd That according to the other rendring all who die have sinned and it being certain That many Infants die who have never actually sinned these must have sinned in Adam they could sin no other way It is afterwards said by St. Paul That by the offence of one many were dead That the judgment was by one to Condemnation That by one man's offence death reigned by one That by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to Condemnation And that by one man's disobedience
that he can divert if not all of the sudden resist the present impressions that seem to master him We do also feel that in many Trifles we do Act with an entire liberty and do many things upon no other account and for no other reason but because we will do them and yet more important things depend on these Our Thoughts are much governed by those impressions that are made upon our Brain When an Object proportioned to us appears to us with such advantages as to affect us much it makes such an impression on our Brain that our Animal Spirits move much towards it and those Thoughts that answer it arise oft and strongly upon us till either that Impression is worn out and flatted or new and livelier ones are made on us by other Objects In this depressed state in which we now are the Ideas of what is useful or pleasant to our Bodies are strong they are ever fresh being daily renewed and according to the different Construction of Mens Blood and their Brains there arises a great variety of Inclinations in them Our Animal Spirits that are the immediate Organs of Thought being the subtiler parts of our Blood are differently made and shaped as our Blood happens to be Acid Salt Sweet or Phlegmatick And this gives such a Biass to all our Inclinations that nothing can work us off from it but some great strength of Thought that bears it down So Learning chiefly in Mathematical Sciences can so swallow up and fix ones Thought as to possess it entirely for some time but when that amusement is over Nature will return and be where it was being rather diverted than overcome by such Speculations The Revelation of Religion is the proposing and proving many Truths of great importance to our Understandings by which they are enlightened and our Wills are guided but these Truths are feeble things languid and unable to stem a Tide of Nature especialy when it is much excited and heated So that in fact we feel that when Nature is low these Thoughts may have some force to give an inward Melancholy and to awaken in us Purposes and Resolutions of another kind but when Nature recovers it self and takes fire again these grow less powerful The giving those Truths of Religion such a Force that they may be able to subdue Nature and to govern us is the Design of both Natural and Revealed Religion So the Question comes now according to the Article to be Whether a Man by the Powers of Nature and of Reason without other inward Assistances can so far turn and dispose his own Mind as to believe and to do works pleasant and acceptable to God Pelagius thought that Man was so entire in his liberty that there was no need of any other Grace but that of Pardon and of proposing the Truths of Religion to Mens knowledge but that the use of these was in every Man's power Those who were called Semipelagians thought that an assisting inward Grace was necessary to enable a Man to go through all the harder steps of Religion but with that they thought that the first Turn or Conversion of the Will to God was the effect of a Man 's own free choice In opposition to both which this Article asserts both an Assisting and a preventing Grace That there are inward Assistances given to our Powers besides those outward Blessings of Providence is first to be proved In the Old Testament it is true there were not express Promises made by Moses of such Assistances yet it seems both David and Solomon had a full persuasion about it David's Prayers do every where relate to somewhat that is Internal Psal. 119.13 27 3â— 35. Psalm 51.10 11. He prays God to open and turn his eyes to unite and incline his heart to quicken him to make him to go to guide and lead him to create in him a clean heart and renew a right spirit within him Solomon says That God gives wisdom that he directs mens paths and giveth grace to the lowly Jâ—r 31.33 34. In the Promise that Ieremy gives of a New Covenant this is the Character that is given of it I will put my Law in their inward parts and write it in their hearts They shall all know me from the least of them unto the greatest Like to that is what Ezekiel promises Ezek. 36.26 27. A new heart also will I give and a new spirit will I put within you and I will take away the stony heart out of your flesh and I will give you an heart of flesh and I will put my spirit within you and cause you to walk in my statutes and ye shall keep my judgments and do them That these Prophecies relate to the New Dispensation cannot be question'd since Ieremy's words to which the other are equivalent are cited and applied to it in the Epistle to the Hebrews Now the opposition of the one Dispensation to the other as it is here stated consists in this That whereas the Old Dispensation was made up of Laws and Statutes that were given on Tables of Stone and in writing the New Dispensation was to have somewhat in it beside that External Revelation which was to be Internal and which should dispose and inable Men to observe it A great deal of our Saviour's Discourse concerning the Spirit which he was to pour on his Disciples did certainly belong to that extraordinary Effusion at Pentecost and to those wonderful Effects that were to follow upon it Yet as he had formerly given this as an Encouragement to all Men to Pray Luke 11.13 That his heavenly Father would give the Holy Spirit to every one that asked him so there are many parts of that his last Discourse that seem to belong to the constant Necessities of all Christians It is as unreasonable to limit all to that time as the first words of it I go to prepare a place for you and because I live ye shall live also The Prayer which comes after that Discourse Joh. 14.2 being extended beyond them to all that should believe in his Name through their word we have no reason to limit these words I will manifest my self to him My Father and I will make our abode with him In me ye shall have peace to the Apostles only so that the Guidance the Conviction the Comforts of that Spirit seem to be Promises which in a lower order belong to all Christians St. Paul speaks of the love of God shed abroad in their hearts by the Holy Ghost When he was under Temptation Rom. 5.5 and prayed thrice he had this Answer My grace is sufficient for thee 2 Cor. 12 9. my strength is made perfect in weakness He prays often for the Churches in his Epistles to them That God would stablish comfort and perfect them Eph. 3.17 enlighten and strengthen them and this in all that variety of Words and Phrases that import inward Assistances This is also meant by Christ's living
of Paul The Conversion of St. Paul himself was so clearly from a Preventing Grace that if it had not been miraculous in so many of its Circumstances it would have been a strong Argument in behalf of it These words of Christ seem also to assert it Without me ye can do nothing ye have not chosen me but I you and no man can come to me except the Father which hath sent me draw him Joh. 1.13.15.5 16. Phil. 2.13 Those who received Christ were born not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man but of the will of God God is said to work in us both to will and to do of his own good pleasure The one seems to import the first beginings and the other the progress of a Christian Course of Life So far all among us that I know of are agreed though perhaps not as to the force that is in all those places to prove this Point There do yâ—t remain Two Points in which they do not agree the one is the Efficacy of this Preventing Grace some think that it is of its own nature so Efficacious that it never fails of Converting those to whom it is given others think that it only awakens and disposes as well as it enables them to turn to God but that they may resist it and that the greater part of Mankind do actually resist it The examining of this Point and the stating the Arguments of both sides will belong more properly to the Seventeenth Article The other Head in which many do differ is concerning the Extent of this Preventing Grace for whereas such as do hold it to be Efficacious of it self restrain it to the number of those who are Elected and converted by it others do believe That as Christ died for all Men so there is an Universal Grace which is given in Christ to all Men in some degree or other and that it is given to all Baptized Christians in a more eminent degree and that as all are corrupted by Adam there is also a general Grace given to all Men in Christ. This depends so much on the former Point that the discussing the one is indeed the discussing of both and therefore it shall not be further entred upon in this place ARTICLE XI Of the Justification of Man We are accounted Righteous before God only for the Merit of our Lord and Saviour Iesus Christ by Faith and not for our own Works or Deservings Wherefore that we are justified by Faith only is a most wholsome Doctrine and very full of Comfort as more largely is expressed in the Homily of Iustification IN order to the right understanding this Article we must first consider the true meaning of the Terms of which it is made up which are Iustification Faith Faith only and Good Works and then when these are rightly stated we will see what Judgments are to be passed upon the Questions that do arise out of this Article Iust or Iustified are words capable of two senses the one is a Man who is in the Favour of God by a mere Act of his Grace or upon some Consideration not founded on the Holiness or the Merit of the Person himself The other is a Man who is truly holy and as such is beloved of God The use of this word in the New Testament was probably taken from the term Chasidim among the Iews a designation of such as observed the external parts of the Law strictly and were believed to be upon that account much in the Favour of God an Opinion being generally spread among them that a strict observance of the external parts of the Law of Moses did certainly put a Man in the Favour of God In opposition to which the design of a great part of the New Testament is to shew that these things did not put Men in the Favour of God Our Saviour used the word saved in opposition to condemned Job 3.18 and spoke of Men who were condemned already as well as of others who were saved St. Paul enlarges more fully into many Discourses in which our being justified and the righteousness of God or his grace towards us are all terms equivalent to one another His design in the Epistle to the Romans was to prove that the observance of the Mosaiâ—al Law could not justifie that is could not put a Man under the grace or favour of God or the righteousnâ—ss of God that is into a state of acceptation with him as that is opposite to a state of wrath or condemnation He upon that shews that Abraham was in the Favour of God before he was Circumcised upon the account of his trusting to the Promises of God and obeying his Commands and that God reckoned upon these Acts of his as much as if they had been an entire course of Obedience Gen. 15.6 Rom. 4.3.22 for that is the meaning of these words Aâ—d it was imputed to him for righteousness These Promises were freely made to him by God when by no previous Works of his he had made them to be due to him of debt therefore that Covenant which was founded on those Promises was the justifying of Abraham freely by grace upon which St. Paul in a variety of Inferences and Expressions assumes That we are in like manner justified freely by grace through the redemption in Christ Iesus Rom. 3.24 That God has of his own free Goodness offered a new Covenant and new and better Promises to Mankind in Christ Jesus which whosoever believe as Abraham did they are justified as he was So that whosoever will observe the Scope of St. Paul's Epistles to the Romans and Galatians will see that he always uses Iustification in a sense that imports our being put in the Favour of God The Epistle to the Galatians was indeed writ upon the occasion of another Controversy which was Whether supposing Christ to be the Messias Christians were bound to observe the Mosaical Law or not Whereas the Scope of the first part of the Epistle to the Romans is to shew that we are not justified nor saved by the Law of Moses as a Mean of its own nature capable to recommend us to the Favour of God but that even that Law was a Dispensation of Grace in which it was a true Faith like Abraham's that put Men in the Favour of God yet in both these Epistles in which Iustification is fully treated of it stands always for the receiving one into the Favour of God In this the Consideration upon which it is done and the Condition upon which it is offered are two very different things The one is a Dispensation of God's Mercy in which he has regard to his own Attributes to the Honour of his Laws and his Government of the World The other is the Method in which he applies that to us in such a manner that it may have such Ends as are both perfective of Human Nature and suitable to an infinitely Holy Being
went about always doing good and was as a lamb without spot is so oft affirmed in the New Testament 1 Pet. 1.19 that it can admit of no Debate This was not only true in his Rational Powers the superior part called the Spirit in opposition to the lower part but also in those Appetites and Affections that arise from our Bodies and from the Union of our Souls to them called the Flesh. For tho' in these Christ having the Human Nature truly in him had the Appetites of Hunger in him yet the Devil could not tempt him by that to distrust God or to desire a miraculous supply sooner than was fitting He overcame even that necessary Appetite whensoever there was an occasion given him to do the will of his heavenly Father Joh. 4.34 He had also in him the aversions to pain and suffering and the horror at a violent and ignominious Death which was planted in our Natures and in this it was natural to him to wish and to pray that the Cup might pass from him But in this his Purity appeared the most eminently That tho' he felt the weight of his Nature to a vast degree he did notwithstanding that limit and conquer it so entirely that he resigned himself absolutely to his Father's Will Not my will but thy will be done Besides all that has been already said upon the former Articles to prove that some taint and degree of the Original Corruption remains in all Men the peculiar Character of Christ's Holiness so oft repeated looks plainly to be a distinction proper to him and to him only We are called upon to follow him to learn of him and to imitate him without restriction whereas we are required to follow the Apostles only as they were the followers of Christ 1 Cor. 11.1 1 Pet. 1.15 Mat. 5.48 And though we are commanded to be holy as he was holy in all manner of conversation that does no more prove that any man can arrive at that pitch than our being commanded to be perfect as our heavenly father is perfect will prove that we may become perfect as God is The Importance of these words being only this That we ought in all things to make God and Christ our patterns and that we ought to endeavour to imitate and resemble them all we can There seems to be a particular design in the Contexture and Writing of the Scriptures to represent to us some of the Failings of the best Men For though Zacharias and Elizabeth are said to have been blameless that must only be meant of the Exterior and Visible part of their Conversation that it was free from blame Luk. 1.6 and of their being accepted of God but that is not to be carried to import a sinless Purity before God For we find the same Zachary guilty of misbelieving the Message of the Angel to him to such a degree Ver. 20. that he was punished for it with a Dumbness of above Nine Months continuance Perhaps the Virgin 's Question to the Angel had nothing blame-worthy in it Luk. 2.49 Joh. 2.4 but our Saviour's Answers to her both when she came to him in the Temple when he was Twelve Years old and more particularly when she moved him at the Marriage in Cana to furnish them with Wine look like a Reprimand The Contentions among the Apostles about the Preheminence and in particular the Ambition of Iames and Iohn cannot be excused St. Peter's Dissimulation at Antioch in the Judaizing Controversy Matth. 20.20 24. Gal. 2.11 12 13 14. Act. 15.39 and the sharp Contention that happened between Paul and Barnabas are recorded in Scripture and they are both Characters of the Sincerity of those who Penned them and likewise Marks of the Frailties of Human Nature even in its greatest Elevation and with its highest Advantages So that all the high Characters that are given of the best Men are to be understood either comparatively to others whom they exceeded or with relation to their outward Actions and the visible parts of their Life Or they are to be meant of their Zeal and Sincerity which is valued and accepted of God and as it was to Abraham is imputed to them for Righteousness Yet this is not to be abused by any to be an encouragement to live in Sin for we may carry this Purity and Perfection certainly very far by the Grace of God In every Sin that we commit we do plainly perceive that we do it with so much freedom that we might not have done it here is still just Matter for Humiliation and Repentance By this Doctrine our Church intends only to repress the Pride of vain-glorious and hypocritical Men and to strike at the Root of that filthy Merchandise that has been brought into the House of God under the pretence of the Perfection and even the over-doing or supererogating of the Saints ARTICLE XVI Of Sin after Baptism Note very deadly sin willingly committed after Baptism is the sin against the Holy Ghost and unpardonable Wherefore the grant of Repentance is not to be denied to such as fall into sin after Baptism After we have received the Holy Ghost we may depart from grace given and fall into sin and by the grace of God we may arise again and amend our Lives And therefore they are to be condemned which say they can no more sin as long as they live here or deny the place of forgiveness to such as truly repent THis Article as it relates to the Sect of the Novatians of old so it is probable it was made a part of our Doctrine upon the Account of some of the Enthusiasts who at that time as well as some do in our Days might boast their Perfection and join with that part of the Character of a Pharisee this other of an unreasonable rigour of Censure and Punishment against Offenders By deadly Sin in the Article we are not to understand such Sins as in the Church of Rome are called mortal in opposition to others that are venial As if some Sins though Offences against God and Violations of his Law could be of their own nature such slight things that they deserved only Temporal Punishment and were to be expiated by some piece of Pennance or Devotion or the Communication of the Merits of others The Scripture no where teaches us to think so slightly of the Majesty of God or of his Law There is a curse upon every one that continueth not in all things which are written in the Book of the Law to do them Gal. 3.10 And the same Curse must have been on us all if Christ had not redeemed us from it The wages of Sin is death And St. Iames asserts that there is such a Complication of all the Precepts of the Law of God both with one another and with the Authority of the Lawgiver that he who offends in one point Jam. 2.10 11. is guilty of all So since God has in his Word given
Decree is either Presumption or Despair since a Man upon that bottom reckons That which way soever the Decree is made it must certainly be accomplished They also argue That because we must receive the Promises of God as conditional we must also believe the Decree to be conditional for Absolute Decrees exclude conditional Promises An Offer cannot be supposed to be made in earnest by him that has excluded the greatest number of Men from it by an antecedent Act of his own And if we must only follow the revealed Will of God we ought not to suppose that there is an Antecedent and Positive Will of God that has decreed our doing the contrary to what he has commanded Thus the one side argues That the Article as it lies in the plain meaning of those who conceived it does very expresly establish their Doctrine And the other argues from those Cautions that are added to it That it ought to be understood so as that it may agree with these Cautions And both sides find in the Article it self such grounds that they reckon they do not renounce their Opinions by subscribing it The Remonstrant side have this further to add That the Universal Extent of the Death of Christ seems to be very plainly affirmed in the most solemn part of all the Offices of the Church For in the Office of Communion and in the Prayer of Consecration we own That Christ by the one Oblation of himself once offered made there a full perfect and sufficient Sacrifice Oblation and Satisfaction for the Sins of the whole World Though the others say That by full perfect and sufficient is not to be understood that Christ's Death was intended to be a compleat Sacrifice and Satisfaction for the whole World but that in its own Value it was capable of being such This is thought too great a stretch put upon the words And there are yet more express words in our Church-Catechism to this purpose which is to be considered as the most solemn Declaration of the sense of the Church since that is the Doctrine in which she instructs all her Children And in that part of it which seems to be most important as being the short Summary of the Apostles Creed it is said God the Son who hath redeemed me and all Mankind Where all must stand in the same Extent of Universality as in the precedent and in the following words The Father who made me and all the World the Holy Ghost who sanctifieth me and all the Elect People of God which being to be understood severely and without exception this must also be taken in the same strictness There is another Argument brought from the Office of Baptism to prove that men may fall from a state of Grace and Regeneration for in the whole Office more particularly in the Thanksgiving after the Baptism it is affirmed That the Person baptized is Regenerated by God's Holy Spirit and is received for his own Child by Adoption Now since it is certain that many who are baptized fall from that state of Grace this seems to import That some of the Regenerate may fall away Which tho' it agree well with St. Austin's Doctrine yet it does not agree with the Calvinists Opinions Thus I have examined this matter in as short a compass as was possible and yet I do not know that I have forgot any important part of the whole Controversy though it is large and has many Branches I have kept as far as I can perceive that Indifference which I proposed to my self in the prosecuting of this matter and have not on this occasion declared my own Opinion though I have not avoided the doing it upon other occasions Since the Church has not been peremptory but that a Latitude has been left to different Opinions I thought it became me to make this Explanation of the Article such And therefore I have not endeavoured to possess the Reader with that which is my own sense in this matter but have laid the Force of the Arguments as well as the Weight of the Difficulties of both Sides before him with all the Advantages that I had found in the Books either of the one or of the other Persuasion And I leave the Choice as free to my Reader as the Church has done ARTICLE XVIII Of obtaining Eternal Salvation only by the Name of Christ. They also are to be accursed that presume to say That every man shall be saved by the Law or Sect which he professeth so that he be diligent to frame his Life according to that Law and the Light of Nature For Holy Scripture doth set out unto us only the Name of Iesus Christ whereby men must be saved THE Impiety that is condemned in this Article was first taug htby some of the Heathen Oraters and Philosophers in the Fourth Century who in their Addresses to the Christian Emperors for the Tolerance of Paganism started this Thought that how lively soever it may seem when well set off in a piece of Eloquence will not bear a severe Argument That God is more honoured by the Varieties and different Methods of worshipping and serving him than if all should fall into the same way That this diversity has a Beauty in it and a suitableness to the Infinite Perfections of God and it does not look so like a mutual agreement or concert as when all Men worship him one way But this is rather a Flash of Wit than true Reasoning The Alcoran has carried this matter further to the asserting That all Men in all Religions are equally acceptable to God if they serve him faithfully in them The infusing this into the World that has a shew of Mercy in it made Men more easy to receive their Law and they took care by their extream Severity to fix them in it when they were once engaged for though they use no Force to make Men Musselmans yet they punish with all extremity every thing that looks like Apostacy from it if it is once received The Doctrine of Leviathan that makes Law to be Religion and Religion to be Law that is that obliges Subjects to believe that Religion to be true or at least to follow that which is enacted by the Laws of their Countrey must be built either on this foundation That there is no such thing as Revealed Religion but that it is only a Political Contrivance or that all Religions are equally acceptable to God Others having observ'd that it was a very small part of Mankind that had the advantages of the Christian Religion have thought it too cruel to damn in their thoughts all those who have not heard of it and yet have lived morally and virtuously according to their Light and Education And some to make themselves and others easy in accommodating their Religion to their secular Interests to excuse their changing and to quiet their Consciences have set up this Notion that seems to have a largeness both of good Nature and Charity in
a Foederal State of Salvation but Christians To them is given the Covenant of Grace and to them the promises of God are made and offered So that they have a certainty of it upon their performing those conditions that are put in the promises All others are out of this Promise to whom the Tidings of it were never brought but yet a great difference is to be made between them and those who have been invited to this Covenant and admitted to the outward Profession and the common Privileges of it and that yet have in effect rejected it These are under such positive denunciations of Wrath and Judgment that there is no room left for any charitable Thoughts or Hopes concerning them So that if any part of the Gospel is true that must be also true that they are under Condemnation Joh. 3.19 for having lov d darkness more than light when the Light shone upon them and visitâ—d them But as for them whom God has left in Darkness they are certainly out of the Covenant out of those Promises and Declarations that are made in it So that they have no Foederal Right to be saved neither can we affirm that they shall be saved But on the other hand they are not under those positive denunciations because they were never made to them Therefore since God has not declared that they shall be damned no more ought we to take upon us to damn them Instead of stretching the severity of Justice by an Inference we may rather venter to stretch the Mercy of God since that is the Attribute which of all others is the most Magnificently spoken of in the Scriptures So that we ought to think of it in the largest and most comprehensive manner But indeed the most proper way is for us to stop where the Revelation of God stops And not to be wise beyond what is written but to leave the secrets of God as Mysteries too far above us to examine or to sound their depth We do certainly know on what terms we our selves shall be saved or damned And we ought to be contented with that and rather study to work out our own salvation with fear and trembling than to let our minds run out into uncertain Speculations concerning the Measures and the Conditions of God's uncovenanted Mercies We ought to take all possible care that we our selves come not into Condemnation rather than to define positively of others who must or who must not be condemned It is therefore enough to fix this according to the Design of the Article That it is not to free Men to chuse at pleasure what Religion they will as if that were left to them or that all Religions were alike which strikes at the Foundation and undermines the Truth of all Revealed Religion None are within the Covenant of Grace but true Christians and all are excluded out of it to whom it is offered who do not receive and believe it and live according to it So in a word all that are saved are saved through Christ but whether all these shall be called to the Explicite Knowledge of him is more than we have any good ground to affirm Nor are we to go into that other Question Whether any that are only in a state of Nature live fully up to its Light This is that about which we can have no certainty no more than whether there may be a Common Grace given to them all proportioned to their State and to the Obligations of it This in general may be safely believed That God will never be wanting to such as do their utmost endeavours in order to the saving of their Souls But that as in the Case of Cornelius an Angel will be sent and a Miracle be wrought rather than that such a Person shall be left to perish But whether any of them do ever arrive at that state is more than we can determine and it is a vain attempt for us to endeavour to find it out ARTICLE XIX Of the Church The Uisible Church of Christ is a Congregation of faithful men in the which the pure Word of God is preached and the Sacraments be duely administred according to Christ's Ordinance in all those things that of necessity are requisite to the same As the Church of Jerusalem Alexandria and Antioch have erred so also the Church of Rome hath erred not only in their Living and manner of Ceremonies but also in matters of Faith THIS Article together with some that follow it Relates to the Fundamental difference between us and the Church of Rome They teaching that we are to judge of Doctrines by the Authority and the Decisions of the Church whereas we affirm That we are first to examine the Doctrine and according to that to judge of the Purity of a Church Somewhat was already said on the Sixth Article relating to this matter What remains is now to be considered The whole Question is to be reduced to this Point Whether we ought to Examine and Judge of Matters of Religion according to the Light and Faculty of judging that we have or if we are bound to submit in all things to the Decision of the Church Here the matter must be determined against private Judgment by very express and clear Authorities other wise the other side proves it self For we having naturally a Faculty of judging for our selves and using it in all other things this freedom being the greatest of all our other Rights must be still asserted unless it can be made appear that God has in some things put a Bar upon it by his Supreme Authority That Authority must be very express if we are required to submit to it in a Point of such vast Importance to us We do also see that Men are apt to be mistaken and are apt likewise willingly to mistake and to mislead others and that particularly in matters of Religion the World has been so much imposed upon and abused that we cannot be bound to submit to any sort of persons implicitely without very good and clear grounds that do assure us of their Infallibility Otherwise we have just reason to suspect that in matters of Religion chiefly in Points in which Human Interests are concerned Men may either through Ignorance and Weakness or Corruption and on Design abuse and mislead us So that the Authorities or Proofs of this Infallibility must be very express since we are sure no Man nor Body of Men can have it among them but by a Privilege from God and a Privilege of so extraordinary a nature must be given if at all in very plain and with very evident Characters since without these Human Nature cannot and ought not to be so tame as to receive it We must not draw it from an Inference because we think we need it and cannot be safe without it That therefore it must be so because if it were not so great Disorder would arise from the want of it This is certainly a wrong way of arguing
Mercy Peace and Oblivion that are made in the Gospel it is contrary to the Truth and Veracity and to the Justice and Goodness of God to affirm that there are Reserves to be understood for Punishments when the Offers and Promises are made to us in such large and unlimited Expressions Thus we lay our Foundation in this matter which does very fully overthrow theirs We do not deny but that God does in this World punish good Men for those Sins which yet are forgiven them through Christ Psal. 99.8 according to these words in the Psalm Thou wast a God that forgavest them though thou tookest vengeance of their inventions But this is a consideration quite of another nature God in the Government of this World thinks fit by his Providence sometimes to interpose in visible Blessings as well as Judgments to shew how he protects and favours the Good and punishes the Bad and that the bad Actions of good Men are odious to him even though he has recieved their Persons into his favour He has also in the Gospel plainly excepted the Government of this World and the secret Methods of his Providence out of the Mercy that he has promised by the Warnings that are given to all Christians to prepare for Crosses and Afflictions in this Life He has made Faith and Patience in Adversities a main Condition of this New Covenant he has declared that these are not the Punishments of an Angry God but the Chastisements of a Kind and Merciful Father who designs by them both to shew to the World the Impartiality of his Justice in punishing some crying Sins in a very signal manner and to give good Men deep Impressions of their odiousness to oblige them to a severer Repentance for them and to a greater Watchfulness against them as also to give the World such Examples of Resignation and Patience under them that they may edify others by that as much as by their Sins they may have offended them So that upon all these Accounts it seems abundantly clear that no Argument can be drawn from the Temporal Punishments of good Men for their Sins in this World to a reserve of others in another State The one are clearly mentioned and reserved in the offers of Mercy that are made in the Gospel whereas the others are not This being the most plausible thing that they say for this Distinction of those twofold Punishments it is plain that there is no foundation for it As for those words of Christ's Matth. 5.26 Ye shall not come out till ye have paid the uttermost farthing from which they would infer that there is a State in which after we shall be cast into Prison we are paying off our Debts this if an Argument at all will prove too much that in Hell the Damned are clearing Scores and that they shall be delivered when all is paid off For by Prison there that only can be meant as appears by the whole Contexture of the Discourse and by other Parables of the like nature It is a Figure taken from a Man Imprisoned for a great Debt and the continuance of it till the last Farthing is paid does imply their perpetual Continuance in that State since the Debt is too great to be ever paid off From a Phrase in a Parable no Consequence is to be drawn beyond that which is the true Scope of the Parable which in this particular is only intended by our Saviour to shew the severe Punishment of those who hate implacably which is a Sin that does certainly deserve Hell and not Purgatory Our Saviour's Words concerning the Sin against the Holy Ghost That it is neither forgiven in this Life nor in that which is to come Matth. 12.32 is also urged to prove that some Sins are pardoned in the next Life which are not pardoned in this But still this will seem a stronger Argument against the Eternity of Hell-Torments than for Purgatory and will rather import that the Damned may at last be pardoned their Sins since these are the only Persons whose Sins are not pardoned in this World for of those who are justified it cannot be said that their Sins are not forgiven them and such only go to Purgatory Therefore either this is only a general way of speaking to exclude all hopes of Pardon and to imply that God's Judgments will pursue such Blasphemers both in this Life and in the next or if we will understand them more critically by this Life or this Age and the next according to a common Opinion and Phrase of the Iews which is founded on the Prophecies are to be understood the Dispensation of the Law and the Dispensation of the Messias the Age to come being a common Phrase for the times of the Messias according to those Words in the Epistle to the Hebrews Heb. 2.5 He hath not put in subjection to Angels the world to come By the Mosaical Law Sacrifices were only received and by consequence Pardon was offered for Sins of a less heinous Nature but those that were more heinous were to be punished by Death or by cutting off without Mercy whereas a full promise of the Pardon of all Sins is offered in the Gospel So that the meaning of these words of Christ's is that such a Blasphemy was a Sin not only beyond the Pardon offered in the Law of Moses which was the Age that then was but that it was a Sin beyond that Pardon which was to be offered by the Messias in the Age to come that is in the Kingdom of Heaven that was then at hand But these Words can by no means be urged to prove this Distinction of Temporal and Eternal Punishment therefore we must conclude that since Repentance and Remission of Sins are joyned together in the first Commission to Preach the Gospel â—uk 24.47 and since Life Peace and Salvation are promised to such as believe that all this is to be understood simply and plainly without any other Limitation or Exception than that which is expressed which is only of such Chastisements as God thinks fit to exercise good Men with in this Life In the next place we shall consider what reason we have to reject the Doctrine of Purgatory as we have already seen how weak the Foundation is upon which it is built The Scripture speaks to us of Two States after this Life of Happiness and Misery and as it divides all Mankind into good and bad into those that do Good and those that do Evil into Believers and Unbelievers Righteous and Sinners so it proposes always the end of the one to be everlasting Happiness and the end of the other to be everlasting Punishment without the least hint of any Middle State after Death So that it is very plain there is nothing said in Scripture of Men too good to be Damned but not so good as to be immediately Saved Now if there had been yet a great deal to be suffered after Death and
The justest abatement that we can offer for thisCorruption which is too manifest to be either denied or justified is this They were then engaged with the Heathens and were much set on bringing them over to the Christian Religion In order to that it was very natural for them to think of all methods possible to accommodate Christianity to their taste It was perhaps observed how far the Apostles complied with the Iews that they might gain them St. Paul had said that to the Iews he became a Iew and to them that were without law 1 Cor. 9.19 20. that is the Gentiles as one without law that by all means he might gain some They might think that if the Iews who had abused the light of a Revealed Religion who had rejected and crucified the Messias and persecuted his Followers and had in all respects corrupted both their Doctrine and their Morals were waited on and complied with in the observance of that very Law which was abrogated by the Death of Christ but was still insisted on by them as of perpetual Obligation and yet that after the Apostles had made a solemn decision in the matter they continued to conform themselves to that Law all this might be applied with some advantages to this matter The Gentiles had nothing but the Light of Nature to Govern them they might seem willing to become Christians but they still despised the nakedness and simplicity of that Religion And it is reasonable enough to think that the Emperors and other great Men might in a Political view considering the vast strength of Heathenism press the Bishops of those times to use all imaginable ways to adorn Christianity with such an exteriorForm ofWorship as might be most acceptable to them and might most probably bring them over to it The Christians had long felt the weight of Persecution from them and were no doubt much frighted with the danger of a Relapse in Iulian's time It is natural to all Men to desire to be safe and to weaken the numbers of their implacable Enemies In that state of things we do plainly see they began to comply in lesser Matters For whereas in the First Ages the Christians were often reproached with this that they had no Temples Altars Sacrifices nor Priests they changed their dialect in all those Points so we have reason to believe that this was carried further The Vulgar are more easily wrought upon in greater Points of Speculation than in some small Ritual Matters Because they do not understand the one and so are not much concerned about it But the other is more sensible and lies within their compass We find some in Palestine kept Images in their Houses as Eusebius tells us others began in Spain to light Candles by Day-light and to paint the Walls of their Churches And though these things were condemned by the Council of Elliberis yet we see by what St. Ierom has cited out of Vigilantius that the Spirit of Superstition did work strongly among them We hear of none that writ against those abuses besides Vigilantius yet Ierom tells us that many Bishops were of the same Mind with him with whom he is so angry as to doubt whether they deserved to be called Bishops Most of these abuses had also specious beginnings and went on insensibly Where they made greater steps we find an opposition to them Epipli Heres 79 Epiphanius is very severe upon the Collyridians for their Worshipping the Blessed Virgin And though they did it by Offering up a Cake to her yet if any will read all that he says against that Superstition they will clearly see that no Prayers were then Offered up to her by the Orthodox And that he rejects the thought of it with Indignation But the respect paid the Martyrs and the opinion that they were still hovering about their Tombs might make the calling to them for their Prayers seem to be like one Mans desiring the Prayers of other Good Men and when a thing of this kind is once begun it naturally goes on Of all this we see a particular Account in a Discourse writ on purpose on this Argument of curing the Affections and Inclinations of the Greeks by Theodoret Theod. de cur Gr. affect l. 8. de Martyr who may be justly reckoned among the greatest Men of Antiquity and in it he insists upon this particular of proposing to them the Saints and Martyrs instead of their Gods And there is no doubt to be made but that they found the effects of this compliance many Heathens were every day coming over to the Christian Religion And it might then perhaps be intended to lay all those aside when the Heathens were once brought over To all which this must be added that the good Men of that time had not the Spirit of Prophesy and could not foresee what Progress this might make and to what an Excess it might grow they had nothing of that kind in their View So that between Charity and Policy between a desire to bring over Multitudes to their Faith and an Inclination to secure themselves it is not at all to be wondred at by any who considers all the Circumstances of those Ages that these Corruptions should have got into the Church and much less having once got in they should have gone on so fast and be carried so far Thus I have offered all the Considerations that arise from the State of Things at that time to shew how far we do still preserve the Respect due to the Fathers of those Ages even when we confess that they were Men and that something of human Nature appeared in this Piece of their Conduct This can be made no Argument for later Ages who having no Heathens among them are under no Temptations to comply with any of the Parts of Heathenism to gain them And now that the abuse of these Matters is become so scandalous and has spread it self so far how much soever we may excuse those Ages in which we discern the first beginnings and as it were the small Heads of that which has since overflow'd Christendom Yet we can by no means bear even with those beginnings which have had such dismal Effects and therefore we have reduced the Worship of God to the Simplicity of the Scripture Times and of the First Three Centuries And for the Fourth we reverence it so much on other Accounts that for the Sake of these we are unwilling to Reflect too much on this Another Consideration urged for the Invocation of Saints is that they seeing God we have reason to believe that they see in him if not all things yet at least all the Concerns of the Church of which they are still Parts and they being in a most perfect State of Charity they must certainly love the Souls of their Brethren here below So that if Saints on Earth whose Charity is not yet perfect do pray for one another here on Earth they in that State of Perfection do certainly
not err in discharging their Commission and the Terms of the Covenant of Grace being thus settled by them all who were to succeed them were also empowered to go on with the Publication of this Pardon and of those glad Tidings to the World So that whatsoever they declared in the Name of God conform to the Tenor of that which the Apostles were to settle should be always made good We do also acknowledge that the Pastors of the Church have in the way of Censure and Government a Ministerial Authority to remit or to retain Sins as they are Matters of Scandal or Offence tho' that indeed does not seem to be the meaning of those Words of our Saviour and therefore we think that the power of pardoning and retaining is only declaratory so that all the exercises of it are are then only effectual when the Declarations of the Pardon are made conform to the Conditions of the Gospel This Doctrine of ours how much soever decried of late in the Roman Church as striking at the Root of the Priestly Authority yet has been maintained by some of their best Authors and some of the greatest of their School-men Thus we have seen upon what reason it is that we do not conclude from hence that Auricular Confession is necessary in which we think that we are fully confirmed by the Practice of many of the Ages of theChristian Church which did not understand these words as containing anObligation to Secret Confession It is certain that the Practice and Tradition of the Church must be relied on here if in any thing since there was nothing that both Clergy and Laity were more concerned both to know and to deliver down faithfully than this on which the Authority of the one and the Salvation of the other depended so much Such a Point as this could never have been forgot or mistaken many and clear Rules must have been given about it It is a thing to which Humane Nature has so much repugnancy that it must in the first forming of Churches have been infused into them as absolutely necessary in order to Pardon and Salvation A Church could not now be formed according to the Doctrine and Practice of the Church of Rome without very full and particular Instructions both to Priests and People concerning Confession and Absolution It is the most intricate Part of their Divinity and that which the Clergy must be most ready at In Opposition to all this let it be considered that though there is a great deal said in the New Testament concerning Sorrow for Sin Repentance and Remission of Sins yet there is not a Word said nor a Rule given concerning Confession to be made to a Priest and Absolution to be given by him There is indeed a Passage in St. Iames's Epistle relating to Confession but it is to one another not restrained to the Priest James 5.16 as the Word rendred Faults seems to signify those Offences by which others are wronged in which case Confession is a degree of Reparation and so is sometimes necessary but whatever may be in this it is certain that the Confession which is there appointed to be made is a thing that was to be mutual among Christians and it is not commanded in order to Absolution but in order to the procuring the Intercessions of other good Men and therefore it is added and Pray for one another By the words that follow that ye may be healed joyned with those that went before concerning the Sick it seems the Direction given by St. Iames belongs principally to Sick Persons and the conclusion of the whole Period shews That it relates only to the private Prayers of good Men for one another The effectual fervent Prayer of a righteous man availeth much So that this place does not at all belong to Auricular Confession or Absolution Nor does there any Prints appear before the Apostacies that happened in the Persecution of Decius of the Practice even of confessing such heinous Sins as had been publickly committed Then arose the famous contests with the Novatians concerning the receiving the lapsed into the Communion of the Church again It was concluded not to exclude them from the hopes of Mercy or of Reconciliation yet it was resolved not to do that till they had been kept at a distance for some time from the Holy Communion at last they were admitted to make their Confession and so they were received to the Communion of the Church This time was shortned and many things were past over to such as shewed a deep and sincere Repentance and one of the Characters of a true Repentance upon which they were always treated with a great distinction of Favour was if they came and first accused themselves This shewed that they were deeply affected with the Sense of their Sins when they would not bear the load of them but became their own Accusers and discovered their Sins There are several Canons that make a difference in the degrees and time of the Penance between those who had accused themselves and those against whom their Sins were proved A great deal of this strain occurs often in the Writings of the Fathers which plainly shews that they did not look on the necessity of an Enumeration of all their Sins as commanded by God Otherwise it would have been enforced with Considerations of another nature than that of shortning their Penance The first occasion that was given to the Church to exercise thisDiscipline was from the frequent Apostacies into which many had lapsed during the Persecutions and when these went off another sort of Disorders began to break in upon the Church and to defile it Great numbers followed the Example of their Princes and became Christians but a mixed Multitude came among them so that there were many Scandals amongst that Body which had been formerly remarkable for the purity of their Morals and the strictness of their Lives It was the chief business of all those Councils that met in the Fourth and Fifth Centuries to settle many Rules concerning the degrees and time of Penance the Censures both of the Clergy and Laity the Orders of the Penitents and the Methods of receiving them to the Communion of the Church In some of those Councils they denied Reconciliation after some sins even to the last though the general Practice was to receive all at their Death Dallaeus de Confessione Morinus de Poenitentia but while they were in a good state of Health they kept them long in Penance in a publick Separation from the Common Priviledges of Christians and chiefly from the Holy Sacrament and under severe Rules and that for several Years more or fewer according to the Nature of their Sins and the Characters of their Repentance of which a free and unextorted Confession being one of the chief this made many prevent that and come in of their own accord to confess their sins which was much encouraged and magnified Confession was at first made
these are of no Value being only Inventions to deceive Men and to expose Religion to Mockery But even severe and afflicting Fasting if done only as a Punishment which when it is over the Penance is believed to be compleated gives such a low Idea of God and Religion that from thence Men are led to think very slightly of Sin when they know at what price they can carry it off Such a continuance in Fasting in order to Prayer as humbles and depresses Nature and raises the Mind is a great mean to reform the World but Fasting as a prescribed Task to expiate our Sins is a scorn put upon Religion Prayer when it arises from a serious Heart that is earnest in it and when it becomes habitual is certainly a most effectual mean to reform the World and to fetch down Divine Assistances But to appoint so many vocal Prayers to be gone through as a Task and then to tell the World that the running through these with few or no inward Acts accompanying them is Contrition or Attrition this is liker a Design to root out all the Impressions of Religion and all sense of that Repentance which the Gospel requires than to promote it This may be a Task fit to accustom Children to but it is contrary to the true Genius of Religion to teach Men instead of that reasonable Service that we ought to offer up to God to give him only the Labour of the Lips which is the Sacrifice of Fools Prayers gone through as a Task can be of no value and can find no acceptation in the sight of God And as St. Paul said that if he gave all his goods to the poor and had not Charity he was nothing 1 Cor. 13 1 2. So the greatest profusion of Alms-giving when done in a mercenary Way to buy off and to purchase a Pardon is the turning of God's House from being a house of prayer to be a den of thieves Upon all these Reasons we except to the whole Doctrine and Practice of the Church of Rome as to the Satisfaction made by doing Penance And in the last place we except to the Form of Absolution in these Words I Absolve thee We of this Church who use it only to such as are thought to be near Death cannot be meant to understand any thing by it but the full Peace and Pardon of the Church For if we meant a Pardon with relation to God we ought to use it upon many other occasions The Pardon that we give in the Name of God is only declaratory of his Pardon or supplicatory in a Prayer to him for Pardon In this we have the whole Practice of the Church till the Twelfth Century universally of our side All the Fathers all the ancient Liturgies all that have writ upon the Offices and the first Schoolmen are so express in this Matter that the thing in Fact cannot be denied Morinus has published so many of their old Rituals that he has put an end to all doubting about it In the Twelfth Century some few began to use the Words I Absolve thee Yet to soften this Expression that seemed New and Bold some tempered it with these Words in so far as it is granted to my frailty and others with those Words as far as the accusation comes from thee and as the pardon is in me Yet this Form was but little practised So that William Bishop of Paris speaks of the Form of Absolution as given only in a Prayer and not as given in these Words I Absolve thee He lived in the beginning of the Fourteenth Century so that this Practice though begun in other Places before that Time yet was not known long after in so publick a City as Paris But some Schoolmen begun to defend it as implying only a declaration of the Pardon pronounced by the Priest And this having an air of more Authority and being once justified by Learned Men did so universally prevail that in little more than sixty Years time it became the universal Practice of the whole Latin Church So sure a thing is Tradition and so impossible to be changed as they pretend when within the compass of one Age the new Form I Absolve thee was not so much as generally known and before the end of it the old Form of doing it in a Prayer with Imposition of Hands was quite worn out The Idea that arises naturally out of these words is that the Priest pardons Sins and since that is subject to such abuses and has let in so much corruption upon that Church we think we have reason not only to deny that Penance is a Sacrament but likewise to affirm that they have corrupted this great and important Doctrine of Repentance in all the Parts and Branches of it Nor is the matter mended with that Prayer that follows the Absolution The Passion of our Lord Iesus Christ Rituale Romanum de sacr poeniten the Merits of the Blessed Virgin and all the Saints and all the good that thou hast done and the evil that thou hast suffered be to thee for the remission of Sins the increase of Grace and the reward of eternal Life The third Sacrament rejected by this Article is Orders which is reckoned the sixth by the Church of Rome We affirm that Christ appointed a Succession of Pastors in different Ranks to be continued in his Church for the Work of the Gospel and the Care of Souls and that as the Apostles setled the Churches they appointed different Orders of Bishops Priests and Deacons And we believe that all who are dedicated to serve in these Ministries after they are examined and judged worthy of them ought to be separated to them by the Imposition of Hands and by Prayer These were the only Rites that we find practised by the Apostles For many Ages the Church of God used no other therefore we acknowledge that Bishops Priests and Deacons ought to be blest and dedicated to the HolyMinistry by Imposition of Hands and Prayer And that then they are received according to the Order and Practice setled by the Apostles to serve in their respective Degrees Men thus separated have thereby Authority to perfect the Saints or Christians that is to perform the Sacred Functions among them to minister to them and to build them up in their most Holy Faith And we think no other Persons without such a Separation and Consecration can lawfully touch the Holy Things In all which we separate the Qualifications of the Functions from the inward Qualities of the Person the one not at all depending on the other The one relating only to the Order and the good Government of the Society and the other relating indeed to the Salvation of him that Officiates but not at all to the Validity of his Office or Service But in all this we see nothing like a Sacrament Here is neither Matter Form nor Institution here is only Prayer The laying on of Hands is only a gesture in Prayer
treats of Marriage to the mutual relation that is between Christ and his Church from that state of Life and says There is a great Mystery here the Vulgar has Translated the word Mystery by Sacrament So though the words immediately following seem to turn the matter another way but I speak concerning Christ and the Church yet from the promiscuous use of those two words and because Sacraments were called the Mysteries of the Christian Religion the Translator it seems thought that all Mysteries might be called Sacraments But it is so very hard here to find Matter Form a Minister and a Sacramental Effect that though Pope Eugenius in that famous Decree of his is very punctual in assigning these when he explains the other Sacraments yet he wisely passed them all over when he came to this and only makes a true consent necessary to the making the Sacrament We do not deny Marriage to be an Ordinance of God but we think that as it was at first made in the state of Innocence so it is still founded on the Law of Nature and though the Gospel gives Rules concerning the Duties belonging to this state of Life as it does concerning the Duties of Parents and Children which is another Relation founded on the same Law of Nature yet we cannot call it a Sacrament for we find neither Matter Form Institution nor Federal Acts nor Effects assigned to it in the Gospel to make us esteem it a Sacrament The Matter assigned by the Roman Doctors is the inward Consent by which both Parties do mutually give themselves to one another the Form they make to be the Words or Signs by which this is expressed Now it seems a strange thing to make the secret Thoughts of Men the Matter Upon the whole Doctrine of the Church of Rome concerning the Sacraments as it is explained by the Schoolmen I have followed the Account given by Honoratus Fabri in his Summula Theologica who is dead within these Ten Years I knew him at Rome Anno 1685. He was a true Philosopher beyond the Liberties allowed by his Order and studied to reduce their School-Divinity to as clear Ideas as it was capable of So that in following him I have given the best and not the worst Face of their Doctrine His Book was Printed at Lions Anno 1669. and their Words the Form of a Sacrament all Mutual Compacts being as much Sacraments as this there being no visible material things applied to the Parties who receive them which is necessary to the being of a Sacrament It is also a very absurd Opinion which may have very fatal Consequences and raise very afflicting Scruples if any should imagine that the Inward Consent is the Matter of this Sacrament here is a Foundation laid down for voiding every Marriage The Parties may and often do Marry against their Wills and though they profess an outward Consent they do inwardly Repine against what they are doing If after this they grow to like their Marriage Scruples must arise since they know they have not the Sacrament because it is a Doctrine in that Church that as Intention is necessary in every Sacrament so here that goes further the Intention being the only Matter of this Sacrament so that without it there is no Marriage and yet since they cannot be married again to compleat or rather to make the Marriage such Persons does live only in a State of Concubinate On the other hand here is a Foundation laid down for breaking Marriages as often as the Parties or either of them will solemnly Swear that they gave no Inward Consent which is often practised at Rome All Contracts are sacred things but of them all Marriage is the most Sacred since so much depends upon it Mens Words confirmed by Oaths and other solemn Acts must either be binding according to the plain and acknowledged Sense of them or all the Security and Confidence of Mankind is destroyed No Man can be safe if this principle is once admitted that a Man is not bound by his Promises and Oaths unless his Inward Consent went along with them and if such a fraudulent thing may be applied to Marriages in which so many Persons are concerned and upon which the Order of the World does so much depend it may be very justly applied to all other Contracts whatsoever so that they may be voided at pleasure A Man's Words and Oaths bind him by the Eternal Laws of Fidelity and Truth and it is a just prejudice against any Religion whatsoever if it should teach a Doctrine in which by the secret reserves of not giving an Inward Consent the Faith which is solemnly given may be broken Here such a Door is opened to Perfidy and Treachery that the World can be no longer safe while it is allowed hereby lewd and vitious Persons may intangle others and in the mean while order their own Thoughts so that they shall be all the while free Next to Matter and Form we must see for the Institution of this Sacrament The Church of Rome think that is strong here though they feel it to be hardly defensible in the other Points that relate to it They think that though Marriage as it is a Mutual Contract subsists upon the Law of Nature yet a Divine Virtue is put in it by the Gospel expressed in these Words This is a great Mystery or Sacrament so the explaining these Words determines this Controversy The chief Point in dispute at that time was Whether the Gentiles were to be received to equal Priviledges with the Iews in the dispensation of the Messias The Iews do not to this day deny but that the Gentiles may be admitted to it but still they think that they are to be considered as a distinct Body and in a lower Order the chief Dignity being to be reserved to the Seed of Abraham Now St. Paul had in that Epistle as well as in his other Epistles asserted that all were equal in Christ That he had taken away the middle wall of partition that he had abolished the Ground of the Enmity Eph. 2.15 16 20 21. which was the Mosaical Law called the Law of Commandments contained in Ordinances that he might make both Jew and Gentile one new Man one entire Body of a Church He being the chief corner Stone in whom the whole building was fitly framed together And so became a holy habitation to God Thus he made use of the Figure of a Body and of a Temple to illustrate this Matter and to shew how all Christians were to make up but one Body and one Church So when he came to speak of the Rules belonging to the several States of Human Life he takes occasion to explain the Duties of the married State by comparing that to the Relation that the Church has to Christ And when he had said that the married Couple make but one Body and one Flesh which declares that according to the first Institution every Man was to have but
as that it can be no where else at the same time And though we can very easily apprehend that an Insinite Power can both create and annihilate Beings at pleasure yet we cannot apprehend that God does change the Essences of Things and so make them to be contrary to that Nature and sort of Being of which he has made them Another Argument against Transubstantiation is this God has made us capable to know and serve him And in order to that he has put some Sâ—nses in us which are the conveyances of many subtile Motions to our Brains that give us Apprehensions of the Objects which by those Motions are represented to us When those Motions are lively and the Object is in a due distance when we feel that neither our Organs nor our Faculties are under any disorder and when the Impression is clear and strong we are determined by it We cannot help being so When we see the Sun risen and all is bright about us it is not possible for us to think that it is dark Night No authority can impose it on us we are not so far the Masters of our own Thoughts as to force our selves to think it though we would for God has made us of such a Nature that we are determined by such an Evidence and cannot contradict it When an Object is at too great a distance we may mistake a weakness or an ill disposition in our sight may misrepresent it and a false Medium Water a Cloud or a Glass may give it a tincture or cast so that we may see cause to correct our first Apprehensions in some Sensations but when we have duly examined every thing when we have corrected one Sense by another we grow at last to be so sure by the Constitution of that Nature that God has given us that we cannot doubt much less believe in contradiction to the express Evidence of our Senses It is by this Evidence only that God convinces the World of the Authority of those whom he sends to speak in his Name He gives them a Power to work Miracles which is an Appeal to the Senses of Mankind and it is the highest Appeal that can be made for those who stood out against the Conviction of Christ's Miracles had no Cloak for their Sins It is the utmost Conviction that God offers or that Man can pretend to From all which we must infer this That either our Senses in their clearest Apprehensions or rather Representations of Things must be Infallible or we must throw up all Faith and Certainty since it is not possible for us to receive the Evidence that is given us of any thing but by our Senses and since we do naturally acquiesce in that Evidence we must acknowledge that God has so made us that this is his voice in us because it is the voice of those Faculties that he has put in us and is the only way by which we can find out Truth and be led by it And if our Faculties fail us in any one thing so that God should reveal to us any thing that did plainly contradict our Faculties he should thereby give us a right to disbelieve them for ever If they can mistake when they bring any Object to us with the fullest Evidence that they can give we can never depend upon them nor be certain of any thing because they shew it Nay we are not and cannot be bound to believe that nor any other Revelation that God may make to convince us We can only receive a Revelation by hearing or reading by our Ears or our Eyes So if any part of this Revelation destroys the certainty of the Evidence that our Senses our Eyes or our Ears give us it destroys it self for we cannot be bound to believe it upon the Evidence of our Senses if this is a part of it that our Senses are not to be trusted Nor will this matter be healed by saying that certainly we must believe God more than our Senses And therefore if he has revealed any thing to us that is contrary to their Evidence we must as to that paâ—ticular believe God before our Senses But that as to all other things where we have not an express Revelation to the contrary we must still believe our Senses There is a difference to be made between that feeble Evidence that our Senses give us of remote Objects or those loose Inferences that we may make from a slight view of Things and the full Evidence that Sense gives us as when we see and smell to we handle and taste the same Object This is the voice of God to us he has made us so that we are determined by it And as we should not believe a Prophet that wrought ever â—o many Miracles if he should contradict any part of that which God had already revealed so we cannot be bound to believe a Revelation contrary to our Sense because that were to believe God in contradiction to Himself which is impossible to be true For we should believe that Revelation certainly upon an Evidence which it self tells us is not certain and this is a Contradiction We believe our Senses upon this foundation because we reckon there is an Intrinsick certainty in their Evidence we do not believe them as we believe another Man upon a Moral presumption of his Truth and Sincerity but we believe them because such is the nature of the Union of our Souls and Bodies which is the work of God that upon the full Impressions that are made upon the Senses the Soul does necessarily produce or rather feel those Thoughts and Sensations arise with a full Evidence that correspond to the motions of sensible Objects upon the Organs of Sense The Soul has a sagacity to examine these Sensations to correct one Sense by another but when she has used all the means she can and the Evidence is still clear she is perswaded and cannot help being so she naturally takes all this to be true because of the necessary connexion that she feels between such Sensations and her assent to them Now if she should find that she could be mistaken in this even tho' she should know this by a Divine Revelation all the Intrinsick certainty of the Evidence of Sense and that connexion between those Sensations and her assent to them should be hereby dissolved To all this another Objection may be made from the Mysteries of the Christian Religion which contradict our Reasons and yet we are bound to believe them altho' Reason is a faculty much superior to Sense But all this is a mistake we cannot be bound to believe any thing that contradicts our Reasons for the Evidence of Reason as well as that of Sense is the voice of God to us But as great difference is to be made between a feeble Evidence that Sense gives us of an Object that is at a distance from us or that appears to us through a false Medium such as a Concave or a Convex-Glass
doubt of the Testimony of our Senses Another presumptive Proof that the Ancients knew nothing of this Doctrine is that the Heathens and the Iews who charged them and their Doctrine with every thing that they could invent to make both it and them odious and ridiculous could never have passed over this in which both Sense and Reason seemed to be so evidently on their side They reproach the Christians for believing a God that was Born a God of Flesh that was crucified and buried They laughed at their belief of a Judgment to come of endless Flames of a heavenly Paradise and of the Resurrection of the Body Those who writ the first Apologies for the Christian Religion Iustin Martyr Tertullian Origen Arnobius and Minutius Felix have given us a large Account of the Blasphemies both of Iews and Gentiles against the Doctrines of Christianity Cyril of Alexandria has given us Iulian's Objections in his own Words who having been not only initiated into the Christian Religion but having read the Scriptures in the Churches and being a Philosophical and Inquisitive Man must have been well instructed concerning the Doctrine and the Sacraments of this Religion And his Relation to the Emperor Constantine must have made the Christians concerned to take more than ordinary Pains on him When he made Apostacy from the Faith he reproached the Christians with the Doctrine of Baptism and laughed at them for thinking that there was an Ablution and Sanctification in it conceiving it a thing Impossible that Water should wash or cleanse a Soul Yet neither he nor Porphiry nor Celsus before them did charge this Religion with the Absurdities of Transubstantiation It is reasonable to believe that if the Christians of that time had any such Doctrine among them it must have been known Every Christian must have known in what Sense those Words This is is my body and This is my blood were understood among them All the Apostates from Christianity must have known it and must have published it to excuse or hide the shame of their Apostacy Since Apostates are apt to spread Lies of them whom they forsake but not to conceal such Truths as are to their Prejudice Iulian must have known it and if he had known it his Judgment was too True and his Malice to the Christian Religion too Quick to overlook or neglect the Advantages which this part of their Doctrine gave him Nor can this be carried off by saying that the eating of human Flesh and the Thyestean Suppers which were objected to the Christians relate to this When the Fathers answer that they tell the Heathens that it was a downright Calumny and Lie And do not offer any Explanations or Distinctions taken from their Doctrine of the Sacrament to clear them from the mistake and malice of this Calumny The Truth is the execrable Practices of the Gnosticks who were called Christians gave the Rise to those as well as to many other Calumnies But they were not at all founded on the Doctrine of the Eucharist which is never once mentioned as the Occasion of this Accusation Another Presumption from which we conclude that the Ancients knew nothing of this Doctrine is that we find Heresies and Disputes arising concerning all the other Points of Religion There were very few of the Doctrines of the Christian Religion and not any of the Mysteries of the Faith that did not fall under great Objections But there was not any one Heresy raised upon this Head Men were never so meek and tame as easily to believe things when there appeared strong Evidence or at least great Presumptions against them In these last Eight or Nine Centuries since this Doctrine was received there has been a perpetual Opposition made to it even in dark and unlearned Ages In which implicite Faith and blind Obedience have carried a great sway And though the Secular Arm has been employed with great and unrelenting Severities to extirpate all that have opposed it Yet all the while many have stood out against it and have suffered much and long for their rejecting it Now it is not to be imagined that such an opposition should have been made to this Doctrine during the nine hundred Years last past and that for the former eight hundred Years there should have been no Disputes at all concerning it And that while all other things were so much questioned that several Fathers writ and Councils were called to settle the Belief of them yet that for about eight hundred Years this was the single Point that went down so easily that no Treatise was all that while writ to prove it nor Council held to establish it Certainly the Reason of this will appear to be much rather that since there have been Contests upon this Point these last Nine Ages and that there were none the first Eight this Doctrine was not known during those First Ages and that the great Silence about it for so long a time is a very strong Presumption that in all that time this Doctrine was not thought of The last of those Considerations that I shall offer which are of the nature of presumptive Proofs is that there are a great many Rites and other practices that have arisen out of this Doctrine as its natural Consequences which were not thought of for a great many Ages but that have gone on by a perpetual progress and have increased very fruitfully ever since this Doctrine was received Such are the Elevation Adoration and Processions together with the Doctrine of Concomitance and a vast number of Rites and Rubricks the first occasions and beginnings of which are well known These did all arise from this Doctrine it being natural especially in the Ages of Ignorance and Superstition for Men upon the supposition of Christ's being Corporally present to run out into all possible Inventions of Pomp and Magnificence about this Sacrament and it is very reasonable to think that since these things are of so late and so certain a date that the Doctrine upon which they are founded is not much ancienter The great Simplicity of the Primitive Forms not only as they are reported by Iustin Martyr and Tertullian in the Ages of the Poverty and Persecutions of the Church but as they are represented to us in the Fourth and Fifth Century by Cyril of Ierusalem the Constitutions and the pretended Areopagite have nothing of that Air that appears in the latter Ages The Sacrament was then given in both kinds it was put in the hands of the Faithful they reserved some portions of it It was given to Children for many Ages The Laity and even Boys were imployed to carry it to dying Penitents what remained of it was burnt in some places and consumed by the Clergy and by Children in other places the making Cataplasms of it the mixing the Wine with Ink to sign the Condemnation of Hereticks are very clear Presumptions that this Doctrine was not then known But above all their not adoring the Sacrament which
the Sacrament of his Blood is the Blood of Christ he carried himself in his own hands in some sort when he said This is my Body St. Chrysostom says the Bread is thought worthy to be called the Body of our Lord And in another Place reckoning up the improper Senses of the word Flesh he says the Scriptures use to call the Mysteries that is the Sacrament by the Name of Flesh and sometimes the whole Church is said to be the Body of Christ. So Tertullian says Christ calls the Bread his Body and names the Bread by his Body Tertul. Lib. 4. adv Marci c. 40. The Fathers do not only call the consecrated Elements Bread and Wine They do also affirm that they retain their proper Nature and Substance and are the same thing as to their Nature that they were before And the Occasion upon which the Passages that I go next to mention are used by them does prove this Matter beyond Contradiction Apollinaris did broach that Heresy which was afterwards put in full Form by Eutycheâ— and that had so great a Party to support it that as they had one General Council a pretended one at least to favour them so they were condemned by another Their Error was that the human Nature of Christ was swallowed up by the Divine if not while he was here on Earth yet at least after his Ascension to Heaven This Error was confuted by several Writers who lived very wide one from another And at a distance of above a hundred Years one from another St. Chrysostom at Constantinople Theodoret in Asia Ephrem Patriarch of Antioch and Gelasius Bishop of Rome All those write to Prove that the human Nature did still remain in Christ not changed nor swallowed up but only sanctified by the Divine Nature that was united to it They do all fall into one Argument which very probably those who came after St. Chrysostom took from him Epist. ad Celarium So that though both Theodoret and Gelasius's Words are much fuller yet because the Argument is the same with that which St. Chrysostom had urged against Apollinaris I shall first set down his Words He brings an Illustration from the Doctrine of the Sacrament to shew that the human Nature was not destroyed by its Union with the Divine and has upon that these Words As before the Bread is sanctified we call it Bread but when the Divine Grace has sanctified it by the means of the Priest it is freed from the name of Bread and is thought worthy of the name of the Lord's Body though the nature of Bread remains in it And yet it is not said there are two Bodies but one Body of the Son So the divine Nature being joined to the Body Both these make one Son and one Person In Photi Bibli Cod. 229. Ephrem of Antioch says The Body of Christ which is received by the faithful does not depart from its sensible Substance So Baptism says he does not lose its own sensible Substance and does not lose that which it was before Dial. 1st and 2d â—ont Eutych Theodoret says Christ does honour the Symbols with the name of his Body and Blood not changing the nature but adding grace to nature In another Place pursuing the same Argument he says The mystical Symbols after the sanctification do not depart from their own nature For they continue in their former substance figure and form and are visible and palpable as they were before But they are understood to be that which they are made Pope Gelasius says The Sacraments of the Body and Blood of Christ are a divine thing Lib. de duâ—bus nat Christ for which reason we become by them partakers of the divine Nature and yet the substance of Bread and Wine does not cease to exist And the image and likeness of the Body and Blood of Christ are celebrated in holy Mysteries Upon all these Places being compared with the Design with which they were written which was to prove that Christ's Human Nature did still subsist unchanged and not swallowed up by its Union with the Divinity some Reflections are very obvious â—irst If the corporal Presence of Christ in the Sacrament had been then received in the Church the natural and unavoidable Argument in this Matter which must put an end to it with all that believed such corporal Presence was this Christ has certainly a natural Body still because the Bread and the Wine are turned to it and they cannot be turned to that which is not In their Writings they argued against the possibility of a substantial Change of a Human Nature into the Divine but that could not have been urged by Men who believed a substantial Mutation to be made in the Sacrament For then the Eutychians might have retorted the Argument with great Advantage upon them The Eutychians did make use of some Expressions that were used by some in the Church which seemed to Import that they did argue from the Sacrament as Theodoret represents their Objections But to that he answers as we have seen denying that any such substantial Change was made The Design of those Fathers was to prove that things might be united together and continue so united without the change of their Substances and that this was true in the two Natures in the Person of Christ And to make this more Sensible they bring in the Matter of the Sacrament as a thing known and confessed For in their arguing upon it they do suppose it as a thing out of dispute Now according to the Roman Doctrine this had been a very odd Sort of an Argument to prove that Christ's Human Nature was not swallowed up of the Divine because the Mysteries or Elements in the Sacrament are changed into the Substance of Christ's Body only they retain the outward appearances of Bread and Wine To this an Eutychian might readily have answered that then the Human Nature might be believed to be destroyed And though Christ had appeared in that likeness he retained only the Accidents of Human Nature but that the Human Nature it self was destroyed as the Bread and the Wine were destroyed in the Eucharist This had been a very absurd way of arguing in the Fathers and had indeed delivered up the Cause to the Eutychians Whereas those Fathers make it an Argument against them to prove that notwithstanding an Uninion of two Beings and such an Union as did communicate a Sanctification from the one to the other yet the two Natures might remain still distinguish'd and that it was so in the Eucharist Therefore it might be so in the Person of Christ. This seems to be so evident an Indication of the Doctrine of the whole Church in the Fourth and Fifth Century when so many of the most eminent Writers of those Ages do urge it so home as an Argument in so great a Point that we can scarce think it possible for any Man to consider it fully without being determined by it
whether formally or substantially or some other way Some Schoolmen thought that the Matter of Bread was destroyed but that the Form remained to be the Form of Christ's Body that was the Matter of it Others thought that the Matter of the Elements remained and that the Form only was destroyed But that to which many inclined was the Assumption of the Elements into an Union with the Body of Christ or a hypostatical Union of the eternal Word to them by which they became as truly a Body to Christ as that which he has in Heaven Yet it was not the same but a different Body Stephen Bishop of Autun was the First that fell on the Word of Transubstantiation Amalric in the beginning of the Thirteenth Century denied in express Words the corporal Presence De Sacram Altaris c. 13. He was condemned in the Fourth Council of the Lateran as an Heretick and his Body was ordered to be taken up and burnt And in opposition to him Transubstantiation was decreed Yet the Schoolmen continued to offer different Explanations of this for a great while after that But in conclusion all agreed to explain it as was formerly set forth It appears by the crude Way in which it was at first explained that it was a Novelty And that Men did not know how to mould and frame it but at last it was licked into shape the whole Philosophy being cast into such a Mould as agreed with it And therefore in the present Age in which that Philosophy has lost its Credit great Pains are taken to suppress the New and freer Way of Philosophy as that which cannot be so easily subdued to support this Doctrine as the Old one was And the Arts that those who go into the New Philosophy take to reconcile their Scheme to this Doctrine shew that there is nothing that subtile and unsincere Men will not venture on For since they make Extension to be of the Essence of Matter and think that Accidents are only the Modes of Matter which have no proper being of themselves it is evident that a Body cannot be without its Extension and that Accidents cannot subsist without their Subject so that this can be in no sort reconciled to Transubstantiation And therefore they would willingly avoid this special Manner of the Presence and only in General assert that Christ is corporally Present But the Decrees of the Lateran and Trent Councils make it evident that Transubstantiation is now a Doctrine that is bound upon them by the Authority of the Church and of Tradition And that they are as much bound to believe it as to believe the corporal Presence it self Thus the going off from the Simplicity in which Christ did deliver the Sacrament and in which the Church at first received it into some sublime Expressions about it led Men once out of the way and they still went farther and farther from it Pious and Rhetorical Figures pursued far by Men of heated Imaginations and of inflamed Affections were followed with Explanations invented by colder and more designing Men afterwards and so it increased till it grew by degrees to that which at last it settled on But after all if the Doctrine of the Corporal Presence had rested only in a Speculation tho' we should have judged those who held it to be very bad Philosophers and no good Criticks yet we could have endured it if it had rested there and had not gone on to be a matter of practice by the Adoration and Processions with every thing else of that kind which followed upon it for this corrupted the Worship The Lutherans believe a Consubstantiation and that both Christ's Body and Blood and the Substance of the Elements are together in the Sacrament That some explain by an Vbiquity which they think is communicated to the Human Nature of Christ by which his Body is every where as well as in the Sacrament Whereas others of them think that since the words of Christ must needs be true in a literal sense his Body and Blood is therefore in the Sacrament but in with and under the Bread and Wine All this we think is ill grounded and is neither agreeable to the words of the Institution nor to the nature of things A great deal of that which was formerly set forth in defence of our Doctrine falls likewise upon this The Vbiquity communicated to the Humane Nature as it seems a thing in it self impossible so it gives no more to the Sacrament than to every thing else Christ's Body may be said to be in every thing or rather every thing may be said to be his Body and Blood as well as the Elements in the Sacrament The impossibility of a Bodies being without extension or in more places at once lies against this as well as against Transubstantiation But yet after all this is only a Point of Speculation nothing follows upon it in practice no Adoration is offered to the Elements and therefore we judge that Speculative Opinions may be born with when they neither fall upon the Fundamentals of Christianity to give us false Ideas of the Essential parts of our Religion nor affect our practice and chiefly when the Worship of God is maintained in its Purity for which we see God has expressed so particular a concern giving it the Word which of all others raises in us the most sensible and the strongest Ideas calling it Iealousie that we reckon we ought to watch over this with much caution We can very well bear with some Opinions that we think ill grounded as long as they are only matters of Opinion and have no Influence neither on Mens Morals nor their Worship We still hold Communion with Bodies of Men that as we judge think wrong but yet do both live well and maintain the Purity of the Worship of God We know the great design of Religion is to govern Men's Lives and to give them right Ideas of God and of the Ways of Worshipping him All Opinions that do not break in upon these are things in which great forbearance is to be used large Allowances are to be made for Mens Notions in all other things and therefore we think that neither Consubstantiation nor Transubstantiation how ill grounded soever we take both to be ought to dissolve the Union and Communion of Churches But it is quite another thing if under either of these Opinions an Adoration of the Elements is taught and practised This we believe is plain Idolatry when an Insensible piece of Matter such as Bread and Wine has Divine Honours paid it when it is believed to be God when it is called God and is in all respects Worshipped with the same Adoration that is offered up to Almighty God This we think is gross Idolatry Many Writers of the Church of Rome have acknowledged that if Transubstantiation is not true their Worship is a strain of Idolatry beyond any that is practised among the most depraved of all the Heathens The only excuse that
26. in Joan. St. Augustin expresses himself in the very Words that are cited in the Article which he introduces with these words He that does not abide in Christ and in whom Christ does not abide certainly does not spiritually eat his Flesh nor drink his Blood tho he may visibly and carnally press with his Teeth the Sacrament of the Body and Blood of Christ But he rather eats and drinks the Sacrament of so great a Matter to his Condemnation And in another Place he says Lib 21. de Civ Dei c. 25. Neither are they speaking of vitious Persons to be said to eat the Body of Christ because they are not his Members to which he adds He that says Whoso eats my Flesh and drinks my Blood abides in me and I in him shews what it is not only in a Sacrament but truly to eat the Body of Christ and to drink his Blood He has upon another Occasion those frequently cited Words speaking of the difference between the other Disciples and Iudas in receiving this Sacrament Tract 54. in Joan. These did eat the Bread that was the Lord panem Dominum but he the Bread of the Lord against the Lord panem Domini contra Dominum To all this a great deal might be added to shew that this was the Doctrine of the Greek Church even after Damascene's Opinion concerning the Assumption of the Elements into an Union with the Body of Christ was received among them But more needs not be said concerning this since it will be readily granted that if we are in the Right in the main Point of denying the corporal Presence that this will fall with it ARTICLE XXX Of both Kinds The Cup of the Lord is not to be denied to Lay People For both Parts of the Sacrament by Christ's Ordinance and Commandment ought to be ministred to all Christian Men alike THere is not any one of all the Controversies that we have with the Church of Rome in which the decision seems more easie and shorter than this The words of the Institution are not only equally express and positive as to both kinds but the diversity with which that part that relates to the Cup is set down seems to be as clear a demonstration for us as can be had in a matter of this kind and looks like a special direction given to warn the Church against any corruption that might arise upon this Head To all such as acknowledg the Immediate Union of the Eternal Word with the Human Nature of Christ and the Inspiration by which the Apostles were conducted it must be of great weight to find a Specialty marked as to the Chalice of the Cup it is said Drink ye all of it whereas of the Bread it is only said Take eat so we cannot think the word all was set down without design It is also said of the Cup and they all drank of it which is not said of the Bread We think it no piece of trifling nicety to observe this Specialty The words added to the giving the Cup are very particularly Emphatical Take eat This is my Body which is given for you is not so full an Expression as Drink ye all of this for this is my Blood of the New Testament which is shed for many for the remission of Sins If the surest way to judg of the extent of any Precept to which a reason is added is to consider the extent of the Reason and to measure the extent of the Precept by that then since all that do communicate need the remission of Sins and a share in the New Covenant the reason that our Saviour joins to the distribution of the Cup proves that they ought all to receive it And if that Discourse in St. Iohn concerning the eating of Christ's Flesh and the drinking his Blood is to be understood of the Sacrament as most of the Roman Church affirm then the drinking Christ's Blood is as necessary to Eternal Life as the eating his Flesh by consequence it is as necessary to receive the Cup as the Bread And it is not easie to apprehend why it should still be necessary to consecrate in both kinds and not likewise to receive in both kinds It cannot be pretended that since the Apostles were all of the Sacred Order therefore their receiving in both kinds is no Precedent for giving the Laity the Cup for Christ gave them both kinds as they were Sinners who were now to be admitted into Covenant with God by the Sacrifice of his Body and Blood They were in that to shew forth his death and were to Take eat and drink in remembrance of him So that this Institution was delivered to them as they were Sinners and not as they were Priests They were not constituted by Christ the Pastors and Governours of his Church till after his Resurrection when he breathed on them and laid his hands on them Joh. 20.22 and blessed them So that at this time they were only Christ's Disciples and Witnesses who had been once sent out by him on an extraordinary Commission but had yet no stated Character fixed upon them To this it is said that Christ by saying Do this constituted them Priests so that they were no more of the Laity when they received the Cup. This is a new conceit taken up by the Schoolmen unknown to all Antiquity There is no sort of Tradition that supports this Exposition nor is there any reason to imagin that Do this signifies any other than a Precept to continue that Institution as a Memorial of Christ's Death and Do this takes in all that went before the taking the giving as well as the blessing and the eating the Bread nor is there any reason to appropriate this to the Blessing only as if by this the Consecrating and Sacrificing Power were conferred on the Priests From all which we conclude both that the Apostles were only Disciples at large without any special characters conferred on them when the Eucharist was instituted and that the Eucharist was given to them only as Disciples that is as Laymen The mention that is made in some places of the new Testament only of breaking of Bread can furnish them with no Argument for it is not certain that these do relate to the Sacrament or if they did it is not certain that they are to be understood strictly for by a Figure common to the Eastern Nations Bread stands for all that belongs to a Meal and if these places are applied to the Sacrament and ought to be strictly understood they will prove too much that the Sacrament may be consecrated in one kind and that the breaking of Bread without the Cup may be understood to be a compleat Sacrament But when St. Paul spoke of this Sacrament he does so distinctly mention the drinking the Cup as well as eating the Bread that it is plain from him how the Apostles understood the words and intent of Christ and how this Sacrament was received
Marriage of most of the Reformers was urged as an ill Character both of them and of the Reformation as a Doctrine of Libertinism that made the Clergy look too like the rest of the World and involved them in the common Pleasures Concerns and Passions of Human Life The Appearances of an Austerity of Habit of a Severity of Life in watching and fasting and of avoiding the common Pleasures of Sense and the Delights of Life that was on the other side did strike the World and inclined many to think that what ill consequences soever Celibate produced yet that these were much more supportable and more easy to be reformed than the ill consequences of an unrestrained Permission of the Clergy to marry In treating this matter we must first consider Celibate with relation to the Laws of Christ and the Gospel and then with relation to the Laws of the Church It does not seem contrary to the Purity of the Worship of God or of Divine Performances that Married Persons should officiate in them since by the Law of Moses Priests not only might marry but the Priesthood was tied to descend as an Inheritance in a certain Family And even the High-Priest who was to perform the great Function of the Annual Atonement that was made for the Sins of the whole Iewish Nation was to marry and he derived to his Descendants that Sacred Office If there was so much as a remote unsutableness between a Married State and Sacerdotal Performances we cannot imagine that God would by a Law tie the Priesthood to a Family which by consequence laid an Obligation on the Priests to marry When Christ chose his Twelve Apostles some of them were married men we are sure at least that St. Peter was so that he made no distinction and gave no preference to the unmarried Our Saviour did no where charge them to forsake their Wives nor did he at all represent Celibate as necessary to the Kingdom of Heaven or the Dispensation of the Gospel He speaks indeed of some that brought themselves to the state of Eunuchs for the sake of the Gospel Matth. 19.10 11 12. but in that he lest all men at full liberty by saying Let him receive it that is able to receive it so that in this every man must judg of himself by what he finds himself to be That is equally recommended to all Ranks of men as they can bear it St. Paul does affirm That Marriage is honourable in all and to avoid Uncleanness he says It is better to marry than to burn and so gives it as a Rule Heb. 13.4 1 Cor. 7.9 That every man should have his own Wife Among all the Rules or Qualifications of Bishops or Priests that are given in the New Testament particularly in the Epistles to Timothy and Titus there is not a word of the Celibate of the Clergy but plain Intimations to the contrary 1 Tim. 3.2 4 5 12. That they were and might be married That of the Husband of one Wife is repeated in different places Mention is also made of the Wives and Children of the Clergy Rules being given concerning them and not a word is so much as insinuated importing that this was only tolerated in the beginnings of Christianity but that it was afterwards to cease On the contrary the forbidding to marry is given as a Character of the Apostacy of the later times 1 Tim. 4.3 1 Cor. 9.5 We find Aquila when he went about preaching the Gospel was not only married to Priscilla but that he carried her about with him Not to insist on that Privilege that St. Paul thought he might have claimed of carrying about with him a Sister and a Wife as well as the other Apostles And thus the first Point seems to be fully cleared That by no Law of God the Clergy are debarr'd from Marriage There is not one word in the whole Scriptures that does so much as hint at it whereas there is a great deal to the contrary Marriage being then one of the Rights of Human Nature to which so many reasons of different sorts may carry both a wise and a good man and there being no positive Precept in the Gospel that forbids it to the Clergy the next question is Whether it is in the Power of the Church to make a perpetual Law restraining the Clergy from Marriage It is certain that no Age of the Church can make a Law to bind succeeding Ages for whatsoever Power the Church has she is always in possession of it and every Age has as much Power as any of the former Ages had Therefore if any one Age should by a Law enjoin Celibate to the Clergy any succeeding Age may repeal and alter that Law For ever since the Inspiration that conducted the Apostles has ceased every Age of the Church may make or change Laws in all matters that are within their Authority So it seems very clear that the Church can make no perpetual Law upon this Subject In the next place it may be justly doubted Whether the Church can make a Law that shall restrain all the Clergy in any of those Natural Rights in which Christ has left them free The adding a Law upon this Head to the Laws of Christ seems to assume an Authority that he has not given the Church It looks like a pretending to a strain of Purity beyond the Rules set us in the Gospel and is plainly the laying a Yoke upon us which must be thought Tyrannical since the Author of this Religion who knew best what Human Nature is capable of and what it may well bear has not thought fit to lay it on those whom he sent upon a Commission that required a much greater Elevation of Soul and more Freedom from the Entanglements of Worldly or Domestick Concerns than can be pretended to be necessary for the standing and settled Offices in the Church Therefore we conclude That it were a great Abuse of Church-Power and a high Act of Tyranny for any Church or any Age of the Church to bar men from the Services in the Church because they either are married or intend to keep themselves free to marry or not as they please This does indeed bring the Body of the Clergy more into a Combination among themselves it does take them in a great measure off from having separated Interests of their own it takes them out of the Civil Society in which they have less concern when they give no Pledges to it And so in Ages in which the Papacy intended to engage the whole Priesthood into its Interests against the Civil Powers as the Immunity and Exemptions of the Clergy made them safe in their own Persons so it was necessary to free them from any such Incumbrances or Appendages by which they might be in the Power or at the Mercy of Secular Princes This joined with the belief of their making God with a few words by the virtue of their Character and of their forgiving
Sin was like Armour of Proof by which they were invulnerable and by consequence capable of undertaking any thing that might be committed to them But this may well recommend such a Rule to a Crafty and Designing Body of Men in which it is not to be denied that there is a deep and refined Policy yet we have not so learned Christ nor to handle the Word of God or the Authority that he has trusted to us deceitfully As for the Consequences of such Laws Inconveniences are on both hands As long as men are corrupt themselves so long they will abuse all the Liberties of Human Nature If not only common Lewdness in all the kinds of it but even brutal and unnatural Lusts have been the visible Consequences of the strict Law of Celibate and if this appears so evident in History that it cannot be denied we think it better to trust Human Nature with the lawful use of that in which God has not restrained it than to venture on that which has given occasion to Abominations that cannot be mentioned without horror As for the Temptation to Covetousness we think it is neither so great nor so unavoidable upon the one hand as those monstrous ones are on the other It is more reasonable to expect Divine Assistances to preserve men from Temptations when they are using those Liberties which God has left free to them than when by pretending to a Purity greater than that which he has commanded they throw themselves into many Snares It is also very evident that Covetousness is an effect of Mens Tempers rather than of their Marriage since the Instances of a ravenous Covetousness and of a restless Ambition in behalf of mens Kindred and Families hath appeared as often and as scandalously among the Vnmarried as among the Married Clergy From these general Considerations concerning the Power that the Church has to make either a Perpetual or an Universal Law in a thing of this kind I shall in the next place consider in short What the Church has done in this matter In the first Ages of Christianity Basilides and Saturninus and after them both Montanus and Novatus and the Sect of the Encratites condemned Marriage as a state of Libertinism that was unbecoming the Purity required of Christians Against those we find the Fathers asserted the Lawfulness of Marriage to all Christians without making a difference between the Clergy and the Laity It is true the appearances that were in Montanus and his Followers seem to have engaged the Christians of that Age to strain beyond them in those things that gave them their Reputation Many of Tertullian's Writings that Criticks do now see were writ after he was a Montanist which seems not to have been observed in that Age carry the matter of Celibate so high that it is no wonder if considering the Reputation that he had a Bias was given by these to the following Ages in favour of Celibate Yet it seemed to give great and just Prejudices against the Christian Religion if such as had come into the Service of the Church should have forsaken their Wives It is visible how much Scandal this might have given and what matter of Reproach it would have furnished their Enemies with if they could have charged them with this That men to get rid of their Wives and of the Care of their Families went into Orders that so under a pretence of a higher degree of Sanctity they might abandon their Families Therefore great care was taken to prevent this They were so far from requiring Priests to forsake their Wives that such as did it upon their entring into Orders were severely condemned by the Canons that go under the name of the Apostles They were also condemned by the Council of Gangra in the Fourth Century and by that of Trullo in the Seventh Age. There are some Instances brought of Bishops and Priests who are supposed to have married after they were ordained but as there are only few of those so perhaps they are not well proved It must be acknowledged that the general practice was that men once in Orders did not marry But many Bishops in the best Ages lived still with their Wives So did the Fathers both of Gregory Nazianzen and of St. Basil. And among the Works of Hilary of Poictiers there is a Letter writ by him in his Exile to his Daughter Abra in which he refers her to her Mothers Instruction in those things which she by reason of her Age did not then understand which shews that she was then very young and so was probably born after he was a Bishop Some proposed in the Council of Nice Socr. Hist. Eccl. lib. 1. c. 12. That the Clergy should depart from their Wives but Paphnutius though himself unmarried opposed this as the laying an unreasonably heavy Yoke upon them Heliodorus a Bishop the Author of the first of those Love-Fables that are now known by the name of Romances being upon that account accused of too much Levity did in order to the clearing himself of that Imputation move that Clergy-men should be obliged to live from their Wives Which the Historian says they were not tied to before for till then Bishops lived with their Wives So that in those days the living in a married state was not thought unbecoming the Purity of the Sacred Functions A single Marriage was never objected in bar to a mans being made Bishop or Priest They did not indeed admit a man to Orders that had been twice married but even for this there was a distinction If a man had been once married before his Baptism and was once married after his Baptism that was reckoned only a single Marriage for what had been done when in Heathenism went for nothing And Ierome speaking of Bishops who had been twice married but by this Nicety were reckoned to be the Husbands of one Wife says The number of those of this sort in that time could not be reckoned and that more such Bishops might be found than were at the Council of Arimini Canons grew to be frequently made against the Marriage of those in Holy Orders but these were positive Laws made chiefly in the Roman and African Synods and since those Canons were so often renewed we may from thence conclude that they were not well kept When Synesius was ordained Priest he tells in an Epistle of his That he declared openly that he would not live secretly with his Wife as some did but that he would dwell publickly with her and wished that he might have many Children by her In the Eastern Church the Priests are usually married before they are ordained and continue afterwards to live with their Wives and to have Children by them without either Censure or Trouble In the Western Church we find mention made both in the Gallican and Spanish Synods of the Wives both of Bishops and Priests and they are called Episcopae and Presbyterae In the Saxon times the Clergy in most of
particular or National Church hath Authority to ordain change and abolish Ceremonies or Rights of the Church ordained only by mens Authority so that all things be done to edifying THIS Article consists of two Branches The first is That the Church hath Power to appoint such Rites and Ceremonies as are not contrary to the Word of God and that private Persons are bound to conform themselves to their Orders The second is That it is not necessary that the whole Church should meet to determine such maters the Power of doing that being in every National Church which is fully empowr'd to take care of it self and no Rule made in such matters is to be held unalterable but may be changed upon occasion As to the first it hath been already considered when the first words of the Twentieth Article were explained There the Authority of the Church in matters indifferent was stated and proved It remains now only to prove That private Persons are bound to conform themselves to such Ceremonies especially when they are also enacted by the Civil Authority It is to be considered That the Christian Religion was chiefly designed to raise and purify the Nature of man and to make Human Society perfect now Brotherly Love and Charity does this more than any one Virtue whatsoever It raises a man to the Likeness of God it gives him a Divine and Heavenly Temper within himself and creates the tenderest Union and firmest Happiness possible among all the Societies of Men. Our Saviour has so enlarged the Obligation to it as to make it by the Extent he has given it a great and new Commandment by which all the World may be able to know and distinguish his Followers from the rest of Mankind And as all the Apostles insist much upon this in every one of their Epistles not excepting the shortest of them so St. Iohn who writ last of them has dwelt more fully upon it than upon any other Duty whatsoever Our Saviour did particularly intend that his Followers should be associated into one Body and join together in order to their keeping up and inflaming their mutual Love and therefore he delivered his Prayer to them all in the Plural to shew that he intended that they should use it in a Body He appointed Baptism as the way of receiving men into this Body and the Eucharist as a joint Memorial that the Body was to keep up of his Death For this end he appointed Pastors to teach and keep his Followers in a Body And in his last and longest Prayer to the Father he repeats this That they might be one That they might be kept in one Body and made perfect in one in five several Expressions Joh. 17.11 21 22 23. which shews both how necessary a part of his Religion he meant this should be and likewise intimates to us the danger that he foresaw of his Followers departing from it which made him intercede so earnestly for it One Expression that he has of this Union shews how entire and tender he intended that it should be for he prayed that the Union might be such as that between the Father and himself was The Apostles use the Figure of a Body frequently to express this Union than which nothing can be imagined that is more firmly knit together and in which all the parts do more tenderly sympathize with one another Upon all these considerations we may certainly gather That the dissolving this Union the dislocating this Body and the doing any thing that may extinguish the Love and Charity by which Christians are to be made so happy in themselves and so useful to one another and by which the Body of Christians grows much the firmer and stronger and shines more in the World that I say the doing this upon slight grounds must be a Sin of a very high nature Nothing can be a just Reason either to carry men to it or justify them in it but the imposing on them unlawful Terms of Communion for in that case it is certain that we must obey God rather than man that we must seek Truth and Peace together Acts 24.16 and that the rule of keeping a good Conscience in all things is laid thus To do it first towards God and then towards man So that a Schism that is occasioned by any Church's imposing unlawful Terms of Communion lies at their door who impose them and the Guilt is wholly theirs But without such a necessity it is certainly both in its own nature and in its consequences one of the greatest of Sins to create needless Disturbances in a Church and to give occasion to all that alienation of Mind all those rash Censures and unjust Judgments that do arise from such Divisions This receives a very great Aggravation if the Civil Authority has concurred by a Law to enjoyn the Observance of such indifferent things for to all their lawful Commands we owe an Obedience not only for fear but for conscience sake since the Authority of the Magistrate is chiefly to be imployed in such matters Rom. 13.3 As to things that are either commanded or forbidden of God the Magistrate has only the Execution of these in his hands so that in those his Laws are only the Sanctions and Penalties of the Laws of God The Subject-matter of his Authority is about things which are of their own nature indifferent but that may be made fit and proper means for the maintaining of Order Union and Decency in the Society And therefore such Laws as are made by him in those things do certainly bind the Conscience and oblige the Subjects to Obedience Disobedience does also give Scandal to the weak Scandal is a Block or Trap laid in the way of another by which he is made to stumble and fall So this Figure of giving Scandal or the laying a stumbling-block in our Brother's way is applied to our doing of such Actions as may prove the occasions of Sin to others Every man according to the influence that his Example or Authority may have over others who do too easily and implicitely follow him becomes thereby the more capable of giving them Scandal that is of drawing them after him to commit many Sins And since men are under Fetters according to the Persuasions that they have of things he who thinks a thing sinful does sin if he does it as long as he is under that apprehension because he deliberately ventures on that which he thinks offends God even while he doubts of it or makes a distinction between Meats for the word rendered doubts Rom. 14.23 signifies also the making a difference he is damned that is self-condemned as acting against his own sense of things if he does it Another ma n that has larger Thoughts and clearer Ideas may see that there is no sin in an Action about which others may be still in doubt and so upon his own account he may certainly do it But if he has reason to believe that his
to the Practice of the second Branch of it We see what particular Care God took of the Poor in the Old Dispensation and what variety of Provision was made for them all which must certainly be carried as much higher among Christians as the Laws of Love and Charity are raised to a higher degree in the Gospel Christ represents the Essay that he gives of the Day of Judgment in this Article of Charity and expresses it in the most emphatical words possible as if what is given to the Poor were to be reckoned for as if it had been given personally to Christ himself And in a great variety of other Passages this matter is so oft insisted on that no man can resist it who reads them and acknowledges the Authority of the New Testament It is not possible to fix a determined Quota as was done under the Law in which every Family had their peculiar Allotment which had a certain Charge specified in the Law that was laid upon it But under the Gospel as men may be under greater Inequalities of Fortune than they could have been under the Old Dispensation so that vast variety of mens Circumstances makes that such Proportions as would be intolerable Burdens upon some would be too light and disproportioned to the Wealth of others Those words of our Saviour come pretty near the marking out every mans measure Luk. 21.4 These have of their abundance cast into the offerings of God but she of her penury hath cast in all the living that she had Abundance is Superfluity in the Greek which imports that which is over and above the food that is convenient Prov. 30.8 that which one can well spare and lay aside Now by our Saviour's design it plainly appears that this is a low degree of Charity when men give only out of this though God knows it is far beyond what is done by the greater part of Christians Whereas that which is so peculiarly acceptable to God is when men give out of their Penury that is out of what is necessary to them when they are ready especially upon great and crying occasions even to pinch Nature and straiten themselves within what upon other occasions they may allow themselves that so they may distribute to the necessities of others who are more pinched and are in great extremities By this every man ought to judg himself as knowing that he must give a most particular Account to God of that which God hath reserved to himself and ordered the distribution of it to the Poor out of all that Abundance with which he has bless'd some far beyond others ARTICLE XXXIX Of a Christian Man's Oath As we confess that vain and rash swearing is forbidden Christian men by our Lord Iesus Christ and James his Apostle so we judg that Christian Religion doth not prohibit but that a man may swear when the Magistrate requireth in a Cause of Faith and Charity so it be done according to the Prophets teaching in Iustice Iudgment and Truth AN Oath is an Appeal to God either upon a Testimony that is given or a Promise that is made confirming the Truth of the one and the Fidelity of the other It is an Appeal to God who knows all things and will judg all men So it is an Act that acknowledges both his Omniscience and his being the Governor of this World who will judg all at the Last Day according to their deeds and must be supposed to have a more immediate regard to such Acts in which men made him a Party An Appeal truly made is a committing the matter to God A false one is an Act of open defiance which must either suppose a denial of his knowing all things or a belief that he has forsaken the Earth and has no regard to the Actions of Mortals or finally it is a bold venturing on the Justice and Wrath of God for the serving some present end or the gaining of some present advantage And which of these soever gives a man that brutal Confidence of adventuring on a false Oath we must conclude it to be a very crying Sin which must be expiated with a very severe Repentance or will bring down verry terrible Judgments on those who are guilty of it Thus if we consider the matter upon the Principles of Natural Religion an Oath is an Act of Worship and Homage done to God and is a very powerful mean for preserving the Justice and Order of the World All Decisions in Justice must be founded upon evidence two must be believed rather than one therefore the more Terror that is struck into the minds of men either when they give their Testimony or when they bind themselves by Promises and the deeper that this goes it will both oblige them to the greater Caution in what they say and to the greater Strictness in what they promise Since therefore Truth and Fidelity are so necessary to the Security and Commerce of the World and since an Appeal to God is the greatest Mean that can be thought on to bind men to an exactness and strictness in every thing with which that Appeal is joined therefore the use of an Oath is fully justified upon the Principles of Natural Religion This has spread it self so universally through the World and began so early that it may well be reckoned a Branch of the Law and Light of Nature We find this was practised by the Patriarchs Abimelech reckoned that he was safe if he could persuade Abraham to swear to him by God Gen. 21.23.26.28.31.53 That he would not deal falsly with him and Abraham consented so to swear Either the same Abimelech or another of that Name desired that an Oath might be between Isaac and him and they sware one to another Iacob did also swear to Laban Thus we find the Patriarchs practising this before the Mosaical Law Under that Law we find many Covenants sealed by an Oath and that was a Sacred Bond as appears from the Story of the Gibeonites There was also a special Constitution in the Iewish Religion by which one in Authority might put others under an Oath and adjure them either to do somewhat or to declare some Truth The Law was That when any Soul i. e. man sinned Lev. 5.1 and heard the voice of swearing Adjuration and was a witness whether he hath seen it or known it if he do not utter it then he shall bear his Iniquity that is he shall be guilty of Perjury So the Form then was the Judg or the Parent did adjure all persons to declare their knowledg of any particular They charged this upon them with an Oath or Curse and all persons were then bound by that Oath to tell the truth So Micah came and confessed Judg. 17.2 upon his Mother's Adjuration That he had the Eleven hundred Shekels for which he heard her put all under a Curse and upon that she blessed him 1 Sam. 14.24 28 44. Saul when he was pursuing
it looks plausiable and is calculated to take in the greatest Numbers They therefore suppose that God in his Infinite Goodness will accept equally the Services that all his Creratures offer to him according to the best of their skill and strength In opposition to all which they are here condemned who think that every Man shall be saved by the Law or Sect which he professeth Where a great difference is to be observed between the words saved by the Law and saved in the Law the one is condemned but not the other To be saved by a Law or Sect signifies That by the virtue of that Law or Sect such Men who follow it may be saved Whereas to be saved in a Law or Sect imports only That God may extend his Compassions to Men that are engaged in false Religions The former is only condemned by this Article which affirms nothing concerning the other In sum if we have fully proved that the Christian Religion was delivered to the World in the Name of God and was attested by Miracles so that we believe it's Truth we must believe every part and tittle of it and by consequence those Passages which denounce the Wrath and Judgments of God against Impenitent Sinners and that promise Mercy and Salvation only upon the account of Christ and his Death Rom. 10.9 10. Mark 8.38 We must believe with our hearts and confess it with our mouths We must not be ashamed of Christ or of his words lest he should be ashamed of us when he comes in the glory of his Father with his holy Angels This I say being a part of the Gospel must be as true as the Gospel it self is and these Rules must bind all those to whom they are proposed whether they are enacted by Law or not For if we are assured that they are a part of the Law of the King of Kings we are bound to believe and obey them whether Human Laws do favour them or not it being an evident thing that no subordinate Authority can derogate from that which is superior to it So if the Laws of God are clearly revealed and certainly conveyed down to us we are bound by them and no Human Law can dissolve this Obligation If God has declared his Will to us it can never be supposed to be free to us to chuse whether we will obey it or not and serve him under that or under another Form of Religion at our pleasure and choice We are limited by what God has declared to us and we must not fancy our selves to be at liberty after he has revealed his Will to us As to such to whom the Christian Religion is revealed there no question can be made for it is certain they are under an indispensable Obligation to obey and follow that which is so graciously revealed to them They are bound to follow it according to what they are in their Consciences persuaded is its true sense and meaning And if for any Secular Interest they chuse to comply with that which they are convinced is an Important Error and is condemned in the Scripture they do plainly shew that they prefer Lands Houses and Life to the Authority of God in whose Will when revealed to them they are bound to acquiesce The only difficulty remaining is concerning those who never heard of this Religion Whether or How can they be saved St. Paul having divided the World into Iews and Gentiles called by him those who were in the Law and who were without Law he says Those who sinned without Law Rom. 2.12 14 15. that is out of the Mosaical Dispensation shall be judged without Law that is upon another foot For he adds when the Gentiles which have not the Law do by nature things contained in the Law That is the Moral parts of it these having not the Law are a Law unto themselves that is their Consciences are to them instead of a Written Law which shew the work of the Law written in their hearts their conscience also bearing witness and their thoughts the mean while accusing or else excusing one another This implies that there are either Seeds of Knowledg and Virtue laid in the Nature of Man or that such Notions pass among them as are carried down by Tradition The same S. Paul says How can they call on him in whom they have not believed And how can they believe in him of whom they have not heard Rom. 1â— 14 and how can they hear without a Preacher Which seems plainly to intimate that Men cannot be bound to believe and by consequence cannot be punished for not believing unless the Gospel is preached to them St. Peter said to Cornelius Of a truth I perceive that God is no respecter of persons Acâ—â— 1â— â—4 35. but in every nation he that feareth God and worketh righteousness is accepted of him Those places seem to import that those who make the best use they can of that small measure of Light that is given them shall be judged according to it and that God will not require more of them than he has given them This also agrees so well with â—he Ideas which we have both of Justice and Goodness that this Opinion wants not special colours to make it look well But on the other hand the Pardon of Sin and the Favourof God are so positively limited to the believing in Christ Jesus and it is so expresly said That there is no salvation in any other Acts 4.12 and that there is none other name or Authority under Heaven given among Men whereby we must be saved that the distinction which can only be made in this matter is this That it is only on the Account and in the Consideration of the Death of Christ that Sin is pardoned and men are saved This is the only Sacrifice in the sight of God so that whosoever are received into mercy have it through Christ as the Channel and Conveyance of it But it is not so plainly said that no Man can be saved unless he has an explicit Knowledge of this together with a belief in it Few in the Old Dispensation could have that Infants and Innocents or Ideots have it not and yet it were a bold thing to say that they may not be saved by it So it does not appear to be clearly Revealed That none shall be saved by the Death of Christ unless they do explicitely both know it and believe in it Since it is certain That God may pardon Sin only upon that score without obliging all Men to believe in it especially when it is not Revealed to them And here another distinction is to be made which will clear this whole matter and all the difficulties that arise out of it A great difference is to be made between a Foederal certainty of Salvation secured by the Promises of God and of this New Covenant in Christ Jesus and the extent to which the Goodness and Mercy of God may go None are in
not true No consequences can be worse than the Corruption that is in the World and the Damnation that follows upon sin and yet God permits it because he has made us free Creatures Nor can any reason be given why we should be less free in the use of our understanding than we are in the use of our Will or why God should make it to be less possible for us to fall into Errors than it is to commit Sins The Wrath of God is as much denounced against Men that hold the Truth in unrighteousness as against other Sins Rom. 1.18 24 26. 2 Thes. 2.11 and it is reckoned among the heaviest of Curses to be given up to strong delusions to believe a lye Upon all these reasons therefore it seems clear that our Understandings are left free to us as well as our Wills and if we observe the Stile and Method of the Scriptures we shall find in them all over a constant Appeal to a Man's Reason and to his Intellectual Faculties If the mere dictates of the Church or of Infallible Men had been the resolution or foundation of Faith there had been no need of such a long Thread of Reasoning and Discourse as both our Saviour used while on Earth and as the Apostles used in their Writings We see the way of Authority is not taken but Explanations are offered Proofs and Illustrations are brought to convince the Mind which shews that God in the clearest Manifestation of his Will would deal with us as with reasonable Creatures who are not to believe but upon Persuasion and are to use our Reasons in order to the attaining that Persuasion And therefore upon the whole matter we ought not to believe Doctrines to be true because the Church teaches them but we ought to search the Scriptures and then according as we find the Doctrine of any Church to be true in the Fundamentals we ought to believe her to be a true Church and if besides this the whole Extent of the Doctrine and Worship together not only with the essential parts of the Sacraments but the whole Administration of them and the other Rituals of any Church are pure and true then we ought to account such a Church true in the largest Extent of the word true and by consequence we ought to hold Communion with it Another question may arise out of the first words of this Article concerning the Visibility of this Church Whether it must be always Visible According to the distinction hitherto made use of the resolution of this will be soon made There seem to be Promises in the Scriptures of a perpetual Duration of the Christian Church I will be with you always Matth. 28.20 Matth. 16.18 even to the end of the world And the gates of Hell shall not prevail against the Church The Iewish Religion had a Period perfixed in which it was to come to an end but the Prophecies that are among the Prophets concerning the new Dispensation seem to import not only its Continuance but its being continued still Visible in the World But as the Iewish Dispensation was long continued after they had fallen generally into some very gross Errors so the Christian Church may be Visible still though not Infallible God may preserve the Succession of a true Church as to the Essentials and Fundamentals of Faith in the World even though this Society should fall into Error So a Visible Society of Christians in a true Church as to the Essentials of our Faith is not controverted by us We do only deny the Infallibility of this true Church And therefore we are not afraid of that Question Where was your Church before Henry the Eighth We Answer It was where it is now here in England and in the other Kingdoms of the World only it was then corrupted and it is now pure There is therefore no sort of Inconvenience in owning the constant Visibility of a constant Succession and Church of true Christians true as to the Essentials of the Covenant of Grace though not true in all their Doctrines This seems to be a part of the Glory of the Messias and of his Kingdom That he shall be still visibly worshipped in the World by a Body of Men called by his Name But when Visibility is thus separated from Infallibility and it is made out that a Church may be a true Church though she has a large Allay of Errors and Corruptions mixed in her Constitution and Decisions there will be no manner of Inconvenience in owning a constant Visibility even at the same time that we charge the most eminent part of this Visible Body with many Errors and with much Corruption So far has the first part of this Article been treated of From it we pass to the second which affirms That as the other Patriarchal and Apostolical Churches such as Ierusalem Alexandria and Antioch have erred so the Church of Rome has likewise erred and that not only in their living and manner of Ceremonies but also in matters of Faith It is not questioned but that the other Patriarchal Churches have erred both that where our Saviour himself first taught and which was governed by two of the Apostles successively and those which were founded by St. Peter in Person or by Proxy as Church History represents Alexandria and Antioch to have been Those of the Church of Rome by whom they are at this day condemned both of Heresy and Schism do not dispute this Nor do they dispute that many of their Popes have led bad and flagitious Lives They deny not that the Canons Ceremonies and Government of the Church are very much changed by the Influence and the Authority of their Popes But the whole question turns upon this Whether the See of Rome has erred in matter of Faith or not In this those of that Communion are divided Some by the Church or See of Rome mean the Popes personally so they maintain That they never have and never can fall into Error Whereas others by the See of Rome mean that whole Body that holds Communion with Rome which they say cannot be tainted with Error and these separate this from the Personal Infallibility of Popes for if a Pope should err they think that a General Council has Authority to proceed against him and to deprive him And thus though he should err the See might be kept free from Error I shall upon this Article only consider the first Opinion reserving the Consideration of the second to the Article concerning General Councils As to the Popes their being subject to Error that must be confessed unless it can be proved that by a clear and express Privilege granted them by God they are excepted out of the common condition of Human Nature It is further highly probable that there is no such Privilege since the Church continued for many Ages before it was so much as pretended to and that in a time when that See was not only claiming all the Rights that
belong'd to it but challenging a great many that were flatly denied and rejected Such as the right of receiving Appeals from the African Churches in which reiterated Instances and a bould Claim upon a Spurious Canon pretended to be of the Council of Nice were long pursued but those Churches asserted their Authority of ending all matters within themselves In all this Contest Infallibility was never claimed no more than it had been by Victor when he excommunicated the Asian Churches for observing Easter on the Fourteenth Day of the Moon and not on the Lord's-Day after according to the Custon of the Roman as well as of other Churches When Pope Stephen quarrelled with St. Cyprian about the rebaptizing of Hereticks Euseb. Hist. Eccl. l. 5. c. 23 24 25. Cypr. Ep. 74 75. Firmil Con. Sard. C. 3 7. Cyprian and Firmilian were so far from submitting to his Authority that they speak of him with a freedom used by Equals and with severity that shewed they were far from thinking him Infallible When the whole East was distracted with the Disputes occasioned by the Arian Controversy there was so much Partiality in all their Councils that it was decreed That Appeals should be made to Pope Iulius and afterwards to his Successors though here was an occasion given to assert this Infallibility if it had been thought on yet none ever spoke of it Great Reverence was paid to that Church both because they believed it was founded by St. Peter and St. Paul and chiefly because it was the Imperial City for we see that all other Sees had that degree of Dignity given them which by the Constitution of the Roman Empire was lodged in their Cities And so when Byance was made the Imperial City and called New Rome though more commonly Constantinople it had a Patriarchal Dignity bestowed on it and was in all things declared equal to Old Rome only the point of Rank and Order excepted This was decreed in two General Councils the Second and the Fourth Con. Constant Can. 3. Con. Chalced C 28. in so express a manner that it alone before equitable Judges would fully shew the Sense of the Church in the Fourth and Fifth Century upon this Head When Pope Liberius condemned Athanasius and subscribed to Semi-Arianism this was never considered as a New Decision in that matter so that it altered the the state of it No use was made of it nor was any Argument drawn from it Liberius was universally condemned for what he done and when he repented of it and retracted it he was again owned by the Church We have in the Sixth Century a most undeniable Instance of the Sense of the whole Church in this matter Pope Honorius was by the Sixth General Council condemned as a Monothelite and this in the presence of the Popes Legates and he was anathematized by several of the succeeding Popes It is to no purpose here to examine whether he was justly or unjustly condemned it is e nough that the Sense both of the Eaâ—tern and Western Church appeared evidently in that Age upon these two Points That a Pope might be a Heretick and that being such he might be held accursed for it Con. Sinuess An. 303. Tom. 1. Conc. And in that time there was not any one that suggested that either he could not fall into Heresy since our Saviour had prayed that St. Peter's Faith might not fail or that if he had fallen into it he must be left to the Judgment of God but that the Holy See according to the Fable of P. Marcellin could be judged by no body The Confusions that followed for some Ages in the Western Parts of Europe more particularly in Italy gave occasion to the Bishops of Rome to extend their Authority The Emperors at Constantinople and their Exarchs at Ravenna studied to make them sure to their Interests yet still asserting their Authority over them The new Conquerors studied also to gain them to their side and they managed their matter so dextrously that they went on still increasing and extending their Authority till being much straitned by the Kings of the Lombards they were protected by a new Conquering Family that arose in France in the Eighth Century who to give Credit both to their Usurpation of that Crown and to the extending their Dominions into Italy and the assuming the Empire of the West did both protect and enrich them and enlarged their Authority the greatness of which they reckoned could do them no hurt as long as they kept the Confirmation of their Election to themselves That Family became quickly too feeble to hold that Power long and then an Imposture was published of a Volume of the Decretal Epistles of the Popes of the first Ages in which they were represented as acting according to those high Claims to which they were then beginning to pretend Those Ages were too blind and too ignorant to be capable of searching critically into the truth of this Collection it quickly passed for â—urrent and though some in the beginning disputed it yet that was soon born down and the Credit of that Work was established It furnished them with Precedents that they were careful enough not only to follow but to outdo Thus a Work which is now as universally rejected by the Learned Men of their own Body as spurious as it was then implicity taken for genuine gave the chief Foundation during many Ages to their unbounded Authority And this furnishes us with a very just Prejudice against it That it was managed with so much Fraud and Imposture to which they added afterwards much Cruelty and Violence the two worst Characters possible and the least likely to be found joined with Infallibility For it is reasonable enough to apprehend that if God had lodged such a Privilege any where that he would have so influenced those who were the Depositaries of it that they should have appeared somewhat like that Authority to which they laid Claim and that he would not have forsaken them so that for above Eight hundred Years the Papacy as it is represented by their own Writers is perhaps the worst Succession of Men that is to be found in History But now to come more close to prove what is here asserted in this part of the Article If all those Doctrines which were established at Trent and that have been confirmed by Popes and most of them brought into a new Creed and made parts of it are found to be gross Errors or if but any one of them should be found to be an Error then there is no doubt to be made but that the Church of Rome hath erred So the Proof brought against every one of these is likewise a proof against their Infallibility But I shall here give one Instance of an Error which will not be denied by the greater part of the Church of Rome They have now for above Six hundred Years asserted That they had an Authority over Princes not only to convict and
be of no value in the sight of God Yet the whole Practice of their Church runs upon these Acts as if a Man's going through them and making himself think them could be of great Value in the sight of God The Third Branch of the Matter of this Sacrament is the Satisfaction or the doing the Penance which by the constant Practice of the Church for above Twelve Centuries was to be performed before Absolution could be given except in extraordinary Cases such as Death or Martyrdom But in these latter Ages in which the necessity of Confession is carried higher the obligation to Satisfaction or the doing of Penance is let fall lower A distinction is invented by which Confession and Contrition Attrition at least are made essential Parts of the Sacrament without which there is no Sacrament as Soul and Body are essential to the being of a Man And Satisfaction is considered only as an integral Part such as an Eye or a Limb in a Man which is necessary to the Order of it but not to its being If Satisfaction is considered as that which destroys the Habits of Sin and introduces the Habits of Virtue If it is Purgative and Medicinal and changes a Man's Principles and Nature then it ought to be reckoned the Principal and least Dispensable thing of all Repentance For our confessing past Sins and sorrowing for them is only enjoined us as a mean to reform and purify our Nature If we imagine that our Acts of Repentance are a Discounting with God by so many pious Thoughts which are to be set against so many bad ones this will introduce a sort of a Mechanical Religion which will both corrupt our Ideas of God and of the Nature of Good and Evil. The true and generous Notion of Religion is that it is a System of many Truths which are of such Efficacy that if we receive them into our Minds and are governed by them they will rectify our Thoughts and purify our Natures And by making us like God here they will put us in a sure Way to enjoy him eternally hereafter Sorrow for past Sins and all Reflections upon them are enjoined us as means to make the Sense of them go so deep in our Minds as to free us from all those bad Habits that Sin leaves in us and from those ill Inclinations that are in our Nature If we therefore set up a sorrowing for Sin as a Merchandize with God by so many Acts of one kind to take off the Acts of another here the true Design of our Sorrow is turned into a trafficking by which how much soever Priests may gain or the value of Sacraments may seem to rise Religion will certainly lose in its main Design which is the planting a new Nature in us and the making us become like God Confession and Contrition are previous Acts that lead to this Reformation which as they teach is wrought by the Satisfaction therefore we must needs condemn that Doctrine which makes it less necessary and more dispensable than the other In the case of Death we confess all the Rights of the Church with relation to a Man's Scandals and his Obligations to make publick Penance may and ought to be then forgiven him But we think it one of the most fatal Errors that can creep into any Church to encourage Men to rely on a Death-bed Repentance The Nature of Man leans so much this way that it is necessary to bend the Point as strong as may be to the other Hand The Promises of the Gospel run all upon the Condition of Repentance which imports a Renovation of the inner Man and a Purity of Life So that no Repentance can be esteemed True but as we perceive that it has purified our Hearts and changed our Course of Life What God may do with Death-bed Penitents in the Infinite Extent and Absoluteness of his Mercy becomes not us to Define but we are sure he has given no Promises to such Persons in his Gospel and since the Function of Clergy Men is the dispensing of that we cannot go beyond the Limits set us in it So there is no reason to make this part of Repentance less necessary or obligatory than the other but very much to the contrary Another exception that we have to the allowed Practice of that Church is the giving Absolution before the Satisfaction is made upon its being enjoined and accepted by the Penitent This is so contrary to all ancient Rules that it were a needless Labour to go to prove it The thing being confessed by all And yet the Practice is so totally changed among them that such as have blamed it and have attempted to revive the ancient Method have been censured as guilty of an Innovation savouring of Heresy Because they condemn so general a Practice that it would render the Infallibility of the Church very doubtful if it should be pretended to have erred in so Universal a Practice Hasty Absolutions contrary both to the whole design of the Gospel and to the constant Practice of the Church for at least Twelve Centuries are now the avowed Methods of that Church to which in a great Measure all that Corruption of Morals that is among them owes its rise and continuance For who can be supposed to set himself against those Inclinations to Sin that are deeply rooted in his Nature and are powerfully recommended by the Pleasure and Gain that arises out of vitious Practices if the Way to Pardon is cast so wide open that a Man may Sin as long and as securely as he will and yet all at once upon a few Acts that he makes himself go through he may get into a State of Grace and be pardoned and justified The power that is left to the Priest to appoint the Penance is a Trust of a high Nature which yet is known to be universally ill applied so that Absolution is generally prostituted among them The true Penance enjoined by the Gospel is the forsaking of Sin and the doing Acts of Vertue Fasting Prayers and Alms-giving are Acts that are very proper Means to raise us to this Temper If Fasting is joined with Prayer and if Prayer arises out of an inward Devotion of Mind and â—s serious and fervent then we know that it has great Efficacy as being one of the chief Acts of our Religious service of God to which the greatest Promises are made and upon which the best Blessings do descend upon us Alms-giving is also a main Part of Charity Which when done from a right Principle of loving God and our Neighbour is of great Value in his Sight But if Fasting is only an exercise of the Body of abstaining so long and from such things this may perhaps trouble and pain the Body but bodily Exercise profiteth nothing so not to mention the Mockery of Fasting when it is only a delay of eating after which all Liberties are taken or an abstinence which is made up with other delicious and inflaming Nutritives