Selected quad for the lemma: nature_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
nature_n	father_n	son_n	substance_n	12,161	5	9.0981	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A10966	A treatise vpon sundry matters contained in the Thiry nine Articles of religion, which are professed in the Church of England long since written and published by Thomas Rogers.	Rogers, Thomas, d. 1616.; Rogers, Thomas, d. 1616. Faith, doctrine and religion professed in England.	1639 (1639)	STC 21233; ESTC S1674	207,708	274

persons not a Trinity to be worshipped so did Anastasius the Emperor command and the Apollinarians did hold l Athanas ad Epictet Some doe grant and acknowledge the name of three in the God-head but deny their persons such were the Noetians Praxentans and Hermogenians These did say how the same God was called by diuers names in the holy Scripture and therefore that the Father became flesh and suffered because one and the same God is called the Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost For which cause they were tearmed Patripassians in this number was Serverus Againe some doe grant the names persons of three and yet depriue not onely the Son and holy Ghost of their diuinity but the whole Trinity also of their properties For they say there is three in heauen viz. the Father the Word and holy Ghost howbeit say they the Father onely is very God the Word is the breath of the Father and the holy Ghost is the Spirit created by God of nothing through the Word spoyling so both the Son and holy Ghost of their deity and the whole Trinity of their properties Such were the Arrian and Macedonian heretikes hence by-named Pneumatomachons because they waged battell with the holy Ghost And some doe bring in other names of deity besides of the Father Sonne and holy Ghost as did the Priscilianists m Concil Bra. car cap. 2. 2. Article Of the Word of God which was made very man The Sonne which is 1 the Word of the Father begotten from everlasting of the Father the very eternall God of one substance with the Father 2 tooke mans nature in the wombe of the blessed Virgin of her substance so that 3 two whole and perfect natures that is to say the God-head and man-hood were ioyned in one person neuer to be diuided whereof is one Christ very God and very man who suffered was crucified dead and buried to reconcile his Father to vs and to be a Sacrifice not only for originall guile but also for all actuall sinnes of men The Propositions 1. Christ is very God 2. Christ is very man 3. Christ is God and man and that in one person 4. Christ is the Sauiour of mankinde 1. Proposition Christ is the very God The proofe from Gods Word IN the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and that Word was God a Iohn 1.1 This is written of Christ Therefore Christ is God Christ was begotten of the Father from everlasting b Psal 2.7 Acts 13.33 Heb. 1.5 Therefore very God This is life eternall that they know thee to be very God and whom thou hast sent Iesus Christ c Iohn 17.3 They shall call his name Emanuel which is by interpretation God with vs d Matth. 1.23 Christ he is the brightnesse of the glory and the engraued Image of the Father his person and beareth up all things by his mighty hand e Heb. 1.3 I beleeue in God the Father c. and in Iesus Christ his onely Sonne our Lord Symb. Apost The Godhead of the Father of the Son and of the holy Ghost is all one the glory equall the Maiesty co-eternall Such as the Father is such is the Sonne The Father vncreate the Sonne vncreate The Father incomprehensible the Sonne incomprehensible The Father eternall the Son eternall The Father is Almighty the Son Almighty The Father is God and the Sonne is God The Father is Lord and the Sonne is Lord Symbol Athanas I beleeue in God the Father Almighty c. and in one Lord Iesus Christ the onely begotten Sonne of God begotten of his Father before all worlds God of God light of light very God of very God begotten not made being of one substance with the Father Therefore very God And this both hath beene of the ancient Christians f Symbo Nicen. and is the Faith of the reformed Churches g Confe Helv. 1. ar 11. ● c 11. Bohem. cap. 4.6 August ar 6. Gal. ar 13 14. Belg. ar 10. Wittemb c. 2. Sueuica ar 1. The errors and aduersaries vnto this truth Miserably therefore do they erre which either deny or impugne the Deity of our Sauiour as did certaine old heretikes viz. The Arrians whereof some were called the Douleians because in scorne they tearmed the onely begotten of God the Fathers seruant a Theod. haer fab lib 4. The Cerinthians b Irenaeus The Ebionites among whom some said that Christ Iesus was a meere man others acknowledged him to be God but not from everlasting c Euseb eccles l. hist l. 3 c. 27. The Eunomians d Basil 5. contra Eunom The Samosatenians who thought that Christ was not the Sonne of God before his incarnation e Concil Bracar cap. 1. The Nestorians whose opinion was that Christ became God by merit but was not God by nature f Liberatus The Macedonians which vtterly denyed the Sonne to be of one substance with the Father g Theodoret. l. 4. haeret fab The Agnoites who held that the diuine nature of Christ was ignorant of some things h Gregor ep 22 l. 8. Againe some late heretikes even to the death never would acknowledge Christ Iesus to be the true and very God as namely Certaine Catabaptists i Zuing. lib. contra Catab Blandrat k Beza ep 19. Matthew Hamant burnt at Norwich An. 1579. one of whose heresies was that Christ was a meere and sinfull man l Iohn chron 12.29 Francis Ker burnt also at Norwich An. 1588 who most obstinately maintained that Christ was not God till after his resurrection Dauid George sometime of Basil who affirmed himselfe to be greater for power then ever Christ was m Hist Dauidis Georg. In oppugning the deity of our Sauiour with these heretiks ioyne the Iewes n Lud Caret I. divinior visci ad Iudaeos and Turkes which say that Christ was a good man such as Moses and Mahomet were o Policy of the Turkish Emp. c. 5 p 16. but not God Hence Amurath the great Turke in his letters vnto the Emp. Rodolph the second An. 1593. tearmed our Sauiour in derision The crucified God vnto whom may be added the Family of Love p Display of the Fam. of Love H. 7. ar 2. Proposition Christ is very man The proofe from Gods Word HOlding the humanity of Christ wee ioyne with the blessed Prophets and Euangelists who either prophecied of his future incarnation a The seed of the woman shal breake thine h●ad Gen. 3.15 The Scepter shall not dep●●t c. vntill Shiloh come Gen. 49 1● and conception in the wombe of a Virgin b Behold a Virgin shall con●●i●● and beare a Son Esay 7.14 or plainely auouched and writ both that the Virgin Mary was his Mother c Matth. 10.18 2● Luk. 27 31.34 and that as very man he grew and increased in strength d Luk. 2.40 endured hunger e When he had ●●sted 40

dayes and 40 nights he was afterward hungry Matth. 4.2 thirst f Iohn 4.7 He said I thirst Iohn 19.28 wept g Luke 19.41 and slept h Marke 4.38 and suffered death i Matth. 27.50 Marke 15 ●7 Luke 23.46 Ioh. ●9 30 33. Hence the ancient Fathers and Christians I beleeue in God the Father Almighty c and in Iesus Christ c. which was conceiued by the holy Ghost borne of the Virgin Mary suffred vnder Pontius Pilate was crucified dead and buried k Symb. Ap●st The right faith is that we beleeve and confesse that our Lord Iesus Christ the Sonne of God is God and man God of the substance of the Father begotten before the world and man of the substance of his Mother borne in the world Perfect God and perfect man of a reasonable soule and humane flesh subsisting Equall to the Father as touching his Godhead and inferiour to the Father touching his manhood l Sym. Athan. I beleeue in one God the Father Almighty c. and in one Lord Iesus Christ c. who for vs men and for our saluation came downe from heaven and was incarnate by the holy Ghost of the Virgin Mary and was made man c m Sym. Nicen. The very same testifie Gods people in Heluetia n Confess Helv. 1. ar 11. 2. c. 11. Basil o Confess Basil ar 4. Bohemia p Confess Bohem. c. 6. the Low countries q Confess Belg. ar 18. France r Confess Gal. ar 14. Ausburgh ſ Confess Aug. ar 3 Wittemberg t Confess W●ttemb c. 2. Suevia v Confess Suevica ar 2. with many more besides x Harmen Confess praef The Errors and adversaries vnto this truth Therefore most wicked were the opinions of those men which held viz that 1. Christ really and indeed had neither body nor soule but was man in appearance onely as the Manichies a Aug. l. 14. contra Faust the Eutichians b Niceph. l 18 c. 52. the Marcionites c philast Beza ePist 81. and the Saturnians d Iren. l. 1. ● 22 2. Christ had a bodie without a soule as thought the Eunomians e Basil contra Eunom the Arrians f Theodoret. haeret fab l. 4. the Apollinarians g Ruffin lib. 2 c. 20. with the Theopaschites h Niceph. l. 18. c. 53. 3. Christ tooke the flesh of the Virgin Mary so did the Valentinians thinke i Iren. l. 1. c. 1. and so thinke the Anabaptists k Confess Belg ar 18. and the Family of Loue who make an allegory of the Incarnation of Christ l H.N. prophecie of the Spi c. 19 sent 9. 4. Christ tooke flesh onely of the Virgin but no soule as the Arrians m Epiphan 5. Christ tooke flesh not of the Virgin onely but by the seed of man too so said Ebion n Euseb eccles hist l. 3. c. 27. and Carpocrates o Iren. l. 1. c. 24 6. The flesh of Christ was spirituall and his soule carnall so dreamed the Valentinians p Tertul. lib. de car Christ 7. The carnall body of Christ was consubstantiall with the Father as published the Apollinarians q Athan. li. de incar Christ 8. The humane nature of Christ before his passion was deuoid of humane affections so thought the Seuerites r Niceph. lib. 17. c. 29. 3. Proposition Christ is God and man and that in one person The proofe from Gods Word THat the Diuine and humane natures of Christ are vnited in one person it accordeth with the holy Scripture For The Word was made flesh and dwelt among vs and we saw the glory thereof as the glory of the onely begotten of the Father full of grace and truth saith the Euangelist Iohn a Ioh● 2.14 And Matthew Iesus when he was baptized c. Loe a voice came from heaven saying This is my beloued Sonne in whom I am well pleased b Math. 3.17 He that descended is even the same that ascended farre aboue the heavens that he might fill all things saith S. Paul c Eph. 4.10 Againe Christ Iesus being in the forme of God thought it no robbery to be equall with God hee made himselfe of no reputation and tooke on him the forme of a seruant and was made like vnto man and was found in shape as a man c. wherefore God hath also highly exalted him c. that euery tongue should confesse that Iesus Christ is the Lord unto the glory of God the Father d Phil. 2.6 7 9 11. And the same Apostle There is one God and one Mediatour betweene God and man even the man Christ Iesus who gave himselfe a ransome for all men e 1 Tim. 2.5 6. Vpon these and the like grounds I beleeue in God the Father Almightie c. and in Iesus Christ his onely Son our Lord which was conceived by the holy Ghost borne of the Virgin Mary f Symb. Apost The right faith is That we beleeve and confesse that our Lord Iesus Christ the Sonne of God is God and man c. who although he be God and man yet he is not two but one Christ One not by the conuersion of the Godhead into flesh but by taking of the manhood unto God One altogether not by confusion of substance but by vnity of person g Symb. Nicen I beleeve in one Lord Iesus Christ the onely begotten Sonne of God begotten of the Father before all worlds God of God light of light very God of very God begotten not made being of one substance with the Father by whom all things were made who for vs men c. came downe from heauen and was incarnate c. He suffered and was buried c. and he shall come againe c h Confes Hel. 1. c. 11. 2. ar 11. Basil ar 4. Bohem ar 6. Gal. ar 15. Belg. ar 19. August ar 3. Wittem c. 2. Suenica ar 2. Harmon confess praef say the ancient and first Christians The very same is the beleefe and confession of all the reformed Churches at this present and alwayes hath beenei. Errors and adversaries unto this truth Detestable therefore is the error Of the Acephalians who denyed the properties of the two natures in Christ a Hartman Schedel Of the Seuerites b Niceph. l. 16. cap. 33. of Eutiches and Dioscorus who affirmed the diuinitie and humanity of Christ to be of one and the same nature Of the Monothelites who denyed that two wils viz. a diuine an humane were in Christ c Volater l. 1. Of Theodorus Mesechius who said that the Word was one thing and Christ another d Magdeburg eccles hist Cen. 6. c 5. fol. 319. Of Nestorius who denied that two natures of Christ to be any otherwise vnited than one friend is ioyned to another e Niceph. l. 18. c. 48. which onely is in good will and affection Of Seruetus who