Law and the same was taught by Calvin not to mention all the rest of our Divines Christum sc. nos reconciliasse Deo justitiam acquisivisse toto obedientiae suae cursu § X. But against this assumption divers things are objected first they feare not to say which I feare to relate that Christ obeyed the Law not for us but for himselfe for they say that Christ as he was man was bound to obey the Law for himselfe which assertion detracteth from the merit of his obedience from the bounty of his Grace from the dignity of his person From his merit for if his obedience were of duety then were it not meritorious as himselfe teacheth Luk. 17. 10. for Debitum non est meritum And if this be true that Christs obedience is not meritorious than have we no title to heaven From his bounty if what he did indeed for us and not for himselfe hee should be thought to have done for himselfe and not for us From the dignity of his peâ—…son as if either he needed to obey for himselfe or by his obedience hee were any way bettered in himselfe or improved But these men shold have remembred that the person who as both of us confesse did obey the Law was and is not onely man but God also and therefore as his bloud was Gods bloud so his obedience was the obedience of God and consequently was performed not of duty nor for himselfe For if of duty then had God been a debtor to the Law Neither needed the humane nature being by personall union united to the divine to obey or to merit for it selfe seeing from the first moment of the conception thereof it was personally united to the Deity of the Sonne of God in whose person it subsisting was from the beginning of the being thereof most happy and enjoying the beatificall vision being at that time as the Schoolemen speake both viator comprehensor Neither did the humane nature which doth not subsist by it selfe work any thing by it selfe in the worke of our redemption but God manifested in the flesh did in and by it both obey and suffer for us And as the eternall Son of God being God coequall with the Father assumed the humane nature and became man not for himselfe for his incarnation was an abasing of himselfe as it were to nothing for man compared to God is as nothing if not as lesse than nothing but for us men and for our salvation so being man whatsoever he did or suffered in obedience to God was not for himselfe for it was a further debasing of himselfe but for us and as for us he sanctified himselfe Iohn 17. 17. so for us he performed all righteousnesse Matth. 3. 15. and fulfilled the Law for us Matth. 5. 17. that whatsoever the Law requireth to justification might bee fulfilled in it Rom. 8. 4. § XI But here the Papists object that our Saviour Christ by his humiliation did merit his exaltation because the Apostle saith that therefore God exalted him Phil. 2. 9. Answere In every aetiologie the reason which is rendred is in a large sense called the cause though it may be any other argument which is not the cause of the Consequent but of the consequence as here humiliation was not the cause but the way to exaltation and exaltation not the effect but the consequent as it is said Luk. 24. 26. ought not Christ to suffer these things and so to enter to his glory And this appeareth by the scope of the Apostle in that place which is to exhort us to the imitation of our Saviour Christ his charity and humility Of his charity in that hee being God for our sakes became man and being man humbled himselfe further and became obedient untill his death even the death of the crosse Of his humility in that it was the way to his glory For before honour is humility and he that humbleth himselfe shall be exalted But humiliation is so farre from being the cause of exaltation that it is the contrary to it even as corruption to generation and losse to recovery yet because recovery presupposeth losse and the generation of one the corruption of another and the exaltation of the Sonne of God his foregoing humiliation therefore each of these may be said to be causa sine qua non as all necessary forerunners may though they be no causes Even as Fabius when Livius Salinator bad him remember that by his meanes hee had recovered 〈◊〉 Why should I not remember it saith he I had never recovered it unlesse thou haddâ—…st lost it Cic. 2. de Oratore And further I adde that the exaltation of Christ whereof the Apostle speaketh was not the exaltation of him to be the Sonne of God for that hee was from all eternity but the manifestation thereof For although in respect of Christs resurrection especially it be said Thou art my Sonne this day have I begotten thee yet was not Christ then first begotten whose generation is eternall but then he was mightily declared to bee the Sonne of God by his resurrection Rom. 1. 4. and this was that name above all names which God did give unto him after his humiliation his manifesting and declaring him by his resurrection to be the Sonne of God So the Apostle saith Heb. 1. 4 5. that Christ hath obtained a more excellent name than the Angels For unto which of the Angells said he at any time Thou art my Sonne this day I have begotten thee This exaltation was a necessary consequent of his humiliation and that in two respects first for avoyding the scandall of the crosse for having taken upon him the forme of a servant and therein having humbled himselfe to become obedient untill death and to the death of the crosse it was necessary lest men should take offence at his great humiliation and refuse to beleeve in a man that had beene crucified that he should mightily be declared to bee the Sonne of God by his resurrection ascension and sitting at the right hand of his Father secondly this declaration of Christ to bee the Sonne of God was to follow his humiliation as a necessary stay of our faith in Christ for if Christ had not risen againe then had our faith beene vaine and wee had remained in our sinnes But by his resurrection and exaltation whereby he was powerfully declared to be the eternall Sonne of God wee understand that the obedience which he had performed and the suffering which hee sustained for us were not the obedience and sufferings of mâ—…re a man but of him that is God for which cause Saint Peter saith that God did raise him and give him glory that our faith and hope might be in God § XII If they will needs with the Arrians understand the place of Christs exaltation it selfe which is his filiation and not of the declaration thereof thereupon
and perfect love expelleth this feare 1 Iohn 4. 18. But though without the true feare of God we cannot please him yet that doth not prove that feare doth justifie For the like may be said of the obedience of the Law of humility of charity of repentance of perseverance Heb. 10. 38. and of the like Neither doth faith justifie because without it no man can please God but because by it alone wee receive Christ in whom God is well pleased and reconciled unto us that is because by it alone wee are justified Secondly because as faith is the beginning of justice so seare is the beginning of wisedome Answ. of this comparison neither part is to be understood of justification but of sanctification or righteousnesse inherent For as faith is the mother of grace of all both internall graces and also of externall obedience so the true sonne-like feare of God is a principall part of true piety But what doth this make for servile feare which is found in them who have no grace Thirdly because as faith doth justifie by making us seeke God and to come unto him so also feare Answ. If by seeking of God be meant the worship of God then that which causeth it is the cause of sanctification But servile feare in it selfe serveth rather to drive men from God though in the gracious dispensation of Gods providence it be made sometimes a meanes to draw them to him And this he proveth by Psal. 78. 34. when he he slew them they sought him and Psalm 83. 16. fill their faces with shame and they shall seeke thy name and Ion. 3. 5. from the example of the Ninivitâ—…s The thing I consesse that by servile feare men are often times forced to seeke God how beit that which is forced many times is fained as we see in the example of the Israelites Psal. 78. 36. who though by the judgements of God were brought to make semblance of repentance yet they did but dissemble for their hart was not upright with God neither were they stedfast in his covenant vers 37. But his proofes I allow not For the first place speaketh of Gods judgments the second of shame the third of the faith of the Ninivites none of feare Fourthly because as by faith Christ is formed in us so by feare the protasis he proveth because Paul saith Gal. 4. 19. my little children of whom I travell in birth againe untill Christ be formed in you But Christ is not formed in us by justification but by regeneration whereby we are renewed according to his image the apâ—…dosis because Esay saith C. 26. 18. according to the Septuagint from thy feare we have conceived and have brought forth the Spirit of Salvation But why doth hee flee from the Latine translation unto which hee is bound which maketh no mention of feare but onely saith we have conceived and have brought forth the Spirit of health as some editions read which last words are not read together in the Greeke nor in the true editions of the Latine but divided by a note of distinction peperimus Spiritum salutes non fecimns Thus Bellarmine for his owne advantage eiteth the fomer part out of the Septuagint and the later out of the vulgar Latine and that corrupted when neither of both agreeth with the originall From which if Bellarmine would argue he should make himselfe very ridiculous The words are we have conceived we have travailed we have as it were brought forth wind so Pagninus Vatablus Tremellius c. Salutes non fecimus in terra no salvations have we wrought on the earth which words being a complaint cannot import that they had from the feare of God which is not here mentioned brought forth the Spirit of salvation So farre is this place from proving that Christ by feare is formed in us Fifthly as faith doth justifie because the just man shall live by his faith Hab. 2. 4. so of feare it is written that the feare of the Lord is the fountaine of life Prov. 14. 27. Answ. The former place speaketh both of the life of grace which is our vivification and the life of glory to which wee are intitled by faith The latter as I have shewed speaketh of sonne-like feare which as all other habits of grace may bee called fountaines of living well which all arise from one common spring which is faith and are all not causes and much lesse preparations but fruits of faith and consequents of justification Sixthly as faith doth justifie by purging of sinnes so feare Answ. To the proposition Faith doth justifie by absolving from sins Act. 13. 38. Rom. 3. 25. and removing the guilt And it purgeth also from the corruptions by sanctifying and purifying the heart Act. 15. 9. To the reddiction that feare which expelleth sinne Eccles. 1. is as I have shewed the feare of sonnes and not of slaves neither doth it concurre to justification but to sanctification § V. To the testimonies of the Fathers affirming some of them that feare serveth to prepare and to dispose men to sanctification and likewise to his reason that it is the nature osfeare to flee from evill and to seeke remedies whereby evill may be avoided I willingly subscribe But though feare be one meanes among many to dispose or prepare men for sanctification or yet for justification yet neither it nor any of the rest doth justifie and therefore doth not disprove justification by faith alone Legall faith working feare is a preparative to the Evangelicall justifying faith but is so farre it selfe from justifying that it pronounceth accursed those that are endued therewith § VI. His third disposition is Hope which he saith ariseth of faith no otherwise than feare doth But yet by his leave with this difference that servile feare is the fruit of a legall faith applying the threatnings of the Law to a mans selfe but hope of salvation is the fruit of Evangelicall faith apprehending the promises of the Gospell and is therefore called the hope of the Gospell Col. 1. 23. Neither can there be any sound hope of eternall life untill a man doth truely beleeve that the promise of salvation doth belong unto him and that he cannot beleeve untill he have the condition of the promise which is justifying faith and therefore of necessity justifying goeth before hope As for that hope which goeth before justifying faith it is evident that it doth not justifie neither is it an habit of grace infused but a naturall affection such as is in all men who attempt any thing As the Apostle saith he that ploweth ploweth in hope and hee that thresheth thresheth in hope Although therefore this hope doe dispose men to justification and sanctification as after a sort it doth in animating of men to use the meanes of grace and salvation in hope that their labour shall not bee in vaine yet for all this hope which doth not justifie at all faith doth justifie alone § VII But let us examine his proofes
For what will it profit a man saith St. Iames if hee shall say that hee hath faith and hath not workes will that faith save him For as the body without the Spirit is dead so that faith which is in profession onely and is without workes is dead § XVII But this reason of his hee doth illustrate by two unlike similitudes For saith hee even as fire because by its heat alone it heateth if from the fire were taken away all other qualityes which are by accident joyned with heat it would still without doubt heat And as a father because by the onely relation of paternity hee hath reference to his sonne if from him who is a father all other attributes were removed as knowledgen â—…bility power health beauty and in stead os them there should succeed ignorance basenesse weaknes sicknes deformity and among all these attributes paternity should remaine yet still that father should have relation to his sonne Even so because a Christian apprehendeth salvation by faith alone and unto it is referred by our adversaryes surely it followeth that faith remayning hee may be saved although hee have no good workes and have many ill Answ. In the former similitude hee compareth a Christian man to fire faith to heat and other graces and good workes to such other qualityes as in fire by accident concurre with heat In which similitude nothing is like For neither doth a Christian man justifie or save others by faith as fire by his heat doth heat other things neither is hee justified or saved by his faith as it is a quality inherent but as it is the hand to receive Christâ—… neither are other graces or duetyes of sanctification which wee call good workes to be compared with I know not what accidentall qualityes concurring with heat but to those unseparable qualityes of fire viz light and drynes For even in the fire that is inflamed there doe concurre necessarily with heat drynesse and light neither were it a true fire without them and yet the act of heating is to be ascribed to the heat of the fire properly and not to the light or drynesse of the element so in a true Christian that is justified there doth concurre necessarily with faith both other sanctifying graces answerable to the drynesse of the fire and also the light of a Christian conversation without which hee is not to be held a true Christian or truely justified and yet the act of justifying or saving is not to be ascribed either to other graces or to good workes but onely to faith receiving Christ or rather to Christ onely received by faith In the other similitude he compareth the reference which faith hath to salvation unto that relation with is betweene father and sonne But faith and salvation are no such relatives Neither are the graces of the sanctification or good workes to be compared to those accidentall adjuncts attributed to a father which may come and goe as being not necessary to the being of a father but rather to those properties of the humane nature as reason will understanding wit c. For although a man cannot become a father without these yet his being a father is not not to be ascribed to these § XVIII And whereas hee would seeme to take away the answeare of his adversaties who alleage that his supposition is impossible both because in his first booke he had proved that saith may truely and indeed be severed from charity and good workes and also because at least in conceit it may be severed from them which he saith is sufficient for the confirmation of an hypotheticall prâ—…position neither can his adversaries deny it who teach thah faith and workes have that relation which is betweene the cause and the effect Hereunto I reply First that I have formerly not onely answered his arguments which hee produced to this purpose but also proved by unanswereable arguments that true justifying faith cannot be severed from charity and good workes Secondly as I said even nowe his supposition implyeth a contradiction and therefore is impossible Impossible I say that workes being supposed to bee present necessitate presentiae should in the same speech be truely supposed to be absent Thirdly If Bellarmine can conceive that true justifying and saving faith may be without charity and good workes then hee may also conceive that that faith may save which is severed from charity and destitute of good workes His assumption I grant for wee teach according to the Scriptures that that faith which is alone severed from charity and good works doth justify or save neither alone nor at all and doe ascribe lesse to such a faith than the Papists themselves doe But his conclusion is faulty as contayning more than can be inferred upon the premisses that good workes are necessary not onely in regard of presence but also of some Efficiencie which was not so much as mentioned in the antecedent of the proposition which the conclusion should gainsay and say no more Thus much of the necessity of good workes CHAP. VI. Of the verity of the justice of works and of the possibilitie of fulfilling the Law § I. NOw Bellarmine will discourse of the truth of the justice of workes or of actuall righteousnesse And in this dispute he spendeth eigth Chapters But to what end for I feare hee wandreth still Hee had in the first booke propounded five principall arguments to prove that faith doth not justifie alone The Fifth and last was that good workes also doe justifie and therefore not faith alone This assertion hee laboureth to prove by divers arguments The first from the necessity of good workes which I have answeared The second from the verity of the justice of workes namely that the good workes of the faithfull and regenerate are truely good which wee doe not deny wee say indeed that the seeming good workes of men unregenerate are not truely good because an evill tree cannot bring forth good fruit But the good workes of the regenerate being the workes of grace and the fruits of the Spirit wee acknowledge to be truely good But will it hereupon followe that therfore they are or may be justified by workes Nothing lesse Hee must prove that the workes of the regenerate are not onely truely good but also purely and perfectly good and not onely that but that they are also perpetually and universally good For if they faile in any one particular as in many things we saith Iames the just offend all they cannot be justified by their obedience For hee that offendeâ—…h in one is guilty of the breach of the whole Law and is so farre from being justified by his obedience that by the sentence of the Law hee is accursed because he hath not continued in all the things which are written in the booke of the Law to doe them unlesse therfore he can prove that not onely some but all the workes of the faithfull are not onely truely but
§ XIV Fourthly actions absolutely good may stand in judgement before God But our workes cannot stand in judgement The best of us have need to pray with him who had lesse neede than wee Enter not into judgement with thy servant O Lord. If thou Lord shouldest marke what is amisse even in our best actions who should be able to stand Noliergo intrare mecum in judicium Domine Deus meus wherefore enter not into judgement with me O Lord my God Quantumlibet rectus mihi videar producis tu de the sauro tuoregulam coaptas me adeam pravas invenior For though I seeme to my self never so right thou bringest forth of thy treasury a rule thou examinest mee by it and I am found wicked This which David and Augustine expounding him speake in respect of the person may bee applyed to his best actions as namely to his prayer unto which more specially David in both places doth seeme to have relation Lord heare my prayer c. and enter not into judgement with thy servant Lord heare my voice c. if thou shouldest marke what is amisse who should stand For though my prayer may the best of us say seeme to my selfe never so godly yet thou hast a rule according to which if thou shouldest exactly examine my prayer it would bee found sinnefull Alas Lord I doe not pray with that humility in respect of mine unworthinesse nor with that feeling of my want nor with that reverence of thy great and glorious Majesty nor with that attention of minde nor with that devotion and fervencie of Spirit nor with that assurance of faith c. that I ought to doe Therefore I come unto thee not in any conceit of mine owne righteousnesse or of the worthinesse of my prayer but I come unto thee in the name and mediation of Christ appealing from thy tribunall of justice to the throne of thy grace desiring and beleeving that the incense of my prayers being perfumed with the odours of his merits may and shall bee acceptable unto thee § XV. But if any popish pharisee doth thinke that hee needeth not thus to pray I shall desire his Conscience thus to speake unto him Doest thou thinke that for the worthinesse of thy prayer thou shalt bee heard and that if the Lord should enter into judgement with thee according to his exact rule he could finde no fault with thy prayer Alas besides those blemishes and imperfections even now mentioned whereof the most godly have just cause to complaine thou directest thy prayer not to God alone but to Saints and Angels and so committest horrible idolatry and when thou dost direct thy prayer unto God thou dost conceive of him under some bodily shape whereby thou doest circumscribe him and make him finite and so no God but an idoll of thine owne braine Thou doest not come unto God in the name and mediation of Christ alone who is the onely mediatour betwixt God and man but in the mediation of many others by whose merits and intercession thou hopest and desirest to be heard Thou cravest not the helpe of the Holy Ghost the Spirit of grace and supplication whose helpe thou findest not thy selfe to need for such a prayer as thou doest make Thy prayer is but a formall recitall of a certaine taske of words uttered for the most part without understanding without feeling without devotion without faith Thou if unlearned as the most are thou prayest in an unknowne language speaking like a Parrat thou knowest not what thy prayer is a meere lip-labour thou hopest by the multitude of thy words and the often repetitions of thy Ave-maries thy Pater-nosters and thy Creeds most ridiculously and odiously reiterated upon thy Beads by most superstitious Battology And notwithstanding all this wilt thou bee so wickedly impudent as to obtrude thy orisons unto God not only as an acceptable service wherewith though he should enter into judgement with thee he could finde no fault but also impetratory of thy desires satisfactory for thy sinnes and meritorious of eternall life Nay I assure thee that thy prayer to God with the opinion of satisfaction and merit though it were otherwise well qualified as it is farre from it there being nothing almost performed in it which is required in prayer it were abominable in the sight of God what shall I say more The acceptable and effectuall prayer is the prayer of faith Iam. 5. 16. whereby a man doth specially beleeve that his requests are or shall bee granted to him as namely for remission of sinnes and eternall life but thou I speake to the best and most learned of the Papists thou I say dost scorne and detest this speciall faith and so thy prayer wanting faith besides all other the abominations thereof is turned into sinne § XVI So in like manner in respect of the rest of our actions though seeming laudable unto us wee must pray that the Lord will not enter into judgement with us To which purpose manifold testimonies of the Fathers might be alleaged These few may serve Hilarie what living man can bee justified in the sight of God In whom there is a mixture of anger of sorrow of concupiscence of ignorance of forgetfulnesse of casualty of necessity happening either through the nature of the body or the motion of the soule alwaies wavering Ambrose hee that thinketh hee hath gold hath lead and hee who thinketh himselfe to have the graine of Wheat hath chaffe which may bee burnt Augustine woe to the very laudable life of men if mercie being removed thou dost examine it Gregory in many places of his Morals lib. 5. c. 7. quia sâ—…pe ipsa justitia nostra ad examen divinae justitiae deducta injustitia est sordet in districtione judicis quod inestimatione sulget operantis lib. 5. cap. 18. ipsa nostra perfectio culpâ non caret nisi hanc severus judex in subtili lance examinis misericorditer penset Lib. 9. cap. 1. Sancti viri omne meritum vitium est si ab aeterno arbitriâ—… districtè judicetur Lib. 9. cap. 2. omne virtutis nostrae meritum esse vitium lib. 9. c. 11. Si remota pietate discutitur in illo examine etiam justorum vita succumbit cap. 14. on those words of Iob. Si habuero quippiam justum non respondebo he saith ut enim sape diximus omnis humana justitia injustitia esse convincitur si districtè judicetur prece ergo post justitiam indiget ut quae succumbere discussa poterat ex sola judicis pietate convalescat lib. 1. cap. 27. Si remota pietate discutimur opus nostrum poenâ—… dignum est quod remunerari praemiis prestolamur cap 28. quousque poena corruptionis astringimur quamlibet rectis operibus insudemus veram munditiem nequaquem apprehendimus sed â—…mur lib. 27. cap. 15. Sciunt Sancti quia omnis humana justitia injustitia
Rom. 4. 16. And because they beleeve that justification consisteth in this certaintie therefore it woâ—…ld follow that justification is impossible But if faith necessarily must bee joyned with charitie and good workes so that otherwise it is not faith but a shadow or counterfeit of it then it followeth that justification in that it dependeth upon a true faith doth also depend upon works and upon love which is the fulfilling of the Lawe and consequently that no man can be certaine of his justification but that justification is a thing altogether impossible And in this argument he doth so please himselfe that he concludeth with this Epiphonema forsooth so stable is the dogmaticall building of heretikes that on each side it threatneth ruine I answere briefly by distinction that justification is either before God in foro coelesti or in the Court of our owne Conscience Before God when the Lord imputing the perfect righteousnesse of Christ to a beleeving sinner absolveth him from the guilt of his finne and from damnation and accepteth of him as righteous in Christ and as an heire of eternall life and this properly is the justification of a sinner That justification which is in the Court of Conscience is not justification it selfe but the assurance of it Howbeit commonly men are then said to bee justified and to have pardon of sinne when the pardon is sealed to their owne Conscience I deny therefore that our justification before God consisteth in the assurance thereof in our owne conscience for those which truely beleeve are justified and blessed whether they be assured thereof or not or that it dependeth upon our charitie or our owne good works but that without respect of our charitie or any worthinesse in us the Lord doth freely and of his meere grace even when wee deserve the contrary justifie us so soone as wee truely beleeve in Christ that and no other being the condition of the covenant And howsoever the assurance of our justification before God if we were to be justified by our owne obedience were impossible because to our justification before God perfect and complete obedience is required which to us by reason of the flesh is impossible yet the assurance of our justification in our owne conscience is not impossible but is ordinarily obtained by the children of God by some more by some lesse because it doth not depend upon the perfection but upon the uprightnesse of our obedience If wee have a true desire an unfained purpose a sincere endevour to walke before God in the obedience of his commandements though wee faile contrary to our desire and purpose in many particulars wee may thereby make our election our calling our justification sure unto us For by our works our faith is demonstrated and our justification knowne to our selves and others in which sence Saint Iames saith we are justified by works § XI In the seventh place Bellarmine addeth the consent of the Fathers into whose minde hee saith this absurditie never entred that faith cannot be where charitie is not And yet for all this bragge he is not able to produce any one pregnant testimony plainely affirming that true faith or justifying faith may bee without charitie wee doe not deny but that the faith of Hypocrites and of all other wicked and impenitent sinners which is not a true and a lively but a counterfeit and dead faith which not properly but catachrestically or rather equivocally is called faith is severed from charitie and from all other graces of sanctification And such is the faith which the Fathers say may bee severed from charitie But though hee hath not cited any one pregnant testimony against us yet one hee hath cited for us in plaine termes avouching that they doe not truely beleeve nor have true faith who doe not live well and to the same purpose I cited Augustine and divers others of the Fathers CAP. IV. Whether justifying faith may be without speciall apprehension of Christ. § I. THe third error of the Papists concerning the nature of justifying faith is that they hold it may be as without knowledge and without charity so also without any speciall apprehension or application of Christ to the beleever But the Scriptures unto justification require that wee should beleeve in Christ. For howsoever by that faith which justifieth wee doe beleeve whatsoever God hath revealed in his Word neither hath any man a justifying faith who denyeth credit to any thing which hee findeth to bee revealed by God notwithstanding as it justifyeth it onely respecteth Christ either directly and expressely or indirectly and by consequence Christ himselfe being as I shall hereafter shew the proper object of justifying faith For the promise of justification and salvation in the Gospell is not made to the beliefe of other things but onely to true faith in Christ. For God so loved the world that hee gave his onely begotten Son that whosoever beleeveth in him should not perish but have everlasting life And as Moses lifted up the serpent in the wildernesse that they who were bitten of the fiery serpents by looking on the brasen Serpent which was a figure of Christ should bee healed even so the Sonne of man was to be lifted up upon the Crosse that whosoever being stung by the old serpent the Devill looketh upon him with the eiâ—… of a true faith that is beleeueth in him should not perish but have eternall life which truth is acknowledged by the Master of the sentences quem Deus proposuit propitiatorem per fidem in sanguine ipsius i. per fidem passionis ut â—…lim aspicientes in Serpentem aneum in lignâ—… erectuÌ„ à morsibus serpentum sanabantur Si ergo recto fidei intuitu in illum respicimus qui pro nobis pependit in ligâ—…o à vinculis Dâ—…laboli solvimur i. peccatis As therefore they who were bitten by the same eyes wherewith they looked upon the brasen serpent beheld all other things which were subject to their view but were cured by looking upon the serpent and not by beholding any other thing so wee by the same eye of the soule which is faith doe beleeve all other things which God hath propounded to bee beleeved his Word being the objectum adâ—…quatum of our faith but we are justifyed and saved by beleeving in Christ and not by beleeving of any other thing In so much that if we should beleeve all other things and did not beleeve in Christ our faith would not justifie us And therefore in the Scriptures justifying faith is ordinarily called faith in Christ and sometimes the faith of Christ and sometimes his knowledge whereby is meant not that Christ is the subject but the proper object of justifying faith which is a truth so manifest that no Christian ought to doubt of it For all true Christians are so called because they beleeve in Christ and by beleeving in him doe hope to bee saved by him § II.
all but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 things indifferent § XIX But let us examine his testimonies two whâ—…reof are scarce worth the examining the one out of Origâ—…n the othâ—…r out of Cyrill and yet both of them so little to his purpoâ—… as theâ—…seeme to make against him rather than for him Origâ—… compareth â—…to women such men as say they are not able to observe certaine pâ—…epts of Christ which the Papists doe not call precepts but Counèlls and therefore belong not at all as they teach but to those who would be thought to live in a state of perfection Besides which notorioâ—…s hypocrites all in the Church of Rome are by this testimony to be â—…ompared to women who not onely say they cannot but also thinke â—…hey need not to observe them as to sell all that a man hath and give it to the poore which indeed is neither a commandemenâ—… nor counsell given by Christ unto all but a precept of tryall to that one wealthy justitiary to him that striketh thee on the one cheeke turne to him the other also blesse him that curseth thee pray for him that persecuteth thee and such like which are indeed precepts given to all the faithfull and not counsailes directed onely to such as are or would seeme to be perfect Cyrill saith hee affirmeth that the precept it self thou shalt not lust which is noted to be most difficâ—…lt may through grace be fulfilled Answ. That place of Cyrill as it is translated into Latine is in a maner without sence neither can any thing be soundly inferred from it Heâ—… seemeth to say that Christ restoring mans nature to his originall perfection which is but begunne in this life said To them of old it was said thou shalt not commit adultery but I say unto you thou shalt not lust quamvis res sit ut â—…pinor ad quâ—…m pertingi nequeat though it be a thing as I suppose which cannot be attained unto namely in this life yet to this perfection Christ hath reformed or restored us viz. inchoative in this life and perfectly in the life to come § XX. The rest of the testimonyes are of â—…wo sorts for either they deny the commandements of God to be impossible as Bâ—…sil orat in illud attende tibi Deut. 15. 9. Hierâ—…e â—…dvers Pelag. lib. 3. in Matth. 5. 〈◊〉 de Natura gratia Cap 43. c. or else they affirme that they are possible if men would as Câ—…ncil Arâ—…sican 2. Can. ult Hilâ—…ru in Psalm 118. Chrysâ—…stom in Matth â—…om 39. in Hebr. homil 16. c. Answ. To preserve these fathers from contradicting themselves certaine distinctions are to be admitted For the same men who deâ—…y the law to be impossible doe conâ—…esse that God commandeth some things which wee cannot doe aâ—…d that never any since the fall of Adam did or could fulfill the whole law of God and that there is no man that liveth without sinne Their meaning therfore is that although no man can fulfill the law yet it is not impossible The first distinction is that which I mentioneâ—… before bâ—…twixt the perfect fulfilling and the upright keeping of Gods commandments for although they cannot in this life be fulfilled in thâ—…t pâ—…rfection which the law requireth yet they may and usually are kept of the faithfull in sincerity and uprightâ—…esse which the Lord in the covenant of grace acceptech The second is conserâ—…ing impossibility For when it is said that the law is impossible to be fulfilled pâ—…ctly it is either understood simply per se as the fathers understood it as it is impossible saith Basil for the eye of a man to see his owne backe or conditionally and per accidens in respect of mans condition or estate For the law was possible to man in his integrity when he was in the earth by Paradise before his fall and shall be possible againe when hee shall be fully renewed in the heavenly Paradise But to man being fallen into the state of disobedience the fulfilling of the law is impossible by accident For 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the fleshly disposition of our corrupt nature is not subject to the law of God neither can it be The third distinction is in respect of the persons for men are either 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 unregenerate or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 regenerate The regenerate man by the grace of God is both willing and able to keepe the law according to the measure of grace received The unregenerate man is not able to keepe the law because hee will not the very frame of his will being enmity against God Rom. 8. 7. Gen. 6. 5. 8. 21. And here it is to be observed that those fathers which had to doe with the Pelagians who held that men by strength of nature were able to fulfill the Law of God or else the Lord commandiug them unpossible things should be unjust neither should the fault be in men who cannot obey but in God who enjoyneth impossible things did grant unto them that God did not command impossibilityes yet they did hold which the Papists also confesse that no man without grace could performe them For indeed to an unregenerate man who is dead in sinne it is as unpossiâ—…le to fulfill the wâ—…ole law of God which is spirituall as it is for a dead man to perfâ—…rme the actions of the naturall life For as I said before out of Augustine man by his sinne hath lost not onely bonum possibilitatis so that â—…ee can doe no good but also possibilitatem non peccandi so that hee cannot but sinne though hee sinne most freely For this is the freedome of a man not regenerate quâ potest peccare non potest non peccare 〈◊〉 dam nabiliur saith the Master of the sentences whereby hee is able to sinne and can doe no other but sinne and that damnably § XXI And further to those testimonies which affirme that men may fulfill the commandements if they will I answeare that nothing can be inferred from thence uâ—…lesse it be proved that men at all times are willing to fulfill them For if they be not willing they are not able and much lesse doe they actually performe them Thus therefore they must argue To them that are allwaies willing to keepe the commandements the Law is not impossible But all men are alwaies willing to keepe the Commandements Therefore to no man is the Law impossible The proposition is not generally true in respect of the regenerate themselves unto whom to will is oftentimes present when how to performe that which is good they find not Râ—…m 7. 18. For the good that they would they doe not and the evill which they would not that they doe v. 19. But the assumption is manifestly false and the contrary is generally true No man is allwaies willing c. And therefore from those Testimonyes wherein the condition of the will is interposed nothing can be concluded
wee ought to thinke our selves mercifully dealt with if wee escape the punishment which by the Law of God is due unto us But here it will bee said if the master shall bee pleased to promise rewards unto the servant for his service well performed may not the servant expect the promised reward I answere that what reward soever shâ—…ll in this kinde be either promised or given it is wholly to be ascribed to the Masters bounty and not to the servants merit § VII For the third That which is done of meere duty by a servant to his Lord there belongeth no reward in justice as deserved by him But all that we who are the servants of God can doe though we should doe all that is commanded is done of meere bounden duety to our Lord. Therefore to all that we can doe though we should doe all that is commanded there belongeth no reward as justly deserved by us But when we have done all that is commanded I speak by supposition as our Saviour doth we must no lesse truely than humbly confesse that wee are unprofitable servants that is as is manifestly gathered out of the parable such as cannot deserve so much as thankes of our Lord. If therefore our gracious Lord shall be pleased out of his bounty freely to promise and according to his promise graciously to reward our imperfect obedience which he might justly punish it is not our merit but his great mercie that he doth not punish it more that he doth accept of it as well pleasing unto him in his welbeloved but most of all that he doth most graciously and undeservedly reward it From whence I reason thus Whosoever are unprofitable servants they doe not merit noâ—… deserve the reward of eternall life of their Lord. All the faithfull though they should doe all that is commanded are unprofitable servants Therefore none of the faithfull though they should doe all that is commanded doe merit or deserve at the hands of God the reward of eternall life And if they who doe all that is commanded cannot merit then much lesse they whose obedience is defective as the obedience even of the best is So saith Hierome si inutilis est qui fecit omnia quid de illo dicendum qui explerenon potuit § VIII The assumption is proved first because our Saviour commandeth his Apostles to confesse as the truth is that when they have done all that is commanded they are unprofitable servants and therefore they who neither doe nor can doe all are impudent lyars when they professe themselves to be profitable servants Secondly by a comparison of earthly Lords and servants For if earthly Lords and masters owe not so much as thankes to their servants who are indeed their fellow servants for all the service which they can doe though they doe not give them the will and the power to doe them acceptable service how much lesse doth God who being our absolute Lord doth also give us will and power to serve him owe unto his servants the reward of the kingdome of heaven And if servants by doing all possible service to their earthly masters who are but their fellow servants cannot deserve so much as thankes at their hands how much lesse can wee who serve the Lord of Lords deserve the kingdome of heaven at his hands by our unperfect and defective service of him Thirdly from the antithesis or opposition that is betweene debitum and meritâ—…m duety and merit For hee that doth but his duety though he performe his whole duty cannot merit a reward of his Master but must confesse himselfe to be an unprofitable servant how much lesse can they merit an heavenly reward at the hands of God who performe not their whole duty but faile in many particulars both by omission and commission as the very best of us doe § IX To avoid the force of this unavoidable argument Bellarmine seeketh many evaâ—…ions which he would gladly father upon the Fathers of the Church For he saith there be foure egregious expositions given by the Fathers none whereof make against the merit of good workes The first of Saint Ambrose that of our selves and by nature we are unprofitable servants â—…apt and unable to fulfill Gods Commandements which our Saviour would have us humbly to acknowledge though by grace we become profitable and therefore as he saith agnoscenda est gratia sed non ignoranda natura Reply Ambrose doth not speake of our corrupt nature neither is it his meaning that by nature wee are unprofitable servants by grace profitable but that by nature wee are servants and by grace sonnes For by nature corrupted wee are not the servants of God but of sinne and Satan But he understandeth the meaning of our Saviour to be that the children of God who are in the state of grace should not glory in their workes as if by them they did merit any thing of God quia jure Domino debemus obsequium because by right we owe obedience to God Neither should we thinke our selves exempted from continued obedience because we are sonnes for as we are sons by the grace of adoption which we are to acknowledge so by nature and creation whereof we are not to be ignorant we are servants As therefore thou who art a master dost not content thy selfe with one worke of thy servant and then biddest him sit downe and eate but having done one worke thou exactest of him another vers 8. So God doth not require the use of one worke in thee but whiles we live we must alwaies work Secondly our Saviour doth not speake of naturall men as being unprofitable because unapt to fulfill Gods Commandements but directeth his speech to the faithfull and namely to his owne Apostles and Disciples who study and endeavour to keepe all Gods Commandements which without grace cannot be done requiring them to make this humble and true confession that even when they have done all that is commanded they are but unprofitable servants such as are described in the parable who deserve nothing at the hands of their master because in doing all that is commanded they doe but their bounden duty and that excludeth merit For debitum non est meritum Yea but Bellarmine proveth out of 2 Tim. 2. 21. that by grace men become profitable to God For he that purgeth himselfe shall become a vessell profitable unto the Lord. Answ. The Greek is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 fit for the master of the house to use for the benefit of the houshold and fitted for every good worke But that our piety or obedience bringeth no profit to God I have shewed before And this is the very second exposition of this place which though repugnant to this present assertion Bellarmine himselfe doth commend in the second place For so hee saith § X. We are commanded as Bede expoundeth this Text to acknowledge that we bring no profit to God but that what good thing
us then our merits need not or if they need then Christ his merit is not sufficient for us We are therefore in the performance of good workes to have an â—…ye to the eternall reward they being the way wherein we are to walke towards it and the meanes whereby we may gather assurance to our selves that wee shall obtaine it But we are noâ—… to doe good workes to that end that by them we may merit eternall life which is purchased by the alone merit of Christ. CAP. VIII Questions which Bellarmine disputeth against other Papists concerning merits And first concerning the conditions of Merit § I. HItherto Bellarmine hath opposed the true Catholikes whom he calleth heretickes Now because merit as the Papists conceive of it is a fiction which hath no ground either in the Canonicall Scriptures or in the writings of the ancient Fathers it is not to be marvelled if in this question which is de non Ente they be miserably divided among themselves Bellarmine therfore in the Chaptâ—…rs following maintaineth that doctrine which he hath delivered against us as the received doctrine of their Church against the private opinions of some learned men among themselves who in some particulars either agree with us or at least disagree from the common tenes of the Papists And first against Holkot and a Doctor of Lovaine whose private opinions were censured and condemned by Pius the fifth and Guilielmus Alâ—…isiodorensis concerning the conditions required to a meritorious worke Which as Bellarmine saith are seven The first condition is that the worke be good For if it bee bad it meriteth nothing but punishment I suppose hee meaneth materially good as being a thing commanded or good ex genere suo in respect of his kinde as prayer almes c. For to a worke formally good he requireth all the conditions following Secondly that it be done in obedience to God and out of a desire to please him for so much the phrase in obsequium Dei seemeth to import otherwise we cannot expect a reward from him This as it is evident in the duties which immediately we performe unto God so it is true in those which we performe immediately to man and mediately to God whom we are to serve not onely in holines but in righteousnes also Thirdly the good works whereunto reward is promised are the works of men living in this world who are called viatores to whom alone as the commandeâ—…nts are directed so the promises are made For of those who are in heaven the question cannot bee understood seeing they are comprehensores who have already obtayned the reward These three are as he saith agreed upon the other foure are questioned § II. The fourth condition therefore is that it bee liberum free disputed against Robert Holkot This is indeed a proper condition if by liberum be meant indebitum For if it be debitum it is not meritâ—…m Luk. 17. 10. But by liberum Bellarmine understandeth that which is willingly performed meaning no more but that to merit is required free-will without which condition the worke indeed cannot bee so much as morally good for such proceed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from election and muchlesse meritorious But though without this condition a worke cannot merit yet neither it nor all the rest which he nameth are sufficient to make a worke truely meritorious of eternall life Howbeit Bellarmine should have done well to expresse himselfe whether hee speake of liberum à coactione or ab obligatione or necessitate officii and if the former whether he speake of arbitrium liberum or liberatum whether free by nature or freed by grace For if the good worke proceed from Gods grace it cannot merit at Gods hand as I have shewed before And it is the opinion of some Papists as it was of the Pelagians that the virtue of meriting which they conceive to bee in their workes proceedeth from the power of their owne free-will as I have shewed before Neither needed Bellarmine to have heaped up Testimonies of Scriptures and Fathers to prove that free-will is required to good workes unlesse hee dispute of free-will by nature For that all good workes doe proceed from the will free by grace and are voluntarily performed by the faithfull there is no doubt to be made § III. The fifth condition that he who must be thought to merit be in the state of grace and the childe of God by regeneration and adoption which he proveth against the aforesaid Doctor of Lovaine This condition is also necessarily required to every good worke not onely meritorious of heaven for how should he attaine to the inheritance of heaven who is not the sonne and heire of God but also good and acceptable unto God For without faith it is impossible to please God Heb. 11. 6. and without it whatsoever is done is sinne Rom. 14. 23. And it is certaine that untill the person be accepted his actions cannot bee acceptable Neither whiles the treâ—… is bad can the fruit be good Neither can a man doe any thing that is good and acceptable to God who is not in Christ as a branch cannot be fruitfull that is not in the vine Neither is any man in Christ but he that is endued with a true faith whereby he abideth in Christ and Christ in him And this we hold both against the Papists that no works of men not regenerate are good and with the Papists against the Pelagians that they are not meritorious which point good leave hath he had at large to dispute against the Pelagians and so I proceed to the sixth § IV. The sixt condition proved against the said Doctor of Lovaine that to the merit of eternall life is required the free and and gracious promise of God which condition I acknowledge to be required unto every rewardable worke For first seeing God is our absolute Lord to whom wee owe our selves and all that we have or can doe who may exact from us what he pleaseth without any reward we could not expect any remuneration from him unlesse it had pleased him for our encouragement unto well doing to promise a reward unto us But we must remember that his promise is not de debito but de gratuito not of rendring a debt but of giving a free reward for he needed not to make a promise for doing those things which he commandeth which without a promise we are bound to doe and therefore in that he promiseth a reward it is of his free grace and when according to his promise hee giveth the reward it is wholly of his grace and not of our merit Secondly when there is no proportion of equality betweene the worke and the reward but the reward incomparably exceedeth the worke it is evident that such a reward promised to such a worke can no way be due to the worke as merited thereby but is wholly to be ascribed to the bounty of
performed as well as we can because commanded knowing that God will accept of our upright though weake indevour § XXI The sixth and the last who seeth not that these words good workes are mortall sinnes imply a contradiction for they shall be good and not good c. Answ. We doe not affirme that good workes are mortall sinnes neither doe we deny them to be truly good Onely we deny them to bee purely and perfectly good And we acknowledge the impurity and imperfection concurring with them to bee a sinne and consequently that the good workes of the faithfull are good per se as being commanded as being the fruits of the Spirit and of faith working by love but sinfull per accidens as being stained with the flesh yea but saith Bellarmine Bonum non existit nisi ex integra causa malum verò ex quolibet vitio that is that is not to bee accounted a good worke whereunto all things doe not concurre which are requisite but that is evill wherein there is any defect therefore if there be any defect or imperfection to bee found in any worke that worke is not to be accounted good but evill Answ. that rule of Diony sius is true according to the rigour of the Law which they call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from which our Saviour hath delivered us but it is not true according to the covenant of grace wherein the Lord accepteth the sincere and upright indevours of his children though defective and unperfect for perfect performance their wants being not imputed unto them but covered with the robe of Christs perfect righteousnesse As therefore their persons though in themselves sinners are in Christ accepted as righteous so their actions though in themselves defective are acceptable in Christ. Here therefore wee may justly retort both the accusation it selfe and all these absurdities upon the Papists who be necessary consequence are proved to hold that all the workes of the righteous are simply evill and so absolutely to be called sinnes Those works wherein is found any defect or imperfection are not good but absolutely they are to bee called sinnes as the Papists teach But in all even the best works of the righteous there is to be found some defect imperfection or blemish as being stained with the flesh This assumption is plainely taught in the holy Scriptures as I have proved heretofore Therefore all even the best actions of the righteous are absolutely to be called sinnes as the Papists teach Here then let all men againe take notice of the Popish pharisaisme or pharisaicall hypocrisie of Papists with whom no man is just or justified in whom is any sinne no action good but simply evill in which is any defect and yet their persons are just and their actions not onely good but also meritorious and that ex condigno and that ratione operis of eternall life CHAP. V. Our fourth Argument that the righteousnesse by which wee are justified satisfieth the Law so doth Christs righteousnesse so doth not that which is inherent in us § I. NOw I returne to our owne proofes The fourth argument therefore to prove joyntly that we are justified by Christs righteousnesse and not by ours may be this By that righteousnesse alone and by no other we are justified by which the Law is fully satisfied By the righteousnesse of Christ alone the Law is fully satisfied and not by any righteousnesse inherent in us or performed by us Therefore wee are justified by the righteousnesse of Christ alone and not by any righteousnesse inherent in us or performed by us For the proofe of the proposition three things are to be acknowledged first that whosoever is justified is made just by some righteousnesse for as I have shewed heretofore to thinke that a man should be justified without justice is as absurd as to imagine a man to be clothed without apparell secondly that all true righteousnesse is a conformity to the law of God which is the perfect rule of righteousnesse insomuch as what is not conformable to the Law is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is iniquity and sinne thirdly that there can be no justification without the Law be fulfilled either by our selves or by another for us For our Saviour when he came to justifie us and save us protested that hee came not to breake the Law but to fulfill it and professeth that not one jot or tittle of the Law should passe unfulfilled Matth. 5. 17 18. Saint Paul likewise avoucheth that by the doctrine of justification by faith the Law is not made void but established Rom. 3. 31. The proposition therefore is undenyable The assumption hath two parts the former affirmative that by the righteousnesse of Christ the Law is fully satisfied the other negative that by any righteousnesse inherent in us or performed by us the Law neither is nor can be fully satisfied For the clearing of the assumption in both the parts wee are to understand that to the full satisfying of the Law since the fall of Adam two things are required the one in respect of the penalty unto the suffering whereof sinne hath made us debtours the other in respect of the precept to the doing wherof the Law doth bind us The former to free us from hell and damnation the other to entitle us to heaven and salvation according to the sanction of the Law If thou dost not that which is commanded thou art accursed if thoudoest it thou shalt be saved In respect of the former the Law cannot be satisfied in the behalf of him who hath oncetransgressed it but by eternal punishment or that which is equivalent in respect of the latter it is not satisfied but by a totall perfect and perpetuall obedience § II. Now our Saviour Christ hath fully satisfied the Law for all them that truly beleeve in him in both respects For hee hath superabundantly satisfied the penalty of the Law for us by his sufferings and by his death and he hath perfectly fulfilled the Law for us by performing all righteousnesse in obeying his Father in all things even unto death and by them both he hath justified us freeing us from hell by his sufferings and entituling of us unto heaven by his obedience And therefore the holy Ghost affirmeth that wee are justified by his bloud Rom. 5. 9. and by his obedience verse 19. For his sufferings were the sufferings of God in which respect they who put him to death are said to have killed the Author of life Act. 3. 15. and to have crucified the Lord of glory 1 Cor. 2. 8 and for the same cause the bloud by which we are redeemed is called the bloud of God Act. 20. 28. or which is all one the bloud of the Sonne of God 1 Iohn 17. His obedience likewise was the obedience of God For Iesus Christ the word that is the second person in Trinity being in the forme of God God coequall with his Father for our sakes
became flesh that is abased himselfe to become man which before hee was not but not ceasing to bee that which hee was before namely the true and the great God God above all blessed for evermore in our nature being perfect God and perfect man hee farther humbled himselfe and became obedient untill death even to the death of the crosâ—…e And therefore the righteousnesse of Christ both habituall inherent in his person and that which was performed by him both active and passive being the righteousnesse of God as it is often called Rom. cap. 1. 3. 10. the righteousnesse of God and our Saviour 2 Pet. 1. 1. who was given to us of God to be our righteousnesse 1 Cor. 1. 30. that wee beleeving in him might bee the righteousnesse of God in him 2 Cor. 5. 21 is therefore called Iehovah our righteousuesse Ier 23. 6. I say his passive righteousnesse being the righteousnesse of God the bloud of God it is a price of infinite valew and superabundantly sufficient to satisfie for the sinnes not onely of the faithfull but of all the world and not onely of this one world but of more if there were more And this habituall and actuall righteousnesse being the righteousnesse and obedience of God is of infinite and alâ—…-sufficient merit to entitle all those that beleeve in him were they never so many to the kingdome of heaven These things if the Papists should deny It would deny them to be Christians The former part therefore of the assumption is of undoubted truth § III. Come wee then to the other part Is there any righteousnesse inherent in us or performed by us that can fully satisfie the Law Nothing lesse For first in respect of the penalty which is due unto us for our sinnes wee cannot possibly fatisfie it but by enduring everlasting torment which though wee should endure for a million of millions of yeares yet wee could not bee said to have satisfied the Law which cannot be satisfied but by endlesse punishment or that which is equivalent but there is nothing equivalent but the precious death and sufferings of the eternall Son of God who gave himself to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a full price of ransome countervailing in respect of the dignity of his person the eternall pains of hel which all the elect should have suffered Therefore there is no possibility for us to escape hell the just guerdon of our sinnes unlesse the Lord impute our siâ—…s to our Saviour Christ and his sufferings to us accepting them in our behalfe as if we had sustained them in our owne persons For although wee should for the time to come performe a totall and perfect obedience to the Law yet that would not free us from the punishment already deserved by us But the Law must be satisfied both in respect of the penalty to be borne and in respect of perpetuall and perfect obedience to bee performed through out our whole life Neither may we thinke by the payment of one debt to satisfie another The obedience which wee hope to performe for the time to come though it were totall and perfect is a debt and duty which wee owe unto God Luk. 17. 10. and therefore cannot discharge us of the penalty which is another debt which wee owe for our sinnes past for wee were sinners from the wombe yea in the wombe and to the guilt of Adams transgression in whom wee sinned and to that originall corruption which we have received from him for which though wee had no other sinnes wee were worthily subject to eternall damnation wee have added in the former part of our life innumerable personall transgressions all deserving death and damnation which if wee be not delivered therefrom by the death and merits of Christ wee must make account to suffer in our owne persons neither can our future intended obedience satisfie for our sinnes as Bellarmine confesseth God is just in forgiving sinnes neither doth he forgive any sinne for which his justice is not fully satisfied § IV. Neither can our righteousnesâ—…e â—…atisfie the Law in respect of the precept by fulfilling it for whosoever hath not continued in all the things which are written in the booke of the Law to doe them but hath at any time transgressed the Law hee hath not fulfilled it Therefore it is most certaine that we cannot satisfie the Law in respect of the precept because wee have already broken it and by our breach of it have made our selves subject to the curse of the Law so farre are we from being justified by it Neither are wee able by our obedience to satisfie the Law for the time to come § V. Against this branch of our argument which by us is added 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as over measure Bellarmine taketh exception alleaging that the faithfull and regenerate are able to fulfill the Law and entreth into a large dispute to prove that the Law is possible which disputation I have fully examined in his due place and confuted Here let the Reader take notice that Bellarmine disputeth sophistically in diverse respects for first hee will needs be actor when indeed hee is reus and that hee might get the better end of the staffe pretendeth to confute our errours when indeed he laboureth to defend his owne Secondly hee answereth but a piece of our argument and such a piece as might be spared as being added mantisae loco by way of advantage for thus we reason no man can satisfie the Law because hee hath already broken it yea hee is so farre from satisfying the Law in respect of the time past that for the time to come hee is not able to fullfill it Thirdly where hee should prove that all those who are to bee justified doe fulfill the Law for else how should they by fulfilling of the Law be justified all that he endevoureth to prove is that it is possible for them that are already justified to fullfill it disputing as wee say a posse ad esse Fourthly where hee should prove that all who are justified doe fulfill the Law for else how should they be justified by fulfilling it hee endeavoureth to prove that some rare men have fulfilled it not caring what becomes of the rest Fifthly where hee argueth that if men shall fulfill the Law they shall be justified his consequence doth not hold in respect of them who at any time heretofore have broken it as all meere men without exception have done though they should perfectly fulfill the Law for the time to come Sixthly he would prove that some doe fulfill the Law and yet cannot deny but that even those some doe sinne many times yea seven times a day and that they have need daily to pray for the forgivenesse of their sinnes and therefore faileth in the proofe of that also as I have made manifest in answering his arguments § VI. Now to make good this part of our reason