Christ onely who being ordeyned of God the Meane of al his mercie to Mākinde he commeth in as Mediatour betweene God vs in all things decreed of God for vs so as we are to expect nothing of all that is decreed concerning the vessels of honour whether it bee in making of vs sonnes or making vs cōforme to the Image of his Sonne in righteousnes and glorie but only in and through Iesus Christ our Lord in whom alone all the promises of God are yea and amen For he is the first borne among all the sonnes of God and the beginning and first begotten of the dead for it is the Fathers will that in all things hee have the praeeminence Rom. chap. 8. ver 29. Col. chap. 1. ver 18. Thus albeit God in him selfe and of him selfe ordayne vs to great dignitie and manifold vnspeakeable blessings yet this honour doeth he reserve vnto his only begotten sonne that of all these blessings we shall enioye none except in through him onely so that it is true that we are ordayned to nothing without Christ but not in that deceitfull sense whereby the mindes of many are deluded as though he were the cause why GOD doth ordeyne vs to adoption The Scripture teacheth vs farre otherwise distinguishing betwixt the cause why God decreeth vs to adoption and the cause why he ordeyneth vs to this adoption through Christ onely Setting downe the cause of the Decree to be his owne will good pleasure in him selfe And declaring the cause why he ordeyneth vs to be adopted through Christ to be this that Christ might be the first borne among manie brethren and that he might have the praeeminence in all things wherevpon it followeth that albeit he be not the cause why we are ordeyned to adoption yet notwithstanding seeing it is Gods will to performe towards vs his gracious purpose and good pleasure of his wil only in and through Christ that of necessitie we must first enioy him before we can enioy any thing of that that is decreed And therefore it was the Fathers will that in him should all fulnes dwell Coloss chap. 1. vers 19. That out of his fulnes we all should receyve Iohn chapt 1. vers 16. And for this same cause is it said That God hath made him wisedome righteousnes sanctification and redemption and that vnto vs 1. Corinth chapt 1. verse 13. For whatsoever God hath made Iesus Christ the Mediatour he hath made him that for our cause so that the love of God to vs and the good pleasure of his wil towards vs is the cause why Christ is made of God the meane of our salvation And therefore in the consideration of Gods Decree Christ as Mediatour commeth in order after the consideration of that wherevnto we are ordayned although in the executiō and performāce of Gods Decree Christ in vs must goe before all other things ordayned for vs for that is the nature of all Meanes which are subordinate to that whereof they are appointed to be Meanes Thus God first in order purposeth and decreeth what to doe to vs and secondly by what Meanes but when hee performeth his Decree he first prepareth the Meanes and then accomplisheth thereby his purpose and decree towardes vs. For if the Lord had never ordayned vs that are men to bee made his sonnes he had never ordayned his sonne to bee made a Man this is cleere by the Apostles speech wherein he declareth the cause why the sonne of God did take mans nature vpon him Hebr. chap. 2. ver 14. saying For asmuch therefore as the children were partakers of flesh and blood even he likewise tooke part with them And thereafter shewing the cause why not only he tooke our nature◠but also did take it with the same infirmities sinne only except wherewith our nature is indued he vseth these speeches For it became him in all thinges to be made like to his brethren Hebrewes chap. 2. vers 17. according to which grounde it is saide in another place That God sent his Sonne in the flesh in the similitude of sinnefull flesh Roman chap. 8. vers 3. This point is evidently cleare by the same Apostles speech Galath chap. 4. verses 4. and 5. when hee sheweth the ende wherefore God sent his sonne in the flesh saying VVhen the fulnes of tyme was come God sent foorth his owne Sonne made of a woman c. that we might receyve the adoption Letting vs see that in Gods execution hee giveth vs the adoption to the which he ordayned vs by the same Meane thorough the which he ordayned to give it vs. Thus we may see evidently that that parte of Gods Decree touching the Meane of our adoption doeth in order of Decreeing depende vpon the former parte touching the adopting of vs but in order of performing the sending of Christ made of a woman and made vnder the Law and made righteousnes sanctification and redemption c. doth goe before our adoptiō For he was not made the cause of eternall salvation to his owne till he was perfited Hebr. chap. 5. vers 9. For which cause the Apostle sayeth Hebr. chap. 2. vers 10. when hee gives the reason why he was made to taste of death That Christ being to bring many children to glorie it became him for whom are all these things and by whom are all these thinges to perfite or to consecrate the Prince of their salvation through afflictions This shall be yet more cleare if wee consider who it is that is appointed the Meane of our adoption that is not the Father nor yet the holy Ghost but the Sonne only and that because hee onely is that vnto the which wee are ordayned For this grounde we must holde that what so ever wee are made by grace it must firste bee in GOD him selfe and then made ours by our communion and fellowship with GOD. Now this blessing of sonne-shippe which is ordeyned vnto vs is no propertie of the Father nor yet of the Holy Ghost but of the seconde person onely who by that propertie is distinguished both from the Father and from the Holy Ghost and therefore although the Father and the Holy Ghost doe with the Sonne not onely ordeyne vs to adoption but also adopt vs yet they neither ordeyne vs to adoption neyther doe adopt vs through any but the Sonne alone for the Father and the Holy Ghost are not the Sonne neither can be because their personall properties are incommunicable howsoever their naturall properties bee common yea one and the same in all three because the nature of all three is most simply one and the same Of which it commeth to passe that we being adopted thorough Christ and so consequently called to the communion of Christ in that which he is by subsisting that is sonnes wee are also made partakers of the Divine nature as sayeth the Apostle Peter that is we are made like to all three in that which they are by nature for all three have but
the selfe same common nature and essence albeit in subsisting and personalitie none be that that the other is and therefore none of them except the Sonne alone can bee a meete Mediatour betwixt GOD and vs in the worke of our adoption For this office of Mediation is not the office of the Divine nature but of a Divine person that hath the Divine nature For if it were the office of the Divine nature which is common to all three alike and as we have said one and the same in all three surely it should no lesse belong to the Father and to the Holy Ghost then to the Sonne but as saith the Apostle 1. to Timoth chap. 2. ver 5. There is but one Mediatour betwixt God and Man that is the Man Christ Iesus But as every common nature is communicate to others by their personall subsisting flowing from a person of that same nature for no nature hath any existing but by subsisting even so we can not be made pertakers of the Divine nature except first we have our subsisting from one that is of the same nature and from that person of that nature which is that in personalitie and subsisting which we are ordayned to be that is fonnes for we must be pertakers of the Divine nature by subsisting the sonnes of God which cannot be naturally neither in nor thorough our selves therefore it is ordayned to be through Christ by making vs one with him who by nature is the onely Sonne of God that by our fellowship with him through grace in that which he onely is by subsisting or personalitie we only consequently by grace be made pertakers of the Divine nature in our conformitie to the Image of God For as among men nature doth not produce nature but one person by procreation of another person doth communicate the same nature even so in the Godhead the nature produceth not nature else there should be many Deities so many Gods but a person produceth a person and production of a person carieth with it communion of nature even so God doth first make vs his children by adoption in Christ in which respect he is saide in the scriptures to beget vs and we are said to be borne of God which birth bringes with it the participation of the Divine nature Thus we have to distinguish our communion and fellowship with Christ which God by his grace bestowes vpon vs in that personall proprietie of his sonne whereby we are made members of his bodie flesh of his flesh and bone of his bones that is the sonnes of God and brethrē of Christ which is our adoption From that communion which foloweth herevpon standeth in our participation of the Divine nature whereby we are made one with Father Sonne and holy Ghost Thus by Gods mercie in calling vs to the felowship of Christ in his sonne-ship the Father of Christ is made our Father and his spirit our spirit and so consequently the nature of all three communicated vnto vs. And for this first vnion with Christ which standeth in the communion of the dignitie of his sonne-ship all Gods children are said in the scriptures to be one in Christ Galath chap. 3. ver 28. And the whole body mysticall is said to be but one and is called Christ 1. Corinth chap. 12. ver 12. and for that cause the promise of God is said to be made to the seede as to one not to the seedes as to many Galat. chap. 3. ver 16. where we may perceyve the vnspeakeable goodnes and infinite wisedome of God in his Decree Goodnes in ordayning vs to be his sonnes and Wisedome in ordayning him onely to be the meane of our adoption who in him selfe only is that which GOD ordayneth vs to be Of which it is manifest that the Decree of our adoption goeth in order before all not only other benefites in Christ but also before the ordayning of Christ him selfe to be a Mediator For if this office of Mediation did not hang and depend vpon that which we are ordeyned to be surely the Father or the holy Ghost should no lesse have bene Mediators then the sonne Besides these things it is also heereby manifest that the benefite of adoption is the first of all benefites in Christ and foundation of all the rest For which cause it is that Gods Decree is most properly defined from it but of this we shall haue occasion to speake hereafter The vse that we haue to make of this point in the doctrine of iustification is that seeing God ordayneth vs to nothing but through Christ our righteousnes can not consist of any thing that is not in Christ for as we are made all other thing whatsoever we are made in him so also are we made the righteousnes of God in him 2. Corint chap. 5. ver 21. which ground wel marked doth cleare many errors specially those which are about the matter of our righteousnes of which it is a wonder that such controversies should be among learned men when as the Scripture of God speaketh plainely that God hath made Christ righteousnes vnto vs. 1 Corinth chap. 1. vers 30. And that hee is all in all things Coloss chap. 3. vers 11. And that he filleth all in all things Eph. chap. 1. vers 23. Wherevpon it followeth that neither in whole nor in part can possibly our righteousnes consist in any thing that is in our selves nor yet in any other thing without our selves but in Christ only And thus much concerning the second point CHAPTER IX THE third thing needfull to be knowne for the right vnderstanding of the nature of Gods saving benefites is the order in the which they are Decreed and accordinglie dispēsed vnto vs. In which point I know there is great neede of circumspect considerate dealing because albeit in my iudgement the mistaking of this point bee no small occasion of the errors which are mantayned by many of great learning as in other things so speciallie in the point of iustification yet notwithstanding the speaking against an error by the most part received and almost contradicted by none must needes at the first bee distastfull to many except their mindes bee by grace sanctified with a greater love of the truthe then of themselves The maine point which cleareth all standeth in this whether adoption or Iustification be in order first The greater part doe holde that Iustification is first so that first we must bee iustified in Christ before wee be adopted to bee sonnes and therefore they devide reconciliation which they make to comprehend both in Iustification as the first part and adoption as the second But what inconvenience may aryse vpon this opinion and what an open entry it maketh to many errors we shall perceyve by these things that follow Some there bee and those but fewe that holde the contrary opinion and doe rather point at it then expresly treate of it esteeming Adoption to be before Iustification or rather to bee as
For there is a great difference betwixt these workes of the Father to witt the bringing of vs to the Sonne or giving of vs vnto him or making vs to receyve him which are all one and the same thing and the Fathers iustifying of vs in the sonne whom now we have receyved The first is the proper worke of God calling vs The other is the worke of God after our calling Which evidētly appeares by the speech of Christ him selfe Math. cha 11. ver 28. where first he invites vs to come vnto him and then promiseth to such as doe come that he will give them rest vnto their soules for God iustifieth none who have not first receyved the sonne For who cā be made the righteousnes of God in Christ who is not first ingrafted in him Now the first worke of faith standeth in our receyving Christ and making him to dwell in our heartes in and through whom now receyved and possest by faith the Lord doth thereafter iustifie and glorifie vs. so to make a Man to be iust before he be a sonne is as much as to make an accident or qualitie to be before or without a subiect or to make a Man wise before he be a Man and this ground the Apostle cleers by his owne speech when he coūted all but dongue that he might gaine Christ and be found in him to this end that he might not haue his owne righteousnes but the righteousnes which is by the faith of Christ Phil chap. 3. thereby playnelie he sheweth vs that we must first gayne Christ and be found in him by faith before we can haue the righteousnes that is by the faith of Christ so that to receyve Christ and to be iustified in Christ are in no sorte to be confounded although they cannot be separated For this is the principall cause why Iustification and all remanent blessings are attributed vnto faith because by faith onely we are made one with Christ and ioyned vnto him who onely is the substance of all our blessings as being made of God vnto vs wisedome righteousnesse sanctification and redemption 1. Corint ahap 1. vers 30 Vpon which vnion with Christ followeth our cōmunion with him both in death and life For being once in him we can not but be pertakers of all blessings in him And of this worke of the Father it is that the Evangelist speaketh in this place which is the first worke of his gracious dispensatiō when as he maketh vs to beleeve in his onely sonne as is manifest by the Evangelistes owne words interpreting the first phrase that is Those that receyved him by these wordes that is Those that beleeue in his Name The second argument lieth in the third phrase of this description which is Those that are borne of God By which wordes both the two former phrases that is those that receyved him those that beleeved in his Name are interpreted thereby teaching vs that this worke is not the worke of Iustification but of Adoption and of our receiving of Christ himselfe by faith that in vnitie with him we may be the Sonnes of God and not our receiving of his obedience by faith vnto righteousnes For by beeing borne of God we are made the Sonnes of God Which birth especially is performed by the Father when by his Spirit he brings vs vnto the Sōne makes vs to receive him by faith in our hearts so making vs one with him By which Vnitie alone it is that we are made the Sonnes of God For as the Vnitie of Christs humane nature in subsisting and personalitie with his divine nature maketh that Iesus Christ the Man is the Sonne of God so our spirituall Vnitie by faith with Iesus Christ the Sonne of God makes vs also to be the Sonnes of God Thus it is plaine by the third phrase that the former two are not rightly taken when they are expounded of those that are iustified If any man would expound this birth not of our effectuall Adoption it selfe but of the preparation of vs therevnto as some most learned and reverent Divines doe Yet never can it make the former opinion true for our beeing borne of God in the Scripturs can never be showen to be meant of our Iustification And if they take it for our Regeneration or Sanctification to the obedience of God then it will follow that wrongly they make Adoption to be a part of Reconciliation If sanctification which is no part of Reconciliation must goe before For they them selues acknowledge that Reconciliation hath but two parts Iustification and Adoption Besides this distinction of Adoption wil hardlie be warranted by the 9. of the Romanes except men will make the Apostle playnely to contradict himselfe who restrayneth the Adoptiō which he ascribes to the Iewes onely to the seed of Abrahā according to the promise and not according to the flesh Because otherwise the trueth of God in his promise would have failed Which consideration likewise appeareth evidently to destroy that distinction of Adoption albeit first devised by one of the auncient Fathers whereby one Adoption is made Adoption but by figure and resemblance the other in substance and effect But it seemeth that the ground of this opinion in some though not in all is buylded vpon this that they esteeme our Righteousnes to consist in the very act of beleeving which may be more iustly said of our Adoption albeit in a circumspect meaning CHAPTER XVI TOVCHING the benefite it selfe which Christ bestowes vpon those that receyve him although we should grant it to be the same in sense which they expound it to be yet it will never inferre that in this place To receyve Christ and beleeve in his name is to be vnderstood of Iustification but according as some of themselves say of the worke of God in making vs to beleeve Of the which followeth the dignitie and prerogative of being sonnes as the first and immediate fruite of faith in Iesus Christ In which sense we denie not but this place may be commodiously interpreted although it seemeth that the spirite of God doth meane somewhat more For vnderstanding whereof we are first to consider the third point which we have said to be the ground of the mistaking of this place which stands in the not distinguishing betwixt the Fathers worke and the Sonnes in our Adoption although in the same place they bee cleerely distinguished by the Evangelist Which oversight maketh great confusion in knowledge For we are to vnderstand that although the three persons of the Trinitie be neither in subsisting nor working to bee separated yet in both they are still to be distinguished and never to be confounded if ever we thinke to have a cleere and vnconfused sight of these great workes of grace which they performe in vs. Now in this place the worke of the Father and the worke of the Sōne in our Adoption are cleerely and distinctly set down Like as in other parts the worke of the spirit
in the same Adoption is distinguished from both The worke of the Father is our Vnion with Christ when he brings vs vnto him and makes vs to receive him by beleeving in his name And this is our comming to the Sonne Which is the proper worke of the Father For none can come vnto the Sonne except the Father drawe him And this is the principall act of our Adoption which most properly is to be called Adoption and as we have said consisteth chiefly in our calling For seeing most properly it is the worke of the Father to adopt certayne it is that our Adoption most properly must consist in the action of the Father For which cause the Fathers worke in making vs to receyve the Sonne that is to beleeve in his name is in this place expounded by way of similitude in a borrowed speech that is to be borne of God For the begetting and working of faith in our hearts is the chiefe and principall part of our spirituall birth beeing the roote ground of all that followeth The worke of the Sonne is next subioyned which stands in giving to those who have receyved him prerogative or as some do render the word dignitie as others authoritie and as others power to bee the Sonnes of God Of all which significations of the word there is none which doth not fitt this place without giving any advantage vnto the Papists in their forged sense of the word power Which benefite proceeding from the Sonne is alwayes to bee distinguished in our Adoption from our Vnion and communion with him by faith which is the worke of the Father vpon which as the cause dependeth the other as the effect for to those whom the Father doth give to the Sonne to be his brethren and in vnitie with him to be the Sonnes of God the sonne doth give the prerogative the dignitie the authoritie and the power belonging to the sonnes of God And this work consisteth in the sonnes bringing vs to the Father For none can come to the Father but by the Sonne for Christ suffred for vs that he might bring vs to God 1. Pet. chap. 3. vers 18. And this is that which is so often spoken of in scriptures by Christ himselfe that to those whom the Father giveth him to those he giveth eternall life and that he giveth the glorie that the Father hath given him vnto those that beleeve in him For whatsoever prerogative dignitie c. the Father hath given vnto the Sonne the same doth the Sonne impart to vs that are his brethren For the prerogatives and priviledges of sonne-ship appertayne onely to Iesus Christ as the onely sonne of God and therefore it belongeth to him alone to communicate those prerogatives to such as the Father doth first by Adoption make his brethren For the prerogative of a sonne is a dignitie depēding not vpon the essence and nature of our Redeemer but vpon his subsisting and personalitie For as the prerogative of a father is proper to the first person so the prerogative of a sonne is proper to the second person and therefore as we doe holde that to adopt is the prerogative of the first person because he onely is the Father so to communicate the prerogatives belonging to those who are adopted to bee children is the prerogative of the second person because he only is the Sonne And therefore is it said if the Sonne make vs free wee shall bee free indeed Iohn chap. 8. ver 36. for freedome is the prerogative of a Sonne and not of a servant And therefore the whole libertie and freedom bee it from ignorance Sathan sinne or death which the saints enioy in Christ is called by the Apostle the libertie of the Sonnes of God in which libertie is comprehended both our wisdome righteousnes sanctification and redemption Which prerogatives when we doe enioy them then may we bouldly esteeme our selves the Sonnes of God And this is that which it seemes the spirit of God doeth meane when he sayeth that Christ doth give vs the prerogative to be the Sonnes of God that is that he bestowes vpon vs such priviledges and blessings or such authoritie and power over all our spirituall enemies as may make vs not only to glorie in God the Father of Christ as our God and our Father but also to carrie our selves in our whole conversation as becommeth the sonnes of God For we do esteeme that to be adopted or made sonnes and to receyve prerogative to be sonnes are two distinct benefites of the two first persons of the Trinitie For a man may bee a Sonne and yet wante the prerogative dignitie authoritie and power of a Sonne For as saith the Apostle Gallath chap. 4. vers 1. 2. The heyre while hee is a childe differeth nothing from a seruant though he be Lord of all but is vnder Tutors and Governours vntill the time appointed of the Father Which custome of men the Apostle applyeth to the Church of God to let vs know that it is a thing to be considered in the children of God aswell as in the children of men so the oversight standes in the not distinguishing betwixt the being of a sonne simply which comes by procreation and birth and the being of a sonne in prerogative dignitie authoritie and power of a sonne which comes by age and fulnes of time appointed by the Father For every child is a sonne to his Father as soone as he is borne yet longe after he receyveth not the prerogative of a sonne but still is in condition as a servant But when the time appointed for his freedome commeth he who was before a sonne by birth but a servant in condition becōmeth to be a sonne likewise by condition aswell as by birth when as the prerogative or dignitie or authoritie or power to be a sonne in estate is given vnto him And in this sense is this place to be vnderstood if it be rightly taken that is that vnto them who were borne of the Father and so which were sonnes by the Fathers begetting of them Christ the sonne did give prerogative or dignitie or authoritie or power to be sonnes in cōdition and state For as we have said before the benefit of being sonnes simply by begetting or birth or by adoption is the proper worke of the Father but to make vs sonnes in the condition and estate belonging vnto sonnes is the proper worke of the Sonne For we have no boldnes to call the Father our Father nor have wee any accesse vnto him as vnto our Father but through Christ alone Neither have we the libertie of the sonnes of God from sinne either by righteousnes or sanctification nor any part of the glory of the sonnes of God but frō Christ alone in whom doth all fulnes dwell and out of whose fulnes we all receyve and by whom only we come vnto the Father And this distinction of these two works of the Father and of the Sonne shineth cleerly in the wordes of the Evangelist
if it were the whole and Iustification reconciliation c. to be comprehended in it as the parts thereof or to follow vpon it as inseperable accidents and infallible consequences thereof or to bee nothing except the way of Adoption Which opinion seemeth most to agree with the Scriptures The special ground wherby the first of these opinions is maintayned is besides other places of Scripture that saying which is in Iohn chap. 1. vers 12. which is as manie as receiued him to them he gaue prerogative to bee the sonnes of God that is to those that beleeved in his name Vpon which place they who defend the former opinion seeme chieflie to rely as though it did import Iustification necessarilie to goe before Adoption because that Christ giveth prerogative to be the sonnes of God to none except such as first have received him and have beleeved in his name But before I either speake of these opinions or yet of this place of Iohn it shall bee first expedient for the better satisfaction of all mindes to lay some groundes vpon the knowledge whereof the light of this point dependeth much in my iudgement Besides other grounds there be five of greatest consequence and most expedient to be knowne for clearing our iudgement in the knowledge of the order of Adoption and Iustification The first is the order of subsisting in the blessed and eternall Trinitie The second is the distinct consideration of the order of Gods gracious love in the three severall obiects in the which it is to be considered The third is the order of our sense and perception of the blessings of God in our selves The fourth is the difference of extent and largenes of one benefite in respect of another amongst themselves by mutuall reference of one to another The fist and last is the consideration of the covenant of grace which God hath made with man in Christ CHAPTER X. THE first ground is most necessarie to be knowne not only to the end that we may know God in him selfe aright but also that we may know his gracious working towards vs aright Wherein by the speciall consideration of the Trinitie three things are to be marked First That every worke of grace is the worke of all three Secondly That the order of their working is according to the order of their subsisting so that in every worke the Father is first the Sonne second the holy Ghost third in order of working Thirdly That in respect of these two former groundes these workes of grace which according to the maner and order of subsisting are most properly attributed to every person according as their maner of working doth chieflie shine and appeare in every worke are to be ordered according to the order of the persons them selves So that the actions attributed to God the Father are in order first the actions attributed to the sonne in order seconde and the actions attributed to the holy Ghost in order third And this consideration of the order of Gods working is no more to be altered then the nature of God it selfe in whom the vnitie of essence is no more essentiall then the Trinitie of persons These three pointes are cleare in the scriptures of God The first when one and the selfe same worke is sometimes attributed to the Father sometimes to the Sonne and sometimes to the holy Ghost to teach vs that not onely these three persons are but one God in nature but further that what thinges the one doth the other doth also according as Christ sayeth My Father worketh vnto this time and I also worke Iohn chap. 5. ver 17. And againe VVhatsoever things the Father doeth the same things doth the Sonne likewise Ihon chap. 5. vers 19. The second of these pointes is likewise manifest in the scripture when in one and the same worke The Father is made in order of working first the Sonne second and the holy Ghost third according to the saying of Christ The Sonne can doe nothing of him selfe except he see the Father working Iohn chap. 5. ver 19. And againe I doe nothing of my self as I heare I iudge Ioh. cha 5. ver 30. And againe The thinges that I speake I speake them so as the Father said vnto me Iohn chap. 12. ver 53. And againe The Spirit he shall not speake of him selfe but whatsoever he shall heare he shall speake He shall glorifie me for he shall receyve of myne and shew it vnto you Iohn chapt 16. verses 13. and 14. By which speeches it is manifest that as the Father subsisteth in order first and so in order possesseth life before the Sonne and the Sonne before the holy Ghost even so in operation of life and all good grace in vs the Father in order worketh before the Sonne and the Sonne before the Holy Ghost According to which order we are taught in the scriptures to worship God praying and giving thankes to the Father in the Sonne by the holy Ghost according to the order of our accesse vnto God which is vnto the Father through the Sonne by the Spirit Ephe. chap. 2. vers 18. Drawing neare vnto God in our ascending vp to him according to the order of his drawing neare vnto vs. that is we ascende by God in God vnto God who of him selfe and in him selfe and by him selfe worketh all grace in vs. of him selfe as the Father in him selfe as the Sonne and by him selfe as the holy Ghost For no man hath any grace either of him selfe but of God alone and that as he is the Father either in him selfe but in God alone and that as he is the Sonne either by him selfe but by God alone that as he is the Holy Ghost The third point is likewise manifest in scripture When as the worke of creation and of the first beeing and existing of all thinges be it either naturall or spirituall is attributed vnto the first person of whom are all things and the worke of dispensation and redemption is attributed to the seconde person in whom onely we enioye all grace And the worke of consummation and sanctification is attributed to the holy Ghost For according to the distinction that is inward arysing from the inward properties whereby these persons are distinguished there is also a distinction outward in the workes of outwarde dispensation according to the terme in which is the beginning of acting Neither is this only to be considered in the actions of outward dispensation towardes vs but in the actions that are inward in God himselfe according to which ground Christ acknowledgeth that the Father hath given him to have life in himselfe Iohn chap. 6. vers 26. For albeit all operation of blessings in vs proceede from the nature and essence of God as the common beginning and terme in all three yet notwithstāding thy are restrayned in respect of order to one beginning that is to one of those three persons according as in every worke the manner of every persons working either of in
before our Iustification seeing he loveth vs not then as iust men because we are yet sinners and God doth iustifie the vngodly And no other ground can preceede in dispensation except our calling which is nothing els in effect but our Adoption or at least the first part and beginning of it Which is the first fruite of his love toward vs by the which wee are made of the seed and so heyres of the promise of righteousnes conforme to the reason of the Apostle Peter Acts chap. 2. vers 39. Where he sheweth that the promise belongeth to all that the Lord our God shall call Which calling is nothing els but the applying to vs in time of our eternall election in Christ before all time which election is nothing els but our Adoption This point is cleere if we consider who they are whose filthines God promiseth to wash away Esay chap. 4. and to whom he promiseth to open the fountayne for sinne and vncleanes Zach. chap. 13. that is to the Doughters of Ierusalem and to the house of David and inhabitants of Ierusalem Which in effect is as much as to say Those who are the children of God who are citizens with the Saints and of the houshold of God And this is that which we said before that we must first be of the seed before we enioy any part or portion of the promise and so consequently righteousnes For the love of God to his Sonne as his Sonne being the only foūdation of Gods love vnto vs it must follow that the first ground of Gods love to vs in Christ must be buylded vpon our communion with him in that which is the foundation of all Gods love to vs that is the Sonne-ship For it is for this cause that it is saide in scripture that Christ is the sonne of Gods love and his beloved and that God is said to make vs acceptable or beloved to him selfe in that his beloved Sonne Secondly we shall perceyve the trueth heereof more cleerly if we consider the grounds in Christ wherevpon dependeth our Adoption and iustification in him Touching our Adoption it must of necessitie be grounded neither vpon the Divine nature of Christ nor simply vpon his humane nature neither vpon his Obedience and suffering in that humane nature now assumed but onely vpon his personalitie and subsisting whereby he is the Sonne of God For which cause our nature which hee assumed was taken by him in vnitie of subsisting or person with his Divine nature In that personall vnitie of our nature assumed with the sonne of God laying the foundation of our Adoption to bee the sonnes of GOD. As touching our Iustification it is buylded vpon his obedience in giving him selfe to the death of the crosse for vs as it is cleare throughout all the scriptures These groundes being considered we have next to marke in which of these two is our communion by faith with Christ first in order accomplished that is whether first by faith we are made partakers of his sonne-ship in being made one with him as the sonne of God or whether first we be made partakers of his obedience and death In answering of this question I thinke there shall no man be founde who shall not agree that we must by faith have fellowship and communion with him selfe as he is the Sonne of God before we can have communion and fellowship of his sufferings For how can his death be our death vntill first he and we be one seeing all vnitie and communion of his sufferinges floweth from our communion and vnitie with himselfe Wherevpon it may easilie appeare that if that saying of those learned and holy men bee not rightly vnderstoode it may make many to cast from them selves the verie foundation and grounde wherevpon the assured confidence and knowledge of their Iustification in Christ dependeth For no man can ever have hope to have part in his death that firste doeth not finde that he hath parte in him selfe for first we must bee fleshe of his flesh and bone of his bones and he of ours before any thing that ever he hath done in the flesh be made ours Of which it followeth that we must first be sonnes before we be iustified For as in earthly Mariage Man and Woman are made one flesh by coniunction of their bodies in one and therevpon followeth communion of all other things even so in our spiritual Mariage with Christ we have no communion with him in any thing that is his vntill the time that first hee be ours and we be his so as he and we be but one And this agreeth with the saying of the Apostle Gallath chapter 3. vers 29. where hee sayeth And if yee bee Christs then are yee Abrahams seed and heyers according to the promise Where the Apostle sheweth that our beeing Christs maketh vs the seed that is the childeren of God And that our beeing the seede maketh vs heyres of the promise And so consequently of the righteousnes that is by faith This same is evident by the Apostles speech Ephez chapter 5. Where hee exhorteth men to love their Wives as Christ loved his Church Which love is declared in these effects that hee did give himselfe for her to this end that he might sanctifie her purifying her by the washing of water that he might make her to himselfe glorious not having spot or wrincle c. By which place it is manifest that the death of Christ and fruites thereof are the effects of his love to those that are nowe alreadie his spouse and ioyned with him in that spiritual Vnitie which is by faith And this we must acknowledge except we will consent to that vile opinion which overthroweth the foundation of all religion which is that even in the intention and purpose of God Christ dyed equally and indifferently for every man alike That is that he did give himselfe to death as well for those that perish as for the elect of God Whereas this place of the Apostle sheweth the direct contrarie that he gave himselfe only for his Church Which is cleere by the Apostles argument wherevpon he vrgeth the like love in husbands towards their wives as was in Christ towards his Church For the analogie of love is builded vpon the analogie of Vnion The force whereof is this if Christ so loved his Church because those of his Church are members of his body of his flesh and of his bones so likewise ought men to love their wives because they are one flesh and one body with their husbands For as the Apostle requireth of husbands towards their wives more then that common love which they owe to all women and that because they are one flesh with their wives but not with any other women even so he vrgeth it from a like example in Christ who beside and above that common love which he carrieth to all flesh did in greater measure declare his love to those that were members of his body flesh of his
For as by one mans disobedience many were made sinners so also by the obedience of one man many shall be made righteous and this general is embraced of all who acknowledge Christ to be our righteousnes but yet in a threefolde different sense The first is of those who by the obedience of Christ vnderstande the whole worke of his humiliation in the which they lay three groundes wherein they place the matter of our righteousnes The first is the worke of Christ in taking vpon him our Nature without sinne The second is his active obedience in fulfilling the Lawe of God during the whole course of his life The third is his passive obedience in submitting him selfe to the death and that of the crosse In the first of these actions they place our iustification from originall sinne and the inborne corruption of our nature In the second they place our Iustification from all our actuall sinnes both of commission and of omission In the third they place our Iustification and absolution from the punishment due to our sinnes The second sense wherein the obedience of Christ is taken is when thereby his active and passive obediēce are only meant without respect of the integritie of his nature and this twofold obedience they esteeme to be necessarie in our iustification against the two evills wherevnto wee are subiect through the fall of Adam The first is the evill of sinne From the which they esteeme vs to bee iustified by the imputation of Christes active obedience in fulfilling the Law The second is the evill of punishment From the which they esteeme vs to be iustified by the imputation of Christes passive obedience in his death and sufferings The third sense wherein the obedience of Christ is taken in our iustification is when thereby the passive obediēce of Christ only in his death is vnderstood by the imputation whereof only as that wherein Christ only is made our righteousnes wee are iustified from all sinne and punishment thereof These three opinions agreeing all in the mayne pointe that is that onely Christ in his obedience is our righteousnes may well without any contention strife or scisme bee tollerated in the Church of God if Christian modestie humblenes of mind meeknes did in that measure possesse al that they could support one another in love and studie more to keepe the vnitie of the spirit in the baunde of peace then by controversies of disputations to engender strife Especially seeing none of these opinions overthrowe the foundation or yet contayneth in them any impietie or leadeth any man from the marke or matter of his righteousnes seeing all three exclude all things except onely Christes obedience from our righteousnes Moreover if wee shall consider two thinges distinctlie we shall easilie perceyve that these three opinions may easily be reconciled and made all to agree in one and that none of them is contrarie to the trueth of God The two things which are distinctly to bee considered are these The first is that wherein standeth the righteousnes it selfe which is imputed vnto vs. The second is of these thinges which are requisite in Christ to the end that in the other he may be righteousnes vnto vs. For these two thinges are not to bee confounded that is that wherein Christ is made righteousnes and that whereby he is made meete to be our righteousnes in that wherein hee is made righteousnes vnto vs. Like as the bloud of the Lambe shadowing Christes bloud is to bee distinguished from these thinges in the Lambe which made the Lambes bloud to serve for a propitiation for sinne For the properties of the beast which was to bee sacrifised for sinne are to bee distinguished from the bloud of the beast which onely was carried in to the most holy place to make expiation of sinnes before the Lord. This ground being considered wee shall easilie perceyve that although Christ bee made righteousnes vnto vs in one particular thinge yet before in that thinge hee can bee our righteousnes all his perfections both in nature and action is required For cleering hereof yet more we have to consider that the matter of our righteousnes in it self is not to be confunded with the action of God in iustifying vs thereby vnto the which many things are required that are no parte nor portion of the righteousnes it selfe so that if wee speake of the action of our iustification all what soever is conteyned in all these three opinions and more also in Christ is required thereto but if we speake of the matter of the righteousnes it selfe whereby wee are iustified wee are to consider of them otherwise Therefore it shall bee needfull that wee consider these two points severally that is first what it is wherein particularly Christ is righteousnes vnto vs. Secondly What thinges they are that are required in him to the ende that in the other hee may bee righteousnes vnto vs. Touching the first The question or doubt seemeth chieflie to arise vpon the worde Obedience which in deede is oftentymes in the Scripture referred to the whole worke of Christs humiliation even from his conception to his resurrection So that all whatsoever hee did in the world is accompted obedience vnto the Father Thus his very Incarnation and takinge vppon him our nature and taking of it in the similitude of sinfull flesh his becomming vnder the Lawe his taking our sinnes and transgressions vpon him his becomming a curse for vs his becomming our high Priest his offering of him selfe vnto the Father his doctrine his actions his sufferings and resurrection are all to be accompted obedience For it was the Father that sent him into the worlde and he came into the world not to doe his owne will but the will of the Father that sent him therefore he witnesseth him selfe that hee spake nothing but according to the commandement which his Father had given him Iohn chap. 12. vers 49. the same hee witnesseth of his actions Ioh chep 14. vers 31. as also of his death and resurrection Iohn chap. 10. ver 18. and yet there is no man that will say that all the particulars of Christes sayings and doinges are parte and portion of the matter of our righteousnes albeit every one of them be a parte of his obedience Therefore we must needes take the name of Christes obedience in a more strict sense when we vnderstand by it the matter of our righteousnes and this stricter sense we are not to gather out of our owne conceyts and fantasies but out of the expresse word of God The word every where when it speakes of our righteousnes not vnder the generall worde of Christes obedience but particularly by those workes of his obedience wherein our righteousnes consisteth doeth onely mention his sufferinge death or laying downe of his life or his bloud or his oblation or offering of him selfe or his being made sinne or his bearinge the chastisement of our peace and such like phrases Which all signifie one