Selected quad for the lemma: nature_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
nature_n divine_a humane_a unite_v 7,632 5 9.5167 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A19748 A confession of Christian religion; Protestation against popery by way of a confession of Christian religion collected for the benefit of private friends I. D., fl. 1607.; Dunster, John, attributed name. 1609 (1609) STC 6172A; ESTC S114690 21,349 54

There is 1 snippet containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

view of his own glory discontinued his wonted obedience to his Soueraigne nor only so but hauing all that he could aske or thought he should receiue from God Qui mandu canerunt vt essent quasi Dio perdiderunt quod erant facto homines immorrales August betooke himselfe to the Diuell to serue him vpon credit only of better pay Eritis sicut Dij thinking by violence to breake into heauen and to exalt his Throne by the Throne of the Almighty But foolish man by this his Apostasie and wilfull disobedience forfeited his former more blessed estate and was stript of his Masters liuery and all his excellent graces dispossessed of Paradice and sent vnto the Divell to pay him his wages for his former seruice and all his posterity by the guilt of his transgression haue their nature defiled and are abandoned of God and entitled to the Divel for his children and ofspring a wicked seede witches children and sonnes of Beliall And now ô yee sonnes of men saith God by his Prophet Micheas c. 6. v. 5. Remember what Balak king of Moab had deuised and what Balarn the Sonne of Beor answered him that you may knowe the righteousnes of the Lord for so I hope I may apply this prophesie O yee sonnes of men now at this time during our bondage vnder the divel remember what the Prince of darknes had devised against vs and how Iesus Christ the sonne of the living God hath answered him and stopt his mouth with a voice of blood and nailed his accusation to a Crosse that yee may knowe the righteousnes nor that only but the exceeding loue and rich mercy of the Lorde to mankinde for there being no way to free vs out of the power of the Devill but by satisfying the iustice of God for the former transgression God the Father in the fulnesse of time sent his beloued Son made of a woman and clothed in our flesh by the shedding of his precious bloud to redeeme out of the power of the Devill all those that by faith apply the merite of his passion vnto themselues and doe afterwarde shew their thankfulnes vnto God for so great Redemption I beleeue then that Jesus Christ the only Sonne of God coessential to the Father and the holy Ghost was incarnate of the substance of the ever-blessed Virgin Mary by the operation of the holy Spirit that as Sampson married a wife in Timnah of the daughters of the Philistins that hee might seeke an occasion against the Philistins for at that time the Philistins reigned ouer Israel Iud. 14.4 So he by espousing our flesh and by being become the seede of the woman of Abraham of Dauid and our brother might condemne Sinne in the flesh and by his power shrowded vnder this vaile ouerthrow and dispoile the strong mā of his possession then was fulfilled that of St. Augustine Christus pectatumest nos Iustitia Christ is made sinne and wee the righteousnesse of God in him So that in the person of Christ I confesse 2. natures the one Diuine the other Humane by the Diuine nature I doe not vnderstand the Divine nature simply and absolutly as it is commō to all the three persons in the Trinity for wee may not say that the whole Trinity was incarnate but I vnderstand these words Diuine nature Relatiuely of the Nature only of the Sonne of God who is the second Person in the Trinity as also by Humane Nature I do not meane ths Generall or speciall nature of man but the nature considered in the Iudiuiduum only to wit that substance of the humane nature which in the wombe of the Virgin Mary the Sonne of God did assume into the vnity of his person And these 2. Natures I confesse to bee vnited in one person 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 truely and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 perfectly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 indiuisibly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 distinctly in which 4. words 4. principall heresies touching the person of our Sauiour of the Arians Apolinarians Nestorians Euticheans were confuted in 4. seuerall councells Nice Constantinople Ephesus Calcedon Yet in this doctrine we must heedfully beware of 2. extreames The first that we do not thinke that the Deity assuming is changed into the Humanity assumed assumpsit quod non erat non amisit quod erat saith S. Augustine nor the manhoode assumed into the Deitie assuming but each remaineth entire in his essentiall properties yet without division of the person Salvâ proprietate vtriusque naturae suscepta est à maiestate humilitas à virtute infirmitas ab aeternitate mortalitas Leo ep ad Flau The second that yet notwithstanding we holde for good all such propositions where that is attributed vnto the subiect in concreto which is to be vnderstood 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as S. Cyrill speakes in the same subiect especially if the Attribute be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and an effect of the office of Mediatorship As God redeemed the world by his blood the God of glory was crucified and we condemne for Blasphemous that saying of Nestorius Noli gloriari Iudee non enim Deum crucifixisti sed hominē as denying the two natures in 1. Hypostasis and implying that the mā Iesus was assumed into the society only of the Divinity and that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as one speaketh of the same Heresie To deliver al this more plainly Christ Iesus the second person in the Trinitie assumed our whole nature both body and soule Totus totum assumpsit me vt toti mihi salutem gratificaret quod enim inassumptibile est incurabile est Pet. Lomb. lib. 3. dist 2. into the vnitie of his person and therein performed the whole worke of our Redemption Non Mediator homo praeter Deitatem non Mediator Deus praeter humanitatem sed inter divinitatem solam humanitatem solam mediatrix est humana divinitas diuina humanitas Aug. Which worke of redemption consisteth of two partes 1. Satisfaction for sin both in culpâ poenâ 2. Intercession The one performed by him in the state of Humiliation by his 1. Incarnation 2. Passion Externall Internall 3. Crucifying 4. Death 5. Buriall 6. Descent into hell The other in his estate of Exaltation glory I beleeue that God I doe not say approued or suggested or furthered but permitted directed and J may truely say willed and ordeined the fal of Adā that thereby he might take occasiō to manifest his glory that in two respects 1 In erecting a consistorie and tribunall for his iustice 2 In exposing to the view of all mē the inexhaustible treasure of his rich mercy or that I may speake in the words of a Prophet In opening of a fountaine of mercy to the house of Dauid to the Inhabitants of Ierusalem to all the Israel of God for sinne and for vncleannesse Concerning the first I confesse that there cā no other reason be assigned of the reiection of the wicked but that