manner and the matter wherein the true vnion of these natures chiefly consisteth it will easily appeare if we doe but obserue that all this may and doth agree with all the Saints and faithfull seruants of God for First God dwelleth in his Saints as in his Temples for We are the Temples of the Holy Ghost 1 Cor. 3.16 1 Cor. 6.19 and the Spirit of God dwelleth in vs saith the Apostle Secondly The Saints are one with God by will and affection 1 Cor. 6.17 Math. 6.10 for the Apostle sheweth vs plainely that he which is ioyned vnto the Lord is one spirit and wisheth rather that Gods will may be done then his owne as they doe daily in their prayers Thy will be done Thirdly That the Saints are Gods Instruments as be many times the wicked also whereby God worketh many excellent things the same Apostle sheweth where he saith That although there be diuersities of operations 1 Cor. 12.6 Rom. 15.19 yet it is the same God which worketh all in all Fourthly That the Saints are called The Sonnes of God and some of them also said to be Gods 1 Iohn 3.1 by the participation of many graces and titles which God hath giuen vnto them it is most plaine Psal 82.6 for I said you are Gods and the Children of the most High And so the Apostle sheweth Gal. 4.6.7 Gal. 4.6.7 and so in many other places And therefore seeing all the faithfull seruants of God may be truly said to be vnited vnto God in respect of the cohabitation of God in them and of their will and affection agreeable to the will of God and of the working of God in them and the bestowing of his names titles dignities and graces vpon them and that the vnion of this Word with our Flesh i. e. of the Diuine Nature with the humanity is farre otherwise then the vnion of the Saints with God it must needes follow that although it be true that there is a most perfect vnity of cohabitation affection operation and participation betwixt the two Natures of Christ yet this is not all but the vnion of them consisteth in a farre more excellent respect then any and all of these And therefore Secondly Brentius Smidelinus What the Lutherans teach concerning the vnion of the two natures of Christ and the rest of their Lutheran followers doe affirme this vnion of both these Natures to consist in the communication of the properties of the Deity to the humanity of Christ so as they are really transferred and the humanity inuested with the diuine properties And therefore they doe conclude that in respect of this reall communicating and transferring of attributes the manhood of Christ is omniscient omnipotent omnipresent and so forth But how grâ—sse this error is and how derogatory to the truth of Christian Doctrine it will easily appeare if we doe but consider those intollerable absurdities that of necessity must needes follow the same for First The absurdities that must needes follow the Lutheran Doctrine The Father and the Sonne should be hypostatically vnited one to the other and so be made one person for that it is most certaine as themselues must and doe confesse that the Father hath and doth communicate all his essentiall attributes and properties vnto the Sonne and therefore if the vnion of these two Natures consisteth in the communicating of properties the Father and the Sonne must be vnited into one person but this is most horribly absurd Therefore the other Secondly The whole Trinity should be incarnate because all the essentiall attributes of the Deity are common to the whole Trinity and to each person of the Trinity Thirdly The two natures of Christ could not be hypostatically vnited because there are certaine diuine properties which cannot be said to be communicated to the humanity of Christ as to be increated to be infinite to want beginning of time to be Ens independens an independant being and certaine things which Christ in respect of his Flesh had not before his passion and resurrection as to bee impassible immortall and such like Fourthly If this vnion consisted in the communicating of the properties then this transfusion of them must be reciprocall that is as the diuine properties are transfused into the humanity so the humane properties must bee likewise transfused into the Deity And then it must needes follow that as Omnipresency Omnisciency Vbiquity and such like are transfused into the humanity so passibility mortality and such like should be really transfused into the Deity but it were most absurd to say that the God-head is capable of humane fraileties And therefore it is as absurd to say that the Manhood was inuested with diuine Excellencies as they are Diuine And Fiftly If this were true then the humanity should be no humanity at all because freed from humane fraileties and inuested with diuine properties And therefore to expresse truly wherein this vnion consisteth Wherein the vnion of the two natures truly consisteth is shewed Thirdly We say that the vnion of these two Natures consisteth in the communicating of the subsistence of the Word with the humane nature that it assumed i. e. of the very being of the Word with the being of our Flesh so that it is an hypostaticall or personall vnion that is such an vnion as that both natures doe make but one person of Christ euen as the soule and body doe make but one person of man Jn Ep. Alex. Concilij anathem 2. for so saith the Councell of Calcedon the Councell of Lateran the Councell of Toledo Saint Cyril and all the Oxthodoxe Fathers that writ thereof Si quis non confitetur carni secundum subsistentiam vnitum Dei patris verbum anathema sit Whosoeuer confesseth not the eternall Word of the Father to be vnited vnto our flesh according to his subsistence let him be accursed And further wee say that the vnion of these two natures i. e. the God-head as it is limited to the second person of the Trinitie and the Manhood of Christ is 1. Inconuertible 2. Indiuisible 3. Inconfused 4. Inseperable Sixe speciall things obseruable in the vnion of the two natures of Christ 5. Substantiall 6. Ineffable First Inconuertible because neither the Diuine Nature is turned into the humanity nor the humanity into the Deity Secondly Indiuisible because the Natures are so vnited into one person that they can neuer be separated vnlesse we diuide the person of Christ which is most hereticall Thirdly Inconfused because the Natures remaine still intire without confounding either their Essence or their properties or their willes or any other operations whatsoeuer and therefore excepting onely his subsistence which is one that we make him not two persons with Nestorius we do affirme that in Christ there are two natures two willes two naturall proprieties and operations intire and vnmixed that we may not confound them with Eutyches for sith the natures are neither confused How the properties
of each nature doe remaine intire and inconfused to each nature nor transfused each into other the properties also must needes remaine intire to either Nature without that supposed transfusion of them each to other for that rule can neuer bee disproued Confundens proprietates essentiales confundit naturas Confound the naturall or essentiall properties of any things and you take away the nature of the things And therefore in that one and selfe-same subsistence of Christ there must needes be a diuine and a humane nature a diuine and a humane wisedome a diuine and a humane will and so of all other properties of each nature they must be as well inconfused as indiuisible And this Christ himselfe briefly sheweth where hee saith I lay downe my life and I take it vp againe John 10.17 for though the actions of each nature are inseparably ioyned together in respect of the person that is though the same person is said to doe the actions of each Nature yet are the actions neuer confounded but doe still remaine distinct and proper to each nature as to lay downe his life is the proper worke of the humanity and to take it vp againe is the proper worke of the Deity And this Damascene doth explaine by the example of a fiery Sword wherein both the natures of the fire and of the Sword and so likewise the actions and proprieties of each of them are preserued intire to each nature Damasc de fide orthodoxa l. 3. c. 15. Nam ferrum habet virtutem incidendi ignis vrendi For the Iron retaineth still and retaineth onely the power of cutting and the fire of burning Euen so it is in the person of Christ the Diuinity doth still retaine the propriety of working diuine operations and the humanity still retaineth the propriety of working all humane operations And Theodoret vseth the same similie though not in the like words Theodor. Dialog 2. f. 166. An example shewing how the two natures though vnited doe remaine inconfused yet to the very same effect saying Si ignis cum ferro comixtio quae ferrum ita ostendit vt etiam ea faciat quae sunt ignis eius naturam non mutat ita nec Dei cum corpore est mutatio corporis c. If the commixtion of the fire with the Iron doth make the Iron not onely to appeare like fire but also to doe the same things as to dry to heate and to burne which the fire doth and yet this fire changeth not the nature of the Iron Euen so the vnion of the Word with our Flesh doth not change the nature of our flesh but as a man hath his soule and body both vnited and inconfused Ita multo magis Christus habens diuinitatem cum corpore habet vtraque permanentia non confusa So much more Christ hauing his diuinity vnited with our flesh hath them both remaining intire and inconfused Fourthly Inseparable because the Natures are so inseparably vnited as that the humane nature which the Word assumed can neuer be separated from the same And therefore when Christ died Subtraxit visionem sed non soluit vnionem The soule parted from the body but the Deity was separated from neither as Leo saith For in respect of this vnion of the Deity with either part of Christs humanity Psal 16.11 When Christ died and body and soule were parted the Godhead parted from neither of them the Man Christ saith vnto the God-head Thou wilt not leaue my soule in Hell nor suffer thine holy one i. e. my body in the graue to see corruption but as a Tree cut in twaine the Sunne cannot be cutte but that it may still shine on either part so the body and soule of Christ being parted the Deity was still vnited vnto them both and could neuer be separated from the manhood after he had once assumed the same into the vnity of his person That there are three speciall kindes of vnion Fiftly Substantiall for as Bellarmine well obserueth diuers things may be vnited three manner of wayes First Essentially as when of many things is made one essence after which manner the matter and forme the kinde and difference are ioyned and vnited together And thus the vnion of these Natures in the words incarnation is not made first because that if it were so then there should be in Christ but one nature and that should be neither diuine nor humane but a certaine third kinde of nature out of them both And secondly because that this essentiall vnion is neuer made but of imperfect natures or if they be perfect then is it by a certaine corruption or conuersion of them but the natures of Christ are perfect and intire and therefore not essentially vnited Secondly Accidentally as when accidents are adioyned to the subiect or when a substance is ioyned to a substance but of that coupling ariseth nothing else but an accidentall forme as when of Timber and Stones we doe compose and frame a House and thus also the hypostaticall vnion of Christs two natures is not made because God is no accident nor the subiect of any accidents Thirdly Substantially as when a substance That the vnion of Christ his natures is substantiall which otherwise existeth of it selfe is drawne to the being of another suppositum i. e. of another of it selfe existing substance and dependeth on the same as a part thereof And thus is the vnion of the Word with our Flesh for wee say that the Word is substantially made Flesh i. e. a true and a perfect man whose being is no accident but a substance Sixtly It is ineffable so absolutely perfect That the manner of the vniting of the two natures is ineffable and so exceedingly mysticall that it can neuer be perfectly declared by any man for though the Fathers sought by many examples and similitudes to expresse and to illustrate the same as by the vnion of the body and soule of a branch ingraffed into a Tree of a fierie Iron and such like yet all come too short for the full expressing of this inexplicable mystery And therefore Saint Bernard compareth this ineffable mystery of the vniting of these two natures vnto that incomprehensible mystery of the Trinity and so indeede that of the Trinity is greatest and this of the incarnation is like vnto it farre exceeding mans capacity for his wayes are in the Seas his pathes in the great waters Psal 76.19 and his footesteps are not knowne And so you see how that these two natures doe make but one person of our Sauiour Christ and how they are really though ineffably vnited in that one and selfe-same subsistence of Christ CHAP. IIII. Of some of the chiefest effects and benefits of this vnion of these two Natures of Christ The effects and benefits of the vnion are of two sorts THirdly For the effects and benefits of this hypostaticall vnion of these two Natures we must vnderstand that they are
especially of two sorts 1. Some in respect of Christ 2. Others in respect of Christians First Those in respect of Christ are likewise three-fold 1. The benefit of the vnion of the two natures in respect of Christ is three-fold Esay 53.12 1 Pet. 2.22 1. An exemption of all sinne and corruption from Christ 2. The collation of ineffable graces into the humanity of Christ 3. The communication of the properties of each Nature to the person of Christ First We finde that although Christ appeared like a sinfull man and was numbred among the wicked yet in very deede he did no sinne neither was any guile found in his mouth for though In carnis assumptione condescendit mihi in culpae tamen vitatione consului◠sibi 1. To free the manhood from all sinne He assumed the true nature of man yet by reason of his pure conception and of this hypostaticall vnion hee was conceiued and liued without sinne and so as Leo saith Qui non alienus ab hominum genere alienus fuit à crimine He tooke vpon him the seede of man but not the sinne of man he vnited himselfe to our nature but he shunned all the iniquity of our nature Secondly The graces callated vnto the humanity of Christ by reason of this vnion of the two natures are very many especially these sixe 2. To inrich the manhood with these and the like speciall graces First His subsistence and that in the second person of the Trinity whereof it selfe as of it selfe is destitute Secondly An extraordinary dignity in that it is a peculiar Temple for the Deity of Christ to dwell in and the place where the Godhead shewes it selfe more manifestly and more gloriously then in any other Creature whatsoeuer for though God sheweth himselfe by his prouidence to be in all his Creatures and by his grace to be after a more speciall manner in his Saints yet is he onely most gloriously eternally inhabiting according to the fulnesse of his Deity by an hypostaticall vnion in the humanity of Christ for In him dwelleth the fulnesse of the Godhead bodily Collos 2.9 And as now in this life No man commeth vnto God but by Christ so hereafter in the next life No man can see God but in the face of Iesus Christ Thirdly A more neere familiarity with the Godhead then any other Creature whether Men or Angels either had or haue or can haue for that to all other Creatures he is adioyned onely by the presence of his grace or glory but to the humanity of Christ he hath personally vnited himselfe for euer So that as he said My Father and I are one that is one essence he may as truly say the Manhood and I are one that is one onely person for euer Fourthly An extraordinary measure without measure of habituall graces wisedome vnderstanding holinesse and the like such as dwels not in that measure in any other Creature whatsoeuer no not in the very chiefest Angels of God for to all them were giuen grace by measure but to the humanity of Christ Ephes 4 7. was giuen grace without measure Iohn 3.34 saith the Baptist euen so much as a Creature is any wayes capable of Fiftly A partner agent with the Godhead according to its measure in the workes of redemption mediation and such like Sixtly To be adored and worshipped with diuine honour not as it is considered in it selfe without respect vnto the Deity but as it is vnited with the Godhead Neque tamen creaturam adoramus Athanas Orat. 5. contra Arrianos Wee worship not the flesh alone considered but wee adore the person of Christ which consisteth of the Word and our Flesh absit sed dominum rerum creatarum incarnatum verbum deum adoramus And yet we adore no Creature God forbid but we worship and adore the Lord of all Creatures the incarnate Word God Iesus Christ saith Athanasius Nam veluti si quis nostrum c. For as if any one of vs should finde a purple roabe or a Kingly Diademe lying vpon the ground would he worship the same trow you but when the King is clothed and decked with the same he is guilty of death that despiseth and refuseth to worship and honour them together with the King that weareth them euen so in our Sauiour Christ wee doe not adore the sole and bare humanity Aug. de verbis Domini sec Joh. Ser. 58. but being vnited vnto the Deity whosoeuer shall despise to adore with diuine worship that onely Sonne of God true God and true man hee shall vndoubtedly suffer the paines of eternall death saith Saint Augustine 3. To haue the properties of each nature to bee indifferently predicated of the whole person of Christ Thirdly For the communicating of the properties we are to consider it First In respect of those properties which are common to both natures ioyntly considered Secondly In respect of those properties which are peculiar to either nature seuerally considered First The Office of a Mediator is ascribed to Christ in respect of both natures Quia totus Christus secundum diuinitatem humanitatem est Mediator Intercessor because whole Christ according to his Deity and humanity is our Mediator and Intercessor saith Saint Augustine Secondly The peculiar properties of either nature are said to be communicated when they are predicated or spoken of the whole person of Christ in the concrete and largest extent and this communicating of properties is nothing else but a forme of speech whereby those things are spoken of the whole person of Christ which indeede are proper to either one nature and not to the other for oftentimes it comes to passe that by reason of the personall vnion of these two natures each one of them doth interchangeably take the concrete names each of other in predication Acts 20.28 as when it is said That God purchased the Church with his owne bloud not that the Godhead shed bloud but because that person which was a God did shed bloud to procure redemption not which it had as God but which it had in respect of the Manhood vnited vnto it So the Sonne of man talking with Nicodemus Iohn 3.13 is said To be in Heauen not that hee was in Heauen as he was man while he was on earth but because that person which was the Sonne of man was by something that was in his person that is his Deity in Heauen So Saint Paul in the first Chapter to the Romans Rom. 1.4 Verse 3.4 doth giue vs a perfect patterne how to interpret all such alternate predications for there hee saith That the Sonne of God was made of the seede of Dauid but how not according to his diuine Sonneship or Deity which hee had from all eternity but in respect of his humane nature which was personally vnited vnto the Sonne of God And therefore though it be most vsuall in the Scripture to heare things properly appertaining to the
goodnesse teaching vs 1. To be afraid to sinne 2. Neuer to desp of Gods goodn 3. To imitate God in each one of the seauen forenamed points 3. By his iustice and that 1. Negatiuely not making the wicked innocent 2. Positiuely by visiting of the sins of the wicked 1. Vpon themselues 2. Vpon their children where is distinguished of 1. Parents 2. Sinnes 3. Children 4. Punishments This Treatise containeth 1. An Introduction of the excellency of the knowledge of Iesus C. wher is shewed that 1. his life is our chiefest direct 2. himselfe our onely consolatiō 2. An explication of that great mystery of the Incarnation of the Word where is handled 1. Who was made 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 where is shewed 1. That there can be but one God and yet that there are three persons in the vnity of that one essence how these three persons are distinguished 1. By their personal actions 1. outward which are 1. Communic 2. Transcient 3. Voluntary 2. Inward which are 1. Permanent 2. Necessary 3. Incommunicable 2. By their nominall relation Father Son and Holy Ghost And that the person made is the second person of the blessed Trinitie To his father 1. Co-eternall 2. Co-essentiall 3. Co-equall And this is fully proued all obict plainely answered and from thence shewed 1. The greatnesse of Gods loue 2. The craftinesse of Satan 3. The peruersnes of hereticks 4. The vnthankfulnes of men 2. Three especiall things touching the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 viz. 1. What 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth i. e. the Word 2. Why Christ is tearmed the Word 3. Why the Euangelist vseth this word 1. Because this name of Christ was best knowne to the Iewes and to the Gentiles 2. Because it was the fit st word that he could vse to make way for his subsequent discourse 3. The impulsiue and the finall causes of the Words incarnation and the reasons why the Word rather then the Father or the holy Ghost was to be incarnate 2. What he was made flesh where is shewed 1. The manner of his conception the reasons and the end thereof 2. The matter that hee assumed 1. All our humane nature i. e. body and soule 2. All our humane frailties both of body and soule sinne onely excepted And here is shewed many excellent lessons that we ought to learne in respect 1. Of God 2. Of Christ 3. Of our selues 3. How the Word was made flesh or how the two natures diuine and humane doe make but one person in Christ where is shewed 1. The distinction of the two natures diuine and humane that they doe still remaine intire and inconfused is fully proued and the chiefest obiections made to the contrary are plainly answered 2. The vnion of the two natures in one personis explained and 1. The confirmatiō of the truth of this point is shewed and the greatest obie made against it are sufficiently answered 2. The manner of this vnion wherein it consisteth is expressed viz. 1. Not as the Arrians say onely in respect of 1. Cohabitation 2. Will and affection 3. Co-operation 4. Participation of his names and dignities vnto the manhood 2. But in the communicating of the subsistence of the Word with the subsistence of the manhood where is shewed that this vnion is 1. Inconuertible 2. Indiuisible 3. Inconfused 4. Inseperable 5. Substantiall 6. Ineffable 3. The chiefest benefits effects of the said vnion is shewed and that 1. In respect of Christ which are 1. An exēpt from all sin 2. A collation of ineffable graces into the manhood of Christ 3. A communication of the properties of each nature to the person of Ch. Where the obiection of the vbiquit indeuouring to proue the manhood inuested with Diuine properties are fully answered 2. In resp of vs viz our vnion and reconciliation with God all the happinesse we haue in this life or doe looke for in the life to come This Treatise containeth 1 An introduction of the meditation of Christ his death which is 1. Acceptable vnto God 2. Profitable for vs. 1. To hinder sinne 2. To kindle our charity 3. To erect our hope 2. A declaration of the passion of Christ wherein is handled 4. 1. The person suffering which was 1. A Man 2. A iust Man 3. A good Man 4. A King 5. A Priest 6. A Prophet 7. A God whereis shewed who are subiect to most affliction 2. The sufferings of Christ 1. In the garden of Gethsemane 1. Alone where is shewed 1. How the affections of Christ differ from ours in respect of the 1. Obiect 2. Maner 3. Effects 2. The cause of his agony in respect of 1. obiect 2. subiect where is †Explained 1. What might grieue Christ 1. In respect of himselfe 1. The greatnesse of his paine and shame 2. The deferring of his death and punishment 2. In respect of others 1. Small account he saw they would make of his death 2. The greatnesse of their punishment which hee knew they must suffer for that their neglect 2. What Christ might feare 1. The waight of sinne 2 The malice of Satan 3 The wrath of God 2 By others where is shewed 1. The treason of Iudas where is shewed 1. what Christ had done for Iudas 2. why Iudas betrayed Christ 3. how Iudas betrayed him 2. The flight of all the followers of Christ 3. The taking and binding of Iesus Christ 2. Before his Iudges viz. 1. Before Annas where 1. He is examined 1. Of his Disciples 2. Of his Doctrine 2. he is strucken by the hie P. ser 3. he is denied by his stoutest Ap. 2. Before Pilate the first time where hee is accused 1. Of impiety against God 2. Of treaso against Caesar 3. Before Herod where the mystery of cloathing Christ in white is explained 4. Before Pilate the 2. time where his scourging crowning with thorns c. is expressed 3. In Golgotha where is expressed 1. Those things that he suffered on the Cros 1. An accursed 2. A shamefull 3. A painefull 4. a lingring D where also is shewed the generality of his suffering 2. The 7. gracious words that he vttered many other speciall obseruat full of comfort 3. The necessity of Christ his sufferings in respect of the causes viz. 1. Instrumentall 1. The enuy of Satan 2. The malice of the Iewes 3. The couetousnesse of Iudas 4. The desire of the multitude 2. Efficient God himselfe for our sinnes out of the loue he bare to man 3. Finall 1. In resp of men 1 To saue the Elect by the vertue of his death 2. To make the wicked without excuse for neglecting his death 2. In resp of God for the glory of his blessed N. where is shewed that this should teach vs 1. To compassionate his death 2. To make vs thankefull for so great a benefit 3. To cause vs to loue him aboue all things in the world 4. To make vs ready to suffer any thing with him and for his sake 4. The
will or the not obeying of his command and therefore whatsoeuer God willeth is no sinne and whatsoeuer God biddeth or willeth to be done is no sinne nay if Abraham had not done it he had sinned because he had not obayed Gods command And thirdly to the words of the Apostle I say that in euery sinne there is two things to be considered 1. The Act. 2. The deformity of the Act. First for the Act we confesse that to doe any naturall Act we doe receiue power and ability from God for in him we liue and moue Act. 17. as the Apostle saith Secondly for the deformity of the Act which is indeed formale peccati i. e. the sinne we say this is wholly from our selues Quia peccare est deficere in agendo vel aberrare à recto scopo Because the sinne is a deficiency and an erring from the scope or will of God and God is the efficient cause or the cause of the efficiency and not of the deficiency of any thing And therefore he cannot be said to worke the sinne though he giueth the power to doe the Act. Ob. But you will say that he can doe whatsoeuer he will but hee willeth the sinne for if he were not willing no sinne should be Therefore he can doe the sinne Sol. I answere that we may be said to will a thing two wayes 1 Properly for it owne sake because it is desireable and thus God onely willeth good 2 Improperly for some other good that may arise from that thing that is willed so a man willeth many times the losse of a limbe to saue his life And thus God may be said to will euill not properly for it owne sake Aug. de cor grat c. 7. but in respect of some other good that may from that euill accrew So hee willed that Iudas should be elected Ad opus damnabile vt per illud opus venerabile i. e. mors Christi compleretur To performe a damnable worke that by the same a most comfortable worke might be effected and so he willed the death of his Sonne that he might be the Sauiour of all his seruants and this is rather to be called a voluntary permission then an effectuall willing of sinne Thirdly they may obiect that he can worke contradictories Ob. 3 because he can make that those things which haue beene and are should not haue beene for he that can doe that which is impossible of it selfe can more easily doe that which is impossible by accident but to make those things which haue beene not to haue beene is onely impossible by accident and therefore God can make them not to haue been and if he can make those things which haue been not to haue been he can worke contradictories To this I answere Sol. that he can reduce all things into nothing as he hath created all things of nothing and that he could not to haue made any thing of those things that he hath made because he is liberrimus agens so free an agent as that hee might haue chosen whether he would haue done any thing or nothing but now being done I say that he cannot doe but that they haue been done for as it is most true That it is simply impossible to make those things which haue beene made not to haue beene made that Quaedam habuerunt rationem possibilium dum erant fienda iam autem deficiunt à ratione possibilium dum sunt facta As some things haue had the possibility of being done while they were to be done and haue now lost the possibility of being done being already done So it is as true that God had the possibility of not doing them before they were done but now he hath not the possibility of causing those things which haue been done not to haue beene done and therefore though for that which hath beene not to haue beene Quod factum est infectum fieri non potest may in some respect be said to be impossible by accident Yet if we consider a thing past in respect of its being past and not to haue beene past it is not onely impossible of it selfe but absolutely impossible yea Magis impossible quam mortuos sustitare A great deale more impossible to doe then to raise all the dead saith a Father And therefore S. Augustine saith excellently well that if any man would say If God be omnipotent lâ—t him make those things not to haue beene done which haue beene already done Aug. contra Faustum Manic lib. 26. c. 8. Hee should consider that this is all one as if hee should say If he be omnipotent let him bring to passe that those things which are true may be false euen in the same respect for which they are true which is impossible for God to doe And so you see that notwithstanding all that can be said it is most apparantly true that although God can doe Omnia possibilia that is not all things that are possible for him to doe as a man may be said to be able to doe what is possible for a man to doe for this were but a circulation to say God can doe all things that he can doe or that are possible for him to doe but simply absolutely all things that are possible to be done yet that hee cannot simply and absolutely doe all things whatsoeuer as especially those things which are repugnant to his Nature or doe imply a contradiction Ob. But then the Vbiquitaries will obiect that for the Body of Christ to be in euery place is no contradiction for they doe not say that it is circumscribed in one place and vncircumscribed in euery place which indeed is contradictory but they say that as the Deity is limited to no place but is vnlimited in euery place so is the body of Christ by reason of the hypostaticall vnion Iohn 1.14 the word being made flesh not bounded to any one place but euery where in euery place wheresoeuer the Godhead is and herein say they there is no contradiction no more then to say that God is euery where which is none at all Sol. To this I answere first that to proue their Vbiquity from the vnion of the word with the flesh is Fallacia non causae vt causa A fallacie when that is alleaged for a cause which is indeede no cause for that hypostaticall vnion doth not make that one nature should be the other nor that one nature should be as the other but that each one of them should intirely preserue their owne properties else had the Diuine nature beene passible and the humane nature impassable which is most absurde Secondly I say that a thing may be sayd to be euery where either 1. Per se by it selfe and so nothing is euery where but God 2. Per accidens in respect of some other thing and thus the Body of Christ How and in what fence the body of Christ may be sayd to
like and yet this is not all for here must be Flesh to though neither seene felt heard nor vnderstood If it be so let all men iudge For I blush to say more in a point so cleere Secondly we confesse that as God can produce any substance of nothing so he can multiply any one thing into a thousand things Matth. 14.17 as he did the fiue loaues to feede fiue thousand men besides women and children but that he should make that which is numerically one Mar. 6 36. to be fiue thousand things and yet to be but one thing John 6.5 at the very same time that it is fiue thousand things and that that one thing should be but in one place and yet at the same time should be in fiue thousand places we say there cannot be a greater contradiction How Christ multiplied the loaues of Bread for as when the loaues were multiplied if he multiplied them in number he did not multiply them to bee more then fiue and yet to remaine but fiue or if he multiplyed them in quantity which I rather thinke he did not make them to be of a greater quantity and yet to remaine of the same lesser quantity that they were before for this is meerely contradictory to be more in number then fiue and yet to be but fiue or to be augmented in quantity and yet to be but the same in quantity but when any part thereof was diminished he still multiplyed the remaining quantity into the same quantity as it was before or greater as he diâ— the meale in the barrell and the oyle in the cruse of the Widdow of Sarepta in the dayes of Elias 1 King 17.16 That it cannot be that one body should be but in one place and yet to be in a hundred places at the same time And herein is no contradiction euen so if God should multiply that one body of his Sonne to be fiue thousand bodies it cannot be that it should be one and fiue thousand both at once or if hee should cause that body which is in one place to be in fiue thousand places all at once it cannot be that it should be in fiue thousand places and yet but in one place as euery child almost may easily perceiue And therefore seeing it is apparant that Christ hath but one true naturall and Phisicall body else we shall make Christ to be no Christ and that it cannot be that that one should still remaine one and yet be fiue thousand millions of bodies and that that one must still remaine in one place Act. 3.21 as Saint Peter sheweth and yet should be at the same time in many millions of places I hope it is as plaine that these things are meerely contradictory and so simplie impossible to be done as that the Sunne doth shine at noone-day But they instance D. Hall relates it How they relate lies to boulster vp their errors that one Xauier as Tursellian reports it was at the same time seene both in a Ship and in a Boat and I read it alleadged out of Bellarmine that hee relates the like of Saint Antony of Padua that he was seene Preaching in a towne of Italy and at the same time was seene in another place and therefore a body may be commeasured to its place and yet be in other places at the same time To these Instances I say not onely with Plautus Plaut Amphyt Tun'id dicere audes quod nemo vnquam homo vidit nec potest fieri tempore vno homo idem duobus vt locis simul sit How dares any man say that which neuer any man did see nor can be that at the same time one man should be in two seuerall places but I say also with Aquinas of the locality of Angels Thom. in Mag. l 1. d. 32. q. 1. art 1. that by the same reason that he might be in two places he may be in a thousand places at once and therefore if Xauier or Antony was in one place it must needs be the Diuell that was in the other place to teach such lies to delude the credulous But yet still they will reply that we must not conceiue of Diuine things and especially of Gods Power by the rule of humane reason For subtill Philosophy doth many times obscure pure Diuinity and Aristotles Bookes of Nature haue caused many a Doctor to corrupt the Scripture for he made Aetius to follow Arrius saith Socrates Socrat. l. 2. c. 28. Eccles. hist and therefore we must attaine vnto the knowledge of these things not by the reason of man but by the rule of Faith That Faith seeth what Reason cannot conceiue which Philo calleth Fidem oculatum so well-eyed and so sharpe-sighted that as the Eagles eye being aloft in the cloudes can notwithstanding espie Sub frutice leporem sub fluctibus piscem Vnder the waues a Fish and vnder the shrubs a Hare so Faith here in earth can notwithstanding search into the deepe things of God in Heauen and can most perfectly see those things which humane sence can no way perceiue Aug. ep 3. ad Volusian To this I answere with Saint Augustine that wee confesse God is able to doe as he hath done many things which we are not able to vnderstand in all which we beleeue them without searching the reason of them because in such things as Saint Augustine saith Ratio facti est potentia facientis The whole reason of the deede is the Power of the doer but as for the ioyes of Heauen though it passeth all vnderstanding to know positiuely what excellent things are there yet negatiuely wee doe certainely know what is not there for there is no sorrow no sickenesse no euill and as we know not perfectly what God is yet wee doe certainely know what hee is not for hee is not the Sunne Danaeus Isagog de Deo the Moone nor any other creature whatsoeuer Euen so though we know not the height or greatnesse of Gods Power what infinite things he can doe aboue what we can speake or thinke yet we know many things that he cannot doe which I haue shewed vnto you before And therefore that bread should be transubstantiated into flesh and yet remaine bread that accidents should subsist without their subiects that Christ should sit in Heauen and lie in the Bread which we doe eate that hee should be visibly there and inuisibly here and that hee should be one and many continued and discontinued intire in one one place and at the same time intire in a thousand places and such like assertions which doe ouerthrow We beleeue not the assertions of the Iesuites not because we know not how they may be done but because we know they cannot bee done not onely the humanity of our Sauiour Christ but also the order of things and the very principles of Nature and doe exceede the bounds of all sence and reason and repugne indeede the very
Sol. But to this Danaeus briefely answereth that these men say he shall be called after the manner of the Hebrewes pro vere manifestabitur Danaeus Jsagog he shall bee truely manifested and declared to bee the Sonne of God Christ was a God from eternitie but he began to be a God existing in the humanitie when he was made flesh so that he shall be called doth not signifie that he should then begin to be but that then he should begin to bee manifested what he was before Besides wee may yeeld that then he should begin to bee and to bee called a God subsisting in the humane nature for this may apparantly bee collected out of the words both of the Prophet and Euangelist for in that the Prophet sayth vnto vs a Childe is borne this is to bee vnderstood of his humane nature and in that he sayth vnto vs a Sonne is giuen it is to be vnderstood of his Diuine nature Quia natus ex humanitate datus ex diuinitate datus qui nesciret exordium natus qui sentiret occasum datus quo nec Pater esset antiquior natus qui matre esset iunior sic qui erat datus est qui non erat natus est Because he is borne in respect of his humanity and giuen in respect of his Dietie for hee was giuen which had no beginning and he was borne which should haue ending hee was giuen which was as auncient as his father and hee was borne that was younger then his mother so hee that was was giuen vnto vs and he that was not was borne vnto vs as Eusebius Emissenus sayth and therefore this Sonne that euer was a God in respect of his Diuine nature could not bee called nor sayd to bee a God existing in the humane nature vntill this Sonne was giuen to bee in carnate and till this Childe was borne vnto vs and so I say of the words of Saint Luke that hee which was euer the Sonne of God in respect of his Godhead should now bee called the Sonne of God existing in the Manhood Secondly They obiect that Saint Iohn calleth him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ob. 2 The Word of God but God spake no words before the Creation when first he said Fiat lux Let there be light and therefore this word before then could not be To this I answere first Sol. that they doe exceedingly corrupt the Text in calling him The Word of God for Saint Iohn doth not call him The Word of God but simply the Word to shew the difference betwixt that Word of the Lord which came vnto the Prophets and Apostles and is left vnto vs in the Scriptures or that was at any time spoken by God at the Creation or since the Creation vnto the Patriarchs or any other seruant of God and this euerlasting Word which euer was and is an eternall God And therefore Saint Cyril saith Cyrillus l. 1. Thesauri That Christ is no accidentall but an eternall essentiall word That he is not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 seu 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Any sound of the Ayre which is breathed out of the mouth of God and is vttered by the helpe of the tongue because God hath neither mouth lippes nor tongue neither is he 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 nec 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 nec 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 any inward or inbred word or significatiue voyce of any such conceiued words because none of these is any subsistent thing but as it were an accident in the subiect which cannot be said to be in God but hee is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The essentiall substantiall and subsistent word as hereafter I shall more amply and plainely shew vnto you when I come to discusse the reasons why he is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Word Thirdly they doe obiect that the wisedome of God saith Ob. 3 Dominus creauit me initium viarum suarum ante secula fundauit me Which according to the words is thus in English Prou. 8.22 God created me the beginning of his wayes before the Worlds he established me Sol. I answere that concerning this place of Salomon I finde diuers sorts of expositions First the Iewes say that by this Wisedome is vnderstood the Law which was created to be the beginning of Gods wayes and as they say two thousand yeeres before the World was made because in the thirtieth verse they finde two iom that is two dayes which they interpret of two thousand yeeres because a day with God is as a thousand yeeres Psal 90.4 Secondly the Samosatenian Heretickes say that this place is to be vnderstood not of Christ but of that vertue of God whereby he hath wisely created and discreetly gouerneth all those things that are created Thirdly the Arians yeelding that it was spoken of the Sonne of God doe say that it proueth him to be made and created by the Father and therefore not eternally begotten of the Father That the Law was not created But against the Iewes I say that it cannot be spoken of the Law because the Law is not created but promulgated and shewed vnto vs to teach vs to know what is good and acceptable vnto God for if it were created then it must be created of nothing and must be either a substance or an accident and the breach thereof would proue to be the offending of a creature and not the Creator which is most absurd and if it were created yet that it should be created two thousand yeeres before the World was made is more absurd for that it should be then created before any time because time beganne when the World was made as Moses sheweth And therefore if the Law were created two thousand yeeres before the World was made then Moses doth not well to make Time to haue his beginning when the World beganne and therefore the meaning of those words I was Deliciae eius die die which is an Hebraisme signifying Quotidie daily or alwayes is this that Christ before all Worlds was euer and alwayes the onely ioy and delight of God in whom as he saith himselfe he was well pleased hee was fully satisfied and contented Secondly Against the Somosatenians I say that whatsoeuer is spoken of any vertue or any wisedome of God must needes be spoken of Christ Luc. 11.49 because hee is the vertue and wisedome of God as Saint Luke sheweth And therefore the same things that are here ascribed vnto that wisedome of God are else-where ascribed vnto Christ the Sonne of God as you may see Iohn 1.1 Heb. 1.2 Colos 1.17 And so Iustin Martyr Justinus in Dialog cum Tryph. and Clemens Alexandrinus doe expound this place of Salomon of the Sonne of GOD. Thirdly Against the Arians I finde diuers answeres Whether the Arians corrupted the Text. First Some thinke the Arians as they vsed to doe in other places corrupted the Text and writ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 pro 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 i. e. Created me in stead of possessed me but I thinke this could not be because Iust Martyr that liued before the Arians were hatched and Athanasius himselfe doth reade it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Created me and therefore Secondly Epiphanius Saint Basil Saint Hierome and others Epiphan heres 69 Basil l. 2. contr Eunom Hieron in ep ad Cypr. doe thinke that the vulgar Edition is not well translated for that the Hebrew word which Salomon vseth should not be translated 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with a iota but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 with an 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the middest of the word The first is He created me and the other is he possessed me and therefore Aquila translates it thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And Tremellius Whether the Hebrew word bee rightly translated 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 created Iehoua possidebat me principio viae suae or ab initio operum suorum as others will haue it And so is the vulgar Latine and our owne last English Translation The Lord possessed me in the beginning of his way And if this be true then those ancient Fathers Saint Athanasius Saint Basil Saint Cyril and others that were much troubled about this place might haue easily answered vnto this obiection of the Arians if they had corrected the Greeke Translation out of the Hebrew Text. But the Iewes contend that the word in the Originall doth aswell signifie to create as to possesse as Rabbi Shelomo Iarchi vpon Genesis 14.19 doth declare for there Moses vseth the same word which Salomon vseth here and although our last English Translation reades it Possessor of Heauen and Earth yet the vulgar Latine and the Septuagint reades it Creator of Heauen and Earth and therefore Thirdly Fulgentius answereth Fulgent in resp ad hanc ob Arrian that although Salomon should say The Lord created me yet could that make nothing against the eternall being of the Sonne of God for that we may easily see Salomon speaketh here of a two-fold generation of the Sonne of GOD. That Salomon speaketh of a two-fold generation of Christ First Of his Incarnation in these words The Lord created me the beginning of his wayes and then Secondly Least we should with Arians imagine that he was not before he was incarnate He sheweth that Ante colles genitus erat Before the mountaines he was begotten and brought forth i. e. In respect of his Diuinity First of his incarnation to be made man That in the first place he speaketh of his incarnation and this making of him to be flesh there followeth none absurdity for though hee speaketh in the present tense or preterperfect tense after the Latines yet is it set downe for the future tense after the manner of the Hebrewes who doe oftentimes especially in things pertaining to God set downe the future tense for the present because they are as certaine to bee done as if they were already done as Tertullian obserueth And the words immediately following To be the beginning of his wayes doth make this exposition the more apparantly true for what is it to be the beginning of his wayes Nisi quod ipse via nobis est factus but that hee was made to be the way for vs to walke in for hee was not made that hee should create new Creatures but that hee might renue those that were lost And therefore Saint Iames vseth the like speech of the godly James 1.18 saying Of his owne will begate he vs with the Word of Truth that wee might be as the first fruites of his Creatures And the Prophet Dauid vseth the like speech of himselfe Psal 51.10 when he saith Create a new heart in me O God And therefore to be the beginning of the wayes of God is to be the first fruites of those that are renued and not of those that are created for if you looke into the workes of Creation you shall heare him say Before the mountaines were setled and before the hills was I begotten Secondly of his eternall generation as he is God That in the second place hee speaketh of his eternall generation it is most manifest for hee changeth his phrase and saith Ante colles genita eram Before the mountaines was I begotten as the Chalde paraphrase hath it or Filiata eram I was sonned his sonne as some translate it for wee must note that created and begotten in the person of the Sonne of God are to bee distinguished or otherwise if we make created and begotten to be the same wee may say that the World was begotten which is most absurd And therefore seeing hee saith that this wisedome of GOD was both created and begotten and that these two words doe signifie two distinct and speciall things wee should consider in what respect hee is said to be created and in what respect he is said to be begotten and then we should plainely see that he is said to be created as he is the Sonne of man and that he is said to be begotten as hee is the eternall Sonne of God for here Salomon sheweth that he is said to be created in respect of that nature wherin he calleth his Father Lord for the Lord saith hee created me But hee calleth his Father Lord in respect of his humane nature and neuer calleth him Lord in respect of his diuine nature for he that is borne a seruant of his Fathers handmaide according to the saying of the Psalmist Psal 116.14 O Lord I am thy seruant and the sonne of thine hand-maide is also begotten of his Fathers Essence according to the saying of Christ Iohn 8. I and my Father are one And therefore though he calleth his Father Lord in respect of his humanity yet doth he neuer call him so but alwayes Father in respect of his Diuinity as I came from the Father and wee saw his glory John 1. as the glory of the onely begotten Sonne of the Father And so you see that these words of Salomon Naz. or 4. de theolog Athan. ser 3. cont Arr. Cyril l. 5. c. 4. 5. 6. 7. Thesauri Aug. l. 1. c. 12. de trinit The Lord created me are to be vnderstood of his incarnation and therefore can proue nothing against his eternall generation And this exposition of Fulgentius is confirmed by Nazianzen Athanasius Saint Cyril Saint Augustine and others And yet Fourthly Saint Hillary in l. de Synodis Aquinas l. 4. c. 8. contra gentes and Bellarmine l. 1. c. 18. de Christo doe answere that the eternall generation of the Sonne of God is sometimes called generation and sometimes creation because it is so ineffable that it cannot be fully expressed by any one word for generation signifieth a production in the same substance but with a certaine mutation of the begetter How the Word may be said to be both begotten created but creation signifieth a production of another substance but without any mutation of the
it were of the like nature with God Fourthly they affirme that although the word it selfe is not found in the Scriptures yet that the full sense and meaning of the word is plainely found Aug. tract 79. In Joh. Cyrillus l. 1. de trinit as Saint Augustine doth most excellently proue out of those words of our Sauiour I and my Father are one Iohn 10. And that it is deriued from the Scripture for it is deriued of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Essence and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is deriued of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and the Lord saith of himselfe Ego sum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I am he that is or I am that I am Exod. 3. And therefore seeing this 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 their verball winde shakes no corne nor cannot derogate any thing from the coessentiality of this word with his Father they proceed against the matter And so Secondly they doe obiect against the truth of the matter declared by this Word And First they argue thus Whose wils are diuers their natures Ob. 1 and essences are diuers but the will of the Father and of the Sonne are diuers for the Sonne saith vnto his Father Father if it be possible Matth. 26.39 let this cup passe from me neuerthelesse not as I will but as thou wilt therefore their Essence must needes be diuers Sol. That Christ as he hath two Natures so he hath a two-fold Will. I answere that the proposition is to be distinguished for whose wils are diuers hauing the same natures their natures must be diuers but in Christ there are two natures diuine and humane and therefore that his will is diuers or not the same will as his fathers is in respect of his humane nature though it be alwayes subiect and agreeable to the same we easily grant but that his will in respect of his diuine nature is any wayes different or diuers from his Fathers will we vtterly deny and we say not that the whole person of Christ but that Christ in respect of his diuine nature as he is the second person of the Trinitie is co-essentiall vnto his Father and therefore though the will of Christ as he is the Sonne of man be not the same as his Fathers will is yet that doth not proue the will of Christ as hee is the Sonne of God to be not the same as his Fathers will is because Christ hath a two-fold will the one as he is the eternall Word and the other as he is made Flesh Ob. 2 Secondly they say he that is mediator betwixt God and men is not of the same essence with God but Christ is the Mediator betwixt God and men 1 Tim. 2.5 saith the Apostle therefore he cannot be of the same essence with God Sol. That there are two sorts of Mediators I answere that the proposition is to be distinguished for it is true of such a mediator as Moses was the Messenger of God to men but it is false of such a Mediator as reconcileth wicked men to God by appeasing his wrath and making satisfaction for their sinnes for that no man can do so but he that is God by nature Now Saint Paul sheweth Christ to be such a Mediator as doth appease the wrath of God and therefore he sheweth euen thereby that Christ must needes be a God by nature and of the same Essence with his Father Ob. 3 Thirdly they say Christ is a Mediator and an Aduocate with God but he is no Mediator nor Aduocate with himselfe therefore himselfe is not of the same Essence with God Sol. I answere that the Name of God is to be taken two wayes First Essentially and so Christ is a Mediator with God Secondly Hipostatically for any person of the God-head and so Christ also is Mediator with God if you vnderstand God for the person of the Father not excluding the Sonne or the Holy Ghost for otherwise it is false because he is not onely Mediator with the person of the Father but also with himselfe and the Holy Ghost So likewise in the conclusion if you take God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for the person of the Father we yeeld Christ is not God because God the Sonne is not nor cannot be God the Father And to the minor I say That Christ reconcileth vs to himselfe that Christ may bee said to bee a Mediator with himselfe if we consider the office of mediation Nam sacrificij modum non sicut vnus quidam ex nobis sacerdotibus affert seruiliter For he doth not seruilely like some of vs or any vnder the Law bring the substance of our sacrifice vnto the Priests which should first offer for themselues and then for the sinnes of their people because he hath nothing herein common with vs that he should receiue it at our hands to offer it for vs but as he is our sacrifice himselfe Cyrillus l. de recta fide ad reginas Sic sibi ipsi conciliat per ipsum in ipso patri So he reconcileth vs vnto himselfe and through himselfe and in himselfe vnto his Father as Saint Cyrill saith Fourthly they say If he be of the same essence with the Father Ob. 4 then is he essentially in the Father but he is not essentially in the Father for the Word was with God and not in God John 1.1 saith the Euangelist but to be with God signifieth not to be in God but without him as a booke held in my hand is with me though it be not in me therefore Christ is not essentially in the Father consequently not of the same essence with the Father To this Fulgentius answereth diuers wayes Sol. 1. If all that is sayd to be with God be without God Fulgent in resp ad obiect Arrianorum and all that is sayd to bee in God bee within him then are wee neerer vnto God then the Sonne of God for here you see he is sayd but to be with God and we are sayd to be in God 1 Cor. 8. for there is but one God the Father by whom are all things and wee in him sayth the Apostle but this is most absurd to say that wee are neerer vnto God then the Sonne of God and therefore it is as absurd to say that all which is with God is without God and all that are sayd to be in him to be within him Secondly Hee proueth that to be with God or with man doth not alwayes signifie to bee without God or without man for it is sayd that the vngodly reasoned with themselues Wisd 2.1 but when a man reasoneth he doth it within himselfe and not without himselfe C. 4.1 and it is sayd that the memoriall of Vertue is immortall because it is knowne with God and with men but it cannot be knowne with men vnlesse the memorie thereof be within men John 14.15 and so our Sauiour Christ sayth If any man loue mee and will
things for vs. euen for euer For this Incarnâ—â—e Word this God and Man Christ Iesus hath performed all things that are necessary for our saluation he liued for vs he dyed for vs he rose againe for vs and he became the Phisitian and the medicine both of our originall and actuall sinnes For against the corruption and guilt of originall sinne the pure birth and vndefiled conception of Christ is a sufficient salue and against the guilt of actuall sinne the Sanctitie and innocent life of Christ tâ—at was without any spot of sinne is a sufficient remedy and against the punishment either of originall or of actuall sinnes tâ—e most pretious death of Christ is a sufficient satisfaction Quia iniusta mors iustam vicit mortem Aug. ser 101. de tempore liberauit nos iuste quia pro nobis occisus est iniustè Because his vniust death hath iustly ouercome our death and he hath most iustly deliuered vs because he was most vniustly slaine for vs. That good examples are meanes to further godlines Besides the Word being made flesh we haue his life as a most perfect patterne to frame our liues thereby for wee are all like Apes apt to imitate and we say the life of our Minister would more moue vs to godlinesse then his doctrine and no doubt but it would doe much to them that hate not their Minister because he will not be as deboyst as themselues for a good example to good men is as a light set vpon a Candlesticke that all they which come into the house Iohn 3.19 may see the light although to euill men Christ an infallible patterne for men to imitate it moues them to the more indignation and wrath because it makes their sinnes appeare the more exceedingly sinfull and will be a iust witnesse against them in the day of wrath for that seeing the light of a good life shining amongst them they hated the same because their deeds were euill And therefore if we would be led by examples and would not erre let vs lay the the example of Christ before our face for this is a true looking glasse that is euer laid open before euery man and will neuer deceiue nor flatter any man and it is not onely a patterne for our practice but the continuall inspection and looking into the same is also in some measure an efficient cause Cyrillus l. 4. c. 5. and impulsiue motiue to incite vs to the imitation thereof and to the performance of all godlinesse because Christ is the giuer of all such graces whereby men do liue a godly life as the Apostle sheweth 1 Cor. 4.7 That we may boldly come to God Moreouer Christ hauing vnited his Deitie with our humanitie and hauing so well tempered his Maiestie with humility we may the more confidently and boldly draw neere vnto the throne of grace for that as his Deity confoundeth so his humanitie comforteth our faint and feeble soules and as his Maiestie amazeth so his humility animateth vs to come vnto him and to seeke of him whatsoeuer is needfull for vs. And further this Word being made flesh Naturam humanam nobilitauit He hath so innobled our humane nature as Saint Augustine saith that we which were wormes and no men are now 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 pertakers of the Diuine nature and as it were Gods and no wormes so that now 2 Pet. 1.4 That we attaine to a farre better state in Christ then we lost in Adam Bernard ser 1. de Epiphan our nature being repayred it is exalted farre aboue the dignitie of its first originall and it hath obtained to a farre better state in Christ then it had and lost in Adam because Adam was but is the image of God but wee are ioyned and made one with God as Saint Bernard saith and therefore foelix culpa quae talem meruit redemptorem happy was that fault as it happened vnto vs which brought foorth such a Sauiour to be made partaker of our flesh that wee might be partakers of his Spirit as Saint Gregory speaketh Secondly more particularly That both our bodies and our soules shall be saued in that he was made a true and a perfect man consisting both of body and soule we may assure our selues of the saluation both of body and soule for as our sinnes deserued damnation vnto both so the assuming of both by this Word hath brought deliuerance vnto them both And in that he was made subiect vnto all our humane frailties passions and miseries being made in all things like â—nto vs sinne onely excepted Heb. 2.17 c. 4 15. we may as I haue already touched before conceiue thereby an exceeding comfort for as Queene Dido said vnto the distressed Troians Haud ignara mali miseris succurrere disco Experience of miseries hath taught mee to succour all those that are miserable euen so Christ hauing felt all infirmities We may be sure of comfort in distresse and suffered more miseries then any of vs can endure will be mercifull and compassionate towards vs when hee seeth vs in distresse for he became like vnto vs that he might be mercifull vnto vs and he was tempted and suffered that he might be able to helpe and succour them that are tempted Heb. 2.17 18. saith the Apostle And therefore seeing wee haue not an High Priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities but is a pittifull and a compassionate Redeemer if we be inuolued in miseries and doe suffer all kindes of infirmities wants scornes sickenesse paines or whatsoeuer else let vs goe boldly vnto the Throne of Grace and beg confidently his mercy and grace Heb. 4.16 to helpe vs in the time of neede for as hee which in our Creation formed vs according to the Image of God was contented now by his incarnation to take vpon himselfe the Image of man So wee which by our transgressions made our selues like vnto the Diuell shall bee most happy and blessed if as Christ became like vnto vs in flesh so we doe endeuour to become like vnto him in the graces of his most blessed Spirit And so much for the second point that he was made Flesh BRANCH III. CHAP. I. Of the distinction of the two Natures of Christ how each of them remaineth entire inconfused and the obiections made against this truth sufficiently answered Branch 3. THirdly We are to consider how this Word was made and still is Flesh which manner may be collected out of this word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 He was made Flesh Touching which wee must well obserue these two speciall points Two things to be considered 1. The distinction 2. The vnion of the two natures the Word and the Flesh that is the Deity and the humanity of our Sauiour Christ First The distinction of these two Natures is most excellently shewed by Saint Paul where hee saith That in Christ there are two distinct natures Rom. 1.3.4
that Christ was made man 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 according to the flesh and declared mightily to be the Sonne of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 according to the Spirit of Sanctification for that according to his humane nature onely he was made of the seede of Dauid which according to his diuine nature was declared still to be the eternall Sonne of God So that here Saint Paul sheweth two natures to be in Christ that is his diuine and his humane nature still remaining entire after his incarnation because as hee was made onely of the seede of Dauid in respect of his manhood for that his God-head was not made of the seede of Dauid so was hee declared onely to be the Sonne of God in respect of his God-head for that his manhood was not the omnipotent and the eternall Son of God But against this place of the Apostle Ob. The most blasphemous subtilties of Heretickes to denie the truth of the two natures of Christ the Somosatenian Heretickes doe affirme that Saint Paul meaneth not hereby to shew a two-fold nature to be in Christ but a two-fold natiuity i. e. a carnall and a spirituall which we finde to be in euery faithfull Christian for to be made of the seede of Dauid say they according to the Flesh doth shew his carnall generation and to be declared to be the Sonne of God according to the Spirit of Sanctification is to shew his spirituall regeneration The first they seeke to confirme out of those places of Scriptures where the Apostle saith The Iewes were his Kinsmen according to the flesh and where hee calleth them Rom. 9.3 Israel according to the flesh for herein say they the Apostle meaneth by these words according to the flesh nothing else 1 Cor. 10.18 but according to the vulgar and common sort of generation And therefore to be made of the seede of Dauid according to the flesh is nothing else but to bee made of him according to his carnall generation And The second they seeke to confirme out of the words of Saint Iohn where he saith That the faithfull are not born of bloud Iohn 1.13 nor of the will of the flesh nor of the will of man but of God And therefore as these phrases and limitations according to the flesh It is a horrible thing to say that all those phrases which are true of vs ' must be likewise true of Christ in the same sence considered Rom. 1.2 Sol. and according to the spirit doe signifie the double natiuitie of euery faithfull man and doe no wayes proue a double nature to be in any man Euen so in Christ they signifie the same things that is two natiuities but not two natures To this I answere first that this phrase 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 according to the flesh neither in the place vrged by me nor in any other place alledged by them doth signifie the common and carnall generation but doth imply a difference and distinction betwixt kindred according to the flesh and kindred according to the spirit for otherwise all Israel was in respect of their common generation kindred according to the flesh And therefore the meaning of the Apostle is to shew that although all of them were the children of Abraham according to the flesh yet that but few of them were the Children of promise Secondly I say that the miraculous and singular birth of Christ is not insinuated so much in the words according to the flesh as it is plainely shewed in the word made for the same being in the originall 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it doth most apparantly shew the extraordinary making of his flesh not after the vsuall and common sort of carnall generation by any humane seede but by a supernaturall generation through the virtuall operation of the Holy Ghost Tertul. l. cont Prax. Iraeneus l. 3. c. 32. Vigilius l. 5. contra Eutychet Aug. l. 1. c. 5. de trinitate as Tertullian Irenaeus Vigilius Saint Augustine and others haue obserued Thirdly I say that there is a great deale of difference betwixt the two-fold generation of the faithfull Saints and the two-fold generation of Christ for when they are said to be borne of the flesh and of the Spitit we confesse that not two natures are thereby signified That Christ was so borne free from all sinne that he needed no further sanctification or regeneration but two beginnings of their diuers births But this cannot be said of Christ because he was so sanctified in the first moment of his conception that he needed not any second regeneration neither is he said to be borne of the spirit in respect of any regeneration as we are but declared to be the Sonne of God according to the Spirit that is manifested to be a true God according or in respect of his owne sanctifying Spirit that is his God-head And therefore though such a limitation might proue a double generation in the rest of Gods Children yet this cannot shew a double generation of him in whom there is no double generation in respect of his manhood but it must needes shew plainely two natures to be in Christ for all other faithfull men are the Sonnes of God by adoption and grace but Christ is the naturall and the essentiall Sonne of God his Father He being the brightnesse of his glory and the engrauen forme of his person Heb. 1.3 And all other men are so borne that except they be borne againe they cannot enter into the Kingdome of Heauen Iohn 3.5 But Christ was so conceiued and borne that there was neither neede nor any possible way of any further sanctification of his person because that in him dwelled the fulnesse of the Godhead bodily But this truth of the two natures of Christ may be confirmed by most apparant and vnanswerable arguments for the Iewes said that he did not onely breake the Sabboath but also said John 5.18 that God was his Father making himselfe equall vnto God And Christ himselfe said I and my Father are all one Iohn 10.30 And therefore the Pharises did rightly collect that Christ by these words had affirmed himselfe to be a God And yet he saith John 14.28 My Father is greater then I but it cannot possibly be that Christ according to the same nature should be equall nay one with the Father and yet inferior to the Father And therefore it must needes follow that he hath one nature according to which he is equall to his Father and another nature in respect whereof hee is inferior to his Father Besides our Sauiour saith Before Abraham was I am John 8.58 And yet Saint Luke saith He was borne in the dayes of Augustus Caesar Luc. 2.7 but it cannot be that Idem secundum idem The same one in the same respect should be before Abraham and after Abraham All Orthodoxe antiquitie confessed two natures to be in Christ And
therefore hee must needes haue two natures in him according to one whereof he was before Abraham and according to the other he was after Abraham And further Vigilius l. 2. cont Eutych Philip. 2. we finde the same confirmed and confessed by all antiquity for Vigilius writing vpon those words of the Apostle who being in the forme of God tooke vpon him the forme of a seruant saith Mirum est c. It is a wonder to thinke why some are afraide to say that Christ had two natures when as the Apostle saith that he had two formes and the great oecumenicall Councell of Calcedon wherein were 630 Bishops Concil Calced Act. 5. in Symb. fidei left this confession vnto all posterity Confitemur in nouissimis diebus filium Dei vnigenitum in duabus naturis inconfuse immutabiliter indiuise inseparabiliter agnoscendum nunquam sublata differentia propter vnionem We confesse that the onely begotten Sonne of God which came in the last dayes to be incarnate is now to be acknowledged to be and to subsist of two natures i. e. Diuine and humane inconfused immutably inseperably and vndiuidedly vnited together and that the differences or distinction of these natures is neuer to be abolished and taken away by reason of the vnion of the same All the actions of Christ doe manifestly shew the two natures of Christ And so in very deed we finde all the actions of our Sauiour Christ while he liued here on earth to make inanswerable proofe of the same truth for as Saint Augustine saith Iacebat Christus quantum ad carnem mortuus in sepulchro mortuos suscitans in inferno vitam tribuens vniuersis in caelo Christ according to the flesh lay dead in his graue yet did he then in Hell i. e. in respect of his soule according to his Godhead raise the dead here on earth Aug. sup Mat. 5. contra Foelicem and giue life to all them that were in heauen Quia vt nec mundum dimittens ad coelum ascendit ita nec coelum deserens venit ad nos sed vno atque eodem tempore totum totus impleuit Because that as now he hath not left the world though he be ascended into Heauen so then he did not leaue the Heauens when hee came to be made flesh on earth but was wholly at one and the selfe-same time in all places replenishing and filling all things And Gregorie Nazianzen doth most excellently shew how the properties of both his natures concurred together and might be easily discerned in him from the very beginning of his dayes Luc. 2.7 to the last end of his being here on earth for he is borne of his mother and wrapped in swadling clouts as being a man but a starre doth manifest him Matth. 2.11 and the wise men adore him as being a God Matth. 3.16 he is baptized in Iordan as being a man but the Holy Ghost descends vpon him from Heauen as being a God he is tempted of the Deuill Mar. 1.12 as he is a man but he ouercomes and expels the Diuels Iohn 4.6 as he is a God he trauels and is thirstie he is hungry and is weary as he is a man but he refresheth the wearie hee feedeth the hungry Iohn 7. and he giueth drinke vnto the thirstie as hee is a God Matth. 24.26 he sleepes in the ship and his Disciples awake him as he is a man but he rebukes the windes and stilleth the rage of the Seas Matth. 8.20 as he is a God he is poore and needy and hath not an house to put his head in as he is a man but he is rich and mighty and cannot be contained in the heauens as he is a God he his sorrowfull and sad he weepes and he prayes as he is a man but he heareth our prayers and comforteth the sorrowfull Matth. 26. as hee is a God he is subiect to infirmities as he is a man Iohn 14. but he healeth all our infirmitie as he is a God he is whipped and crucified as hee is a man but he renteth the vaile of the Temple Esay 53. and causeth the Sunne to hide his face for shame to see him crucified as hee is a God he saith Eloi Eloi Lamasabachthani My God my God Matth. 27.46 why hast thou forsaken me as he is a man but hee saith vnto the theefe This day shalt thou be with me in Paradise as he is a God Luke 23.43 he dyeth and is buryed and lyeth in his graue as he is a man but he ouercommeth Death and destroyeth the Diuels Matt. 27.50.60 and raiseth himselfe vnto life againe as he is a God and being risen he appeares vnto his Disciples and eates and talkes with them Luke 24. v 15. 31. as he is a man but he vanisheth out of their sight and ascendeth vp vnto Heauen as he is a God and so now the Heauens doe containe him and he sitteth there on the right hand of God Psal 68.4 as he is a man but he sustaineth the Heauens and rideth vpon the same as vpon an horse as he is a God and so Fulgentius saith Fulgent ser de Epiphan Iste puer in praesepi quidem paruulus collocatur sed magnus in coelo mirabiliter operatur permittit se manibus in terra portari sed praecipit sibi coelestia famulari That little child is laid in a cratch i. e. as he is a man but he doth wonderfully worke in heauen i. e. as he is a God and he suffereth himselfe to be carryed in their armes as he is a man but he supporteth all things and commandeth all the hoast of Heauen to doe him seruice as he is a God And therefore it is most apparant that the person of Christ so subsisteth Vt cum in homine Christo videtur veritas hominis Idem de persona Christi l. 2. ad Tamrisi in eodem Deo Christo cognoscatur paternae veritas deitatis as when we see the veritie of the Manhood in the Man Christ Iesus we must know and acknowledge the eternall Deitie in the same God Christ Iesus because he is still a perfect God and a perfect man and of these two natures subsisting in one person inconfused But against this Eutyches and his followers What the Eutychian heretickes say against this truth haue and doe most impiously affirme that in Christ after his Incarnation there is but one onely nature made of the Word and of the flesh by the conuersion of the Deitie into the humanitie because the Euangelist saith that the Word was made flesh euen as when the Water was made Wine it was no more Water but was presently conuerted into Wine Nazian in Ep. ad Clidonium or else by the conuersion of the flesh into the Deitie because Gregory Nazianzen and Gregory Nyssen say that Caro Christi est deificata the flesh of Christ is now deified and to confirme
the same they doe obiect Ob. 1. Concil Cal. act 1. post Ep. Cyrilli First the authority of some ancient Fathers alledged in the councell of Calcedon for Eustachius affirmeth that Saint Cyrill writ Non oportere intelligere in mysterio incarnationis duas naturas sed vnam naturam dei verbi incarnatam that wee must not vnderstand in the mysterie of the Incarnation two natures to be in Christ but one nature of the word God incarnate and made flesh Sol. How the Word may be said to be incarnate or made flesh James 1.17 I answere that the nature of the Word may be said to be incarnate if it be rightly vnderstood i. e. Non per conuersionem in carnem sed per vnionem cum carne in vna hypostasi Not by the conuersion of it into flesh which could not possibly be because God is immutable and without any shadow of turning but by the vniting of the same with the flesh in the same subsistence so the words of Nazianzen and Nyssen doe onely shew the vnion and coniunction of the flesh with the Dietie and not the conuersion of the manhood into the Godhead and for the words of Eustachius alledged out of S. Cyrill I say that they be none of the words of Eustachius but of Dioscorus or some other Eutychian Hereticke that hath most impiously and falsly inserted that sentence among the words of Eustachius Ob. 1. Secondly they do obiect that S. Iohn saith not that the Word did assume flesh but was made flesh and therefore as the water that is made wine hath no more two natures but onely one because the nature of the water is conuerted into the nature of the Wine so the Word though before his incarnation he had a nature different from the flesh yet now being made flesh hee hath onely the same nature with the flesh Sol. To this Theodoret answereth that the flesh was assumed of the word and he proueth the same out of these Scriptures where Saint Paul saith Phil. 2.7 that Christ being in the forme of God did take vpon him the forme of a seruant And againe where hee saith that he tooke not on him the nature of Angels Heb. 2.16 but he tooke on him the seed of Abraham And againe Saint Iohn himselfe in this very Chapter and verse immediately after he had said that the Word was made flesh doth adde That Christ did assume our flesh that we should not thinke it to bee made by the conuersion of the Word into the flesh Et habitauit in nobis And he dwelt in vs for this is all one as if he had said the Word was made flesh because that hauing assumed and vnited our flesh vnto himselfe he began now to remaine and to dwell in our flesh for euer But the Holy Ghost fore-seeing that Nestorius would affirme Christ to consist of two persons Why the Euangelist saith the Word was made flesh as if the diuine person had assumed the humane person which is most blasphemous therefore he directed the Pen of the Euangelist to write the Word was made flesh and not to say the Word assumed the flesh to shew that he is no more twaine but one Christ And yet least we should fall into the error of Eutyches to say that Christ after his incarnation had but one nature because he had but one person he addeth and he dwelt in vs to shew vnto vs that he is not so made one by the conuersion of either nature into the other but that still each nature remaineth whole and intire without confounding either the substance or the properties of either nature for the humane nature of Christ is not deified by the cōuersion of the flesh into the nature of the word Aug. de heresibus heres 55. nor the Word made flesh by the conuersion of the same into the nature of flesh as Apolinaris taught but the flesh is said to be deified How the flesh is said to be deified and the Word incarnate and the Deity is said to be incarnate and made flesh by reason of the vnion and coniunction of the flesh with the word in one person euen as the soule and body remayning still two intyre natures without the conuersion of either into the nature of other are vnited together to make one person i. e. one man and therefore Saint Augustine saith that his diuine nature was not consumed when his humane nature was assumed Humana quippe natura accessit diuina non recessit homo factus Aug. ep 120. naturam suscipiendo nostram non amittendo suam Because the humane nature was adioyned and the Deity was not abolished but he was made man by taking our nature vpon him and not by leesing or casting his owne nature from him How Christ notwithstandin◠his incarnation remaineth still what he was before and the duine Poet Prudentius saith I de manet quod semper erat quod non erat esse incipiens What he was he alwayes is but is otherwise for our blisse And so the common distich hath it Sum quod eram nec eram quod sum nunc dicar vtrumque ignoras nisi me stirpe ab vtraque tenes I am what I was but I was not as I am for now I am both God and man and thou knowest me not if thou knowest not me to be of both these natures Nazian orat 3. de Theolog. and so Gregory Nazianzen saith Permansit quod erat assumpsit quod non erat Hee remained what he was and he assumed what he was not because the Word was made flesh Non deposita sed seposita maiestate Not by cancelling or laying away but as it were by concealing and laying aside for a time the most glorious appearance of his diuine Maiestie Emyssen hom 2. de natiuit as Eusebius Emyssenus doth most briefly and excellently declare How one thing may be made another thing three wayes And that we might the better vnderstand how this Word was made flesh Euthymius sheweth that one thing may be made another thing three manner of wayes First When one thing is turned and changed into another thing John 3.9 as when the meate that we eate is turned into bloud the milke into cheese Gen. 19.26 the water into wine Lots wife into a piller of Salt and such like and thus the Word was not made flesh because without any change hee remained still what hee was before Secondly when some accident only is added vnto the substance as when the brasse or stone or any other mettall is made a statue or receiues any other impression And thus likewise the word is not made flesh because the diety is incapable of any other forme but the forme of GOD and no accident can be in GOD. The Word is made flesh not by changing either nature into the other but by vniting the one to the other Thirdly when one substance is adioyned vnto
an vpright man and should not be hated of all men I But will the good and godly men hate them who doe confesse their sinnes and doe alwayes striue against their owne corruptions The wicked men may hate them but surely the godly will not I answere That the more godly men be the lesse they hate them yet because in them sinne stickes so close vnto them that although they confesse and detest it with their soules yet hath their flesh alwayes some loue and affection vnto the same in so much that Saint Augustine in one of his Meditations confesseth That in his spirit and soule he did so heartily pray against his sinne that his flesh and carnall desire was afraide God would heare the prayers of his soule and so depriue them of their delights Gal. 5.17 for in the best men The flesh lusteth against the spirit and drawes them oftentimes to doe what they would not doe And therefore as in the best men there is still remaining naturall corruption so the same will still oppose it selfe against all them that will seeke to dispossesse this olde Adam from their soules And therefore seeing Christ did suffer Christians suffer and that the more godly they be the more enemies they shall haue we should not iudge of men and especially of the Preachers of Gods Word according to their outward appearance of their enemies crosses and afflictions but we should iudge righteous iudgements And we that suffer may and should reioyce and be glad that We are counted worthy to suffer for the name of Christ And so much for the Person suffering Part. 2 PART II. CHAP. I. Of the sufferings of Christ in the Garden of Gethsemane Of the sufferings of Christ SEcondly We are to consider the sufferings of this Person Iesus Christ Thus it behoued Christ to suffer Well might it haue agreed with his excellent Nature to haue conferred benefits and to bestow gifts on the Sonnes of men but to suffer torments and to endure all indignities at the hands of sinnefull men is strange and admirable so incompetible is the Person and the Passion of Iesus Christ And yet if we diligently obserue all those Tragicall Scenes that are seene in the Records of the Euangelists and marke all the dolefull passages of his whole life euen from the first houre of his birth vnto the last moment of his breath we shall finde the same to be nothing else but a Mappe of miseries or a tempestuous Sea of all calamities for he was no sooner borne but hee beganne to beare our sorrowes he was cast into a Cratch That the whole life of Christ was but a continuall suffering the breathings of the Beasts perhaps did warme his cloutes to preserue his life and he liued not long but hee suffered the effusion of his bloud and the sharpenesse of circumcision He was no sooner circumcised but he was designed vnto the slaughter Herod seekes his life and hee will slay all the Children of Bethlehem or he will put this Childe vnto the Sword And therefore in the middest of Winter he must flie to Egypt to saue his life there hee liued a while and hee must needes liue poore for they that haue nothing among their friends may very well bee thought to haue lesse among strangers when he returnes he must retire himselfe into corners for feare of Archilaus Matth. 2.23 and when he begins to shew himselfe to the World hee must beginne to combate with the Diuell he is no sooner baptized Chap. 4.2 but he is tempted forty dayes together without meate without drinke without sleepe and he can no sooner beginne to publish the glad tidings of saluation but they presently accuse him of sedition His friends say hee is madde his enemies say he hath a Diuell All seeke his life Iohn 8.48 and this is the summe of his whole life Pouertie and miserie hunger thirst weakenesse wearinesse reproaches lyings slaunders and what not Yet all these sufferings were but flea-bitings Christs chiefest sufferings in these three speciall places they were but tastes of that bitter Cuppe whereof hee sucked out the very dregges and all 1. In the Garden of Gethsemane 2. In the presence of his Iudges 3. In the Mount of Caluerie These were the places of his torments and in all these places we must consider both the greatnesse of his griefe which is Paena sensus the paine of feeling and the smalnesse of his comfort which is Paena damni the paine of leesing And therefore by Gods assistance I will chiefly insist vpon those sufferings that he suffered in these places First It is concluded of all Diuines That Christ suffered both in soule and body that the sufferings of Christ was both in soule and body sorrowes of soule and paines of body for He hath carried our sorrowes saith our Translation our paines saith another to shew that whether wee regard his disconsolate soule or his tender body it was a painefull and a sorrowfull suffering so painefull and so sorrowfull that as it was well-neere intolerable vnto him so it is almost incredible vnto vs for though at the bringing of Christ into the world to bee the Sauiour and Redeemer of his Church the Prophet Esay saith Esay 52.7 How beautifull vpon the mountaines are the feet of them that bring these glad tidings of peace i. e. How ready is euery man to embrace this newes yet when he goeth about to expresse the manner of our diliuerance by such sorrowes paines and sufferings Esay 53.1 he makes a stand and saith Who beleeueth our reports For The first degree of Christs suffering was that he was made passible First I told you before that this sufferer was a God blessed for euer and the God-head is impassible no sorrow no griefe no paine could fasten vpon the Deity and therefore how could our Sauiour suffer To this the Prophet answereth Sacrifice and burnt offerings thou wouldst not haue 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Leo Ser. 8. de Passione but a body hast thou ordained me as both the Septuagint and the Author to the Hebrewes hath it Nam cum mortis aculeum non possit accipere natura deitatis nascendo tamen suscepit de nobis quod pati posset pro nobis For seeing the Deity could not suffer death The Word was made Flesh that hee might goe the way of all flesh and make a passage vnto his Passion that so hee might really suffer Hillar de Trin. lib. 10. and not appeare to suffer as Saint Hillary otherwise a most excellent Author doth imagine And indeed Hoc primum tormentum magnum mysterium quod passibilis factus est This was his first suffering torment and an vnspeakeable mystery that he was made able to suffer torments That the Humanity onely suffered And we say that Christ suffered not in respect of his Diuine nature but in respect of his humane nature for though the Deitie was in the sufferer yet
sole of his foote vnto the crowne of his head Esay 1.6 there was nothing whole in him but wounds and swellings and soares most full of grieuous paines And in all this his great and grieuous sufferings we must know them to be the sharper in respect of the tendernesse of his body and the senciblenesse of his spirit because as Aristotle saith Quo complexio nobilior quo mens dexterior Aristot l. 2. de anima c. 9. co tenerior esse solet caro The more noble our complexion and the more quicke and nimble is our apprehension the more sencible is our flesh of the least paine and correction but the flesh of Christ of all other men must needes be the most tender The tenderer our flesh and the quicker our spirits the more sensible wee are of paine because as I shewed you before he was soly begotten of a pure Virgin and his minde must needes be most intellectiue and most apprehensiue of all paine because he was of that age which is most sensitiue and therefore the sufferings of Christ in all respects must needes be most insufferable And yet all this was but the least part of his sorrowes not neere the halfe of his sufferings for hee was to wrestle with the wrath of God that was due to vs for our sinnes yea hee was to tread the fiercenesse of the wrath of God Reuel 15.5 And there can be no conflict in the World so great as to grapple with an angry God for the Prophet Dauid speaking hereof Psal 76.7 saith Thou euen thou art to be feared and who can stand in thy sight when thou art angry The Earth trembled and quaked Psal 18. v. 7. 15. the very foundations also of the hilles shooke and were remoued because he was wroth yea the springs of waters were seene and the foundations of the round World were discouered That the sufferings of Christ were a great deale more then are expressed by the Euangelists or then can be conceiued by any man at thy chiding O Lord at the blasting of the breath of thy displeasure And if his anger and displeasure be so great O who can endure the height of his furie who can ouercome by suffering the fiercenesse of his wrath And therefore to shew how vnspeakeable and how dangerous a tâ—ing it is for any man to define what the vnspeakeable sufferings and the incomprehensible feelings of Christ were both in the Garden of Gethsemane before his Iudges and especially vpon the Crosse in Mount Caluarie the Fathers of the Greeke Church in their Lyturgie after they had recounted his bloudy sweate his shamefull crowning his spitefull handling and all the other particular sufferings which are recorded by the Euangelists they doe most excellently conclude 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 By thine vnknowne sorrowes and by those infinite sufferings incomprehensible to vs though most sensibly felt by thee Haue mercy vpon vs and saue vs O Lord our God And in all this he truly suffered not imaginarily as some haue imagined Sed vere languores nostros ipse tulit But he truly bare our infirmities and carried our sorrowes Not as the Priests of the Law Leuit. 10.17 which were likewise said to beare the sinnes of the people i. e. typically in the figure but truly in the fact hee bare the punishment of them all and that not in outward appearance as malicious Marcion held it Tertull. contra Marc. l. 4. 8. Aug. de haeresibus ad Quodv heres 46. and afterwards the Manichees maintained it as Saint Augustine saith but as he was a man 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 physically and truly so hee endured and suffered all these sorrowes Vere sicut verus homo Most truly as being a true naturall man as Aquinas saith He did most sencibly and feelingly suffer them all for it was not with him as it was with the three Children in the third of Daniel Dan. 3 27. who were cast into the fierie Furnace and yet came out not hauing their hayre singed nor their coates changed nor the smell of fire had passed on them but as Plutarch reports of Coriolanus hee can yet shew his wounds that he suffered and make demonstratiue expressions of his sorrowes farre beyond the apprehension of any man to conceiue them But if any man demand how Christ being God could suffer any paine seeing the Deitie is subiect to no passion Heinsius P. 81. Heinsius answereth that Christ suffered not in respect of the diuine nature which he had as God but in respect of his humane nature which he had as he was Man for though the Deity was in the sufferer yet was it not in the suffering How the Godhead suffered not but sustained the manhood that it might suffer though it was in the Body of Christs passion yet was it not in the passion of Christs Body but as I shewed vnto you before Page 438 the humanity onely suffered and the Deity sustained it that it might suffer because the impotency of the one required the omnipotency of the other Christ being a man that he might suffer and being a God that he might be able so to suffer such insufferable things And therefore we say that Christ in respect of his Deity remained still intire vntouched invulnerable impassible and that very then when his humanity suffered and was dead the Deity liued impassibly and rent the vayle of the Temple sealed vp the Sunne-beames vnder a signet of Cimmerian Cloudes caused the Earth to tremble the Centurion to auerre that Christ was the true and essentiall Sonne of God and raysed vp the interred Carkasses from their graues And we say that it was the humane nature of Christ that stood and suffered vpon the Crosse and in the anguish of its passion breathed out that dolefull complaint euen to the Godhead hypostatically vnited vnto it as well as to the Father and to the holy Spirit saying My God my God Math 27.46 why hast thou forsaken me And although the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the distance betwixt these two Natures be so great and the disparity be so euident as that the one was passible and mortall the other impassible and immortall yet are they so combined and vnited in our Sauiour Christ that although he is not one nature yet is he but one person one Christ one Redeemer and when the humanity suffered and was buried yet was it not neither could it be possibly cast off or forsaken by the Deity vnto which the linkes and ligaments of Gods loue had so strictly and eternally obliged it by an hypostaticall and indissoluble vnion Thus Christ though he was God yet as man Dixit multa gessit mira pertulit dura dura verba duriora verbera durissima supplicia He bore and suffered an incredible paine and vnsufferable sorrowes Esay 53. so great and so grieuous that Esayas may well call him virum dolorum No sorrow like the sorrowes of Christ
indeed and therefore vpon that day he did rise that his enemies might be conuicted by the testimony of their owne watchmen and bee brought therefore either to confesse their faults or to remaine without excuse if they knowing the truth would notwithstanding seeke as they did to conceale and suppresse the truth Secondly Secondly of his disciples His friends and disciples vpon the foresaid apprehensions did expect his resurrection vpon this third day for so the two disciples trauelling towards Emaus after they had said many things concerning him Chrysost hom 9. in Matth. and that they trusted it had beene hee which should haue redeemed Israel they adde this as a most speciall obseruation besides all the rest Luk. 24.21 that to day is the third day since these things were done and therefore to confirme their weake faith and to comfort their disconsolate soules hee did rise againe the third day Thirdly of all Christians Thirdly We were all to reape and to receiue the fruits and benefits of his resurrection and therefore chiefly as hee rose so hee rose the third day in respect of vs all i. e. to confirme our faith and that especially in these foure respects The Resurrection of Christ the third day confirmeth our faith in foure respects 1. Touching the quality of his person 2. Touching the certainty of his resurrection 3. Touching the manner of our restauration 4. Touching the manifestation of our state and condition First Our Sauiour Christ consisted both of a Diuine and a Humane nature Humane that he might die and Diuine that he might rise againe and to shew his death it was requisite that he should rise no sooner then the third day because in lesse time then that a man cannot well bee saide to bee dead but may bee suspected to be in a sound or in a fit of an apoplexie How the third day was the fittest time for Christ to rise in respect of the person of Christ or some other fained fit and in respect of the Diuine nature it was vnpossible that he should be held of death any longer then three dayes for it is the opinion of most grounded vpon experience that in all dead carkasses and a wounded body especially putrefaction and corruption beginneth the third day so Martha saith of Lazarus he hath beene dead foure dayes and he stinketh then no doubt but he began to stinke the third day but the humane nature of our Sauiour Christ in respect of its hypostaticall vnion with the Deity euen then when it lay in the graue could not see much lesse feele corruption Psal 16.11 Act. 2.24 as the Prophet Dauid sheweth therefore it was vnpossible saith Saint Peter that he should bee holden of the paines of death i. e. be stayed so long by death vntill putrefaction or other like penalties and consequences of death had seized vpon him and therefore as in respect of his humane nature it was not conuenient he should rise any sooner so in respect of his Diuine nature it was vnpossible hee should be stayd any longer Christ stayed while the third day to shew the verity of his deâ—th â—nd no longer to shew the certainty of his resurrection Secondly Our Sauiour was to shew both the verity of his death and the certainty of his resurrection but if hee had risen sooner then three dayes the verity of his death might be called into question and if he had promised after a long time to haue raised himselfe againe as Mahomet said that after 800. yeares he would reuiue and reuisite his Sarazens againe then might the falshood thereof lurke in the length of time and indeed if he had staid in his graue any whit longer then he did it might be easily obiected and with some probability by his aduersaries that there was no certainty of his resurrection whether it was he that was crucified had raised himselfe or some other that appeared in his name or whether he had raised the same body that was buried or had assumed some other body like vnto the same because the countenance of a dead body is soone changed and our memory and knowledge of such is soone stupified as we see these three dayes time made most of them that they knew him not prima facie vpon the first sight therefore Christ to shew the verity of his death stayed while the third day and he would stay no longer to shew the certaintie of his resurrection Thirdly Christ rose the third day might paralell our creation Christ in our redemption was to paralell our creation and in many things this second Adam was to resemble the first Adam for Saint Paul speaking of Gods oeconomie and dispensation of his grace vnto vs sheweth how Almighty God purposing to redeeme mankinde did so sweetly dispose of the manner of our redemption that as by man came death so by man came the resurrection from the dead and so a due proportion and resemblance should be in many things betwixt the first and second Adam But we finde that the first Adam was formed out of the earth as from a sole mother without any Father by the Word of God and was both created and fallen in the sixt day the day before the Sabbaoth therefore the word God Amb. l. 5 ep 19. in the sixt age of the world was made the second Adam of a sole mother without a father and in the sixt day of the weeke the same day wherein Adam was created and transgressed and about the same hower that the first Adam sinned by eating the fruit of the forbidden tree was this second Adam crucified vpon a tree and in the same place as some doe thinke wherein the first Adam was buried and as the Father after his creation rested vpon the Sabbaoth so Christ after our purchase and redemption rested in his graue all the Sabbaoth and then as his Father â—pon the first day of the weeke had begunne the world so Christ vpon the first day of the weeke did beginne to renue the world and caused as Lactantius saith Omnia cum domino dona redire suo All graces to bee renued all men that beleeued in him to be reuiued and now to beginne againe to liue a new life vnto God with him And this was prefigured in the Law where Moses sheweth that the sheafe of their first fruits was to be brought vnto the Priest Leuit. 23.11 and the Priest was to waue the same before the Lord on the morrow after the Sabbaoth which was the Sabbaoth of the Passeouer Vers 15. to note vnto vs that Christ which is the true first fruites that is offered vnto God for vs all was to be waued and raised vp the immediate morrow after the Passeouer that as Adam was created the last day and then dyed and so begat Ecclesiam morientium a Congregation of sinners all subiect vnto death so Christ the first day of the weeke was raised vp and liues for euer to
all the faculties of the soule Our will is guided by our iudgement saue onely the vegetatiue as Nyssenus saith yet of it selfe it hath no light but is inlightned by the reason iudgement of the vnderstanding Viues l. de anima And therefore actus voluntatis à voluntate producitur sed à ratione suadetur The Act of the will is produced by the will but it is induced and moued by the reason saith Viues And therefore if the vnderstanding be darkened Matth 15.14 it is no maruell that the will should be corrupted for if the lame will carry and command the blinde vnderstanding and the blinde reason doe leade and guide the lame will then are both like to fall into the Ditch Of the perfection of Adams vnderstanding But though the vnderstanding of Adam in Paradice was so perfect that he knew his God which made him his wife to be bone of his bone and flesh of his flesh though hee neuer saw her before and all the other creatures so well that at the first sight he was able to giue them names agreeable to their natures Gen. 2.20.23 yet now the vnderstanding of all men iâ— so blinded that it cannot see the light of any Diuine truth How our vnderstanding is now darkened through sinne Peccatum enim tenebrae for sinne is as the blacknesse of darknesse and as a deepe dungeon wherein there is no light and all sinnes are called the workes of darkenesse not onely because they are done in darkenesse or at least desired to be kept secret but also because they are the workes of them whose vnderstandings are so darkned that they cannot perceiue the excellency of the Grace of God Rom 13.12.13 but doe thinke all the mysteries of our faith to be not onely mirabilia strange and wonderfull but also incredibilia impossible and incredible and therefore whatsoeuer we doe say of grace and of spirituall things Ephes 5.8 they are but foolishnesse vnto them for as in the night time when there is no light a bush seemes a man and a man a beast and we iudge Lead to be siluer Brasse Gold and Gold no better then Copper So those men qui sordide viuunt Chrysost hom 4. in Iohn which do loue liue in iniquity can no wayes vnderstand the excellency of piety saith Saint Chrysostome And therefore sinne brought this infirmitie vpon vs to bee 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Darkned in our vnderstandings and our fathers affected-knowledge of good and euill brought inflicted ignorance of all good vpon all his children for as we reade of a certaine Widdow Ephes 4 1â— that desiring to see better then she did had her eyes so cunningly closed by a subtle and a false Physition that while she hoped for a greater measure of sight How Adam by affecting knowledge brought ignorance vp-all his posterity he stole away all the treasure that she had and then hauing her eyes opened and seeing how shee was cozened shee worthily complained that she saw worse then euer she did before So Adam desiring to know much and to see better then he did before became indeed to know iust nothing and to see himselfe in a farre worser state then euer he was before for God is light and in him there is no darknesse at all and therefore falling away from God wee are depriued of all light 1 John 1.5 and are plunged into the place of vtter darkenesse Iohn 12.35 and therefore as he that walketh in darknesse knoweth not where he goeth so we being separated from God wee know not what is truth we know not what is good And the Philosophers themselues the seekers and searcherâ— after Knowledge did finde to their endlesse griefe The Philosophers saw and professed the blindnesse of all men that when they had turned their strength into weaknesse their marrow into drynesse and their colour into palenesse by their continuall watchings and indefessed vnwearied studies and musing to get knowledge they attained at length to no more but hoc vnum scire se nihil scire to know this one thing that they knew iust nothing And as our Sauiour said to Nicodemus in the like case if they could not attaine to the knowledge of earthly things Iohn 3.12 how should they vnderstand heauenly things For although the vnderstanding which Nazianzene calleth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the eye and lampe of reasâ—n should be exceeding sharpe to discerne the alterations of the skyes to enter into the secrets of nature How sharpe our vnderstanding is in natural things to reach vnto the height of heauen and the deepnesse of Hell it selfe yet in things concerning God he could reach no further then 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 such points as might be manifested by demonstration as Saint Clement speaketh For if we talke of Christs conception by the holy Ghost How blockish euery man is naturally in the mysteries of our Faith without the helpe of man of his birth of a pure Virgin without breach or impeachment of her Virginitie of his Death as the Sonne of God personally vnderstood for otherwise the Diuine Nature is impassible and so of his resurrection as hee is the Sonne of Man and of the resurrection of all flesh at the last day and such liâ—â— Mysteries of our Faith then both the wise Grecians euen all the Schoole of Athens and the foolish Iewes euen all the whole ranke of Rabbies will count each point 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a fained thing cry out with the Athenians Act. 17.18 What will these bablers say for as the eye of man saith S. Augustine being either blinde or pur-blinde cannot presently discerne the cleerest obiect euen so saith he Animus pollutus aut mens turbata deum presentem videre non potest the minde that is distracted with worldly cares or the soule that is polluted with filthy sinne can neither vnderstand God nor godlinesse And therefore Moses saith that all the imaginations of the thoughts of mans heart were onely euill continually Gen. 6.5 Tit. 1 15. Rom. 8.6 and Saint Paul saith that our very mindes are defiled and our wisedomes death but if the light that is in thee be darkenesse how great is that darkenesse if our mindes and vnderstandings be thus blinded and defiled through sinne in what case shall the other faculties of the soule be What an excellent facultie the memory is Sabel l. 10. c. 9. Exemp de memor Thirdly for the memory It is a faculty qua repetit animus quae fuerunt Whereby the soule retaineth as it were in her sight and knowledge all the things that are past Et hoc nil sanctius nil vtilius homini dedit Deus and it is the best and most excellent gift that God bestowed on man saith Sabellicus for this is the Treasurer of all Learning and the Keeper of all those Arts and Knowledge which by great study and labour we haue
grosse ignorance and the memory with sottish forgetfulnesse so that now wee will indirectly wee iudge darkely and wee remember nothing that is heauenly Hence it comes to passe How our soules are fuller of diseases then our bodies that our bodies are not so subiect to diseases as our soules be to sinnes for pride is the soules tympany when it doth turgescerefastu waxe big and swell through the distaine of others enuie is the worme that gnaweth at the heart then which it is most certaine that Siculi non inuenere tyranui tormentum maius The Sicilian Tyrants did neuer feele a more fearefull torment and wrath is a plurisie that will not be appeased without blood for of the raging man it is most truely said Mad that his poyson cannot others kill He drinkes it off himselfe himselfe to spill And therefore of all the men in the world we are aduised to keepe no company with an angry furious man but as the Poet saith Dum furor in cursu currenti cede furori Ouidius lib. 1. de rem amor Difficiles aditus impetus omnis habet To turne aside from euery furious wight Cause fury will haue passage in despight And Lust is the soules feauer the flames thereof are the flames of fire and the waters thereof are aqua 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the waters of folly and madnesse And in this How the sickenesse of the soule is worse then the sickenesse of the body the sicknesse of the soule doth exceed all the sicknesse of the body for the body hath some respite from its sickenesse but the soule hath none from sinne and euery sicknesse of the body kils it not but euery sinne slayeth the soule for the reward of sinne that is of euery sinne is death saith the Apostle And hence likewise in my iudgement that branch of Pellagianisme taught also by Lactantius that the light of Nature if it were well vsed might make way for Diuine instruction may bee sufficiently confuted for though they teach that man by sinne hath not quite killed his soule but wounded the same like the man that fell among theeues and was left halfe aliue and therefore might Lactan diuin iustit c. 5. That Nature though neuer so well vsed cannot procure the gifts of grace Ephes 2.1.5 Coloss 2.13 saith Lactantius come to the same doctrine that we doe follow Si quae natura ducente sanserunt defendissent If they had constantly maintained those things which Nature taught them yet the Apostle saith here that sinne brings death vnto the Sinner and if death then sure there was no life i. e. no life of Grace in him And so in many other places the Apostle sheweth as much for he saith that we were dead in trespasses and sinnes and that God hath quickned vs by Iesus Christ And therefore it is apparently plaine that at the beginning of our conuersion we are altogether passiue and haue no power in the world to releeue our selues vntill grace hath quickened our soules Ob. But against this it may be obiected that the Apostle saith the Gentiles knew God Rom. 1.21 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so much as might be knowne concerning God that is his eternall power and God-head when they considered him in his workes and therefore the light of Nature was not quite extinguished in them Sol. That sinne extinguished all knowledge of God but what God reuealeth to man I answere that this knowledge of God was not from the light of Nature in them but it was reuealed by God vnto these naturall men to make them without excuse as Zanchius well obserueth for so the Apostle sheweth in the 19 verse of the same Chapter where he saith Deus enim illis manifestauit for God reuealed the same vnto them and therefore I say that the sinne of Adam did quite kill the soule of euery man for the reward of sinne is death and therefore we may all of vs cry out with the Apostle Rom. 7.24 O wretched men that we are who shall deliuer vs from this body of death And here-hence we may also see the iudgement of God threatned in Paradise Gen. 1.17 In what day thou eatest of the tree of Knowledge of good and euill thou shalt die the death to be truely and presently inflicted vpon Adam for though his body seemed to liue yet was his soule separated from God and therefore must needs be presently dead Aug. de ser dom in monte habetur de poenitent distinct 2. But as sinne is three manner of wayes committed as I shewed before so is the death of the soule three wayes inflicted and they are prefigured by those three sorts of dead men which our Sauiour raised in the Gospell as S. Augustine sheweth The first was Iayrus his daughter she was a Virgin â—nd was as yet within the doores and therefore our Sauiour went into the house and put out all the people and vouchsafed to take her by the hand and to say Talitha cumi Damosell Mar. 5.41 Of a three-fold death of the soule I say vnto thee arise This signifieth that soule which sinned onely by consent but hath not yet brought forth the sinne into fact and therefore God will be mercifull vnto such and will not require to shame them before the world but hee will goe in himselfe and accept of their inward repentance for such inward sinnes The second was the Widdowes sonne of Naime and hee was caried out to be buried and therefore our Sauiour in the presence of them all Did touch the Beere and said Luk 7.14 Yong man I say vnto thee arise and he sate vp and began to speake And this signifieth the soule that sinneth in fact and therefore as she publikely sinned so she must be publikely restored and as by her sinne she offended many so by her sitting vp They that publikely sinne must publikely testifie their repentance i. e. by her standing and constancy in grace and by her talking i. e. by her confession of her sinnes she must giue satisfaction vnto many Nam qui publice peccat publice corrigendus publice restaurandus est For he that publikely offendeth is publikely to be reprooued publikely to be restored saith the Law The third was Lazaus John 11. and hee was dead and laid in his graue and therefore Iesus was faine to goe a great iourney to raise him and when he came to him he groned in his spirit and was troubled he wept and he groaned againe Ver. 35. he lifted vp his eyes he prayed and he cryed with a loude voyce saying Ver. 43. Lazarus come forth and then he came forth but how bound hand and foot saith the Euangelist with graue clothes and his face bound with a Napkin so that his friends and standers by were faine to loose him and to let him goe Ver 44. And this signifieth the soule that is accustomed to sinne that is dead and buried in sin and
of themselues but as Dauid was much moued when he saw the people smitten for his sinnes 2 Sam. 2â— 17 and as Iacob halted when the Angell smote him on the thigh Gen. 32.31 so are we many times more grieued to see and more affraid to heare that our Children and the fruits of our loynes shall be punished then our selues And therefore seeing that fearefull curse of the Prophet To serue God is the greatest good that wee can doe vnto our Children Let the iniquity of his Father be had in remembrance and let not the sinne of his Mother be done away doth light so heauily vpon the Children of the wicked it should teach all Parents that loue their Children To feare the Lord and to striue more to get Gods blessing rather then the greatest patrimony vnto our Children for they may assure themselues that as the old verse saith De male quaesitis vix gaudet tertius haeres If they haue inlarged their substance by wicked meanes it will be the onely meanes to cut off all their posterity as may be seene in Saul Achab Ieroboam and the like but the blessing of the Lord perpetuateth the same And therefore as some for the loue that they beare vnto their Children will giue themselues vnto the Diuell by committing all sinnes in oppressing others to inrich them so let vs if we loue our Children cease to sinne for this will free our selues from woe and bring the best blessing vnto them and Secondly It should teach all Children to be humbled and to pray to God with our lyturgy saying Remember not Lord our offences nor the offences of our Fore-fathers but spare vs good Lord spare thy people and giue vs thy grace and forgiue vs all our sinnes through Iesus Christ our Lord Amen And thus I haue shewed thee O man Quid sit optimum What is the chiefest good and what we may learne concerning God that he is an Omnipotent eternall being good vnto all specially vnto his Saints and iust vnto sinners And now Quid nisi vota supersunt What remaineth but to apply all this vnto our soules to beleeue in him to loue him and to feare him and to prayse his name his blessed name for euermore for it is a good thing to sing prayses vnto our God yea and it becommeth well the iust to be thankefull Psal vlt. Verse vlt. And therefore prayse thou the Lord O my soule and all that is within me prayse his holy name and let euery thing that hath breath prayse the Lord through Iesus Christ our Lord. Amen Amen A Prayer O Eternall God whom to know as thou art is vnpossible as thou hast reuealed in thy Word eternall life wee most humbly beseech thee to open the eyes of our vnderstanding that wee may see thee at all times in all places and in all our actions and giue vs O Lord thy heauenly grace that seeing thee wee may loue thee with all our hearts feare thy power extoll thy goodnesse and admire thy iustice to preserue vs from all sinnes and to retaine vs in thy wayes to thine eternall glory and to our endlesse comfort Amen IEHOVAE LIBERATORI FINIS The Third Golden Candlesticke HOLDING The Third greatest Light of Christian RELIGION Of the Incarnation of the WORD IOHN 1.14 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And the Word was made Flesh I Haue described in my formost Treatise O Theophilus The coherence of this Treatise with the former Treatises O dearely beloued of God the miserable estate of that poore man that was eiected out of Paradise and left halfe dead betweene Ierusalem and Iericho betwixt Heauen and Hell being already excluded out of Heauen but not fully thrust and intruded into Hell and in my next Treatise I haue shewed vnto thee a poole of Bethesda John 5.2 and brought vnto thee a good Samaritan that is onely able and willing to heale all thy maladies but as yet thou wantest an Angel to stirre the Waters and this good Samaritan hath not alighted and therefore I must now shew you how to apply the salue vnto the sore and how the Angel of the Couenant Iesus Christ alighted and descended from the throne of his Maiestie which is his horse for he â—ideth vpon the Heauens Psal 68.4 as vpon an horse to releeue this poore distressed and afflicted man And this by Gods helpe I shall doe out of these words The Word was made flesh for here is the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Esay 7.14 the salue laid vnto the sore here is Emmanuel God with vs the blessed God which I haue described in my last Treatise vnited and made one with vs which in my first Tract I haue shewed to be so miserably afflicted and therefore we may now reioyce and be assured of our health and saluation because the Word is made flesh CHAP. I. Of the excellency of the Knowledge of Iesus Christ God hath fixed many impressions of his goodnesse in the creatures WHosoeuer will religiously and seriously obserue those manifold impressions of the Diuine goodnesse which the Lord God hath not slightly planted in the natures of all liuing creatures for a short space to be preached but hath also indelibly fixed in the memory of all ages most seriously to be considered he shall surely finde sufficient matter of reuerence loue and admiration but he shall be neuer able sufficiently to comprehend the excellency of so huge an Ocean of goodnesse within the straight and narrow compasse of his vnderstanding This were but with Saint Augustines Boy to empty the Ocean Sea with an Oyster-shell into an hole and therefore the serious and continuall contemplation of such plentifull and farre-spread goodnesse of God did so inuade and fill the thoughts of that Kingly Prophet Dauid that being as it were rauished or wrapt in an extacie at the inexplicable expression and vnconceiueable consideration of the same hee breaketh forth into these heauenly acclamations saying O Iehoua In coelis est benignitas tua Psal 36.5.6.7 O Lord our Gouernour How excellent is thy Name in all the world thou that hast set thy glory aboue the Heauens thy faithfulnesse reacheth vnto the cloudes thy righteousnesse is like the strong mountaines Psal 147. thy iudgements are like the great deepe thou sauest O Lord both man and beast But I will not suffer my speech at this time to enter into that infinite Ocean of Gods goodnesse whereby he giueth food vnto all flesh feeding the young Rauens that call vpon him and whereby he adorneth the fields with all kinde of fruitfull trees and pleasant flowers and all flowers with sweet smels and delicate colours neither will I enter into any part or parcell of his excellent prouidence whereby he gouerneth the whole world by his wisedome sustaineth all things by his power and relieueth all things by his goodnesse for this is too large a field for me to post ouer in so short a space as is now allotted me to
obuiously meete Secondly by vnanswerable reasons drawne from Scripture First from the incommunicable properties of God and would be here tedious to relate Secondly We may shew the same by infallible and vnanswerable reasons drawne from Scriptures as First From those incommunicable properties of the Deity which are properly ascribed vnto him as First To be Omnipotent Iohn 3.31 Heb. 1.3 Philip. 3.21 Apoc. 1.18 Secondly To remit sinnes not onely instrumentally as the Ministers doe as we see in Mathew 16.19 Iohn 20.23 But absolutely by his owne proper power and authority as wee see in Mathew 9.6 Mar. 2.5.7.9 Luc. 5.20 Thirdly To be in many places at the same instant as Mathew 18.20.28.20 Fourthly To haue the same equall power with the Father Iohn 5.17 c. 16.15 Fiftly To raise himselfe from the graue Rom. 1.4 Ioh. 10.18 Sixthly To send forth and to giue the Holy Ghost Zach. 12.10 Iohn 16.7 Secondly From those relations that he hath with God Secondly from the relations that he hath with God as to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The onely begotten Sonne of God Iohn 1.18 To be the Image of the Father Iohn 14.7.8 9. 2 Cor. 4.4 Coloss 1.15 And to be the very forme of God for the Apostle saith That He being in the forme of God thought it no robbery to be equall with God Therefore he must needes be true God First Because the forme of God is most simple and essentiall and not compounded or accidentall for that in God there is no composition no accidents Et nihil est in Deo quod non sit ipse Deus Nor any other thing which is not God Gabriel Biel. super 1. sentent dist 1. q. 5. Because the Diuine Essence Identificat sibi omnia quae sunt in Diuinis Doth identifie or deifie all things that are in the De ty To bee the forme of God is to be a very God Secondly because the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one existing and being in the forme of God doth plainely signifie the verie nature of God for as his being in the forme of man proueth that hee was a verie man so his being in the forme of God and his iust and lawfull thinking that it was no wrong or robberie to bee equalâ— with God doth most substantially proue that hee was a very God by nature before hee was incarnate and made man for who can bee in the forme of God but verie God or who can rightly be aequall with God Esay 40.18 but God For to whom will yee liken God or what likenesse will yee compare vnto him sayth the Prophet and therefore Saint Basil sayth that to bee in the forme of God is as much Basilius l. 1. cont Eunomium as to exist in the essence of God for that as to take vpon him the forme of a seruant signifieth that our Lord was made partaker of the humane nature so by saying that hee was in the forme of God hee ascribeth vnto him the proprietie of the nature of God Colloss 1.15 and so discussing the words of the Apostle which is the image of the inuisible God he sayth that this image was not made with hands Ambros l. 7. Ep. 47. Aug. l. de fide ad Petrum l. 1. c. 1. de trinit Hiâ—ar l. 12 de trinit Lombard l. 3. dist 5. neither was it the worke of any arte or cogitation but a liuing image yea life it selfe retayning the identitie of the Godhead not in the similitude of any figure but in the substance of the same and so Saint Ambrose Saint Augustine Saint Hillarie Pet. Lombard and diuers others doe most truely interpret this being of him in the forme of God to proue him to be a true and eternall God Thirdly From those Epithets which are ascribed vnto him and are onely agreeable to the Diuine nature Thirdly from the Epithets ascribed vnto him as First To be the author of our Election Iohn 13.18 Secondly To know the secrets of our hearts Matth. 9.4.5 Mar. 2.8 Luke 5.22 Thirdly To Illuminate vs. Iohn 1.9 Fourthly To heare the prayers of them that call vpon him Iohn 14.14 Fiftly To Iudge the quicke and the dead Iohn 5.22 Sixtly To giue vnto his seruants euerlasting life Iohn 5.24 Seauenthly To bee truely rich and so able to doe and to bestow these great rewards vpon his seruants for he that is truely rich must needs be the true and eternall God but Christ sayth the Apostle is rich for hee being rich for our sakes became poore 2 Cor. 8.9 therefore hee must needs bee the true God That Go dis truely rich it appearth hence that he onely is El shadai a God of all sufficiencie and therefore hee sayth Psal 50.12 If I bee hungry I will not tell thee for all the world is myne and all that therein is and he onely may most truely say Mille meae siculis errant in montibus agnae All the beasts of the forrest are mine and so are the cattell vpon a thousand hills Neither is he onely rich in temporall riches Rom. 2.11 but in spirituall gifts and graces also for Saint Paul speaketh of the riches of the Benignitie and Lenitie and long sufferance of God and in Ephes 1.18 He speaketh of the riches of his grace where hee calleth God rich in Mercie or rich in glorie and Rom. 11.33 He crieth out O the deepenesse of the riches both of the Wisedome and Knowledge of God and therefore it is most playne that God is truely rich And that none else is rich but God it may bee as easily confirmed for that euery man if hee doth but consider his owne estate may say with the Prophet Dauid I am poore and in miserie and our wants are a great deale more then our wealth and what we haue wee haue not of our selues but wee haue receiued them from God for what hast thou that thou hast not receiued sayth the Apostle 1 Cor. 4.7 and what thou hast receiued is properly none of thine and therefore as thou camest naked and broughtest nothing into the world so thou shalt returne naked Job 1.21 and carrie nothing out of the world againe But against this you will obiect that the Scripture sayth Ob Abraham Lot Iob and diuers others were very rich and yet no Gods and therefore that euery one which is rich is not a God I answere first that these men were not truely rich Sol. No man in this world is truely rich but were so thought to bee in the opinion of men and therefore so called after the manner of men for he onely is a rich man qui nihil quaerat nihil appetat nihil optet amplius which neither doth nor can seeke nor wish nor desire any more then he hath as Cicero sayth but none of these were such for Abraham and the rest of them did professe that they were pilgrimes and strangers here on earth and therefore sought their countrey aboue
proued and that the Holy Ghost is God as all the holy Fathers haue as sufficiently confirmed yet that there are not three Gods but one God Athan. in Sym. as Athanasius sheweth therefore it must needs follow that all three haue but one and the selfe-same Essence and consequently that the Sonne is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Patri Consubstantiall or co-essentiall vnto his Father and therefore also hence it must needs follow that as Caluin saith our Sauiour Christ is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A God of himselfe independent as absolute as the Father is And yet for the better vnderstanding of this point how Christ may be said to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 God of himselfe Thom. p. 1. q. 33. we must consider that Aliud est habere essentiam Diuinam à seipso How Christ is God of himselfe aliud habere essentiam diuinam à seipsa existentem It is one thing to haue his Diuine Essence from himselfe and another to haue his Diuine Essence existing of it selfe To say that the person of the Sonne hath his Diuine Essence that is his personall being from himselfe we cannot because it is from the Father the Father communicating his whole Essence vnto the Sonne and therefore we say that the Sonne Ratione 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in respect of his personall being is not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 God of himselfe but God of God and Light of Light as the Nicen Councell hath it because the person of the Sonne existeth from the person of the Father but to say that the Sonne hath his Diuine Essence existing of it selfe Idem ibid. is most certaine Quia remota relatione ad patrem sola restat essentia qua est à seipsa for taking away the relation of the Sonne vnto the Father there remaineth but the Essence which is of it sâ—lfe and therefore we say that the Sonne Quoad essentiam absolutam In respect of his absolute Essence is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 A God of himselfe because the Essence of the Sonne is the very same that the Essence of the Father is And so to this truth set downe by Caluine Bellarmine himselfe subscribeth Bellar. de Christo But the old and new Arrians cannot endure to yeeld him to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the same Essence with his Father but rather 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of some other such like Essence but not of the same substance as Athanasius sheweth Athan. in l. de expositione fidej And therefore they doe obiect First against the Word here vsed by the Fathers to expresse this truth Secondly against the truth and true meaning of the matter contained and declared by this Word Ob. Idem in l. de decret Con. Nicen. First for the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 though first found out by themselues yet of all others the Arrians could not indure it as Athanasius witnesseth because as they said neither 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 essence nor 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the same essence can be found any where in all the Scriptures Sol. That the word Essence is plainely deriued out of Scriptures Rom 1.20 To this Epiphanius answereth that although the name of essence in plain tearme is not found either in the Old or New Testament yet the sense and signification thereof the Synonomie and aequiualencie of the same is obuiously found in many places for the Apostle speaketh of his eternall power 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and Godhead and what is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 his Godhead but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the very Essence of God Philip. 2. and so he speaketh 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the forme of God but the forme of any thing is no lesse Philosophicall then the Essence of that thing and Saint Peter saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That wee might bee made partakers of the Diuine Nature 2 Pet. 1.4 but the nature of God and the Essence of God are both the same Besides Essence is deriued of esse to be and it is the abstract of the name or Word which in the concrete is called ens being but God is said to be both ens esse Exod. 3.14 the chiefest being and to be in the Scriptures as ego sum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I am that I am and hee that is hath sent me vnto you and therefore if the Scriptures call him ens the being why may not we call him essence for though it cannot be well said That abstract names are most agreeable to God that man is humanitie in the abstract yet because God is most simple by nature we may as well speake of him in the abstract as in the concrete nay the abstract names are more properly agreeable vnto him then the concrete as to say that he is Truth rather then true Wisdome rather then wise iustice Dionys de Diuin nominibus rather then iust and so essence or being rather then to be as Dionysius saith And further we finde the word Essence vsed in the Scripture for where the prodigal Child saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Luc. 15.12 Father giue me the portion of thy substance which pertaineth to me he vseth the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to expresse his fathers substance and what is the riches or the substance of God but his Diuinitie and therefore the word Essence is not improper nor altogether inuented without Scripture to expresse the Nature of GOD. And for the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 coessentiall or of the same essence That the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the same Essence was not first vsed by the Fathers of Athanasius time the fathers answere that it was not first inuented by the fathers of the Nicen Councell as the Arrians falsely affirmed for one of themselues denying the Deitie of Christ said that if they should yeeld Christ to be a true God then must it follow that he is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the same essence with God whereupon Hosius and the rest of the Orthodox fathers concluded that he was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the same essence with God and it was vsed long before that time though not controuerted by Dionysius Romanus Dionysius Alexandrinus Origen Theognostus and others as Athanasius affirmeth Secondly they say that it was not so far fetcht as the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of another essence and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the like essence which themselues vsed to deny the coessentiality of the Sonne of God with his Father so free were they to deuise what they would to maintaine errours and so strict against the defenders of the truth Thirdly Luk 6. Deut 7.6.14.2.26 Ambros l. 3. c. 7. de fide they alleadge that the Scriptures vsed the like words as 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And Moses calleth the children of Israel 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which we translate a speciall people or a peculiar chosen people vnto himselfe a people as
God to communicate himselfe vnto all creatures by his presence and it was a greater kindnesse to communicate himselfe to all the godly by his grace but it is the greatest of all to vnite himselfe hypostatically by his spirit vnto our flesh And therefore this could not be done without infinite goodnesse and so in this respect we find this worke of the incarnation ascribed to each person for the Father sent me saith our Sauiour and I came into the world saith he of himselfe and the Holy Ghost shall come vpon thee and the power of the most high shall ouer shadow thee whereby thou mayst conceiue saith Gabriel vnto the blessed Virgin And therefore seeing the whole Trinitie was the Maker of this Word flesh how can it be but that the whole Trinitie should be incarnate and made flesh Sol. That the Son onely assumed our Flesh I answere that this worke of the words incarnation is to bee considered 1. Inchoatiue 2. Consummatiue As it was inchoated and begun As it is consummated and finished In the first sense it is common to all the three persons of the Trinitie for it was made by them all three but in the second sense it was proper onely vnto the Word because it was assumed onely by the Word Aug. in Enchyrid C. 38. as Saint Augustine sheweth for as if three Maides should spinne and make a garment and then put it vpon one of them to weare all three should be the makers yet but one should be the wearer of the same Euen so though the Father did appoint Christ a body and this body was conceiued by the Holy Ghost yet neither the Father nor the Spirit did assume that body but only the person of the Sonne of God and therefore Saint Augustine saith truly Idem Ser. 3. de temp that Impleuet carnem Christi pater spiritus sanctus sed maiestate non susceptione The flesh of Christ was filled with the Maiestie of the Father and of the Holy Ghost but it was onely vnited to the person of the Word Ob. But then againe it may be obiected that seeing the nature of the Father and the nature of the Sonne be the very same for they be both 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of the very selfe-same essence as I haue sufficiently shewed vnto you before and the whole diuine essence is in euery one of them therefore how can it be but the Sonne being incarnate the Father should be incarnate also Sol. To this we answere briefly that although the nature of the Father and the nature of the Sonne be the very same yet Aliter est in patre aliter est in filio This very selfe-same essence is otherwise or after another manner in the Father The diuine nature limited in the person of the Sonne was made Flesh and after another manner in the Sonne and therefore we say that the Diuine nature simply considered cannot be said to be incarnate Sed natura diuina determinata limitata in persona filij But the diuine nature limited and determined in the person of the Son And this Saint Augustine doth most excellently expresse against the Iewes saying O Iudae Cytharam respice c. Behold O Iew the Harpe when it yeelds sweet and pleasant tune there be three things that seeme to concurre alike the skill the hand and the string and yet there is but one sound heard Ars dictat manus tangit chorda resonat The Art or skill directeth the hand toucheth and the string onely soundeth Tria pariter operantur they doe all three worke alike and yet neither the skill nor the hand doe yeeld the sound but onely the string Sic nec pater Operatio in tribus constat sed quemadmodum ad solam chordam soni redditio sic pertinet ad solum Christum carnis humanae susceptio nec spiritus sanctus susceperunt carnem tamen cum filio pariter operantur So neither the Father nor the Holy Spirit did assume the flesh and yet they did all agree in the working and making of this flesh but as the string alone doth yeeld the musicall harmony so the word alone did assume the flesh the worke is seene in all three but as the sound of the musicke pertaineth vnto the string alone so the assumption of our flesh pertayneth to the word alone and if any incredulous Iew with Nichodemus demaunds how this Word should be made flesh of a Virgin without the helpe of man let him tell me how Aarons rod Aug. de incarnat Dom. cont Iudaeos being a drie sticke could blossome and beare ripe Almonds and I will tell him how the Virgin did conceiue and beare a Sonne but he cannot tell the former though the lesser miracle and therefore no wonder that I cannot expresse the latter which is so ineffable a mysterie saith Saint Augustine And so you see the first Branch of this Text touching the person who was made the Word the Sonne the second person of the blessed Trinity fully discussed BRANCH II. CHAP. I. Of Christ his apparition before his incarnation and of the conception of Christ the manner of it and the reasons why hee was so conceiued 2. Branch Tres misturas fecit omnipotens illa maiestas in assumptione carnis nostrae ita mirabiliter singularia singulariter mirabilia vt talia nec facta nec facienda sint amplius super terram SEcondly We are to consider what hee was made Flesh for the Word was made Flesh Saint Bernard saith God did three workes three mixtures as hee calleth them in the assumption of our flesh so singularly wonderfull and so wonderfully singular that the like were neuer made before nor shall be made hereafter vpon the face of the Earth Coniunct à quippe sunt ad invicem Deus homo mater virgo fides cor humanum For now are ioyned together God and our Flesh a Mother and a Virgin a diuine Faith and a humane Heart for the Word and Soule and Flesh haue met and made but one Person These three are one and this one is three not by the confusion of substance but in the vnity of person This is the first and most super-excellent mixture or coniunction The second is a Virgin and a Mother a thing so admirable so singular that since the World beganne it was neuer heard that shee which brings forth a Childe should be a Maide and that shee should be a Mother which still remaines a Virgin The third is Faith and Mans Heart Inferior quidem sed non minus forsitan fortis an inferior copulation but perhaps not deseruing much lesse admiration For it is a wonder to see how the Heart of Man can yeeld Faith and beliefe vnto these two and to beleeue that God should be made Man that shee should remain a Virgin which had borne a Sonne for as Iron and a Gally-cup can neuer be coupled together Bernard Ser. 3.
another and yet is not transferred or changed into the nature of the other as a Souldier putting on his armour is made an armed man or a man wearing on his garments is no more a naked but a cloathed man And so the Word is now cloathed with our flesh tâ—e same Word but after another manner before onely subsisting of the Deity now of both natures being made flesh not as water is made wine but as Aaron was made Priest and Dauid King not by changing him into a Priest or King but by beginning to be what they were not and not leauing to bee what they were or because this doth not so fully shew it the Priestly or Kingly dignity being but an accidentall title conferred vpon these persons as a naked man is cloathed and made an apparelled man or a Souldier harnessed and made an armed man when all his harnesse is put vpon him as Theodoret Theodoret in Dialog Saint Augustine and others doe declare And so you see that in our Sauiour Christ the two natures doe still remaine intire inconfused CHAP. II. Of the vnion of these two natures of Christ in one and the selfe-same person and some obiections answered SEcondly touching the vnion of these two natures the Deitie and the Humanity wee must know that although this eternall Word the Sonne of God was so made flesh i. e. a perfect man of the seed of Dauid as that still each nature remaineth intire and inconfused yet we must not imagine that he is therefore two sonnes or two persons as Nestorius thought but that he is one onely person consisting of both these natures And because this point of the vnion of these two natures is not of small moment but is a point full of comfort much opposed and of great difficulty I will diuide all that I meane to say concerning the same vnto these three principall heads First The truth hereof shall be confirmed Three things handled concerning the vnion of both natures in Christ and the obiections of our aduersaries shall be answered Secondly The manner of this vnion wherein it consisteth shal be shewed Thirdly The chiefe benefits and effects thereof shall be declared First for the vnion of these two natures A very good simily of Justin Martyr to expresse the manner of the vnion of the two natures in Christ the Word and the Flesh Iustin Martyr saith Sicut post vnitionem primigenij luminis cum solari corpore c. as after the collection and the vnition of the light with the body of the Sunne no man can plucke them asunder neither doth any man call the one a part the Sunne and the other the light but both of them ioyntly together we terme the Sunne euen so after the vnition of our flesh with this true light the Word No man will call the Word apart to be one Sonne of God and the Sonne of man to be another but he will vnderstand both these together to be one and the selfe-same Christ as by the name of Sunne we vnderstand both the light and the body which containeth the light and as the light and body of the Sunne are two seuerall natures so there be in our Sauiour Christ two distinct and seuerall natures Altera nostra altera nobis superior The one is ours the other is Gods and as the light is actually in the Sunne so that none can seperate it from that body wherein it is fixed and contained Hoc exemplo diuinae vnitionis adducto nos ad magis cognitionem confugimus si non omnino ipsá veritatem assequuti certe quandam similitudinem quae pâ—escrutantibus sufficiat Iustin Martyr de recta confess siue de coessent trinit yet we may easily discerne the nature and the proprietie of each one from the other Sic in vno filio dei vniuersam vim nemo seperauerit ab vnica filietate naturae tameÌ„ eius proprietatem ratione quiuis discreuerit So in that one Sonne of God no man can seperate his whole vertue i. e. of the Word and Flesh from that onely Sonneship and yet in our vnderstandings we may discerne the different proprietie of each nature And so saith the Father By this example we flie vnto the more holy cogitation of the diuine vnion of these two natures and if hereby we be not altogether able to attaine vnto the truth thereof as what can be fully sufficient to expresse so great a mystery yet certainly we haue herein a most excellent similitude which will greatly helpe and contentedly suffice the godly and moderate searchers of this truth The vnity of Christ his person most cleerly proued from Scriptures But indeed the holy Scriptures doe of all other writings most fully and cleerely shew that these two natures doe make but one person in our Lord and Sauiour Iesus Christ for when Christ asked his Apostles whom doe men say that I the Sonne of man am Saint Peter answered that he was Christ the Sonne of the liuing God Matth. 16.13 therefore he is but one person because Saint Peter confesseth the Sonne of man to be the Sonne of the liuing God Verse 16. And the Angel said vnto the Virgin that holy thing which shall be borne of thee Luke 1.35 shall be called the Sonne of God therefore hee is but one person because he which was born of the Virgin was is none other but he that is truly called and is the true Sonne of God And Saint Paul speaking of Christ as he was the eternall Sonne of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 2.3 in respect of his Godhead and as he was the sonne of Dauid 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in respect of his Manhood yet doth he not say of his Sonnes as of two but of his Sonne made and declared to be his Sonne to shew vnto vs that as before his making so now after his making he is still but one Sonne one person of the two distinct natures subsisting Iohn 20.31 And Saint Iohn more plainely saith that these things are written that you might beleeue that Iesus is the Christ the Sonne of God that is that Iesus the Sonne of Mary is that same Christ which is the Sonne of God And in his first Epistle he doth almost nothing but confirme this truth that is 1 Iohn 1.1 that there is but one person in the God and man Christ Iesus For Chap. 1. he saith that which was from the beginning which we haue heard which wee haue seene with our eyes therefore he must needs be but one person for to see with their eyes that word which was from the beginning could no wayes be but onely in respect of the vnitie of the person So Chap. 2. he saith Chap. 2. v. 22. Who is a lyar but he that denyeth Iesus to be the Christ So Chap. 3. he saith Chap. 3. v. 16. In this we perceiue the loue of God that he laid downe his life for vs. So Chap.
Manhood to be affirmed of our blessed God and Sauiour and also things properly belonging to him as he is God ascribed to the man Christ Iesus yet is it most hereticall to confound the one nature with the other as the Eutychians did or to communicate properly the speciall properties of one nature vnto the other as the Lutherans doe for in the concrete and not in the abstract as the Schooles doe speake wee say 1 Cor. 2.8 That they haue crucified the Lord of glory as noting that person which was and is the Lord of glory and vnderstanding it of his person not in respect of that nature whereby hee was the Lord of glory but in respect of the other nature personally vnited thereunto wherein hee was passible and might be crucified And so speaking of his person in respect of his other nature we say That the man Christ is Almighty because hee is so in respect of his diuine nature personally vnited vnto his humanity Pamas l. 3. c 3. 4 de fide orthodoxa Theodoret. in Dialog but as we may not say That they haue crucified the Godhead so wee may not say That the manhood of Christ is Almighty for when any thing is affirmed of Christ in respect of that one nature which properly belongeth vnto the other the meaning thereof is not to inuest the one nature with the properties that are peculiar to the other but thereby to shew the truth and certainty of the vnion of both natures in one person And we haue a good example hereof in man as hee consisteth of body and soule for wee may truly say that man is heauenly and immortall and that man is mortall and earthly And againe wee may say that the soule sleepeth and the body heareth whereas to sleepe is the property of the body and to heare is the property of the soule and yet they destroy the nature of man that would either turne the one of these natures into the other or confound one of these with the other or inuest the one nature really with the properties that are peculiar vnto the other Euen so we may say that God was borne of a Virgin and the Virgin to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Mother of God that God suffered and was crucified and did redeeme the Church with his owne bloud yet not simply Acts 20.28 Sâ—d 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but in this or that respect that is in respect of another nature which God hath vnited vnto himselfe because God here is a concrete Word and not an abstract and signifieth the person of Christ and not the diuine nature of Christ And so we say that the man Christ is Almighty Omniscient Omnipresent c. yet not simply in respect of his manhood but in respect of the person which is the same God and man or of the other nature of the man Christ Iesus for that here man also is a concrete Word signifying the whole person and not the humane nature of Christ And so in this respect and after this manner the speciall properties of each nature may be predicated and affirmed of the other nature Quia vt Deus propter vnitatem propria ducit humana sic homo propter vnitatem propria ducit diuina Because that as the God Christ Cyrillus de incarn c. 26. in respect of the hypostaticall vnion of the two natures assumed all the humane properties so the man Christ in respect of the same vnion is partaker of all the diuine properties as Saint Cyril speaketh But on the contrary side we may not say that the Deity of Christ was borne of a Virgin or that Mary is the Mother of the God-head or that the diuinity of Christ was passible and mortall nor that the humanity of Christ is Almighty Omniscient Omnipresent or the like because the deity and humanity are abstract words i. e. such words as doe note vnto vs the two natures of Christ the one diuine the other humane and not the person of Christ And therefore if we doe but rightly distinguish betweene praedicata absoluta et limitata the things that are spoken absolutely in the largest sense and the things that are predicated by way of limitation in the strictest sense we shall easily see that the communication of the properties of both natures doe no wayes proue such a reall trans-fusion of the properties of each nature into the other as that the humanity of Christ should receiue into it selfe from the Deitie a power to be omnipotent omniscient or omnipresent in it selfe but as the natures are distinct so the properties of each nature are still distinct without trans-fusion or confounding the one with the other CHAP. V. Of certaine obiections and arguments endeuouring to proue the inuesting of the humanity of Christ with diuine properties answered and the effects of this vnion in respect of all Christians shewed ANd yet notwithstanding all this and all else that hath beene spoken by all the most famous Diuines of this latter time the Lutherans say that Christ did such miracles in his naturall body and that there are such things ascribed to the manhood of Christ as doe sufficiently proue that his humane nature is really inuested with the diuine properties For First they doe obiect that when the Iewes would haue Ob. 1 throwne him downe the hill he passed away inuisibly from amongst them all therefore the man Christ Iesus is inuisible To this Ludolphus answereth that this happened not Sol. by making the Body of Christ inuisible Ludolphus p. 1. c. 65. p. 155. but by the sudden striking of his enemies with such stupified blindnesse as were the Sodomites when they sought for Lots doore vntill they were wearied Secondly they doe obiect that Christ came into the roome Ob. 2 where the Apostles were the doores being shut therefore the body of Christ is voide of that grossenesse incident to a naturall body and is now made inuisible and inpalpable To this some doe answere that he came in Sol. the doores being shut i. e. at that time when the doores are vsually shut in euery place but this could be neither strange to the Apostles nor any extraordinary act of Christ Zanch. tom 8. p. 389. and therefore Zanchius doth more truely answere that this proueth not any mutation to bee in the body of Christ nor any inuestment of the same with Diuine properties but that by the omnipotent power of his Deitie he caused the doores to goe backe That the doores opened themselues to Christ and to open themselues vnto him to make way for the true and solyd Body of Christ to enter in as the stone was rolled away from the doore of the sepulchre to make way for the same solyd body to passe forth And we reade that to others he did the like to this for Saint Peter being in prison Act. 12.10 and the doores being shut they opened themselues vnto him and he came forth and all the Apostles
from God and the chiefest argument of his Diuine loue towards man for though it was great loue to be clothed with the vaile of our flesh and to take the infirmities of our fraile and feeble nature yet is it farre greater loue to be compassed with the shadow of Death and to vndergoe the penalty of our sinfull nature And therefore seeing the mercifull and gracious Lord hath so done this maruellous worke Psal 111 4. that it ought to be had in remembrance I may well say with the Prophet Lam. 1.12 Haue ye no regard O all ye that passe by the way Stay here and consider and behold If euer there were any sorrow like his sorrow or any suffering like the suffering of Christ your businesse may be great and your occasions vrgent yet none so great none so waighty as this and none so acceptable vnto God as this for if you must remember when he rested how much more should you remember how he suffered Secondly It is most profitable vnto men in three respects Secondly As no worke more acceptable vnto God so none more profitable for vs for the serious meditation of the sufferings of Christ effecteth in vs besides many others these three especiall good 1. It hindereth vs to sinne 2. It kindleth our charity 3. It erecteth our Hope For Orosius sup ep ad Rom. l. 6. First Tanta vis crucis vt si ante occulos ponatur c. So great is the power and efficacy of the sufferings of Christ that if it were alwayes fixed in the mindes of the faithfull How the meditation of Christs Passion driueth away sinne so that they did intentiuely behold the death of Christ no concupiscense no lust no enuy no fury could ouercome them but presently vpon the consideration of Christ his sufferings the whole hoste of the flesh and of sinne would flie away saith Orosius and Saint Bernard saith Bern. ser 62. in Cant. Quid tam efficax ad curanda coÌ„scientiae vulnera necnon ad purgandam mentis aciem quam Christi vulnerum sedula meditatio What can be more powerfull to cure the sinfull wounds of our consciences yea and to purge our mindes from all sinnes then the sedulous meditation of the wounds of Christ for the Passion of Christ sheweth how dearely it cost him to redeeme vs from sinne and therefore it should make vs afraid to sinne for when the Harlot Lais asked of Demosthenes 1000. Dracmas i. e. almost 24. pound of our money or as some report 10000. Dracmas i. e. 200. pound for one nights lodging with her he wisely answered her Non tanti emam paenitere I will not buy repentance at so deare a rate so when Satan suggesteth vs to sinne if we did but consider the great price that Christ did pay for sinne and must be paid before it can be pardoned for we are bought with a price yea with a great price 1 Cor. 6.1 saith the Apostle there is no doubt but it would be a great meanes to preserue vs from sinning for it is most certaine saith Origen Origen in c. 6. ad Rom. that the true consideration of the Passion of Christ in the heart of a Christian is the chiefest munition to guard vs against euery sinne for as Vriah said vnto King Dauid The Arke and Israel 2 Sam. 11.11 and Iuda abide in Tents and my Lord Ioab and the seruants of my Lord are incamped in the open field Sap. 2.8 and shall I then goe downe into mine house to eate and drinke and to lie with my wife as thou liuest and as thy soule liueth I will not doe this thing So euery good Christian man will say My Sauiour Christ did weare a Crowne of thornes and shall I say come let vs crowne our selues with rose buds his hands are extended vpon the Crosse to imbrace me and shall I stretch forth mine hands vnto wickednesse to disgrace him he being ready to die had gall to eate and vineger to drinke and shall I being perfectly whole say with them in the booke of Wisedome Come Wisedome 2.7 let vs fiâ—l our selues with Wine and pleasant oyntments He suffered his breast his side and his heart to be opened and pierced for me and shall I harden my heart and shut the doore of my soule against him he was contented to heare himselfe reuiled and scorned for mee and shall I still scorne him and stop mine eares from hearing him so graciously speaking and so louingly calling me by the mouth of his holy seruants And as Origen saith Pro me Dei filius iugulatus est iterum me peccare delectat The Sonne of God was slaine for my sinnes and shall I euer againe delight in sinne So will euery true remembrancer of Christs sufferings say the desire of mony betrayed my Sauiour and shall I euer after that loue couetosnesse my wanton pleasures my vaine delights my swelling pride my greedy desire and all my wicked sinnes were the onely cause of my Sauiours want Chrys hom 88. in Matth. of his bitter sorrowes and his shamefull cruell death and shall I euer loue those sinnes that brought these sorrowes vnto him no sure I will not doe it saith euery soule that thinkes of this Etiam si lapis esset yea though his heart were made of stone yet the true meditation hereof would mollifie the same like waxe and cause him to depresse his pride and to detest all sinne saith Saint Chrysostome for as the destroying Angell could not hurt any of them whose doore-posts were sprinkled with the bloud of the Paschall Lambe so the subtlety of Satan that destroying enemie can neuer preuaile against them which haue their mindes and hearts alwayes sprinkled with the true meditation of the suffering and shedding of the pretious blood of Iesus Christ Gal. 6.14 And therefore as that blessed Apostle Saint Paul saith God forbid that I should glory in any thing The meditation of Christs Passion cannot choose but make vs to loue Christ saue in the Crosse of Iesus Christ whereby the world is crucified vnto me and I vnto the world that is whereby all worldly vanities and pleasures are become loathsome vnto me and I am become a hater and detester of them as being the cause of Christ his Crosse so I say vnto euery man if euer Satan or the lust of the flesh inticeth thee to sin I pray thee doe but this one thing before thou dost the sin call to mind and consider what thy deare Sauiour suffered for thy sinnes and I doubt not but it will proue a most wholesome antidote and a most excellent preseruatiue against sinne And Secondly As the consideration of Christs Passion is a great meanes to preuent sinne so it is of maine force to stirre vp our loue and to kindle our affection towards Christ as Saint Bernard saith Nihil est quod eum ita nobis amabilem reddit quam calix ille Bern. ser 20. in
euery state 1. Of Grace Rom. 11.20 2. Of Laps Luke 23.40 First In the state of grace we must feare to leese the goodnesse of God for so the Apostle saith Thou that standest by faith be not high minded but feare Secondly In the state of laps wee must feare to feele the iustice of God for so the good thiefe said vpon the Crosse Fearest thou not seeing thou art in the state of condemnation Thirdly In the state of recouery God must be feared 3. Of Recouerie Psal 130.4 for his double fauour for so the Prophet saith With thee there is mercy that thou maist be feared That is Mercy to forgiue that we may be afraide to offend And thus Saint Bernard saith In statu gratiae time ne non digne opereris ex ea In the state of Gods fauour feare lest thou turne the graces of God into wantonnesse as the false Steward that wasted his Masters goods and the slothfull seruant that hid his Lords Talent Luke 16.1 In statu lapsus time quia reliquit te custodia tua spiritus Deus Math. 15.18 25. Angeli Dei In the state of sinne feare because God hath forsaken thee and the Angels of God haue no charge of thee In statu restitutionis time quia deterius est recidere quam incidere In the state of restauration feare to relapse because recidiuation is farre more dangerous then the first transgression And so you see the meaning of this Angels consolatorie words vnto the women Iames 2.19 Feare you not That is not me not men not deuils for they feare themselues and tremble and they cannot hurt you because you seeke Iesus that was crucified and you walke in the light therefore you cannot stumble for he that walketh in the light Iohn 11.9 stumbleth not saith our Sauiour but you may and should feare God with a filiall feare that is To stand in awe to offend his blessed Maiestie for this expelleth all sinne and wickednesse from vs and continueth the loue and fauour of God vnto vs. And so much for the Angels comforting of these weake and comfortlesse Women Euery benefit requires a dutie Secondly This Angell doth not onely comfort and shew benignity vnto these Women but he doth also instruct them and require a duty from them Quia beneficium exigit officium Because euery fauour shewed requires a willingnesse to haue our seruice performed and as Aristotle saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Aristot aethic l. 5. 5. It behoueth the party gratified to be proportionably seruiceable to him that did him kindnesse so that euery good turne in nature is obligatory and whatsoeuer benefiteth ipso facto bindeth And therefore this Angel setteth downe vnto these Women two especiall lessons The first of Theorie which they must know The second of practice which they must doe CHAP. III. How the Angell informeth the Women of the Resurrection of Christ many wayes and how the vbiquity of Christ his Body is here confuted by this Angell FOR the first In the lesson of Theorie The Angell sheweth the resurrection of Christ three manner of wayes this Angell sheweth vnto these Women the Resurrection of Christ and that as you may see three especiall wayes 1. By way of Negation He is not here 2. By way of Confirmation For he is risen 3. By way of Illustration For he is risen as hee said and as you may see Come see the place where the Lord lay First The Angell saith Christ is not here that is That this assertion of the Angell quite ouerthroweth that doctrine of the vbiquity of Christs Body in respect of his corporall presence for otherwise as he is God he was there and in all other places of the World but as he is a man consisting of a true naturall body defined and measured with quantity and bounded with the limits of his trinary Dimensions bredth length and thickenesse and all other properties of a true body he was gone and was not there And therefore this onely place of Scripture if there were none other is sufficient to disproue all the vbiquitaries in the World for if his body was in euery place how could the Angell say that he was not in that place It is true that Christ may be said to be euery where and that the Virgins Sonne may be said to haue created the World Bonauent l. 3. sent dist 22. q. 2. but how Non per proprietatem naturarum sed per communicationem proprietatum Not by the propriety of Natures but by the communication of properties and that not as transfused the properties of the one Nature into the other but as predicated of whole Christ in respect of the personall vnion of the one Nature with the other For though the Apostle saith Coloss 2.9 That in him dwelleth the fulnesse of the God-head bodily yet we must note a difference betweene Diuinitatem communicari humanitati To communicate the Deity and all the diuine properties vnto the humanitie Bellar. de incar Christi l. 3. c. 16. Et diuinitatem inhabitare in humanitate And to haue the Diuinity and all the diuine properties to dwell in the humanity How Christ may be truely said to be euery where and so to dwell not as he doth in vs by his grace but by a personall vnion vnto his Nature And therefore as a House by reason of a mans dwelling in it cannot be said to goe or to speake but the man dwelling in the House may be said to doe the same so the body of Christ by reason of the inhabitation of the Deity cannot be said to know all things or to be euerywhere but the God-head that dwelleth in that body may be and is euery where for though the humanity of Christ subsisteth in the person of the Sonne of God and in that respect may be said to be euery where In what sense the manhood of Christ may be said to be euery where because that hauing no subsistence of it owne it subsisteth in a person that is euery where yet in respect of its Essence being a finite creature it is no wayes capable of the diuine properties And therefore though Christ personally may be said to be in all places or the Body of Christ vertually respectu virtutis seruatricis that is in respect of his sauing vertue as the Sunne which is essentially in Heauen but vertually in all inferior bodies may be said to be euery where yet the Body of Christ locally or the manhood of Christ solely considered must needes be in one place Otherwise how could his manhood be contained within the straights of the Virgins wombe if his manhood was euery where How could his body be nayled to the Crosse wrapped in clothes laide in the Sepulcher if that his body was so spacious as that no limits could containe him Or how could the Angell say Bellar. de incar l. 3. c. 12. He is not here if he was euery where
that they had recollected more courage now after his death then euer Peter the boldest of them had during his life which all men will say is most vnprobable because a liuing Dogge is better then a dead Lyon Eccles. 9.4 and therefore Christ being aliue might animate the vilest coward-like Thirsites to be more valiant and aduenturous for his defence then now being dead he could doe to the most heroicke Achilles yet is it any wayes likely or could it possibly be that his Disciples should come thither breake vp the Monument tumble away that great stone take vp his body bestrip him of his winding sheete lay all his linnen cloathes wherewith he was wrapped so orderly by themselues a signe they had leisure enough and were in no danger at all or else they were very fooles that they did not suddenly snatch him away and take some other time and place to bestrip him and then carrie him away neuer after to be seene or found without the espyall of some one or other among so many that attended there Ideo mentita est iniquitas sibi But the Iewes answere that as the foolish Virgins whereof our Sauiour speaketh so these foolish and sottish Souldiers they all slumbered and slept and then while their Argos eyes were sleeping his Disciples came those poore fresh-water Souldiers and their committed charge was stollen away The absurdities following the High Priests saying But then I replie first with Rhemigius out of Saint Augustine If they all slept Quomodo furtum viderunt How can they tell his Disciples and not others tooke him away Might not God take him as he did Enoch or the Angels burie him and hide him as they did the bodie of Moses or how can they tell who tooke him away for they slept and therefore surely no credit to be giuen vnto them If they had said We slept and therâ—fore we cannot tell what became of him this might haue some likelihood of truth but to say We slept and his Disciples stole him away this must needes be apparantly false Secondly If they slept why did the High Priests giue them money large money saith the Text for their negligence and not rather punish them for their slothfulnesse must men be so largely rewarded for euill doing especially in so weighty a cause as not the losse of a Citie or a Kingdome but the losse of saluation to the whole race of mankinde all depended vpon this one point for if he rose againe he was the Sauiour of the World if not he was but an impostor Why then would they not watch or if not why not seuerely punished and no punishment too great for so great a negligence Thirdly If they were awake why did they hire them to say they were asleepe This may be answered They knew money deliuered him into their hands and therefore they thought that money would conceale the truth from the people for as the Poet saith Quid non mortalia pectora cogit auri sacra fames What wickednesse is not done for money How the loue of money maketh many men to doe any thing These Souldiers had beene Preachers to publish this truth vnto the World had not their mouthes beene stopt with siluer for as this opens the mouthes of many to bruite forth and to testifie many lies so it shuts the mouthes of as many to conceale and keepe secret many truthes and therefore the high Priests did giue large money to these Souldiers to conceale this truth and to belie themselues to say that they were asleepe Well then if they were asleepe how can they tell what became of him and why did the chiefe Priests giue them such large summes of monies for their negligence or if they were awake why did they hire them so dearely to say they were asleepe To all this they must answere now to vs as they did heretofore in another case to Christ Wee cannot tell Math. 21.27 But then O foolish Iewes if you cannot tell why will you not beleeue that your Messias is alreadie come and that God hath raysed him from the dead Saint Paul tels vs why Rom. 11.25 Because partly obstinacy is come vpon them vntill the fulnesse of the Gentiles be come in O Lord if it be thy will doe thou open their eyes that they may see the truth CHAP. VI. Of the testimony of the Angell and the manifold apparitions of Christ after his Resurrection to proue the truth and certainety of his Resurrection YOV see then how the Iewes are blinded to destroy themselues but on the other side we doe know and beleeue and teach this Iesus the Sonne of Mary whom the Iewes haue crucified to be the true Messias and the Sauiour of the World not onely because hee liued without sinne and died without cause on his owne behalfe but especially because that he being dead and laide in his graue did declare himselfe mightily to be the Sonne of God Rom. 1.4 by his Resurrection from the dead And this Resurrection of him we doe most faithfully beleeue and as constantly teach for these three especiall reasons and respects and a three-fold cord is not easily broken That we beleeue the Resurrection of Christ fâ—r three speciall respects 1. In respect of this Angelicall assertion 2. In respect of his personall apparitions 3. In respect of many other circumstantiall demonstrations First the Angell said vnto the women why seeke yee the liuing among the dead he is not here but he is risen Et si non credideritis oraculo credite oculo and if you will not beleeue vs beleeue your owne eyes Math. 28.1 Luke 24.4 for you may see the place where hee lay And this was spoken vnto two women as Saint Matthew sheweth and by two Angels as Saint Luke saith and therefore if Diues thought that the words of one man comming from the dead would bee sufficient to make all his brethren to beleeue the torments of hell First The Angels testifie the Resurrection of Christ why should not the words of these heauenly Angels bee alonely sufficient to make vs to beleeue this diuine truth of the resurrection of the Sonne of God for the Angels though they be mutabiles natura mutable in respect of their nature yet are they now confirmati per gratiam ne à veritate voluntatem auerterent so confirmed by grace that they shall neuer euert themselues from the truth Isidorus de summo bono saith Isidorus Secondly as the Angels had testified that he was not there in the graue among the dead but was risen and aliue among the liuing so truth it selfe confirmes this truth vnto vs by those manifold apparitions that he made after his resurrection That Christ appeared twelue seuerall times after his resurrection during the space of forty dayes that before he ascended into heauen he walked here on earth And these if I be not far deceiued in my reckoning were at least twelue times according to the
737 TI. No time mispent that is spent to know the person of Christ 305 Christ how made in time 400 Of the time when Christ was borne ibid. How time hath his fulnesse 401 The particular time of the words incarnation 402. Titillation and thoughts of sinne is sinne 14 TO Torments of Hell how intollerable 86 Not equall to all the damned 93 Not suffered by Christ 581 TR. That we doe not traduce sinnes from our parents 246 Transubstantiation hath a double contradiction 173 How full of absurdities ibid. Defenders of Transubstantiation how agreeable to the false prophets whereof our Sauiour biddeth vs to beware 548 What the Author thinketh of Transubstantiation 549 Treason of Iudas what it should teach vs. 463 Mysterie of the Trinity why not fully reuealed at the first 272 How darkly shewed in the creatures 273 Trismegistus what he said of the word 312 Morall truth what it is 312 Truth in vs not as it is in God ibid. Physicall truth what it is ibid. God is truth two wayes 213 All truths how they doe proceed 213 Truth of things of vnderstanding of words 213 214 Diuine truth measureth all things 214 Expressed truth is two-fold 215 Truth how excellent it is ibid. How like the light 215 How it expelleth errors ibid. Sheweth what euery thing is ibid. How it begets vs to God 216 God true in himselfe in his workes and in his words 216 The primarie expressed truth contained in the holy Scriptures 215 Truth to be sought whatsoeuer it cost 217 To be defended with the losse of all that we haue 217 How alwayes handled on earth ibid. How at last it will preuaile 218 How euery truth proceedes from God 222 How God loueth it ibid. How it should be alwayes spoken 222 231 How hardly found in these dayes 222 231 Truth makes vs like to God 231 Truth and iustice how they pleaded against man 319 TV. To turne from sinne turnes away all the wrath of God 195 TW Twelue apparitions of Christ after his resurrection 565 Twelue wonders in the Manna of the Israelites 703 Two things further the sinnes of the parents to continue in the children 246 Two-fold will in Christ 296 Two sorts of Mediators 296 Two reasons shewing why Christ was made flesh 320 Two things to be done for man before he could be saued 321 Two things to be considered touching the conception of Christ 333 Two signes of a true Teacher 466 Two reasons moued Pilate to condemne Christ 478 That there is a two fold hope 649 Two kindes of prayer 700 TY. Giuing of Canaan to the Israelites a type of giuing heauen to vs. 127 The three women seeking Christ a type of the Church 519 520 Typicall testimonies that Christ should rise the third day 554 To liue vnder the tyrannie of sinne how lamentable it is 635 VA. VAnities of the world how soone they passe away 129 Christ despised all vanities 260 Vaine-glory how it tainteth many of the Clergy 525 Valentinus his heresie 343 VB Vbiquity cannot be communicated to any creature 156 Vbiquitie of Christ his body ouerthrowne by the assertion of the Angell 543 Obiections of the Vbiquitaries answered 168 388 VE Veniall sinnes or the least sinnes bring death 41 Vertue is of an admirable beauty 47 Christ a patterne of all vertue 260 VJ. Victory of Christ ouer Hell Death Sinne and Satan 634 Villanies of Satan to be shewed and why 392 Villanies done to Christ not paralelled since the world began 474 Vineger how giuen to Christ to drinke 482 Christ why borne of a Virgin 334 The blessed Virgin still continued a Virgin to her death 336 Visitation of God two-fold 243 To visite what it signifieth 243 God visiteth the afflicted ibid. God visiteth the wicked 244 VN Vnderstanding of Adam in Paradise how excellent 57 58. Our Vnderstanding now how darkened through sinne 58 How quicke and sharpe in naturall things 59 How blockish in all Diuine mysteries ibid. Our vnderstanding of God very small 121 Vnion of Christ his natures expressed by a simily of Iustin Martyr 371 Wherin the Nestorian heretickes auouched the same to consist 375 Wherein the Lutherans affirmed it to consist 377 Wherein it doth truely consist 378 Vnion of the two natures inconuertible indiuisible c. 379 Vnion of things three wayes made 380 Vnion of Christ his natures substantiall 381 Ineffable ibid. What benefits it bringeth 282 283 c. We must be vnited to Christ if we will ascend to Heauen 627 Vnity of brethren 689 Want of vnity amongst vs. 691 Vnrepentant sinners shall neuer be absolued 242 VO Voice of the creature three-fold 705 WA WAight of sinne feared by Christ 545 Christ how he walked vpon the waters 388 Warre how lawfull 702 All wants supplied by Christ 262 Way to Heauen how said to be hard 98 And how easie 99 Three wayes of knowing God 120 Three wayes of expressing what God is Wayes of wickednes how hard and difficult 99 121 Best way to teach is to lay a good foundation 392 Way to saue man could neuer haue beene found but onely by the wisdome of God 393 WE Wealth what discommoditie it bringerh 524 WH White clothing of Christ what it signified 473 White an argument of innocency 478 WI. Wicked men delight in committing sinne 36 They are greedy to doe it ibid. And they haue their full content when they haue done it ibid. How they should be afraid to offend Gods power 179 They haue no part in the speciall mercy of God 188 Wicked men not loued of God 189 They are with held from many sinnes by the goodnesse of God 200 To giue vnto the wicked power to serue God God is no waies to doe it 210 The wickednesse of professors of the truth ought no waies to disparage the truth of God 219 220 The wicked how they abuse Gods goodnesse 22â— How punished in their children 245 That they shall be punished 244 Not euery sinne of the wicked is visited vpon their children 247 The wicked how they doe deceiue themselues 517 How it hapneth that they seeke not God 5â—1 How they are terrified and punished by the Angels 536 How they are said to ascend 6â—0 How still captiues vnto Satan 635 Wife of Pilate how she iustified Christ 475 Will of God reuealed in our consciences and in the scriptures 11 Wilfull sinners 33 How fearefull is their state ibid. They can pleade no excuse ibid. The will commandeth all the faculties of the soule 53 Will to sinne deserueth the punishment of sinne 55 Our will cannot be compelled by Sathan nor by any other outward enemie 55 57 Our owne will is the cause of all our woe 55 How our will to doe good is quite killed by sinne 56 It is drawne to sinne by our owne corruption 57 How it is guided by the iudgement 57 How we may be said to haue free-will 57 To will to sinne euer is a temporarie act 97 God cannot will things contrarie to his nature 153 To will a thing we