both yet not the same Person When we speak of the communicating of the Divine Essence from the First to the Second and Third Persons we must be understood as was before hinted to speak this of them as Persons or as they are personally considered for that Essence simply and absolutely considered is not communicated to the Son and Spirit but only as it subsists in them as such Persons the Godhead it self they have in and from themselves but their distinct Personalities in which the Godhead subsists are of the Father It being thus from hence it follows that according to the distinction of the Persons there must also be a distinct communication of the divine Essence not that there is one Essence in the Son and another in the Spirit for both are God only that is distinguish'd according to their Personal Consideration and the Personal Properties belonging to them which notwithstanding their oneness in Nature do alwayes remain Well then Christ's Sonship being a Personal thing proceeding not simply from the Divine Essence but as it subsists in the second Person therefore it must be proper and peculiar to him and not common to the Holy Ghost he being another Person and the Divine Nature subsisting in him accordingly with respect to his Personal Properties 2. Because though the same Divine Essence be communicated to both yet not in the same way and manner For though both come from the Father yet 't is in divers respects the Son coming from him by Generation the Spirit by Procession And therefore though both are God and both come from God yet both are not the Sons of God because 't is coming from God in the way of Generation only which entitles to Sonship Thus * Quaeris à me si de substantiâ Patris est Filius de substantiâ Patris est etiam Spiritus Sanctus cur unus Filius sit alius non sit Filius Ego respondeo sive capias sive non capias De Patte est Filius de Patre est Spiritus Sanctus sed ille genitus est iste procedens August contra Maxim lib. 3. cap. 14 Austine answers it Thou askest of me saith he if the Son be of the substance of the Father and the Holy Ghost be of the substance of the Father also why is one the Son and not the Other I answer whether you comprehend it or not the Son is of the Father the Holy Ghost is of the Father but the Son is begotten the Spirit proceeds Thus this great Divine did solve this difficulty stopping here and going no further If any will be so curious as to enquire further wherein the difference lies betwixt eternal Generation and eternal Procession I am not asham'd to give them this answer I cannot tell 't is a mystery far above my reach God hath not revealed it and there is nothing in Nature which will give us any light about it therefore it becomes us rather to adore than to be inquisitive I know the Schoolmen who are privy to all secrets and have a key to open every difficulty though it be lock'd up never so close attempt the opening of it but they had better have let it alone here humble ignorance is better than sawey curiosity I think * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hujus differentiae scire credi ex divina revelatione At 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 est nobis incomprehensibile ineffabile Alting Theolog. Prolem loc 3. Problem 38. p. 238. they speak best who say we know and believe there is a difference 'twixt Generation and Procession but what that is and wherein it lies that is to us incomprehensible 'T is time therefore for me to leave this Point and to come to the Application of the main Truth Is Christ thus God's own Son I infer then Use 1. Three Things inferr'd from Christ's Sonship 1. That he is God 1. That he is God Not a meer titular or nuncupative God not a God by Office only not a made God a contradiction in the adject but he is God truly properly essentially Which great Truth is most strongly asserted and proved by various convincing Arguments against Jews Arrians Socinians all the Opposers of it I must not engage in so vast a Subject I 'le only argue from this Relation wherein Christ stands to God as he is his own Son which indeed by its self is sufficient if there was nothing more to demonstrate his Godhead He who is the true Son of God and such a Son of God is truly God but Christ is the true Son of God and such a Son of God his own Son therefore he is truly God c. The Apostle joyns the true Son and the true God together therefore the Argument is good 1 Joh. 5.20 We know that the Son of God is come and hath given us an understanding that we may know him that is true and we are in him that is true even in his Son Jesus Christ this is the true God and eternal Life I do not say that every Son of God is God for the Saints are Sons and yet not God but I say he who is such a Son as God's own proper natural consubstantial coessential only begotten Son he is God where-ever this Sonship is there 's the Deity or the Divine Essence now Christ is thus God's Son therefore he is God What the Father is as to his Nature that the Son must be also now the first Person the Father of Christ is God whereupon he too who is the Son must be God also A Son alwayes participates of his Fathers Essence there is betwixt them more an identity and oneness of Nature if therefore Christ be Gods Son as hath been fully proved he must then needs have * Nisi esset Jesus Christus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Naturâ Deus non esset 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Naturâ seu Naturalis Dei Filius Cloppenb Anti-Smalc c. 3. p. 72. Vide Jacob ad Portum contra Ostorod c. 9. p. 59. Estwick against Bidale p. 442 c. that very Nature and Essence which God the Father hath in somuch that if the second Person be not really a God the first Person is but equivocally a Father Therefore he himself tells us †Job 10.30 I and my Father are one where he is speaking of a far higher oneness than that of Consent or Will only Christ being both the natural Son of God and also his Son by eternal Generation that makes the thing unquestionable for what is that Generation but the Fathers communicating of his own Nature and Essence to him This is that which is done in all Generations for Generation is alwayes the production of another in the same Nature * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Epiph. Haeres 69. p. 750. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Phot. Ep. p. 4. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Najanz Orat. 35. tom 1. p. 568. like ever begets like as 't is said of Adam he
We read Mark 11.9 They that went before and they that followed cryed saying Hosanna blessed is he that cometh in the name of the Lord Believers who liv'd before Christ's incarnation and they who follow since both are equally obliged to magnifie God for him both receiving the same benefit by him 2. It may be enquired Why Christ was incarnate just when he was why at this very Epocha or period of time rather than at any other was Christ incarnate why not either before or after but just then Answ why because it was that very time which God had set therefore called the fulness of time Gal. 4.4 He that is pleas'd to set the time for other things as for the Churches deliverances Thou shalt arise and have mercy upon Zion for the time to favour her yea the set time is come Psal 102.13 and so in several Other cases surely he was pleas'd to set the time for so great a thing as the coming of his own Son in Flesh he in his eternal decree had determin'd the precise time for this which therefore when it was come then Christ came now I say all must be resolv'd into this True there were some more immediate Reasons why he came just when he did he was to come before the Scepter was wholly departed from Judah Gen. 49.10 whilst the Second Temple was standing Hag. 2.6 7 8 9. during the Fourth Monarchy Dan. 2.44 Daniel's 70 weeks were almost expired Dan. 9.24 there was a general expectation raised in the world of the coming of the Messias as might easily be made out Now with respect to these things the Lord Jesus came at that very period of time whereat he did but they all falling out but in compliance with and subordination to the Decree of God therefore the determination of the time of Christ's Coming and Incarnation must ultimately be resolv'd into that O he came just when he did neither sooner nor later because the Father had appointed that very time Prop. 'T was not the Divine Essence absolutely considered which assumed Flesh but that Essence considered as subsisting in the Second Person 4. 'T was not the Divine Nature or Essence simply and absolutely considered which assumed Flesh but it was that * Tota igitur Natura Divina fuit incarnata sed non quatenus absolutè in se consideratur ut omnibus Personis communis sed quatenus personalibus proprietatibus seu 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Personâ Filii determinata coâ—sideratur Davenant in Col. 2.9 p. 240. Solus Filius suscepit humanitatem in singularitatem Personae non in unitatem Naturae Divinae Concil Tolet. Neque enim Divina Natura si propriè accuratè loqui velimus sed Persona Divina assumsit Naturam Humanam Divina quidem Natura unitur Humanae sed eam nòn assumsit assumere enim non est Naturae sed Suppositi Bisterf contra Crell p. 565. Vide Alting Theol. Problem p. 562. 577. Nature considered as subsisting in the Second Person If this restriction and stating of the Point be not admitted we cannot avoid our holding the Incarnation was common to all the Persons contrary to what the Church hath ever held and to what was asserted but even now therefore when 't is said †1 Tim. 3.16 God manifested in the Flesh you are to understand God in the Personal not in the Essential notion Prop. The Nature assuming was the Divine Nature 5. The Nature assuming was the Divine Nature that being considered as was laid down in the forgoing Proposition The Manhood did not assume the Godhead but the Godhead it * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Damasc de Orthod Fide lib. 3. cap. 2. p. 167. Man did not become God but God became Man 't is not said that †〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Athan. de Inc. Christi t. 1. p. 612. the Flesh was made the Word but the Word was made Flesh this is a thing so unquestionable that the very naming of it is enough Prop. That the Humane Nature was so assum'd as to subsist in the Divine that both Natures make butâ— one Person 6. The Lord Jesus the eternal Son of God God blessed for ever did so assume the Humane Nature as in a most mysterious and unconceivable manner to unite it upon the first framing or forming of it to his Divine Nature and to give that a subsistence in this so as that both do make but one Person the Essence Properties Operations of both Natures yet remaining the same without either conversion or confusion Here the Hypostatical Vnion is both asserted and and also described for wherein doth the nature of that Vnion consist but in that which is here laid down Of the Hypostatical Vnion Of it you read Col. 2.9 In him dwelleth all the fulness of the Godhead bodily i. e. Personally and Hypostatically Rom. 9.5 Whose are the Fathers and of whom as concerning the Flesh Christ came who is over all God blessed for ever here 's both the Natures of Christ and both in him making but one Person upon the personal conjunction of which he 's call'd Emmanuel God with us Matth. 1.23 But not to insist upon the Proof of this Vnion which all but INFIDELS and SOCINIANS do believe The mysteriousness thereof I will endeavour as well as I can rather to explain and open it an undertaking which I enter upon the Lord knows with great fear and dread because of the loftiness and mysteriousness of the thing to be opened O 't is a thing so sublime and mysterious as that it transcends the capacity of Angels and Men how then shall I be able to speak of it or to it Take whom you will single out a Person of the sharpest wit the profoundest judgment the most elevated reason let all the most raised abilities concur in him and then set the Hypostatical Vnion before this person alas poor man how will he be puzzl'd nonplus'd unable to fathom so great a depth as this is And well he may since 't is the mystery of mysteries one of the first magnitude than which by a narrow intellect none more hard to be conceiv'd of or understood 'T is indeed sure and certain to Faith which believes it because God reveals it which readily answers all Objections and * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Justin Martyr solves all difficulties about it by resting on divine revelation but if Reason beyond its proper bounds will be prying into and judging of a thing so abstruse its blindness as well as its boldness will soon appear its bucket will not go to the bottom of a Well so deep its line is too short to measure such heights breadths lengths depths as are here to be found I do not in the least wonder that they who make Reason to be the supream Judge of matters of Faith do throw off the belief of this mystery for though it be not at all contrary to reason
Humanitatis non duas Personas Idem de Trinit Unit. Dei Vid. Anselm de Incarn Verbi cap. 5. p. 87. Person and both make but one * Person Here 's the difference 'twixt the essential union of the three Persons where there is but one Nature yet three Persons as also 'twixt the mystical Vnion of Believers where there is the Union of Persons yet not so as to make one Person and the Hypostatick Vnion of the two Natures in Christ for against the former here is distinction of Natures yet but oneness of Person and against the latter here is the union of Natures so as to make but one Person And this follows upon the former head for if the Manhood hath not personality in it self but only subsists in the Godhead then it cannot cause any personal multiplication in him In short in Christ there is Nature and Nature but not Person and Person aliud aliud but not * In Deo non aliud aliud quia una Natura in Christo non alius alius quia una Persona alius alius for 't is but one Christ as Soul and Body make but one Man so God and Man make I say but one Christ We call it the Personal Vnion but how not because 't is made up of Persons but because it centers in one Person Christ took the †Aquin. Sum. 3. parte quaest 4. Art 2. Nature of of man but not the Person of man Nature did not assume Naturè nor did Person assume Person but Person assumed Nature He was a Person before incarnation and his personality or a distinct personality did not result from the unition of the two Natures only they are said to make one Person as the latter Nature makes no personal addition to Christ And he was a * Vid. Daven in Colos 242. perfect Person before the Vnion only in ordine ad finem the redeeming of man he was pleased to take the Manhood into communion with the Godhead So much for these two things wherein the nature of the Hypostatical Vnion mainly lies In this Vnion no conversion or confusion of the two Natures 3. Though this Vnion be thus close and intinious yet notwithstanding the Essence Properties Operations of both Natures are preserv'd entire without any conversion or confusion Nestorious multiplies the Person Eutyches eris upon another extream as 't is usual when the staff is crooked and bends too much one way they that would make it strait do often make it to bend as much the other way he confounds the Natures to shun the plurality of Persons he destroyes the distinction of the Natures asserting that after the Union the Humane Nature was wholly smallowed up in the Divine and so leaving but one Nature to Christ both of these Opinions were condemned by the Primitive Church as equally false heretical and dangerous Here 's the admirableness of this Union though the Godhead and the Manhood are brought into so near a conjunction yet both retain that which is essential and proper to each the One is not converted into the Other nor yet both confounded in one The Word was made Fesh but not so as to * O 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Najanz Orat. 35 375. Non potes dicere nisi natusfuisset hominem verè induisset Deus esse desi-'ssit amittens quod erat dum fit quod non erat Periculum enim status sui Deo nullum est c. Terrull de Carn Chr. p. 359. Quasi non valuerit Christus vere hominem indutus Deus perseverare Idem p. 360. Verbum caro factum est c. non in carnem mutatum ut desisteret esse quod erat sed caepit esse quod non erat August de Trin. Unit. tom 4. p. 947. Ep. 174. Non mutando quod erat sed assumendo quod non erat cease to be the Word still when Christ was incarnate he did not part with what he had only he â—ook what he had not there was assumption but no abolition * Nemo credat Dei Filium coaeternum coaequalem conversum esse in hominis Filium sed potius credamus ut non consumptâ Divinâ perfectè assumptâ humanâ substantiâ manentem Dei Filium factum hominis Filium August de Temp. Serm. 23. p. 616. c. Neutra tamen ex duabus Naturis in aliam mutata est substantiam unita quippe est non confusa Verbi Dei hominisque substantia ut in Deum quod ex nobis fusceptum fuerat perveniret O admirabile mysterium O innarrabile commercium Aug. Medit. c. 16. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Damasc Orth. Fid. lib. 3. cap. 2. vide etiam ibid. c. 3. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Najanz Orat. 39 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Nyssen contra Apollinar l. 2. p. 69. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Isidor Pelus l. 1. Ep. 323. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Chrysost in Joh. 1.14 Vid. Athan. de Inc. Christi p. 624. See Leporius his recantation in Cassian de sucarn Dom. L. 1. Agit utraque for ma cum alterius communione quod proprium est Verbo scil operante quod Verbi est carne exequente quod carnis est Leo in Ep. ad Flav. Ep. Constantinop no conversion no confusion Indeed the two Natures stand at so great a distance that though they may admit of Vnion yet they are not capable of any transmutation or commixtion the Godhead can never be so depress'd as to be turn'd into the Manhood nor the Manhood ever be so advanc'd as to be turn'd into the Godhead The Athanasian Creed thus sets it forth Although Christ be God and Man yet he is but one Christ one not by conversion of the Godhead into Flesh but by taking of the Manhood into God one altogether not by confusion of substance but by unity of Person The Scriptures plainly hold forth the two Natures of Christ to be distinct even after the Vnion turn to Rom. 1.3 4. Rom. 9.5 1 Pet. 3.18 2 Cor. 13.4 To which Texts let me add a few Considerations drawn out of some other Texts Christ sayes * Joh. 10.30 I and my Father are one there 's his Godhead but withal he sayes †Joh. 14.28 my Father is greater than I there 's his Manhood too he sayes ‖ Joh. 8.58 Before Abraham was I am there 's his being God and yet he was born but the other day there 's his being Man too he had the Divine Nature for he was Omniscient but he had the Humane also at the same time for he 's said to * Luk. 2.52 grow in wisdom and †Mark 13.32 not to know the time of the last Judgment of which before he was God and so the Father's Will and his were all one but he was also Man and so he pray'd * Luk. 22.42 Nevertheless not my Will but thine be done He was the â€
and the world was made by him and the world knew him not Eph. 3.9 c. Who created all things by Jesus Christ by him not as an instrument but as a social or coordinate cause Col. 1.16 17 By him were all things created that are in heaven and that are in earth visible and invisible whether they be Thrones or Dominions or Principalities or Powers All things were created by him and for him And he is before all things and by him all things consist Heb. 1.2 By whom also he made the worlds Now could Christ have thus cooperated with the Father in the Creation and yet not have a being before his incarnation which was so long after the Creation Joh. 1.15 John bare witness of him and cryed saying This was he of whom I spake He that cometh after me is preferred before me for he was before me how was Christ before John Baptist if he did then only exist when he was born for in reference to that John Baptist was before Christ he being born before him Joh. 17.5 And now O Father glorifie thou me with thine own self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was mark the latter words with the glory which I had with thee before the world was Phil. 2.6 Who being 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 subsisting existing in the form of God c. Joh. 16.28 I came forth from the Father and am come into the world again I leave the world and go to the Father Joh. 6.62 What and if ye shall see the Son of man ascend up where he was before in respect of his Divine Nature or as he was the Son of God Do not these Scriptures sufficiently evince that Christ had a Being before he was Incarnate the drawing forth of their full strength and the answering of the several Cavils and Evasions of the Adversaries about them would fill up a Volume the Learned know where and by * See Arnold Catech. Racov Major de Personâ Christi p. 187. c. Hoorneb Socin Conf. Tom. 2. de Christo cap. 1. Calovius Socin Proflig de Filio Dei controv 1. But especially Placei Disput de Argum. quibus efficitur Christum prius fuisse quà m in utero Beatae Virginis secundum carnem conciperetur This is fully and learnedly discoursed of by Dr. Pearson on the Creed Art 2. p. 213. to p. 237. Whom both of these are fully done This Sending of Christ therefore speaks his existence before he assumed flesh he must have an antecedent Being otherwise he would not have been capable of being * Necesse est ut qui mittitur existat priusquam mittatur fatente Enjedino Calov Socin Proflig p. 183. sent And he was first sent and then incarnate his Mission being antecedent to his incarnation though this be dony'd by the †Misit à se per virtutem Spiritus Sancti genitum ex matte suâ natum ad virilem aetatem perductum non adhuc generandum oriturum quod dictu ipso absonum est Scripturae planè dissonum Slichting Enemies with whom we have to do for God sent him that is appointed that he should assume the bumane nature and this is his being sent in the likeness of sinful flesh as a judicious Expositor descants upon the words Of Christ's Personality 2. Secondly this Sending of Christ speaks his Personality He did not only exist before he took flesh but he existed as a Person he had his 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 wherein the notion of a Divine Person consists his manner of subsistence distinct from the subsistence of the Father and of the Holy Ghost but this explication of Christ's being a Person more properly belongs to the next head Here I say Christ was a Person by which I mean he was not a thing quality dispensation or manifestation as some fondly and dangerously speak but he was and is a Person having a proper personal subsistence And he must be so or else he could not be the Subject of this Sending 'T is very true God may be said to send or give that which is but manifestative as he sends his Gospel which yet is not a person but only a manifestation of his Will Grace Love Wisdom c. But now in Christ there is something more than bare sending even that which will amount to the proving of him to be nothing less than a Person For he is sent to be incarnate to take the likeness of sinful flesh upon him now a bare Quality or Manifestation are under an utter incapacity of being thus or doing thus who will be so absurd as to assert such a thing If Christ be sent by God the Father and upon that doth assume flesh then certainly he was a Person for none but a Person could do this had the Apostle only said that God sent Christ the Truth in hand had not been so evident at leastwise from this Text but when he adds he sent him in the likeness of sinful flesh this undeniably proves his personality 3. Thirdly it notes the distinction that is betwixt the Father and Christ Which appears not only as One is the Father and the Other is the Son though that evidently infers a distinction for the same Person in the same respects cannot be Father and Son too cannot beget and be begotten too but also as the * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Epiphan adv Haeres p. 740. See Gerhard Loc. Com. tom 1. cap. 6. p. 263. de personali Filii a Patre S. S. distinctione One sends and the Other is sent The Father and the Son are One in Nature and Essence with respect to which he saith †Joh. 10.30 I and my Father are One yet they are ‖ Una est Patris Filii Spiritus Sancti Essentia in quâ non est aliud Pater aliud Filius aliud Spiritus Sanctus quamvis Personaliter sit alius Pater alius Filius alius Spiritus Sanctus Fulgent lib. 1. de Fid. Ecce dico alium esse Patrem alium Filium alium Spiritum Sanctum Male accepit idiotes quisque aut perversus hoc dictum quasi diversitatem sonet ex diversitate separationem pretendat Patris Filii Spiritus Ter tul adv Praâ—eam Of the distinction of the three Divine Persons See Dr. Cheynel of the Trin-unity c. 7. p. 181 c. et 227. to 248. distinct Persons The number and distinction of the Persons in the Trinity is usually taken notice of by Diviâ—â—s from this Scripture The Apostle faith Theophylact had spoken of the Spirit in the former Verse in this he speaks of the Father and of the Son 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 tenching the Trinity And saith * Ex his verbis apparet Divinarum Personarum in Sanctâ Triade Numerus Distinctio Pet. Martyr from these words the number and distinction of the Persons in the holy Trinity doth appear Which great Truth is also frequently
be adored by Faith not to be comprehended by Reason Isa 53.8 Who shall declare his Generation I may make use of this Text though possibly the Generation mention'd in it be not that which I am treating of for I much incline to think that it here notes that numerous issue and seed that Christ should have upon the Preaching of the Gospel rather than his being eternally begotten by the Father yet 't is very well known that several of the FATHERS take it in the latter sense they making this to be the meaning of the words Who can be able to understand in himself or to declare to others the hidden ineffable incomprehensible Generation of the Son of God surely none can Without controversie this as well as Christ's Incarnation is a * 1 Tim. 3.16 great mystery Nicodemus was a knowing man yet strangely puzzled at the Regeneration of Believers Joh. 3.4 How can a man be born when he is old can he enter the second time into his mothers womb and be born certainly the eternal Generation of God's own Son is a thing much more abstruse and unsearchable And there are riddles in Natural generation which we cannot resolve Eccles 11.5 As thou knowest not the way of the spirit nor how the bones do grow in the womb of her that is with child * Vide Najanz Orat. 35. t. 1. p. 566 567. now are we so much at a loss and non-plus there how much more shall we be at a loss when the far more unconceivable Generation of Christ is before us O therefore I advise you to be very humble and sober in all your disquisitions about that There are two things in Reason which you must alwayes oppose and beat down viz. the curiosity of it for it loves dearly to be prying into God's Ark into things which he sees good to lock up from the Creature and the pride of it for it also loves to sit upon the bench as Judge of the matters of Faith to be giving out its decrees and edicts as to believing or not believing now do not you give way to it in either of these respects in your most earnest desires after knowledge still keep within the compass of what the Word reveals and let the Word alone command and order your Faith and especially in such profound mysteries as that which I am upon see that these two things be done by you When I consider the several nice and curious Questions which * Non dubito asserere quando in Scholasticorum Quaestiones de his rebus incido quin in totidem salebras labyrinthos Syrtes Charybdes ipsaque adeo 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 incidere mihi videar Quantò satius tutiusque est intra Scripturae limites se arcte continere sapere nolle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Episcop Inst Theol. lib. 4. cap. 33. sect 2. Some have rais'd and discuss'd about the Generation of the Son of God I cannot but stand and wonder at the pride and sauciness of the Wit of man and so far I do concur with that Learned person in his severe censure upon these men What is more than the thing it self the Father's communicating of his own Nature and Essence to Christ we must humbly submit to be ignorant of by soaring too high we shall but scortch and hurt our selves 2. In your eying of God the Father's active Generation of Christ take heed of all gross Conceptions about it so as not in the least to measure it by or to parallel it with any Physical or Carnal Generation Our apprehensions must be rightly informed about this otherwise what absurd and wretched notions shall we run our selves upon So far as there is that in common Generations which speaks goodness and perfection so far you make use of them to help you in your conceiving of the Divine Generation of the Son of God but there being much in them which speaks defect and imperfection all that you must praesâ—ind and cut off and lay aside when you are thinking of that Generation which is the ground of Christ's Sonship As for instance for like to beget like for one thing to conveigh its nature and substance to another this is good in Physical Generations and so far they may be improved to shadow out unto us the mystery of God's eternal generation But now there being sundry other respects which carry imperfection in them these you must be sure to keep out of your thoughts and by no means to conceive by them of that which I am upon As in our knowledge and conceptions of God by the Creatures we pick out of them what is good and perfect and lay aside what is evil and imperfect and so by them we ascend to know and conceive of God so we must do in Natural and Physical Generations with respect to God the Father's supernatural and hyperphysical Generation of Christ To shew the * Of this see Zanch. de tribus Elohim lib. 5. cap. 8. p. 254. Alting Theol. Elenct p. 170 171. Estwick against Biddle p. 443. Dr. Rearson on the Creed p. 275. c. difference betwixt these two let me particularize in a few things without much enlarging upon them Natural Generation upon the failing of individuals is necessary for the preservation of the species in God the Father's begetting of Christ it was quite otherwise In natural Generation there is multiplication there though the thing begetting and the thing begotten have the same nature and essence yet numerically they are not the same but in the Father's begetting of Christ these as the Learned prove are perfectly one and the same they have not only the same specifical but the same numerical Essence here as the divine Essence was not divided so neither was it multiplied for 't is as incapable of multiplication as of division Natural Generation in the Creature is a transient act that in God was an immanent act In Natural Generation the thing begetting precedes the thing begotten and begets that which is after it in time in God the Father's Generation of Christ it was not so both Father and Son being coeternal In Natural Generation there must be such a time before things arrive at their prolifick vertue far be it from us to entertain such a thought as to the Father's Generation of Christ So that you see there is a vast disparity betwixt these two and therefore you must in your apprehensions reverently distinguish betwixt them and not in common judge of the one by the other God forbid that you should so sadly mistake Though the Father's communicating of the Divine Essence to the Son was a true and proper Generation so far agreeing with Generations amongst us yet in other respects it was quite of another nature and so you are to conceive of it otherwise you will entertain very gross and unworthy thoughts of God 3. Joyn Study and Prayer together Would you know Christ as the eternal Son of God especially would you go beyond
of God You find in Scripture that saving Faith is described by its special reference to Christ as standing in this relation so Gal. 2.20 The life which I now live in the Flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God who loved me and gave himself for me why doth the Apostle thus express it by the Faith of the Son of God I answer partly because Christ the Son of God is the efficient and * Heb. 12.2 author of faith partly because this Son is the great Object of faith and partly because Faith in its essential act doth very much eye Christ as thus related to the Father for 't is a believing or relying upon him as the Son of God 'T is very usual in the Gospel where it speaks of believing to mention Christ with it as standing in this relation 1 Joh. 3.23 This is his commandment that we should believe on the name of his Son Jesus Christ 1 Joh. 5.13 These things have I written unto you that believe on the name of the Son of God that ye may know that ye have eternal life and that ye may believe on the name of the Son of God Joh. 3.16 God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son that whosoever believeth in him as the only begotten Son should not perish but have everlasting life O what a person is Gods own Son for Sinners to believe on what an all-sufficient Saviour how able to * Heb. 7.25 save to the utmost must he needs be who is God and Man the Son of God and the Son of Man And indeed 't is not enough barely to believe on Christ but there must be such a believing on him as may in some measure be answerable to this his relation is he God's own Son at what a rate should we believe what a faith should we act upon him what great things should we expect for him and from him can any thing be too high for our faith when we have the proper natural Son of God in our eye as its basis and foundation Saints should have their faith raised not only upon the encouragement of the Promises but also upon the consideration of Christ's Person as he is so near and dear to God I have formerly observed how our Apostle in the Text rises higher and higher in the setting forth of the Love of God he sayes God sent there was Love he sent his own Son there was more Love this own Son he sent in the likeness of sinful flesh there was yet more Love and this he did for this end that he might for sin condemn sin in the Flesh c. there was the very top and zenith of Love Now as there is a rise in these things in the setting off the Love of God so there is also a rise in them in their several engagements and encouragements to us to believe in Christ and to believe in him yet more and more firmly and fiducially he was sent therefore we must believe he was and is God's own Son therefore we must the rather and the more strongly believe he took our flesh here 's an higher argument for an higher faith in that flesh he condemned sin performed all that the Law commanded suffered all that the Law threatned what a faith doth this call for Now if notwithstanding all this it shall yet be either no believing or but faint-believing both will be sad though in a great disparity for the faint-believing is unanswerable to what is reveal'd and uncomfortable to the Saint but the no-believing is damnable to the Sinner 3. Branch of the Exhortation To honour Christ 3. Thirdly is Christ God's own Son how then should all honour and adore him certainly upon this Sonship the highest yea even divine adoration it self is due to him Is he a Son such a Son the Son of such a Father the greatness of his Person arising from that high and near relation wherein he stands to God calls for the highest respect reverence veneration which Angels or Men can possibly give unto him Besides this 't is the absolute Will of the Father that all should * Joh. 5.23 honour his Son even as they honour himself for he having the same Nature and Essence with the Father the Father will have him have the same honour which he himself hath which whosoever deny's to him reflects dishonour upon the Father who will not bear any thing derogatory to the glory of his Son 'T is a known * Nicephor lib. 12. cap. 9. Sozom. l. 7. c. 6. story that of the carriage of Amphilochius to the Emperour Theodosius he had petitioned the Emperour to be severe against the Arrians to discountenance and suppress them because in their Opinions they did so much disparage the Son of God but could not prevail whereupon he made use of this device coming one day into the presence of the Emperour and of his Son Arcadius who now ruled joyntly with his Father he made his humble obeysance to the Emperour himself and shewed him all reverence but as for his Son he passed him by shewed him no respect at all rather dealt derisorily with him stroking him upon his head and saying to him in a way of contempt Salve tu Fili The Emperour upon this was much offended sharply reproves Amphilochius for his affront to his Son c. whereupon the good man vindicates his carriage plainly telling the Emperour he had given reverence enough to his Son And now the Emperour was more incens'd commands him with great indignation to be thrust out of his presence c. which whilst some was doing Amphilochius turn'd himself to the Emperour and said thus O Emperour thou being but a man canst not bear the contempt or disparagement of thy Son how dost thou think the great God can bear that contempt of his Son which the Arrians cast upon him the Emperour was much affected at this begg'd the Bishop's pardon commended his ingeny and did that now which he refus'd to do before The inference is undenyable if great Men stand so much upon the giving of all honour and due observance to their Sons much more will the Great God stand upon the giving of all due Honour and Reverence to his own and only Son O therefore let Christ be highly adored and honoured by you If you ask me how I answer every honouring of him is not sufficient but it must be such as may suit with his infinite Majesty and Greatness you must conceive of him as God as the Natural and eternal Son of God and according to that honour which is due to him as such so you must honour him The Apostle speaks of some * Rom. 1.21 who when they knew God they did not glorifie him as God so some pretend to give some glory to Christ but they do not glorifie him as God O this is that which you must come up to to adore and reverence Christ in such a manner
hard as that the power of the Son of God cannot effect it and what can be so high as that the Obedience of the Son of God cannot merit it Had Christ been only the Son of Man then indeed Faith could not have bore up with such confidence but he being the Son of God also and having the Nature Essence Attributes of God how may Faith triumph as to the efficacy and meritoriousness of his obedience 'T was the blood of God which he shed Acts 20.28 O what a greatness and * Superest ut poena illa Fidejussoris nostri pretio dignitate atque merito foret infinita id quod allter fieri non potuit quam si Persona patiens foret ipsa infinita Nam ut Pèccati c. Vid. Thes Salmur de Christo Mediat parte 1. th 13. p. 246. infiniteness of Merit must needs result from the greatness and infiniteness of such a Person Heb. 9.13 14. If the blood of Bulls and of Goats and the ashes of an Heifer sprinkling the unclean sanctifieth to the purifying of the Flesh How much more shall the blood of Christ who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without spot to God purge your Conscience from dead works to serve the Living God 4. You may go boldly to the throne of Grace upon all occasions For you have God's own Son to lead you thither and to make way for you and not only so but this own Son improves all his interest in and with the Father for your good why are you afraid to go to God Heb. 4.14 16. Seeing then that we have a great High Priest that is passed into the heavens Jesus the Son of God c. let us therefore come boldly unto the throne of Grace that we may obtain mercy and find grace to help in time of need 5. You need not in the least question the prevalency of Christ's intercession Doth Christ intercede and shall he not prevail will not the Father hear such a Son Suppose he may deny you which he will not yet surely he will not deny his own and onely Son Christ upon this relation may ask any thing and he shall have it mark the connexion Psal 2.7 I will declare the decree the Lord hath said unto me thou art my Son this day have I begotten thee what follows now upon this why Vers 8. Ask of me and I shall give thee the Heathen for thine inheritance and the uttermost parts of the earth for thy possession God thinks nothing too much for this Son when he asks it of him and 't is the same when he asks for you as when he asks for himself therefore fear not but that your Prayers shall be graciously answered Christ himself interceding for you when the Kings own Son carrys the Petition doubtless it shall be granted 6. This is the Person to whom you are mystically united and therefore his Glory and Greatness reflects a Glory and Greatness upon you You are in Christ not only as he is the Son of Man but as he is the Son of God also for the Vnion is terminated not in this or that Nature but in the whole Person the Apostle therefore takes special notice of this 1 Joh. 5.20 We know that the Son of God is come and hath given us an understanding that we may know him that is true and we are in him that is true even in his Son Jesus Christ O to be in this Son there 's the glory and safety of a believer I have done with this high and most Evangelical Truth The Lord Jesus is God's own Son upon which I have been somewhat large partly because of the excellency of the Argument it self and partly because of the great opposition made against it 2 Joh. 3. Grace be with you mercy and peace from God the Father and from the Lord Jesus Christ the Son of the Father in truth and love ROM 8.3 c. In the likeness of sinful Flesh CHAP. XII Of Christ's Incarnation and abasement in Flesh A Fourth General in the Words handled Why the Apostle is so express in the further adding of these Words to the former Five things laid down for the explication of them Flesh not taken here in the same sense with Flesh in what went before A double Synecdoche in the word Flesh Christ did not bring Flesh from Heaven with him but assum'd it here on Earth His sending in Flesh was not his taking a meer humane shape c. Likeness to be joyn'd not with Flesh but with sinful Flesh Two Propositions rais'd from the Words Of the First that Christ was sent in Flesh What his sending in Flesh imports this opened more strictly and more largely Of Marcion and Others who denied the verity of Christ's Incarnation and Body That proved as to both as also the verity of his whole Manhood Of his having a true Soul Of his submitting to the common adjuncts and infirmities of Flesh How the Humane Nature in Christ and in us differ His Incarnation not impossible not incredible The Reasons of it 1. That the Old-Testament Prophecies Promises Types might thereby receive their accomplishment 2. That Christ might be qualified for his Office as Mediator and the work of Redemption 3. Because it was the fittest and the best way in order to the redeeming of man Seven Propositions laid down for the due stating and opening of Christ's Incarnation As 1. That Christ who before was the eternal Son of God and had a praevious existence was made Flesh this made good against the SOCINIANS 2. That the Second Person only was incarnate 3. That this was not done till the fulness of time 4. That 't was not the divine Essence absolutely considered which assumed Flesh but that Essence considered as subsisting in the Second Person 5. That the Nature assuming was the Divine Nature 6. That the Humane Nature was so assum'd as to subsist in the Divine and that both of these Natures make but one Person where the Hypostatical Union is opened and prov'd 7. 'T is probable that if Adam had not fallen Christ had not been sent in the Flesh Of the Second Proposition That Christ was sent in the likeness yet but in the likeness of sinful Flesh Of the Sanctity of Christ's Humane Nature The Grounds thereof Use 1. To inform 1. Of the excellency of the Gospel and of the Christian Religion As also 2. Of the excellency of Christ's Flesh or Manhood Use 2. Wherein several Duty 's are urged upon Christians as namely 1. To give a full and firm assent to the Truth of Christ's Incarnation and also firmly to adhere to Christ as having assumed our Flesh where something is spoken against those who make little of a Christ in Flesh but are all for a Christ within 2. To be much in the study and contemplation of Christ incarnate 3. To adore the Mystery it self and also the Father and the Son in the Mystery 4. To endeavour after the powerful influence of it
that being suppos'd to be modest and rectified yet 't is infinitely above it There are several unions in Nature but all come short of this there 's no resemblance in the whole compass of Nature that doth exactly reach it Some I know speak of a * See Mr. Perkins on Galat. p. 273. plant which hath no root of its own only it grows and is sustain'd by a tree of another kind by which they would shadow out the subsistence of the Humane Nature of Christ in the Divine Others tell us the union of the * Yet there is a disparity in the union of these two in Man and of the two Natures in Christ Of which seè Dr. Jackson on the Creed 7th B. p. 333. Soul and Body in Man is of all resemblances the most fully expressive of this Vnion Now 't is granted these or some other such-like resemblances may hold forth something of it but alas 't is but something they go but a little way their discoveries are as imperfect as those which some Travellers make of the World who when they have seen and said all they can do yet leave a vast terra incognita undiscovered Without controversie great is the mystery of Godliness God manifested in the flesh c. Christ's incarnation hath the precedency before all the other mysteries which are there mentioned about him if that in it self be such a mystery how must the mystery thereof be heightned the Hypostatical Vnion being taken in and added to it The Mystical Vnion is very mysterious the Hypostatical Vnion much more Well therefore might I in the Proposition thus lay it down that the uniting of the Humane Nature in Christ to the Divine is done in a most mysterious and unconceivable manner Well! upon the due weighing of that which hath been said it concerns me with all tenderness and humility to treat of this Argument and to fetch in all the light and direction that ever I may for I shall need it all from the Word and Spirit The Hypostatical Vnion opened in some Particulars 'T is not a common or ordinary Vnion but special and extraordinary 1. I desire that this in the General may be taken notice of that the Hypostatical Vnion is no common or ordinary Vnion but that which is special and extraordinary O 't is an Union by it self that which is of a very different and peculiar nature from all other Vnions Of which there is great diversity for instance there 's an Union by apposition as in the several parts of a building by mixtion as in the several Elements in a compound body by alteration as when water is turned into wine there is a Natural Vnion as in the Soul and Body in man a Moral Vnion as betwixt Friend and Friend a Relative Vnion as betwixt Husband and Wife a Mystical Vnion as betwixt Christ and Believers an Vnion in respect of special presence or inhabitation of special assistance of special grace and favour which was all that Nestorius would grant in the Vnion of Christ's Divine Nature with his Humane but most falsely * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Athan de Inc. Verbi Dei p. 593. for then there would be no more for substance in the Hypostatical Vnion then what there is in that which belongs to all Believers Christ being in these respects united also to them though in a lower degree Now some of these Vnions are not at all applicable to Christ such as are so do yet come short of that high and glorious Vnion that is betwixt his Godhead and his Manhood alas take the highest of them what is it when compar'd with the Hypostatical Vnion You 'l ask me why or what is there in that more than in them let the following head be observed and there will be the Solution of this Question I add therefore The two great things wherei◠it consists 2. The two Natures are so united in Christ as that the Humane doth subsist in the Divine and that both do make up but one Person Herein lies the formal nature of the Hypostatical Vnion that wherein it differs from and transcends all other Vnions whatsoever the explication of this therefore I must a little insist upon Of the Subsistence of the Humane Nature in the Divine 1. First the conjunction of the two Natures in Christ is so near as that the Godhead imparts subsistence to the Manhood for the Manhood as 't is in Christ is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 having no subsistence but what it hath in the Personality of the eternal Word so it subsists and no otherwise And here 's one great difference 'twixt the Humane Nature as in us and as in Christ in us it hath its proper personality and subsistence in Christ it hath not so But how comes this about take an answer to that from a * Estwick against B. p. 113 Judicious Divine It 's true saith he the essential parts of a man's Body and Soul being united would have constituted a Person as they do in all other men if they had been left to themselves but it was prevented and stayd from subsisting in it self and was drawn into the Unity of the second Person by Divine and supernatural operation whereby it was highly advanced and subsists in a more eminent sort than it could have done if it had become a rational humane Person * Incarnatio non est qualiscunque unio sed est specialissima proxima immediatissuna unio quâ Persona divina humanam Naturam suâ Personalitate carentem it a terminat ut eam personaliter sustentet ipsique illud complementum attamen longè eminentiori modo communicet quod a suà connaturali Personalitate accepisset Bisterf contra Crell p. 568. Vid. Davenant in Colos p. 244. And this may also prevent that Objection which from hence so readily offers it self viz. that if the Humane Nature in Christ hath not a personal subsistence belonging to it then it wants that perfection which that Nature commonly hath in all Men which seems to make it less perfect and excellent in him than 't is in them This is easily answered the Consequence is not good because the want of this subsistence is compensated with advantage in that subsistence which the Manhood hath in the Godhead in which the Humane Nature subsisting 't is so far from being depress'd that 't is highly advanc'd as the Sensitive Soul in man being joyn'd with a nobler Soul and subsisting in it is thereupon more excellent than the sensitive Soul in a Beast though there it hath a subsistence distinct from and independent upon the reasonable Soul The two Natures make but one Person 2. Secondly Such is the Vnion of the Humane with the Divine Nature in Christ that 't is taken into his * Deus in aeternam personam Deitatis temporalem accepit substantiam Carnis August Duas substantias accipimus in uno Filio Dei unam Deitatis aliam
to the utmost of its capacity having nothing in its several faculties but truth in the Vnderstanding holy conformity in the Will heavenliness in the affections I say represent to your selves in your thoughts such a Soul and then think what an excellent Soul would that be just such a Soul is in Christ Indeed if we consider these constitutive parts of Christ's Manhood as they stand apart and by themselves they are excellent to a very high degree but if we go further and consider them in the Hypostatick Vnion then we are at a mighty loss and cannot conceive what a glory is by that conferr'd upon them As suppose a Pearl was put into a glass of Chrystal that would put a great radiancy upon it but what if the Sun it self could be put into this glass how radiant then would it be So here the Lord Christ having so precious a Soul dwelling in his Flesh even that if there was nothing more must make it very glorious but when the Godhead it self dwells in it how unspeakable must its glory and splendor needs be Leaving the parts let me speak to the whole the whole humane nature in Christ is transcendently excellent If the essential and eternal Son of God will so far condescend as to assume Man's Nature certainly in him the Manhood must have all that dignity glory perfection that ever it was capable of and surely never was the Humane Nature so advanc'd as in Christ If you consider it as 't is in us so it hath its worth and excellency for man is yet a glorious creature though 't is too true by the loss of God's image he hath lost very much of his glory As he was at first created in the state of innocency he was high indeed by the Fall the case is sadly altered the Humane Nature now is exceedingly debas'd and depress'd but yet even in its ruins as 't was with old Carthage it may be seen what once it was much is lost and the best is lost but all is not lost the glory of the Saint is gone but the glory of the Man in a great measure yet remains He is yet as to his natural composition and indowments very excellent the top of the whole creation God's * Vid. Nyssen de Hom. opif. c. 3. p. 51. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Euryphamus in Stobae Ser. c1 p. 556. Theophrastus calls him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as though God in him would vye with and out-vye all that he had done besides in the whole visible creation See Weems's Portrait p. 60 61. master-piece and highest workmanship endowed with a body curiously wrought with a Soul of divine original excellent in its being and operations And besides this which is general it pleases God in some to restore the Humane Nature in part to what it lost in Adam's fall to advance it again by Grace and Regeneration yea to take it up to heaven to the vision and fruition of himself And now 't is at its 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 here 's its non-ultra its highest advancement 't is not capable as in us of higher exaltation that what it hath by Grace and Glory This dignity and glory the Humane Nature hath in us but yet as 't is so subjected take it even at its highest elevation it comes infinitely short of the dignity and excellency of the Humane Nature of Christ the reason is because in it there 's all that hath been spoken in an eminent manner and besides which is higher than all the former it is taken into a near conjunction with the Divine Nature How glorious must that Manhood be which subsists in the Godhead and hath no subsistence but in that The nearer the Vnion is with that the greater is the perfection and glory of that which is admitted into that union And hence it is that there is such a fulness of Grace in Christ as Man over and above what is in the best of men that he is * Psal 45.7 anointed with the oyl of gladness above his fellows that his Manhood bears a part in the mediatory Office that 't is to be worshipped with Divine Worship as hath been proved before I say all this belongs to it by vertue of the Hypostatical Vnion from which in all things it derives super-excellent Glory And yet I must tell you this Humane Nature as high as 't is is the lowest thing in Christ that which is the highest in us is but the lowest in him Supremum infimi infimum supremi as Man he 's glorious but what is he then as God! What a Person is Christ take him altogether O let him be adored and reverenced by you as Man but especially as he is God-man So much for Information Use 2. Exhortation to several Dutys 2. Secondly was Christ sent in flesh hence ariseth matter of Exhortation to several Duties 1. I would exhort you to give a full and firm assent to the truth of Christ's incarnation To give a full and firm assent to the truth of Christ's Incarnation as also firmly to adhere to Christ as sent in flesh Here are two things which Iâ—le speak to apart First see that you give a full and firm assent to the truth of Christ's Incarnation 'T is a thing which the Scripture layes a great stress upon 1 Joh. 4.3 Every Spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God and this is that spirit of Antichrist whereof you have heard that it should come and even now is it in the world 2 Joh. 7. Many deceivers are entred into the world who confess not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh this is a deceiver and an Antichrist It seems the Incarnation of Christ met with early opposition his flesh was no sooner translated to Heaven but 't was deny'd on Earth this Apostle therefore who in his Gospel had been a great asserter of it in his Epistles will be also a zealous defender of it and see how warm he was upon it the denyal of Christ's coming and of his coming in the flesh for there lies the main emphasis he carries as high as Antichristianism and sets no lower a brand upon it Antichristianism doth not only lie in the opposing of Christ in his Offices which is the latter and modern Antichristianism but also in the opposing of him in his Natures as God and Man which was the first and ancient Antichristianism to deny Christ's Manhood and assuming flesh this is down-right Antichristian the very spirit of Antichrist if the Apostle here may be believed Now there 's a twofold denial of this one open express direct the other * Non attendamus ad linguam sed ad facta si enim omnes interrogantur omnes uno ore confitentur Jesum esse Christum quiescat paululum lingua vitam interroga Aug. in Ep. Joh. Tract 3. implicit virtual interpretative the former I hope is very rare the latter I fear is too common he
did perfectly obey the Law and as that his perfect obedience is imputed and reckoned to them upon which 't is theirs to â—â—l intents as if they had so obeyed in their own persons But there being many difficulties about this and it leading me to the main Truth which the words hold forth I must endeavour further to open it Which I shall do in the discussing of these three Propositions Three Propositions to clear up the third Interpretation and the main Truth 1. That our Lord Christ was made under the Law 2. That being made under the Law he fulfilled it 3. That his fulfilling of the Law is imputed to Believers so as that in him they fulfilled the Law also 1. Proposition Christ was made under the Law 1. Christ was made under the Law The Apostle is express in this When the fulness of the time was come God sent forth his Son made of a woman made under the Law Gal. 4.4 made under the Law that is made subject to the Law so as that he was under the obligation thereof and bound in all things to conform to its righteousness And this subjection of Christ to the Law did result partly from his Nature partly from his Office From his Nature as he was Man and so a Creature for his Manhood was a created thing now every creature as such is indispensably subject to the Law of God a Creature necessarily must be under the Law of his Creator and Soveraign so far therefore as Christ was such he was indispensably obliged to the Law so far his subjection was natural and thereupon necessary From his Office or that oeconomy and dispensation which he had submitted unto as Mediator Redeemer Surety c. with respect to this he was to be subject too yet in it his subjection was purely free and voluntary 'T is a * See Bodius on Eph. c. 5. p. 812. c. nice Question which some discuss Whether Christ's subjection to the Law did arise from the natural necessity of his being as he was Man and a Creature or whether it did arise only from that mediatory Office which he had submitted to I think things being rightly stated both may be taken in both Nature and Office did require that Christ should be subject to the Law though * This opened in Turret in de Sat. Christi p. 277 278. in different ways For the better understanding of Christ's being made under the Law I desire you to take notice of four or five things Five things to open the Proposition 1. Christ subject to the Law as Man 1. This must be understood of him with respect to his humane Nature This was the Nature which only was capable of subjection Christ as man only could be obedient As to his divine Nature he made the Law so he was the Law-giver and so he was in all acts of power and authority equal with the Father 't was solely in respect of his humane Nature that he was made under the Law which was part of that form of a Servant which he took upon him Phil. 2.7 As he was God 't was proper to him to command as he was Man only 't was proper to him to obey in the former notion he was Lord of the Sabbath Matth. 12.8 in the latter he was bound to keep the Sabbath Christ as man and because man was subject but then 't was only as such 2. As Man in the state of his humiliation 2. Christ as being made under the Law is to be considered not meerly as a Creature upon which he was subject to it but as a Creature in the state of his humiliation and suretyship during which state only his subjection to the Law was to continue For his humane Nature now in Heaven is a Creature and yet there 't is not if we speak strictly under the Law for though Christ there doth materially the things which the Law requires as to be holy to love God c. yet he doth not do them formerly as acts of obedience to the Law but as things which spring from the perfection of his nature and state therefore I say when we are speaking of Christ's being subject to the Law we must not consider him only as Man but as Man in such a way or state in the carrying on of such an undertaking which when he had effected his subjection was to cease Some say that though the subjection which Christ was under in reference to his Office as Mediator be at an end yet his subjection to the Law which was natural and did arise from his being a Creature that yet remains I answer if by this natural subjection they mean only that which results from his Being or that obligation which results from the intrinsick goodness of things so we grant him even in Heaven to be under it but if they mean that subjection or that obligation which relates to and results from an external Law so we deny Christ there to be under it in his glorified state he doth the things which the Law commands but not as or because they are commanded by the Law 3. He was principally subject to the Moral Law 3. The principal Law that Christ was made under and which he was principally obliged to fulfil was the * Vide Bradsh de Justif c. 18. Moral Law This was the Law which at first was made to Adam which he brake and so entayl'd the curse upon all his posterity therefore Christ the serond Adam was also made under this Law that he might fulfil it and so restore man to his primitive happiness This was the Law which was the rule and standard of righteousness wherefore if Christ will convey a righteousness to the creature he must be made under and fulfil this Law He is said to be a curse for us now that curse doth mainly refer to the Moral Law though 't is very true by way of allusion 't is set forth by that which was proper to the judicial Law Gal. 3.13 And he is also said to redeem us from the Law that is from the curse of the Law now 't is the curse annexed to the moral Law that he redeemed us from therefore that was the Law which he was made under This was the Law most excellent if Christ would submit to put himself under the obligation of a Law less exeellent surely he would not refuse to submit to put himself under the obligation of this which was the most excellent Law Especially considering how necessary this was for the good of Sinners for since God stood upon the performance of this Law as the way wherein he would justifie it was most necessary that Christ should be subject to it and perform it or else there would have been no justification Had he been made only under the Ceremonial Law than the benefits of his Obedience would have reached no further than that people who were concerned in that Law and so the Jews
the righteousness of God which is by faith of Jesus Christ unto all and upon all them that believe ch 3.22 Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Jesus Christ whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood c. v. 24 25 26 Abraham believed God and it was counted to him for righteousness ch 4.3 Now it was not written for his sake alone that it was imputed to him but for us also to whom it shall be imputed if we believe on him that raised up the Lord Jesus from the dead who was delivered for our offences and was raised again for our justification v. 23 24 25 Therefore being justified by faith we have peace with God thorough our Lord Jesus Christ ch 5.1 Especially read what the Apostle writes in drawing up the Parallel betwixt the two Adams ch 5.15 to the end of the Ch. I say read and consider what is before asserted over and over concerning Justification and then tell me whether the Apostle might not well thus infer There is therefore c. and whether there be not strength enough in these premises to bear the weight of the Conclusion There is therefore now no Condemnation c. for unquestionably the Illative therefore upon which the Proposition is bottom'd like the Handle in the Dial points to all that the Apostle had been speaking of concerning justifying Grace 2. The Priviledge is farther sure upon Sanctification From their Sanctification Such as are in Christ are always sanctified wherever the Union is with the Son there is Sanctification by the Spirit now such as are sanctified shall never be condemned Rev. 20.6 Blessed and holy is he that hath part in the first Resurrection on such the second death or Condemnation hath no power Sanctification doth not carry in it such a direct and intrinsick opposition to Condemnation as Justification doth nor is it any meritorious ground of Non-condemnation Yet where there is Sanctification there shall be no Condemnation for upon this the power and dominion of sin is taken away * Dum non essent in Christo consentirent concupiscentiae erat illis damnatio Nunc autem cum sint in Christo repugnent concupiscentiae nihil damnationis est illis quamquam ex carne concupiscant quia non pugnatores sed victi damnantur nec est damnabile si existant desideria â—â—rnalia sed si eis ad peccatum obediatur Anselm This must be understood of Condemnation in Event and that too as grounded upon the meer Grace of God vigorous resistance is made against it the bent of the heart is for God there 's the participation of the Divine Nature the Image of God is renewed in the Soul the Creature in part is restored to that original rectitude which was before the Fall with many such like considerations upon all which the sanctified person is secured from Condemnation God hath such a love to Grace it being the work of his own Spirit and to gracious persons they in sanctification being made after himself as 't is exprest Eph. 4.24 that he will never suffer such to perish eternally Grace merits nothing yet it secures from the greatest evils and entitles to the greatest good Nothing shall save where Grace is not nothing shall damn where Grace is The Sinner shall not live the Saint shall not dye O this Sanctification though it be imperfect yet how great good doth result from it Paul had sad remainders of sin in him but withall Grace was in him he had his double self as the Moralist expresses it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 his renewed self and his unrenewed self the Law was spiritual but he was carnal sold under sin what he would not that he did what he would that he did not he was led captive by the Law of sin and death here was his unrenewed self Yet where he complains most of Sin even there he discovers much if not most of Grace he had a sinning Nature but he allow'd not himself in sin he consented to the Law that it was good it was not he that did so and so but sin that dwelt in him to will was present with him though how to perform he did not find he delighted in the Law of God in the inward man with his mind he served the Law of God c. here was his renewed self Do not these things evidence Grace was all this spoken in personâ irregeniti as some tell us No doubtless the Apostle here speaks as a * With my mind I serve the Law of God Ego qui in me significo quemlibet justum sub gratiâ constitutum Anselm Quod meo judicio tantam vim tantam emphasin habet ut illi planè humanae naturae corruptionem ignorare videantur si qui sint qui eam cum tali animi constitutione consistere posse putant nisi aliundè sit aliquatenus immutata Amyral Consid cap. sept Ep. ad Rom. p. 16. He might have gone higher â—haâ—â— aliquatenus immutata gracious man and in the person of gracious men And what doth he infer from all this There is therefore now no Condemnation c. Oh saith Paul I have sin enough to humble me but yet sin shall not damn me there 's too much of it in me but yet it hath not my heart with my mind I serve the Law of God the main bent of my heart is for holiness the corrupt Nature is very strong in me but yet it hath not its full strength its entire unbroken power and dominion over me that through Grace I am freed from I am though but imperfectly yet truly sanctified and hereupon though I may lie under much trouble here yet I am safe as to my eternal state there is therefore now no Condemnation to me I desire it may be observed that he doth not only infer Non-condemnation from the work of Grace in him spoken of in the closure of the former Chapter but as soon as he had laid down in common this great happiness of persons in Christ he presently confirms it as to himself from his sanctification and the dethroning of sin in him by the regenerating Spirit For the Law of the Spirit of Life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the Law of Sin and Death And with respect to others he much enlarges upon it Rom. 6.5 6 7 8 21 22 23. Well then persons in Christ they being justified and sanctified are above the danger of Condemnation and these are the two great Pillars upon which the Therefore in the words is built From their union with Christ The Text affords us another Argument or Ground of Non-condemnation and that lies in the Subject it self There is no Condemnation to them who are in Christ Jesus why so because they are in Christ Jesus for these words are not only descriptive of the persons to whom the priviledge belongs but they are also argumentative and contain a
Vnion Joh. 14.20 At that day ye shall know that I am in my Father and you in me and I in you that day refers either to the time when the Spirit should be given which is promised v. 16 17 or to the glorisied state spoken of v. 19 upon the effusion of the Spirit men may come to know something of this Union but it will never be fully understood by them till they be in Glory In the opening of it so far as the present state and the height of the mystery will admit of I must look into the Word and keep to that and fetch all from that for 't is Revelation and not Reason which here must give us Light The Word having reveal'd it Reason may be useful as an Handmaid to shadow it out by such and such Resemblances thereby to help us the better to conceive of it but that which must be our first and main Guide about it is Scripture Revelation Now the Scripture speaks of a threefold Vnion 1. There is the Vnion of three Persons in one Nature Of the Vnion of the Three Pexsons of the two Natures in Christ and of the Mystical Vnion 2. There is the Vnion of two Natures in one Person 3. There is the Vnion of Persons where yet Persons and Natures are distinct 1. There is the Vnion of three Persons in one Nature This is in the Trin-Vnity where you have three Persons united in the Godhead the Trinity in Vnity and the Vnity in Trinity One in Three in respect of Nature and Essence and Three in One in respect of Personality This is that ineffable incomprehensible Union which is between the Father Son and Holy Ghost in the same common Nature of the Godhead Of which the Apostle speaks 1 Joh. 5.7 There are three that bear record in heaven the Father the Word and the Holy Ghost and these three are one Here are Three and yet One Three as to their distinct Personal Subsistences and yet One as to their common Nature This a Mystery to be adored not to be fathomed a * The Union betwixt the Three Persons c. the knowledge of this is not nay cannot be attained unto by the Light of Nature No example can illustrate no Reason Angelical or humane can comprehend the hidden excellency of this glorious Mystery But it is discovered to us by a divine Revelation in the written Word and our Faith must receive and our Piety admire what our Reason cannot comprehend Cheynel of the Divine Trin-Unity ch ◠p. 19 Vide Aquin. p. 1. Qu. 39. Art 1 2. Lombard Lib. 1. Dist 2 3. Mystery much too deep for the Plummet of Reason to reach he that by Reason would go about to grasp it is as foolish as he that would attempt to put the Ocean into a bucket or to grasp the Universe in the hollow of his hand 2. There is the Vnion of two Natures in one Person This is that which we commonly call the Hypostatical Vnion or the Union of the two Natures in Christ his Godhead and his Manhood both making up but one Person You may thus conceive of it 'T is the substantial supernatural conjunction of the two Natures in Christ the Divine assuming the Humane and giving it a subsistence in its self so that both make but one Person and yet so as that the being and properties of both Natures are preserved intire As to this twofold Vnion I am not at present concern'd to speak to them when I shall come to the third Verse I shall have occasion there to speak to the latter 3. There is the Vnion of Persons where yet Persons and Natures are distinct and this is the Mystical Vnion The Mystical Vnion opened that which is betwixt Christ and Believers this I am only now to speak to Concerning which that you may not mistake the Nature of it you must know here is Vnion but no transmutation confusion or commixtion here is the union of persons but not personal union 1. Here is union but no transmutation confusion or commixtion I 'le put them together for brevity sake Believers are united to Christ but yet not so as that they are changed or transformed into the very essence or being of Christ so as to be Christed with Christ as some too boldly speak or that he is changed or transformed into the essence and being of Believers no you must not entertain a thought of any such thing Christ is Christ still and Believers are but Creatures still notwithstanding this Union though they be really and nearly united yet both keep their Natures distinct and are the same after the Union that they were before it As it is in the Persons in the Sacred Trinity (a) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Damasc de Orthod Fide lib. 1. cap. 11. pag. 42 there is Vnion but no confusion they are Essentially one yet they have their personal Properties and distinct Subsistences And as it is in the two Natures of Christ they are under a near Vnion they make but one Person yet for all this they are (b) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Synod Calced distinct the Godhead is not turned into the Manhood nor the Manhood into the Godhead they are united but not confounded or converted for both of them even after this Union do still retain their * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Damasc Dial. cap. 66. essential properties without confusion or conversion So 't is in the Union of Believers with Christ for thus far we may make use of the two former Vnions to open the Mystical Union by they all agree in This though in other things they differ You may take a lower resemblance of it if you please In Man there is a near Vnion between Soul and Body and these two united make up the man * Vide Nemes de Nat. Hom. p. 97. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. yet upon the union the Soul is not turned into the nature of the Body nor the Body into the nature of the Soul they are not confounded though united they yet retain their essence and properties distinct the Soul is the Soul still and the Body is the Body still So it is in the Vnion between Christ and Believers 2. Here is the Vnion of persons but not personal union And here lies the difference between the Mystical Vnion and the Hypostatical Vnion The Hypostatical Vnion is Personal but not of Persons the reason is because in Christ there are two Natures but there is but one Person there is this Nature and that Nature in Christ but not this Person and that Person in Christ as Nestorius held there is in Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 aliud aliud but not alius alius as the Learned express it Christ did not assume the * Vide Lombard Lib. 3. Dist 5. Person of man but the Nature of man into his Person Non assumpsit Hominem Personam sed
as to the Body also The Soul indeed is the principal Subject of this Union but the Body too hath its share in it therefore the Apostle saith 1 Cor. 6.15 Know ye not that your bodies are the members of Christ As Christ in the assuming of the nature of man took not the body only or the soul only but both and so united them to the Godhead so 't is in the Mystical Union the whole man is knit to whole Christ And which puts marvailous sweetness into it the totality of this Vnion on Christs part reaches to every individual Believer in the world as the whole Soul is united to every part of the Body so 't is whole Christ to every Believer Sixthly 'T is an immediate Vnion Christ and the believing Soul they * See Davenant upon the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Colos 2.19 Per has commissuras Christus tangit nos nos tangimus Christum touch each the other if I may so express it and the Word encourages me so to do there is nothing that doth intervene or interpose between Christ and it In other unions it is not so there is union between the head and the members yet all the members do not touch the head the Foot is at a great distance from the head though it be united to it all the parts of the building are united to the foundation yet they are not all contiguous to it there is apposition but no contiguity But now the Union which I am upon is so immediate that every Believer touches Christ as it were and lies close and near to him Which yet is not to be taken of any * Omnis physicus contactus excludendus est Zanch. in cap. 5. ad Eph. p. 242. Physical or Local Contact but only of that which is Moral and Spiritual not of any immodietas suppositi but only of that immedietas virtutis or unionis which is through the Spirit and Faith Lastly 'T is an indissoluble Vnion The knot therein is tied so fast that it shall never he again untied or loosened Christ and Believers are so firmly joyned together that none shall ever be able to part them all the powers of Hell with all their united strength shall never be able to disjoyn or separate one Soul from Christ As no * Non obstat unioni huic intercapedo locorum five distantia Coeli Terrae quâ Christus quâ homo fideles peregrè ab ipso versantes disterminantur Quia unio non est existentia corporis Christi intra corpora nostra nec locali contactu aut inclosione constat Alting Explic. Catech. Part. 2. Qu 76. p. 266. distance of place doth hinder the Union so no force or violence from Devils or men shall ever be able to dissolve the Union And herein lies the peculiar transcendent blessedness of this Union above all other Unions They all may cease be broken and come to nothing the members may be separated from the head and the head from the members the tender Husband may and shall be parted from the affectionate Wife the building may be broken off from the foundation the Soul may be divided from the Body But the Mystical Union stands fast forever Christ and a gracious Soul can never be separated God hath joyned them and * Mat. 19.6 what he hath joyned together no man shall ever put asunder There are two abiding things in the Saints their Vnction and their Vnion Their Vnction abides But the anointing which ye have received of him abideth in you 1 Joh. 2.27 and their Vnion abides for it follows and ye shall abide in him Our Apostle makes his Challenge in the close of this Chapter who shall separate us from the Love of Christ he tells you none should ever be able to do it v. 38 39 so who shall separate us as to our Union with Christ none shall none can Possibly the influences of it for some time may be suspended but yet the Union it self is not nay cannot be dissolved As it was in the Hypostatical Union for a time there was a suspending of the comforting influences of the Divine Nature to the Humane insomuch that our Saviour cried out * My God Mat. 27.46 My God why hast thou forsaken me yet for all this the Union between the two Natures was not in the least abolished So here in the Mystical Vnion the sensible effects comforts benefits of which may sometimes be kept in and not appear but yet the thing it self abides and so shall abide firm and inviolable forever 'T is an inseparable an insuperable Vnion Yea Death it self though that be the bane of all other Unions shall never reach this so as to put an end or period to it And thus I have finished the Heads necessary to be spoken to for the opening of this admirable and blessed Vnion In the clearing of which I have given you the Explication of the Subject of the Proposition There is no Condemnation to them who are in Christ Jesus I must not dismiss so excellent so useful a Point without some practical improvement of it VSE 1. Of Examination whether we be in Christ And first are they and they only the persons to whom there is No Condemnation such as are in Christ Jesus I would then put all of you upon the most serious Examination whether you be thus in Christ Jesus Pray bring it down to your selves and ask your selves one by one this question Am I in Christ some are so in him am I one of them what is this Mystical Vnion to me It concerns you to be very inquisitive about this because the grand priviledge in the Text depends upon it You cannot safely apply No Condemnation if it be No Vnion If you desire a solid foundation to build upon for exemption from Condemnation you must make sure of this Vnion the happiness and safety of your future state wholly depends upon your present being in Christ O that you would be perswaded with the greatest diligence faithfulness impartiality to search and examine your selves about this The Apostle is very smart upon it 2 Cor. 13.5 Examine your selves whether you be in the faith prove you own selves know you not your own selves how that Jesus Christ is in you and you in him except you be reprobates and say I except you be liable to eternal condemnation Two Distinctions concerning Vnion with Christ Now that I may help you in this great Enquiry viz whether your have that very Vnion with Christ which will effectually secure you from this most dreadful Condemnation I must first distinguish about it 1. Union with Christ is either Material and Natural or Spiritual and Supernatural There is a Material or Natural Union with Christ consisting in oneness with him in respect of one of his Natures For he having assumed the nature of man and hypostatically united it to the Godhead upon this wherever the nature of man is there is Union
or conjunction with him so far as the participation of one and the same Nature with him will go The Spiritual and Supernatural Union is that which hath been opened viz. that which is brought about by the Spirit and by Faith upon which the Creature is not one with Christ meerly in respect of his Manhood but he is one with him in an higher manner as being also according to his measure made a partaker of his Divine Nature that is to say as the Image of God is imprinted upon him as the several Graces of the Spirit are wrought in him as Christ and he are not only one flesh but also one spirit both having the same spirit dwelling in them and both being animated and acted by one and the same spirit Now to apply this Distinction The first of these Vnions is not sufficient to secure from Condemnation or to entitle to Salvation for then that being * Nullus est hominum cujus Natura non erat suscepta in Christo Prosp resp ad cap. Gall. c. 9. Of this see Cyril l. 10. c. 13. in Joh. Dei Filius quia suscepit humanam Naturam cum omnibus hominibus conjunctus est c. sed ista conjunctio generalis est tantum ut ita dicam juxta materiam Pet. Martyr common and general all men living should be saved and none should be condemned Even the graceless and unregenerate are men and have that very nature which Christ assumed but is this enough for an everlasting state of happiness Surely no! 'T is true even this natural union is very precious and the foundation of great joy and comfort to Believers O for such to remember that Christ hath match'd into their family sits in Heaven in their nature and is of the same flesh and blood with themselves this I say must needs be very sweet The Apostle speaks of it as a very great thing Heb. 2.11 He that sanctifieth and they that are sanctified are all of one This 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 admits of various interpretations I conceive this is the best Christ and the Saints are all of one that is all of one nature of one and the same flesh and blood for it follows v. 14. Forasmuch as the children are partakers of flesh and blood he also himself took part of the same c. and v. 16. For verily he took not on him the nature of Angels but he took on him the seed of Abraham I say this Vnion is matter of great comfort to Believers but for Others who have nothing more than that Christ is man and hath assumed their flesh and is as they are and they as he what will this avail them What is Christs taking our flesh if he doth not give us his spirit what is it for him to be made like to us in our nature if we be not made like to him in his nature Christ with the humane Nature is in Heaven and yet thousands with the humane Nature are in Hell O rest not in meer manhood though Christ be man but get an higher a closer a more special Union with him or else it will be condemnation for all that 2. I distinguish Secondly Union with Christ is either External and Visible or Internal and Invisible The First is common and general yet not so common as the Material and Nartural Vnion spoken of before for all are Men but all are not Christians This lies in Church-membership the participation of Church-priviledges living under the Word and Sacraments passing under the Baptismal Seal making of some external profession of Religion c. The Second includes and supposes all this but hath a great deal more in it it notes real insition and implantation into Christ This Distinction is evidently grounded upon that of our Saviour Joh. 15.2 where he saith Every branch in me that beareth not fruit he taketh away here is the external Vnion for here is a branch which bears no fruit and yet it is in Christ how it must be understood in respect of Church membership external profession c. And every branch that beareth fruit he purgeth it that it may bring forth more fruit here 's the internal and special Union that which is as was said by real insition and implantation into Christ Now the enquiry lies here whether you be so in Christ as to be ingrafted and implanted into him the Former without this will signifie but very little 'T is indeed a great mercy to be a member of the Visible Church but this without a close and special membership with Christ will not secure a mans everlasting state if it be only external conjunction with Christ here it may for all that be eternal separation from him hereafter What is it for the Branch to be ty'd or fast'ned to the Stock if it doth not coalesce and incorporate with the Stock what is it for a man to be in Christs mystical Body only as the wooden leg or eye of glass is in the natural body where there is apposition but no coalition or union Certainly when Paul here tells us There is no Condemnation to them who are in Christ Jesus he means such a being in him as is more than what is external and common or (a) Illi in Christo esse dicuntur hoc loco non qui mediatè tantum secundum quid in Christo sunt nempe ratione Ecclesiae ipsius quae corpus Christi mysticum c. sed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 intelliguntur veri Christiani qui immediate in Christo sunt per Unionem mysticam cum ipsius personâ fide virtute Spiritus Sancti c. Gomar founded upon any such bottom As particularly such as is by meer Baptism I mean when 't is the participation of the external sign only and there 's nothing more (b) 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Theophyl They therefore who open the Words by this are too large and general Alas Baptism (c) Non loquitur Paulus de iis qui Sacramentum tantummodo Baptismi perceperunt quos extrinsecus duntaxat unda alluit non autem intus in animo Gratia expiavit sed eos intelligit qui sunt in Christo Jesu h. e. rem etiam Sacramenti adepti sunt Justinian in loc Qui sunt in Christo Jesu i. e. qui per Baptismum Christum induerunt eique per Fidem dilectionem incorporati sunt factique tanquam viva ejus membra tanquam palmites Christo ut viti insiti Perer. Disp 1. in Cap. 8. ad Rom. Qui sunt insiti per Baptismum in eo regenerati Estius alone will not do it there must be something more than the external badge and livery of Christianity or else that will come short both of Vnion here and No-Condemnation hereafter O how many are there who are baptiz'd live in the Church are visible members thereof who yet are far from being inwardly knit to Christ and therefore shall perish eternally This is to be
in Christ and how may that be known thus by our being New Creatures The Apostle sets it down indefinitely that he may reach every person if any man be in Christ c. This New Creature is one of the greatest riddles of Christianity to men that have it not 'T is that new creation which the Soul passes under in the work of Conversion or that great and universal change which follows upon Conversion a converted man is a changed man a quite other person than what he was before he may say with Austine I am not I all old things are pass'd away and all things are become new as it follows in the place alledged Upon Conversion understanding judgment thoughts will affections Conscience heart tongue life all is new when the Sinner is turned from Sin to God he hath new Principles from which he acts new Ends for which he acts new Guides and Rules by which he acts is not here a wonderful change Now are you acquainted with this New Creature what do you find of it in your selves it converns you to make sure of it for all is nothing without it * Gal. 6.15 In Christ Jesus and so in reference to the proof of being in Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth any thing nor uncircumcision but a new Creature O this is all in all this must be the sure and infallible witness of your Union with Christ Therefore examine your selves about it I beseech you look back compare your selves with your selves hath any thorough change been wrought in you are you not the same you ever were just such as you came into the world Can any that hears me say O blessed be God! 't is not with me as it hath been Time was when I was blind as ignorant a Creature as any but I hope now in some measure I am enlightened God hath shined into me and set up such a Light in me that I see what I never saw before and I see it in another manner than I did before Time was when I could swear curse be drunk take Gods name in vain profane Sabbaths c. but I dare not now give way to such impieties Time was when Sin and I agreed very well but now my heart rises at it * Psal 119.104 I hate every false way Time was when I had no love for Duty I liv'd in the total omission of it but now I love Prayer I love the Word and all the Ordinances of Christ are precious to me Time was when I was all for the world my whole heart was taken up in it but now * Phil. 3.8 I count all but loss that I may gain Christ now None but Christ none but Christ Can any of you thus speak here 's a change indeed upon that the New Creature indeed and upon that Being in Christ indeed There 's a double change which evermore accompanies the Mystical Vnion 1. The State of the Person is changed He who before he was in Christ was a Child of wrath is now upon his being in Christ an heir of Grace he that before the Union was in a state of Condemnation is now after the Union in a state of Salvation 2. The Nature is changed there 's a new Nature a new Soul not physically yet morally infus'd into the regenerate person the * 2 Pet. 1.4 divine Nature it self is now communicated to him whereupon he doth not think speak or act as he did before he doth not love or live as before he walks in newness of life as 't is Rom. 6.4 This is the change which we are to make sure of for assuredly the Lord Jesus will put none into his bosome or make them a part of himself but first the New Creature shall pass upon them to prepare and make them fit for so near and so close an Union 'T is not consistent with his honour to take a Sinner just as he finds him and without any more adoe to own him as a member of himself There out any more adoe to own him as a member of himself There cannot be a passage-from one Head to another but there must be some not able alteration Christ will not break off a branch from the first root and ingraft it into himself but he will first alter the very nature and property of it 'T is not in the power of Creatures to change those whom they take into Union with them the Husband may take the Wife into his bosome but he cannot change her Nature temper disposition As Bernard saith of Moses Aethiopissam-duxit sed non potuit Aethiopissae mutare colorem he married an Aethiopian but he could not alter her Aethiopian complexion much less could he alter her inward temper But Christ can and doth thus work upon those whom he takes into near Union and relation if he joyns the black swarthy Soul to himself he puts a new complexion upon it he makes it comely with his own comeliness as God promises Ezek. 16.14 So then by this you may know whether you be truly really savingly in Christ viz if you be new Creatures without the new Creation there 's no Mystical Vnion 2. Another trying Scripture is that Gal. 5.24 They that are Christ's who are in him have crucified the Flesh with the Affections and Lusts This also is a very close Word and it speaks this No Crucifixion no Vnion The crucified Head will have crucified Members he that is planted in Christs person shall * Rom. 6.4 be planted in the likeness of Christs death O is Sin crucified in you did you ever set that upon the Cross which brought the Son of God to the Cross is there in you that death to sin which carries some analogy to Christs death for sin is the Flesh with all its cursed retinue the affections and lusts thereof mortified in you is the corrupt Nature dead as to its former power and soveraignty in the Soul for that 's the crucifixion here spoken of Assure your Selves Christ will not have a member in him to be under a foreign power the Flesh shall not be the Ruler where He is the Head where he brings about the Vnion he will have the Dominion My Text too speaks of this Flesh and it tells you that they who are in Christ Jesus do not walk after the Flesh but after the Spirit Paul here seems to rise and to go on step by step would you know who are exempted from Condemnation he tells you such who are in Christ would you further know who are in Christ he tells you such who walk not c. Here then is the Characteristical Note of all who are in Christ they live not the fleshly carnal sensual Life but the spiritual heavenly holy Life Sirs what is your walking 't is the Conversation that must discover the Vnion do but reflect upon your course of Life and that will plainly tell you to what Head you belong 1 Joh. 2.6 He that saith he abideth in him ought himself
the higher faculties under the filthiness of the Spirit So Eph â— 3 Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the Lusts of our Flesh how why in fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the * Non Corpoâ—s tantum hâ—e partis ratione carentis sed etiam 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 opera esse vult omnes esmedi cupiditates quas ex solâ animae parte quae censetur rationis expers produci Platonici prohibent Salmas in Epictet p. 117. mind So that all Lusts do not he in the desires of the flesh but there are some which lie in the mind and in the highest faculties of the Soul Therefore the Apostle in this Chapter v. 6. speaks of the wisdom of the flesh where God willing we shall shew against the Papists that the Flesh and the Lusts thereof are not to be confined to the lower and sensitive part in man but that they do also extend to the nobler and higher part in him And to instance but in one place more you read Col. 2.18 of a fleshly mind These are the Lusts that are situated in the upper region of the Soul but then there are Others which reside in that region which is lower They are called fleshly Lusts 1 Pet. 2.11 I beseech you as strangers and pilgrims abstain from fleshly Lusts c. They are also called worldly Lusts Tit. 2.12 The grace of God which hath brought salvation teacheth us to deny ungodliness and worldly Lusts They are stiled fleshly Lusts because they are altogether for the satisfaction of the fleshly and sensual part or because they reach no further than the fleshly part and they are stiled wordly Lusts because they are drawn forth by wordly Objects or because they draw out a man in eager propensions after worldly things What it is to walk after the Flesh in this particular consideration of it Now to bring this down to the business in hand The Flesh being thus particularly considered so to walk after it it 's this For a person to be under the regency and dominion of Lust in whatever part or faculty it may reside or exert it self so that he acts in a ready willing full subjection to it and compliance with it 'T is to be under the unbroken strength of sensual propensions and to follow them in the course of life More closely 't is to be carried out with vehemency of desire after some fleshly good so as wholly to be swallowed up in pursuits after it and delights in it even to the slighting undervaluing total neglect of what is truly and spiritually good this is Lust by which whoever is thus acted he is a walker after the Flesh For wherever Lust commands and is obeyed in one respect or another there 't is walking after the Flesh Oh doth it bear sway in any of you that you obey and act by it in heart and life the dark side of the Character is towards you you walk after the Flesh and not after the Spirit Saints in Christ Jesus do not thus walk the Flesh may sometimes be stirring and lusting in them but they dare not hearken or give way to it they repel its evil motions and propensions do not follow or steer their course by the commands and counsels thereof and they are not inordinately desirous of sensual things In general they do not they dare not * Rom. 6.12 obey sin in the lusts thereof or fall in with the cursed suggestions and follicitations of the Flesh to that which is evil They that are Christ's have crucified the Flesh with the affections and lusts thereof Gal. 5.24 But let this suffice for the opening of the Negative who walk not after the Flesh much more might be added but that which follows will give more light about it Before I enter upon the applying of this let me proceed to the opening of the positive or affirmative part Such as are in Christ Jesus do not walk after the Flesh what then do they walk after why after the Spirit The Question here to be answered is Quest what is it to walk after the Spirit or when and how may persons be said to walk after the Spirit Ans What is meant by Spirit For the better answering of which Question we must first enquire what we are to understand by the Spirit for that being cleared the walking after it will be the more evident Here also not to insist upon the several significations and senses of the word Spirit in this place it must be taken either Personally for the Spirit of God the third Person in the Sacred Trinity or Habitually for Grace in us the Divine Nature implanted in the Soul in the work of regeneration or it must be understood of both You find Grace in Scripture set forth by Spirit Joh. 3.6 What is born of the Flesh is Flesh and what is born of the Spirit is Spirit where the latter Spirit must be understood of the heavenly and renewed Nature Jude 19. the Apostle speaks of some who were sensual having not the Spirit which though it be chiefly to be understood of the Spirit of Grace of which these persons were destitute yet it takes in the Grace of the Spirit too So Gal. 5.17 The Flesh lusteth against the Spirit and the Spirit against the Flesh i. e. the corrupt Nature and the renewed and sanctified Nature do reciprocally oppose and contend each against the other So some interpret that of our Saviour Mat. 26.41 The Spirit is willing but the Flesh is weak but I cannot lay so great a stress upon this place for this import of the word And as the sinful Nature may very well be set forth by Flesh so Grace or the sanctified Nature may as well be set forth by this appellation of Spirit Why Grace is set forth by the Spirit And that for these reasons 1. because 't is of the Spirit of God it being immediately infused and created by him 2. Because 't is principally seated in the Spirit the Soul of man 3. Because 't is a spiritual thing and vents it self most in spiritual acts 4. Because of the nobleness and excellency of it Now you 'l ask in which of these senses is Spirit here to be taken I answer 't is best to take in both namely both the Spirit of Grace and also the Grace of the Spirit or the renewed Spirit in the Creature the thing here spoken of is applicable to both and therefore why should we limit it to one The word Spirit throughout in this Chapter is generally taken in the personal notion for the Holy Ghost himself and no sooner had the Apostle mentioned Spirit in this verse but presently in the second verse he speaks of the Spirit as consider'd personally the Law of the Spirit of Life c. he means the living and quickening Spirit of God therefore to be sure this sense must be taken in And Grace habitually considered or the renewed
Nature in the Soul that too may have its place here very properly for Spirit being set in opposition to the Flesh which is the depraved Nature it must have some reference to that other Nature which is opposite to this And * Spiritus sumitur pro animo regenerato per Spiritum Pareus Per spiritum intelligit novitatem Naturae effectam per regenerationem Spiritus vitiositate naturali emendatâ Piscat Vocat Carnem universam hominis naturam ut quae corrupta exciderit à priftinâ dignitate cui opponitur Spiritus eadem viz. instaurata per Spiritum Dei Beza Interpreters generally so open it 't is best therefore I say to take in both these notions of the word Spirit The natural and philosophical notion of Flesh and Spirit is Body and Soul though yet some Philosophers sometimes speak of them in a somewhat different and more restrained sense For Spirit they make to be as the whole Soul in general so sometimes only the highest part of the Soul viz. the intellectual and discursive Faculty in compliance with whom or rather with the * Vide Drussum in 1 Thes 5.23 Jewish Writers in their Nephesh Ruach and Nesama Paul seems so to use the word * 1 Thes 5.23 I pray God your whole Spirit and Soul and Body be preserved blameless c. And as to Flesh that they make to be not onely the Body it self but also the sensitive Soul that part which is void of and sets it self against Reason and refuses to be subject to the Laws and Dictates of the rational faculty Thus the * For this see Salmas in Epicl Simplic p. 116. c. Platonists and Stoicks do frequently make use of the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Flesh onely they differ about the diversity of the Faculty where 't is seated from the reasonable faculty Now though Flesh and Spirit in the Text contain in them something higher than what this philosophical notion of them reaches yet 't is not altogether to be rejected and therefore in this discourse it will accordingly be made use of What it is to walk after the Spirit Now I come to answer the Question What is it to walk after the Spirit In general 't is to walk in the way of Spirit The Flesh hath its way and the Spirit hath its way the way of the Flesh is sin wickedness rebellion against God c. the way of the Spirit is holiness obedience righteousness c. He then that walks in the way of Sin he walks after the Flesh and he that walks in the way of Holiness he walks after the Spirit for the walking is according to the way that men go in So again To walk after the Spirit 't is to bring forth the fruits of the Spirit the Spirit hath its fruits such as Love Joy c. Gal. 5.22 and the Flesh hath its fruits several of which are recited Gal. 5.19 where the fruits of the Spirit fill up the life there 't is walking after the Spirit and so è contra as to the Flesh In short as to the general opening of it To walk after the Spirit 't is to live the holy and the spiritual life 't is to have Gods Spirit and to act in compliance with and obedience to it and 't is too to have the Divine Nature in the Soul to follow the motions and dictates of that Nature and to live in the exercise of the several Graces which grow upon that root I could very much enlarge upon this General Description but I shall chuse rather to explain the thing particularly under these Five Heads To walk after the Spirit 't is 1. To have the Spirit to be the principle of acting 2. To have the Spirit to be the guide of life and to follow its guidance 3. To have those affections which are proper to and suit with the Spirit 4. To live under and to close with holy inclinations and propensions to what is good 5. To act for spiritual Ends. Here I instance in more particulars than I did in the opening of the Walking after the flesh but they are as applicable to that as to this and they being contraries the One will illustrate the Other I. To walk after the Spirit 't is for a person to be acted by the Spirit or to act from the Spirit as his principle That is the principle as hath been said which acts a man or from which he acts when the Spirit is this to a person so that he lives and acts by its vital quickening agency and working in him then he may be said to walk after or according to the Spirit You heard before a man walks after the flesh when the flesh is his principle and so he walks after the spirit when the spirit is his principle This is applicable to the Spirit in both of the respects which have been mentioned As 1. take it personally the Holy Spirit is in Believers as the spring and principle of their obedience and holy actings In a sober sense all others I dread and detest that which acts and animates the Saints in their course it is Gods own Spirit he is not barely in them but he is in them as a lively and active principle to actuate their Graces to quicken and excite them to all holy and spiritual acts This is a part of that walking in the spirit which you read of Gal. 5.25 If we live in the spirit let us also walk in the spirit as if the Apostle had said if the Spirit hath been a quickening spirit to us and hath wrought a supernatural life in us then let us walk in the Spirit that is let us all along live and act by this Spirit as our great principle Such as are in Christ they pray mortifie sin are heavenly minded love God deny themselves c. now in all these acti agunt they act as they are acted from above the Spirit on his part stirs them up to what is good and gives out his influences to them in what is good and they on their part fall in with his exciting and assisting grace in opposition to all the interposures of the flesh and so they walk after the Spirit Then 2. take the Spirit habitually for Grace or the sanctified Nature in the heart this is a secondary or subordinate principle the principium Quod as the former is principium Quo from which spiritual acts do proceed You have the Apostle speaking to this double principle Gal. 2.20 I am crucified with Christ nevertheless I live yet not I but Christ liveth in me there 's the supreme and first principle and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God there 's the subordinate and secondary principle Faith and Love those two great branches of that general root which I am upon make all the several wheels in a gracious heart to move that which is done in the life comes from
these in the heart the spiritual walker doth all from these two Graces as his abiding principles he lives by the Faith of the Son of God and * 2 Cor. 5.14 the Love of Christ constrains him Now he who is acted by this twofold principle he is the walker after the Spirit 'Pray observe as there are two publick Heads to which all men in the world do belong the first and the second Adam and as there are two Common States under which all are and shall be comprehended at present it is the state of Nature or the state of Grace and hereafter it is the state of blessedness or the state of mistery So there are also two Common Principles by which all men in the world are acted viz the Flesh and the Spirit They that have Flesh for their principle they walk after the Flesh they that have the Spirit for their principle they walk after the Spirit So far forth as our principle is divine and spiritual so far forth is our walking divine and spiritual for that is always answerable to its principle O are you acted in your course by an inward principle is that the Spirit of God and Grace in the heart is all done by and from this Spirit this is to walk after the Spirit II. To walk after the Spirit 't is to have the Spirit for the guide of life and to follow its guidance Where there is a fleshly guide there 't is fleshly walking where there is a spiritual guide there 't is spiritual walking for the Course is denominated as from the principle so from the guide or rule And indeed the latter is in part included in the former for whatever is the principle that carries in it too the nature and use of a guide inasmuch as the action is always steered and ordered by and according to the principle but yet I consider them here as distinct I say when the Spirit is the guide and followed as the guide this is to walk after the Spirit As I may be said to walk after one when he goes before me shews me my way and I follow him step by step where he goes I go as he bids me move so I move So 't is in reference to this walking after the Spirit Thus 't is very commonly opened Ambulare secundum spiritum quid est sequi in omnibus nostris actionibus ductum Spiritus Sancti What is it to walk after the Spirit 't is for a man in all his actions and motions to follow the Spirits conduct and guidance And here too 1. God's spirit is a guiding spirit He leads directs the Soul to and in the way of holiness I say in the way of holiness for this pure and holy spirit always leads to that which is pure and holy never to that which is sinful his excitations and guidance being evermore agreeable to his Nature Psa 143.10 Teach me to do thy will for thou art my God how doth God teach or guide a man to this it follows thy spirit is good good in it self and good as a guide to us lead me unto the land of uprightness Now when this Spirit is the dux viae a persons leader and guide and he follows its guidance in his conversation then his walking is right and good 'T is set forth Ver. 14. of this Chapt. by being led by the spirit As many as are led by the Spirit of God are the sons of God You read Ezek. 1.20 of the living Creatures whithersoever the Spirit was to go they went thither was their spirit to go And you read of the people of Israel Numb 9.16 As the cloud moved they moved as that stood they stood c. Thus 't is with the spiritual walker he is one who fetches his guidance from the unerring spirit and who regulates all his motions according to the spirits direction what the Spirit bids him do that he doth what the Spirit forbids him to do that he doth not he moves or stands still as this great guide directs him Let not any mistake me as though I did in this assert or advance any Enthusiasms immediate inspirations or directions from the spirit without or besides much less against the written word No God willing I shall shew the danger and vanity of such pretences when I come to the 14 v. I am for the Spirit and the * Ambulare secundum spiritum est omnes actiones qualescunque sunt dirigere instituere secundum dictamen Spiritus Sancti in Verbo in conscientiâ nostrâ secundum Verbum loquentis Sâ—râ—so Word conjunctly he guides but 't is by and in the Word and the guidance of the Word is the guidance of the Spirit He that squares his Life by the Counsels Commands Prohibitions of the Word he truly walks after the Spirit Again 2. there is the sanctified Nature which is a guide also though inferiour to the former Gal. 6.15 16. In Christ Jesus neither circumcision availeth any thing nor uncircumcision but a new creature and as many as walk according to this rule peace be on them and mercy and upon the Israel of God The New Creature or Grace is a rule 't is not onely regula regulata but in some sense also regula regulans For in subordination to the Word it shows a man what is good and directs him to and in the doing of it what is evil and how he is to shun it it leads him to those things which are suitable to its self as to love God to hate sin c. He that lives in compliance with this guide he walks not after the flesh but after the spirit III. To walk after the spirit 't is to have spiritual and heavenly Affections such as are proper to and suit with the Divine Spirit The Spirit himself wherever he dwells and the spiritual life wherever it is wrought in the Soul are always attended with spiritual affections and indeed much of the influence and efficacy of both is exerted in the spiritualizing of the affections These are always suited to the Nature the fleshly nature hath fleshly affections and the Divine nature hath Divine and spiritual affections so that the walking after the spirit or after the flesh is very much to be judged of and measured by them Doth the poor Creature love God is his delight and joy in spiritual things have they his most strong and vehement desires this is to walk after the spirit Our Apostle himself here opens the twofold walking by this Ver. 5. They that are after the flesh or who walk after the flesh mind the things of the flesh but they that are after the spirit or who walk after the spirit mind the things of the spirit This minding the things of the flesh or of the spirit is not to be limited either to the inward acts of the Mind in the thoughts onely or to the outward endeavours but it includes and takes in the affections also Here then is the difference
to the Lord of Glory but 't is as much your duty to deal thus revengefully with the Flesh O let all cry out in the height of their hatred against it Let it be crucified why but what evil hath it done nay rather ask what evil hath it not done therefore cry out the more let it be crucified And indeed the crucifixion of our Natural Flesh in Christ without the crucifixion of moral and sinful Flesh in our selves will not profit us Paul saith he was crucified with Christ Gal. 2.20 how why in a spiritual and mystical sense so as to be dead to the Flesh and so as to live the spiritual life And the Apostle lays it upon this 1 Pet. 4.1 2 Forasmuch then as Christ hath suffered for us in the flesh arm your selves likewise with the same mind For he that hath suffered in the flesh hath ceased from sin that he no longer should live the rest of his time in the flesh to the lusts of men but to the will of God 'T is a Scripture somewhat dark but the strength of it lies thus Christ hath suffered for us and we in an analogical sense must be ready to suffer too this is the same mind here spoken of and Christ having suffered hath ceased from sin h. e. so as to dye for sin no more so saith the Apostle you too in your own persons must so dye to sin as no longer to live in it This is the being planted into the likeness of Christ's death Rom. 6.5 and you find the Apostle there in that Chapter from this very Topick the Death of Christ earnestly disuading persons from walking after the flesh I have done with the Motives to inforce the Dehortation What men are to do that they may not walk after the Flesh Before I go off from this Head something must be hinted by way of Direction What is to be done some may say that we may no longer walk after the Flesh I answer 1. Get out of the Flesh For being in the flesh is always attended with walking after the flesh as the State is always according to the Course so the Course is always according to the State if you be in the fleshly state your conversation will be a fleshly conversation Such as the man is such are the principles and such as the principles are such will the practises be also Therefore get out of the state of Nature in which the Flesh rules and carries a man whither it pleases and get into Christ persons out of Christ are all Flesh and thereupon will be wholly followers of the Flesh Spiritual walking discovers the Vnion but first the Union is the ground of spiritual walking that will certainly follow upon being in Christ but being in Christ must necessarily antecede it Till thou beest ingrafted into Christ no good fruit can grow upon thee he that is flesh must needs live and act flesh 2. Get the Spirit and walk after the Spirit 'T is the divine Spirit and the divine Nature from that Spirit which must dethrone and break the power of sinning and sinful Nature Till the Holy Spirit and grace come into the heart the Flesh lords and domineers in the life as you will hear more fully when I come to the second Verse The Apostle joins together Sensual and not having the Spirit Jud. 19. where the latter clause is not onely a further description of the persons spoken of but 't is also the assignation of the cause or reason of their being sensual viz. because they had not the Spirit Till the mighty Spirit of God comes into the Soul by saving illumination and overpowering influences to say efficaciously to a man * Isa 30.21 This is the way walk therein there may be convictions purposes resolutions to the contrary yet still there will be one way or other walking after the Flesh And so for Grace no sooner doth this take possession but the Walking is altered which it never is before to any purpose Prov. 2.10 When wisdom entereth into the heart c. discretion shall preserve thee c. to deliver thee from the way of the evil man c. who leave the paths of uprightness to walk in the ways of darkness who rejoice to do evil c. Your way to be rid of the Flesh is to get the Spirit set a thousand Arguments the most effectual Considerations imaginable before the Sinner to draw him off from this fleshly walking till the regenerating sanctifying Spirit take hold of him they are all weak and ineffective I add Walk after the Spirit Every man will be walking there 's no standing still all will be in motion so long as they are in viâ and every mans Walking will be in one of these two ways either after the Flesh or after the Spirit for non datur tertium And these being contrary do mutually exclude each the other he that walks after the flesh cannot in sensu composito walk after the spirit and he that walks after the spirit cannot walk after the flesh therefore Gal. 5.16 Walk in the spirit and ye shall not fulfil the lusts of the flesh the Reason then upon which this Direction is grounded is strong and evident And let me tell you Principles you will and must have some or other which if they be not good they will be bad and so as to Guides Affections Propensions Ends these will be in every reasonable Soul from one cause or another So that if you be not spiritual you will be carnal for one of these two you must be as both you cannot be O let it be the Former that it may not be the Latter 3. Take heed of particular allowed fleshly acts for they make way for that general course which you are to shun Acts produce Habits as well as Habits do produce Acts particular acts of sin especially if allowed and repeated end in a course of sin If you gratifie the flesh in some things it will grow upon you as sad experience proves the Gangrene or Leprosie at the first begins with some particular member but if it be let alone in a little time it diffuses it self over the whole body and so 't is here as to sin A little leaven leavens the whole lump 'T is true as hath been observ'd the Apostle here fixes his Character upon the Course and not upon single acts but he that allows himself in them will not stay there in time hee 'l fall into a wicked and fleshly Course 4. Timely suppress the first risings of the flesh it gains by delays O as soon as the corrupt Nature begins to stir and show it self see that you fall upon it presently make speedy and vigorous resistance to it if you give the Enemy time hee 'l grow stronger and the Conquest will be the more difficult You read Jam. 1.15 of the conceiving of Lust 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Vide Stobaeum in Eclog. Serm. 3. p. 9. when Lust hath conceived
it bringeth forth Sin now Sin must be taken at the first conception as soon as the temptation offers it self and begins to allure and tickle by something that it presents so that the Heart inclines to a closure with it now fall on presently and parlie no longer This brat of Babylon must be dasht in pieces in its very infancy 't is good to kill the Cockatrice in the very egg to quench the fire at the first smotherings of it within or else it will quickly flame forth in the life even to the making the conversation carnal Be very watchful over the initial suggestions of the Flesh and fall upon the timely exercise of mortification upon the first motions of sin say Sathan Flesh * Mat. 16.23 get thee behind me thou art an offence to me But I must not further expatiate upon these things So much for the disuasive part of this Vse against walking after the flesh 2 Branch of the Vse to exhort to Walking after the Spirit I go on to the persuasive part wherein I would most earnestly exhort you to walk after the Spirit I will be but short upon this because that which I have already spoken hath a great tendency to the promoting of it for the truth is whilst I have been disuading you from walking after the Flesh I have in effect been persuading you to walk after the Spirit in beating you off from that I have been drawing you on to this You have heard what it is so to walk what now remains but that you would all endeavour to put it in practise and O that this might be your way and course Let others live as they please let it be your fixed resolution that you will live the holy spiritual heavenly life True there are but few who do thus walk the World is but a great Exchange wherein the Spirits Walk is very thin whilst the Fleshes Walk is full and crowded but 't is better to be with the Few in the way of the Spirit than with the Many in the way of the Flesh And I desire you to lay it to heart have not you your selves too long walked after the flesh is it not high time for you to think of another Course 1 Pet. 4.3 The time past of our life may suffice us to have wrought the will of the Gentiles when we walked in Lasciviousness Lusts Excess of Wine c. When will ye walk in newness of life as the expression is Rom. 6.4 when shall the renewing and the renewed Spirit command govern act guide you in your whole conversation when will you so walk that you your selves and others too may know by the spiritualness of your deportment that you are indeed in Christ Jesus * The exhortation to walking after the Spirit pressed by some Motives Here consider in opposition to what was said of the former walking but three things 1. This is excellent Walking The spiritual life is the excellent life * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Arist Eth. lib. 10. cap. 7. this speaks somewhat more than what is of man there is something divine and supernatural in it To be acted by to live under the conduct and guidance of the blessed Spirit to have affections propensions ends all holy this is truely great This is the Life which is most agreeable to the humane Nature not onely as consider'd in its primitive unstained glory and excellency but as 't is now under its sad ruins and decays O how unbecoming how ill doth a vitious Conversation comport even with that Reason natural Light and those broken excellencies which are yet left in Man Man is not so low but that by complying with sensual Lusts he yet acts below himself nay so far as he puts on the Sinner he puts off the Man where he un-Saints himself he un-Mans himself Sensuality and wickedness carry in them a contradiction to his very Being nothing so well suits with that as a pious religious heavenly course Further the fleshly life is a base sordid life but the spiritual life is a raised noble life So much as the Spirit is above the Flesh the Soul above the Body so much is the * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Arist ibid. p. 138. spiritual life above the sensual or carnal life The life which I am urging upon you is the very life of God himself for the Apostle speaks Eph. 4.18 of some mens being alienated from the life of God through the ignorance that is in them by which life of God he means in part the holiness of God or that holy life which God lives the holy liver then he not being alienated from Gods holiness lives the life of God he acts in * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Plato in Thaeaet conformity though under a vast disproportion to the great God must there not then needs be unspeakable glory and excellency in Spiritual Walking The more one lives the fleshly life the more he resembles the Beast the more one lives the spiritual life the more he resembles God the Creature is not so much debased and depressed by the One but he-is as much advanc'd and dignified by the Other Saints may be censured and misjudged by the world but in truth they come the nearest and are most like to God that they might be judged according to men in the Flesh but live according to God in the Spirit 1 Pet. 4.6 I do but allude to these words for I know in their first and proper sense they point to another thing than that which I cite them for Gods people are judged as if they lived according to men walking in or after the Flesh as others do but 't is not so they walk in or after the Spirit and so live according to God what a great thing is this for poor creatures to live according to God! who would not so live And this too is the Life of the blessed ones in Heaven take the glorified Saints how do they walk not after the Flesh I assure you for they have no such Flesh to walk after they are wholly freed from the sinning and sinful Nature are perfectly renewed and sanctified and accordingly they act All in them or from them is divine and spiritual there 's nothing that they do but what flows from a gracious principle all their thoughts and affections are swallowed up in God their love joy delight are unmixtly spiritual the pleasures of the Flesh are nothing to them they have not the least inclination to the least evil the great thing they mind and rejoyce in is the Glory of God O what an holy spiritual life do the Saints live in heaven Must not the same life then needs be excellent in the Saints here so far forth as they can reach it in their imperfect state Surely none can undervalue or think low of it but onely they who are altogether ignorant of and strangers to it A Child of God would not for a thousand worlds live any other
of Sin for though that puts forth a great efficacy in the manner of its working yet it doth not rise to such a pitch or degree of efficacy in what is evil as the Spirit of God doth in what is good Set corrupt Nature never so high yet 't is but a finite thing and so hath but a finite power but the Spirit is an infinite being and in his saving and special workings he puts forth an infinite power and therefore He must work more efficaciously than Sin can do the Law of the Spirit must carry it against and notwithstanding the Law of Sin for though both pass under the same appellation of Laws yet they are Laws of a different kind and nature with respect to their power and efficacy This Law or power of the Spirit is that which I will speak to and for the better opening of the Truth in hand which mainly points thereunto I 'le do two things Two things propounded for the opening of the Observation 1. I 'le speak to the necessity sufficiency efficacy of the power of the Spirit in order to the freeing of men from the power of Sin 2. I 'le shew in what Way or Method the Spirit doth work and exert his power in his rescuing of Souls from Sins power In the First of these Heads three things are put together which must be spoken unto apart The Necessity of the Spirits power to free from Sins power 1. First of the necessity of the power of the Spirit Concerning which I may confidently affirm that 't is indispensably absolutely necessary for the divesting Sin of its long possessed soveraignty no less a power than the mighty power of this Spirit can bring down Sins power ô it s no easie thing to rescue the poor enslaved captive-soul out of its bonds Omnipotency it self is requisite thereunto that 's the * Luk. 11.21 22. strong man which keeps the palace till Christ through the Spirit which is stronger than it comes upon it and overcomes it Israel had never got out of their bondage under Pharaoh if God himself had not brought them out of it through a mighty hand and by an out-stretched arm as you read Deut. 5.15 and so 't is here Let 's bring it to a particular case take a Sinner who is under the Law of Vnbelief as there are too many such God knows nothing shall ever free this Sinner from the power of his unbelief unless a divine and an almighty power from above be put forth upon him 'till this be done all the Calls Commands Invitations Promises of the Gospel are all weak and ineffectual therefore 't is said to be the faith of the operation of God Col. 2.12 and the Apostle pray'd that God would fulfil the work of faith with power 2 Thes 1.11 and says the Prophet who hath believed our report and to whom is the arm of the Lord revealed Isa 53.1 without the revealing of Gods mighty arm there 's no believing and you read that God in sanctification and the working of Faith doth put forth the exceeding greatness of his power according to the working of his mighty power which he wrought in Christ when he raised him from the dead Eph. 1.19 20. what can be spoken higher than this You see the Law of the Spirit is necessary to the freeing of a person from the Law of Vnbelief and is it not so in all other things wherein Sins power shows it self The power of Nature which some do so much magnifie can never conquer the power of Sin alas 't is impar congressus there 's no eaven match betwixt them and besides Natures greatest strength is on Sins side its relicks onely where 't is good are for God against Sin but its full and entire strength as 't is bad are for Sin against God God hath but its shattered sorces as it were but Sin hath its full Body what can enfeebled Nature what will depraved Nature do against Sin Let it be considered if the power of Grace in the Regenerate be so small that by that alone without the concurrence of divine and special assistance from above they can do nothing which Christ affirms Joh. 15.5 no not so much as think a good thought as the Apostle affirms 2 Cor. 3.5 what then can be expected from meer Nature in the Vnregenerate in whom Sin is in its full strength as to the weakning or subduing of it In things of a spiritual nature the Scripture doth not onely deny the act but the power too Joh. 6.44 No man can come to me except the Father draw him 1 Cor. 2.14 The natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God c. neither can the know them because they are spiritually discerned Jer. 13.23 Can the Aethiopian change his skin or the Leopard his spots then may ye also do good that are accustomed to do evil So in that which I am upon 't is not onely the Sinner doth not free himself from the Law of Sin but of himself without the mighty power of the divine Spirit he cannot so do he that is not strong enough to subdue some one particular Lust how shall he be able to subdue the whole body of Sin in all its united and combined force as he that cannot conquer one single Souldier can much less conquer the whole Army If God leave a man to grapple with Sin meerly by his own strength woe be to him The necessity of the Spirits power to free from Sins power made out in some Particulars That the power of the Spirit is absolutely necessary to free from the power of Sin will be very evident if you consider those several advantages which it hath for the securing and holding up of its power in the Sinner As 1. 't is in possession 2. It hath been so a long time may be twenty forty theescore years to be sure from the time of the Sinners coming into the world for its power and his birth are of the same date now Vsurpers in possession and who have long been so are not so easily conquer'd 3. It s dominion is entire it hath all on its side the whole Soul is for Sin insomuch that when the Spirit of God comes to grapple with it he finds nothing there to side with him or to take his part which argues the necessity of his infinite power When there is a party within a Kingdom ready to fall in with the foreign force that comes to depose the Tyrant he may with more facility be vanquished but if all the people unanimously stick to him then the conquest is the more difficult As Christ once said * Joh. 14.30 the prince of this world cometh and hath nothing in me so the poor Sinner may say the Sin-subduing Spirit comes but he finds nothing in me to close with him 4. The natural man likes the power of Sin it hath his heart which is worst of all for the securing of its empire he
strongly defended of old by Austine against the Pelagians and of late by the Dominicans and Jansenists against the Jesuits and I could wish the Controversie had lodged there but there are other persons and parties concerned in it Well! I am thus fal'n upon it but I 'le presently get off from it for it being a point only incidental in my passage I am not bound to stay upon it In short therefore this I assert that Gratia liberatrix est Gratia efficax Soul-freeing Grace is effectual Grace where-ever and whenever the Spirit undertakes to deliver any man out of Sins power he doth it effectually he then puts forth such a mighty power as that he infallibly doth effect what he designed which is all that * Non aliam irresistibilitatem propugnant nostri quam realem efficacem operationem cujus vi effectum certò vel infallibilitèr existit Ames Coron Art 4. c. 3. Dicimus Gratiam efficacem quae operatur velle perficere adeo potenter in opere conversionis quovis opere salutari voluntatem movere ut certò caûsalitèr tollat non resistibilitatèm aut connatam aut adnatam aut etiam omnem actualem resistentiam sed actualem resistentiam vincentem adeo ut gratia semper eliciat consensum acceptationem ac proinde eo momento impossibile sit quod voluntas non annuat aut de facto resistat D. Ward Conc. de Grat. discrim p. 31 32. Divines mean by that so much disliked word irresistibly As the power of Nature take it at its best cannot much further this freedome so the power of Nature take it at its worst as to the final issue shall not be able to hinder it The Scriptures which hold forth the efficacy of saving grace in general are applicable to that particular branch of it which I am upon Cant. 1.4 Draw thou me we will run after thee Joh. 6.45 Every man that hath heard and learn'd of the Father comes to me Jer. 31.18 Turn thou me and I shall be turned Ezek. 36.27 I will put my Spirit within you and cause you to walk in my statutes and ye shall keep my judgments and do them there 's much in each of these Texts to prove what is before me might I but stay upon them 'T is in the acts of Grace as 't is in the acts of Providence in which sometimes the stream runs with such a mighty force that there 's no resisting of it Isa 43.13 I will work and who shall let it and so I say 't is in the acts of Grace it works with such a power that none can let it Our Apostle himself here before Conversion was as much under the Law of Sin as ordinarily any are and yet as soon as the renewing acts of this Spirit took hold of him he yielded presently and made no prevailing opposition * Acts 9.5 6. indeed at first he was at his Who art thou Lord but 't was not long before he threw himself down at the feet of Christ saying Lord what wilt thou have me to do So much for the threefold consideration of the power of the Spirit with respect to the effect here mentioned making free from the Law of Sin The Ways and Methods of the Spirit in making free from the Law of Sin The Second thing propounded was to show In what Ways or Methods the Holy Spirit doth exert his power in the making a person free from the Law of Sin For the explaining of which we must distinguish of his Workings they are either those which are at the first Conversion by which Sins habitual dominion is destroyed or those which follow after Conversion and continue the whole life by which Sins actual dominion is prevented and kept down by the first he makes free by the second he keeps free from the Law of Sin With respect to each of these workings the Spirit hath his different Ways and Methods which therefore must be distinctly spoken unto 1. As to the first in the general he puts forth his power in and by the doing of the main work viz. the Converting of the Soul He comes and (a) Acts 26.18 turns it from Sin to God brings about the (b) 2 Cor. 5.17 new Creature in it (c) Gal. 4 19. forms Christ therein (d) Col. 1.13 translates it out of one state into another and herein you have the Law or mighty power of the Spirit exerted I say the mighty power of the Spirit for this is a work which calls for such power without which it would never be done ô 't is no easie thing to convert a Sinner indeed there 's nothing more difficult than that is Though all things are alike easie to an Almighty Agent as God and his Spirit are yet as things are considered in themselves and as we conceive of them so some are more easie or hard than others are as here 't is easier to create a World than to convert a Soul the new Creation is more difficult than the old for in the latter there was nothing to oppose or make resistance but in the former there 's Sin Satan a wicked heart within a cursed World without all uniting and combining in all their strength to oppose to their utmost the work of Conversion there the matter was indispos'd and unfit to be cast into such a form and that was all but here 't is not onely unfitness but renitency reluctancy the highest opposition that is imaginable it being so it follows that that must be a mighty power by which the work is done notwithstanding all this resistance The Spirit therefore puts forth such a power whereby he makes * Zech. 4.9 mountains to become plains cuts his way through the very rock conquers all that vast hoast which is mustered up against him in spite of all opposition converts the Sinner here 's the Law of the Spirit Now upon and by this he frees from the Law of Sin for upon Conversion Sin is as much depos'd and pull'd off from the throne as * 2 Kings 11. Athaliah once was then its Reign expires from that time forward it must not any more lord it as before it did but this hath been already spoken to Observe it 't is the Law of the Spirit of Life which frees from the Law of Sin 't is not absolute or meer power that doth it but 't is power as regenerating as changing the heart as implanting the divine Nature by which Sin is brought under How he exerts his power upon the Vnderstanding But more particularly in freeing from the Law of Sin this is the way of the Spirit 1. He effectually works upon the Vnderstanding that being the leading faculty and there being in it several things by which in special Sins dominion is kept up and he working upon reasonable Creatures in that way which best agrees with them as such therefore there the Spirit of God begins and first exerts his power upon that
which might be as useful in order to Information as the two Former were in order to Exhortation and Consolation Something hath been spoke for the opening of the Nature and Grounds of Christ's being sent but as to the determination or close application of that to his Person wherein we have to do with Jews and Infidels little hath been spoken I mean in that way and method which is proper to those Opposers of Christ and Christianity Here therefore I should lay down and make good these two Propositions 1. That that Jesus in whom we Christians believe even He who was born of the Virgin Mary suffered under Pontius Pilate was crucified dead and buried and rose again c. I say this Jesus was the very Person whom God sent and consequently that he was the Shiloh or Messias prophesied of 2. That this Jesus was so sent by God to be the true and only Messiah as that besides and after him no other Person is to be expected in that nature or quality to be sent by God Now though these be two as weighty and as Fundamental Truths to us Christians as Christians as any whatsoever and though I could not hope to reach the great Enemies of the Gospel so as to fasten any conviction upon them yet probably I might in the pursuing of this Argument reach some weak Christians so as to confirm stablish them in the belief of these great Truths yet I shall not at present engage in the discussing of these two Propositions First because in so great Points 't is better to say nothing then not to speak fully and throughly to them which if I could other Discouragements being removed hope to do yet here in this place without making the Work in hand too vast and big to be sure I could not Secondly because however pertinent this Undertaking might be to some other Texts to that which I am upon it would not be so pertinent where the Apostles drift and design is not so much in opposition to Jews and Infidels to assert that Christ was the very Person sent of God as to assign for the Comfort of Believers the Way and Course which God took to bring about their Salvation when upon the terms of the Law it was impossible namely he sent his own Son c The Text therefore not tying me to it I may wave it I shall have work enough to go over what the proper and immediate Sense of the Contents of this Chapter will lead me to and therefore I may well cut off what is of a more remote and forraign Consideration So that this shall suffice for the First Observation Christ was sent and sent by God the Father ROM 8.3 God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh c. CHAP. XI Of Christ's being the Natural and Eternal Son of God The Second Observation spoken to Of Christ's being God's Son How his Sonship is attested in Scripture Of his being God's own Son That opened as he is considered both relatively and absolutely That He is the Natural Son of God coaequal coessential coaeternal with the Father is asserted and proved by sundry Scriptures The true Notion and Ground of Christ's Sonship vindicated against the Socinians Where 't is made good against them that He is not the Son of God 1. in respect of his miraculous Conception Nor 2. of his extraordinary Sanctification Nor 3. of his Resurrection Nor 4. of the Dignity and Advancement of his Person Nor 5. of the Father's Special Love to him Nor 6. of Adoption Nor 7. of his Likeness to God But he is the Son of God in respect of his participation of his Father's Essence and of his eternal Generation Some Others besides Socinians somewhat concern'd in this Controversie Of the different communication of the Divine Essence from the Father to the Son and to the Holy Ghost Use 1. In which by way of Inferenee 't is shown 1. That Christ is God 2. That he is a very great and glorious Person 3. That the work of Redemption was an high and costly Work Use 2. Christians from hence are exhorted 1. To study Christ in this Relation as God's own Son Some Directions given about that 2. To believe him and on him as Such 3. To honour and adore Christ 4. To admire the greatness of God's Love Use 3. To draw forth the Comfort wrapp'd up in this Relation of Christ I Proceed to the Third General observed in the Words 2. Observ Christ God's Son and his own Son the Description of the Person sent he is described by his near and special Relation to God as being God's own Son From whence the Second Observation will be this That the Lord Jesus the Person sent by God as you have heard was his Son yea his own Son 1 Joh. 4.14 We have seen and do testifie that the Father sent the Son to be the Saviour of the world Here Two things are to be spoken to 1. Christ was God's Son 2. He was God's own Son 1. First Christ was God's Son He was truly the Son of man but not only the Son of man for he was also the Son of God and he was as truly the latter as the former In reference to his Humane Nature he is stiled the * Gen. 3.15 Seed of the Woman the †Gal. 3.16 Seed of Abraham the ‖ Matth. 1.1 Son of David the * Isa 11.1 Jer. 23.5 6. Zech. 6.12 branch of the root of Jesse the Son of man in reference to his Divine Nature he is stiled the Son of God This Relative Appellation or Title is so frequently apply'd to Christ that if I should cite the several Texts where it occurs I must transcribe a great part of the New Testament Several attestations of Christ's Sonship Yet it will not be amiss to take notice of the several attestations there upon record to this great Truth As that of John Baptist Joh. 1.34 I saw and bare record that this is the Son of God That of Nathanael Joh. 1.49 Rabbi thou art the Son of God That of Peter Matth. 16.16 Thou art Christ the Son of the living God That of the Centurion Matth. 27.54 Truly this was the Son of God That of the Eunuch Acts 8.37 I believe that Jesus Christ is the Son of God That of Martha Joh. 11.27 Yea Lord I believe that thou art the Christ the Son of God which should come into the world The Devils themselves witnessed to it Matth. 8.29 they cryed out saying What have we to do with thee Jesus thou Son of God Mark 3.11 Vnclean Spirits when they saw him fell down before him and cryed saying Thou art the Son of God Christ himself even when he was speaking to God the Father often asserted and pleaded his Sonship And the Father himself in a most solemn and open manner attested it First at Christ's Baptism Matt. 3.17 Lo a voice from heaven saying This is my beloved Son in whom I
Christ is stiled the only begotten of the Father which Title the Evangelist John often repeats the Other Evangelists speak much of Christ's Manhood and of his Birth as Man but * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Epiphan adv Her lib. 2. tom 2. p. 747. John is altogether taken up with the Godhead of Christ and with his eternal Generation as the Son of God whence Nyssene saith of him that he did indeed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and Some think he was from hence call'd John the Divine In reference to which he calls him over and over God's only begotten Son as you see Joh. 1.14.18 Joh. 3.16.18 1 Joh. 4.9 Now how is Christ the only begotten Son of God surely it must be in respect of some extraordinary way and manner of his Sonship peculiar to himself and what can that be but that which I am upon Never was any person * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Damasc Naianz Orat. 2. de Filio Sp. Sancto Pag. 590. puts in another word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 so begotten of the Father as he was God hath other Sons begotten of him as some prealledged Scriptures testifie but yet Christ is stiled his only begotten Son because of his special and incommunicable Generation because he is the Son of God by Nature and hath that very Nature and Essence which God the Father hath Take away this speciality of his Sonship and how shall we interpret this exclusive title of Christ the only begotten of God He is not only called God's own Son but also his only Son and nothing can make him to be so as will appear by and by but his being the Natural Son of God and by eternal Generation 'T is observable after the Evangelist had been speaking of the Sonship of Christ Vers 14. and he speaks of this as being of a different kind and order from the former upon which he calls him the only begotten of the Father The old Arrian Hereticks had a pretty evasion for this Christ sayes Eunomius whom Basil and his Brother Nyssen have so profoundly confuted was the only begotten of the Father in as much as he was begotten only of the Father which evasion exactly falls in with that modern Gloss which some Socinians give upon the Text Christ was God's own Son i.e. he was the Son of no other but of God But to this 't is answered there 's a great difference betwixt being begotten only of the Father and being the only begotten of the Father the first makes God to be the only begetter but not Christ to be the only begotten without which this Title of his would signifie nothing For 't is true as to the Saints they are begotten only of the Father but yet 't is not true that they are the only begotten of the Father indeed this belongs not to them at all but only to Christ their Sonship by regeneration and Christ's Sonship by eternal Generation are things of a quite different Nature and Species and it must be so or else he could not truly be stiled the only begotten of the Father The Apostle in this Chapter Vers 32. calls Christ God's own Son He that spared not his own Son c. now the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 imports as much as God's proper or natural Son That 's the fignification of it in other references Luke 6.44 Every tree is known by his own fruit 't is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that fruit which is proper and natural to it so that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is to be taken 1 Cor. 15.38 God giveth it a body as it hath pleased him and to every seed his own body And so Christ is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 God 's own Son that is his Son who hath the same Nature and Essence with himself There are three Properties if the two First be not one and the same belonging to Christ in his Sonship which are incommunicable to any other As 1. He is a Son Co-equal with his Father Joh. 5.18 The Jews sought the more to kill him not only because he had broken the Sabbath but said also that God was his Father making himself equal with God The Jews were in the right as to the thing only they erred as to the Person because they would not see that Christ was this Son of God and therefore equal to the Father their Argument was good and their Inference proper and genuine if Christ do claim to be the proper Son of God then he must be equal with God nothing could be more true And he had and must have such a Sonship as will rise up to this therefore his whole discourse in which he is very large Joh. 5. 10 Chapt. tends to the proving of nothing lower than his Natural Sonship and consequently his equality with his Father And if he had been only the Son of God in a lower way why did he not so explain himself why did he suffer the charge of blasphemy upon it nay why did he lose his life upon it Had he been the Son of God only as others are the very telling of that had quieted the people acquitted him from blasphemy and saved his life but he lets them alone to go on in their malice against him because that was the very truth which they pitched upon and which he would have to be known namely that he was so the Son of God as to be equal with God For a further proof of this take that of the Apostle where he speaks it out expresly Phil. 2.6 Who being in the form of God thought it not robbery to be equal with God surely there is more in this being equal with God than what Some particularly * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 est spectari tanquam Deum Grotius As though there were no more in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 than in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Dr. Pearson on the Creede p. 246. Grotius are pleas'd to make it to be it notes equality of Nature and Essence not only some external show or appearance or estimation by others The latter Clause must be expounded as 't is joyn'd with the former and then its sense and emphasis will be clear enough Christ being in the form of God existing in the Divine Nature and really participating of that Nature thought it no robbery no bold encroachment upon the honour of God to be equal with God to assume and apply that Nature to himself which he had in truth And which will much strengthen this exposition of the words as that which follows Vers 7 8. speaks Christ's Natural equality with us as he was Man and must be so interpreted so this here speaks Christ's Natural equality with the Father as he was God and must be so interpreted also 2. Christ is a Son Co-essential with the Father He is not only like him but of the same Nature and Essence with him not only under some resemblance of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but under a perfect identity and
Essential Son of God 't is the very Title which they prefix before some of their Treatises in which One would think that they did concur with us holding the same thing which we do and giving the same honour and respect to Christ which we do when in truth there 's no such thing they do but speak fraudulently according to the custom of their * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. See much of the fraud of the Arrians in this in Epiphan adv Haeres lib. 2. tom 2. p. 738 Of them Hilarius speaks to the same purpose Tribuunt Christo Dei nomen quia hoc hominibus sit tributum Fatentur Dei verè Filium quia Sacramento Baptismi verè Dei Filius unusquisque perficitur Ante tempora saecula confitentur quod de Angelis Diabolis non est negandum Ita Domino Christo sola illa tribuuntur quae sunt vel Angelorum propria vel nostra Caeterum quod Deo Christo legitimum verum est Christus Deus verus i.e. eadem esse Filii quae Patris Divinitas denegatur Contra Auxent Mediolan old Predecessors for here 's the Fallacy they me an by all this nothing more than that Christ was the Son of God in regard of his wonderful Conception and Nativity by the Virgin Mary But to pass by their frauds let us come to the thing We say Christ's filiation or Sonship was grounded upon something of a far higher nature than this that he was the Son of God antecedently to it even from all eternity they ground his Sonship upon it only making it but then to commence when he was begotten by the holy Ghost conceived and born by the Virgin Against which dangerous Opinion we argue thus 1. If Christ's Sonship did result from this as the true and proper ground of it then the * Vide Stegm Photin Dip. 16. p. 180. Arnold Catech Racov. major p. 176. Holy Ghost the third Person should rather be intituled the Father of Christ than the First Person because that effect which was the foundation of Christ's Sonship was more immediately produced by him than by the First Person But this is notoriously false for all along in the whole current of the Word Christ is brought in as the Son of the Father and as standing in this relation to the Father and not to the Spirit 2. Christ himself never resolves his Sonship into his miraculous Conception or Birth You find him sometimes professedly treating upon it and giving the world ' an account about it what doth he then ground it upon why he carry's it up to his doing what the Father did Joh. 5.19 to his quickning whom he will even as the Father doth Joh. 5.21 to his having life in himself as the Father hath life in himself Joh. 5.26 to his being one with the Father Joh. 10.30 to his being in the Father and his Father in him Joh. 10.38 He doth not at all mention his miraculous Conception which in all probability he would have done if that had been the proper Ground of his Sonship but he insists altogether upon things tending to the proof of his participating of his Fathers Nature and Essence and by them he designs to make out his Sonship yea and that it was such a Sonship as did render him equal with his Father but this he could not have done either with truth or evidence had he been only the Son of God upon what is here pretended 3. Though Christ's Conception and temporal Generation was very wonderful yet that did but reach to his Flesh or Humane Nature and there terminate Now the Scripture doth not place his great Sonship in his Humane but in his Divine Nature therefore as to that it speaks him to be the * Qui factus est ex semine David secundum carnem hic erit Homo Filius Hominis qui declarandus est Filius Dei secundum Spiritum Sanctificationis hic erit Deus sermo Dei Filius Tertul. adv Praxean Torquetur frustra locus Luc. 1.35 c. A nuda enim conceptione nativitate Carnis ex Virgine manavit non Filii Dei sed Filii hominis appellatio Quod verò Angelus porrò affirmat illud est hâc Filiatione non obstante etiam vocandum Filium Dei adhibitâ exactè particulâ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ad conciliandam utramque Filii Hominis Filii Dei uni Christo tribuendam appellationem per communicationem idiomatum c. Cloppenb Ant. Smalc p. 71. Son and Seed of David or the Son of Man in contradistinction to his being the Son of God And his Sonship to God cannot be grounded upon that which was the ground of his Sonship to Man for where the Sonships are so different they must needs have different Grounds and foundations Pray let these two Texts be well weighed and they will sufficiently prove what I say Rom. 1.3.4 Concerning his Son Jesus Christ our Lord who was made of the seed of David according to the flesh and declared to be the Son of God with Power according to the Spirit of Holiness by the resurrection from the Dead Rom. 9.5 Whose are the Fathers and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came who is over all God blessed for ever The sum of all Christ hath two Natures according to which two Natures he hath two distinct Sonships he is the Son of God and he is the Son of Man these different Sonships must have different causes grounds therefore his Conception upon which he was the Son of Man cannot make him also to be the Son of God 4. As to the Text alledg'd by our Adversaries to prove their Opinion there 's a double Answer commonly given to it 1. The particle therefore in it is not causal but illative 'T is not brought in as signifying the Ground of Christ's Sonship but as a note of inference wherein something is inferr'd from what went before The Angel had told Mary that the Holy Ghost should come upon her and the power of the Highest should overshadow her and then adds therefore also the Holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God therefore what may be the force of this word in this place 't is a meer deduction drawn from the premises to this effect Since such a thing shall be done by the Holy Ghost therefore according to what was prophesied Christ shall be called the Son of God The words plainly refer to the prophesie Isa 7 14. Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign Behold a Virgin shall conceive and bear a Son and shall call his name Immanuel The Evangelist brings them in expresly in that reference Matth. 1.21 22 23. And she shall bring forth a Son and thou shalt call his name Jesus for he shall save his people from their sins Now all this was done that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the Prophet saying Behold a
proper Son of God but how why not only as he was eternally begotten by him but also as he was miraculously Conceived by the Virgin Mary that agreeing to none but only to him And therefore in this Point upon their blending of these things together they are judged by Some * See Peltius Harm Remonstr Socin Art 4. to Socinianize Now though this Opinion doth come incomparably short of that which absolutely deny's Christ's eternal Generation provided that the abettors of it who seem to grant this Generation do state it right that is that they hold Christ to be begotten in the very Nature and Essence of God and therein equal to him 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of which there is just matter of doubting as to the * Instit Theol. lib. 4. cap. 32. Person nam'd but now he making the Son in the Deity it self not co-ordinate but subordinate to the First Person I say though this Opinion thus stated be nothing neer so bad as the former yet †Censura Profess Leid in c. 3. p. 51. Trigland in Exam. Apâ—log cap. 5. Alting Theol. Elenc p. 151. c. et p. 181. c. Divines of another persuasion cannot close with it or let it pass without some Confutation The Arguments against it do very much fall in with those which have been insisted upon already 1. First if Christ be the Son of God as eternally begotten with respect to his Divine Nature and also the Son of God as conceived in time c. with respect to his Humane Nature then the Scripture doth groundlesly and needlesly distinguish betwixt his being the Son of God in reference to the one and his being the Son of Man in reference to the other Nature Why doth it make him to be * Rom. 1.3 4. God's Son according to the Spirit of Holiness i. e. his Divine Nature and the Son of David according to the Flesh i. e. his Humane Nature if with respect to both he be the Son of God this is to confound those things which the Scripture makes distinct and places under several references Christ's Sonships as the Son of God and as the Son of Man are two very different things and therefore they cannot have the same foundation 'T is true he who is the Son of Man is also the Son of God but as he is the Son of Man or in what is proper to him as the Son of Man so he is not the Son of God And 't is true these two in concreto may convertibly be predicated each of the other thus the Son of God is the Son of Man and the Son of Man is the Son of God but this is founded not upon the oneness of the foundation of the Relation nor upon the oneness of the two Natures but upon the * Inficiamur Christum esse 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. quamvis propter Naturam Humanam personae divinae hypostaticè unitam dicamus etiam in concreto hunc hominem Jefum Deum ac Filium Dei unigenitum esse per communicationem idiomatum c. Cloppenb Comp. Socin p. 38. communication of properties and the union of the two Natures in one Person It comes to this where the relations are distinct the grounds of these relations must be distinct and therefore Christ's Sonship as the Son of God and as the Son of Man being distinct there cannot be one and the same ground of them 2. If this was so that Christ was the Son of God conjunctly upon his eternal Generation and also upon his conception and advancement in time then he would strangely differ in the same relation I do not contradict my self in what I said but now under the former head for there I spake of both the Sonships of Christ which differ very much and must not be confounded but here I speak only of his single Sonship as he is the Son of God which is but one and must not be divided Observe me as the difference of the Sonships of Christ as the Son of God and as the Son of Mary depends upon the difference of their Grounds eternal Generation being the ground of the one and temporal Generation being the ground of the ooher so the oneness of the same single Sonship of Christ as the Son of God depends upon the oneness of the ground of it viz. his Generation by the Father for if you add any other ground to this then Christ ceases to be one Son then he is the Son of God partly by Nature and partly by Grace partly begotten and partly made partly from eternity and partly in time what a strange Son would Christ be upon these terms 3. There can be but one true and proper Cause of one and the same Filiation this hath been already proved Divines are so tender of multiplying this relation of Christ that several of them though they grant the distinction of his Natures and hold his twofold Generation yet they argue but for one Sonship to belong to him for say they Sonship belonging to the Person and being founded upon the Person Christ being but one Person therefore he can have but one Sonship so * 3. p. Quest 35. Art 5. in corpore Art Aquinas argues I concur with †See Durandus Rada c. Junius Martinius Amesius in Hoorneb Socin Conf. tom 2. de Christo c. 1. p. 30 31 32. Others who attribute a twofold Sonship to Christ but then I affirm that each of them have but that one single Cause or foundation which is respectively proper to them 't is only eternal Generation of the Father which makes Christ to be the Son of God and 't is only temporal Generation of the Virgin which makes him to be the Son of Man 4. We say Oppositorum opposita ratio if Christ be the Son of Man only because he was conceived of the substance of his Mother then he is the Son of God only upon the account of his being begotten of the substance of his Father as a * Dr O. ag B. p. 179. Worthy Author argues 5. Whatever is over and above eternal Generation is but manifestative and not constitutive of Christ's Sonship this hath been made out in the several particulars alleadg'd therefore it will be needless to add any thing further upon it I have shown wherein and how Christ is the Son of God his own proper Son I 'le but propound one Question and very briefly Answer it and then I shall have finish'd the Explicatory part 'T is this if Christ be God's Son because in his ineffable Generation the Divine Essence was communicated to him Quest. Of the different Communication of the Divine Essence from the Father to the Son and to the holy Ghost Answ why may not the Holy Ghost the third Person also be stiled the Son of God to whom the same Essence was communicated as well as unto Christ I answer No for two Reasons 1. Because 't is the same Essence in
as may be suitable to his Nature and Relation as he is the infinite God and the eternal only begotten Son of God and what Honour can be high enough for such a Person But more particularly there 's a twofold Honour which you must all give to Christ 1. The Honour of Worship Heb. 1.6 When he bringeth in the first-born into the world he saith And let all the Angels of God worship him God will have his only begotten Son to be worshipped though he be very tender to whom that honour is given Divines do from hence strongly argue yet I know * Remonstr Apolog Cap. 2. 16. Episcop Inst Theolog. lib. 4. sect 2. cap. 34. 35. Some make but little of this Argument to prove the Godhead of Christ thus if religious Worship be God's peculiar if a God be the sole and adaequate object of Divine Worship if no Creature be to share with him therein it being that Glory which he will not give to another Isa 42.8 Matth. 4.10 Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God and him only shalt thou serve and yet the Father will have Christ to be the proper Object of divine Worship hence it follows that then he is and must be more than meer Man that he is true and very God And surely it would be no better than flat Idolatry in us Christians to give proper and formal religious worship to Christ was he not truly God as well as truly Man Therefore as to this Franciscus David and Christianus Franken both Socinians were in the right against Socinus if Christ was but meer Man the common Principle in which they all agreed then he could not be worshipped with religious Worship without Idolatry whereupon they would not give any such worship to him And as this Worship proves Christ's Godhead so his Godhead is the * Of this see Zanch. de tribus Elohim l. 3 c. 12. Junius Def. Trinit contra Samosat Profess Leid Cens cap. 16. Voetius de Adorat Christi Cheynel Trin-unity very largely p. 334. c. Dr. Stillingfleet of the Idolatry of the c. chap. 2. p. 112 113 114. ground of it for the adaequate immediate proper ground of Divine Worship as attributed to Christ is his divine Nature Essence and Sonship true he as Man is to be worshipped but not because he is Man the Humane Nature of Christ is the Object of Worship but 't is only as 't is taken into Personal Vnion with the Divine As he is Mediator and set in such an Office he is to be worshipped but this is not the proper and fundamental reason thereof for though he never had been Mediator yet Worship would have been due to him as the Father and Spirit are to be worshipped though the Office of Mediator belongs not to them Further the Lord Jesus as he in our Nature hath done such great and excellent things for us is to be worshipped yet this is only a forcible motive and inducement thereunto not the proper ground of it it remains then that the alone reason of Worship given or done to Christ is his being God and the co-equal co-essential Son of God And he being so what an obligation doth this lay upon you to worship him there 's inward worship consisting in the trust fear reverence adoration of the heart there 's outward worship consisting in attendance upon and due observance of Gospel-institutions as Prayer Hearing the Word c in both of these respects let Christ be worshipped by you both are due to him as he is God's own Son Well may you tender your homage to him in this way when Angels themselves bow before him and worship at his throne 2. Secondly there 's the Honour of Obedience which you must also give to Christ This is annexed to the declaration of his Sonship at the same time in which the Father attested that Christ was his Son he enjoyned obedience and subjection to him * Matth 17.5 This is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased what follows hear ye him this hearing of Christ is the Creatures obeying of him in all his holy Laws Commands and Institutions and so 't is as if God had said here 's a Person whom I own for my Son in a special and peculiar way whom therefore I have set as * Psal 2.6 my King upon my holy Hill of Sion into whose hands I have put †Matth. 28.18 all power upon whose shoulders I have laid the ‖ Isa 9.7 Government therefore I charge you to hear him and to yield all Obedience and Subjection to him O Sirs 't is God himself and not such a poor worm as I who requires this of you it must be Reverence and it must be Obedience too this high relation of Christ calls for both and believe it without this Obedience he that is God's Son will never be your Saviour for Heb. 5.9 Being made perfect he became the author of eternal Salvation unto all them and to none but them that obey him I have spoken much to press believing on this Son upon you but let me add there must be obeying of him as well as believing on him Obedience is not so of the very essence of Faith but that Faith may very well be defin'd without it yet 't is an inseparable Adjunct or Consequent or fruit of Faith and these two do alwayes concur in the Subject though they be different in themselves and have a different influence upon justification and salvation But that which I aim at is this since Christ is the Son of God and this is clearly revealed to you since this Son hath made known to you in the holy Gospel what his Will and pleasure is how he would have you to live what to do what to shun I beseech you now hearken to him comply with him in all his excellent Commands give up your selves in an universal subjection to his blessed Laws let there be an obediential frame of heart to his whole Will this is indeed to honour him and to honour him in such a way as best answers his Sonship to God and his Lordship over you 4. Branch of the Exhortation To adore the Love of God 4. Fourthly is Christ no lower a Person than God's own Son what cause have we then to admire and wonder at the greatness of God's Love in his sending of him Here 's a glass indeed to transmit and represent unto us the Love of God O how shall we get our hearts affected with it what thankfulness in us can bear any proportion to the mercy before us For God to send to send a Son such a Son in such a manner as follows in the words here 's the Wonder of Wonders God never did the like before and hee 'l never do the like again and blessed be his name there is no need he should 'T would have been admirable mercy if God would have sent some other person upon this errand to redeem
upon Heart and Life So as 1. To be humble 2. Not to give way to Sin 3. Especially not to those sins which do more directly disparage and debase the Humane Nature 4. To love God and Christ 5. To be willing to do to suffer to be abased for Christ 6. To labour after a participation of the Divine Nature 7. To be highly thankful both for the Thing it self and also for the revelation of it Use 3. Of Comfort As 1. Christ in Flesh must needs be un effectual way for promoting God's Glory and the Sinners Good 2. In this God hath given out a very high demonstration of his Love 3. By this all the Promises are seal'd and all the great things of Faith and Hope made sure and credible Particularly 1. The Mystical Union 2. Communion with God Christ's special presence the inhabitation of the Spirit 3. The Communications of Grace from God 4. Our Sonship to God 5. The Resurrection of our Bodies 6. The Future Glory 4. God is now knowable and accessible 5. The Humane Nature highly dignify'd and advanc'd 6. Christ upon this is the more compassionate 7. There are few troubles of Conscience wherein this may not afford matter of ease and relief The Fourth General in the Words THis branch of the Words contains a Fourth Head in it which comes next to be opened Our Apostle having spoken of God's sending his own Son he goes on to shew in what manner he sent him and as to that he saith God sent him in the likeness of sinful flesh Here 's nothing in the Text but Wonders but the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the great things of God! the further we go the deeper the Waters are and still new matter offers it self to heighten our admiration 't was wonderful that God should send such a Son but that he should send such a Son in such a manner in Flesh yea in the likeness of sinful Flesh this is yet more wonderful O Christian stay alittle pause upon these Words get thy thoughts up thy heart elevated in the contemplation of what is here set before thee and then read one Why this Branch is added to what goes before In my entrance upon them it may be enquired why the Apostle is so particular and so express in this matter * Nonne satis erat dicere mittens Filium suum Hoc ipso verbo declaratum non fuisset istud magnum mysterium scituque dignissimum quomodo videlicet peccatum peccati damnavit Omnipotens similitudine â—arnis peccati peccatores à peccato liberans c. Corn. Mussus had it not been enough for him to have said God sent his own Son and so to have broke off but he must also add that God sent him in the likeness c To which I answer there was great reason for this amplification for the Apostle being here treating of such great mysteries of such high and glorious discoveries of the Wisdom Grace Love of God towards lost Sinners he thought in these he could not be too full or too express and he being to set down in a little room the whole model and platform of mans Salvation the good Spirit of God directed him to put in enough both for the setting forth of God's admirable Love Mercy c. and also for the encouragement of the Believers Faith with respect to the certainty compleatness and fulness of his Salvation Now Christ's incarnation and abasement in Man's Nature being so pertinent and proper and so necessary as to both of these ends therefore our Apostle will not pass that over without a particular mentioning of it And elsewhere you find him when he had spoken of Christ's mission presently to subjoyn Christ's incarnation also as Gal. 4.4 When the fulness of time was come God sent his Son made of a woman c. 'T was not only God's sending of Christ but his so sending of him viz. in Flesh yea in the likeness of sinful Flesh which puts such an emphasis and accent upon his own Grace and which doth give such full assurance to poor Creatures that they shall be effectually redeem'd and sav'd Upon these Considerations therefore besides the admirableness of the thing in it self Paul when he is upon such an Argument might very well superadde this to what preceded and he 's not satisfied with the once mentioning of it in the general but he repeats it and more particularly shows what use God made of Christ's Flesh or what good did by that redound to us for sin he condemned sin in the Flesh that is in the flesh of Christ The Explication of the Words For the clearing up the true meaning of the Words and the vindicating of them from those false interpretations which some of the old Hereticks put upon them I will lay down a Few Particulars 1. First that Flesh as here used concerning Christ carry's a quite other sense in it than what it did when it was spoken of before You had it Vers 1. Who walk not after the Flesh c. in this Verse what the Law could not do in that it was weak through the Flesh in which sense as 't is there used it occurs in many following Verses Now Flesh in these places is taken in a very different notion from Flesh in this for in them 't is taken morally and accidentally but here where Christ is concern'd in it 't is taken Physically and substantially in them it notes Man's nature as corrupted but here the very being and substance of the Humane nature or the verity of the Humane nature it self abstracted from any such adjunct and so 't is twice taken in this Verse 2. That Flesh in this application is not to be understood in its more narrow and limited sense but in its more general and comprehensive sense Here 's a double Synecdoche in the word as it signifies 1. the whole Body 2. the whole Man or the whole nature of man Flesh in its strict acceptation is but a part of the body and the body but a part of the Man but so you are not here to take it for Christ had a perfect entire compleat body and every thing as well as meer Flesh which is proper to a body for instance he had blood as well as Flesh therefore both are named Heb. 2.14 He also took part of the same i.e. of Flesh and blood and he had bones as well as flesh Luke 24.39 A Spirit hath not flesh and bones as ye see me have Further Christ was not only clothed with Flesh as that is limited but to one part of Man but he assumed the * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Cyrill Alexandr in Joh. p. 95. whole Nature of Man he had a Soul as well as a Body which two are the essential constitutive parts of Man What more common in Scripture than by Flesh to set forth Man in his whole entire humane Nature See Gen. 6.12 Psal 65.2 Isa 40.5 Joel 2.28 Luk. 3.6 Rom. 3.20 Joh. 17.2
some things as 't is plain he was for he knew not the * Vide Najanz Orat. 36. p. 588. precise time of the day of judgment Mark 13.32 as he was God he knew all things so his Vnderstanding was infinite he must therefore have some other Vnderstanding which was but finite in reference to which there might be something which he did not know He also had an humane Will distinct from his Divine Will for what could that Will be which he did submit and subordinate to the Will of his Father but this Luk. 22.42 Nevertheless not my Will but thine be don Then for those Affections which are proper to the Soul 't is clear Christ had them as namely Anger Mar. 3.5 Mar. 10.14 Love Mat. 10.21 Sorrow Mat. 26.38 Luk. 19.41 Fear Heb. 5.7 Joy Luk. 10 21. Joh. 11.15 Pity Mat. 9.36 Mat. 13.32 Now where these three things are most certainly there is a true and real Soul Yet here also our blessed Lord and Saviour is assaulted he hath two Natures which make up his Person his Deity and his Humanity but both of them by several persons are taken away as you heard but now and there are two Essential parts which make up one of his Natures his Manhood viz. Soul and Body but both of these too by several persons are taken away also Marcion divests him of a Body and * See Epiphan vol. 1. p. 743 771. Apollinaris of a Soul the Arrians also are charged with this Heresie these held that Christ had no Soul but that the ‖ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Theodor. lib. 5 contra Haeres cap. 11. Deity was to him instead of a Soul and supply'd the office thereof that what the Soul is to us and doth in our bodies all that the Divine Nature was to Christ and did in his Body O what light can be clear enough for their Conviction and guidance in the way of truth whom God hath given up to †2 Thes 2.11 strong delusions that they should believe lies Are not the Scriptures clear enough in this matter that Christ had a real Soul what was the subject of his inexpressible sorrow and agonies in the Garden but his Soul Matth. 26.38 My Soul is exceeding sorrowful even unto death c. Joh. 12.27 Now is my Soul troubled and what shall I say what did he in special recommend to God when he was breathing out his last gasp but his Soul Luk. 23.46 When Jesus had cryed with a loud voice he said Father into thy hands I commend my Spirit and having said thus he gave up the Ghost what was the part affected in his sore desertion when he cry'd out My God my God why hast thou forsaken me surely his Body could not be the immediate subject of a punishment purely spiritual no that must terminate in his spiritual part the Soul By all this it appears then that Christ was as truly God so also truly Man he having a true Body and a true Soul Yet a little further that I may take in the whole truth Of Christ's submitting to the common Adjuncts c. of the Humane Nature and leave out nothing which may tend to the heightning of Christ's incomparable Love and condescension to Sinners he was not barely sent in Flesh so far as the verity of the Humane Nature is concern'd in his assuming the Essential parts thereof but he also submitted to the common accidents adjuncts infirmities miseries calamities which are incident to that Nature He lay so many Weeks and Months in the Virgins womb received nourishment and growth in the ordinary way was brought forth and bred up just as common Infants are ' bating some special respects shown to him to discover the greatness of his Person had his life sustain'd by common food as ours is was hungry thirsty weary poor reproached tempted deserted c. liv'd an afflicted life then dy'd a miserable death was a * Isal 53.3 man of sorrows and acquainted with grief †Phil. 2.7 made himself of no reputation took upon him the form of a Servant was made in the likeness of man not only in the taking of their Nature but also in submitting to those abasements and miseries which now that Nature is lyable unto his whole life was a life of sufferings wherein as there was enough in his Holiness * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Justin Martyr Expos Fidei Miracles to shew him to be God so there was also enough in his meanness poverty sufferings to shew him to be Man In a word he took all our infirmities upon him take it with a double restriction 1. To all our †〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Damascen de Orthod Fid. l. 3. c. 20. sinless infirmities such as are culpable and carry sin in them they must be excepted for though he was made like to us in all things yet without sin Heb. 4.15 2. To all our Natural infirmities as to personal infirmities such as are proper to this and that Person as blindness deafness lameness c. these Christ did not put himself under for he did not assume this or that Person but the Nature in common and therefore was not lyable to the particular infirmities of Individuums How the Humane Nature in Christ and in us differs but only to those which properly belonged to the common Nature I would carry this a little higher though I have said so much concerning the reality and sameness of Christ's Humane Nature with ours yet you are not in all respects to equalize that Nature as 't is in him and as 't is in us for Substance and Essence 't is one and the same in both yet in other considerations there 's a great disparity for 1. The Humane Nature is solely and singly in us in Christ 't is conjunctly with the Divine 2. We have it in the way of common and ordinary generation Christ had it in a special and extraordinary way 3. 'T is tainted and defil'd in us in Christ 't is perfectly pure and holy 4. In us it hath its proper subsistence in Christ it subsists only in his Godhead Thus I have shewn what this sending of Christ in the Flesh is and what it imports viz. the truth of his Incarnation of his Body and his assumption of the whole entire and perfect Nature of Man and also as the several Heads fell in my way I have out of the Word given you the proof of them I say out of the Word for these Mysteries are only to be known and believed upon the light and authority thereof if it asserts them that certainly must be sufficient to command the belief of Christians who profess in all things to make the Scriptures to be the Rule of their Faith And as to the credibility of Christ's incarnation from rational Considerations in subserviency to and grounded upon Gospel-revelation sundry * Tertull. de Carne Christi Deo nihil impossibile nisi quod non vult
greater and more perfect Tabernacle not made with hands that is to say not of this building c. by this Tabernacle of the Lord 's pitching and not made with hands he means the body or flesh of Christ which was the true Tabernacle and of which the common Tabernacle was but a type and indeed there was so great a resemblance betwixt these two as that the one might very well prefigure and typify the other For 1. the Outside of that Tabernacle was but mean it was made without of very ordinary and common things within 't was rich and glorious it being beautified with Gold Silver Precious Stones c. but without all was plain it being covered only with Ram-skins and Goat-skins and such materials Exod. 25.1 c. and 26.14 c. So here Christ's outside was especially to some but very mean Isa 53.2 He hath no form nor comliness and when we shall see him there is no beauty that we should desire him but yet he was exceeding glorious within as 't is said of the Church Psal 45.13 such as had a discerning eye they could see the inward glory of his Godhead shining through the cloud of his Manhood And the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us and we beheld his glory the glory as of the only begotten of the Father full of grace and truth Joh. 1.14 2. God's special presence was in the Tabernacle there was the Shechinah or habitation of God wherein at first by an extraordinary Cloud he signified his glorious presence to be as afterwards he did in the Temple too By which therefore Christ sets forth his Body Joh. 2.19 21. Jesus answered and said unto them Destroy this Temple and in three dayes I will raise it up but he spake of the Temple of his Body Both Tabernacle and Temple were * Dr. Cudworth true Notion of the Lord's Supper p. 62. types and apt resemblances of his Flesh or Manhood in respect of the special presence and inhabitation of the Divine Nature in it Hence †Dr. Jackson on the Creed 7th Book sect 3. ch 20. Some make all those great Promises made to the people of Israel concerning God's presence with them in special in the Tabernacle and Temple to point to Christ's Incarnation and in that to receive their accomplishment you may read them Exod. 25.8 Exod. 29.44 45 46. Levit. 26.11 12 13. Ezek. 37.26 27 28. 3. The Tabernacle was a * Josephus calls it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 templum portatile Antiq. Jud. lib. 3. cap. 5. And Austine Templum deambulatorium moveable thing whilst Israel was in the Wilderness in an itinerary posture as they moved the Tabernacle moved with them it was not fixed all that time as afterwards it was So it was with Christ he was here on earth with his Body for some time but neither he nor it were here long to abide he ascended up to heaven and thither he carried his Body with him and there t is fixed this the Evangelist alludes unto Joh. 1.14 The Word was made Flesh and dwelt amongst us c. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 he tented or tabernacled it for a time amongst us in respect of his short abode here in reference to which our Bodies too are set forth by Tabernacles 2 Cor. 5.1 4. 2 Pet. 1.13 14. I might also instance in Melchisedech as a personal Type of Christ he was without Father and Mother c. Heb. 7.3 which is very applicable to Christ for he as the * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Najanz P. 375. tom 1. Son of God was without Mother and as the Son of man without Father Well then that all these Prophesies Promises Types might be fulfill'd it was necessary that Christ should assume Flesh there 's the first Ground of it The 2d Reason why Christ was incarnate and sent in Flesh that he might be the better qualify'd for his Office and Work 2. This was necessary in regard of Christ's Office and Work 1. As to his Office He was to be the Mediatour betwixt God and Man and that was to be his great and standing Office now in order to his administration thereof it was requisite that he should be Man and take our Nature for he who will be a Mediator 'twixt God and Man must himself be both God and Man He must be God that he may be fit to transact treat negotiate with God and he must be Man that he may be fit to do the same with Man God alone was too high to deal with Man and Man alone was too low to deal with God and therefore Christ was a middle Person 'twixt both that he might deal with both He could not have been fit to be the Mediator in respect of Office if he had not first been a middle Person in respect of his Natures for saith the Apostle Gal. 3.20 A Mediator is not of one but God is one Not of one that is 1. not of one Person for mediation supposes more persons than one was there none besides God himself Christ's mediatory work would be at end that necessarily implying different parties betwixt whom he doth mediate 2. Not of one Nature the Mediator must necessarily have more Natures than one Observe it God saith the Text is one viz. as he is essentially considered and therefore as so he cannot be the Mediator but Christ as personally considered he is not of one that is not of one Nature for he is God and Man too whereupon hee 's the Person who is qualify'd to be the Mediator And therefore when he is spoken of as Mediator his Manhood is brought in that Nature being so necessary to that Office 1 Tim. 2.5 For there is one God and one Mediator between God and Man the Man Christ Jesus 2. Christ's Incarnation and Manhood was necessary in respect of that Work which he was willing to undertake I mean the Work of Redemption If he will engage to redeem and save lost Sinners he must be so qualify'd as that he may first make * Vide Anselm cur Deus Homo Lib. 1. Cap. 11 12 19 20. satisfaction to an injur'd and offended God for that God stood upon and would not recede from he had decreed as appears by the event to save man that way and what he decrees must accordingly be accomplished he had threatned death to the Sinner which threatning therefore must be inflicted either upon the Offender himself or his Surety and God as Rector mundi will vindicate the honour of his Government and therefore will punish the transgression of his Laws upon such Considerations as these there must be Satisfaction Now in order to that there must be suffering yea Christ himself must suffer partly because he was pleas'd to substitute himself in the Sinners stead and partly because his sufferings only could be satisfactory but unless he be Man how can he suffer So that the chain or link lies thus without satisfaction no redemption without suffering
several other Texts in order to the more undeniable proving of the Proposition before us as also to answer the various replyes evasions misinterpretations about them by such who dissent and yet I could most willingly engage therein did I think such an undertaking would be proper in such a Discourse as this or tend to the advantage of any but the truth is I fear I should but perplex private Christians with things that possibly would be too high for them and I 'm sure I should do that which is needless for Others who know where this is * Arnold Catech. Racov. major p. 27◠Galov Socin proflig p. 285. Cocceius against Socin in cap. 1. Joh. cap. 15. Bisterf against Crellius p. 564. Jacob. ad Portum against Ostorod p. 166. Owen against Biddle ch 13. p. 289. c. done already And indeed the whole matter in this Controversie is by Crellius himself brought into a narrow compass wherein we are very willing to joyn issue with him for he grants if Christ did praeexist before he was incarnate that then his incarnation must needs be believ'd and own'd according to our stating of it but I have * See p. 284. c. already proved and Others do it much more fully that he did so praeexist therefore upon that Concession the thing is clear and I need say no more upon it Only let me leave this one word with our Opposers their Homo Deus factus is the greatest falshood but our Deus Homo factus is the greatest truth 2. Prop. Christ the Second Person only was incarnate The second Proposition is this that Christ the Son of God the second Person in the ineffable Trinity he only was incarnate 'T is here said God sending his own Son in the likeness c. the taking then of flesh was that personal act which was proper to the Son alone and in that so often alledged Text 't is said * Joh. 1.14 the Word was made flesh which Title the Word is never attributed to the Father or to the Spirit but alwayes to the Son and you see he 's the person who was made flesh 'T is true Incarnation was the act of the whole Trinity approbativè but 't was only the Son's act terminativè all the Persons approved of it and * Sola persona Filii incarnata est operante tamen eandem incarnationem totâ Sanctâ Trinitate cujus opera sunt inseparabilia August Quest de Trinit tom 3. p. 1040. Vid. Anselm de Incam Verbi cap. 3. 4. concurred to it but it was terminated only in Christ the second Person The Schoolmen compare Christ's Flesh to a garment made by three Virgin-sisters which yet but One of them only wears A †See Lombard lib. 3. Dist 1. Dr. Jackson on the Creed 7th Book p. 255. Question is commonly here started why the second Person rather than the first or the third was thus incarnate which Some do venture to answer by assigning the Reasons of it I humbly conceive there is too much of curiosity in the Question and too much of boldness in the Answer why Christ was incarnate I can give several Reasons but why he rather than the other Persons there I must be silent 'T is also query'd * Of this see Zanchy de tribus Elohim l. 5. c. 6. p. 546. c. Tilen de Incarn Filii Dei Disp 1. Sect. 20. Aug. Serm. 3. de Temp. there being such an oneness betwixt all the Persons how the Son can be said to assume the Humane Nature and yet the Father and Spirit not assume it to which the Answer is obvious this difference might very well be upon that personal distinction which is betwixt them for this assumption of flesh being not the act of the Nature which is common but of the Person which is limited the second Person might so assume and yet the other Persons not 3. Prop. Christ not incarnate till the fulness of time Thirdly Christ's incarnation was in time and not till the fulness of time He was alwayes God for he that is not alwayes God is never God the Divine Essence admitting neither of beginning nor end but he was not * Neque enim Caro issa quae ex came Virginis nata est semper fuit sea Deus qui semper fuit ex carne Virginis in carne Hominis advenit Cassian de Incar Dom. Lib. 6. alwayes man there never was a time in which he was not God but there was a time in which he was not Man His Generation as the Son of God was eternal but his Generation as the Son of Man was but temporal In the fulness of time God sent his Son made of a woman c. Gal. 4.4 The Evangelist sets him forth in his two Natures Joh. 1. with respect to his Divine Nature he shews that he was from everlasting In the beginning was the Word c. the same was in the beginning with God c. then he comes to his Humane Nature and that he shews was in time the Word was made Flesh he was not so ab aeterno but he was made so in time In such a sense Christ may be said to be incarnate from all eternity viz. in regard of God's eternal parpose and decree as in reference to that he is said to be the Lamb slain from the foundation of the world Rev. 13.8 but as to the actuality of his Incarnation that was but 1600 and odd years ago A double enquiry here will be made As 1. if this was deferr'd so long what then became of those who lib'd and dy'd before Christ was inearnate The efficacy and benefit of Christ's Incarnation to those who lived before it if that was so necessary as hath been shown what became of the Patriarchs of all who liv'd under the Law before that was in being I answer they had the merit virine benefit of the thing though they had not the thing it self for God having decreed it and Christ having covenanted and ingaged to the Father that in the fulness of time he would take flesh the Father all-along look'd upon it as actually done and accordingly dealt with Believers under the Law as though it had been actually done insomuch that they had the same benefit by a Christ in Flesh which we now have Therefore 't is said Rom. 3.25 Whom God set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past through the forbearance of God Heb. 9.15 For this cause he is the Mediatour of the New Testament that by means of death for the redemption of the trrnsgressions that were under the first Testament they which are called might receive the promise of eternal inheritance Whatever our Lord is now since the actual exhibition of him he was the same before effectively and virtually for 't is Jesus Christ the same yesterday and to day and for ever Heb. 13.8
Matth. 22.45 Lord of David and the Son of David the branch of David and the root of David both ‖ Revel 22.16 root and off-spring how could such different things be affirm'd of him but upon the distinction of his two Natures that therefore is not in the least impeach'd by the Hypostatical Vnion True upon this Union there is the communication of properties betwixt them so as that that which is proper to one Nature is applyed to the other as you see Joh. 3.13 1 Cor. 2.8 Act. 20.48 and so as that that which is predicated of the one may be also predicated of the other I mean in the concrete for in the abstract this will not hold as I cannot say the Deity is the Humanity or the Humanity is the Deity yet I may truly say God is Man and Man is God a communication of properties thus far or in this sense we deny not it follows upon the Vnion but that that which is essential to one Nature should really Physically be convey'd and made over to the other Nature as Omnipresence Vbiquity Omniscience c. from the Godhead to the Manhood which is the Popish and Lutheran Communication this as implying a Contradiction and carrying in it a perfect repugnancy to the nature of the thing we cannot assent unto The Humane Nature in the first moment of its formation was united to the Divine 4. No sooner was the Humane Nature framed or formed but in that very instant of time it was united to the Divine Nature this also I put down as another branch of the main Proposition 'T was * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Damasc Orth. Fid. l. 3. cap. 2. v. Luommbard L. 3. Dist 2. taken as soon as it was made its first existence and its union were contemporary We distinguish betwixt the formation sanctification and assumption of the Humane Nature and we conceive of these as done successively in such an order first that Nature was form'd then sanctify'd then assum'd But this is meerly founded upon our conception not that it was so indeed and really as to the things themselves for in truth there was no priority of time priority of Nature I deny not betwixt the one and the other but at the very same moment wherein by the Power of the Holy Ghost the Manhood of Christ was formed it was also sanctify'd and united to the Godhead A Question here is moved by Some whether Christ's Humane Nature was compleat and perfect at the first that is whether as soon as ever his Flesh was formed his Soul was infus'd and united to it or whether as it is with us there was not some space of time intervening betwixt the formation of the Flesh and the infusion of the Soul in the discussing of which there is a difference among them Some being for the * Sharp Cursus Theol. p. 362. Affirmative and Others for the †Lud. Capellus in Thes Salmur part 2. p. 12. thes 15. Dr. Jackson on the Creed 7th Book Sect. 3. ch 29. p. 324. Negative But which is to my purpose all agree in this that whether it was only Flesh for sometime or whether both Flesh and Soul were form'd together yet still the Vnion began at the first instant of the Incarnation There was a time before Christ's Manhood did exist but as soon as ever it did exist there was no time wherein it was under disunion and disjunction from his Godhead Thus I have endeavoured by these Four things to give you a little light concerning the Hypostatical Vnion of the two Natures in Christ's Person which this Sixth Proposition led me unto a point of such high importance and so proper to the subject in hand that I could not wholly pass it over and yet withal so sublime and mysterious that I can neither speak nor conceive of it according to what is in it 7. Prop. 'T is probable if Adam had not faln Christ had not been sent in Flesh 7. Let me add but one thing further 'T is probable had there been no sin that Christ had not been sent in Flesh or had not Adam fallen and thereby involv'd his whole Posterity in a state of sin and guilt 't is probable that Christ had not been incarnate I express it modestly going no higher than 't is probable because though the Scriptures make it certain to me yet 't is not so to others nay some are of a quite other opinion The question is not de possibili what God by his absolute Power and Will might and could have done but only de facto whither if man had not sin'd Christ should actually have assum'd our Nature about which the Schools with other Divines are divided some * Scotus in 3. part disput 7. Quest 3. Absque praejudicio concedi potest etiamsi humana natura non peccasset adhuc Christum carnem sumpturum fuisse Alex. Alons 3. p. Qu. 2. memb 13. Catharinus de praed Christ Pet. Galatinus de Arc. Cathol ver l. 7 c. 2. Osiander c. affirming it some * Aquinas p. 3. qui. 1. art 3. Vasquez in 3. part tom 1. disp 10. art 3. Becan Theol. Schol. p. 3. c. 1. qu. 7. Calvin Instit l. 2. c. 12. against Osiander Hoorneb Socin Confut. tom 2. l. ◠c. 2. p. 253. Stegm Photin disp 15. p. 176. Alting Theol. Probl. Loc. 12. Probl. 5. p. 564. denying it The former affirm though sin had not been yet Christ would have come in Flesh not to have dy'd or suffer'd but only to have let the world see the glory and excellency of his Humane Nature that so great a work as his Incarnation might not have been lost or not done that God thereby might give out a singular demonstration of his Love to man the latter cannot lay so great a stress upon these things and therefore assert if man had not sin'd Christ had not been incarnate And indeed their Opinion seems to be more agreeable to the Word for that usually mentions saving from sin and the taking away of sin as the end and ground of Christ's taking Flesh My Text describes the state of the sinner to be desperate upon the terms of the Law and then upon that God sent his Son in Flesh it adds further he was thus sent to condemn sin in his Flesh so that had there been no sin to have been condemn'd he had not been sent in Fesh So Matth. 1.21 She shall bring forth a Son and thou shalt call his name Jesus for he shall save his people from their sins 1 Tim. 1.15 This is a faithful saying and worthy of all acceptation that Christ Jesus came into the world to save sinners c. Joh. 1.29 Behold the Lamb of God which taketh away the sin of the world Dan. 9.24 Seventy weeks are determined upon the people and upon thy holy city to finish the transgression and to make an end of sins and to make reconciliation for iniquity Tit. 2.14 Who gave
Adam's loins too for his genealogie is carried up to Adam Luk. 3. yet he not descending from him in the ordinary fleshly way his Person was exempted from the guilt of his sin and his Nature from the general depravation 3. Christ was actually Holy there was nothing but holiness in whatever he did all his actings inward and outward did exactly correspond with the Nature and Will of his Father he never was guilty of the least sin in thought word or deed sin was neither contracted nor * Eandem assumsit Naturam Chriâ—tus sed in ea non peccaviâ— Ambros committed by him Grace and Holiness were advanced in him to the highest pitch according to the utmost capacity of the Humane Nature without the least mixture of what is contrary thereunto in a word he liv'd in his whole course a most holy innocent spotless sinless life as the Scriptures which have been alledged do abundantly testifie The Grounds of Christ's Holiness and Sanctity This sanctity and sinlessness of Christ's Humane Nature was necessary upon a double account 1. To fit it for the personal union with his Divine Nature Can it be imagin'd that ever the Lord Jesus would take a Nature tainted with sin and so nearly unite it to himself when the Divine Nature stood at so great a distance from sin can we without blasphemy think that it would assume the Humane Nature had it been sinful into so close an union as that both should make but one person O such a thing was not possible God can take a sinning if repenting Creature into his bosom but he cannot take a sinning Nature into his Person Christ might condescend to take flesh yet be God but he could not have taken sinful flesh and yet be God the humane nature simply considered was not inconsistent with his Godhead but that Nature if sinful was 2. This was necessary in respect of Christ's Office and undertaking for our good In order to which as he must be man so he must be man perfectly holy and righteous for he that is a sinner himself cannot be a Saviour to other sinners then 't would be Physician heal thy self or Saviour save thy self all that such a one could do would be little enough for himself Christ was both Priest and Sacrifice with respect to both he must be without sin as Priest for if sin had been chargeable upon him he must then have offer'd for himself and so have been in the same condition with the Priests under the Law which the Apostle shews he was not Heb. 7.26 27. As Sacrifice too for whatever was offer'd up to God it was to have no blemish in it In allusion to which the Apostle calls him a Lamb without blemish and without spot 1 Pet. 1.19 answerably to the Paschal Lamb Exod. 12.5 and to the two Lambs in the fire-offering Numb 28.3 and he 's said to offer himself without spot to God Heb. 9.14 How could Christ have taken off guilt from us had he had it lying upon himself or how could he have made us righteous had he not been righteous himself therefore 2 Cor. 5.21 He hath made him to be sin for us who knew no sin that we might be made the righteousness of God in him and Isa 53.11 By his knowledge shall my righteous servant justifie many mark it Christ being a righteous Person himself so he comes to justifie and make others righteous so 1 Joh. 3.5 And ye know that he was manifested to take away our sins and in him is no sin the connexion is observeable * Si esset in illo peccatum auferendum esset illi non ipse auferret August he that will take away sin from others must have no sin in himself Christ coming for that end therefore in him there was no sin Three things as †one observes from the words were requisite to him that should be the Mediator he must be God he must be Man * Piscat he he must be perfectly and unmixtly holy all these three qualifications you have in the Text Christ was God's own Son there 's his Godhead he was sent in flesh there 's his Manhood he was sent but in the likeness of sinful flesh there 's his purity and holiness Having done with the Explicatory part Use 1. Information I come now to what is Applicatory Where in the first place passing by other things these two we are mainly informed of 1. Of the excellency of the Gospel and Christian Religion 2. Of the excellency of Christ's Flesh or Manhood Of the excellency of the Gospel and Christian Religion 1. First that great Truth which I have been upon informs us of the excellency of the Gospel and Christian Religion The more raised and mysterious the things are which the one reveals and the other believes the more excellent must both of them needs be for this is a Principle grounded upon Reason and strengthned by the Consent of all who pretend to Religion whether it be true or false What more common amongst men when they would argue for the excellency either of that from which they fetch their Religion or of their Religion it self than to cry up the mysteries and to tell us what high sublime mysterious things are contained in them These make a great impression upon mens minds and strongly induce them to believe that whatever hath in it such mysteries must certainly be of God and have a divine Original therefore Heathens themselves as well as Christians have much pleas'd themselves with this and have been great pretenders to such and such mysteries thereby to gain credit and reputation to their way Now let us apply this Principle or common test to the Gospel-revelation and the Christian Religion and then I 'm sure their excellency above all other pretended Revelations and Religions will be evident For look into all those admired and rare Secrets those high and raised mysteries which they who know not the Gospel did so much cry up and magnifie and do but compare them with this one mystery God 's own Son sent in flesh alas what trifles what shallow contemptible ridiculous things are they in comparison of it A God incarnate shames all the little mysteries of the Pagan Religion if so good a title may be given to so bad a thing they all vanish before this and are not able to stand in competition with it Now where is this profound mystery revealed but in the Gospel and where is that revelation believed but in the Christian Religion therefore how excellent must both needs be upon this account The Heathens knew nothing at all of this they dreamt of Men being made Gods but that he who was truly God should be made truly Man this they were altogether ignorant of in all their Religion there was no such mystery The Apostle cryes out 1 Tim. 3.16 Without controversie great is the mystery of Godliness God manifested in the flesh c. his design in these
of the hands of your enemies might serve him without fear in holiness and righteousness before him all the dayes of your life Luk. 1.74 75. Partly too because upon Christ's sending in the flesh you have so full a demonstration of the evil of sin how hateful it was to God c. for it having got into the world nothing could expiate it unless God's own Son will take flesh yea and suffer and die in that flesh and so bring about the expiation of it O what an evil is sin Now notwithstanding and after all this will you yet love it and live in the commission of it what will this be but in effect to say you regard not what Christ was or did that you desire as far as in you lies to make this his great act the taking of flesh to be insignificant and to no purpose as also to declare to the world by your practises that you have quite other thoughts of sin than what God himself hath Especially they must shun those sins which do most disparage and debase the Humane Nature 3. Of all sins be sure you shun those which do most directly disparage and debase the Humane Nature such as drunkenness intemperance bodily uncleanness c. what a sad thing is it that ever such things should be done where there is such a Nature When Christ hath assum'd that Nature and by assuming it hath so dignified and advanc'd it nay when he hath so highly glorify'd it as to carry it up with him to Heaven and there to sit with it at the right hand of God shall we by such and such sinful courses the gratifying of such base lusts * Agnosce O Christiane dignitatem tuam divinae consors factus Naturae noli in veterem vilitatem degeneri conversatione redire Leo de Nativ dishonour and disparage it God forbid Sinners let me intreat you when ever the temptation comes to excite you to those Evils which in special do entrench upon the glory of the Humane Nature as to drink to excess to defile your bodies by fleshly lusts c. do but seriously think with your selves that you are Men and shall such carry it as beasts that your Saviour hath just such a body as you have and doth he abuse it by the committing of such Evils that he hath your Nature and doth he so and so sin in it that he hath restor'd it as 't is in himself to its pristine glory and will you as 't is in your selves keep it as vile as ever surely if such who are drown'd in sensuality did but seriously think of this they would abandon their base lusts rather than by them debase their excellent Nature They must love God and Christ 4. Love God and Christ yea love them strongly ardently to a very intense degree of love * 1 Joh. 4.16 God is Love he hath made it appear so in his sending of Christ in flesh therefore he deserves love he hath sufficiently acted and declared his love to you how will you act and declare your love to him c. he loved and * Joh. 3.16 so loved you will you not ‖ Si amare pigebat saltem reamare non pigeat August de Catech. Rud. return love for love I and so love him too to the utmost of your capacity What will fire the cold heart with love to God if this will not do it viz. his sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh he that knows and considers this certainly he cannot but be full of divine Love And then Love Christ was he willing to put on your rags to cloath himself with your flesh did he take your Nature and that too under those circumstances which have been mentioned doing this not for himself but wholly for your good was he pleas'd so far to condescend as to become one of you nay to put himself not only into your Nature but also into your stead he might have been a Man and yet not a Surety O let him have your Love your most hearty and cordial Love pray let it be your greatest grief that you have no more love for him who deserves so much alas 't is but a drop when it should be an Ocean but a poor spark when it should be a vehement flame And I would have you to love Christ who is incarnate as well as because he was incarnate what an alluring attracting object of Love is Christ God-man God loves him as he is in our flesh the Angels love him as in our flesh the glorify'd Saints love him too in that notion will not you also love him as he is so considered Christ in our Nature is a Person very amiable what is there in mear man to draw our love to him which is not in Christ God and Man with great advantage he indeed is the Deliciae humani generis * Psal 45.2 fairer than the children of men the †Cant. 5.10 chiefest amongst ten thousand ‖ 16. altogether lovely those excellencies which are but scattered in us do all like lines in the Centre concur in him A Christ incarnate is the love of heaven let him be the love of earth too 5. So love Christ as to be willing nay ambitious to do to suffer Be ambitious to do and suffer for Christ to be abased for him O Sirs what shall we * Deus Homo factus est quid facturus est Homo propter quem Deus factus est Homo August tom 3. p. 1070. do for him who hath done such inexpressible things for us shall we be loth to take his Cross who was so willing to take our Nature he had but the likeness of sinful flesh and yet how willingly and patiently did he suffer we have the reality of sinful flesh shall we hang off from suffering or be impatient under it what abasement can be too much for the sons of men when the Son of God was thus abased what service can be too mean for us when Christ stooped to the form of a Servant He that knows how much Christ's love was above him will never think any work or service to be below him 6. As Christ was pleas'd to partake with you in your Nature Labour after the participation of the divine Nature so let it be your desire and endeavour to partake with him in his I mean that which the Apostle speaks of when he saith that by these you might be partakers of the divine Nature 2 Pet. 1.4 even man in such a sense is capable of this and therefore should pursue after it 'T was part of Christ's humiliation to take our Humane Nature but 't is our highest exaltation to be brought under the participation of his divine Nature of which though we cannot be partakers as he was of the former for then we should be properly and formally deify'd which is high blasphemy yet in the fruits and effects of it and in regard
of our Nature How is that Nature advanced by Christ's assuming of it that which was his abasement was its advancement As a mean family is advanc'd when some person of eminency marry's into it so Christ having match'd into our broken and decay'd Nature what an honour did he thereby reflect upon it God put a great deal of glory upon it in its first creation Christ hath put much more glory upon it in the Hypostatical Vnion The Angelical Nature in some respects is above ours but in others ours is above it the Angels are not so concern'd in the mystical conjunction to Christ as we are their advantages by a Saviour are not so high as ours they are confirmed by Christ in a state of happiness and that 's all but we are confirmed and restored too the great things which are done by Christ as Mediator he doth them in our Nature and the great Honor which is conferr'd upon him refers to him in our Nature 't is the Son of Man who stands on the right hand of God Act. 7.56 Dominion and Glory and the Kingdom is given to the Son of man Dan. 7.13 14. hee 'l judge the world as the Son of man Matth. 25.31 Joh. 5.27 But the main preheminence of the Humane Nature above the Angelical lies in the intimate uniting of it to the divine Nature Heb. 2.16 Verily he took not on him the Nature of Angels but he took on him the seed of Abraham Man was the creature that was to be redeemed and therefore 't was the Nature of man that shall be assumed can we think of this without great joy Christ himself as Man is above us in all things he must have the preheminence Col. 1.18 but Angels who are of another order in several respects are below us Christ incarnate must needs be very compassionate 6. A Christ incarnate is and must needs be very compassionate This was one great reason why he took our Nature upon him and in that Nature was exercis'd with such sorrows and sufferings that he might the better know how to sympathize with his members in all their sorrows and sufferings Heb. 2.17 18. In all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren that he might be a merciful and faithful High Priest in things pertaining to God to make reconciliation for the sins of the people For in that he himself hath suffered being tempted he is able to succour them that are tempted Heb. 4.15 We have not an High Priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities but was in all points tempted like as we are yet without sin He that hath felt what others undergo knows the better how to pity them sense and experience further compassion where persons are not made of flint none sympathize so much with those who labour under Gout Stone c. as those who have been afflicted with those pains themselves God told the people of Israel they knew the heart of a stranger seeing they themselves were strangers in the Land of Egypt Exod. 23.9 How then must the bowels of Christ work towards afflicted ones he himself having been afflicted just as they are besides the mercifulness and tenderness of his heart there is also his own former experience which is yet fresh in his memory of their miseries which doth much draw out his compassion to them Pray what are your afflictions let them be what they will Christ underwent the same are you poor so was he are you tempted so was he are you deserted so was he are you burdened under the weight of sin so was he though in a different way do you suffer by men so did he And if there be any infirmities which he did not lie under yet he knows how to pity you for though he did not feel those particular infirmities in kind such as sickness blindness c. yet he had some others which were equivalent to them and so by proportion he knows how to commiserate you so it comes in Heb. 5.2 Who can have compassion on the ignorant and on them that are out of the way for that he himself also is compassed with infirmity 'T is some alleviation to our grief in our troubles when we know we have some who sympathize with us under them O you that fear the Lord know in all your sorrows sufferings troubles whatsoever Christ in heaven hath a fellow-feeling and sympathy with you he suffers no more but he sympathizes still let this be an allay to your grief and a support to your faith There 's ease and relief from this under all troubles of mind 7. Lastly There 's something in this which may give ease and relief under all troubles of mind There 's such a fulness in this Truth for the comfort of Souls that there is scarce any inward trouble or discouragement which gracious persons here are exercised with wherein they may not find considerable relief and satisfaction for conscience from this Incarnation of the Son of God Christ's flesh is precious balm for a wounded Spirit as 't is meat indeed to feed the hungry Soul so 't is balm indeed to heal the wounded Soul 't is an universal catholick Cordial to revive and cheer under all faintings whatever Do I speak to any who are under spiritual darkness O that a Christ in Flesh might be thought of and improv'd by such To instance in the special fears complaints discouragements burdens of troubled Souls and to shew what there is in Christ as incarnate proper for their support and comfort under all would be a vast work I must therefore only hint a few things Are you tempted to entertain hard thoughts of God to question the mercifulness of his Nature his goodness c do you conceive of him in some hideous and frightful manner you greatly mistake God and think very much amiss of him First think of God in Christ and then of Christ in flesh and surely you 'l have other apprehensions A Christ sent in flesh represents God as benign good merciful gracious full of pity tender-hearted as designing nothing but good to repenting sinners did he thus send his own Son and is he not all this after he hath done such a thing can you imagine that he delights in the death of sinners or that he will not be gracious to all who fly to him Are you afraid because of the Justice and Wrath of God pray remember therefore Christ came in flesh that he might satisfie the one and pacifie the other these were the very things which he undertook to accomplish and what he undertook no question but he went through with Doth Sin lie heavy upon your Consciences mark the Text God sent his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh for what end for sin to condemn sin in the flesh sin brought Christ from heaven and he would not return thither again 'till by a Sacrifice offered in his flesh he had fully expiated it Sin it self could not
pleasing to God the like you have of the Levitical Sacrifices Levit. 1.9 an offering made by fire of a sweet savour unto the Lord so Vers 13.17 answerably to which yea far above them Christ was a Sacrifice of a sweet smelling savour to God Heb. 7.27 This he did once when he offered up himself Heb. 9.14 who through the eternal Spirit offered up himself to God Vers 26. but now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the Sacrifice of himself Vers 28. So Christ was once offered to bear the sins of many Indeed the great business of the Apostle in his excellent Epistle to the Hebrews is both to assert and also to illustrate Christ's being a Sacrifice for Sin which he doth so fully and plainly as that one would think there should be no doubts or differences amongst any that bear the name of Christians about either the thing or the true nature and notion thereof Of Christ's being the eminent Sacrifice and the reference of all the old Sacrifices to him Yea Christ was not only a Sacrifice a true real proper Sacrifice in opposition to those who would make him but an improper figurative metaphorical Sacrifice but he was the Sacrifice in a way of eminency unto which therefore all the Law Sacrifices did bear a special reference For 1. Those were the Types of this all of them * Propter hoc etiam omnia Sacrificia Veteris Testamenti leguntur ut hoc unum Sacrificium designarent per quod vera est reinissio peccatorum mundatio animae in eternum Ambros in Ep. ad Heb. c. 9. Fuit apud Veteres oblatio Holocausti Concio quaedam de morte Christi quâ nes à peccatis per fidem purgati sumus Quia omnia Sacrificia Legis in unum Christum respiciunt atque unicum ejus Sacrificium adumbrant Munster in Lev. 1.1 typifying and prefiguring Christ the grand Sacrifice and like the gnomon in the Dyall pointing to him in this consideration I say all were typical adumbrations of him therefore we find they are not only in the body and lump of them but as taken severally and apart apply'd and brought down to him yea he was shadowed out by them not only with respect to their matter but also with respect to the several rites and modes used about them both of which assertions are sufficiently made out in the forenamed Epistle And whereas †Socin de Servat p. 2. c. 9. Against him in this see Grotius de Sat. Christi p. 126 127. Turretin de Satis p. 216. Franz Disp 6. thes 34 c. Essen Tri. Crucis p. 226. Hoornb Socin conf 597 599. Some affirm that the annual expiatory Sacrifices of which you read Levit. 16. only did prefigure Christ and his being a Sacrifice 't is a very great falsity those indeed might so prefigure him eminently but not solely For we find Others apply'd to him as well as those as namely the Lamb in the daily Offering the Paschal Lamb which was partly a Sacrifice and partly a Sacrament Joh. 1.29 1 Pet. 1.19 1 Cor. 5.7 Rev. 5.6 c. Chap. 13.8 the red Heifer to be Sacrific'd upon occasion for the expiating of the guilt of unknown murder Numb 19. Heb. 9.13 the daily Sacrifices Heb. 7.27 Heb. 10.11 But passing by these things I say Christ was typified by the old Sacrifices and probably that might be one End of God in his instituting of them For that they were of * For this vide Suarez in 3. part Sum. Aquin Quest 83. Art 1. Disp 71. Rivet in Gen. Exerc. 42. p. 170. c. p. 222. Franz de Sacrif Disp 2. thes 76. Disp 3 Disp 76. Disp 16 thes 33. Cloppenb Scho. Sacrif probl 2. p. 51. c. Dr. O. de Theologiâ Adamica l. 2. c. 1. p. 133 134. divine and positive institution and not taken up upon the Light or Law of Nature is to me though I know †The Papists generally Bâ—llâ—rm de Missâ l. 1. c. 20. Valentia de Missae Sacrificio l. 1. c. 4. Others are of this Opinion also The Author of Eccles Policy p. 100. c. Defence c. p. 421. c. who yet grants expiatory Sacrifices to be of divine Institution p. 427. c. Others think otherwise a truth clear enough But why did God institute them to appoint the slaying of so many poor Creatures such various and costly Sacrifices to be offered so often to be repeated such for every day such for every Sabbath such for every New Moon such every year at the solemn and anniversary Expiation besides what were offered at the Passeover at several Feasts at the lesser and greater Jubile upon particular and special occasions as dedications c pray what might be God's End or Ends in all this Was it that he might shew his dominion over the Creatures was it that he might by this demonstrate the Evil of Sin and what the Sinner deserv'd upon it was it to * Theodoret for this Vol. 4. de curandis Graec. affectibus c. 7. p. 584. gratifie the Jews who having been amongst the Egyptians where Sacrifices did abound might therefore be taken with them and fond of them and thereby to prevent their Idolatry Several such Ends and Reasons are assign'd but surely that which I am upon must not be left out if not preferr'd before any other viz. therefore God †Fagius in Levit. 1.2 gives two reasons of them Ut populus in Idololatriam pronus ab idolis averteretur in cultu Dei retineretur Deinde ut typos haberet populus Dei Sacrificii Christi quem oportebat aliquando in crucem agi pro peccatis suorum Rivet in Gen. p. 222. Praecipuè quia voluit adumbrari Sacrificiis passionem futuram Mediatoris c. did ordain and institute Sacrifices that by them he might typifie and prefigure that great Sacrifice which was to come thereby the better to prepare and inform the world about it but how or in what measure and in what extent God did clear up this Notion Vse and End of Sacrifices I shall not be too forward to determine 2. As the Law-Sacrifices were Types so they were but Types there was little in them take away the typical nature of them what poor things were they further than as they did point to Christ The Apostle calls them but shadows of good things to come Heb. 10.1 figures for the time then present Heb. 9.9 patterns of things in the Heavens Heb. 9.23 examples and shadows of heavenly things Heb. 8.5 3. Nay Thirdly all that * Hujus Sacrificii à Christo peragendi Sacrificia caetera typi erant quia ut pecus moriebatur pro homine Levit. 17.11 ita Jesus Christus esset sanguinem suum effusurus pro nobis Utraque igitur auferebant reatum hoc tamen discrimine quod Sacrificium Christi id praestabat virtute suâ illa vero legalia proprie
necessitas propitiationem requirit propitiatio non fit nisi per hostiam necessarium suit provideri hostiam pro peccato Orig. in Numb Hom. 4. Christ himself be made a Sacrifice for sin why must he take flesh and then die in that flesh why must his precious blood be poured out why must he feel the wrath of his Father be under a necessity of suffering and of such suffering too was there not a cause for this yes surely and what could that be but satisfaction God had great and weighty Reasons which made him to insist upon this so as that he would in this and in no other way let out his Love and Mercy to Sinners for instance he must vindicate his truth make good his threatning maintain his own honour as also the honour of his Laws make known his Holiness let the world see what Sin was what an extreme hatred he had to it keep up and assert his rectoral righteousness c. for though as * Vid. Hulsium in Theol. Jud. p. 473. Grot. de Sat. c. 2. pars offensa and creditor he might have done what he pleas'd yet as rector mundi he must do that which shall speak him to be just and righteous in his Government now were not these great and weighty reasons for God to do what he did and could these high ends have been attain'd without satisfaction All his Attributes were equally dear to him and thereupon shall all be advanc'd alike he was not for the advancing of Mercy only but of Justice also and therefore he will so carry it in his dealings with man as that he may glorifie the one as well as the other If he justifie the Sinner wherein he displays so much of Mercy hee 'l do it in such a way as that he may display his Justice too wherefore Christ must be a Sacrifice first to expiate Sin by his blood and then God will not charge it upon the Sinner Rom. 3.25 26. Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past c. he goes over it again To declare I say at this time his righteousness wherein or son what end that be might be just and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus what could the Apostle have spoken fuller plainer to determine the business in hand how can the Denyers of Christ's Satisfaction and of the necessity thereof stand before the light of this Scripture Propitiation must be made by blood by the blood of Christ that thereby God might declare his righteousness that he might be just not so much in himself and in the general as in this special act of the justifying of a Sinner Had we no other Text in all the sacred Records but this one me-thinks it should be enough to silence and convince gain-sayers 't is a bulwark for Faith which will stand firm in spite of all the little batteries that men can make against it But the truth of Christ's satisfying divine Justice will yet more fully appear from what follows in the next Head therefore I go on to that The true Nature and. Ends of Christ's Death 2. Secondly this may help us to right notions concerning the Nature and Ends of Christ's death For if it be ask'd How or in what manner he dy'd we see he dy'd as a Sacrifice if it be further ask'd Wherefore did he die or what were the main ends of his dying I answer he dy'd chiefly for such ends as are most proper to Sacrifices If God's own Son die undoubtedly there must be something special in his death and some great ends must be design'd to be promoted thereby * 2 Sam. 3.33 died Abner as a fool dieth but what were they Answ such as may best comport and suit with the common ends of all Sacrifices especially of those by which he was more directly typified therefore the pacifying of an angry God the purifying of a guilty Sinner being the principal ends in the death of the typical Sacrifices as you have heard answerably these must also be the principal ends of the death of Christ the real Sacrifice The SOCINIANS in this matter run into two dangerous Errors 1. they make that in Christ's death to be supream and principal which was indeed but subordinate nay 2. they make that which was but subordinate to be the sole thing therein altogether excluding and denying what was supream and principal Now this one thing which I am upon viz. Christ's being and dying as a Sacrifice in correspondency with the Ends of the Levitical Sacrifices was it rightly understood and firmly believ'd would be a sufficient confutation of and antidote against their pernicious tenents For do they say that the main end of the death of Christ was to turn men from sin the contrary appears because that was not the main end in the Law-Sacrifices or do they say that Christ died only for our good 't was not so because that doth not agree with the Law-Sacrifices which were offered not only for the Sinners good but in the Sinners stead or do they say that he died only as a Witness of the Truth as an Example c. 't was not so neither because it shuts out that which was the principal intendment of the Law-Sacrifices But besides this there are some other things of considerable strength which that we may the better take in we must more particularly enquire into those Causes or Ends of Christ's death which * Socin de Serv. p. 1. c. 3. c. et de Officio Christi Crellius de Caus Mortis Christi with all the rest Against them see Grot. de Sat. p. 26. c. Franz de Sacrif p. 400. c. et 606 c. Hoornb Socin conf l. 3. p. 492. c. Portus contra Ostorod p. 447. c. Turret p. 7. p. 247. c. Dr. Stillingst discourse concerning the true Reasons of the Sufferings of Christ with many Others they assign that by the removal of false Causes and Ends I mean in their exclusive sense the true ones may the better appear They say therefore 1. Christ dy'd for this End that he might bear witness to the truth confirm the Evangelical Doctrine and give assurance to the world of the verity of what he had taught To which we reply the question is not whether these were true and proper Ends that we readily grant but whether they were the principal much more the sole Ends of Christ's death that we utterly deny And our denyal is grounded upon these Reasons 1. All along in Scripture the confirmation of the Doctrine of the Gospel is laid upon Christ's Works and Miracles not upon his Death reade Act. 2.22 Joh. 10.25 passim And he having by these given a sufficient proof or evidence of the truth of what he had taught it cannot be imagined that he dy'd only or chiefly for this that by his
thereof He was the end of the Law for righteousness to them that believe c. made under the Law to redeem them that were under the Law that we might receive the adoption of Sons 2. They say that Christ's fitness for his Mediatory Office did result from his Person from the personal Vnion of the Divine and Humane Natures in him rather than from his active Obedience to the Law for else he could not have been look'd upon as one fit to be a Mediator till he had finished his whole Obedience to the Law whereas from the first instant of the personal Vnion he was fit for that Work and Office 'T was fit nay necessary that Christ the Mediator should conform to the Law but these are two different things what was fit for the Mediator to do and what must fit him to be the Mediator These Ends therefore respecting Christ himself being removed it follows that it was wholly for us that he fulfilled the Law whence then I infer that that must be imputed to us otherwise the end of it would not be attained for without the imputation of it we should neither be the persons designed in it nor profited by it To prevent mistakes and to give this Argument its full strength I would state it thus Whatever Christ did that we were obliged to do and which was to be our righteousness before God that certainly must be imputed to us I do not say that all which Christ did is strictly and properly imputed to us but whatever he did if we were bound to do it and if the doing of that was to be our righteousness that must be imputed or else we are in a sad case He was incarnate for us yet that is not formally imputed why because Sinners were not under any obligation to any such thing so I might instance in his working of Miracles Intercession c. But now if our Lord will be pleas'd to put himself under the Law and to fulfil the Law that must be made over to us because that was a thing which we our selves according to the capacity of Creatures were bound unto and this was to be our righteousness before God what is so circumstantiated must be imputed therefore this being taken in the Argument is good Several other Arguments are produc'd for the imputation of the active as well as of the passive Obedience As that both together make most for the * See Bodius in Eph. p. 796. glory of Christ and for the ease and †Neque conscientias pacaret aliqua justitiae portio sed perpetuò illas trepidare necesse esset nisi firmiter persuasae forent totam justitiam Legis sibi imputari Polan in Dan. p. 187. comfort of burdened Souls That 't is a mighty loss for Christians to lose Christ's active Obedience and why should it be the active only or the passive only if they may have both quidni utraque saith Pareus himself can we have too much of Christ is not all of him precious and do not we need all Surely the * Certè tutiùs ibit ille qui plus Christo ad majorem gloriam ascribit quod in eo quaerat quà m qui ei quicquam adimit Et qui totam Saivatoris Sponsoris nostri Obedientiam Legi divinae praestitam ampléctitur quam qui praecipuam ejus partem pro justitiâ coram Deo sibi imputari non credit Wegelin Disp de Obed. Christi safest way is to take-in as much of him as ever we warrantably may They who go this way also urge the Consent of the Reformed Churches the Suffrages of several famous Divines as concurring with them that their Opinion hath the advantage of being judg'd the more antient and Orthodox which that excellent person †Noram probe sententiam priorem antiquiorem Orthodoxam magis passim audire Sed re apud me accuratius perpensâ penitiusque perspectâ suo merito ea id audire visa est In Praefat. ad Tract de Justif p. 6. Mr. Bradshaw though he somewhat dissents about the thing doth ingeniously confess But these things I shall pass over if the foregoing Arguments will not convince and satisfie I shall hope for less from these So much for this third Opinion Fourth Opinion Christ's active Obedience imputed as a part of his Satisfaction 4. There is a Fourth Say some the * Bradshaw de Justif in Praefat p. 10. active as well as the passive Obedience of Christ is imputed yet not in the sense of the promoters of the former Opinion but only thus as †Thus Grotius de Sat. c. 6. p. 89. Bradshaw de Justif c. 18. sect 5 6. Mr. Baxters Aphor. p. 54. Great Propit p. 92 93. it was a part of Christ's Satisfaction for the violation of the Law as 't is so considered they say it is imputed but not in any other notion They say Christ's active obeying was satisfactory and meritorious as well as his passive than which nothing more certain And indeed the passive without the active had not been satisfactory or meritorious 't was Christ's ‖ Neque tamen excluditur reliqua pars obedientiae quâ defunctus est in vitâ c. Et sanè in ipsâ i. e. in morte Crucis for that he 's speaking of and doth immediately go before primum gradum occupat voluntaria subjectio quia ad justitiam nihil profuisset Sacrificium nisi sponte oblatum Calvin Instit l. 2. c. 16. sect 5. voluntary subjection to the Will of his Father which was an active thing even in his dying which put such an efficacy into his death Now his active Obedience being thus taken is they grant made over and reckoned to Believers * Gataker Animadv in Lucium p. 1. sect 1. p. 2. Bodius in Ephes p. 798. Others to the same purpose consider Christ's active Obedience two wayes either strictly as active as it lay in conformity to what the Law commanded or as there was humiliation and abasement attending that Obedience in the former respect they deny it to be imputed in the latter they say it is This middle and reconciliatory Opinion is somewhat new and modern and owned as yet but by very few but in those few for their worth and eminency there are very many I shall not set my self to argue or object any thing against it though something might be said upon that account I rejoyce with all my heart that we may have the active Obedience of Christ upon any terms or under any considerations I am so far from arguing against it that I keep it by me as a reserve that if there be not solid and satisfactory Answers to be given to the weighty Objections made against the imputation of Christ's active Obedience as commonly asserted which is to be try'd by and by I may fall in and close with it No more at present therefore about the First Question Of the Second Question How the imputation of
time introduces light the putting on of the garment and the removal of the nakedness are but one and the same thing and done together Answ Many things are here mentioned which cannot so distinctly be spoken to in the answering of an Objection Answ What place remission of sin hath in Justification whether of being the form of it or but an integral part or only an effect and Consequent is a thing that Divines are not very well agreed about whether the whole of Justification doth lie in remission is a point wherein also they differ But I must not at present engage in these debates I will defer the discussing of them till I come to open the Doctrine Doctrine of Justification which the 30 Verse of this Chapter will lead me to I shall now only suggest what is proper for the answering of the Objection before us And 1. what if the Opinion argued against doth make remission of sin and imputed righteousness to be different parts of Justification they both as * See Burg. of Justif 2 part Serm. 27. integral parts concurring to the compleating and perfecting of it I say what if it so doth is it the worse for that is this a novel tenent or that which but few or none do own have not several with great solidity and judgment defended it as to any error in it or any absurdities that will follow upon it I must confess I do not as yet understand either the one or the other A difference of parts in Sanctification is commonly granted viz. mortification and vivification the abolition of the power of sin and the implantation of the divine Nature the putting off the old man and the putting on the new man Eph. 4.22 now why may not Justification have its parts as well as Sanctification If the Believers righteousness doth lie in the fulfilling of the Law and there be different parts in that Law its commanding and its punishing part then that righteousness which results from the fulfilling of it must admit of different parts too So that remission of sin is one part that being grounded upon the satisfying of one part of the Law and imputation of righteousness is another part that being grounded upon the satisfying of the other part of the Law The Scripture speaks of these not as one and the same but as distinct Rom. 4.25 Who was delivered for our offences there 's remission and was raised again for our justification or righteousness there 's the other part how the latter is attributed to Christ's resurrection is not my business now to enquire I only cite the words as holding forth a distinction betwixt remission and righteousness So Rom. 5.9 compar'd with Rom. 5.19 And Dan. 9.24 to make reconciliation for iniquity and to bring in everlasting righteousness here are the two parts of Justification set forth as different and distinct 'T is true the Apostle Rom. 4.6 7 8. speaking of the Sinners righteousness instances only in the forgiveness or non-imputation of sin but he doth not do it as if that was the all in that righteousness but 1. because that being one eminent part thereof he puts it for the whole 2. because that remission of sin and the imputation of a positive righteousness being never parted in naming the one he included the other not as if they were one and the same in their nature but because they are never separated in the â—ubject I cannot yet be convinc'd but that the removal of Sins guilt and the introducing of a positive righteousness are things of a different nature and carry distinct notions in them for besides what hath been already said though in God's dealing with fal'n Sinners they are never parted yet as they are considered in themselves they may be parted Amongst us sometimes sin is remitted when yet the offender is not justified as we see in the case of Joseph's Brethren Shimei Abiathar c. and 't is possible for a person to be justified though he hath no sin to be remitted as it would have been with Adam had he stood he was then capable of Justification but not of remission now this their separableness evinces a difference or distinction betwixt them To object therefore against the imputation of Christ's active Obedience as well as of his passive one being suppos'd to free us from guilt the other to make us righteous that this would infer two different parts of justification this is so far from being an Objection that 't is but a plain asserting of what is so indeed 2. Whereas 't is said that this doth also make different causes of Justification I say as before what if it doth Provided that by those ye understand only the different grounds or matter of Justification according to its different parts that is as Christ dy'd and shed his blood there 's the ground of the Sinners discharge from guilt that which is imputed to him in order to that effect then as he in all things actively conformed to the Law there 's the ground of the Sinners positive righteousness or that which is imputed to him in order to that effect Such a multiplication of Causes which are not so of a diverse nature but that they do unite and concur in some one as the general Cause as these do in Christ's righteousness or Obedience carries in it nothing repugnant to Scripture or Reason This righteousness of Christ is the one only material Cause of the Sinners righteousness but that dividing it-self into his active and passive righteousness accordingly the Causes of the Sinners righteousness are diversified 3. The allusions brought against the Truth in question seem to fasten some absurdity upon it For they tend to this that for any to say upon one act sin is remitted and upon another the person is made righteous 't is as if one should say that by one act the crookedness of a thing is removed and that by another 't is made streight and so as to light and darkness To which I reply I except against these similitudes as not suiting with the thing in hand they are proper for things of another nature not for that which we are upon for that being a Law-act is not to be judg'd of by things of a physical nature Suppose the effects mention'd are produc'd by one and the same act yet they are not so pertinently alledg'd because what we are speaking of falls under another consideration We are not concern'd about crookedness and streightness but about guilt and righteousness all allusions which suit not with these as things of a legal nature are insignificative Will they say that that which frees the Offender from guilt when he stands arraign'd before the Judge doth also make him a true and exact keeper of the Law that at the same time and by the same sentence wherein he is acquitted from the violation of the Law that he is also thereupon to be look'd upon as a person that hath really kept the Law such an