of nature from God the naughtines came vnto the Subiect by the corruption of man The Places of Scripture which are wont to bee wrested against the truth of this Doctrine of Providence are for the most part these Against the Materiall Cause 1 Of the Corinth 9.9 Ans Providence is eyther generall or speciall A conclusion from the deniall of the one vnto the deniall of the other is of no force 2 Sam. 1.6 1. King 21.34 Ans Providence and chance are not repugnant the one to the other if the respect of divers causes bee distinguished Esay 31. 1. Act. 5.38 Ans according to the divers considerations of the beginninges wee iudge both of the Causes whether neerest or remote and of the qualities of Actions whether good or bad but whatsoever quality is vitious it is from the particular beginning and not from that which is Vniversall or Common Against the Formall Cause Ezec. 18.33 Ose 13.9 Answ a double consideration of the punishmēt of sinne is wont and ought to bee distinctly noted one is of Iustice in God and hath a respect of morall good another of merite and fault in man hath a respect of evill and in this latter signification these places are to bee vnderstood Prou. 16.4 Answer The working of God in respect of the wicked presupposeth three thinges first the limitation of sinne secondly the withdrawing of Grace thirdly the ordayning of punishment Ierem. 10.7 Answ The Prophet speaketh from the feeling of his own infirmity not of an vntruth in doctrine nor of any wickednesse in life but of his vocation vnto which hee was drawne against his will Exod. 4.21 Esa 69.19 Ezek. 14.9 Rom. 1.28 2. Thes 2.11 Answere A Working is one thing and a working permission is another thing That is in good thinges onely this both in good evil for by permitting God worketh foure wayes first as touching the materiall of sinne secondly as touching the withholding of grace which God oweth to no man because it is grace Thirdly as touching the endes vnto which God disposeth sinnes Fourthly as touching the iust punishment of the sinner whereof this is the highest degree by sinne to punish sinne OF THE WORKES OF Grace or of Redemption CHAP. V. THe Worke of God Externall and Temporall which he bringeth to passe in thinges is twofold of Nature and of Grace The Worke of Nature whereof hithervnto we haue spoken is whereby God hath eyther created thinges not as yet being or conserveth governeth and ordereth them being created by his Providence The Worke of Grace is that which God effecteth in the Elect who shall be heyres of Salvation according to the good pleasure of his will And this Worke commonly is called Redemption for the explication of which worke three thinges concurre the beginning the manner and the Effect or the Application thereof The beginning is Christ as hee is God and man from whome there is no power nor healthfull Action which is needefull for Redemption but doth proceed The manner according to which Christ executed this worke is that holy disposing and dispensation of his offices Now the Effect or Application is discerned first by the degrees hereof in this life that is by Calling and by Iustification Secondly by outwarde meanes that is by Gods Covenant and by his Sacraments Thirdly by the Subiect that is the Church which Christ hath redeemed with his blood Wherefore wee must treate first of Christs person secondly of the offices of his person Lastly of the other places pertayning to the application OF THE PERSON OF CHRIST The Part Confirmatiue CHAP. VI. THe neerest singular and determinate beginning of our Redemption is Christ as hee is God and man because by him Man was to be redeemed in whome our redemption was from everlasting Predestinated by him againe to be restored by whom at first he was created in him he ought to bee made partaker of the loue of God who was the Sonne of loue or the beloved Sonne and at last in him to obtayne the right of Sonnes or adoption who by Nature was the Sonne and heyre of God from everlasting Christ therfore being God and man is as the scripture most briefly defineth the Worde made flesh or God made manifest in the flesh that is a person in whose singularity two Natures the properties thereof remayning whole are vnited for the Redemption of mankind For the explication of this Definition we must consider of three things in order First of the Natures and the necessity verity and actions thereof Secondly of the Subject of the Natures or of the person and of both the Vnity and the operation thereof Thirdly of the Hypostaticall vnion of the Natures and of the manner foundation power and efficacy thereof As concerning the Natures whereas Nature is an outward beginning making the thing it selfe and distinguishing it from other things we acknowledge two such natures in Christ according to the Scripture Divine and Humane both in themselues and in their properties distinct a Rom. 9 1 1. Ioh. 5.20 Phil. 2.6 the one from everlasting immutable immortall impassible the other in time conceyved and borne mutable mortall passible Both are Indivisibly necessary for the redemption of mankind or the dispensation of the office of a Mediator the divine Nature that hee might satisfie God that the satisfaction might bee proportionable to our debt that an Infinite good might helpe an Infinite evill by overcomming death and by vndergoing both the heavines of sinne and the infinitenesse of Gods judgement Adde further that whereas the arbitrement betweene God and man is aboue the humanity because no man can bee a chiefe and supreme messenger of divine thinges but God by his God-head because no working aboue nature such as is a sufficient Intercession with God is of or from nature because no beginning but of the Godhead it selfe can bee the beginning of that satisfaction which may stand before God it must needes bee that according to the divine nature in his person hee tooke on him all the partes of Mediation or Mediatorship But the humane that being man hee might according to the Law satisfie Gods justice that hee might sufficiently suffer for the accomplishment of the worke of satisfaction both by obeying made vnder the law and by dying made a curse according to the Law that in all thinges being like vnto his brethren sinne excepted hee might bee a faithfull and vniversall high Priest in those thinges which are to bee performed before God to purge the sinnes of the people b He. 2.17 Now the divine Nature of Christ that wee may in few wordes speake touching the verity of those Natures is that whereby hee obtayneth the same Essence with the Father and the holy Ghost albeit both according to his person whereby hee is distinguished to bee the Sonne of God and according to the dispensation of his office whereby hee is discerned to bee a Mediator hee is distinguished from the essence of God of which nature
by dispensation his Natures are the beginninges of Naturall Actions but his person is the beginning both of common and particular actions according to both natures wherefore every working of Christ in respect of his person is in number one in respect of his Natures is in kinde two-folde One in number because hee is one effectuall Worker and one absolute Perfection In kinde two-folde because there is one Divine of the God-head and another humane of the man-hood The last remayneth concerning the Hipostaticall Vnion of the two Natures in Christ the Nature Foundation Power and Efficacy whereof are now briefly to bee expounded The Nature of this Vnion we shall discerne by the definition and division thereof for it is a Personall Conjunction of two Natures in Christ a conjunction I say Personall not of persons and of two Natures yet not Naturall not such as is of thinges Superiour with the Inferiour of the Accidentes with the Substances or the parte with the whole but in that both mediately the two Natures are vnited in the person and immediately the humane Nature is vnited to the person after a secret and most straite manner y 1. Tim. 3.18 Gal. 4.4 Col. 2.9 Hence this vnion which in very deed is one in the manner of considering is vsually tearmed and distinguished to be two-fold the one immediate of the person assuming and the humane nature assumed for the humane nature it owne z Personalitate Person-head that I may so say being forsaken or left came vnto the person already perfect not to be perfected by that of which it was assumed that it whole might subsist in the whole person a Ioh. 1.1.2.3 c. Ioh. 1.14 Heb. 2.14 the other mediate of two natures between themselues wrought by meanes of the person without any eyther confusion of Natures or division of person Not by the confusion of Natures for it is made Immutably and inconfusedly the Essentiall Natures and their properties which neyther should bee confounded nor can bee transfused being distinct and entire so that they be neyther confounded between themselues nor changed each one in themselues Not by Division of Person for it is made Indivisibly and Inseparably so that neyther the humane Nature from the person nor the natures in the person from themselues are any while or any where separated The Foundation or ground of this vnion is the Incarnation the Efficient Cause of this Inchoatiuely as the Schoole-men speake is the whole Trinity but Terminatiuely Christ himselfe is being made that which he was not and yet remayning in the meane while that which he was Of this Incarnation there are two partes Conception and Nativity both are ordinary as touching the Verity of the matter for Christ tooke vnto him a Nature like to ours of the Substance of Mary yet extraordinary as touching the manner that is both of forming in the wombe of Mary and of Assumption and of Sanctification as also lastly in respect of fulfilling or accomplishment for the forming was immediate in the Virgine without the meanes of a man The Sanctifying was from all spotte of sinne whether Habituall or Actuall the Assumption was made into the vnity of Person without any alteration Lastly the fulfilling was according to the Prophesies From this vnion that in few wordes wee may expresse the power thereof two things follow the Communion of natures and the communication of properties The Communion is in very deede the same with the vnion of Natures according to Subsistence yet in manner of consideration it differeth because that is as it were the Effecte and Consequent of this for this communion of natures doth properly signifie a Concomitance of properties and operations of both natures in the worke of mediation concurring together vnto one absolute perfection by reason whereof it commeth to passe that the proper things of each nature be and are sayde to bee common in the person and this is the ground of the communication of the properties For it is a Phrase of speaking wherby the property of one nature is really vttered concerning the whole person of Christ yet so that it properly pertayne vnto one nature in respect of the thing itselfe and vnto the other in respect of another thing for wee say that God purchased his Church by his blood c Act. 20.8 that Christ being man is every where d Ioh. 3.13 and this is as the Schoolmen call it That grace of the vnion by reason of which wee may say of Christ that God is man and man is God Christ is God and man Now this communication is after a divers manner both Reall and Verball Reall because of the vnion of the Natures and the vnity of the person for Christ is one who being God hath that which is humane in the verity of humane nature and being man hath that which is divine in the verity of divine nature the same in the Sonne God and man wherefore as the word because of the flesh is man so the flesh because of the word is God and yet neyther is eyther the humane nature coextended with the divine nor the divine concluded in the humane because that looke what e Idiomata properties in the concretiue name are communicated in the person according to both natures these in the Abstract in each natures are not communicated because they are properties Therefore the vniversall presence omnipotence and omniscience no lesse then Eternity it selfe and incomprehensiblenes are the selfe Essential things of God or his Essentiall properties which cannot bee communicated now to bee every where to bee omnipotent omniscient as to bee Eternall and Incomprehensible are truely vttered of Christ being man not according to another person but according to another thing by the communication of properties which is true so farre foorth as the thing it selfe is true From this Reall communication of properties wee must distinguish that reall communication of gifts naturall supernaturall made by the divine nature the gifts of the humane as well according to it selfe as in the person whereof some pertayne to the perfection of the flesh assumed and some to the power of office The gifts of Perfection are all those wherewith the assumed nature according to it selfe and in it selfe was enriched whether they bee those which by force of the Vnion the humane nature of Christ enjoyeth after a most blessed manner or those which were put in and infused and that in the highest degree that ever a humane nature can attayn or lastly whether they were gotten by habite as those which Christ successiuely tooke according to the order of nature vntill his nature was brought vp vnto the perfection thereof The giftes of power or office are those which in respect of the dispensation hee receyved in time not according to eyther Nature apart but according to the whole person which therefore was incarnate that in both Natures and according to them both hee might performe the healthfull office of a Mediator
cause of salvation Efficient Act. 23.48 Ans There is 〈◊〉 Consequence from the state marke and conditioÌ„ of the persons which weâ— elected to the causes of Election eythâ— impulsiue or meritorious Rom. 8.29 Answere The Presâ—ence or fore-knowledge of God is nâ— the Consequent or the Effect of thing but the Antecedent neyther doothâ— signifie in the place cited a foreseeing of the beginning but the speciall loâ— of God but the fore-knowledge of approbation is one and that of naked science and knowledge is another Heb. 11.6 It is one thing to treâ— of the first cause of Election and another thing of the meanes and subordinate causes for faith is the proper and onely Instrument of our Iustification and reconciliation with God of which mention is made in this place Rom. 11.20 It is one thing to treate of the perseverance of the Saints but another thing of the election neyther ought those which are the meanes to bee mingled with the Causes and beginnings Places for good Workes Rom. 8.29 The Conformity of â—â—e Image of the Sonne of God is the â—onsequent of Predestination but not â—e Efficient meritorious cause thereâ—f and those words which are to bee â—â—pounded according to the sense of the â—postle by the vnderstanding of the â—erbe Substantiue Were ought not to â—e taken in a contrary meaning 1. Tim. 2.20 to treat of the seales of â—aith which of the Apostle are reckoned â—o be two the one Inward the note or â—nowledg of divine approbation the other outward the avoiding of iniquity of which the Apostle speaketh in this â—lace as also to treate of the cause and beginning of our salvation and election are things diverse Apoc. 3.11.4 It is one thing to treate of the crowne of Ministrie and another thing of the crowne of eternall life and the worthinesse which in scripture is attributed to the elect is not 〈◊〉 naturall excellencie but of meerenes oâ— fitnesse by God given freely also theâ— is one by inherence in the faithfull and another by imputation of which mention is in this place Distinctions for the matter I. THe matter of Election is called so Equivocally eyther Ex qua out 〈◊〉 which and it is the counsel of God 〈◊〉 Circaquam about which and it is maâ— or in which and it is Christ as the Mediator II. MAn is considered eyther Commonly without any consideratiâ—â— of the qualities or Singularly as he iâ— a Sinner after that manner in the fâ— Act of Election and Reprobation bâ— after this in the second III. THe number of the Elect and Reprobates the person numbering and numbered is certaine though both be not certainely knowne vnto vs. For the FORME I. THe Forme of Predestination consisteth in two thinges in the Action and manner thereof the Action is Adoption the maner is in Christ in whom as in a bond lying betweene the vnion of vs with him was made II. PVrpose Prescience Predestination are distinguished in God not by time but by order Purpose signifieth the whole counsell of God Prescience the first degree thereof Predestination not only them but also those which depend on them III. DEcree together with the execution therof as they ought neyther to be confounded or mingled together nor plucked asunder so it is needefull they should bee ioyned together and distinguished all which distinction is from that which is the latter from the maner of the thinges effected OF CREATION The Part Confirming CHAP. III. THat sorte of Divine Actions immanent wee haue already declared in the doctrine concerning Predestination now by order wee passe to Gods actions externall Of these according to the double obiect there ought distinctly to be had a double respect and notice for those divine actions which passe over vnto the Creatures doe eyther belong to this common nature the common beginning of things naturall or to speciall grace the speciall beginning of thinges supernaturall vnto the communion whereof Man is to bee advanced Those which concerne Nature men distinctly consider to be eyther that first beginning or springing vp as it is a In fieri in the doing or making or the conservation of the same as b In sacto it was already done or made that wee are wont to expresse by the name of Creation but this by the name of Providence The Worke of Creation is known of vs two wayes the one common according to the common consideration of all thinges which were created even as the generall and every speciall of them haue their proper conditions in nature which were effected since that first vniversall beginning in the very time of Creation the other particular according as there is a singular respect and expresse marke of the same the first maner properly belongeth to Divinity the second to the science of thinges Naturall Creation therefore Theologically is the first bringing foorth of Nature and of thinges in nature done or made by God in the beginning of time and finished in the space of six dayes vnto his owne glory and the salvation of the Elect. The Cause Efficient of Creation is God for the thinges created were not by one vnderstanding conceyved and by another procreated as the Valentinians thought not by another Nature which Cerinthus calleth one while the Wombe another while the Generall Worke not by the Angels as the Symonians deemed not by their peculiar spirites called Daemones as the Philosophers Lastly not by Fortune as Epicures but by God they were produced and disposed c Psal 33.9 Esa 40.28 which beside the Scripture eyther the distinct workings of the three persons or the nature or maner of the Creation or lastly the manner of beginning doth convince The persons working in the Creation are as the Causes first the Primordiall Cause is the Father d Act. 17.24 the working cause is the Sonne e Col. 1.16 Ioh. 1.3 and the perfecting or finishing cause is the holy Ghost f Gen. 1.2 Psal 33.6 The manner of Creation is two-folde the one by the bringing forth of things the other by the most wise setting of them in order g Iob. 9.8 Esa 40.22 both of them is from God eyther immediately or mediately The consideration of beginning is that it should loue singularity and there can bee no vniversall first thing vnlesse it bee one neyther one vnlesse it be God The matter of Creation ought to bee distinguished two wayes according as there is one creation primary immediate another secondary and mediate There was no primary matter of creation neyther with God coeternal nor of God existent or as a materiall cause put or spread vnder the work of this creatioÌ„ for God gaue not immediately the beginning of nature by nature but by himselfe for that he is of infinit power he necessarily excludeth all matter wherfore out of nothing as it were the bound God brought forth h Psal 33 9. Rom. 4.17 Heb. 11.3 nature by his owne power Of the second and mediate Creation the
we haue more largely treated in the place concerning God The humane Nature of Christ is that whereby hee holdeth the same Essence with vs both the manner of subsisting or being a person and the vitious accidents and sinnes of the substance being excepted For neyther is the humane nature of Christ any thing by it selfe subsisting without dependance but being without subsisting was assumed in the singularnesse of person without any eyther confusion of natures or division of person c Phil. 2.6 Ioh. 1.1 Neyther could any contagion of sinne infect that humane nature of Christ the substance whereof being otherwise in it selfe corrupt originally the vnspeakable operation of the holy Spirite sanctified and most fully purged from every spot nor yet ought to infect as being that wherein the purging of our sinnes was to be performed d Luc. 1.35 Heb. 4.15 These thinges excepted Christ tooke our true and Reall Nature the same both whole and perfect according to the substance properties and infirmities thereof The Substance for Christ had both our whole Nature and the Essentiall parts of it whole Our whole Nature for hence is he called in the Scriptures The seede of the Woman e Gen. 3. 22.16 the seede of Abraham the seede of David according to the flesh or the fruite of his loynes f Act. 2.30 and very where the Sonne of man The Partes for hee had both a reasonable Soule and an Instrumentall body A reasonable Soule this the Scripture and g Ioh. 10.17 Mat. 26.38 the end of his Incarnation prooveth for that which is not assumed is incurable The Verity of Nature because the other partes of man haue their beauty by the Soule An Instrumentall Body this proued the verity of his humane Nature which requireth a limitted matter that is a fleshly and an earthly body h Luc. 22.42 the verity of satisfaction which ought to bee made in a body truly passible mortall Lastly the verity of demonstration for Christ shewed even by signes that hee had a body not phantasticall or heavenly but fleshly and earthly i Luc. 2.40 Mat. 4.2 Ioh. 11.35 Ioh. 4.6 Mat 8.24 Mat. 27.50 Iob. 19.27 The properties which Christ coassumed are eyther of the whole nature to witte to bee created and to bee finite or of the partes as of the Soule for he had vnderstanding k Mat. 26.28 and will l Luc. 22.42 the operations of both and of the body for hee had a shape quantity and circumscription and all the properties and naturall actions of a body m Luc. 2.40 Mat. 4.2 Ioh. 11.35 Ioh. 4.6 Mat. 8.24 Mat. 27.50 Iob. 19.27 Infirmities for it was behouefull for the end of his Incarnation that hee should wholy take vnto him all naturall defects sinne excepted for of defects some are simply miserable as Augustine tearmeth them and some damnable or as Damascene calleth them Detestable those Christ wholy tooke because they were no let to his perfection knowledge and grace n Ioh. 1.14 1. Tim. 3.16 Heb. 5.7 but these hee did not so because they had hindered our Redemption Of these natures the necessity and verity whereof hath beene declared there are divers operations o 1. Pet. 3.18 for there are two natures in Christ as it were two inwarde and effectuall beginninges out of which formally Actions and their manners are deduced wherefore as all thinges in Christ his subsisting onely excepted are two-fold or of two sorts to witte his Nature Properties Will Knowledge p Mat. 11.27 23.37 Ioh. 2.19 1. Cor. 15.27 Luc. 2.47 so are there two-folde operations some divine some humane distinguished by their beginninges manners of doing and the particular Actions of each of them By their beginninges because looke how many Natures there are so many formall beginnings of actions there are By the manners of doing for every beginning worketh according to it owne manner and condition the God-head after a supernaturall and divine manner the man-hoode after a Naturall and Humane manner By particular Actions for the Worde worketh that which is of the Word and the Flesh that which is of the Flesh without any confusion of Natures in the vnity of Person Thus much concerning the Natures the other thing followeth concerning their Subject that is the person and both the vnity and operations thereof Of the Person of Christ there is vsually held and declared a double respect in the Scriptures the one in regarde of the Essence of the Word the other in regard of the office and dispensation In respect of Essence Christ being considered or severally or without commixture as Nazianzene speaketh is in the divine Essence another person from the others but not another thing In respect of the dispensation which wee consider of in this place he is that second person of the God-head Incarnate that is that person who tooke mans Nature by creating it in the singularity of his subsistance immediately and by his person vnited the same with the divine nature mediately so as Christ is one of both Natures not two into both one and the same without time begotten of the Father the Sonne of God without mother and in time begotten of the Virgine the Sonne of man without Father the naturall and consubstantiall Sonne of both This Vnity of Person three things doe proue first the authorities of the Scripture for Christ is as the Prophet teacheth Emanuel r Esa 7. as the Angell teacheth the same Sonne of God which should bee borne of Mary Å¿ Luc. 1.35 as the Evangelist teacheth the Word made flesh t Ioh. 1.1 as the Apostle teacheth the same who came of the Father according to the flesh who is God aboue all things to be praysed for ever u Rom. 9.5 Secondly the end of his Incarnation because that God and man might bee made one in the Covenant It was behoofefull that one should bee made God and man in person not by participation of grace but by verity of nature not by confusion of substance but by vnity of Person Thirdly the denominations of both natures attributed to the same Subject for as those thinges are not incident to the divine nature which are proper to the humane nor those vnto the humane which are peculiar to the divine so all in common and according to truth are vttered of the person according to both Natures x Act. 20.28 1. Cor. 2.8 therefore the one and the same person is Eternal and not Eternall Infinite and Finite holding all the divine and humane properties those from everlasting as he is God these in time assumed as he is man both really yet Intransitiuely as he is man-God This Person is the common beginning of those actions which the Greeke Fathers haue called divinely Humane for the actions of Christ are not onely some humane some divine but also some of common operation which Christ effecteth both as he is Man-God by Nature and as hee is Mediator
The Verball Communication is sayde to bee that which pertayneth to the exposition of wordes and Phrases which offer themselues in the holy Scriptures and by which that which is proper to one nature is vttered of the other by name onely by reason of the Identity of the person and the vniting together of the properties in the person Now as there are three sortes of Names whereby the Subject is vttered concerning Christ so there are three kindes of Attributes which of him are pronounced for some agree with the divine nature onely some with the humane onely and some with both natures in his person those which are of the first and second sort are Incommunicable those which are of the third are spoken of Christ in his person in respect of both Natures From this difference both of Subjects and Predicates a double manner of Predication or Declaration ariseth proper and simple improper and figuratiue Proper is when eyther those things which are true in the Subject that is in the person according to eyther nature are likewise pronounced of the same and therefore that which is pronounced divine concerning the person is vnderstoode to bee true according to the divine nature and that which is pronounced humane according to the humane as the Sonne of God is every where Almightie Eternall the Sonne of man is borne Dead in Heaven or when the Predicate common to both natures is vttered or pronounced also by a common name of the Subiect as Christ redeemed vs with his blood Improper eyther when those thinges which are of the whole person are vttered of eyther Nature named in the concrete as God redeemed his church the flesh quickneth or secondly when that which is proper to one nature is vttered of the person named by the other nature as God suffered man is every where which manner of speaking hath beene called t Eâ—all age the changing or communication Of the Person of CHRIST The confuting Part. For the necessity of the Divine Nature in the worke of Mediator-shippe against Bellarmime Lib. 5. 2. Contro 1. Tom. Chap. 3. I. THe beginning of Mediatorshippe is considered eyther absolutely or oppositely the person of Christ God-man is the beginning absolutely but oppositely and distinctly there is one beginning in the same persoÌ„ which is first or Principiant which is the Word according to the divine Nature thereof the other second or principiate that is the humane Nature subsisting in the Person II. CHrist performed some workes according to the forme of a servant some according to the forme of God simply but other some according to both commonly III CHrist when he is compared to God is distinguished from the Creature two wayes in nature and dispensation in nature when according to his person hee is distinguished from the Father In dispensation when according to his office he is distinguished from the Essence of God as he is a Mediator according to nature he is equall with the father but according to dispensation hee is inferior to the Father IIII. THe Fathers when they make mention of the humane Nature exclude not the divine but suppose the vnion of both coÌ„curring together in the vnity of the person for or to the vnity of working V. CHrist in nature coÌ„municateth with both partes which are to bee conjoyned as it were with boundes that must bee vnited together yet in the manner of dispensation hee differeth as he is God-man or God and man VI. CHrist acording to the nature wherby hee is God hath agreeablenes with God but whereby hee is man with vs as on the contrary whereby hee is God hee differeth from vs but whereby hee is man or by his voluntary dispensation he differeth from God VII CHrist is considered eyther as he is God-man or according to the manner of his absolute nature eyther this or that after the first manner hee is sayd to be the mediator of himselfe not after the second VIII MEdiatorshippe agreeth not with the Person according to the common nature of the God-head but according to the speciall nature or the forme subsisting which they call a Personalitas Personhood or Personality IX IT is one thing to speake of the God-head of Christ in himselfe according to his owne nature a parte and another thing as hee is in the b Supposiâ—o Subject Now Christ is a Priest not as hee is God by nature but as hee is God-man by the dispensation of his will The Places 1. Tim. 2.5 Answ Christ is pronounced man three wayes for eyther the person of Christ is noted which person is man or the person of Christ whereby hee is man or lastly his manhood simply Now it followeth not hee is Mediator being man therefore he is Mediator as hee is man or according to his man-hood For the Verity of the Humane NATVRE I. IT is one thing to treate of the Materiall cause of Christs flesh and another thing of the forming cause for the holy Ghost brought not the substance but disposed and sanctified it II. LOoke concerning what the Accident of a thing is denyed concerning the same it is not needefull to deny the matter and Subject of that Accident and so on the contrary III. OF Defects which indeed are Privatiuely so called some are repugnant to perfection in themselues to be shunned and condemned some are common to all in themselues indeede to bee shunned by the will of nature yet not condemned Lastly some are Personall according to the manner of every Individuum of the first Christ had no experience the second because they are Essentiall and naturall defects of man corrupt Christ tooke them all on himselfe of the third the matter is doubtfull The Places 2. Cor. 13.4 Ans It is one thing to treate of Christ oppositely and distinctly according to both natures but another thing of the person with which because of vnity that is communicated which is proper to both natures Ioh. 6 51. There is one descent locall another Metaphoricall another of Nature another of dispensation another according to substance another according to evacuation Exinamitionem Christ descended according to the manner of dispensation and evacuation and not locally Now the flesh of of Christ is two wayes considered either according to it selfe simply or as it was vnited with the divine nature by the meanes of his person and after this manner not after that the flesh of Christ is called the bread of life to witte not causally but Instrumentally For the vnity of Person I. OF Christ there is a two-fold consideration one according to the person commonly the other according to the natures oppositely Now those thinges are vttered of the natures in the person which agree with the person in respect of both II. THe coessence is of the natures not of the person for Christ is not another of or from the Father and another of or from the Virgine according to the person but another of the Father and another of the
Virgine according to the natures because according to the divine Nature he is coessentiall with the Father but according to the humane coessentiall with the Virgine Ioh. 2.19 Ans The conclusion from the Natures to the person is of no force for the person of Christ is not called the Temple but his Manhood in which the Godhead dwelt bodily Heb. 7.3 The Nativity of Christ is two-fold the one without Mother according to the divine nature the other without Father according to the humane and both were vnited in the one and the selfe same Subject For the quality of Natures I. COncrete or conjoyned names are not multiplyed vnles the Subjects be multiplyed but whereas there is but one Subject alone in Christ of necessity there is but one Christ alone II. THe Actions and Passions are of the person and not of the natures now a conclusion from the persons vnto the natures is in consequent For the Hypostaticall vnion and the communications of Properties against the Vbiquitaries I. A Thing is vnited three wayes Essentially when of many there is made one Essence Accidentally when the Accidents are ioyned to the Subjects Substantially when the substance which otherwise of it selfe might exist is drawne to the being of another Subiect and dependeth on it as a part of 〈◊〉 it II. WEe must make a difference betweene the God-head sending and the person sent and there is one consideration of the Worde by reason of the Essence and another by reason of the office III. VVHatsoever thinges are pronounced of Christ eyther they are divine simply pertayning to his divine nature or humane pertaining the humane or coÌ„mon mediately pertayning to the whole person therefore glory Power and other things when they are pronounced of Christ are these three wayes to bee considered as divine and then they are Essentiall and Incommunicable as humane and then they are proper to Christ in the forme of a servant as mediatory which are proper to the person of Christ in both natures together and in common IIII. SVch as is the substance of every thing such also is the manner of being but there is but one substance of Christs body therefore but one manner of being which is proper to bodies that is circumscriptiue not definitiue which is proper to the spirits nor repletiue which is proper vnto God V. FRom Christ being maÌ„ to Christs manhood the conclusioÌ„ is impertinent for neither the nature ought to be confounded with the nature the persoÌ„ with the nature or the abstract with the concrete VI. THe imitation b Exoequatio equalnesse or communication of Essence or properties maketh not an vnion but the copulation of nature in one subsistence VII WE must distinguish betweene whole Christ and the whole of Christ the first whereof respecteth his person the second his natures for that which is true of whole Christ cannot conveniently or truely be pronounced of the whole of Christ The Places of Scripture Mat. 26. Act. 2. Ephes 1. The right hand is one thing and to sit at the right hand is another Christ is one thing and the man-hood of Christ is another thing the figured signification of right hand is one thing and the proper is another for in the Scriptures the right hand of God importeth two thinges besides the proper signification to witte Power and Glory both Christ hath communicated vnto him as hee is a person God-man whence it is that the Schoolemen affirme Christ to bee ascended vnto his sitting at the Fathers right hand c Aequaliter Aliqualiter equally according to the divine Nature in some sort according to the humane as a double descent is given him in the Scriptures one according to his e Exiâ—anitionem debasement as being God the other according to the locall places as being man Mat. 28. Phil. 2. Col. 3. Ephes 4. The properties of the one nature are attributed to the whole person because of the vnity of the Subject for all that power dignity exaltation is proper to the office and person of the Mediator and not to the natures now they are attributed to Christ being man partly by grace of the vnion and partly because of that exaltation of Christes person which was made aboue every Name OF THE OFFICE OF CHRIST The Confirming Part. CHAP. VII FRom the person redeeming wee passe to the manner of Redemption which the office of Christ doth circumscribe for whereas the manner of Redemption comprehendeth all that action course and manner of Christ which he hath performed according to the ordering disposing and dispensation of both his Fathers will and his owne wee must throughly discerne them by their degrees and the degrees of the office of Christ Now wee discerne them partly Generally according to a common maner partly singularly according to their speciall kindes and partes Generally the office of Christ is defined to be an office of mediation committed to the Sonne a Heb. 5 5. Ioh. 3.17 by the Father and of the Sonne both voluntarily receaved b Ioh. 10.18 Heb. 10.7 and in both natures perfectly fulfilled c Phil. 2.8 Rom. 5.19 that hee might vnite and reconcile vs to God and God to vs for ever d Ioh. 11.51.52 Rom. 4.25 The Cause efficient of this office essentially is God the Father Sonne and holy Ghost e Heb. 1.9 Esa 61.1 but yet the order of proceeding being kept to witte both that which is inward of the persons among themselues and that which is outward as touching the things created for in respect of both it commeth to passe that the Father from whome is both the Essence and vertue of working according to the beginning is sayde to be the Efficient cause of this office of whom the Sonne is annoynted both as touching the calling and as touching the bestowing of Gifts the latter whereof properly pertayneth to the humane nature the former to both Now the forme is sayde to bee the meane or mediating cause by order of person from the Father but by dispensation of office subordinate e Ioh. 14.28 to the Father The matter of this office is considered two wayes Subjectiuely and it is both the natures of Christ f Ioh. 6.33 not severally but joyntly together for there are two parts or offices of Mediatorshippe the first in the thinges that concerne God the second in the things that concerne vs and therefore Christ must bee as a Mediator in office so the middle-one in person betweene God and vs that communicating with both by nature hee might bee a Mediator betweene both by office Secondly effectually and they are all actions which hee performed Divine as God humane as man one and indivisible as Mediator whence it is that they are called Divine-humane because as there is but one Worker of the Workes of both Natures so is there but one absolute ending for the working is of the person but the beginnings of the workings are of the Natures The forme is the manner
God and man yet wee must not stay in the very signes neyther are the eyes of faith to be lifted vp to the place of the bread but vnto heaven x Col. 3.1 That this popish Adoration is Idolatrous both in it selfe and in the Adiunct Ceremonies wee proue divers waies In it selfe by three Arguments drawne from the cause from the manner and from the kindes of Adoration for seeing the cause of the Adoration of Christ is proper in his God-head for nothing is properly to bee adored but that which is God the worshipping eyther of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 cannot be translated to the outward signs theÌ„selues without manifest sacriledge then seeing the manner of Christs adoration requireth that neyther the person be divided nor the natures equalled or the difference of them takeÌ„ away the bread cannot at all bee worshipped or the bodie in the bread but either the nature and the properties thereof should be confounded while the presence of Christs bodie is judged to bee in the bread or that which is not fitte for a humane nature but in regard of the person should Idolatrously bee attributed not onely vnto him simply and as touching himselfe but also vnto his Sacrament Lastly seeing there are two kindes of Adoration Praying Thanksgiving neyther of them can be applyed to the bread neyther properly nor Sacramentally whereas both belong to Christ as being God and man In the Ceremonies it is idolatrous whether you respect the reserving of Reliques the inclosing or carrying about or the Elevation of the Eucharist for albeit there were certain beginnings of these ceremonies in the ancient church yet seeing they were prescribed neyther by Christ nor his Apostles or observed in the most ancient and purest church they were for the good cause taken away in the churches of the Gospell OF THE LORDS Supper The Part Confuting Distinctions in Defence of the Interpretation and signification of the NAME I. THe Supper of the Lord signifieth eyther the signe or the action that is eyther it is taken Relatiuely or Absolutely Being Relatiuely it signifyeth the Symboles or Signes of Gods grace Absolutely taken 〈◊〉 signifyeth the whole Action comâ—â—sed of the visible and corporall 〈◊〉 â—ing of the Signes and of the invisible and Spirituall receiving of Christ and his benefites II. THe Lords Supper is considered eyther abstractly as touching it selfe or applyedly in the lawfull vse this way it is properly called a Sacrament that way it is not but abusiuely and improperly III. THere are fowre formes of speaking concerning the Supper of the Lord the sense whereof and manner of vnderstanding them is the same the First is wherein the Name of the thing signified is layed on the Signe as the Supper is the New Testament The 2. wherein the thing signified of the Supper in respect of the effect and efficacy thereof is given to the Signe as the Supper maketh vs partakers of the new Testament Thirdly wherein the offices of the signes are expounded in their proper signification as the Supper is the signe of the Covenant The fourth when in the lawfull vse of the Supper the Sacrament is conjoyned with the promise of grace as he which receiveth the bread and wine worthily shall eate the body and drinke the bloude of Christ Distinctions in Defence of the Efficient Cause principall and First for the Subiect of Predication against Bellar. Lib. 1. De Sacra Euchar. Cap. 10. I. THe Pronounes demonstratiue and Relatiue aswell with the Greekes as Latines doe not alwayes according to rule agree with the substantiue following but sometimes also with that which goeth before and contrariwise not alwayes with that which goeth before but with that also which followeth Moreover the thing which is only a note in the vniversall and not in the particular according as bread was in the Supper is most vsually vttered by a Nowne vniversall of the Neuter gender II. THose things which are to be vnderstoode Tropically according to the nature of a sacrament ought not or may not be properly and simply taken Now there is a double Trope in the proposition touching the cuppe for by a Synechdoche the cuppe is put for the wine in the cuppe and by a Sacramentall Metonymy the Effect of the thing signified is given to the Signe In Defence of the whole Predication to Cap. 9. I. THe Stile of Scripture doth most manifestly proue that the Sacraments of the olde and new Testament as also Testaments compacts and covenants are found to haue beene instituted in Figuratiue wordes and the precepts to haue beene vttered Figuratiuely II. AN Argument drawne from a Figuratiue speaking to the obscurenesse of the same is inconsequent for it followeth not that if it be Figuratiue therefore it is not perspicuous or on the contrary if it be perspicuous that therefore it is not Figuratiue III. THe Testimonies of the Fathers are Sacramentally to be taken that is to bee expounded according to the maner and Trope which is agreeable to Sacraments Whence it is that they all haue judged that Christs words are to bee expounded not according to the Word spoken but according to his meaning IIII. THe appellation of the Word spoken or the sence of the wordes is taken sometimes in a larger and sometimes in a straiter signification in a strayter in regular Predications in a larger in those which are Figuratiue Wherefore in the very wordes of the Supper we retayne the very word spoken but sacramentall wherein not so much the letter and the sound of the words as the sure and certaine meaning thereof is to bee followed to wit that which may agree with the nature of a Sacrament Of the Wordes of Consecration against Bellarmine Lib. 4. Cap. 13. I. THe wordes of the Institution of the Lords Supper are of two partes some are the words of the Evangelists and some of Christ himselfe those are not onely recited as a history but doe admonish as well the Ministers as the Communicants what Christ did what he commaunded likewise to bee done of both These serue for consecration yet so that neyther the rest ought to bee omitted nor consecration bee circumscribed with foure or fiue wordes onely or lastly Prayers and Thanksgivings bee excluded seeing as well the former as the latter words of the Institution doe finish the consecration and the Substance of Bread and Wine is not changed by a certaine hidden vertue of those few wordes but on the contrary the consecration which is made in the Eucharist is called in the Scriptures a hallowing with thankesgiving II. THere was a double respect of the Apostles in that first Supper one of Pastors and dispensers of Gods misteries but the other of the church or the vniversall company of the faithfull which they represented in the first respect the commaundement to Doe ought to bee referred to all that which Christ did concerning the bread and wine in the second to all that which the Communicants ought to
and verity thereof The other concerning the order and Methode of our institution Divinitie wee meane not that first patterne which in God is of God himselfe nay is God himselfe for both God that which is in God is the selfe same in a simple Essence wherein by an indivisible and vnchangeable act he knoweth both himselfe in himselfe and out of himselfe all and singular thinges by himselfe but the stampe out of that former expressed and shapened by a revelation and gratious communication thereof eyther according to the vniversall nature in all men or according to speciall grace measure of the scripture in the Church Hee that would enquire the veritie hereof ought to consider two things first that it is secondly what it is That there is such a stampe of Divinity the Nature of God the light both of our owne Naturall conscience and supernaturall knowledge revealed as also the common experience of Nations and ages doe declare The Nature of God for sith hee is by all meanes infinitely good we must no way think that God wanteth a good meane to communicate good whose property it is to bee a communicator of himselfe or to communicate himselfe with other his creatures according to their condition a Mat. 5.45 The light both of our Naturall conscience by which clearely shining all men haue this setled in their heartes that there 's is a Divination and other kindes of divine communications b Rom. 1 1â—.19 2.24.25 as also of supernatural Knowledge revealed whereby wee know that whole truth to bee fully and plainely registred in the holy scriptures which was behoofefull for vs to know to our salvation Common Experience for even the Gentiles themselues being strangers from God had the Oracles of the Divell in stead of these from God rather then that they would deny that stamped Divininity or bee saide to want the same c Rom. 1.21.22.23 for hence it came to passe that whereas among the Heathen some of their Gods were thought to bee very Gods some others to be such spirites as they called Daemones the heathens Divinity was held to bee of two partes for the one treated of the Gods themselues the other of d Daemones those spirites which they called Daemones that which treated of their Gods August lib. 5. de Civit. Dei cap. 6. was held of them to bee three-sold as Augustine out of Varro teacheth to wit Poeticall Naturall and Civill that which did set forth the power of those spirites was two-fold for whereas of those spirites called Doemones some were good some evill that which discoursed of the evill spirites who were to bee pacified and appeased was called Magicke and Inchantment but the other which delighted the good with sacrifices was called Divine ministration and Expiation therefore there is a Divinity Now if you respect the true interpretation of the word it is defined thus to bee a knowledge of the Oracles or speeches of God but if the thing or matter it selfe it is a true wisedome of divine thinges from God communicated eyther by meane Naturall according to inbred principles or else by a meane more excellent according to grace supernaturall And of this Divinity wee speake in this place wee call it Wisedome by example of Scripture f 1. Cor. 26. first for the excellency of the thing as being the most certaine declarer of principles most noble Princesse of all sciences secondly for the singular meane or manner of knowing for this wisedome is distinguished from that which in the Scripture is called earthly sensuall and diuellish The subject of this Theological wisdome are matters divine both for their Nature and the manner of considering for whereas a Subiect hath two partes the one which containeth the place of the matter is called the thing considered the other of the forme and is the manner of considering it wee obserue them both in the explication of this subiect The thing considered is God himselfe and all thinges disposed vnto God that is all thinges divine eyther of their owne nature or by relation vnto God The manner of considering is proportionable to Gods truth even to the whole truth and everie part thereof alike or equally infused fitted to the dignity of the deliverer to the nature of the argument as also to the condition of those to whome it is delivered And this is the nature and verity of Divinity now wee will briefly shew the Methode of our Institution concerning the same There is a two-fold Methode of teaching the one from Principles the other vnto Principles the one a Priori proceeding from the Cause to the Effect and from the first and highest to the lowest and last the other a Posteriori proceeding from the Effect to the Cause or from the last and lowest to the highest and first The vse of the former is chiefest in sciences contemplatiue of the latter in the practicke or actiue Now whereas Divinity in both these holdeth the first principal place by reason wherof some haue distinguished it into Contemplatiue and Actiue and for that it affordeth a faculty both of knowing and doing well which is the right way of wisedome it hath fallen out that Dâ—vinity hath been handled in a diverse Mâ—thod by diverse men yet by all of them profitably and faithfully For whereas all order is taken eyther from the nature of thinges to bee considered or from our better and easier knowledge thereof Calvin Melanthon Vrsinus haue done well who observed an order of their better knowledge in a method vnfoulding by way of Analysis g Analytiâ—a in like manner Hiperius Musculus Hemingius Zanchius haue done well observing the order of Nature h Synthetiâ—a Synthesis also is contrary to Analysis beginning froÌ„ things granted to that vvhich is in question in a Method of composing and couching thinges handsomly together Wee in this our Institution will ioyne both these together borrowing i a Synthesi from the Methode of composing the disposition and k Ab Analysi from the Methode of vnsoulding the invention of the same that from both the l Systema full constitution of this body of Divinity which we haue in hand may arise Therefore by an order Syntheticall as wee tearme it wee will begin from the first Principles that by the Means wee may come to the last but we wil set downe a declaration such as wee call Analyticall of the first middle and last thinges first in teaching the truth by way of confirmation then in reproving the falshood by way of confutatioÌ„ that by the helpe and benefite of the Definition of every point of Divinitie and by the Analysis of the same through the causes thereof but this by the Appendix or addition of the generall solutions which wee will lay vnder every place or point and set against the principal arguments of our adversaries especially Bellarmines this is our Methode THE FIRST Booke of the Principles of sacred
Diuinity CHAP. I. ALL Sciences haue their proper principles aboue which as being those that cannot be demonstrated and are immediately the first wee may not ascend but among many sciences that is the more perfect which is or commeth of the superiour 〈◊〉 Principles and that the most perfect which resolveth a matter into the first Principles which depend not vpon any former of which sort Divinity alone is For the principles of other sciences are not simply the first buâ— onely in their owne kinde because indeed in their owne science they haue no other Former but there ought not to bee any other Former Principles of Divinity neyther in it selfe nor out of it selfe to wit neyther any Principle of being nor any principle of knowing For there are two Principles the one of the thing the other of knowledge those out of which other things are produced these on which the knowledge of other thinges doe depend both these a Analogiâ—e proportionably are of vs to bee considered in Divinity for the true exposition of the word intimateth vnto vs those two beginnings to wit God and the Word God is the Principle of being and the first cause of Divinity from which both the end of Divinity and the means vnto his end doe spring the Word is the principle of knowing by which the end of Divinity and the meanes vnto it may be knowne Both the principles are immediatly 〈◊〉 the first God is a Principle immediately first because nothing was beâ—â—hâ—â— the word is a principle imâ—ediately first because nothing was â—poken before it which two though â—hey goe together in dignity and office of beginning yet in the course of order in the manner of doing and in â—he producing of the effect they are distinguished and are mutually each to other subordinate for God first mediately speaketh vnto vs in the worde then the Worde mediately bringeth vs vnto the knowledge of God which knowledge sith it is entended to be the principall and proper subiect of whole Divinity the meane thereunto subordinate which wee called the Word ought first to be knowne Of the Word of GOD. The parte confirming CHAP. II. THe Primary Principle of Divinity for dignity is God but for the order of better knowledge the wordâ— is the first The word we vnderstand 1. Enâ—â—tiatiue or which is vttered whereby God hath communicated with man eyther specially through Revelation by Oracles visions or dreames or generally through a liuely tradition oâ— doctrine from hand to hand or through a more excellent manner by the Scripture The same wee thus define It is at holy Instrument concerning the truth necessary a Rom. 15 4. 1 Tim 4. â— Ioh. 5.35 to salvation faithfully and perfectly written in the Canonicall b Rom. 1. 2 Pet. 1.19 2 Pet. 3.15 16. bookes by the Prophets and Apostles c 2. Tim. 3 16. as the Secretaries of God for the healthfull instruction of the Church d 2. Pet. 1 22. Psal 1 19.1 1. Tim. 4 13 16. Wee call it an Instrument both in respect of the Covenant whereof God would haue an Instrument to be made and by a renued contract publikely to be registred as also in relation to another thing as in the proper vse and office thereof because the holy Scripture is not for it selfe but as the manner of â—struments is for another thing the â—hority perfection perspicuousnes â—d vse of this Instrument shall be made â—dent by a Methodicall e Analyst resolution the causes The Cause Efficient of the Scripture God f 2 Tim. 3.16 2 Pet. 1.21 the Father in the sonne by the â—rit for the same hath the Father layed â—en to the Church by the word Enunâ—tiue and by the workes of grace â—wer generally and specially ordinaâ—y and extraordinarily g Heb. 11. the Sonne â—th both wayes confirmed it in the â—ew Testament h Heb. 1.2 the holy Ghost seaâ—th the same in the hearts of the faithâ—ll by the word inwardly testifying or 〈◊〉 an inward Testimony i Esa 59.21 Ioh. 14.26 the Scripâ—re then is diuine by originall and by â—e things thereof both Essentiall and â—aturall as also assumed By Originall because every knowâ—dge of truth is from the first truth â—hereof the Scripture is an instrumenâ—ll badge and as it were a shapened â—mage hence it is that God both â—mmediately with his own finger wrote the Decalogue in Tables and k Exod. 34 27. mediately by servants as his l Actuaâ—ios Taâ—ulaâ—ios Notaries and publicke pennemen commaunded that whole m Systema compacted body of holy scripture with every part thereof to bee written n 2. Tim. 3.16 Insitis Adsitis The scripture also is divine for the matters both put therein and put thereto for both the Essentiall parts thereof are divine in matter and forme and the end divine also as hereafter shall bee declared yea and the apparant signification and demonstration of the Spirite and presence of God very antiquity the invincible force of the truth and many other pointes doe witnesse the same to be divine now it must needes bee that the Scripture which hath God to be the author hath also divine authority Further this authority is two wayes considered first in it selfe secondly in respect of vs the authority of the Scripture in it selfe is divine if we consider the cause subiect and certainty of doctrine The Cause because the authority of the Scripture is as great as that of the holy Ghost o. 1 Ioh. 1 9. who endited both the matter and words thereof and whose Prophets and Apostles were onely the Amanuenses pennemen p Ioh. 14.16 The Subiect for whereas there is wont to be a double respect of testimonies concerning the authority of a thing one from the power or efficacy of him that witnesseth the other from the Nature and property of the Instrument the Scripture in respect of the thinges whereof it is the Instrument hath an exceeding great and infallible authority q Heb. 4 12. The certainty of doctrine which the Scripture hath from God by Vertue Verity and Complement by Vertue because he hath confirmed the same both at all times with his spirit and at convenient tyme with his workes of grace and power r 1. Thes 1.5 by Verity because it contayneth the whole truth communicable in it selfe both alone and perfectly Å¿ 2 Pet. 1.19 By Complement because as in substance so also in event all thinges are most certaine and most true in the Scripture t Mat. 24 35. Now in respect of vs or vnto vs the authority of the Scripture is divine by the testimony of God both particular and generall Particular because God hath both publikely testified that soveraigne Authority by ordinary and extraordinary meanes and privately sealed it by his everlasting spirite in the conscience of the godly u Ioh. 1.37 5.6 Generall because first God vsed the vndoubted Ministery of his servants as fiâ—te
God is a substance without composition of matter and forme with out quality good true iust c. without quality or bound exceeding great and incomprehensible without motion or action without passion pittifull without scituation of place most present without time the first and the last without habite or addition the Lord of all thinges for all the properties are affirmed of God Essentially and that both formally and in the abstract because of the individuall perfection of the Essence as also subiectiuely and in the concreate because of the verity of God existing Of these properties some doe note out vnto vs the Essence as it were a Priori partly Negatiuely as Infinitiues and partly Affirmatiuely as simplicity some other as it were a Posteriori and that partly Properly as those thinges which are in GOD principally and by themselues as Power Knowledge Will partly improperly as those thinges which are spoken of God Metaphorically or by way of translation or according to the similitude of a humane passion or affection as Loue Anger c. Those which are in God a Priori are given to God one and onely according to his Essence Action and Vse and they are sayed to be incommunicable as Simplicity Infinitiues Simplicity is in God altogether Indivisible and Absolute admitting no either diversity or composition of parts or accidents neyther in himselfe nor in the persons nor in his workes not in himselfe because God is the same that his Essence is and his Essence is the same that the being of God is m Eph. 5.26 1 Ioh. 1.7 for God is the principall first and pure acte of whom all things are wrought and by whom all thinges doe worke Not in the Persons because the Essence is whole and the selfe same in them as whole and the selfe same abiding in euery one whence we say that the Father is in the Sonne the Son in the Father the holy Ghost in both each one in euery one not in works because the Essence Will and Action are altogether the same thing for as the Essence of God is naturally disposed so it willeth and doth and againe as it willeth and doth so his Essence is disposed Neither do the Act and the thing done differ in God but they are the selfe-same thing so as while one thing seemeth to be done by the Godhead all things are together effected in one thing and while many things one thing is effected in many things By this simplicitie the exceeding great perfection of God is concluded for that which is one and most simple is of all most sufficient and most content with himselfe and therefore is both selfe sufficient for himselfe from himselfe and in himselfe to all things and in all things as also to others a paterne and cause of all perfection Nature grace Infinitnes in God is not a magnitude or multitude which wee may not passe through but an incomprehensible power or an incomprehensiblenes of an act whereby he is neyther from without nor from within finite in himself every where whole or most inwardly in all things by his Essence and power For by his Essence God is every where n Psa 145.3 1. Rin. 8.27 Ier. 23.23 or by speaking more properly hee is every where it selfe that is that selfe same thing which we call every where being in every place without definition dimention or circumscription in every time without changeablenes whole in all thinges whole in each thing whole in himselfe the manner of this Infinitnes is that it be neyther multiplyed norrarified and that the Essence of God be not made diverse but the same whole and one that it be sayed to be present with all thinges and with each thing yet of none contayned according to which manner wee say that God is every where and no where to witte in that hee is contayned of none hee is no where but in that hee contayneth all things he is every where By his power God is every where because by him this o Vniversum whole frame was both perfected and is affected yet so that neyther by perfecting that power of God is weakened for it is vnmeasurable and infinite no time no where failing nor by affecting doth suffer for hee is God of power super-essentiall not onely p Superficies comprehending the outmost partes of all thinges but also with it whole selfe pearcing and passing thorough the depth of all things That which necessarily and as it were by an Issuing forth q Cōsectarium followeth vpon this Infinitenes is immutability that which likewise followeth Immutability is Eternity for hee which is Infinite can neyther bee mooved nor changed according to vtter and inner qualities and whereas he hath in himselfe and from himselfe the fulnesse of perfection r I ac 1.17 Mal. 3.6 Essence and Power hee cannot bee extended neyther concerning Essence nor concerning worke hee which is immutable is not changed into another nature but possesseth the same whole neyther receyving nor ever hereafter about to receyue but without time hee is that hee is and that hee is not hee never may be that is it which we call ſ Psal 90.2 Apoc. 1.8 eternall Those properties which being from that which is the latter are in God bee spoken indeed of God principally and by themselues but yet according to the proportion both of his Act and vse in the Creatures they are communicated vnto them and are t Ex concreto ioyntly vttered of them these therefore are in God most inwardly according to beginning and vnmoueably but in the Creatures Accidentally by participation and after a mooueable manner as are these amongst the chiefest Power Knowledge and Will Power in God is that whereby he perfectly doth all things which he willeth and all thinges which hee can will hee can perfectly doe this is called absolute that actuall And both of them are actiue Now God willeth by act partly Internall and Eternall which act is in God eyther according to beginning limite as the vnderstanding of God or else it is indeede according to beginning in God but according to limitation in another as Providence Predestination and in respect of this Act the actuall power in God is called Immanēt or abiding in partly also by act externall and temporall as Creation Redemption and in respect of this act the actuall power in God is called Trāsient or going forth Hee can Will infinite thinges u Mat. 3.9 as his being is Infinite and so likewise hee can doe infinite thinges which are absolutely possible and yet never shall bee determined to a certain order of things he can then doe more thinges then hee doth if hee will yet he never will do them But as hee cannot will eyther things contrary as evill good or thinges contradictory as to be and not to be so can he not do eyther contrary things which in a nature most simple and incommutable cannot subsist or thinges
or Formal as when we say that the fire necessarily burneth Those which are necessary by supposition or by necessity of condition or consequence doe put one a necessity eyther from the inward beginning or from the outward or from both together Thinges contingent are those which may be or not be such as properly happen to every Individuum or singular thing for the power is the matter which is capable of things possible or contingent and the matter is of every singular thing and of every Individuum which are limitted in their owne matter And this is the maner of those things which are now those things which are don or the actioÌ„s are distinguished two wayes by their beginnings and qualities By their beginnings because some actioÌ„s are from a common beginning and arâ— called Naturall which eyther nature by it selfe effecteth neyther is the action of will required for the same as to liue to quicken c. or effecteth them witâ— the action of naturall will as to eate drinke c. other some are from a singular beginning and are called Voluntary which our will Intellectiue effecteth not led by the instinct of nature but by the rule of reason whether by advise or deliberation from which is the will electiue or by an vnadvised motion Voluntas per causam from which is the Will by a cause By the qualities because som are good some evill that which is the goodnes or evilnes of actioÌ„s is discerned both by their own coÌ„mon condition according to the beginnings in actions natural and by a singular manner according to theiâ— speciall kinde and circumstances in actions voluntary and all and every one of these as well those which are as those which are done bee subiect to Gods Providence by wayes both common and singular as in the explication of the cause ensuing shall bee declared The Forme of Gods Providence is that perpetuall Act of directing all and singular things vnto their proper ends which act ought two wayes to be considered and discerned to witte common and singular by the one according to the divers degrees of that act of Gods providence by the other according to the singular nature and condition of the subiects vpon which it worketh The Act of Gods providence is generaly discerned by three degrees the declaration whereof is very necessary for the vnderstanding of this doctrine The first degree is of Conservation whereby all and severall thinges are ordinarily sustayned in the same state of Nature and naturall properties in which they were created This conservation according to the distinction of things which either are or are done is both of Existence and of power The conservation of Existence is the continuance of the substance of things which had their being by creation whether they be of a whole speciall kind or of any Individuum h Psa .. 19.12 104 19.20 c. The conservation of Power is whereby God sustayneth and moveth the proper powers of every Creature which pertayne to the operations and perfections thereof by a singular i Iob. 14.4 Heb. 9.27 Psal 134.2.3 beginning which in thinges involuntary is a singular nature in things voluntary is wil. Both of them is from God as from the vniversall beginning on whome the beginnings both common and singular of thinges and actions doe depend In which dependency two things are to bee noted the one is that the same first beginning of the conservation of things doe so worke in the inferiour beginnings that it detracteth nothing from them but ordinarily leaveth their Actions perfect for God so ordereth all thinges which hee hath created that hee suffereth them also to exercise and doe their owne proper motions The other is that that first beginning worketh by those which are inferior after the manner of those Inferiour for as oft as many causes Coordinate or together ordained doe befal the last effect followeth not the first cause by necessity or contingence but the neerest cause Hence is that tearm Fate or Destiny natural so termed by Christians which is a course and order of naturall causes depending vpon the first cause which vnlesse they be hindered by the same of their owne power nature bring forth the same effect The second degree is of Governing whereby God in whose power is supreme authority disposeth of al things consisting in his own power ruling the same according to the liberty of his owne will Of this Governing there is a threefold consideration the one consisting in Commanding the other in Doing the third in not Doing which they cal Permitting the first verily is of Doctrine and Right and therfore not proper to this place the other two properly respect the action of Gods provideÌ„ce the Action therefore of God governing is two-fold the one performing the other permitting The Action performing is that which of the Grecians is called Fore-Knowledge according to good pleasure whereby God effectually performeth in all and severall things that which belongeth to his owne worke Now hee performeth whatsoever is good in Nature both common and particular as the vniversall beginning of Nature The Action permitting is that which of the Grecians is tearmed Foreknowledge according to permission wherby God forbiddeth not the Actions of others but permitteth to the will of the doer the manner of them Of this Permission there are in the Scripture two kindes the one is of a permission Simple and Absoâ—ute when GOD permitteth simply that which hee might simply and immediately hinder as when hee permitted Adam to fall the other k Ex Hypothesi by Supposition when God after a humane manner tempereth his permissions according to the condition of men such permissions as these are very many in the Olde Testament both are in God from his owne will and are moved to the end which the will of God hath fore-appointed The thirde Degree of GODS Providence is of ordayning whereby God by his admirable Wisedome bringeth all thinges though most out of order vnto their due order and proper Ende In this ordayning three thinges concurre the appointment of the End the disposing of the meanes vnto the end and the directing of the meanes disposed The appointment of the End because God limitteth as all Subiectâ— with their formes so the motions of the forms with their ends whether proper or nerest which are of things according to their own nature or that last or furthest end which is aboue nature to witte Gods glory to which all thinges tend by Gods ordayning This supreme end of thinges though according to perfection signified it be one onely yet according to the manner of signifying which manner is from the obiects it is two-fold his most powerfull Iustice and Grace which in God haue the respect of chiefest good Vnto this double End there is a double disposing of the meanes according as there is fitly laied down by the schoolmen a double intent of God the disposer the one by it selfe chiefly or first intended
because aswell it selfe as all things vnto it selfe are intended the other by it selfe intended but not chiefly or first because it selfe indeed is intended but not all thinges therevnto the intent after the first way is Gods â—race after the second Gods iustice The directing of the means disposed â—s an effectuall bringing of them along â—nto the end by the knowne meanes of Gods wisedome whether revealed or â—idden now this directing of the means 〈◊〉 eyther by it selfe or by accident And this is the manner of generall providence which being layed downe â—here is a more easie way and method â—nto the particular meanes thereof according to the particular nature of the Subiects For first of all the nature of thinges whether generall or particular is subiect â—o Gods providence according to al the meanes both of appointment governing and ordayning l Mat. 10.29.30 Luc. 12.6.7 Pro. 16 33 for the appointment governing and ordayning of things naturall so faree extend themselues as the m Causalitas causing of the first agent extendeth it selfe now it extendeth it selfe as farre as vnto all n Entia beings not only as touching the beings of speciall kindes but also as touching the o Individua particular thinges themselues neyther onely as touching the beginnings of things incorruptible but also of things corruptible Secondly the Accidents of Nature whatsoever they are which are of common Nature in their own perfection are subiect to Gods Providence after the manners already remembred but those which are of particular Nature in their defect are subiect to Gods Providence after the manner of Governing and Ordayning p Gen. 37.28 Iob. 1.21 Esa 10.5.6 c. Act. 2.23 Rom. 8.28 Thirdly all ends of things whatsoever whether meane or supreame are appointed governed and ordayned of God Fourthly those which are meanes whether they bee ordinary or extraordinary the first cause vseth even them according to their owne Nature by appointing governing and ordayning them Fiftly concerning things necessary and contingent that we may see thereinto and in few wordes expound the more difficult points therof three things are to be noted First that the Nature and naturall properties of things as they be are from God and that therefore according to the maner which God hath put into things they are subiect to Gods providence q Iob. 10 10.11 Exod. 15 26. Ps 105.17 And thus stands the maner nature of things that some be necessary some contingent those the order whereof betweene the Cause and the Effect is vnchangeable eyther absolutely by themselues and of their owne Nature or by Supposition and relation to the Causes proposed which neverthelesse may eyther not be or be changed these the order whereof is mutable into both partes of it owne nature indefinite such as are the things of nature or thinges particular which haue the conditions of mutability and contingency infolded among themselues in themselues Secondly that it is an effect of Gods providence that any thing happeneth by what manner soever whether contingently or necessarily and therefore that falleth out necessarily which Gods providence hath disposed to fall out necessarily and that commeth to passe contingently because such is the reason or manner of Gods providence hence God being the vniversall beginning eyther mediately or immediately causeth that the things stand both wayes and that out of causes necessary or contingent Effects and Events necessary and contingent are produced Thirdly of what soever things there is a contingency of these there is also a necessity by supposition and therfore nothing is so contingent which may not two wayes be necessary by supposition one way in it owne existence for what was to be contingent the same froÌ„ whence it proceeded must needs preseÌ„tly haue or formerly had a being The other way by the determined decree foreknowledge of God in respect wherof all thinges come to passe infallibly but to speake properly it is one thing that somewhat falleth out contingently another thing necessarily and another thing infallibly the first and the second inferre the order of the Effect vnto the Cause but the third is more common then both because thinges both contingent and necessary come to passe infallibly yet those contingently these necessarily These things layed down it is manifest that all things both necessary and contingent are every way subiect to Gods Providence 1. of Conservation because both haue being and power froÌ„ God 2. of Governing for of both God disposeth according to the liberty of his will whether effecting or permitting 3. of Ordayning because God also hath prescribed an end vnto them according to their Nature and dâ—sposeth them as meanes wisely and bringeth them vnto the same powerfully Sixtly as concerning Actions Naturall and Voluntary it is to be noted that three beginnings of actions must be considered and proportionally distinguished the one Vniversall is God the other Generall is Nature the third Particular and is eyther a Naturall Inclination or Instinct or Will Electiue Of these beginnings there are particular properties the vniversall beginning is finite the Generall is desining the particular is defined in his Subiects the first is from it selfe and to it selfe the second hath a relation vnto God the third vnto both Whence it commeth to passe that those actions which are from the particular beginning mediately are from God by the generall beginning but those which are from the generall beginning are from God immediately Here it is evident that all actions whether naturall or voluntary are subiect to Gods Providence first by way of Conservation for God conserveth the Natures of thinges and the liberty of will which hee hath given man Secondly by way of governing because God as hee is an vniversall beginning effectually moveth all other beginnings to doe or worke thirdly by way of ordayning because he bringeth and directeth all actions vnto the end which hee hath fore-appointed to them whether Naturall or Voluntary r Psal 139.3 The last thing remayneth concerning good and bad actions and that the manner and efficacy of Gods providenâ—e in evill actions for of the good there is no difficulty might according to the degrees thereof the better be knowne two things are to be premised One is that according to the difference of the beginnings whereof wee haue aboue spoken the one the selfe same action is both good evill good as touching the generall as it is from God and common Nature for both God and Nature of themselues doe alwayes bring forth good actions evil according to the particular respect in man as hee is corrupt for every vitious act taketh the necessity of the vice from the neerest cause which is the will of the offender whence is that of the Schoolemen Å¿ Principalitatem Causalitatis omnis in peccato consistere penes voluntatem quae imperat actum that the chiefty of every procurement in sinne consisteth in the power of the Will which coÌ„mands the Act. The other
is that in every Action three thinges are to bee discerned and distinguished the Nature the Subiect the Accidentall quality of them both The Nature is from the Creator which gaue it and moveth the beginnings of naturall properties and actions The Subiect is the moving of the Action which is according to nature in respect whereof every sinne is said to bee in God subjectiuely The Quality is the Accident of Nature and of the Subiect being good indeed according to grace but evill according to the corruption that groweth in nature and in the Subiect which infecteth man and those things which are of man with a bodily and effectual taynt or strayne whence the will which is the inward beginning of actions infuseth the force of that corruption into the actions immediately These things layed downe it is to bee marked that Providence also in evill actions worketh by all the wayes and degrees t Esa 45.7 Lam. 3.37 Am. 3.6 In the way degree of Conservation for it hath put into man both the beginning of Nature which by it selfe by a naturall necessity is limitted as also the beginning of actions which is the will that by it owne power limitteth her motions and freely inclineth them vnto whatsoeuer actions vndetermined againe it sustayneth the will as it moveth the things of nature by a common beginning and the actions naturall and voluntary by a particular beginning By way and degree of Governing for first God bringeth to passe effectually the worke that is evill as farre foorth as it hath a respect of good chiefly it hath that both because it is in good subiectiuely because it is vnto good reduciuely Secondly God remitteth the sinne and prescribeth a bound vnto it according to the liberty of his will u Pro. 16.9 Thirdly hee permitteth evill things not that he alloweth them but that it is no evill to permit evils for sith hee which permitteth hath power to forbid without any obligation as also he to whome it is permitted hath power to doe without any compulsion the Will in both parties is voluntary in the former without fault in the latter without excuse In the way and degree of ordayning for God ordayneth the events of sinnes vnto good x Rom. 8.28 eyther morall that is of punishment and chastisement or Supernaturall that is of his glory in Iustice and mercy y Rom. 5.20 11.33 wherby it is cleare that for a thing to haue being to doe and to bee ordayned it is good but for the same to bee evill to doe evill and to bee carried vnto evill it is euil that God effecth but this God suffereth to bee effected by the creature this is the formall cause of providence The end of Providence which may easily bee gathered from the thinges afore-going is the glory of God conioyned with the salvation of the Elect. z Mat. 6.26 OF PROVIDENCE The Part Confutatiue Distinctions for the Cause Efficient I. FAte or Destiny is eyther true or fayned that without violence this violent The true Fate eyther is Divine or Naturall the Divine is nothing else then the governing and providence of thinges the Naturall is none other then the course and order of naturall thinges The fained Fate eyther is of the Chaldeans or the Stoickes the one superstitiously bindeth and tyeth the actions and eventes of thinges vnto the power and position of the starres the other is flowing from everlasting being such a ranke and knitting together of causes that on it should depend both God himselfe and Gods Providence the Consequent of both is a necessity of constraint II. VNto Providence pertayne two thinges the manner of order the execution thereof the first is Eternall the second Temporall III. GOD governeth the Inferior things by the thinges superior not for the defect of his power but for the aboundance of his goodnesse according to the liberty of his will IIII. THe Nature of the following cause is not onely like to the superior Cause in that it hath somewhat thence but also vnlike it in that it proceedeth from without or outwardly For the Materiall Cause I. ALL thinges subiect to the causing of the first agent are also subiect to the ordinance of the same vnto their end wherefore all things in that they haue being are subiect to Providence II. IT is one thing to treate of the cause vniversall and another thing of the Causes particular Of the Particular Causes there are chances but the Vniversall Cause nothing can escape III. COrruptions and defects in naturall thinges are indeed against the particular nature yet they are from the Intention of the vniversall nature in that they fall out for the good of the whole vniversall IIII. THe manner of the Doer is one and of the Instrument is another that which is of the Instrument and the Creature is disorder but that which is of the doer and the Creator even in things most out of order is order V. SOme things are done by Providence efficiently and causally some other thinges according to Providence permissiuely and determinatiuely For the Formall Cause I. THe Soule alwayes worketh freely which although it depend on the causes yet it selfe is the neerest cause of her own actions for naturall effects haue more likenesse with the neerest causes then with the furthest off II. THere is one necessity from the former or a Constituens that which appointeth another from the latter b Consequens or that which â—nsueth one inward another outward one of constraint another of â—mmutability one absolute another by supposition the distinction of all which in this point of Providence is very necessary III IT is one thing to speake of deedes is they are in act and another thing as they are subiect to the Cause contingent for after the first maner they are necessarily after the second contingently IIII. SInne is two wayes considered eyther properly principally as it is sinne or as farre forth as it hath the respect of good and that two wayes first because it is in naturall motion action Inclination that is in good subiectiuely Secondly because it is vnto good God from evill drawing forth good V. THat thing which being once decreede another infallibly followeth without any other Intermediate Cause is the Cause of the Consequent but God will haue sin to come to passe not immediately but by the wil of man as the meane intermediate VI. OF things being God is the effectuall beginning but sinne to speake properly hath not the manner of an Act or being but of defect for there is a double being of the thing and of the manner vnder the being of the maner not only notions and relations are contayned but also Privations and sinne is a being of the manner not having a being Positiuely but Privatiuely VII IN every sinne there are two things the Materiall or the Subiect and the Formall that is to say the naughtinesse The Subiect is a thing
workes whereas these are two divers propositions to bee without workes and to iustifie without workes The third Argument is taken from the removal of the Causes whereas Faith alone Iustifieth which causes are of Bellarmine referred to three heades cap. 16. The first is the authority of the word whervnto the Adversary answereth That it is no where taught in the scripture That wee are iustified by faith onely Answ Though the Particle alone be not expressed in the Scripture yet the signification of that word is expressed by Synonimall formes of speaking which are these 1. Without Workes 2. Of Grace freely by Grace 3. The exclusiue Particles which are two particulars Galat 2.16 but by Faith Luc. 8.30 By beleeving onely by which formes of speaking as all works aswell Ceremoniall as Moral are excluded so faith alone is included as the only Instrument of Iustification The second head is the will of God who will haue vs iustified with the alone condition of faith The Adversary answereth that it contradicteth the Scripture which layeth downe also the condition of Repentance Answere 1. Repentance is the condition of faith and of the person justified but not properly of Iustification 2. It is one thing to treate of the condition of Iustification but another thing of the cause and Instrument therof for a condition noteth a consequent or effect but a cause the Antecedent or Efficient 3. Neyther is our Iustification with the condition of Faith as Faith is a habite in vs but as it apprehendeth Christ out of vs. The third is the nature of faith which alone hath that property that it apprehendeth Iustification The Adversary answereth that Faith doth not properly apprehend Answ There is a double apprehensioÌ„ the one of knowledge in the vnderstanding the other of trust in the Will both these Faith includeth which in respect of the vnderstanding and the will apprehendeth Christ but the nature of the Sacramentes is otherwise which were instituted not that they might iustifie but that they might confirme the party iustified in the feeling of his Iustification The fourth Argument is from the maner of Iustifying for we affirme that faith Iustifieth not by the maner of cause worthinesse or merite but by relation onely which Bellarmine denyeth and proveth by three arguments that faith iustifieth by the manner of merite and cause cap. 13. The first is taken from testimonies which teach that faith is the cause of iustification Rom. 3. Rom. 5. Ephes 1. Answer First for Faith is one thing and by Faith is another thing The one is of the cause the other of the Instrument Secondly neyther is the maner of works the same with that of faith in opposition because workes haue the nature of righteousnesse inherent in vs but faith the nature of righteousnesse imputed vnto vs. Thirdly nor doe the places which are alleadged note the cause of Iustification but eyther the Instrument thereof or the quality and state of a man iustified The second is taken from those testimonies which testifie that faith is the beginning of righteousnesse and hereby the formall cause of Iustification Rom. 4. First there is a two-fold imputation as in that very place the Apostle noteth the one of debt the other of grace and the Apostle treaâ—eth of this and not of that Secondly â—â—th Faith is the instrumeÌ„t it is no strange â—hing if as it is vsually the manner of â—nstruments the name and the office of the thing whereof it is but the Instrument bee attributed vnto it 1. Cor. 3. First A foundation is vsually considered two wayes properly or by a Metalepsis properly Christ is so but by a Metalepsis Faith which hath respect to Christ For distinctions sake the one may bee called i Primum ad primuÌ„ the first the other to the first Secondly a foundation is eyther vnderstoode to bee as a part of a building or a ground of a building Christ and Faith are sayd to be the foundation of the Church not properly as they are a part thereof but as they are the Ground and Base of the same Act. 15. First the hearts are justified by faith not as the cause but as the Instrument not by effecting but by affecting or applying Secondly the place it selfe doth manifestly distinguish Faith which is onely the inner instrumeÌ„tal cause from the cause properly Efficient to witte the Father in the Sonne by the holy Ghost The third is taken from those Testimonies which teach that Remission of sinnes is obtayned by Faith Luke 7. Ans First men are sayde to bee saved both properly of God our onely Saviour and figuratiuely by the meanes which it hath pleased God to vse eyther inward as faith or outward as the voyce of the Gospell and the signes thereof Secondly the efficacy of faith wholy dependeth vpon the object which it apprehendeth and it is sayde to saue for that it is the effectuall and necessary Instrument of Salvation like as the Gospell is called the power to every one that beleeveth vnto salvation Rom. 4. Ans First The Particle wherefore noteth not the cause of the Consequent but of the Consequence Secondly it is there shewed not what the habite of faith deserveth sith faith and merites are opposites but what is the vse and effect of true naturall faith Rom. 10. Answ First the Apostle doth neyther make preaching the cause of faith nor faith the cause of invocation and salvation but teacheth that as that is the Instrument of the one so this is of the other SecoÌ„dly the degrees of Salvation are reckoned vppe by the Apostle which are badly confounded with the causes thereof Thirdly those things which Faith obtayneth by Invocation it obtayneth as an Instrument and not as a Cause because all the power of Faith consisteth in Relation Heb. 11. Ans First men please God by faith not for faith Secondly whatsoever examples are cited they note not the merite of Faith but the vse and effect thereof The Fift Argument is fee from two principles the first whereof is the Formal Cause of Iustification which the Adversary affirmeth to bee righteousnesse inherent in vs The second is the merite and necessity of good workes Of the former wee shall treate in the explication of the Formall Cause of the latter in the place concerning good workes DISTINCTIONS IN DEfence of the Materiall Cause I. THere is one Iustice Create and another Increate the one is of God of Christ as hee is God the other of the Creature and of Christ as hee is a creature II. THe Create righteousnesse is eyther of the Person or of the cause by that some person is judged just by this a righteousnesse of the Cause of some controversie is vnderstoode the righteousnesse of the Person to speake properly is in Christ III. OF the person there is one inherent another Imputatiue that was in Christ this is in vs by the worke of the Spirite for Christ IIII. INherent righteousnesse is eyther originall or habituall or else
dispensation wherefore they agree in all the causes In the Efficient Cause for there is the same Author even God by his free mercy and the same meritorious cause even the death of Christ r Ier. 31.31 Rom. 9.7 Mar. 1.15 In the Matter for the thinges promised and sealed vp are the same to witte the Grace and Glory of God Å¿ Rom. 4. â—3 Gal. 3. â—6 In the Forme for in general the maner of administring is the same that is the internall communication of the spirite and the externall communication of the word r Gen. 22.18 Psal 2.22 Mat. 28.19 In the End because the end on both sides is life eternall for the scriptures examples and manner do proue that the Fathers in the olde Testament who were partakers of the same promise with vs had no other end Scripture because the very forme of the covenant and the Prophets the Interpreters thereof make mention of life eternall u Gen. 15 8. Psal 116.15 Esa 51.6 Heb. 11.9 Examples for the Author to the Hebrewes doth testifie that Noah Abraham and the rest that were in the same covenaÌ„t atained vnto that end Manner for they abounded both with the same spirit of faith and with the signs of the same signified thing x 2 Co. 4 13. Ier. 15.6 1 Cor. 10.3 The difference is in the manner of administring and in the circumstances of the disposing In the manner of Administration as well on Gods behalfe as on mans behalfe on Gods behalf for both the internall communication of the Spirite and the externall communication of the Doctrine and Signes was farre more evident and effectuall in the New Testament then in the Olde y Act. 15.8 2. Cor. 4.13 Ier 3â— 31 On mans behalfe for they who were in the Olde Testament had but the Image for the truth absent the shadow for the body but they who were vnder the New haue both the present truth and the perfect body z Heb. 10.1 Adde further that they had Mâ—ses for the Mediatour of that covenant but we Christ a Heb. 8.6 12.24 In circumstances both of time and place Of Time the Olde Testament endured vnto the first comming of Christ the New shall endure from the first vnto the second Of Place for the Olde Testament from the time of Abraham was inclosed onely in a corner of the world but the New passed over all the world b Mat. 10.5.6 Eph. 2.2 Rom. 3.24 OF GODS COVEnant The Confuting Part. Distinctions in Defence of the Efficient Cause I. THe wordes Covenant and Testament are d Homonyma Equivocall Covenant signifieth three thinges First that bargaine made by God with man whether it bee the whole or the partes thereof Secondly aswell al the lawes and holy promises taken vniversally as any speciall commaundement whatsoever or promise added to the covenant Thirdly by a Metonymy the bookes wherein the covenants are written downe Likewise also the word Testament doth signifie three thinges First the meaning of our will concerning that thing which wee would haue to be performed after our death as touching our goodes the Grecians call it a disposing 2. according to the vse of Scripture a compact betweene God man the Grecians tearme it a composition 3. By a Metonymy the books or distinct parts of the Bible II. THe word Covenant is taken eyther absolutely or oppositely Absolutely for the free Covenant both old and new Oppositely for the Legall covenant or the Law it selfe and in the first sence wee here take it but taken in the second as the olde Testament is called in the Scripture the Killing Letter and the Ministery of death so the new Testament is also called the ministery of the Spirite and life III. THe Foundation Condition and Cause of the Covenant when they are pronounced of Christ are in matter the same but do differ in manner for he is called the foundatioÌ„ by way of application the Condition as he is to bee applyed and the cause as he is or was applyed IN DEFENCE OF THE MATTER I. THe Conditions of the covenants on mans behalfe are not Essentiall because both Faith and Workes haue but the nature the one of an instrument the other of a Testimony II. THree distinct kindes of promises doe offer themselues vnto vs in the Scriptures the first is the promise of the covenant of Workes wherein is promised eternall life vnder condition of workes proceeding from the powers of nature the second is of the free covenant vnder condition of Faith the third is of particular promises agreeable to the free covenant vnder condition of the works of Grace IN DEFENCE OF THE FORME I. THe Forme of the Couenant consisteth in Relation for the Relate is God the Correlate is Gods people the foundation is the solemne obligation of the thinges referred each to other II. THere are three principall times before the law vnder the law after the law and there are three notable persons as the captaines of those times Abraham Moses Christ they make not three covenants but onely a three-fold manner of administring one Covenant III. WE must make a difference betweene the thinges substantiall of the Covenant and the thinges accessary those were eternall these temporary IIII. THe dividing of the Covenant into the old and new is not of the generall into the speciall but of the Subject into the accidents and diverse adjunctes make not the substance of the thing divers V. THe new Testament is so called because of a double succession the one of persons for Christ succeeded Moses the other of the dispensation for the Evangelicall Dispensation succeeded the Legall OF THE SACRAments in Generall The parte confirming CHAP. XI THe Second ordinary meane of the execution on Gods behalfe are the seales of the Covenant or the Sacramentes Of these wee vsually and duely holde and expound a two-fold manner the one Generall concerning all the other Speciall concerning each one of the Sacraments Now by the Name of Sacrament which is translated from military affaires to Christian vses wee doe not in the largest signification by a Metalepsis vnderstand every mystery or hidden secret of a holy and divine thing in which sence the Gospell the Incarnation of Christ the calling of the Gentiles are wont to bee expounded in Scriptures Neyther in a lesse generall signification by a Catechresis doe wee vnderstand a divine mystery and vnknowne Symbolicall secret or every such thing as signifieth somewhat else beside the shew which is offered vnto the senses such as are Ceremonies Types Parables Signes and Figures all which because they pertaine to divine matters were called of the old Fathers Sacraments but in a more restrained and most proper signification by the name of Sacrament wee vnderstand a Signe of Grace ordayned of God that hee might both seale vp his benefits in vs and consecrate vs to himselfe for ever for in the signification of Sacrament there is a mutuall respect the one on Gods behalfe offering
cited out of Acts 19. proue the same power of both Baptismes because they are the words of Paul speaking of them who were baptized by Iohn in the name of the Lord. The Second Place is of Marke the last ver 16. Answ It is there declared not why but who should bee saved and withall it is taught what is the Consequent of Baptisme and Faith The Third is of Iohn 3.5 Ans The name of Water is Equivocall For in the Scripture it is vsually taken in a three-fold signification for eyther specially it signifieth Baptisme or the the outward Legall washing or lastly the very Effect of the holy Ghost in vs. If it bee taken in the first signification the sense is that Baptisme is the ordinary Signe of Regeneration in the Church If in the second the sense is that the outward clensings of the Law doe not profite vnlesse the inwarde purging of the Spirite bee added thereto If in the third the Name of the Spirite is added d Exegetice by way of exposition for that the Efficacy of the outward Sacramentall Baptisme dependeth vpon the Spirite The Fourth is Act. 2. Answere To be baptized for the Remission of sinnes properly noteth not the Effect of Baptisme but the end and scope thereof neyther was the Action ordained to signifie the signe but the signe to signifie the action signified The Fift Act. 8. Answere The Particle By signifieth sometimes Efficiency sometimes the Instrument and sometime the Signe And in this place it is taken Symbolically because the gift of the holy Ghost by the laying on of hands is both signified and sealed The Sixt is the 1. Cor. 10. Answ To partake of one Bread is not a cause but a publicke Testimony that wee are of one Body wherevpon it is called one Bread not in number but by the common notion of a Sacrament to wit representing vnto vs that one mysticall body of Christ The Seventh is Eph. 1. Answ by a Metonymy that which is proper to the thing signified is attributed to the signe because Baptisme is the signe of our Consecration indeed effectuall not by it owne power but of him who being one became all things to vs the faithfull The Eight is the 1. of Pet. Answ Salvation is attributed to Baptisme because it is the visible Instrument of Salvation both by the signifying and sealing Adde further that Baptisme as a Counter-paterne is opposed against the deliverance from the deluge not in respect of Efficacy but of the Consequent or the thing signified Neyther is there a difference properly put betweene the Baptisme of the Iewes and ours but betweene the outward and inward Baptisme for asmuch as the Effect of this is Salvation and Peace of conscience Distinctions in Defence of the END Bellarmine proveth by fiue Arguments that the sealing of Grace and Gods promises is not the End of a Sacrament 2. Cap. 14. Lib. 1. De Sacramento I. THe end of the Sealing of the Sacrament is not eyther that wee may bee taught what are Gods promises which the word teacheth or that wee should more belieue the Sacraments then the promises for the Sacraments are for the promises and not the Promises for the Sacraments but that the truth of Gods promises might bee confirmed and sealed II. THe Essence and nature of Sacraments ought to be gathered partly from the words of the Institutor partly from the properties of a Sacrament that the wordes of the Institutor do include a promise it hath beene aboue sayde that the property of a Sacrament is to signifie and seale the thing promised the Nature of every Relation and the vse of all signes doe evidently proue III. THe vse of divine Testimonies dependeth vpon the will of the Institutor whether they bee Signes or workes which being Subordinate neyther ought nor may bee opposed both are effectuall and haue their vse neyther doth the abuse of the Signes in Hypocrites take away the vse of them but such is the nature of things opposite doth more establish the same in the godly IIII. THe sealing of Gods promises hath respect eyther vnto the Faith of the covenant or vnto the Faith of them that are in the Covenant In Infants the sealing of Gods promise is made properly in respect of the Faith of the Covenant but in them that are of ripe yeares in respect of their faith in the Covenant V. THe end of Sacraments hath respect eyther vnto the Institutor or vnto him that vseth the same the end of the Institutor is that Sacramentes should seale but of the vsers eyther that they vse that sealing according to the will of the Institutor to their owne Salvation or that they abuse them to their owne condemnation Which last end being accidentall taketh not away the proper end whether Principall or Secondary OF BAPTISME The Part Confirming CHAP. XII THe Doctrine in speciall concerning the two Sacraments of the New Testament to wit Baptisme and the Lords Supper is next after added vnto the Doctrine touching the Sacraments already expounded in Generall The word Baptisme according to the manner of the true interpretation thereof doth Generally signifie any washing whatsoever especially the Legall and Iewish clensings and purgings or purifying which is done by water but Particularly it is taken eyther Metaphorically for the Crosse and Martyrdome a Mat. 10.38 which they call The Baptisme of bloud or Synecdochically for the pouring out of Gods visible Gifts wherewith the Apostles were furnished b Act. 15. which they call The Baptisme of c Flaminis Inspiration or most properly for the first Sacrament of the New Testament which they tearme the Baptisme of d Fluminis Water in which last signification it is of vs here taken and defined To wit that it is the first Sacrament of the New Covenant instituted by Christ consisting of things Analogicall to wit the Signe and the thing signified as also of the Analogicall relation of themselues betweene themselues together with their action or working by which they which are in the Covenant are washed with water by the Minister of the Church that being ingraffed into Christ they might bee made partakers of the inward washing of the soule by his bloude and spirite The Efficient Cause of Baptisme may bee considered two wayes eyther as the Cause Instituting or as the cause vsing Baptism instituted or the baptizing After the first manner Christ onely by his holy spirit ought to be called accounted the Author of Baptisme in asmuch as who first instituted Baptisme in the person of Iohn the Baptist whose Baptisme Christ himselfe witnessed not to bee of men but of God and from heaven e Ioh. 1.23 31. and afterwardes confirmed the Baptisme of Iohn instituted with the word of commaundement promise f Mat. 28.19 For albeit as touching the Circumstance and manner of Christs manifestation there was some difference betweene the Baptisme of Iohn and of the Apostles yet in kinde it was one and
to be Veniall or pardonable for that it is worthy of pardon but for that God vouchsafeth pardon to the Sinne and the Sinner Not the Third because it is false both that Sinne is Veniall of it own nature and that any the least Sinne should not bee against Charity For it is the transgression of the Law the ende whereof is Loue. Not the Fourth because the Nature or consideration of man offended is one and of God is another for according to the party offended the greatenesse of the offence is esteemed Not the Fift for no sinne is vnperfect because every sinne is a perfect iniquity though there bee degrees of this perfection Not the Sixt because though all sins doe not exclude charity yet they offend Now in that they exclude not or are veniall to the faithfull we must impute it not to sinne it selfe but to Gods mercy in Christ OF FREE WILL. The Part Confirming CAP. V. NOw after the Condition of man vnder Sinne followeth the consideration of humane strength which after Sinne remayned in man and is commonly and vsually expounded and noted by the Name of Free-Will But it is needefull we discerne the nature of this Doctrine three manner of wayes First commonly and absolutely according to the causes thereof Secondly in Particular according to the state and condition of man being a Sinner Thirdly respectiuely and comparatiuely according to the diverse estate of Man out of the State of Sinne whether of his Integrity or redemption or glory Commonly and Absolutely Free-will is defined to bee a naturall power or faculty of the Soule by it owne and proper motion without coaction or forcing to chuse or refuse the good or the evill which is proposed or offered to the will by the mind or vnderstanding to bee chosen or refused The Efficient Cause of this Free-will is vsually two wayes distinguished For one is Primary and another Neerest The Primary or Principall is God the beginning not onely of every good in nature but also of Nature it selfe and of the faculties and functions thereof a Gen. 45.8 Pro. 16.1 Ier. 10.23 Phil. 2.13 The Neerest is Free-will it selfe that is the will of mā which by judgement of reason going before of it owne accord choosing imbraceth or refusing shunneth that which was objected by the mind b Esa 1.19.20 Mat. 23.37 1. Kin. 3.5 Of this will there is vsually had a double consideration the one as touching the Speciall the other as touching the Operation As touching the speciall it is sayed to bee a faculty of willing or nilling as touching the Operation it is sayde to bee a function or action of that faculty eyther improperly occupied about the ends or properly about the meanes that tend to the ends The Matter hath the nature eyther of a Subiect or Obiect That which hath the nature of a Subiect as in this place we consider it is a substance created intelligent indued with reason wherein namely the vnderstanding and will are the essentiall parts proportionally but freedome is sayde to consist or be in these parts as the separable accident in the Subject That which is of the Obiect is generally all that which is put or consisteth in election or choice But specially it is the moral good or evil whervnto the will of the Creature is freely carried or which it freely escheweth And as touching Free-will in the cause of Naturall good the question is more Philosophicall then Divine The Forme of Free-will is the very freedome of the mind or of the Electiue will which for learning sake must three wayes be distinguished known For there is one freedome in the Subject another to the Object and lastly another from the lett that crosseth the same which three it is needefull that wee know for the making of this Forme and for the condition of mans Free-will First there is required freedome in the Subiect that is in the will it selfe which from her inward beginning worketh alwayes freely and that by reason of it owne nature according to which a free necessity of willing is laide vpon it So that it is not to bee called a Will which is bereft of this Freedome For the wil hath such a reciprocacy with Freedome as with it owne Essentiall property Then there is required freedome to the Obiect eyther to both opposite by way of disjunction to witte eyther morall good or morall evill whereof the one is chosen or refused before or rather then the other or to eyther of thē when onely one is offered to be taken or refused Lastly there is required freedome from the let that crosseth For the wil of man is freede from compulsion and from necessity From Compulsion for what it doth it doth the same of it owne accord From Necessity for albeit in respect of the Speciall it be necessarily limited to doe eyther good only or evill onely or both yet by it own inward power it freely limiteth it selfe to the bringing forth of it owne act yet it is needefull that both manners of Freedome be distinguished First from the Freedome of right and secondly from the Freedome of slavery That nature hath denied to man This the corruption of nature He hath not freedome of right who of due is Subject to another and according to the will of the same liueth is moved and worketh c Pro. 21.1 Act. 2.23 Wherefore all selfe power or liberty ought to bee given and assigned to God alone he hath not freedome from slavery who through his owne fault hath made himselfe a slaue to sinne and the tyranny thereof d Ioh. 8.34 The End is the glory of God in his Iustice and mercy and the Salvation or inexcusablenesse of man Particularly in the state of Corruption Free will is defined to be a naturall faculty and power freely and without coaction to chuse and performe the evill which by the mind is offered to the will to be chosen and performed The Efficient Primarie Cause is God both in respect of the Will and the freedome it selfe as being the Author and beginning of both as touching the naturall state thereof The neerest cause are the mind and will of man so farre forth as both by corruption of nature are averted from good and converted to evill and the vnderstanding verily proposeth and iudgeth falshood for truth and the will chuseth and followeth the evill in stead of the good c T it 1.15 1 Cor. 2.14 Rom. 8.7 Rom. 5.6 2. Tim. 2.26 The Matter as it is considered in the Subiect is the naturall or carnal man but as in the obiect it is the evill vnto which the actions of both faculties are carried Now the Evill whether you referre it to the inward or to the outwarde actions wee two wayes consider absolutely and in it selfe or Relatiuely as having reference to another thing The Evill absolutely is that which is strictly forbidden of God Relatiuely is that which is evill in the obiect circumstances and end that is which