when your thoughts are come to the highest stay there and be content to wonder in silence and if you cannot reach to conceive of him as he is yet take heed you conceive not of him as he is not Neither will it suffice your Christian mind to have this awful and confused apprehension of the Deity without a more special and inward conceit of three in this one Three Persons in this one Essence not divided but distinguished and not more mingled than divided There is nothing wherein the want of words can wrong and grieve us but in this Here alone as we can adore and not conceive so we can conceive and not utter yea utter your selves and not be conceived yet as we may think here of one substance in three subsistences one Essence in three Relations one Jehovah begetting begotten proceeding Father Son Spirit yet so as the Son is no other thing from the Father but another Person or the Spirit from the Son Let your thoughts here walk warily the path is narrow the conceit either of three substances or but one subsistence is damnable Let me lead you yet higher and further in this intricate way towards the Throne of Grace All this will not avail you if you take not your Mediator with you if you apprehend not a true Manhood gloriously united to the Godhead without change of either Nature without mixture of both whose Presence whose Merits must give passage acceptance vigour to your Prayers Here must be therefore as you see thoughts holily mixed of a Godhead and Humanity one Person in two Natures of the same Deity in divers Persons and one Nature wherein if ever Heavenly Wisdom must bestir it self in directing us so to sever these apprehensions that none be neglected so to conjoyn them that they be not confounded O the depth of Divine Mysteries more than can be wondered at O the necessity of this high Knowledge which who attains not may babble but prayeth not Still you doubt and ask if you may not direct your Prayers to one Person of three Why not safely and with comfort What need we fear while we have our Saviour for our pattern O my Father if possible let this Cup pass and Paul everywhere both in thanks and requests but with due care in Worshipping all in one Exclude the other while you fix your heart upon one your Prayer is sin retain all and mention one you offend not None of them doth ought for us without all It is a true rule of Divines All their external works are common To sollicite one therefore and not all were injurious And if you stay your thoughts upon the sacred Humanity of Christ with inseparable adoration of the Godhead united and thence climbe up to the holy conceit of that blessed and dreadful Trinity I dare not censure I dare not but commend your divine method Thus should Christians ascend from Earth to Heaven from one Heaven to another If I have given your Devotions any light it is well the least glimpse of this knowledge is worth all the full gleames of Humane and Earthly skill But I mistake if your own heart wrought upon with serious Meditations under that Spirit of Illumination will not prove your best master After this weak direction study to conceive aright that you may pray aright and pray that you may conceive and meditate that you may do both and the God of Heaven direct you inable you that you may do all CHAP. III. Concerning Christ our Mediator I Will now by God's help prove by the holy Scriptures that the Eternal Word viz. the second Person in the Trinity took flesh of the Virgin Mary and so was made like unto his brethren in all things sin only excepted Heb. 2.17 4.15 For neither the Father nor holy Spirit took our nature upon them but Christ only For as by the first Adam came sin and death by sin even so comes grace and life by Jesus Christ Rom. 5. But here we must note how Christ took Man's Nature upon him Not by turning his Godhead into his Manhood but by assuming of his Manhood into his Godhead not by confusion or mixture of substance but by unity of Personâ— For as the reasonable Soul and fleshly body is one Man even so the Deity and Humanity is one Christ When I say Christ took our Nature upon him I mean not that he took our flesh only as some Hereticks have thought but the Soul of man also Forasmuch as he is no half-Saviour but a Redeemer both of Body and Soul for St. John saith The Word was made Flesh viz. by taking Man's flesh or Nature in union with the Word which is Christ And why he is called the Word I have already shewed and shall God willing do it again in the Questions and Answers about Christ in a place set for it therefore I pass it over here Quest But the Eutychians ask us Of what matter the flesh of Christ was made Or Did he not bring it out of Heaven Answ No truly for as the first Adams flesh was made of the Earth as it is written Gen. 2.7 Even so it is written Christ was made of a Woman Gal. 4.4 for he did not pass through her as Water through a Pipe but took part of her substance therefore the Prophet Isaiah saith There shall come forth a Rod out of the Stem of Jesse and a branch or blossome shall grow out of his roots Isa 9. Acts 13.23 And Solomon calleth him a Lilly and Rose Cant. 2.1 Now you know the Flower and the Rose taketh its nature of the root For as St. Paul saith As is the root such are the branches Rom. 11.16 17. Besides it was the Will of God that the same flesh that sinned should be punished as we may see an instance in Davids Child although David sinned in killing of Vriah yet it pleased God to spare Davids person from death and punish him in his flesh viz. his Child with death See 2 Sam. 12.14 Howbeit because by this deed thou hast given great occasion to the enemies of the Lord to blaspheme the Child also that it born unto thee shall surely die Even so it was Adam that sinned but it pleased God to spare his person and punish him in his flesh viz. Christ For as St. Paul saith He was made a Curse for us Gal. 3.13 And as St. Peter saith The just suffered for the unjust 1 Pet. 1.18 3.18 See the comparison also betwixt the two Adams in Rom. 5.18 Therefore as by the offence of one judgment came upon all men to condemnation even so by the righteousness of one the free gift came upon all men to justification of life For as by one man's disobedience many were made sinners so by the obedience of one shall many be made righteous And thus as St. Paul saith He is flesh of our flesh Forasmuch as the Children are partakers of flesh and blood he also himself took part of the same Heb. 2.14
to be a speech by Synechdoche viz. wherein a part is taken for the whole or the whole for a part Q. But those Titles which belong to the Office of Redemption are they to be attributed to the Natures severally asunder or to the Person A. To the Person as Christ is a Mediator Pastor Priest according to both Natures although each of them in that work retaining his own proper efficacy or operation Q What is the Effect of that Personal Vnion A. The bestowing of gifts whereby the Humane Nature in the Person of Christ is adorned and whereby it excelleth all other Creatures in Wisdom Goodness Holiness Power Majesty and Glory which the old Fathers call the Deifying of the Flesh the Schoolmen Habitual Grace of the Communion of Properties which is mutual one of another and the reciprocation of the Names altogether distinct Q How manifold is the state of Christ A. Two-fold one of Humiliation whereby he willingly undergoing the burdens reproaches and punishments of our Nature did humble himself to the death of the Cross the Divinity in the mean while according to Irenaeus resting or hiding it self that he might be crucified and die The other of Exhaltation whereby after his death his Humane Nature did lay aside all the infirmities of it but not the Essential Properties and was wonderfully exalted above all Creatures unto the greatest honour yet not in any case match'd and equalled to the Divine Nature of Christ Phil. 2.7 9. Q. What are the Doctrines contrary to this A. The first Heresie of Macedonius and Valentinus who affirmed That Christ brought with him a Celestial body from Heaven As also of Apelles who said His Body was aiery his Flesh star-like and that he passed from the Virgin as Water from a Pipe 2. Of the Marcionites who feigned unto him an imaginary Body 3. Of Apollinaris who denyed that Christ did assume a reasonable Soul but that his Divinity was unto him instead of his mind 4. Of Eunomius who affirmed Christ to be meer man and that he was called the Son of God by Adoption And of Ebâ—oni who said that Christ was born by Humane generation 5. Of Nestorius who taught That as there be two Natures in Christ so there are two Persons and that the Divinity is present with the Humanity by circumstance and combination but not by Personal union Therefore he denyed that Mary was the Mother of God or brought forth God and affirmed that Man not God was crucified of the Jews 6. Eutyches Heresie contrary to the former for he taught that the Humane Nature after the Union was indued with the properties of the Divinity viz. the Divine Nature was turned into flesh 7. Of the Manichees who avouched that Christ had but one only Will and not two a Divine and a Humane Will 8. Of the Vbiquitaries who attribute to the Humanity of Christ the Essential properties of the Divinity altogether forgetting that saying He that taketh away the Properties taketh away the Nature and on the contrary He that attributeth the Proprieties attributeth the Nature and of whatsoever the Essence cannot be affirmed no more can the Essential Proprieties thereof be affirmed of the same Now I have here briefly given you an account of these Eight Opinions about Christ as aforesaid And by these you see St. Peters words fulfilled 2 Pet. 2.1 But there were false Prophets also among the People even as there shall be false Teachers among you who privily shall bring in damnable HERESIES even denying the Lord that bought them and bring upon themselves swift destruction And many shall follow their pernitious wayes by reason of whom the way of Truth shall be evil spoken of Acts 20.28 For St. Paul saith Take head therefore unto your selves and unto all the Flock over which the Holy Ghost hath made you Overseers to feed the Church of God which he hath purchased with his own blood for I know this that after my departing shall grievous Wolves enter in among you not sparing the Flock also of your own selves shall men arise speaking perverse things to draw away disciples after them So Isa 9.21 saith That Manasses against Ephraim and Ephraim against Manasses and both against Judah Also Herod against Pilat and Pilat against Herod and both against Christ even so here is the Eunomians or Socinians or Bidelians against the Eutychians and both against Christ for the one denyeth his Divine Nature and the other his Humane contrary to Matth. 22.45 and Rev. 22.16 I am the root and off-spring of David and so by consequence both deny the true Christ For the Devil knoweth there is no Salvation for us without Faith in him who is David's Lord and David's Son Acts 4.12 Neither is there Salvation in any other for there is none other Name under heaven given among men whereby we must be saved Acts 4.12 And now Brethren that I may as the Apostle Paul saith Acts. 20.26 be clear from the blood of you all for I have and will declare unto you all the counsel of God that I know touching this matter but as the Apostle saith 1 Cor. 13.9 So say I for we know in part and we prophesie in part for now we see through a glass darkly but then face to face now I know in part but then shall I know even as also I am known 2 Pet. 3.17 Ye therefore beloved seeing ye know these things before beware lest ye also being led away with the Error of the wicked fall from your own stedfastness For some of you have been as brands pluck'd out of the fire Jude 23. I mean out of the Eutychian Heresie which doth not only deny Christ to be truly David's Son but saith That he that was truly David's Lord and Creator was mortal and died contrary to 1 Tim. 1.17 Now unto the King Eternal Immortal Invisible the only Wise God be honour and glory for ever and ever Amen And now because the right knowledge of Christ and union of his Natures is so absolutely necessary to Salvation I will add some Questions and propound them for the Eutychians consideration CHAP. VII Containing Questions Answers about the Union of Natures in Christ Quest 1. WHy must Christ become Man and take our Nature viz. the flesh of the Virgin Mary Answ Because the Justice of God required that seeing in that Nature God was offended in that Nature should a satisfaction be made to God for the offence Now sin was committed in Man's Nature Adam sinned first and in him all his Posterity therefore Christ took Man's Nature that so he might suffer death and so make satisfaction to his Father for Men's sins Q. 2. Is there no way appointed of God to remit our sins but by shedding of blood A. No so saith the Holy Ghost Heb. 9.22 Without shedding of blood there is no remission Q. 3. Can Christ considered as he is the Eternal Word Joh. 1.1 and very God 1 Joh. 5.20 die A. No for God is immortal and
quickned by the Spirit which we call his Divine Nature for as he did bear our sins so also our punishment for sin which was death but by his Divine Nature he overcame it as aforesaid 1 Pet. 3.18 Obj. 2. Peradventure some will object against these things as I have before laid down saying He may be the Son of David although he did not take of the flesh of the Virgin Mary and so by consequence the flesh of David inasmuch as he was born of the Daughter of David for it may be read Born of a Woman as well as made of a Woman Gal. 4.4 as also Rom. 1.3 born of the Seed of David A. We say with you He was born of the Seed of David and so of the Virgin Mary But yet so as he was also made of the Seed of David and of a Woman Which thing you deny viz. that he was made of the Seed of David and if so then he was not properly the Son of David although born of a Daughter of David no more than Bethsheba's Child was Vriah's which was begotten of her by David which you know was David's and not Vriah's Child although she was his Wife for no man is properly the Son of such a man except he partake of the substance nature or flesh of that man But you say Christ did not do so therefore he was not by your Opinion the Son of David Obj. 3. But no Child say they doth take any thing from his Mother but only nourishment therefore Christ did not A. Who told you so not God's Word and do you know by experience how bones do grow in the womb but if your Opinion be true why then doth God forbid his Children to marry their Sister by the Mothers side how is she kin to him if she was begotten by another father But God saith your Opinion is false as you may see Levit. 18.9 c. Some Queries to the Eutychians Query 1. Whether doth not the Eutychian Opinion in denying the two Natures in Christ viz. the Divine and Humane by consequence deny the Lamb the Priest and the Altar mentioned in the Law to be types of Christ contrary to the Analogy of Faith Answ They do for Christ as Man is the Lamb as God the Altar and as God-Man the Priest Q. 2. Whether doth the Holy Ghost apply these three to Christ in the New Testament yea or nay A. Yes he doth apply them for he is the Lamb or Sacrifice for sin Joh. 1.29 Heb. 9.26 10.10 and the Altar Heb. 13.10 and the Priest Heb. 5.6 For as the typical Lamb was without blemish even so was Christ saith St. Peter 1 Pet. 1.18 2.24 Secondly The Priest was sanctified or set apart to offer a Sacrifice acceptable to God even so was Christ Joh. 17.17 Thirdly As the Altar did sanctifie the Sacrifice even so did the Godhead of Christ the Humane Nature Heb. 9.14 Query 3. Whether doth not the Eutychian Opinion make the threefold Offices of Christ of none effect or deny them all A. Yes for the Divine Nature cannot be anointed to be Priest Prophet and King Query 4. Whether can any man come to the Father but through Faith in these threefold Offices of Christ A. No for what the Tabernacle or Temple was to them under the Law that is Christ to us under the Gospel And as God manifested to them in the Temple was the proper object of worship to them even so God manifested to us in Christ is the proper object of worship to us for the Flesh or Humane Nature of Christ is the medium or mean by which we have access to God in all our Worship This is proved Heb. 10.19 20 c. Some Arguments to prove the Opinion of the Eutychians heretical and dangerous Argum. 1. That Doctrine or Opinion that saith Christ was not the Seed of the Woman Gen. 3.15 which was promised of God to break the Serpents head is a dangerous Arg. 2. That Opinion that maketh the Tabernacle or Temple Lamb Priest and Altar ordained of God for Divine Worship till Christ came in the flesh no true types of him is a dangerous Opinion But such is their Opinion Therefore dangerous Arg. 3. That Opinion which in it self or the natural consequences depending thereon maketh void all the promises of God concerning man's Salvation by Christ must needs be a very dangerous Opinion But such is their Opinion therefore dangerous The Reasons appear plain to every impartial Reader in all these three Arguments But here I will add That either the Seed of the Woman Gen. 3.15 was God which was justly offended with Adam for his sin Or else it was the Man Christ which was made of a Woman Gal. 4. But it was not God that was made of a Woman therefore Man And now for you to say that God the Creator of all things in Heaven and in Earth Col. 1.16 made himself a Creature or was made so is false as I said before and also impossible sith God is Perfection it self And to say that he passed through the Virgins womb as Water through a Conduit as some Hereticks have said is also false And to say he had an imaginary body and not a real body as some Hereticks have said is also very false as appeareth by his death and resurrection As to the proof of the second Argument That the Lamb the Priest and the Altar were types of Christ see what is already said in the Questions and Answers as also the Scriptures thereunto annexed Which cannot be applyed to him viz. Christ except you with us grant the two Natures to be in one Person If you can shew us how you do it As to the proof of the third Argument That your Opinion doth deny all the Promises of God I prove it thus That Opinion that denyeth Christ to be the true Son of David denyeth all the Promises of God concerning mans Salvation But such is your Opinion Therefore c. 2ly That Opinion that denieth the proper signification of the Sacraments viz. Baptism the Lords Supper must needs be a dangerous Opinion but such is your Opinion therefore dangerous The reason of the minor Proposition is because it denyeth the two Natures in Christ which are lively set forth by the Sign and the thing signified by these Sacraments 1. For as all the Ordinances of God's instituted Worship as Sacrifices under the Law c. so all the Sacraments under the Gospel seem to have immediate relation to Christ as God manifested in the flesh For you may observe they consist of two parts the one Natural the other Spiritual the one External the other Internal the one as it were the Body the other the Soul of it the one representing the Humanity the other the Divinity of Christ so that every Ordinance of Worship is as it were a representation of Christ incarnate 2. The Divine Essence or Godhead in Christ seemeth to be the proper object of all Worship for Christ saith
12. If the Father Son and Spirit be all Creators of Heaven and Earth then are they God by Nature but they are all Creators of Heaven and Earth therefore God by Nature Gen. 1.16 2dly If they all know the thoughts and search the heart of man then are they God by Nature but they all do so therefore 3dly If they may all be ultimately sinned against then are they God by Nature but they may be so therefore 4thly If we may worship them with Divine Worship then are they God by Nature but we may worship them with Divine Worship therefore 5thly If we may be baptized in their Name then are they God by Nature but we may yea ought to be baptized in their Name therefore God by Nature Matth. 21.19 20. The reason is plain because we expect the remission of our sins in his Name into which we were baptized as also promise to worship him in Spirit and in Truth for God is a Spirit and therefore will be worshipped in Spirit and in Truth Now albeit St. John saith speaking of Christ I and my Father are one Joh. 10.30 He doth not by this saying deny the three Persons for in that he saith we are he teacheth us that he and his Father be not one Person forasmuch as ARE cannot be spoken of one Person properly and in that he saith ONE he declared that he is of the self-same substance with his Father Oh the exceeding deepness and power of God's Word which is as a two-edged Sword for with these two syllables Are and One it confoundeth two Heresies viz. the Arrians and Patripâ—ssions and Sabellians which wrest that saying of Christ He that seeth me seeth the Father also Joh. 14. which must be understood of their Essence and not of their Persons as appeareth by these words I go to prepare a place for you saith Christ and if I go I will come again which plainly proves a distinction of the Person vers 2 3. If we may not believe St. John that there be three that bear record in heaven viz. the Father the Word and the Holy Ghosh and these three are one 1 Joh. 5.7 to be a Unity and Trinity as aforesaid then these absurdities will unavoidably follow That if the Father be both the Son and the Holy Ghost as he is if their Persons be one as well as their Essence is one which is indivisible Isa 44.6 I am and there is none besides me Then the Father was he which took our Nature upon him Heb. 2.16 the Father was tempted of the Devil he suffered hunger and thirst he was buffeted and and scourged of the Jews and put to death by wicked hands he also came down in the likeness of a Dove and also of fiery Tongues he begat himself he is greater than himself he sent himself into the World he gave himself a Seat at his own right hand he is the express Image of himself he is greater than himself But if our English Eutychians cannot see these things as aforesaid to be blasphemy against God the Father yet I hope you will see them to be great absurdities for they are the natural consequences of your Opinion for you say it was God that died in the likeness of Man and to prove this you wrest as you do other Scriptures Phil. 2.6 8. for you say He that was in the form of God thought it no robbery to be equal to God and you say He put himself in the likeness of Men and being found in fashion as a man he 〈◊〉 himself and became obedient to death even the death of the Cross wherefore God also hath highly exalted him c. Now if the Godhead was turned into flesh as Water was turned into Wine as you say it was and there can be but one God by Nature both you and we say and I hope believe then if the Father be that one God For to us there is but one God the Father of whom are all things and we in him and one Lord Jesus Christ by whom are all things and we by him 1 Cor. 8.6 Then I pray consider of your Opinion as also the bad consequences that depend upon it For if you shall still be obstinate and deny that the Eternal Word did ever take any flesh of the Virgin Mary into Personal Union with it self as we say it did but will still say and believe that the Eternal Word viz. God the Creator of Heaven and Earth did make himself a Creature viz. Man and so died for our sins Then how you can acquit your selves from being rightly called blasphemers of the Eternal God which is only Immortal and Immutable as I said before I cannot yet tell because of the reasons aforesaid c. Now forasmuch as I understand by some late Conferences I have had with our English Eutychians that they deny or at least doubt of God's Omnipresence and with the Anthropomorphites think of God as if he were some old Man sitting in some one place on a Throne as Kings use to do and so with the Papists and Socinians think that one may see from his right hand to his left as Dr. Owen saith in his Answer to Mr. John Biddles Catechism Now you may see by this how one Error begetteth another For first they deny the Divine Essence of the Eternal God to be Infinite Immense and as the Prophet Jeremiah saith To fill Heaven and Earth Jer. 23.24 And as Solomon saith The Heaven of Heavens cannot contain him how much less this House which I have built 2 Chron. 6.18 But they not minding such Scriptures as these or else not understanding of them but reading some other Scriptures which speak of his coming down from Heaven to see Sodom c. Gen. 18 19 chap. As also because man was made in his Image and that he hath hands and feet c. Therefore they cannot tell how he should properly be a Spirit or Spiritual substance Joh. 4.24 and therefore cannot understand the blessed Trinity as I said before And indeed without this be granted the Trinity cannot be proved to be three Persons and yet but one God as we say and believe as aforesaid for although we distinguish the Persons in the Godhead yet we do not separate them because the Essence is Infinite and Omnipresent Psal 139.7 Whither shall I fly from thy Presence If I ascend up into Heaven thou art there if I make my bed in Hell behold thou art there Amos 9.2 3 4. And to give you one instance what we mean when we say they are distinct and not separated from the Essence of God we mean after this manner as when we-say there are three Faculties in the Soul of Man viz. Understanding Will and Memory now these three Faculties are distinct yet not separated from the Soul for the Soul acts wholly in these three yet not three Souls but one Soul even so is the Eternal Godhead in the Father Son and Spirit and yet but one God but this
For the Apostle saith Verily he took not on him the Nature of Angels but he-took on him the Seed of Abraham Wherefore in all things it behoved him to be made like unto his brethren that he might be a merciful and faithful High Priest in things pertaining to God to make reconciliation for the sins of the People By all which it doth appear that he took flesh of the Virgin Mary I touch this matter the more because not long since I communed with some men who very confidently did affirm that the eternal Word did not take any flesh of the Virgin Mary And they also boasted that there were many Men and Women in England of their opinion concerning this matter For although they do grant that Christ as Man was really flesh yet they deny the matter of which it was made to be of or from the Virgin Mary but say that it was Heavenly matter viz. the Divine Nature was turned into Flesh in the Virgins Womb even as the Water at Cana was turned into Wine Joh. 2.7 Now I will by God's help in this ensuing Discourse demonstrate the falshood of this their Opinion for it denyeth Christ to be the true Son of David according to the flesh contrary to all these Texts Gen. 26.4 22.18 2 Sam. 7.12 Psal 132.11 Acts 2.30 all which prove him to be the true Son of David according to the flesh As also St. Matthew and St. Luke reckon his kindred and generation from Adam Abraham and David c. Moreover Christ came not only to die for our sins but also to be an example unto us and a perfect pattern of good living as shall be declared afterward more fully For how could he more set forth his exceeding love to us than in dying for us For greater love than this hath no man than to bestow his life saith Christ speaking of his own death Now the Deity suffered no infirmity or change which is impossible wherefore it was necessary that he should take our Nature upon him who came to heal our infirmities and to teach us to cure them through Faith in well-doing If he had taken them in any other nature then the example of his life would not have been teachable unto us for if he had been tempted in any other nature or died how could we learn to withstand the Devil and to overcome his temptations by Christ's example wherefore there was no way like this to redeem man He is Wisdom therefore he took the wisest way c. Now that you may the better understand these great Mysteries concerning God and of the Father and of Christ Col. 2.2 I will put that which I have said into Questions Answers that so through God's blessing you may see this great Mystery of Godliness 1 Tim. 3.15 and believe it As also add more to this that I have here said for your comfort by way of Vse and Application and so leave the Work to â—he blessing of God and your serious consideration CHAP. IV. Questions and Answers about God Quest WHat things are we to know concerning God Answ 1. What God is 2. What a God he is or how he is affected towards us Quest What is God A. God is an Essence Spiritual Incomprehensible Almighty Immortal Infinite Love it self Mercy it self Justice it self Holiness it self Purity it self Goodness it self Wisdom it self Long-suffering it self Bountifulness it self which is the Father who from all Eternity begat the Son Coeternal with himself and of the same substance with the Father and the Son not made nor created but begotten of the Father from all Eternity Joh 4.24 1 Tim. 1 17 Jam. 1.17 Acts 1.8 Jer. 23.24 1 Joh. 4.8 16. Exod. 34.6 7. Mat. 5 44. and the Holy Ghost proceeding from them both the Father and the Son the Creator and Conserver of all things the Redeemer and Sanctifier of the Elect. Which is no definition for he that is super-substantial and incomprehensible cannot be defined but such a description as sufficiently containeth all such things as in this life are necessary for us to know for the service of God and our Salvation Q. Is there one God only or whether be there more A. One only Deut. 6.4 Hear O Israel the Lord thy God is One Lord. 1 Sam. 2 2 Isa 41.4 44.6 Mat. 12.32 And so 1 Cor. 8.4 We know that an Idol is nothing in the World and that there is no other God but One. And seeing the true God is most high Eph. 4.6 1 Tim â— 5. and most infinite actually therefore there can be no more but One God because there can be no more but one that is above all neither any more but one infinite And this one God is manifested to us by such testimonies as cannot deceive to wit by Miracles Prophesies and other things which by his Omnipotence may be done Q. How is God said to be One A. Neither by a genus nor species but in Essence and in Number or in regard of his Nature because there is one only Essence of God and that indivisible Q. Why doth the Scripture make mention of Elohim or Gods joyning that word as well with the plural as singular number A. Not to the end that it should make a multitude of Gods or divide the Essence but to distinguish the Persons because though there be one Person of the Father another Person of the Son and another of the holy Ghost yet the Father is not another thing or another God distinct from the Son and the holy Ghost the Son is not another thing or another God distinct from the Father and the holy Ghosh neither is the holy Ghost another thing or another God distinct from the Father and the Son because the Nature of God is but one and indivisible although the Father be one the Son another and the holy Ghost another And therefore they are not of divers Natures of another and divers Substance not conjoyned or knit together in one Substance as men which have one common essence not only of the like substance but of one and the same substance have the same Essence the same Eternity the same Will the same Operation the same Power and the same Glory Phil. 2.6 Q. How many wayes is the Name of God taken in Scriptures A. Two wayes properly for the Substance Essence and Nature and improperly Now it is taken properly or for the Essence when it is taken without the distinction of any one of the Persons as Joh. 4.24 God is a Spirit where God is taken for the whole Essence of the Deity as is also the Name Jehovah Or else personally when there is joyned unto the Name of God the name of the Person as God the Father God the Son God the holy Ghost Or when the Father is opposed to the Son who is very God and the second Person in the Trinity as Rom. 7.25 I thank God by Jesus Christ So Rom. 8.3 the Father is called God the word Father
him not by a Trope or Symbolically by reason of the presence of God as Exod. 17.15 It is given to the Altar Psal 24.8 It is given to the Ark. Jer. 33.16 It is given to Jerusalem Q. 9. Which be the testimonies of the second sort A. The works which none can do but God alone which are ascribed to him to wit to create and preserve to redeem to blot out iniquities to search the heart to hear our prayers to quicken to judge moreover the Miracles which he wrought by his own power according to that Prophesie Isa 53.5 6. unto which also even Christ himself sendeth us and for the working whereof he gave power to his Apostles moreover those Attributes which do agree only to the Nature of God and ascribed unto him as Eternal Almighty Infinite King of Kings Saviour and the rest testifie him to be God by Nature See these Scriptures following Joh. 1.3 5.17 Col. 1.16 Heb. 1.23 1 Cor. 1.30 1 Thess 1.10 Matth. 9.6 9.4 Mar. 2.8 14.13 Joh. 14.14 5.27 5.22 10.25 Matth. 11.45 10.8 Mic. 5.2 Joh. 1.1 17.5 3.31 Phil. 3.21 Matth. 18.20 28.20 Rev. 19.26 Matth. 1.21 Acts 4.12 Q. What is the third kind of testimonies A. The worship and honour which is performed unto Christ namely Invocation Adoration Faith Hope Psal 72.11 All the Kings of the Earth shall worship him all People shall serve him Isa 11.10 and Rom. 15.11 12. All Nations shall call upon him and trust in him Rom 14.11 Phil. 2.10 Psal 2.12 Blessed are they that put their trust in him every knee shall bow unto him And Joh. 14.1 Ye believe in God believe also in me Acts 7.39 Lord Jesus receive my Spirit All which do prove that he is true God Q. Why is it necessary that Christ the Redeemer should be God A. For two causes especially whereof of former is the greatness of the evil wherewith all mankind was overwhelmed which could be taken away by no creature The later is the greatness of the good Mat. 19.17 which could be restored by none to man again but by God who alone is truly good Q. What is the greatness of the evil A. It standeth in Four things which be these The greatness of man's sin the infinite and unsupportable weight of God's anger the power of Death the tyranny of the Devil which to take away to abolish to appease to overcome none was able but God alone Q. What is the greatness of the good which could be restored by no creature A. The restoring again of the Image of God therefore Christ 1 Cor. 1.31 is made to us Wisdom Righteousness Sanctification and Redemption Col 3.10 not only by revealing and teaching of them but by performing and restoring of them Q. Why is he called the Word A. Because it is he that spake the Word and all things were made Q. According to which Nature is he called the Image of God Col. 1.15 A. Not according to his Humane Nature alone as man is said to be made after the Image of God but especially according to his Divine Nature but manifested in the flesh 2 Tim. 3.16 or so far forth as God hath truly manifested himself in Christ whereupon he is called The brightness of the Glory of the Father Heb. 1.3 and the Character or ingraven form of his Person because he is not some vanishing representation but ingraven and durable Q. Prove that Christ is very Man A. I will Gen. 3.15 The Seed of the Woman is promised which shall break the Serpents head Gen. 22.17 God promised Abraham that in his Seed all the Nations of the Earth should be blessed 3 Sam. 7.12 It is promised to David that his Son must sit upon his Throne and Reign for ever Isa 7.14 Behold a Virgin shall Conceive and bring forth a Son Besides all this the History of the Gospel doth plainly prove that Christ was conceived * Luke 1.31 2.7 21. 22.20 Heb. 2.4 Mat. 26.38 4.2 Joh. 19.29 19.34 Mat. 27.50 9.36 Joh. 2.17 11.33 35. Mat. 26.37 38. Acts 1.9 11. born circumcised had a true Body and Soul was hungry thirsty shed his blood that he died and that he had all the Properties and Affections of man's Nature yet without sin that he ascended visibly and locally into Heaven and thence that he shall come again to Judgment Q. Why must Christ needs become Man A. 1. The Justice of God required it should be so that the disobedience committed in our flesh might in the same be repaired Rom. 5.17 18 19. Heb. 2.14 2. The reason of our Adoption for it pleased the Son of God to take the Nature of Man upon him and to become our brother and so by that means to become our nearest kinsman and most near allied unto us that we being made his members might be made the Sons of God Gal. 3.16 and that he might have right to redeem and ransom us Hence is matter of comfort in every kind of temptation Therefore the Apostle to the Hebrews Heb. 2. 17. 4.5 saith He took not upon him the Nature of Angels but the Seed of Abraham and in all things became like to his brethren that he might have compassion of his brethren 3. For the confirmation of our Resurrection for in that Christ took on him our Nature and hath raised it up and given unto it immortality and hath exalted it in Heaven by vertue of that Communion which we have with him shall we be raised up at the last day and this our vile body shall be made conformable to the glorious Body of Christ Phil. 3.21 1 Cor. 15.22 As in Adam all are dead so in Christ shall all be made alive Q. Why was neither the Father nor the Holy Ghost incarnate but the Son A. 1. Because it was meet that the World should be redeemed and all things restored by him by whom all things were created or that man should be redeemed from death by him by whom he was first created and should have been brought unto life eternal if he had not sinned 2. It would have been unconvenient that there should be two Sons one in the Divine Nature another in the Humane Nature 3. It was the Eternal Decree of the Father whereby he purposed to save mankind by his Son Heb. 2.10 Q. Whether is Christ God and Man divided or joyned together A. Joyned and uniced but not divided Q. By what kind of Vnion A. Not by inhabitation only as God dwelleth in the Saints Joh. 17.21 not by consent only as the Faithful are one in the Father and the Son not by Mixture as when Water is mingled with Wine not by Combination as two boards be joyned together lastly not by Composition whereby of the mixture of two things there ariseth a third but by Personal Union which as it 's said the Greeks call Incorporation because neither the whole Deity nor any part of it
is subjectively communicated to the Humanity of Christ but only the Humane Nature was assumed of the Son of God into the same Person Heb. 2.16 Q. What is the Personal Vnion in Christ A. It is that whereby the Person of the Son of God being a Person from all Eternity existing did assume the most pure Nature of Man wanting all personal existing of its own into the unity of his Person and made it his own the properties of each Nature being preserved Or as Paul defines it Col. 2.9 whereby in Christ doth dwell all the fulness of the Godhead bodily whereof we have a manifest resemblance in the union of the Soul and the body And therefore the Apostle doth well call it a great Mystery of Godliness 1 Tim. 3.16 Q. How is this Union made A. Without all confusion Without all conversion of one Nature into another indivisibly inseparably The difference of the Natures by no means being taken away by the union but rather the propriety of either Nature being saved and joyned together or concurring into one Person and one subsisting as the Calcedon Synod speak in the History of Evagrius lin 2. cap. 4. And from that time that the Word did assume our Humane Nature he never left it no not in his death And to this purpose make these Verses I am that I was not I was that I am now both am I called Thou knowest me not except thou know me subsisting of both Natures See Mr. John Tombes his Exposition upon the Calcedon-Council concerning the two Natures in Christ asserted in his Book intituled Emmanuel or God-man Sect. 15. Q. By what testimonies will you prove that the Divine and Humant Nature in Christ did joyn together in one and the same Person A. Isa 7.14 9.6 Luk. 1.35 That which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God Joh. 1.14 And the Word was made Flesh not by Sacramental-union in which respect Christ was said to be a Rock not by confusion of the Natures nor by commutation as Water is turned into Wine Joh. 2.14 but by assuming the flesh into the unity of this Person The Voice of God speaketh thus of Jesus Christ the Son of Mary This is my beloved Son Matth. 3.17 He that descended is even the self-same that ascended above all Heavens that he might fill all things Eph. 4.10 God sent his Son born of a Woman Gal. 4.4 Q. Why is it necessary that Christ should be both God and Man in one and the same Person A. 1. To die end he might reconcile God and Man or that he might make God and Man one 2. That he might be a fit Mediator between God and Men 2 Tim. 2.5 Heb. 8 6 by reason of his Participation and Affinity with them both 3. That he might reconcile God unto us by his death which if he had been God alone he could never have suffered if only Man he could never have overcome 4. That the work of Redemption performed in the flesh of the Son might become of sufficient price for sin whereby God that infinite good was offended For although certain actions do properly proceed from the Divine Nature and some are done by the Humane Nature yet all of them do equally receive their price and worthiness from the Divine Nature So the flesh of Christ hath power to quicken because it is the flesh of that Person who is God the obedience of the Man Christ doth Justifie because it is the obedience of that Person who is God the blood of Christ redeems the Church because it is the blood of God Acts 20.28 Q. What is the Communication of Properties A. It is such a manner of Predication whereby those things which be proper to Natures are indifferently attributed to the Person of Christ which is but one and that because Christ in his two Natures is both to wit perfect God and perfect Man to whom therefore these things are truly and indeed attributed as well those which are proper to God as those which be proper to Man Therefore it is well and truly said God or else the Son of God was born of the Virgin Mary suffered was crucified and God purchased unto himself the Church with his own blood 1 Cor. 2.8 Acts. 20.28 Not simply principally and by himself as he is God but by accident and in another respect or in regard of another thing because that which is proproper to one Nature namely to be conceived born crucified to die is not attributed to his Divinity but to the Person taking the name of one namely of the Divine Nature For this word the Son of God or God which is the subject of the Proposition is the concrete and not the abstract and signifieth not the Divine Nature but the Person who is God and Man Therefore it is well said The Son of Man or Christ-Man is Eternal Almighty All-present saveth raiseth the dead giveth Eternal Life And Joh. 3.13 No man hath ascended into Heaven but he that came down from Heaven both in respect of the Union seeing that the self-same Person is both Man and God for as God by reason of the unity doth account those things which belong to the Humane Nature proper to himself so as he is Man by reason of the union doth account those things which belong to the Divine Nature to be proper to it self and also because the Son of Man is a word concrete which signifies the Person of Christ being but one consisting of the Divine and Humane Nature and therefore whole Christ is every where present but not all that is in Christ On the contrary it is wickedly said That the Divinity of Christ was born of the Virgin suffered death and that the Humanity of Christ is Eternal every where present Almighty for the Divinty is a word abstract which simply signifieth the Divine Nature in Christ which is most free from all manner of sufferings Now the Predication of divers Natures by reason of the Hypostatical or Personal Union is of no force but in those things which are signified as whole and perfect for as we do not use to say the Body is the Soul or the Man is the Soul so neither do we say this God Christ is the Body of Christ or the Soul of Christ but only God is Man Q. Is the communication of Properties verbal only or real A. It is a true and real speech because the Person of whom by the trope Synechdoche as well the Divine as the Humane either names of Proprieties or Effects are indifferent and equally affirmed containeth all those things in it self truly and indeed which do agree to very God and very Man those things which be Divine as he is God those also which be Humane as the same is Man but not in respect of both Natures but according to the one and the other For then should be brought in the Eutychian Heresie of the confounding of the Natures or Properties and it should cease
special Instructions to guide and direct us in the whole course of our life Thus far I have declared my Faith concerning the Passion of Christ under Pontius Pilate and now I will shew you what I believe concerning his Death I do believe that he died I believe his death was not a fiction or imaginary death but a true death indeed according to the Prophesies which were before delivered concerning him Isa 53. He was cut off from the Land of the living Dan. 9. The Messiah shall be cut off The Types and Sacrifices of Lambs daily in the Temple did fore-shew and preach the death of the Lamb of God The accomplishment and truth of the Types and Prophesies are recorded faithfully Joh. 1.29 ch 19. Mat. 26 27 Chapters Mark 15. Luk. 23.26 First He died to satisfie the Justice of God for the Elect that he might free them from death and from the fear of death as it is written Heb. 2.14 Forasmuch as the Children were partakers of flesh and blood he also himself likewise took part with them that he might destroy through death him that had Power over death that is the Devil and that he might deliver all them which for fear of death were all their life time subject to bondage Secondly He died to fulfil all the Promises of God from the beginning Gen. 3.15 Thirdly I say his death was voluntary and an accursed death First voluntary for so he speaketh Joh. 10.18 No man taketh my life from me but I lay it down of my self Secondly It was an accursed death for so it is written Gal. 3.13 Christ was made a curse for us and how He sheweth it in the words following Cursed is every one that hangeth on a tree As if he should avouch in effect that Christ's death was accursed that is that it contained in it the first death that is the separation of Body and Soul for that for a time he did apprehend and undergo the wrath of God due to Man for sin yet was he never out of God's favour for in the midst of his loud cryes he calls God his God Matth. 27.46 He was never so oppressed of death as the damned are For as he suffered the bodily death without any corruption of body so be suffered the extream pangs of the Soul but not as forsaken of God more than in his own apprehension and feeling Fourthly The Comfort and Use we have of this Faith or the Blessings we reap by the death of Christ are many and very precious never to be forgotten of true-hearted Believers 1. This voluntary and true obedience of Christ unto death even this accursed death is our Righteousness before God as it is written Rom. 5.19 As by the disobedience of one man many were made sinners so by the obedience of one Righteous many are made Righteous In this Righteousness of Christ's Death lyeth the chief matter of all our felicity and rejoycing as the Apostle speaketh Gal. 6.14 God forbid that I should rejoyce in any thing but in the Cross of Christ There is no one thing more recommended in so many and so evident Prophesies than this So by the Death of Christ I am freed from the second Death 2. By this Faith in Christ crucified and dead for us I behold to my exceeding comfort a divine proportion between the infinite debt of God's Elect and the satisfaction done by the death of Christ unto God's Justice for the same as infinite as the debt 3. I see the unspeakable love of God to his Elect continually preached unto me and manifested as before mine eyes Joh. 3.16 4. I see that God's Divine Justice is satisfied by Christ's Death in the same Nature which offended him Gen. 3.15 Heb. 2.14 to mine exceeding great consolation 5. My trembling Conscience by this Faith is quiet and pacified for I feel hereby that the pollution of my Conscience is done away because my heart is sprinkled with the blood of Christ Heb. 9.14 and the scorching heat of it is abated by this Water of Life which streams unto my heart from the side and heart of Jesus Christ Zach. 12.10 11. 13.1 6. The first Death by Christ is turned into a blessing and made unto me a gate of Life So that now I may truly say That the day of Death is better unto me I being in Christ than the day wherein I was born 7. The Death of Christ doth ratifie his last Will and Testament unto me Thus it pleased the Father to make authentical and to seal unto me the Covenant of Grace Heb. 9.16 8. By his Death he hath not only taken away the condemnation of sin Rom. 8.1 for us but also hath broken the power and infection of it in us The act of Christ's Death is past but the vertue and powet thereof endures forever When we have Grace to deny our selves and to put our trust in Christ and by Faith hold him fast in our hearts then as Christ himself by the Power of his Godhead overcame Death Hell and Damnation in himself for us so shall we by the same Power of his Godhead and Grace dwelling in us Eph. 3.20 Gal. 2.21 2 Cor. 13.5 crucifie the flesh with the affections and lusts thereof Gal. 5.25 26. 9. The Death of Christ ought to be to all impenitent Sinners the greatest Motive to move them and turn them unto Christ and to humble them because they have pierced him by their sins This I say ought to cause them to mourn for him as the Prophet Zechary speaketh Ch. 2.10 whom even they themselves and not the Jews only have wounded Isa 53. wherefore if this move them not their case is dangerous 10. Be ready if thou beest a Believer to lay down thy life for Christ if need so require as he hath done for thee and to die rather than to do any thing which thou knowest manifestly to be contrary to his Will Of this mind were all the Martyrs and Faithful People of God in all Ages 11. To give some special Instructions if it be doubted what the Altar was whereon Christ offered his Sacrifice because the Papists avouch it to be the Cross I believe rather that Christ himself was the Priest the Sacrifice and the Altar as I said before the Sacrifice as he is Man the Priest as he is both God and Man the Altar as he is God For the property of an Altar is to sanctifie the Sacrifice as Christ saith Matth. 25.9 Now Christ as he was God sanctifieth himself as he was Man Joh. 17.19 For their sakes sanctifie I my self And this he did First By setting apart his Manhood to be a Sacrifice unto his Father for our sins Secondly By giving unto his Sacrifice merit and efficacy to be a meritorious Sacrifice wherefore the Wooden-Cross was not his Altar as Papists have imagined 12. The Prophet Haggai saith that the second Temple built by Zerubbabel was nothing in beauty unto the first which was built by Solomon For it wanted
cannot die 1 Tim. 1.17 for he only is without beginning and without end Q. 4. But although God as God cannot die yet cannot he change himself from a Creator to a Creature and so die A. No for saith the Holy Ghost Mat. 3.6 I am the Lord I change not Jam. 1.17 Neither is there any shadow of it Q. 5. Did Christ take our flesh and not our sin A. Yes for the Holy Ghost saith He was made like unto his brethren in all things sin only excepted Heb. 2.17 4.15 Q. 6. How could he take our flesh and not our sin also sith all other men partake of both A. All other men came from Adam and by Adam as a procreant cause Rom. 5.12 but Christ came from Adam but not by Adam viz. being made of a Woman Gal. 4.4 even as Eve was made of a Man Gen. 2. but not begotten as Cain and all other men are Matth. 1.18 Q. 7. How could Christ properly be the Son of Man and so the Son of David and of Abraham and Adam if he did not take the very flesh and blood of the Virgin Mary the Daughter of David as St. Luke in his third Chapter saith she was A. He could not for God had sworn with an oath to him That of the fruit of this Loyns according to the flesh he would raise up Christ to sit on his Throne Acts 2.30 Q. 8. If so whether then is not that Opinion heretical and damnable that denyeth Christ to be the true Son of David A. It is because there is no Eternal Salvation to be had in any other Acts 13.38 39. Q. 9. Whether if Christ had been a Creature only although an Angel or Man could he have overcome death A. No for as he was Man the Jews did destroy the temple of his body Joh. 2.19 but as God he raised it up again the third day as he told the Jews he would do Joh. 10.18 Q. 10. Whether if Death and the Grave had kept Christ Prisoner for ever could any have been saved A. No so St. Paul saith 1 Cor. 15. For then they which are asleep in Christ are perished Q. 11. Whether doth not this absurdity follow the Eutychian Opinion that if Christ be only God then he could not die as aforesaid if only Man then he cannot raise himself from the dead A. It doth unavoidably follow upon their Opinion Q 12. Whether such a Doctrine which by its natural consequences maketh the death and resurrection of Christ impossible or else in vain ought not to be abandoned by all Christians A. Yes doubtless it ought for it destroyeth the Faith of Gods Elect utterly if believed Q. 13. What must we do with those Brethren that are ignorant of these bad consequences as aforesaid A. Instruct them in the true Faith concerning Christ's death and resurrection Q. 14. But what must we do if they be obstinate and will not repent A. Then after the first and second admonition reject them Tit. 3.10 Q. 15. If Christ before he came from Heaven was of the uncreated substance of the Father their Essence being One then will it not follow that the Father was made flesh at well as the Sou sith you say it was the Essence that was made flesh not the Person of the Son took it into Personal Union as we with the Scriptures say he did Heb. 2.14 16. Q. 16. If it were possible for the uncreated substance to make it self into Flesh which by nature is a Spirit and spiritual substance Joh. 4.24 Then how could he receive nourishment from the Virgin as you say he did and grow in her womb Q. 17. If he be of the uncreated substance how could he grow in Wisdom as he did sith the uncreated substance is wisdom it self Prov. 8. Q. 18. If Christ be only of the uncreated substance then how could he be ignorant of the day of Judgment Mark 13.32 Q 19. If he was only of the uncreated substance then how could he be anointed by the Holy Ghost Luk. 4.18 Acts 4.27 Q. 20. If he be only of the uncreated substance then whose Will did he obey when he said Not my Will but thy Will be done Luk. 22.42 For the Essence is one in the Father and the Son Joh. 14.9 11. Q. 21. Why did Christ die as you say he did if he was only of the uncreated substance Did he die to satisfie himself viz. as God Answer fairly and do not now when you see all these gross absurdities follow your Opinion as the natural consequences of it say you cannot tell what he was before he was made flesh in the Virgins womb for then you worship you know not what Joh. 4.22 with the Samaritans and so you are Idolaters as they and the Athenians were Acts 17.22 23 c. Some Objections Object 1. Peradventure some may say These absurdities will follow upon your own Opinion as well as ours for you say he was God by Nature as well as we and there is but one God by Nature Gal. 4.8 Answ 1. Not so for we alwayes distinguish betwixt the Essence of the Son and the Person saying The Essence is one with his Father but not his Person therefore we say his Person was begotten not his Essence and we also say that his Person took Flesh of the Virgin Mary not the Essence and therefore it was the Person of the Son that was born of her not the Father nor the Spirit for although the Essence of the three be one yet the Persons be distinct as 1 Joh. 5.7 So that the Eternal Word the Son of God did never pray to his Father as I remember till he became our Mediator no more than the Holy Ghost doth pray to the Father which for himself you know he doth not but Christ did pray for himself which could not be for his Godhead but for his Manhood which is a Creature and therefore ought to perform homage to God the Creator For we alwayes distinguish betwixt the Natures which you deny therefore we say it was his Humane Nature that was ignorant of the day of Judgment for with his Divine Nature he knoweth all things Joh. 2.25 And by virtue of it he could and did forgive sins which two things viz. To search the heart and and to forgive sins none but God can do therefore we cannot conceive how he could become our Saviour and Mediator except he had these two Natures in one Person for if he had not took our Nature and so appeared before God in our stead bearing our sins in his own body as St. Peter saith 1 Pet. 2.24 And so St. Paul saith Was made sin for us who knew no sin that we might be made the righteousness of God in him 2 Cor. 5.21 for else Justice could not have punished him 2. If he had been put to death in the flesh which we say only died which distinction you deny but we with St. Peter say he was put to death in the flesh but