be greater cannot be determined but when man fell mankinde wholly was lost and unlesse grace save must everlastingly perish As some with the lost Angels must be objects on whom God will glorifie his justice Matth. 25. 41. So others must be vessels of mercy on whom his free grace shall be seen to make them as the Angels of heaven Therefore love is assigned as the alone impulsory motive God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten sonne John 3. 16. God who is rich in mercy according to the great love wherewith he loved us when we were dead in sinne Eph. 2. 5. Of this all that expect to be saved by grace must be tender that it be not obscured Gods designe being to advance it our care must be that it be not lessened In this exercise of free grace God yet keeps up authority and rule power and dominion still is his Man was made of God subject to a Law and under dominion having the law written in his heart from the Creation and he was not divested of it by Adams fall nor yet delivered from it by Christs Redemption Corvinus indeed in his Reply to Moulin cap. 8. sect 7. saith That men under an obligation to punishment are not under any obligation to obedience God will not be served by that man that hath violated his Covenant giving his reason of this assertion To be admitted to serve is a to token of favour which is not vouchsafed as he sayes to menunder guilt and wrath But this is a manifest errour Mans guilt can never rob God of his Sovereignty nor yet disingage man from his duty Standing right with God he is bound to homage Under guilt he is bound both to homage and punishment and to be admitted to serve is not meerly of favour but of dominion and power It was no great favour that Israel in Egypt found in the service of Pharaoh to serve with acceptance is indeed a favour but necessity and duty ties all that are under Sovereignty As man fallen in right is a subject though in his demeanour a rebel So in his regenerate estate still he ows subjection When God became a Saviour to the Elect of mankind he did not cease to be a Sovereigne The children of a King and Emperour know their father to be their Sovereign as by one is well observed The child of God knows God in Christ to be his Lord We are redeemed not to licentiousnesse not to a state of manumission from the command of God but to serve in righteousnesse and true holinesse all the dayes of our life Luke 1. 74. It can be no part of our Christian freedome to be from under the Sovereignty of heaven This Sovereignty of God is two wayes held forth unto us First in keeping up his commandments the power and vigour of his precepts Secondly in his exercise of discipline in chastisement and correction Here I shall assert three things First God in the days of the Gospel keeps up the power and authority of his Law the Obligation of it is still in force to binde the consciences of beleevers Secondly That this Law which God thus keeps up in force is a perfect and compleat rule to those to whom it is given Thirdly That this Law binds as given by the hand of Moses As to the first when I speak thus of the Obligation of the Law I hope I scarce need to tell in what sense I do take the Law Not in the largest sense for any doctrine instruction or Ordinance of any kinde whatsoever Men have their Laws and Directories but I have to deal with the Law of God Neither do I take it for the whole of the Word of God all his will revealed in his Word as it is taken Isa 2. 3. The Law shall go forth of Zion and the Word of the Lord from Jerusalem Nor yet as it is taken for all the Scripture of the Old Testament as in that Text of the Apostle In the Law it is written by men of other tongues and by other languages I will speak to this people 1 Cor. 14. 21. Nor yet for the five books of Moses as it is taken in the words of Christ All must be fulfilled that was written in the Law of Moses Luke 24. 44. Neither do I here understand the Ceremonial Law which stood up as a partition between Jew and Gentile Ephes 2. 14. All that did binde the Jews and was not of force from God with the Gentiles is taken off from Christians There was a confession of guilt a beast needed not to have been slain if they had been innocent this held them under hopes that there was sacrifice to take away sinne imposed on the Jewes till the time of reformation Heb. 9. 10. as an Appendix to the first Table fitted to the Jewes state and condition as a shadow of good things to come Heb. 10. 1. Nor yet the judicial Law given to order the Common-wealth or State of that people farther then so much of it as was of nature and then did bind the Gentiles It is the moral-Moral-Law that I meane that Law which was obligatory not only to the Jews but Gentiles for breach of which they suffered Levit. 18. 27 28. Neither do I understand the Moral Law as a covenant upon observation of which life was expected and might be claimed This is utterly inconsistent with the Gospel If there had been a Law that could have given life verily righteousnesse had been by the Law Gal. 3. 21. And this righteousnesse giving life utterly overthrows the Gospel If righteousnesse come by the Law then Christ is dead in vain Gal. 2. 21. In which sense I deny that the Jewes were ever under the Law The Law was not given as such a covenant as shall God willing be shewn So the Moral Law and Ceremonial Law should militate one against another The Moral Law holding them in themselves looking for a righteousnesse of works and the Ceremonial Law leading them out of themselves unto a sacrifice for remission of sinne Abraham was under no such covenant he had the Gospel preached to him Gal. 3. 8. and so had the seed of Abraham But it still hath the nature of a Law binding to obedience it is for ever a rule for the guide of our wayes That it was once of force is without question and above all contradiction and therefore I need not to multiply Old Testamentâ— Scriptures for it There is no repeale of it it was never antiquated and abolished therefore it is of force Though a Law be urged yet if a repeal may be pleaded there is a discharge That it is not repealed I shall shew and further that it is not capable of any repeal If it be repealed then either by Christ at his coming in the flesh or else by his Apostles by commission from him after the Spirit was given But neither Christ in person nor the Apostles by any commission
hath lost its commanding power then it can give sinne no more being yea it hath lost its own being power of command being of the essence of it If the Law Thou shalt not kill have no power of command then I sin not if I kill If that Law Sweare not at all have no power of commanding then our RANTERS high oaths are no more sinnes then our eating of swines flesh or 〈◊〉 not observing the Feast of the Passeover Where there is 〈◊〉 there is no transgression and a Law antiquated and repealed that the power of command is gone as in the Laws before mentioned is no Law If he still prâ—sse that similitude of the Apostle that a dead husband hath now power of command But the Law to a beleever is a dead husband First I say if he will be pleased to informe me how a dead husband rips up his wives faults how he curbs and keeps her in which he confesses is the Laws office to a beleever then I shall speedily give an account how this dead husband retaines power of command The Argument is as well of force The dead husband hath no power to discover his wives faults to restraine curb or keep her in But the Law is a dead husband to beleevers Therefore the Law hath no such power It lies upon him to answer this argument to free himself from self-contradiction And I would faine see this answered and the other maintained Secondly for more full satisfaction I say that some learned Expositors make the husband in that similitude not to be the Law but sinne which hath its power from the Law So Diodati in his Notes upon the place Man signifieth sinne which hath power from the Law the woman is our humane nature and of these two are begotten the depraved errours of sinne So also Doctor Reynolds in his Treatise of Divorce page 37. setting out the scope of this similitude thus expresseth it As a wife her husband being dead doth lawfully take another and is not an adulteresse in having his company to bring forth fruit of her body to him so regenerate persons their natural corruption provoked by the Law to sin and flesh being mortified and joyned to Christ as to a second husband Master Burges Vindiciae Degis page 218. saith Sinne which by the Law doth irritate and provoke our corruption that is the former husband the soul had and lusts they are the children thereof and this the rather is to be received because the Apostle in his reddition doth not say the Law is dead but we are dead But if he will still contend that the Law is the husband in that place which by reason of corruption hath so much power for irritation and condemnation over an unregenerate man I shall onely give him that advice which Doctor Reynolds in the place quoted gives Bellarmine upon occasion of his interpretation of this similitude Let Bellarmine acknowledge that similitudes must 〈◊〉 be set on the rack nor the drift thereof be streched in such sort 〈◊〉 â—f they ought just in length breadth and depth to match and sit that whereunto they are â—â—â—â—mbled And when he confesseth power in the Law notwithstanding this death to performe diverse offices in the souls of beleever◠〈◊〉 cannot affirme that the law is wholly dead nor deny but that it may have this office of command likewise The power which the Law loseth is that which corruption gave it which is irritation and condemnation Corruption never gave command to the Law and the death of corruption through the Spirit can never exempt the soul from obedience or take the power of command from it Let it be granted that the Law is the husband here mentioned the similitude is this That as the Law through our corruption was fruitful in mans nature to the bringing forth of sinne and condemnation So Christ by the Spirit is to be fruitful in our nature to bring forth works of grace to salvation and so the death of the Law is meerly in respect of irritation or inflaming to sinne and binding over to condemnation not in respect of command That this is the full and clear scope of this similitude beyond which it must not be stretched plainly appeares verse 5. For when we were in the flesh the motions of sinnes which were by the Law did work in our members to bring forth fruit unto death So that here is nothing against the commanding power of the Law God still keeps up his Sovereignty and by this Law he rules the regenerate I wish our Authour would sadly reflect upon that reason of his The Law is not authorized by Christ to reigne and rule in the consciences of his people For his Fathers peace his own righteousnesse and his Spirits joy There is none that speaks of the reigne of the Law in the consciences of the people of God but God in Christ reigns and by his Moral Law rules for all these reasons So farre are these from excluding his rule by his Law in his peoples hearts If this rule of the Law be destructive to Christs righteousnesse then Christs coming for righteousnesse must needs be to destroy the Law which Christ disclaimes And the rule of the peace of God in our hearts is so farre from excluding his rule by his Law that without it it can never be attained Great peace have they that love thy Law and nothing shall offend them Psalme 119. 165. This is the confidence that we have in God that whatsoever we ask according to his will we shall receive because we keep his commandments 1 John 3. 22. A Commandment hath a commandâ—â—â— power and only they that keep them have this peace ruling in their hearts The Spirits joy and the power of the Law to command are so farre from opposing one the other that the Spirit gives testimony of Gods abode in no other but such as confesse and yeeld to this power He that keepeth his Commandments dwelleth in him and he in him and hereby we know that be abideth in us by the Spirit which he hath given us 1 John 3. 24. And of like nature is that which he further hath Though the Law the former husband be dead to a beleever yet a beleever is no widow much lesse an harlot for he is married to Christ and is under the Law of Christ which is love If the moral Law respective to the power of command be dead then love is dead with it Jesus Christ reduces the ten Commandments into two Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart and thou shalt love thy neighbour as thy self If then the Law be dead this love from the heart is dead and so a beleever is either a widow or an harlot Master Burges Vindiciae Legis page 12. shews at large that to do a thing out of obedience to the Law and yet by love and delight do not oppose one another which if the Reader consult with his enlargement of it he
the argument seems of force We vindicate Gods justice in commanding works though to us now impossible seeing once we had power to reach the highest of his precepts and his command is no rule of our empaired strength but of our duty But if men never had that power and the Law never required it it is injustice according to all parties to exact it Answ Let those that fall to the Arminians in this tenent that they may make the Law an imperfect rule and an insufficient direction see how they can avoid it how they can vindicate Gods justice thus impeached But the Orthodox party have still maintained that Adam had in his integrity that faith that doth justifie though then it performed not that office of justification as he had that faculty whereby we see dead bodies though then there was no possibility of such sight there being no dead bodies to be seen And that faith in Christ is commanded in the first precept of the Law is manifest There we are commanded to have God for our God no Interpreter will deny that the affirmative is contained in that negative Thou shalt have none other gods but me Now God is the God of beleevers Heb. 11. 16. No man can have any communion with God but by faith in Christ And so consequently this faith is there required what Expositor of the Law doth not put trust and affiance in God within the affirmative part of the first commandment as well as fear love and obedience And without Christ there can be no affiance or trust If we conceive the moral Law to reach no farther then the duties expressely there named or the evils forbidden we shall make it very scant and narrow we shall see small reason of that of the Psalmist Thy Commandment is exceeding broad Psalme 119. 96. But in case we take in all that by necessary consequence may be inferred according to the approved rules of interpretation then scarce any duty is more clearly laid down then this of faith in Christ And whereas one faith A man cannot preach Faith in Christ out of the Moral Law I say a man out of the Moral Law may evince the necessity of Faith in Christ unto every one that lives in Gospel-light to whom Christ is tendred The Law requires the duty and the Gospel discovers the object no man out of the Law could have evinced Abraham that he must offer his sonne nor that he must have left his countrey but when Gods minde was made known to him the Moral Law did binde him to obedience and he had sinned against the Moral Law in case he had refused There is no command given of God to any man at any time of an nature whatsoever but the Moral Law ties him to the observation of it not immediately explicitely but upon supposition of such a command intervening Therefore ye shall observe all my Statutes and all my judgements and do them I am the Lord Levit. 19. 37. Faith in Christ being commanded of God I John 3. 23. the Moral Law obliges to obedience of it See Molin Anatom Arminianis cap. 11. Respons Wallaei ad Censuram Johannis Arnol. Corvini cap. 11. Ball on the covenant page 105. Burges Vindiciae legis page 117. A farther difficulty here offers it selfe Obj. and an obstruction laid against that which in this Treatise is after intended If the covenant or second covenant as opposite to that of works be in Christ and grounded on the work of reconciliation then it is commensurate with it and of no greater latitude and only the elect and chosen in Christ the called according to Gods purpose being reconciled only these are in covenant when the Scripture as shall be God willing made good confines not this covenant within the limits of the invisible Church known only to God But it is as large as the Church visible To this I answer Answ that the Prophetical office of Christ as Shepherd and Bishop of our souls and so much of his Kingly office as consists in a legislative power hath its foundation as well as the covenant in this work of reconciliation Had not this been undertaken by Christ for mankinde man had never enjoyed that light man had never had an Oracle or an Ordinance as the fruit of his Prophetick office yet these Ordinances are not commensurate with reconciliation nor of equal latitude with election So neither is the covenant but either of both in order towards it As Ordinances therefore are Christs gift from heaven as the fruit of his death and resurrection when yet all that partake of these Ordinances do not yet die or rise with Christ So is the covenant when yet all in covenant are not stedfast in it nor obtaine the graces of it Therefore I know not how to admit that which a Divine singularly eminent hath laid down That all the effects of Christs death are spiritual distinguishing and saving Seeing gifts of Christ from his Fathers right hand are fruits of his death yet not spiritual distinguishing and saving That they are in some sort spiritual I dare grant that is in ordine ad spiritualia if I may so speak they have a tendency to a spiritual work That they are distinguishing from the world as it is taken in opposition to the Church visible I yeeld for I do not enlarge the fruit of Christs death to all man-kinde assenting to Master Owen and Master Stalham in the grounds that they lay of Gods respite of the execution of the whole penalty on man with the continuance of outward favours not to be upon the account of Christ but for other reasons yet I know not how to affirme that Ordinances which yet are fruits of his death are all saving spiritual and distinguishing seeing they neither conferre salvation nor saving grace on all that partake of them So that Christ is a Mediatour of this covenant and yet those enter into it that have not reconciliation by Christ Jesus The Ephesians that were afar off are made nigh by the blood of Christ Ephes 2. 13. that is brought into a visible Church-state in the fruition of Ordinances made free of that city whose name is The Lord is here Ezek. 48. 35. CHAP. XVIII Farther differences between the Covenant of Works and the Covenant of Grace A Farther difference of importance between these covenants is in the conditions annext unto either of them and here the difference is brought to the height This alone so diversifies them that they are not barely in circumstance and way of administration but in substance two distinct covenants The least difference in conditions diversifies bargains and agreements on what part soever the difference is Conditions of the covenant between God and man are of two sorts either such in which God engages himselfe or in which man is engaged either the stipulation on Gods part or else the restipulation on the part of man The former unto which God is engaged are either rewards in case of
the covenant requires not exact perfection in the same height as the Law calls for it then a Christian may fall short of the Law in his obedience and not sin perfection being not call'd for from him nor any more called for from him than through grace he doth performe he rises as high as his rule and so sins not through any imperfection therefore to make it out that a beleevers imperfections are his sins it must needs be that the covenant requires perfection as to make good that he may be saved in his imperfections it must be maintained that it accepts sincerity But this argument is not of weight Christ entering a gospel-Gospel-covenant with man findes him under the command of the Law which command the Law still holds the Gospel being a confirmation not a destruction of it All imperfection then is a sinne upon that account that it is a transgression of the Law though being done against heart and laboured against it is no breach of covenant We are under the Law as men we are taken into covenant as Christians Retaining the humane nature the Law still commands us though the covenant in Christ through the abundant grace of it upon the termes that it requires and accepts frees us from the sentence of it Here is objected What shall we think of those Texts in the New Testament which require us to be perfect 2 Cor. 13. 11. James 1. 4. Yea perfect as God is perfect Matth. 5. 48. reproving weaknesse and infirmity and commanding a going on to perfection Answ We are to think of them as Protestant Dâ—vines ordinarily do in their commenting upon them We deny saith Rivet that the perfection of which Scripture speaks either when it commands us to be perfect or gives testimony of perfection or integrity to some consists in a freedome from sinne Exercit. 52. in Genes pag. 267. The Text quoted out of James serves well to explaine the rest Let patience have her perfect work that ye may be perfect and entire wanting nothing whence we may argue 1. That perfection which Christians may attaine is the perfection that the Apostle calls unto This is plaine in the text He calls for perfection that we may be perfect But Christians can reach no further a degree in perfection than sincerity Therefore the Apostle calls onely to sincerity 2. That is the Apostles meaning where he speaks of perfection that himself gives in as his meaning This is cleare he is the best interpreter of himself But he expresses himselfe by perfect there to mean entire or lacking nothing A perfection of entirenesse or integrality then he meanes a perfection of parts and not of degrees For that text of Paul 2 Cor. 13. 11. Finally brethren farewell be perfect c. let us compare with it that which he testifies of some in Corinth 1 Cor. 2. 6. Howbeit we speak wisdome among them that are perfect that is those that have a right and more full understanding of Gospel mysteries put in opposition to the weaknesse of novices which perfection is according to the Apostle the way to unity of judgement As for the Text Mat. 5. 48. Be ye therefore perfect as your Father which is in Heaven is perfect If it be streined to the highest it calls for a divine increated perfection our adversaries then must yeeld that there is a sicut similitudinis non aequalitatis in that place And if the context be consulted we shall finde that it is opposed to that half hypocritical-righteousnesse which was found in Scribes and Pharisees which all must exceed that enter into the Kingdome of heaven In Heb. 6. 1. a novice-like imperfection in knowledge is reproved and a further growth towards perfection is called for It is further objected If perfection were not the duty of a Christian and unperfectnesse and infirmity his sinne why doth the Apostle groane and grieve under the remainder of his natural infirmities and presse on to perfection Rom. 7. 14. to the 24. Phil. 3. 12 14 The conclusion here is granted The one is a duty the other is a sinne and because of failing in the one and the burden of the other the Apostle groanes Foreseeing that this would be yeelded him there is added by way of objection Or is such unperfectnesse a sinne onely in reference to the rule of the Law and not the rule of the Gospel or that the Law doth but the Gospel doth not call for perfection Answ There is not one rule of the Law as I have demonstrated at large and another of the Gospel seeing the Gospel establishes the Law Onely the Gospel-covenant calls for those sincere desires which grace works to conform us in our measure of the rule of the Law There is yet a third opinion which I may well doubt whether I understand but so farre as I do understand I am as farre from assent to it as either of the former and that is of those who do not only assert a personal inherent righteousnesse as well as imputed against the Antinomians But also affirm that this righteousnesse is compleat and perfect which if it were meant onely of the perfection of the subject as opposed to hypocrisie dissimulation or doublenesse implying that they do not only pretend for God but are really for him that they do not turne to him feignedly as Israel was sometimes charged Jerem. 3. 10. but with an upright heart or of the perfection or entirenesse of the object respecting not one or only some but all commandments which is called a perfection of parts we might readily assent to it The covenant calls for such perfection Gen. 17. 1. Walk before me and be thou perfect and many have their witnesse in Scripture that they have attained to it as Noah Gen. 7. 9. Job Job 1. 1. Hezekiah Esay 38. 3. But a perfection above these is maintained a perfection compleat and full Righteousnesse signifies as is said a conformity to the Rule and a conformity with a quatenus or an imperfect rectitude is not a true conformity or rectitude at all imperfect righteousnesse is not righteousnesse but unrighteousnesse It is a contradiction in adjecto though holinesse be acknowledged to be imperfect in all respects where perfection is expected in reference to the degree that it should obtaine or the degree which it shall obtaine or in reference to the excellent object about which it is exercised or in reference to the old covenant or the directive and in some sense the preceptive part of the new Covenant in all these respects it is imperfect and righteousnesse materially considered is holinesse and therefore thus imperfect but formally considered it is perfect righteousnesse or none this not in relation to the old rule but the new Covenant Upon this account they are charged to discover grosse ignorance that use and understand the word righteous and righteousnesse as they relate to the old rule as if the godly were called righteous besides their imputed righteousnesse only
it p. 272 Baptisme into particular Church-societies examined p. 461 See Infants Infant-Baptisme Beleevers Vnregenerate persons have the name and outward priviledges of Beleevers p. 249 Berith In the most proper sense signifies a Covenant p. 37 Birth-priviledge Birth-interest in Ancestours-priviledges is of the nature of the things that descend from Parent to Childe p. 401 402 It is so in civil Priviledges in all Kingdomes States Corporations ibid. Vpon this account Protestants are taken up by Jesuites and the Orthodox by Anabaptists in their words p. 403 Birth-interest in Ancestours-priviledges is held up in all other Religions p. 405 God ownes Infants borne in the Church upon account of their birth as his children his servants ibid. Birth-interest being denied parent and childe are heterogeneal p. 406 Children then brought up not in Covenant but for Covenant ibid. According to Scripture-grounds no hope left of their salvation p. 407 Branch What with the Apostle it signifies Rom. 11. 16. p. 325 Branches of two sorts Natural and engraffed ibid. See Root C Canaan GIven to Abrahams natural issue by Promise p. 301 That gift was an appendant to the Covenant p. 303 The promise of it did not denominate the Covenant mixt p. 226 Carnal See Covenant Camero's Assertion of an animal life in Paradise p. 100 His distinction of an absolute and conditional Covenant of the Antecedent and consequent love of God p. 46 47 Children Acts 2. 39. Comprizes Infants p. 322 Not the same with sons and daughters of the Nation vers 17. p. 319 See Promise Christ Is the Mediatour of the Covenant of Grace a fulnesse and fitnesse in him for that work p. 92 A Covenant made of God with him p. 14 This Covenant not the same with the Covenant of Grace made with man ibid. In the assumption of mans nature he did not change the law of nature p. 57 Whole Christ is to be received by Beleevers p. 190 Justification strictly so called seemes to be the fruit of Christs passive righteousnesse p. 123 His active and passive obedience both concurre to mans full happinesse ibid. See Mediatour Christians Vnregenerate persons have the name and outward priviledges of Christians p. 252 Church The distinction into visible and invisible asserted and explained p. 267 See Engraffing Church visible Distinguished into universal and particular p. 269 Universal visible Asserted p. 267 c. It consists of all that make profession of Christian Religion p. 268 Interest in it is of equal latitude with the Covenant p. 267 Church particular A man by Covenant with God interessed in the universal Church visible needs nothing farther for his accesse and interest in particular Churches p. 270 Cohabitation makes not up a Church congregational p. 273 Yet it is necessarily required ibid. A people cohabiting in a vicinity ough to associate in Church-fellowship for Ordinances ibid. Professing Christians in such cohabitation are to be esteemed particular Church-members p. 274 Church-Covenant Explicite or implicite p. 459 Covenant explicite not essential to the relation of a particular Church-member p. 460 Without any Scripture-precedent p. 272 460 Where all is enjoyed for the being of a particular Church much may be wanting for the well-being p. 273 Church pure impure When to be judged pure p. 277 Impure Churches have yet the being of Churches ibid Rome a Church of most impure being ibid. That which especially denominates a Church pure or impure is doctrine p. 278 Doctrines tending to the defilement of Churches are tainted either in the foundation or superstruction ibid. See Errors Parochial Churches Vindicated p. 274 See Place Circumcision A seale of spiritual mercies p. 227 Both a priviledge and a bondage p. 208 Called by the name of Covenant p. 423 It was bottomed on the commandement p. 297 Which command had relation to the Covenant ibid. It was peculiar to Abrahams natural issue p. 301. Cohabitation See Church particular Commands Frequent and full under Moses his administration p. 213 See Law Consent In man of necessity to his being in Covenant with God p. 3. Consequence From Scripture justified p. 416 Conditions Covenant What a Covenant-condition is p. 35 Conditions of the Covenant of Works and the Covenant of Grace on Gods part seem to be the same p. 99 Conditions in the Covenant of Works Were in mans power p. 102 103 Kept man within himself for righteousnesse p. 115 116 Their end was mans preservation 117 Conditions in the Covenant of Grace Covenant of Grace hath it's conditions p. 33 34 Arguments asserting it p. 34 c. Objections answered p. 36 c. These conditions are not performed without special assistance of Grace p. 104 Arguments for special assistance in this work p. 104 105 Objections answered p. 113 c. These conditions carry a man out of himself for righteousnesse p. 116 They are for mans restitution p. 117 A people thus in Covenant must come up to the termes and conditions of the Covenant p. 190 c. No happinesse or assurance but in performance of these conditions p. 195 Objections answered p. 199 Covenant in general Figurative acceptions of the Word p. 2 Requisites in a Covenant p. 3 Mutual contracts of the nature of it p. 38 Distinguished p. 4 Defined p. 5 Covenant between God and Man Reasons why God dealt in a Covenant-way with man p. 6 7 Covenant between God and man defined p. 8 Definition asserted p. 37 38 This Covenant distinguished into Covenant of Works Covenant of Grace p. 8 Covenant of Works and Grace Their agreement p. 86 Their respective differences p. 87 c. Covenant of Works Was entered in mans integrity ibid. Was alone for his preservation p. 88 Did precede the Covenant of Grace ibid. Was a small time in force p. 90 Had no Mediatour p. 91 Covenant of God with Christ Not the same with the Covenant of Grace entered with fallen man p. 14 15 Covenant of Grace Defined p. 159 Distinguished into the Old and New or first and second p. 202 Hath it's solemnities in the highest way p. 5 12 Was entered in mans fallen estate p. 87 Is for mans restitution p. 88 Is in time after the Covenant of Works ibid. Is of everlasting continuance p. 90 Is in and by a Mediatour p. 91 God in this Covenant so manifests his free grace that he still keeps up his Sovereignty p. 53 Old and New or first and second Covenant Their agreement in 6. particul p. 202 c. They are one in substance p. 204 Old Covenant Was administred and held forth by Servants Prophets Priests c. p. 205 It received only the Jewes ibid. It had its date of time and is antiquated for another to succeed p. 206 It was dedicated with the blood of Bulls and Goats ibid. It held forth Christ only in a promise to be incarnate to suffer p. 207 It held all out under types figures and shadowes ibid. Vnder that dispensation knowledge dim those under it in a state of darknesse comparativè to Christians p.
extreams the one much prejudicial to the Reader in Treatises of this nature to give us a bare skeleton of bones and sinewes leaving their Readers to clothe them with skin and flesh These serve better to help their memories that are already seen in the subject then to help those with satisfaction that are not already verst in it Memoriae mater ingenii noverca I would learned Amesius in his Medulla Theologiae Cases of Conscience and other learned Works had not affecting brevity herein been defective Sure I am the Reader might well wish that learned Camero's work De triplici foedere had by his own hand been more inlarged that he had spoken more fully where his Reader may see cause justly to close with him and given in his Reasons especially in several differences which he assigns beteewn the Old which he calls the subservient Covenant and the Covenant of Grace where many suppose they have cause to dissent from him The other extream might be the Readers benefit but would have been my burthen and that is an enlarged full discourse on every particular Divinity-head that may occur in the handling of this Subject a way which reverend Master Ball intended I have heard it from those that received it from his own mouth that his purpose was to speak on this Subject of the Covenant all that he had to say in all the whole body of Divinity a work that the whole Church might wish had not Divine providence determined otherwise that he had enjoyed life to finish That which he hath left behinde gives us a taste of it and the advantage the Church might have received by it I have thought it enough to handle each particular so as might well answer expectation in reference to the present subject To speak of Christ as a Mediatour of the Covenant and to set forth the distinct parts of his work in such mediation without handling the whole of the work and all the Offices incident to his Mediatorship To speak of his death ratifying the Covenant of grace waving the controversie of the extent of it in the intention of God or purpose of Christ It is sufficient to me to assert Faith to be a condition of the Covenant necessary to be put in by us to attain the mercies in the Covenant to speak of it so far as is here concerned without a large Treatise of the nature requisites and life of it so I may say of godly sorrow cessation from sin sincerity of obedience and the like Thirdly Those particulars relating to this subject which are most controverted and in this age disputed I have spoke to more at large to instance in some The conditions of the Covenant of Grace as well to the an sint whether there be any such conditions at all which in our times by several hands out of several Principles is denyed Or the Quae sint what these conditions be laying down rules and helps for the better discovery of them The supposed differences between the old and new Whether such that offer injurie to the Covenant under which the Fathers lived under Moses his administration or before his dayes making it a meer carnal Covenant consisting of temporal promises as the possession of the Land of Canaan and protection there or at the least a mixt Covenant and no pure Gospel-Covenant and the seals suitable Or such that put too great a limit to the Covenant in Gospel-times vesting it onely in the elect regenerate excluding all professed ones not yet regenerate not onely from Covenant-mercies but all Covenant-terms not admitting any to stand in any relation to God but those only whom his Spirit hath changed making the call of God in the largest sense convertible with Election and the seal of Baptism to be of no greater latitude unlesse by mistake mis-applied than the seal of the Spirit and determining it in the persons of the elect about which the meer congregational men and the Antipoedobaptists agreeing in the former do differ that they excluding the seed and leaving them in the same condition hope of education excepted with the Heathens In these and some others as the Reader may meet withall I have been more large in such things where all agree or where it much skills not whether we agree or differ as in what place whether on earth or heaven man had enjoyed immortality in case he had not sinned what need we to administer matter of contention our work is to make up breaches were it possible so far as it may stand with truth and not to widen them Fourthly I have not so tied up my self to the expresse immediate doctrine of the covenant but that I have occasionally drawn Corollaries or Inferences leading to other things of neer relation to and necessary dependance upon this of the Covenant I shall not need to give instance the Reader all along will meet with them such as I thought would be useful and to the judicious not ungrateful some of them practical that the whole of the Book might not be found to be Polemical ayming at least at that which the Poet so cries up Omne tulit punctum qui miscuit utile dâ—lci Fifthly For that part in which Infant-Baptisme and its grounds are particularly vindicated from Antipoedobaptists the Reader may see their arguments and corrupt glosses are examined onely as according to my method laid down I have been necessitated and so that the Covenant had not been vindicated according to my duty in case that had been neglected And here those that please to heed may see First the dependance that this Controversie about Infant-Baptisme hath on the doctrine of the Covenant that a Scripture Covenant cannot be asserted but Infant-Member-ship Infant-Baptisme in the latitude as now generally used by Pastors in their Congregations must be upheld Secondly the order in which this controversie is here carried may so much the rather invite the Reader to it seeing what is in opposite Authors laid down scatteringly without regard to any head of doctrine in the Covenant to which it doth relate here it is reduced to its proper place and carried on in that manner as an orderly Treatise and not a personal conflict following adversaries no farther than as they stand in the way to cloud the truth that is there prosecuted and though many advantages are hereby neglected that might have been taken which adversaries use to prosecute to the uttermost and these adversaries would to the height have improved yet I am very well pleased making it my businesse that my Reader may not be troubled but edified Thirdly the Scriptures that are produced and ordinarily agitated in this controversie of Infant-Baptism are not only urged but a just Analysis of the context opened the full scope and drift laid down so that it may appeare that the words are not enforced but of themselves in their native strength commend that doctrine to us that of Jerome Apol. adversus Jovinian much takes with me Commentatoris
though under the eye and care of endearing friends yet sometimes may feel the want of a parental wing I am not without fears that this Orphane Treatise may complain of som Errata's through the Authors unexpected death the slow progresse of the Presse and my great distance from it The God of truth teach thee how to profit break every shell that thou mayest taste of the kernel clear up truths to thy apprehension and imprint them upon thy heart so prayes he who beggs thy prayers for him because he is Thine in our Lord Jesus Samuel Beresford A Scheme of the whole This Treatise contains 1. An Introduction 2. The body of the Treatise The Introduction doth contain 1. The figurative acceptions of the word Covenant 2. Requisites in a Covenant properly so called Chap. 1. 3. A distribution of Covenants into the in several kinds 4. Seven Reasons of Gods dealing with men in a Covenant way 5. The Covenant between God and man defined The body of the Treatise contains a distribution of the Covenant into the Covenant of Works Chap. 2. Covenant of Grace The Covenant of Grace is considered 1. In the general nature of a Covenant 2. Joyntly with the Covenant of Works 1. As considered in the general nature of a Covenant we may observe 1. A Covenant in the proper nature of it between God and fallen man asserted Chap. 3. 2. This explained in several propositions 1. The Covenant of Grace is between God and man and not between God and Christ Chap. 4. 2. The outward and not the inward Covenant is a Covenant properly so called 1. Asserted and argued Ch. 5. 2. Cleared in 6 positions Ch. 6 3. The conditionality of the Covenant of Grace 1. In five arguments proved Ch. 7. 2. Objections answered Ch. 8. Ch. 9. 4. God keeps up his sovereign y 1. In the power and authority of his Law Ch. 10 11 12. 2. In exercise of Discipline and correction for sin Ch. 13. 2. Consider joyntly with the Covenant of Works we see 1. Their agreement in eight particulars Chap. 14. 2. Their differences 1. In the Covenants themselves 2. In the Conditions annext Differences in the Covenants are 1. Primae The Covenant of Works was entered in mans integrity Chap. 15. The Covenant of Grace was entered in mans fallen condition 2. A prima ortae Differences à prima ortae The Covenant of Works was for mans preservation of Grace for mans restitution Ibid. The Covenant of Works had its precedency in time of Grace followed after Asserted Objections answered The Covenant of Works was of small time in use of Grace is of everlasting continuance chap. 16. The Covenant of Works had no Mediatour Asserted Objections answered of Grace was in and by a Mediatour Asserted Works incumbent on the Mediatour held forth 1. To bring men into a capacity of Covenanting 2. To bring men within the verge of the Covenant 1. By his tender of it 2. Shaping the heart for it 3. To bring the soul up to the termes of the Covenant 4. To crown those that come up to the terms of it chap. 17. Differences in the conditions 1. Supposed on Gods part Death threatned Life promised The same in both Asserted Objections answered chap. 18. 2. Real on mans part 2 Differences asserted 1. In the Covenant of Works the conditions were in mans power of Grace they are not performed without special grace Asserted in 6. Reasons chap. 18 Objections answered chap. 19 2. In the Covenant of Works the conditions kept man within himselfe of righteousnesse chap. 20 of Grace the conditions carry man out of himself to be righteous by anothers righteousnesse 3. In the Covenant of Works conditions were for mans preservation Ibid. of Grace conditions were for mans reparation 3. Conditions discovered 1. Serviceable for mans returne to God which is Faith 1. Explained the sense of it given and reasons evincing it Chap. 21 2. In 4. Propositions cleared 1. God will not justifie a wicked person 2. Man hath no righteousnesse of his own for justification 3. Man hath a righteousnesse of grace tendered Ibid. 4. This righteousnesse is made ours by Faith Asserted Explained 1. Faith in the Sovereignty of God doth not justifie 2. Faith justifies as an instrument 3. Objections answeâ—ed chap 22. 1. Asserted Ib. 2. Object answ 4. Corollary drawn A justified man is fitted for every duty Ibid. 2. Serviceable for mans reparation in his qualifications to hold up communioÌ„ with God which is repentance 1. Objection a prevented It is not the same with faith Chap. 23. 2. Duty explained In the pre-requisite godly sorrow Asserted in six particulars limited Ibid. In the essentials Privative Cessation from sinne Ibid. Positive Returne to God 3. Objections answered 1. Joyntly against Faith and Repentance They are mans conditions not Gods chap. 24. 2. Particularly against repentance it self 1. It is not hereby made a Covenant of Works 2. Repentance necessarily flowing from Faith is not thereby diserabled Ibid. from being a condition in the Covenant of Grace 4. Degree of obedience required in our returne 1. Perfection of degrees not called for of God in Covenant 2. Covenant of Grace doth not call for perfection and accept sincerity Asserted Objections answered 3. Our Evangelical righteousnesse is imperfect Chap. 25. 4. Covenant of Grace requires and accepts sincerity 4. Corollaries drawn 1. Necessâ—â—y of a constant standing Ministery to bring men into Covevenant with God and to bring them up to the termes of it 1. Explained 2. Asserted 1. In seven reasons evincing that such a Ministery is established 2. In reasons evincing such a Ministery to be thus established 3. Objections answered Joel 2. 28 29. Vindicated ch 26 Jer. 31. 31. c. Vindicated 2. Schooles and Nurseries of learning in order to a gifted Ministery Asserted Chap. 27. Objections answered 3. Orderly way of admission of men into a Ministerial function necessary 1. Asserted by several reasons Chap. 28. 2. Explained by distinguishing of Callings 3. Ordination defined in the parts of it explained 4. Ministers of Christ must bring their people up to the termes of the Covenant 1. Explained 2. Asserted Chap. 29. Objections answered 5. People in Covenant must come up to the termes of the Covenant Chap. 30. The Covenant of Grace is either the Old or New Covenant In which observe 1. Agreement in 6 particulars Chap. 31. 2. Differences Chap. 32. Differences 1. Real in six particulars 2. Supposed or imaginary Nine Positions premised for a right understanding of the Old Covenant Chap. 33. Differences themselves assigned Differences assigned are 1. Laying the Old Covenant too low 2. Putting too great a restrainâ— on the New I. Laying the Old Covenant too low 1. Supposing it to consist of meere carnal promises 1. Interests to which this deives Popish Socinian Antipaedobaptistical Chap. 34. 2. Contrary asserted and the spiritualty of the Old Covenant maintained 2. Supposing it to be a mixt and no pure Gospel Covenant Chap. 35. 1. Meaning enquired
into 2. Grounds Examined Enervated II. Putting too great a restraint on the New Covenant 1. Limitting it alone to the Regenerate 1. To which something is spoke 1. By way of concession that sundry Divines seeme to speak to that purpose 2. By way of Avoidance from their owne words 2. Contrary asserted 1. In Old Testament-times 1. By confession of the advesarie 2. By Scripture-testimony 36 2. In New Testament times 1. by New Testament Scriptures Mat. 28. 19 Mat. 22. 24 Heb. 10. 29 1 Pet. 2. 9 37 2. By Arguments of sundry sorts ch 38 3. Objections answered ch 39 4. Corollaries drawn 1. Professed Beleevers are under a Covenant of Grace and not a Covenant of Works chap. 40 2. Interest in a Church-state is of equall atiude with the Covenāt c. 41 3. Such Covenant-interest is sufficient to give accesse to and interest in particular visible Churches chap. 42 4. Dogmatical Faith entitles to Baptisme chap. 43 5. Impenitence and unbelief in professed Christians is a breach of Covenant chap. 44 Five Positions concerning particular Churches 1. Where nothing is wanting to the being of a Church yet much may be wanting for the wel-ordering 2. A people in a vicinity ought to associate themselves 3. Professing Christians upon tender ought to be received 4. Reformation of abuses is the work of Christians rather than separation 7. Rules concerning separation 5. Together Churches out of Churches unwarrantable 2. Terminating it onely in the person actually entring excluding the issue in which 1. Question stated as to Abrahams natural issue Chap. 45 2. Arguments concluding the natural issue of Abraham to be in Covenant Chap. 46 3. New-Testament Testimonies evincing it Ibid. 4. Objections from Rom. 9. 6 7 8. answered Chap. 47 5. The extent of it to the issue of Beleevers in New-Testament times 1. Asserted Chap 48 2 Proved 1. By Scripture testimonies Rom. 11. 16. Chap. 49. 50 1 Cor. 7. 14. Chap. 51 Galat. 4. 29 Chap. 52. Matth. 19. 14. Marke 10 14 Luke 18. 16. Chap. 53 2. By several arguments Chap. 54. 6. Corollary for Infant-Eaptisme Chap. 55 1. By Arguments asserted objections answered 2. The reality of connexion between the Covenant and the Seal vindicated Chap 56 3. Sin of Sacriledge upon the repulse charged Ch. 57 4. The title of all infants of professing parents asserted Chap. 58 7. Practical uses concerning parent and issue inserred Ch 60 1. All possible engagements to holinesse of life Ibid. 2. Parents must see that their childrens breeding answer their birth 3. There is great danger in opposing Gods Covenant-people 4. Consolation from this Birth-priviledge 1. In reference to Nations 2. In reference to single persons 1. Themselves 2. Their posterity The Analytical Table being chiefly intended for and suited to learned capacities the vulgar Reader may here see the whole of the following Treatise as it is digested into Chapters and these easily found by the pages opposite to them Chap. 1. AN Introduction into the whole page 1 Chap. 2. The Covenant of God entred with mankinde distinguished page 8 Chap. 3. A Covenant between God and fallen man in the proper nature of it asserted page 10 Chap. 4. The Covenant of grace is between God and man and not between God and Christ page 13 Chap. 5. The Outward and not the Inward Covenant is a Covenant properly so called page 19 Chap. 6. Six positions tending to clear the thing in question page 24 Chap. 7. The Covenant of Grace calls for conditions from man page 33 Chap. 8. A grand Objection against this Doctrine answered page 36 Chap. 9. Further Objectious against the former Doctrine answered page 48 Chap. 10. God in the dayes of the Gospel keeps up the power and authority of his Law The obligation of it is still inforce to bind the consciences of Beleevers page 53 Chap. 11. The Moral Law is a perfect rule of righteousnesse page 62 Chap. 12. The Moral Law bindes as it was delivered by the hand of Moses page 73 Chap. 13. God entring a Covenant of Grace with his people keeps up his Soveraignty in exercise of Discipline in the correction and chastisement of his people for sinne page 77 Chap. 14. 〈…〉 between the Covenant of Works and the Covenant of Grace page 86 Chap. 15. Differences between the Covenant of Works and the Covenant of Grace page 87 Chap. 16. A further difference between the Covenant of Works and the Covenant of Grace page 91 Chap. 17. Works incumbent upon the Mediatour of the Covenant of Grace page 93 Chap. 18. Further differences between the Covenant of Works and the Covenant of Grace page 99 Chap. 19. Objections against the former Doctrine answered page 113 Chap. 20. Further differences in the conditions in the Covenant of Works and the conditions in the Covenant of Grace page 115 Chap. 21. Faith is a condition of the Covenant of Grace page 118 Chap. 22. Objections against the conditionality of Faith answered page 130 Chap. 23. Repentance is a condition of the Covenant of Grace page 136 Chap. 24. Objections against the conditionality of repentance answered page 144 Chap. 25. What degree of obedience the Covenant of Grace calls for from Christians page 148 Chap. 26. The necessity of a Ministry to bring men into Covenant with God and to bring them up to the termes of it page 160 Chap. 27. Schooles and Nurseries of learning in order to a gifted Ministry necessary page 173 Chap. 28. An orderly way of admission of men into the Ministerial function necessary page 180 Chap. 29. Ministers of Christ must bring their people up to the termes of the Covenant pressing the necessity of faith and repentance page 188 Chap. 30. A people in Covenant must come up to the termes of the Covenant being engaged to God they must answer their engagements page 190 Chap. 31. The distribution of the Covenant of Grace into the Old and New Covenant with the harmony and agreement that is found between them page 202 Chap. 32. Differences assigned between the Old and New Covenant page 205 Chap. 33. Positions tending to clear the first Covenant under Old Testament-dispensations page 210 Chap. 34. The Old Covenant was not made up of meer carnal promises but contained New Govenant-promises that were spiritual and saving page 219 Chap. 35. The Old Covenant was a pure Gospel Covenant and not mixt page 224 Chap. 36. The Covenant of Grace admits Christians in Gospel-times in a state of unregeneration and is not limited in the bounds of it to the elect regenerate page 231 Chap. 37. New Testament-Scriptures asserting the latitude of the Covenant of Grace in Gospel times page 235 Chap. 38. Arguments evincing the Covenant of Grace in Gospel-times in that latitude as before is asserted page 248 Chap. 39. Objections against this latitude of the Covenant answered page 257 Chap. 40. Professed beleevers are under a Covenant of Grace and not a Covenant of Works page 262 Chap. 41. Interest in a Church-state is of equal latitude
with the Covenant page 267 Chap. 42. A man in Covenant with God and recieved into the universal Church visible needs no more to give him accesse to and interest in particular visible Churches page 270 Chap. 43. A dogmatical faith entitles to Baptisme page 289 Chap. 44. Impenitence and unbelief in professed Christians is a breach of Covenant page 294 Chap. 45. The question stated concerning the birth-priviledge of the issue of beleevers page 295 Chap. 46. Arguments concluding the natural issue of Abraham Isaac and Jacob to be taken into Covenant page 301 Chap. 47. Rom. Chap. 9. Verse 6 7 8 vindicated page 309 Chap. 48. The Covenant in New Testament times takes in parents with their children page 316 Chap. 49. Rom. 11. 16. vindicated page 323 Chap. 50. Arguments from a late hand for ingraffing into the Church invisible and breaking off from it answered page 330 Chap. 51. 1 Corinth 7. 14. vindicated page 349 Chap. 52. Galat. 4. 29. vindicated page 366 Chap. 53. Mat. 19. 14 Mark 10. 14. Luke 18. 16. vindicated page 393 Chap. 54. Reasons evincing the birth-priviledge and covenant-holinesse of Believers and their issue page 401 Chap. 55. A Corollary for Infant-Baptisme Infant-baptisme by arguments asserted page 410 Chap. 56. The reality of connexion between the Cavenant and initial seal asserted page 422 Chap. 57. The with-holding Infants of Christian parents from baptisme is the sin of Sacriledge page 437 Chap. 58. The children of all that are Christians in profession are by vertue of Covenant-interest to be recieved into the Church by baptisme page 448 Chap. 59. A defence of the former Doctrine respective to the latitude of Infant-Baptisme 468 page 458 Chap. 60. The application of the whole in several inferences page 478 A TREATISE OF THE Covenant OF WORKS AND OF THE Covenant OF GRACE CHAP. I. An Introduction into the whole I Shall not make it my businesse for an Introduction into this Work to enquire after the derivation of the word Etymologies are known to be no definitions The denomination being usually given from some adjuncts variable according to times places and not from any thing that is of the essence of that which is enquired after in which those are highest in Criticismes in giving their judgements of them can yet ordinarily go no higher then conjecture The common acception of the word in Scripture is that which will give the greatest light in finding out the nature of Scripture covenants which as most other words is variously used Sometimes is used Properly implying a covenant in deed and truth strictly so called and containing all the requisites of a Covenant in it Sometimes Tropically for that which contains some parts and adjuncts of a covenant and so carries some resemblance to and stands in some affinity with it This Tropical figurative and the native proper sense must be carefully distinguished and may by no meanes be confounded by those that will understand the true nature of a covenant and avoid those manifold mistakes into which some upon this a lone account have been carried The figurative acceptions of the word are diverse sometimes the homage required or duty covenanted for is called a covenant by way of Synechdoche seeing a covenant between a Superiour and Inferiour doth comprize it so Jerem. 34. 13. I made a Covenant with your fathers in the day that I brought them out of the Land of Egypt which Covenant is no other then the Law that he gave them Exod. 21. 2. Sometimes the promise annext is called by the name of a covenant by a like Synechdoche Gen. 17. 7. I will establish my covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant to be a God unto thee and to thy seed after thee Gen. 9. 11. Sometimes the Seal is called by the name of a Covenant by way of Metonymy of the adjunct serving to ratifie and confirme a covenant Gen. 17. 10. This is my covenant which ye shall keep between me and you and thy seed after thee every man-childe among you shall be circumcised Sometimes Christ the Mediatour of the covenant is called by a like figure the covenant Isa 42. 6 7. I will give thee for a covenant of the people and light unto the Gentiles Sometimes the Lord Christs undertaking to work the graces covenanted for in the hearts of his people in the way of his power exerted in the conversion of sinners is called by the name of a covenant Jerem. 31. 33. This is the covenant that I will make with the whole house of Israel after those dayes saith the Lord I will put my law in their inward parts and write it in their hearts of which more in its own place Sometimes a covenant is taken for that peace which usually followes upon covenants Job 5. 23. Thou shalt be in league with the stones of the field and the beasts of the field shall be at peace with thee Hos 2. 18. In that day I will make a covenant for them with the beasts of the field and with the fowles of heaven and with the creeping things of the ground and I will break the bowe and the sword and the battel out of the earth and will make them to lie down safely When yet neither a Law nor a Promise nor Seal annext nor yet the Mediatour or any undertaking of his can be a covenant properly so called A Law from God with a Promise annext assented to by man is a covenant and when a Seal is added there is a condescension to our weaknesse for the more abundant ratification and confirmation of Gods stability in his Promises In our enquiry after such covenants which God in his gracious condescension is pleased to enter with man the general nature of a covenant must be held every species must partake of its Genus We must not make Gods covenant with man so farre to differ from covenants between man and man as to make it no covenant at all we must also observe that which differences it from covenants meerly humane that covenants divine and humane be not confounded together In order to which we must know that in every covenant properly so called these requisites must concur First it must not be of one alone but at least of two parties one can make no bargain or agreement Secondly there must be a mutual consent of these parties When Nahash the Ammonite offered to make a Covenant with Israel on condition that he might thrust out all their right eyes 1 Sam. 11. 2. the Israelites refusing and running the hazard of a fight rather then undergo it here was no covenant Thirdly each party must engage themselves one to another for performance of somewhat covenanted for whether debt duty or promise When Abraham agreed with the Hittites for a burial place for foure hundred Shekels Gen. 23. 15 16. There was a covenant properly so called having apparently in it all requisites of a covenant So also in
Jeremies purchase Jer. 32. 10. and the Levites hiring of himselfe to do the office of a Priest Judg. 17. 10. Micah and he mutually agree he is to do the office of a Priest and Micah is to pay his covenant-wages so that he hit right of the nature of a covenant that defined it to be A mutual agreement between parties upon Articles or Propositions on both sides so that each partie is tied and bound to perform his own conditions This holds forth the general nature of a covenant and is common to all covenants publick and private divine or humane differencing it first from a Law or Precept where there is a command out of sovereignty propounded without any obligation or engagement on the Law-giver or Commander Secondly from a single promise where there is a signification of the will of him that makes the promise touching some good to him to whom the promise is made without any restipulation from him And to let passe several Divisions of covenants little pertinent to our purpose which may be seen in Civilians and Politians particularly in Grotius lib. 2. De Jure Belli Pacis cap. 15. and to speak to such which may give some light to the present work Covenans of this nature properly so called are either between equals where either party may indifferently indent with other neither standing engaged to other otherwise then by covenant as in the instances before mentioned The Priest was not engaged to officiate for Micah nor Micah to give money or rayment to the Priest but by vertue of contract one was the others equal in regard of any dependance one upon the other Or else they are between Superiour and Inferiour the Superiour condescending to the Inferiour to deale by way of covenant when yet the whole that is required by him is of debt and might without agreement or stipulation be required and exacted This superiority and inferiority is either mixt and imperfect or else it is absolute and sovereigne Mixt and imperfect superiority and inferiority is between parent and childe master and servant equal in being but Superiour and Inferiour in relation Of this nature was that of Isaac with Esau Gen. 27. 34. Take I pray thee thy weapons thy quiver and thy bowe and go out to the field to take me some venison and make me savoury meat such as I love that my soul may blesse thee before I die Esau was tied as a childe to do what Isaac required though he had hinted or promised no blessing Superiority and Inferiority absolute and sovereigne is only between God and his creature no other is an absolute Superiour and such is the covenant when God enters covenant It is of sovereignty that God makes a Law It is of condescension and goodnesse that he enters covenant in which man may not indent but must accept professedly accepting and in sincerity of heart performing what God in covenant demands yet it is a covenant and properly so called that he enters with his creature especially that which he enters with mankind having all the ingredients and fore-named requisites of a covenant as in the sequel God willing shall be demonstrated God is engaged to retribution and man to fealty and either of both by consent Covenants between any parties whether Superiour and Inferiour or equals among themselves are either simply and nakedly such without any farther solemnity or ceremony or any thing more then is essentially necessary in a Covenant a mutual engagement between each other on such termes and propositions as are mutually agreed Or else they are covenants with addition of ceremonies solemnities wayes of ratification and confirmation as instances might be given in covenants both humane and divine As the committing the words of the Covenant to writing Jer. 32. 10. Calling in witnesses in the same place and Ruth 4. 10 11. giving of the hand making oath Ezek. 17. 18. or any other National custome in use for confirmation as the setting up of a stone Joshuah 24. 26 27. the division of a Calf and passage between the parts of it Jerem. 34. 18. laying upon themselves by way of imprecation such a judgement that then befel that beast in case of falsification so that some making definition of a covenant over and above what is essential make addition of such wayes of ratification so Ravanellus defines a Covenant to be A mutual agreement of two parties in which either ties himself to other upon certain conditions in the use of some outward signes and tokens for attestation and confirmation that the promise may be inviolable The covenant which God pleases to enter with man especially with fallen man under which we are and our fathers in old Testament-administrations were is not a bare naked covenant but in the highest way of solemnity committed to writing John 20. 31. confirmed by witnesses with miracles Heb. 2. 4. by oath Heb. 6. 13. 17. by seals Matth. 28. 19. Matth. 26. 28. compared with Rom. 4. 11. And when he might have dealt with man by way of sovereignty ruling solely by prerogative and command not letting man know any reward for his service or at all to have understood the issue and event yet he is pleased to wave such right and to deal by way of covenant and that in this way here mentioned First That his people might be willing in the day of his power Psalme 110. 3. Obedience extorted contributes not that honour to him whom we obey we confesse a necessity in our selves to yeeld but scarce acknowledge any worth in such a Superiour to command serving no otherwise then Israel did Pharaoh as a bond man serves his master one volunteer that goes out of choice more honours an expedition then ten that are prest by power for service only waiting an opportunity by slealth out of dislike as Davids souldiers out of shame to quit the service I Sam. 19. 3. Secondly to vanquish all temptations and overcome all assaults that may occurre in mans way of obedience Adam in innocency was foiled by a temptation which he had overcome in case he had heeded the terms of the covenant the curse that was threatened and the promise that was contained in it man in his fallen estate undergoes many tryals and is encountered with variety of temptations had he not a word on which he might hope a word of promise in way of covenant from God he could not stand but of necessity must perish Thirdly that love rather then fear might principle man in his obedience as seeing more of goodnesse to induce then of wrath to scare him into it God will have his servants sons The free honour of a childe to his father rather then the compulsory fear of a servant pleases him Fourthly for the aggravation of sinne The more of condescension goodnesse bounty and love appears in Gods way of dealing the more of equity is seen and the more ingratitude and folly appears in mans disobedience Fifthly for mans greater
consolation An up-right-hearted man findes abundance of peace in his covenant entered with God when he prayes and seeks the greatest mercy in prayer he is able to say In thy faithfulnesse answer me and in thy righteousnesse Psal 143. 1. Paul can say that God the righteous Judge shall give him a Crown of righteousnesse 2 Tim. 4. 8. Having engaged by covenant righteousnesse ties him to make good his engagements This is Gods end in his entrance of covenant and ratification of it by oath consequently in committing it to writing and confirming it by seal That by two immuntable things in which it was impossible for God to lie we might have a strong consolation who have fled for refuge to lay hold upon the hope set before us Heb. 6. 18. These strong consolations were the end of God in ratifying his Covenant They are the support and Spirit reviving cordials to his people in Covenant See the result of the Psalmists meditations In the multitude of my thoughts within me thy comforts delight my soul Psalme 94. 19. I will both lay me down in peace and sleep for thou Lord only makest me dwell in safety Psalme 4. 8. The Lord is my light and my salvation whom shall I feare The Lord is the strength of my life of whom shall I be afraid Psal 27. 1. Sixthly for the greater terrour of the adversaries of his people when they see themselves engaged against them and God stands in a covenant unviolable engaged for them when they see that their work is to ruinate and destroy him that God will save Hence it is while their Rock sells them not one of them chases a thousand and two put ten thousand to flight Deut. 32. 30. Paul in bonds can make Felix tremble on his Throne Acts 24. 25. Hamans wise-men and Zeresh his wife spake words of terrour upon experiment made If Mordecai be of the seed of the Jews before whom thou hast begun to fall thou shalt not prevaile against him but shalt surely fall before him Ester 6. 13. Seventhly the Lord hereby puts a name and an honour upon his people David took it to be an honour to be related to Saul and so to become the sonne of a King much more then is it an honour to be brought into this relation to God This honour have all the Saints and they are taken into covenant for honour sake The Lord hath avouched thee this day to be his peculiar people as he hath promised thee and that thou shouldest keep all his Commandments and to make thee high above all Nations which he hath made in praise and in honour and that thou mayest be an holy people to the Lord thy God Deut. 26. 18 19. They are the portion the inheritance the children the espoused ones and whatsoever else that speaks a neer relation is theirs This was Gods way of dealing I doubt not with the Angels though we being not interested in it there is no necessity that it should be written for our learning Sure we are it was his way of dealing with man as well before his fall as presently shall be shewn as out of more abundant grace and condescension for his restitution And not mentioning for present any more then that which is essential in the covenant of God with man I suppose it may be thus held out to us A mutual compact or agreement between God and man upon just and equal termes prescribed by himself in which God promises true happinesse to man and man engages himself by promise for performance of what God requires This description here laid down comprizes the way of God in every one of his covenants with man both before and after his fall under Old and New Testament-revelations all that is essential in any covenant that he enters Equals covenanting do either of them article and indent but God condescending to a covenant man must not article but must assent and engage for performance of what is prescribed otherwise it will hear the nature of a Law but not of a Covenant It is true all men are bound upon tender from God to accept It was the sin of Jewish and heathenish people to stand out whensoever the Gospel was preached but they were no covenant-people till they gave their assent and then they were received as a covenant-people and baptized Exceptions cannot be taken against or challenge made of this definition of covenants in general nor of the covenant which God in particular entereth with man and these standing they will give us light and afford us singular help for a right understanding of the covenant of God entered with man in the several species and distinct wayes of administration of it CHAP. II. The Covenant of God entered with mankinde distinguished THere is a two-fold covenant which God out of his gracious condescension hath vouchsafed to enter with man The first immediately upon the creation of man when man yet stood right in his eye and bore his image the alone creature on earth that was in a capacity to enter covenant We have not indeed the word covenant till after man was fallen nor yet in any place of Scripture in reference to the transactions past between God and man in his state of integrity neither have we such expressions that fully and explicitely hold out a covenant to us but we finde it implied and so much expressed from whence a covenant with the conditions of it is evinced That Law with the penalty annext given to our first parents Gen. 2. 17. Of the tree of knowledge of good and evil thou shalt not â—at for in the day that thou eatest thou shalt surely die plainly implies in it a covenant entred man was in present possession of life that is according to Scripture phrase happinesse in his whole person full and compleat according to his present capacity This is to be continued aâ— is there evidently implied till sinne dispossesse him of it Till he sin he shall not die As long as he persists in his integrity his life is to be continued of which the Tree of Life as is not to be doubted was a Sacrament The second God was pleased to enter with man upon his fall which was a covenant of reconciliation the most unhappy variance between earth and heaven having intervened The former is usually called a â—ovenant of Works the latter is called a covenant of Grace though indeed the fountain and first rise of either was the free grace and favour of God For howsoever the first covenant was on condition of obedience and engaged to the reward of Works yet it was of Grace that God made any such promise of reward to any work of man when man had done all even in that estate which was commanded he was still an unprofitable servant he had done no more then duty and no emolument did thence accrew to his Maker It was enough that he was upheld and sustained of God in the work to live in him
and upon him when the work was done he might have been justly annihilated If merit be taken in a proper sense Adam in innocency was too low for it all his work being an homage due no profit redounding to God and the work bearing no proportion to the reward But a more superabundant measure of Grace is seen in Gods entrance into covenant with man in his fallen condition and infinitely more savor is shewn in his reconciliation then in his preservation Therefore this by way of eminency hath the honour to be stiled the covenant of Grace the other retaines the name of the covenant of Works These two bearing these denominations have their respective agreement and differences which are to be enquired into but before I reach those it is necessary that somewhat be spoken to assert a covenant of grace in Gospel-times and to give us some further light for a right understanding of it CHAP. III. A Covenant in the proper nature of it between God and fallen man asserted BEfore I proceed any further in this work one great rub that lies in the way is to be removed otherwise not only all that which I have said but also all that which I shall speak on this subject will fall to the ground and that is their objection that say that God hath not entred any covenant properly so called with fallen man He hath by way of Sovereignty laid commands upon man Of free grace hath made rich and large promises by way of legacy bequeathed life and salvation to him but hath entred no covenant properly so called as these say with him which is purposely done to avoid those conditions which are asserted in this covenant If this stand the division before laid down of a Covenant into a Covenant of Works and a Covenant of Grace necessarily falls such a division must not be suffered where any one member of the division is not If therefore there be no covenant of God with fallen man nor no such thing as the covenant of Grace there can be no such division of the covenant and all agreement or differences assigned will be between an entity and a non-entity between that which hath a reality and a meer Chimaera A covenant therefore in the proper nature of it is to be asserted and the speedâ—est way to make this good is to prove from Scripture the name and the thing that the word Covenant is there and the thing in the proper nature of it which the words hold out and all of this respective to the transactions between God and fallen man The word we finde in places without number it were a needlesse labour to give instances when every Reader is able to furnish himself with such multitudes But when this cannot be denyed the impropriety of the speech is objected It is called by the name of a Covenant as is said when in strict propriety of speech it is no covenant But to avoid this the thing it self may be as easily proved as the word and when we have nomen and nominis rationem then we have a covenant not equivocally not yet analogically but properly so called And here I may deal liberally with any adversary and undertake to make proof not only of all the essentials of such a covenant in Scripture but the usual adjuncts not onely of all that makes up the nature but all accessories usually added to the solemnity of covenants The essentials or real properties of a covenant are contained in the usual definitions which afterwards we shall see laid down from several hands all of which are in short comprised in these words A mutual consent of parties with stipulation on both sides Parties consent and mutual engagement is all that is required to the same being of a covenant when two parties agree and either of them both have their conditions to make good there is a covenant or bargaine see it exemplified in several instances given Chap. 1. All of these we finde in that one place Deut. 26. 17 18 19. in the covenant that God enters with his people Thou hast avouched the Lord this day to be thy God and to walk in his wayes and to keep his Statutes and his Commandments and his Judgements and to hearken to his voice And the Lord hath avouched thee this day to be his peculiar people as he hath promised thee and that thou shouldest keep all his Commandments And to make thee high above all Nations which he hath made in praise and in name and in honour and that thou mayest be an holy people unto the Lord thy God as he hath spoken There are the Covenanters God and his people There is consent on both parties Thou hast avouched the Lord hath avouched And there is a stipulation on both sides On Gods part To make them high above all Nations which he hath made in praise and in name and in honour On the peoples part To keep all his Commandments to be an holy people There are covenant-mercies from God to his people unto which of grace he engages himself and there are covenant-duties unto which man stands engaged Psal 103. 17 18. But the mercie of the Lord is from euerlasting to everlasting upon them that fear him and his righteousnesse unto childrens children to such as keep his Covenant and to those that remember his Commandments The usual solemnities of a covenant are also found in the transactions between God and his people as well as the essentials of it 1. Covenants used to be written for memorial for posterity and so is the covenant between God and man as in Old so in New Testament-times These things are written that you might believe and that believing you may have everlasting life John 20. 31. 2. Covenants used to be confirmed with outward visible signes as the killing of beasts Gen. 15. Jer. 34. this was done in the old administration Exod. 24. Half of the blood was sprinkled upon the Altar to denote Gods entering of Covenant vers 6. The people also were sprinkled with blood to shew their voluntary entring into covenant vers 8. And in the new dispensation a new and unheard of ratification was used the blood of the Mediatour of the Covenant Math. 26. 27 28. This Cup is my blood in the New Testament which was shed for you and for many for the remission of sins This latter is a plain allusion to the former in which you may finde 1. A threefold agreement Either of both these were covenants 2. Either of both these had their ratifications and confirmations 3. Either of both were confirmed with blood 2. A threefold difference 1. The former was the Old covenant which was antiquated This is the New 2. The former was ratified and sanctified with the blood of beasts This is ratified and sanctified in the blood of Christ 3. That blood could never take away sin Heb. 10. This was shed for many for remission of sins Thirdly covenants use to be confirmed by seal so is
this covenant between God and his people which is to be spoken to elsewhere As the being of a covenant is thus plentifully proved by Scripture-testimony so we might as amply prove it by arguments drawn from thence The Churches of Christ are espoused unto Christ Hos 2. 19 20. And I will betroth thee unto me for ever yea I will betroth thee unto me in righteousnesse and in judgement and in loving kindnesse and in mercies I will even betroth thee unto me in faithfulnesse and thou shalt know the Lord. 2 Cor. 11. 2. I have espoused you to one husband that I may present you to Christ and Spouses are in covenant with their Bridegroom The Churches of Christ are married to Christ Isa 54. 5. Thy Maker is thine Husband the Lord of hosts is his Name and thy Redeemer the holy One of Israel the God of the whole earth shall he be called And wives are in covenant with their husbands Their sinnes against God are branded with the names of Adulteries Whoredomes and these are not barely dis-obedience of a Command or neglect of a favour but breaches of covenant The Churches of Christ are servants of Christ Levit. 25. houshold servants Ephes 2. 19. and servants are their Masters by covenant Their sinnes in this relation are not barely obstinacy stubbornness or ingratitude but they are charged with treachery falsehood dealing falsely in covenant and their hearts being not stedfast in covenant It is above me to conceive how man can be a covenant-breaker not alone respective to man but God as he is frequently charged when there hath past no covenant between God and him They may question whether there were ever any such thing as a covenant in the world that deny this to be a covenant in the proper nature of it some objections raised in their due place will be answered CHAP. IV. The Covenant of Grace is between God and man and not between God and Christ. HAving asserted a covenant in the proper nature of it it is necessary before I proceed further on to give differences between this covenant of Works and the covenant of Grace to speak something by way of Explication covenant being taken in so various and ambiguous senses or at least so many senses put upon it which I take to be a misunderstanding of the Scripture-covenant I shall lay down certaine Explicatory Propositions for clearing of the thing in question And the leading on shall be this The Covenant of grace is between God and man between God and those of fallen mankinde that he pleases to take into covenant God and man are the two parties in the covenant It is not made between God and Christ. This is so plain that a man might think there needed no words about it but that there are some that will have man to be no party in it and that it is entred onely with Christ on behalf of those that God hath chosen in Christ to himself To this I shall speak first by way of concession yeelding to them of this opinion these three things that follow 1. That there is such a covenant of which they speak which was entred between God and Christ containing the transactions which passe between the Father and the Sonne the tenor of which covenant we find laid down by the Prophet Esay 53. 10 c. and commented upon by the Apostle Phil. 2. 6. There we see first the work that Christ by covenant was to undergo To make his soul an offering for sinne that is as elsewhere is exprest to give his life a ransome for many and as he covenanted so he did He became obedient to death even the death of the crosse Phil. 2. 8. and that upon account of this covenant entred Christ himself speaking to it and of his work in it saith John 10. 18. This Commandment have I received of my Father Secondly the reward that he was to receive which is laid down by the Prophet in many words 1. He shall see his seed ver 10. As Isaac being received from the dead in a figure saw a seed had an innumerable posterity so the Lord Christ who was received from the dead in truth hath his seed in like manner beleevers innumerable which are called his seed in resemblance to the seed of man 2. He shall prolong his dayes not the dayes of his seed as some would have it making this one with the former and rendring the words videbit semen longaevum being delivered from death he shall live and reign eternally Revel 1. 18. 3. The pleasure of the Lord shall prosper in his hand he shall irresistibly do whatsoever is the Fathers pleasure to be done in the work of mans salvation 4. He shall see the travel of his soul and shall be satisfied upon this work done he fully enjoys the whole of all his desires 5. Therefore will I divide him a portion with the great and he shall divide the spoile with the strong He obtains a perfect victory hath a plenary and full conquest over every adversary 2. We yeeld that the whole of these covenant-transactions between God and Christ was on our behalf Making his soul an offering for sinne he offers it for those that are fallen by iniquity All is as is there said for the justification of many Whatsoeve it is that upon the work done redounds to himself yet the reason of undertaking was for us Vnto us he was borne unto us he was given He was wounded for our transgressions he was bruised for our iniquities he was delivered for our offences and raised again for our justification He endured the mulct and we reap the benefit 3. We confesse that it is the work of Christ that we enjoy a being in covenant as it is his gift that we enjoy the blessing of Ordinances But when all these are yeelded the truth must be asserted that there is a covenant to which Scripture constantly speaks which is entred of God with man and not with Christ which me thinks with much ease might be made to appear 1. There are frequent testimonies of Gods entry of covenant with his people 1. With the leading persons in the covenant which stand as the root of many thousand branches which are their off-spring in covenant He entred covenant with Abraham Gen. 15. 18. Gen. 17. 2. The like he enters with Isaac Gen. 26. 3. with Jacob Gen. 35. 11. and therefore he is so frequently called the God of Abraham Isaac and Jacob. And the covenant of God is alike known by the name of the covenant with Abraham Isaac and Jacob. 2. He enters covenant with the whole body of the people of Israel Deut. 5. 1 2. Hear O Israel the statutes and judgements which I speak in your ears this day that ye may learn them and keep them and do them The Lord our God made a covenant with us in Horeb the Lord made not this covenant with our fathers but with us even us who are all of us alive
making blessed There are many promises in Scripture made to Abraham and the seed of Abraham and there is much difference among interpreters to which of these promises this text refers The Reader if he please may consult Paraeus on the words and Junius in his parallels but to what text soever it is that these words do refer I am confident that the Apostle speaks not of any blessednesse received by covenant but a promise of making Nations blessed and this is not indeed to seeds as of many but to seed as of one which is Christ which I gather by comparing the words in hand with v. 8. of the same chapter and the Scripture foreseeing that God would justifie the Heathen through faith preached before the Gospel to Abraham saying In thee shall all Nations be blessed This is the promise that this Text holds out which is not a covenant for blessednesse but a promise to make blessed repeated againe verse 19. The Law was added because of transgressions till the seed should come to whom the promise was made which is not Christ collectively or mystically but personally considered not entring covenant but as Mediatour of the covenant So that this text serves nothing for this purpose A learned Writer indeed sayes It is beyond my brain to conceive that God should immediately make a Covenant with us who were children of disobedience and of wrath who could not be capable of any such covenant and conditions That Christ hath a hand to bring us into covenant before was yeelded and how far he hath a hand further to carry on the covenant may be yet further considered but man is a party in covenant and as God may make promises and give good things to fallen man so he may enter covenant with him likewise CHAP. V. The outward and not the inward Covenant is a covenant properly so called WHereas there is an usual distinction almost in all that write or speak of the covenant of a double covenant between God and his people one external and the other internal one passing outwardly and the other inwardly kept and observed Or as Dr. Preston expresseth it a single and double covenant which I shall forbear to examine seeing I know there is a right meaning though I much doubt whether there be in the Reader a right understanding My second Proposition shall be that it is the external Covenant not the inward that exactly and properly is called by the name of a Covenant and to which priviledges of Ordinances and title to Sacraments are annext This Proposition occasioned by this received distinction is of three heads which in case the Reader please he may subdivide into three distinct Positions 1. The outward and not the inward Covenant is most exactly and properly called by the name of a Covenant which I thus make good 1. That covenant to which the definition of a covenant doth belong hath exactly and properly the nature of a covenant this none can deny The definition sets out the nature of the thing defined But the definition most actly belongs to the outward covenant not to the inward This is plain An agreement of parties on tearms and Propositions is the definition of a covenant Now the outward covenant is an agreement on tearmes and Propositions as I have abundantly declared in that covenant God engages himself to man for his happinesse and man engages to faith and obedience The inward covenant hath no tearmes or Propositions at all for man to make good upon account of his covenanting seeing the performance of the conditions of the Scripture-covenant is his very entrance into the inward covenant He that believes and repents keeps covenant nothing more is expected of God or promised by man But beleeving and repenting is the first closing with God in covenant according to them that speak of an inward covenant 2. A covenant to perform conditions is a covenant properly so called But the outward covenant not the inward is a covenant to perform conditions This is plain The conditions in the inward covenant are the covenant 3. That which confounds entrance into covenant and keeping of covenant is no covenant properly so called In a covenant properly so called these are distinct But the inward covenant confounds entrance into covenant and keeping of covenant and therefore in exact propriety of speech is no covenant 2. The outward and not the inward Covenant is most usually in Scripture called by the name of a Covenant which is plaine in that they that have no part or portion in the inward covenant are yet still spoken of in Scripture as people in covenant God calls all Israel his people and that upon covenant termes Deut. 29. 10 11 12 13. Al of those that thus covenanted with God were not in the inward covenant This people at their worst and the wrost among them are called the people of God as by those that were strangers to this covenant These are the people of the Lord say the men of Babylon and are gone forth out of his land Ezek. 36. 20. so also by the Lord himself Jer. 2. 32. Can a Bride forget her attire yet my people have forgotten me dayes without number How often doth God own Israel as his people when he yet brands them as a rebellious revolting stiff-necked treacherous and adulterous people They that forsake the covenant of God that break covenant that deale falsely in it upon whom God brings a sword to avenge the quarrel of his covenant are in the outward not in the inward covenant But such there be among Gods covenant-people as he frequently complaines that break covenant c. These are not then in his inward but outward covenant The great objection is and all that carries colour against this Jer. 31. 32 33. where the Lord differencing the Old and New covenant saith This is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel and the house of Judah not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt which my Covenant they brake although I was an husband to them saith the Lord But this shall be my Covenant that I will make with the house of Israel After those dayes saith the Lord I will put my Law in their inward parts and write it in their hearts and will be their God and they shall be my people That is alone the inward covenant and the elect regenerate are alone within it The inward covenant then is called in Scripture a covenant and is in exact propriety of speech a covenant For answer I shall have further occasion to speak to this Text. In this place I shall only put some Queries 1. Whether those that carry this Text to an unconditionate covenant and restrain it alone to that which they call the inward covenant do not make the covenant in the time of the Law and that in Gospel-times essentially
in it A Scholar saith Mr. Hudson that is admitted into a School is not admitted because he is doctus but ut sit doctus and if he will submit to the rules of the Schoole and apply himself to learne it is enough for his admission The like may be said of the Church-visible which is Christs School Vindicat. pag. 248. The door of the visible Church saith Master Baxter Saints Rest Part. 4. Sect. 3. is incomparably wider then the door of heaven and Christ is so tender so bountiful and forward to convey his grace and the Gospel so free an offer and invitation to all that surely Christ will keep no man off if they will come quite over in spirit to Christ they shall be welcome if they will come but onely to a visible profession he will not deny them admittance This seems to me to speak the mind of Jesus Christ for their admittance and that in foro Dei as well as in foro Ecclesiae they stand in covenant-relation and have title to Church-membership Thus the Reader may see my thoughts in this thing and though I doubt not but that some will question much that I have said yet now at last I hope my meaning may be understood CHAP. VII The Covenant of Grace calls for Conditions from Man A Third Proposition which I shall here lay down is that Gods covenant with man hath its restipulation from man when God engages to man to conferre happinesse upon him he requires conditions from him This I know hath strong opposition by men of two sorts and they of different stamps and for different ends The first deny all Gospel-conditions all covenant-termes on mans part to the end they may assert justification before and without Faith Salvation without Repentance and Obedience which though it be contradicted by abundant testimonies of Scripture placing unbeleeving impenitent and disobedient ones in hell under the wrath of God yea such unbeleeving impenitent ones that have laid highest claime to Christ Matth. 7. 23. yet it seems wholly to follow and necessarily to be evinced from this absolute unconditionate covenant If Christ have wholly finished not only the work of mans redemption but also of his salvation upon the crosse without farther work of application as one in a distinct Treatise hath made it his endeavour to prove then we may as he there doth decry both our faith in Christ and Christs intercession for us Herein one of late according to his wonted weaknesse is very industrious and whereas the Scripture tells us Christ dwells in our hearts by Faith Ephes 3. 17. he would prove that Christ enters into us without us dwells in the unbeleeving and in reference to this opinion of his he makes it his businesse as to deny Faith in reference to Justification so all Gospel-covenant-conditions All other covenants besides this were saith he upon a stipulation and the promise was altogether upon conditions on both sides But in this covenant of Grace viz. the new covenant it is far otherwise there is not any condition in this covenant I say the new covenant is without any condition whatsoever And he further tells his hearers that he is on a nice point Faith is not the condition of the covenant Others utterly distasting the aforenamed opinions of Justification without faith or salvation without obedience or repentance which seeme to be the natural issue and necessary consequents of an unconditional covenant yet with great resolution do affirme the covenant to be without conditions joyning in the premisses with these heterodox teachers but peremptorily denying the conclusion Against both of these that oppose it either more desperately or more innocently I affirm and might quote a cloud of witnesses that the covenant of grace hath its conditions which to me is clear First by the definition of a covenant given in by the Authour before named a few pages before his assertion before mentioned It is a mutual agreement between parties upon certaine Articles or Propositions on both sides so that each party is bound and tyed to perform his own conditions It is in the definition and of the essence of a covenant in general according to him to have conditions yet this covenant in particular with him is without condition Here is a species that partakes not of the nature of the genus a particular covenant that wants the essence of a covenant which is the same as though he should finde us a man that is no living creature a Vine or Fig-tree that is no plant a piece of scarlet of no colour such a thing is this unconditional covenant If the essence of a covenant require it then this covenant is not without it Secondly by the expresse Texts of Scripture which lay down conditions of the covenant either in expresse words or those that of necessity imply a condition See John 8. 51. Verily verily I say unto you if a man keep my saying he shall never see death Who sees not there First a Priviledge granted by way of covenant Secondly the condition on which it is to be obtained John 8. 24. If ye beleeve not that I am he ye shall die in your sinnes Heb. 3. 6. Whose house are we if we hold fast the confidence and the rejoycing of the hope firme unto the end Who knows not If to be a conditional particle All pardon and justification if Scripture may be heard is suspended on mens not beleeving John 3. 16. For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son that whosoever beleeveth on him should not perish but have everlasting life Mar. 16. 16. He that beleeveth and is baptized shall be saved and he that beleeveth not shall be damned Thirdly by Analogy with the covenant of Works entred of God with Adam in innocency Gen. 2. 17. This on all hands that I know is granted to have been conditional and who sees not in the Texts mentioned conditions as expresse in the Gospel as not eating of the tree of knowledge of good and euil to man in Paradise either both or neither must be conditional Fourthly from the nature of conditions in covenants A condition in a covenant is somewhat agreed upon by the Parties in covenant upon performance of which the benefit of the covenant is obtained and upon the failing of it the whole benefit is lost and the penalty whatsoever it is incurred In covenants between equals either indent and article what those conditions shall be upon defaylance of which the benefit is lost and the penalty incurred In covenants between superiour and inferiour the superiour doth prescribe and the inferiour doth yeeld In all covenants there are such conditions that upon performance or failing of them the covenant doth stand or fall such there are in the Gospel-covenant There we are enjoyned to believe and repent upon obedience to and performance of these we reap the benefit of the covenant Upon failing in them the benefit is lost and the penalty incurred He that
beleeveth not shall be damned Except ye repent ye shall all likewise perish There are then conditions in this covenant Fifthly from the absurdities that will follow upon the denial of conditions on mans part in the covenant First then man is out of danger of being faulty in the covenant he can be no covenant-breaker He cannot be charged that his heart is unsteady in it This of it self is plaine He that is tyed to nothing fails in nothing he that is engaged to no servce neglects no service As God hath that glory that he keeps covenant so man hath that Priviledge that he is not in a capacity of breaking of it The Church might have spared that Apology for themselves that they had not dealt falsely in the covenant Psal 44. 17. seeing they were under no such engagement that they could falsifie or in any such capacity of being false but we finde God complaining against his People for breach of covenant Jerem. 11. 10. Isa 24. 5. Psal 78. 10 37. we finde him giving out his threats to avenge the quarrel of his covenant Levit. 26. 25. Master Baxters Questionist who seems contrarily minded thought it an exception of validity That it follows from his doctrine that the New covenant is never violated by any I am sure it follows from this doctrine that it is not in any capacity of violation Secondly then we may say as the Apostle in another case Our preaching is in vain at least to salvation vaine the Gospel in mans mouth is no power of God to salvation In faith or unbelief in a penitent or unrepentant condition in holinesse or disobedience God will save he looks neither at faith uprightnesse or any qualification when in a covenant-way he engages himselfe to conferre salvation In case God doth not regard it to what end is there any paines to work a people to it This I know some Assertours of this doctrine will disclaime but let them shew how they will avoid it CHAP. VIII A grand Objection against this doctrine answered HEre an objection of weight by reason of the difficulty of some Scripture-Texts on which it is grounded is to be taken into consideration It is true saith one that in covevenants usually there is a mutual contract and there are mutual performances to which persons are engaged thereby But for the thing it is certaine that however the words of foedus pactum in Latine 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Greek covenant in English be used the Hebrew Berith and the Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 used in the Old and New Testament do not alwayes import a mutual contract and mutual performances God is said to establish a Covenant with all living Gen. 9. 9 10. between whom and God there neither is nor can be a mutual contract and performance And the term rendred covenant is not only rendred Testament but also the holy Writers do illustrate the New covenant rather by the metaphor of a Testament then of a covenant 1 Corinth 11. 25. Gal. 3. 15. Heb. 9. 16 17. and where the Promises are set down without any reciprocal contract or duty exprest Heb. 8. 10 11 12. and 10. 16 17. Rom. 11. 26 27. This argument is against all being of covenants as well as the conditionality of them as indeed if conditions be denied all being of a covenant is destroyed and therefore it might have been well brought in where the covenant it self was asserted as militating against the very being of it But it cannot conveniently be held out in both places and therefore it must be considered here and for answer let us first take what is granted that usually in covenants there is a mutual contract and that these words Latine and Greek be used to imply such covenants in which there are mutual contracts and mutual performances and to which persons are engaged on both sides and then let us examine what is affirmed concerning those two words Berith and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for the contrary And for the first who does not know that the word is sometimes used for a covenant improperly so called A bare command Jer. 34. 13. A bare Seal Gen. 17. 10. is as we have heard called a covenant And so a bare promise here in the place quoted is called a covenant likewise Not that beasts and birds can covenant but they shall be as secure from the judgement there mentioned as though there had past a mutual contract in the strongest engagements Eliphaz shewing the priviledges of the godly saith Job 5. 23. They shall be in league with the stones of the field the same word is in both places shall we now say that a league or covenant is no act of reason because man is in league and covenant with stones which are unreasonable creatures or rather shall we say with Master Caryl in his Exposition To be in League with stones is an improper and allusive speech stones are not capable of the formalities of a League So we say for God to make a covenant with unreasonable creatures with beasts birds and creeping things is an improper and allusive speech likewise Birds Beasts and creeping things are in an incapacity of covenant Gomarus handling that question of Universal Redemption in his Comment on Gal. 1. a Patron of the Lutherans as he calls him disputing for it from the form of the covenant of Grace as that Disputant stiles it Gen. 3. 17. where the seed of the woman is promised to break the Serpents head denies that those words containe the forme of a covenant because it is certain as he sayes that a Covenant properly so called containes an obligation of two parties with conditions on both sides which cannot be proved saith he in those words and therefore it is not a covenant properly so called From which learned hand we see 1. That a covenant properly so called is of two parties 2. That both parts have their conditions 3. That there is a covenant between God and man properly so called in which God and man are both obliged 4. That no Scripture-expression holds out this covenant that holds not out these conditions This is the proper acception for which we contend and improper acceptions as they do not hold forth the nature of a covenant so we confesse they do not imply mutual contracts or mutual performances So that the Argument is brought to this A covenant sometimes in an improper sense is said to be made with those that cannot make mutual contracts therefore a covenant is no mutal contract nor hath any mutual engagements We might as well argue that because a stone is called a witnesse Josh 24. 27. a heap of stones is so called Gen. 31. 48. which have neither eyes nor ears to see or hear what is done or said nor yet a tongue to utter it therefore there is no use of eyes or ears or of a tongue in any one that is brought for a witnesse As the Hebrew word Berith is improperly used
or at least used in a sense more large then to denote a covenant wheresoever it doth not hold out an agreement of two parties with engagements on both hands So the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whensoever it is used in that sense seemes to be taken improperly Seeing in its received signification according to good Interpreters it doth denote not a covenant but a mans last Will and Testament which never is of force but by the death of the Testator Heb. 9. 16 17. which is not true of a Covenanter his death is not required to make the covenant valid So Ravanellus Testament saith he in Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is taken 1. Properly for the declaration of a mans Will concerning that which he would have done after his death and is ratified by the death of the Testator for it is not of force while the Testator liveth Heb. 9. 16 17. 2. Improperly for a covenant which living men enter among themselves Rivet also Exercit. 103. in Gen. speaking of those words of the Apostle Gal. 4. 24. These are two Testaments Testament there he saith is not to be taken in a proper signification for that which is done by a dying man and ratified by his death but for a covenant-agreement or order as Pererius hath well observed Alsted in his Lexicon Theologicum having spoken to the sense in which translatours of the Bible sometimes use it as the same with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 resolves We must yeeld somewhat to custome After saith Testament properly signifies a just declaration of a mans Will concerning that which he would have done with his goods after his death The Greeks properly call it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Estius is very full setting out the Original denotation of the word together with the received signification of it For though 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith he if you look to the Etymologie of the word holds out no more then a disposing and with Greek Authours as Budaeus witnesseth in his Commeâ—t on the Greek tongue signifies in general a covenant-agreement or promise yet the common and most received signification is the same as Testamentum in the Latine which is the declaration of a mans Will concerning that whith he would have done after his death The Apostles Application of a Testament properly so called to the covenant of God Heb. 9. 16 17. hath troubled many Interpreters Erasmus on this acount questions the Authors skill in the Hebrew tongue and Cajetan calls into question the authority of the Epistle Most conclude from hence that the Original of the Epistle was Greek in that there is not Hebrew words to hold out such expressions and the Syriack translator was put to it to keep the Greek word and put it into a Syriack Character For the clearing of this doubt it is not enough to say that these words are sometimes promiâ—â—uously used Berith for a Testament 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for a Covenant as Camerarius notes out of Aristophanes a Greek Poet as Rivet observes Seeing the Apostle applies a Testament in the proper received sense to that which signifies a mutual agreement For the salving of which Estius reckons up several opinions which he rejects some of which others of good note follow and afterwards acquaints the Reader with his own thoughts in words drawn out to such a length that I shall refer the Reader if he please to the Authour himself Dixon on the words saith The Articles of the covenant also evince it to be a Testament and the promiser bound to make his word good and so to die For Jer. 31. The Lord Christ promiseth to reconcile his people to God to take away their sinnes and to be their God Justice required satisfaction of them before they could be reconciled satisfaction they could not make themselves therefore he who promised to make the reconciliation with God was found to make the satisfaction for them to God and if satisfaction for them then to under-lie the curse of the Law for them and so to die Gomarus says The covenant of the New Testament is both a covenant and a Testament It is a covenant because it is an agreement between God and man concerning salvation promised and faith owing by man And a Testament because it is established upon the promised death of the Son of God and an heavenly inheritance by it so that it may not unworthily be called a Testamentary covenant or a Testament-covenant by reason of the concurrence of both in one And after concludes Simply it is a covenant by reason of the mutual agreement between God and beleevers Respectively a Testament by reason of the way and manner of the chief and most eminent part in the covenant that is the promise of grace whereby God promiseth to be our God propitious to us and to give us everlasting life as an inheritance by the death of his Son Junius in his parallels undertaking to give satisfaction hath a remedy with me worse then the disease though learned Mr. Grayle endeavours his Vindication After a large discourse in what latitude the word Berith is taken The Apostle he saith shewes the limitation of it out of the Types and shadows of the Law in the fifteenth and following verses when he shews that the grace of God was herein more eminent and conspicuous in that he gave unto his not a covenant but a Testament giving in his reasons because a covenant must have contained mutual conditions which if either part did not performe the covenant were void but a Testament is an instrument of liberality and bounty by which men are called and made heirs without eying of any duty that is to be done by them Here by the way we see that in case it be a covenant according to him it hath mutual conditions and therefore he is together with Ravanellus Gomarus Vrsinus before quoted to whom may be added Peter Martyr on Judg. 2. giving the like definition wholly against those who make this inference That it cannot be proved to be of the general nature of covenants that there should be such a convertibility as that both must seal or contract or perform But for his position that God hath not given a covenant to his people I wonder how it slipt from him Such unwary expressions in a seeming tendency to advance grace from pious persons have made way for strange superstructions He might have said that those Types and Shadows of the Law did argue it to be more then a bare and common covenant being ratified by blood which led to the blood of the Mediatour And so Rivet as I understand him answers Paul in his Epistle to the Hebr. saith he chap. 9. doth not argue from the simple signification of the word but from the circumstances of the covenant But his denying it to be a covenant is that which I must oppose He is large indeed to shew in what latitude the word Berith
in some Old Testament Texts is used as also the Latine word Foedus in prophane Authors All of which shews no more but that the word in the exact denotation and largest sense of it imports no more then an ordination or disposition yet that hinders not but that as Interpreters generally render it so the received and accustomed use of it is to hold out a covenant bargaine or agreement As the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in its largest sense comprizes any Assembly even for civil uses Acts 19. 39. yea rude congregated routs verse 41. yet in the generally received sense it is taken for holy Assemblies So it is with Berith the word may admit of a large sense but the received sense is with more restriction The Jews had their covenants man with man Abraham with Abimelech Gen. 21. 72. Isaac with Abimelech Gen. 26. 28. Laban with Jacob Gen. 31. 44. And this was the word whereby they did expresse their covenants And as the word Church is sometimes used improperly for Church Members that make not up a whole Church The Church in Aquila and Priscilla 's house Rom. 16. 5. Sometimes for Church-officers Matth. 18. 17. Tell it to the Church who could not be the whole Church whereof infants are a part or as all must confesse women who yet are no competent judges so there are improper acceptions of the word covenant when the proper sense is that which hath been held out which is a mutual compact or agreement on terms and Propositions The learned observe that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 properly answers to the word Berith Ravanellus observes out of Hierome that Aquila and Symmachus did so translate it and Rivet on Genes Exercit. 135. saith That which the Septuagint and Theodotio call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that Symmachus translates 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 pactum foedus which saith he is the proper signification of the Hebrew word Berith which word is not read in the Old Testament for the ordering of a mans Will or Testament Now it is not denyed but the word foedus and pactum in Latine 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in Greek covenant in English do signifie mutual contracts in which there are mutual performances and so the Hebrew word Berith in like manner this being according to the learned the genuine signification of it And if this were not the received signification of it how did the Objection before mentioned ever come into any mans head that the Apostle did bewray ignorance in the Scripture-use of the word in applying it to a mans Will or Testament and what needed so much pains for his defence in it Hierome on those words Gal 3. 17. This I say that the Testament confirmed of God saith If any compare the Hebrew volumes and other Editions with the translation of the Septuagint he shall find that where Testament is written it doth not signifie a Testament but a Covenant which in the Hebrew tongue is called Berith And in case Gods whole dispensations and Gospel-communications as Junius would have it be a Testament onely and no covenant why is the world so abused with the word foedus pactum in Latine covenant in English By which all men understand that which we call a covenant no man understands a Testament why do we say covenant of Works covenant of grace if the former onely were a covenant properly and the other a Testament as though we should cal an Eagle and a Lion both by the common name of a bird perswading that a Lion were a bird as well as an Eagle yet if it were a Testament properly so called it would not overthrow the conditionality as Mr. Grayl out of Swynborn shews Testaments have their conditions How comes it to pass that Scripture holds out so frequently that similitude of a marriage Is 54. 5. Hos 2. 19. 2 Cor. 11. 2. Eph. 5. 32. to set out this transaction A marriage contract is not a mans Testament hath a wife barely a Legacie and doth she enter no covenant with her husband How comes it to passe that turning aside from God after other lovers is called in Scripture by the name of whoredomes adulteries which is the breach of a marriage-covenant and how is sin against God called a dealing falsely with God we cannot deale falsely in the covenant if it be not a covenant but a Testament men may carry themselves unthankfully but falsehood argues an engagement How is it that we finde in Old and New Testament-Scriptures mutuall engagements between God and his people of God to them of them to him in case God hath vouchsafed them a Legacie by Testament in the death of his Son and left them out of covenant And how is that without Covenant without Christ without God without Hope with the Apostle are one and the same when yet all people that have hope in Christ are out of covenant There be that say The holy Writers do illustrate the New covenant rather by the Metaphor of a Testament then a covenant These seeme to make it neither a Covenant nor a Testament Every one knows that a Metaphor is a figure whereby a word is carried out of its proper signification into some other that carries resemblance with it In case there be a metaphor in that expression then it is not proper but borrowed But as I beleeve that Abraham spake not by a Metaphor to God when he said Gen. 18. 25. Shall not the Judge of all the world do right God absolving and and condemning the sons of men giving rewards and inflicting penalties is a Judge properly so called so I do not think that God spake in any Metaphor to Abraham when in the chapter before Gen. 17. 7. he saith I will establish my covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee God is a Judge of all the earth properly so called and he hath entred a covenant with his people properly so called likewise It is true that we understand that relation of God to his people more clearly by the Analogy that it bears to Judges that are set up among men for absolution of the innocent condemning of the guilty And so we are holpen in our understandings of the covenant of God entred with his people by Analogy with the covenants that are among men but in neither of both of these is the word taken out of its proper sense and applyed to any other that it will not properly bear I finde indeed an eminent Divine affirming That a covenant is not so properly said to be with God and man as between man and man not denying the duty which man owes to God nor the engagement by which he is obliged but freely yeelding both and sticking only at the consent on mans part which among men he sayes is requisite and doth mutually concur to make the covenant valid But neither in the covenant of nature or grace is this consent anteceding the validity of the covenant required in man This I confesse
I am not able to reach Nothing with me is more plain then that consent is pre-required in both these covenants Adam I confesse as it is objected was bound to consent yea I will yeeld more that it is no more possible to conceive Adam to deny consent then the Sunne to be without light seeing in his natural motion he was carried in that way of full conformity to God that the Sun may as well be dark as Adam averse from the will or tender of God yet if we could conceive a dark Sunne it could not be a light to rule the day so if we could conceive Adam denying consent to God in the tender of covenant Adam had not been in covenant For fallen man it is clear what held the Pharisees out of the New covenant but their non-consent rejecting the counsel of God against themselves Luk 7. 30. as also those Jews Act. 13. who contradicting and blaspheming judged themselves unworthy of eternal life The covenant was tendered to all those Gentile Nations and Cities where the Gospel was preached and all were bound to yeeld assent but where there was assent of faith there the covenant was entered where assent is denied there they remained strangers from the covenants of promise in the same way of Gentilisme as though the Gospel had never been tendered or the Name of Christ held forth So that these things considered I doubt not but I have made it appear That there is a mutual contract and mutual performances to which persons are engaged not only usually in covenants but in all covenants And that it is of the general nature of covenants that there should be such a convertibility as that both must if not seal some contracts are without seals yet contract or performe and where a seal is vouchsafed must accept of it and that the definition of the covenant in the general is vindicated That God hath entred a covenant properly so called with man with fallen man in which there is a contract of this nature and engagements to mutual performances God condescending to it of grace and man obliged to it by duty yet accepting voluntarily Which as the former might be confirmed by the authority of Divines of eminency Mr. Ball speaking of the covenant of God in the general entred with man saith It may be thus described A mutual compact or agreement betwixt God and man whereby God promiseth all good things specially eternal happinesse unto man upon just equal and favourable conditions and man doth promise to walk before God in all acceptable free and willing obedience expecting all good from God and happinesse in God according to his promise for the praise and glory of his great Name And Vrsin in his Catechisme page 91. defining a covenant in the general nature of it as before he saith it is A mutual agreement between God and man whereby God confirmes to man that he will be merciful forgive their sinnes give them a new righteousnesse his holy Spirit and everlasting life in and by his son the Mediatour In like manner men tie themselves to God for faith and repentance that is by a lively faith to receive this mercy alone and to yeeld true obedience to God And Lucas Trelcatius in loco de foedere thus defines it The covenant is an agreement to God with man concerning eternal happinesse to be communicated to man upon a certain condition to the glory of God And then explaining himself he says When we say an agreement we understand a mutual obligation of God and man by a stipulation intervening that what is promised on both parts may be performed And farther saith There are two parties of the covenant 1. The promise of God concerning everlasting life 2. The obligation of man for performance of the condition prescribed of God the first is free the second is necessary And in conclusion such a bottome I believe is laid in the Introduction that will bear the whole fabrick that follows after Junius and Gomarus are as opposite as may be one to the other in this dispute about the covenant as may be seen in the Appendix to the first chapter But they both agree in this that every covenant of necessity is to have mutual engagements and performances Gomarus denies that the promise Gen. 3. 15. containes the covenant of grace because no conditions are there mentioned And Junius to avoid conditions denies that there is any such thing as a covenant between God and man for if it were a covenant he sayes it must have conditions Therefore according to them both if we grant a covenant we must grant conditions and the full nature of the covenant is in no Scripture laid down where we have not these engagements or conditions laid down likewise Some think to reconcile all this by the various acception of the word Sometimes it is soused in Scripture that the free promise of God is thereby signified and the restipulation of our duty withit God requiring man to engage by covenant to that which he might require did there no promise intervene yet sometimes in Scripture covenant doth signifie the absolute promise of God without any restipulation and of this kinde is that covenant in which God promiseth to give to his elect faith and perseverance to which promise there cannot be conceived any condition to be annexed which is not comprehended in the promise it self So Learned Camero de triplici foedere Thes 1. 2. For this absolute covenant here spoke to I desire the Reader to observe what the same learned Authour hath farther in his third Thesis This distinction of the Covenant doth depend upon the distinction of the love of God for there is a love of God to the Creature from whence every thing that is good in the creature hath wholly flowed and there is the acquiescent love of God in the creature and this the creature hath received not for any thing from it self but from God as it was loved with that first love of God that love for better understanding we call Gods primary or antecedent this Gods secondary or consequent love from that we say doth depend both the paction and fulfilling of the absolute covenant from this depends the fulfilling of that covenant to which is annexed a restipulation not so the paction for that we say depends on the first love This antecedent love is wont to be called Amor benevolentiae which can be no more then a purpose or resolution in God for good to man The second is wont to be called Amor complacentiae a love of delight or content How the former can be a covenant or any covenant properly so called depend upon it as preceding the latter I do not see First this goes before the giving of Christ the gift of Christ is an effect of it Joh. 3. 16. Now God covenants not with man without the Mediator as Camero himself acknowledges and therefore this that precedes can be no covenant made
Secondly a covenant plainly argues an agreement at least in tender from one and professed acceptation from the other party A covenant of parties at a distance either party holding his distance respective to that where the distance is held is the greatest absurdity Now in this absolute covenant as it is called there is not so much as a tender from God much lesse an acceptance from man and so as yet a distance held and therefore no covenant or agreement Thirdly this supposed absolute covenant Jer. 31 33. Heb. 8. 10. hath mercies of two sorts graces priviledges And though men contend that the promise of grace is absolute seeing there is nothing pre-required of us for the writing of this Law in our hearts yet the priviledge of remission of sins hath its conditions Act. 10. 43. Act. 13. 38 39. Act. 3. 19. Fourthly none can claim any interest in or take any comfort from this absolute covenant depending on the antecedent love of God preceding the conditional covenant depending on the consequent love of God before he hath entered the second which is conditional and performed the conditions and knows that he hath performed them This is clear it is made all say with the Elect now none can claime his interest till he knows his Election which is made sure only by our saith and new obedience by the knowledge that we have of our faith and new obedience But it is enough to me that a covenant comprizing a restipulation of our duty is here confest which is the Gospel way to salvation without which the acquiescent love of God is not attained As to that Text Heb. 8. 10. the Reader may see more elsewhere CHAP. IX Further Objections against the former doctrine Answered THe covenant of grace entred with fallen man saith one is called an everlasting covenant and Heb. 8. 12. God saith I will be merciful to your iniquities and your sinnes will I remember no more Now suppose there were conditions for man to performe and man did faile in those conditions what were become of the covenant Ans The conditions failing of the covenant is broke the everlasting covenant is broke which though it seeme a contradiction to some yet it is not so to the Prophet Is 24. 5. They have transgressed the Law changed the Ordinances and broken the everlasting Covenant It is said to be everlasting because it shall not be antiquated for another to succeed it or at least that man is not to put a period to it so Circumcision and the Passeover are Ordinances for ever not that non-entring into it never break or transgresse it The Elect of God Regenerate do indeed keep covenant so do not all that enter into it There are frequent Scripture-complaints of Breach of covenant Secondly It is said Man hath no tie upon him to perform any thing whatsoever with covenant as a condition that must be observed on his part let the covenant it self be judge in this case mark it in Jeremy Ezekiel or in Heb. 8. Answ In those Texts there are graces mentioned as Gods work on the soule and priviledges promised to be enjoyed Whatsoever is there set forth as Gods work upon the soul is also required of man as duty namely to be renued in the spirit of his mind Eph. 4. 23. To make him a new heart and a new spirit Ezek. 18. 31. That the Word of Christ dwell in him richly in all wisdome Col. 3. 16. It will be hard for any to point out a promise of this nature but it may be answered with a command as an obligation unto duty As the precepts must not thrust out the promise nor duty shoulder out free grace So the promise must not destroy the precept In that of Jeremy conditions on mans part are included so as by the assistance of grace to be performed The tie lies upon us on pain of losse of all that the covenant promiseth and bearing all that-it threatneth Thirdly Suppose saith one there should be a fault of performing in this Covenant whose were the fault Answ The fault is his who is chidden in Scripture and beaten for it namely those that did flatter God with their mouth and lied unto him with their tongues whose heart was not right with him nor were sledfast in his covenant Ps 78. 36 37. They upon whom he will bring a sword to avenge the quarrel of his covenant Lev. 26. 25. are in the fault Fourthly if there be conditions then the covenant is not free gifts must be of absolute grace and bounty if a condition be required the freedome of the gift is destroyed Answ This is true of such conditions where there is merit in the condition whereby benefit accrues to him that engages by promise holding proportion with the reward But here is nothing indented by way of covenant but that homage which is naturally due which God may challenge from us as creatures without either engagement unto or exhibition of any reward at all for their paines and what he may require without reward when he covenants for it the reward is free If Abraham had made Eliezer of Damascus his heir upon his faithful service the inheritance had yet been a free gift and of grace conferr'd upon him Make the Proposition universal All conditions in promises destroy the nature of a gift in the thing promised and then it is to be denied A covenant of grace would then be a contradiction seeing it is no covenant as hath been demonstrated without a condition Then the Prophet doth contradict himself in the tender of a covenant in the most free manner as is possible Isa 55. 1 2. Ho every one that thirsteth c. even their conditions are required Incline your ear and come unto me Hear and your soul shall live Let the wicked for sake his way the unrighteous man his thoughts and let him return unto the Lord and he will have mercy upon him and unto our God for he will abundantly pardon Here are free promises with conditions Men who have not that sovereignty account their gifts free and yet require conditions from them on whom they are conferred An Alms-house is founded and endowed with revenue conditions are put upon the Almes-people to reside in such an house assigned to wear clothes of the colour and forme prescribed or whatsoever else the Founder please and yet the gift is free Finally God cannot covenant with man and keep up his sovereignty if we leave out obedience in the Articles of the covenant The covenant is upon equal termes if subjection be excluded to be a God in covenant and not require subjection is the highest of contradictions A Learned Writer after a large discourse held of the right that Redeemed ones have to the death of Christ before beleeving saith Here may be observed the mistake of those who winde up the merit of Christ as affecting God as I may so speak unto a conditional engagement viz. that we shall be made partakers of
be satisfied which how impossible it is for man to do and how injurious to the sufferings of Christ to attempt the doing of it let us guesse by the definition that Bellarmine gives of it Lib. quart de peniten cap. 1. Actio quâ is qui alierum laesit tantum facit quantum satis est ad injuriam compensandam sive is qui laesus est justè exigit All that we can suffer can never satisfie the wrong that our sinnes have done to the divine Majesty God may justly exact more then either on earth or in their imaginary purgatory any man can discharge As the sufferings of this life are not worthy of the glory that shall be revealed so neither do they match the evil that justly might be inflicted They are all just but not from Gods revenging justice In themselves they have the nature of curses but they are no part of the curse which upon the breach of the covenant of works and upon the transgression of the Law is menaced As a skilful Physician makes poison up into a medicine so doth God turne curses into blessings they serve not to kill but to cure his people 7. These sufferings are not yet barely as some use to speak from sinne but chastisements for sinne not only to prevent sin that it may not be committed but because men have allready sinned The Corinthians were chastened not alone least they should prophane the Lords Supper but because they had prophaned it God afflicted David not onely lest he should commit adultery but because he had committed adultery He threatens Eli and punisheth him not only lest he should be too indulgent to his sons but because he had been too indulgent to them It cannot be conceived how afflictions should prevent sin to come if they do not correct sin already past why are men afraid to sinne upon account of sufferings but because upon sin they have suffered Smart for sinne makes a childe of God watchful against sin The childe that hath seen his fathers frowne is afraid lest he should frowne againe that hath beene scourged knows what a father thinks of a fault and is afraid of a second It is here objected that it stands not with justice in this way to afflict beleevers seeing Christ in their stead hath made satisfaction and to punish one sinne twice is injurious Answ 1. These know that Socinians deny that Christ hath made any satisfaction and if these two cannot stand together viz. Christs satisfaction and beleevers correction they will soone assume that beleevers do suffer for which the Scripture is very full and therefore Christ hath not satisfied and so their dangerous errour will be supported 2. One truth must not be produced to the overthrow of another Christ satisfaction takes us out of the hand of condemnation and delivers from revengeful wrath but not out of the hand of discipline when God becomes a Saviour he doth not cease to be a Sovereign a father that is a Judge may lash his childe that he never intends to sentence If any will see further Objections raised and answered let him consult Mr. Burges of justification Part. 1. Lecture 5. pag. 33. CHAP. XIV Agreement between the Covenant of works and the Covenant of grace HAving asserted a covenant of grace and premised such things that may contribute some light towards a right understanding of it I must proceed to enquire into the respective agreement and differences between these covenants The former is an easie work there being no controversie or dispute raised about it and therefore I shall briefly passe it over They agree 1. In the general nature of a covenant both are covenants strictly so called as hath already been demonstrated 2. They have one and the same authour that is God He proposed the termes of the covenant to Adam for himself and all of his posterity and he enters covenant with the posterity of Adam in their fallen condition 3. The parties in covenant are in both of them God and man God propounding man accepting though there be as we have heard that would have it otherwise 4. In either of both there is a tendency to mans happinesse Life is given in promise in both as we see Rom. 10 5 6 c. where both covenants are distinctly considered what difference or agreement there may be in the life promised will after be spoke unto 5. In both of them there is a restipulation from man as there is an engagement from God as God engageth himself for reward so man is engaged to duty the former was never doubted the later hath been largely proved 6. In either of both righteousness is called for from those that enter covenant For the first it is not questioned in that it is a covenant of Works Failing in doing was death Interest in perfect righteousnesse is required in the latter which is called the righteousnesse of faith and is the righteousnesse of the Law performed not by our selves but by another Christ is the end of the Law for righteousnesse to every one that beleeveth Rom. 10. 4. Sincerity in inherent righteousnesse is required likewise both of these will be morefully demonstrated 7. Either of both are indispensable the conditions being not performed the penalty of the covenant in both is inflicted Adams posterity had experience of the one and all unbeleevers and impenitent ones will bear the other not believing not repenting brings death as sometimes not perfectly obeying That distinction of the covenant of grace calling for one thing and accepting of another afterwards will be considered 8. Neither of both covenants are personal as entered with any single person or persons and determined in him or them but both of them include posterity In the covenant of works it is not so expressly delivered but not to be doubted That covenant was entred with Adam for all his the latter is more expresse to the covenanters and their seed both in Old and New Testament-Scriptures which by a party is questioned but remaines largely to be confirmed CHAP. XV. Differences between the Covenants of Works and the Covenant of Grace HAving spoken to the agreement between these two Covenants I must now more largely enquire into the differences which will prove a work of greater difficulty there being so much opposition The first and leading difference is that being both of them between God and man they were entred into in a different estate and condition of man The first was entered in statu instituto in mans integrity when man had not at all by sinne incurred the displeasure of God or weakened his abilities for obedience Man then stood as he came out of Gods hand bearing in himselfe a lively resemblance of God The second was in statu destituto in mans fallen estate now in sinne under wrath dead in sinne and wholly disabled from yeelding obedience of this there is no controversie and therefore I need not make more words about it And from hence all
other differences which I shall observe or which as I suppose are observable have their rise which are these following The covenant of Works or as learned Camero calls it the covenant of Nature was for preservation of man in life that is in present blisse and happinesse to hold him in the condition in which it found him which is implyed in the penalty threatned as was before noted man must not die till sinne enter and exprest in that promise of God Do this and live His life must be continued as long as his obedience lasted his happinesse must have been perpetuated though not necessarily in the same degree God might have translated him from a life on earth to a life in heaven had he kept to the terms of the covenant The covenant of grace is for mans restitution reconciliation and recovery He was before in blisse and if he had so abode he might with good reason have taken up Peters words It is good for us to be here Now he is in misery and must be restored if ever he be blessed and so a farther difference doth arise The covenant of works had its precedency was first in time The covenant of grace in order of time follows after This must needs follow Mans estate in integrity being before his fall the covenant made in his integrity must needs precede the covenant entred into in his fallen condition unlesse we will place the third of Genesis before the first the fall of man before his creation And therefore that is utterly a mistake in one who in the very entrance upon his Treatise of the two covenants gives the covenant of grace the precedency in time giving this as his reason why he places the covenant of Grace before the covenant of Works because the covenant of Grace was in being before the covenant of Works quoting for proof Gal. 3. 17. The covenant which was made before of God in Christ the Law which was four hundred and thirty years after cannot disanul But this can by no means serve his purpose unlesse we should conclude that the covenant of Works had its beginning in Mount Sinai at the giving of the Law by Moses and the covenant of Grace of only four hundred and thirty yeares more ancient standing And that will as little serve his purpose which he after brings in that there was an agreement and covenant between God the Father and his Sonne Jesus Christ about the salvation of man before Adam sinned yea before the world began Seeing that covenant between the first and second person of the Trinity was not the covenant which he hath in hand to treat upon namely the covenant which God entred with man as he himself confesses No covenant can be made with man before man be in being A noâ—ens can be no party in a covenant And whereas we are told that the same covenant which was made with Jesus Christ before time was afterwards made with man I desire that all would observe what is laid down in that Treatise concerning that covenant Christ for his part was by covenant to become a Mediatour Surety and Saviour for all those that his Father should give him And must we become such Mediatours Sureties and Saviours also God the Father did promise to Christ as is further said all the things that did belong to his Mediatourship and things to gratifie and satisfie him for his Mediatourship May we by covenant expect such things from the Father likewise If we are neither tied to the same work to which Christ by covenant was tied nor are to receive the like gifts as he by covenant was to expect we are not in the same covenant that past between the Father and Christ And though these two were one which must not be yeelded the covenants ad intra which the persons of the Trinity make with themseâ—es and those ad extra with the creature may not be confounded yet that would evince no such precedence in time seeing there was alike agreement in the whole Trinity for the creation of man and Gods covenant with him in his integrity as is fully assented to in the same Treatise to the utter overthrow of all that which upon the former supposition he had built To that question To what end should the covenant of Grace be made before man stood in need of Grace he answers Known unto God are all his works from the beginning of the world And he had all things then as present and real before the eyes of his glory as now he hath viz. Mans Creation Fall Recovery and in this sense there was no precedency of time in regard of any of Gods Counsels or secret actions And then there can be no precedency of one of his covenants before another we must finde then a sense according to which there is a precedency which is not found in any covenants of the Trinity among themselves which in exact propriety of speech are purposes rather then covenants and were before all time but in the actual entrance and assent by the creature given which is in time and admits precedency In which consideration the covenant of works hath its precedency before that of Grace as the state of integrity was before the fall Whence farther yet follows that the covenant of works was but a small time in force at least but a small time of use only during the space of mans integrity which some say was only one day in all probability not long in that man enjoyed no fruit of that blessing in Paradise Increase and multiply But this second is of everlasting continuance when the first Covenant was violated by our first parents and so made uselesse that of grace succeeded which is our only planck after shipwrack but none shall ever succeed this second Adam failing of salvation by the covenant of Works which he entred in the first place is saved by the covenant of grace into which after his fall he entred and into which he was of grace admitted but he that is not saved by the second must everlastingly perish and so I understand that text Heb. 10. 26. If we sinne wilfully after we have received the knowledge of the truth then there remaineth no more sacrifice for sinnes but a fearful looking for of judgement and fiery indignation where by sinning wilfully I understand an utter rejection of Gods tender of this sacrifice of Christs blood which I gather from the Apostle in the words that follow the proof that he brings of that sad assertion He that despised Moses Law died without mercy under two or three witnesses of how much sorer punishment shall he be thought worthy that hath trodden under foot the blood of the Sonne of God and counted the blood of the covenant wherewith he was sanctified an unholy thing This is that wilful sinne of which there is no expiation When man had cast off the yoke a sacrifice was found Christ made his soul an
covenant-keeping or punishments in case of covenant-breaking The one the Lord promises The other he threatens I finde no material difference in the conditions on Gods part in these covenants Life is promised in both in case of covenant-keeping and death is threatned in both in case of covenant-breaking Some indeed have endeavoured to finde a great difference in the life promised in the covenant of works and the life that is promised in the covenant of grace as also in the death that is threatned in the one and the other and thereupon move many and indeed inextricable difficulties What life man should have enjoyed in case Adam had not fallen And what death man should have died in case Christ had not been promised From which two endlessely more by way of consectary may be drawn by those that want neither wit nor leisure to debate them In which the best way of satisfaction and avoidance of such puzling mazes is to enquire what Scripture means by Life which is the good in the covenant promised and what by Death which is the evil threatned Now for the first Life containes all whatsoever that conduces to true happinesse to make man blessed in soul and body All good that Christ purchases and heaven enjoys is comprised under it in Gospel-expressions I am come that they might have life and that they may have it more abundantly John 10. 10. He that hath the Son hath life and he that hath not the Sonne hath not life 1 John 5. 12. On the contrary under Death is comprised all that is injurious to man or mankinde that tends to his misery in soul and body The damnation of Hell being called death the uttermost of evils being the separation of soul and body from God John 8. 51. 1 John 3. 14. Sinne which leads to it and is the cause of it is called death in like manner Ephes 2. 1. And the separation of soul from the body being called death sicknesses plagues are so called in like manner Exâ—d 10. 17. Now happinesse being promised to man in covenant only indefinitely under that notion of life without limit to this or that way of happinesse in this or that place God is still at liberty so that he make man happy where or how he pleaseth to continue happinesse to him and is not tied up in his engagement either for earth or heaven And therefore though learned Camero in his Treatise de triplici foedere Thes 9. with others makes this difference between the covenant of works and the covenant of grace In the covenant of Works which he calls nature life was promised and a most blessed life but an animal life in Paradise in the covenant of Grace a life in Heaven and spiritual And Master Baxter in his Aphoris of Justification page 5. saith that this life premised was only the continuance of that state that Adam was then in Paradise is the opinion of most Divines Yet with submission to better judgements I see not grounds for it seeing Scripture no way determines the way and kinde of this happinesse promised and in case that we take liberty to say that when long life is promised upon earth in many texts of Scripture that the promise is made good though it faile on earth in case it be supplied in heaven life being the marrow of the promise much more then is it made good when it is indefinitely promised without limit to a man whil'st on earth in case it be made good by his translation into heaven And indeed there are strong probabilities heaven being set out by the name of Paradise in Christs speech to the thief on the crosse and in Pauls vision in that rapture 2 Cor. 12. if we may make such a supposition of mans standing now he is fallen that he should not have continued a life of immortality on earth but have been translated into heaven He had that blessing from God as other living creatures to be fruitfull and multiply Gen. 1. 28. and how the world could have contained all those individuals at once which to eternity man should propagate cannot be imagined And to conceive that an end in time should be put to propagation when an animal life in the use of the creature should be continued is scarce consistent with reason But a thousand of these God can expedite when we are at a stand He promised life and he could have made it good and we see he limited not himself where or how to conferre it And what I have said of life promised the same I say of death threatned in case man upon sinne be brought into a state of misery Justice is done and the threat takes hold where and howsoever this misery be suffered whether it had been in sorrows and horrours on earth in separation of the soul first for torments and the body to follow or in a speedy dispatch of soul and body to hell Gods way of execution after the sinne committed on those that are not by Christ ransomed does not argue that the penalty in the covenant necessitated him to it might not he at once have poured out the whole of his vengeance on vessels of wrath when yet we know that he takes time for the execution of it A Learned Writer enquiring into this death that was here threatned saith that the same damnation that followed the breach of the second covenant it could not be When I suppose it rather should be said that in substance and kind it can be no other Infidels that were never under any other covenant then that of works and covenant-breaking Christians are in the same condemnation there is not two hells but one and the same for those that know not God and those that obey not the Gospel of Christ 2 Thes 1. 8. Neither is there any Limbus or distinct place for infants in original sinne and out of the covenant of grace Neither can I assent to that speech To say that Adam should have gone quick to hell if Christ had not been promised or sinne pardoned is to contradict the Scriptures that makes death temporal the wages of sinne It were I confesse to presume above Scripture but I cannot see it a contradiction of Scripture A burning Feaver a Consumption Leprosie Pestilence c. are in Scripture made the wages of sinne yet many go to hell and misse those diseases And if it be said Scripture so makes death the wages of sin that all must suffer it I answer Those Scriptures are all of them leges post latae appointed of God as his way upon mans fall neither absolute justice nor yet the penalty threatned necessitating him to that way of proceeding He takes the same way where his justice hath already satisfaction Those that are priviledged from death as the wages of sinne thus die God tied not up his own hands as States do their Judges and ministerial officers to one way of execution and this his way with the unbeleeving is voluntary and
know not their Election it is not as yet made sure by them So that as to us it is without any determinate object None can say my interest is in this Promise These were delivered to the whole body of Israel when not one in many did reap the benefit of them Mr. Baxter therefore makes them Prophecies De eventu Prophecies of what shall happen I suppose they may be fitly called the declaration or indication of Gods work in the conditions to which he engages and of the necessary concurrence of the power of his grace in that which he requires As Austin and others have interpreted that which is affirmed of our Saviour That he is the true light which enlightneth every man that comes into the world John 1. 9. not to be so understood that all in the world are enlightned by him for many are in darknesse but that all that are enlightned have light by his light explaining it with this similitude Such a Schoolmaster teacheth all the children in a Town that is all that are taught he teacheth Some go to no School at all so these Promises I will circumcise your heart and the heart of your seed All of their seed that are circumcised in heart he circumcises and so in all the other none of all these are done without his special work This was little heeded by the generality of the people of the Jews if they minded duty it was well they little thought of assistance through grace Tugging it out by their own strength and looking for no more from heaven than that which they had in hand Therefore entring Covenant and walking in their own strength they brake Covenant and were never able to rise to the duties of it as is hinted in that of Jeremy Therefore God promises a new covenant in which there shall be a full discovery and right understanding of the meaning of the Covenant I will write my Law in their hearts I will put it into their inward parts So that as the commandment of love was a new commandment so this covenant was a new covenant both given of old both a new cleared for a right understanding There was nothing wrong saith Mr. Dixon in the former Covenant but it was imperfect and all things in it were not expressed clearly Annot. on Heb. 8. 7. That which was chiefly defective as it seems was this here mentioned and therefore Mr. Baxter sayes well that this place doth comprize but part of the covenant not the whole though he be taken up by another for it in these words God saying expressely this is my Covenant to say it is not is not to interpret the Word but to deny it God sayes to the People of Israel Is not this the fast that I have chosen to loose the bands of wickednesse to undo every burden If any one should interpret that Text would he say the whole of a Religious Fast is there exprest and a full definition of a Fast laid down or would he instead of interpreting deny that Scripture So also that of James Jam. 1. 26. Pure religion and undefiled before God the Father is this To visit the fatherlesse and the widow and to keep a man unspotted of the world Will any say that the whole of Religion is set out in that Scripture or will he be put to it to deny the Scripture I suppose he would rather say that that which those Jews to whom Isay speaks did in use to do Religious Fasts with supply of that which Isay calls for in which they were defective makes up a Religious Fast compleat That which the scattered Tribes did in Religion with what James further calls for would render a man entirely Religious So also that of Jeremy 22. 15 16. Shalt thou reigne because thou closest thy self in Cedar Did not thy father eat and drink and do justice and judgment and then it was well with him He judged the cause of the poor and needy and then it was well with him was not this to know me saith the Lord Will any say that that was all the knowledge that Josiah had of God or will he say rather that this was an evident proof of the sincerity of it so I say that which the Jews already understood to be in the covenant together with that which those places of Jeremy and the Hebrews further hold forth set out the entire nature of a covenant and so in all of them Scripture is interpreted not denied And whereas one affirmes that there is no condition on mans part in those texts in question an adversary of all conditions on mans part in the covenant replyes If you mean such conditions that God requireth of us yet worketh in us it is there punctually exprest As Gods work it is there indeed exprest but not as our duty which lame understanding of the covenant hath wrought as much mischief in our age setting up free grace without any eye upon his sovereignty looking at Gods work and not at all on mans duty as their looking at duty in that age without eye had to the power of grace to enable for it Hence are those desperate counsels Sit still do nothing doing undoes you and that not toward Dilemma Art thou out of Christ thou mayst break thy heart in working and profit nothing Art thou in Christ then all is wrought to thy hands And so doing still is vain and Mr. Baxters Questionists like demands How can you make it appear that according to the new Covenant we must act for life and not only from life or that a man may make his attaining of life the end of his work and not rather obey it out of thankfulness and love To which I suppose he hath received a satisfying and if throughly weighed a sadning answer Appendix p. 78. 79 c. Fifthly This appears in that differencing work which is seen among men here in the flesh There is a great difference between those that are of God and those that are in the world that lies in wickednesse This is from the power of grace enabling to answer to that unto which God in covenant calls and not from the different improvement of any power of man or the exercise of that freedome of will which together with the whole species of mankind he hath received The Apostle puts the question Who hath made thee to differ 1 Cor. 4. 7. In which he intends to stop all mouths from boasting as appears in the next words If any therefore shall answer in Grevenchovius his words as I have seen them quoted or in any words that hold out or inferre the same thing I make my self to differ The Apostle will not sit down by it He expressely tells us It is not of him that willeth nor of him that runneth but of God that sheweth mercy Rom 9. 16. If grace makes the difference and not man then grace enables man to go higher than his own power and to go higher than any power that can
Law blamelesse therefore of a conversation exact walk up to his principles After conversion he knew nothing by himself 1 Cor. 4. 4. His heart condemned him not He exercised himself continually to have a conscience void of offence both to God and man Acts 24. 16. Yet he durst rest in none of these I am not saith he hereby justified 1 Cor. 4. 4. What things were gain to me those I counted losse for Christ yea doubtlesse and I count all things but losse for the excellency of the knowledg of Christ Jesus my Lord for whom I have suffered the losse of all things and do count them but dung that I may win Christ and be found in him not having my own righteousnesse which is of the Law but that which is through faith of Christ the righteousnesse which is of God by faith Philip. 3. 7 8 9. The ignorance of this was the bane of the body of the Jewish Nation The Gentiles which followed not after righteousnesse have attained to righteousnesse even the righteousnesse which is of faith But Israel which followed after the Law of righteousnesse hath not attained to the Law of righteousnesse wherefore because they sought it not by faith but as it were by the works of the Law Rom. 9. 30 31 32. For they being ignorant of Gods righteousnesse and going about to establish their own righteousnesse have not submitted themselves unto the righteousnesse of God Rom. 10. 3. And still it is the undoing of a great part of the world Man being naturally inclined to look after a righteousnesse of his own and extreamely opposite to this righteousnesse which in the covenant of grace is tendered and by which in a Gospel-way he must be saved The righteousnesse of the former covenant was wrote in the heart by nature and such remainders left that the man that minds any righteousnesse alone looks after it But this is onely of Revelation He must have light without him to lead to this righteousnesse which is not his own nor inherent in him What naturally he did not know he is naturally ready to oppose and refuse Men know not how till they be taught of God to see a reason of it or to understand that it is of any use A man may be wise with another mans wit strong with another mans strength learned by another mans knowledge as well as righteous as they conceive by another mans righteousnesse Hence are the scornes that are put upon it and the Treatises that are wrote against it Vain man would faine be somewhat as wise Job 11. 12. so also righteous This takes all from man strips him of all in which he may glory as Romans 3. 27. This which man so opposeth the covenant of grace establisheth And that which he so advanceth the covenant of grace disclaimes 3. The conditions on mans part in the covenant of works were for mans preservation in statu quo in that condition in which he was created To hold him in communion with God which was his happinesse he expected not to be bettered by his obedience either respective to happinesse no more is promised than in present he had nor yet in his qualifications respective to his conformity to God in righteousnesse and true holinesse What improvement he might have made of the habit infused by the exercise of obedience I shall not determine But no change in qualifications was looked after or given in promise The conditions of the covenant of grace are serviceable to man in his return to God for his recovery as to his state of happinesse lost so to the repaire or new frame of his qualifications depraved and spoiled This is plain of it self and will be further explained in that which follows Other differences there are assigned by Divines to difference these two covenants some of which fall in with these that I have mentioned and some to which I cannot in all things consent See Camero de triplici foedere 1 Thes 9. * These I thought to be most material and with these I shall rest satisfied CHAP. XXI Faith is a condition of the Covenant of Grace HAVING asserted conditions in the covenant of grace and held forth several differences between the conditions in the covenant of works and in the covenant of grace we are now further to enquire what these conditions are that are called for in this covenant on which we treat Those Divines that with concurrent judgments acknowledge this covenant to be conditional are not yet so unanimous in their assignation of them For a full discovery some things are to be premised as truths taken for granted rather than disputed 1. That God covenants with man and engages himself to him not onely for justification but also for salvation Not onely for pardon of sinne but everlasting life and glory Not onely to be reconciled to him but to conferre eternal happinesse upon him 2. Whatsoever God requires of man in order either to his justification or salvation without which he is not justified or saved and man engages unto in order to his justification or salvation this is a covenant condition This I take to be clear in case there be any such thing as a condition in any covenant and it is also granted by a professed adversary of all conditions in the covenant of grace faith and repentance are saith he means of our enjoying the comforts of the covenant but not conditions going out of the nature of a covenant for every means is not a condition though every condition be a means but when a means is by stipulation and contract appointed for the acquiring of any thing then it is a condition Whatsoever then we can finde thus required of God in this way of contract and stipulation is a condition by the confession of our adversaries 3. Whatsoever is required of man in order to his justification is a condition of his justification and all that is required in order to his eternal salvation is a condition of salvation God making tender of both and man engaging himself to seek both whatsoever is required in order to either respective to that is a condition 4. That which is a condition of justification is also a condition of salvation in that salvation presupposes a justified estate but it holds not on the contrary that which is a condition of salvation is not therefore a condition of justification More is required to hold us up in constant communion with God then to bring us into a state of actual reconcilement to God This being premised the work will be more easie to assigne conditions in this covenant The condition immediately serviceable for mans return to a reconciled state with God and consequently of his justification is faith which almost all acknowledge to be a condition and Camero with several others makes it to be the sole condition of the covenant A condition it is as is above contradiction John 3. 15 16. God so loved the world that he gave his
love in a graciously disposed soul cleaves to Christ for communion but receives him not for justification These two stand as relatives there is no soul entituled to this righteousnesse but by faith and faith is it that entitles to it the beleeving soul hath interest in it Therefore justification in Scripture is ascribed to faith and denied to works when neither faith nor works can beare us out of themselves before the tribunal of God but faith takes hold and the soul by faith rests on this righteousnesse of grace which the Gospel tenders It is true that faith receives the Spirit as well as it receives the blood of Christ Joh. 7. 39. Gal. 3. 14. But this is for another use for the work of sanctification inherent not justification by righteousnesse imputed And it is also true that faith accepts Christ as a Lord as well as a Saviour But it is the acceptation of him as a Saviour not as a Lord that justifies Christ rules his people as a King teacheth them as a Prophet but makes atonement for them onely as a Priest by giving himself in sacrifice his blood for remission of sins These must be distinguished but not divided Faith hath an eye at all the blood of Christ the command of Christ the Doctrine of Christ but as it eyes and fastens on his blood so it justifies He is set out a propitiation through faith in his blood Romans 3. 24. not through faith in his command It is the blood of Christ that cleanseth all sin and not the Sovereignty of Christ These confusions of the distinct parts of Christs Mediatourship and the several offices of faith may not be suffered Scripture assignes each its particular place and work Sovereignty doth not cleanse us nor doth blood command us faith in his blood not faith yeelding to his Sovereignty doth justifie us There are several acts or fruits of justifying faith Heb. 11. But all are not justifying It is not Abrahams obedience Moses self-denial Gideon or Sampsons valour that was their justification but his blood in which faith alone gives interest who did enable them in these duties by his Spirit Paul went in these duties as high as they living in more clear light and under more abundant grace I doubt not but he out-topt them and yet he was not thereby justified as 1 Cor. 4. 4. James indeed saith that Abraham was justified by works when he had offered Isaac his son on the Altar James 2. 21. But either there we must understand a working faith with Piscator Paraeus Pemble and others and confesse that Paul and James handle two distinct questions The one whether faith alone justifies without works which he concludes in the affirmative The other what faith justifies whether a working faith onely and not a faith that is dead and idle or else I know not how to make sense of the Apostle who streight inferres from Abrahams justification by the offer of his sonne And the Scripture was fulfilled that saith Abraham beleeved God and it was accounted to him for righteousnesse How otherwise do these accord He was justified by works and the Scripture was fulfilled that saith he was justified by faith Neither can I reconcile what he saith if this be denied with the whole current of the Gospel The Rhemists indeed understand those texts of the Apostle where he excludes works from justification to be meant of mans moral works done before faith and conversion The works of the Law done without Christ Annot. in Rom. 3. 20 28. As though the Law did not command those duties unto which Christ through faith strengthens a Christian converted by grace And when the Apostle concludes the impossibility of being justified by the works of the Law his meaning should be unlesse grace assist the Law that it may justifie This could not be the Apostle calls it a righteousnesse of God without the Law not a righteousnesse of the Law with addition of strength from the Gospel All works before or after conversion inherent in us or wrought by us are excluded from justification See Ravanellus in verbum Justificatio Num. 3. page 867. This justification wrought freely by grace through faith Rom. 3. 24. is no way consistent with justification by works And what the Apostle speaks of election we may well apply to justification the same medium equally proves the truth of both If by grace then it is no more of works otherwise grace is no more grace But if it be of works then it is no more of grace otherwise works were no more works Rom 11. 6. And these things considered I am truly sorry that faith should now be denied to have the office or place of an instrument in our justification nay scarce allowed to be called the instrument of receiving Christ that justifies us because the act of faith which is that which justifies us is our actual receiving Christ and therefore cannot be the instrument of receiving This is too subtile a notion we use to speak otherwise of Faith Faith is the eye of the soul whereby we see Christ and the eye is not sight Faith is the hand of the soul whereby it receives Christ and the hand is not receiving And Scripture speaks otherwise We receive remission of sinnes by Faith and an inheritance among them that are sanctified is received by Faith Acts 18. 26. Why else is this righteousnesse sometimes called the righteousnesse of Faith and sometimes the righteousnesse of God which is by Faith but that it is a righteousnesse which Faith receives Christ dwells in us by Faith Ephes 3. 17. By Faith we take him in and give him entertaintment We receive the promise of the Spirit through Faith Gal. 3. 14. These Scriptures speak of Faith as the souls instrument to receive Christ Jesus to receive the Spirit from Christ Jesus The instrumentality of it in the work of justification is denied because the nature of an instrument as considered in Physical operations doth not exactly belong to it which if it must be alwayes rigidly followed will often put us to a stand in the assignation of causes of any kind in Moral actions The material and formal causes in justification are scarce agreed upon and no marvel then in case men mind to contend about it that some question is raised about the instrument But in case we shall consider the nature and kinde of this work about which Faith is implied and examine the reason and ground upon which Faith is disabled from the office of an instrument in our justification and withall look into that which is brought in as an instrument in this work in the stead of it I do not doubt but it will easily appear that those Divines that with a concurrent judgment without almost a dissenting voice have made Faith an instrument in this work speak most aptly and most agreeably to the nature of an instrument The work about which Faith is implied is not an absolute but a relative
have had our conversation in the world Yea this is a mark of him who is entirely the Lords professedly and really his When the question is put Who shall dwell in Gods holy hill Who shall abide in his Tabernacle answer is returned He that walks uprightly and worketh righteousnesse Psal 15 1 2. And when a like question is put Isa 33. 14. Who among us shall dwell with the devouring fire Who amongst us shall dwell with everlasting burning We have the like answer returned in the words that follow He that walketh righteously and speaketh uprightly And Jesus seeing Nathanael saith John 1. 47. Behold an Israelite indeed There are many Israelites in name but here was an Israelite indeed and this is his character in whom there is no guile His inside was the same with that without In the discharge of this the Saints of God have promised to themselves upon good grounds all happinesse Psal 119. 6. Then shall I not be ashamed when I have respect unto all thy commandments The want of this renders all that is done void and vaine as to the acceptation of God when the heart glances aside and is not right with God in worshipping him doth not seek him Math. 15. 8. This people draweth nigh unto me with their mouth and honoureth me with their lips but their heart is farre from me Israel is an empty Vine he bringeth forth fruit to himself Hos 10. 1. Their heart is divided therefore shall they be found faulty verse 2. Amaziah did that which was good in the sight of the Lord but not with a perfect heart 2 Chron. 25. 2. Judah hath not turned unto me with their whole heart but feignedly Jerem. 3. 10. Psal 78. 34 35 36 37. When he slew them then they sought him and they returned and enquired early after God and they remembred that God was their rock and the high God their redeemer neverthelesse they did flatter him with their mouths and they lied unto him with their tongues for their hearts were not right with him neither were they stedfast in his Covenant By all which I suppose it is evident that God in covenant calls for obedience requires integrity of heart in it will not accept where sincerity of heart is wanting and where it is he crowns it with happinesse and glory And from what hath been spoken a full definition of the new covenant may be thus given A gracious Covenant of God with fallen man whereby God engages himself upon faith in Christ and returne to God in sincere obedience to confer on man remission of sinnes and all whatsoever that tends to everlasting happinesse They that professe to beleeve and returne to God are in Covenant They that do beleeve and sincerely returne enjoy the blessings and mercies of the covenant This Arminians make the decree of God and will have no other than such conditional Election not an Election unto faith and obedience but because it is foreseene that men will beleeve and persevere in sincere obedience in which they are opposed by the Orthodox See Moulins Anatomy of Arminianisme chap. 12. Sect. 10. This is the covenant of grace published and promised in the Gospel which Arminians would make one with Election confounding the Will of Gods Decree with the Will of his Command and Promise He that would see more into the nature of sincerity that he may answer to that which God in covenant doth require may peruse Ball on the Covenant chap. 11. and Doctor Preston on Gen. 17. 1. CHAP. XXVI The necessity of a Ministery to bring men into Covenant with God and to bring them up to the termes of the Covenant FRom hence several Corollaries may be drawn and Inferences made 1. Of the necessity of a Ministery a constant standing Ministery as to bring men into covenant with God so to bring them also up to the termes of the covenant to a lively saving faith and sincere obedience God works not man into covenant by immediate voice Neither doth he use the Ministery of Angels in his ordinary way of working of it But when he would take in the Nations of the world into covenant with himself he sends out his Ministers for that work giving them a Commission with gifts and abilities suitable to disciple all Nations Matth 28. 19. Where a Ministery comes not there that people remaine out of covenant in the state of the Ephesians before their call as it is set out by the Apostle Ephes 2. 12. without Christ aliens from the Common-wealth of Israel and strangers from the Covenants of promise having no hope and without God in the world And where the Gospel-covenant is tendered and not received there that people continue out of covenant rejecting the councel of God against themselves Luke 7. 30. and rendering themselves unworthy of everlasting life Acts 13. 46. This was the case of the people of Athens There Paul preacht yet there he setled for ought we read no Church of beleevers though he had there some particular Converts Dionysius the Areopagite and a woman named Damaris with others Acts 17 34. Where the word was delivered and there received there was a people in covenant with God as at Ephesus Corinth Philippi Thessalonica c. Those Ministers had the honour of planting of laying the first foundation of preaching where Christ before had not been named Rom. 15. 20. A people thus brought into covenant do not alwayes come up to the termes of the covenant All covenanters keep not covenant their hearts are not steady in it Therefore there is no lesse necessity of a Ministery in established Churches to keep up a people in Covenant with God through the termes of the covenant to bring them to the happinesse promised Theirs is the work of watering of building on anothers foundation of preaching Christ where Christ before at least was known by name and in some sort professed That there was such a Ministery in the Church of the Jews to teach Jacob his Laws and Israel his judgements to require what God in covenant called for is not denyed that a Ministery was necessary in the Primitive Apostolique times to work men into covenant and for the plantation of Churches is confest likewise But when the Apostles left the world then this order as some say sell with them all Ministerial power died with them We are made to beleeve saith one because the Apostles were ordained by God to be Teachers of the people and endued with gifts for that end that therefore there is a like divine though secret Ordination from God in the making of our Ministers Compassionate Samaritane page 24 25. But if the Scriptures may be heard this may soone be decided I shall therefore by arguments make it appear First that God hath established a Ministery and appointed it through all the ages of the world to be perpetuated Secondly I shall give reasons to manifest the necessity of such a Ministery to be thus established and
conclude our Assurance of happinesse but the determination of that being thus put is easie No man in true grace shall go to hell or misse of heaven God doth not adorne man with that glory to reject him The Apostle exhorts to love not in word nor in tongue but in deed and in truth and for a motive adds Hereby we know that we are of the truth and shall assure our hearts before him 1 Joh. 3. 18 19. But the minimum quod sic when it is that grace may be accounted true is not so easie to determine It is not every faintish desire that is the work on which all this glory rests It must be a work of farther power and efficacy on the soul for satisfaction of which I shall referre the Reader to the learned labours of my much honoured neighbour Master Anthony Burgesse in his spiritual refining CHAP. XXXI The distribution of the Covenant of Grace into the Old and New Covenant with the harmony and agreement that is found between them BY Gods assistance we have been thus farre carried on in the work in hand to finde out the nature of a covenant and Gods way of entring covenant with man And for the more clear discovery of both we have held forth the agreement which is found between the covenant of Works which God entred with man in his state of integrity and the covenant of Grace entred of God with man in his fallen condition as also their respective differences So that all that is essential in this covenant and necessarily required to the attainment of the priviledges and mercies promised in it hath been made known and a compleat definition given with such corolaries and inferences that have been judged necessary Now this covenant thus entred with man in his lapsed estate and hitherto cleared admits of distinction and is distinguished in Scripture by the names of the Old and New Covenant Heb. 8. 13. The first and second covenant Heb. 8. 7. The first some call and not unfitly a covenant of Promise under that covenant Christ was known in promises only and not manifested in the flesh Others call it a subservient covenant being to lead in the second in its full lustre and glory which alone they call a covenant of Grace and make it a third covenant But I shall content my self with the Scripture-termes calling the first Old not because it was first in being but because it is to be abolished and another to succeed the later New because it is never to be antiquated as the Apostle Heb. 8. 13. explains himself Now it must needs contribute much to the clear understanding of the covenant as well of the termes of it as the mercies in it and be a great advantage for the better understanding of sundry both Old and New Testament-Scripture in case the agreement between this Old and New covenant together with their true differences be rightly assigned and those imaginary differences assigned by some erroneous on either hand to the great prejudice of either of the covenants be throughly examined A work of difficulty but were it well followed of singular profit On this by the help of Gods grace I shall adventure and in the first place lay down their agreement afterwards their respective true and real differences and then proceed to examination of such differences which some have assigned which I reserve to the last place seeing in the two first I shall be brief The last will be found a businesse full of tedious difficulty and trouble In several things there is a full agreement between these covenants 1. In the Authour propounding God is the Authour of them both God is the God not of the Jews only who were in the first covenant but of the Gentiles also taken through grace into the second covenant Rom. 3. 29. 2. In the party accepting as specifically considered they are both entred with man Neither Angels nor any other creature articles or is articled with in it and hitherto there is an agreement of both with the covenant of works 3. In the motive or impulsive cause Both of these are of singular grace entred with fallen man in his lost condition there was no hint of this grace before the fall nor any need or use of it being not for mans preservation but his restitution 4. In the Mediatour Christ Jesus who was one and the same in both For though Moses have the name of Mediatour Gal. 3 19. Receiving the lively oracles and giving them to the people Acts 17. 38. as the Judges in Israel had the name of Saviours Nehem. 9. 27. and thereupon Camero makes this difference between the Old and the New covenant That Moses was Mediatour in one Christ in the other Thes 68. yet he confesses that that mediation by the benefit whereof men are truly and effectually united to God belongs only unto Christ De trip foedere Thes Moses work was only to deliver the way of the worship of God in those times and that not in his own name but as a servant Heb. 3. 5. He that Moses did serve of whom he wrote Joh. 5. 46. that Prophet like unto Moses whom God promised to raise Deut. 18. 15. in all ages was Mediatour 5. They agree in the conditions annext Both these covenants have one and the same conditions on Gods part Remission of sins and everlasting happinesse as after shall be shewed more fully They are the same on mans part Faith and Repentance The just then did live by faith Heb. 2. 4. And without faith it was then impossible to please God Heb. 11. 6. Acts 10. 43. To him give all the Prophets witnesse that through his name whosoever beleeveth in him shall receive remission of sins God then called for returne to himself and sincerity in our returnes accepting those that were sincere Ezek. 18. 31. The eyes of the Lord run to and fro through the whole earth to shew himself strong in the behalf of those whose hearts are perfect before him 2 Chron 26. 9. 6. They agree in the unity of Church-felloship constituting one and the same Church of Christ The Church in those dayes in which the Fathers lived is one and the same Church with this in Gospel-times In Gospel-times men come from the East and West and sit down with Abraham Isaac and Jacob in the Kingdome of heaven Matth. 8. 11. One and the same Kingdome receives both Their Faith was terminated upon Christ as well as ours Abraham saw his day and rejoyced John 8. 56. Moses bore his reproach and esteemed it greater then the treasures in Egypt Heb. 11. 26. They did eat the same spiritual meat and did drink the same spiritual drink they drank of the Rock that followed them and the Rock was Christ 1 Cor. 10. 3. The same not among themselves but the same with us They are saved by the same free grace and mercy as we Jews by nature are justified by the same faith in Jesus as
it is not a prophecie but a Gospel 2. In the Old covenant all was held out to the people under types figures shadows All about the Tabernacle and Temple Persons Uâ—ensils Sacrifices did lead to Christ all of these darkly holding him forth They had a shadow of good things to come and not the image of the things themselves Heb. 10. 1. a little of reality in a great bulk of ceremony In the New Testament the truth of it is clearly and manifestly without figure or type held forth unto us 3. In the Old Testament knowledge was dim and obscure It could be no other when it was wrapt up in prophecies and types A prophecie is a riddle till it be unfolden and little is known of a man by his shadow comparative to that which is seen in the man himselfe Therefore though the state of the Jewes in Old Testament times was a state of light comparative to the darknesse that was with other people and their land was called a valley of visions Isa. 22. 1. yet it was little more than darknesse comparative to that light which in Gospel times is revealed Christ was a Minister of circumcision and when he began his Ministery in the land of Zebulon and Nepthali the Text says The people that sate in darknesse saw a great light Mat. 4. 16. Circumcision therfore in different respects was both a Priviledge and a Bondage A Priviledge Rom. 3. 1. It was a great mercy to have light let in at any crevice promises any way sealed and ratified to us A Bondage Acts 15. 10. To live in so dim a light and to be laden in so burdensome a way was a heavy yoke So that as the Apostle putting the question What advantage the Jew had and what priviledge there was of circumcision above and before the Gentile Rom. 3. 1. answers Much every way and gives in his reason of the preheminence So in case the question should be put What advantage hath the Christian and what priviledge there is of Baptisme above and before the Jew Answer may be made Much every way and the reason given of the preheminence in Gospel-times in the particulars above mentioned So that the New covenant is a better covenant established upon better promises Heb. 8. 6. Promises are more full and clear Though it must be confest that a Christians preheminence above the Iewes doth not equal a Iewes preheminence above the Gentile The Iew was in covenant with God and was heire of the Promise The Gentiles were aliens from the Common-wealth of Israel strangers from the covenant of Promise having no hope and without God in the world Ephes 2. 12. The Iew was in the same covenant in his time as Christians are in Gospel-times There is not a promise in the New covenant whether it be for priviledges conferred upon us or graces wrought in us but by the help of that light we may finde in the Old covenant the same held out as after will be more clearly manifested The betternesse is in the greater ease being freed from that bondage of the ceremonial yoke and in their more distinct clearnesse The glory of all that the covenant doth tender being in so clear and full a way held out in Gospel-times that he that is least in the Kingdom of God under the glory of the New Testament-revelation is greater in the way of Gospel-Mysteries then John Baptist who was the greatest of Prophets greater than a Prophet Those Prophets that did foresee and foreshew the Birth Life Death Resurrection Ascension of Christ the triumphant conquest of his enemies his glory at the right hand of his Father the spreading of the Gospel the call of the Gentiles did not themselves see it as now the meanest that are in Christ do understand it no more than they who now preach through Christ the Resurrection of the dead the everlasting blisse of glorified Saints in their eternal fruition of Gods presence are able to understand it in that measure as the meanest that then shall have the happinesse to enjoy it 6. They differ in the Seales annext for either of their ratification and confirmation for howsoever they are of the same use leading to one and the same thing signified the Jewes had Christ in their Sacraments 1 Cor. 10. 4 1 Cor. 5. 7. and we have no more in ours yet they differ in the outward stamp or effigies as I may so speak as well that of initiation as that of corroboration The initiating Sacrament of the Jewes which gave them the denomination of the people of God was that painful circumcision in the flesh signum vile incivile yet those that would be the Lords did and must submit unto it All of Abrahams seed with him received that signe And all of those that with him would joyne unto the Lord. This was to be the leading Sacrament He that was not circumcised in the flesh might not eat of the Passeover Exod 12. 48. And when a stranger shall sojourne with thee and will keep the Passeover unto the Lord let all his males be circumcised and then let him come neer and keep it and he shall be as one that is borne in the land for no uncircumcised person shall eat thereof A full Text against all that plead for unbaptized persons admission to the Lords Table God will not suffer that disorder that the leading Sacrament should come after The initiating Sacrament with Christians is that of Baptisme no sooner was a man brought into covenant but he was streight baptized assoon as he made profession he had this sealing engaging signe the application of water which is of an abstersive cleansing nature implying our staine and guilt and leading us thither where purification and freedome is found the Spirit and blood of Jesus Christ The following Sacrament in the Old covenant was that of the Passeover a Lamp without blemish to be eaten in the place and way that God prescribed That in the New Testament is the Supper of the Lord in ordinary common useful and necessary elements Bread and Wine which are of a strengthning cheering nature Ps 104. 15. Implying our fainting feeble estate our disconsolate and sad condition and leading us where we may find both strength and consolation CHAP. XXXIII Positions tending to clear the first covenant under Old Testament-dispensations BEfore I proceed to the examination of those supposed differences which some have brought in to the prejudice of both covenants I shall lay down certain positions to give some light for the more clear understanding especially of the Old covenant and to help us if it may be in our judgements of them both as well in their agreement as their severall differences First Position God delivered unto Adam in Paradise not only a Law or Rule of life but also a Covenant as was before shewed So Moses in Mount Sinai delivered unto the people of the Jews not a Law or rule only but a covenant likewise This might be
confirmed at large but that others have fully done it and I know not that there is any adversary that appears in it The name of a covenant is frequently given to it Deut. 4. 13. He declared unto you the covenant which he commanded you to performe even ten Commandments See 2 Kings 18. 12. 2 Chron. 6. 11. All the essentials of a covenant before mentioned Parties Consent Conditions are found in it as we may see in that one Text Deut. 26. 17 18. Thou hast avouched the Lord this day to be thy God to walk in his wayes and the Lord hath avouched thee this day to be his peculiar people as he hath promised thee Yea the solemnities of a covenant as before hath been largely shewne are found in it Secondly This covenant delivered by Moses to the people of Israel was a covenant of Grace the same in substance with this under which we live in Gospel-times This is so largely proved to my hand by Master Ball in his Treatise of the covenant page 102 103 104. and Master Burges in his Vindiciae legis page 224 225. that I may spare my paines yet in brief That covenant which teacheth Christ in which men attaine salvation that accepts men upon repentance in which there is pardon of sinne and in which the heart is circumcised of God that is a covenant of grace One of these single will evince it much more in their joynt strength will they conclude it But the covenant delivered by Moses was such a covenant In that covenant Christ was taught John 5. 46 47. Had ye beleved Moses ye would have beleeved me but if ye beleeve not Moses how will ye beleeve my words Whence the collection is plaine Beleevers of Moses are Beleevers of Christ and Rejecters of Moses are Rejecters of Christ See Luke 24. 25 26. with 44 45 46. John 1. 45. Acts 26. 22 23. Rom. 3. 21 22. The Prophecies Promises Types Genealogies Sacraments under that covenant whether ordinary or extraordinary all held forth Christ as might be easily shewn in their several particulars In that covenant the people of the Jews attained salvation and were not only fed with temporal Promises and a covenant meerly carnal not looking above or beyond the land of Canaan as shall be shewen In this covenant men are accepted and received into mercy and favour upon repentance When thou art in tribulation and all these things are come upon thee in the later dayes if thou turn to the Lord thy God and shalt be obedient to his voice for the Lord thy God is a merciful God he will not forsake thee neither destroy thee nor forget the covenant of thy fathers which he sware unto them Deut. 4. 30 31. In this covenant there is pardon of sinne the great priviledge of the New covenant Heb. 8. 12. The Lord proclaimes himself to Moses The Lord the Lord God merciful and gracious long-suffering and abundant in goodnesse and truth keeping mercy for thousands forgiving iniquity transgression and sin Exod. 34. 6 7. See Exod. 32. 31 32. 2 Chron. 7. 14. Psal 25. 11. Psal 51. 12. 7. 9. 14. In this covenant the heart is circumcised another great priviledge of the New covenant Heb. 8. And the Lord thy God will circumcise thy heart and the heart of thy seed to love the Lord thy God All of these any of these hold out a covenant of Grace Thirdly the ten commandments which are called the covenant of God Deut. 4. 13. 2 Chron. 6. 11. all that Moses delivered to Israel being there epitomized holds forth a covenant of Grace and not of Works This appears in the Preface intimating Gods grace and goodnesse to that people bringing them out of the land of Egypt and the house of Bondage Which deliverance had more in it than a bare temporal mercy otherwise their passage through the red Sea could have been no Baptisme as the Apostle calls it 1 Cor. 10. 1. Neither had it been any act of justifying faith in Moses to observe the Passeover which yet the Apostle observes Heb. 11. 28. Then their Rock and Manna had been a viaticum in the way but no Sacrament There God avoucheth himself to be the God of that people I am the Lord thy God and he was a God in covenant to none of man-kinde fallen but by an act of grace It appears in the first commandment where God requires them to accept him and cleave unto him which cannot be done but through Christ It appears in the second commandment in the preceptive part of it which contains the whole ceremonial Law in which pardon of sinne was found through Christ Thither Interpreters reduce all the Sacrifices Types Sacraments of the Jewes It appeares in the reasons annext to that precept which as it threatens judgement on transgressours of the Law so mercy to those that observe it Mercy is an act of Grace and not vouchsafed but in Christ It appears in the fifth commandment in the promise there annext and fastened to it So that this covenant or this summe or epitome of the covenant between God and his people which was put into the Arke and the Mercy-seat or propitiatory set upon it in the most holy place Exod. 26. 34. was a covenant of Grace Fourthly this covenant delivered by Moses and epitomized in the Decalogue being a covenant of Grace it could by no meanes be in the whole and entire nature of it a covenant of Works This is plaine God doth not at once with the same people enter covenant upon so opposite termes These are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 either of them destructive to the other We may argue concerning the covenant as the Apostle doth concerning Election If by grace then it is no more of works otherwise grace is no more grace but if it be of works then it is no more grace otherwise work is no more work This I speak as for their sakes that make it a mixt covenant such a one as Pauls adversaries preacht in the Churches of Galatia so also for their sakes that assert it to be a covenant of Works never undertaking any answer to those arguments which so clearly conclude it to be a covenant of Grace Fifthly What this covenant is to any that it is to all whether it be of works or of grace what it is in it selfe in the tender and termes of it that is the denomination of it This is plaine Mens faith or unbelief Mens obedience or transgression cannot diversifie the nature of that which God doth tender And what God spake to the people he spake to all the people the same to all that he spake to any Exodus 19. 25. Exodus 20. 18. compared and therefore that is a mistake in some that say That the Law is doubtlesse a pure covenant of Works to some men but not to all It is a covenant of works occasionally and accidentally and not only to those which are not related to comprehended in or made
partakers of the covenant of Grace He should rather have said that the ten commandments had been a covenant of Grace but sometimes by an accident or especial occasion had become a covenant of Works which yet could not have held The covenant of Grace and the covenant of Works are two distinct and opposite Species They have one and the same univocal Genus of whose nature they equally partake Therefore as an Oxe can by no occasion or accident be a Horse or a Horse a Sheep or a Sheep a Lion or a Lion a man so a covenant of Grace can by no occasion or accident be a covenant of Works one and the same thing intended for one end may occasionally and accidentally have another event as the Ministery intending salvation may prove an aggravat on of condemnation but no occasion or accident can change the nature of any thing into that which is of a kind opposite to it and different from it And in such cases where the event is hindred and another happens the denomination is and must be from the primary intention The Apostle calls the Gospel the power of God to salvation Rom. 1. 16. The word is called the word of Life though to some through their obstinacy it turns to condemnation and to death If our author in this question take liberty to differ from all as himself professeth I hope he will not be displeased if all differ from him Hanc veniam petimusque damusque vicissim Sixthly In Moses time and under his administration commands were frequent and full as well ceremonial as moral as also menaces The directive and maledictive part of the Law were clear and open for discovery of sinne to work to a sense of danger to put them in a posture to look for and long after the Messiah But the promises more obscure I mean the promises of eternity scarce known any otherwise then as they were shadowed out in temporal things This as the Apostle shews was figured by that vaile which was before Moses his face when he spake with the people upon the renuing of the Tables Moses his face upon his converse with God in the Mount shone with that glory that Aaron and all the children of Israel were afraid to come nigh Exod. 34. 30. Afterwards he speaks to the people and talks with them And till he had done speaking with them he put a vaile before his face verse 33. Whereupon the Apostle having entred comparison between the Ministers of the Law and the Ministers of the Gospel alludes to this vaile before Moses his face 2 Cor. 3. 12 13 14. in these words Seeing then we have such hope saith he we use great plainnesse of speech and not as Moses which put a vaile over his face that the children of Israel could not stedfastly look to the end of that which is abolished but their mindes were blinded Upon which Diodati saith Moses Ministry kept the people under the shadows of ceremonies without contemplating the mysteries which were figured by them to the bottom which was reserved for the time of the Gospel Heb. 10. 4. Whereof was a figure that vaile on Moses his face Not saith he that that was the end of that act of Moses but of that which the Apostle saith may be allegorically understood thereby namely of the obscure dispensation of the Law Which obscure dispensation meeting with that blindnesse that was in the judgements of that people held them in such ignorance that they saw little of Grace in that covenant but rather through their blinde mistake looked upon it the generality of them as a covenant of Works And this the Apostle signifies in the place before quoted as also Rom. 10. 3. They being ignorant of Gods righteousnesse and going about to establish their own righteousnesse have not submitted themselves to the righteousnesse of God This caused them so tenaciously to hold to the precepts of the Law especially to the ceremonial part which though more burdensome yet was easilier fitted to their corruption that they refused Christ the end of the Law for righteousnesse sake to every one that beleeveth Rom. 10. 3. Seventhly There was yet so much of grace and Christ held out in this covenant that they were not only left without excuse that were under it but convinced of sin if they saw not Christ and the grace of the covenant in it Christ in his contest with the Jewes who would not receive him but stood in opposition and raised persecution against him appeales to the Scriptures Old Testament-Scriptures Search the Scriptures for they testifie of me and in them you think to have eternal life Iohn 5. 39. Where we see a double encomium of the Scriptures 1. From the Iewes own acknowledgement In them eternal life may be found 2. From the testimony they give of Christ In them upon search Christ may be found There are such discoveries there that hold him out and eternal life in him to those that search them And they suspecting by that intimacy of communion that he profest to have with the Father and the heavy charge that he laid upon them that he was about to accuse them to the Father Christ puts it off from himself and puts it upon one that they had least in suspition even Moses Moses in whom they trusted in whom they pretended to repose confidence It is he that is ready to accuse them not of breach of the Law or transgression of any command of his which they could easilier have beleeved but of unbeliefe of Moses You have one that accuseth you even Moses in whom you trust for had ye beleeved Moses ye would have beleeved me for he wrote of me Unbelief in Christ set forth in Moses is a sinne which Moses his writings shall charge upon them So also in that speech of Christ to the two disciples in the way to Emmaus O ye fools and slow of heart to beleeve all that the Prophets have spoken ought not Christ to have suffered those things to enter into his glory where we see them charged with sin in that they understood not Christ in the Prophets Christ in Moses as follows there in the next words Beginning at Moses and all the Prophets he expounded unto them all the Scriptures the things concerning himselfe Luke 24 25 26 27. They that dwell at Jerusalem and their Rulers because they knew him not nor yet the voices of the Prophets which are read every Sabbath day they fulfilled them in condemning him Acts 13. 27. Eightly There are those phrases in Moses which are ordinarily quoted as holding out a covenant of Works and in a rigid interpretation are no other yet in a qualified sense in a Gespel-sense and according to Scripture-use of the phrase they hold out a covenant of Grace and the termes and conditions of it To instance in some few Deut. 4. 1. Now therefore hearken O Israel unto the statutes and unto the judgements which I teach you to
do them that ye may live and go in and possesse the land which the Lord God of your fathers giveth you Deut. 5. 33. You shall walk in all the wayes which the Lord your God hath commanded you that ye may live and that it may be well with you and that ye may prolong your dayes in the land which ye shall possesse Deut. 30. 16. In that I command this day to love the Lord thy God to walk in his wayes and to keep his commandments and his statutes and his judgements that thou mayest live and multiply and the Lord thy God shall blesse thee in the land whither thou goest to possesse it Deut. 6. 24 25. And the Lord commanded us to do all these statutes to fear the Lord our God for our good always that he might preserve us alive as it is this day And it shall be our righteousnesse if we observe to do all these commandments before the Lord our God as he hath commanded us We may so interpret those Scriptures and the Jewes as it appears for a great part did so interpret them that they hold out a covenant of Works when Grace was not at all acknowledged to assist in doing nor Christ known at all to satisfie for failing and to expiate for transgression These seeing nothing but a reward upon labour and punishment in case of transgression They may yet be so interpreted as taking Grace in the Work for change of the heart and putting it into a posture for obedience according to that even in Moses Deut. 306. I will circumcise thy heart and the heart if thy â—eed to love the Lord thy God with all thine heart and with all thy soul that thou mayest live and so these duties are only Gospel qualifications of truth and sincerity of obedience In this sense which they may well bear and I take to be their native sense here is no more than what we finde in the Gospel from Christ and the Apostles They that have done good shall rise unto the resurrâ—ction of life John 5. 28. To them that by patient continuing in well-doing seek for glory and immortality eternal life Rom 2. 5. Where as in many other places we may see that according to the New covenant a man may make the attaining of life the end of his work and the Reader may see phrases of his nature to be New covenant New Testament and Gospel-language unlesse they will charge Christ and the Apostles to have Old Testament-spirits To save a mans self may be so understood as to bear a sense purely legal anti-Evangelical and opposite to Grace or Faith in Christ and so it is used by the Apostle or a phrase very near it For by Grace ye are saved through Faith not of your selves it is the gift of God Eph. 2. 8. Not obscurely shewing that if we are saved of our selves it is not of Grace not of Faith and not the gift of God Yet the phrase may be understood in a Gospel-sense as requiring and implying no more than our endeavour in a state of grace through the assistance of the Spirit to walk in Salvation-way To strive to enter in at the strait gate and to seek the Kingdome of God and the righteousnesse of it and so we finde it used and that more than once in Scriptures 1 Tim. 4. 16. Take heed unto thy self and unto the doctrine in so doing thou wilt save thy self and them that hear thee Ministers taking heed to doctrine save hearers and yet are no saviours in opposition but in subordination to the Lord Jesus Ministers and others taking heed to themselves save themselves and yet are no self-saviours in opposition to free grace the merit of or faith in Christ Jesus Peter in his first Sermon after receiving of the holy Ghost preâ—cht the Gospel yet he urg'd this which some will have to be no other than a covenant of Works Save your selves from this untoward generation Act. 2. 40. And the Apostle preacht no other thing than Christ and him crucified when he called on the Philippians to work out their own salvation with fear and trembling Phil. 2. 12. To be found in our own righteousnesse in that sense that Paul uses it Phil. 3. 8. doth exclude the righteousnesse of faith that was no bottom on which he durst stand yet in the sense that Ezekiel uses it the soul is delivered by it Though Noah Daniel and Job stood before me they would but deliver their own soules by their righteousness Ezek. 14. 14. so Ezek. 18. 22. In his righteousness that he hath done he shall live Noah was an heir of the righteousness of faith Heb. 11. 7. as the Holy Ghost himself witnesseth yet the same Holy Ghost tells us that his own righteousness delivers his soul So Solomon saith Righteousnesse delivers from death he doth not only say it would deliver were it exact and compleat but such as it is it doth deliver Prov. 20.2 David as Paul observes describeth the blessedness of the man unto whom God imputeth righteousness without works Rom. 4. 6. Yet the same David puts blessednesse upon works Psal 112. 1. Blessed is the man that feareth the Lord that delighteth greatly in his commandments Psalme 119. 12. Blessed are the undefiled in the way who walk in the Law of the Lord Blessed are they that keep his testimonies that seek him with the whole heart Ps 128. 1. Blessed is every one that feareth the Lord that walketh in his wayes And so also the Apostle James Who so looketh into the perfect Law of Liberty and continueth therein not being a forgetful hearer but a doer of the word that man shall be blessed in his deed James 1. 25. The Apostle Peter tells us We are kept by the mighty power of God through faith unto salvation 1 Pet. 1 5. Our salvation is not in our own keeping It is not our own care that frees us from destruction yet John saith He that is begotten of God sinneth not and keepeth himself that the wicked one toucheth him not 1 John 5. 18. Here are the same words affirmed and denied and both from one and the same mouth of truth a different sense therefore is to be enquired after A righteousnesse which is the condition of the covenant of Works out of our own inherent strength and abilities in an exact perfection is denied a righteousnesse not of us but through grace wrought in us in sincerity which the covenant of Grace calls for is asserted and required Ninthly Though the whole Law that Moses delivered from God on Mount Sinai to the people and is among the sacred Oracles of God for posterity do containe a covenant of Grace yet the Law is taken sometime in that strict sense as containing a covenant of Works and holding forth life upon condition of perfect obedience So the Apostle Rom. 10. 5 6. puts an opposition between the righteousnesse of the Law and the righteousness of Faith So also Gal. 3. 18. If
they so much glean yet far enough to sit down with Anabaptists to cast Infants as they hope out of the covenant and Church-membership and so exclude them from Baptisme Here I shall undertake to make good these foure particulars 1. That this expression of theirs is very untoward and such that will bear no fair sense without the utter overthrow even of that difference between the Covenants which they would build on this distinction 2. That the proof that they bring of this mixture of the first covenant is very weak and not at all cogent 3. That they are not constant to themselves but give and take and know not what to determine 4. In case all were granted yet they know not how to bring any thing home of all that they say to serve their own interests Their expressions I say are untoward in denying purity of Gospel in the first Covenant and affirming a mixture That which is not pure but mixt is a compound of pure and impure such that hath some ingredients such as they ought and others such that make all adulterate As silver mingled with dresse or wine with water Isa 1. 22. The false teachers Saint Pauls adversaries preach such a mixt Gospel when they urged with such vehemency a mixture of works which caused the Apostle to stand in such feare of the Corinthians lest they should be drawn away from the simplicity that is in Christ 2 Cor. 11. 2. They do not beleeve that the Gospel which Paul tells us was preached to Abraham Gal. 3. 8. was any such impure Gospel this sure is not their meaning they dare not say that Abraham was under any such delusion What then can be the meaning but that he had promises not only of blisse and in reference to eternal salvation but also promises of earthly concernment as that of the land of Canaan and his plantation there The Covenant takes its denomination from the Promises saith one of them but the Promises are mixt some Evangelical belonging to those to whom the Gospel belongeth some are domestick or civil Promises specially respecting the house of Abraham and the policie of Israel To this I readily agree and then the distinction falls to nothing Seeing in Gospel times in New Testament-dayes this will denominate a not pure but mixt Gospel as well as in those times we our selves are under such a Gospel as well as the Jewes I know not how we could pray in faith Give us this day our daily bread in case we were without a promise of these things or how man could live by every word that proceeds out of the mouth of God in case we had no word from God The Apostle tells us Godlinesse hath the promise of this life and that which is to come 1 Tim. 4. 8. It would trouble many a perplexed man in case he could not make good that those words Verily thou shalt be fed Psal 37. 3. did not at all belong to him There is no believing man in any relation but he hath Gospel-Promises in concernment to that relation as appears in that speech of Pauls encouragement of servants Epes 6. 8. Knowing whatsoever for good thing any man doth the same shall he receive of the Lord whether he be bond or free It It were ill with all sorts had not they their domestick relation-promises which these speak of as making a mixture 2. As their expressions are untoward so taking them at the best their proof is weak That the Covenant takes its denomination from the Promises but the Promises are mixt say these men The most eminent Promises which contain the marrow of all give the denomination and not such that are annext as Appendants to them The Promise of the land of Canaan is an appendant to the great covenant made of God with Abraham as Chamier with good warrant from the text Gen. 17. 7 8. calls it lib. de baptis cap. sec The Covenant being made of God to be the God of Abraham and his seed which might have been made good wheresoever they had inhabited or sojourned the promise of Canaan is over and above added to it The reason given in by one for his dislike of Chamiers expression calling it an Appendix to the covenant is little to purpose Psal 105. 10 11. The gift of the land of Canaan is called a Covenant saith he and therefore is not an appendant to it By the same reason Circumcision must be the Covenant and not a Seal appendant to it seeing Circumcision is called a Covenant Gen. 17. 10. they are not ignorant of these Scripture-metonymies 3. As the proof is weak to make the Covenant not a pure Gospel-covenant but mixt so they are not constant to themselves pointing that out which makes pure Gospel Gen. 17. 5. Gen. 15. 5. Gen. 12. 3. Gen. 18. 18. illustrated by some New Testament-Scriptures Rom. 4. 17 18. Gal. 3. 8 9 16. Acts 3. 25. one observes it is to be noted that those Promises which were Evangelical according to the more inward sense of the Holy Ghost do point at the priviledges of Abrahams house in the outward face of the words and thereupon raises a doubt whether any covenant made with Abraham be simply Evangelical And so he findes out Evangelical-Promises in the inwards of that covenant which is non-Evangelical in the outward face So Bellarmine with whom he so much to speak in his own language symbolizeth finds out spiritual Evangelical Promises in that which he concludes to be of another nature denying that the Promise made to Abraham in the letter was any Promise of forgivenesse of sins but of special protection and government and earthly happinesse yet confesseth that in a mystical sense they were spiritual Promises both of pardon of sin and life eternal and that they belong to us Bellar. de Sacr. Bapt. lib. 1. cap. 4. whereupon Chamier observes That which is promised mystically God in covenant doth promise but heaven is here promised mystically therefore in this covenant here is a Promise of heaven so the inward and outward face will be all Evangelical Lastly they yet know not how to bring any thing home were all granted to serve their interest they seem to contend that the Evangelical Promises are vested in the persons of true Belevers The other which are civil or domestick serving to make up the mixture were priviledges descendable and traducible to posterity and upon this account circumcision of the natural seed of Abraham came in for confirmation and seale of that which alone was civil domestical and non-Evangelical and being not considered as a leading Sacrament of the whole Church as Baptisme is now but only of the Jewish Church as such proper to Abraham and his posterity and much differing from Baptisme it is no argument that we in Gospel-times transmit any such priviledge to posterity or that our seed before actual faith have any title to the covenant This seems to be their meaning to which we have
with Christians and so of necessity there must be two distinct Gospels If that spoken of by Jeremy be a covenant properly so called holding out the whole nature of the gospel-Gospel-covenant and that New distinct from the former then the old covenant must needs in the whole nature of it be a distinct covenant likewise In what sense Jeremy is to be understood according to the genuine meaning of the Text I have endeavoured to clear as in my answer page 105. 106 107. So also chap. 26. of this Treatise and whether I have answered the objection which some divine that I cannot without enervating the Argument for effectual grace and perseverance in it I must appeal to the impartial Reader I am sure none can build effectual grace and perseverance on that Text making it a distinct Covenant from the first without the overthrow of effectual grace and perseverance in Old Testament-times CHAP. XL. Professed believers are under a Covenant of Grace and not a Covenant of Works IT necessarily follows by way of Corollary from that which hath been delivered that no professed believer that is a member of the Church visible is under a Covenant of Works but eo nomine that he professedly gives his name to Christ he is under a Covenant of grace That a man cannnot be under two Covenants respective to the same thing I suppose is agreed upon on all hands A man that holds by one title if he accept a second makes void the first whether his former title were better or worse whether it tends to his prejudice or benefit thus to make change of it As it is with covenants among men so it is in the Covenant between God and man If the New Covenant make void the Old where both Old and New are substantially the same and the difference only circumstantial as the Apostle sheweth that it does Heb. 8. 13. much more then in those covenants which are essentially differing as are the Covenant of Works and the Covenant of grace Some that would limit the Covenant only to the regenerate and men of justifying faith as to the just latitude of it make use of this Maxime that the same man cannot be under two Covenants which is indeed a right way of arguing from principles granted on both parts Now they assume that all unregenerate and persons not justified are under a Covenant of Works This they take for granted when it rests to be proved and so conclude that these are under no Covenant of Grace but a Covenant of Works I assume on the other hand that so many of them as are Christians though not Regenerati but Regenerandi as Pareus speaks are under a Covenant of Grace and therefore they are not under a Covenant of Works Here to avoid mistakes some things are to be premised 1. That many of them have not any explicit knowledge of either Covenant either that under which originally they were or that under which through grace they are They are the people of God and therefore under a saving Covenant with God though not emproved for salvation that perish for lack of knowledge Hos 4. 6. all that bear the name of believers in primitive times were not got up in knowledge to the first principles 2. As to their present qualification and condition they are in no better an estate than if the obligation of the Covenant of Works were still upon them A man dealing falsely in the Covenant of grace is in as sad a condition as he that is under that hopelesse and destructive Covenant of Works yea his condition admits of many sad aggravations in that treachery is above rebellion and perfidiousnesse exceeds bare disobedience They were a people in Covenant that God owned as his to whom he said Ezek. 16. 48. As I live saith the Lord God Sodom thy sister hath not done she nor her daughters as thou hast done thou and thy daughters Blessednesse is no where in Scripture said to be on the head of all those that are in covenant unlesse it be meant comparatively or respectively only but on such as keep his covenant and remember his commandments to do them Psal 103. 18. And if all that were in covenant did keep covenant there would not be so much complaint as there is in Scripture of breach of covenant nor could men be under that charge that their hearts are not stedfast in covenant 3. They are yet in a more desirable estate and in fairer way towards happinesse than those that are as the Apostle speaks strangers from the covenant of promise Eph. 2. 12. As the Jewes were a people nigh to the Lord Psal 148. 14. So they are Eph. 2. 13. Salvation is of these though they be not as yet by a thorough work of grace in a saving state There are of these that shall be saved Acts 2. 47. and so there is not for ought that Scripture speaks among those that are without covenant such are in Scripture-language without God without hope Eph. 2. 12. under the wrath and indignation of God Jerem. 10. 25. Psal 79. 6. When the Apostle therefore had spoken much against the Jew outwardly and the circumcision of the flesh that is men circumcised in flesh and not in heart Rom. 2. upon the question put yet concludes that these Jewes have This circumcision hath much profit every way much advantage and the advantage is as he expresses it especially the Oracles of God which are the covenant-draughts and if they were utterly out of covenant I would desire any to shew where the advantage lies That they are in covenant with God and in a covenant of grace appears therefore 1. In that they have the Oracles of God To them that is to the Jew outwardly these Oracles were committed as the Apostle tells us Rom. 3. 1. They were committed to them as their inheritance Deut. 33. 4. They were possest of them in order to everlasting life John 5. 39. And these Oracles being Covenant-tables Covenant-draughts the professed believer that by favour from God stands possest of them is in Covenant with God 2. They have the seals of the covenant Covenant and right to the seale where seals are appointed cannot be severed as shall be shewen They are in covenant as Abraham was and they have the seales of the covenant as Abraham and his seed had Those were circumcised and these are baptised and that it may appear that they had not this honour barely from man without approbation from God as some seem to hint in their distinction of Forum Dei and Forum Ecclesiae as though the Church received them when in the sight of God they had no right to be received we finde 1. That the Spirit of God in the Scripture still calls them in way of honour by the name of circumcision and men may but God will not thus give an equivocal or nick-name to them As they were circumcised in the flesh so it was the minde of God that they should beare in
child-bearing The natural posterity which was the birth by Promise we only understand And so the Apostle explaines it Rom. 9. 7 8. Neither because they are the seed of Abraham are they all children but in Isaac shall thy seed be called That is they which are the children of the flesh these are not the children of God but the children of the Promise are counted for the seed Where children of God is taken in the same latitude as Adoption ver 4 comprizing all the visible body of the Jewes as it is also taken Deut. 14. 1. Only those that are borne by Promise are included and all the sonnes of Ishmael and Keturah though their parents were once in Covenant are by Gods special command shut out Neither are all these included for as God cast off Ishmael and his seed so he also cast out Esau and his posterity Therfore the Apostle having brought the former distinction of seeds rests not there but addes verse 10 11 12 13. And not only this but when Rebecca also had conceived by one even by our Father Isaac for the children being not yet borne neither having done any good or evil that the purpose of God according to Election might stand not of works but of him that calleth It was said unto her the elder shall serve the younger as it is written Jacob have I loved but Esau have I hated And therefore the denomination of the seed is in Jacob sirnamed Israel Therefore when the head or if you will the root of the covenant is mentioned in Scripture it is not barely Abraham but Abraham and Isaac to exclude all Abrahams seed of any other line not barely Abraham and Isaac but Abraham Isaac and Jacob. The natural seed of Jacob then not according to ours but Gods own limits is included in that covenant in the full latitude and extent of it Secondly we do not say that this covenant was entred with Abraham as a natural Father nor his seed comprehended as natural children we well know that quâ tale is omne then all natnral parents were in Covenant in that they had natural children and all natural children were in Covenant because they were the natural issue of their parents Abrahams Father was a natural father and Abraham was his natural son yet neither of them upon that account were in covenant we say it was entred with Abraham accepting the termes of it from God for himself and his natural issue all his natural issue not by God himself excluded were in covenant He that made the covenant according to his good pleasure might put limits to it Abraham may be considered 1. As a man the Son of Terah of the race of Adam 2. As accepting of Gods call and receiving his tender for him and his 3. As a faithful and an upright man regenerate and stedfast in covenant It is not as man that God enters covenant in this latitude for Abraham himself was not thus in covenant If he had been in covenant as a man then no man had been out of covenant Neither is it as an upright man before God and keeping covenant for those of his posterity whose hearts were not stedfast were in covenant and did hand it over to their seed But as a professour of the Faith accepting the covenant taking God for his God in contradistinction to false gods he accepted it for himself and for his seed his natural posterity And all that professe the faith hold in the like tenure are in covenant and have the covenant not vested in their own persons only but enlarged to posterity Thirdly we entitle the seed of Abraham as before to spiritual mercies and so the seed of all that hold in the tenure of Abraham to saving grace and life eternal not by an absolute conveyance infallibly to inherit we know though Israel be as the sand of the sea yet a remnant only shall be saved Rom. 9. 27. but upon Gods termes and conditions in the Gospel held out of God to his people Salvation is made over by vertue of covenant to all thus in covenant in that sense as Christ speaks John 4. 22. Salvation is of the Jews In that sense as Christ useth it of Zacheus family This day is salvation come this house Luke 19. 9. In that sense as the Apostle to the Hebrews speaks of it where he sets out the danger of neglecting so great salvation Heb. 2. 3. In that sense as I conceive the Apostle speaks of it where he saith that upon the cal of the Jews All Israel shall be saved Rom. 11. 26 They shall enjoy those priviledges in which salvation upon Gods terms may be obtained and this is all that can by any means be squeezed out of their words that say the covenant of Grace was made of God with Abraham and his natural seed or with beleevers and their seed It is even irksome to read the large businesse that is made to find out our meaning about the covenant of God made with Abraham and his seed and we must per force confesse that we mean it of a covenant infallibly absolutely to conferre grace and consequently salvation To be so in Covenant as that a man cannot fall from it To this end words of mine are produced that I never uttered and several arguments produced against this supposed tenent and authorities multiplied out of Protestant Writers Beza Twisse Wallaeus The Annotations on the Bible Ames Paraeus Downham I am content that all these Worthies shall still stand up in their honour and that this shadow should fall with shame as well as I am that Bellarmine Stapleton a Lapide Becanus Estius should fall with it whose arguments in this controversie one after other have been brought against me To draw all up towards a conclusion All that is necessarily included in Gods entrance of covenant with a people engaging to be their God and taking them for his people is here by this grand Charter of Heaven made over to Abraham and his natural issue by Isaac and Jacob. All their posterity are branches of this root by nature simply considered and they are holy branches by vertue of this covenant which necessarily implies priviledge of Ordinances the fruition of Gods Oracles which are his covenant-draughts without which no people are in Covenant but all are strangers And this priviledge of Ordinances implies also all Priviledges leading to and accompanying salvation and salvation it self upon Gods terms in his word revealed and so before the disputation the Reader hath my supposition CHAP. XLVI Arguments concluding the natural issue of Abraham Isaac and Jacob to be taken into Covenant MY first Argument is taken from the addition annext to this covenant in the words immediately following The Lord having made a covenant in full words with Abraham and his seed he addes and I will give unto thee and to thy seed after thee the land wherein thou art a stranger all the land of Canaan for an everlasting possession and
nature and natural is only by birth and off spring Peter Paul Barnabas were all naturally Jewes borne of Jewish Parents and bred up in the way and Religion of the Jewes such onely Christ chose for Apostles being himself a Minister of the Circumcision Peter therefore being one of the twelve must necessarily be such Paul was such as we know from his own mouth a Jew and of the Tribe of Benjamine Barnabas was such of the Tribe of Levi. And being such they enjoyed a priviledge which the Gentiles wanted they were by birth and off-spring of a Nation that is holy No Nation was so great as they who had God so nigh unto them who had statutes and judgements so righteous The Jew had every way prerogatives and advantages but chiefly the Oracles of God God had not dealt so with every Nation when other Nations were without God they had God nigh unto them when others were uncleane they were holy This great priviledge of Birth Gentiles wanted and so were by off-spring sinners as Birth renders all so they remaine unholy and uncleane among the unholy and unclean without any such title to the Covenant of God that thereby they might obtaine any other denomination they are dogs while the people in Covenant are children And by this means the seeming opposition which is between this text and that of the Apostle Ephes 2. 3. is easily reconciled Here the Apostle makes an opposition nature between Jews and Gentiles Jewes by nature had priviledge above Gentiles There he makes Jewes and Gentiles in nature equal We saith he were by nature children of wrath as well as others as well as Heathens that have no Birrh priviledge Nature in that Text is not the same as nature in this Nature there is taken for the qualification of nature which is equally defiled in Jewes and Gentiles which is there evidenced in the conversation of the Jewes being before convertion by grace the very same with the Gentiles Among whom also we all had our conversation in times past in the lusts of our flesh fulfilling the desires of the flesh and of the minde and were by nature children of wrath even as others Nature here is taken for a Birth-priviledge and so the Jews though in themselves sinners are reputed an holy people a people by covenant holy to the Lord. Nature simpl considered is stained and renders Jewes and Gentiles equally sinners and obnoxious to Gods wrath of which Justification by faith is an acknowledgement as the Apostle here shews verse 17. But birth of Jewish Ancestors of the stock of Israel puts them into a select condition into the number of a people holy to the Lord. Neither is this any contradiction common things dedicated for holy service and use are holy A people by nature sinners dedicated to the Lord are for holy service and use for the service of the Lord when others are for service of idols Therefore jerusalem a City none of the holiest for any transcendent manners of the inhabitants thereof is yet called by the Evangelist the holy City by reason of the Temple and worship there that were holy That which is a priviledge of nature or birth belongs to the natural issue that cannot be denied But to be incovenant with God as a people holy and exceeding others that are without as sinners is a priviledge of nature or birth therefore this priviledge belongs to the natural issue This Argument as it is cleare of it selfe so it hath this advantage that for interpretation of the word Nature it hath approbation from profest adversaries one saith I grant his sense of the word Nature and that the Apostle there speaks of himself and other Jewes as in reputation more holy then the Gentiles because of their interest in Circumcision and observance of Moses Law And this grant involves him not in a few contradictions 1. That this was a Birth-priviledge as he here acknowledges being the Jews priviledge by birth of nature and therefore belonged to the natural seed when 〈◊〉 elsewhere he saith they inherit onely domestick and civil benefits 2. This interest in Circumcision and observance of Moses Law was a priviledge of Ordinances and he is wont to deny that birth entitles any to such priviledges 3. This is spiritual mercy which the Jews here had in Circumcision and Moses Law Circumcision by his confession seales Gospei-mercies the same that Baptism sealeth And Moses in the Law wrote of Christ John 1 45. John 5. 46. and yet he denies the natural seed any Promise of spiritual mercies Any one of these arguments severally much more all joyntly make good this Position that all the natural seed of Abraham by Isaac and Jacob are in that great Charter vouchsafed of God taken into covenant so as to be the people of God and to enjoy all priviledges of his people in order upon Gods termes to everlasting salvation CHAP. XLVII ROM 9. 6 7 8. Vindicated THough I hear of none that have much to say to all these Scriptures as indeed little rather nothing can be said they hold forth with so clear a light a covenant in that latitude and with those prerogatives as you have heard yet one hath a Text of Scripture not to clear any one but to silence and overthrow them all and that is the words of the Apostle Rom. 9. 6 7 8. where the Apostle having sufficiently hinted to them the rejection of a great part of the Jews in his profession of that great heavinesse and sorrow of heart in their behalf and that he could wish that himself were accursed from Christ for them undertakes to answer an objection If Israel be cast off then the Word of God will be of none effect his promise will faile But the promise of God made with his people cannot faile therefore Israel in such a considerable number is not cast off In which place saith One this very Text that now is the apple of our contention was brought into question This Argument thus held out in behalf of the Anabaptists is borrowed from Stapleton the Jesuite at least Stapleton hath gone before him in it and he hath learned to a haire to follow him Stapleton in his antidote undertaking to make good that Calvin contradicts the Apost which he puts into his Marg. saith Calvin says that the whole progeny of Abraham is holy because God entred the covenant of life with him in these words I will be a God to thee and thy seed that is according to Calvin to all that shall descend from him to all that according to the flesh are borne to him as also now the partition-wall being taken away to all the children of Christians which according to the flesh shal be born to them And Calvin addeth saith he that God calls all of the off-spring of Israel his children But saith he the Apostle speaks the contrary expressely They are not all Israel that are of Israel neither because they are the seed of Abraham are they
birth legitimate not spurious renders the reasoning here in this place 1. Childish 2. Incongruous 3. Untrue 1. Weak and childish to tell the Corinthians if their marriage-society were adulterous then their children were bastards if their marriage were nul children were illegitimate This is too low a way of reasoning und unworthy of the Apostle such that every childe well knew before the Apostle told them In that great contest about the marriage of Henry the eighth with the relict of his brother Arthur in which the judgement of so many Universities was desired if one had argued that in case this marrige be a nullity then the Princesse is not legitimate But the Princesse is legitimate Ergo the marriage is no nullity he would have been looked upon as a strange disputant 2. Incongruous To bring phrases fully answering the Church-state and condition of either parents beleeving unbeleeving which in the Scripture is holy and uncleane and yet to understand them of holinesse and uncleannesse of another kinde of legitimation and bastardy if they may be as I think they never were so called is meerly incongruous That these words fully answer the Church-state of parents and the Church-state and condition which the children derive from them is plaine in that parallel text Gal. 2. 15. Jews by nature that is holy by birth from beleeving parents not sinners of the Gentiles not uncleane by birth from unbeleeving ancestors So Master Cartwright on these words in his answer to the Rhemists If you will know what this holinesse of children new-born is the Apostle telleth you it is through the Covenant to be a Jew by nature or birth and if you will farther understand what this uncleannesse of children is the Apostle in the same place telleth you it is not to be sinners by nature as those which are born of the Heathen I well know and acquainted the Reader p. 2. of my Birth-priviledge that the Apostles scope Gal. 2. 15. is another viz. to prove that Jews and Gentiles have both one and the same justification not by works of the Law but by Faith but falling upon the mention of the Jewe and Gentile he gives them characters as Master Cartwright well observes fully parallel to that which is here delivered 3. The argument thus understood is untrue The stresse is wholly laid on the beleeving party as to the holinesse of the issue twice over The unbeleever is meerly passive in it when the childe hath legitimation equally from both Against the former interpretation and for mine which Chamier affirmes to be Calvini omnium nostrorum take these arguments 1. That holinesse which necessarily follows to the issue from the sanctification of an unbeleeving by a beleeving yoke-fellow is Covenant holinesse and not legitimation But the holinesse in this place of the Apostle necessarily follows to the issue from the sanctification of an unbeleever by a beleever Ergo it is Covenant-holinesse not legitimation 2. That which is derived from the eminency of one parent above another and not equally from both is not legitimation But this holinesse is derived from the eminence of one parent viz. the beleeving parent above the other Ergo it is not legitimation 3. The result or fruit which follows from a beleevers faith is not legitimation But the holinesse in the Text is a result of the faith of the beleeving yoke-fellow The minor is evident seeing faith is twice hinted at in the beleever I know that there is one that denies that the unbeleeving husband or wise is here said to be sanctified in the beleeving It is saith he in the husband not in the beleeving husband in the wife not in the beleeving wife that is not in the Text. The marriage is between a beleever and an unbeleever the unbeleever is sanctified whether husband or wife by their yoke-fellow but not as is said by their beleeving yoke-fellow the Reader that puts off his reason may matter such denials To evince sense of bastardy and legitimation from those words of the Text unclean and holy the Apostles argument is put by one into this forme If the unbeleeving husband were not sanctified by the wife then were your children uncleane But they are not uncleane but holy Ergo the unbeleeving husband is sanctified by the wife And this sequel as is said were not true if this proposition were not true All the children of those parents where one is not sanctified to the other are unclean The Proposition is of an unbelieving husband and a wife and yet the Proposition must be of all parents that will prove it as he that wiâ—â— prove If an Englishman be noble he is honourable must prove it by this universal or general All Noble men are honourable and not put in all Englishmen Noble for then he antecedent and the conclusion would be all one whereas the Proposition proving must be larger then the Proposition proved else we might conclude ex meris particularibus To say if the unbeleeving husband were not sanctified by the wife your children were unclean is all one with this All the children of the unbeleeving husband not sanctified to the wife are uncleane This of it selfe is not such that many words should need to be spent about it But seeing that a learned hand layes so much and so great stress upon it It may not be slightly passed over and who sees not here a wilde parallel well worthy of such a monstrous assertion The proposition is of two standing in full disparity and an instance is given in a single person where there is no disparity at all and by two adjuncts which are Synonyma I desire to know how this sequel may be proved If a wife of an ignoble birth be not made Noble by her husband her issue is ignoble must it be proved by this Proposition The issue of every wife not made noble by her husband is ignoble or will it serve The issue of every ignoble wife not made noble by her husband is ignoble If a poore man take a wife and is not enricht by her he still remaines in a poore condition shall this be made good by a proposition That all men taking wives and not enricht by them are in a poore condition or will it serve that every poor man taking a wife and not enricht by her is in a poore condition are these true or are they false propositions Yea what is affirmed in his own instance to prove that if an Englishman be noble he is honourable it is sufficient to prove it by this Proposition All Englishmen noble are honourable will not hold Let any one tell me how he will make good this Proposition If a Dutchman be borne of a Duke he is a Duke if he be borne of an Earle he is an Earle must it be All men born of Dukes are Dukes of Earles are Earles This with us in England is false but of all Dutch men thus borne it is truth But the
both those This is proved because our Saviour from their estate inferres a likenesse to them in others for the same estate Apolog p. 150. This Argument what colour soever it carries yet it is not conclusive It may be taken more largely in Christs argumentation and in a more restrained sense in his words of Instruction or Application as in a place much parallel I shall shew 1 Cor. 6. 1 2. There we have the Apostles reproof vers 1. and his reason vers 2. as in the Evangelists we have Christs assertion confirming his reproof ver 14. and his application ver 15. Now Saint in the Apostles reproof is taken more largly than it is taken in his reason A visible Saint is meant in the first place a real and glorified Saint in the second visible Saints may judge in small matters for real Saints in glory shall judge the world shall judge Angels and so it may be here infants have their present title to the visible Kingdome and men qualified as infants shall only enter the Kingdome of Glory His second reason that Christ directs his speech to the Disciples already in the visible Church and therefore speaks not of the Church visible I know not how to make up into a reason If I understood it I would either yield or answer it The third reason that the speech Mark 10. 15 Luke 18. 17. is like Mat. 18. 3 4. but there it is meant of the Kingdome of Glory Ergo so here is answered already If Mark 10. 15. Luke 18. 17. be like Matth. 18 3 4. yet Mark 10. 14. Luke 18. 16. which we have in question is unlike to Matth. 18. 3 4. Thirdly Were it granted him that the Kingdome of Glory must be understood both in Christs reason and application yet he is nothing holpen Infants have right to the Church visible militant because they are in a capacity of entrance into the Church triumphant Acts 2. 47. The Lord added to the Church daily such as should be saved Not necessarily saved but now having entered Covenant with God they were in a capacity and therefore added as visible Church-members Infants standing in this capacity ought to have admission likewise It is said that if this proposition were granted that they have right to the Church visible militant who shall be of the Church triumphant yet this right cannot be claimed but by those who are elect and therefore from these Scriptures so expounded it cannot be proved that any other than elect infants are to be baptized Answ If election or non-election must steere us in admission to Baptisme this were to purpose interposed but when there is nothing that can be objected against them as hindring their salvation it is sufficiently proved that it may not hinder their Baptisme That must not be pleaded against any as a barre to hinder their admission into the Church on earth that will not hinder their admission into the Church in heaven CHAP. LIV. Reasons evincing the Birth-priviledge and Covenant-holinesse of the issue of Beleevers HAving already so largely insisted upon by Scripture proofs that children are in covenant with parents and that priviledges of Ordinances which necessarily imply a covenant do descend to posterity I shall lay down certain grounds some of them making way towards and others necessarily inferring of themselves the conclusion First This is of the nature of those things which descend from Parent to childe from Ancestors to Posterity which is in their power to convey to their issue There are those things indeed which are personally inherent in men and proper to them so that they cannot convey them to their issue there is no deriving of them to others by succession As 1. Individual accidents of the body wounds scarres or comelinesse of feature these are so in the Parent that they are not conveyed to their children 2. Habits or proper gifts whether acquired by pains or infused The son of a learned man inherits not his fathers gifts The son of an Artificer is no such Artist The son of a Prophet hath not by vertue of birth the gift of prophecy nor is the son of a regenerate man endowed with saving grace for that reason There are on the contrary those things that passe from Parent to childe which the Parent by nature or special priviledge hath power to convey As 1. The essential or integral part of a Species with the natural properties that do accompany it so one brute beast brings forth another one brid brings for another and man brings forth one of mankind 2. The priviledges or burdens which in Family or Nation are hereditary they are conveyed from Parents to Posterity from Ancestors to their issue As is the Father so is the child as respecting these particulars This none have questioned and these things in hand being of the same nature it is a faire propable ground of it self if evidence to the contrary from Scripture be not cleare that they are thus still transmitted Secondly It is so in Kingdomes Common-wealths Cities in Corporations Families The son of a Noble man is Noble of a Free-man is Free Acts 22. 28. As the sonne of a bond-man where by the Law of Nations they are bond men is a bond-man likewise Exod. 21. 4. Now we know that in Scripture the Church of God is frequently stiled by these names By the most honourable of them Mat. 8. 11 12. Mat. 21. 43. Ephes 2. 19. Hebrewes 12. 22. Ephesians 3. 15. to let us understand that as Cities Kingdomes Families have their priviledges so the people of God in covenant have theirs â—ikewise But we are told Object You do very carnally imagine the Church of God to be like civil Corporations as if persons were admitted to it by birth whereas in this all is done by free Election of grace and according to Gods appointment nor is God tied or doth tie himself in the erecting and propagating his Church to any such carnal respects as descent from men Christianity is no mans birth-right Protestant Divines are taken up by the Jesuites in the self same way for this very thing A Lapide on 1 Cor. 7. 14. saith Hence Calvin and Beza have drawn their opinion of a birth-righteousnesse and say that the children of Beleevers are holy and saved without Baptisme because on this account that they are Beleevers children they are reputed to be born in the Church within that Divine covenant I will be thy God and the God of thy seed Gen. 17. 7. As children in the civil Law are accounted free whose parents are either of them free but saith he they are deceived and gives his reason The Church is not a civil Common-wealth but supernatural and there is no man born a Christian but spiritually new borne and is made holy not civilly but really by faith hope and charity infused into the soul So Stapleton on the same words in his Antidotum applying the Spiritual Antidote against Calvins Carnal Poyson saith
That Jewes carnally descended from Abraham or the children of Christians may be made partakers of the Covenant entered of God with Abraham Birth according to the flesh does nothing So also Bellarmine speaking of the covenant with Abraham saith It descends to us not by carnal but spiritual generation So that these men have sucked the spiritual meaning from the Jesuites and Master Marshal holds to the carnal imaginations of Protestant Reformers They produce many Texts of Scripture where this Birth-priviledge in their thoughts is evidently set forth Jesuites contradict it and upon this account it is a carnal imagination to conceive it The Apostle knew not saith one that God had so by promise Object or other engagement bound himself but he was free as he said to Moses after the promise made to Abraham to have mercy on whom he would Rom. 9. 15. If this be meant of any engagement of God to confer saving graces or habitual qualifications on the natural seed of Beleevers the words then carry reason with them But neither he nor his great friends will learn to distinguish between Gods conditional covenant contained in priviledges of Ordinances and habitual saving graces otherwise they know from Moses that God exercised this freedome in making choise of Israel above all Nations and that the Apostle knew and in the same Chapter lets us know Rom. 9. 4. that to them pertained the covenants and that this was their prerogative for Birth-priviledge Rom. 3. 1. We say the son of a Free-man is Free the son of a Noble-man is Noble we never said that the son of a Learned-man is Learned we say that the son of a Christian is a Christian as to interest in Ordinances We never said that the son of a Regenerate man is Regenerate It is further urged Object If this were true that the covenant of Grace is a birth-right-priviledge then the children of Beleevers are children of Grace by nature for that which is a birth-right-priviledge is a priviledge by nature And if Christianity is hereditary that as the child of a Nobleman is Noble the child of a Free-man is Free the child of a Turk is a Turk of a Jew a Jew the child of a Christian is a Christian Then Christians are born Christians and not made Christians and how are they then children of wrath by nature which whether it may not advantage the Pelagians and deniers of Original sinne it concernes those that use such speeches to consider To this I answer It concernes those that presse these objections to see how Chamier Paraeus and other Protestant Writers answer them when they are in their very words urged by Jesuites If they can reconcile Galat. 2. 15. with Ephes 2. 3. then they have an answer The Apostle was by birth of the people of God in covenant and yet by nature a childe of wrath It is further said Object To conceive that it is in Gods Churches as in other Kingdomes and after the Lawes of Nations is a seminary of dangerous superstitions and errours It is well that they have learned an Artifice from these superstition-hating Jesuites to keep out the inlet of superstition among us if there were no parallel held betwixt the Church of God and other Kingdomes after the manner of the Law of Nations but such that are Seminaries of superstition they may do well to acquaint us how it comes to passe that the Curch in Scripture hath the name of a City Family Kingdome Similitudes ever carry some resemblance If this were the alone ground on which the Birth-priviledge of Christians were bottomed they had said something but being only an illustration of it and nothing more they are over lavish in their censure Similitudes indeed may be over-stretched beyond their reach and if they had laid down rules to declare where the Similitude holds and where it holds not as I have done in the Birth-priviledge and made it appear that it holds not in that for which I produce it they had said somewhat to the purpose Read Mal. 1. 6 8 14. and tell me whether there be any ground laid for dangerous superstitions Thirdly It is so in all other Religions they keep up their priviledge of interest in the worship of their Ancestors The childe of a Turke is a Turke the childe of a Pagan is a Pagan the child of a Jew is a Jew And it is the Apostles Argument in like case respective to Ecclesiastical communion that because Sacramental communion rendered them one Ecclesiastical body with Christians so communion in worship will make one body with those of other Religions 1 Cor. 10. 17 18 19. See Paraeus on the words and Cudworths True notion of the Lords Supper There are common principles that are the same in all Religions and we must beleeve them to hold unlesse Scripture hold forth a difference Fourthly God ownes children born in the Church as by birth his his servants Levit. 25. 39 40 41 42. If thy brother that dwelleth by thee be waxen poor and be sold unto thee thou shalt not compel him to serve as a bond-servant but as an hired servant and as a sojourner he shall be with thee and shall serve thee unto the year of Jubile And then shall he depart from thee both he and his children with him and shall return unto his own family and unto the possession of his fathers shall he returne For they are my servants Root and Branch Parent and childe are servants of God As they were the servants of their Master when they could do them actually no service by reason of their relation to them so they are the servants of God on the same account And as he owns them as his servants so also he ownes them as by birth his children Ezek. 16. 20 21. Moreover thou hast taken thy sonnes and thy daughters whom thou hast borne unto me and these hast thou sacrificed unto them to be devoured Is this of thy Whoredomes a small matter That thou hast slain my children and delivered them to cause them to passe through the fire for them If there were no Birth-priviledge how had God this property in Infants and this David pleads Ps 116. 16. O Lord I am thy servant truly I am thy servant and the son of thy hand-maid because he was borne in Gods house and was a childe of a servant of his he pleads his interest Fifthly If the child be not in covenant the parent and childe are heterogeneal and respective to Church-relation in the most opposite condition the Parent in the Kingdom of God by vertue of the faith that he professes the childe in the Kingdome of Satan by reason of his non-interest in the Promise and want of title to Covenant-relation But Scripture makes them still as one Jewes children are Jewes by nature Gentiles children are sinners that is Gentiles by nature The Root being holy the Branches are holy Parents not sanctified children are unclean but Parents
Scripture to deliver unto us the grounds of it If they will subscribe to that part That the grounds reasons and causes of the necessity of infant-Baptisme are contained in Scriptures then I will subscribe to the other that those words infants ought to be baptized are not the Scripture Then Doctor Prideaux is brought in who sayes Paedobaptisme rests on no other divine right then Episcopacy but we are not told whether Doctor Prideaux goes about to bring down infant-Baptism to unwritten Tradition or to bring up Episcopacy to divine right according to Scripture And out of these Premisses this conclusion is inferred that the Ancients and learned afore Zuinglius did account infant-Baptisme to have been an unwritten tradition having reason from Scripture not evident of it self but to be received from the determination of the Church Which for ought that I can discerne is thus gathered some Papists to set up unwritten traditions have in contradiction to themselves fastened infant-Baptisme upon it of which onely one lived before Zuinglius Some Protestant Writers every one of them living after Zuinglius speak not one word to the purpose Ergo the learned before Zuinglius did account infant-Baptisme to be an unwritten tradition Me thinks the Scripture-Arguments which may be found in Authors far above Zuinglius his standing as in Aquinas 3. part quaest 68. art 9. August de Baptis contra Donat. lib. 4. cap. 24. with others might with more strength conclude that they rested on a written foundation and were not satisfied with unwritten tradition CHAP. LVI The reality of connexion between the Covenant and initial seale asserted THe several minor propositions in the syllogismes before laid down being proved at large in the foregoing discourse So that nothing more needs to be added yet if there be no necessary connexion between the covenant and the seale the major propositions will yet be called into question Though it be granted that infants be Church-members are in covenant have the promises are Saints are in the bosome of the Church by birth-priviledge are children of the Kingdome c. Yet it will be said though most unreasonably that they are not yet to be baptized I shall therefore 1. Bring Scripture proofes for the real connexion between the covenant and the seale clearing those Scriptures from exceptions taken against them 2. I shall make it good with arguments or reasons 3. I shall returne answer to objections brought against that which is here asserted That all in covenant are to enjoy the initial seal of the covenant let the words of God himself in the institution of circumcision be considered Gen. 17. 7 9 10 11 14. I will establish my covenant between me and thee and thy seed after thee in their generations for an everlasting covenant to be a God unto thee and to thy seed after thee Thou shalt keep my covenant therefore thou and thy seed after thee in their generations This is my covenant which ye shall keep between me and you and thy seed after thee Every man-child among you shall be circumcised and ye shall circumcise the flesh of your foreskinne and it shall be a token of the covenant betwixt me and you And the uncircumcised man-child whose flesh of his foreskin is not circumcised that soul shall be cut off from his people Here we see 1. A covenant entered 2. A seal appointed as the Apostle Rom. 4. 11. calls it 3. The necessary connexion between the seal and covenant declared They are to be circumcised because they are in covenant Having interest in the covenant They have together with it interest in the initial seal against this is objected First All the force of this proof hangs on the particle therefore verse 9. and may be rendared And thou or but thou as well as thou therefore and is by others rendered Tu autem and Tu vero which are neither of them illative termes 1. We have no reason but that it may be an illative as well as a copulative and being an illative particle he hath no exception against the strength of it 2. I deny that all the force of the proof hangs on that particle look farther on into verse 10. This is my covenant which ye shall keep between me and you and thy seed after thee every man-childe among you shall be circumcised and take in with it Acts 7. 8. And he gave him the covenant of circumcision And so Abraham begat Isaac and circumcised him the eighth day c. and let them at more leisure finde an answer to this argument That which God himself calls by the name of a covenant ought not to be separated from it But God calls circumcision by the name of a covenant Ergo they ought not to be separated 2. Let them consider the relation in which the Apostle puts this Sacrament of circumcision to the covenant Rom. 4. 11. An instituted appointed signe and seale is not to be divided from that which it signifies and seales circumcision was an instituted appointed signe and seale of the covenant therefore it is not to be divided from it Secondly it is said If it were granted that therefore is the best reading yet that the inference verse 9. should be made from the Promise only verse 7. I will be a God to thee and thy seed after thee and not as well if not rather from the Promise verse 8. of giving to him and his seed the land of Canaan I finde no sufficient reason given This reference engages the adversary 1. In a contradiction to himself who sayes elsewhere the promise of the Gospel was confirmed to Abraham by the signe of circumcision He also contends that it was a mixt covenant made up of spiritual and temporal mercies and then it must take in the spiritual as well as the temporal Promise All that know the nature of covenants and use of Seales know that the Seale ratifies all that the covenant containes But the covenant according to him contained not barely the promise of the land of Canaan and therefore the reference must carry it farther than the land of Canaan 2. It engages him in a contradiction to the Apostle who makes circumcision a signe and seale not alone of the land of Canaan but of the righteousnesse of faith Thirdly It is said But if it were yielded that the inference were made peculiarly from the Promise verse 7. to be a God to Abraham and his seed it must be proved that every Believers Infant childe is Abrahams seed afore it be proved that the Promise belongs to them It must either be proved that they are Abrahams children or have the priviledge of the Children of Abraham which from Genesis 9. 27. Rom. 11. 17. is sufficiently proved especially being confirmed by those Texts that carry the covenant in Gospel-times to the issue And for his exception that the covenant was not made to every childe of Abraham though it were true yet it would not serve his purpose provided that we in Gospel-times
are under the same covenant as was Isaac to whom the promises were made If some of Abrahams children were left out that concerns not us so that we are taken in yet the instance is very weak to prove it As appeares saith he verse 19. concerning Ishmael and Heb. 11. 9. that Ishmael was himself in covenant though not established in covenant as God there and verse 21. promised concerning Isaac not his seed never received appeares not alone by the signe and seale which he received verse 23. which yet is sufficient for God to seale to a blanke is very strange to signe a covenant to a man never in covenant but also from Gal. 4. 30. What saith the Scripture Cast out the bond-woman and her sonne for the sonne of the bond-woman shall not be heir with the sonne of the free-woman A man cast out of covenant was before casting out in covenant Ejection supposes admission unlesse we will give way to our Authors dreame of Ejection by non-admission He was cast out after the time of the solemnity of his admission by circumcision as may be seen Gen 22. For that of Heb. 11. 9. it is a mystery what he will make of it unlesse he will conclude that because Abraham sojourned in the land of Promise that therefore none were in covenant that were not taken into that land so Moses and Aaron will be found out of covenant It is further said As for a visible Church-seed of Abraham that is neither his seed by nature nor by saving faith nor by excellency in whom the Nations of the Earth should be blessed to wit Christ I know none such in Scripture therefore some men have fancied such a kind of Church-seed as it is called I know not how saving faith comes in when a faith of profession will serve the turne The whole of Abrahams seed had circumcision as a seale of the righteousnesse of faith when many of their Parents had no more than a faith of profession Fourthly Were all these things yielded yet the Proposition as is said would not be made good from hence All these we see are made good against his exceptions Let us now see the strength which is reserved for the last push for overthrow of this Proposition The inference is not concerning title or right of infants to the initial seale as if the covenant or promise of it self did give that but the inference is concerning Abrahams duty that therefore he should be the more engaged to circumcise his posterity This should rather have been left to us for the strengthening of our proposition than have made use of it himself for refutation of it It was Abrahams duty to give them according to Gods command the initial Seale in this we are agreed whether it will thence follow that they had right and title to it or were without right let the Reader determine It is further said He was engaged to circumcise onely those that are males and not afore eight dayes and not onely those that were from himself but also all in his house whose children soever they were which apparently shewes that the giving Circumcision was not commensurate to the persons interest in the Covenant but was to be given to persons as well out of the Covenant as in If of Abrahams house and not to all that were in the Covenant to wit Females which doth clearly prove that right to the initiall Seale as it is called of circumcision did not belong to persons by vertue of the covenant but by force of the command If it could be proved that Abraham kept Idolaters in his house professedly worshipping a false god and gave circumcision to them in that faith and way of false worship it would prove that a man might have the seale and not be in covenant but it would not prove that he might be in covenant and be denied the Seale and then infant-Baptisme might be of easier proof Though they were not in covenant though they were not holy yet they might be baptized But I will not yield so much I do not believe that Abraham carried circumcision beyond the line of the covenant and that he had those in his house which were aliens from God seeing I finde that Testimony of the Lord concerning him Gen. 18. 19. For I know him that he will command his children and his houshold after him and they shall keep the way of the Lord to do justice and judgement that the Lord may bring upon Abraham that which he hath spoken of him And that resolution of Joshua That if others would serve the gods that their fathers served that were on the other side the floud or the gods of the Amorites in whose land they dwell yet he and his house would serve the Lord Josh 24. 14 15. As it is a private mans duty to serve the Lord and not Idols so it is the Master of the Families duty to see that the Lord and not Idols be worshipped in his house As I do beleeve that if any of our adversaries had a profest Heathen in his Family he would not keep him there and not chatechize him and that he would not during his profession of Heathenisme baptize him So I beleeve concerning Abraham He catechized all that he took in as Heathens and did not circumcise them in their Heathenisme This some Paedobaptists as is said are forced to confesse when they grant the formal reason of the Jewes being circumcised was the command and the covenant he makes only a motive I wonder what need there is of an Argument to force such a confession The reason I say why Jewes were circumcised and Christians baptized is the command were there a thousand covenants and no institution of a signe or seale such a signe or seale there could have been no circumcision nor no Baptisme The command is the ground and the covenant is the directory to whom application si to be made We say all in covenant are entituled to the Seale for admission but we pre-suppose an institution They will have all Beleevers and all Disciples baptized which they cannot conclude upon their faith and knowledge barely but upon the command to baptize Beleevers and Disciples So that the command is with reference to the covenant with reference to interest in the covenant From these foregoing exceptions a conclusion is drawne that all this doth fully shew that the proof of the connexion between and the initial Seale without a particular command for it is without any weight in it And I conclude that it fully shewes that the proof of the connexion between the covenant and the initial Seale pre-supposing the institution of such a Seale and a general command is of that weight that all are meere frivolous trifles that are brought for exceptions against it Another Scripture holding out the connexion between the covenant and initial seale is Acts 2. 38 39. Repent and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sinnes
is not unfitly called in instrument of God p. 128 See Faith Justification Ishmael In Covenant when circumcised p. 296 Not to be branded with bastardy ibid. He and his seed cast out of Covenant p. 298 Justification Mans concurrence in it necessarily required in it as an acceptant not as agent p. 127 It is a transient act of God not an immanent p. 132 It is not from eternity p. 131 c. A justified man an an fitted for every duty to which God calls p. 135. See Faith Instrument K. Kingdome of Heaven IN what sense taken Matth. 19. 14 c. p. 399 The Hinge of the contraversie concerning infants interest in Covenant hangs not on the interpretation of those words ibid. Anabaptists reasons not sufficient to prove it to be meant of the Kingdome of Glory p. 400 Though understood of the Kingdome of Glory it serves not to discovenant or dischurch infants p. 401 L. Law COnsidered as a Covenant to give life is inconsistent with the Gospel p. 55 Moral-Law hath a commanding power over Beleevers ibid. By Arguments asserted ibid. Objections answered p. 58 In what sense a dead husband p. 59 See Moses A rule of our duty not of our strength p. 151. Life What in Scripture it implies p. 100 The same in substance in the Covenant of Works and the Covenant of Grace ibid. A Medium may be concieved and is by some assigned between life and death in Scripture acceptation p. 123 Lord. The acceptation of Christ as Lord doth not justifie p. 125 Love To do a thing out of obedience to the Law and by love not opposite p. 61 Love cleaves to Christ for communion but recieves him not for justification p. 125 M. Master Marshal VIndicated p. 435 Mediatour A foure-fold work respective to the Covenant incumbent on the Mediatour p. 93 c. See Christ Moses Metaphor God's entring Covenant with man no Metaphor p. 10. 37 Ministers Must bring their people up to the termes of the Covenant in pressing the necessity of Faith and Repentance p. 188 c. They must not sever the promise from the duty p. 189 Ministry The necessity of a Ministry to bring me into Covenant and to bring them up to the termes of the Covenant p. 160. Reasons evincing that God hath appointed such a Ministry to be perpetuated through all ages p. 162 c. Reasons evincing the necessity of such an established Ministry p. 165 c. Objections answered p. 168 169 An orderly call from God into the Ministerial function necessary p. 180 Reasons assigned p. 181 182 Several wayes of calling to the work of The Ministry p. 182 See Ordination Ministry-maintenance p. 442 Moses The Law as delivered by Moses bindes Christians p. 73 74 75 He delivered a Covenant to the Jewes p. 210 He delivered a Covenant of Grace to the Jewes p. 210 211 In his time commands were frequent and full the directive and maledictive part for discovery of sin were open and clear but promises for eternity little known p. 213 He was a Mediatour in type N. Nature TAken for Birth-priviledge or descent from Ancestors p. 307 Taken for qualifications of nature ibid. Jewes by nature had priviledges above Gentiles p. 307 308 O. Obedience See Righteousnesse Olive THe whole universal Church visible Rom. 11. p. 325 Fatnesse of the Olive glory of Ordinances p. 326 Ordination An orderly call by way of Ordination into the Ministerial function necessary in all not gifted by immediate revelation p. 182 Ordination described ibid. Men in Ministerial function are to act in Ordination p. 182 183 They are to set men apart as Presbyters and Elders p. 184 Ordination not to be passed but upon examination and tryal p. 140 To be solemnized with fasting and prayer p. 185 186 Imposition of hands to be used p. 187 Objections answered ibid. P. Pardon NAtional and personal p. 343 My People That phrase applied in New Testament-Scriptures to those that stand invisible relation to God p. 258 Places for worship In New Testament-times have their warranty In what sense holy p. 441 Places holy by divine institution by divine approbation p. 439 Positions concerning places for worship in Gospel-times p. 441 Not in equipage with the Temple and Tabernacle ibid. Temple and Tabernacle had the pre-eminence in four Particulars ibid. Our places of meeting by good warranty called Churches p. 441 c. Position This Position that the Moral Law hath no commanding power over Believers examined p. 58 That position concerning the Old Covenant to be both a Covenant of Works and a Covenant of Grace examined p. 210 Power Necessary in the call of Nations to a visible Church-state p. 330 Priviledge See Birth Professors Who to be accounted so before men p. 450 Promises Made to the wiked made good to the believing and penitent p. 190 Absolute promises yield not peace to him that is wanting in the conditions of God required ibid. p. 47 Objections answered p. 190 Spiritual promises rare and obscure under Moses his administration p. 213 Scriptures evincing the spirituality of Old Testament-Promises p. 222 Temporal promises annexed as appendants to spiritual in the Old Covenant p. 226 Children of Promise All the seed of Abraham by Isaac born by vertue of that miraculous promise p. 298 Q. Quaeries PVt to those that restraine the New Covenant to the Elect regenerate p. 234 c. Put to those that put a limit to the New Covenant respective to the issue p. 317 R. Reconciliation GRadual or total of persons of Nations p. 331 Repentance A distinct grace from faith p. 136 A condition of the Covenant of grace ib. Considered in the prae-requisites p. 137 In the essential parts of it ibid. Privative part which is cessation from sin is required in Covenant p. 140 Positive part which is a returne to God and an holy walk with God is required in Covenant p. 142 See Righteousnesse Objections answered p. 144 c. Reprobation No cause of unbelief or sin p. 341 It leads not to condemnation without merit of sin as Election leads to Salvation without merits of works ibid. Righteousnesse What degree of righteousnesse is required in the Covenant of Grace p. 148 Perfection of degrees is not so required that upon the defection of it the penalty is incurred p. 149 Perfection of degrees is not required and sincerity accepted p. 151 Reasons assigned ibid. c. Objections answered p. 153 Our Evangelical righteousnesse is imperfect p. 155 c Sincerity is required and accepted p. 112 c. Root and Branch Denote parent and childe Rom. 11. 16. p. 325 Root Abraham Isaac and Jacob. ibid. Every natural parent a Root p. 338 Every natural believing Parent an holy Root ibid. Abraham a Root by communication not by example p. 399 S. Sacraments ARe Gospel mysteries p. 446 Sacriledge Defined p. 440 With-holding infants of believing parents from Baptism is Sacriledg p. 437 c. Saints Vnregenerate persons have the name and outward priviledge of Saints p.
him away And that it is not only a misery that must be repayredâ—y a change of Pastors but also a sin which must be reâ—â—est by the change of your lives For if your uâ—worthinesse have driven your teacher is to a corner and you sinn'd him into his grave your Repentance and Humiliation must raise another out of his ashes So great so saa so generall is this losse that I am ready to excuse my self and think it more reason then passion if in my solitary mournings and retired complaints I cry out My Father my Father the horsemen of England and the Charriot thereof To tell you of his worth in a measure proportionate to my experience would require too long a discourse from your Infant-Orator And to tell you of your losse I have said too much already which although it do not answer many of your expectations yet I hope may conduce to the affecting of you to an aâ—tention to him whose eloquence can represent your losse and whose wisedome can teach you how to make the best use of it ERRATA Pag. 1. line ult for And read In. p. 2. l. 24. a Ruler r. the Rule p. 5. l. 16. for This r. Thus. l. 17. for This r. Thus. p. 12. l. 11. for 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 l. 13. for Art r. out p. 20. l. 28. dele and wise The Authours dissent from some â— AdvertisemeÌ„â—s to the Reader concerning the present work A double request made to the Reader Dissertatio de morti Christi Cap. 1. pag. 1. Figurative acceptions of the word Covenant Requisites in a Covenant Distinctions of Covenants Mutus pactio disarum partium quâ altera alterise ecritis conditionibus obligar ad aliquid faciendum dandum aut accipiendum adhibitis signis Symbolis externis ad solennem testificationem confirmationis causa ut promissio sit inviolabilis Sic Ursinus Reasons why God deals with man in a Covenant-way The Covenant between God and Man defined God entered Covenant with man in his estate of integrity Grace is the fountain and first rise of every Covenant of God with man In the usual accessories on solemnities Arguments evincing a Covenant in the proper nature of it The outward and not the inward Covenant is properly a Covenant The outward Covenant is most usually in Scripture called by the name of Covenant Men enjoy priviledges of ordinances and interest in Sacraments upon account of the outward Covenant Posit 2. Posit 3. Posit 4. Posit 5. Posit 6. The Covenant of Grace calls for conditions from man Arguments for a conditional Covenant A grand objection against the conditionality of the Covenant of Grace answered * Antecedens falsâ â—ititur hypothesi quâ—si verbis illis formula foederis gratiae contineretur Contrà verò foedus propriè obligationâ—â— duaâ—um partium certis utrinque conditionibus complecti certum est qualem hoc loco extare probare non potest ideoque nec foedus propriè est a Testamentum Grace 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sumitur 1. Propriè pro suprema animi seu voluntatis nostrae 〈◊〉 de eo quod post mortem nostram fieri cupimus sic Testamentum morte testatoris ratum est nondum enim valet cum 〈◊〉 testator 2 Impropriè prâ— paectione 〈◊〉 foederè quod viventes inter seiuire solent b Nomen Testamenti sumi non debet iâ— proprie 〈◊〉 pro eo quod fit ab 〈…〉 sed pro foedere 〈…〉 ut bene animadvertis Pererius c Aliquid dandum est consuetudini Testamentum propriè justam voluntatis 〈◊〉 de eo quod quis post mortem de 〈◊〉 suis fieri velit Graeci propriè 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vocant d Quamviâ— enim 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 si vocis eâ—ymoâ— attendas non plus sonet quà m dispositionem apud authores Graecos Baeudaeo teste in commentariis Gracae linguae significet in genere pactum conventum pollicitationem constaâ— tamen vulgarem 〈◊〉 ejus significationem esse quâ denotes idem quòd apud Latinos Testamentum id est voluntatis decretum de co quod quis post mortem suaâ—fierâ— velit e Foedus N. T. foedus est quia est mutuum inter Deum homines salutis promissae obedientiae fidei ab hominibus debitae pactum simul Testamentum est quia hoc foedus promissa filii Dei morte per eam haereditate crelesti à Deo sancitum est adeo ut non iâ—â—merio ut foedus Testamentarium Testamentum foederis ob concursum utriusque queat appellari Indè constat simpliciter quidem esse foedus ratione pacti mutui Dei fidelium sed secundùm quid esse Testamentum ratione modi partis ac potioris in foedere nempe promissionis gratiae quâ Deus nobis promittit se fore Deum nostrum propitium vitam aeternam daturum tanquam haereditaâ—em merito obedicntiae mortis Filii sui f Circumscriptionem hujus nominis ex typis atque umbraculis legis demonstrat paulò pùst ver 15. sequentibus Apostolus Cùm omnino statuit Dei gratiam eo luculentiorem heminibus explicatam esse quòd suis non foedus sed Testamentum dederit Quia foedus conditiones mutuas fuisset habiturum quas si altera pars non praestet foedus est irritum Testamentum verò liberalitatis gratiae citra ullam conditionem instrumentum est ex quo hoeredes vocantur instituuâ—tur citra contemplationem ullius officii quod ab ipsis proficisci possit g Non hoc voluit Paulus in Epistola ad Hebraeos cap. 9. ex simplici vocis significatione arguere sed ex ipsius foederis circumstantiis h Quod Lxx. Theodotio 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 dixerunt Symmachus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hoc est pactum vel foedus vertit quae est propria significatio Hebraicae vocis Berith Quae vox non legitur in V. Tâ— pro dispositione Testamentariâ i Foedus Dei est mutua pactio inter Deum homines quâ Deus confirmat hominibus se futurum eis propitium remissurum peccata donaturum justitiam novam Spiritum Sanctum vitam aeternam per propter Filium Mediatorem vicissim homines se obligant Deo ad fidem poenetentiam hoc est ad recepiendum verâ fide hoc tantum beneficium ad praestandam Deo veram obedientiam k Foedus est pactum Dei cum homine de foelicitate aeterna certâ conditione ci communicanda ad Dei gloriam Pactum cùm dicimus intelligimus mutuam Dei hominis obligationem ex stipulatione intervenientem ut utrimque reddatur quod promissum est Duae ergo sunt partes foederis 1. Promissio Dei de vita aeterna 2. Obligatio hominis ad observationem conditionis a Deo praescriptae Prima est libera secunda est necessaria Further obctions against the conditionality of the Covenant answered Mans fall by sin was no
Tribes from Hosea 1. 10. Hos 2. 23. is there applied to the call of the Gentiles into a Church-state and condition Neither is that of force against it that is objected from verse 23. where the Apostle saith That he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy which he had afore prepared unto glory God sets up visible Ordinances and calls to a Church-state as is there prophecied that he may there work to himselfe a people of invisible relation that thereby he may make them vessels of mercy having afore prepared them unto glory So likewise Rev. 18. 4. Come out of her my people that ye be not partakers of her sinnes and that ye receive not of her plagues All Professours of faith and worshippers of the true God are there included in that exhortation to quit Babylon so all Ministers of Christ are to urge and presse it Men therefore of visible Profession have this title in compellation from GOD of my people It is yet objected Jeremiah 31. 31 32 33. Behold the dayes come saith the LORD that I will make a new Covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah not according to the Covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt which my Covenant they brake although I was an husband to them saith the Lord. But this shall be my Covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those dayes saith the Lord I will put my Law in their inward parts and write it in their hearts and will be their God and they shall be my people Here is a third purpose or interest for which this Text is produced to serve The first was to assert an unconditionate Covenant in the dayes of the Gospel which we examined chapter 25. when the Gospel expressely holds out Covenant-conditions more expressely than the Covenant of Works which is confest to be conditional The second to overthrow a publick Ministery and all private mutual exhortation which we spake to chapter 26 when the New Testament doth establish both And to set up this Prophecie in a third particular against all New Testament-light none must be of the called of God into Covenant for fruition of Church-priviledges but those that are regenerate Men in Old Testament-Covenant broke Covenant as is there exprest Men in the New Covenant shall keep covenant and these are only the Elect and Regenerate To this I might have many things to say No such sense must be put upon this one single Text as to restrain the covenant only to those that are stedfast in it and carefully observe it when other New-Testament-Scriptures clearly and unanimously hold it out in that latitude to comprehend those that are transgressours of it no more than it must be brought though there be like colour for both to overthrow Gospel-Ordinances private and publick exhortations when in the New Testament there is a clear and full establishment of them There are those that are in the faith so farre as to enter Covenant that make shipwrack of the faith 1 Tim 1. 19. Disciples of Christ that go back and walk no more with him Joh. 6. Men sanctified by the blood of the Covenant that tread under foot the blood of the Son of God and do despight to the Spirit of grace Heb. 10. 29. There are that escape the pollution of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ and are again entangled and overcome Those that have known the way of righteousnesse that turne from the holy Commandment To whom it happens according to the true Proverb The dogge is turned to his own vomit again and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire 2 Pet. 2 22. It is farre easier to returne answer to this Scripture held out by way of Prophecie what shall be than to give answer to all these Scriptures and far more than these setting out what is in New Testament-times 2. That we may interpret and not commit Scriptures finde out the sense of all and not create differences in any we may observe that though it be granted that those that have the Law written in their hearts and put into their inward parts do enter covenant and not break it yet it is not said none shall enter covenant and transgresse it There may still be an outward covenant according to Interpreters that may be broken as well as an inward covenant that shall be observed If it be said that these are two distinct covenants one succeeding the other one abolished when the other takes place according to that of the Apostle Heb. 8. 13. In that he saith a New Covenant he hath made the first Old now that which decayeth and waxeth Old is ready to vanish away then it will follow this being the characteristical difference that as none in New Testament-times enter covenant but they keep covenant so none in Old Testament-times were in covenant but they did transgresse it at least that the covenant that then was was wholly transgresseable and the covenant that now is is not in any possibility to be transgrest But the contrary is evident there were those that kept covenant in Old Testament-times Psal 44. 17. All this is come upon us yet have we not forgotton thee neither have we dealt falsely in the covenant Psal 103. 17. And also there are those that break covenant in New Testament-times 1 Tim. 5. 12. Having damnation because they have cast off their first faith The Law was written in mens hearts and put into their inward parts in the dayes of the Old Testament and some were as it is called in an inward Covenant Deut. 30. 6. The Lord thy God will circumcise thy heart and the heart of thy seed to love the Lord thy God with all thine heart and with all thy soule that thou mayest live Psal 37. 31. The Law of his God is in his heart none of his steps shall slide Psal 119. 11. Thy word have I hid in my heart that I might not sinne against thee Encline your eare and come unto me hear and your soule shall live and I will make an everlasting Covenant with you even the sure mercies of Dâ—â—id Isa 55. 3. And so by consequence it fairly holds notwithstanding this Text that there is as hath been proved an outward covenant in the dayes of the Gospel The oldnesse to be abolished is only in circumstances wherewith one and the same covenant that now is was then clothed 3. The covenant then spoken to by Jeremy in the place quoted is not a covenant properly so called or at least as Master Baxter observes not the whole of the covenant So there must be two distinct covenants one in being when the Prophet wrote and another to have its being in the time of which he prophesied one covenant made with the Jewes and another covenant distinct from it made