Selected quad for the lemma: nature_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
nature_n contain_v law_n moral_a 2,485 5 9.8922 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A87005 Syons redemption, and original sin vindicated: wherein are these particulars largely handled and discovered. I. That sprinkling of water in the name of the father, son and Holy Ghost is not baptism, ... II Infants not the subjects appointed by God to be baptized, ... III That the second death was never threatned to be inflicted upon Adam ... IV A clear and large discourse as touching Gods decree, of election and reprobation. V A large exposition upon the ninth chapter to the Romanes, ... VI A brief disproof of the unlawfulness of the paying or receving of tithes, ... VII The ordination of the national ministery examined and disproved. VIII The answer of objections against the Jews return out of their captivity ... IX A clear discovery of the glorious effects (or that which will be effected) under the sound of the seventh trumpet. X A full discovery of Judah and Israels glory to be enjoyed in their own land, ... Published for the instruction and comfort of all that wait for the appearing of the Lord Jesus and Zions redemption. Being an answer to a book of Mr. Hezekiah Holland, sometimes preacher in Sutton-Valence in Kent. By George Hammon pastor to the Church of Christ, meeting in Biddenden in Kent. Hammon, George. 1658 (1658) Wing H504; Thomason E958_1; ESTC R207642 184,723 213

There are 2 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

Apostle which saith For the Priesthood being changed there is also a necessity of the change of the Law From whence we see that both Law and Priesthood is done away by Christ so those that do uphold it by paying or receiving of Tythes deny Christ crucified and misery will be their portion Secondly Arg. 2 if Tythes or a Tenth was a type of the first fruits of the Converts of the Seed of Abraham to Christ in the primitive time then those that pay Tythes and such as receive Tythes deny the vertue of Christs death and the work of the Spirit in the primitive time But Tythes or the Tenth was a type of the first fruits of the converts of the Seed of Abrahnm which was to be given to Christ by his death and by the work of the Spirit Ergo they that pay or receive Tithes deny Christ Crucisied and the work of his Spirit That which will be questioned is the minor how I can prove that Tithes or a Tenth were a type of a Tenth that was to be converted from amongst the Jews as a first fruits to God and the Lamb and that the converts of Israel are the Anti-type of Tithes Esa 6.8 9 10 11 12 13. and that they are called a Tenth see the Prophet Esaiah will prove it in these words Also I heard the voice of the Lord saying whom shall I send and who will go for us Then I said here am I send me And he said go and tell this people hear ye indeed and understand not and see ye indeed but perceive not Make the heart of this people fat and make their ears heavy least they see with their eyes and hear with their ears and understand with their heart and convert and be healed Then said I Lord how long And he answered until the Cities be wasted without Inhabitant and the houses without man and the land be utterly desolate and the Lord have removed men far away and there be a great for saking in the midst of the land But yet in it mark that shall be a Tenth and it shall return and it shall be eaten as Teyl tree and an Oak whose substance is in it when they cast their leaves so the Holy seed shall be the substance thereof From these words we may see that although God did intend to harden Israel and cast them off for their sins yet there was to be a small number one amongst ten that was to be a Holy people and return to the Lord and be eaten that is to be received as a first fruit to Him and the Lamb I could say much to this but I pass minding this discourse was but a digression from the matter in hand And whereas you ask me What command women have to eat the Paschal Lamb or the Lords Supper under the Gospel Answer That the women were to eat the Passover is very evident being part of the Family and of the Congregation of Israel and not onely so but in most places where there is mention made of men as touching gifts to be bestowed on them the women are included as you have granted from the word Anthropos and that word is not only used in the Corinths but also to the Ephesians in the * A 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or homo which is a woman as well as a man fourth chapter and in the eight vers and at several other places and that there is a plain precept for women to receive the Lords Supper is plain from the Text in the first of the Corinths 11 28. according to the true signification of the word and your own grant And so I am come to your last Argument as touching Infants Baptism Ephes 2 3. the which I draw from the Ephesians in these words and were by nature the children of wrath as well as others the Baptisers say you say the Text calleth them children of Wrath onely who walked in sinful and evil courses but I answer say you that that exposition giveth the Text the lye To which I answer and say you are much mistaken in what you say for nature is that which leadeth from sin not to sin those that are not lead by it and do not obey it it will plead guilty and lay them under wrath and that it leadeth from sin and not to sin see Rom. 1.26 2.14 1 Cor. 11.14 Gal 4.8 But because I have answered this Text once and again in my former Treatise I shall be brief at present and say that nature in its region as I may say is pure although it teacheth not the Mysteries of the Gospel yet it is able to teach men to live purely according to the Law as saith the Apostle The Gentiles that have not the Law do by nature the things contained in the Law these are a Law to themselves c. From whence you may see nature leadeth from sin to do things that are Holy Just and Good and not to do that which is evil but if persons that have no other Law to guide as the Ephesians had not before conversion and yet sin against it that will lay them under wrath and so it came to pass that the Apostle saith they by nature were the children of wrath as well as others and so briefly thus as a man is a Malefactor by the Law of a Nation when he hath broken the Law so were these Ephesians by nature having transgressed against it the children of wrath that is nature convicted them and lay them under wrath and this is the meaning of the Text as you may see also more at large in my Dagons Down-fal Again Where you say I father Infants Baptism upon Pope Innocent the third the which say you was an errour because it was long in practice before him To which I answer although it might possibly be practised before yet it was not enjoyned as practise but let it be Pope Innocent or Cyprius or who it will that brought that practice and established it to be sure it was not by Christ nor his Apostles but I might say as Paul saith in another case a point of your own hath confessed it And in the last place you tell me of the antiquity of this practice of Infants Baptism and withal you say He that is wise will drink near the fountain head Answer I have also read what men have said for and against the antiquity of that practise but I finde Christ and the Apostles to be the very best Authors And whereas you say It was practised near the primitive time the which is near the fountain head Answer It argueth the truth of the practise of it never the more for being near the Apostles time unless you could prove it to be practised by the Apostles for we are not ignorant of this one thing that there was false doctrines crope in to the true Church in the primitive time and therefore likely it was that false doctrine should be broached in the world and
in the Gospel by Christ It was said of old time thou shalt not commit adultery but I say saith Christ that he that looketh on a Woman to lust after her hath committed adultery already with her in his heart That which hath been often mentioned are commanded in the Old Testament if it be moral and perpetual is also mentioned and commanded in the New-Testament And what is taught more than love and holiness and righteousness in the Old Testament and yet it is also taught up frequently and the people blamed for neglect of their duty in these particulars in the New Testament these with many things of the same nature I might offer unto you they will shew thee that those things that are moral and perpetual are frequently enjoyned in the Gospel although they have been commanded in the Old Testament also and now I am come to the examination of that which you call your digression in your eighth page which is as followeth We have a former Ordinance ●or Tithes 1 Cor. 9. Even so hath God ordained that those that preach the Gospel the Apostle quoteth a former statute or ordinance for Ministers maintenance and it seemeth out of Moses Law for v. 9. the Levitical Text is alledged Thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the Ox Now ever did God appoint any way to maintaine such as did his service but the way of Tithes which was never a tipe of any thing nor never repealed To the answer and that in its particular order and first a few words to your word digression the which I say you may properly call digression for it doth not onely digress from the matter in hand but also from the truth and I believe is the cause of your great Transgression in pervering the right way of the Lord even your greediness of gain that many of you take the Ministry for filthy lucres sake and so buy and sell the word of the Lord and live by the gain thereof and were not your eyes so full of covetousness you might come to see the truth but to pass that and come to examine more of what weight is in your matter called digression the first is We have a former Ordinance for Tithes say you and cite 1 Cor. 9. To which I answer doth the Apostle say that God hath ordained that a Gospel Minister should have Tithes for his preaching if he had said so I do assure you that my eys have been very dim when I have read that 1 Cor 9 But have you a former ordinance for Tithes I pray Sir consider did ever God ordain that any should receive Tithes or Tenths save Levites in the type God never did ordain that any should receive Tithes or a Tenth but Levy in the type and Melchizedeck viz. Christ in the Antitype and Melchizedeck viz Christ in the Antitype And are you a Levite and have you no inheritance amongst your Brethren O are you Christ If you are neither Christ nor a Leavite I pray shew where you have a former ordinance to take Tythes because I never read that any other were to take the Tenth or Tythes but you cite that Levitical ●ex spoken of by Paul 1 Cor 9.9 For thou shalt not muzzle the mouth of the Ox that treadeth out the Corn. From whence you think you have warrant to take the Tenth of the corn but first I think you have more reason than to suppose that the Ox●id eat up the tenth part of the Corn although you would if you might eat up the seventh part of it and more but the Apostle reasoneth thus that it was lawful for a Pre●cher of the Gospel or a Minister of Christ but you are none to eat and drink such things as are given them freely and that the Church ought not to muzzle their mouths if they troad out their corn that is if they did sow unto the Church spiritual things they ought to give them to eat and drink of their carnal things the which the Corinths did not for Paul did preach unto them and was fain to take of other Churches to satisfie his hunger for he was often in hunger and nakedness that is in very much want of food and cleathing the which is a vast difference between you and him for you are so far from being in hunger and nakedness to do service to the Church that some of you are often in silk and drunkennesse how beit there is a day coming that will try you in the which you shall givean account to God for your selves But you say The maintenance of the Gospel-ministry is not Tithes or a renth but such things as is freely set before them That if Tithes be not a Gospel maintenance for a Gospel Ministry then hath God appointed any other way To which I answer and that very briefly that the Gospel-maintenance is a free maintenance free from compulsion see Christ sending out his seventy commanding them to eat such things as was freely offered unto them and where ever there is a true Gospel Minister and a true Gospel people there will be no want of communicating each to other without constraint the Minister will freely communicate spirituals and the Church will freely communicate temporals Christs Ministers will labour with their hands rather than to be chargeable to the Church this will be in a true Gospel Church and also the Minister ought to labour with his hands rather than to be too chargeable to the Church and thus freely the one will do in communication to the other and so walk together in a sweet harmony of God not compelling one another but to serve each other in love And again whereas you say That Tithes are not typical nor repealed I doubt not but I shall prove them both typical and repealed and first that they are typical we may see the Apostle doth affirm to the Hebrews in these words Heb. 7.9 And as I may so say Levi also who received Tithes paid Tithes in Abraham for he was yet in the loins of Abraham when Melchizedeck met him From whence we may see that the Tenth or Tythes properly belong to Christ which was the Antitype of Melchizedeck but now to prove that Tyths are typical and that such as receive them or such as pay them deny Christ nailed to the Cross See these two Arguments briefly in the room of more that might be given First Arg. 1 if Tythes were part of the Levitical Law to be a maintenance of the Leviticall Priesthood which Law and Priesthood were to be done away by Christs nailing to the Cross then such as pay Tythes or receive them deny Christ crucified But Tyths was part of the Levitical Law to be a maintenance of the Levitical Priesthood which Law and Priesthood was to be done away by Christ nailed to the Cross Ergo those that pay or receive Tythes Heb. 7 12. are such as deny Christ crucified the minor is evidently cleared from the words of the