or that so accounting it they held themselves bound to consecrate that more then any other to the worship of God The Gentiles as Eusebius at large declares came to the knowledge of it from the Iewes and did in that as in other things become their Imitators and receive it into their manners Or upon some other ground or superstition they might account the number of seaven to be sacred as because by that number the Planets which they honoured as their chiefest Deities were terminated for which cause we know by their names they intituled their dayes But what ever were the motive as it is without all question that the Gentiles as well as the Iewes held the number of seaven in great veneration accounting it the number of perfection and full of mysteries So it is as unquestionable that by the light of nature they knew not that that part of our time was to be separated to Gods service And therefore Zanchius speakes more inconsiderately then beseemes his learning when hee saith That Nature teacheth all men to consecrate one day of seaven to the externall worship of God Which others and among them Amesius better considering acknowledge to be onely of positive right and morall not in regard of nature but of discipline as comming under that ranke of morall Precepts which neede instruction to helpe naturall reason to know and judge of them Now albeit Calvine who in this as in other things wants not his followers thinks the seaventh day not to be so stood on as that he would tye the Christian world precisely to that Yet there are many grave and judicious Divines both Ancient and Moderne that judge the institution of one Day in seaven to be so farre morall as that it doth binde the Church perpetually and immutably Thus among the Ancients Saint Chrysostome upon those words And God blessed the seaventh day and hallowed it Genes 2. 3. Here saith hee from the beginning God intimates to us this Doctrine instructing us to separate and lay aside one day in the compasse of every weeke for spirituall exercises And among our moderne Writers that admired Hooker saith That wee are bound to account the sanctificatiō of one day in seven a duty which Gods immutable law doth exact for ever Thus hee with many others whose judgements I honour yet dare not herein wholly subscribe to them neither For the Law exacting the observation of one day in seaven being onely positive as must needs be granted cannot containe in it selfe any perpetuall obligation For all Lawes of that nature though made by God himselfe admit mutation at least when the matter concerning which or the condition of the Persons to whom they were given is changed Now the Day concerning which this Precept was given together with the State of the Church to which it was given being changed I see no reason why the proportion of one in seaven should be simply and in it selfe immutable Yet thus much I willingly grant them that some time to be set apart for Gods worship being absolutely of the Law of nature that proportion of time which God himselfe made choyce of for his owne People is the fittest that can be imagined and Nature informed by God cannot but acknowledge His wisedome and goodnesse in this choyce in that hee hath so attempered it that neither the long space betweene can make us forget our duty to him nor the quicke returne of it hinder our providing for the necessities of nature And hereupon the Church of Christ hath taken it as an obligation belonging to them and that as it is in our Church Homily Gods will and commandement was to have a solemne time and standing day in the weeke wherein the people should come together and have in remembrance his wonderfull Benefits and render him thanks for them as appertaineth to loving kinde and obedient people Thus farre then this Commandement extends to us Christians as well as to the Jewes in as much as to consecrate some part of our time to God is morall and a seaventh part though not morall yet fitly chosen and appointed by God and observed by the Church of Christ not as simply immutable yet as most worthy to be retayned For the third particular The particular seventh day there mentioned that is the seaventh day from the Creation This cannot be said to be Morall any way but is ceremoniall and temporary and expired with the dissolution of the Iewish Church And this is generally confessed by all whom the heresie of Iudaisme hath not infected and the mutation of the Day approved by the practise of the Christian world ever since the Apostles times is a sufficient disclaime to the morality of it For one of these three must needs hence be inferred Eyther that that which is morall may bee changed or that the Church of Christ hath now for this sixteen hundred years erred in the change of it orlastly that the particular day prescribed to the Jews was Ceremoniall and not perpetuall The first no man will say that vnderstands the nature of morall precepts and their dependance upon the Law of nature which is one and the same with all men every where and in all ages and in that regard immutable And he deserves not the name of a Christian that dares affirme the second It remaines therefore that we pitch upon the third confesse that herein that Commandement was Ceremoniall not perpetuall But besides the practice of the Church we have the warrant of the Apostle S. Paul who ranks the Sabbath among the shadows of things to come whereof the body is Christ Now the body had they are the words of the late learned Bishop of Winchester the shadowes vanish that which was to come when it is come to what end any figure of it it ceaseth too So that to hold the shadow of the Sabbath is to continue is to hold that Christ the body is not yet come Neyther can the force of this place be avoyded by saying that the Iewes had other Sabbaths that were there meant as the Sabbaths of weekes and the first and last dayes of their great feasts which were called Sabbaths For the Apostle speakes indefinitely of the Sabbath dayes hath not there left any ground to rayse any distinction upon or to shew that he aymed onely at them more then this That he speakes there in the plurall number will not helpe this shift but rather crosse it it helpes it not because we know it is usuall in the new Testament to use that number when the Sabbath in question is spoken of it crosseth it rather in that being in the plurall number it may rather seeme to comprehend all their Sabbaths whatsoever they were and so to be far from excluding this The place then is cleare and alone sufficient to prove the point in hand To which I will onely adde that the reason drawn from the example of God who rested upon the
at all take those places of Scripture which so severely prohibit all work upon the Sabbath as if they did no lesse belong to us now then heretofore to the Iewes and by this meanes those precepts threatnings and promises which concerned the observation of the Sabbath are pressed upon us point blanck Whereas indeed they concerne us onely indirectly and cannot without fetching a compasse be alledged at all for our Sunday Now the Scripture being so expresse as it is apprehended for the strict observance of our Sunday under the name of the Sabbath no marvell if men have made it a prime Case of Conscience and that so many scruples are dayly raised and so many traditions broached about the beginning and ending of the Sabbath about the works of a mans particular Calling what they are and how farre lawfull on that Day what are the proper duties of the Day and the like For the cleare resolution therefore of this Question Whether the use of Recreations may stand with the due observation of the Lords Day it is convenient that I have some recourse to the Sabbath Where because I love not Cramben saepiùs coctam apponere or to stuffe my discourse with a tedious explanation of those things which are commonly known and every where to be found I will with as much brevity as the cause will suffer inquire into these 4. particulars 1. Whether and how farre forth the fourth Commandement concerning the Sabbath is moral and perpetuall and so belonging to Christians 2. When and by whom the Lords day was instituted 3. What workes the lews might doe on their Sabbath 4. Whether and what liberty Christians now have on the Sunday more then they had and how farre that liberty is to be extended To begin with the first The law which God gave unto his people the Iewes according to the three-fold variety of the object or things prescribed is three-fold Morall Ceremoniall and Iudiciall The Morall is that which concernes the manners of men and belongs to them as men and this commands those things which are in themselves acceptable and well-pleasing to God and those which hee will have all men every where and at all times to observe as the perpetuall and unchangeable rule of living being the expresse image of the minde of God according to which hee who is the Law-giver judges it meete and right that the reasonable creatures should order their lives The Ceremoniall belongs to men as joyned together in that Society which is called the Church and this containes those precepts which concerne the externall worship of God and were given by him to the Iewish Church in accommodation to the times in which the Church was under age and under the promise and therefore instituted for the signifying prefiguring and sealing of the truth of the promises made to them to be fulfilled in the exhibition of our Saviour and withall for the preservation of order and decencie in their Ecclesiasticall meetings and performances The judiciall belongs to men as joyned in a civill Society or Cōmon-wealth contayning the forme of civill government to be used by them tending to their good as they were a Society and to the preservation and exacting of the eutward worship of God and the discipline thereof as it was commanded in the Morall and Ceremoniall Lawes So that the Ceremoniall Law determined the Morall in order to God the Politicall or judiciall in order to men in a civill society and both in accommodation to that state of the Church And these though they have in them something which is juris moralis and so farre forth are contained under the Morall precepts yet being fitted to serve that state of the Church which was to be held in expectation of the Messias when the time came that he was actually exhibited and so the promise fulfilled the shadowes were then of no longer use the body being come and therefore at the time of the death of Christ they were abrogated de jure so that they became unnecessary and unprofitable and had their power of obligation taken away And afterward when by the Apostles doctrine Christians came to understand that Christ was the end of the Law and when the Temple the seate of their religion and the place destined to the use of those ceremonies was destroyed they were de facto actually and fully taken away and those things which before the death of Christ were commanded and in that interim betweene his death and the destruction of the Temple which was the space allotted for the solemne funeralls of the Iewish Synagogue were tolerable though already dead became from that time forward deadly and intolerable So that onely the Morall Law remaines now in force for the practise of Christians The ceremoniall and judiciall excepting in that wherein they are reducible to this are antiquated and out of date Now the precepts of the Morall Law are summarily comprehended in the Decalogue or ten Commandements which had this prerogative peculiar to them that they were delivered not by Moses but by God himselfe and by him written in tables of stone and preserved in the Arke to shew their dignity above others and to note out the perpetuity of observance which was due unto them Where before wee apply these things to our present purpose two things are to be noted First That howsoever all the precepts of the Morall law belong to the Law of Nature as being agreeable to reason which is the rule of Humane actions and are in that respect of perpetuall observance yet all of them are not of the same ranke nor belong in the same degree and manner to the law of Nature There are some things which by the instinct of nature and naturall light of the understanding wee presently see to be good or bad and which are so plaine that without any great consideration they may by the first principles or common notions implanted in us be either approved or rejected and these are absolutely of the law of nature Others there are that require more consideration of circumstances and the use of Discourse to apprehend and judge of them and these are so of the law of nature that notwithstanding they require the helpe of discipline by which those which are ignorant and not able by diligent consideration or discourse to attaine to the knowledge of them may be instructed by the wise and learned And lastly there are some to the knowledge whereof humane reason stands in neede of Divine Instruction And these two latter sorts especially the last though they in some sort belong to the Law of Nature and were haply at our first Creation written in the tables of mans heart in more plaine Characters and more easie to be read then now since the fall they are may in respect of the other be termed morall non ratione naturae sed disciplinae not in regard of nature dictating but in regard of Discipline informing nature Secondly that
the fourth Commandement as it enjoynes the externall observation of the seaventh day is not morall either of these wayes Whence S. Augustine saith That among all those ten Commandements that onely of the Sabbath is figuratively to be observed whereas as hee after saith Wee observe the other Commandements there properly as they are cōmanded without any figurative signification And generally the Ancients as Calvin hath truly observed called this Precept a shadow which as he there saith was truly but not fully said of them And therefore they do better and more fully expresse the nature of this Cōmandement which say it is partly morall and partly ceremoniall So Peter Martyr and generally all Divines both reformed and others use now to speake Now if any shall therefore thinke it unworthy a place in the Decalogue and to be rankt with those precepts which are morall and of perpetuall observance Aquinas may seeme to give them full satisfaction who saith 1. that the Precept concerning the Sanctification of the Sabbath is put among the Precepts of the Decalogue for that which is moral in it 2. That this Precept as Ceremoniall ought rather to have a place in the Decalogue then any other The other Ceremonies being signes of some particular effects of God but this of the Sabbath was a signe of a generall benefit viz. the Creation of the Vniverse So that that which Amesius will have a most certaine rule and received among all the best Divines as he calls them That all and onely the Morall precepts were delivered by the voyce of God himselfe and by Him written in the tables of stone is not true unlesse Saint Augustine Calvin Martyr c. be in his esteeme none of the best Divines Yet perhaps wee may admit that rule so farre as to say That all the Morall Precepts are contayned in the Decalogue and that every Precept there contayned is Morall though all of every Precept be not so but may have something that is ceremoniall annexed to it which haply God thought good to place among the morall precepts to intimate the perpetuall necessity of having some ceremonies in the Church though that ceremonie be not necessarily perpetuall but with the rest of that nature to expire at the death of Christ which though wee admit yet cannot any justly charge us that wee diminish any of the tenne words or that wee expunge one Commandement out of the Decalogue in as much as wee affirme that onely which was ceremoniall in this Commandement to bee expired and out of date and that there is in it a morality still remaining which retaines its full power of obligation and exacts the same obedience under the same penalty which it did at its first promulgation or inscription in the heart of Adam In which respect the Church hath good cause still to use her accustomed Antiphona at the repeating of this Commandement as well as at any of the rest and to pray Lord have mercy upon us and encline our hearts to keepe this law And here because some who love to have this Commandement termed morall though thereby they intend no more then what hath beene already granted use so to argue as if they did not acknowledge it at all to be ceremoniall it will not be amisse before wee proceed any further to answere some of the principall arguments that are brought to this purpose And I wil begin with that of our Saviour Math. 5. 17. Thinke not that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets I came not to destroy but to fulfill Which words in their opinion make strongly for the morality and perpetuall obligation of the fourth Commandement For from hence they argue to this purpose That which our Saviour did not destroy but fulfill is still in force but hee did not destroy the law contayned in the Decalogue Therefore it is still in force For answere hereunto I say That in this argument two things are by them supposed First they suppose that by the Law in this place is meant only the law contained in the Decalogue or ten Commandements Secondly That our Saviours fulfilling and not destroying this law was the ratifying and perpetuating of the observation of it under the Gospel If wee grant them both these wee shall condemne the Christian Church for altering the day from the seventh to the eight or first day of the week which cannot stand with this exposition of our Saviours speech who in the words following saith expresly That not one jot or title shall passe from the Law But both these are beside the meaning and intent of our Saviour as will easily appeare to any that with indifferency doth consider his words For First the Law which our Saviour here speakes of is of larger extent and latitude and comprehends not onely the Decalogue or law morall but the Ceremoniall and judiciall also As being indeed put for the Pentateuch or five bookes of Moses And so The Law and the Prophets as much as Moses and the Prophets Which formes of speech are used as a Periphrasis of the old Testament of which these two are the maine essentiall parts The Bookes of Moses so containing and describing the Law that they reserre whatsoever else they containe unto that receive their denomination from it as from the principall subject of them The Prophets that is their Bookes comprehend all the rest of the old Testament which the Hebrewes divide into the former and latter Prophets and the Hagiographa All which though they be not Prophesies being written by divine inspiration and by holy men as they were moved by the Spirit of God may justly be termed The word of Prophecy and passe under the name of the Prophets That the Law is taken in this sense is manifest by the use of the same phrase else where Where not only the duties commanded in the Decalogue but Christ and faith in him is said to be taught and witnessed by the Law to which purpose the Apostle S. Paul useth the same phrase Acts 28. 23. Rom. 3. 21. Now what word in all the Decalogue gives witnesse to Christ or perswades the faith which is required in him Certainly however some have found not onely the faith in Christ but the Sacraments also of the New Testament commanded in the Decalogue yet there is no one word there which imports any such thing Yea the very context evinces thus much for our Saviour having thus prefaced his exposition of the Law keeps not himselfe within the bounds of the Moral Law as appeares verse 18. And therefore Interpreters generally upon this place shew how our Saviour did not destroy but fulfill the Ceremoniall Law also as well as the Morall which were altogether needlesse if by the Law that onely were understood Now the Law being as it must needs be thus largely taken any man may easily perceive that the not destroying but fulfilling of it is not the ratifying and the perpetuating of
were yet weake in faith or hinder others of that Nation from beleeving in Him Besides be it that Christians did hold themselves freed from the observance of the Sabbath yet being among those who still made conscience of it even to superstition as did the unconverted Jewes it could not but prove very incommodious to their speedy and farre flight which the greatnesse and suddennesse of the danger required in as much as thereby they should expose themselves to the fury of those who were no lesse zealous in compelling others then superstitious in observing it themselves In these respects our Saviour might well admonish his Disciples to pray that their flight might not bee on the Sabbath day and yet not teach them to observe the Sabbath after his death or that while the observation of it lasted they should thinke themselves so tied in conscience of it that they might not on that day flie farre to save their lives and much lesse to establish the Morality of the Lords Day which neither He nor his Apostles nor the following ages of the Church till within these few yeares ever designed by the name of the Sabbath without some difference added to distinguish it from that of the Jewes For though we finde it sometimes called our Sabbath or the Sabbath of Christians in regard that in the maine end of it it succeeded that yet generally the Sabbath simply put and without addition notes the Iewish Sabbath or the Day on which it was celebrated which is our Saturday and the day before that which we keepe which is therefore called by the Evangelists and S. Paul 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 one or the first day from the Sabbath and by S. Iohn in the Revelation the Lords Day by which name or that which the same day had among the Gentiles viz. the Sunday it hath ever since been knowne in the Christian world But I will leave these and now returne thither whence for the answering of these objections I have digressed And having seene the nature and severall degrees of Morall Precepts and in generall that the fourth Commandement hath in it somewhat not moral That I may apply these things to our present purpose and manifest the truth thereof I will more particularly inquire into the nature of that Commandement and in it distinctly consider these 4. things First A Day or time set apart for Gods service Secondly the seventh day or one in the revolution of seven Thirdly the particular seventh there mentioned namely the seventh from the Creation Fourthly the strict surcease or rest from ordinary labours on that day For the first of these It cannot be denied but that the very Law of Nature it selfe to use the words of a Worthy of our Church requireth no lesse the sanctification of times then of places persons and things For which cause it hath pleased God heretofore as of the rest so of times likewise to exact some parts by way of perpetuall homage And that as Aquinas it is morall that man should depute some time of his life for the service of God For there is in man a kind of naturall inclination that to every thing necessary there bee a time assigned as to our bodily refection sleepe and the like Whence also to the spiritnall refection of the soule whereby the soule is refreshed in God by the dictate of naturall reason a man deputes some time And so to have some times for holy Offices comes under the Morall Law and is absolutely of the Law of Nature written in the heart of every man being involved in that principle which even depraved nature hath ever acknowledged viz. that God is to be worshipped And therefore Amesius hath well observed that thus farre the time of Gods worship falls under that precept which exacts the worship it selfe and as God when he created the world is said to have concreated time with it so when he ordained religious actions he appointed also to the same a time for them as a necessary circumstance without which they could not be performed And as the time in which such actions are done so that some Day or Dayes should be destinated and set apart for the more solemne performance of those actions may seeme to be a dictate of the same Law of nature in as much as the Heathens who had no other guide but the law of Nature had their solemne Feasts and set Dayes in all ages consecrated to the worship of their Gods whereby they manifested though not the knowledge of the true God yet their acknowledgement of that Principle That God is to be worshipped and the conveniencie of assigning some Dayes peculiarly to that end For the second That one day in the revolution of seaven should be thus set a part this cannot be said to be absolutely of the Law of nature Nature being ignorant of this without the instruction of the written Law in which God hath revealed his pleasure concerning the Quota pars or how much of our time hee requires to be consecrated to Him And this will easily appeare to any that doth without prejudice consider it For it is an easie thing to give an estimate of what Principles are naturall and written in the hearts of all men and what are gotten by instruction discipline and information Now men may by the light of Nature from the creature climbe up to the knowledge of the Creator and from the nature of God conclude his worship and from the nature of his Worship conclude a time as to all other things to be due to it But to goe further and to determine what part of our time wee cannot For it will not follow that because some time is due therefore the seaventh day more then the eighth of every moneth which was observed by the Graecians in honour of Neptune or any other day above or under that number And for this cause it is saith Saint Chrysostome that in the giving of this Commandement concerning the Sabbath which hee calls a Precept not made knowne to us by our conscience God added a reason as because Ged rested the seventh day from all his worke and againe because thou wast a servant in Egypt c. Whereas in those Precepts that are purely morall as when he saith Thou shalt doe no murther hee onely gives the precept without giving any reason at all Why so saith that Father because our conscience had taught us this before so that God speakes as to those that knew and understood reason sufficient for the Prohibition Neither doth Eusebius though alledged by some to that purpose any way contradict this when he saith That not onely the Hebrewes but all almost both Philosophers and Poets acknowledged the seaventh day to be sacred For here it is not questioned whether the Gentiles which wanted the law of God to informe them did hold the seaventh day as hallowed but whether they were induced by the instinct of nature so to account it
that were vnder the law that wee might receive the adoption of sonnes Secondly the Iews by reason of their long abode in a place of continuall servile toyle could not suddainely be weaned and drawne unto contrary offices without some impression of terror whence the severity with which this duty was enjoyned and the violation thereof punished was to them most necessary And besides we know that there is nothing more needfull then to punish with extremity the first transgressors of those Lawes that require a more exact observation for many ages to come These considerations then being peculiar unto them that strict rest which was thereupon exacted being but accidentally annexed to the principall sanctification of the Sabbath cannot belong unto us by vertue of that command by which it was enjoyned them And this is confessed even by those that stand most for the observation of the Sabbath who grant that the strictnesse of the rest on the Sabbath was Ceremoniall and did belong to the Iewes onely and is abrogated by the death of Christ So Elton And Amesius It may be granted that there was somewhat a more strict observation of the Sabbath commanded in those times as fitted to the pedagogy and time of servitade which obteynes not in all ages So he and generally the most of those which propugne the Doctrine of the Sabbath To give a briefe and full resolution to the first question propounded viz. whether and how farre forth the fourth Commandement concerning the Sabbath is morall and perpetuall and so belonging to us Christians To the former part I say the fourth Commandement is partly morall and partly Ceremoniall To the latter I say First it is morall and perpetuall that some time be dedicated to the solemne publique worship and service of God Secondly that one day in the revolution of seaven be consecrated to this end is not morall yet very convenient and fitly observed and retayned by the Church of Christ Thirdly that the particular seaventh day which the Iewes observed is neither morall nor sit to bee observed being altogether abrogated and out of date ever since the death of Christ Lastly the resting from ordinary labours as it is connected with the dutyes of Gods worship and a means without which they cannot be performed is no lesse necessary on the dayes consecrated to that end now then heretofore but as it concerned the Iewish Sabbath it is together with the Sabbath abrogated So that Christians are not bound either to rest on that day which the Iewes did or to rest on their owne Sabbaths or dayes consecrated to Gods service with the same strictnesse which was enjoyned the Iewes on theirs Thus much shall serve to have spoken of the first generall question Having explained the nature of the fourth Commandement touching the Iewish Sabbath I come now to speake of the Lords Day in which that which was Morall in that Commandement is and ever hath beene observed by Christians The institution of which when and by whom it was being the second generall part of our inquirie And here all Divines are not of one opinion Some ground this no lesse then the Iewish Sabbath upon the fourth Commandement which say they includes both the Sabbath of the Iewes and of the Christians Because the Lord doth not say Remember that thou keepe holy the seventh Day but Remember that thou keepe holy the Sabbath Day that is the Day of rest which before the comming of Christ was the seventh from the Creation but afterward the first day of the weeke or Lords Day But these men while they over greedily seeke after a divine foundation for the Lords Day doe not consider that they stretch the Precept beyond the intent of the Lawgiver For though it bee granted that the Lord doth not say Remember to keepe holy the seventh day but the day of ceasing indeterminately yet seeing in the following explication which God added it is determined unto that particular seventh which was the seventh from the Creation to which it expresly is referred as to the speciall reason of the Institution the Sabbath there cannot without forcing and manifest absurdity bee said to bee as the Genus to the Iewish and Christian Sabbath and to include both For is it not manifestly absurd and unbeseeming a rationall man and much more the wisdome of the Supreame Law-giver to say God in sixe dayes made heaven and earth and rested the seventh and for that cause sanctified the seventh Day Ergo Hee will have men in imitation of him to rest sometime viz. before the comming of Christ on that day whereon hee rested and sometime viz. after Christs comming to rest on the day in which hee began to worke Neither can this absurdity bee salved as some have endeavoured to doe by saying there is alwayes more meant in the Precepts and prohibitions then in words are expressed for those things which are so meant without particular expression must either be necessarily connected with or some way subordinat to that which is expressed that so it may be included in it Sure I am it ought no way to be excluded as we see this is by Gods owne exposition of himselfe and the reason which hee alledgeth which can no way agree both to the Jewish Sabbath and the Lords Day Again others urge the Institution of the Lords Day as founded upon Gods sanctification of the seventh Day at the Creation which being before all Ceremonies must say they needes binde Christians as well as the Jewes But this labours of the same weaknesse and absurdity which the other did For what day did God sanctifie there Surely not the first day of the Weeke but the seventh from the Creation which they must with the Jewes cry up againe if they will have their argument hold good But besides this the weaknesse of this foundation appeares in that as hath beene shewed they cannot prove that God instituted the Sabbath and commanded it to bee observed from that time forward but onely that Moses there relating the story of the Creation intimates the reason of Gods after Commanding his people to rest upon that Day And lastly granting that to be the Institution which cannot be proved and that not the seaventh day from the Creation as the words expresly say but a seaventh or one in seaven were thereby intended to be perpetuall to belong to us Christians If all this be granted here will yet be but a partiall foundatiō and no compleat institution of that particular day which we observe for all this notwithstanding why might not the second third fourth or any other have beene observed and yet that institution of one in seaven no way violated Others therefore no doubt espying the weaknesse of it forsake this hold and seeke for authority to prove it to be of Divine Institution out of the New Testament And among these Amesius will have it to bee done by Christ himselfe laying this for a ground worke that