Selected quad for the lemma: nature_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
nature_n	contain_v	law_n	moral_a	2,485	5	9.8922	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A32801	The divine trinunity of the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, or, The blessed doctrine of the three coessentiall subsistents in the eternall Godhead without any confusion or division of the distinct subsistences or multiplication of the most single and entire Godhead acknowledged, beleeved, adored by Christians, in opposition to pagans, Jewes, Mahumetans, blasphemous and antichristian hereticks, who say they are Christians, but are not / declared and published for the edification and satisfaction of all such as worship the only true God, Father, Son, and Holy Spirit, all three as one and the self same God blessed for ever, by Francis Cheynell ...	Cheynell, Francis, 1608-1665.	1650 (1650)	Wing C3811; ESTC R34820	306,702	530

and Ordinances as he himself should from time to time appoint The due acknowledgement of Gods immensity and infinite Majesty in our attendance on the Instituted means of worship is clearly opposed to the Image-worship in the 40th Chapt of Isaiah and first Chapter to the Romans and therefore the inside and compass of this second Commandement is spirituall though the words of it are so comprehensive as to take in ceremoniall as well as Evangelicall worship For Reverend Divines have made it cleare that though the second Commandement be morall in regard of its substance and generall nature which containes the immutable Law above mentioned yet in regard of its particular application to those significant Ceremonies Sacrifices and Sacraments which God did appoint we say all Ceremoniall Institutions are referred unto and comprehended under the second morall Commandement of God See Mr. Shepheard in his excellent Treatise of the morality of the Sabbath pag. 24. 40 41. 3. The third Commandement prescribes a reverend use of all the Titles Properties Works and Ordinances of God with Spirituall understanding and affection with faith reverence love joy sincerity and thankfulnesse in thought word and life 4. In the fourth Commandement we are not only required to rest but to sanctifie a rest to Jehovah If then we find the Titles Properties Works of Jehovah given to Christ and his holy Spirit in the Old and New Testament we must conclude that Christ and his holy Spirit are to be worshipped in the same Ordinances with the same spirituall and divine worship which is due to God the Father The scope of Law and Gospell is to bring us unto God by the Mediation of Christ and assistance of the Spirit that we may rest upon Christ for justification walk and grow up in Christ in the progress of our sanctification for our everlasting satisfaction Our business therefore is to avoid those two dangerous Rocks upon which so many split and suffer shipwrack in this tempestuous age namely the Rock of neglecting duties in the course of our sanctification and the Rock of resting in Duties which overthrows our justification We must labour by all means appointed by God to gaine a spirituall Practicall experimentall knowledge of the love of Iesus Christ a knowledge which surpasses all intellectuall knowledge an affectionate knowledge which is felt in the heart but cannot be comprehended in the braine This is the right Evangelicall knowledge which prepares a man for spirituall and Evangelicall worship for heavenly Communion with Father Son and holy Ghost in all Gospell dispensations and Gospell-Conversation that he may come to be enriched with the unsearchable riches of Christ and filled with all the fulness of God For this Cause saith the Apostle and well he might I bow my knees unto the Father of our Lord Iesus Christ mark the strain it is purely Evangelicall that he would grant you according to the riches of his glory to be strengthened with might by his Spirit That Christ may dwell in your hearts Here are all the three co-essentiall Persons but how may this be obtained And to know the love of Christ which passeth knowledge to know it in my heart to beleeve it with my heart to feele it in my heart because the love of God is shed abroad in my heart by the holy Spirit But what shall I gaine by this Why the Apostle goes on That ye may be filled with all the fulness of God Ephes. 3. 14 16 17 19. The great design of the Apostle was to be found in Christ having the righteousness which is of God through the faith of Christ without pleading his own righteousnesse which is of the Law for his justification And to have a Spirituall and Practicall knowledge of Christ grounded upon a deep and affectionate experience of the vertue of Christs Death and Resurrection in his own soule Phil. 3. 9 10. that he might be thereby encouraged and provoked to press forward in the course of Sanctification toward the mark for the prize of the high calling of God in Christ Iesus v. 14. that his faith might act in all holy services Iustifying faith is the Principle of Evangelicall Worship and Gospell-conversation Grace be to you and peace from him which is which was and which is to come and from the seven spirits which are before his throne and from Iesus Christ who loved us and washed us from our sins in his own bloud And hath made us Kings and Priests unto God and his Father to him be glory and dominion for ever and ever Amen Rev. 1. 4 5 6. The hearts of true beleevers are golden vials full of odours and incense faith and love sincerity and zeale selfe-denyall and thankfulnesse humility and godly reverence and the beliefe of their redemption by the blood of Christ moves them to acknowledge the divine power of their Redeemer and to give him divine worship The Angles Elders People all joyne even ten thousand times ten thousand and thousands of thousands in this acknowledgement Worthy is the Lamb that was slaine to receive ●●wer and riches and wisdome and strength and honour and glory and blessing And every creature which is in heaven and on the earth and under the earth and such as are in the sea and all that are in them heard I saying Blessing glory honour and power be unto him that sits upon the Throne and unto the Lamb for ever and ever And the foure beasts said Amen And the foure and twenty Elders fell down and worshipped him that li●eth for ever and ever Rev. 5. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14. We must be brought to the knowledge and faith of the Son of God before ever we can be wise unto Salvation 2 Tim. 3. 15. Isa. 53. 11. Ioh. 3. 14 15. Gal. 2. 20. When once we come to beleeve the love of Christ then we love adore obey Father Son and holy Spirit after an Evangelical manner All the Fundamentall Articles of our faith have reference unto Christ as the Foundation because they are all such as concern his Father his Spirit his Incarnation Mediation or his Church and the benefits which the Church receives from him And in like manner all our worship is directed unto Father Son and Spirit as one God by the Mediation of Christ and assistance of th● Spirit Eph. 2. 18. 2 Cor. 13. 14. 1 Pet. 2. 5 1 Ioh. 1. 3 4. Ephes. 4. 15. It is our happiness our heaven upon earth to beleeve adore an● live to Father Son and holy Spirit by maintaining an holy Communion with all three a● one God and our God in the use of all Ordinances and Duties required of us This is the mystery of Godliness the Art of living unto God this is the Lesson which all Members of the Church universall must learne the foure beasts who joyne with Angels and Presbyters in adoring the Lamb are as

shew and the Toleration of Seducers made the world Antichristian as Mr. Cotton proves And how the Christian world hath been not onely shaken but even broken by the Arian and E●tychian persecutions by the insurrection of the Macedonians in Greece and by the Antichristian warres and persecutions for many hundred years is evidently proved by sad and experimentall demonstrations When King James did tolerate Papists he did persecute Puritans as they then called men that were seriously and invincibly pious When Seducers get head they strengthen their party by force aswell as fraud and oppose such as dissent from their damnable errours as the Circumcellians did with Clubs and Swords or as Zedekiah did Micaiah with his fists Muncer Becold c. who were so tender and careful to preserve the Tares would not suffer the wheat to grow till harvest XII We must distinguish as judicious Davenant did between tolerable and intolerable errours simple and complicate errours as others speak There are corrigible and incorrigible Heretikes some Hereticks are but perverted and they are teachable others are subverted men that are smitten with a Spirit of Obstinacy impenitent and self-condemned men condemned Formally by their own conscience or Virtually by their proud and stubborn contempt of Christian admonition and their voluntary rejection of plaine truths that they may enjoy their beloved errours and their haereticall lusts men whose lives are as full of Atheisme as their assertions of blasphemy Seducing Heretikes who endeavour to thrust away others from the beliefe or worship of the only true God Father Son and Holy Ghost The Calvinists do not say that any one ought to be put to death for simple Heresie as the reverend and learned Professours of Leyden shew in their censure of the Arminian confession And on the otherside the Lutherans grant that seditious blasphemous seducing Heretikes Idolators and Apostates are when they grow incorrigible to be punished with death aswell as Sorcerers Traytours or Adulterers Let them name one of us saith Beza if they can who saith that all Heretikes ought to be put to death or that calls every one Heretike who dissents from him in some pro●itable but not Fundamentall points Servetus saith Mr. Calvin might have saved his life if hee had been a modest Heretike Master Cotton approves the Decree of the Senate of Geneva for punishing of Servetus with death No judicious Protestant will affirme that errours are to be confuted with fire and faggot but with meeknesse of wisedome expressed in faithfull instructions and admonitions our reasons are spirituall and if the Magistrate draw the sword in Gods name it is not to punish simple errour but to smite some intolerable errour that is twisted and complicated with blasphemy Apostacy Obstinacy or some such sins as are eminent in Seducing Heretikes and destructive to the Soules Religion and Peace of Christians Some erroneous persons have the itch and some the plague some of them are melancholike and some of them are mad and mad men must be bound or at least not permitted to walk abroad without their keeper The itch and the plague are both infectious but they are not both alike dangerous and nothing is more clear in point of Civill-government then that Magistrates should not suffer any to go about with plague-sores running on them Seducing Apostates Blasphemous Heretikes and grosse Idolators do not only subvert Order and Peace but Faith Piety they infect nay poyson souls XI●I The glory of God the good of Soules the happinesse of Christian societies are irresistible Motives to quicken the Magistrate to act against such dangerous persons as we have described according to the law of judgement and their different demerits in Faith and Love 1. In Faith for the Christian Magistrate doth not act like himself if he doth not performe acts of Civill-justice in Faith And it is cleare that if there be no morall equity in any of the judiciall Lawes in the Old Testament and there are none at all extant in the New the Christian Magistrate cannot performe any act of Civill-justice in Faith But it is indeed too evident to be denyed that All divine lawes which concern the punishment of Morall transgressions are of perpetuall obligation and therefore still remaine in force according to their substance and generall equity abstracted from speciall circumstances Typicall Accessories and the old formes of Mosaicall Politie For 1. These divine Lawes are not expired in their own nature 2. They are not repealed by God 3. The authority of the Law-giver is the same under both Administrations old and new the consciences of Christians aswell as Jewes are subject to his soveraigne and perpetuall jurisdiction 4. The matter of the Lawes is Morall and very agreeable to the Dictates of nature as doth appeare by the severall Lawes and Decrees of Heathens Dan. 3. 29. Ezra 7. 23. 25 26 27. Ezra 10. 3. 5. 8. compared with Numb 15. 30 31. Levit. 24. 15 16. Deut. 13. 8 9. Zach. 13. 3 6. Seducing poysoning slaying of Soules is by the law of Nature and Nations the worst of injuries 5. The reason of these divine Lawes is immutable and that reason is sometimes expressed and declared But it is not necessary that there should be any expresse ratification of every Morall Law in the New Testament which is plainly delivered in the Old 6. These divine Lawes are Independent on the will of Man and therefore indispensable mans authority II. The Magistrate is to act in Christian Love and charity against these dangerous men It is mercy to drive away the wolfe and cruelty to spare him there must be so much Fatherly love shewen to the souls of Christians to the ●●ttle flock as to preserve them from Wolves and Foxes Hee who loves Christ the Christian religion the souls and peace of Christians will not beare the sword in vaine his head heart hand bowels will keep time in working according to the written Rule XIV The Happinesse of Civill societies aswell as Church Assemblies doth much depend upon the punishing of Antichristian Heretikes seducing Apostates c. according to the nature and measure of their offences In all Civil States whose Acts are recorded in sacred or profane stories the Magistrates were to have a care not only of Justice Honesty but of that Religion also which they estemed divine for the good happinesse of their Civil state though it is no wonder if the Heathens did misapply this zealous instinct of nature to the maintenance of Superstition and Idolatry of a false Religion and false Gods Socrates Theodorus and Protagoras famous Philosophers were all three condemned at Athens by the Law against Irreligion But let us look into Christian states When the means of Instruction and Reformation have been vouchsafed to a people that are in Covenant with God and they corrupt the truth and worship of God the Lord doeth not onely punish degenerate Churches but even

do subsist And when we describe a Divine Person it is absurd to abstract the Personality from the Divine Nature for how can you describe a Divine person if you do abstract his Personality from his Divinity Every single Person is God nay every single Person is the Godhead the Nature the Essence of God considered with that subsistence relation and propriety which is peculiar to that Person Every single Person is God of himself Deus non est per alind Deus Finally ●ake all the three Persons together and ●hey are nothing else but one God and ●hey are one God not Absolutely consider●d in his abstract nature but Relatively considered with those peculiar relations ●nd incommunicable properties whereby ●he three Persons are distinguished from one another When the name of God is ●aken Essentially or Commonly in Scrip●ure we say it doth belong to all three Persons because it is spoken without any determination or restriction to any one particular person as Iohn 4. 24. God is a Spirit Mat. 4. 10. Mat. 19. 17. There is none good but God These places must needs be interpreted of all three Persons for it is certain that Christ did not by these speeches exclude himself or the Holy Spirit from being good or being worshipped And when the Name of God is taken personally or singularly in Scripture we say it is understood of one Person by a Synechdoche because though the other Persons may be excluded from what is proper and peculiar to any one Person because it is personal and therefore incommunicable yet they cannot be excluded from any thing that is essential because the same Divine essence is common to all Now the Title of God is essentiall and what hath been said of that is true of all Essential Titles and Attributes but Personal relations properties and actions are all peculiar as we shall shew at large in the next Chapter All that I need inferre from hence for the present is That when we describe the Divine nature we should not abstract it from the three Persons and when we describe a Divine Person we should not abstract him from the Divine Nature When the Scripture speaks of Created persons it doth not abstract the personality from the singular substance or nature When the Apostle saith 2 Cor. 1. 11. that thanks shall be given by many persons he doth not mean many personalities but many humane singular substances thanks should be given by a multitude of men particular men Actiones sunt suppositorum non suppositalitatum In like manner when we read that Christ is the Character of his Fathers person Heb. 1. 3. the word is Subsistence the meaning is not that the Son is the character or expresse image of the Fatherhood of the first Person for Christ doth not beget a Son as the Father doth but Christ is the image of the Subsistent that is of God the Father and not of the mere Subsistence or Personality as it is abstracted from the Divine Nature Jesus Christ hath two natures in one single person now that person is a Divine person the second person of the Godhead and if I describe the person of Jesus Christ I may abstract his person from his humane nature and not mention that nature which doth infinitely differ from his Divine person but I must not abstract the person of Christ from his divine nature because he hath no other then a divine person which cannot be separated from and should not be described without consideration and mention of the divine nature For this Second Person is not barely considered as a person or as a second person but as a divine person as the second person of the Godhead as the naturall coessential coequal coeternal Son of God as his own Son his first begott●● Son his only begotten Son Rom. 8. 32. Ioh. 1. 14. And therefore he must be considered as God the true God God blessed for ever Ioh. 1. 1. 14. 18. Rom. 9. 5. 1 Ioh. 5. 20. and therefore he must be described as God 〈◊〉 himself for the Son is Iehovah as hath been proved and we are obliged to believe in the Son as well as in the Father Ioh. 4. ● Iesus Christ is one and the same God with the Father Now Papists and Socinians wi●● both confesse that the Father is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 God of himself and therefore it will follow that the Son is God of himself If the Godhead of the Son were begotten and the Godhead of the Father unbegotten there would be two distinct Godheads in the Father and the Son the one begotten and the other unbegotten Take it thus the● in brief The second Person of the Godhead is the only begotten Son of God subsisting i● the unbegotten nature of God because he is the naturall and coessentiall Son of God the Father and therefore hath one and the same unbegotten nature with the Father the subsistence of the Son is begotten but the divine nature of the Son is unbegotten The Holy Ghost is an infinite Spirit coessential with the Father and the Son and not a mere Subsistence proceeding from both and yet he is distinguished from both by his personal relation and incommunicable property These grounds being laid for a foundation it is easie to build on and inferre 1. That the Father Son and Holy Ghost are not mere Personalities but Divine Persons 2. A Divine Person is not a Quality or any other Accident but an infinite Substance subsisting after the most perfect and glorious manner that is or can be 3. The Divine nature being infinite doth contain all manner of perfection within it self both Absolute and Relative and therefore the relations which are between the Divine Persons are naturall perfect divine 4. The Divine Nature cannot be separated from all or any one of the Divine Persons 5. These three Divine Persons are one and the same God one Infinite Spirit and therefore they are Coessential Coequal Coeternal 6. These three Divine Persons are distinguished as shall be shewen in the next Chapter but cannot be divided or separated either from the Divine Nature or from one another because they do al● three subsist in the Divine nature and in one another for they have one and the same single and infinite nature and are one infinite Spirit the same omnipresent God 7. The word Subsistence is a consecrated word which as we find upon record in the holy Scripture is fit to be made use of when we speak of that Divine manner of being which the Father Son and Holy Ghost have in the Godhead and in one another The heathen Oratour could say Verbis consecratis utendum He meant words that were consecrated by the use and approbation of Classical Authors but I mean words consecrated by the Holy Ghost The word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which we render Subsistence and by way of Analogie PERSON hath many other significations but

Chapter A Divine Person is Spiritual for God is a Spirit the Father of Spirits the Spirit of Spirits an infinite Spirit and therefore hath life the best of lives nay is life it self in perfection and therefore we read of the understanding and will of God an understanding life is the best life that we are acquainted with and the life of God is a subsisting life every one of the Divine persons is subsistent and therefore every one of them hath subsisting life We may then safely conclude that every one of the Divine persons is a spiritual and infinite Subsistent I say Subsistent to shew that I do not abstract the Subsistence of the person from the Divine Nature in which the person doth subsist herein all the three Persons do agree Moreover every Divine Person hath some Relative perfection for they are mutually related to one another Finally every Divine Person hath some peculiar and incommunicable propertie But if we come to treat of any peculiar manner of subsisting or the Order of subsisting or that singular relation which is proper●o ●o every one of the three or any certain ●ncommunicable propertie whereby any one person is distinguished from the rest ●hen we must leave treating of what is common to all three persons and shew wherein these Coessential persons differ or whereby it doth appear to us that they are distinguished We will therefore for Orders sake enquire 1. What distinction there is between the Divine Nature and the Divine Persons Father Son and holy Ghost 2. What difference there is between ●reated and uncreated persons 3. How these three uncreated persons are distinguished from one another This question concerning the Distinction of the Divine Nature and these three most glorious persons which subsist in it is the most difficult point in all Divinitie ●nd therefore I humbly beg the assistance of all these glorious persons that I may conceive and write judiciously and reve●ently of this profound and glorious My●●erie of Faith I remember that excellent ●peech of judicious Calvin Non minori ●eligione de Deo nobis loquendum quam cogitandum sentio quicquid autem de Deo a nobis cogitamus stultum est quicquid loquimur insulsum What ever we think● or speak of our own heads concerning God will be like our selves unsavourie foolish and vain No language is rich enough no words are significant enough to declare this profound Mysterie which the understanding of men and Angels cannot comprehend nor the tongue of men and Angels express if all the Saints and Angels in heaven and earth should sit in Councel and communicate their notions to one another about this Argument they would acknowledge this Mysterie to be not onely inexplicable and unspeakable but unconceiveable and incomprehensible 1. Concerning the Distinction which is between the Divine Nature and a Divine Person it is to be considered that I have most studiously declined the describing of a Divine Person in abstracto for the reasons mentioned above and I might add many others but it is enough to say that the most cleanly Abstraction doth but suggest an inadaequate Conceit of a Divine Person and when you abstract the nature of God from the personalities men are apt to dream of some strange God that is neither Father Son nor holy Ghost and so to create a new God or to conceive that the Divine Nature may as the humane nature of Christ doth subsist in alieno supposito 2. They who denie the Trinitie must if they be not worse then Turkes or Socinians acknowledge that God the Father doth subsist and therefore they are engaged to shew the difference between the Essence and Subsistence of the Father as well as we are who believe the Trinitie But there is no greater a distinction between the Person of the Father and the Nature of the holy Ghost then there is between the Person of the Father and the Nature of the Father for the Nature of the Father and the holy Ghost is one and the same Divine Nature which is as impossible to be divided or multiplied in two or three Persons as it is in one single and undivided person because the Divine Nature is single and infinite and the Divine Persons do mutually subsist in one another and all three Persons subsist in this single and undivided Nature which is indivisible immultiplicable and most purely and singularly one and the same infinite perfection in all three Persons and there can be but one most single absolute and infinite Perfection 3. The Divine Nature is subsistent necessarily and perfectly subsistent the most perfect manner of subsisting by and of it self is due to the most perfect Nature 4. The Divine Nature is not indifferent to subsist in the Father Son and holy Ghost or out of them for in regard of its infinite Perfection and actualitie it can neither subsist without or otherwise then in the Father Son and holy Ghost because the Divine Nature cannot subsist without all or any of that Relative perfection which shines in these three glorious persons who do all subsist in the same Divine Nature and yet mutually subsist in one another with all Relative Perfection The reason is most clear because the Divine Nature being infinite in perfection must needs contain and comprehend all Relative as well as all absolute Perfection 5. God is not compounded as Angels are of Nature and Subsistence for whatsoever doth belong to the Perfection of God doth belong to the Nature of God and therefore God doth not subsist by the superadding of any thing or manner of a thing any Modus that is as the Schooles speak Extraessential or really distinct and separable from the Essence and Nature of God And we have formerly shewen that the Essence of God is intrinsecally necessary and infinitly perfect and therefore the most perfect manner of subsisting by and of it sel● is due to the most perfect Nature 6. Although Men and Angels are not able to comprehend much less express this incomprehensible Mysterie yet we may set satisfactorie bounds to our thoughts and discourses by the Analogy of faith for the Scripture saith that the Father and the Son are one and that all three Persons are one and therefore we do conclude that as the infinite Perfection and Actualitie of the Divine Nature doth require three Subsistences because this infinite Perfection doth contain all Relative as well as all absolute Perfection so doth the single and most singular Nature of God require that these three glorious Persons subsist in the Vnitie of the Godhead Now we are sure that the One-nesse or singlenesse of Gods Nature doth well agree with the infinitness of his Nature because there can be no multiplication of that which is infinites there cannot be two or three infinites and therfore we must needs conclude that these three Subsistents are one infinite God subsisting with all absolute and Relative Perfection This is the Sum

of God can be communicated to a Creature any more then the Divine Essence it self Isa. 42. 8. Matth. 19. 17. 1. Tim. 1. 17. For all the Attributes of God are his Name his Perfection his Glorie his Essence his Godhead and if any of the Attributes were communicated the Essence of God must be multiplied divided or distracted from it self The communicable Attributes are infinite and there cannot be more infinites then one and therefore they must all signifie one single and infinite Perfection For if any of the Attributal Perfections were finite then the Perfection of God would be made up of many finite Perfections and God would not be infinitely perfect in himself of himself and by himself but by some finite Perfections superadded to his Essence which is utterly repugnant to the single and infinite Perfection of God Yet true it is that some Attributes of God are said to be communicable by Analogical Accommodation not in respect of the properties themselves which are all infinite but in respect of the Effects of those properties there is something in the Creature by the bountie of our Creatour and Grace of our Redeemer which doth after a weak manner resemble the Perfection of God and therefore we are said to be partakers of the Divine Nature 2. Pet. 1. 4. when we bear the image of God in righteousnesse and holinesse of truth For we are still to remember that God is to be known per viam eminentiae when we make an Eminent Distinction between one Divine Attribute and another or ascribe any of the Perfections which are found in the Creatures by way of Attributal Perfection unto God For God is not great in quantity or good by a qualitie but by his own infinite Essence We must remove all imperfection from God that we may know him per viam negationis and therefore we say mercie and goodness are not accidents in God his understanding and his will are not faculties his anger and hatred are not passions his many Attributes are but one single Perfection the Perfections which are in the Creature are imperfect but the Perfection of God is infinite Finally we must consider God as the cause of all Perfection in the Creature that we may know him per Viam Causalitatis These grounds being laid let us consider what great difference there doth to ou● weak understanding appear to be between the Divine Attributes whether they be compared with the Divine Nature or with one another and yet that indeed and truth there is no real difference between the Attributes and the Divine Nature or between the Divine Attributes themselves and we shall more easily conceive what great difference there is between the Father Son and holy Ghost without any Essential difference between them The holy Scriptures speaking to our weak capacitie describe God and his Attributes after such a distinct manner to us that we cannot but conceive that there is some ground even in the word of God for this virtual and eminent Distinction between the Attributes as will-be most evident to any that observe the usual phrase and language of the Scriptures in these and the like places Exod. 34. 6. 7. 1. Tim. 1. 17. Psal. 103. 8. 9. 10. 1. Tim. 6. 15. 16. But it is as clear that God doth herein gratiously condescend to our weakness because we know that the Divine Nature is ●●ngle and infinite and therefore doth con●ain in it all Actual Perfection eminently ●nd all possible Perfection both singly and ●ctually because all true and pure Perfection is most Formally included in the Na●ure and Essence of God and therefore this eminent Distinction grounded on the Phrase of Scripture and upon visible Ob●ects and Effects gives us no ground at all ●o conceive that the Divine Nature is not one single infinite perfection because the Scripture speaks distinctly of God and of his several Attributes only to teach us to apprehend the impartible perfection of God by degrees rather then parts because we cannot apprehend it altogether Our conceits of God are inadaequate and collected by way of Analogy from the perfection of the creatures but we must consider that what the creatures do performe by many and distinct qualities and acts God doth performe by his owne Essence which is one most single and most pure act And therefore we conclude that this distinction is not really grounded upon God himself upon his Nature or Essence but upon the Effects of God The objective conceits or things conceived are not really or actually different in themselves but virtually and ●minently in the several Effects Egresses Terminations of Gods eminent vertue and single power which is every way boundlesse and infinite and therefore never works according to its full and adaequate vertue The Scotists do indeed seeme to say more because they say that this distinction of the Attributes is Formall and ex natura Rei but then they come off againe in their explication of these termes and say that their meaning is that they are distinguished Formally not Actually but Virtually and Eminently and therefore we meane the same thing For the divine Essence is not only a single Unity but the first Unity which is uncapable of any difference or number whatsoever only we cannot by a single act comprehend Gods single perfection because our understanding is finite and his perfection is infinite But it will be said that the Attributes of God have to our apprehension not only different but contrary effects the Justice of God doth punish and the mercy of God doth spare The answer is easie the Effects are to our apprehension contrary nay they are contrary in themselves but the Attributes are not contrary for the Attributes do both belong to the same God nay they are the same God and these Attributes do not overthrow but preserve one another Now we readily grant that the Effects are really different nay contrary but we deny that the Attributes of Justice and Mercy are really different or contrary in themselves Finally we grant that according to our manner of apprehension it is very improper to say that the Attribute of Gods mercy is the Attribute of his Punitive Iustice because the termes are here taken in sensu formali as we use to speak and therefore that manner of predication is improper yet if you take the termes in sensu identico the thing is true because Mercy and Justice are the same thing the same Essence We may say that the same God the same Essence which is mercy it selfe doth punish but it is very improper and absurd to say that God doth forgive by his punitive Iustice because God who speaks distinctly of his own Attributes in his word that he might help our weak understanding will not give us leave to speak so confusedly of his glorious Attributes as to puzzle the understanding of our weak brethren What I have said concerning the

Essence and his Essence is single uncompounded undivided indivisible it must needs follow that whatsoever is in God is God and God is as hath been often shewen one single infinite Perfection This is our first Principle and last Conclusion into which all our debates and by which all our doubts about this Argument may and ought to be resolved X. The Distinction between the Divine Nature and Persons may be considered 1. In respect of predication the Divine Essence is predicated of every Person because every one of the three Subsistences is God nay is the Divine Nature considered with this or that Personal Propriety and Relation respectively But one Person is not predicated of another the Father is not the Son nor is the Son the Father or the holy Ghost 2. In respect of Communication the Divine Nature is not onely communicable but communicated to all three Persons but it is of the Formal Reason of a Person to be incommunicable 3. In respect of Relation The Divine Nature doth indeed eminently containe all absolute and relative Perfection but the Formal Relations whereby the Persons are not onely distinguished from but opposed to one another cannot be Essential under that consideration because they are peculiar to the several Persons and not common to all three Persons as the Essence and Nature is Peculiar and distinctive Relations are not essential because the Persons who are relatively distinguished are not essentially distinguished The Divine Nature of the Father is not his Father-hood for if it were then every one of the three Persons would be God the Father all three Persons would be one Person which is a manifest Contradiction 4. In respect of Generation and Procession the Divine Essence doth not beget nor is it be gotten it doth not proceed and yet the Father doth beget the Son is begotten and the holy Ghost doth proceed the Person of Christ is begotten but his Divine Nature unbegotten 5 In respect of number the Persons are three the Divine Nature most simply single and singularly one 6. In respect of Order there is an Order to be observed amongst the Divine Persons the Father is the first Personal Principle the Son the second and the holy Ghost who is breathed forth by the Father and the Son is the third the Scripture saith there are three and doth commonly reckon them in that Order and we have no ground to reckon the holy Ghost before the Son because he proceeds from the Son but the Divine Nature being a single Vnitie and the first Vnitie is as uncapable of Order as it is of Number XI Notwithstanding all these and some other distinct Considerations I shall be bold to make this Peremptorie Determination The three Divine Subsistences are not really distinguished from the Divine Nature or Essence The Scripture saith Christ and his Father are one Ioh. 10. 30. and that all three are one 1. Iohn 5. 7. Essentially one and therefore really one I have said enough above to prove all three Persons to be essentially one The three Persons are one God subsisting with all possible Perfection Relative as well Absolute in one pure Act ex parte Rei The three Divine Persons do not differ from the Divine Nature as an humane Person doth from the humane Nature singularly considered for a singular humane Nature may be separated from an humane Person as is evident in the Incarnation of our Lord and Saviour But the Divine Nature cannot subsist in alieno supposito the Nature of God cannot subsist in any other or any fewer then these three Persons who are one and the same God And therefore the Divine Nature doth not differ really from the Persons tanquam res à re as we say nor tanquam res à modo separabili they do not differ really either way nor do the Persons differ really that is realiter separabiliter from one another as shall be proved when we come to speak of the Distinction of the Divine Persons in the next Chapter XII The Distinction between the Divine Nature and three Divine Subsistences is not a groundlesse Conceit or a meer fiction of reason because it is grounded on the Word of God For our apprehension of God must be agreeable to that Divine Revelation which God hath vouchsafed us of himself in Scripture Now it is most clear and evident by what hath been said in this whole Discourse that the holy Scriptures teach us to conceive distinctly of some things in God which are not really distinguished in him And therefore Mr. Fry may do well to consider and retract that rash Censure which he passes upon this Doctrine of God when he saith that the Doctrine of three distinct Persons or Subsistences in the Godhead is a chaffie grosse Carnal and absurd Opinion in the Title and 22. page of his blasphemous book For this distinction is not onely grounded on a Phrase of Scripture but is eternal XIII The Distinction between the Divine Nature and Persons is an Eminent distinction I have told you above what we mean by that expression The Persons are the Essence of God and not any thing separated or divided from it every one of the three Persons is a Person of the Godhead nay every one of the three Persons is the Godhead considered with some particular property and relation and the Godhead being absolutely single we must conclude that the Divine Nature and a Divine Person is the same Essentiall Reall thing though they are Eminently distinguished by sundry considerations as hath been shewen But it is objected that every one of the three Persons is a Substance and if there be three substances subsisting in the Godhead under sundry Formal considerations then there will be three Divine Substances three Substantial Relations and Properties and therefore the Godhead will be compounded by these three Substances substantial properties and relations or else there will be three substantiall and formall Gods To this grand objection I make these few returns by way of answer 1. Every one of the three Persons is a Substance a Divine Substance but they are the same Divine Substance because they are the same God these three are one they are unum one divine substance one God they are all three divine Persons but they are Coessentiall Persons and Inessentiall persons of the same Godhead II. The peculiar relations do distinguish but they do not compound for they do not super add any new Entity much lesse any new Godhead because all these relations are Natural eternal and therefore they are God Absolute and Relative perfection in God are but one single perfection 1. The parts or extremes wherewith any thing is compounded must be really or at least Modally and Separably distinct for all created Natures and Persons being compounded are not only Modally but separably distinct 2. The parts compounding must be united by some efficient cause and one of the parts must be

this time he sees how easie it is to retort his owne Argument and if this retortion may helpe him to answer it I shall be glad that I have retorted it His onely answer ought to be I doe beleeve that these three are three Subsistents in the same single and infinite Godhead Phil. 2. 6. Joh. 10. 30. 1 Joh. 5. 7. Heb 1. 3. Vorstius Valentinus Gentilis the Transylvanians require some more curious answer but I shall be as plaine and as briefe as the weight and depth of this Mystery will permit me to be I remember that Aristotle saith He doth make a truth sufficiently plaine who brings such proofes as the point in question will beare Now it is most evident that supernaturall Mysteries cannot be expounded according to the rules of Art Some returne this answer That if by Tres Res three reall things you meane three persons there are three Real persons in the Godhead they are not made three by a fiction of reason they are declared three by the plaine words of Scripture but they were three before any Scripture was written even from the dayes of eternity But if by Tres Res three reall things you meane three Divine Essences we do deny that three persons are three Divine Essences or three Gods for these three persons are but one God blessed for ever If you aske others they will say that these three are one Being but they are three proper and peculiar manners of being subsisting in the same God-head They have one essentiall subsistence say others but they have three Incommunicable manners of subsisting Some expresse it thus these three are Really distinct but not Essentially Modally but not separably Truly but Relatively Formally and yet but Personally Others that meane the same thing say they are distinguished Secundum esse Personale non secundum esse Quidditativum They then that say the persons are Really distinct should explain themselves warily according to some of these or the like safe expressions namely that by really 1 they doe not meane essentially 2. They do not mean separably 3. That by really they doe meane that the Relations and personall properties whereby the three persons are known to be distinguished are reall relations and reall properties and not fictions of reason The Relations are opposite the properties incommunicable and much might be said of the personall actions to the selfe-same purpose but I must hasten Some do adventure to call this distinction naturall but that is a very dangerous expression it must not passe without some favourable graines of allowance nor can it then passe unlesse it be seasoned with some graines of Salt and be mollified with some faire and Orthodox Interpretation By naturall distinction they meane Relative because say they the relations which are between these uncreated persons are not onely real but naturall also The Relation between God the Father and his owne naturall Son is a naturall relation grounded upon a naturall and personall act●on namely the eternall generation of the Son The Greek Fathers speake much of the Familiar and proper Emphasis of this naturall Relation between the Father and the Son By naturall distinction then they do not meane an essentiall distinction as if the three uncreated persons did differ in nature but naturall in that sound and Orthodox sense recited above I had rather leave my Margin to relate the curiosities of others then to perplex a meer English Reader with any Scholastical difficulties I have said enough for the explication of those termes which are most usuall and yet likely to give offence to such as do not understand the importance of them I shall therefore conclude this point with Fulgentius his Commentary which is an excellent Contexture of some pertinent Scriptures for the proofe of the point When you read saith he of Father Son and Spirit understand that there are three persons of one essence omnipotence eternity c. For our Saviour saith I am not alone but I and the Father that sent me Ioh. 8 16. And concerning the spirit he saith And I will pray the Father and he will give you another Comforter even the spirit of Truth Joh. 14. 16 17. Moreover he commanded his Apostles to baptize all Nations in the name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost And the equality of the Persons proves the unity of the Nature Phil. 2. 6. Iohn 5. 18. and from hence he concludes that there are three Persons and not three Natures in the blessed Trinity From what hath been said it is evident that these three uncreated Persons are truly distinguished but they cannot be divided and it is not so safe to expresse the distinction of uncreated Persons by Termes of Art They who say the distinction is Naturall Reall Absolute or Relative do deny that the distinction is Essentiall or that the Persons are separable They who speak most tenderly say it is Modall Formall Personall They who say it is Naturall in respect of Personall Relations and Naturall Actions confesse that it is Supernaturall and Mysterious because the Unity of the Godhead is unquestionable the Trinity of Persons subsisting in that Godhead admirable both put together undeniable and inexplicable and yet most necessarily and highly credible They who say the Persons are Formally distinct do mean that they are truly distinct they do not conceive that the distinction of the uncreated Persons is grounded upon a meer fiction of reason or upon the weaknesse of our apprehension as if we did conceive one Person to be three Persons because he is called by three names as Praxeas Sabellius and some others dreamt Nor do they beleeve that this distinction of these three uncreated Persons is only grounded upon the phrase of Scripture but they do acknowledge that there is a true and proper not an improper and figurative distinction between these uncreated Persons nay they all confesse that this true and proper distinction is an Eternall distinction it was from and it will last to all eternity and therefore is not grounded only upon some offices and externall dispensations which have respect unto the creature CHAP. VIII The Grand Mystery of three Divine and Coessential Subsistents in the single Godhead is not Problematicall but Fundamentall ALL points of Doctrine revealed in Scripture are profitable and precious truths and every man is obliged to receive beleeve and embrace every truth made known to him in and by the holy Scriptures Because all truths contained in Scripture are of equall credit in respect of the Authority of the Revealer but all truths are not of equall necessity weight and importance in respect of the Nature and Matter of the points revealed There is a vast difference between the nature matter weight and importance of these two Propositions 1. Paul left his Cloak Books and Parchments at Troas 2 Tim. 4. 13. 2. Jesus Christ is God and man the only Mediatour between God and man the only and All-sufficient Saviour of

Arminians the constant enemies of the Grace of God should consider that the Pelagians the advocates of Free-wil and corrupt nature were confounded with those plain Scriptures which were urged by the Councels of Carthage Milevis Orenge and Holy Augustine in his fragrant works The Socinians the enemies of the onely true God Father Son and Holy Ghost should consider that the Arrians were overthrown by the Scriptures in the Nicene councel and by the godly Pastours of the Church who instead of broken Scriptures which the Arians urged with as much fraud as the devil did Mat. 4. produced plain Scriptures and the whole Series of both Testaments and so did invincibly refute their blasphemous errours The Libertines who claym a liberty of publishing damnable Heresies and blasphemies under pretence of Prophesying might learn that where the Spirit of the Lord is there is liberty true liberty but no where else for he who protends to speak by the Holy Ghost and yet denies Iesus to be the Lord doth at once blaspheme Christ and the Holy Spirit and is an Anti-spiritual Lyar an Antichristian Blasphemer and hath neither Father Son nor Spirit dwelling in him For he who speaks by the Spirit doth acknowledge Jesus to be the Lord 1 Cor. 12. 3. And he who denies the Son hath not the Father Who is a lyer but he who denies that Iesus is the Christ He is Antichrist who denies the Father and the Son whosoever denies the Son the same hath not the Father 1 Jo. 2. 22 23. In like manner every Spirit which confesseth not that Iesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God but of Antichrist 1 Joh. 4. 2 3. This is that Vorstian liberty which hath undone so many Nations already and is now Idolized in England under the name of Liberty of Conscience by such as have neither Conscience nor liberty Reverend Dr. Sibbs did exceedingly cry out against this kind of Liberty in his time He would not have way given to Vorstian lawlesse licencious liberty of prophesie that every one so soone as he is big of some new conceit should bring forth his abortive Monster for then the Pillars of Christian Faith will soon be shaken and the Church of God which is an house of Order will be●ome a Babel an house of Confusion The dolefull issues of which pretended Liberty we see in Polonia Transylvania and in Countries neerer hand I might proceed but this is sufficient for a taste and if I should but name all the errours of this age and not confute them I should abuse my Reader and therefore I desire to stop in time and beseech all that are spiritually minded to hea●ken to the Spirit speaking in the word Beloved beleeve not every spirit but beleeve the Holy Spirit who is the Author of the Scriptures the Author of Faith the Iudge of Controversies the interpreter of the Scriptures the Doctor and comforter of the Elect and he will lead you into all necessary truth for your present edification and everlasting Salvation The Holy Spirit will assure you that the Scriptures of truth were all written by his own Authority and you may safely set to your seale when you have received the infallible testimony of the Holy Ghost We are witnesses of these things saith the ●postle and so is the Holy-Ghost also Act. 5. 32. We shall never receive the word as the Word of God with joy reverence submission and assurance of Faith specially in times of ●ffliction and temptation unlesse we receive the witnesse of the Spirit and ground our Faith upon the wisdome and evident demonstration of the Spirit When we look upon the word of God and consider 1 The wonderfull consent of all those Holy and selfe-denying men that penned it 2. The marvellous fulfilling of all the strange Prophecies in the fullnesse of time appointed by God 3. The Admirable Providence of God in preserving the Scriptures notwithstanding all the rage and malice of Hereticks and persecutors 4. The supernaturall Miracles wrought for to confirm it 5. The Harmonious testimony that the Church Martyrs Saints have in all ages given to it 6. The Antiquity Majesty Efficacy of it 7. The divine and heavenly matter contained in it 1. Mysteries above reason 1 Cor. 2. 9. 2. Commands contrary to our corrupt nature sent to all Nations and even to the greatest and proudest of men 3. Threats beyond the strength of man to inflict or the capacity of man to comprehend an hard heart a seared Conscience and yet a trembling Spirit a reprobate mind and sense a spirit of madnesse giddinesse horrour or slumber an everlasting worm eternall fire torments with the devil and his Angels 4. Promises and rewards beyond the power of man to bestow or wisdome of Angels to comprehend 1 Pet. 1. 12. Ephes. 3. 10. 5. The fall corruption Redemption Salvation of man wonderfully declared in the Holy Scriptures the inward frame and disposition of mans heart his secret thoughts and most intimate projects his reserved wishes desires ends and purposes undenyably discovered for his conviction even to admiration and amazement 1 Cor. 14. ●5 then the reason of man is even confounded the obstinacy of mans heart subdued all the pride of humane glory stained and the Scriptures appeare to be the word of God But now all these Arguments and many more which I could name will not be effectuall for our regeneration and conversion untill the Spirit be pleased to set all home upon the heart by his own irresistible efficacy and seale this truth to the Conscience by his own infallible testimony But when the Spirit speaks to and works upon our spirits then we do assent and consent to all the proposals of God our very thoughts are captivated and subdued unto the obedience of Christ 2 Cor. 10. 5. Our Conscience is convinced swayed and undeniably obliged to beleeve what is promised allow what is commanded our will made willing to chose both the affections to embrace both our whole man to follow after both according to the directions of God for performing what is commanded and obtaining of what is promised Rom. 7. 12. 22. Psa. 119. 106 112 113 127 128 167 173 174. I must acknowledge my absolute total and universal dependance upon the infallible wisdome infinite truth power majesty greatnesse and goodnesse of the Holy Spirit and confesse that he hath soveraigne Right and divine authority to reveale and prescribe whatsoever he pleases upon the rewards and penalties of everlasting life and death And I am obliged to beleeve and embrace al that the Spirit teacheth without any contradiction though it seeme never so improbable to my carnall reason and be really contrary to my corrupt affections ends and esianes The spirit teaches me how to apprehend and judge of spirituall things after a spirituall manner for the spirit teaches me what to approve and