that it containeth Yet in some sort all the tenne may be defended to be morall because the fourth Commandement is morall as well as the rest in its foundation and principall end although the thing expressed in it be a particular determination ceremoniall and positive Whence profane fellowes cannot with any colour of reason inferre that the substance of the other Commandements is not morall nor obligatory to Christians For whatsoever is in them saving the promise annexed to the fifth Commandement which belongeth not to the substance thereof sheweth of it selfe that it is morall because it hath its foundation in the Law of nature written in the hearts of all men and is found so frequently that no thing is more frequently ratified and confirmed by the Scripture of the New Testament which is the rule of Christianity and therefore obligeth all Christians untill the worlds end which can not be so said of the fourth Commandement in the expression that it maketh of a seventh day for a day of rest For fitly that is not of the Law of Nature and is not prescribed by the Gospell it cannot oblige Christians as a morall Law 29 By the same meanes is taken from the Roman Church the pretence which some think this doctrin furnisheth unto them that the second Commandement whereof we make so great use against their Idolatry is not morall nor perpetuall but was particular to the Iewes even as according to our confession was the fourth Commandement For all that the second Commandement aimeth at is contained and expressed most clearely in the words thereof which is to forbid to represent and worship God by Images to make Images to bowe downe to them and to serve them religiously and all that is essentially morall and perpetuall grounded on the Law of nature which of it selfe teacheth and sheweth that it is a thing most absurd and unworthy of God who is a Spirit Infinite Almighty Eternall Immortall Inuisible and the only Wise GOD to represent and serve him by mortall Images As also a thing unworthy of man to worship the worke of his owne hands as the Paynims themselve have acknowledged and written 30 Witnesses hereof are the most ancient Romanes who knowing by the Law of Nature that GOD is a Spirit judged by the same light that hee ought not to be figured nor served by Images And therefore they had no Images at all during the space of more then an hundred threescore and ten yeeres And Uarro a Romane and a Pagan saith that if that had continued so the Gods had beene served more purely adding that the first which framed Images to the Gods abolished the feare due unto them and were the cause of many errors as wee reade in S. Augustine in the fourth booke and 35. Chapter of the City of God The Prophets also in many places of the old Testament rebuke the Nations which were strangers from the Covenant of God for their Images and Statues as being guilty of a most hainous sin in making and worshiping them against a Law which pertained to them and which they were bound to know These their reprehensions they confirme by naturall reasons as may be seen Exod. 23. vers 24. Exod. 34. vers 13. Deut. 7. vers 5. 25. Deut. 12. v. 3. Deut. 29. vers 17. Psal. 97. vers 7. Psal. 115. vers 4 5 6. 7 8. Psal. 131. vers 15. 16 17 18 20 21 22 23 24. Esay 44. vers 9. 10. 18. 19. Ierem. 10. vers 3. c Ierem. 8. vers 19. Ier. 51. vers 17 18 19 47. Habac. 2. vers 18 19 20. The Apostles have likewise done the same in the new Testament and namely S. Paul who in the 17. Chapter of the Acts proved and made it knowne to the Athenians And in the first Chapter of the Epistle to the Romans condemned the Romans for transgressing the Law of Nature darkening the light thereof and smothering the secret and inward sting of their consciences by changing the glory of the incorruptible God into the Image of a corruptible man and of other living creatures S. Iohn in his first Epistle and in the fifth Chapter and last verse thereof exhorteth the faithfull to keepe themselves from Idolls And in the ninth Chapter of the Revelation the crossnesse of false Christians is noted verse 20. by this that notwithstanding so many plagues wherewith GOD had visited them they repented not of the workes of their hands that they should not worship Idols of gold and silver and brasse and stone and of wood which neither can see nor heare nor walke Therefore seeing the whole matter of the second Commandement is morall grounded upon the Law of nature and established not only by the Old but also by the New Testament the Commandement is also morall 32 For whereas some would referre and reduce to the second Commandement the whole externall service of the Iewes as contained in some sort therein to inferre from thence that if the fourth Commandement be in part ceremoniall because unto it are referred all the Sabbaths of the Iewes all their holy dayes and New Moones the second may likewise be called ceremoniall in part for the same reason To that I answer that a reduction and reference of the externall and ceremoniall service of the Iewes may in some respect be made to all the Commandements of the first Table As indeed some ceremoniall ordinances are in certain respects referred to each of them by some interpreters And may be all in this manner referred to the second Commandement which being negative GOD under the prohibition to make any kinde of Images for religious worship compriseth all will-worship And sith in all negative commandements the affirmative opposed unto them are comprehended he commandeth on the contrary that he be served according to his ordinance and Commandement Now sith at that time the manner of his service consisted in the observation of holy dayes and diverse ceremonies prescribed by him in the Law of Moses it may be said that in it he commanded them all But indirectly and a farre of Which cannot make the second Commandement to be ceremoniall because the ceremoniall and outward service appertaineth not Directly and properly to the substance thereof and is not expressed therein But whatsoever is expressed in it is of it selfe morall Whereas in the fourth Commandement the foresaid feasts and ceremonies are directly and neerly comprised For in it God ordaineth a principall holy day and under it comprehendeth all others All that is expressed in it is ceremoniall And the ceremoniall service of the Iewes maketh an essentiall part of the sanctification of the Sabbath injoyned in it So this commandement is not ceremoniall indirectly and in regard only that unto it may be referred and appropriated by a remote and farre fetched reduction the feasts New Moones and Iewish Sabbaths but it is such directly and properly in it selfe even in the neerest substance and matter which it propoundeth So the foresaid exceptions against it should be
had observed the same course towards Adam for that commandement as hee did for all the rest and for all the rest as for that which neverthelesse he did not For he ingraved the substance and tenor of all the other Commandements in Adams heart and made him to know them naturally without any instruction by word of mouth whereof he had no need But he wrote not in his heart the knowledge of the fourth Commandement seeing as they say he declared it unto them by audible words resounding in his eares that he might know it whence it followeth that all the rest are morall but this is not whereof we shall have occasion to discourse more largely in the first Chapter of the second part of this Treatise 2 Of those that defend the morality of one Sabbath day in the weeke some seeke to decline the weight and edge of the foresaid arguments by a frivolous distinction saying that morall things are of two sorts the one that are founded in the Law of nature and therefore oblige all men naturally The others that are of a positive Law depend on institution and notwithstanding are parts of the morall Law of a perpetuall necessity and of an immutable right as well as all other morall precepts are that the morall Law as it is morall is of farre greater extension then is the Law of nature and that the Sabbath is morall in this last sort 3 But first they speake against the ordinary sence and custome of all men who by the word morall understand that which is naturally and universally just that is which reason when it is not misled and the inward Law of nature dictateth by common principles of honesty or ought to dictate to all men of it selfe without any outward Vsher This Law all men take for the Law of nature and reciprocally they take the Law of nature for this Law which is proved by the ordinary and common distinction that all Divines make betweene the morall ceremoniall and judiciall Lawes which in former times God gave to the Iewes in which distinction they referre to the last hands and sorts all the positive ordinances which pertained to the ecclesiasticall or civill government and to the first the ordinances and rules of the Law of nature wherof these others were circumstantiall appendices and determinations Nay morall signifieth onely the duties of essentiall godlinesse and righteousnesse in things belonging naturally to good and holy manners towards GOD or towards man whether in doing good or departing from evill and not all things that may be usefull and in some sort may bee referred to the rules of good behaviour Otherwise things ceremoniall and judiciall as such should not bee distinguished from morall things for these also have an usefull reference to the foresaid duties of good and godly behaviour And therefore if the ordinance of the Sabbath although advowed to bee a positive Law is notwithstanding called morall it shall bee in one and the same respect both morall and ceremoniall and all ther ceremonies may after the same manner challenge the name of Moralities which is absurd 4 Secondly after they have confessed the Sabbath to bee a part of the positive Law grounded only on the order and discipline that GOD was pleased to establish they broach an affirmation without ground and without reason when they say therewith that it is of an immutable right and carrieth with it a perpetuall obligation For where and from whence is there any evidence of this doth this right belong to all things that are of the positive Law Their condition and nature giveth it unto them Will any Divine any Lawgiver any Logician make of this a probleme and hold for the affirmative Away with Sophistry and captious dealing It must bee the revealed will of God that matcheth positive with naturall Lawes and marketh them with the silver stampe of immutability Now if GOD hath not communicated this dignity with any positive Law ordained by him from the beginning of the world till this day what appearance is there that he hath given it as it were by birth-right to the Sabbath Have they to underprop this their assertion any cleere and evident testimony brought from the unreprocheable truth of holy Scripture For we make no account of any mans bare affirmation But the whole drift of the discourse following shall shew more and more God willing how short they come of their promises and of the But and Blank they aime at CHAPTER third REASON 3. 1. The Pagans never knew neither by Nature nor by Tradition the necessity of the keeping of a Seventh day of Sabbath 2. Yet they knew all morall duties commanded in the first and second Table of the morall Law 3. They knew also that God is to be served publikely and that a part of his service consisted in the offering of Sacrifices 4. They knew likewise by naturall light that some dayes are to be appointed for his service and are blamed for the transgression of all other Commandements that are morall c. 5. But are never blamed for the inobservation of one day of Seven 6. Nay they did laugh to scorne the Iewish Sabbath 7. Answer to an objection taken out of Philo against the foresaid affirmation 8. To another from IOSEPHUS 9. As also to other passages of diverse Authors Pagans Iewes and Christians which serve to overthrow it 10. The Pagans did never keepe regularly for their publike devotions any other Seventh day of the weeke 11. Yea are never reproved for any such omission 12. Reply to this answer 13. First answer to the said reply 14. Second answer unto it 1 MY third argument shall be taken from this that the Gentiles never knew by naturall light nor also by tradition come unto them from hand to hand by the care of their fore-Fathers the necessity of the keeping of the Seventh day of the weeke and never practised any such day Surely if it were a morality and a point of the Law of Nature or if GOD had prescribed it by a particular Commandement to Adam willing him to sanctifie it particularly and to celebrate in it the remembrance of his workes and rest hee had done it purposely that Adam should instruct his off-spring to the like seeing there was a like reason for them and for him Yea all his progeny and successors in whom abideth still the Law of Nature although darkened with sinne had knowne in some sort by the residue of the light of Nature glittering in them that they were bound to keepe a Seventh Day At least the notice of this Commandement which is pretended to have beene given to their first Father from the beginning should have come to them by Tradition successively from the Fathers to the Children till their dayes For we see that all the Gentiles by the light of Nature and by Tradition have had some knowledge of all things that in themselves are good and lawfull and of all morall precepts 2 They have knowne that one
that although God had ordained by the Law of Moses that his people should surcease from all outward and servile workes on the Sabbath day yet he required not that cessation as a thing essentiall to his service or so necessary that it could not upon any occasion be lawfull to man to doe such workes on that day but rather that authority and power was given him according to Gods intention in case hee were forced thereunto by some urgent necessity As for example the saving or sustaining of his life For the keeping of the Sabbath was not the scope and end which man was made for or a thing of so great consideration before God as is the conservation of the necessary interests of man For if that had beene it should not have been lawfull to man to breake it upon any case or necessity whatsoever but nill he will he he must be subject to the most straite observation thereof notwithstanding any danger whatsoever hee may fall into thereby Nay man was rather the scope and end of the Sabbath and of the observation thereof and his interests were of greater importance then they And therefore when mans goods life or reputation are in jeopardy the Sabbath must give place unto them as being a thing wherein consisteth not properly and essentially the glory and service of God and which is to be kept onely as a helpe to his service when stronger and more profitable considerations for the glory and service of God bind not to the contrary as they doe when life honour or such other things of great consequence to man come in question For then it is more expedient for the glory and service of God that a mans life honour goods c. be saved by some worke otherwise forebidden on the Sabbath day then that with a manifest hazard of his life honour or goods he should tie himselfe to a precise keeping of the Sabbath and to a scrupulous cessation which in such a case should become superstitious It is questionlesse that the matter was to be taken so under the old Testament and this is the maine point that Christ intended to maintaine and verifie against the Pharisees which urged a so precise and strict observation of the Sabbath that it turned to the prejudice and damage of man made man slave of the Sabbath subjected not the Sabbath to man and GOD so inthralled man with the keeping of that day that it was a thing unlawfull unto him to prepare and take in his pinching hunger a mouthfull of meate for his sustenance although hee should starve and perish for want of food 3 Vpon this reasoning of Iesus Christ it followeth clearely that the keeping of a seventh day of Sabbath appointed in the fourth Commandement is not morall For first Christ sorts it with the observations commanded in the Law touching the Shew-bread the sacrifices and other ceremoniall services of the Temple Matth. 12. vers 6. as being of the same nature that is belonging simply to the Iudaicall policie order and government And all the strength of his argument is grounded upon this point that the Sabbath is of the same nature with these ceremonies and therefore as they might be dispensed with keeping of them if stronger reasons obliged them to the contrary so they might sometimes be released from the forbearing of all workes on the Sabbath day if they had just and necessary reason to doe some workes that day Else the Pharisees might have most easily replyed that although David in his hunger tooke the liberty to eat the Shew-bread which was not lawfull to eate but to the Priests and albeit it was lawfull to any man to preferre the workes of mercy in his owne or in his neighbours necessity to sacrifice yet it followed not that hunger could give him any licence to breake the Sabbath because these observations concerning the Shew-bread and the Sacrifices were but ceremonies which might be sometimes omitted and dispensed with whereas the Sabbath and the keeping of it was a thing morall and undispensable 4 Secondly Iesus Christ saith that the Sabbath was made for man and not man for the Sabbath Marke 2. verse 27. Now it cannot be said of any thing truely morall and ordained of God by a morall Commandement that it is made for man and not man for it that it is the end of man and not man the end of it that it should yeeld to the interests of man and not man to the interests of it For example dare any man be so bold as to say that the Commandements to have no other GOD but the true GOD to shunne Idolatry to abstaine from blaspheming and profaning in any manner the name of GOD to honour Father and Mother not to be a Murtherer a Whoremunger a Thiefe a false Witnesse not to covet another mans goods not to love GOD and the neighbour are made for man and not man for them and that man may dispense with them for his owe particular interests Verily it is not lawfull to a man to breake these Commandements as it is lawfull to him to breake the Sabbath for his owne conservation in any thing that hath reference unto him Nay hee should tread under foot all his owne interests rather then transgresse in any of those points Which sheweth evidently that the Commandement concerning the Sabbath is not of the same nature that these others are of That these are morall are of the Law of nature have in themselves an essentiall justice and equity and for that cause are undispensable so binding conscience at all times that it cannot be lawfull at any time to doe any thing against them That this of the Sabbath was onely a Commandement of order of ceremoniall policie of a positive Law and for that cause liable to dispensation and abrogation as in effect it was dispensed with in the forenamed occasions and CHRIST by his comming into the world hath abolished under the new Testament the particular Commanment given concerning it 5 The observation which is made by some that Christ saith that man was not made for the Sabbath or for the day of rest but saith not that man was not made to sanctifie the Sabbath is but a vaine subtilty For by the Sabbath Christ understandeth both the rest of the day and the day of rest For in the Scripture the word Sabbath signifieth the one and the other And seeing the observation and sanctification of the day consisted at least in part in a rest and cessation of all externall workes as is evident by the words of the fourth Commandement and of Exodus Chap. 31. v. 14 15. and of Ieremiah Chap. 17. vers 22. 24. yea seeing this sanctification onely was proper unto it and particularly tied unto it and seeing it taketh from it the name of Sabbath wherewith it is honored to say that man is not made for the rest or cessation and is not necessarily tied unto it but may dispense with it not through a fancy and at
true beleever hath authority and freedome to exempt himselfe from the keeping of the Sabbath for his owne need and to yeeld to such necessities which are more urgent and of greater importance then was the Sabbath of which sort was the narrow strait whereunto hunger had driven Christs Disciples that is no lesse forcible to fight against the morality of the Sabbath as appeareth by that which hath beene already said 10 Such then being the nature of the Sabbath it is evident that it is not morall that of its selfe it obligeth not the conscience to the keeping of it that if it bindeth conscience it commeth from GODS command by a positive Law such as he gave to the Iewes and that only when more inforcing reasons doe not dispense with the observation of it as there be some such Now the positive Lawes given to the Iewes being wholly abrogated no man can say that the Law of the Sabbath bindeth the conscience of Christians if it be not shewed that Christ will have this Law of the Sabbath to continue under the New Testament and hath commanded the keeping of a Seventh day as he might have done In which case that Law should bee obligatory not for any morality it hath in it but because Christ had ordained it for the order of the Church This I pretend cannot be shewed but rather that the stinting of the time of GODS publike service hath beene left to the free will of the Church and that even now at this time when a Seventh day is set downe we ought to keepe it in obedience to the Church as following herein the order which she hath thought good to institute and not through opinion of any necessity proceeding from GODS immediate command farre lesse of Religion inherent in the thing it selfe CHAPTER Eighth REASON 8. 1. The Apostle condemneth the Galatians for observing dayes and moneths and times and yeeres 2. It is answered that the Apostle condemneth onely the observation of dayes c. prescribed in the ceremoniall Law 3. Refutation of that answer out of the drift of the whole Chapter 4. Besides that it maketh the Apostle to condemne thà t which he approved and so to contradict himselfe if this answer were true 1 I further justifie this by the Apostle in his Epistle to the Galatians Chapter 4. verse 10. where hee blameth them for observing dayes and moneths and times and yeeres for they deemed that in the observing of them there was a point of Religion and of Gods service which they were necessarily obliged unto on Gods behalfe and that for conscience sake either because the thing it selfe deserved as much or through respect to Gods Commandement It is this surmise which the Apostle blameth For if the Galatians had kept some dayes but as a thing indifferent and an ecclesiasticall order for the publike practise of divine service by the exercise of the ministrie the celebration of the Sacraments and other holy duties more and more sanctified with prayers thankesgiving Psalmes Hymnes and spirituall songs knowing and being perswaded by the Lord Iesus that there was no divine obligation no Religion tyed to those dayes in themselves it is as sure as can be that they had not bin worthy to be censured for all that is done and may be done in the Church under the New Testament Hereupon I say that we fall manifestly into the Apostles censure if we keepe a Seventh day of Sabbath beleeving it to be a morall thing which God hath expresly commanded and therefore necessary and as such binding the conscience For this is evidently to observe dayes after the fashion which the Apostle condemneth 2 It is answered to this that the Apostle speaketh in that Chapter of judaicall dayes moneths times and yeeres only as they are ordained to be kept by the ceremoniall Law of Moses as for example to observe in things belonging to the Sabbath the Seventh day of the weeke Which law being abolished he blameth the Galatians that they indeavoured to set up again the observation of dayes after the manner of the Iewes but reproveth them not for keeping a Sabbath day 3 This answer giveth no content at all I acknowledge freely that doubtlesse the dayes kept by the Galatians were the same which the Iewes observed For to esteeme that they were dayes consecrated to Idols which they had beene enured unto when they lived in Paganisme and had observed unto that time even after their conversion is farre from all likelihood and contrary to the Text which speaketh of dayes belonging to these weake and beggarly rudiments which God had ordained in the infancy of the Church which were judaicall dayes and none other and from which Iesus Christ was come into the world to redeeme men And the Apostle blameth the Galatians universally for observing such dayes without exception of any other day which he ought to have excepted if there had beene any other obligatory Nay he blameth them not for keeping them after the fashion of the Iewes by the practice of the ceremoniall service which the Iewes yeelded to God on those dayes whereof he maketh no mention neither is there any likelihood that the Galatians did any such thing but for keeping them for Religions sake And his reprehension is such a one that the right thing he aimed at in it is to condemne the observation of any day whatsoever under the New Testament for Religion and conscience sake in reference to any obligation from the day it selfe The foundation of his reproofe as appeareth manifestly by the whole drift of his discourse is this that to be Religious about dayes and to be tyed unto them by Gods command was a point of bondage belonging to the rudiments of the Law and that the Gospell which is the Law of liberty cannot suffer this bondage Therefore hee speaketh in generall tearmes Yee observe dayes and moneths and times and yeeres and addeth not judaicall or after the Iewish fashion because also to keepe other dayes then those of the Iewes and that for conscience sake and for the same opinion of Religion which the Iewes had of their dayes although otherwise then they hâ—d beene as bad and contrary to the Gospell it is not so when dayes are kept simply for ecclesiasticall order although they were Iudaicall dayes And indeed the Sabbath day of the Iewes to wit the last day of the weeke was kept by the Apostles and by diverse Christians in the Primitive Church many yeeres constantly As likewise the feasts of the Iewish Passeover and Pentecost were observed by the first Christians without any fault or offence on their part because this observation was not practised by them in the same respects that they were by the Iewes that is through opinion of Religious necessity and divine obligation 4 Verily if wee be obliged in our conscience and by a divine commandement under the new Testament to the observation of a seventh day of rest â—eligiously as the Iewes were as is pretended although it
and just that this last day of the creation should yeeld the possession of the day of rest unto it 2 To underprop this opinion they have broached diverse reasons amongst which we shall order in the first place the reason taken out of the second Chapter of Genesis ver 3. where Moses after hee had said that God finished all his workes in sixe dayes and rested on the seventh day addeth And God blessed the Seventh day and sanctified it because that in it he had rested from all his workes which hee created and made Of which words they conclude that as soone as ever the Creation was ended and the Seventh day begun to subsist in nature it was blessed and sanctified that is consecrated to Gods service and ordained even then to our first Parents while they were in the state of innocency to be kept by them for this end and therefore the observation of a Seventh day is morall is of the Law of nature and is in no wise ceremoniall seeing it was established before sin came into the world at which time there was no shadowes and figures of Christ because in that state of innocency our first Parents had not stood in neede of him nor of any direction to him by ceremonies If then in that estate wherein no corruption of sin had hindred them to serve God continually and the bodily imployments had been no great disturbance unto them in the practice of that duty God judged necessary to injoine unto them a seventh day to the intent that giving over all other care they should in it addict themselves only to the actions of his service and all religious exercises how much more in the state of sin wherein men have so many hindrances from Gods service both by sin and by the laborious occupations of their worldly callings is it necessary that a set day of rest be ordained unto them to cease wholly in it from the turmoile of their secular affaires and to give themselves only to holy and religious exercises belonging to Gods service This necessity is as great under the new Testament as it was under the old and therefore God hath not omitted to ordaine under both a Sabbath day yea a seventh day of rest which being established before sinne and consequently being morall bindeth all men perpetually 3 There be divers meanes to answer this objection First nothing obligeth us to believe that the words written in the third verse of the second Chapter of Genesis should be thus translated And God blessed the seventh day and sanctified it as if Moses had meant to expresse a time past long before his penning of this Booke and to tell that this blessing and sanctifying was made even from the time that the creation was finished and from the first seventh day of the world Whereas they may be translated thus And God hath blessed the seventh day and hath sanctified it understood as being said with a Parenthesis and in regard of the Ordinance which God had lately made in the daies of Moses concerning the seventh day when he gave by his Ministery the Law of the Israelites Which ordinance Moses made mention of in his relation to the history of the creation as of a thing established and knowne of the Israelites when he writ by occasion of that he had said that God after he had created all his works in sixe daies rested on the seventh day So we may give this exposition to Moses words God made all his works in six daies and rested on the seventh day and thence he tooke occasion to blesse and sanctifie now that day giving commandement by his Law to his people of Israel to keepe it in their generations So it shall be a narration made in this place occasionally according to the ordinary custome of holy Writers and specially of Moses when in the historicall relation of things that were come to passe long before they find occasion to speak of things happened since specially of those that were come to passe in their time when they wrote to interlace upon that occasion a short rehearsall of them with the narration of things more ancient and to speake of both in such a manner as if they had happened in the same time whereof I will here set downe some examples 4 First we find divers places named by anticipation As in the 12. Chapter of Genesis verse 8. It is said that Abraham removed unto a mountaine Eastward from Bethel which name of Bethel was not in the daies of Abraham the name of the place betokened by it in the foresaid words For it was not called Bethel till in it Iacob saw a ladder reaching to heaven and the Lord standing above it Then Iacob called it Bethel that is The house of God whereas before that time it was called Luz as may be seene in Genesis Chap. 28. vers 13. 19. But Moses writing the history of Abraham called it Bethel by an historicall anticipation because in his time Bethel was the ordinary name of that place We read in the fourth Chapter of Ioshuah vers 19. that the people came up out of Iordan and pitched in Gilgal which was not so called till Ioshuah in that place circumcised the people Chap. 5. vers 9. Likewise in the second Chapter of Iudges and first verse the Author saith that the Angel of the Lord came up from Gilgal to Bokim because the place which he calleth Bokim was so called when he wrote that history although it was not yet so called when the Angel came thither but received that name afterward from the teares which the people shed and powred out before God after the Angel had rebuked them For the Text saith that when the Angel of the Lord spake these words to all the children of Israel the people lift up their voice and wept Therefore they called the name of that place BOKIM vers 4 5. 5 Secondly we find the same anticipation in the description of things and actions As in the 16. Chapter of Exodus where Moses reporteth how God began first to give Manna to the Israelites which I pretend also to be the time of the first institution of the Sabbath and how the Israelites carried themselves about the ordering thereof and immediatly he addeth how he by Gods command ordained that an Omer of it should be filled to be kept for the generations of the Israelites vers 32. and gave an injunction to Aaron to take a pot to put in it that Omer full of Manna and to lay it up before the LORD to be kept for their generation vers 33. He reciteth also at once that as the LORD commanded him so Aaron laid it up before the Testimony to be kept vers 34. which things as it is evident were not done at the first when God gave them that bread to eat because then there was as yet neither Tabernacle nor Arke nor Tables of the Law But because when Moses wrote all these things were done and
of the maymednesse of his argumentation wherein is left out the rest commanded to men in the fourth Commandement if by the rest of God wee must understand Gods owne rest and not the rest which he ordained to men For I deny not but that this was also understood by the Apostle But as I have said courtly indirectly and by consequence taken from the rest which he expresseth from which this other hath its beginning and dependance although it be not of the same antiquity and that it cannot bee proved that the Apostle meaneth any such thing Moreover albeit we could not find a way to answer such a reply and to refute it there should not bee in that any great inconvenience seeing the thing it selfe affords an easie answer and the Apostle answereth not alwayes formally in all places to all replyes which might be made to his allegations It sufficeth if their vanity bee evident of it selfe or if they may be otherwise refuted as here the reply which is broached against the Apostle his reasoning might have beene easily CHAPTER Sixth Answer to the fifth Reason taken from the fourth Commandement and first to the generall argument taken from the nature of the said Commandement 1. First objection The fourth Commandement is a part of the morall Law and therefore it is morall 2. A generall answer shewing the nullity of this objection 3. A particular answer shewing that the Decalogue is an abridgment of the whole Law of Moses 4. Specially that the fourth Commandement is an abridgment of the ceremoniall Law 5. This is confirmed by the Prophets who by the profanation of the Sabbath understand the transgression of the whole ceremoniall Law 6. Falsity of an objection that the Prophets urged not the transgression of the ceremoniall Law 7. Second Objection The Decalogue had divers prerogatives which the ceremoniall and Iudiciall Law had not 8. Cleere refutation of this Objection 9. Third Objection God distinguisheth betweene his covenant comprehending the moralities only and his statutes and judgements which were ceremoniall lawes 10. Uanity of the said distinction 11. Fourth Objection The Summarie of the Decalogue is morall therefore all the precepts thereof are morall 12. Answer in this summary the ceremoniall Law is comprised 13. Refutation of the fifth Objection taken from the union of the tenne Commandements 14. Answer to the sixth Objection that our opinion mutilates the Decalogue of a Commandement and authoriseth the changing of times 15. Another Answer The fourth Commandement is morall in the principall substance thereof 16. But is ceremoniall in the determination of a particular seventh day for Gods service 17. Seventh Objection that if this were so God would not have named it in the Decalogue more then the place of his service 18. Answer these things are not alike 19. Eight Objection answered to wit that God might have named in the Decalogue the New Moones and other Holy dayes 20. The former answer confirmed 21. A farther answer shewing that under the Sabbath all Holy dayes were comprised as under the word Sanctifie all ceremoniall duties 22. Those of the contrary opinion confessing that there is some thing ceremoniall in the fourth Commandement cast themselves into a great absurdity 23. The falsitie of their doctrine that a seventh day in generall is only commanded shewed by Scriptures 24. And by reason 25. How it may be said that all dayes appointed for Gods service are grounded on the fourth Commandement 26. One of seven dayes cannot be morall and the seventh ceremoniall 27. Wherein consists the morality of the fourth Commandement 28. How the keeping of one of seven dayes may be gathered out of the fourth Commandement 29. Answer to the first inconvenience that of tenne Commandements nine only should be morall 30. Answer to the second inconvenience that Papists may affirme the second Commandement to bee likewise ceremoniall 31. Confirmed by the testimony of Pagans of the Prophets and of the Apostles 32. Answer to the third inconvenience that the second Commandement should also be ceremoniall 33. Confirmed by Bellarmine 34. Answer to the fourth inconvenience that the fourth Commandement might be taken out of the Decalogue 35. The retorsion shewing that the doctrine of the morality of the Sabbath giveth a great advantage to the Roman Church 1 THe principall reason alleadged to prove the morality of the Sabbath is taken from the fourth Commandement Remember the Sabbath day to keepe it holy c. And first they urge in generall the nature of the Commandement which is one of the ten of the morall Law which God Himselfe pronounced with his owne mouth ingraved with his owne hand upon two Tables of stone for a signe and token of perpetuall continuance and caused the said Tables to be put and kept in the Arke and therfore the fourth Commandement must of necessity be morall and perpetuall as the rest are otherwise nine Commandements onely shall be morall But these nine being morall it cannot be said reasonably that this is not morall And if any man should dare to say it profane men may be so licentiously bold as to make the same exception against the rest in all things wherein they cope with their particular vices saying also that they are not morall That they of the Roman Church who to shrinke from the objection which we make against their idolatry by the formall words of the second Commandement of the Law presume to answer that this Commandement is not morall and did belong to the Iewes only shall finde a sufficient colour to this answer if it were true that in the morall Law there is to be found a Commandement which is not morall and that the fourth Commandement is such a one And therefore as they have taken out of the Decalogue the second Commandement although without all reason seeing it is morall and perpetuall others may take out of it the fourth Commandement and comprehend it no more with the rest and that with as good reason seeing it is not morall and concerneth us not 2 To this I answer first that in vaine doe they seeke to shew that the Commandement of the Sabbath obligeth us because it maketh a part of that Law which God uttered with his owne mouth in the mountaine of Sina with so many evidences of his Majesty and wrote it with his finger upon two Tables of stone which he gave to Moses and caused to be put in the Arke as if these considerations did give greater force and efficacy to this Law to binde us as it did binde the Iewes to keepe it in all things that it comprehendeth for they might prove with as good reason that in these time under the Gospell we are bound to have a Tabernacle or Temple like unto that which the Iewes had of old and to observe the same service which they observed in it because God in the same mountaine with much Majesty shewed the patterne thereof to Moses and commanded him to make it after that patterne Whereas much
otherwise we are not bound to keepe the Law in that respect that God pronounced it in the Mountaine of Sina and wrote it upon two Tables which were given to Moses For in those respects it obliged the Iewes only to whom alone also it was adressed in the preface put before it Heare Israel c. No more are these considerations of value to make it continue for ever The inscription therof in Tables of stone might have had another end and usage then that which is pretended by those which say that it denoteth the perpetuity of all that is contained therein for it represented the hardnesse of the heart of man which is more refractary and thwart to the spirituall inscription of the Law of God then the hardest stone is to the materiall inscription which hardnesse the Law is not of it selfe able to vanquish and overcome because it is a dead letter written in stone It is God God alone who by his grace and by the power of the Gospel and of the Spirit which accompanieth the Gospell changeth the heart of stone into an heart of flesh Ezech. 36. ver 26. and 2 Cor. 3. ver 3 6 7 8. Wee are bound to the observation of the Law and it is perpetuall only as it is morall and written naturally in the tables of the heart and as it commandeth us things which of their nature are good just and holy or forbiddeth those which in themselves are evill which also the Gospel of Iesus Christ our onely Law hath declared and confirmed to be such as it confirmeth the other nine Commandements but maketh no mention of the fourth Commandement which is here brought in question as if it did binde us to the observation of a seventh day 3 Neither doe I see any inconvenience to affirme that the Law of the ten Commandements which is called Morall is not such in its totality but only in regard of the greatest part thereof to wit of the nine Commandements for whose sake it hath deserved the title given unto it of morall naturall universall and perpetuall Law as often the whole is named from that which is the principall in it And that it is Ceremoniall particular and temporall in regard of a parcell thereof to wit of the fourth Commandement For the Scripture saith no where that all the Commandements of this Law are without exception Morall Nay seeing this Law is often called in generall termes Gods Covenant made with the Israelites Exod. 34. vers 28. Deut. 4. vers 13. 23. Deut. 5. vers 3. Deut. 9. vers 9. 11. 15. c. 1 King 8. vers 21. which Covenant comprehended not onely the Morall points but also the Ceremonies as may be seene Exod. 24. vers 7 8. Exod. 34. vers 10. 27. Levit. 2. vers 13. Levit. 26. vers 2. 15. Ierem. 34. vers 13. It is most like or rather most plaine that God comprehended in the said Law as in an Epitome or short discourse all his Ordinances both Morall and Ceremoniall which afterward hee declared more fully to Moses and which are dispersed here and there in his Bookes And as the other nine Cōmandements are the summary of the Morall ordinances even so the fourth Commandement concerning the Sabbath day and the sanctification thereof which was done with the practice of Ceremonies is a summary of all the Ceremoniall ordinances 4 For to this Sabbath day all other Sabbaths and legall feasts have relation and to them all the Ceremonies whereby they were solemnized have reference Philo a learned Iew hath observed this very well in his exposition of the Decalogue where he saith that the ten Commandements are the summary of all the speciall Lawes contained in the whole sacred volume of the Law-giver and that the fourth Commandement containeth compendiously the Feasts Sabbaths Sacrifices Vowes Purifications and other Ceremonies And indeed the Sabbath is joyned with all other holy-daies in the 23. Chapter of Leviticus as being of the same nature and is put in the first place before them all as being the first and principall of them all It is also joyned with the Sanctuary Levit. 19. vers 30. and with the new Moones and other solemnities Esa. 1. v. 13 14. where God declareth that hee cannot away with it and maketh no better account of it then of all the rest of their solemne meetings and appointed Feasts Also the observation of the Sabbath day is taken in divers places of the old Testament as denoting summarily all the Ceremoniall service which God had of old injoyned to Israel as being a speciall and principall point of that service and a meane for the observation of all the other points whereby he would be honoured Notable amongst other places is that of Ezechiel Chap. 20. vers 11. 12 13. where God saith first that he gave them his Statutes and made them to know his Iudgments which if a man doe he shall even live in them vers 11. understanding by Statutes and Iudgements the Morall Commandements properly as it is evident by the 18. Chapter of Leviticus whence these words are taken and where the Statutes Iudgements and Ordinances wherof we speake are expresly opposed to the vices of the Land of Egypt and of the Land of Canaan vers 3 4 5. As in the foresaid 20. Chapter of Ezechiel vers 18. 19. they are also opposed to the vices of their Fathers who in former times had lived in Egypt to which vices the Commandement of the ceremoniall Law could not be conveniently opposed because before the times of the pilgrimage of the Israelites in the wildernesse they were unknowne and had no sway Now after this God addeth in the foresaid Chapter of Ezechiel ver 12. Moreover also I gave them my Sabbaths to be a signe between me and them c. distinguishing the Sabbaths from the Statutes whereof he had spoken before as a Commandement ceremoniall and typicall from those that are Morall and comprehending under it all other typike and figurative ordinances of the Law whereof for this cause although hee had established them in the wildernesse as well as the Sabbath he maketh no mention at all 5 And in the 22. Chapter of the same Prophet God blaming in many particularities the crimes committed by the Iewes against the Morall Law condemneth their transgression of the Ceremoniall Law saying simply vers 26 that they had defiled his holy things and had their eyes from his Sabbaths Likewise in the 23. Chapter vers 38. and in other places the prophanation of the Sabbath is set downe to signifie the violation of the whole outward and ceremoniall service which God had ordained in that time because the Sabbath day was then solemnly destinated to the practice thereof Yea the violation also of the internall spirituall and Moral service but by consequence because the externall service was ordained of God to be unto his people a help and meanes to fortifie them in the practice of the other in such sort that he who neglected
finde that they were not onely ceremoniall or meerly judiciall but also morall ordinances and illustrations more ample of the Decalogue 11 They object againe that Iesus Christ in the Gospell hath set downe the summary of the whole Law of the Decalogue in these two Commandements Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thine heart with all thy soule and with all thy minde and thy neighbour as thy selfe and that as this summary is morall even so the Law whereof it is the abridgement is purely morall unlesse wee will accuse Christ to have given a morall summary of a thing that is ceremoniall 12 But this objection is of no force For first I might answer that this summary hath reference to the Law of the Decalogue in as much as it is morall and that being in the greatest part of its Commandements morall and onely ceremoniall in one it is not uncoth that the summary thereof is propounded as morall and not ceremoniall But Secondly I say that this summary hath reference not onely to the morall Law which is pretenâ—ed to be alone contained in the Decalogue but also to the ceremoniall which I maintaine to be likewise summarily comprised in it And indeed Moses having said in the sixth Chapter of Deuteronomy ver 1 2 3. These are the Commandements Statutes and Iudgements which the Lord your God hath commanded and which I command thee that thou mayest heare them and take heed to doe them he addeth in the 4. and 5. verses Heare O Israel the Lord our God is Lord alone Thou shalt therefore love the Lord thy God with all thine heart with all thy soule and with all thy might referring this summary which commandeth them to love God to all the Commandements Iudgements and Statutes of God which he had before designed as being the foundation of the obedience due unto them And in the Gospell the Lawyer asked the Lord in generall which is the greatest CoÌ„mandement of the Law whereunto the Lord answered The greatest Commandement to wit not in dignity onely but also in extent is Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thine heart And the second like vnto this Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thy selfe On these two Commandements hang all the Law and the Prophets Which answer sheweth that unto this summary did belong whatsoever is comprised in the Law and in the Prophets and therefore the ceremoniall Law as well as the morall It cannot be denied but that the ceremonies as long as they were in force were to be kept through love to God as well as morall duties And the love of God obliged the Iewes as strictly to practise the ceremonialls as the moralls For the love of God requireth the observation of all his Commandements and it is knowne to be sincere by the keeping of them all Now God had commanded the ceremonies to the Iewes for the whole time of the old Testament And therefore in this respect that God had commanded them and also in regard they had all or the most part of them a morall foundation they might very well nay they ought to be referred to this morall summary Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thine heart As if Christ had said The Commandement most generall and principall of all and which is the foundation of the obedience that ought to be yeelded to all the other Commandements is to love God with all the heart For whosoever loveth him so will undoubtedly serve him alwaies according to all his Commandements 13 As for the argument taken from the union which is betweene the fourth Commandement and the other nine wherewith it maketh up one Law to prove from thence that it is of the same nature and morall as they are it is a light and slight argumentation For it is an ordinary thing and most manifest in all Lawes of God and men that in the same body of a Law which is framed of many Articles following one another there are some different in nature from the rest Vnder the same name of Gods covenant are sufficiently understood all the heads and Articles both ceremoniall and morall as is evident by the passages already cited And God comprehended them all together in grosse when he spake so often to his people of the keeping of his whole Law of all his Commandements Testimonies Ordinances and Iudgements These tearmes occure ordinarily in holy Scripture joyned together and all acknowledge with one consent that by them and in them all points as well ceremoniall as morall are understood Why then I pray might they not farre more be distinctly and particularly set downe together in the body of the same Law without inforcing from thence that they are of the same nature And to make my advantage of similitudes which some of those against whom I dispute make use of if in a naturall body the diverse parts whereof it is framed are not alwayes of the same nature as in the bodies of men and beasts other is the nature of flesh other of bones other of gristles c. If in an artificiall body as in a chaine and in a carkanet graines of corall of silver of gold c. are fitly coupled together why may not much more be different in nature the parts and articles of a legall body if I may name it so although they have no essentiall connexion together And certes in many places of the bookes of Moses commandements morall and ceremoniall are to be found mixed one with another Now should not a man argue fondly and unsoundly if because in these diverse places and namely in the foresaid 34. Chapter of Exodus from the tenth to the eight and twentieth verse God joyneth in one tenor certaine speeches to Moses wherein are expressed sundry ordinances of a diverse nature hee would seeke to make an inference from that union that they are all of the same nature although the contrary be most evident and true For the commandements prohibiting to worship any other God but him to make any materiall Idols and to worship them to match with Infidels which are morall commandements are there combined with other Commandements of keeping the feast of unleavened bread and other solemne feasts as of consecrating unto him all the first borne of men and cattell that open the matrix which are ceremoniall Yea the Commandement of keeping the Sabbath day which is in the 21. verse is placed there amongst commandements that are wholly ceremoniall Will they against whom wee dispute allow us to inferre upon this that the Sabbath is ceremoniall doubtlesse not Let them therefore suffer us to reject this their argumentation that the Commandement concerning the Sabbath is morall because in the Decalogue it is put among morall commandements and on the otherside to judge it to be most reasonable that God in the first Table thereof where his scope was to comprehend compendiously all that concerneth the service which hee would have yeelded unto him hath set downe
A TREATISE OF THE SABBATH AND THE LORDS-DAY Distinguished into foure parts WHEREIN IS DECLARED BOTH THE Nature Originall and Observation as well of the one under the Old as of the other under the New Testament WRITTEN IN FRENCH BY DAVID PRIMEROSE Batchelour in Divinitie in the Vniversity of Oxford and Minister of the Gospell in the Protestant Church of Roven Englished out of his French Manuscript by his Father G. P. D. D. LONDON Printed by Richard Badger for William Hope and are to be sold at his Shop at the signe of the Glove in Corne-Hill 1636. THE TRANSLATOR TO THE READER I Wrote to my Sonne Preacher of the Gospel at Roven desiring him to set downe in a paper distinctly and clearely his oinion concerning the Sabbath with the confirmation thereof by such arguments which hee should thinke most pregnant and a solide refutation of the contrary arguments which he did accordingly but in the French Tongue as writing onely out of a dutifull affection to condescend to my desire not thinking and far lesse desiring it should be Englished and made publike here Neither had I any such intention as being most unwilling that he who is a stranger to this nation although not a stranger to the Church should goe formost to breake this yee And therefore I kept it by me three yeeres till being advertised that others were gone before and their Bookes were on the Presse and finding no man that would or could translate it into our Tongue and take the wearisome paines to place the additions which he sent me at divers times afterwards in their roomes I undertooke this labour my selfe hoping that things being compared with things cause with cause reasons with reasons and the contrary arguments which are to be found in so many bookes for and against the morality of a seventh day of a weekly Sabbath being examined and conferred one by another the Christian charitable and judicious Readers shall be stirred up after they have proved all things to hold fast that which is good without imparing any thing of that religious service which they owe and yeeld publikely in the Church and privately at home with their families to the Lord their God who needs not the errours of men though never so specious for the upholding of his service If in this end of my translation I have done any thing amisse I say with David Let the righteous smite me it shall be a kindnes and let him reprove me it shall be an excellent oile which shall not breake mine head In the meane while let all Christians according to the exhortation of the Apostle put off anger wrath malice and put on charity which is the bond of perfection and so walk worthy of the vocation wherwith we are called with all lowlines and meeknesse with long suffering forbearing one another in love endeavouring to keepe the unity of the spirit in the bond of peace that living in peace the God of love and peace may be with us and live in us for ever and ever Amen THE PREFACE The state of the Question 1. All men are bound to serve God every day privately in some measure according to his word 2. They are also bound to serve him publikely and to have a day stinted for his publike service 3. There is among godly and learned Christians a great controversie about the Originall Nature and Observation of that day 4. Some hold the sanctification and observation of one of the seven dayes of the weeke to be morall and therefore of perpetuall necessity since the beginning unto the end of the world 5. Others maintaine that the stinting of a day for Gods publike service is a point of order and of Ecclesiasticall governement depending wholly on institution 6. This Treatise made for the defence of this last opinion is divided into foure parts 1 ALl men are obliged to honour and serve God all the dayes of their life by the heedfull practice of all the exercises of religion and godlinesse which hee hath prescribed in his holy word Neither ought they to let any day slip without the imployment of some time and the carefull applying of themselves in some competent measure to that duty that thereby they may thrive in the knowledge of truth which is after godlinesse and increase in sanctification without which no man shall see the Lord. Neverthelesse seeing God hath ordained that man in the sweat of his face shall eat his bread and live by the labour of his owne hands Gen. 3. v. 19. that this transitory and dying life is besieged with so numerous an hoste of difficulties that it cannot be guarded without many necessary imployments returning every day that the labour whereunto all men are tied will scarcely suffer them to take their breath they cannot for the most part apply themselves to the necessary actions of Gods service with such care vigilancie attention and continuance as is requisite 2 These ordinary paines of temporall callings are a far greater impeachment to the publike and solemne service that the faithfull are bound to render joyntly to God in their publike meetings For the King of heaven is not satisfied with their private devotions in their closets severally or together with their families at home but will have them also to doe unto him full and absolute homage abroad confessing him to be their Creator Redeemer and perpetuall Benefactor calling upon his holy name and setting forth his praise in their congregations and religious assemblies Now the dayes of man are a warfare upon earth and his dayes are like the dayes of an hireling and the life of the faithfull is intangled and diverted with so many necessary and toilesome affaires that it is very difficult unto them to have such holy and religious meetings every day yea in many places it is impossible Therefore it is altogether necessary that a day be chosen and picked out from amongst a number of other dayes and peculiarly appointed that in it as often as it returneth all persons setting aside the care of all temporall and worldly affaires and daily imployments may extraordinarily set themselves with one accord to serve God publikely in the assemblies appointed for that end and that each person may on that day serve him apart before and after the publike service with such a regard and assiduity that it goe beyond the ordinarie devotion of every day No body amongst true Christians which take to heart the honour glory and service of God will make a controversie of this Neither is this the subject of the controversie which is canvassed and sifted on both sides with great earnestnesse yea with too great eagernesse between many Christians which are learned godly and consenting in the profession of the same doctrine and truth of the Gospel of peace 3 Their variance and disagreement is about the nature beginning and particular observation of the day which is separated from all other dayes that it may be especially applied
to Gods service to wit 1. If it be a thing of naturall justice of perpetuall necessity and whereunto all are tied by a morall commandement appertaining to the New as well as to the Old Testament that of seven daies of the weeke one be kept for the end aforesaid 2. If before the Law was given by Moses to the people of Israel yea if from the beginning of the world God himselfe made the particular designation of this day setting it apart for his service and commanding to Adam and to all his posterity the hallowing and keeping of it 3. If under the New Testament there be a divine ordinance of such a day of rest as well as there was under the Old Testament 4. And if by Gods command the consciences of faithfull Christians are under the Gospell as much obliged to hallow it as the Iewes were under the Law and for the better and more religious sanctification thereof to abstaine from all outward workes which are lawfull and are practised on other daies lest they should transgresse that divine Commandement and so finne against religion and conscience These are the maine points which some learned Divines and godly Christians instructed by them demurre upon 1. Some of them deeme that the keeping of one of the seven dayes of the weeke is a morall and naturall duty that God himselfe sanctified it for his service by an expresse and perpetuall Commandement that so it was from the beginning so it is still and shall never be otherwise till the end of the world 2. That before sin came into the world as soone as Adam was created God prescribed unto him and to Eve our first parents and in them to all men which were in their loynes and were to come out of them the hallowing of one day of the weeke which was the seventh day 3. That he reiterated and renewed this Commandement in the fourth precept of the morall Law which he gave in Horeb to the people of Israel and hath bound all Christians under the New Testament to hallow and keepe it religiously because it is of the same nature with the rest of the Commandements of the Decalogue which are all morall 4. That for this cause our Lord and Saviour Iesus Christ and his blessed Apostles have ordained and prescribed it unto them And so all men have beene all men are all men shall in all times be tied to the religious observation thereof by the necessity of a divine and morall Commandement 5. That we are bound in conscience by the binding power of this Commandement to refraine alwayes on this seventh day of Sabbath or of rest from all earthly workes used on the other dayes of the weeke 6. This onely they acknowledge that the particular observation of one constant day amongst these seven as of the first or of the last of seven is not morall nor of a like obligation under the Old and under the New Testament that it is onely a point of order and of ecclesiasticall government which God did otherwise order and settle under the Old than he hath done under the New Testament That under the Old Testament from the creation of the world till the comming of Christ he ordained the observation of the last day of the weeke in remembrance that he created the world in six dayes and rested on the seventh or last day from all the works that he had made whereas he hath ordained that under the New Testament the first day of the weeke shall be religiously solemnized in remembrance that on that day our Lord Iesus Christ rose from death to life and by the exceeding greatnesse of the power of his glorious resurrection hath performed the worke of the second creation which is the redemption of the world from the slavery of the devill the power of the Law the bondage of sinne And therefore it behooveth the first worke of the Creation to yeeld to this worke the prerogative of excellencie of nature as likewise of the possession which it had till then of the solemne day of rest That for this cause so important and peremptory the day of Gods service was to bee changed and removed from the last day of the weeke wherein was finished the first Creation unto the first day wherin the second was fully accomplished by our Lord Iesus Christ who hath himselfe appointed this alteration 5 Others doe hold that verily it is a duty naturall morall and perpetuall to serve God publikely 1. That all men are obliged unto it and bound to meet together in the Church for that purpose 2. That being there they ought to give their mindes to the exercises of religion with a more particular earnestnes diligence than they are able to do every day at home or abroad 3. That they must have a set day purposely stinted for the fulfilling of a duty so religious so necessary and so fruitfull 4. But that such a day must be one of seven or of another number which in order of that nūber they deny to be a morall point to have in it any naturall necessity For their tenet is that it is a thing of order of Ecclesiastical government depending intirely of institution 5. That indeed under the Law which God gave by Moses to the children of Israel this holy and most perfect Law-giver amongst other points whereby he directed the Ecclesiasticall order and Church-government which that people was to be ruled by instituted and commanded the consecrating of a severall day for his service even of one of seven and of the last of those seven which he had rested on from all his works a most strict precise forbearance of all worldly works on that day 6. But appeareth not at all that God gave any commandement to Adam either before or after his fall binding him or his progenie to the keeping of any day whatsoever as to a thing morall and necessarie neither is there any trace of such a Commandement to be found till the comming of the Israelites to the wildernesse for till then God had left it free 7. That under the New Testament one day of seven is kept to wit the first day of the weeke wherein our Lord Iesus Christ rose from the dead But not for any morall necessity tying all men to observe one day of the weeke Nay not for any expresse Commandement which God the onely Law-giver hath given by Iesus Christ or his Apostles to keepe such a day and namely the first but through an usage which hath beene introduced and conserved in the Christian Church since her first beginnings till this present time 8. That therefore this observation is simply of Ecclesiasticall order and that a cessation from ordinary workes on this day is more particularly requisite than in another day of the weeke seeing the Church hath appointed and set it apart for Gods publike service Yea that an universall refraining from all these workes to the intent that the whole day bee without
pretence 4 Of this I inferre that seeing in the Gospell there is no expresse command touching the keeping of a seventh day of rest it cannot be a morall point For since all other morall points are so often and so expresly injoined therein what likelihood is there that God would have omitted this without making an evident injunction thereof Nay seeing under the old Testament God was so carefull to recommend the keeping of his Sabbaths as may be seene every where in the Bookes of the Prophets is it credible that if he had intended under the new Testament to tie us to the observation of a seventh day of Sabbath he would have shewne as great care to recommend it unto us as he did theirs to the Iewes seeing it is pretended that on Gods behalfe we are as straitly bound to the observation of the Sabbath as they were CHAPTER seventh REASON 7. 1 Manifest reasons out of the three first Evangelists against the morality of the Sabbath What is meant by the Sabbath second first 2 Exposition of Christs answer to the Pharisees who blamed his Disciples for plucking the cares of corne and rubbing them to eate on the Sabbath day 3 First argument out of this answer The Sabbath is declared to be of the same nature that the Shew bread and Sacrifices were of and mercy is preferred unto it Therefore it is not morall 4 Second argument Christ affirmeth that the Sabbath was made for man not man for the Sabbath Therefore it is not morall 5 A reply to this argument refuted 6 Third argument Christ addeth that the Sonne of man is Lord even of the Sabbath day Therefore the Sonne of man being taken for Christ as he is Christ and Mediator it is not morall 7 Fourth argument Christ did handie-works without necessity and commanded servile workes to be done on the Sabbath day without necessity Therefore it is not morall 8 Christ as the Sonne of man was not Lord of the morall Law but only of the ceremoniall Therefore the Sabbath is not morall 9 If the Sonne of man who is Lord of the Sabbath be taken in its vulgar signification for every man the Sabbath cannot be morall 10 Hence it followeth that the Sabbath was onely a positive Law given to the Iewes and not to Christians 1 I Adde that not onely there is nothing expresly set downe in the Gospel confirming the morality of a Sabbath day but much otherwise that it furnisheth strong arguments to overthrow it As among others those namely which are to be found in S. Matthew Ghap. 12. vers 1 c. in S. Marke Chap. 2. vers 23. c. in S. Luke Chap. 6. vers 1 c. where is related a thing that came to passe on the Sabbath day which S. Matthew and S. Marke call simply the Sabbath and S. Luke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Sabbath second first or second principall which the interpretors take diversly Some understand it of two holy daies the one following the other immediately and more particularly of the second day after the first of the feast of unleavended bread For that feast was kept seven daies which all were Sabbaths although the first and the last only were solemne Sabbaths of holy convocation Others take it for the seventh and last day of the said feast of unleavened bread which was a very solemne day and equall in holinesse to the first day of the said feast whence it was called Second First that is to say another first or the first called backe againe and renued A third sort expound it of the second solemne feast of the yeere called the feast of weekes or of first fruits and by S. Luke the Sabbath Second First that is second in order after the first and as it were another first in dignity For all the feast daies were Sabbaths It may be also that this Sabbath Second First fell out on an ordinary Sabbath of the weeke Wherein there is a great apparence of truth seeing the Pharisees blamed Christs Disciples for plucking the eares of corne and rubbing them in their hands to eat on that day which they could not have done with any colour saving on an ordinary and weekely day of Sabbath wherein God had forebidden all kinde of worke and namely the making ready of meat For in all other solemne Sabbaths of yeerely feasts he had expresly permitted this particular worke of making ready whatsoever was necessary to every one to eate as may be seene Exod. 12. vers 16. But although this Sabbath Second first be understood of another day then of an ordinary Sabbath it imports not much and no exception can be taken against it to impaire the strength of the arguments which are gathered out of the foresaid places For whatsoever Christ said in defence of that which his Disciples did and the Pharisees blamed in this Sabbath second first is manifestly generall and pertaineth to all Sabbaths kept in times past among the Iewes whether ordinary or extraordinary Thus then the three Evangelists doe record that Iesus went on the Sabbath day thorow the corne fields and his Disciples plucked the eares of corne and did eat rubbing them in their hands Whereof being reproved by the Pharisees as profaners of the Sabbath whereon God forebad to doe any worke Iesus Christ to cleare them and refute the Pharisees alledgeth the example of David and of those that were with him Which when they were an hungry did take and eate the Shew-bread which was not lawfull to eate but to the Priests alone and were not blamed for this because the necessity of hunger was a sufficient excuse unto them Whence his intent was to inferre that his Disciples also in that which they did then were to be excused of breaking of the Sabbath by the same necessity of hunger which they were pinched with and which gave them liberty to doe that which otherwise was not lawfull to doe on the Sabbath day Moreover Iesus Christ addeth If yee had knowne what this meaneth I will have Mercy and not Sacrifice yee would not have condemned the guiltlesse Of which argument this is the force that if God preferred the works of mercy and of love to the Sacrifices which in all the outward service of the Law were the most holy and would have the Sacrifices to give place to those workes by identity of reason his meaning was also that the keeping of the Sabbath or abstaining from outward works on that day should give place to that mercy and love which man oweth to himselfe or to his neighbours and would not have allowed that a man should consent to die for want of meat to be hunger-starved or to bring harme to himselfe by some other evill rather then to breake the Sabbath by making meat ready or doing some other necessary worke which was otherwise forbidden on the Sabbath day Hee confirmeth this saying The Sabbath was made for man and not man for the Sabbath the meaning of which words is
pleased to subject him unto and to stint unto him that time to wit the seventh day for the particular time of his service even as he appointed unto him the garden of Heden for the place where he would have him to make his residence and there to apply himselfe to admire the workes of his Creator to serve and to worship him And indeed any man may with as good reason conclude that it must needs be a morall thing to serve God in Heden because it was the place where God had setled Adam to be served by him there in the state of his innocency as they doe which seeke to prove that it is a point of morality to keepe a seventh day of Sabbath because God ordained in that state a seventh day to Adam For the determination of a certaine time can no more be a morall point then the determination of a place neither of them being founded in the principles of nature and of naturall justice and equity as should be whatsoever is morall and as indeed is all that is written in the ten Commandements saving the Commandement of the seventh day of Sabbath which is a thing depending entirely on institution and government as shall be seene more fully afterwards Or why may it not be inferred that not only a seventh day but the last of seven is morall because if God ordained a seventh day to Adam it was the last of seven as those against whom we doe dispute doe avouch 6 Now if a seventh day could not be ordained to Adam in quality of a morall thing but onely as a point and rule of order granting that it was prescribed unto him it is inconsequent that it was to continue afterwards by a perpetuall ordinance given to all men For there is no necessity that all men after sinne came into the world ought to be alwaies ruled in Gods service by the same outward order that Adam was ruled by before he sinned seeing things pertaining meerly and simply to order are subject to alteration 7 It is most true that if in the state of innocency God had ordained to Adam a particular day amongst others to serve him it should be as much nay farre more fit and necessary that wee under the state of sinne should alwaies have alike ordinance for us But I say withall seeing it is supposed that Adam had one of seven daies prescribed unto him in that estate although he applyed himselfe every day to Gods service without distraction that we in the estate we are in and wherein we give our selves so seldome and so sparingly to Gods ordinary service by reason of our worldly imployments should have beene tyed to more then one in seven Yet for all that Seeing God hath never prescribed to sinfull men but one seventh day and that as I pretend for the time of the bondage of the Law only Seeing also under the new Testament although we be alwaies sinners he would not stint unto us any day but in that point hath left his Church free I inferre from thence that it is not likely that hee ordained and limitted to Adam a seventh day nay not any other day of Sabbath For by such a limitation he had tyed and inthralled him in that estate of innocency as much and more then his off-spring in the estate of sinne which seemeth to imply that hee was as much and more led daily away from Gods service then are poore sinners which goe farre beyond all reason CHAPTER Third Answer to the second Reason 1. Second reason for the morality of the Sabbath that before the Law was given the people of Israel went not out to gather Manna in the wildernesse on the seventh day of the weeke 2. First answer Of this argument the morality of the Sabbath cannot be inferred no more than of many ceremonies which were religiously observed long before the Law was given 3. Second answer In the wildernesse God commanded the observation of the Sabbath and of sundry other ceremonies before the Law was given and then onely beganne the keeping of the Sabbath 4. Therefore in vaine are urged the words of Exodus Chap. 16. vers 29 30. The Lord hath given you the Sabbath c. which have relation onely to the command newly made 5. Third answer If the institution of the Sabbath had beene more ancient and if it had beene kept by the Patriarches their children had knowne it and practised it in Egypt 6. Nullity of the reply made to this answer that they had forgotten it first because God did never rebuke them for the inobservation of the Sabbath in the land of Egypt 7. Secondly because many godly men which were in Egypt had not forgotten it and yet before the commandement concerning it was given in the wildernesse made never mention of it nay knew it not as is proved by the Text. 8. And by other places of the old Testament 9. Second reply that besides the generall reason which moved God to give the Sabbath to all men he appropriated it to the people of Israel for some other reasons besides 10. First answer to this reply it cannot be proved that GOD gave it to all men nay it is absolutely appropriated to the Iewes 11. Second answer There is not one of the reasons why God gave the Sabbath to the Iewes adapted to other nations although they were capable of many of them 12. Nor also to the Patriarches who had no notice of the Sabbath 13. If in the Scripture any thing be adapted to the Iewes which was common to other men it is knowne to have beene common either by the nature thereof or by the testimony of Scripture But it is not so of the Sabbath 1 THe second argument alledged for the morality of the Sabbath is that before the Law was given by Moses it was observed which is proved by the sixteenth Chapter of Exodus where it is said that on the seventh day the Israelites went not out to gather Manna but rested every man in his place on that day because it was the holy Sabbath unto the Lord which the Lord himselfe had ordained Whence they would conclude that it was already an ancient ordinance knowne of the Israelites to be such that for this cause they went not out on the seventh day to seek Manna that for the same cause God powred it not downe on that day lest it should be an occasion unto them of violating the Sabbath For all this was done before the Law was given the giving whereof is described afterwards in the same Booke of Exodus Chap. 20. 2 To this I answer first that although it could be most cleerely shewed that the Sabbath was observed from the beginning before the Law which notwithstanding cannot be proved that availeth nothing for the morality of the Sabbath We see that from the beginning and in all times before the Law the firstlings of the slocke and the first fruits of the ground were offered to God Genes 4. ver
first three commandements concerning the morall and perpetuall service and next the fourth concerning the ceremoniall service established by him at that time 14 Neither is it a diminishing from Gods Commandements against the prohibition which he hath made Deut. 12. vers 32. to say that the fourth Commandement of the Decalogue was ceremoniall and for a season no more then to say the same of all other commandements manifestly ceremoniall which God gave of old to the Iewes and in consideration whereof as well as of those of the Decalogue God gave in that place objected against us Whatsoever thing I command you observe to doe it Thou shalt not adde thereto nor diminish from it It is not a diminishing from it to explaine the nature thereof and to shâ—w of these ten Commandements which are morall and perpetuall which are ceremoniall and temporall No more is it an unjust usurpation of authority to change times with the wicked Antiochus Dan. 7. vers 25. to keepe no more the seventh day ordained by the fourth Commandement As it is no changing of times to forbeare the keeping of all other daies ordained of God under the Law but it is a submitting of our selves to that changing which God himselfe would have to be made seeing hee had not ordained the Sabbath nor the feast daies but for a certaine space of time to wit til the time of the new Testament as it is manifest by that hath beene said 15 But secondly albeit that which the fourh Commandement enjoineth in expresse termes concerning the seventh day the sanctification of that day and the ceasing from all workes in it be ceremoniall neverthelesse I grant that it is morall in its foundation end marrow and principall substance which must be distinguished from particular determinations laid upon this foundation and added to this principall substance The foundation and principall substance hid and infoulded in the termes of the Commandement is that there must be an order according unto which God is to be served and worshipped not onely by each person by himselfe and in his particular conversation but also openly publikely and in common by the whole body of his people assembled and drawne together that consequently it is necessary a certaine time be appointed for this publike service and applyed ordinarily to that use For without a stinted time how can many meet together to give their minde to the publike practise of Religion This is morall grounded upon the principles of nature Witnesses be the Gentiles which having no other Law but the Law of nature have acknowledged and practised this appointing all of them set dayes for the publike exercise of their Religion This also is ratified by the Gospell which recommendeth unto the faithfull the assembling of themselves together for the preaching of the word administration of the Sacraments common prayers collections and other holy exercises which are in use under the Gospell and consequently that they have appointed times to attend upon them and as under the Old Testament the word of Moses and of the Prophets was read and preached every Sabbath day Acts 13. verse 27. Acts 15. verse 21. that even so the word of the Gospell have dayes appointed wherein it to be read and preached In this doe agree and shake hands together the Law and the Gospell Moses and Christ. Because this is morall God hath injoyned it in the morall Law and this is the scope of the fourth Commandement For as in the three first God ordained the inward and outward service which hee will have every particular man to yeeld unto him every day in private and severally from the society of other men so in this fourth Commandement he injoyneth a service common and publike which all must yeeld together unto him forbearing in the meane while all other businesses to give themselves without disturbance to that necessary duty This is the end of the fourth Commandement for as in the three first he had ordained his service according as it may and ought to be rendred unto him every day upon all occasions particularly by every one apart and out of the company of other men so in this fourth Commandement he injoyneth a solemne time for a publike service which all are bound to render unto him ceassing in the meane while from all other occupations that they may without any disturbance apply themselves unto it with all religious zeale and devotion 16 The thing which is not morall in the fourth Commandement and that I affirme to be an ordinance appertaining to the Iewish government and to the time not of the New but of the Old Testament is that which is expressed by the tearmes of the Commandement to wit the determination of a seventh day and of a particular seventh even the last of seven For in this there is no thing that hath any taste of morality It is not founded on the Law of nature the Gentiles had never any knowledge thereof the Gospell hath not ratified it as hath beene shewed before 17 They object that if there be no thing morall in the fourth Commandement more than I have said the ordinance of the Sabbath day for Gods service shall no more be morall then was the Commandement concerning the building of the ancient Tabernacle to be the place of Gods service seeing this command teacheth us also that of necessity there must be some place assigned for ecclesiasticall meetings and that it was no more needfull to put in the Decalogue Thou shalt keepe the Sabbath day then Thou shalt frequent the Temple 18 To this I answer that verily there is a morality in this point that the faithfull resort of ten to some place where they may attend on GODS service But it was not at all so needfull to make expresse mention thereof in the Decalogue as of an ordinary and set time for that this ordinance concerning such a time draweth of necessity after it the ordinance of some place because it is not possible to flocke together on an ordinary and solemne day to serve God if there be not a place appointed for that purpose But the appointing of a certaine place includeth not the institution of an ordinary time For a place may be ordained for publike meetings wherein there is no ordinary meeting Farre lesse was it necessary nay it was no wayes necessary in regard of the morality to put in the Decalogue a commandement concerning a particular house such as was of old the Tabernacle because although there be some morality by consequence in it or rather a necessary sequele of a morality for as much as necessity being imposed to the faithfull to meet together there must be some place appointed for their meetings but it is not needfull that those meetings should be with that absolute necessity alwayes in a house builded and erected for that end For although they should come together in an open aire having no other cover but the skye in grots and dennes under the ground or