there may be Dissolution Dissolution is the way to not-being It much helps us in the contemplation of the Simplicity of God to look upon it as opposed to Composition all the ways whereof the Learned have referred to these seven Heads Composition is either of 1. Parts which are bounded by quantity as a body having one part upon another 2. Matter and Form as a man of body and soul these two compositions are only found in corporeal things 3. General and special Nature as every species whose common nature is to be found in some other thing where the special nature is not as a living creature and a man 4. Dicimus deum esse bonum justum veracem 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 creaturam 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Alsted Metap Part. 1. cap. 23. A Subject and an Accident as every created substance There are no accidents in God he is wise holy just essentially there is not a substance and a quality in him When God is said only to have Immortality 1 Tim. 6.16 it is to be understood by way of Eminency he so hath it as none hath besides him he hath it originally not derivatively and by participation 5. An Act and a Possibility objective that is to be if the thing looked at as yet is not in being or passive that is not to be though that not-being never shall be if the thing be looked at as in actual being this composition holds concerning Angels 6. A Person and Nature as Christ compounded of the divine Person and humane nature which yet is not properly composition of parts but of number 7. Being and Individuation that is that by which we have such a particular Being as humanity and Peter Obj. Where there is a Plurality there is not Simplicity But in the divine Nature there is a Plurality therefore Ans The Objection holds where there is a plurality of Essences Beings or things but not where there is only a plurality of Subsistences In the divine Nature though there be a Trinity therefore a plurality of Subsistences or Persons yet there is but one Essence In the Trinity there is distinction but not composition Obj. 2. The Attribute of Simplicity concludes that all the Attributes are God himself and consequently that there is no inequality amongst them yet we read that his tender mercies are over all his works so as it may seem Mercy exceeds the other Attributes Ans The meaning is that his mercy is over that is upon all his works not that Gods Mercy exceeds all his other Attributes as if one Attribute were greater then another for all the Attributes of God are equal not one higher or greater then another because they are all God himself From the Simplicity of God it followeth 1. That whatsoever is in God is God 2. Whatsoever God willeth he willed from Eternity and always willeth 3. Whatsoever God willeth he willeth simply absolutely and independently 4. God is Justice Wisdom Love c. essentially although he be said to have them eminently yet he hath them not derivatively Eternity is God without beginning without end and without all manner of succession there is nothing past nor to come It was well said of him who unto the question Quid autem sit aeternitas quaerat aliquis Hîc si respondeam per verbum modestiae nescio recta ingenia per se intelligent a byssum esse What was Eternity answered by that word of modesty I know not It is the measure without measure of the duration of God according to our apprehension Three things are requisite thereunto viz. to be without Beginning without End and without all Change An unalterable and independing Duration It is all at once where there is nothing past nor to come A remaining NOW Duration is either increated viz. Eternity proper to God or created viz. Eviternity the duration of the blessed in Glory or Time which is the duration of the corruptible creature Eternity is a Duration consisting of an eternal NOW without beginning and without ending there is nothing past nor to come Eviternity is a Duration having a continuing NOW with a beginning but without ending The duration of Angels and of the Blessed in respect of their persons and substances admit of no instant concerning which it can be said that it is past but in regard of their operations and other accidents their duration admits of succession Time is a successive Duration having a beginning and ending without any remaining NOW Immensity is God present every where neither included in Deus est sphaera cujus centrum est ubique circumferentia nusquam Enter proesenter Deus â—ic â—bique potenter nor excluded from any place or thing Psal 139.7 Isai 60.1 God is a Sphere whose Center is every where the Circumference no where God is no where and God is every where he is no where in that he is not contained any where he is every where in that he containeth all Hence God in respect of his Omnipresence is compared to an infinite Point God is in every place by his Essence as the universal Cause of the Being and operation of all things by his Presence beholding all things and by his Power upholding all things Besides that Omnipresence of God whereby he is always present with all creatures there are certain peculiar ways of his presence with divers creatures In Christ he dwelleth bodily that is personally Col. 2.9 and filleth the Manhood with the Spirit out of measure Iohn 3.34 In the Saints he dwelleth as in his Temple by the presence of his indwelling Spirit the effect of his special grace 1 Cor. 3.16 He is said to dwell in Heaven because it is the place wherein he is pleased to manifest his glory immediately and in most excellent manner unto the blessed God is said to come to us and depart from us not in respect of his universal Presence or change of place but in respect of the degrees of his in-dwelling Spirit assisting grace and other special effects of his favour towards his people The same also holds true in respect of the common effects of the Spirit in regard of others Bodies are in places circumscriptively bounded by their dimensions without penitration Angels are in places definitively that is though they are not bounded by dimensions of height bredth and depth as bodies yet they are not in two places at once whilest they are in this place they are not in another God is in every place always Immutability is God without any alteration in respect of Being Will or any Accidents Psal 102.27 28. Mal. 3.6 Jam. 1.17 With whom is no variableness nor shadow of turning Obj. God might have willed or not willed the being of the creature else he were not free He that may both will and not will is mutable The sum is the liberty and immutability of God seem not to consist together Ans That immutability and liberty consist together Vide Smisin Tr. 2. disp
clearly seen in respect of its divers created objects which as they have their being from Gods good pleasure so had he so pleased they had never been but continued for ever in their nothing himself notwithstanding eternal all blessed and all glorious Omnipotency is God able to do whatsoever his wisdom doth conceive Gen. 18.14 Matth. 19.26 Isai 46.10 All Contradictions Impossibilities and Repugnancies unto the revealed Will of God are excluded in this Proposition God is Omnipotent or God can do all things That things which imply a contradiction as namely for the same thing to be and not to be and impossibilities as namely for a man not to be a reasonable creature and the like fall not under the compass of Omnipotency is not from any defect it is indeed from the perfection of power in God but from the impossibility of the things so that concerning matters of this nature it is more convenient to say Vnde convenientius dr Ea non possunt fieri quam quod Deus ea non possit facere Tho. Part. qu. 25. art 3. that they cannot be which sheweth their non-possibility to be then that God cannot do them which seemeth to touch upon Omnipotency So likewise that God cannot sin lye or deny himself is not from defect but from the Eminency of his Power and Absolute Perfection whence he is uncapable of being touched with any imperfection Obj. God cannot destroy Sodom until Lot be gone out of it Gen. 19.22 Like speeches whereunto are used elsewhere it seems therefore God is not Omnipotent Ans The Power of God is either absolute and unlimited by it he is able to do all things that are possible though he never do them or ordinate and limited by his Decree and revealed Will according to which God having freely bounded himself changeth not being immutable These words and the like spoken elsewhere are to be understood of his limited not of his unlimited power Though God be Omnipotent yet he is not Omnivolent that is though God can do whatsoever he pleaseth yet God is not pleased to do whatsoever he can Perfection is God all-sufficient and all-excellent not having need of any thing giving sufficience unto and having in him the perfection of all things Gen. 17.1 2. Exod. 6.3 This Attribute renders God as that infinite Sea of all happiness Perfection is increated Glory that is all the Attributes in one word as Happiness is the Sum of Mans good so Glory is the Sum of all Gods Attributes The Perfection of God is Essential Independent Unlimited without increase or decrease As the Power of subordinate causes is contained in the first cause virtually and as the Authority of Under-Officers is in the Prince after a more excellent manner so the virtue of all second causes is contained in the first cause eminently The word Eminently taken in its strict and proper sence seemeth to intend the effect to be in the cause not only in a more excellent manner then in it self but also in a super-created manner Things are in God agreeable to the Nature of God in themselves according to their proper natures Eminential Continency and Virtual Continency that is for one thing to be contained in another eminently as the Excellency of the creature is in the Creator Or Virtually as all things saleable are in money Eccles 10.9 are not the same the first is proper to the Creator the second is found in the creature The Essential Perfection of God is Increated Glory Eternal alwayes the same from which nothing can be taken to which nothing can be added The acknowledgement of the manifested Perfections of God is Glorification viz. The Act of the creature done in time admitting more or less according as God is known or acknowledged CHAP. II. Of the Trinity FOr our better proceeding in searching into this Mystery of Mysteries Consider 1. The Clearness of the Truth from Scriptures 2. What a Person is 3. What it is that constitutes a Person 4. What a Personal Act is the attending whereunto helps much to clear both the Nature of a Person and the Trinity of Persons 5. The Names or Appellations ascribed to the several Persons in the Scripture 6. The Distinction between a Person the Essence 7. The Distinction between a Person and a Person 8. What terms we are to avoid in speaking of the Trinity 9. Satisfaction to some few Objections 10. The Usefulness of this Doctrine Amongst the Multitude of Scriptures The Clearness of this Truth from the Scriptures holding forth the Doctrine of the Trinity of Persons in the Divine Essence Let it at present suffice to transcribe these And God said Let us make man in our image after our likeness Gen. 1.26 And the Lord God said Behold the man is become as one of us to know good and evil Gen. 3.22 Go to Let us go down and there confound their language that they may not understand one anothers speech Gen. 11.7 But none saith Where is God my Makers so is the Hebrew who giveth Songs in the night Job 35.10 And one cried unto another and said Holy holy holy is the Lord of Hosts the whole Earth is full of his Glory Isai 6.3 And the Heavens were opened unto him and he saw the Spirit of God descending like a Dove and lighting upon him and lo a voyce from Heaven saying This is my Beloved Son in whom I am well pleased Matth. 3.16 17. Go therefore and teach all Nations baptizing them in the Name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Ghost Matth. 28.19 But when the Comforter is come whom I will send unto you from the Father He shall testifie of me John 15.26 The Grace of the Lord Jesus Christ and the Love of God and the Communion of the Holy Ghost be with you all Amen 2 Cor. 13.13 For there are three that bare record in Heaven the Father the Word and the Holy Spirit and these three are one 1 John 5.7 A Person viz. an Increated Person is the Divine Essence subsisting in a Relative Property What a Person is The Essence with its Subsistence not the Essence alone not the Subsistence alone 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Subsistentia but both the Essence and the Subsistence constitute a Person this the Greek word holds forth Heb. 1.3 which is translated a Person Subsistence adds unto substances the independing manner of their existing In reasonable Nature it giveth Created in the Divine Nature it is Increated Personality Subsistence considered in its abstract notion as distinct from Essence the manner of the Essence the manner of the Existence for Essence or Being and Existing in God are all one A Relative Property an incommunicable property are Synonima's i. e. they are divers terms and expressions signifying the same thing they give personality and distinguish one person from another The Subsistences in the Divine Nature are relative and individuating that is they are relative properties They are Relative Hae
voces adeò propriè relatione sonant ut nemo intelligens relatione inesse divinis si ratione uti volet negaturus sit Jun. loc com l. 2. c. 19. as appears by their Names viz. Father Son and Holy Ghost and by the order of their Original implyed in those Names They are individuating that is distinguishing and incommunicable in that they are the Subsistences of an absolutely perfect-intellectual-living nature These Individuating Subsistences are by Divines generally called Persons not only from just consequence deduced from other Scriptures but expresly according to our last and best Translation of the Text fore-quoted Heb. 1.3 by a similitude taken from a Created Person the Reason whereof will appear by considering the nature thereof Persona est rational is Naturae substantia individua Boetius Persona ost intellectualis Naturae incommunicabilis Existentia Richardus Victorinus ex Smisingo de Trin. to 2. disp 2. qu. 5. num 108. Vrsin Explic Care part 2. qu. 25 as we have it described diversly By some that it is an individual Substance of a reasonable Nature By others that it is an incommunicable Existence of an intellectual Nature By later Writers that it is an individual or singular Being subsisting living understanding incommunicable not sustained of another not a part of another The Sum is that the term Person signifying that which is most perfect in the whole reasonable Nature whether Angels or men it is aptly used to express the Subsistences of the Divine Nature which is of absolute perfection which aptness of a created to express an increated person notwithstanding Observe yet these differences between them Every created person hath a distinct essence from another Two created persons whether Angels or men have two distinct particular and individual Essences or Natures though they have the same general Essence But all the increated persons have the same Essence John 10.30 One created person hath not his in-being in another but one increated person is in another John 14.10 One created person proceeds from another in time but amongst the increated persons though there be an Eternal Order of their Original one from another yet there is no priority of Time Duration or Nature the one being God the other a creature we must always remember that in applying the term Person by way of similitude unto God we remove from him all imperfection In that the Subsistences in the Divine Nature are Relative Hence it follows that innascibility that is not to be begotten or not to be of another which is a Property of the Father doth not constitute a person and so of any other properties that are not relative In that the Subsistences in the Divine Nature are individuating hence it follows that the active Spiration or Breathing of the Holy Ghost by the Father and the Son though it be Relative for breathing and breathed are Relates yet it doth not constitute a person because it is not proper to either person but common to both 'T is a Relation but not a Relative Property For the clearer understanding of the Nature of a Person as also that there are three and but three Persons the Consideration of a Personal Act is of much use The Acts What a Personal Ast is the attending Whereunto helps much to clear both the Nature of a Person and the Trinity of Persons Modi subsistendi proveniunt ex actibus divinae Essentiae immanentibus Keck The. l. 1. c. 3. or Works of God are of three sorts Essential whose Principle is the Divine Essence subsisting in three Relative Properties of Father Son and Holy Ghost its object the creature Personal whose both Principle and Object or Term is one or more of the three Persons Or mixt the Principle whereof is the Divine Essence the Object or Term one of the Persons such is the Incarnation having the Essence for its Principle the second Person for its term A Personal Act is the Divine Essence or God working eternally and necessarily upon it self The first way of the Divine Essence acting upon it self produceth the first Person The second way of its acting upon it self produceth the second Person The third way of its acting or working upon it self produceth the third Person Hence godly and judicious Divines observing the distinction of the Persons in the Divine Nature to arise from immanent acts therein and that God being a perfect Act must necessarily both understand and will and consequently there being no Act without an Object nor any necessary Object from Eternity but himself that he must needs be both Act and Object Crdo ejus à quo alius per intellectum Ordo ejus qui ab alio per intellectum Ordo ejus qui ab alio per voluntatem Smising de ◠eo trino uno Jun. loc com l. 2. c. 28. and that the Divine Nature acting firstly in a way of understanding upon it seif doth beget Whence is the Name of the Father and that acting upon it self by a reflex act of the understanding this Reflexion is a Conception and Generation of it self which is the manner of the Subsistence of the Son and that both as understanding and understood of it self it is willed of it self in most perfect most desired and most spiritual manner which is the manner of the Proceeding of the Holy Ghost I say hence godly and judicious Divines have conceived The First Person as of God understanding himself The Second Person as of God understood of himself The Third Person as of God beloved of himself As God for the helping of us to understand his Essence Ames Med. lib. 1. cap. 5. Daven in Col. 1.15 Kecker Th. lib. 1. cap. 3. The Names and Appellations ascribed to the several Persons in the Scripture is pleased to take unto himself certain Names and Attributes by the help of which we may the better understand his Essence so is he pleased to take unto himself certain names and appellations to help us to the better understanding of his Subsistence yet in the use of these names and Appellations we must be always mindfull of the Attributes of-simplicity and perfection whence we may so make use of such Appellations as that we remove from God all composition and imperfection The first Person is called the Father 1. Because he is the first in the order of the Original of the Persons 2. Because he is of none though not without the Son 3. Because understanding himself from Eternity he doth thereby as it were form and bring forth in himself a most perfect Image of himself the contemplation of him according to this Eternal Act helps us to conceive of his Eternal Begetting The second Person is called the Son The Generation or the manner and order how the Son is of the Father is taught by these expressions 1. He is called the Word Ioh. 1.1.14 1 Ioh. 5.7 The Word is either inward or outward Inward viz. the cogitation which is as it were the speech
of the mind within it self and to it self especially in the reflex acts of the understanding Outward viz. the expression which is the perceiveable Image of our cogitation so the Son is said to be the inward Word of the Father i. e. the Knowledg of himself and the outward Word of the Father because he makes known the Counsel of God unto the World The Image of the Invisible God Col. 1.15 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is he is the perfect and Essential Image of the Father for God here is taken personally not essentially 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 splendorē emitto The Brightness of his Glory Heb. 1.3 The Person of the Father is set forth by a Metaphor taken from the glorious Light the Person of the Son by the splendor refulgence and brightness of that Light The Character of his Person in the same verse for so indeed is the Word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it is not the same Word with that which is turned Image Col. 1 that is a person that exactly expresseth the Person of the Father as the impression that is upon the wax exactly expresseth the print ingraven upon the seal The third Person is called the Holy Ghost or Holy Spirit 1 Ioh. 5.7 and is from the Father and the Son as from God wholly willing and acquiescing in himself hence he is called the Spirit that is breathed taken passively and Emphatically and is as it were God beloved of himself he is also sayd to Proceed Ioh. 15.26 A Person is distinguished from the Essence not as a thing from a thing The distinction between a person and the Essence Vid Keck log l. 1. sec 2. cap. 5. but as the manner of a Being or a relation is distinguished from the being or thing it self for the better understanding whereof consider that things may be distinguished really rationally or modally Really so one thing in actual being is distinguished from another thing in actual being in respect of their Essences so one apple differeth from another and whiteness in the wall from whiteness in the snow Rationally such is the distinction between the right hand and the left hand of the Pillar this hath no foundation in the things themselves but depends only upon our Conception Modally when the distinction is not between the things and things but between things and the manner or respect of the Being of those things this distinction is more then meerly Rational having its being in the things themselves not in our thoughts yet less then that which is properly real not putting an Essential difference such as is between things and things only distinguishing the manner of the thing from the thing it self see it exemplified in some instances as in a Person and his relations A quality and its degrees viz. Faith stronger and weaker Heat greater or lesser Quantity and its degrees Peter a man and a child A subject and its adjuncts as the hand open and shut A thing and the order of that thing A relation is not the person nor our meer imagination but an actual modification of the person Isaac is a son in respect of Abraham a father in respect of Iacob these relations in him are not his person it self nor our meer conceptions but the actual manner or respects of the being of his Person Degrees are distinguished from the qualities more then in our meer conceit having an actual existence in the thing whether we think of them or not yet not Essentially as divers things for the degree is not a quality but it is a manner of the quality and so of the rest of the instances respectively It remains then a manifest truth that there is an actual distinction the use whereof is great for the help of our understanding between the Essence and the Persons Doctissimiquique Theelogi recentiores personas sacro sancte Trinitatis vccant cum Justino Martyr et Damascene 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Keck Theol. l. 1. cap. 4. Vid. lccum as also between a person and a person in the Trinity and therefore the more diligently to be attended to which is more then Rational yet not Real as the manner of the thing is distinguished from the thing the thing it self remaining the same which distinction is called modal such is the distinction of a person from the Essence according to the general Doctrine of Divines When we sometimes read in Authors that a person is distinguished really from the essence we are to understand Really not strictly and properly but in a large sence namely as opposed to a distinction of Reason and it is as much as if they should say the distinction between a person and the Essence is founded in the Divine nature and not in our reason or conception having its true existence whether we think of it or not A Person is distinguished from a Person The distinction between a person and a person as a relation and manner of a being or thing is distinguished from a relation or manner of a being or thing or otherwise they are distinguished by the order of their original their personal properties and the manner of their working upon the Creature It being but now sufficiently shewn what the manner of a Being or thing is and how it is distinguished from the thing it is not hard to conceive especially in the matter before us where the manner of a thing is a relation how the manner of a thing is distinguished from the manner of a thing From the processions and relations arising out of that infinit Sea of being viz. the divine nature Ioh. 8.42 15.26 appeareth the order of the Original of the persons The order of Original in the divine nature Ordo naturae locum non habet in personis quia earum una et indivisa est naturae est lib. 1. dist 9. S. 4. Inter personas divin non est proprie ordo natura sed originis tantum Smising de Deo trino et uno disp 3. q. 1. Num. 33. is that whereby one person is of another The Father is the first The Son is the second The Holy Ghost the third person but we may not say the Holy Ghost is the first and the Father is the third person The Father is he who is not without another and from whom is another viz. the Son The Son is he who is of another viz. the Father and from whom with the Father is another viz. the Holy Ghost The Holy Ghost is he who is from others viz. the Father and the Son and from whom is not another In the divine nature there is an order of original or priority of order without priority of duration dignity causality or nature properly A personal or incommunicable property is that which is proper to one person the personal property of the Father is to Beget Psal 2.7 the personal property of the Son is to be Begotten Ioh. 1.14.18 the personal property of the Holy Ghost
both natures together As the word God is used Acts 20.28 not in an abstracted sence for the divine Nature which hath no blood but in a concrete sense noting the Person with both Natures viz. divine and humane With as good reason we may conclude That Christ according to the humane nature alone forgiveth sin which who yeildeth not to be an untruth Because we read The Son of man hath power to forgive sin Matth. 9.6 The Apostle here sheweth that man though no other man but the Man Christ Jesus is Mediatour thereby admonishing us in our prayers not to leave out any sorts of men because Christ our Saviour is held forth as taking upon him the nature of man not this or that sort of men Obj. 5. If Christ as God-man be Mediatour then the Divine Nature subsisting in the relation of the Son received the Office of Mediatour and consequently something may be added to God but nothing can be added unto God because he is perfection it self Ans The Divine Nature received not the Office as considered in it self but in respect of its voluntary dispensation as accepting of subsistence with the humane nature that is Christ received and sustained and sustaineth the Office of Mediatour not as God alone nor as man alone but as God-man The divine Nature in respect of its voluntary dispensation the humane Nature properly To the Divine Nature there is not added any thing only a relation but to the humane Nature Vrsin Catec Part 2. quest 31. qu. 1. there is added a real change The Properties of either Nature of the Mediatour are attributed to the whole Person in the Concrete by the communication of properties because that which is proper to either nature is necessarily true of the Person subsisting with both natures Albeit the Mediatorly Office of Christ respects only the Elect yet the Majesty of Christ and that as man extendeth it self unto the whole Creation Thou hast crowned him with glory and honour and hast given him Dominion over the works of thy hands and hast put all things in subjection under his feet Heb. 2.7 8 9. God hath given to the Man Christ Jesus a Lordship and Governing Power over the creatures Matth. 28.18 A Lordship and Governing-power over the Reprobate both Angels and men Phil. 2.10 A Lordship and Headship over and to be Conservator of the Elect Angels 1 Tim. 5.21 Ephes 1.10 Col. 2.10 A Lordship and Saviourly Office of Mediatourship over elect men Ephes 1.22 1 Cor. 15.27 Christ hath all to do where God hath any thing to do As concerning the creature the Kingdom of God and of the Man Christ Jesus are of equal extent Hence their Attributes in that respect are alike God is said to be the King of Kings and Lord of Lords 1 Tim. 6.15 And Christ hath on his vesture and on his thigh a Name written KING OF KINGS AND LORD OF LORDS Revel 19.16 Haeres ex asse God is said to be all in all 1 Cor. 15.28 And Christ is said to be all in all Col. 3.10 He is sole Heir unto God Heb. 1.2 As Pharaoh spake to Joseph Gen. 41.40.44 that doth God say unto Christ Thou shalt be over my house and according to thy w rd shall all my people be ruled only in the Throne will I be greater then thou Without thee shall no man lift up his hand or foot What the Father speaks of that Son Luke 15.31 may be applyed from God the Father unto Christ And all mine are thine and thine are mine John 17.10 In this man viz. the Man Christ Jesus the Kingdom of God and of man are of like and co-equal extent The Principal Effects and Consequents of the Personal Union Of certain Effects and Consequents of the Personal Vnion in respect of the Manhood in respect of the Manhood are 1. The Grace of Eminency whereby the Manhood by reason of this personal union is exalted far above all creatures and now sitteth at the right hand of God 2. Created habitual Grace which Christ received out of measure John 3.34 It was in him in its full latitude in four respects 1. In respect of its Subject Valentia Tom. 4. disp 1 qu. 7. punc 2 here it is to be found in its proper subject as light in the Sun Grace is in Christ not only as in its proper but as in its super-exceeding subject 2. In respect of its Nature There is in Christ all kind of grace 3. In respect of the Intensness of it it is in him in the highest degree in the utmost as much as is possible to be in a creature both negatively it could not be exceeded and positively none was equal unto it The Soul of Christ doth not only eminently contain but exceedeth all the grace that is in Men and Angels 4. In regard of the Effects That he might be fit to derive unto his Members all that measure and fulness of grace that becometh such an Head The Grace that is in the Elect is the same in kind with that created Grace that is in Christ 3. Created Power As Christ received the Spirit out of measure so the Created Power of Christ was and is out of measure The power of working miracles was in Christ as man constantly and permanently after the manner of an habit in which regard he exceeded the power of working miracles which was in the Prophets and Saints who could not work miracles at their pleasure but at times Divine Assistance occasionally enabling of them thereunto The Humanity of Christ Homo Christus habet omnem petentiam humanitas omnem potestatem besides its inherent power which exceeds all other creatures is also to be looked at as an Instrument of the Divinity which is Omnipotent Whence it followeth That Christ as man could and can do whatsoever he pleaseth either by this inherent Power or else as an Instrument of the Divinity The Man Christ is Omnipotent the Humanity hath as much power as a creature is capable of Hereby Christ was capable to receive that compleat Authority of Executing all Power both in Heaven and Earth Matth. 28.18 4. Created Knowledge The Knowledge that is in Christ is either increated or created Increated is that which is in him as God whereby he knoweth all things John 2.25 Created is that which is in him as man and is of three sorts Beatifical Infused and Experimental 1. Beatifical Knowledge is called the Knowledge of Vision by it he doth not only see God face to face as all the rest of the blessed do but seeth also the Manhood in Personal Vnion with the Godhead Christ hanging upon the Cross had the Vision of God even then whiles he suffered desertion by God there was then personal union without any comfort of communion The knowledge of the blessed and the torment of the cursed Of it John 1.18 its principle the perfect understanding of the Manhood it s Medium the light of glory 2. Infused whereby he
is that condition of things possible wherein there is not only a possibility that such things may be but there is also a divine determination that they shall be This is founded in the Decree of God The Existence of things is there actual being in time according to the Decree This proceedeth from the external efficiency of God The creature considered as possible is the object of the Decree The creature in the second state fore-mentioned viz. in its condition of possibility is the object of the Decree Where we must remember the sufficiency of the Creator is the possibility of the creature The possibility of the creature is nothing else but God able to create the creature To think the creature hath a possibility of it self were in effect to think the creature to be a Creator As the Futurition of the creatures is not any thing in the creatures themselves in that as yet they actually are not but is God Esse objectivuÌ„ creaturaruÌ„ in intellâ—ctu divino est ipsuÌ„ esse Dei quia 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 esse Eminenter creaturaruÌ„ est non tam esse creaturaruÌ„ quaÌ„ esse Dei Twiss de sci Med. willing the creatures to be so the possibility of of the creature by the same reason is not any thing in the creature but is God able to cause the creature to be But the Futurition of the creature is nothing else but God willing the creature to be God able to cause the creature or what else is possible to be is his sufficiency God willing the creature to be is his Decree God representing the creature having an objective being in his will is that which is called the divine Idea The creature as possible is the object of the Decree The Idea is the object of the divine knowledge of what is decreed The objective Being of the Creatures in God is the very Being of God Esse Objectivum Creaturarum in intellectu divino est ipsum esse Dei The Creature in God is the Essence it self creating Creatura in Deo est ipsa creatrix Essentia Anselm The Idea is the Divine Essence representing the creature Idea est Essentia Divina Aquinas representans Creaturam The Creatures themselves as they are conceived in the mind of God are the Idea of that nature which they have in themselves Ipsae Creaturae prout in mente divina concipiuntur Twisse de Scien media lib. 1. cap. 7. Numb 14. sunt Idea illius Naturae quam habent in semetipsis The Objective Being of things in respect of the divine understanding is not a relative being but a most absolute and most real being viz. the very Being of God himself Esse Objectivum rerum respectu Intellectus Divini Cajetan in part pri Tho. q. 15. Art 1. non est esse relativum sed absolutum realissimum scil esse Dei We judge with Cajetane saith Doctor Twisse that the objective being of the creatures in God is the very Being of God Nos autem cum Cajetano judicamus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 esse Objectivum Cajetan ibid. Twiss de sci med Creaturarum in Deo esse ipsum esse Dei Were not the Object of Divine Knowledge in God there could be no certaine knowledge of future contingents Objectum proximum immediatum divinae cognitionis Rivet Cattol Orth. tractat 4. qu. 6. non est aliquid extra Deum sed est ipsa Essentia divina quia sequeretur ex suppositâ sententiâ scientiam futurorum contingentium non esse infallibilem Deus in seipso effectus videt tanquam in causa Et quomodo vid. ibid. Which premised the Proposition appears thus The Object of the Decree is not to be sought for out of God himself but both to be sought and found in himself 1. Because the Object of the Decree is from Eternity being as ancient as the decree it self There cannot be an Act without or before the Object 2. The Object of the Decree being Eternal and there being nothing Eternal but God either the Object of the Decree must be in God or no where The Object of the Decree is that which in order proceedeth or fore-goeth the Decree The Sufficiency of God in which the possibility of the creature is founded precedeth the Decree in order of our conception For though the Sufficiency of God and the Decree or Will of God which is also true of all other Attributes are the same in God not having in him any real difference yet they represent unto us notions formally differing The Object of the Decree that is which by the free Act of the Decree acting as it were thereupon passeth from a state of Possibility unto a state of Futurition Now all these predications joyntly are found and only found in the possibility of the creature founded in the Sufficiency of God Therefore the creature in its condition of possibility is the Object of the Decree This Proposition asserting the creature in its condition of possibility to be the Object of the Decree agreeth every way with the Doctrine of the Nature of God and inferreth no incongruities whereas the asserting of any other object disagreeth with the Nature of God and inferreth intolerable inconsequences From these grounds it is not hard to conceive that not man considered as actually being whether in his pure or corrupt estate but as yet to be and in the Divine Essence namely as capable in respect of the Sufficiency of God to be what he pleased is the Object of the Decree scil as concerning man This great Truth would be the more readily and quietly embraced did we duly consider 1. That this one single Act of the Decree is to be conceived by us after the order of the end and the means conducing to that end 2. The End of God in the Decree is himself Prov. 16.4 God made all things for himself i. e. for the manifestation of his glory in a way of justice upon the Reprobate in a way of justice tempered with mercy upon the Elect. The Creation of man mutable the permission of sin the punishing of him justly for sin make up one full and perfect Medium conducing to this end as concerning the Reprobate The Creation of man mutable the permission of sin the effectual Application of Free-grace and Glory notwithstanding sin for the merit sake of Jesus Christ make up one full and perfect Medium conducing to this end as concerning the Elect. 3. That these Acts not being subordinate so as any of them are to be looked at as the end of the other but all of them being co-ordinate that is conjoyned into and making up one way serving unto Gods end we ought not to think or say thus God created man that he might permit him to sin and permitted him to sin that he might punish him for sin Ezek. 33.11 But God created man permitted him to sin and condemneth him for sin to manifest the Glory of his Justice The
because they are but parts of a whole Hence it followeth that the hamane Nature was not before it was assumed The second person in the Trinity in assuming it created it and in creating it assumed it he did not create it without but within his person Obj. If the humane nature of Christ hath not a created personally then Christ as man is wore imperfect then other men who are persons Deest personalius non propter defectum sed propter perfectionem Daver in Col. 2.9 Of the personal union Deitas sustentat humanitatem tanquaÌ„ suaÌ„ et propriam et iâ—â—i dat subsistentiam Daven in Col. Ans The humane Nature of Christ is without a created personality not for the defect of any thing requisite unto its perfection but for the addition of the personal union which far excelleth all created excellency it is without a created personality that it may be made partaker of an increated personality The assumption of the humane Nature into the increated subsntence of the second person of the Trinity is the personal union The Word was made flesh and remaining what he was began to be what he was not The Incarnation is the miracle of miracles a document to beleevers a testimony against unbeleevers Isai 7.14 None can declare Christs generation Isai 53.8 Neither can any declare his Incarnation his Name is secret Judg. 13.18 Wonderful Isai 9.6 A name that no man knoweth viz. perfectly but he himself Rev. 19.12 The Trinity is the greatest the Incarnation is the next mysterie And without controversie great is the Mysterie of godliness God was manif st in the flesh c. 1 Tim. 3.16 Concerning God and Christ we may fitly use those words though there spoken in another sence Prov. 30.4 What is his Name and what is his Sons Name if thou canst tell The divine Nature Parkins on the Creed i. e. the increated person supplyed and always supplyeth the place of created personality giving subsistence to the manhood in Christ Mr Perkins yet acknowledging that amongst all the Works of God there cannot be found another example hereof in the world illustrates the subsistence of the humane Nature in the divine by the plant Missel or Misselto which having no root of its own both lives and grows in the stock or body of the Oak or some other tree In that the person of Christ is increated but one and that one person subsisteth in both Natures hence it followeth 1. That Christ though he assumed the nature of man yet the manhood assumed was not a person otherwise there would be two persons in Christ 2. That the Body of Christ the matter whereof was the sanctified Seed of the Virgin Mary was compleatly Organized and inspired with a reasonable Soul from the instant of its conception besides the ordinary course of nature otherwise the divine Nature should have assumed an Embrio not the nature of a man 3. That though Christ be the Son of God by Eternal generation Christus est unus in utraque natura non duo unus et idem sive tempore natus de patre Filius dei 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 et in tempore natus de Virgine Filius hominis 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Trelcat Jun. lib. 2. loc 4. in respect of the increated proceeding of the second Person from of the first Mat. 16.16 Ioh. 8.42 And the Son of man being born of the Virgin Mary in the fulness of time in respect of his humane Nature Mat. 1.1.18 21 23. yet the person being but one there is but one Son not two Sons 4. That the Virgin Mary is by Elizabeth truly called the Mother of our Lord Luk. 1.43 and by the Ancients Maria a veteribus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Dei para appe atur Synop. pur Theol. disp 25. Nata est humana natura ex Maria Virgine ergo et tota persona nata est sc SecunduÌ„ illuÌ„ sui parti Keck Th. lib. 3. c. 2. the bringer forth of God for the humane Nature never subsisting but in the divine in that the humane Nature was born of the Virgin Mary therefore the whole person was born of the Virgin Mary Because that which is true of the part is true of the whole in respect of that part by the communication of Idioms or properties therefore also that Holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God Luk. 1.35 The personal union in respect of the manner of it The Manner of the Personal Union 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 sub slantialae Tho. p. 3. q 6. Pa. 2. vid. Gâ— Har. cap. 17. Of the Office was without any change of either nature one into another without confusion of one nature with another they remain distinct in themselves and in their properties without division Neither soul nor body did ever subsist in themselves but from the first instant of their Creation they subsisted in the second Person of the Trinity without separation of one nature from another There was no cessation of the Personal Union during the time of Christs death no not whilest his body lay in the grave Lastly It was substantial the substance of the Manhood was united to the substance of the Divine Nature subsisting in the second Person Jesus Christ God-man is as we saw before the greatest of the Essential Works of God that Miracle of miracles such as God never made before nor ever will make the like again Unto this Person God-man Man that in our nature he might suffer for us and God that his sufferings might become effectual unto us thus fitted for the greatest service by the union of both created and increated excellency in him The Father committed the work of Mediation which was readily and freely accepted by the Son thereby undertaking by Bond of Covenant and Virtue of Office the absolute meriting for and application unto the Elect the freedom from all the evil of the curse and the fruition of all the good of the promise Satisfaction and Merit are contained in the Office of Christ formally and Efficacy is contained therein virtually Christ is Mediatour not as man alone nor as God alone but as God-man As God-man he is a Middle-person and consequently a fit Mediatour between God and man Isai 7.14 Matth. 1.23 As God-man he became of no reputation Philp. 2.7 8 9. As God-man he was a Prophet Deut. 18.15 Matth. 11.27 A Priest John 10.17 18. Heb. 4.14 Heb. 7. A King Acts 2.36 Luke 1.33 As God-man he overcame death for us Heb. 2.14 Reconciled us Rom. 5.10 11. Col. 1.21 22. Entered into Heaven for us Heb. 4.14 6.20 c. Therefore he is Mediatour as God-man not as man alone nor as God alone The Lord Jesus took not this honour upon himself but was called thereunto by the Father hence he is said to be preodained 1 Pet. 1.20 fore-appointed Rom. 3.25 Elect of God Isai 42.1 Sanctified of the Father that is set apart to the Office
God by one eternal-free-constant act What the Decree is absolutely determining the Futurition i. e. the infallible future being of whatsoever is besides himself unto the praise of his own Glory the cause and disposer of all things the Antecedent and disposer of all events It is God decreeing because whatsoever is in God is God Ratio actus pueri licèt per negationē a nobis explicitur formaliter consistit in positiva perfectione includente omnē perfectionē formaliter et eminenter quā sequitur talis negatio Smising tract 1. dis 2. n 32. Deus omnia simul et semel comprehendit ab illo aternitatis NVNC ex quo fuit Deus Less de perfect ◠4. c. 1. It is God Decreeing by one Act whatsoever God willeth he willeth by one single act hence God calleth himself I Am Exod. 3.14 to shew that he is without begining without end and without succession In him there is nothing past nothing to come but all is present Whatsoever he thinks he always hath thought and always doth and will think Whatsoever he willeth he always hath Willed and always doth and will Will. There can be no more a new thought a new intent or a new purpose in God then there can be a new God This is further evidenced from the Simplicity of God which is God considered as one meer and perfect Act without all composition Whence he might either not have been or may not be Of him it never could or can be said that any thing was to be in him which is not or cannot be that is A pure Act includes all perfection and removeth all imperfection It is an Eternal Act without beginning without end without all alteration or succession God comprehendeth all things and all events together and at once in the moment of Eternity Eternity is an everlasting NOW without beginning without end without succession all at once always It is a free act proceeding from God not as the Son from the Father nor as the Holy Ghost from the Father and the Son by a necessity of nature but so as there is no necessary connexion between his absolut being and the being of the things that are Decreed God hath no need of the things decreed he might have been without them he had been blessed for ever though they had never been It is a constant act What God willeth he willeth always a meer and a pure act without any interruption or shadow of change By it God determineth absolutely because his Decree is the first and and universal cause it is one Act certain and independent all things and all events depending thereupon By it He determineth infallibly God being immutable infinitly wise and able to see all his will fulfilled By it He so fore-disposeth of all as serveth to the manifestation of his all-glorious perfections He made all things for himself Even the Wicked for the day of Evil Prov. 16.4 He is both Alpha and Omega the First and the Last Rev. 1.17 It is the cause and disposer of all things being the first and universal cause before all second causes which are the effects of it It is the Antecedent and disposer of all events consequently of sin The Decree is the antecedent not the cause of sin sin is the consequent not the effect of the Decree As the Decree is the antecedent so it is also the disposer of sin God is the Orderer of sin Acts 4.28 the disorder of the second cause falleth under the order of the first but he neither is nor can be the Author of sin Iam. 1.13 A Consequent Non paucos dissolvitnodos distinctio illa necessaria inter effectū et consequens Prideaux lect 1. de Absol decreto is an event infallibly following something foregoing not as an effect followeth its cause but rather as the night followeth the day of which the day foregoing is no cause according to order of divine institution Death is the Antecedent of the Resurrection but not the cause The Resurrection is the consequent but not the effect of Death The fall of the Jews was the Antecedent not the cause of the calling of the Gentiles The removing of the Romane Empire from the West was an Antecedent not a cause of the Revelation of Antichrist The calling of the Gentiles the Revelation of Antichrist were consequents not effects of these there Antecedents As the Sun had it the faculty of seeing could the whole Globe be presented at the same time halfe whereof only in regard of its figure is now in sight of it at once would with one look behold it all so God by one act comprehends all things and all events always The Decree is that everlasting womb wherein is conceived whatsoever hath been is or shall be Time and Eviternity that is the duration of the Creature upon Earth and in Heaven or Hell do but bring forth what is therein conceived according as it is conceived The Decree is all things in Gods purpose Creation and Providence are but the execution of the Decree the Decree containeth all things eminently The Decree is that one from which is all If the Prophet contemplating the Comprehensiveness of Gods Providence concerning the Waters and Heaven the dust of the Earth the Mountains and the Hills all which is but a little part of the execution of his Decree breaketh out thus Who hath measured the waters in the hollow of his hand and meted the Heaven with a span comprehended the dust of the Earth in a measure and weighed the Mountains in Scales and the Hills in a Ballance Isai 40.12 how much more cause have we to be wrapped up with holy admiration in contemplating the Decree it self which eminently containeth all and say who is this that doth not only measure the waters mete out the Heavens comprehend the dust weigh the mountains and hills but doth also exactly and infallibly comprehend and dispose of all things all events which have been are or shall be in this world or in the world to come yea and in Hell it self in one eternal act Whatsoever can be conceived besides God himself What the object of the Decree is falleth under one of these our conditions viz. of 1. Impossibility 2. Possibility 3. Futurition i. e. the infallible after-being of things 4. Existence Impossibility is when the nature of things is such as their very being implyeth a contradiction as for a thing to be and not to be at the same time of these as was said before it is more conveniently said that they cannot be then that God cannot do them Possibility is that condition of things wherein as their is no repugnancy in the nature of such things but that they may be so neither is their any determination by God that they shall be this is founded in the sufficiency of God as for the like things to be done in Tyre and Sidon that were done unto Corazin and Bethsaida was possible but not decreed Futurition
that necessary and infallible connexion with Eternal life whence salvation may be certainly promised to the person so qualified Or Saving Qualifications are taken improperly First Causally viz. instrumentally for the external means whereby a saving work is wrought so that act of hearing the Word by which faith is begotten in the heart is called saving 2. In respect of the purpose of God and so all previous dispositions intended by God as preparative unto a saving work afterwards to be wrought by him are by some called saving But we are to know that a saving work in the two last sences neither being saving properly nor having a personal promise of salvation made thereunto and therefore indeed is no saving work falleth not under the compass of this question By Faith we are to understand the Faith of Gods Elect which we ordinarily call justifying or saving Faith Concerning the varity of judgements The various judgements concerning the question touching the relation that qualifications before faith have unto conversion Some erre on the one hand with the Enthusiasts not giving them their due by denying any preparatory use of them more on the other by giving them too much we all being prone thereunto by reason of that legal self the remainders of which are yet dwelling in us Albeit we take so much from Christ as we overgive to them whose differing tenets together with their gradual aberrations from the truth and defections even unto the Pelagian heresie it may not be unprofitable in this place to take a brief notice of beginning with the last Pelagius affirmed that man merited grace by the Works of Nature Acta Scripta Synod Art 3 4. The Missilienses by Prosper called the reliques of Pelagians and commonly Semi-Pelagians affirmed that man by previous dispositions performed by the strength of nature obtained grace as a reward The Papists teach Bellarm. de Justif l. 1. c. 2 Zeged sum doct Papist That there are certain pre-requisite and preparatory Dispositions that merit the infusion of grace and justification which to them is the same and more then conversion is with us with the merit of congruity The Arminians taxe the Orthodox Acta Scripta Synod ubi supra Pemble alii for asserting all acts before faith to be sin and teach that there is in a man not regenerate that is vvithout faith a hunger and thirst after righteousness a hatred of sin and such other like acts which ought to be accounted acceptable unto God unto the communicating of further grace that to all such God giveth sufficient grace to believe and leaveth it in the power of such a soul vvhether it will believe or not Others vvith vvhom the fore-mentioned are not to be named reverend learned judicious and pious though they justly abhor the tenets of the fore-mentioned yet seem to teach that there are some qualifications before faith that are saving vvhereunto faith and salvation may be ascertained This tenet religiously premising all due reverence and high esteem in the Lord unto the persons This discourse I hope in the Spirit of Christ craveth leave to examine and also to propound the following considerations for the negative alvvays asserting That it is our duty to encourage orderly to the uttermost to believe in Christ and to hold forth the increase of hope according as the preparatory work doth increase yet not so far as certainly to promise faith or salvation or to deny yea or not to teach the soul before faith however qualified to be the object of and to lye under the si credideris that is the If you believe of the Gospel So as it remains a truth concerning the Soul yet without faith however qualified that if God shevveth it mercy it is free and meer mercy if he doth not shevv it mercy he doth it no vvrong and that his purpose to shevv or not to shevv mercy thereto is yet unrevealed Texts of Scripture against ascertaining Salvation to any qualifications before faith Mark 16.16 He that believeth not shall not be damned John 3.34 He that believeth not the Son shall not see life but the wrath of God abideth on him Rom. 14.23 Whatsoever is not of faith is sin Heb. 11.6 But without faith it is impossible to please God 2 Cor. 13.5 Examine your selves whether you be in the faith prove your own selves Know you not your own selves how that Jesus Christ is in you except ye be Reprobates John 5.12 He that hath the Son hath life and he that hath not the Son hath not life John 15.5 For without me you can do nothing Rom. 8.9 Now if any have not the Spirit of Christ he is none of his Mat. 7.17 18. Even so every good tree brings forth good fruit but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit a good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit Mat. 12.33 Either make the tree good and his fruit good or else make the tree corrupt and his fruit corrupt 1 Cor. 13.2 3. And though I give my body to be burned and have not charity it profiteth me nothing Which charity they that are without justifying faith have not it being the effect thereof Gal. 5.6 For in Jesus Christ neither circumcision availeth any thing nor uncircumcision but faith which worketh by love Rom. 8.2 For the Law of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus hath made me free from the Law of sin and death To assert the death of sin before the in-dwelling Spirit of Christ Jesus is to assert the effect before the cause So of the Scriptures the Arguments follow Arg. 1. To promise salvation before faith and consequently before Christ holds not correspondency vvith the rest of Gods Dispensation of his Acts of grace who so orders the administration thereof as that Christ may have the preheminence in all things Which appeareth by the follovving induction of some particulars God his love to his viz. Election is in Christ Ephes 1.4 The Meritorious Procuring of the effects of this love to be applyed viz. Redemption was wrought by Christ In the first actual application of this Love by effectual Vocation the Soul passively receiveth Christ by the infused grace of faith for unto Dr Ames putting the Souls passive receiving of Christ before the active I fully consent and conceive it manifest that the nature and very form of faith consisting in receiving of Christ it thence followeth that if the Soul acting faith that is by the second act of faith receiveth Christ actively then by the grace of faith viz. by the first act it receiveth Christ passively If then Gods Love to his be in Christ the meritorious procuring the effects of this Love to be applyed be by Christ the first actual application of this Love be the receiving of Christ judg whether it be agreeable to that administration which giveth unto Christ the preeminence in all things that the revelation of this Love which is clearly
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Sicredideris particula si non est 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Buc. loc 21. q. 3. In which respect we are said to be chosen in him Ephes 1.4 Ascribing due glory unto the Father takes not from but adds to the glory of the Mediatour That Name above all names given unto the Mediatour is Jesus Christ the Lord Philip. 2.9 10 11. Gods Name is the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ 2 Cor. 1.3 Ephes 1.3 1 Pet. 1.3 Christ is all and in all Col. 3.11 God is all in all 1 Cor. 15.28 Christ is all and in all efficiently and meritoriously God is all in all essciently and originally Obj. 3. The active and passive Obedience of Christ is the condition of the salvation of the Elect Jes 53.10 As Adams personal and perfect obedience was a condition in the first Covenant therefore though grace be free in respect of election yet it is not free in respect of the Application of the good of Election Ans The Application both of grace and glory and all the good of the Covenant of grace are free to us though conditioned unto Christ Free-grace exciudes not Christs Merit but mans merit Obj 4. Faith is a condition though not of it self yet of salvation that in the Elect themselves therefore the Application of salvation seems not to be free in respect of the Elect. Ans A Condition is either a Condition properly so called i. e. an antecedent Condition Or a Condition improperly so called i. e. a consequent Condition A Condition properly so called is a Law or Observation annexed to a business the performance whereof lyeth upon the Covenant and accordingly the business becometh valid or null Such a condition was Works in the first Covenant If Faith were such a condition there would soon be an end of the Covenant of grace yea the Covenant of grace were indeed no Covenant of grace A Condition improperly so called or a Consequent Condition is such a condition whose performance by the Covenantee is absolutely undertaken for and irresistably wrought by the Covenantor and not left in suspence upon the Covenantee to be performed by his own strength Faith is a consequent condition not an antecedent condition So as this Proposition I will give Eternal life unto the Elect if they do believe is aequivolent unto this I will out of my absolute will give unto the Elect Eternal life because I will out of my absolute will give unto the Elect to believe The Condition of Faith depends not upon the Will of the Elect either to be or not to be but upon the absolute and gracious Will of God Obj. 5. Repentance and New-obedience are necessary to salvation Luke 13.3 Heb. 3.14 Therefore the Application of the good of Election seemeth not to be free in respect of us Ans Good Works which is also true of Repentance are necessary as the way appointed of God unto salvation but not as the cause this were to change the Covenant of grace into a Covenant of works Our good works are the effects of grace the reward of our good works is a reward of grace Good Works are necessary to salvation as the way not as an instrument or cause Faith is necessary as the way and as an instrument The term Special why diligently to be observed the active and passive Obedience of Christ is necessary as a Meritorious cause The Reason why the term Special is diligently to be observed in this Proposition is That we may the more distinctly conceive of the nature of grace and both discern and eschew the errour of the enemies of grace who so affirm it as in effect they deny it and whilest they seem to stand for grace they indeed withstand and overthrow it either by an equivocation in or by a sophistical interpretation of the term Grace * Pelagiani naturae vim gratiae nomine nuncupare solebant quo sententiāsuā occultarēt offensam hominū de gratia Dei sanctè sententiā e◠commodiùs vitarent Twiss vind grat errat 9. Sect. 9. The Pelagians Semi-pelagians Jesuits and Arminians all affirm this Proposition viz. That Faith is the Effect of Grace but understanding the word Grace therein in such a various and graceless sence as followeth The Pelagians understand by grace only the grace of nature that is the remainder of the Image of God in man after the fall whereby the Will without any further help from supernatural grace is able to believe Thus the Pelagians confound grace and nature The Semipelagians or Massilienses men of much account for learning their time whom Prosper in his Epistle to Augustine calleth the Reliques of the Pelagians understand by grace the conjunction of supernatural grace with free-will So as they both concure together as Joynt-workers and partial-causes i. e. fellow-causes in working of faith Which help of supernatural grace man according to them merits by the good use of his free-will The Jesuits understand by grace Facientiquod in se est presertim si vivat sub notitia Evangelii Deus non denegat auxilium primae gratiae Smising disp Theol. Tom. 1 Tr. 3. disp 6. Fidelis faciens quod ex se est ex congruo meritur gratiā justific antē idem 623. Justificatus potest de congruo mereri gratiam perseverandi idem 700. N. 518. Justificatus potest de condigno mereri salutem ibid. the conjunction of free-will and supernatural grace So as they both concur as joynt partial or fellow-causes in the working of faith Where also note That they understand not faith as we do but define their faith to be a general knowledge and certainty whereby they conclude the Word of God to be divine and true The Sum of their Doctrine comes to this To the natural man that doth what in him lyes especially if he liveth under the knowledge of the Gospel God will not deny the help of the first grace The believer that doth what in him lyeth merits with the merit of congruity justifying grace i. e. habitual grace according to them The justified person may merit with the merit of conguity the grace of perseverance The justified Person persevering may merit salvation with the merit of condignity The Arminians understand by grace the conjunction of supernatural grace yet that is but supernatural common grace with free-will So as both concur together as co-working joynt partial or fellow-causes of faith as it is with a man and a boy drawing the sameship together So as the work is not wrought by grace alone without free-will nor by free-will alone without grace but by both together Whence it followeth according to them which they also affirm that as much grace on Gods part may be put forth upon one that finally resisteth the motion of grace as there is upon one that yeildeth obedience thereunto And that the last and conclusive reason in such a case why one believeth and the other believeth not is from the free co-operation of
the passive voyce as being received by Christ before he makes mention of himselfe in the active voyce as having actively received Christ Receptie respeciu hominis est vel passiva vel activa Medulla l. 1. c. 26. Upon this Text Doctor Ames grounds that Spiritual and profitable distinction of a double receiving of Christ Passive and Active Passive whereby the Spiritual principle of grace is ingenerated Active proceeding from that ingenerated habit of grace and the operation of God fore-going and exciting thereunto we are received of Christ before we doe receive Christ Christ in working the grace of faith receiveth us by the act of faith we receive him Christ taketh the Soul before the Soul taketh him A third place to the same purpose is Ephes 2.1.5 And you hath he quickned who were dead in trespasses and sins even when we were dead in sins he hath quickned us together with Christ The infusion of the habit of Faith or Grace into the Soul is the quickning of the Soul until then the Soul is dead as a dead body so a dead Soul is passive in respect of its quickning or being made alive That the infusion of saving faith or saving grace is the infusion of Life appeares thus The Spirit of the Command and Promise viz. that infused grace which inclineth us to obey the Command and receive the Promise is Life the Image of God in Adam which consisted in a conformity to the Command was his spiritual life the spirit of Faith is the spirit of the Command 1 Joh. 3.23 this is his Commandement That we should beleeve on the name of his Son Jesus Christ that it is the spirit of the Promise is out of doubt Joh. 3.33 As the Image of God in Adam which consisted in conformity to the command was his Spiritual life so the Image of God created anew in the Soul is life either this is life or what can be life As the spirit of sinne is the spirit of death so by the rule of contraries the spirit of effectual saving grace is Spiritual life He that hath the Sonne hath life 1 Joh. 5.12 But every Beleever hath the Sonne From the nature of the grace of faith receiving of Jesus Christ as our Lord and Saviour being of the essence and form thereof as a natural principle of natural sense motion and action is natural life so a supernatural principle of supernatural sense motion and action is supernatural life But such a Principle is saving faith and each other saving grace No Life-lesse principle can enable the Soul to a Life-act it cannot be reasonably conceived how a Beleever as a Beleever should not be alive The summe is this text holds forth an Active-quickning Christ enlivening a dead passive Soul So from Scripture the Arguments follow First from the supernatural nature of the Habit of saving faith or of the habitual frame of the New Creature In receiving a supernatural Habit Theologi vocant habirum infusum per se quiaper se sua natusra postulat ita non alitèr fieri suarez Meraph Tom. post disp 44. sect 13 n. 6. or Principle the Soul is passive saving faith or the habitual frame of the New Creature is a supernatural Habit or Principle therefore in receiving saving faith or the habitual frame of the New Creature the Soul is passive Supernatural is that which exceeds the power of Nature and is received of the Soul by way of inspiration only as the gift of Prophecy or both by inspiration and infusion as the habits of grace such habits the Schools call Habits infused of themselves their very nature denying them to be otherwise attained either by acts or any created cause whereby they are distinguished from Habits infused by accident such as are the gifts of Tongues and the gifts of healing which though they are ordinarily acquired and gotten by acts of study and practise yet have sometime been infused as in the Apostles time In receiving that supernatural saving habit or principle before which the soul hath received no supernatural saving habit or principle the soul is passive But the grace of saving faith is such a supernatural saving habit or principle received before which the soul hath received no supernatural saving habit or principle Therefore in receiving the supernatural saving habit or principle of faith the soul is passive From the nature of the subject of saving faith which is wholly unable to confer any causative power towards the producing of such an effect In receiving a miraculous impression the soule is passive but the infusion of the habit of faith or principle of life in Vocation or Conversion is a miraculous impression Vocation is a miracle it being no lesse a miracle to raise a soul from spiritual than a body from natural death therefore in receiving the infused habit of faith the soul is passive notwithstanding God oft-times makes such use as he pleaseth of men in working a miraculous effect in them yet because in such works the whole efficiency alwayes flows from God and none from man Men are passive in receiving such miraculous effects or impressions Moses putting his hand into and plucking it out of his bosome Exod. 4.7 Naamans dipping himself seven times in Jordan 2 King 5.14 conferred no more power to the curing of their Leprosie nor the womans touching the hem of Christs garment Mark 5.28 29. to the healing of her issue of blood than if they had done nothing In receiving that saving power to do before which there is no such active saving power the soul is passive we cannot do any thing whilst we are but yet receiving power to do but in receiving the habit of faith we receive that saving power to do before which there is no such active saving-power Therefore in receiving the habit of faith the soul is passive Vocation is compared to Circumcision of the heart Deut. 30.6 to Creation to powring out of the Spirit so is the habit of faith there called Tit. 3.6 to quickning or making alive As therefore the person circumcised was passive in Circumcision the creature in its creation the subject quickned in its vivification and the subject into which precious water is powred is passive in respect of the water powred thereinto So the soul in Vocation which is all these spiritually as being that work wherein the heart is circumcised quickned hath inherent saving grace created in it and powred out into it by the Spirit must needs be passive The contrary tenet makes us in the creation of faith to be our own creators in part An assertion as full of pride as empty of reason it makes us in part authors of our faith a high degree of spiritual facrilege against the glory of Christ and grace of the Gospel Obj. 1. The Soul before and in receiving of grace is active in respect of the use of means therefore not meerly passive Sol. Passive is taken either absolutely for that which is simply passive and