Selected quad for the lemma: nature_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
nature_n conceive_v divine_a subsistence_n 3,611 5 15.0046 5 false
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A61548 A discourse in vindication of the doctrine of the Trinity with an answer to the late Socinian objections against it from Scripture, antiquity and reason, and a preface concerning the different explications of the Trinity, and the tendency of the present Socinian controversie / by the Right Reverend Father in God Edward, Lord Bishop of Worcester. Stillingfleet, Edward, 1635-1699. 1697 (1697) Wing S5585; ESTC R14244 164,643 376

There are 10 snippets containing the selected quad. | View original text

and_o these_o be_v call_v different_a modes_n of_o subsistence_n on_o which_o the_o distinct_a personality_n be_v found_v which_o can_v be_v no_o other_o than_o relative_a but_o a_o person_n be_v that_o which_o result_v from_o the_o divine_a nature_n and_o subsistence_n together_o and_o although_o a_o person_n can_v be_v say_v to_o be_v a_o relative_a consider_v as_o such_o yet_o be_v join_v with_o the_o manner_n of_o subsistence_n it_o do_v imply_v a_o relation_n and_o so_o a_o person_n may_v be_v say_v to_o be_v a_o relative_a be_v 23._o but_o say_v they_o if_o the_o three_o person_n have_v all_o the_o same_o individual_a substance_n than_o they_o be_v true_o and_o proper_o only_a three_o modes_n and_o therefore_o although_o among_o man_n personality_n be_v distinct_a from_o the_o person_n because_o the_o person_n be_v distinct_a intelligent_a substance_n yet_o this_o can_v hold_v where_o there_o be_v but_o one_o individual_a substance_n the_o question_n be_v whether_o those_o they_o call_v nominal_a trinitarian_n be_v liable_a to_o the_o charge_n of_o sabellianism_n the_o answer_n be_v that_o they_o can_v because_o they_o assert_v far_o more_o than_o three_o name_n viz._n that_o each_o person_n have_v the_o divine_a nature_n distinct_o belong_v to_o he_o but_o say_v they_o 291._o these_o person_n be_v but_o mere_a modes_n no_o say_v the_o other_o we_o do_v not_o say_v that_o the_o person_n be_v only_o a_o modus_fw-la but_o that_o it_o be_v the_o divine_a nature_n or_o godhead_n subsist_v under_o such_o a_o modus_fw-la so_o that_o the_o godhead_n be_v still_o include_v in_o it_o join_v to_o it_o and_o distinguish_v by_o it_o grant_v all_o this_o the_o unitarian_n reply_n yet_o where_o there_o be_v the_o same_o individual_a substance_n the_o person_n can_v be_v only_o a_o modus_fw-la to_o which_o it_o be_v answer_v that_o this_o individual_a substance_n have_v three_o distinct_a way_n of_o subsist_v 306._o according_a to_o which_o it_o subsist_v distinct_o and_o different_o in_o each_o of_o the_o three_o divine_a person_n so_o that_o here_o lie_v the_o main_a point_n whether_o it_o be_v sabellianism_n to_o assert_v the_o same_o individual_a substance_n under_o three_o such_o different_a modes_n of_o subsistence_n if_o it_o be_v the_o most_o learned_a and_o judicious_a of_o the_o father_n do_v not_o know_v what_o sabellianism_n mean_v as_o i_o have_v show_v at_o large_a in_o the_o follow_a discourse_n for_o they_o utter_o disow_v sabellianism_n and_o yet_o assert_v vii_o that_o the_o several_a hypostasis_n consist_v of_o peculiar_a property_n in_o one_o and_o the_o same_o divine_a substance_n but_o it_o be_v not_o the_o authority_n of_o father_n which_o they_o regard_v for_o they_o serve_v they_o only_o as_o stone_n in_o the_o boy_n way_n when_o they_o quarrel_n viz._n to_o throw_v they_o at_o our_o head_n let_v we_o then_o examine_v this_o matter_n by_o reason_n without_o they_o person_n among_o man_n say_v they_o be_v distinguish_v from_o personality_n because_o they_o have_v distinct_a substance_n therefore_o where_o there_o be_v but_o one_o substance_n the_o person_n can_v be_v only_o a_o mode_n and_o therefore_o the_o same_o with_o the_o personality_n i_o answer_v that_o the_o true_a original_a notion_n of_o personality_n be_v no_o more_o than_o a_o different_a mode_n of_o subsistence_n in_o the_o same_o common_a nature_n for_o every_o such_o nature_n be_v in_o itself_o one_o and_o indivisible_a and_o the_o more_o perfect_a it_o be_v the_o great_a must_v its_o unity_n be_v for_o the_o first_o be_v be_v the_o most_o one_o and_o all_o division_n come_v from_o distance_n and_o imperfection_n the_o first_o foundation_n of_o distinction_n be_v diversity_n for_o if_o there_o be_v no_o diversity_n there_o will_v be_v nothing_o but_o entire_a and_o perfect_a unity_n all_o diversity_n come_v from_o two_o thing_n dissimilitude_n and_o dependence_n those_o philosopher_n call_v megarici_fw-la do_v not_o think_v much_o amiss_o who_o say_v that_o if_o all_o thing_n be_v alike_o there_o will_v be_v but_o one_o substance_n or_o be_v in_o the_o world_n and_o what_o we_o now_o call_v different_a substance_n will_v be_v only_o different_a modes_n of_o subsistence_n in_o the_o same_o individual_a nature_n the_o difference_n of_o substance_n in_o create_a being_n arise_v from_o those_o two_o thing_n 1._o a_o dissimilitude_n of_o accident_n both_o internal_a and_o external_a 2._o the_o will_n and_o power_n of_o god_n whereby_o he_o give_v they_o distinct_a and_o separate_a being_n in_o the_o same_o common_a nature_n as_o for_o instance_n the_o nature_n or_o essence_n of_o a_o man_n consider_v in_o itself_o be_v but_o one_o and_o indivisible_a but_o god_n give_v a_o separate_a existence_n to_o every_o individual_a whereby_o that_o common_a nature_n subsist_v in_o so_o many_o distinct_a substance_n as_o there_o be_v individual_n of_o that_o kind_n and_o every_o one_o of_o these_o substance_n be_v distinguish_v from_o all_o other_o not_o only_a by_o a_o separate_a internal_a vital_a principle_n and_o peculiar_a property_n but_o by_o such_o external_a accident_n as_o do_v very_o easy_o discriminate_a they_o from_o each_o other_o and_o the_o subject_n of_o all_o these_o accident_n be_v that_o peculiar_a substance_n which_o god_n have_v give_v to_o every_o individual_a which_o in_o rational_a being_n be_v call_v a_o person_n and_o so_o we_o grant_v that_o in_o all_o such_o create_a being_n the_o personality_n do_v suppose_v a_o distinct_a substance_n not_o from_o the_o nature_n of_o personality_n but_o from_o the_o condition_n of_o the_o subject_n wherein_o it_o be_v the_o personality_n in_o itself_o be_v but_o a_o different_a mode_n of_o subsistence_n in_o the_o same_o common_a nature_n which_o be_v but_o one_o but_o this_o personality_n be_v in_o such_o a_o subject_n as_o man_n be_v it_o from_o thence_o follow_v that_o each_o person_n have_v a_o peculiar_a substance_n of_o his_o own_o and_o not_o from_o the_o nature_n of_o personality_n but_o when_o we_o come_v to_o consider_v a_o divine_a essence_n which_o be_v most_o perfect_o one_o and_o be_v whole_o uncapable_a of_o any_o separate_a existence_n or_o accident_n there_o can_v be_v no_o other_o way_n of_o distinction_n conceive_v in_o it_o but_o by_o different_a modes_n of_o subsistence_n or_o relative_a property_n in_o the_o same_o divine_a essence_n and_o herein_o we_o proceed_v as_o we_o do_v in_o our_o other_o conception_n of_o the_o divine_a nature_n i._n e._n we_o take_v away_o all_o imperfection_n from_o god_n and_o attribute_v only_o that_o to_o he_o which_o be_v agreeable_a to_o his_o divine_a perfection_n although_o the_o manner_n of_o it_o may_v be_v above_o our_o comprehension_n and_o if_o this_o be_v own_v the_o trinity_n of_o the_o mob_n i_o be_o not_o ashamed_a to_o own_v myself_o to_o be_v one_o of_o they_o but_o it_o be_v not_o out_o of_o lazyness_n or_o affect_a ignorance_n but_o upon_o the_o great_a and_o most_o serious_a consideration_n 15._o they_o may_v call_v this_o a_o trinity_n of_o cipher_n if_o they_o please_v but_o i_o think_v more_o modest_a and_o decent_a language_n about_o these_o matter_n will_v become_v they_o as_o well_o as_o the_o thing_n themselves_o much_o better_a and_o they_o must_v prove_v a_o little_a better_o than_o they_o have_v do_v that_o different_a modes_n of_o subsistence_n in_o the_o divine_a nature_n or_o the_o relation_n of_o father_n and_o son_n be_v mere_a cipher_n which_o be_v so_o often_o mention_v in_o scripture_n as_o a_o matter_n of_o very_o great_a consequence_n and_o that_o when_o we_o be_v baptize_v in_o the_o name_n of_o the_o father_n son_n and_o holy_a ghost_n we_o be_v baptize_v into_o a_o trinity_n of_o cipher_n but_o our_o unitarian_n proceed_v and_o say_v that_o the_o same_o author_n affirm_v not_o only_o the_o personality_n 10._o but_o the_o person_n to_o be_v mere_o relative_n for_o he_o say_v that_o every_o person_n as_o well_o as_o every_o personality_n in_o the_o trinity_n be_v whole_o relative_n 157._o but_o it_o be_v plain_a he_o speak_v there_o not_o of_o the_o person_n in_o himself_o but_o with_o respect_n to_o the_o manner_n of_o subsistence_n or_o the_o relative_a property_n belong_v to_o they_o but_o if_o the_o notion_n of_o a_o person_n do_v beside_o the_o relative_a property_n necessary_o suppose_v the_o divine_a nature_n together_o with_o it_o how_o can_v a_o person_n then_o be_v imagine_v to_o be_v whole_o relative_n but_o they_o urge_v that_o which_o make_v the_o first_o person_n in_o the_o trinity_n to_o be_v a_o person_n make_v he_o to_o be_v a_o father_n and_o what_o make_v he_o to_o be_v a_o father_n make_v he_o to_o be_v a_o person_n and_o what_o follow_v from_o hence_o but_o that_o the_o relative_a property_n be_v the_o foundation_n of_o the_o personality_n but_o by_o no_o mean_n that_o the_o person_n of_o the_o father_n be_v nothing_o but_o the_o relative_a property_n
quality_n and_o disposition_n which_o we_o perceive_v by_o observation_n and_o arise_v either_o from_o constitution_n or_o education_n or_o company_n or_o acquire_v habit_n 2._o as_o to_o the_o true_a ground_n of_o the_o real_a difference_n between_o the_o existence_n of_o one_o individual_a from_o the_o rest_n it_o depend_v upon_o the_o separate_a existence_n which_o it_o have_v from_o all_o other_o for_o that_o which_o give_v it_o a_o be_v distinct_a from_o all_o other_o and_o divide_v by_o individual_a property_n be_v the_o true_a ground_n of_o the_o difference_n between_o they_o and_o that_o can_v be_v no_o other_o but_o the_o will_n of_o god_n and_o no_o consequent_a faculty_n or_o act_n of_o the_o mind_n by_o selfreflection_n etc._n etc._n can_v be_v the_o reason_n of_o this_o difference_n because_o the_o difference_n must_v be_v suppose_v antecedent_n to_o they_o and_o nothing_o can_v be_v say_v to_o make_v that_o which_o must_v be_v suppose_v to_o be_v before_o itself_o for_o there_o must_v be_v a_o distinct_a mind_n in_o be_v from_o all_o other_o mind_n before_o it_o can_v reflect_v upon_o itself_o but_o we_o be_v not_o yet_o come_v to_o the_o bottom_n of_o this_o matter_n for_o as_o to_o individual_a person_n there_o be_v these_o thing_n still_o to_o be_v consider_v 1._o actual_a existence_n in_o itself_o which_o have_v a_o mode_n belong_v to_o it_o or_o else_o the_o humane_a nature_n of_o christ_n can_v not_o have_v be_v unite_v with_o the_o divine_a but_o it_o must_v have_v have_v the_o personal_a subsistence_n and_o consequent_o there_o must_v have_v be_v two_o person_n in_o christ._n 2._o a_o separate_a and_o divide_a existence_n from_o all_o other_o which_o arise_v from_o the_o actual_a existence_n but_o may_v be_v distinguish_v from_o it_o and_o so_o the_o humane_a nature_n of_o christ_n although_o it_o have_v the_o subsistence_n proper_a to_o be_v yet_o have_v not_o a_o separate_a existence_n after_o the_o hypostatical_a union_n 3._o the_o peculiar_a manner_n of_o subsistence_n which_o lie_v in_o such_o property_n as_o be_v incommunicable_a to_o any_o other_o and_o herein_o lie_v the_o proper_a reason_n of_o personality_n which_o do_v not_o consist_v in_o a_o mere_a intelligent_a be_v but_o in_o that_o peculiar_a manner_n of_o subsistence_n in_o that_o be_v which_o can_v be_v in_o no_o other_o for_o when_o the_o common_a nature_n do_v subsist_v in_o individual_n there_o be_v not_o only_o a_o separate_a existence_n but_o something_o so_o peculiar_a to_o itself_o that_o it_o can_v be_v communicate_v to_o no_o other_o and_o this_o be_v that_o which_o make_v the_o distinction_n of_o person_n 4._o there_o be_v a_o common_a nature_n which_o must_v be_v join_v with_o this_o manner_n of_o subsistence_n to_o make_v a_o person_n otherwise_o it_o will_v be_v a_o mere_a mode_n but_o we_o never_o conceive_v a_o person_n without_o the_o essence_n in_o conjunction_n with_o it_o but_o here_o appear_v no_o manner_n of_o contradiction_n in_o assert_v several_a person_n in_o one_o and_o the_o same_o common_a nature_n 5._o the_o individual_n of_o the_o same_o kind_n be_v say_v to_o differ_v in_o number_n from_o each_o other_o because_o of_o their_o different_a accident_n and_o separate_a existence_n for_o so_o they_o be_v capable_a of_o be_v number_v whatever_o be_v compound_v be_v capable_a of_o number_n as_o to_o its_o part_n and_o may_v be_v say_v to_o be_v one_o by_o the_o union_n of_o they_o whatever_o be_v separate_v from_o another_o be_v capable_a of_o number_n by_o distinction_n but_o where_o there_o can_v be_v no_o accident_n nor_o division_n there_o must_v be_v perfect_a unity_n 6._o there_o must_v be_v a_o separation_n in_o nature_n wherever_o there_o be_v a_o difference_n of_o individual_n under_o the_o same_o kind_n i_o do_v not_o say_v there_o must_v be_v a_o actual_a separation_n and_o division_n as_o to_o place_n but_o that_o there_o be_v and_o must_v be_v so_o in_o nature_n where_o one_o common_a nature_n subsist_v in_o several_a individual_n 47._o for_o all_o individual_n must_v divide_v the_o species_n and_o the_o common_a nature_n unite_v they_o and_o this_o philoponus_n understand_v very_o well_o and_o therefore_o he_o never_o deny_v such_o a_o division_n and_o separation_n in_o the_o divine_a person_n as_o be_v imply_v in_o distinct_a individual_n which_o be_v the_o last_o thing_n to_o be_v consider_v here_o 3._o we_o be_v now_o to_o inquire_v how_o far_o these_o thing_n will_v hold_v as_o to_o the_o person_n in_o the_o trinity_n and_o whether_o it_o be_v a_o contradiction_n to_o assert_v three_o person_n in_o the_o godhead_n and_o but_o one_o god_n we_o be_v very_o far_o from_o dispute_v the_o unity_n of_o the_o divine_a essence_n which_o we_o assert_v to_o be_v so_o perfect_a and_o indivisible_a as_o not_o to_o be_v capable_a of_o such_o a_o difference_n of_o person_n as_o be_v among_o men._n because_o there_o can_v be_v no_o difference_n of_o accident_n or_o place_n or_o quality_n in_o the_o divine_a nature_n and_o there_o can_v be_v no_o separate_a existence_n because_o the_o essence_n and_o existence_n be_v the_o same_o in_o god_n and_o if_o necessary_a existence_n be_v a_o inseparable_a attribute_n of_o the_o divine_a essence_n it_o be_v impossible_a there_o shall_v be_v any_o separate_a existence_n for_o what_o always_o be_v and_o must_v be_v can_v have_v no_o other_o existence_n than_o what_o be_v imply_v in_o the_o very_a essence_n but_o will_v not_o this_o overthrow_n the_o distinction_n of_o person_n and_o run_v we_o into_o sabellianism_n by_o no_o mean_n for_o our_o unitarian_n grant_v that_o the_o noetian_o and_o sabellian_o hold_v 16._o that_o there_o be_v but_o one_o divine_a substance_n essence_n or_o nature_n and_o but_o one_o person_n and_o how_o can_v those_o who_o hold_v three_o person_n be_v sabellian_n yes_o say_v they_o the_o sabellian_o hold_v three_o relative_a person_n but_o do_v they_o mean_v three_o distinct_a subsistence_n or_o only_o one_o subsistence_n sustain_v the_o name_n or_o appearance_n or_o manifestation_n of_o three_o person_n the_o latter_a they_o can_v deny_v to_o have_v be_v the_o true_a sense_n of_o the_o sabellian_o but_o say_v they_o these_o be_v three_o person_n in_o a_o classical_a critical_a sense_n we_o meddle_v not_o at_o present_a with_o the_o dispute_n which_o valla_n have_v against_o boethius_n about_o the_o proper_a latin_a sense_n of_o a_o person_n and_o petavius_n say_v valla_n objection_n be_v mere_a jest_n and_o trifle_n but_o our_o sense_n of_o a_o person_n be_v plain_a 4._o that_o it_o signify_v the_o essence_n with_o a_o particular_a manner_n of_o subsistence_n which_o the_o greek_a father_n call_v a_o hypostasis_fw-la take_v it_o for_o that_o incommunicable_a property_n which_o make_v a_o person_n but_o say_v our_o unitarian_n a_o person_n be_v a_o intelligent_a be_v 5._o and_o therefore_o three_o person_n must_v be_v three_o intelligent_a being_n i_o answer_v that_o this_o may_v be_v take_v two_o way_n 1._o that_o there_o be_v no_o person_n where_o there_o be_v no_o intelligent_a nature_n to_o make_v it_o a_o person_n and_o so_o we_o grant_v it_o 2._o that_o a_o person_n imply_v a_o intelligent_a be_v separate_a and_o divide_v from_o other_o individual_n of_o the_o same_o kind_n as_o it_o be_v among_o man_n and_o so_o we_o deny_v it_o as_o to_o the_o person_n of_o the_o trinity_n because_o the_o divine_a essence_n be_v not_o capable_a of_o such_o division_n and_o separation_n as_o the_o humane_a nature_n be_v but_o say_v they_o again_o the_o father_n do_v hold_v a_o specifical_a divine_a nature_n ib._n and_o the_o person_n to_o be_v as_o so_o many_o individual_n this_o they_o repeat_v very_o often_o in_o their_o late_a book_n and_o after_o all_o refer_v we_o to_o curcellaeus_n for_o undeniable_a proof_n of_o it_o ib._n let_v we_o for_o the_o present_n suppose_v it_o 13._o than_o i_o hope_v the_o father_n be_v free_v from_o hold_v contradiction_n in_o the_o doctrine_n of_o the_o trinity_n for_o what_o contradiction_n can_v it_o be_v to_o hold_v three_o individual_a person_n in_o the_o godhead_n and_o one_o common_a nature_n more_o than_o it_o be_v to_o hold_v that_o there_o be_v three_o humane_a person_n in_o one_o and_o the_o same_o common_a nature_n of_o man_n will_v they_o make_v this_o a_o contradiction_n too_o but_o some_o have_v so_o use_v themselves_o to_o the_o language_n of_o jargon_n nonsense_n contradiction_n impossibility_n that_o it_o come_v from_o they_o as_o some_o man_n swear_v when_o they_o do_v not_o know_v it_o but_o i_o be_o not_o willing_a to_o go_v off_o with_o this_o answer_n for_o i_o do_v take_v the_o father_n to_o have_v be_v man_n of_o too_o great_a sense_n and_o capacity_n to_o have_v maintain_v such_o a_o absurd_a opinion_n as_o that_o of_o a_o specific_a nature_n in_o god_n for_o either_o it_o be_v a_o mere_a logical_a notion_n and_o act_n
without_o this_o must_v this_o present_o be_v run_v down_o as_o heresy_n when_o he_o assert_n at_o the_o same_o time_n three_o person_n in_o the_o same_o undivided_a essence_n but_o this_o be_v say_v to_o be_v a_o contradiction_n so_o it_o be_v in_o the_o other_o case_n and_o not_o allow_v then_o and_o why_o shall_v it_o be_v otherwise_o in_o this_o i_o speak_v not_o this_o to_o justify_v such_o explication_n but_o to_o show_v that_o there_o be_v a_o difference_n between_o the_o heresy_n of_o deny_v a_o article_n and_o a_o mistake_n in_o the_o explication_n of_o it_o even_o the_o great_a heresie-maker_n in_o the_o world_n distinguish_v between_o heresy_n and_o erroneous_a explication_n of_o article_n of_o faith_n as_o any_o one_o may_v find_v that_o look_n into_o they_o and_o even_o the_o inquisitor_n of_o heresy_n themselves_o allow_v the_o distinction_n between_o heresy_n and_o a_o erroneous_a proposition_n in_o faith_n which_o amount_v to_o the_o same_o with_o a_o mistake_a explication_n of_o it_o and_o they_o all_o grant_v that_o there_o may_v be_v proposition_n that_o tend_v to_o heresy_n or_o savour_n of_o it_o which_o can_v be_v condemn_v for_o heretical_a and_o even_o pegna_n condemn_v melchior_n canus_n for_o be_v too_o cruel_a in_o assert_v it_o to_o be_v heresy_n to_o contradict_v the_o general_a sense_n of_o divine_n 226._o because_o the_o school_n can_v make_v heresy_n 2._o it_o be_v frequent_o and_o solemn_o affirm_v by_o he_o 19_o that_o the_o unity_n of_o the_o godhead_n be_v the_o most_o real_a essential_a indivisible_a inseparable_a unity_n that_o there_o be_v but_o one_o divine_a nature_n which_o be_v original_o in_o the_o father_n and_o be_v substantial_o communicate_v by_o the_o father_n to_o the_o son_n as_o a_o distinct_a subsist_v person_n 28._o by_o a_o eternal_a ineffable_a generation_n and_o to_o the_o holy_a ghost_n by_o a_o eternal_a and_o substantial_a procession_n from_o father_n and_o son_n do_v the_o other_o who_o maintain_v a_o trinity_n deny_v this_o by_o no_o mean_n for_o we_o have_v already_o see_v that_o they_o assert_v the_o same_o thing_n so_o that_o they_o be_v full_o agree_v as_o to_o the_o main_a fundamental_a article_n and_o even_o the_o unitarian_n yield_v that_o from_o the_o beginning_n he_o assert_v 19_o that_o the_o three_o divine_a person_n be_v in_o one_o undivided_a substance_n wherein_o then_o lie_v the_o foundation_n of_o this_o mighty_a quarrel_n and_o those_o unreasonable_a heat_n that_o man_n have_v fall_v into_o about_o it_o to_o the_o great_a scandal_n of_o our_o church_n and_o religion_n in_o short_a it_o be_v this_o that_o the_o same_o author_n assert_n 15._o 1._o that_o it_o be_v gross_a sabellianism_n to_o say_v that_o there_o be_v not_o three_o personal_a mind_n or_o spirit_n or_o substance_n 2._o that_o a_o distinct_a substantial_a person_n must_v have_v a_o distinct_a substance_n of_o his_o own_o proper_a and_o peculiar_a to_o his_o own_o person_n but_o he_o own_v 17._o that_o although_o there_o be_v three_o distinct_a person_n or_o mind_n each_o of_o who_o be_v distinct_o and_o by_o himself_o god_n 29._o yet_o there_o be_v not_o three_o god_n but_o one_o god_n or_o one_o divinity_n which_o he_o say_v be_v entire_o and_o indivisible_o and_o inseparable_o in_o three_o distinct_a person_n or_o mind_n that_o the_o same_o one_o divine_a nature_n be_v whole_o and_o entire_o communicate_v by_o the_o eternal_a father_n to_o the_o eternal_a son_n and_o by_o the_o father_n and_o son_n to_o the_o eternal_a spirit_n without_o any_o division_n or_o separation_n 30._o and_o so_o it_o remain_v one_o still_o this_o be_v the_o substance_n of_o this_o new_a explication_n which_o have_v raise_v such_o flame_n that_o injunction_n from_o authority_n be_v think_v necessary_a to_o suppress_v they_o but_o those_o can_v reach_v no_o far_o than_o the_o restraint_n of_o man_n tongue_n and_o pen_n about_o these_o matter_n and_o unless_o something_o be_v find_v out_o to_o satisfy_v their_o mind_n and_o to_o remove_v misapprehension_n the_o present_a heat_n may_v be_v only_o cover_v over_o and_o keep_v in_o which_o when_o there_o be_v a_o vent_n give_v may_v break_v out_o into_o a_o more_o dangerous_a flame_n therefore_o i_o shall_v endeavour_v to_o state_n and_o clear_a this_o matter_n so_o as_o to_o prevent_v any_o future_a eruption_n thereof_o which_o will_v be_v do_v by_o consider_v how_o far_o they_o be_v agree_v and_o how_o far_o the_o remain_a difference_n ought_v to_o be_v pursue_v 1._o they_o be_v agree_v that_o there_o be_v three_o distinct_a person_n and_o but_o one_o godhead_n 2._o that_o there_o be_v no_o separate_a and_o divide_a substance_n in_o the_o trinity_n but_o the_o divine_a nature_n be_v whole_o and_o entire_o one_o and_o undivided_a 3._o that_o the_o divine_a essence_n be_v communicate_v from_o the_o father_n to_o the_o son_n and_o from_o both_o to_o the_o holy_a spirit_n so_o that_o the_o charge_n of_o sabellianism_n on_o those_o who_o reject_v this_o new_a explication_n be_v without_o ground_n for_o no_o sabellian_n do_v or_o can_v assert_v a_o communication_n of_o the_o divine_a essence_n which_o be_v agree_v on_o both_o side_n the_o dispute_n turn_v upon_o this_o single_a point_n whether_o a_o communicate_v essence_n do_v imply_v a_o distinct_a substance_n or_o not_o on_o the_o one_o side_n it_o be_v say_v 33._o that_o there_o be_v but_o one_o god_n there_o can_v be_v but_o one_o divine_a essence_n and_o if_o more_o essence_n more_o go_n on_o the_o other_o side_n that_o since_o they_o own_o a_o communicate_v essence_n necessary_a to_o make_v a_o distinction_n of_o person_n in_o the_o son_n and_o holy_a ghost_n if_o the_o essence_n be_v not_o distinct_a the_o foundation_n of_o distinct_a personality_n be_v take_v away_o but_o how_o be_v this_o clear_v by_o the_o other_o party_n they_o say_v 34._o that_o it_o be_v one_o peculiar_a prerogative_n of_o the_o divine_a nature_n and_o substance_n found_v in_o its_o infinite_a and_o therefore_o transcendent_a perfection_n whereby_o it_o be_v capable_a of_o reside_v in_o more_o person_n than_o one_o and_o be_v according_o communicate_v from_o the_o father_n to_o the_o son_n and_o holy_a ghost_n so_o that_o the_o communication_n of_o the_o divine_a nature_n be_v own_v to_o the_o person_n of_o the_o son_n and_o holy_a ghost_n but_o how_o then_o come_v it_o not_o to_o make_v a_o distinct_a essence_n as_o it_o make_v distinct_a person_n by_o be_v communicate_v the_o answer_n we_o see_v be_v that_o it_o be_v a_o peculiar_a prerogative_n found_v on_o the_o infinite_a and_o therefore_o transcendent_a perfection_n of_o the_o divine_a nature_n but_o they_o further_o add_v that_o when_o the_o son_n and_o holy_a ghost_n be_v 36._o say_v to_o have_v the_o same_o divine_a nature_n from_o the_o father_n as_o the_o origin_n and_o fountain_n of_o the_o divinity_n not_o by_o the_o production_n of_o a_o new_a divine_a nature_n but_o by_o a_o communication_n of_o his_o own_o which_o be_v one_o and_o the_o same_o in_o all_o three_o without_o separation_n difference_n or_o distinction_n that_o this_o be_v indeed_o a_o great_a mystery_n which_o have_v be_v always_o look_v upon_o by_o the_o great_a and_o wise_a man_n in_o the_o church_n to_o be_v above_o all_o expression_n and_o description_n so_o that_o the_o great_a difficulty_n be_v at_o last_o resolve_v into_o the_o incomprehensible_a perfection_n of_o the_o divine_a nature_n and_o that_o neither_o man_n nor_o angel_n can_v give_v a_o satisfactory_a answer_n to_o inquiry_n about_o the_o manner_n of_o they_o ibid._n and_o the_o author_n of_o the_o animadversion_n say_v 36._o that_o in_o the_o divine_a person_n of_o the_o trinity_n the_o divine_a nature_n and_o the_o personal_a subsistence_n coalesce_v into_o one_o by_o a_o incomprehensible_a ineffable_a kind_n of_o union_n and_o conjunction_n but_o do_v those_o on_o the_o other_o side_n think_v that_o the_o assert_v three_o distinct_a substance_n in_o one_o and_o the_o same_o individual_a substance_n tend_v to_o clear_v and_o explain_v the_o notion_n of_o the_o trinity_n and_o make_v it_o more_o easy_a and_o intelligible_a the_o divinity_n they_o say_v be_v whole_a entire_a indivisible_a 30._o and_o inseparable_a in_o all_o three_o but_o can_v one_o whole_a entire_a indivisible_a substance_n be_v actual_o divide_v into_o three_o substance_n for_o if_o every_o person_n must_v have_v a_o peculiar_a substance_n of_o his_o own_o and_o there_o be_v three_o person_n there_o must_v be_v three_o peculiar_a substance_n and_o how_o can_v there_o be_v three_o peculiar_a substance_n and_o yet_o but_o one_o entire_a and_o indivisible_a substance_n i_o do_v not_o say_v there_o must_v be_v three_o divide_a substance_n in_o place_n or_o separate_v substance_n but_o they_o must_v be_v divide_v as_o three_o individual_n of_o the_o same_o kind_n which_o must_v introduce_v a_o specific_a divine_a nature_n which_o i_o think_v very_o
inconsistent_a with_o the_o divine_a perfection_n but_o of_o this_o at_o large_a in_o the_o follow_a discourse_n i_o do_v not_o lay_v any_o force_n upon_o this_o argument_n that_o there_o can_v be_v no_o ground_n of_o the_o distinction_n between_o the_o three_o substance_n 262._o if_o there_o be_v but_o one_o substance_n in_o the_o godhead_n as_o some_o have_v do_v because_o the_o same_o substance_n can_v both_o unite_v and_o distinguish_v they_o for_o the_o ground_n of_o the_o distinction_n be_v not_o the_o substance_n but_o the_o communication_n of_o it_o 264._o and_o where_o that_o be_v so_o free_o assert_v there_o be_v a_o reason_n distinct_a from_o the_o substance_n itself_o which_o make_v the_o distinction_n of_o person_n but_o the_o difficulty_n still_o remain_v how_o each_o person_n shall_v have_v a_o substance_n of_o his_o own_o and_o yet_o there_o be_v but_o one_o entire_a and_o indivisible_a substance_n for_o every_o person_n must_v have_v a_o proper_a substance_n of_o his_o own_o or_o else_o according_a to_o this_o hypothesis_n he_o can_v be_v no_o person_n and_o this_o peculiar_a substance_n must_v be_v real_o distinct_a from_o that_o substance_n which_o be_v in_o the_o other_o two_o so_o that_o here_o must_v be_v three_o distinct_a substance_n in_o the_o three_o person_n but_o how_o then_o can_v there_o be_v but_o one_o individual_a essence_n in_o all_o three_o we_o may_v conceive_v one_o common_a essence_n to_o be_v individuate_v in_o three_o person_n as_o it_o be_v in_o man_n but_o it_o be_v impossible_a to_o conceive_v the_o same_o individual_a essence_n to_o be_v in_o three_o person_n which_o have_v peculiar_a substance_n of_o their_o own_o for_o the_o substance_n belong_v to_o the_o person_n be_v the_o same_o essence_n individuate_v in_o those_o person_n and_o so_o there_o be_v no_o avoid_n make_n three_o individual_a essence_n and_o one_o specific_a or_o common_a divine_a nature_n and_o maimonides_n his_o argument_n be_v considerable_a against_o more_o god_n than_o one_o if_o say_v he_o there_o be_v two_o god_n 1._o there_o mu●t_v be_v something_o wherein_o they_o agree_v and_o something_o wherein_o they_o differ_v that_o wherein_o they_o agree_v must_v be_v that_o which_o make_v each_o of_o they_o god_n and_o that_o wherein_o they_o differ_v must_v make_v they_o two_o go_n now_o wherein_o do_v this_o differ_v from_o the_o present_a hypothesis_n there_o be_v something_o wherein_o they_o differ_v and_o that_o be_v their_o proper_a substance_n but_o maimonides_n think_v that_o wherein_o they_o differ_v sufficient_a to_o make_v they_o two_o go_n so_o that_o i_o fear_v it_o will_v be_v impossible_a to_o clear_v this_o hypothesis_n as_o to_o the_o reconcile_n three_o individual_a essence_n with_o one_o individual_a divine_a essence_n which_o look_v too_o like_o assert_v that_o there_o be_v three_o god_n and_o yet_o but_o one_o and_o the_o author_n of_o this_o explication_n do_v at_o last_o confess_v that_o three_o distinct_a whole_a inseparable_a same_o be_v 30._o be_v hard_a to_o conceive_v as_o to_o the_o manner_n of_o it_o now_o to_o what_o purpose_n be_v new_a explication_n start_v and_o dispute_v raise_v and_o carry_v on_o so_o warm_o about_o they_o if_o after_o all_o the_o main_a difficulty_n be_v confess_v to_o be_v above_o our_o comprehension_n we_o have_v much_o better_o satisfy_v ourselves_o with_o that_o language_n which_o the_o church_n have_v receiu●d_v and_o be_v express_v in_o the_o creed_n than_o go_v about_o by_o new_a term_n to_o raise_v new_a ferment_n especial_o at_o a_o time_n when_o our_o unite_a force_n be_v most_o necessary_a against_o our_o common_a adversary_n no_o wise_a and_o good_a man_n can_v be_v fond_a of_o any_o new_a invention_n when_o the_o peace_n of_o the_o church_n be_v hazard_v by_o they_o and_o on_o the_o other_o side_n it_o be_v as_o dangerous_a to_o make_v new_a heresy_n as_o new_a explication_n if_o any_o one_o deny_v the_o doctrine_n contain_v in_o the_o nicene_n creed_n that_o be_v no_o new_a heresy_n but_o how_o can_v such_o deny_v the_o son_n to_o be_v consubstantial_a to_o the_o father_n who_o assert_v one_o and_o the_o same_o indivisible_a substance_n in_o the_o father_n and_o the_o son_n but_o they_o may_v contradict_v themselves_o that_o be_v not_o impossible_a on_o either_o side_n but_o do_v it_o follow_v that_o they_o be_v guilty_a of_o heresy_n be_v not_o three_o substance_n and_o but_o one_o a_o contradiction_n no_o more_o say_v they_o than_o that_o a_o communicate_v substance_n be_v not_o distinct_a from_o that_o which_o do_v communicate_v but_o this_o whole_a dispute_n we_o find_v be_v at_o last_o resolve_v into_o the_o infinite_a and_o unconceivable_a perfection_n of_o the_o godhead_n where_o it_o be_v most_o safe_o lodge_v and_o that_o there_o be_v no_o real_a contradiction_n in_o the_o doctrine_n itself_o be_v part_n of_o the_o design_n of_o the_o discourse_n afterward_o but_o here_o it_o will_v be_v necessary_a to_o take_v notice_n of_o what_o the_o unitarian_n have_v object_v against_o this_o new_a explication_n 12._o viz._n that_o it_o be_v condemn_v by_o the_o ancient_n in_o the_o person_n of_o philoponus_n in_o the_o middle_a age_n in_o the_o person_n and_o write_n of_o abhor_v joachim_n but_o more_o severe_o since_o the_o reformation_n in_o the_o person_n of_o valentinus_n gentilis_fw-la who_o be_v condemn_v at_o geneva_n and_o behead_v at_o bern_n for_o this_o very_a doctrine_n to_o these_o i_o shall_v give_v a_o distinct_a answer_n 1._o as_o to_o joh_n philoponus_n i_o do_v free_o own_v that_o in_o the_o greek_a church_n when_o in_o the_o six_o century_n he_o broach_v his_o opinion_n that_o every_o hypostasis_fw-la must_v have_v the_o common_a nature_n individuate_v in_o it_o this_o be_v look_v upon_o as_o a_o doctrine_n of_o dangerous_a consequence_n both_o with_o respect_n to_o the_o trinity_n and_o incarnation_n the_o latter_a be_v the_o first_o occasion_n of_o it_o for_o as_o leontius_n observe_v 5._o the_o dispute_n do_v not_o begin_v about_o the_o trinity_n but_o about_o the_o incarnation_n and_o philoponus_n take_v part_n with_o those_o who_o assert_v but_o one_o nature_n in_o christ_n after_o the_o union_n and_o he_o go_v upon_o this_o ground_n that_o if_o there_o be_v two_o nature_n there_o must_v be_v two_o hypostasis_n because_o nature_n and_o hypostasis_fw-la be_v the_o same_o then_o those_o on_o the_o church_n side_n say_v leontius_n object_v that_o if_o they_o be_v the_o same_o there_o must_v be_v three_o distinct_a nature_n in_o the_o trinity_n as_o there_o be_v three_o hypostasis_n which_o philoponus_n yield_v and_o ground_v himself_o on_o aristotle_n doctrine_n that_o there_o be_v but_o one_o common_a substance_n and_o several_a individual_a substance_n and_o so_o hold_v it_o be_v in_o the_o trinity_n whence_o he_o be_v call_v the_o leader_n of_o the_o heresy_n of_o the_o tritheius_fw-la this_o be_v the_o account_n give_v by_o leontius_n who_o live_v very_o ●ear_v his_o time_n a._n d._n 620._o the_o same_o be_v affirm_v of_o he_o by_o nicephorus_n 47._o and_o that_o he_o write_v a_o book_n on_o purpose_n about_o the_o union_n of_o two_o nature_n in_o christ_n out_o of_o which_o he_o produce_v his_o own_o word_n concern_v a_o common_a and_o individual_a nature_n which_o he_o call_v 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d which_o can_v agree_v to_o none_o else_o and_o the_o main_a argument_n he_o go_v upon_o be_v this_o that_o unless_o we_o assert_v a_o singular_a nature_n in_o the_o hypostasis_n we_o must_v say_v that_o the_o whole_a trinity_n be_v incarnate_a as_o unless_o there_o be_v a_o singular_a humane_a nature_n distinct_a from_o the_o common_a christ_n must_v assume_v the_o whole_a nature_n of_o mankind_n and_o this_o argument_n from_o the_o incarnation_n be_v that_o which_o make_v roscelin_n in_o the_o begin_n of_o the_o dispute_a age_n a._n d._n 1093_o to_o assert_v that_o the_o three_o person_n be_v three_o thing_n distinct_a from_o each_o other_o as_o three_o angel_n or_o three_o man_n because_o otherwise_o the_o incarnation_n of_o the_o second_o person_n can_v not_o be_v understand_v as_o appear_v by_o anselm_n epistle_n 3._o and_o his_o book_n of_o the_o incarnation_n write_v upon_o that_o occasion_n but_o as_o a●selm_n show_v at_o large_a if_o this_o argument_n hold_v it_o must_v prove_v the_o three_o person_n not_o only_o to_o be_v distinct_a but_o separate_a and_o divide_a substance_n which_o be_v direct_o contrary_a to_o this_o new_a explication_n and_o then_o there_o be_v no_o avoid_v tritheism_n but_o to_o return_v to_o joh._n philoponus_n who_o say_v nicephorus_n divide_v the_o indivisible_a nature_n of_o god_n into_o three_o individual_n as_o among_o man_n 48._o which_o say_v he_o be_v repugnant_a to_o the_o sense_n of_o the_o christian_a church_n and_o he_o produce_v the_o testimony_n of_o gregory_n nazianzen_n against_o it_o and_o add_v that_o leontius_n and_o georgius_n piside_v confute_v
there_o be_v two_o person_n in_o christ_n one_o divine_a and_o the_o other_o humane_a and_o two_o son_n the_o one_o by_o nature_n the_o son_n of_o god_n who_o have_v a_o pre_n existence_n and_o the_o other_o the_o son_n of_o david_n who_o have_v no_o subsistence_n before_o this_o be_v the_o opinion_n which_o dionysius_n set_v himself_o against_o in_o that_o epistle_n and_o which_o therefore_o ●ome_o may_v imagine_v be_v write_v after_o nestorius_n his_o heresy_n but_o that_o be_v no_o new_a heresy_n as_o appear_v by_o the_o cerinthian_o and_o it_o be_v that_o which_o paulus_n samosatenus_fw-la flee_v to_o as_o more_o plausible_a which_o not_o only_o appear_v by_o this_o epistle_n but_o by_o what_o athanasius_n and_o epiphanius_n have_v deliver_v concern_v it_o athanasius_n 591._o write_v a_o book_n of_o the_o incarnation_n against_o the_o follower_n of_o paulus_n samosatenus_fw-la who_o hold_v as_o he_o say_v two_o person_n in_o christ_n viz._n one_o bear_v of_o the_o virgin_n and_o a_o divine_a person_n which_o descend_v upon_o he_o and_o dwell_v in_o he_o against_o which_o opinion_n he_o dispute_v from_o two_o place_n of_o scripture_n viz._n god_n be_v manifest_a in_o the_o flesh_n and_o the_o word_n be_v make_v flesh_n and_o from_o the_o ancient_a doctrine_n of_o the_o christian_a church_n and_o the_o synod_n of_o antioch_n against_o paulus_n samosatenus_fw-la and_o in_o another_o place_n he_o say_v 635._o that_o he_o hold_v that_o the_o divine_a word_n dwell_v in_o christ._n and_o the_o word_n of_o epiphanius_n be_v express_v to_o the_o same_o purpose_n etc._n that_o the_o logos_fw-la come_v and_o dwell_v in_o the_o man_n jesus_n and_o the_o clergy_n of_o constantinople_n charge_v nestorius_n with_o follow_v the_o heresy_n of_o paulus_n samosatenus_fw-la and_o photius_n in_o his_o epistle_n say_v 35._o that_o nestorius_n taste_v too_o much_o of_o the_o intoxicated_a cup_n of_o paulus_n samosatenus_fw-la and_o in_o the_o forego_n epistle_n he_o say_v that_o paulus_n his_o follower_n assert_v two_o hypostasis_n in_o christ._n but_o some_o think_v that_o paulus_n samosatenus_fw-la do_v not_o hold_v any_o subsistence_n of_o the_o 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d before_o but_o that_o the_o word_n be_v in_o god_n before_o without_o any_o subsistence_n of_o its_o own_o and_o that_o god_n give_v it_o a_o distinct_a subsistence_n when_o it_o inhabit_v in_o the_o person_n of_o christ_n and_o so_o marius_n mercator_n and_o leontius_n understand_v he_o who_o say_v that_o he_o differ_v from_o nestorius_n therein_o basil._n who_o assert_v a_o divine_a word_n with_o its_o proper_a subsistence_n but_o according_a to_o they_o paulus_n by_o the_o word_n understand_v that_o divine_a energy_n whereby_o christ_n act_v and_o which_o dwell_v in_o he_o but_o dionysius_n say_v he_o make_v two_o christ_n and_o two_o son_n of_o god_n but_o the_o doctrine_n of_o the_o christian_a church_n he_o say_v be_v that_o there_o be_v but_o one_o christ_n and_o one_o son_n who_o w●s_v the_o eternal_a word_n and_o be_v make_v flesh._n and_o it_o be_v observable_a that_o he_o bring_v the_o very_a same_o place_n we_o do_v now_o to_o prove_v this_o doctrine_n as_o in_o the_o beginning_n be_v the_o word_n etc._n etc._n and_o before_o abraham_n be_v i_o be_o it_o seem_v that_o some_o of_o the_o bishop_n who_o have_v be_v upon_o the_o examination_n of_o his_o opinion_n before_o the_o second_o synod_n which_o depose_v he_o send_v he_o a_o account_n of_o their_o faith_n and_o require_v his_o answer_n wherein_o they_o declare_v the_o son_n not_o to_o be_v god_n according_a to_o god_n decree_n which_o he_o do_v not_o stick_v at_o but_o that_o he_o be_v so_o real_o and_o substantial_o and_o whosoever_o deny_v this_o they_o say_v be_v out_o of_o the_o communion_n of_o the_o church_n and_o all_o the_o catholic_n church_n agree_v with_o they_o in_o it_o and_o they_o declare_v that_o they_o receive_v this_o doctrine_n from_o the_o scripture_n of_o the_o old_a and_o new_a testament_n and_o bring_v the_o same_o place_n we_o do_v now_o as_o thy_o throne_n o_o god_n be_v for_o ever_o etc._n etc._n who_o be_v over_o all_o god_n bless_v for_o ever_o all_o thing_n be_v make_v by_o he_o etc._n etc._n and_o we_o do_v not_o find_v that_o paulus_n samosatenus_fw-la as_o subtle_a as_o he_o be_v ever_o imagine_v that_o these_o place_n belong_v to_o any_o other_o than_o christ_n or_o that_o the_o make_n of_o all_o thing_n be_v to_o be_v understand_v of_o the_o make_n of_o nothing_o but_o put_v it_o into_o man_n power_n to_o make_v themselves_o new_a creature_n these_o be_v discovery_n only_o reserve_v for_o the_o man_n of_o sense_n and_o clear_a idea_n in_o these_o bright_a age_n of_o the_o world_n but_o at_o last_o after_o all_o the_o art_n and_o subterfuge_n which_o paulus_n samosatenus_fw-la use_v there_o be_v a_o man_n of_o sense_n as_o it_o happen_v among_o the_o clergy_n of_o antioch_n call_v malchion_n who_o be_v so_o well_o acquaint_v with_o his_o sophistry_n that_o he_o drive_v he_o out_o of_o all_o and_o lay_v his_o sense_n so_o open_a before_o the_o second_o synod_n that_o he_o be_v solemn_o depose_v for_o deny_v the_o divinity_n of_o the_o son_n of_o god_n 30._o and_o his_o descent_n from_o heaven_n as_o appear_v by_o their_o synodical_a epistle_n it_o be_v pity_n we_o have_v it_o not_o entire_a but_o by_o the_o fragment_n of_o it_o which_o be_v preserve_v by_o some_o ancient_a writer_n we_o find_v that_o his_o doctrine_n of_o the_o divinity_n in_o he_o by_o inhabitation_n be_v then_o condemn_v 3._o and_o the_o substantial_a union_n of_o both_o nature_n assert_v i_o have_v only_o one_o thing_n more_o to_o observe_v concern_v he_o which_o be_v that_o the_o arian_n party_n in_o their_o decree_n at_o sardica_n or_o rather_o philippopolis_n do_v confess_v that_o paulus_n samosatenus_fw-la his_o doctrine_n be_v condemn_v by_o the_o whole_a christian_n world_n for_o they_o say_v 4._o that_o which_o pass_v in_o the_o eastern_a synod_n be_v sign_v and_o approve_v by_o all_o and_o alexander_n bishop_n of_o alexandria_n in_o his_o epistle_n to_o alexander_n of_o constantinople_n affirm_v the_o same_o and_o now_o i_o hope_v i_o may_v desire_v our_o man_n of_o sense_n to_o reflect_v upon_o these_o matter_n here_o be_v no_o fire_n nor_o faggot_n threaten_v no_o imperial_a edict_n to_o enforce_v this_o doctrine_n nay_o the_o queen_n of_o those_o part_n under_o who_o jurisdiction_n they_o live_v at_o that_o time_n open_o espouse_v the_o cause_n of_o paulus_n samosatenus_fw-la so_o that_o here_o can_v be_v nothing_o of_o interest_n to_o sway_v they_o to_o act_v in_o opposition_n to_o she_o and_o they_o find_v his_o interest_n so_o strong_a that_o he_o retain_v the_o possession_n of_o his_o see_n till_o aurelian_a have_v conquer_v zenobia_n and_o by_o his_o authority_n he_o be_v eject_v this_o synod_n which_o depose_v he_o do_v not_o sit_v in_o the_o time_n of_o aurelian_a as_o be_v common_o think_v but_o before_o his_o time_n while_o zenobia_n have_v all_o the_o power_n in_o her_o hand_n in_o those_o eastern_a part_n which_o she_o enjoy_v five_o year_n till_o she_o be_v dispossess_v by_o aurelian_a from_o whence_o ant._n pagi_n conclude_v 2._o that_o paulus_n keep_v his_o see_n three_o year_n after_o the_o sentence_n against_o he_o but_o upon_o application_n to_o aurelian_a he_o who_o afterward_o begin_v a_o persecution_n against_o all_o christian_n give_v this_o rule_n that_o he_o with_o who_o the_o italian_a bishop_n and_o those_o of_o rome_n communicate_v shall_v enjoy_v the_o see_n upon_o which_o paulus_n be_v at_o last_o turn_v out_o by_o this_o we_o see_v a_o concurrence_n of_o all_o the_o christian_a bishop_n of_o that_o time_n against_o he_o that_o deny_v the_o divinity_n of_o our_o saviour_n and_o this_o without_o any_o force_n and_o against_o their_o interest_n and_o with_o a_o general_a consent_n of_o the_o christian_a world_n for_o there_o be_v no_o mighty_a awe_v and_o draconic_a sanction_n to_o compel_v 54._o of_o which_o they_o sometime_o speak_v as_o if_o they_o be_v the_o only_a powerful_a method_n to_o make_v this_o doctrine_n go_v down_o and_o what_o great_a argument_n can_v there_o be_v that_o it_o be_v then_o the_o general_a sense_n of_o the_o christian_a church_n and_o it_o will_v be_v very_o hard_a to_o condemn_v all_o his_o opposer_n for_o man_n that_o want_v sense_n and_o reason_n because_o they_o so_o unanimous_o oppose_v he_o not_o so_o unanimous_o neither_o say_v our_o unitarian_n because_o lucian_n a_o presbyter_n of_o the_o church_n of_o antioch_n and_o a_o very_a learned_a man_n join_v with_o he_o it_o will_v have_v be_v strange_a indeed_o if_o so_o great_a a_o man_n as_o paulus_n samosatenus_fw-la can_v prevail_v with_o none_o of_o his_o own_o church_n to_o join_v with_o he_o especial_o one_o that_o come_v from_o the_o same_o place_n of_o samosata_n as_o
have_v these_o to_o god_n but_o as_o he_o be_v the_o maker_n of_o they_o 926._o number_n belong_v to_o material_a and_o circumscribe_v being_n but_o say_v he_o the_o most_o perfect_a unity_n be_v to_o be_v conceive_v in_o the_o most_o simple_a and_o incomprehensible_a essence_n where_o it_o be_v observable_a that_o he_o use_v those_o word_n which_o be_v allow_v to_o express_v the_o most_o perfect_a and_o singular_a unity_n which_o petavius_n himself_o confess_v 10._o that_o they_o can_v never_o be_v understand_v of_o a_o specific_a nature_n and_o curcellaeus_n can_v deny_v that_o 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d be_v add_v to_o 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d do_v restrain_v the_o sense_n more_o to_o a_o numerical_a unity_n as_o he_o call_v it_o how_o then_o be_v it_o possible_a to_o understand_v s._n basil_n of_o more_o god_n than_o one_o in_o number_n and_o in_o the_o very_a same_o page_n he_o mention_n the_o 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d the_o sameness_n of_o the_o divine_a nature_n by_o which_o the_o 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d be_v better_a understand_v but_o curcellaeus_n will_v have_v no_o more_o than_o a_o specific_a unity_n understand_v 106._o before_o he_o say_v that_o 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d will_v have_v signify_v more_o but_o now_o he_o find_v it_o use_v the_o case_n be_v alter_v so_o that_o the_o father_n can_v not_o mean_v any_o other_o than_o a_o specific_a unity_n let_v they_o use_v what_o expression_n they_o please_v but_o these_o i_o think_v be_v plain_a enough_o to_o any_o one_o that_o will_v not_o shut_v his_o eye_n in_o a_o other_o place_n s._n basil_n make_v the_o same_o objection_n and_o give_v the_o same_o answer_n one_o god_n the_o father_n and_o one_o god_n the_o son_n how_o can_v this_o be_v and_o yet_o not_o two_o god_n because_o say_v he_o the_o son_n have_v the_o very_a same_o essence_n with_o the_o father_n not_o two_o essence_n divide_v out_o of_o one_o as_o two_o brother_n but_o as_o father_n and_o son_n the_o son_n subsist_v as_o from_o the_o father_n but_o in_o the_o same_o individual_a essence_n 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d but_o curcellaeus_n have_v one_o fetch_v yet_o viz._n that_o s._n basil_n deny_v god_n to_o be_v one_o in_o number_n 113._o and_o make_v he_o to_o be_v one_o in_o nature_n because_o he_o look_v on_o a_o specific_a unity_n or_o unity_n of_o nature_n as_o more_o exact_a than_o numerical_a s._n basil_n look_v on_o the_o divine_a nature_n as_o such_o to_o have_v the_o most_o perfect_a unity_n because_o of_o its_o simplicity_n and_o not_o in_o the_o least_o speak_v of_o it_o as_o a_o specific_a unity_n but_o curcellaeus_n himself_o call_v this_o 105._o a_o unity_n by_o a_o mere_a fiction_n of_o the_o mind_n and_o can_v he_o imagine_v this_o to_o have_v be_v more_o accurate_a than_o a_o real_a unity_n these_o be_v hard_a shift_n in_o a_o desperate_a cause_n after_o all_o our_o unitarian_n tell_v we_o 30._o that_o s._n basil_n do_v against_o eunomius_n allow_v a_o distinction_n in_o number_n with_o respect_n to_o the_o deity_n but_o how_o as_o to_o the_o essence_n by_o no_o mean_n for_o he_o assert_v the_o perfect_a unity_n thereof_o in_o the_o same_o place_n even_o the_o unity_n of_o the_o substance_n but_o as_o to_o the_o characteristical_a property_n of_o the_o person_n he_o allow_v of_o number_n and_o no_o far_o but_o say_v they_o this_o be_v to_o make_v one_o god_n as_o to_o essential_a property_n and_o three_o as_o to_o personal_n how_o can_v that_o be_v when_o he_o say_v so_o often_o there_o can_v be_v but_o one_o god_n because_o there_o can_v be_v but_o one_o divine_a essence_n and_o therefore_o those_o property_n can_v only_o make_v distinct_a hypostasis_n but_o not_o distinct_a essence_n and_o be_v this_o indeed_o the_o great_a secret_n which_o this_o bold_a man_n as_o they_o call_v he_o have_v discover_v i_o think_v those_o be_v much_o more_o bold_a i_o will_v not_o say_v impudent_a who_o upon_o such_o slight_a ground_n charge_v he_o with_o assert_v more_o god_n than_o one_o in_o number_n but_o gregory_n nyssen_n 17._o say_v curcellaeus_n speak_v more_o plain_o in_o his_o epistle_n to_o ablabius_n for_o say_v he_o to_o avoid_v the_o difficulty_n of_o make_v three_o god_n as_o three_o individual_n among_o man_n be_v three_o man_n he_o answer_v that_o true_o they_o be_v not_o three_o man_n because_o they_o have_v but_o one_o common_a essence_n which_o be_v exact_o one_o and_o indivisible_a in_o itself_o however_o it_o be_v disperse_v in_o individual_n the_o same_o he_o say_v be_v to_o be_v understand_v of_o god_n and_o this_o petavius_n have_v charge_v he_o with_o before_o 3._o as_o appear_v by_o curcellaeus_n his_o appendix_n this_o seem_v the_o hard_a passage_n in_o antiquity_n for_o this_o purpose_n to_o which_o i_o hope_v to_o give_v a_o satisfactory_a answer_n from_o gregory_n nyssen_n himself_o 1._o it_o can_v be_v deny_v that_o he_o assert_v the_o unity_n of_o essence_n to_o be_v indivisible_a in_o itself_o and_o to_o be_v the_o true_a ground_n of_o the_o denomination_n of_o individual_n as_o peter_n have_v the_o name_n of_o a_o man_n not_o from_o his_o individual_a property_n whereby_o he_o be_v distinguish_v from_o james_n and_o john_n but_o from_o that_o one_o indivisible_a essence_n which_o be_v common_a to_o they_o all_o but_o yet_o receive_v no_o addition_n or_o diminution_n in_o any_o of_o they_o 2._o he_o grant_v a_o division_n of_o hypostasis_n among_o man_n notwithstanding_o this_o indivisibility_n of_o one_o common_a essence_n for_o say_v he_o among_o man_n although_o the_o essence_n remain_v one_o and_o the_o same_o in_o all_o without_o any_o division_n 〈◊〉_d yet_o the_o several_a hypostasis_n be_v divide_v from_o each_o other_o according_a to_o the_o individual_a property_n belong_v to_o they_o so_o that_o here_o be_v a_o double_a consideration_n of_o the_o essence_n as_o in_o itself_o so_o it_o be_v one_o and_o indivisible_a as_o it_o subsist_v in_o individual_n and_o so_o it_o be_v actual_o divide_v according_a to_o the_o subject_n for_o although_o the_o essence_n of_o a_o man_n be_v the_o same_o in_o itself_o in_o peter_n james_n and_o john_n yet_o take_v it_o as_o in_o the_o individual_n so_o the_o particular_a essence_n in_o each_o of_o they_o be_v divide_v from_o the_o rest_n and_o so_o philoponus_n take_v hypostasis_fw-la for_o a_o essence_n individuate_v by_o peculiar_a property_n 47._o and_o therefore_o assert_v that_o wherever_o there_o be_v a_o hypostasis_fw-la there_o must_v be_v a_o distinct_a essence_n and_o from_o hence_o he_o hold_v the_o three_o person_n to_o have_v three_o distinct_a essence_n 3._o we_o be_v now_o to_o consider_v how_o far_o gregory_n nyssen_n carry_v this_o whether_o he_o think_v it_o hold_v equal_o as_o to_o the_o divine_a hypostasis_fw-la and_o that_o he_o do_v not_o appear_v to_o i_o from_o these_o argument_n 1._o he_o utter_o deny_v any_o kind_n of_o division_n in_o the_o divine_a nature_n for_o in_o the_o conclusion_n of_o that_o discourse_n he_o say_v it_o be_v not_o only_o 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d a_o word_n often_o use_v by_o the_o greek_a father_n on_o this_o occasion_n from_o whence_o athanasius_n against_o macedonius_n infer_v a_o identity_n 280._o and_o caesarius_n join_v 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 12._o and_o so_o s._n basil_n use_v it_o but_o he_o add_v another_o word_n which_o be_v 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d indivisible_a yes_o as_o all_o essence_n be_v indivisible_a in_o themselves_o but_o they_o may_v be_v divide_v in_o their_o subject_n as_o gregory_n nyssen_n allow_v it_o to_o be_v in_o men._n i_o grant_v it_o but_o then_o he_o own_v a_o division_n of_o some_o kind_n which_o he_o here_o absolute_o deny_v as_o to_o the_o divine_a nature_n for_o his_o word_n be_v that_o it_o be_v 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d in_o any_o consideration_n whatsoever_o then_o he_o must_v destroy_v the_o hypostasis_n not_o so_o neither_o for_o he_o allow_v that_o there_o be_v a_o 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d as_o to_o the_o hypostasis_n however_o for_o he_o propose_v the_o objection_n himself_o that_o by_o allow_v no_o difference_n in_o the_o divine_a nature_n the_o hypostasis_n will_v be_v confound_v to_o which_o he_o answer_v that_o he_o do_v not_o deny_v their_o difference_n which_o be_v found_v in_o the_o relation_n they_o have_v to_o one_o another_o which_o he_o there_o explain_v and_o that_o therein_o only_o consist_v the_o difference_n of_o the_o person_n 〈◊〉_d which_o be_v a_o very_a considerable_a testimony_n to_o show_v that_o both_o petavius_n and_o curcellaeus_n mistake_v gregory_n nyssen'_n mean_v but_o there_o be_v other_o argument_n to_o prove_v it_o 2._o he_o assert_v such_o a_o difference_n between_o the_o divine_a and_o human_a person_n as_o be_v unanswerable_a viz._n the_o unity_n of_o operation_n for_o say_v he_o
among_o man_n if_o several_a go_v about_o the_o same_o work_n yet_o every_o particular_a person_n work_v by_o himself_o and_o therefore_o they_o may_v well_o be_v call_v many_o because_o every_o one_o be_v circumscribe_v but_o in_o the_o divine_a person_n he_o prove_v that_o it_o be_v quite_o otherwise_o for_o they_o all_o concur_v in_o the_o action_n towards_o we_o as_o he_o there_o show_v at_o large_a petavius_n be_v aware_a of_o this_o and_o therefore_o he_o say_v he_o quit_v it_o and_o return_v to_o the_o other_o whereas_o he_o only_o say_v if_o his_o adversary_n be_v displease_v with_o it_o he_o think_v the_o other_o sufficient_a which_o in_o short_a be_v that_o essence_n in_o itself_o be_v one_o and_o indivisible_a but_o among_o man_n it_o be_v divide_v according_a to_o the_o subject_n that_o the_o divine_a nature_n be_v capable_a of_o no_o division_n at_o all_o and_o therefore_o the_o difference_n of_o hypostasis_n must_v be_v from_o the_o different_a relation_n and_o manner_n of_o subsistence_n 3._o he_o express_v his_o meaning_n full_o in_o another_o place_n for_o in_o his_o catechetical_a oration_n p._n he_o say_v he_o look_v on_o the_o doctrine_n of_o the_o trinity_n as_o a_o profound_a mystery_n which_o three_o individual_a person_n in_o one_o specific_a nature_n be_v far_o from_o but_o wherein_o lie_v it_o chief_o in_o this_o that_o there_o shall_v be_v number_n and_o no_o number_n different_a view_n and_o yet_o but_o one_o a_o distinction_n of_o hypostasis_n and_o yet_o no_o division_n in_o the_o subject_n for_o so_o his_o word_n be_v 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d which_o be_v contrary_a to_o what_o he_o say_v of_o human_a hypostasis_n now_o what_o be_v the_o subject_a in_o this_o case_n according_a to_o curcellaeus_n his_o notion_n it_o must_v be_v a_o individual_a but_o since_o he_o assert_v there_o can_v be_v no_o division_n in_o the_o subject_n than_o he_o must_v overthrow_v any_o such_o individual_n as_o be_v among_o men._n these_o be_v the_o chief_a testimony_n out_o of_o the_o greek_a father_n who_o authority_n curcellaeus_n and_o other_o rely_v most_o upon_o as_o to_o this_o matter_n which_o i_o have_v therefore_o more_o particular_o examine_v but_o s._n jerom_n say_v curcellaeus_n 48._o in_o his_o epistle_n to_o damasus_n think_v three_o hypostasis_n imply_v three_o distinct_a substance_n and_o therefore_o when_o the_o campense_n will_v have_v he_o own_v they_o he_o refuse_v it_o and_o ask_v his_o advice_n then_o it_o be_v plain_a s._n jerom_n will_v not_o own_o three_o distinct_a substance_n and_o so_o can_v not_o be_v of_o curcellaeus_n his_o mind_n but_o say_v he_o s._n jerom_n mean_v by_o three_o substance_n three_o god_n different_a in_o kind_n 107._o as_o the_o arian_n do_v but_o how_o do_v that_o appear_v do_v he_o not_o say_v the_o arian_n bishop_n and_o the_o campense_n put_v he_o upon_o it_o but_o who_o be_v this_o arian_n bishop_n and_o these_o campense_n no_o other_o than_o the_o meletian_a party_n for_o meletius_n be_v bring_v in_o by_o the_o arian_n but_o he_o join_v against_o they_o with_o s._n basil_n and_o other_o who_o assert_v three_o hypostasis_n and_o the_o campense_n be_v his_o people_n who_o meet_v without_o the_o gate_n as_o the_o historian_n tell_v we_o but_o it_o be_v evident_a by_o s._n jerom_n that_o the_o latin_a church_n understand_v hypostasis_fw-la to_o be_v the_o same_o then_o with_o substance_n and_o the_o reason_n why_o they_o will_v not_o allow_v three_o hypostasis_n be_v because_o they_o will_v not_o assert_v three_o substance_n so_o that_o curcellaeus_n his_o hypothesis_n have_v very_o little_a colour_n for_o it_o among_o the_o latin_a father_n since_o s._n jerom_n there_o say_v it_o will_v be_v sacrilege_n to_o hold_v three_o substance_n and_o he_o free_o bestow_v a_o anathema_n upon_o any_o one_o that_o assert_v more_o than_o one_o but_o hilary_n say_v curcellaeus_n own_v a_o specific_a unity_n 89._o for_o in_o his_o book_n de_fw-fr synodis_fw-la he_o show_v that_o by_o one_o substance_n they_o do_v not_o mean_a one_o individual_a substance_n but_o such_o as_o be_v in_o adam_n and_o seth_n that_o be_v of_o the_o same_o kind_n no_o man_n assert_n the_o unity_n and_o indiscrimination_n of_o the_o divine_a substance_n more_o full_o and_o frequent_o than_o he_o do_v and_o that_o without_o any_o difference_n or_o variation_n as_o to_o the_o father_n and_o the_o son_n and_o although_o against_o the_o arian_n he_o may_v use_v that_o for_o a_o illustration_n of_o adam_n and_o seth_n yet_o when_o he_o come_v to_o explain_v himself_o he_o declare_v it_o must_v be_v understand_v in_o a_o way_n agreeable_a to_o the_o divine_a nature_n and_o he_o deny_v any_o division_n of_o the_o substance_n between_o father_n and_o son_n 67._o but_o he_o assert_v one_o and_o the_o same_o substance_n to_o be_v in_o both_o and_o although_o the_o person_n of_o the_o son_n remain_v distinct_a from_o the_o person_n of_o the_o father_n 6._o yet_o he_o subsist_v in_o that_o substance_n of_o which_o he_o be_v beget_v and_o nothing_o be_v take_v off_o from_o the_o substance_n of_o the_o father_n by_o his_o be_v beget_v of_o it_o but_o do_v he_o not_o say_v that_o he_o have_v a_o legitimate_a and_o proper_a substance_n of_o his_o own_o beget_v nature_n from_o god_n the_o father_n 18._o and_o what_o be_v this_o but_o to_o own_o two_o distinct_a substance_n how_o can_v the_o substance_n be_v distinct_a if_o it_o be_v the_o very_a same_o and_o the_o son_n subsist_v in_o that_o substance_n of_o which_o he_o be_v beget_v and_o that_o hilary_n beside_o a_o multitude_n of_o passage_n to_o the_o same_o purpose_n in_o he_o can_v be_v understand_v of_o two_o distinct_a substance_n will_v appear_v by_o this_o evidence_n the_o arian_n in_o their_o confession_n of_o faith_n before_o the_o council_n of_o nice_a set_v down_o among_o the_o several_a heresy_n which_o they_o condemn_v 12._o that_o of_o hieracas_n who_o say_v the_o father_n and_o son_n be_v like_o two_o lamp_n shine_v out_o of_o one_o common_a vessel_n of_o oil._n hilary_n be_v sensible_a that_o under_o this_o that_o expression_n be_v strike_v at_o god_n of_o god_n light_a of_o light_n which_o the_o church_n own_v his_o answer_n be_v luminis_fw-la naturae_fw-la vnitas_fw-la est_fw-la non_fw-la ex_fw-la connexione_fw-la porrectio_fw-la i_o e._n they_o be_v not_o two_o divide_v light_n from_o one_o common_a stock_n but_o the_o same_o light_n remain_v after_o it_o be_v kindle_v that_o it_o be_v before_o as_o appear_v by_o his_o word_n light_n of_o light_n say_v he_o imply_v that_o it_o give_v to_o another_o that_o which_o it_o continue_v to_o have_v itself_o sit_fw-la and_o petavius_n say_v that_o the_o opinion_n of_o hieracas_n be_v that_o the_o substance_n of_o the_o father_n and_o son_n differ_v numerical_o as_o one_o lamp_n from_o another_o and_o hilary_n call_v it_o a_o error_n of_o humane_a understanding_n which_o will_v judge_v of_o god_n 12._o by_o what_o they_o find_v in_o one_o another_o do_v not_o s._n ambrose_n say_v as_o curcellaeus_n quote_v he_o 96._o that_o the_o father_n and_o son_n be_v not_o two_o god_n because_o all_o man_n be_v say_v to_o be_v of_o one_o substance_n nou._n but_o saint_n ambrose_n be_v direct_o against_o he_o for_o he_o say_v the_o arian_n object_v that_o if_o they_o make_v the_o son_n true_a god_n and_o con-substantial_a with_o the_o father_n they_o must_v make_v two_o god_n as_o there_o be_v two_o man_n or_o two_o sheep_n of_o the_o same_o essence_n but_o a_o man_n and_o a_o sheep_n be_v not_o say_v to_o be_v man_n or_o two_o sheep_n which_o they_o say_v to_o excuse_v themselves_o because_o they_o make_v the_o son_n of_o a_o different_a kind_n and_o substance_n from_o the_o father_n and_o what_o answer_n do_v s._n ambrose_n give_v to_o this_o 1._o he_o say_v plurality_n according_a to_o the_o scripture_n rather_o fall_v on_o those_o of_o different_a kind_n and_o therefore_o when_o they_o make_v they_o of_o several_a kind_n they_o must_v make_v several_a go_n 2._o that_o we_o who_o hold_v but_o one_o substance_n can_v make_v more_o god_n than_o one._n 3._o to_o his_o instance_n of_o man_n he_o answer_v that_o although_o they_o be_v of_o the_o same_o nature_n by_o birth_n yet_o the●_n differ_v in_o age_n and_o thought_n and_o work_v and_o place_n from_o one_o another_o and_o where_o there_o be_v such_o diversity_n there_o can_v be_v unity_n but_o in_o god_n there_o be_v no_o difference_n of_o nature_n will_n or_o operation_n and_o therefore_o there_o can_v be_v but_o one_o god_n the_o last_o i_o shall_v mention_v be_v s._n augustin_n who_o curcellaeus_n produce_v to_o as_o little_a purpose_n 97._o for_o although_o he_o do_v mention_v the_o same_o instance_n of_o several_a man_n be_v of_o the_o same_o kind_n yet_o he_o speak_v so_o express_o against_o a_o specific_a unity_n in_o
property_n of_o a_o thing_n as_o when_o we_o say_v that_o such_o a_o thing_n be_v of_o a_o different_a nature_n from_o another_o we_o mean_v no_o more_o than_o that_o it_o be_v difference_v by_o such_o property_n as_o come_v to_o our_o knowledge_n sometime_o nature_n be_v take_v for_o the_o thing_n itself_o in_o which_o those_o property_n be_v and_o so_o aristotle_n take_v nature_n for_o a_o corporeal_a substance_n which_o have_v the_o principle_n of_o motion_n in_o itself_o but_o nature_n and_o substance_n be_v of_o a_o equal_a extent_n and_o so_o that_o which_o be_v the_o subject_a of_o power_n and_o property_n be_v the_o nature_n whether_o it_o be_v mean_v of_o bodily_a or_o spiritual_a substance_n i_o grant_v that_o by_o sensation_n and_o reflection_n we_o come_v to_o know_v the_o power_n and_o property_n of_o thing_n but_o our_o reason_n be_v satisfy_v that_o there_o must_v be_v something_o beyond_o these_o because_o it_o be_v impossible_a that_o they_o shall_v subsist_v by_o themselves_o so_o that_o the_o nature_n of_o thing_n propery_n belong_v to_o our_o reason_n and_o not_o to_o mere_a idea_n but_o we_o must_v yet_o proceed_v far_o for_o nature_n may_v be_v consider_v two_o way_n 1._o as_o it_o be_v in_o distinct_a individual_n as_o the_o nature_n of_o a_o man_n be_v equal_o in_o peter_n james_n and_o john_n and_o this_o be_v the_o common_a nature_n with_o a_o particular_a subsistence_n proper_a to_o each_o of_o they_o for_o the_o nature_n of_o man_n as_o in_o peter_n be_v distinct_a from_o that_o same_o nature_n as_o it_o be_v in_o james_n and_o john_n otherwise_o they_o will_v be_v but_o one_o person_n as_o well_o as_o have_v the_o same_o nature_n and_o this_o distinction_n of_o person_n in_o they_o be_v discern_v both_o by_o our_o sense_n as_o to_o their_o different_a accident_n and_o by_o our_o reason_n because_o they_o have_v a_o separate_a existence_n not_o come_v into_o it_o at_o once_o and_o in_o the_o same_o manner_n 2._o nature_n may_v be_v consider_v abstract_o without_o respect_n to_o individual_a person_n and_o then_o it_o make_v a_o entire_a notion_n of_o itself_o for_o however_o the_o same_o nature_n may_v be_v in_o different_a individual_n yet_o the_o nature_n in_o itself_o remain_v one_o and_o the_o same_o which_o appear_v from_o this_o evident_a reason_n that_o otherwise_o every_o individual_a must_v make_v a_o different_a kind_n let_v we_o now_o see_v how_o far_o these_o thing_n can_v come_v from_o our_o simple_a idea_n by_o reflection_n and_o sensation_n and_o i_o shall_v lay_v down_o the_o hypothesis_n of_o those_o who_o resolve_v our_o certainty_n into_o idea_n as_o plain_o and_o intelligible_o as_o i_o can_v 1._o we_o be_v tell_v that_o all_o simple_a idea_n be_v true_a and_o adequate_a 31._o not_o that_o they_o be_v the_o true_a representation_n of_o thing_n without_o we_o by_o that_o they_o be_v the_o true_a effect_n of_o such_o power_n in_o they_o as_o produce_v such_o sensation_n within_o we_o so_o that_o real_o we_o can_v understand_v nothing_o certain_o by_o they_o but_o the_o effect_n they_o have_v upon_o we_o 2._o all_o our_o idea_n of_o substance_n be_v imperfect_a and_o inadequate_a because_o they_o refer_v to_o the_o real_a essence_n of_o thing_n of_o which_o we_o be_v ignorant_a and_o no_o man_n know_v what_o substance_n be_v in_o itself_o and_o they_o be_v all_o false_a 18._o when_o look_v on_o as_o the_o representation_n of_o the_o unknown_a essence_n of_o thing_n 6._o 3._o abstract_n idea_n be_v only_o general_a name_n make_v by_o separate_a circumstance_n of_o time_n and_o place_n etc._n etc._n from_o they_o which_o be_v only_o the_o invention_n and_o creature_n of_o the_o understanding_n 4._o essence_n may_v be_v take_v two_o way_n 1._o for_o the_o real_a internal_a 15._o unknown_a constitution_n of_o thing_n and_o in_o this_o sense_n it_o be_v understand_v as_o to_o particular_a thing_n 2._o for_o the_o abstract_n idea_n and_o one_o be_v say_v to_o be_v the_o nominal_a the_o other_o the_o real_a essence_n and_o the_o nominal_a essence_n only_o be_v immutable_a 20._o and_o be_v help_n to_o enable_v man_n to_o consider_v thing_n and_o to_o discourse_v of_o they_o but_o two_o thing_n be_v grant_v which_o tend_v to_o clear_v this_o matter_n 1._o that_o there_o be_v a_o real_a essence_n which_o be_v the_o foundation_n of_o power_n and_o property_n 2._o that_o we_o may_v know_v these_o power_n and_o property_n although_o we_o be_v ignorant_a of_o of_o the_o real_a essence_n from_o whence_o i_o infer_v 1._o that_o from_o those_o true_a and_o adequate_a idea_n which_o we_o have_v of_o the_o mode_n and_o property_n of_o thing_n we_o have_v sufficient_a certainty_n of_o the_o real_a essence_n of_o they_o for_o these_o idea_n be_v allow_v to_o be_v true_a and_o either_o by_o they_o we_o may_v judge_v of_o the_o truth_n of_o thing_n or_o we_o can_v make_v no_o judgement_n at_o all_o of_o any_o thing_n without_o ourselves_o if_o our_o idea_n be_v only_o the_o effect_n we_o feel_v of_o the_o power_n of_o thing_n without_o we_o yet_o our_o reason_n must_v be_v satisfy_v that_o there_o can_v be_v no_o such_o power_n unless_o there_o be_v some_o real_a being_n which_o have_v they_o so_o that_o either_o we_o may_v be_v certain_a by_o those_o effect_n of_o the_o real_a be_v of_o thing_n or_o it_o be_v not_o possible_a as_o we_o be_v frame_v to_o have_v any_o certainty_n at_o all_o of_o any_o thing_n without_o ourselves_o 2._o that_o from_o the_o power_n and_o property_n of_o thing_n which_o be_v knowable_a by_o we_o we_o may_v know_v as_o much_o of_o the_o internal_a essence_n of_o thing_n as_o those_o power_n and_o property_n discover_v i_o do_v not_o say_v that_o we_o can_v know_v all_o essence_n of_o thing_n alike_o nor_o that_o we_o can_v attain_v to_o a_o perfect_a understanding_n of_o all_o that_o belong_v to_o they_o but_o if_o we_o can_v know_v so_o much_o as_o that_o there_o be_v certain_a being_n in_o the_o world_n endue_v with_o such_o distinct_a power_n and_o property_n what_o be_v it_o we_o complain_v of_o the_o want_n of_o in_o order_n to_o our_o certainty_n of_o thing_n but_o we_o do_v not_o see_v the_o bare_a essence_n of_o thing_n what_o be_v that_o bare_a essence_n without_o the_o power_n and_o property_n belong_v to_o it_o it_o be_v that_o internal_a constitution_n of_o thing_n from_o whence_o those_o power_n and_o property_n flow_v suppose_v we_o be_v ignorant_a of_o this_o as_o we_o be_v like_a to_o be_v for_o any_o discovery_n that_o have_v be_v yet_o make_v that_o be_v a_o good_a argument_n to_o prove_v the_o uncertainty_n of_o philosophical_a speculation_n about_o the_o real_a essence_n of_o thing_n but_o it_o be_v no_o prejudice_n to_o we_o who_o inquire_v after_o the_o certainty_n of_o such_o essence_n for_o although_o we_o can_v comprehend_v the_o internal_a frame_n or_o constitution_n of_o thing_n nor_o in_o what_o manner_n they_o do_v flow_v from_o the_o substance_n yet_o by_o they_o we_o certain_o know_v that_o there_o be_v such_o essence_n and_o that_o they_o be_v distinguish_v from_o each_o other_o by_o their_o power_n and_o property_n 3._o the_o essence_n of_o thing_n as_o they_o be_v knowable_a by_o we_o have_v a_o reality_n in_o they_o for_o they_o be_v found_v on_o the_o natural_a constitution_n of_o thing_n and_o however_o the_o abstract_a idea_n be_v the_o work_n of_o the_o mind_n yet_o they_o be_v not_o mere_a creature_n of_o the_o mind_n as_o appear_v by_o a_o instance_n produce_v of_o the_o essence_n of_o the_o sun_n be_v in_o one_o single_a individual_a in_o which_o case_n it_o be_v grant_v 1_o that_o the_o idea_n may_v be_v so_o abstract_v that_o more_o sun_n may_v agree_v in_o it_o and_o it_o be_v as_o much_o a_o sort_n as_o if_o there_o be_v as_o many_o sun_n as_o there_o be_v star_n so_o that_o here_o we_o have_v a_o real_a essence_n subsist_v in_o one_o individual_a but_o capable_a of_o be_v multiply_v into_o more_o and_o the_o same_o essence_n remain_v but_o in_o this_o one_o sun_n there_o be_v a_o real_a essence_n and_o not_o a_o mere_a nominal_a or_o abstract_a essence_n but_o suppose_v there_o be_v more_o sun_n will_v not_o each_o of_o they_o have_v the_o real_a essence_n of_o the_o sun_n for_o what_o be_v it_o make_v the_o second_o sun_n to_o be_v a_o true_a sun_n but_o have_v the_o same_o real_a essence_n with_o the_o first_o if_o it_o be_v but_o a_o nominal_a essence_n than_o the_o second_o will_v have_v nothing_o but_o the_o name_n therefore_o there_o must_v be_v a_o real_a essence_n in_o every_o individual_a of_o the_o same_o kind_n for_o that_o alone_o be_v it_o which_o make_v it_o to_o be_v what_o it_o be_v peter_n and_o james_n and_o john_n be_v all_o true_a and_o real_a man_n but_o what_o be_v it_o
which_o make_v they_o so_o be_v it_o the_o attribute_v a_o general_a name_n to_o they_o no_o certain_o but_o that_o the_o true_a and_o real_a essence_n of_o a_o man_n be_v in_o every_o one_o of_o they_o and_o we_o must_v be_v as_o certain_a of_o this_o as_o we_o be_v that_o they_o be_v man_n they_o take_v their_o denomination_n of_o be_v man_n from_o that_o common_a nature_n or_o essence_n which_o be_v in_o they_o 4._o that_o the_o general_a idea_n be_v not_o make_v from_o the_o simple_a idea_n by_o the_o mere_a act_n of_o the_o mind_n abstract_v from_o circumstance_n but_o from_o reason_n and_o consideration_n of_o the_o true_a nature_n of_o thing_n for_o when_o we_o see_v so_o many_o individual_n that_o have_v the_o same_o power_n and_o property_n we_o thence_o infer_v that_o there_o must_v be_v something_o common_a to_o all_o which_o make_v they_o of_o one_o kind_n and_o if_o the_o difference_n of_o kind_n be_v real_a that_o which_o make_v they_o of_o one_o kind_n and_o not_o of_o another_o must_v not_o be_v a_o nominal_a but_o real_a essence_n and_o this_o difference_n do_v not_o depend_v upon_o the_o complex_fw-la idea_n of_o substance_n whereby_o man_n arbitrary_o join_v modes_n together_o in_o their_o mind_n for_o let_v they_o mistake_v in_o the_o complication_n of_o their_o idea_n either_o in_o leave_v out_o or_o put_v in_o what_o do_v not_o belong_v to_o they_o and_o let_v their_o idea_n be_v what_o they_o please_v the_o real_a essence_n of_o a_o man_n and_o a_o horse_n and_o a_o tree_n be_v just_a what_o they_o be_v and_o let_v their_o nominal_a essence_n differ_v never_o so_o much_o the_o real_a common_a essence_n or_o nature_n of_o the_o several_a kind_n be_v not_o at_o all_o alter_v by_o they_o and_o these_o real_a essence_n be_v unchangeable_a for_o however_o there_o may_v happen_v some_o variety_n in_o individual_n by_o particular_a accident_n yet_o the_o essence_n of_o man_n and_o horse_n and_o tree_n remain_v always_o the_o same_o because_o they_o do_v not_o depend_v on_o the_o idea_n of_o man_n but_o on_o the_o will_n of_o the_o creator_n who_o have_v make_v several_a sort_n of_o being_n 2._o let_v we_o now_o come_v to_o the_o idea_n of_o a_o person_n for_o although_o the_o common_a nature_n in_o mankind_n be_v the_o same_o yet_o we_o see_v a_o difference_n in_o the_o several_a individual_n from_o one_o another_o so_o that_o peter_n and_o james_n and_o john_n be_v all_o of_o the_o same_o kind_n yet_o peter_n be_v not_o james_n and_o james_n be_v not_o john_n but_o what_o be_v this_o distinction_n found_v upon_o they_o may_v be_v distinguish_v from_o each_o other_o by_o our_o sense_n as_o to_o difference_n of_o feature_n distance_n of_o place_n etc._n etc._n but_o that_o be_v not_o all_o for_o suppose_v there_o be_v no_o such_o external_a difference_n yet_o there_o be_v a_o difference_n between_o they_o as_o several_a individual_n in_o the_o same_o common_a nature_n and_o here_o lie_v the_o true_a idea_n of_o a_o person_n which_o arise_v from_o that_o manner_n of_o subsistence_n which_o be_v in_o one_o individual_a and_o be_v not_o communicable_a to_o another_o a_o individual_a intelligent_a substance_n be_v rather_o suppose_v to_o the_o make_n of_o a_o person_n than_o the_o proper_a definition_n of_o it_o for_o a_o person_n relate_v to_o something_o which_o do_v distinguish_v it_o from_o another_o intelligent_a substance_n in_o the_o same_o nature_n and_o therefore_o the_o foundation_n of_o it_o lie_v in_o the_o peculiar_a manner_n of_o subsistence_n which_o agree_v to_o one_o and_o to_o none_o else_o of_o the_o kind_a and_o this_o be_v it_o which_o be_v call_v personality_n but_o how_o do_v our_o simple_a idea_n help_v we_o out_o in_o this_o matter_n can_v we_o learn_v from_o they_o the_o difference_n of_o nature_n and_o person_n we_o may_v understand_v the_o difference_n between_o abstract_a idea_n and_o particular_a being_n by_o the_o impression_n of_o outward_a object_n and_o we_o may_v find_v a_o intelligent_a substance_n in_o ourselves_o by_o inward_a perception_n ●ut_v whether_o that_o make_v a_o person_n or_o not_o must_v be_v understand_v some_o other_o way_n for_o if_o the_o mere_a intelligent_a substance_n make_v a_o person_n than_o there_o can_v be_v the_o union_n of_o two_o nature_n but_o there_o must_v be_v two_o person_n therefore_o a_o person_n be_v a_o complete_a intelligent_a substance_n with_o a_o peculiar_a manner_n of_o subsistence_n so_o that_o if_o it_o be_v a_o part_n of_o another_o substance_n it_o be_v no_o person_n and_o on_o this_o account_n the_o soul_n be_v no_o person_n because_o it_o make_v up_o a_o entire_a be_v by_o its_o union_n with_o the_o body_n but_o when_o we_o speak_v of_o finite_a substance_n and_o person_n we_o be_v certain_a that_o distinct_a person_n do_v imply_v distinct_a substance_n because_o they_o have_v a_o distinct_a and_o separate_a existence_n but_o this_o will_v not_o hold_v in_o a_o infinite_a substance_n where_o necessary_a existence_n do_v belong_v to_o the_o idea_n of_o it_o and_o although_o the_o argument_n from_o the_o idea_n of_o god_n may_v not_o be_v sufficient_a of_o itself_o to_o prove_v his_o be_v yet_o it_o will_v hold_v as_o to_o the_o exclude_v any_o thing_n from_o he_o which_o be_v inconsistent_a with_o necessary_a existence_n therefore_o if_o we_o suppose_v a_o distinction_n of_o person_n in_o the_o same_o divine_a nature_n it_o must_v be_v in_o a_o way_n agreeable_a to_o the_o infinite_a perfection_n of_o it_o and_o no_o objection_n can_v be_v take_v from_o the_o idea_n of_o god_n to_o overthrow_v a_o trinity_n of_o co-existing_a person_n in_o the_o same_o divine_a essence_n for_o necessary_a existence_n do_v imply_v a_o coexistence_n of_o the_o divine_a person_n and_o the_o unity_n of_o the_o divine_a essence_n that_o there_o can_v be_v such_o a_o difference_n of_o individual_a substance_n as_o there_o be_v among_o mankind_n but_o these_o thing_n be_v say_v to_o be_v above_o our_o reason_n if_o not_o contrary_a to_o it_o and_o even_o such_o be_v say_v to_o be_v repugnant_a to_o our_o religion_n 2._o that_o therefore_o be_v the_o next_o thing_n to_o be_v careful_o examine_v whether_o mystery_n of_o faith_n or_o matter_n of_o revelation_n above_o our_o reason_n be_v to_o be_v reject_v by_o we_o and_o a_o thing_n be_v say_v to_o be_v above_o our_o reason_n when_o we_o can_v have_v no_o clear_a and_o distinct_a idea_n of_o it_o in_o our_o mind_n and_o that_o if_o we_o have_v no_o idea_n of_o a_o thing_n it_o be_v certain_o but_o lose_v labour_n for_o we_o to_o trouble_v ourselves_o about_o it_o 28._o and_o that_o if_o such_o doctrine_n be_v propose_v which_o we_o can_v understand_v we_o must_v have_v new_a power_n and_o organ_n for_o the_o perception_n of_o they_o we_o be_v far_o from_o defend_v contradiction_n to_o our_o natural_a notion_n of_o which_o i_o have_v speak_v already_o but_o that_o which_o we_o be_v now_o upon_o be_v whether_o any_o doctrine_n may_v be_v reject_v when_o it_o be_v offer_v as_o a_o matter_n of_o faith_n upon_o this_o account_n that_o it_o be_v above_o our_o comprehension_n or_o that_o we_o can_v have_v no_o clear_a idea_n of_o it_o in_o our_o mind_n and_o this_o late_a author_n have_v undertake_v to_o prove_v that_o there_o be_v nothing_o so_o mysterious_a or_o above_o reason_n in_o the_o gospel_n to_o be_v above_o reason_n he_o say_v may_v be_v understand_v two_o way_n 67._o 1._o for_o a_o thing_n intelligible_a in_o itself_o but_o cover_v with_o figurative_a and_o mystical_a word_n 2._o for_o a_o thing_n in_o its_o own_o nature_n unconceivable_a and_o not_o to_o be_v judge_v of_o by_o our_o faculty_n though_o it_o be_v never_o so_o clear_o reveal_v this_o in_o either_o sense_n be_v the_o same_o with_o mystery_n and_o from_o thence_o he_o take_v occasion_n to_o show_v his_o learning_n about_o the_o gentile_a mystery_n and_o ecclesiastical_a mystery_n which_o may_v have_v be_v spare_v in_o this_o debate_n but_o only_o for_o the_o parallel_n aim_v at_o between_o they_o as_o to_o priest-craft_n and_o mystery_n without_o which_o a_o work_n of_o this_o nature_n will_v want_v its_o due_a relish_n with_o his_o good_a christian_a reader_n other_o we_o see_v have_v their_o mystery_n too_o but_o the_o comfort_n be_v that_o they_o be_v so_o easy_o understand_v and_o see_v through_o as_o when_o the_o heathen_a mystery_n be_v say_v to_o have_v be_v institute_v at_o first_o in_o commemoration_n of_o some_o remarkable_a accident_n 71._o or_o to_o the_o honour_n of_o some_o great_a person_n that_o oblige_v the_o world_n by_o their_o virtue_n and_o useful_a invention_n to_o pay_v they_o such_o acknowledgement_n he_o must_v be_v very_o dull_a that_o do_v not_o understand_v the_o meaning_n of_o this_o and_o yet_o this_o man_n pretend_v to_o vindicate_v christianity_n from_o be_v
creed_n be_v not_o liable_a to_o their_o charge_n of_o contradiction_n impossibility_n and_o pure_a nonsense_n 2._o that_o we_o own_v no_o other_o doctrine_n than_o what_o have_v be_v receive_v by_o the_o christian_a church_n in_o the_o several_a age_n from_o the_o apostle_n time_n 3._o and_o that_o there_o be_v no_o objection_n in_o point_n of_o reason_n which_o ought_v to_o hinder_v our_o assent_n to_o this_o great_a point_n of_o the_o christian_a faith_n but_o the_o chief_a design_n of_o this_o preface_n be_v to_o remove_v this_o prejudice_n which_o lie_v in_o our_o way_n from_o the_o different_a manner_n of_o explication_n and_o the_o warm_a dispute_n which_o have_v be_v occasion_v by_o they_o it_o can_v be_v deny_v that_o our_o adversary_n have_v take_v all_o possible_a advantage_n against_o we_o from_o these_o unhappy_a difference_n and_o in_o one_o of_o their_o late_a discourse_n they_o glory_n in_o it_o and_o think_v they_o have_v therein_o outdo_v the_o foreign_a unitarian_n for_o say_v they_o we_o have_v show_v 3._o that_o their_o faith_n concern_v this_o pretend_a mystery_n be_v so_o many_o and_o so_o contrary_a that_o they_o be_v less_o one_o party_n among_o themselves_o than_o the_o far_o more_o learned_a and_o great_a number_n of_o they_o be_v one_o party_n with_o we_o this_o be_v speak_v of_o those_o they_o call_v nominal_a trinitarian_n and_o for_o the_o other_o who_o they_o call_v real_a they_o prove_v they_o guilty_a of_o manifest_a heresy_n the_o one_o they_o call_v sabellian_o which_o they_o say_v be_v the_o same_o with_o unitarian_n and_o the_o other_o polytheist_n or_o disguise_a pagan_n 15._o and_o they_o borrow_v argument_n from_o one_o side_n to_o prove_v the_o charge_n upon_o the_o other_o and_o they_o confident_o affirm_v that_o all_o that_o speak_v out_o in_o this_o matter_n must_v be_v drive_v either_o to_o sabellianism_n or_o tritheism_n if_o they_o be_v nominal_a trinitarian_n they_o fall_v into_o the_o former_a if_o real_a into_o the_o latter_a this_o be_v the_o whole_a design_n of_o this_o late_a discourse_n which_o i_o shall_v here_o examine_v that_o i_o may_v remove_v this_o stumble_a block_n before_o i_o enter_v upon_o the_o main_a business_n 1._o as_o to_o those_o who_o be_v call_v nominal_a trinitarian_n who_o be_v they_o and_o from_o whence_o come_v such_o a_o denomination_n they_o tell_v we_o 7._o that_o they_o be_v such_o who_o believe_v three_o person_n who_o be_v person_n in_o name_n only_o indeed_o and_o in_o truth_n they_o be_v but_o one_o subsist_v person_n but_o where_o be_v these_o to_o be_v find_v among_o all_o such_o say_v they_o as_o agree_v that_o there_o be_v but_o one_o only_a and_o selfsame_a divine_a essence_n and_o substance_n but_o do_v these_o assert_v that_o there_o be_v but_o one_o subsist_v person_n and_o three_o only_a in_o name_n let_v any_o one_o be_v produce_v who_o have_v write_v in_o defence_n of_o the_o trinity_n for_o those_o who_o have_v be_v most_o charge_v have_v utter_o deny_v it_o that_o learned_a person_n who_o be_v more_o particular_o reflect_v upon_o in_o this_o charge_n 10._o be_v by_o they_o say_v to_o affirm_v that_o god_n be_v one_o divine_a intellectual_a substance_n or_o real_o subsist_v person_n and_o distinguish_v and_o diversify_v by_o three_o relative_a modes_n or_o relative_a subsistence_n and_o mr._n hooker_n be_v produce_v to_o the_o same_o purpose_n 11._o that_o there_o be_v but_o one_o substance_n in_o god_n and_o three_o distinct_a relative_a property_n which_o substance_n be_v take_v with_o its_o peculiar_a property_n make_v the_o distinction_n of_o person_n in_o the_o godhead_n but_o say_v they_o these_o mode_n and_o property_n do_v not_o make_v any_o real_a subsist_v person_n but_o only_o in_o a_o grammatical_a and_o critical_a sense_n and_o at_o most_o this_o be_v no_o more_o than_o one_o man_n may_v be_v say_v to_o be_v three_o person_n on_o the_o account_n of_o different_a relation_n as_o solomon_n be_v son_n of_o david_n father_n of_o rehoboam_n and_o proceed_v from_o david_n and_o bathsheba_n and_o yet_o be_v but_o one_o subsist_v p●rson_n this_o be_v the_o force_n of_o what_o they_o say_v but_o then_o in_o a_o triumph_a manner_n they_o add_v 13._o that_o the_o realist_n have_v so_o manifest_a a_o advantage_n against_o they_o that_o they_o have_v no_o way_n to_o de●end_v themselves_o but_o by_o recrimination_n i._n e._n by_o show_v the_o like_a absurdity_n in_o their_o doctrine_n and_o thus_o they_o hope_v either_o side_n will_v baffle_v the_o other_o and_o in_o the_o mean_a time_n the_o cause_n be_v lose_v between_o they_o but_o in_o so_o nice_a a_o matter_n as_o this_o we_o must_v not_o rely_v too_o much_o on_o a_o adversary_n representation_n for_o the_o leave_v out_o some_o expression_n may_v make_v a_o opinion_n look_v with_o another_o appearance_n than_o if_o all_o be_v take_v together_o it_o will_v have_v we_o must_v therefore_o take_v notice_n of_o other_o passage_n which_o may_v help_v to_o give_v the_o true_a sense_n of_o the_o learned_a author_n who_o be_v chief_o aim_v at_o 1._o in_o the_o very_a same_o page_n he_o assert_n that_o each_o of_o the_o divine_a person_n have_v a_o absolute_a nature_n distinct_o belong_v to_o he_o though_o not_o a_o distinct_a absolute_a nature_n 157._o and_o to_o the_o same_o purpose_n in_o another_o place_n 245._o 2._o that_o the_o eternal_a father_n be_v and_o subsist_v as_o a_o father_n by_o have_v a_o son_n and_o communicate_v his_o essence_n to_o another_o and_o elsewhere_o 243._o that_o the_o relation_n between_o father_n and_o son_n be_v found_v on_o that_o eternal_a act_n by_o which_o the_o father_n communicate_v his_o divine_a nature_n to_o the_o son_n 3._o that_o the_o foundation_n of_o the_o doctrine_n of_o the_o trinity_n be_v this_o 240._o 1._o that_o there_o can_v be_v but_o one_o god_n 2._o that_o there_o be_v nothing_o in_o god_n but_o what_o be_v god_n 3._o that_o there_o can_v be_v no_o composition_n in_o the_o deity_n with_o any_o such_o positive_a real_a be_v distinct_a from_o the_o deity_n itself_o but_o the_o church_n find_v in_o scripture_n mention_n of_o three_o to_o who_o distinct_o the_o godhead_n do_v belong_v express_v these_o three_o by_o the_o name_n of_o person_n and_o state_v their_o personality_n upon_o three_o distinct_a modes_n of_o subsistence_n allot_v to_o one_o and_o the_o same_o godhead_n and_o these_o also_o distinguish_v from_o one_o another_o by_o three_o distinct_a relation_n what_o do_v these_o man_n mean_v to_o charge_v one_o who_o go_v upon_o these_o ground_n with_o sabellianism_n do_v he_o make_v the_o three_o person_n to_o be_v mere_a name_n as_o s._n basil_n in_o few_o word_n express_v the_o true_a nature_n of_o sabellianism_n 64._o that_o it_o be_v 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d one_o thing_n with_o different_a denomination_n can_v the_o communicate_v the_o divine_a essence_n by_o the_o father_n to_o the_o son_n be_v call_v a_o name_n or_o a_o mode_n or_o a_o respect_n only_o and_o these_o man_n of_o wonderful_a subtlety_n have_v not_o learn_v to_o distinguish_v between_o person_n and_o personality_n where_o be_v the_o least_o intimation_n give_v that_o he_o look_v on_o the_o divine_a person_n as_o modes_n and_o respect_n only_o that_o be_v impossible_a since_o he_o own_v a_o communication_n of_o the_o divine_a essence_n and_o that_o each_o of_o the_o divine_a person_n have_v the_o divine_a nature_n belong_v to_o he_o can_v it_o ever_o enter_v into_o any_o man_n head_n to_o think_v that_o he_o that_o own_v this_o shall_v own_v the_o other_o also_o but_o the_o personality_n be_v a_o thing_n of_o another_o consideration_n for_o it_o be_v the_o reason_n of_o the_o distinction_n of_o person_n in_o the_o same_o undivided_a nature_n that_o there_o be_v a_o distinction_n the_o scripture_n assure_v we_o and_o withal_o that_o there_o be_v but_o one_o divine_a essence_n how_o can_v this_o distinction_n be_v not_o by_o essential_a attribute_n for_o those_o must_v be_v in_o the_o divine_a essence_n and_o in_o every_o person_n alike_o otherwise_o he_o have_v not_o the_o entire_a divine_a nature_n not_o by_o accident_n as_o man_n be_v distinguish_v from_o each_o other_o for_o the_o divine_a nature_n be_v not_o capable_a of_o these_o not_o by_o separate_v or_o divide_a substance_n for_o that_o will_v be_v inconsistent_a with_o the_o perfect_a unity_n of_o the_o godhead_n since_o therefore_o there_o can_v be_v no_o other_o way_n of_o distinction_n we_o must_v consider_v how_o the_o scripture_n direct_v we_o i●_n this_o case_n and_o that_o acquaint_v we_o with_o the_o father_n son_n and_o holy_a ghost_n as_o have_v mutual_a relation_n to_o each_o other_o and_o there_o be_v no_o repugnancy_n therein_o to_o the_o divine_a nature_n and_o therefore_o the_o distinction_n of_o the_o person_n have_v be_v fix_v on_o that_o as_o the_o most_o proper_a foundation_n for_o it_o