the rules of iustice and honesty Wherevpon naturall reason perswaded that all things being deuided euerie man should knowe his owne otherwise no peace or concord could be maintayned in humane society For all things being Common the way lay open to euery man at his pleasure to abuse others and as it were to rob them of God his Blessing Heereupon Aristotle iudged the diuision of all worldlie goods to haue bene agreable to the law of Nature which the precept of our Decalogue seemes to approue NON FVRTVM FACIES For the Lawe of God is neuer contrarie to the Lawe of Nature neither doth Nature euer cōtrary it selfe though some may perhaps think that herein shee hath For albeit at the Creation of all things togeather with man in the state of grace a cōmunity was intended yet was it not so absolutely resolued of by Nature but that by necessity I meane by fall of man from Gods grace she did dispense with this law and left free to mans choyce to imbrace vpon her warrant either the one or the other as best might fit the time place and natures of men which euer synce the world began haue giuen occasiō of the making of all lawes Whereby we see that though Nature giue the grounds to lawes yet mans vnderstanding still giues the particuler forme For Nature creating man gaue vnto him those worldly blessings to vse well with warrant either to hold them in Common or in Proper as reasō from tyme to tyme could best perswade his will But when reason and will had agreed that it was fit that euery man should enioy his part in proper Nature moued man further and told him that now he might lawfully think on his succession and not onely liue in his species but breath as it were to the worlds end in a lineall Posterity by honorable deeds and vertuous Acts with which desire Nature as a wife mother so inflamed man her noblest child after his fall from grace that some men by Natures light only haue done acts almost aboue Nature and none hath hardlie beene so base but desirous to liue and leaue an honorable memory behind them Which that they may the better do Nature hath not only giuen them power to leaue their well gotten wealth but in a manner their habituall vertues to their issue in which this worldly honour the soules worldly lyfe and vertues temporall reward may liue free from all-killing tyme. Yet did she not then by any Commaund leaue it to any one in particuler but giuing a generall suggestion of the fitnes of the thing left the forme to their best discretion For had shee not done soe all Nations had bene tyed to obserue one forme in leauing their goods and fortunes to their Posterityes for Nature being one without chaunge to all of necessity prescribes no binding rule to any in particuler but to all in generall no man being able to say that this Natures law Commaunds me to do and yet byndes not any other to do the like Which is euident in the matter of succession or claymes of inheritance no one Country obseruing the forme held by another or tying it selfe without controle to obserue his owne as I shall hearafter declare For albeit as I haue said the coniunction of man and woman which wee call Marriage or Matrimony togeather which the desire of issue be of Nature from whence also are sprung not only a diuision of goods and the fortunes of this world but also a laudable desyre to preserue a family and name by the ordination of heyres to well gotten possessions yet did Nature neuer set downe as a law that those fortunes should be left to the elder brother or younger or to any one in particuler or to all but to whom the Father being true free Lord thereof should best deuise by will guided by reason For it was neuer yet auerred by any sound Deuine Philosopher or lawyer that Nature makes immediatly heyres but men whom the positiue lawes of euery Country ordayne by that forme and power of law where such an act should be done And this is I presume without controle what the law of Nature commaunded touching the matter in question Next let vs see what the lawes of God do commaund CHAP. III. That the breach of some written lawes of God vpon warrant of the Primarie law of Nature is without sinne and that therfore there can be no such right in Primogeniture which is not in the Fathers power to auoyd though there were a precept to the contrarie as there is not IF Nature being taken for the principall and all-producing cause of the whole frame of the Vniuerse with al creatures therein be nothing els but the working Will of the Highest and first Moouer as Deuines and Philosophers do hould then surely must Natures law be his will which he cannot contradict or commaund to the contrary except he should be contrary to himselfe which he cannot For what is in God is God therfore Constant Immutable Out of which ground it is easily proued That if the law of God teach that which the law of Nature hath ordained the right of inheritance cannot be tyed to any other person or persons then to those which the Fathers will approues according to power giuen him by the lawes of the Nations where he liues Which power deriued from Natures law cannot erre from the law of God For whosoeuer shall consider but of Gods Commaundements giuen to man shall well fynd that God thereby hath still seconded his former ordinances giuen by Nature For so long as man kind liued in a sort after the innocency which Gods grace in his first Creation had wrought in him God gaue him no other law but when as by sinne those sparks which remayned after his fall were quite extinguished he gaue him new lawes yet agreable to Nature As for example in our present affayres When man had made by Natures priuiledge partition of Gods and Natures blessings then God said to his people by the mouth of Moyses Thou shalt nor steale Thou shalt not couet thy Neighbours house his wife his oxe his Asse or any thing that is his As also Thou shalt not kill Which with all other his Comaundements teaching what sinne is are agreable to the law of Nature yet are dispensed withall as far as the lawes of Nature euer permitted For though that the expresse Comaundement of God be Thou shalt not couet any thing that is thy Neighbours nor kill yet in some cases both may lawfwlly be done The one in extreme want of present food the other in defence of life and goods in which the law of God is good by the originall law of Nature which made all for the sustenance of man and gaue leaue to defend life with the losse of anothers bloud yea life if otherwise it cannot be Vpon which ground I argue thus Suppose the law of God did at this present cō maund which indeed it doth not that the in
world though he being the youngest sonne of three had Europ for his inheritance which in all arts and vses of life far excelleth Affrick Asia and all the rest of the earth Whereas according to the pretenses of those customary challenges Iaphet Sem should either haue had all or byn Lord Paramount of all Cham and Iaphet with their posterity but Farmers or Fre-holders vnder him I will not also as if there were penury of resemblances againe vse for example Esaus disinherision though that were inough for our present purpose For if it had bene sinne which Iosiphus the Iew neither in his Antiquities or Scripture faith the Mother could not haue procured it God would not haue prospered it nor Iacob himselfe being a good man haue accepted it nor Esau whose anger Iacob feared haue left it vnreuenged Neither is there in Scripture nor in any writen Law vnder heauen any commaundement to restraine the Fathers power but rather the contrary For such is the law of Nature that they who are exaequo one mans children should if not exaequo yet not exiniquo be prouided for Against which partiality the Imperiall Lawes admit so forcible a remedy vnder the title of an inofficious Testament as it shal inable the yonger childe to a certaine proportion of estate whether the deceased Father would or no if he had no iust reason for omission or disauowment in his last will The example certainely of the same holy Patriarch Iacob in preferring Ephraim before Manasses Ephraim the younger son before the elder being his grandchildren against the set purpose of Ioseph their Father seemes vnaÌ„swerable on behalfe of the power of parents for transferring or distributing their blessings Of which it may truely be said Qui prior in benedictione est potior in iure Of Salomon I haue spoken before who was not the eldest sonne of Dauid Salomon but Adonai after Absalom was slaine as Dauid himselfe was not the eldest sonne of lesse his Father but the youngest and yet chosen by God who sees not as man doth for with him there is respâ—ctus personarum to gouerne Israel though he was not set before his brothers in the priuate inheritance of his familie And in the Ghospell it is apparent by the Parable of the workmen who came at vnequall houres into the vineyard and yet had equal wages that first and last are to him a like who though he created thinges in number weight and measure yet he squares not his fauors by priority of being but of well-deseruing Augustus Caesar the most renowned of all the first Emperours setled the succession of his Empire not vpon his onely Gâ—andchilde Agrippa Posthumus Agrippa Posthumus the sonne of his daughter sole heyre the lady Iulia though Tacitus sayth that he was nullius stagitij compâ—rtus then what if he had indeed byn a notorious vnthrift but vpon Tiberius a stranger in bloud and his sonne by no other but by a ciuill title of Adoption because he reputed him far the fitter to gouerne Chosroas King of Persia Medarses made Medarses his younger sonne companion in his Empire and left out his eldest sonne Sinochius But let forraine examples passe for briefnes sake wherwith of all tymes places books are full In our Country wee might alledg the fact of Brutus Brutus the reputed fouÌ„der of our Nation who diuided Albion afterward called Brittaine to his three sonnes leauing onely the best portion to Locrinus ancieÌ„tly called Loegres Albania now Scotland to Albanact and Cambria or Wales to Camber Leir long after knew he had so much power in himselfe as a Father euen against the euidence of his owne act of partition by the originall law of Nature as for the ingratitude of his owne children to confer the kingdome wholy vpon his younger child Cordeilla in preiudice of his grandsoÌ„nes Mâ—rgan and Cunedage Cordeilla borne of his eldest daughters I knowe that some will deny credit to Brutus history which in this case they might with the more reason do if the ancient Weale or Brittish Custome did not answere in the practise thereof to that act of Brutus For not onely king Roderick deuided his kingdome of Wales to his three sonnes according to that distinctioÌ„ of the countrey into Northwales Southwales and Poâ—island but others since haue done the like among them As for Brutus History Brutus History an it hath some enmies so also hath is many friends and those of speciall worth and note Henry Archdeacon of Huntington Matthew of Westminister others among the ancient And of later tymes Syr Iohn Price William Lambert Humphrey Lloyds Doctor White of Basingstoke Count Palatine in right of the Ciuill law Chaire an honour due to the iust number of years by him passed innumerable others Aboue all the rest Edward the first King of England with all the Earles Barons of this Realme by their authentick deed or instrument confirmed in Parliament But let vs proceed They who know the old fashions of Ireland either by report or by the printed Statutes of that Nation may testify of their most ancient Tenure Irish Tauistry or Fundament custome which there is called Tauistry By which the land and chiefest of a Name after the predecessors death is not a warded to the eldest sonne but to the worthiest if I misremember not the iudgment wherof is left with the people and such Tenants about as haue interest and right of voyce As Alexander the great though as it is apparent in the Machabees very falsly is said to haue left his Empire And the custome of equal shares may be in other places also which neuer borrowed their equall partitions from Gauelkind A custome I graunt which some haue very lately altered in their priuate families by Parliament In Scotland there is scarse any thing in their most ancient Records more often found concerning their succession to the Crowne therof then Vncles to reigne before Nephewes euer by Nationall Custome as is auerred But the abundance of forraine examples must not carry me from home Arthur Arthur the Great was left heyre to the crowne by his Father King Vther surnamed Pendragon or Dragons head though begotten in Bastardy rather theÌ„ the soÌ„nes of Lot king of PicÌ„tland being borne of Vthers sister or as some write of his daughter Anne an history which euen Buchanan relateth out of the Scottish Monuments on Arthurs behalf for very true To come neerer in the same kynd Athelstane that victorious king of England Athelstane being a Bastard was notwithstanding preferred before the lawfull eldest sonne euen by his Father King Edward surnamed Sinior to whom saith Florentius Wigornienss an authour aboue 500 yeares old Râ—gni gub rnacula reliquit and not to any of his sonnes by his wife Queence Little cause is there to seeke examples so far off William the Conquerour preferred William his youngest sonne before Robert the eldest in the Kingdome of England and
Henry the first was surrogated to Rufus his Brother VVilliam Rufus and still kept Robert out The title of more sufficiency not of more propinquity made Stephen K. Stephen as being then a man growne to step in before Matildes the Empresse and her Infant sonne Henry Plantagenet I will not speake of King Iohns succession before his nephew Arthur the sonne of Geffrâ—y the elder brother to Iohn Henry the 4. K. Iohn King of England did in open Parliament pretend a descent from Edmund Earle of Lancaster Edmund Earle of Lancaster soÌ„ne of Henry the third king of England in preiudice of king Richard 2. auering that Edmund was disinherited for deformity and his brother Edward afterward by the name of king Edward 1. preferred Which though it were not so yet is it sufficient to shew that Henry 4. did hould that his ancestour king Henry 3. might haue done such an act if the cause had bene sufficient And what interest had Henry of Riâ—hmoud to his Diademe being neyther of the right bloud nor of the Royall Name when neuerthelesse of the true Plantagenets sundry Males were aliue and one of them at that very tyme king of England also in possession But to leane Kings affaires If all must necessufily haue gone to one how came it then to passe that in this kingdome there were at one tyme so many great and honorable families of one bloud disinyned in their seats and distinguished in their Annories by different arguments Our whous to meanly seeme in our antiquities and stories as not to knowe it was so And that many renowned houses to speake as de magis notisâ— Plantagâ—nets Sundry grint Families of one 〈◊〉 at a tyme. Mortiniers Beaufords Bâ—â—â—champâ— 1 Disla-Poles Neuill Grayes and the like haue growne and flourished out of one common Ancestour It can neuer be refelled Of disinherisions in worthy Families M. William Camden â—â— Lâ—renceaux King of Arnies giues vs two eminent examples And who is he that remembers not one or other in this owne knowledge or acquaintance Ianc Daughter of Hugh Courtney and heyre to her Mother Carewes wife of Nirold Lord Carew disinaerited her eldest sonne Thomas cùm mirùs reuerenter matrem haberet and parted her lands which were goodly among her three younger sonnes of whom are sprung three seuerall worshipfull bouses of the Carewes called Haccombe Anthony and Bury So that God hath by the successe confirmed the lawfulnes of the fact And this is the first of Maister Caindens examples The other is this Bryand Lile or Fitz-Earle Lord of Abergeuenny hauing two sonnes Brientius de insula both leprous built for them a Lazaretto or spittall gaue to Miles Earle of Heresord far the greatest part of his patrimony from his Children The one of these exaÌ„ples is in the descriptioÌ„ of Deuonshire and this other in Monmouthshire And this Chapter may suffice for the illustration and clearing the former Doctrine and the subiect of this whole discourse by examples CHAP. X. That the Law of Naturall Equity Reason confirme iust Disinherision that the riotous liues of Elder Brothers deserue that vehement reproofe with which the Author closeth vp this Treatise LET vs now looke into the Nature of equity and examine whether in Naturall reason which is the law of all lawes the temperate ought to be subiect to intemperate Fooles Madmen to whom no law imputes sinne are not punished for theft or murther or for any other offence which they do being mad or vnreasonable For though humanely they cannot offend yet in this sort according to equity they many be punished The reason is That all law being grounded on Naturall equity for otherwise it is no law doth not only punish offences coÌ„mitted but also preuents offeÌ„ces which may be done by reasonable or vnreasonable creatures And since that Fooles and Madmen cannot offend to be punished or by punishment can be reformed and yet they with whom they shall liue shall surely be offended if not ouerthrowne by them hauing power as Namely Brothers Sisters and all their whole family put in daunger of misery and ruine the law according to all Natural equity takes al power from them I haue inserted this clause according to Naturall equity for that it is against Nature that men should be subiect to beasts or insensible creatures Heerupon Aristotle disputing the nature of rule and subiection saith That none are borne slaues but such as Nature hath abridged of the vse of reason who being truly slaues are altogether vnfit to gouerne VpoÌ„ which ground also the same great Philosopher disputing whether a Monarchy or Comonweale is the better forme of Policy he saith a Comonweale Because the wisest best meÌ„ are admitted to sway therein But it may be said What is all this to our purpose Yes thus far it may be well applied If Nature intent to make al mankind reasonable according to their species being hindered by some ineuitable accident shall so blemish and maime those in whom such want and Natural weaknes shal be found that they according to diuine and humane law may and ought to be depriued of all right and clayme to any thing more then to sustaine Nature as other creatures may do and not to giue vnto them any soueraignty rule or gouernement which by law or custome might otherwise haue falne on them Because according to naturall diuine equity neither man nor yet the creature made for mans vse ought to be gouerned by Beastes and such do fooles and madmen seeme If this be so as according to Natures rule it cannot be otherwise what punishment shall we think due to that reasonable creature borne in a ciuill society of men vnto whom Nature hath not bene a Stepdame in bestowing of her blessings whose name and Family hath bene ennobled and enriched by the industry and vertue of many worthy Predecessors who shall through disorder and inordinate desires habituated in him by custome euill conuersation become vnreasonable yea a sinfull-creature a wilfull and most punishable madman and a thing vnworthy the name of man a Prodigall who contrary to all rule law or order of the most barbarous society of men takes away the soule as I haue said before of all his Ancestors who being dead yet long might liue in their posterity and consumes the womb his family I meane wherein he was borne and without all remembrance of his obligation to the dead whom as hauing his being from them he ought to honour or respect to the huing to whome he should be a comfort deuoures in some sort them of his owne species society and bloud All which the Anthropophages do not For though they feed on their species which are men like to themselues yet they hunt after straungers and nourish then nearest bloud with others flesh obseruing still some law of society among themselues which our ciuill monster doth not For he contrary to all course of Nature sucks out oftentimes the bâ—oud of his nearest and dearest friends namely his children brothers and sisters Ariotous heyre is a ciuill Monster yea some haue brought their all-tender-harted parents to the greatest of all woes â—bâ—â—â—ary in their old age And all this to maintaine by force of fraud a damned crew of Diuells in the shapes of men Nature hath giuen yea she so strongly hath inhabituated a laudable desire in all creatures to preserue them species that directly or in directly to vndergo the contrary wore not onely vnnatural and moâ—â—â—rous bâ—â—â—worthy also of seuerest punishment Families let them be Princely Noble Gentle or Vulgar are in a manner particuler kindes or species allowed of by Natures law to be raised or maintaine of vnder or in their cheife genus mankind vniuersall which to ouerthrow either directly or indirectly let the Philosopher either Naturall or Morall the Lawier either Ciull or Caâ—â—â—â— the Diuine Scholeman or Casuist iudge how punishable Morall Law-makers for many ages pretermitted to make lawes against this sort of oftenders being asked why they answeared That no man could be so ingratefull or inhumane By which wee see how grieuous the offence was deemed by them and how seuere punishment were they to make lawes in these our corrupted times they would prescribe for such offenders Thus much for our present matter in question In the arguing whereof if what I write in defence of younger Brothers as here the case is put I seem to haue taken vpon trust rather then vpon knowledge or reading the wiser sort will I hope not blame me For my intent was nor but onely as at first I promised to set downe a Table-discourse and not a Controuersy discussed in Schooles If I haue spoken according to dialecticall reason as I belieue then may I safely think that my discourse is armed with strong Authority For what hath bene spoken heretofore truely which reason hath not dictated to all Authors pens If therefore I were able to cite a thousand great Writers for what I haue said yet should they be no more but that which Naturall reason hath or may teach daily All which with my self I intrust to the gentle and equall Censure of my Courtuous Reader FINIS
tymes when the land is let to the Heyre generall to alter the estate if the land so conueyed shall come to Daughters and to leaue it to a Brothers sonne or to some other of the same name though peraduenture many degrees remoued for preseruation of the name and family If this may be deemed lawful and no sinne being done against a well deseruing child for whom Nature and her deserts plead her worthy to be her Fathers heyre then without all compare if the preseruation of a name and family might not iustly be laboured for according to power giuen by the law of God and man what may be lawfully acted against an vnthrifty heyre who in any reasonable mans iudgment is likly in his shrowd to bury the memory of all his Ancestors vertues which should liue in him and his ofspring as his forefathers haue done in theirs It is neyther new nor straung in the practise of our tymes in causes of this Nature to ouerthrow in tended perpetuities and by act of parliament to giue leaue vpon som good considerations to sell lands which otherwise by no lawes can be sold from the heyre the Father being but tennant only for tearme of his life Which surely by no power vnder God could be done if the thing in it self be vnlawful sinne Out of which it may be argued a fortiori If power may be giuen to a Father being tennant for tearme of life to sell his sonnes lands onely to pay his owne debts peraduenture idly made though it be to the ouerthrowe of his Familie because naturall equity say they doth wil that euery one should be relieued with his owne for so it may be deemed though in loue to his child hee hath passed the estate yet that he ought to be preserued from thraldome therewith in his necessity which if it be so as all men do confesse it how reasonable a thing yea how comendable and farre from sinne is it for a Father truely Lord of his owne without all tye of law either deuine or humane as I haue proued to dispose of his lands to the honour of God and comfort of his family to a yonger sonne when as it is most probable that the elder will neither vse it to the one nor the other but rather to nourish sinne and sensuality CHAP. VIII That vnthriftines is one knowne name of many hidden sinns and is alone a sufficient cause of disinherison proued by the Law of God and Man HAVING thus vpon good consideration beyond my first intention as it appeareth by my Preface enlardged this my discourse with the precedent Chapter I haue resolued my selfe vpon my Readers fauour and on the former grounds to argue one question more which I hold verie necessary for the perfecting of this small work which is whether a Father may disinherite his eldest sonne or heire at common law for such an vnthriftines as in most mens iudgements is like to be the ruine of his family Though many foule sinnes besydes the abusing of gods blessings be concomitant to vnthriftynes yet because they are not apparant to the world and de abscondit is non iudicat Praetor I will only breifly argue whether in reason or conscience a desperate vnthrift may be disinherited It is well knowne to all the wise and temperate whose iudgments passion doth not ouersway how great an enemy prodigality or vnthriftynes is to all manner of goodnes and how cunningly she not onely hinders the increase of all vertues in those in whome she reigneth but also vniustly oftentymes cuts off the vertuous reward of many a worthy predecessor yea giues occasion to the euill to detract to the good to suspect their deserts All which how great a wrong it is to a Noble family I leaue to the indifferent reader to censure I will not deny but there may be many sinns in a man which in the sight of God and iudgment of men of themselues are more heynous and deserue afar greater damnation then Prodigality doth yet since that sins in this world are to be punished Those sinnes more punishable which are more offensiue to common society though lesse heinous in their particuler Nature not as they are in themselues but as they by circumstance are offensiue to the society peace and honour of mankind which God and Nature euer as the reward to all morall vertues and as the chief end of mans life intended For otherwise vsury detraction forgery adultery fornication swearing and drunkennesse all which and many more which are as greiuous offences in the eye of heauen as theft should be punished with death as theft is But since they do not offend so much the peace of a publique weale at which the Ciuill magistrate aymes as theft doth they are not censured with such seuere punishment at it is All which shewes directly that offences by circumstance are made in a Ciuill society against which they are committed either great error lesser and are accordingly to be punished and no lesse doth the reason and righ rule of state commaund Out of which grounds it is euident that all formes of gouernement do most punish that offender who directly or indirectly seeks to disturbe the peace or ouerthrow the liberty or disgrace the state wherin he liues yet many greater offences then these may be committed as Incest and Apostasy which are not so sharpely punished by the Ciuill Magistrate For euery one to whome God hath giuen power on earth doth chiefly seek the end for which his power from aboue is giuen vnto him and doth censure and punish in the highest degree those offences which tend to the ouerthrowe of a well setled state and by good and lawfull power confirmed Now to come vpon these premisses to the matter in question to apply that which hath beene sayd to our purpose It is well knowne to the world that a family is a ciuill society yea the only common weale which God and Nature first ordayned and from which all societyes Common-wealths species of Gouernement first tooke their originall For the mantainance of which society there is no question but God hath giuen many priuiledges to a Father as well to reward the well-deseruing as to punish an euill child or member of his body not onely by depriuing them of their expected fortunes but by cutting them of from his body either by banishment or by death it selfe For it is euident by the Ciuill law that a Father had for many yeares not onely free power to disinherit but also power of life and death our his children who should greiuously offend him or his liuing vnder his Ciuill gouernement But since that things vnknowne are growne out of vse and may seeme as well incredible as straunge I cannot in discretion passe ouer the matter in question so lightly as that it may worthily be subiect to sharpe censure or rashly be branded with the mark of vntruth Therefore laying aside the testimony of the old Roman lawes in the case