not because many Books are lost as the Writings of Nathan and Gad with others 1 Chron. 29. 29. as also the Epistle of St. Paul to the Laodiceans Col. 4. 16. Answ. The single Books have an essential Perfection because they have the Matter and Form of the Word of God the whole Canon has a proportionate one The one has the perfection of the part the other of the whole But we have all the Books that are Canonical those Books that are lost were Historical Narrations and some others too that were not Canonical Obj. 6. All that Christ said and did are not comprehended in the Scriptures Answ. All that Christ did and said necessary for our Salvation are in the Scriptures Obj. 7. St. Paul bids us 2 Thess. 2 15. to hold or keep the Traditions Answ. Either the Apostle there speaks of those free and indifferent Constitutions that concern the Government of the Church or concerning the Doctrine which he himself in Person had preached to them and then even that was contained in his Writings and other Canonical Books for Tradition is wont to be taken in that Sense Now he had delivered nothing contrary to the Scriptures as some others had done Obj. 8. But besides Those Books which we call Apocrypha should seem to be truly Canonical because not only many Councils but many Fathers have called and accounted them Canonical Answ. We are to give credit to Councils as far as they follow the guidance of Scripture and no further and if at any time General Councils call these Books Canonical this is only in a comprehensive Sense and has no other meaning but that they were wont to be read in the Church for the edâ—fication of the People not that they had the same assurance of them as of those that are truly Canonical because these were never received into the Hebrew Canon and from hence they were called Deutero-Canonici or Canonical in a second Form And then as to some of the Fathers that they called them Canonical that will not prove them such Neither is it very likely that the more Ingenuous of them would call them so unless in the foregoing Sense Obj. 9. The Church is wont to cite many things from thence Answ. The Apostles cited some things from the Writings of the Heathens but we must not gather from thence that their Writings are Canonical Obj. 10. There are many things in the Books of the Apocrypha which migâ—ly encourage Faith and Piety There you have â—ittle Morals Oecâ—mics and Pâ—liticks in short a Compendium of Scripture Answ. All the Books that contain good Precepts are not Canonical ART VII Of the Old Testament THE Old Testament is not contrary to the New for both in the Old and New Testament everlasting Life is offered to Mankind by Christ who is the only Mediator between God and Man being both God and Man Wherefore they are not to be heard which feign that the Old Fathers did look only for transitory Promises Altho' the Law given from God by Moses as touching Ceremonies and Rites do not bind Christian Men nor the Civil Precepts thereof ought of necessity to be received in any Commonwealth yet notwithstanding no Christian Man whatsoever is free from the Obedience of the Commandments which are called Moral Against the aforesaid Article it is Objected Obj. 1. That in the Old Testament things were obscure but in the New they are clear In the Old Christ was shadowed out under Ceremonies in the New himself is present from whence may be inferred an Opposition between the Two Testaments Answ. There may be inferred some difference between the Old and the New Testament in respect to the manner of Administration to the clearness and circumstances of Things but no contrariety in respect to the Substance Obj. 2. Christ as a Man had not yet suffered and for that reason Grace thro' him was not yet offered Answ. Grace was effectually offered thro' Christ that was to come Obj 3. The Mystery of the Incarnation was unknown to the Sons of Men Eph. 3. 5. Answ. It was unknown to the Gentiles before their Conversion Or This Mystery was unknown to the Fathers i. e. It was not so plainly and distinctly known as now it is as you have it in that Text. Obj. 4. The ancient Church was in its Infancy and its Knowledge was accordingly Gal. 4. 3 So in bodily things it could not discern Spiritual ones Answ. The ancient Church is called childish not because it knew nothing of Christ but because its Knowledge was very weak in respect of the Church of the New Testament which saw those things brought to pass which were before prophesied of Obj. 5. Christ was the Mediator of a better Covenant because it was established by better Promises Heb. 8. 6. Answ. Christ is the Mediator of a better Covenant than that of Moses for that promised only Blessing upon condition they kept the Law But the ancient Covenant that was freely made with the Patriarchs has the same Promises with the New Testament in which Life is promised by Faith Obj. 6. Circumcision is called an everlasting Covenant Gen. 17. 13. The Passover is called an everlasting Worship and the whole Levitical Service is called an eternal Precept a perpetual Ordinance and therefore it does bind all Christians Exod. 12. 14. Answ. The Levitical Ordinances are called everlasting i. e. so long as the Old Law should last so that such a duration is spoken of as the nature of the thing will bear And the Word Olam in the Original signifies an Age or long time but does not always denote an absolute Eternity Obj. 7. The Law of not cating Blood does bind Christians Acts 15. 29. Answ. The eating of Blood was forbidden to the Gentiles not for ever but for a time to avoid giving Offence to the weak Jews who were not yet fully confirmed in the Faith of Christ and did still believe that this Ordinance was not quite abolished But then you 'll say that abstaining from Blood and Fornication are both joyned together in the Apostle's Edict Acts 15. 29. therefore by the same necessity that Christians are obliged to abstain from Fornication by the same likewise are they bound as to the eating of Blood I answer that the eating of Blood and Fornication were joyned together by the Apostles not that they really were but only were accounted equal For by most Heathens Fornication was accounted no Sin and Christians began to be wondred at by the Gentiles that they were so much in love with Chastity Neither is it any new thing in the Law of Moses to have moral judicial and ceremonial Precepts mix'd together Obj. 8. None can make wiser Laws than God Now the civil Precepts of the Law Of not defrauding the Hirelings of care for the Poor and several others do highly oblige every Christian. Answ. 'T is true no body makes Laws wiser than God but among the Laws which He has made some are only proper for the
Jewish Commonwealth and these do not bind Christians but there are others which have the nature of common Justice and a natural Law and are the Explications and Determinations of the moral one and the observation of them is likewise injoyned in the New Testament But these do bind every one to observe them Obj. 9. The moral Law is not made for a Righteous Man 1 Tim. 1. 9. Answ. The Law as to its Punishments whereof it threatens a great many is not made for a Righteous Man to Condemnation altho' it be made as to its Rules for Observation A just Man even for the love of Justice conforms himself to that Law and then the threatnings of the Law signifie nothing to him Consequently then this can be nothing to wilful Libertines that the Just are not bound by any Christian Laws ART VIII Of the Three Creeds THE Three Creeds Nice Creed Athanasius's Creed and that which is commonly called the Apostle's Creed ought thoroughly to be received and believed for they may be proved by most certain Warrants of Holy Scripture Obj. 1. This Article seems to be imperfect because it makes no mention of the Ephesian Chalcedonian and Constantinopolitan Creeds which were wont to be approved of by the Church Answ. This Article mentions the chief Creeds not exclusively to others as if they might not be true likewise and it was not necessary to mention All. Obj. 2. The Inventions of Men are not to be obtruded upon the Church nor to be received as necessary to be believed but the foregoing Creeds as such and are proposed to our Faith as if they were the Wâ—d of God Answ. The aforesaid Creeds were indeed composed and methodized by Men but yet they are not the meer Fancies of Men contrary to the Holy Scriptures which the Argument supposes but the Doctrine contained in them is conformable to the Word of God Neither do we receive them with an equal degree of Faith with the Holy Scripture but we give them the next place to That and reverence them as the chief Monuments of Faith Obj. 3. To omit others that Sentence in Athanasius's Creed seems to be too severe where he speaks of the Confession of Faith That except every one do keep it whole and undefiled without doubt he shall perish everlastingly What shall we then say of those that labour under an invincible Ignorance How shall they believe on him of whom they have not heard says St. Paul Rom. 10. 14 If then Men want the Means of Knowledge and the Tidings of this Doctrine has in no sort come to them it is plain they are not to be blamed and that they are free from Damnation for God obliges no one to Impossibilities Answ. Athanasius means chiefly those to whom the Catholick Faith has been propounded and explained who have all the means requisite for the knowledge of the Truth As to others who of them will be saved God himself will in an extraordinary manner enlighten their Understandings that they may perceive what things are necessary to Salvation ART IX Of Original Sin ORiginal Sin stands not in the following of Adam as the Pelagians do vainly talk but it is the Fault and Corruption of the Nature of every Man that naturally is ingendered of the Off-spring of Adam whereby Man is very far gone from Original Righteousness and is of his own Nature inclined to Evil so that the Fleth lusteth always contrary to the Spirit And therefore in every Person born into this World it deserves God's Wrath and Damnation And this Infection of Nature does remain yea in them that are Regenerated whereby the Lust of the Flesh called in Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which some do expound the Wisdom some Sensuality some the Affection some the Desire of the Flesh is not subject to the Law of God And altho' there is no Condemnation for them that believe and are Baptized yet the Apostle does confess that Concupiscence and Lust has of it self the nature of Sin Against which it is Objected Obj. 1. That God does not punish the same Sin twice but he has â—ready punished Adam's Sin in Adam and therefore will not punish it in us Ans. Adam's Sin was not Numerically but Specifically One and that inclusive of the whole Species As he sinned so have we likewise sinned in him and we are justly punished in our selves Obj. 2. It is plain there is no such thing as Original Sin because the Son shall not bear the Iniquity of the Father says the Prophet Ezek. 18. 20. Answ. The Son does not bear the Personal Sins of his Father but the Sin of the first Man was a stain of the whole Nature when therefore any one is punished for the Sin of Adam he is punished for his own Obj. 3. Sin is a voluntary thing but Original Sin is not so in Infants Ans. Original Sin is voluntary in All nay even in Infants too for our Wills were in the Will of Adam as in the Principle of Mankind in him we willed and desired Evil. Obj. 4. An Accident of one Individual is not transferred to the whole Species but the Sin of Adam was only an Accident of one Individual Ans. Adam inasmuch as he was the Principle of Human Nature was to be look'd upon here as an universal Cause Obj. 5. The Children of Holy Men are Holy 1 Cor. 7. 14. therefore they are not born in Sin Ans. The Children of Holy Men are not so Holy as to be free from Original Sin but they are called so in regard of a Communion with the Church by reason of that Covenant Gen. 17. 7. I will be a God to Thee and to thy Seed They are therefore Holy with a relative and not with any inherent Holiness so also they are Innocent in respect to those Sins which are committed against Knowledge Obj. 6. In Baptism we receive a perfect Remission of Sins therefore Original Sin is wholly taken away and so remains not in the Regenerate Ans. Remission of Sin takes away Sin as to its Imputation not as to its Being for Mortification is but imperfect in this Life so in Baptism Sin is taken away but not so much the Sin it self as the Sting of it that it may not hurt us Obj. 7. Things absolutely disagreeing do not meet in the same Subject but Sin and Righteousness are of that sort therefore since there is Righteousness in the Regenerate there can be no Sin there Answ. Sin and Righteousness cannot be in the same Subject in the highest but yet easily in lower degrees Obj. 8. Concupiscence or a proneness to Evil is distinguished from Sin as the Cause is from the Effect Jam. 1. 15. and therefore is not of it self to be accounted Sin Answ. Concupiscence is distinguished from Actual Sin and from an external Act already compleated but in the mean time it has of it self the nature of a Sin because of it self it is not subjected to the Law of God And it is this
is an Union between Two absolute Things there indâ—ed there is a Composition But in God his Essence is absolute and the Person relative And Persons do not differ from one another really and essentially but really and personally i. e. by relative Personalities Obj. 8. Where there are One and Three Beings there there are Four Buut in God there are One and Three Beings the Father Son and Holy Ghost are Three and yet Essence it self is none of these Answ. * We are not to imagine here that the Author meant to favour the Sabellian Heresie For though to say that Three Persons are Three Modes of Subsistence be Sabellianiâ— yet as an Answer to the foregoing Objection the faâ—rest Interpretation is That though there be Three distinct Persons in the Godhead or Divine Nature the Divine Nature is not to be reckoned as a thing distinct and separate from them And this will give likewise an Orthodox Sense to the Comparison of Light There is one only Essence in God and Three Persons are only the Three Modes of his Subsistence Now Modes do not number a thing but they are numbered and included in it so that it cannot be said to be different from them So for Example if there be Three Degrees of Light the Morning Noon and Evening Light Light it self will not be any fourth thing in respect of these Degrees which are to be reckoned up and included under Light singly and simply considered Obj. 9. If there be Three Persons in the Divine Essence then there will be first and second before and after and so it will not be perfectly simple Answ. Before and after do not relate to the Essence but to the Modes of subsisting And though they generally suppose a priority of Time and Essence yet there is a priority of Order that does not exclude a Co-aeternity And Eternity has relation to the Essence of God Obj. 10. The Doctrine of the Trinity is contrary to Reason because it asserts the same numerical Essence to be wholly in One and wholy in Three which seems impossible Answ. The Divine Essence is One and Infinite and so is wholly in One Person and wholly in Three This cannot be said to be impossible since the Essence of a reasonable Soul is totally in the whole and wholly in every Part. Now the true Image of this thing is this That many Men are One Man only by a Participation of the Species or Humane Nature Obj. 11. This Doctrine introduces Three Infinites when it is impossible thsre should be any more than One. Answ. There is One Infinite viz. the Divine Essence however that Infinity is not a personal Property but an essential one There are not indeed Three infinite Gods but Three Persons make up One infinite Nature Obj. 12. The Father is said to be the only true God Joh. 17. 3. Answ. Hereby are excluded all fictitious Deities or Creatures but not the Son or the Holy Ghost Even the Father alone is God who has an Omnipotent Son Obj. 13. The Scripture does not make use of these Words and Phrases Trinity Person and to proceed Answ. Although these Terms are not to be met with in the Scriptures yet the Sense and Meaning of them are plainly to be fetched from thence ART II. Of the Word or Son of God which was made very Man THE Son which is the Word of the Father begotten from everlasting of the Father the very and eternal God of one Substance with the Father took Man's Nature in the Womb of the Blessed Virgin of her Substance So that Two whole and perfect Natures that is to say the Godhead and Manhood were joyned together in One Person never to be divided whereof is One Christ very God and very Man who truly suffâ—red was cruâ—fied dead and buried to reconcâ—le his Father to us and to be a Saâ—fice not only for Oâ—nal Guilt but also for the Actual Sins of Men. Obj. 1. That it does by no means agree to a Spiritual Nâ—e to â—eget therefore Christ is not 〈◊〉 of God Answ. This is true Physically speaking in the manner that corporeal Substances be et their Likeness and Substance but it very well agrees in a Me a physical Sense as an Angelical or Human Mind begets Reason which is the proper Fruit of the Mind and in the most Spiritual Sense of all we may suppose one Person to beget another from and in himself as the Father begat the Son Obj. 2. That Christ has not all the Divine Perfections because he wants Paternity which is a Perfection of the Father therefore he is not God Answ. Christ has all the absolute Perfections that are common to the Three Persons which is sufficient although he has not the Chracteristical Ones which are proper only to One. Obj. 3. That if the Father and the Son are of the same Essence then if the Son be incarnate and made Flesh the Father is so too Answ. The whole Divine Essence is incarnate not absolutely but relatively inasmuch as it is wholly in the Son the whole Divinity originally undertook the Work of Incarnation This may be illustrated by a Similitude Three Sisters weave one Garment and the second wears it Obj. 4. If the eternal Son of God be incarnated it follows that he had a Being and was a Person before he was incarnate If this be so What is that which was conceived in the Virgin 's Womb and boâ—n Not a Person for then there would be Two Persons and Two Sons of God If the Person is not born of the Virgin how does that deserve to be called a Man which is born of her since no body can be called a Man that is not a Humane Person For a Man is distinguished to be such by his Person and nothing else Answ. There is one sort of Individual which subsists of it self and is rightly called Person and another which does not subsist of it self but in another as the Hand in the Body But because it does not subsist of it self is therefore not to be called a Person So the Humane Nature of Christ never did subsist by it self but always in the Divine Logos and for that Reason was never of it self a Person Obj. 5. God sent his Son not in true Flesh but as the Apostle says Rom. 8. 3. in the Similitude of sinful Flesh And so Christ was not a true Man Answ. The true Flesh of Christ is called the Similitude of Flesh not simply so but as obnoxious to the Sin of the Flesh not that Christ did assume the Likeness of Flesh and as it were the Image of a Body and not a real one but only the Similitude of sinning Flesh This could not be for Christ was not a Sinner though he was like to Sinners Obj. 6. Christ and Melchisedeck are compared together because both of them were without Father and without Mother Heb. 7. 3. And therefore Christ was not born of a Virgin Answ. Christ is said to be without Father
the Latin Versions Prayer is our Conference with God and this ought to spring from our own Senâ—e And therefore as far as we are able we ought to know those things we speak whilst we are praying Obj. 3. It is 〈◊〉 that Piety is much diminished ever 〈◊〉 tâ—e Mother Tongue began to be in Use in the Church Answ. True Piety is not diminished instead of a senseless Superstition which did formerly prevail there is now 〈◊〉 many sincere Piety altho' the Church was never without many prosane Perâ—ons And if Piety was diminished in many this would be only accidentally so by the default of some wicked Men As the Gospel when it is preached is to very many a savour of Death unto Death But Prayers in a known Tongue cannot be the cause of this Impiety Obj. 4. The 〈◊〉 of the Lesser Asia mâ—de use of the Greek Tongue in their Worship But all the People did not understand it 〈◊〉 when the Lame Man was â—ealed they spoke in the Lycaonian Language Acts 14. 11. And so again Acts 2. there are reckoned up various Tongues that were tâ—n in Asia and which the Apostles made use of Answ. The Lycaonian Tongue was a Dialect of the Greek as well as many others were and the Apostles preached in Greek to these People so that without doubt they understood them Obj. 5. If there was one Tongue used in all Churches it would much tend to the Vnity of the Church Answ. The Unity of the Church does not depend upon the Unâ—y of Tongues but upon the Unity of Doctrine Obj. 6. The end 〈◊〉 Divine Service is not the Instrucâ—n of the People but the Worship of God Now God 〈◊〉 our Prayers wâ—en they are utteâ—ed in an unâ—own Tongue and it is enough that the People 〈◊〉 dâ—nt Minds Answ. The principal â—d of Divine Service is the Worâ—ip of God but in Subordination to this the Edification of the People is to be considered likewise Now the People canâ—ot be 〈◊〉 unless they understaâ— 1 Câ— 14. And then the End of a Publiâ—k Meeting is not that God may understand 〈◊〉 that he may approve of the whole Assembly Neither is it enough for the People to understand that something is done to the Praise of God and to have a devout Mind in general but they ought likewise distinctly to understand what it is that is done to the Praise of God ART XXV Of the Sacraments SAcraments ordained of Christ be not only Badges or Tokens of Christian Mens Profession but rather they be certain sure Witnesses and effectual Signs of Grace and God's good Will towards us by the which he does work invisibly in us and does not only quicken but also strengthen and confirm our Faith in him There are Two Sacraments ordain'd of Christ our Lord in the Gospel that is to say Baptism and the Supper of the Lord. Those Five commonly called Sacraments that is to say Confirmation Penance Orders Matrimony and Extreme Unâ—ion are not to be counted for Sacraments of the Gospel being such as are grown partly of the corrup following of the Apostles partly are States of Lâ—fe allowed by the Scriptures But yet have not like Nature of Sacraments with Baptisin and the Lord's Supper for that they have not any visible Sign or Ceremony ordained of God The Sacraments were not ordained of Christ to be gazed upon or to be carried about but that we should duly use them And in such only as worthily receive the same they have a wholsom Effect or Operation but they that receive them unworthily purchase to themselves Damnation as St. Paul says Obj. 1. The Sacraments are often made use â—s by Hypocrites and therefore they are not certain Signs of Grace Answ. Out of a charitable Opinion the Sacraments are distributed to All but they are certain Signs of Grace only to them that beheve and receive them worthily Obj. 2. Neither this Word Sacrament nor the number of only Two Sacraments is to be met with in Scripture Answ. Although we do not find the Word Sacrament in Scripture yet the thing that is meant by that Word is to be found there And the Apostle 1 Cor. 10. reckons up only these Two Sacraments neither in the Sacred Writings the Word Sacrament being strictly taken can we find any more Some have thought that these Two were signified by the Water and Blood which came out of Christ's Side John 19. Obj. 3. The external Sign of Confirmation is Imposition of Hands Acts 8. 17. Answ. Tâ—at Confirmation there spoken of by Imposition of Hands was extraordinary and peculiar to the Apostles Obj. 4. The Judicial Sign of Repentance is Absolution John 20. 23. Answ. There is no outward Sign there prescribed not so much as the Matter or Form of a Sacrament because there is nothing that is distinct from the Word spoken Christ himself made use of no other outward Sign besides Breathing on them Obj. 5. The Ceremony of Extreme Unction is to be met with Jam. 5. 14. together with a Promise annext to it Answ. The Command concerning Extreme Unction took place only whilst there was miraculous Gifts in the Church and relate only to the miraculous curing of sick People Obj. 6. The outward Sign of Orders is Imposition of Hands 1 Tim. 4. 14. Answ. Imposition of Hands is not essential to Holy Orders because it was not always practised Matthias was chosen into the Place of Judas without it Acts 1. The Apostles were chosen and conâ—ecrated without it Mat. 10. Mark 3. And it is strange that the Romanists should make Imposition of Hands a Sacramental Riâ—e as well in Orders as Confirmation whereas we no where find in Sâ—ripture that one and the same Sign should be in Two different Sacraments Obj. 7. Concerning 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 are told Eph. 5. 32. That it is a Mystery or Sacrament Answ. The Apostle does not mean that Matrimony is properly a Sacrament but only a Mystery whereof there are many that are not Sacraments ART XXVI Of the Unworthiness of the Ministers which hinder not the Effects of the Sacraments Although in the visible Church the Evil be ever mingled with the Good and â—ometimes the Evil have chief Authority in the Ministration of the Word and Sacraments yet sorasmuch as they do not the same in their own Name but in Christ's and do minister by his Commission and Authority we may use thâ—ir Ministry both in hearing the Word of God and in receiving of the Sacraments Neither is the Effect of Christ's Ordinance taken away by their Wickedness nor the Grace of God's Gifts diminished from such as by Faith and rightly do receive the Sacraments ministred unto them which be effectual because of Christ's Institution and Promise altho they be ministred by Evil Men. Nevertheless it appertaineth to the Discipline of the Church that Enquiry be made of Evil Ministers and that they be accused by those that have Knowledge of their Offences And finally being found guilty by just Judgment be deposed
Will chiâ—fly and first of all nay in no sort is it placed in the Will that any Man whenâ—oever he pleases mâ—y attain Salvation But thâ—t there is sometiâ—s a sort of Power in the Will subordinâ—te and agreeable to Grace no body will dâ—ny 〈◊〉 has any regard to St. Austin Whilst we hav◠〈◊〉 says he whilst it is in our Power to do 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Aâ—d in another place spâ—king of the 〈◊〉 shâ— of Hell There is a grâ—ter 〈◊〉 says 〈◊〉 whâ—h yoâ— oâ—ght â—o fâ—ar and which yâ—u have in your own powâ—r to prevâ—nt coming upon you The Judgment of the most Râ—verend and Learned Father in God Lancelot Bishop of Winchester who himself had a great part in the Affair concerning the Articles that were offered to the Assembly at Lambeth by Dr. Whitaker THE Four first Articles are about Predestination and Reprobation The one is called by the Apostle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Depth of the Riches of the Wisdom and Knowledge of God! Rom. 11. 33. the other by the Prophet A great Deep Psal. 36. 6. I in truth ingenuously confess that I have followed St. Austin's Advice Such Mysteries as I cannot unfold to admire them as they are concealed And therefore for these Sixteen Years ever since I was made Priest I have neither publickly nor privately dispuâ—ed about them or medled with them in my Sermons And even now I had much rather hear than speak of them my self And indeed since the Place it self is doubtful and has on both sides dangerous Precipices Since some of the Texts of St. Paul from whence commonly these Opinions are drawn are to be reckoned as St. Pâ—ter â—serves amongst the 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to be understood And since there 〈◊〉 many amongst the Clergy who are ab◠〈◊〉 such Matters with that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as they ought and few aâ—g 〈◊〉 â—ople 〈◊〉 â—re 〈◊〉 proper 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 â—hings I should advisâ— if it were 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 nothing might be said on either side 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 might not every whâ— be so 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 â—lly managed as it is wâ—t to be 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 better Purpoâ—e to teach 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 â—nly the way to Salvation in things manifestly relating to a Holy and a well-govern'd Life than to trouble their Heads with the Secrets of Providence and the hidden things of God whereas an over-curious Inquiry into these things does but turn Peoples Heads and make them break out into Enthusiastick Frensies and scarce ever tend to the Edification of strait and narrow Dispositions However being asked to give my Opinion concerning these Articles and that by your Lordship too whom it is my Duty to obey I answer thus in short To the First wherein Predâ—stination is assâ—ted That God in his Eternal whether you will call it â—ore-knowledge or Knowledge whereby he sees things which are not as though they were has predestinated some and reprobated others is I think without all manner of doubt The Words of Scripture are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 before the Foundation of the World i e. God has chosen us from all lâ—ternity and when he had chosen did predestinate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 1 4 5. Now it was out of the World that â—e hath chosen us John 15. 19. And therefore he has not chosen All Men in the World but only Some otherwise it could not â—e called Election But then those whom he hath not chosen supposing him to approve of his Choice as the Nature of Election bears he hath reprobated And for this the Scripture use the Word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to câ—t away Rom. 11. 2. and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to reject or reprobate Heb. 12. 15. There â—ms to be almost the same Reason for Reprobation as for Election for one as for the other And if this do not appear plain enough I would add That some are predestinated one way namely by Christ and others â—e reprobated another namely for their Sins To the Second Article wherein the Cause of Predestination is explained The Word of God by the Prophet is most true That in me only is thy Help i. e. Help is to be had from none but me and from me you can have nothing else but Help As also that of the Apostle Who is it that maketh thee to differ from another i. e. from God alone we have whatsoever makes us to differ from others But yet concerning that Expression the sole good will and Pleasure of God it may be asked 1. Whether it includes or excludes Christ i. e. whether the Act of Predestinating be an absolute or a relative Act. As to my self I think it to be relative and that there is no good Pleasure of God towards Men but by his Son in whom he is well pleased nor that any one is predestinated either before or without the Direction and Approbation of Christ. But as the Scripture has it Christ was first fore-known 1 Pet. 1. 2. and then we in him Rom. 8. 29 Christ was first predestinated Rom. 1. 4. and then we by him Eph. 1. 5. Now we are not as some imagine in the first place elected and Christ afterwards and for our Sakes For it were impossible for us to be predestinated into the Adoption of Sons but by a natural Son neither could we be 〈◊〉 to be â—formable to the Image of his Son as the Scripture speaks unless the Son were first appointed to whose Image we are to be conformed Wherefore to this Article likewise I would choose to add The good Pleasure of God in Christ And then in the second Place it may be asked likewise whether this sole Will and good Pleasure includes or excludes the Fore-knowledge of God I can by no means think that these Two things viz. to sore-know and to predâ—stinate are to be separated but we should rather as the Aposties do joyn them together But in this neither dare I give my Opinion rashly or condemn the Fathers who almost All do assert that we are both elected and predestinated according to a Faith foreseen which also Beza himself confesses saying That the Fathers are by no Upon 〈◊〉 of Rom. ver 2 Edit 2. mâ—ns in this Matter to â—e regarded who refer it all to a 〈◊〉 In which notwithstanding I should think that they spoke rather concerning the Series and Order that God made use of in the Act of Predestination than of the real Cause of it Which Order some dispose one way and some another according to their different Apprehensions But the Fathers seem to me to have thought thus That there was no Election but what was disposed in this following manner 1. That God loveth Christ and then loves us in Christ as also the Apostle says Eph. 1. 6 That God hath accepted us in the Beloved 2. Those that are thus accepted he does endue with Grace and Faith 3. Those that are so endued and thereby distinguished from the rest he does elect And 4. The Elect he does predestinate Most certainly the