1. Cor. 10.3 VVhat is the same but that which also wee haue saith Augustine Therefore the same meat and the same drink but to the vnderstanding and beleeuing But to the not vnderstanding that Manna alone Book de Vti lit paenitent vpon Ioh. tract 21 that water alone but to the beleeuers the same which now for then Christ was to come now he is come was to come and is come are diuers words but the same Christ 5 Because it could not be that Christ locally sitting at the table and communicating with the disciples as it is Mat. 26.29 I will not drinke henceforth of this fruit of the vine should himselfe eate himselfe really and corporally Did Christ Iesus take part of the same signes Truly no lesse then of the Paschall Lambe Concerning which let him which doubteth thinke 1 That the Lord Iesus sanctified the ordinarie Sacraments of both the Testaments in the vse thereof 2 And in instituting of the supper by his example went before in sayings doings that the whole Church may know that the first paterne is to be respected of her in that regard that it was the greatest cause why he did not abstaine whereupon Hierome saith ipse conuiua conuiuium ipse comedens qui comeditur that is Epist ad Hed. biam he is the guest and the feast he is eating and that which is eaten Is there that vertue and that sense of the words of Christ wherewith he instituted this Sacrament that as often as vpon the bread and wine they are recited by the Priest who hath a purpose to consecrate then the substance of bread and wine eyther by Analysis is resolued into the first matter or euen into nothing so that in steed thereof doe succeed the bodie and bloud of Christ or by a simple mutation is turned into the substance of the true bodie and of the true bloud of Christ so that the substance of bread is formed into the flesh of of Christ the bare accidents of breas and wine remayning hanging without a subiect God forbid 1 Because it were magicall to attribute the power of changing the substance of the signes to certaine words mumbled ouer 2 Because in expresse words of the Apostles and Euangelists the true natural substance of bread and wine is affirmed before and after consecration as they call it 1. Cor. 10.16.17 and 11.26 27.28 The bread which we breake is it not the communion of the bodie of Christ And wee that are many are one bread and one bodie because we all are partakers of one bread and As often as yee shall eate this bread ye shew forth the Lords death till he come And Whosoeuer shall eate this bread and drinke this cup of the Lord vnworthily shall be guiltie of the bodie and bloud of the Lord. And Let a man examine himselfe and so let him eate of this bread and drinke of this cup. For whereas they say that it is called bread not which is now but which was before it is confirmed by no testimonie of Scripture or iudgement of sense and besides Math. 26.29 I will not drinke saith hee henceforth of this fruit of the Vine Thus spake Christ after consecration 3 Because the kingdome or God is not corporall meate and drinke Rom. 14.17 4 Because in the proposition the pronoune hoc this demonstratiue doth not demonstrate the bodie of Christ For the transubstantiation saith Thomas is not accomplished but in the last instāt of the pronouncing of the words neither doth it demonstrate the accidēts alone of the bread For the accidētes are not the body of Christ neither doth it demōstrate any wandring thing or singular thing vncertainly determined For there is no Indiuiduum or singular thing which is not something And therefore certaine not wandering vndetermined or indefinite and especially the Demonstratiue Hoc this doth signifie some certaine thing 5 Because it is a wicked thing to be thought and spoken that the bread it selfe is properly and substantially the bodie of Christ 6 Because of this conuersion neither doth the Scripture giue sentence nor sense or reason iudge as of the rod of Moses turned into a Serpent a Exod 4.3 and of the water turned into wine Iohn 2.9 Where the Euangelist said not simply Water but Made wine For the accidents of bread doe plainely shew that bread doth remaine and they which partake of those holy signes doe feele in themselues a taste of wine and the power of the bread and wine This is an vnanswerable reason Framed thus euerie miracle is sensible transubstantiation is not sensible therefore it is no miracle 7 Because the substance the accidents thereof remayning cannot perish neyther can the accidents subsist without a subiect nor be the accidents of bread which are not the accidents of bread 8 Because the substance being remooued and the nature of the signes the similitude affinitie habit relation and Analogie of the signes to the thing signified come to nothing For the bread signifieth the bodie of Christ because it nourisheth strengtheneth and sustaineth which accidents cannot doe 9 Because heere is no word of Christ which may signifie a conuersion or transubstantiation For the verb Est doth not signifie to be made to be changed to be turned And note that which is said to be made cannot properly be said to be for Esse to be and Fieri to be made are said 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to say contradictorily 10 Because a carnall eating of the bodie of Christ is no where prooued in the Scriptures 11 Because it should follow that both the faithfull and vnbeleuers doe receiue the bodie of the Lord and his quickening spirit which neuer can be feuered from his bodie And Augustine saith that They doe not eate the bodie of Christ but which are in the bodie of Christ Because that bodie cannot be spoyled of quantitie nor in an instant and without locall motion be together in heauen in earth vnlesse vpon necessitie we should make an vbiquitie of Christs bodie which the verie transubstantiators do refuse to doe and the Fathers denie and they doe determine contrarie things which say that a bodie and the quantitie are truely present and yet not by meanes of the quantitie 13 Because now the bodie of Christ cannot be separated from the bloud nor the soule from his bodie and concerning Concomitancie there is nothing extant is the word of God 14 Because they write that Victor the third Bishop of Rome died hauing drunk poyson out of a chalice giuē him by his Subdeacon and that Henrie the seuenth Emperour of Lucelburge tooke poyson from the bread taken in the Eucharist by a Monke of Senens one of the preachers order 15 Because infinite discommodities doe follow this Transubstantiation as that the accidents must remaine without a subiect that if it happen that Mice do gnaw the bread they shal be said to gnaw accidēces or that if worms do breed of the bread it
Math. 9.36 Iohn 2.17 Ioh. 11.33.35 Mat. 26.37.38 that he ascended visibly and locally into heauen and thence that he shall come againe to iudgement l Act. 1.9.11 Why must Christ needes be true man 1. The iustice of God required it should be so that the disobedience committed in our flesh might in the same be repaired m Rom. 5.17.18.19 Hebr. 2.14 2. The reason of our adoption for it pleased the Sonne of God to take the nature of man vpon him and to become our brother and by that means to become our nearest kinsman and most neare allied vnto vs that we being made his members might be made the sons of God Gal. 3.26 and that he might haue right to redeeme and ransome vs n Ier. 32.8 Ruth 3.12.13 Hence is matter of comfort in euery kind of temptation Therfore the Apostle to the Hebrewes 2.17 4.5 saith He tooke not vpon him the nature of the Angels but the seed of Abraham and in all things became like to his brethren that he might haue compassion of his brethren 3. For the confirmation of our resurrection for in that Christ tooke on him our nature and hath raised it vp and giuen vnto it immortalitie and hath exalted it in the heauen by vertue of that communion which we haue with him shall we be raised vp at the last day and this our vile bodie shall be made conformable to the glorious bodie of Christ Phil. 3.21 1. Cor. 15.22 As in Adam all are dead so in Christ shall all be made aliue Why was neither the Father nor the holy Ghost incarnate but the Sonne 1. Because it was meet that the world should be redeemed and all things restored by him by whom all things were created or that man should be redeemed from death by him by whom he was first created and should haue bene brought vnto life eternall if he had not sinned 2. It would haue bene vnconuenient that there should be two Sonnes one in the diuine nature another in the humane nature 3. It was the eternall decree of the Father whereby he purposed to saue mankind by the Sonne a Heb. 2.10 Whether is Christ God and man diuided or ioyned together Ioyned and vnited but not diuided By what kind of vnion Not by inhabitation onely as God dwelleth in the Saints not by consent onely b Ioh. 17.21 as the faithfull are one in the Father and the Son not by mixture as when water is mingled with wine not by combination as two boords be ioyned together lastly not by composition whereby of the mixture of two things there ariseth a third but by personall vnion which the Greekes call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 incorporation 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because neither the whole Deitie nor any part of it is subiectiuely communicated to the humanitie of Christ but onely the humane nature was assumed of the Sonne of God into the same person Leu. 2.16 What is the personall vnion in Christ It is that whereby the person of the Sonne of God being a person from all eternitie existing did assume the most pure nature of man wanting all personall existing of it owne into the vnitie of his person and made it his owne the proprieties of each nature being preserued Or as Paul defines it Colos 2.9 Whereby in Christ doth dwell all the fulnesse of the godhead bodily Whereof we haue a manifest resemblance in the vnion of the soule and the bodie but that it doth not fit in euery point For in man from the nature of the soule and the nature of the bodie there ariseth a third nature compounded of two which is called the nature of man But in Christ there is not made a frame of one third nature of the diuine and humane but each remaines pure and vnconfounded Neither doth that similitude of the iron red hote agree in euery point because the heate and the light in the iron being hote are but qualities not the very substance of the fire And therefore the Apostle doth well call it a great mysterie of godlinesse 1. Tim. 3.16 How is this vnion made Without all confusion without all conuersion of one nature into the other indiuisibly inseparably The difference of the natures by no meanes being taken away by the vnion but rather the proprietie of either nature being saued and ioyned together or concurring into one person and one subsisting as the Calcedon Synode speaketh in the historie of Euagrius lib. 2. cap. 4. And from that time that the Word did assume our humane nature he neuer left it no not in his death And to this purpose make those verses Sum quod eram nec eram quod sum nunc dicor vtrumque Ignoras nisime stirpe ab vtraque tenes I am that I was nor I was that I am now both am I called Thou knowest me not except thou know me subsisting of both natures By what testimonies will you proue that the diuine and humane nature in Christ did ioyne together into one and the same person Esa 7.14 9.6 Luk. 1.35 That which shall be borne of thee shall be called the Sonne of God Ioh. 1.4 And the word was made flesh not by sacramentall vnion in which respect Christ was said to be a rocke not by confusion of the natures not by commutation as water is turned into wine Ioh. 2.14 but by assuming the flesh into the vnitie of the person The voice of God speaketh thus of Iesus the sonne of Marie This is my welbeloued Sonne Mat. 3.17 He that descendeth is euen the selfe same that ascended aboue all heauens that he might fulfill all things Ephes 4.10 God sent his Sonne borne of a woman Gal. 4.4 But what meanes this that the flesh of Christ is said by Damascene and Gregorius Nyssenus to be deified Not because it is turned into the diuine nature but because it is ioyned vnto it into one person and we must vnderstand it of the bestowing of gifts vpon it whereby the humane nature of Christ doth excell all creatures yet so as they do not abolish his nature Why is it necessarie that Christ should be both God and man in one and the same person 1. To the end he might reconcile God and man or that he might make God and man one 2. That he might be a fit Mediator betweene God and men by reason of his participation and affinitie with them both a 1. Tim. 2.5 Heb. 8.6 3. That he might reconcile God vnto vs by his death which if he had bene God alone he could neuer haue suffered if onely man he could neuer haue ouercome 4. That the workes of redemption performed in the flesh of the Sonne might become a sufficient price for sinne whereby God that infinite good was offended For although certaine actions do properly proceed from the diuine nature and some are done by the humane nature yet all of them do equally receiue their price and worthinesse from the diuine nature So the
cannot be truely said to be the bodie or the bodie the soule although conioyned personally in one man yet in that peculiar and beyond all example vniting of the humane nature by subsistence of the Deitie in the person of the Sonne God is said to be a man and man God against Nestorius by vnitie of person and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 by naming one by the other against Eutiches According to what sense is the bread of the Lords Supper the bodie of Christ Not according to an essentiall or personall or reall but according to a mysticall meaning Sacramentall and significatiue whereby the thing which doth signifie taketh the name of that thing which it signifieth saith Augustine namely by reason of the Analogie or mutuall respect both of one to another and also to him from whom it is taken For Christ teacheth not in this proposition what that bread and that wine is in it owne nature and substance or in the same signification of diuers words or what is contained in them but what they are in signification in office in vse in proportion In nature they are bread and wine in signification they are the bodie and bloud of Christ And therefore here the predicate is spoken of the subiect Sacramentally that is to say in that kinde of signification wherin the thing signified is no lesse truely offered and to be taken spiritually by faith then the signe it selfe is deliuered to be taken with the instruments of the body What manner therefore of predication is it Not proper and regular for that proposition is not identicall wherin the same thing is said of it selfe as This is bread of bread This is a bodie of a bodie seeing that breade and the bodie of Christ doe differ in kinde neither is the speciall spoken of the singular nor the generall the difference the proper or the accident of the speciall as Peter is a man a man is a liuing creature apt to be taught white but an vnlike thing of an vnlike the thing signified of the signe yet notwithstanding proportionally as the manner of relatiues doth require for things seuered or vnlike if there bee an Analogie or signification may so be conioyned that they may make a proposition but figuratiuely as I am the vine Iohn 15.1 and the field is the word 13. Mat. 38. Therefore this predication is figuratiue and that not simplie Metaphoricall or allegoricall like as the flesh and bloud of Christ are called the meat and drinke of the faithfull but Metonimicall For most rightly it is called a Metonimie not of the continent for the conteined but of that manner whereby the name of the thing signified is giuen to the signe As in this proposition The bread is the bodie of Christ the name of the thing signified which is the bodie of Christ is giuen to the signe namely bread Therefore it is a metonimicall speaking verie familiar in the scriptures as a Gen. 41.26 the seauen kine are seuen yeares Iohn is Elias b Math. 11.14 that is to say figuratiuely for the predication of a singular concerning a singular is not true but figuratiuely Herod is a Foxe c Luk. 11.32 that is to say Metaphorically Christ is the way d Iohn 14.6 The doore e Iohn 10.7 bread f Iohn 6.53 The rock is Christ g Ier 10.4 So the bread of the Eucharist is the bodie of Christ figuratiuely metonimycally and Sacramentally For the bodie of Christ cannot bee called breade regularly and properly when as the bodie of Christ is neither the Genus nor the species nor the differentia nor the proprium nor the Accident of bread Whereby it commeth to passe that the predication of the bodie of Christ concerning the bread Eucharisticall is figuratiue seeing that euery predication is either proper or figuratiue for a third time of predication there is none For it is a foolish thing to say that Sacramentall predications are vnusuall whereof there is so frequent vse in the Scriptures And truely this figuratiue predication is not in euery word seuerally and considered in it selfe but in the whole attribution for bread is bread properly and the bodie not allegoricall not tropicall not figuratiue much lesse a spirit or vision also not a mysticall bodie which is the Church or a signe of the bodie it signifieth not the merit of Christ but the proper body of Christ for the true body of the Lord is altogether spoken of the true bread I say it is in the whole attribution because the copula or word est is doth ioyne together two things vnlike which wee may resolue thus Bread is the signe or seale of the bodie of Christ But againe it is to bee noted that it is not onely a figuratiue Metonimicall or significatiue speech as this is The field is the world that is signifieth the word and other like in parables because so it should more faintly expresse the nature of that mysterie but Sacramental because therwithal the exhibition of the thing sealed is promised as in this proposition Rods boūd together are the Romane Empire that is they do not barely nor simply onely signifie the Iurisdiction of the Romane Empire but they doe certainely testifie that the Empire together with the signes is transferred to him to whom the rods are lawfully deliuered So that which is promised by worde and is signified by signes is truely also giuen of GOD but to be taken by saith Is not the proprietie of the speach or the word to bee kept in the verie words of the Supper Seeing that the appellation of the worde is vsed sometime in a larger sometime in a stricter signification truely in the very wordes of the Supper the Sacramentall word is to be kept but this same sacramentall word is vnlike to other regular predications and it is to be made plaine by a conuenient interpretation agreeing to the nature of the Sacraments For in a Sacramentall speach not so much the letter or the sound of words as the true sense is to bee followed that is to say which doth agree with the nature of the Sacrament which Christ instituted and with all the circumstances of the institution and with the Analogie of faith Is it not a proper proposition wherein the Subiect and the attribute are vnderstood so to be coupled that the Attribute is in the Subiect or in the place wherein the subiect is as Deut. 12 23. The bloud is the life because it conteineth the life Not at al for neuer can any thing be properly predicated of another thing in which it existeth or to which it is conioyned although it be a streight coniunction but onely figuratiuely Therfore if the breade bee therefore the bodie either because some hidden thing in the breade is the bodie of the Lord or because in this breade is that bodie of the Lord it can neuer bee prooued that these words This is my bodie are a proper predication Are the places of Scripture which are
shall be said that they are brought forth out of the accidences that although the bread be broken it shal be concluded that the accidences are broken with many of the like kinde all which are against the nature both of Christs sacrament and Christs bodie Is not the bread of the Supper at leastwise by a miracle turned into the bodie of Christ No. 1 Because such a miracle doth not affect the outward senses for miracles doe plainely shew a change if there be any made and doe runne into the eyes and the rest of the senses and doe strike men with admiration as the rod did being turned into a Serpent and the water when it was made wine 2 Because miracles are ceased 3 Because miracles although they are done besides and aboue yet not so against nature as that they doe ouerturne it 4 Because this is spoken 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is contradictorily that a miracle which is an extraordinarie worke of God should bee done in an ordinarie Sacrament of the Church For miracles are extraordinarie works of God and of a certaine time and belong to certaine persons if you looke to the workers of miracles But the Sacraments doe belong to all times and to the vniuersall Church and are part of the ministerie of the Gospell wherin Christ dealeth after an ordinarie manner or by certaine and perpetuall ordination not making a miraculous change in the nature or in the qualities of the Elements 5 Miracles take not together away the substance or qualities naturall and also leaue them that is they doe not implie a contradiction as when the rod of Moses was turned into a Serpent it was not together a rod and a serpent But the miracle of Transubstantiaâ—ion taketh away the substance of bread and withall keepeth the properties of bread And it repugneth this immoueable and euerlasting principle of any thing whatsoeuer eyther the affâ—â—matâ—on or negation thereof is true that is to say euerie thing is or is not 6 For the faith or credit of miracles as that in the hands of Gregorie in his booke of the super at his praiers this Sacrament was turned into a fleshie fingâ—r sometime there appeared a little boy and that the Sacrament being bored through with Laurell stickes sent out bloud aâ—d that it was turned into coales and ashes in the time of Cyprian as he wâ—â—teth we doe thus imbrace them that they may be said to be done eyther to driue away vngracious and vnworthy men from so great a Sacrament or to declare and commend the dignitie thereof but not to confirme the superstition and error concerning Transubstantiation For we know that we must not beleeue false Prophets making meÌ„ by miracles to beleeue theÌ„ a Math. 24 2 Thess 2.9 that Antichrist shal come being famous for signes lying wonders Is not that true which Christ spake and can it not be performed by him No doubt it is and is also performed the question is not concerning the truth but concerning the sense of the words namely whether it be plainely affirmed by the words of Christ that the bodie and bloud of Christ together with the bread and wine are essentially actually really present vpon earth and really corporally in the mouth of the bodie although inuisiblie receiued as well of the godly as of the vngodly which thing we denie 1 Because the words of Christ do not beare it and they which hold Consubstantiation keepe not the words of Christ as they are most properly spoken but they follow a certaine sense For Christ neither said In or vnder this bread is my bodie but this that is this bread is my bodie which things doe as much differ betweene themselues as to be and to containe something And the visible bread it selfe not any thing hidden in the bread is called the bodie of the Lord. And the Schoole men themselues doe confesse that the letter of the words is not kept if for this is my bodie thou sayest heere or vnder bread is my bodie 2 Because a reall inexistence of the bodie of Christ In with or vnder the bread maketh nothing to the spirituall taking therof which notwithstanding is the finall cause of this Sacrament Seeing that faith being taught by the word of of God and more confirmed by those holy signes doth truly receiue the bodie of Christ being in heauen by the holy Ghosts working as the sayings do teach which bid vs seeke behold Christ in the heauens a Col 3.1 Moreouer a reall and bodily presence doth bring no profit which may not be had from the spirituall presence For Iohn 6.51.54.56 The Lord promised to them which eate him life eternall and also that he will dwell in them they in him what is required more then these things 3 Because the bodie of Christ is spirituall meat and therefore of the minde not of the bodie to be eaten with faith not with the mouth Neyther is it more difficult to faith to receiue the bodie being in heauen then in the bread or in the mouth and that which is more faith of her owne nature and force looketh vpward and is not excluded by any distances of times or places 4 Because how much is giuen to the Eucharist by an Hyperbole or exaltation so much is taken away from all other sacraments by a Tapeinosis or extenuation 5 Because the opinion of the inexistence of the bodie of Christ doth confirme the worshipping of bread and the carnall opinion concerning that iornall prouision necessary to saluation for them which are about to die 6 The nature of a bodie is ouerturned whiles that it is decreed that it is substantially in many places or euery where which thing agreeth to no creature For most truly Athananasius 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is That which is consubstantiall with God is euerie where And Chrysostome 2 Col. Hom. 5. Hee is God whose center is euerie where and circumference no where In like manner there is determined against nature that there is a thing not to be felt insensible inuisible vncircuÌ„scribed without qualitie quantitie forme and figure and yet corporally present that is a bodie without a bodie against the Essentiall properties of a true bodie whereby Christ prooued the true and essentiall presence of his bodie Luke 24.38.39 Iohn 20.27 saying Behold my hands and my feete For it is I my selfe handle mee and see For a spirit hath not flesh and bones as yee see me haue For hee is said not to bee seene of them 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Luke 24.31 because he was taken from their sight But He denieth the nature it selfe which denieth the properties thereof or as Theodoret saith the taking away of the properties is the denying of both natures And that eistinction of corporal presence into visible and inuisible is a fained distinction For this abolisheth the manner of a bodie neither doth one nature receiue any thing contrarie and diuerse in it selfe
Christ because it signifieth Christ So we say with Cyprian that the forme that is that the appearance and sight of bread and wine are not changed but that the substance of breade and wine are changed into the Sacrament of the bodie and bloud of the Lord which before they were not So Chrysostome That which belongeth to the signes he attributeth to the thing signified especially in respect of faith and the cogitation of the minde What meane the ancient fathers whiles that euery where they doe admire with astonishment the mysterie of the Supper they call it the Fearfull mysterie they require Faith they celebrate the power of God they deny that the order of Nature is to be sought in the bodie of Christ they attribute a conuersion to the signes They signifie a change made by grace not of the substance that is of the naturall matter and forme but of the qualitie that is of the former office condition calling end and vse of the Elements which is the consecration appointment and adhibition or traduction of the signes from a common vse to an holy mysticall vse or office that is to the obsignation and testimony of eternall life that surely they may be nourishment not for the bodie onely for this life as in our ordinarie table or before the blessing but that by reason of Gods ordinance because they are now the Sacraments of the bodie and bloud of Christ they may feed the soule also for as much as they are taken that they may bee vnto vs most sure pledges of the bodie and bloud of Christ and of eternall life flowing vnto vs from him Whereupon Paule doth not simply call it the Supper and the cup but the Supper and cup of the Lord and 1. Cor. 10.4 he calleth the rock of which the Israelites did drinke in the wildernesse spirituall Dial. 10 8 From hence Theodoret saith The Lord honoured the signes which are seene with the name of his bodie and bloud verily not chaunging the nature it selfe but putting grace to nature because these Elements are made Sacraments or spirituall things that is outward meanes of the holy Ghost and instruments of strengthning keeping and increasing the communion of Christ in vs. Therefore this change not essentiall but Sacramentall the fathers admire as wonderfull and supernaturall and that worthily For it cannot be done without the power of God that that earthly and decaying thing which is appointed properly to nourish the bodie should begin to be vnto vs a most holy thing a spirituall and heauenly foode Neither is it a worke of nature that those signes should moue the minde so powerfully and effectually and should offer and exhibit the bodie and bloud of the Lord to bee apprehended also of our minds by faith like as it is not a worke of nature that water should be made the lauer of regeneration or washing of the new birth Tit. 3.5 Although the Sacramentall change is no more a thing miraculous and vnspeakable then when of common waxe is made an authenticall seale of a publick instrument but because that is diuine and a cause of diuine things but this is humane and an ordinance instituted to establish mens matters Whereupon Augustine saith that SacrameÌ„ts may haue honour as religious things De trinit B. 31. c 10. but not astonishment as wonderfull things Moreouer the same fathers doe require faith because faith is heere especially necessarie whereby wee may firmely determine that the breade is the bodie of the Lord that is that wee by the lawfull vse of the bread are truely made partakers of the bodâ—e of Christ Finally they doe grant that that vnspeakeable and truely meruailous fellowship of vs with Christ is established wherin the order of nature is not to be sought for because it goeth beyond all humane sence Whether when we say of a firie sword of an infant lying in a cradle of wine contained in a vessell and the like This is Fire this is an Infant this is wine And Deut. 12.23 The bloud is the life because it containeth the life by which speaches the presence of the Attribute is manifestly affirmed are therefore the words of Christ to be vnderstoode of his bodilie presence at the place where the bread is No for truely the fire doth set the sword on fire doth pierce through the whole substance thereof but it changeth not the nature of the Sword saith Theodoret and in a fired sword the fire doth keepe still the force of burning as the sword of cutting neither hath the sword the operation of fire Dial. 2 c 19. B. 3 c â—9 but the burning is the effect of fire as cutting of the sword saith Damascen By which simile the ancients declared the most streight vnion of the two natures made without confusion and not a reall effusion of the Properties of the Deitie into the humane nature But heere is a great dissimilitude For those are naturall coniunctions whereby either new qualities are applyed to bodies or substances to substances but here all things are supernaturall by the institution of Christ Besides Christ is present in the Supper not for the bread but for the man for Christ spake not these words This is my bodie for the bread as though hee were about to make a substantiall change thereof or were about to communicate his bodie to the bread but hee gaue a promise to the disciples concerning the communication of his bodie whereby he doth ioyne vs to himselfe as it were members of his bodie What is therefore the naturall and proper sense of the words of the Lords Supper This that is bread which being broken Christ did reach with his hands to his disciples is not substantially or essentially or naturally in it self but mystically or by a SacrameÌ„tal promise not by a simple bare signification but also although spirituall yet a reall signification that is true and not imaginarie but hee himselfe because nothing is so truely done as that which hee doth by exhibition of the holy Ghost vnder coÌ„dition of faith that he himselfe My bodie or as Paul doth vnfold it 1. Cor. 10.16 The bread is the CoÌ„munion of the body of Christ that is the seale effectual token or instrument or meanes of the communion of the bodie of Christ Which interpretation Augustine doth confirme The Lord doubted not to say This is my bodie when he gaue the signe of his bodie And Tertullian Against Adimantus c 12 Against Marcion b. 4 hauing taken the bread and distributed it to the Disciples he made it his bodie by saying This is my bodie that is a figure of my bodie Neither doe wee otherwise interpret that enuntiation This or this cup is my bloud that this may bee the sense of the words of Christ As often as yee which are my Disciples and beleeue in mee doe eate this bread and drinke of this cuppe let it be vnto you a sure remembrance and testimonie that you are truely but yet
a God Which is the booke of Scripture That which by way of excellencie is called the Bible namely the writings of the old and new Testament wherof the holy Ghost is the immediate author Of which booke the Psalmist speakes in the 19. Psal 8. 2. Sam. 22.2 2. Pet. 1.21 The Law of the Lord is perfect conuerting the soule the testimonie of Iehouah is sure and giueth wisedome to the simple How many wayes hath the Lord reuealed himselfe in the bookes of the Scripture 1. By the word or by certaine oracles 2. By sundrie testimonies added vnto the word By what oracles Gen. 1.31 God sayd God created God saw that all which he had crâ—ated was very good By what testimonies 1 By that admirable worke of Creating the whole world of nothing a Gen. 1.1 2. By famous miracles as namely by deliuering the children of Israel out of Egypt Exod. 20.2 By leading them through the red sea without wetting of their feete b Exod. 14.21.22 By feeding them without anie ordinarie bread for the space of fortie yeares in the wildernesse c Exod. 16.4.13.14 15. Deut. 8.3 By causing the Sunne to stand still Iosua 10.13 And by causing the Sunne to go backward at the prayers of king Hezechiah 2. King 20 11. By raising of the dead d 2. King 4.33 11.21 Mat. 9.25 Luk. 7 15. Ioh. 11.43.3.44 1. Kin. 17.22 And by many other wonderfull workes and miracles 3. By diuerse visions whereby the Lord did offer himselfe to be seene of men in visible formes and likenesses In which manner he appeared vnto Adam both before and after his fall to Noah before and after the floud to Abraham ten times to Isaac twice to Iacob seuen times to Moses often and so to diuerse others 4. By foretelling of things to come by the Prophets and by the euent of the same 5. By promising and exhibiting of Christ the Messias Ioh. 1.18 No man hath seene God at anytime the Sonne who is in the bosome of the Father he hath reuealed him And therefore Christ saith to Philip Ioh. 14.9 He that seeth me seeth the Father 6. By the inward liuely and effectuall reuelation of the holy Ghost which is onely bestowed vpon the Elect. What then is that is reported Psal 14.1 The foole hath said in his heart There is no God This is answered Psal 10.11 That such denie not so much the being of God as the prouidence of God Againe they that take from God his iudgement denie in truth that there is a God And howsoeuer some haue in word denied that there is a God yet in deed they haue witnessed that they thought the contrarie which is plaine out of Suetonius in the life of Caligula But no man hath seene God at any time Why we see not our soule yet we haue a soule we see not the fountaines of waters yet there are fountaines we see not the wind yet there is a wind and we see not God yet there is a God inuisible in himselfe but in his works though obscurely and vnperfectly visible to vs. What things are we to know concerning God 1. What God is 2. What a God he is or how he is affected towards vs. What is God For the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 it is either deriued of a verbe that signifieth to runne because God runneth through all things 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 currere vel 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 cernere or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 timor God is Iehouah Elohim or else of a word that signifieth to behold because he beholdeth all things or else of a word that signifieth to feare because men are moued for feare to worship him And God is an Essence spirituall incomprehensible almightie immortall infinite loue it selfe mercie it selfe iustice it selfe holinesse it selfe puritie it selfe goodnesse it selfe wisedome it selfe long suffering it selfe and bountifulnesse it selfe which is the Father who from all eternitie begat the Sonne coeternall with himselfe and of the same substance with the Father and the Sonne not made nor created but begotten of the Father from all eternitie and the holy Ghost proceeding from them both the Father and the Sonne the Creator and conseruer of all things the Redeemer and sanctifier of the Elect a Ioh. 4.24 1. Tim. 1.17 Iam. 1.17 Ap. 1.8 Ier. 23.24 1 Joh 4.8.16 Exod. 34.6.7 Mat. 5.44 Which is no definition for he that is supersubstantiall and incomprehensible cannot be defined but such a description as sufficiently containeth all such things as in this life are necessarie for vs to know for the seruice of God and our saluation Is there one God onely or whether be there more One onely Deut. 6.4 Heare ô Israel the Lord thy God is one God alone b 1. Sam. 2.2 Esa 41.4 44.6 Mark 12 32. And so 1. Cor. 8.4 We know that an Idol is nothing in the world and that there is no other God but one alone c Ephes 4.6 1. Timoth. 2.5 And seeing the true God is most high and most infinite actually therefore there can be no moe but one God because there can be no more but one that is aboue all neither any moe but one infinite And this one God is manifested to vs by such testimonies as cannot deceiue to wit by miracles prophecies and other things which by his omnipotent nature may be done How is God said to be one Neither by a genus nor species but in essence and in number or in regard of his nature because there is one onely essence of God and that indiuisible Why doth the Scripture make mention of Elohim Gods ioyning that word as well with the plurall as singular number Not to the end that it should make a multitude of Gods or deuide the essence but to distinguish the persons because though there be one person of the Father another person of the Sonne and another of the holy Ghost yet the Father is not another thing or another God distinct from the Sonne and the holy Ghost the Son is not another thing or another God distinct from the Father and the holy Ghost neither is the holy Ghost another thing or another God distinct from the Father and the Sonne because the nature of God is but one and indiuisible although the Father be one the Son another and the holy Ghost another And therefore they are not of diuers natures of another and diuers substance not conioyned or knit together in one substance as men which haue one common essence not only of the like substance but of one and the same substance hauing the same essence the same eternitie the same will the same operation the same power and the same glorie Phil. 2.6 How many wayes is the name of God taken in the Scriptures Two wayes properly for the substance essence and nature and improperly Now it is taken properly or for the essence when it is taken 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without the distinction of any one of
made Psal 104.4 Who makest thine Angels spirits and thy ministers a flaming fire And in this fourth signification we vse the word Angel here purposing to speake first of Gods Angels and then in order of the wicked Angels Whence had Angels their beginning From God who created them of nothing and that through Christ Coloss 1.16 By whom al things were made whether in heauen or earth things visible and inuisible whether they be thrones or dominations principalities or powers I say all things were made by him and for his sake Are Angels without all matter or not They are not altogether and indeed without matter as neither is the soule of man for God alone is without matter For there is nothing created which is not also compounded either by natural composition as consisting of matter and forme or else metaphysicall namely of the essence or of the act and the power Yet because they do not consist of any corporall matter which is palpable and subiect to the sight but rather spirituall altogether and as they say in the schooles onely of the power and the act they are said to be without matter But God alone is a power or pure Act as Aristotle said verie well in the 11. booke of his Metaphysiks chap. 7. But when were the Angels created Not before the world For onely the Sonne of God was before the world Whence it followeth that they were created in the beginning of all things but in what day they were created it cannot sensibly be defined but onely it may probably be gathered by the historie of Moses that they were created the first day when the heauens wherin they dwell were created whereupon they be called the Angels of heauen a Math 24.36 Gal. 18. The cause why Moses concealed the creation of Angels when he recited the creation of all other things created is this that he purposed to apply and fit his narration to the capacitie of the common people and of the ruder sort and therfore only to set downe briefly the creation of things visible Christ saith Math. 18.10 that the Angels do alwayes behold the face of his Father therefore they haue bene alwayes The aduerbe alwayes doth not signifie eternitie or a thing without beginning but the continuance of their appearing before his Father for the seruice of the godly which began euen from the beginning of the world which the Greeke text doth more fully expresse 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to wit which is vnderstood at all times What is an Angell It is as Damascene saith lib. 2. cap. 5. a spirituall or intellectuall substance alwayes moueable of its owne power without a bodie ministring vnto God according vnto grace and in nature immortall But the Apostle comprehending the nature and office of good Angels defineth them thus Hebr. 1.14 They are ministring spirits sent forth for the seruice of those who shall be heires of saluation Are the Angels substances really and truly subsisting They are substances because those things are attributed to them in Scripture which can agree to nothing else but to a substance really subsisting as to stand in the presence of God and to praise him some of them are said to haue fallen and other some of them to haue continued in the truth Further to haue appeared after diuerse maners yea taking vnto them bodies and to haue manifested them selues by sundrie effects Now actions are properly of substances that is of those things onely which haue their true subsisting And therefore looke how many Angels there be there be so many sundrie Angelicall essences subsisting seuerally euen as there be diuers men How were the Angels created All of them good because Gen. 1.31 Whatsoeuer God had made was exceeding good although some of them fell a Isa 14.12 and continued not in the truth And they also were good and created in the truth b John 8.44 And Iude in the sixt verse saith that they kept not their first estate but left their owne habitation Are the Angels mutable or immutable In regard of their substance they be incorruptible c Mat. 22.30 because they are without all matter but in respect of the power of God as they were made of nothing so they may be brought vnto nothing again if God should take away his hand Psalme 104.20 But in regard of that estate wherin they now are they cannot be changed by means of the grace will and decree of God although of their owne nature they be mutable as well to that which is good as to that which is euill For whatsoeuer is created the same is mutable saith Damascene And God himselfe speaketh thus of himselfe I am your God and change not Mal. 3.6 What is the reason that some of the Angels falling from the truth others continued in grace and truth The nearest and immediate cause is the goodnesse of the will of the Angels themselues wherein God had created them at the beginning The mediate or superior cause was the free fauor of God whereby their will was holpen that they were inabled to will and could will to persist in the truth and so indeede did continue whilest that others to whom this grace was not communicated not willing to persist and continue fell from the truth by their owne default Phil. 3.8 God worketh in you both to will and to do But the supreme and highest cause of all is the eternall firme and immutable decree of God and his good pleasure proceeding from his wisedome whereby he elected and predestinated some to be made partakers of his grace and to perseuere and reiected the other of his owne iust pleasure for his owne glorie 1. Timoth. 5.21 I charge thee saith the Apostle in the sight of God and the Lord Iesus Christ and of the elect Angels If they be elect then some of them be elect not all of them Can those then which continued in the truth fall from the same and so fall into sinne No because they are truly happie seeing they do euer behold the face of their heauenly Father Mat. 18.10 yet not by nature but by grace and the blessing of God for Christs sake But seeing they can no more sinne nor become miserable do they not cease to haue freedome of will No for whatsoeuer they will they will it freely Moreouer they are more free now then before then they had power to sinne and not to sinne now they are so free from sinne that they cannot sinne and so free from miserie that they cannot now become miserable any more for they are made most holy and also most happie What names are giuen to the Angels Of their nature they are called spirits because of their spirituall essence For Angell is a name of office Spirit of nature Augustine They are called also shining starres or morning starres a Iob. 3.8.7 because they are of a most pure cleare and shining nature The sonnes of God not by essence or nature as that onely begotten
Sonne but by adoption and grace or discretiuely to the end they might be distinguished from the sonnes of men Of their office they are called Angels For their dignitie and power they are called gods and Satan is called the god of this world b 2. Cor. 4.4 so also they are called principalities and powers in heauenly places c Eph. 3.10 By the effect they are called Seraphim whom Dionysius calleth * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 fierie because they burne with the loue of God and in loue towards godly men They are called a flame of fire Hebr. 1.7 not as though they were of a fierie nature and substance but because they be the auengers of Gods anger which do like fire consume the wicked as often as need requires From the manner of appearing they be called Cherubin of this word Cherub which signifieth any figure that hath wings whether it be of a man or of a beast d Heb. 12.19 also men e Gen. 3.24 Exod. 25.18 and the men of God f Psal 18.11 Zac. 1.5.6 From their ministerie they be called Watchmen and the keepers of the world a Dan. 4.14 How many wayes haue Angels appeared vnto men 1. In sleepe or in dreames as Mat. 1.20 it is said that the Angell appeared to Ioseph the husband of Marie in a dreame b Mat. 2.13 2. In vision as namely to the Prophets and that either without a true bodie but yet not without some bodily forme or else taking vnto them manifestly true bodies c Gen. 18.2 Tertul. de carne Christi and these either created by God of nothing or else then first formed not borne of some matter that was before for they came not to die therefore not to be borne or else in some other natural bodies which had bene before either of men as in Zacharie the Prophet the Angell spake Zac. 2.3 As Augustine vnderstands it Enchir. to Laurent chap. 59. or else of other liuing creatures as when the Angell spake in Balaams asse as Zanchius vnderstands it no otherwise then the euill Angel in the Serpent spake in old time to Eua d Gen. 3.1 And diuels haue entred into certaine men and by Christ were cast out againe yea also into hogges e Mat. 8.28 They tooke not bodies from the starres or the heauens as Apelles thought nor had they proper bodies making an aâ—gelicall substance but their bodies were earthly as appeareth by the feeding feeling and washing of them as Tertul. proueth Whether might Angels when they assume vnto them true humane bodies be called men No because they did not ioyne the humane nature hypostatically vnited vnto them but they tooke vnto them and put from them those bodies as Augustine saith euen as it were a garment What became of those bodies after their ascension to heauen They being made of nothing returned to nothing or made of earth returned to earth or into nothing for it is all one with God to create of nothing and to bring into nothing Do Angels moue out of their places and dispatch their businesse within the space of time Yes indeed because they be finite spirits though not circumscribed because they are not measured by their place but limited because they are so in one place as they cannot be in another And Luk. 1.26 The Angell Gabriel was sent of God into a citie of Galile and Heb. 2.14 they are called ministring spirits sent for the seruice of the elect They are said to descend from heauen and to ascend into heauen as in Iacobs ladder Gen. 28.12 and whatsouer is done is measured with time But they be so nimble and so swift that they are moued in an vnconceaueable time and dispatch their businesse speedily And for that cause they are said to flie and to haue wings b Esa 6.2 Reu. 14.6 How many Angels be there Dan. 7.10 Daniel is said to haue seene million millions of Angels and ten thousand hundred thousands Heb. 12.22 You haue come to the innumerable companie of Angels innumerable indeed to men but easily numbred of God c Mat. 26.53 Iude 15. All which notwithstanding were created of God so many in number at the beginning and not multiplied by procreation one of another Are there orders and degrees of Angels No man that is conuersant in the Scriptures can deny but that there is some order among the Angels because order and distinction in all things is an excellent and diuine thing for some are called Cherubins other Seraphims some Angels other Archangels But this order is not from the dignitie and excellencie of the nature of the Angels as though some were more excellent then others by nature but rather from their diuerse kinds of offices Hereupon Paule Colos 1.16 calleth them thrones seates dominations principalities which is an Hebrue kind of putting the Abstract for the Concrete the substantiue for the adiectiue because God vseth their ministerie in the administration of Empires kingdoms and commonweals But that there be Hierarchies and degrees of Hierarchies among the Angels as the Papists imagine it cannot be proued by any testimonie of Scripture For he is called the Archangell not who is more excellent in nature or superior by affectation of gouernment because there as Basill saith all ambition ceasseth but he who is designed of God for the execution of some speciall hard and difficult seruice or else he that is set apart of God for a time with many other Angels for the executing of Gods commandement So those names thrones dominations powers principalities are borrowed by a similitude from mens affaires to signifie the excellencie of the Angels and their offices and how many and diuers and great workes God doth bring to passe by them d Psal 18.11 Hath each of them his proper name Those names are not proper but appellatiues or common names which are imposed vpon them for a time according to the offices which are giuen them in charge or else according to those diuerse meanes in respect of vs whereby they do execute the will of God mightily performe it and appeare vnto men As Dan. 8.16 9.21 Luk. 1.19 mention is made of Gabriel which name doth signifie the Might of God because by him the Lord did shew foorth his power Againe Dan. 10.13 mention is made of Michael which is Who is like vnto the strong God Tob. 3.19 is mention made of Raphael which name is taken from Curing or healing for he came to heale Sara and Tobie as also of Vriel 4. Esdr 4.1 Deriued of the light because he came to illuminate and to instruct Esdras Haue the Angels any knowledge of things They haue 1. natural which God put into them in the creation for they be vnderstanding spirits Whereupon Christ saith Ioh. 8.44 that some of theÌ„ did continue in the truth or in the knowledge of the truth but others did not Besides they haue reuealed knowledge or by the reuelation of God as Dan. 8.16 and
at their pleasure and the Princes of darknesse because they are the authors of all ignorance of God of blindnesse mischiefes vnhappinesse malice of all disorder trecherie crueltie c Ephes 2.2 Ephes 6.12 Col. 2.15 As for the name Lucifer it came from a false and friuolous exposition of that place Isaiah 14.12 which as may well appeare was in derision ironically giuen to the King of Babylon Whence do euill Angels take their beginning In respect of their nature and substance they are of God who did create them good of nothing and who doth still vphold them But in regard of the qualities brought vpon them they are of themselues as Christ witnesseth Ioh. 8.44 The diuel when he speaketh a lie speaketh of his owne that is of himselfe and continued not in the truth wherin he was created at the beginning but fel by his owne free wil and was a murderer from the beginning not in respect of Satan himselfe but of man that was made that is to say then when he first set vpon man whereupon we may gather that the Angels sinned before that Adam and Eue sinned What was the first sinne of the Angels Some thinke that it was pride according to that Eccles 10.15 Pride is the beginning of all sinne Others thinke it was enuie whereby Satan enuied that man was made after the image of God according to that Wisdom 2.24 By the diuels enuie death entered into the world But Christ shewes Ioh. 8.44 it was lying or the hatred of the truth that is of the euerlasting Gospell touching Christ who should take our flesh vpon him and of his grace which is needfull for all men to life eternall and of the nature of man which should be exalted aboue all Angels And therefore indeede it was the hatred they bore of Christs glorie and mans felicitie Also it was their apostacie and rebellion whereby Satan fell from God his maker and that very sinne which Christ calleth The sinne against the holy Ghost a Math. 12.31 1. Iohn 5.16 because he fell wittingly and willingly and of purpose from the truth and that also with hatred of that euerlasting truth whereof Christ speaketh I am the truth Ioh. 14.6 And to Pilate I am come into this world that I might beare witnesse to the truth Ioh. 18.31 The same is proved by the continuall practise of Satan euen from the beginning of the world to the end sowing lies and heresies either against the Deitie of Christ or against his humanitie or against his office And raising vp most cruell persecution against that truth of Christ Is there a great number of those Angels which fell from the truth Yes sure a great number and almost innumerable yet vncertaine to vs and not know howne many For 2. Pet. 2.4 and Iude 6. we reade that very many Angels fell at one time from the truth and therefore are cast into hell or the bottomlesse pit And Luk. 8.30 mention is made of a legion of diuels which possessed one man And Mat. 12.45 the vncleane spirit returning taketh with him seuen other spirits that is many other spirits worse then himselfe and more vncleane And Reu. 12.7 we reade that the dragon with his Angels fought against the woman and therefore there is no cause why we should sleepe secure and carelesse What punishment is inflicted vpon euill Angels Manifold 1. In that they are cast out of the heauens wherein the blessed be and wherein they were created into hell that is not only into that place vnder the earth ordained for the euerlâ—â—ting torments of the reprobate which Luk. 16.23 calleth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hell and chap. 8.31 the bottomlesse pit that is a gulph of a wonderfull depth but also into this ayre which compasseth the earth and into the region vnder the Moone as testifieth the Apostle Eph. 2.2 6.12 to exercise the patience of the godly and also to punish and to vexe the wicked for their impietie where also they being tyed with the chaines of darknesse are kept to the generall iudgement a 2. Pet. 2.4 Jud. 6. 2. In that their whole nature how great soeuer is wholy corrupted and defiled so as there is in it nothing at all sound and pure 3. Their will is so obstinate in sinne as they are not able no not to desire to repent of euill nor to be saued Which is by the iust iudgement of God who hath decreed that they which sinne against the holy Ghost that is they which wittingly and willingly and of set purpose sinne and renounce the knowne truth should neuer repent b Heb. 6 4. 10.26 1. Ioh. 3.8 1. Ioh. 3.8 The diuell sinneth euen from the beginning namely continually and obstinately 4. Their mind was darkened to wit being depriued both of the knowledge of all that truth as well of themselues as of God and of Christ which might stand them in any stead to life eternall As also of that created knowledge of those things wherin at the beginning they were created for which cause they are tearmed the princes of darknesse c Eph. 6.12 And yet not wholly because they excell yet in great knowledge of things concerning both God and men namely such as was naturall vnto them or they haue by nature partly by that naturall light which is left in them partly by obseruation partly by the effects of Gods power which come to passe in time By which means they knew Christ both to be the Sonne of God and also should be the Iudge of the world a Mat. 8.21 Act. 16.17 19. but yet without any affection towards him without any loue or affiance in him and to their greater terror and condemnation b Jam. 2.19 For which cause they are called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is Skilfull but more truly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because they do alwaies abuse that their knowledge to euill and neuer to good Can euill Angels foresee things to come and certainely foretell them To foresee and to foretell things to come so farre foorth as they are things to come and to know them before hand of themselues and by themselues and of their owne proper spirit they cannot for it is the peculiar worke of God alone for so it is said Esa 41.23 Tell vs what things shall come to passe and then we shall know that ye are gods But by the instinct of another or by reuelation from another and by the present causes by the experience and obseruation of things and by probable coniectures to foresee things to come it is granted vnto creatures So then by these meanes the wicked spirits may foretel things to come as namely such things as they haue learned to haue bene foretold in some place by some holy Prophet or such things whose natural causes they see to be present before their eyes or such things which they see now are disposed and like to come to passe or such things as themselues are purposed
because the heart amongst all the intrailes and members in man is the first that liueth and the last that dieth And euery where in the Scriptures the speciall actions of the soule are ascribed to the heart d Mat. 15.18.19 Rom. 2.15 10.10 1. Pet. 3.4 Is the whole soule in the whole bodie and in euery part of the bodie the whole soule Of this mind is Augustine and some other after him as light is in the aire which is primarily by it selfe in the whole secundarily in the parts And that it is not only the forme act and perfection of the whole body but also of euery particular part And lastly that it hath no bodie and is not circumscribed in any place and is indiuisible But others thinke that like a certaine king she sitteth in some one part of the bodie alone and in one place as it were in her princely pallace doth diffuse her vertue thorough the whole bodie and that it doth exercise diuerse actions in the diuerse parts of the bodie according to the diuerse placing of the instruments in those parts which are necessarie for the doing of such actions So it reasoneth in the head it willeth in the heart it concocteth in the stomacke seeth in the eyes a 1. Cor. 12.17 to which opinion we subscribe touching which notwithstanding modest wits may forbeare till they be confirmed But how many parts or faculties of the soule be there Three essentiall according to Plato the vnderstanding facultie the facultie of anger and of lusting or after Aristotles the facultie of reasoning and discoursing of sense of liuing or nourishing For the same Aristotle saith the soule is that principium to wit inward and formall whereby we first liue haue sense and vnderstand But that distinction better befitteth the doctrine of Christians whereby the soule is distinguished into the vnderstanding which is also called the Mind and the Will or as the Scripture sometimes speaketh the spirit and the soule being taken in a more strict signification b 1. Thes 5.23 Heb. 4.12 What is the vnderstanding It is that facultie whereby we do discerne obiects either to be liked or disliked and the vnderstanding is double 1. Practising whereby we discerne good from euill right from wrong 2. Speculatiue whereby we distinguish truth from falsehood by the notions of goodnesse and truth which God hath put into our minds c Rom. 1.32 2.14 And what is the will A facultie of the soule whereby we either chuse or refuse the obiects so farrefoorth as the vnderstanding iudgeth them to be good or euill Which if it follow the rule of reason it is called election or consultation in a speciall manner but if otherwise it be moued by a false shadow and appearance of good then it is called both a passion and perturbation of the mind or an affection as also concupiscence Were all the soules of men created of God at once as the Angels were Origen and other Fathers haue bene of that mind and that they were as it were laid vp in Gods store-house but the contrarie is proued by the Scriptures For Gen. 2.17 Moses spake but of one soule Againe Dauid sheweth that soules are created successiuely in euery mans bodie Psal 33.15 who frameth their hearts that is their soules one by one and Zach. 12.1 Who frameth the spirit of man in the middest of him Rom. 9.11 the Apostle writeth of Iacob and Esay that before they were borne they had done neither good nor euill If they had done neither good nor euill then it followeth that their soules were not created from the beginning for it is against reason that all this while they should do nothing at all Whether was the soule of Euah made of Adams or not and whether are the soules deriued one of another by propagation or else new ones euermore created of God Some of the Fathers were of opinion that as one candle is lighted by another euen so the whole man is deriued of the whole man the soule of the soule the bodie of the bodie For say they first as one Lion begets another so by the power and efficacie of Gods blessing one man begets another who consists not only of a bodie but of a soule 2. Because we reade not that God created and inspired a new soule 3. Because the soule is the primarie seate of sinne in which Dauid saith his mother conceiued him Psal 51.7 4. Because in the first conception the soule is potentially in the bodie which according to the generatiue power giuen to mans seed is brought into act But the creation of the first soule as a plaine patterne sheweth what is the beginning of all other soules Againe Adam said of Euah Genes 2.23 This is now bone of my bone and flesh of my flesh but he saith not soule of my soule which he should haue said if so be that the soule of Euah had bene taken out of his soule Moreouer the testimonie of Zaccharie 12.1 is cleare who frameth or formeth the spirit of man in the midst of him And Eccles 12.7 The spirit returneth to God that gaue it Peter also commaundeth that we should commend our soules to the faithfull Creatour 1. Pet. 4.19 Besides that opposition doth seeme to require the same Heb. 12 9. where the fathers of our flesh are opposed to the Father of spirits because he doth not vse the helpe of men in creating of liuing creatures to which we must referre that of Esa 57.16 where in expresse words God is said to make soules to wit immediatly and not by propagation of man Yea the very nature of the soule doth testifie the same which is most simple and therefore indiuisible So then seeing to the propagation of it there is required a decision it is apparent that it hath not his beginning by propagation from the soule of the parents Neither indeed can spirituall substances be changed one into another and therefore as one Angell cannot beget another Angell euen so no more can one soule being of the same kind and nature produce another soule Wherefore it remaineth that it is created in the infusion of it and infused in the creating of it as August saith But herupon it will follow that God rested not from all his works Gen. 2.2 I answer out of Augustine that God rested from the workes of some new kind but not from the works of the same kind a Ioh. 5.17 By what meanes then is originall sinne conueyed to the children Neither by meanes of the soule nor by meanes of the bodie but by meanes of propagation from Adam alone For that all mankind is corrupted by Adam doth not so much proceed from generation vnlesse it be in regard of the manner that is so farrefoorth as one sinfull man begets another sinfull man as from the iust iudgement of God who as he had adorned all men in one as the roote and head of all mankind with originall iustice so after that
dayly through Christ c 2. Cor. 3 18. and shall be perfected in the life to come How doth the image of God shine in mans bodie 1. Not in respect simply that it is a bodie and endued with such a forme but so farre foorth as the bodie is ioyned with a reasonable soule carrieth with it some part of the image of God and doth in some sort comprehend it in the whole world whereupon also man is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a little world wherin shineth the builder and master workman of the whole world 2. Because the diuers members of the bodie eyes eares mouth tongue hands do represent the spirituall parts of God that is to say his spirituall perfections wisedome power and the rest of Gods attributes no otherwise then Heb. 8.5.9 24. 10.1 the tabernacle and the arke of the couenant the table vessels and sacrifices were representations of heauenly and spirituall things 3. Because the gifts of the mind do make the bodie shine euen as the light of the candle doth make the skinne of the lanthorne to shine and the very righteousnesse and holinesse of the soule did redound to the very bodie and to the members of the bodie and so by that meanes man did exercise by the body that soueraigntie and excellencie vpon all inferiour creatures and caried in his countenance a certaine soueraigne maiestie by meanes whereof the beasts also did acknowledge him for their Lord. Gen. 2.20 Why and to what end did God create man after his owne image 1. That God who is in himselfe and in his owne nature inuisible might make his essence and nature in some sort visible in man as it were in a glasse and so by this meanes might offer himselfe to be knowne of man for the proper end and vse of a picture is that he whose picture it is might thereby be knowne 2. To the end that God being so acknowledged of man he might loue worship and glorifie him for euery like loueth his like 3. That God himselfe might of the other side vnite man vnto himselfe as being like vnto him vnto eternall happinesse 4. To the end that men being made after the same likenesse of God might not onely loue and reuerence God but one another both in this life and that which is to come 5. That the reprobates being made after the image of God might be without all excuse What things are against this doctrine 1. The heresie of the Manichees and of the Anthropomorphites who fained God to haue a bodie who should frame the bodie of Adam after the image and likenesse of his owne bodie 2. The dotage of Osiander who taught that the bodie of man was framed after the shape or idea of that body which Christ should afterwards assume 3. Also of Flaccus Illyricus who affirmed that the image of God that is his holinesse and righteousnesse was of the essence of his soule 4. Of the Schoole-men who affirmed that the image of God was nothing else but a certaine accessorie and outward decencie The tenth common Place of originall Righteousnesse What doctrine hath affinitie with the former touching the image of God THe doctrine of originall righteousnesse or of the first integritie of our nature Was the first man created of God in originall righteousnesse He was which is proued by the doctrine going before For Gen. 1.27 Moses saith He made man after his owne image male and female made he them Now we said that the most speciall part of that image was that pourtraiture of the righteousnesse and holinesse of God which was made in man whereof this was a signe that they walked naked and were not ashamed Gen. 2.24 Moreouer Gen. 2.31 immediatly after the creation of Man Moses addeth presently And they were very good To this purpose maketh that Eph. 4.24 Put ye on the new man which after God is created in true righteousnesse and holinesse Whether if man had stood in that his originall righteousnesse should he haue had neede of Christ the Mediator Not that he might be reconciled to God and be healed of his sinne which he had not yet committed but by whom so long as he would he might be kept in the fauour of God and be preserued from sin for that sentence of Christ is alwaies true without me ye can do nothing Ioh. 15.5 That same originall righteousnesse wherein Adam was created was it a substance or an accident It was not a substance but it was an vprightnesse and integritie in nature and therefore a qualitie which may be present or absent according to the definition of an accident without the destruction of the subiect that is the soule For these differ a nature right and the rightnesse of nature as much as a right line and the rightnesse of the line do differ because the line is the subiect of the rightnesse Therefore the soule of Adam was the subiect of that original righteousnesse and integritie but his soule was not that righteousnesse it selfe Againe it is proper to God to be essentially iust and good because God is very goodnes it self integritie it selfe and iustice it self And therefore if that originall righteousnesse of the first man had bene a substance then man should haue bene called iustice it selfe which without blasphemie to God cannot be spoken Besides the contrary to that originall righteousnesse to wit originall sin is an accident because it entred into the nature of man Now then seeing contraries haue both one genus or generall it followes that original righteousnes was not a substance but an accidēt Lastly seeing the restauration of that image is nothing else but the repairing of new qualities which is wrought by regeneration It followeth that originall righteousnes was also a qualitie wherby the whole man was iust and right yet indeede such a one as might be lost as afterwards was proued by the fall of man What then was that originall righteousnesse 1. The light in the mind of man whereby he knew God and his will 2. The ingrauing of the law of God in his heart wherby he was moued to obey him and the integritie of the whole man whereby the spirit was subiect to and obeyed God the soule was subiect to and obeied the spirit the body was subiect to the soule and obeied it 3. The acceptation of the whole man whereby he was acceptable and well pleasing to God but yet so as man might loose it as the very euent shewed Why is it called originall Because it was natural the first man was created in it vnto it not as a priuate person but as the stocke and roote of all mankind a Gen. 1.17 Ephes 4.24 Now say that Adam had stood in that originall righteousnesse should it haue bene deriued to all his posteritie It should 1. because it was the righteousnes of mans nature and not the righteousnes of a priuate person 2. Because the contrary to it namely original sinne was deriued by Adams meanes to
are ignorant of the true causes and looke onely vpon the inexpected euents a thing may be said to come to passe by fortune So Numb 35.29 There is a law of murthers by chaunce which that they come not by chaunce to passe it may be gathered out of Exod. 21.13 Where GOD is saide to giue him into the hands of the slayer who is slaine in this manner Yet are they said to be by fortune in the iudgement of men because they are not done of vs by premeditate aduise Where notwithstanding we must remember the saying of Basil that Chaunce and Fortune are words of Heathens and as of Augustine It repented mee that I haue vsed the word Fortune Is not Free-will taken away by this vnchaungeable prouidence of God and administration of all things No in no sort because God ruleth and gouerneth mans will according to the nature thereof But it is the nature of mens wil that whatsoeuet it willeth eyther good or euill it willeth it freely and of it owne accord not against the will and by constraint otherwise it should be no will but a Nilling For example Matth. 27.1 Herode Pilate and the Iewes condemned Christ of their owne free-will and of set purpose yet the Apostles say they did nothing but tbat which the hand and counsell of God had decreed to be done Actes 4.27.28 Doe not these places of Scripture seeme to make against Gods prouidence where it is said It repented God Gen. 6.6 1. Sam. 15.11 and those abrogations of his decrees which are recorded Ioan. 3.4.10 Isai 38.1.5 No because in those places the Scripture descendeth and applyeth it selfe to our capacitie and describeth God not such as hee is in himselfe but such as we vnderstand him euen as when the same Scripture saith of God that he is angrie But those denuntiations of iudgement doe containe a condition not expressed Gen. 20.3.7 Is it not vnseemely for the highest Maiestie of God to abase it selfe euen to take care of these lowest things No for as it was no disgrace to create them no more it is to take care of them being created What is the peculiar prouidence of God That whereby God by his grace or holy Spirit liueth and raigneth in his Church gouerneth and cherisheth the godly worketh in them both the will and the deed he maketh them to walke in his precepts a Ezech. 36 27 defendeth them terrifieth restraineth and vanquisheth their enemies Shew me some testimonies of this Psal 1.7 God knoweth the way of the righteous Psal 34.16 The eyes of the Lord are vpon the righteous And the whole Psalm 91. He that dwelleth in the secret of the most high c. To this purpose serueth that place Math. 10.30 Euen all your haires are numbred Math. 16.18 The gates of hell shall not preuaile against the Church 1. Tim. 4.10 God is the Sauiour of all men especially of the faithfall And innumerable others like to these Doth God gouerne all things by himselfe alone without meanes or by meanes and second causes Neyther simply but partly by himselfe without meanes yea often against or besides ordinarie means he bringeth things to passe As without meanes he sustained Moses fortie daies in the mount b Exod 34.28 and the Prophet Elias c 1 Reg 19.8 But against meanes and naturall causes he deuided the red Sea d Exod 14.16 as likewise by his power the waters of Iordan stood e Iosue 3.19 and the waters were deuided into two parts f 2 King 2 8 He made the Sunne to go backe g 2 King 20.11 He restrained the force of the fire in the Babylonian furnace that it could not burne the young men h Dan. 3.21.91 He turned the rocke into pooles of waters and the crag into fountaines of waters i Psa 114.8 He made the Iron to swim in the water k 2 King 6.6 Partly also he ruleth and administreth by himselfe and with meanes or second causes yet so as God is alwaies present with them and in them sheweth his speciall power according to that Deut. 8.3 Man liueth not by bread onely but by all that which proceedeth out of the mouth of God So with fiue loaues he feedeth a great multitude l Iohn 6.9.11.12 From second causes he produceth another effect then their nature and disposition affordeth and when the second causes are in action actually he hindereth their effect changeth mitigateth or maketh it more grieuous As in Elias his time it rained not for the whole space of three yeares m 1 Kings 17 1.7 Isay 5.6 I will commaund the clouds that they shall not raine Why doth God ordinarily vse middle or second causes seeing he can do all things by himselfe without meanes 1 He doth it for our cause that we may more easily perceiue God helpeth vs in them or by them for seeing we are carnall we need visible things that our faith may be the better confirmed and rest assured in Gods promises And also that he may declare his goodnes to vs whilest he maketh vs as it were fellow-workers with himselfe in ruling our selues or others 2 That he may shew himselfe Lord of all things which vseth creatures and means as he pleaseth to his glory and our saluation 3 That we should not abuse meanes as being ordained of God 4 Least in the pretense of Gods prouidence we should neglect meanes or second causes odained by God for who so neglecteth them despiseth the ordinance of God For God hath not onely decreed the ends of actions but their meanes also which meanes are therefore subiect and subordinate to prouidence as the drinking of a potion belongeth to the sicke man and bread to him that is hungrie So God promised victorie to Dauid but thus if he fought and laied ambush a 2. Sam. 5.19.24 he hath promised to nourish man but with condition if he labour b Psa 128 2 If therefore the determination of God be vnchangeable and all things come to passe infallibly by the counsell and will of God is there anie place left for our deliberations counsels comaunds prayers teaching cautions and endeuors It is certaine that to euents certaine and decred by God it is in vaine to vse and applie those meanes without which God hath decreed or hath said that he will effect such things but those meanes which both himselfe hath decreed to vse and which he hath shewed both in his word and the course of nature them he will vse and also hath commaunded vs to vse them it can not be said of these without a wicked contempt of Gods word and the order by him appointed that they are vsed in vaine For where the first cause is granted we ought not remoue or take away the second nor contrarily And as God hath made the ends so likewise hath he created and prescribed vnto vs the means wherby it pleaseth him to bring vs vnto them which meanes to neglect is to tempt
guiltie of Gods anger and eternall death vntil pardon be granted and except the benefit of Christ help a Ioh. 1.29 and besides these it comprehendeth those workes which the corruption of our nature bringeth forth in vs which the Scripture calleth The workes of the flesh b Gal. 5.19 By what names is this sinne called in the Scriptures The sinne that dwelleth in a man because it remaineth continually in the flesh vntill death but in them who are not regenerate it raigneth in the regenerate it only dwelleth and not raigneth c Rom. 7.17.20 Malum adiacens The sinne which easilie cleaueth to vs and compasseth vs round about occupying all our strength e Heb 12.1 The sense and vnderstanding of the flesh f Rom. 8.6 Also it is absolutely and simply called Sinne g Rom 7 8. Because it is the source and fountaine of all sinnes The bodie of sinne h Rom. 6.6 because in it are gathered together all sins which breake forth when occasion is giuen The Lawe of the â—â—mbers i. because all the members of soule and bodie i Rom. 13.4 that is all the parts powers of man obey it as a Law Flesh k Gen. 6 3. concupiscence c. to which is opposed the Spirit which signifyeth the grace of regeneration l Gal. 16.17 The heart of man m Gen 8 21 Also old Adam n Rom 6 6. How doth Originall sinne differ from actuall sinne As the tree differeth from the fruite or the roote from the branches Originall sinne is like a tree and a roote out of which euill fruites and boughes do spring namely actuall sins not only outward but also inward Out of the heart proceede euill thoughts saith Christ Mat. 15.19 Gal. 5.19 In that place are recited the workes and fruites of the flesh that is of originall sinne Moreouer in actuall sinne the matter of the sinne remaineth not for when a man hath either committed adulterie or spoken blaspheamie those actions straight cease to be when the thing is done notwithstanding the offence to God and the guilt remaine still But in originall sin the matter therof passeth not away for wee finde in experience that the corruption of nature sticketh by vs seeing still we run into sinne and are vntoward to heauenly things both in body and soule What is the end or wage of Originall sin Eternall damnation together with all the mischiefes incident to this life a Gen 2 17 3 19 What is the effect thereof It deceiueth it worketh all concupiscence it killeth b Rom. 5 12 17 What vse is there of this Doctrine concerning Originall sinne A threefold vse 1. That wee may acknowledge our vncleannesse and that laying away all arrogancie wee may betake our selues and flie to Christ our Sauiour 2. That in what manner we vnderstand that the vnrighteousnesse of Adam is imputed to vs in the same maner we may beeleeue that wee by the righteousnesse of Christ are accounted truly and perfectly iust before GOD as the Apostle teacheth Rom. 5.15 3. That because our birth and generation was and is full of vice wee may know we haue neede of a regeneration according to that Ioh. 3.5 Except a man be borne againe he cannot enter into the kingdome of Heauen How is this Doctrine opposed By sundry errors 1. Of the Pelagians who denie that Originall sinne is deriued by propagation to posteritie but say it is conueyed only by imitation and example They also affirme that death is the condition of mans nature although Adam had not fallen Also that Adams sinne hurt no man but himselfe onely Also they say that infants when they are borne doe not bring with them a prauitie of nature resisting the law of God contrarie to Pauls assertion Rom. 5 12. 2. By the Monkes who denie that Originall sinne is a sin worthy of death but either a guiltinesse onely of another mans faults or onely a fewell and matter to feede sinne contrarie to Pauls speach Ephes 2.3 where he saith VVe are the children of wrath Also they determine that it is onely in the bodie in the senses and inferiour faculties but not in the minde and will Also that by Baptisme not only the guilte but the euill and prauitie of concupiscence is taken away that concupiscence is not a sinne but a natuall appetite or desire that it is onely in the sensual appetite giuen vnto man that by striuing with it he may more more be sharpened to follow vertue and may binde God to himselfe by his greater desert Also they say that infants damned for Original sin only haue not poena sensus no punishment of feeling in their bodies but only poena damni or punishment by losse of the sight and enioying of God although it be credible that those are more gently to bee punished in whom originall sinne hath not yet broke forth into workes Also that Marie the mother of our Lord was conceiued borne without originall sin which iudgment also they hold of Iohn Baptist therefore that Christ died not for Marie and Iohn Baptist because he died for originall sinne onely which they wanted yet Mary reioyced in God her Sauiour and Iohn confesseth that he is not worthie to beare the shoes of Christ 3 Of those who say the corruption onely of nature is imputed to vs not the guilt also of Adam and contrarily of those who say the guilt and not the corruption is to be vnderstood by the name of originall sinne 4 Of those Papists who hold that onely actuall sinnes are forbidden by the law and that therefore a man may satisfie the Lawe 5 Of the adherents of Flauius Illiricus who teach that it is not an accident but the verie nature of man and the substance thereof corrupted contrarie to that saying of Paule Rom. 7.21 Sinne is present with me 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and contrarie to those testimonies which teach that God is author of mans nature euen since his fall and also against those places whereby wee learne that Christ tooke our humane nature and substance and redeemed man but not sinne 6 Of the Philosophers who call that only sinne which resisteth reason whereas reason it selfe can doe nothing but erre vntill it be enlightened by the light of God 7 Of the Libertines who define and restraine sin to be only that wherein a man thinketh himselfe to sinne 8 The blasphemie of the Manichees who say that sinnes proceed of God ⧠The sixteenth Place of Actuall sinne VVhat is actuall sinne IT is a fruit of Originall sinne when the lawe of God is actually violated to wit euery action affection speech or omission disaagreeing with Gods will whereby a man becomes guiltie anew and is guiltie of Gods anger and eternall death Of which Iames speaketh 1.15 Concupiscence after it hath conceiued bringeth forth sinne and sinne finished bringeth forth death whereby Concupiscence he vnderstandeth the roote that is Originall sinne by sinne finished
of the Iewes and Gentiles or the whole company of them who are receiued into the couenant for the Old couenant properly belonged to Abraham and the Israelites his posteritie Deut. 32.8 VVhen the most high God diuided to the nations their inheritance when he separated the sons of Adam he appointed the borders of the people according to the number of the children of Israell d Gen. 15.18 17.7 for the Lords portion is his people Iacob is the lot of his inheritance But the new couenant belongeth to all nations to whome God hath vouchsafed the light of the Gospell Mark 16.15 Go yee into all the world and preach the Gospell to euerie creature Hee that shall beleeue and be baptized shall be saued c. Act. 10.15.34.35.43 Rom. 1.16 3.29 As in many other places But may not God seeme mutable or vnlike himselfe seeing hee hath changed that which once hee purposed No in no case for neither hath hee changed his purpose nor done any thing disagreeing with it but hee sheweth himselfe most wise because in diuerse ages he knoweth how to vse diuerse meanes to bring his elect to the knowledge of their saluation in Christ according as hee saw the estate of both that is as both old and latter times required Euen as the Physition taketh one course of cure in a childe another in a man of ripe age according to the diuersitie of their constitutions and yet can hee not therefore bee tearmed inconstant or vnlike himselfe Therefore Paule Ephes 3.10 calleth this dispensation of the couenant the manifolde and diuerse wisdom of God because God in his wisdome doth in other maner call the Gentiles then in old time he did the Iewes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 VVhat therefore is the Old Testament It is a solemne maner of confirming the Couenant comprehended in the Morall Law the ceremonies and Sacrifices ordained to this end that the promise of grace and eternall life for Christes sake might bee kept with condition of faith obedience through faith on mans part to be performed What is the new Testament It is a full manifestation of Gods grace which hath shined to the world since Christs comming into the world which is effected without the strict and hard exacting of the Law and the administration of the ceremonies VVhen was this ordained In Paradise straight after the fall of our first parents for at that time was vttered the first promise pertaining to the Gospell concerning Christ to come a Gen. 3.15 and afterwards it was made to a certaine familie namely of Abraham b Gen. 12.3 17 4 5 19. 22 18 It was performed at the time when Christ was exhibited and confirmed by his bloud and death But why is one and the same Testament called Old and New c Luk 22 20 It is Old in regard of the promise New in regard of Christ alreadie exhibited Also it is Old in respect of the adiunct For the publishing of the Lawe did in time goe before the sending of Christ and that ample declaration of the Gospell or new as it were renewed as Iohn 13.34 The Lord there calleth the commaundement of Loue a new commaundemen wholy renewed or which must be euer new Besides because it was confirmed by Christs death For a Testament is confirmed and in force when the testator is dead otherwise it is not of force whilst he liueth who made it Heb. 9.17 Who made this will or Testament The sonne of God VVho are the hearers All that beleeue VVhat is the inheritance All the benefits which the death of Christ hath procured vs. VVhat are the tables of the Testament The holy Bible or holy Scripture VVhat seales are there to this Testament The Sacraments which in the Old testament were circumcision and the Passeouer but in the new Baptisme the Lords Supper What is the vse of this Doctrine It sheweth that there was alwaies one way to attaine saluation namely by faith in the free promise of Christ and that there was one and the same Church in the old and new Testament What opinions are against this Doctrine 1. The errour of Sernetus and certaine Anabaptists who faine that the people of Israell was fatted pampered in this life without any hope of heauenly immortalitie euen as swine or beasts are for the slaughter 2 The madnes of them who falsely imagined a threefold way of saluation namely the Law of Nature the Law of Moses and the Law of Christ as if there had beene three seuerall couenants of God differing in substance The three and twentieth common place Of the passion and death of Chist What vnderstand you by this terme of the passion of Christ 1 I vnderstand by a Synecdoche a part for the whole whatsoeuer Christ suffered from the first moment of his conception as for example his lying in the maunger when hee was newely borne when there was no roome for his mother in the Inne Luk. 2.7 And afterwards when vpon the eight day after his natiuitie hee shed his bloud in the circumcision the same Chap. vers 22. and from thence vntil the time wherein hee was offered a sacrifice for vs vpon the Altar of the crosse but especially all kinde of iniuries and that horrible punishment which was executed vpon him vnder Pilate 2. The passions of Christ are called the crosses or calamities of Christes mysticall bodie which is the Church or of his members which must bee heere accomplished vntill all the members in their certaine manner and measure become conformable to Christ by the crosse Whereupon the Apost Colos 1.24 saith thus I fulfill the rest of the afflictions of Christ in my flesh for his bodies sake which is the Church that is for the comfort of the Church a for as Leo the first saith The iust hau◠receiued not giuen crownes and from the fortitude of the faithfull are sprung examples of patience not gifts of righteousnesse 3. Metonimically the adiunct for the subiect by passion is vnderstoode the Historie describing Christ passion VVhat is the Lords passion or suffering It is a part of Christs obedience whereby he himselfe beeing innocēt became a sacrifice for the guilty or thus It is a propitiatory sacrifice wherby the son of God being made man offered himselfe to the father that hee might merit for all that beleeue in him eternall iustification sanctification deliuerance from sinne and eternall death and in the end eternall life as Christ himselfe doth expound the matter Ioh. 17.19 I sanctifie my selfe that is I offer my selfe to the Father for them to be an holy and pacifying sacrifice that they also may be sanctified for euer VVhat are the efficient causes of Christs passion There are three efficient causes thereof God Sathan and men and all these in diuerse respects 1. The Counsel and determination of God the most absolute and high will of God that is his ordinance whereby from eternitie he hath so disposed of this businesse that therein he
of vs and of the things signified the coniunction is not in trueth essentiall and personall but mysticall and yet in its kinde reall to wit spirituall by the power of the holy Ghost alone who bringeth to passe that Iesus Christ who now as he is man hath his being in heauen and yet is no lesse truely giuen to vs which are in earth then the signes themselues namely so farre forth as our faith beholding him in the Sacraments doth clime vp into the heauens that we may more and more truely imbrace him and he may liue and abide in vs. For the holy Ghost knoweth to ioyne most nearely together by the bond of faith those things which if you respect the distance of the place are farthest asunder which is done after a heauenly and spirituall manner and not naturally not by the ioyning touching of substances after which manner the beleeuers are most nerely ioyned together one with another as also the husband and the wife are knit together by the bond of mariage although they bee farre asunder in regard of the distance of places Whether are both the things and the signes offered vnto vs of God ioyntly together Yes ioyntly together in respect of God that promiseth truely and without all deceipt but yet distinctly notwithstanding so as oftentimes hee that taketh the signes receiueth nothing lesse then the thing it selfe Whereupon Augustine saith vpon Leuit 7 quest 84 It nothing auaileth Simon Magus to haue the visible Baptisme who wanted the inuisible sanctification What is the manner of receiuing the signes and the things signified The manner of receiuing the signes is naturall or bodilie and the signes are receiued both of the beleeuers and also of the vnbeleeuers after a naturall manner although with contrarie successe But the things themselues signified are communicated in respect of God that giueth them by the holy Ghost and in respect of vs by faith whereby alone Christ with all his benefits is apprehended of vs a Eph. 3.17 For a thing intelligible spiritually propounded cannot bee perceiued vnlesse it be after a spirituall manner that spirituall things might answer to spirituall things corporall and visible to corporall and visible b 1 Cor. 1.13 In this Treatise what doe these things signifie Really Substantially corporally Sacramentally Spiritually Really signifies properly that the verie thing it selfe is truely receiued to which these words substantially and essentially are equiualent So the beleeuers in the right vse of the Sacrament are said to receiue Christ really substantially or essentially also to take the holy elements really substantially essentially But corporally spiritually signifie the manner of receiuing only the signes are receiued corporally but Christ spiritually And to receiue Sacramentally is to receiue the signes of the bodie and bloud of Christ Whether do all they inioy the matter of the Sacraments which vse visible signes No but only the beleeuers vnto whom the promise of grace doth belong and for whose sake the same is ratified by certaine seales For what part or fellowshippe hath the beleeuer with the vnbeleeuer 2. Cor. 6.15 Is it possible for a man to be guiltie by meanes of the thing signified who is not partaker of the same Yes hee may for the abusing of the signes and for the contumelious reproach against the thing signified none otherwise then hee which despiseth the seruants of Christ is guiltie of the contempt of our Lord Iesus Christ and of his Father also a Luk. 10.16 Is faith of the Substance and essence of the Sacraments No because faith maketh not a Sacrament to bee a Sacrament but the institution of God Indeede faith is necessary that wee may receiue the matter of the Sacrament for by faith Christ dwelleth in our hearts b Eph. 3.17 But whether a man beleeue or whether hee beleeue not if the Sacrament be rightly administred hee receiueth the true Sacrament namely in respect of God Yet in respect of the Communicant if a man beleeue not he receiueth the bare signe because without faith neither the word nor the Sacrament can do vs any good Whence is the consecration or the sanctification and blessing of the Sacraments Not by making the signe of the Crosse the repeating and secret murmuring of any words as Iuglers Coniurers do repeat their charmes in conceiued words namely for example of Iupiter that sends the thunder or of bringing the Moone out of Heauen to wit by the force and vertue of letters and syllables if they be repeated and vttered after a certaine manner But from the holy and good will choise institution or ordinance blessing consecration worke commaundement the ratification of the word and the promise of God himselfe who for the good of men hath made choyce of water bread and wine and hath instituted by his ordinance set thē apart for some special purpose and because he hath shewed that it is his pleasure to haue them for Sacraments and how he will haue them celebrated Further by the holy vse which is performed by prayers by the commemoration of the benefits and promises of God and giuing of thanks VVhen is such consecration made First indeede the Lord himselfe made it once and together by himselfe in that first institution namely in that last Supper and this being once made doth consecrate sanctifie the Sacraments to the Church vntill the end of the world as that word once spoken Increase and multiply is perpetually effectuall Gen. 1.28 But now he doth repeat the same by prayers and the word whereby the whole Institution and vse of the externall things is clearely vnfolded by men and those not any whomsoeuer but such as bee lawfully called that is to say by his Pastors and Ministers For otherwise it is no Sacrament but a prophanation of the Sacrament VVhether is there any change of the signes in the Sacraments Truely there is not in the nature or substance the naturall qualitie or quantitie of the Elements the change I say is not of the essence nature as saith Theodoret But only in respect of the end office condition vse for which they bee propounded in the Church namely because they begin to signifie to vs in trueth things altogether heauenly and diuine and that not of their owne nature but by the appointment of the sonne of God As namely for example sake when water btead wine are remoued from the common vse and by the commaundement of God are made the signes of the body and bloud of the Lord which thing certainly they haue not by nature For then euery water should bee the signe of Christs bloud but by the institution of the Lord himself Also the name of the signes are indeed changed but not the matter namely to the intent that we might haue a greater regard of the things signified then of the signes and that the minde might mount vp from the Elements vnto Christ Therefore Theodoret in 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 saith that
of the Couenant whereby God doth testifie that he doth truely receiue the beleeuers into his Couenant How doe the Sacraments of the old and new Testament differ 1. By outward adiuncts and the circumstance of time For those continued vntill the time of Restitution for those things are said to bee 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 right which passe not with a certaine crooked turning course but are directed straight vnto their marke but these must endure vntill the end of the world or vntill the state of glorie in which all trueth shall clearely and perfectly bee made manifest and therefore there shall bee no neede of Sacraments a Heb. 9.19 2. In the manner or condition of their signifying for the Sacraments of the old Testament foretold Christ as it were to come but the Newe declare him as it were exhibited And â—â—erefore they cannot possibly both stand together seeing the time to come can neuer bee the time past and the time past can neuer make the time to come to bee more ancient b Heb. 8.13 3. In the diuersitie or qualitie of the signes or in the signes and ceremonies which differ much for there bee some signes of the Olde and other of the Newe Testament 4. In the number measure of signifying vertue and easinesse 1 For ours saith Augustine are fewer in number whereas in the Old Testament the signes were more in number because the people of Israell were as yet vnder the gouernment of the Law and therefore as children vse to bee were kept vnder more figures and rites 2. Ours were better in regard of the profit 3. More excellent or manifest not in outward shew or worldly pompe but in the vnderstanding and signification of heauenly and diuine things 4. Ours are greater in force that is of greater efficacie to confirm our faith 5. More easie to bee done for there is nothing in Baptisme or the Supper of the Lord which is hard troublesome or bloudy But Circumcision and the Sacrifices were more troublesome bloudie and required greater paines Yet all this maketh not that our Sacraments and the sacraments of the ancient fathers should not be the same in substance What Doe not the Sacraments of the old Testament differ from ours in the effect because those did only shadowe forth and signifie grace which these offer present vnto vs No because in either testament there is the same grace of Christ yea the same Christ propounded And the Apostle testifieth that the old Fathers did eate the same spirituall meat with vs and drinke the same spirituall drink 1. Cor. 10.3 I say the same with vs not as some expound it only amongst themselues which is vnderstood by the purpose of the Apostle the tenour of the text the name of Christ and the word baptizing there vsed and receiued the seale of the righteousnesse which is of faith and therfore that they were made paâ—takers of Christ which is righteousnesse to all that beleeue in all ages Rom. 4.11 And yet I grant that the sacraments of the fathers were figures pictures and shadowes of ours not in regard of the things themselues but in as much as they shadowed things more darkly and obscurely signified by them a 1 Cor. 10.6 In which respect they may be called types of ours but types not without trueth Why then doth Paul say Gal. 4.9 that the Sacraments of the Fathers were weake and beggerly and carnall Elements which were not able to sanctifie the conscience because of their weaknesse and vnprofitablenesse Heb. 7.19 9.10 1. Because he speaketh of them not simply as that they were naked elements which could offer or seale no grace but in some respect as now abrogated by Christ 2. Hee speaketh of them as he saw them receiued of the Iewes seuered from Christ and his promise that is as they are considered in themselues and by themselues seuered from the things signified in cogitation and as bare signes because the sanctification dependeth not of the signes either old or new but wholie and only of the vertue of the holy Ghost Did the Fathers eate the flesh of Christ seeing that as yet it had no beeing actually and corporally in the nature of things Yes because although it was not extant simply or actually in regard of his bodily substance yet in some respect namely as it was to bee giuen for the life of the world it was that spirituall meat which might no lesse bee eaten of them then that Lambe which was slaine from the beginning of the world is eaten now of vs by faith b Reu. 13.8 2. Because Iesus Christ is the same to day yesterday for euer Heb. 13.8 one and the same Sauiour of both Testaments In whome alone it pleased the Father to gather together all things Ephe. 1.10 3. Because those Fathers were indued with faith which maketh those things to be which are hoped for and doth demonstrate those things which are not seene Heb. 11.1 And therefore although in those ancient times the humane nature was not assumed of the word yet it was preseÌ„t to the faith of the godly in former times which did conioyne them then with Christ that should be borne So that that which had no beeing as yet in the order of nature yet neuerthelesse had euer a being by the force and efficacie of faith Therefore Christ saith Abraham sawe my day and reioyced Ioh. 8 56. But they did eate the flesh of Christ which should be giuen for them wee eate it being alreadie giuen for vs. The times are changed saith Augustine but faith is not shall bee giuen and is giuen shall come and is come in Ioh tract 4 these words differ saith hee but yet Christ is one and the same Doe the Sacraments giue remission of sins and doe they conferre or containe grace and are they ordained to iustifie and to regenerate or whether is grace tyed to the Sacraments No. 1. Because they are the signes not the causes of grace 2. That which is proper to God ought not to be bestowed on the creature 3. The subiect of grace is not the body but the spirit 4. No bodilie thing doth worke vpon spirituall things Againe not by the work done or as an efficient cause by them selues or their owne vertue working any thing or flowing from their essence as they speake in the schooles but ministerially or Instrumentally yet effectually so farre forth as they support nourish our faith Not by any inward power or vertue of their owne but by vertue of the principall agent or worker in that sence that Paul affirmeth the Gospel to be the vertue and power of God to saluation to euery one that beleeueth Rom. 1.16 1. Tim. 4.16 he saith that the remedie of the holy Scripture doth saue a man not that there is any magicall vertue in the letters syllables or sound of the words for the Apostle saith Heb. 4.2 The word profited not them beeing not mingled with faith but because
it vseth these meanes helps and instruments to worke our saluation In which sense the Church is said to be sanctified and washed in the lauer of water thorough the word Ephe. 5.16 Tit. 3.5 Baptisme is called the Lauer of Regeneration Renonation And Act. 22.16 Be baptized washed from thy sins in calling vpon his name Hereupon Augustine hath this saying whence commeth this vertue to the water that it should touch the bodie in Ioh. Trac 80 and wash the heart but that the word causeth it not because it is spoken but because it is beleeued And that the grace of God ought not to bee tyed to the outward signes Peter teacheth speaking thus of Baptisme 1 Pet. 3.21 It saueth vs not that Baptisme whereby the filthinesse of the flesh is cast away but whereby it comes to passe that a good conscience maketh request to God by the Resurrection of Iesus Christ Cornelius receiued grace before Baptisme a Act. 10.5 For God vseth meanes and instruments to worke our saluation but yet so as hee worketh by his owne proper and inward vertue most freely when how and in whome hee will and doth not yeelde vp his power and vertue to the outward signes As also in that seuen times washing of Naaman the Syrian in Iordan was not placed the purging of him from his Leprosie which then the power of GOD alone wrought in him b 2. King 9 â—4 Hence it comes to passe that some receiue grace without the Sacrament as Abraham was iustified before Circumcision and the Theefe on the Crosse without Baptisme and the Lords Supper Some receiue the Sacraments and not grace because they want faith as Iudas of whom Augustine saith Hee receiued the bread of the Lord but not that bread which was the Lord. Others receiue both together as it were by a certaine coniunction of the thing with the signes as the faithfull who take the Supper worthily Whether doe the Sacraments imprint any stampe or anie spirituall worke in soule and that such as cannot be blotted out Not of themselues or their owne power nor yet by anie supernaturall verture inherent in them not by a reall and essentiall imprinting of some signe as the printing of a picture or signe is made in wax or money For the Scripture alloweth none such But yet God doth as it were marke out and seale vp his Sacramentally spiritually by them as instruments giuing the pledge of his spirit and the light of faith whereby they are made conformable to Christ and discerned from infidels and are marked out vnto the profession of Christ And this note in the purpose of God is such as cannot bee blotted out 2. Tim. 2.19 The foundation of God is sure hauing this seale The Lord knoweth who are his And 2. Cor. 1.21 He which hath annointed vs is God and who hath sealed vs and giuen vs the pledge of his spirit And Ephe 1.13 In whom also yee beleeuing yee were sealed with the holy spirit of promise which is the earnest of the Inheritance And Chap. 4.30 Doe not yee greeue the holie spirit of God by whom yee are sealed And Ezech. 9.4 The markes of the letter Tau is saide to be made in the forehead of those men which sigh and mourne And Reuel 7.3 The seruants of God are marked in their foreheads as on the contrarie the children of perdition are saide to bee marked with the marke of the beast Reuel 13.16.17 To whome doth it belong to administer the Sacraments To them only to whom it is permitted to exercise the office of Preaching the Gospell According to that saying Goe yee forth teach all Nations baptizing them in the name of the Father son and Holy Ghost Math. 28.28 and 1. Cor. 4.1 For the Sacraments bee the appurtenances of the Ministerie of the word of God and the seales of Gods promises which cannot lawfully be set too without the vnfolding of this word of God For neiher can their be an accessorie vnlesse their be a principall And it belongeth to the same man as the Chancelor vsing the Kings authoritie to write the tables of the Testament faithfully and to seale them with his seale Whence doe the Sacraments receiue their power and excellency From the institution of God so that that forme be obserued which he hath prescribed that by a publick person either rightly called or at the least by a common error vsing the publicke function and not of the manners merit and excellencie of the person working administring Phil. 1. But whether doe the Ministers to whom is committed the lawfull administration of the Sacraments and are called Gods fellow-morkers deliuer also with their hands the matter of the Sacrament No but they do outwardly giue the earthly signes and doe onely performe the outward dueties and God doth inwardly conferre the heauenly gifts represented by them giues increase because God alone doth Circumcise the heart a Deut. 30 And therefore this Circumcision is said to be made without hands b Col 2 11 And Iohn the Baptist confessed that hee indeede baptised them with water but the Lord Iesus did baptise them with the Holy Ghost and with fire Math. 3.11 And onely the heauenly father giueth that bread which is indeede heauenly Iohn 6.32 Otherwise sometimes that is ascribed to the Ministers of the word which belongeth to God alone For that is the nature of words which belong to one thing that that is attributed to the instrument which belongeth to the principall efficient cause Where and when ought the Sacraments to be admininistred In the assembly of the Church and vsually no where else to wit when the whole Church is gathered together or a great part thereof not out of the assembly of the Church Which ought to be the forme and manner of administration That those signes should bee vsed without change which Christ himselfe hath prescribed And that the words of the institution then also of the Lords promise be recited and explaned not in a strange but in a knowne speach before the Sacrament bee administred and deluered a Act 19.3 4.5 1 Cor. 11 23 For the Apostle doth expresly forbid 1. Cor. 14.19 to vse a strange language in the Church And such ceremonies ought to bee vsed which are not humane and receiued but appointed and commaunded by the authority of the son of God as also praiers and thanksgiuings After the example of Christ who commaunded the Church to doe this Doe ye this And Act. 22.16 Be thou baptised and be thou washed from thy sinnes in calling vpon the name of Iesus Now the comelines and dignitie of the Sacrament is to bee esteemed by the word of God Also the multitude and pompe of humane rites doth occupie the senses and the mindes and doth ouerturne the Ceremonies appointed by God To whom are the Sacraments to bee administred The Sacraments indeed are common to the godly and vngodly and also other outward things in the Church
or as Damascen saith One nature is not made capable of contrary Substantiae things disagreeing 7 Because the presence of the bodie is opposed to a religious remembance 8 Because it should follow that the Apostles did eate the passible and mortall bodie and that Christ is not to be sought in the heauens 9 Because the heauens must receiue him and being receiued containe him vntil the time that all things be restored Act. 3.21 10 Because the like kinde of speaking is no where found in Scripture which is properly according to the letter to be vnderstood of two natures together and vnlike essences For it is not said water is wine or the rod is a serpent but water was turned vnto wine the rod into a serpent And as often as the first substāce that is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 hoc aliquid is predicated of another first substance in scripture the Enuntiation of that sort is figuratiue as the Rocke was Christ 1. Cor. 10.4 Christ is that lambe of God Iohn 1 29 Iohn is Elias Math. 11.14 Christ is the true vine Iohn 15.1 11 Because it is needfull to seeke for an othet sense whē the absurdity of the word or letter written do make against any Article of faith or against any manifest place of Scripture as this doth And to make sense of these words Hoc est corpus meum there are fourteene seuerall opinions amongst the Papists 12 Because when the Capernaits did imagine in their minde I know not what corporall eating of the flesh of Christ Christ drewe them backe from that conceipt saying That his words are spirit and life that the flesh profiteth nothing that is to say so eaten as the Capernaits did dreame And he obiected vnto them the mention of his Ascension into heauen Iohn 6.62.63 13 Because this opinion maketh that the bodie of Christ is common to the godly and vngodly which truly is no light discommoditie but a great impietie 14 No Sacrament can be fully expressed and vnderstood without a Trope For in all Sacraments it is most vsuall that the name of the thing signified is giuen to the signe it selfe or the signe is named from the thing signified and that both for the conueniencie of the signe and the thing signified and also for the most certaine giuing and receiuing of the thing signified Whether doth the omnipotency of God take away the discommodities which follow transubstantiation consubstantiation It is not lawfull to reason Theologically from the Omnipotencie of God vnlesse the will of God goeth before plainly laid open in his expresse word For so Christ said to the Sadduces Math. 22.29 Ye are deceiued not knowing the scriptures nor the power of God Because we must looke not what God can doe absolutely but what he will doe for our God is in heauen saith the Psalme 115.3 He doth whatsoeuer he will not what he can Wherupon Tertullian Dei posse velle est non posse nolle that is de spiritu e◠Litera God can doe that which he will that which he will not that he cannot but that which he would both he could doe and he hath shewed it And Augustine saith God is omnipotent not because he can doe all things but because he can bring to passe whatsoeuer he will so that nothing can resist his wil or any way hinder the same but that it is fulfilled Which sayings are vnderstood of that absolute omnipotencie by which God is said that he can doe many things which notwithstanding he will not and therefore doth not but of the actuall and effectuall power wherby God bringeth to passe all things which he will For the will of God is conuerted with the actuall omnipotencie whereupon we rightly gather God will therefore he can doe and doth in like manner God can and doth therefore he will But it is absurd to gather God is omnipotent therefore he doth al things euen which he will not whereupon Damascene saith omnia quidē quae vult potest non vero quae potest vult potest enim perdere mundum sed non vult that is to say he can do all things which he will but he will not do all things which he can For he can destroy the world but he will not 2 We may not argue from the omnipotency of God to confirme that which containeth a contradiction as when any thing is said to be and also not to be or to be such a thing and also not to be such a thing in act and in deed Therefore the schoolemen doe affirme that God cannot make that contradictories may be together true Because a contradiction doth put to be and not to be togither which to doe is a point of impotency not of omnipotencie This Impossible is not a signe of weaknes but it is a token of exceeding great vertue and constancie So God cannot dy he cannot sin he cannot be deceiued he cannot ly a T it 1.2 Heb. 6.18 he cannot make a thing done vndone one that is begotten vnbegotten hee cannot bring to passe that if there be a thing defined there may not also be a definition thereof He therefore which saith indefinitely and simply that God can doe all things doth comprehend not onely good things but also the contrarie euils of these things which doe agree to the deuill and not to God as saith Theodoret verie well But those things which are said to be possible to God some of them are said to be simplie vnpossible by reason of his constant nature Some Hypothetically that is by a presupposall by reason of the constant and altogether vnchangeable truth of his decree and will God truly can simply bring to passe that that may be done which is not or that which is may cease to bee that a bodie may be a Spirit Also He is able of stones to raise vp children vnto Abraham b Mat. 3.9 he is able to bring to passe that a Camell may goe through the eye of a needle c Math. 19 24.26 but not leauing him as he is by nature but making him so slender as is needfull to be done like as he is able to bring to passe that a rich man may enter into the kingdome of heauen not so long as he is such a one but changing him and teaching him to depend onely vpon one God But because it once pleased God that his son hauing taken vnto him flesh should be made our eternal brother like vnto vs in al things which doe appertaine to the naturall and substantiall truth of a bodie according to his creation a Heb. 2 17 4.15 Phil. 3.28 he will not haue things contrarie to nature which do destroy the humane nature in Christ assumed which do take it away and ouerturne the definition therof therefore potenter non potest that is powerfully hee is not able saith Augustine To bring to passe that the bodie of Christ may be together in act a body and not a bodie
senses all which truely together cannot bee deceiued vnlesse they bee withholden as in the two Disciples which did thinke the Lord to be some stranger and in Marie Magdalene which supposed that he had beene the gardiner Luk. 24.16 Ioh. 20.15 Whether vnlesse the bodie of Christ be determined to be euery where by this is it separated and pulled asunder from the Diuine nature which is eueriewhere and to which it selfe is personally vnited or hath the body of the Lord obtained that by the vnion that it should be wheresoeuer the word is In no wise because of those things which are equally vnited so as one doth not stretch further then another one cannot be in any place where the other is not but if the one doe stretch further then wheresoeuer the lesse is there also is the greater but not contrariwise as wee may see in a precious stone and in a ring Because therefore the diuinitie of Christ doth exceede the humanitie wheresoeuer the humanity is there is the diuinitie with it not on the contrarie Neither is the personall vnion a making euen of the humane nature with the Diuine or an effusion of the properties of the Diuine nature into the humane that the humane nature may haue the same properties which the diuine hath but it is such an vnion wherby the humane nature doth subsist in the person of the word so as it may be as it were a part therof neither may it subsist by it selfe or without the word But it doth not follow Epist 57. ad Dard. saith Augustine that that which is in God is euery where as God is Moreouer seing that the deitie is euery where whole not by parts not as in a place it cannot be that the humane nature which it assumed can be said to be separated any where from it although it be contained onely in it owne place so as the inuiolable truth thereof doth beare But also the bodie of the sunne and the light thereof haue betweene themselues a naturall and extreme coniunction yet notwithstaÌ„ding to what places soeuer the light doth extend it self the body doth not come to them really So also the eye the sight are verie neerly ioyned together between themselues yet the sight goeth to many things to which the eye doth not extend it selfe Finally rightly said those ancient fathers in the general council of Chalcedon that the difference of natures in Christ is not taken away for the vnion but rather that the propertie is kept of both natures concurring into one person or one hypostasis But whether did that which Christ said Ioh. 3.13 No man ascendeth vp to heauen but the sonne of man which is in heauen make the humane nature of Christ while it was in earth to haue beene also at the same time in heauen No for the Sonne of man in this place signifieth the whole person of Christ which also is the Sonne of God but the humane nature doth signifie onely one part of that person which was assumed in time of the virgin Therefore that which is spoken of this person which is not man onely but also God is amisse said to be spoken of the humane nature also For by this it should be gathered that the humane nature was before Abraham before it was conceiued in the wombe of the virgine But it is certaine that the sonne of God when hee did speake in earth was in heauen in the same manner wherein hee descended from heauen For Christ doth speake of one and the same subiect that is of the sonne of man that he descended from heauen concerning whom he said that he is in heauen But the son of maÌ„ is said to haue desceÌ„ded not because his flesh fell downe from heauen but because the diuine nature is from heauen and tooke vnto it humane flesh Therefore the sonne of man when hee was vpon earth is so said to haue beene in heauen not because the humane nature but because the diuine nature of this sonne which alwaies filleth heauen and earth was in heauen namely by the Trope Synecdoche wherby both the whole is plainely vnderstood Booke 6. cap. and a part is named of the whole saith Cassian It is not vniust to subiect the nature of Christs glorious body which is called spirituall to the lawes of common nature In no wise because the glorie abolished not the trueth of the bodie nor changed it into a spirit but altogether made it subiect to the spirit a Luk. 24.36 Acts. 1.9 10 11. 7.55 56 Aug. Whether doe the Orthodoxall Fathers when they write that the bread which the Lord did reach to the Disciples not changed in forme but in nature by the almightie power of his word was made flesh Cyprian Serm. de caena domini In prologe Psal 33 That Christ bare himselfe in his hands Augustine That the bodie of the Lord doth enter into our mouth That the tongue is made bloudie with the bloud of Christ and that Christ himselfe is seene touched broken and that teeth are fastned to his flesh whither doe they I say b Chrysost Hom. 83. vpon Math. 45. vpoÌ„ Iohn hom 24 vpoÌ„ 1. Cor. speake properly and without trope No seeing that the senses themselues and experience do witnesse the contrarie and these things cannot bee spoken properly without great and Capernaiticall blasphemy Therefore those speaches of the fathers are figuratiue whereby the name and effects of bodie and bloud are giuen to bread and wine and in like manner those things which are done in the signes are attributed to the bodie and bloud of Christ but yet although somewhat hardly and by an hyperbole to commend the worthinesse of the mysterie they doe shewe in these most expresse figuratiue and Metonimicall phrases how certaine and effectuall the mystery is of our communion with Christ or our spirituall eating of Christ namely of such sort that we may bee flesh of his flesh and bone of his bones that is that being truely made one with him wee may enioy all his goods b Ephe. 5.30 In epist vpon Ioh tractat 1 serm de Crâ—mate Epist 102 ad Euodium Otherwise saith Augustin We cannot with the hand handle Christ fitting in heaueÌ„ but we can touch Christ by faith And Tract vpon Io. 50. The bodie of Christ ascended into heauen some body may aske How shal I hold him being absent How shal I send my hands into heauen that I may hold him sitting there Send thy faith thou hast hold on him And vpon Ps 73. he writeth that he did beare himself in his owne hands after a sort namely because he did beare in his own hands the SacrameÌ„t of his bodie And Cyprian saith that Sacraments haue the names of those things which they doe signifie And the same Augustin Neither let it moue thee saith he that somtime the thing which doth signifie doth take the name of that thing which it signifieth for so the rock is called
flesh of Christ and bone of his bones not according to substance as Eue was of the flesh and bones of Adam but according to qualitie for as much as the Church is the Spouse of Christ not in respect that wee are men but in that wee are truely Christians a Psal 45.11 Cantic 1.8 2 Cor. 11.12 Apoc. 21.2 by which similitude is declared that Christ doth not only deliuer his goods to his Church to be vsed and enioyed but also doth giue himselfe to vs and make himselfe ours 2. The second is of the head and of the members bound fast by the same quickning spirit b Eph. 2 22 4 12 1 Cor. 6 1◠whereby is signified not onely the most streight copulation of vs with Christ but that we doe take life safetie and euerie good thing from him alone that he doth excell his Church 3. The third is of plants and stocks as of the vine and the branches and of engrafting c Ioh 15 1 by which the stock and the young slip being ingrafted do growe together into one plant in very deed d Rom. 6.5 Coll 2 7 but this is the difference 1. That we by nature being wild vines doe not growe out of that vine concerning which it is spoken but we are first ingraffed into in by grace afterward we are trimmed by the husbādman that all bitternesse of tast being laid aside by little and little wee may bring forth sweet fruit 2. Because in this spirituall grafting we being the gresses must passe into the nature of the stock into which we are grafted not on the contrarie as it is in naturall graffing 3. Nether thereupon is to be imagined a reall transfusion of the substance or qualities of Christ himselfe and a certaine 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or continuitie of them betweene themselues as the Postellians and Libertines do think but a power an operation and a streight efficacie whereby Christ by the holy Ghost doth change vs beeing iustified into himselfe and doth renewe vs vnto spirituall life 4. The forth is of a spring and e Ioh. 4.14 of riuers but so that seeing we are a most impure sinke we must first of all by grace bee purged from vncleannesse most pure waters being powred in 5 The fift is of a house and of a building built together of liuing stones but yet by workmanshippe not made with hands laide vpon the chiefe corner stone and pretious yea the fundamentall corner stone a liuing and pretious stone f Eph 2.20 1 Cor. 3 16 1 Pet. 2.4 which similitude doth tend to this end that it may bee manifestly knowne that the whole Church and euerie member thereof is sustained by Iesus Christ alone to whom it cleaueth spiritually by faith in whome by whom and in respect of whom the holy Ghost doth builde the whole companie of the faithfull vpon this foundation the stones whereof he doth ioyne together by vnity of faith continual loue and so being ioyned together hee doth defend and maintain them against all the tempests insultings of the world 6. The sixt similitude is of meat drinke or of eating drinking a Ioh 6 51. but with a manifold difference 1. Because meate and drink taken after a corporall manner cannot giue life but onely doth conserue corporall life that as it seemeth good vnto God but the meate and drinke which in this mysterie are signified by similitude haue life and that truely eternall in themselues 2. Because these naturall meats drinkes are digested by natural heat and being altered are assimulated to the substances of the bodies But this spirituall meate drinke is incorruptible doth transforme vs into it selfe by a new as I may say qualification as Augustine saith Non mutaberis in me sed ego mutabor in te that is thou shall not be changed into me but I shall be chaunged into thee 3. Corporall meat drinke doth maintain this life but for a small time which life also they do hurt sometime also kill vnlesse they be taken in that measure discretion wherin it becommeth them to be taken But whosoeuer doth eate drinke that spirituall meate and drink one only the same is made partaker of immortality 4. Seing that Christ giueth his flesh with the meate and his bloud with the drinke and declareth the spirituall receiuing of the same by the names of eating and drinking he doth not signifie a passage of his flesh and bloud into our soule or bodie or a transfusion of the qualities either of his soule or of his bodie into vs but an inspiration of the peace of conscience of an holy spirituall and heauenly life by the gift of the spirit of sanctification Therefore in those similitudes all are metaphoricall but not proper speeches neither are to be vrged precisely 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is according to the letter 1 Cor 2. 13 but so as the Apostle admonisheth that spiritual things may not be ioyned to corporal but spiritual things to spirituall that is that we may apply the words to the things What is the end and fruit of this our communion with Christ Manifold 1. Our bringing againe into the good fauour of the Father by a Mediator 2. The communion of Christ himselfe with vs wherby as our eternal Priest he doth beare vs in his heart and maketh intercession to the father for vs esteemeth it done to himselfe whatsoeuer good or ill is done toward his brethren 3. The participation and communion of all his goods for among friends all things are common and a spirituall congruence conformitie with Christ For euen as our guilt naturall blemish al our sins which follow therevpon are laid vpō Christ himselfe not by real inhesion infusion but by imputatiō alone according to the couenant of the Gospell but that all the miseries sin excepted punishments due to our sins that same our suretie a Heb 7.22 in very deed took vpon himself subiectiuely so his most perfit righteousnes proceeding from that obedience which being most absolute he performed to the father in his flesh euen to the death of the crosse by which he attained both the paying of all our debts also right to obtaine eternall life for the beleeuers is not ours by a reall infusion inhesion therof but by imputation acceptance 4. By vertue of the holy Ghost or by a real efficacie within vs he doth conuey into our masse which is inserted into his masse by faith spiritually the liuely liquor iuice spirit of eternall life that is he bringeth forth in vs another effect of that sauing vertue being vnseparable from his flesh by which he doth quicken renew sanctifie within vs both our mind and also will affections doth make vs conformable to his humane nature and so he beginneth spiritual life inherent righteousnesse in vs subiectiuely at length to be perfected in the last
vsed For whosoeuer shall eate this bread or drinke of the cuppe of the Lord vnworthily the Apostle saith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is vnworthily shall bee guiltie of the body and bloud of the Lord. 1. Cor 11.27 How many sorts are of them which come to the Supper of the Lord Two one of them which eate worthily another of them which eate vnworthily Who doe come worthily These doe differ To bee worthy or vnworthie and to come worthily or vnworthily to the supper of the Lord. For no where doth the Apostle so speake That some are worthy some vnworthy but he speaketh of thē which eate worthily vnworthily Therefore they doe eate the breade and drinke the cuppe of the Lord worthily not which want the least blemish or spot of sin of which sort there are none in the world For by nature wee are all both vnworthy of so great a benefit and not sufficient to perceiue so great mysteries but our sufficiencie is of God 2. Cor. 3.5 a Col. 1.12 But. 1. The which acknowledge their owne vnworthinesse and bewaile it and rely vpon the worthinesse of Christ that is They which are truely afraid in the acknowledging of the great wrath of God against their sins and are grieued with their whole heart because they haue offended God who doe acknowledge confesse that they haue many waies deserued punishments for their sins and haue in heart and in mouth that confession of Daniell O Lord righteousnesse belongeth vnto thee and vnto vs open shame chap. 9.7 Which motion is stirred vp in vs by consideration of Gods lawe of eternall and temporall punishments but especially by thinking of the sonne of God laid groueling in the garden and hanging betweene two theeues vpon the crosse for our sinnes 2. They which haue hungrie and thirsting soules after the fauour of God and doe flee to the onely hauen of health that is to the mercie of God for Christs sake the mediatour and are lifted vp with confidence hereof and doe iudge with a firme assent that they are receiued of God into fauour for his sake and that the good promises in the Gospell are exhibited to themselues that is to say the communion of the bodie and bloude of Iesus Christ and participation of the merit and efficacie of him remission of sins renouation and life eternall a Mat. 5.6 3. They which haue a purposed endeauour to amende their liues and to yeeld newe obedience that is who haue determined nothing more surely then to referre all there purposes and endeuours to the honour of God who haue remitted wronges and all their iniuries as it is said Math. 5.24 Leaue thine offering before the Altar and Goe thy way First bee reconciled to thy brother And they which are readie to loue all the members of Christ to helpe them and to bestowe themselues for them according to the example of Christ 4. They which call to minde the sending of the son of God his passion and the whole benefit of redemption and do giue thanks to God for it 5. They which doe determine with themselues to die for the confession of the name of Christ Finally faith euen begun with repentance doth make them of vnworthy to become worthie But this worthines is not to be meant concerning perfection such as befalleth no not to the most holy But concerning the beginnings of conuersion and faith which may be felt in our selues and acknowledged of others by no obscure but evident signes and tokens But for such as doe repent and yet are earnstely afraid may not these flee the vse of the Sacrament by reason of former slips No but let them know that therefore this so great pledge is set forth that their faith may be kindled and confirmed concerning remission of sins by the vse of those things and let the minde reconciled to God call vpon him againe and serue him afterward with a good conscience Let the mindes of such rely not vpon their owne worthinesse but as the prodigall sonne returning to his father doth not plead his merits and deserts but acknowledgeth accuseth and bewaileth his fault so let vs acknowledge our pollutions let vs accuse our selues for them and let vs flee vnto Gods mercy promised for Christs sake The pledge of which mercie is the Supper it selfe in which Christ testifieth that remission of sins is giuen to vs freely that is not for our worthinesse but because he was made a sacrifice for vs and let vs knowe that this medicine is prepared for the sick that is for them which acknowledge their owne weaknesse What counsell therefore doth the Apostle giue to them which come to the Supper Let a man examine himselfe and so that is to say when as he hath examined himselfe and found himselfe fit by the grace of God Let him eat of this bread and drinke of this cup. 1. Cor. 11.28 What must we examine This Paul declareth saying 2. Cor. 13.5 Prooue your selues whether you are in the faith examine your selues knowe yee not your selues how that Iesus Christ is in you except ye be reprobates Yet notwithstanding they are not forthwith to bee thought reprobates whosoeuer are not yet effectually called or whosoeuer also after calling do fal into great sins Wherefore the right examination and tryal of our selues consisteth in this that euerie one should descend into himselfe thoroughly trie and examine himselfe 1. Whether hee bee truely grieued for sinnes committed 2. Whether hee doth truely beleeue in Christ the pacifier of Gods wrath for sins 3. Whether he hath an earnest purpose afterward to auoid sins hatred lust gluttonie the like and to liue righteously holily that so he may shewe himselfe thankfull to God Who ought to take this examination Let a man examine himselfe saith Paule for 1. No body can better and more certainely iudge whether hee bee in the Faith then euery one himselfe 2. Neither doth the vnworthinesse of others condemne vs but our owne 3. Neither doth any man know what is in our heart or what our affections are towardes God more than we our selues 1. Cor. 2.11 Finally the saying of the Apostle is emphaticall that euery one may know that this he must doe least any man should dreame that the faith ' which they call implicite or folded in is onely required or that we should depend vpon an other mans faith And truely the Apostle saith let euery man examine himselfe but not his neighbour least any should be busied in iudging his neighbour or should thinke that the vnworthinesse of another may be danger to himselfe For euery one shall giue accounte of himselfe to God Rom. 14.12 Which thing notwithstanding doth not hinder the examination instruction of Pastors wherby the Pastors in the Doctrin of pietie doe make tryall of their hearers profiting which are helped if neede be with familiar instruction counsell and comfort For this latter examination doth serue for the former And euery one is bound to confesse the