see him but maiest touch him and haue him in thee Chrysostom doth here command vs to beleeue Christ vvhen he saith This is my body but to behold it with the eyes of vnderstanding For he saith that neither any sensible or bodily thing is giuen in the sacraments but by those things that be sensible the very gifts to be vnderstood and incorporall are giuen vs and that not onely in Baptisme but also in the Supper of the Lord. But if Christ do giue vs himselfe in his Supper and yet no bodily thing is giuen for he saith that the gifts be incorporall It is manifest that Chrysostome doth agree with the rest of the Fathers that Christ is present in the vse of the sacrament by grace and vertue of his body And although this Author doe vse in some places deuout Hyperbolicall speeches disputing of this sacrament which thing he hath also done here when hee affirmeth that Christ is set before vs not only to be seene but also to be touched yet an indifferent reader may easily perceiue by this place and some other Theodoritus Dial. 1. what was his right opinion of this matter The very same thing doth Theodoritus plainely teach in his first Dialogue in this wise Ortho. Our Sauiour himselfe chaunged the names and gaue the name of the figure to his bodie and the name of his bodie to the figure Sodal Thou saiest true but I would learne the cause of this change of names Ortho. The cause is plaine to them that bee instructed in the heauenly mysteries for his will was that they which partake the heauenly mysteries should giue no heed to the nature of the thinges which bee seene but by the change of names they should beleeue the alteration that is made by grace for he which before had called his naturall body meat and bread and againe calleth himselfe a Vine the same hath honoured the figures which be seene with the title of his bodie and blood not altering the nature but ioyning grace to the nature Nothing can bee spoken more plainely then Theodoritus doth here expounde how bread is the body of Christ that is to say because the nature of bread remaineth and yet by grace is made his bodie in that grace is ioyned to the nature of the bread The same man Dial. 2. Idem Dial. 2. For neither doe the mysticall signes after the sanctification depart from their proper nature for they tarie in their former substance shape and forme and may bee seene and touched euen as before but they be vnderstood to be the things that they bee made and so beleeued and worshipped as though they were the same which they be beleeued He said before that the nature of the signes did remaine but that there was a change made by grace that the nature was not changed but that grace was ioyned Here doth he plainely say that the substance fashion and forme of the outward figures bee the same after sanctification that they were but yet they be made other things to our vnderstanding and faith that is to say by grace as he taught vs before singing al one song with Chrisostome That no sensible or corporate thing is here giuen but that they bee things intelligible and incorporate which be giuen by grace and with vertue Euthymius in Matth. cap. 64. Hereunto appertaine the words of Euthymius vpon Matthew chap. 64. Therefore euen as the olde Testament had sacrifices and blood so hath the new also namely the body and blood of the Lord for hee saide not These bee signes of my body but These bee my body my blood Therfore we must not take heed to the nature of those things which bee set before vs but to the vertue of them For euen as aboue nature hee deified the flesh that was taken of the Virgin if it bee lawful to vse this phrase so also doth he vnspeakeably change these things into his verie liuely body and into his verie precious blood and into the grace of them In that hee saith Wee may not regard the nature of those things that be set before vs he teacheth that the nature of the bread remaineth and in that hee addeth But to the vertue of them hee sheweth that by vertue they be the body of Christ and not by any carnall meanes Finallie he addeth by interpretation And into the grace of them that hee might exclude carnall imaginations Leo Synod Ro. de con dist 2. Leo and the Synode of Rome de consecrat Dist 2. doe not differ from these for thus bee the words Because in that mysticall distribution of spirituall food this is giuen and this is receiued that wee receiuing the vertue of this heauenly meate may become his flesh which was made our flesh You haue almost the very words which Emissenus and Chrysostome vsed as we rehearsed before The distribution of the heauenly food the vertue of the heauenly meate receiued and that so we become his flesh What other thing is this then that wee be ioyned with his flesh by grace and vertue For how can we otherwise be channed into his flesh To this tendeth also the saying of Hilary there brought in among other Hilarius For the visible quantitie is not to be esteemed in this mysterie but the vertue of the spirituall sacrament Moreouer Theophylactus which is counted as it were a certaine follower and interpreter of Chrysostome doth affirme this most plainely as we haue aboue more fully set foorth out of the which I will repeate a few thinges here the rest Reader thou maist thy selfe take out of him For both he taketh vtterly away carnal imaginations and affirmeth that the words of this mysterie are spiritually to be vnderstood as those which haue no things carnall but bring euerlasting life and he sheweth the manner and way how to vnderstand them writing in this wise And how saith he is not flesh seene O man Thoph in Mar. cap. 14. this is done for our infirmitie for insomuch as the bread and wine be of those things which we be acquainted withall we abhorre them not but if we should see blood and flesh set before vs we could not abide it but should abhorre it Therefore God of his mercie fauoring our frailtie retaineth still the forme of bread wine but he changeth the creatures into the power of flesh and blood The same man in Ioan. cap 6. vpon these words Idem in Ioan. cap. 6. This is a hard saying who can away withall c. See their follie for their dutie had been to haue asked learned those thinges whereof they were ignorant but they started backe and did construe nothing spiritually but all things as they outwardly appeared For when they heard of flesh they thought hee would compell them to be deuourers of flesh and blood But because wee vnderstand it spiritually neither wee be deuourers of flesh and yet we be sanctified by such meat The opinion of Theophylactus is certaine that
spoken if so be the author be thought to agree with himselfe yet since it is counted another mans worke to haue a false title it ought not to take place in a controuersie of so great a matter Therefore in this third part of this worke I meant to shew I thinke I haue so done how Christ our Lord ought to be beleeued to be present in the administration of his holy Supper according to common agreeable interpretations of the ancient Fathers First I taught that a spirituall vnderstanding of eating the flesh of Christ was required by them and all carnal imagination abolished Then that it was no spiritual maner of vnderstāding if a man folow the letter and proper signification of the words such as they fained which brought in Transubstantiation or doe appoint a grosse presence of flesh with the bread but that all such imaginations be carnall and humane not spiritual Lastly what those Fathers deemed spirituall vnderstanding namely that the body of Christ in the sacrament of Thankesgiuing is giuen to the faithfull by grace and effectual povver in a certaine holy signe But here a doubt riseth If we beleeue that the grace and vertue of his true body bee ioyned with the bread and wine wee shall seeme to attribute too much to the Elements therof should come a double euil for so it shall come to passe that the worshipping of the sacrament will follow the perill of idolatrie euill men when they receiue the sacrament should also eate his body be partakers of his grace But that cannot be He that eateth me saith Christ he shall liue for me and hee that eateth this bread shall liue for euer which cannot bee vnderstood of ill men As concerning the worshipping of the sacrament I answere that the ancient fathers receiued the sacrament of thanks-giuing with reuerence and great honor yet for all that were safe from idolatrie which thing might also happen to vs if the ancient discipline were reuoked August in Psal 98. the maner of Catechisme restored For Augustin doth euidently teach in Psal 98. when he saith That the ancient fathers worshipped when they did receiue He gaue you his very flesh to be eaten for saluation but none eateth that flesh vnles he haue first worshipped And we do not only not offend in worshipping but we offend in not worshipping The same man in Sent. Prosperi Idem in Sent. Prosp But we in the forme of bread and wine which wee see doe honour inuisible things namely flesh and blood Likewise Eusebius Emissenus Euseb Emiss When thou goest vp to the holy Altar to bee fed with the spirituall food behold in thy faith the holy bodie and blood of thy God honour it esteeme it greatly And Chrysostome 1 Cor. 10. Homilia 24 Chrysost 1. Cor. 10. Hom. 24. For I will shew thee that on earth which is worthy of greatest honor For euen as in Kings pallaces not the walles not the goulden roofe but the body of a King sitting in his throne is the excellentest of al so is also in heauen the body of the king which is now set before thee to bee seene in earth I shew thee neither Angels nor Archangels nor the hie heauens but the Lord of all them Ambrose vpon the 1. Cor. 11. Ambros 1. Cor. 11. The sacrament of thankesgiuing is a spirituall medicine which being tasted with reuerence doth purifie a deuout mind And by and by he teacheth that we must come with a deuout minde and with feare to the holy Communion that the mind may know that it oweth a reuerence to him whose body it cōmeth to receiue Theodorit also dial 2. Theodoritus Dial. 2. For neither do the mystical signes after the sanctificatiō depart from their proper nature for they remaine in their former substance shape fashion and may be both seene and touched euen as before but the things which they be made be vnderstood and beleeued worshipped as if they were the self things which they be beleeued By this and other places it is easie to perceiue with what honor with what reuerēce the ancient fathers came to the holy Communion Neyther is it any maruell since they beleeued that they receiued in that bread the true nature and vertue of our Lords true body and were farre off from idolatrie being instructed and diligently taught not to worship the outward signe but the inward vertue Which thing Augustin declareth by these wordes August de doct Christ. lib. 3. cap. 9. De doctrina Christiana lib. 3. cap. 9. For he serueth vnder a signe which worketh or reuerenceth any thing that signifieth not knowing what it signifieth but he that either worketh or reuerenceth a profitable signe ordained of God whose force and signification he vnderstandeth doth not honor this that is seene and passeth away but rather that whereunto all such things be referred And soone after But in this time after that by the resurrection of our Lord Iesus Christ the most manifest iudgement of our libertie appeared we haue not bene laden with the weightie operation of those signes which we now vnderstand but the Lord himselfe the doctrine of the Apostles hath deliuered vnto vs a few in steed of manie and those verie easie to be done most pure to be kept namely the sacrament of Baptisme and the celebration of the body blood of our Lord which euerie man when he receiueth being instructed he knoweth whereto they be applied so that he doth reuerence them not with a carnal seruitude but rather with a spirituall liberty Here wee see with what learning the Christian men in time past were seasoned before they should come to the vse of the sacraments and how albeit they honored or worshipped aswell in Baptisme as in the celebration of the Supper yet that was done without perill or offence Perill as here it is euident when as they had no respect to that which is seene and doth decay but to the vertue and signification therof Offence because they had a conscience in time past I will not say to receiue the sacraments before Infidels and such as were ignorant of the mysteries but not so much as to talke of so secret matters before them Of the which thing there be many testimonies but wee wil for this time be content with this one taken out of the 2. Dial. of Theodoritus For Orthodoxus Dial. 2. Theod. being asked how he before the consecration called that which was offered by the Priest answered We must not speake frankely for it is likely that there be some here present which be not instructed in the mysteries of Christ Eran. Answere mee therefore softlie By this place it is euident how warily and soberly they in time past spake of the mysteries And this is worth the labour to note That the ancient writers when they spake of the sacraments did vse diuers termes of honoring reuerencing or worshipping By
in his second Apologie writeth thus And this meate is called with vs that is Thankesgiuing c. whereof none other may be partaker but he which both beleeueth those things to be true which we say also hath bene purified with the washing which is giuen for the remission of sinnes and regeneration and also so liueth as CHRIST hath appointed For wee take not these things to be common and wonted bread and accustomed drinke but euen as the word of God IESVS CHRIST our Sauiour was made man and had both flesh and blood for our saluation Euen so in like maner wee haue bene taught that the meate which is hallowed by the prayers of the word that we receiued of him and by which our blood and flesh by a change made are nourished is both the flesh blood of the same CHRIST which was made man For the Apostles in their Commentaries which be called the Gospels haue left in writing that CHRIST did so command them and that he said when he had taken bread and giuen thankes Doe this in remembrance of me This is my body And that when he had taken the cup and giuen thankes hee said This is my Blood Partly the other words of this testimoniall doe affirme the trueth of his body and chiefly because by a similitude taken of the two natures in CHRIST he declareth that there be also two natures in the Sacrament namely of the outward signe and of the flesh Blood of IESVS CHRIST Alike vnto this is spoken in Irenaeus in his 4. booke For how say they againe that the flesh commeth into corruption doth not receiue life which is nourished of the body and Blood of the Lord Therefore let them either change their opinion or else abstaine to offer the things which are aforesaid but our opinion is agreeing to the Sacrament of thankesgiuing and this Sacrament againe confirmeth our opinion For wee offer those things that be his preaching agreeably the partaking and trueth of Flesh and Spirit For euen as the bread which is of the earth receiuing the calling vpon God is now no more common bread but a Sacrament of thanksgiuing made of two things earthly and Heauenly so also our bodies receiuing the Sacrament of thankesgiuing be not now corruptible because they haue the hope of resurrection The same man in his fift booke and because wee be his members and are nourished by the creature he giueth vs the creature making his Sonne to arise and raining as he listeth the same Cup which is a creature he confirmed to be his Body by which he increaseth our bodies When therefore both the Cup mixed and the bread made receiueth the word of God it is made the Sacrament of the blood and body of CHRIST whereof both the substance of our flesh is increased consisteth how then doeth he denie that the flesh is able to receiue the gift of God which is life Euerlasting seeing it is nourished with the blood and bodie of CHRIST These words of Irenaeus albeit not very dark yet wil they be more plaine if we adde certaine things to them out of S. Augustine August tit de consecrat dist 2. He in his booke of the Sentences of Prosperus and is found De consecratione distinct 2. writeth thus This is it that we say and that by al meanes we labour to proue that the Sacrifice of the Church is made two maner awayes that it consisteth of two things Of the visible forme of Sacraments and the inuisible flesh and blood of our Lord IESVS CHRIST of the Sacrament and of the substance of the Sacrament that is the body of CHRIST As the person of CHRIST consisteth of God and man since CHRIST himselfe is very God and very man because euery thing conteineth in it selfe the nature and trueth of those things whereof it is made But the sacrifice of the Church is made of two things of the Sacrament and of the substance of the Sacrament that is the body of CHRIST There is therefore the Sacrament and the substance of the Sacrament the bodie of CHRIST S. Augustine repeateth that comparison between the person of CHRIST and the Sacrament of thankesgiuing and therein hee saith plainely that the trueth and nature of the bodie is conteined The same man De consecrat distinct 2. Idem ibidem Whether is this mysticall Sacrament of the Cup made in figure or in trueth The trueth saith My flesh is verily meat and my blood is verily drinke Else how can it bee a great matter The bread that I shall giue is my flesh for the life of the world vnlesse it bee very flesh But because it is not godly that CHRIST should be deuoured with teeth the Lords will was to haue this bread and wine in mysterie to be by his power made his flesh and blood in veritie by the consecration of the holy Ghost and to be daily offered mysticallie for the life of the world That like as his true flesh is created of the Virgin by the holy Ghost without the companie of man so by this same Spirit the same bodie mystically is consecrated of the substance of bread and wine The body of CHRIST is both trueth and figure Trueth in that the bodie and blood of CHRIST by the power of the holy Ghost is made by the strength thereof of the substance of bread and wine And the figure is that which outwardly is perceiued The same man in the same title Idem ibidem They that eate and drinke CHRIST eate and drinke life To eate him is to be refreshed to drinke him is to liue That which is visiblie taken in the Sacrament is eaten and drunke spiritually in very trueth Idem ibidem The same man in his booke of the Sentences of Prosperus in the same title saith But we in the forme of bread and wine which we see do honor inuisible things namely flesh and blood Neither doe we alike take these two formes as we did take them before the consecration seeing that we faithfully confesse that before the consecration they be bread and wine which nature hath framed but after the consecration they be the flesh blood of CHRIST which the blessing hath hallowed He againe vpon the 54. Psalme Vntill the world come to an end the Lord is aboue yet for all that the Lords trueth is also here with vs For it is fit that the body in the which he rose againe should be in one place but his trueth is spred euery where He also in his Epistle to Irenaeus CHRIST is bread of the which hee who so eateth liueth for euer whereof hee himselfe saith thus And the bread which I will giue is my flesh for the life of the world And he expoundeth it how it is bread not onely according to the word whereby all things liue but according to the flesh that hee tooke for the life of the world For mans flesh which was dead through sinne being knit
to them an horrible and hainous thing to feed vpon mans flesh thinking hee had spoken this after that sort as though they should haue bene taught to haue eaten his flesh sod or rosted and cut in pieces whereas the flesh of his person if it should bee deuided into morsels could not haue bene sufficient for all mankinde which being once spent Religion should seeme to perish vvhich should not haue aftervvard a sacrifice remaining any longer But in such like thoughts flesh and blood profiteth nothing because as the Master himselfe hath expounded These words be Spirit and life neither doth the carnall sense pearse the vnderstanding of so great a depth vnlesse Faith be added too The Bread is food the Blood is life the Flesh substance the Body the Church A body because of the agreeing of members in one Bread for the conformitie of nourishment Blood for the effect of life giuen Flesh for the propertie of the humanitie taken Also hee sayth This common bread beeing changed into flesh and blood doeth procure life and encrease to the bodies and therefore by the accustomed effect of things the weakenesse of our faith is aided and taught by a sensible argument that the effect of eternall life is in the visible Sacraments and that we be knit to Christ not so much by corporall as by spirituall passage Also this bread which hee reached to his disciples beeing changed not in forme but in nature by the omnipotencie of the Word is made flesh and euen as in the person of Christ the humanitie was seene and the diuinitie hid so into the visible Sacrament vnspeakeably doeth the diuine substance powre it selfe Also the Master truely of this Institution sayd that Vnlesse wee should eate and drinke his blood we should not haue life in vs instructing vs by a spirituall lesson and opening our vnderstanding to so hidden a matter that wee should knowe that our eating is an abiding in him and our drinke as it were a certaine incorporation by submitting our seruice and ioyning our willes and vniting our affections Also hee sayth Among the guests of the Lords table the natural man is not admitted whatsoeuer flesh and blood doeth appoint is shut out from this company it sauoureth nothing it profiteth nothing whatsoeuer the finenes of the sence of man doth goe about Cyprian hath these and many other places to the same purpose The very words of Cyprian doe sufficiently declare that which belongeth to our purpose How the Letter is not to bee followed in these things which be spoken of this mysterie how the vnderstanding of the Flesh is vtterly to be shunned and all things to be referred to a spiritual sense That there is the presence of the diuine power in this Bread the effect of euerlasting life and that the diuine substance is powred thereinto that the words are spirit and life that a spirituall lesson is giuen that this Body this Blood and Flesh this substance of body ought not to be taken after a common sort nor as mans reason doth appoint but to be named thought of beleeued for certaine excellent effects powers and properties ioyned thereto which be euen within the body and blood of Christ by nature namely that it doeth both feede and reuiue our soules and prepareth our bodies to resurrection and immortalitie Cyrill in Ioan. lib. 4. cap. 14. The same opinion hath also Cyrillus who though he affirme in many places the trueth and nature of the body of Christ to be in the Sacrament yet hee is in opinion that it is a spiritual and diuine matter and not to be vnderstood after the manner of men For first he declareth that the same maner of eating is set foorth in the words of the Lords Supper which the Lord himselfe signified when he said Vnlesse you eat the flesh of the Sonne of man c. For so he writeth in his 4. booke vpon the 14. Chap. of Iohn Where after he had spoken somewhat of them that did say How can this man giue his flesh to be eaten hee addeth these words Therefore they ought first to haue set the rootes of faith in their minde and then to seeke for those things that are to be sought for of man but they before they would beleeue did seeke importunately For this cause therefore the Lord did not open how it might be but exhorteth to seeke it by faith So to his disciples that beleeued he gaue the pieces of bread saying Take ye and eate ye this is my body The cup also in like maner he caried about saying Drinke yee all of this This is the cup of my blood which shall be shed for many for the remission of sins Thou seest manifestly that by no meanes he would declare the maner of the mysterie to them that sought it without faith but to them that did beleeue and did not seeke it he plainely declared it Likewise in cap. 21. Idem in cap. 21 vpon these words This is a hardsaying thus he saith And such as want sharpenesse of wit are wont to abhorre knowledge which should be sought with great study and much labour but yet the spirituall man accustomed to the Lords doctrine as to great dainties doth continually sing How sweet be thy words vnto my throat yea aboue hony to my mouth But the naturall Iew doeth thinke this spirituall mysterie full of foolishnesse and where by the Lords words he is stirred to an higher vnderstanding of things yet he falleth still to his accustomed madnesse Likewise in his cap. 22. expounding these words Doeth this offend you Idem in cap. 22 c. hee writeth on this sort For ignorance many which followed Christ not vnderstanding his words were troubled for when they heard him say Verely verely I say vnto you vnlesse ye eate the flesh of the Sonne of man and drinke his blood you shall not haue life in you they thought Christ had called them to the cruel maners of beasts and stirred them to eate the rawe flesh of a man and to drinke blood which be euen horrible to heare For they had not yet knowen the maner of this mysterie and the godly ministration thereof Also in the 24. chapter Idem cap. 24. The words therefore that I haue spoken to you bee spirit that is spirituall and of the spirit and life that is to say they be of the liuely and naturall life Idem ad Calosyrium The same mans words are rehearsed to Calosyrius which follow For least we should abhorre flesh and blood set vpon the holy Altars God fauouring our frailty powred into the things offered the power of life turning them into the trueth of his owne flesh that a body of life as it were a certaine seed that giueth life might be found in vs. By these and many other places in Cyrillus we be lift vp from the letter to the spirite from the sence of the naturall man to a more hie vnderstanding of a spirituall mysterie It must not
A WAY OF RECONCILIATION OF A GOOD AND learned man TOVCHING THE Trueth Nature and Substance of the Body and Blood of Christ in the Sacrament Translated out of Latin into English by the Right Honorable Lady Elizabeth Russell Dowager to the Right Honourable the Lord Iohn Russell Baron and sonne and heire to Francis Earle of Bedford AT LONDON PRINTED BY R. B. ANNO 1605. The Author to the Reader TO seeke the attonement of men is to be commended and it hath a sure promise of God Blessed bee the peace-makers But I feare me lest in greedily following the same it happen to me which chanceth to them that part fraies while they seeke others safetie they beare the blowes themselues And I while I study to make enemies friends perhaps shall haue small thankes of them Which if it happen the example of him shal comfort me which said If I should please men I should not be the seruant of Christ Farewell and indeauour thy selfe to please Christ TO THE RIGHT HOnourable my most entierly beloued and onely daughter the Lady ANNE HERBERT wife to the Lord HENRY HERBERT sonne and heire apparant to EDVVARD the most noble Earle of Worcester MOst vertuous and woorthilie beloued daughter Euen as from your first birth and cradle J euer was most careful aboue any worldly thing to haue you sucke the perfect milke of sincere Religion So willing to ende as I beganne I haue left to you as my last Legacie this Booke A most precious Iewell to the comfort of your Soule being the woorke of a most good learned and worthy man Made aboue fiftie yeeres since in Germanie After by traueile a French creature Now naturalized by mee into English like to his learned Author to whom from my part most Honour and seruice is due Surely at the first I meant not to haue set it abroad in Print but my selfe onely to haue some certaintie to leane vnto in a matter so full of controuersie and to yeeld a reason of my opinion But since by my lending the Copie of mine owne hand to a friend I am bereft thereof by some And fearing lest after my death it should be Printed according to the humors of other and wrong of the dead who in his life approued my Translation with his owne allowance Therefore dreading I say wrong to him aboue any other respect I haue by Anticipation preuented the worst J meant this to you good daughter for a New-yeeres gift but altered by griefe for your Brothers broken arme Farewell my good sweet Nanne God blesse thee with the continuance of the comfort of his holy Spirit that it may euer worke in you and perseuere with you to the ende and in the ende IN ANNAM FILIAM Vt veniens Annus tibi plurima commodet ANNA Voce pia Mater supplice mente precor Vt valeas paritérque tuo cum Coniuge Proles Officijs iunctis vita serena fluat ELIZABETHA RVSSELLA Dowager ¶ A CERTAINE MAN wisheth to all Christians the health and peace of our Lord IESVS CHRIST THE question of the Supper of IESVS CHRIST and Sacrament of Thankesgiuing hath brought foorth to vs aboue other things a cruel and pernitious contention For the other Authors of sects Anabaptists and Suencfeldians be neither learned nor of our family But this is a ciuill and domesticall euill a bloody and deadly wound hidden in our bowels Surely it is a lamentable and horrible matter that the thing which was first instituted for the confirmation of mens minds in loue and concord and fellowship of the body of Christ which is the Church is now wrested to variance and confusion And if there haue bene any good in this broile it hath bene in the silence and sorrow of good and learned men of whom aswell the misliking sheweth that there is somewhat in both parts that might be amended and prayer and earnest desire may percase somewhat obtaine at Gods hand that contention taken away the agreement of minds may againe ioyne in one But this booke which is made touching this question whose soeuer it bee sure it seemeth to be the worke of a good learned and modest man and one that hath bene long much and well exercised in the Monuments of our Fathers and Elders Neither doeth it moue mee that he would not be named for because there is no bitter word in this disputation and he doth reason of the matter learnedly well and truely neither doth seeme willing to craue thankes at mens hands nor to haue taken this Treatie in hand either for desire of praise or greedines of Honour but to be mooued thereunto by the common sorrow and hurt to make an entry to that thing the which many men greatly desiring the peace of Christs Church haue wished with earnest and continuall prayers namely the remembrance of the Christian peace and the forgetting of deuilish debate Bucer whom I with honour speake of and for remembrance sake had found and made a way to this concord and there was great agreement of minds betweene him and Luther and hee pacified the Churches of the Heluetians and while hee liued there was peace and quietnesse but when they were both dead beholde againe bitter bookes on both sides And surely they be to be pardoned which write vnwillingly but those which without cause haue renued this wound if there be any such these surely seeme to me little to feare what men iudge of them or to esteeme the peace which Christ gaue and left vnto vs. But I returne to this Booke which pleaseth me best aboue other in this kinde of argument not that I will altogether allow it to the Congregation but because it seemeth to come neerest to the taking away of this contention For which cause he that cannot inuent a better if he be not content with this and cannot defend his owne let him take heed that hee doe not that for mans sake which he ought to leaue vndone for Christes cause namely that he nourish not contention which is the greatest enemie the Church can haue I see nothing concluded in this disputation that either is repugnant from the nature of our Religion or not honourably ynough spoken of this so great singuler mysterie both which things if both the parts had retained or followed we should haue had quietnesse long ere this I blame neither part I beare good will to both I loue both And if that were done in writing that is done and that of many with good conscience in the leading of our life and retaining and esteeming the friends on both sides men should both haue written and disputed of this question on both sides with lesse offence and bitternesse But now wee write in such sort as though wee did defend the persons and not the cause and apply the trueth of the cause not to the ordinance of Christ but to the interpretation of men Iesus Christ restore to vs his peace which he gaue and left vnto vs when hee departed hence which we
haue lost by these our contentions Iesus Christ I say whose Victory Triumph Honour Praise and Glory be for euer and euer Amen ¶ A way of Reconciliation touching the trueth nature and substance of the Body or of the Flesh and Blood of CHRIST in the Sacrament WHat good man doeth not sorrow or what man zealous in Religion doeth not often bewaile the pitifull and vnluckie contention about the LORDS SVPPER which hath now many yeres troubled the Churches of CHRIST which haue imbraced the pure doctrine whereby not onely brotherly Loue is broken but also cities and whole countreys be thereby brought in danger For whereas after the expelling the darkenesse of Ignorance and the happy restoring to the Church the gift of tongues a certaine new Light was restored to the world and the Gospel had begun to take so great roote that thereby hope of very great fruit was offered to ensue By and by this sharpe and vehement contention bursting in among the chiefe champions of the Word hath miserably troubled these very good beginnings For looke what weapons they had valiantly vsed in setting foorth the trueth in ouerthrowing the enemies of the Gospel the very same after this strife was risen did they bend one against another So that the happie course of the Gospel that began to flourish is not only hindered but also by factions discords the matter is come to that passe that vnlesse the mighty Right-hand of the Lord do resist the trueth doeth seeme to appaule and decay againe yea and to returne to the former confusion For if we will iudge the matter truely no force hath so much withstand the inlarging of the Gospel no not the deceits and inchantments of the idole of Rome not the crueltie of Princes against the flocke of CHRIST not the troublesome motions of breeders of Sects as this onely rash contention hath done hurt which bringeth to the minds of godly men sorrow to the enemies cause to reioyce and to the weake and vnlearned offence and falling And surely there is no doubt but that our owne wickednesse hath bene the originall of this so great an euil as it hath bene of many other For wee not regarding or rather contemning the light offered vs are iustly thought vnworthy of so great a benefit Which thing also is the cause that albeit many learned good men vnderstand what profit it should be for the Christian common wealth speedily to pacifie this quarrell and to ende the contentions few notwithstanding doe earnestly traueile about this matter And if any haue attempted it it seemeth to fall out as vnluckily taken in hand to the contrary part For my part when I saw no end could be made of strife nor any hope in any one of better sequele I thought best to commit the matter to GOD by prayer and with silence to looke for helpe in season at his hands Yet in this meane space I thought it my part not to neglect a matter of so great waight but after examination had of the chiefe points of this controuersie to bolt out what was trueth and what not and then to determine vpon a sure grounded opinion both by authoritie of holy Scripture and by the vndoubted testimonies of the Fathers aswell to satisfie my selfe as to yeeld a reason thereof to any that should perhaps demand it of mee that the minde should not wauer continually to fro tossed as it were with the contrary violence of winds While I take this worke in hand diligently tread the steps of the old Interpreters me thinketh I perceiue vnlesse my opinion deceiue me that this controuersie is not so intangled nor darke as most men suppose and that these sharp cōtentions haue come rather by mens fault then by the nature of the matter and that the way of Reconciliation shall not bee so hard with men desirous rather of the trueth then of quarrelling Wherefore albeit I took in hand this worke whatsoeuer it be priuately to my selfe yet because among my friends certaine good men and well giuen were so desirous I did not greatly passe to haue it come to the eares eyes of other that if there be herein any profit it may also do them good The cause I haue thought good so to diuide that briefly it may bee brought to three especial points First wil I shew the trueth of the body of CHRIST in the Sacrament to be giuen to the faithful and that these termes Nature and Substance are not to be shunned but that they of old time disputing of the Sacrament vsed them Then will I declare the difference betweene the Lords proper body and that which is in the Sacrament and that the olde Fathers were of that opinion And lastly I will set foorth at large what maner of Body that is which is receiued in the mysterie why it is called by that name after the opinion of the selfe same Fathers Which things once expounded a man may easily iudge of the whole controuersie First it is manifest ynough by the declaration of the Euangelists Matthew Matth. 26. c. Matth. 14. c. Luke 22. c. Marke and Luke that our Lord IESVS CHRIST when he should depart out of this world and leauing the earth should goe vp to the Father did ordeine the Sacrament of his Body and Blood in the presence of his disciples at Supper and so when he had taken the bread he blessed brake it and gaue it to them saying This is my body After the like maner the Cup also saying This Cup is the new Testament in my Blood 1. Corinth 11. Doe this in remembrance of me Paul also writeth to the same effect to the Corinthians in his first Epistle the 11. chapter rehearsing in a maner the very same words Et cap. 10. in the tenth chapter The Cup saith he of blessing which we blesse is it not the partaking of the Blood of Christ The bread which we breake is it not the partaking of the Body of Christ By these words of the Euangelists and the Apostle they of old time were of that opinion that CHRIST our Lord which is Trueth it selfe spake these things truly and did in deed performe those things that he spake so that no place of doubt might any more be left concerning the trueth of the matter Moreouer those words which in the sixt chapter of Iohn Iohn 6. c. the Lord spake My flesh is meat indeed and my blood is drinke indeed c. The bread which I will giue you is my flesh And vnlesse you eate the flesh of the Sonne of man and drinke his Blood c. The Fathers with great accord as well Grecians as Latines doe apply to the Sacrament of Thankesgiuing And that they haue interpreted those places so both in Iohn and the rest of the Euangelists and Paul to the Corinthians the testimonies that follow taken out of the authors themselues Iustin Martir Apol. 2. shal happily proue First Iustin Martyr
who wil thinke those distant from this naturall vnion which be vnited in one CHRIST by the vnion of one CHRISTS bodie For if all we eat one bread we be made all one body And within few wordes after But that this bodily vniting to CHRIST is attained by the partaking of his flesh Paul himselfe againe doeth witnesse disputing of the mysterie of godlinesse the which saith he hath not bene knowen to the sonnes of men in other generations as it hath bene reueiled now to his holy Apostles and Prophets in the Spirit that the Gentiles be coheires and ioyned in body and equall partakers of the promise in Christ The same man to Calosyrius Idem ad Calosyrium For that wee should not be afraide of the flesh and blood set vpon the holy Altars God submitting himselfe to our frailtie putteth a force of life into those things that bee offered turning them into the trueth of his owne flesh that the body of life as it were a certaine quickning seed may bee found in vs whereupon he addeth Doe this in a remembrance of me Hitherto Cyrillus Cyprianus de coena Domini Cyprian of the Supper of the Lord This bread not in outward apparence but in nature changed by the mightie power of the Word is made flesh which the Lord did reach to his disciples And in the same place Who euen to this day createth and sanctifieth blesseth and diuideth to those that take it godly this his most true and holy bodie Hieron in Matth. de consecrat dist 2. Hierom vpon Matthew De consecrat dist 2. He tooke bread which is the comforter of man and passed to the true Sacrament of Passeouer That as Melchisedec for a figure therof before had done when he offered bread and wine he should represent it in the trueth of his bodie and blood Chrysost in Io. Hom. 45. Chrysostom vpon Iohn Hom. 45. But that not onely by loue but euen in very deed wee should be turned into that flesh he worketh the same by the meate which hee hath giuen vs. For when he ment to bring his loue vpon vs he ioyned himselfe to vs by his body and made himselfe one with vs that the body might be knit with the head The same man Homil. 61. Idem Hom. 61. Therefore that we should be this not only by charitie but in very deed should bee mingled with that flesh this is brought to passe by the meat which hee hath giuen vs. Chrysostom hath also many other sayings to the same meaning Those things that S. Ambrose writeth in his 6. Ambros lib. 6. de sacra cap. 1. booke the first chapter of the Sacraments do agree with these Euen as our Lord IESVS CHRIST is the true Sonne of God not as men be by grace but as a Sonne of the substance of the Father so is that which wee take the very flesh of CHRIST and they drinke his very blood as he himselfe said And a little after Then when his disciples could not away with the talke of CHRIST but hearing that he would giue them his flesh to eate and his blood to drinke they went away But Peter alone said Thou hast the words of eternall life and whither should I goe from thee Lest therefore any moe should say this as though there should be a kinde of lothsomnesse of blood but that the grace of redemption might remaine therefore receiuest thou the Sacrament in a similitude but thou obteinest the grace and vertue of the true nature The same man in his 4. booke the 4. Idem lib. 4. cap. 4. cap. Thou seest therefore how effectuall in operation the word of CHRIST is If then there be so great efficacie in the word of our Lord IESVS CHRIST that that should begin to bee which was not How much more is it of effect to make those things to be that were before and to be changed into another thing And so that which was bread before the consecration the same is become the body of CHRIST after the consecration because the word of CHRIST doeth change the creature And so of bread is made the body of CHRIST and the wine mixed with water in the cup is made blood by the consecration of the heauenly word But perhaps thou wilt say I see not the forme of blood But it hath a likenesse For euen as thou hast taken the likenes of his death so also doest thou drinke the similitude of his blood that there should be no abhorring of blood and yet the price of our redemption wrought Also before the wordes of CHRIST the cup is full of wine water after the words of CHRIST haue wrought there is the blood made which hath redeemed the people Therefore marke how the word of CHRIST is able to make alteration in all things Beside CHRIST himselfe doeth testifie that wee doe receiue his bodie and blood of whose fulnesse and testimonie we ought not to doubt Likewise peraduenture thou saiest I see another thing How prouest thou that I do receiue the bodie of CHRIST This remaineth yet for vs to proue that this is not it which nature hath fashioned but it that blessing hath hallowed and that there is greater force of the blessing then of nature because nature it selfe is also changed by the blessing Also But if the blessing of man was of such force that it could turne nature What doe we say of the very heauenly consecration whereas the very wordes of the Lord our Sauiour do worke For this Sacramēt which thou receiuest is wrought by the words of CHRIST But if the word of Elias was of such force that it could bring fire from heauen Shall not the word of CHRIST be of power to change the kinds of elements Eusebius Emyssenus de consecrat dist 2. Eusebius Emyssenus likewise who was in yeeres before Ambrose doth witnes in these wordes the opinion which was then had of the Sacrament and it is had De consecrat dist 2. Whereupon the heauenly authoritie confirmeth That my flesh is verily meat and my blood is verily drinke Let therefore all doubt of misbeliefe be laid aside because hee that is author of the gift is likewise witnesse of the trueth For the inuisible priest doeth turne with his word by a secret power the visible creatures into the substance of his bodie and blood saying thus Take ye eate ye this is my body and the hallowing being repeated Take ye drinke ye this is my blood Therefore euen as the height of the heauens the depth of waters and largenesse of earth had their being of nothing suddenly at the becke of the Lord that commanded so with the like power in the spirituall Sacraments when power commandeth effect obeieth How great therefore and wonderfull benefits the force of the heauenly blessing doeth worke How it ought not to seeme a new vnpossible matter to thee that earthly and mortal things bee turned into the substance of Christ aske thy selfe that art
borne anew in Christ Hee againe in his oration of the bodie of the Lord Let not man dout but that the chiefe creatures at the becke of power by the presence of Maiestie may be turned into the nature of the Lords bodie Leo Syn. Rom. de consec dist 2. Leo the bishop and the Synode of Rome as is there declared In what darknesse of ignorance in what bodie of slouthfulnes haue they hitherto lyen that they would neither learne by hearing nor know by reading that which is so agreeable in the congregation vvith the confession of all persons that the trueth of the bodie and blood of Christ among the Sacraments of the communion cannot be kept in silence no not of the tongues of Infants because in that mysticall distribution of the spirituall food this is giuen and this is receiued that wee receiuing the strength of this heauenly meat doe become his flesh which was made our flesh Gregor hom Pasch ibidem Gregorie homilia paschali and it is there rehearsed For he is daily eaten and drunke in trueth but yet he remaineth vvhole and one and vnspotted And it is therefore a great mysterie and to be reuerenced with feare because there is one thing to the sight and another to the vnderstanding Euthym. in Matth. cap. 64. Euthymius vpon Matthew cap. 64. Therfore euen as the old Testament had sacrifices and blood so also hath the Nevv namely the bodie and blood of the Lord. For hee said not These be signes of my body but he said These be my body my blood Therfore vvee must not take heed to the nature of those things that bee set before vs but to the vertue of them For euen as aboue nature hee did deifie the flesh that vvas taken of the Virgine if it bee lavvfull to vse this phrase so also doeth hee vnspeakeably change these things into his very liuely bodie and into his very precious blood and into the grace of them Theophil in Matth. cap. 26. Theophilactus vpon Matt. 26. In saying This is my body hee declareth that the bread vvhich is sanctified vpon the Altar is the very body of the Lord and not a figure ansvvering vnto it for he said not This is a figure but This is my body The bread is transformed by an vnspeakable working into the body of Christ albeit it seemes bread to vs that bee weake and abhorre to eate raw flesh especially the flesh of man For that cause truly bread appeareth but it is flesh The same man vpon Marke cap. 14. Idem in Marc. cap. 14. When he had blessed it that is vvhen he had giuen thanks he brake the bread which thing also we do adding thereto prayers This is my body this I say which you take For the bread is not a figure and example onely of the Lords body but it is turned into the very bodie of Christ Damascenus doth also vvrite almost the very same things lib. 4. cap. 14. Damas de fide Orth. lib. 4. cap. 14. The bread and vvine is not a figure of the body and blood of Christ to the right faith for God forbid wee should beleeue so but it is the very deified bodie of the Lord by his owne saying This is my body not a figure of my bodie but my bodie This is my blood not a figure of my blood Many other places also may be brought forth here taken out of the Fathers vvhich agree with the rehearsed by al the vvhich vve may easily perceiue what vvas the opinion of them al asmuch as apperteineth to this part of our diuision namely that the Sacrament of Thankesgiuing is not only a figure of the Lords body but also comprehendeth in it the trueth nature substance of the same For it cannot be a doubt to any man that will read their writings that they oftentimes vsed these termes Truly Naturally Substantially the coniugates of them And although our faith dependeth not vpon men but vpon the word of God yet since they defend their opinion with the authoritie of the Scripture it is very profitable for godly minds desirous of the trueth to cōsider how so many notable men both for godlinesse and learning haue vnderstood the words of the Scripture and with great agreement left their interpretations to their succession neither shall he auoid the blame of rashnesse whosoeuer he be that dare despise so great authoritie Now let vs take in hand our second part Whether they of ancient time haue thought that there is any difference between the body of our Lord which is distributed in the Sacrament and that which was taken of the Virgin mother vvhich ascended into heauen and from thence shall come at his time to Iudgement That is whether the body of Christ bee in the Sacrament of Thankesgiuing according to the proper signification of a mans body or otherwise differing somewhat from a proper body When I speake of a proper body I meane a body properly vnderstand which shall suffice to haue once admonished Then vvhether these termes Trueth Nature Substance ought to be vnderstand after the common sort in this matter or after a more peculiar maner and more fit for the Sacraments Finally whether there be any aequiuocation in these termes or no. For there is not onely heed to bee taken with vvhat words the fathers haue spoken in old time but also what they ment when they so spake And that is not to be proued by our ovvne or other mens inuentions or light coniectures but by the assured testimonies of the Fathers themselues But that wee may haue the easier entrie to this matter wee must perceiue that the body of Christ is called not after one maner vvise in the Scriptures but sundry vvaies First as that bodie as vvas taken vpon him and borne of the Virgin vvhich also rose againe and ascended into heauen of the vvhich this vvas spoken Mee truely shall ye not haue alway And this I leaue the world and go to my Father And this Feele and behold for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as you see me haue Secondarily as the Church is called the body of Christ according to this saying You are Christs body And this And he gaue him to be a head ouer all things to the Church which is his body Thirdly as the Sacrament of the body of Christ is called the body of Christ wherof Christ himselfe said This is my body And Paul The bread which we breake is it not the partaking of the body of Christ And this Making no difference of the Lords bodie Which places be vnderstood of the Sacrament of his body vvhereby it commeth to passe that the bodie of Christ is called properly and vnproperly Properly that bodie taken of the Virgin Vnproperly the Sacrament and the Church That the Church is not properly the bodie of Christ no man doubteth It remaineth that vvee prooue the same of the Sacrament This is especially to bee marked
of thy heart and especially receiue it whole Christ with the thirstie draught of the inward man Eusebius declareth by this similitude what maner of change is made in the sacrament how earthly things be turned into the substance of Christ and what maner of substance that is without doubt like vnto that change wherewith wee be altered in our Baptisme and such a substance as wee put on in the bath of Regeneration when we be borne the children of God and made a new creature and new men when we passe into the body of the Church where in our outward part nothing is changed but all inwardly and for that cause calleth he it spirituall food which we behold in faith touch with minde take with the hand of our heart and receiue with the thirstie draught of the inward man Ambros in Epist ad Hebr. de consecrat dist 2. With this agreeth that that Ambrose writeth vpon the Epistle to the Hebrewes and is repeated De consecrat dist 2. In Christ was once a mighty sacrifice offered for an euerlasting Redemption vvhat doe vve then doe vve not dayly offer him yes but in remembrance of his death and it is but one sacrifice not many for Christ vvas once offered and this sacrifice is a paterne of that Ambrose saith plainely that that true sacrifice vvas once offered but this sacrifice is offered euery day and hee declareth in vvhat sort it is one sacrifice and not one vvhen he saith that this is a paterne of that The same man in his booke of Mysteries saith Idem in lib. de Myst. In that sacrament is Christ because it is the body of Christ it is not then a corporall but a spirituall food vvhereupon the Apostle also saith of the figure of it That our fathers did eate the same spirituall food for the body of God is a spiritual body the body of Christ is the body of the diuine spirit These things cannot be said of Christes true and proper body namely that it is a spirit for a spirit hath not flesh and blood vvhich that body hath as the Lord himselfe did vvitnesse before his disciples Feele yee and see you saith he for a spirit hath not flesh and bones as you see me haue Idem de Sacr. lib. 4. Wherefore the same auctour De sacramentis lib. 4. saith thus Thou seest therefore hovv mighty in operation the vvord of Christ is If then there be so great force in the vvord of the Lord Iesu that those things should begin to be which were not hovv much more is it of force to make those things remaine which were and yet to change them into another thing The heauen was not the sea was not the earth was not But hearken to him that saith He spake the word and they were made he commanded and they were created Therefore that I may ansvvere thee it was not the body of Christ before the consecration but after the consecration I tell thee it is now the body of Christ He spake the word and it was made he commanded and it was created Thou wast thy self but thou wast an old creature after thou wast consecrated thou didst beginne to be a new creature Wilt thou know how new a creature Euery one is saith he a new creature in Christ Ambrose taketh his argument à maiore By the word of God new things are made then is it no marueile if things which now be and remaine are changed into another thing by his word vvhich thing is done in Sacraments Examples of the first are Heauen the Sea the Earth of the later man which before he be regenerate is an old creature but after regeneration by force of the word albeit he be the very same he vvas before namely a man still yet he receiueth an invvard change and of an old is made a new creature Like vnto this he affirmeth the change in the sacrament to bee when as both bread remaineth and yet getteth to it selfe a nevv substance that is to say a new dignitie That same thing doth hee yet more fully expound in his sixt booke writing thus Idem de sacrament lib. 6. Peraduenture thou mayest say How is it very flesh for I see a similitude I see not the trueth of blood in deed First of all I told thee of the vvord of Christ that it worketh as of force to change and alter the appointed kindes of nature Moreouer when the disciples of Christ could not away with his talke but hearing that hee vvould giue them his flesh to eate and his blood to drinke went their way yet Peter alone said Thou hast the words of eternall life whither shall I goe from thee Least therefore any moe should so say but the grace of Redemption should remaine Therefore thou takest the sacrament in a similitude but thou doest attaine the grace and vertue of the true nature At the last he addeth to make vp the matter And thou which receiuest bread art made partaker in that spirituall food of the diuine substance We learne by the authoritie of this so great a man that that which we take in the sacrament is a spiritual not a corporall food neither that that flesh is to be taken after the maner of his proper flesh as the Capernaits did and vvith offence went backe but together with the outvvard signe we obtaine the grace and vertue of the true nature and receiuing the bread are partakers of his diuine substance And here also we see that Ambrose was of the same opinion that Emissenus was and far otherwise vnderstandeth both the alteration which is made in the sacraments and also the very terme of substance then it is either taken in proper speach or as Philosophers do naturally speake Idem de offic lib. 4. cap. 48. To the same purpose serueth also that which he writeth in his booke De officijs lib. 4. cap. 48. Here is the shadovv here is the image there is the trueth the shadow in the Lavv the image in the Gospel but the trueth in heauen In time past the Lambe was offered the calfe vvas offered Novv is Christ offered but he is offered as man as taking his Passion but hee as a Priest doeth offer himselfe here as in an image but there in trueth where hee maketh intercession for vs as an aduocate vvith his Father Hee putteth a difference in the one oblation from the other And albeit both after their maner be done in deed yet this vvhich is solemnized in the Church is done in an Image but the trueth it selfe remaineth as an Aduocate for vs vvith the Father And this place of Ambrose doeth seeme to be like to that place of Origen vpon the 38. Origen in Psal 38. Psalme vvhere he intreateth of that saying of Paul For the Law hauing a shadow of those good things to come hath not the very Image of the things c. And thus he vvriteth But if any man can passe from this shadovv let him
my flesh And againe Vnlesse ye eate the flesh of the Sonne of man c. And how saith he is not the flesh seene O man this is done for our infirmitie For since the bread and wine bee of those things which we be acquainted withall we abhorre them not but if wee should see blood and flesh set before vs we could not abide it but should vtterly abhorre it Therefore God of his mercie fauouring our frailtie retaineth still the forme of bread and wine but he altereth the element into the power of flesh and blood By all these places it is most certaine that Theophylactus followed the steps of the ancient fathers set aside all carnall imaginations in this Sacrament called vs to such as be hie and spirituall that it is not only a figure of the Lords bodie but rather is verely his body yet they that be partakers are not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to say flesh eaters And he addeth the cause for that we vnderstand it not carnally but spiritually that is to say that they remaine the formes of bread and wine but yet do passe into the power of the Lords flesh and blood and as he tearmed it be transelemented in which tearme there is no cause why we should faine to our selfe any Popish Transubstantiation as they cal it Idem in Ioan. cap. 6. For writing vpon the 6. Chapter of Iohn he vseth the same terme saying thus Therfore euen as I saith he liue for the Father that is as I am borne of the Father which is life euen so also he that eateth me liueth by the meanes of me while he is after a sort mixed with me and is transelemented into me that can quicken By this terme of transelementatiō he meant to signifie nothing els but the same change that is fit for the Sacraments wherof Ambrose Emissenus and others make mention as before we haue repeated for otherwayes wee cannot be transelemented into Christ And no maruell that Theophylactus so tearmed it since Chrysostom himselfe vpon the sixt chap. of Iohn homilia 45. vseth these wordes Chrysost in Ioan. cap. 6. homil 45. But that we should not onely by loue but also in very deed bee turned into that flesh hee hath wrought it by the meate which hee hath giuen vs. Behold Chrysostome saith we are turned into the flesh of Christ really as I may so terme it But yet who seeth not that turning to be spirituall not carnal Euen so is bread turned in very deede and transelemented into Christes flesh but by a spiritual and no carnall turning because the bread doeth get to it the power of the flesh And these things which haue bene thus cited out of Theophylactus albeit he be not so ancient an authour yet because hee is chiefly alleaged of such as followe the carnall sence in the sacrament of thankesgiuing though hee doth very manifestly expound himselfe and teacheth nothing repugnant to holy Scriptures and writings of old Authors I meant to shew the true opinion of so learned a man and not to discredit his authoritie as a late writer Damascenus is yet vnspoken of whom the aduersaries vse as it were a chief champion but in case they would not snatchingly picke out such sentences as serue the humor of their affections but marke well the through drift of his writing he helpeth not so much their cause as he doth ouerthrow it Albeit that I may frankely admonish the reader and vtter mine opinion he is but a very slippery and an vncertain author in expounding of this mysterie and none I dare say among the olde writers shall be found that hath reasoned of this matter so obscurely and doubtfully Truely I gather by him that vvhen hee had determined to write a breuiat of the true faith hee vvould neither leaue this sacrament vnspoken of nor yet vvist how to intreate of it plainely enough The vvhich of his ovvne vvords the indifferent reader shall easily iudge Damas De fide Orthod lib. 4. cap. 14. He vvriteth De fide orthod lib. 4. cap. 14. of Christ in this vvise It behooued not onely that the first fruits of our nature should come into the partaking of a better but that all persons as many as would should both be borne by a second natiuitie and nourished with a nevv meat meet for that natiuity and so preuent the measure of perfection And a litle after And because he is a spirituall Adam it behoued the natiuitie also to be spirituall and likewise the meate For since vvee haue a double and compound nature it is fitte that the natiuitie bee also double and the food likevvise compound The natiuitie therefore is giuen vs by vvater and spirit I meane by holy Baptisme but the meate is our Lord himselfe Iesus Christ vvhich came dovvne from heauen Then after alleaging the vvordes of the Lords Supper and proofes of vvhat force the vvord is he addeth Euen as all things vvhatsoeuer God had made he hath made them by the vvorking of the holy Ghost so novv also the same force of the holy Ghost bringeth to passe those things that be aboue nature the vvhich no thing can comprehend but onely faith And a little after But bread and vvine bee taken For God knovveth mans vveakenes For commonly those things vvhich it is not acquainted vvith it shunneth vvith loathsomnesse Therfore he humbled himselfe after his wonted maner and bringeth to passe by the accustomed things of nature such things as bee aboue nature And euen as in Baptisme because it is the maner of men to bee washed vvith vvater and anointed vvith oyle he coupled vvith oile and vvater the grace of the holy Ghost and made it to be the vvashing of regeneration After the same sort because men are vvont to eate bread and drinke vvine and vvater he coupled therevvithall his Diuinitie and made them his body and blood that by matters vsuall and agreeable to nature we may be caried to those things which passe nature Hitherto hee seemed to agree with the rest for such as the second natiuitie is such saith he is the meate He termeth the natiuitie spirituall likewise also the meat The natiuitie to be double through water and the holy Ghost the meat also double but how it is double hee alleageth not forthwith as hee did in the natiuity but the meate saith he is the very bread of life which came downe from heauen yet after a few wordes he declareth howe it is done saying As the water is coupled with the grace of the holy Ghost and is made the washing of regeneration so is the diuinitie coupled with the bread and is made the body blood of the Lord. And this hee affirmeth to be the working of the holy Ghost and that the bread and wine be taken for mans infirmitie and by matters vsual to nature those things bee wrought that passe nature which onely faith can comprehend None of these things be contrary to the opinion of the
other Fathers but those things that follow be not so It is verely his body saith he that is knit with the diuinitie that body taken of the holy Virgin This before him no man had said If his meaning be of the proper body the authoritie of the Fathers that were before him cryeth out against him which plainely affirme that body to be taken from the earth caried aboue the starres and not to be here who also with manifest difference doe separate that body from the sacrament of the bodie vnlesse peraduenture we may so interprete it as that saying of Augustine The same body and not the same body the same by grace and power and not the same according to the proper maner of a body the which it may seeme that this Authors meaning was when he writ this For by and by there followeth Not that the body that was taken of the Virgin should come down from heauen but that the very bread and wine is chaunged into the body and blood of the Lord. By which woords hee himselfe testifieth that this body which is receiued in the Sacrament is to bee vnderstood one way and that body which was taken which hee denieth to come downe from heauen another way For if it abide in heauen without comming downe hither and if bread be made of the very same body that was taken sure the bread must be in heauen and the faithfull shall here receiue neither the bread nor yet the body which thing no man in his right wits can affirme But if wee leaue the body that was taken in his place in heauen as our faith doth require and say notwithstanding that the same is present in the sacrament by grace and power as the rest of the Fathers do pronounce and therefore this bread may be called and beleeued for the naturall propertie of a body that is coupled with it to be the body of Christ not properly as that body that he tooke vpon him but after a spirituall sort as the sacrament of that body the matter is not intricate but plainely opened neither shall there bee any neede to frame crooked mazes that be cleane contrary to our faith or to knit vaine ropes of sand or to shun the similitudes that the former Fathers vsed and to inuent other similitudes grosse and strange from mysteries as Damascenus doth in this place For euen as saith hee the bread in eating and the wine and water in drinking are naturally turned into the body and blood of him that eateth and drinketh them and be made another body then that they had before so the Shewe bread and the wine and water by inuocation and comming of the holy Ghost bee changed aboue the law of nature into the body and blood of Christ and be not two but one and the same What other thing doeth hee by this similitude but open a way to 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is the eating of mans flesh which thing Cyrillus Theophylactus and other Fathers do detest How much better haue Cyprian Ambrose Epiphanius Emissenus and other said which affirme a like change in the sacrament of thankesgiuing as that which is made in Baptisme whereby it commeth to passe that the signes do remaine the same and by grace they get to themselues a new substance in like maner as one selfe man being not yet regenerate doeth belong to the olde Adam and after regeneration becommeth a new man and a new creature not by a fleshly meane which agreeth not to sacraments but after a spirituall sort But Damascenus forgetting himselfe who had before affirmed this meate to be spirituall as the regeneration in Baptisme now teacheth it to be carnall if this bread must passe into the body of Christ as common bread doth into the bodies of those that eate it vvhereby it happeneth that he falleth also into another errour for he denieth this bread and wine to bee a figure This bread and wine saith he is not a figure of the body and blood of Christ God forbid but the very deified body of the Lord. And no marueile it is that he denieth this if he be in opinion that this bread is so changed as common bread is into the body of the feeder But all they of old time throughout be repugnant and surely hee iarreth with himselfe for after those wordes cited out of the sixt Chapter of Iohn Vnlesse yee eate the flesh of the Sonne of man c. And My flesh verely c. by and by he bringeth another similitude of a coale farre diuerse from the former A coale saith he is not simple wood but coupled with fire so the bread of communion is not simple bread but coupled with the diuinitie How diuers is the maner of these two similitudes before he said that the Shewbread was turned into the body of Christ beyond nature as the common bread is naturally changed into the body of him that eateth it but that is not done vvhile there remaineth bread here he saith that the bread of communion is not simple bread but bread coupled with the diuinitie The bread therefore remaineth to what is it coupled to the diuinitie Where is then that grosse transmutation Againe a litle after This is that pure sacrifice without blood which God hath commanded by the Prophet should be offered to himselfe from the rising of the Sunne to the going dovvne of the same If hee speake of the body that hee tooke vpon him how is it without blood if hee speake of his spirituall body and blood he saith trueth Againe he saith This body is not consumed it is not corrupted nor cast into the draught If his meaning be of his spirituall and better substance of the sacrament vvee confesse it if of the outward signe Origen farre better learned then Damascenus saith As touching to that material part that it hath it goeth into the belly and is cast into the draught Damascenus goeth yet further and saith The bread is the first fruites of the bread to come which is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but epiousios doth signifie either the bread to come that is of the world to come or els that which is taken for the consecration of our substance But vvhether it be this way or that way it is aptly called the body of Christ For the Lords flesh is a spirit giuing life because it was conceiued of a quickening spirit For that which is borne of spirit is spirit But this I speake not to take away the nature of a body but willing to shew his quickening and diuinitie How changeable is this speach sometime one and the selfe bread is one and selfe body another time it is the first fruits of the bread to come otherwhile flesh at another time spirit At last about the end he saith For albeit some named the bread and wine patternes of Christs body and blood as that holy man Basill yet after the sanctifying they called it not so but before the
that earthly and mortall things bee changed into the substance of Christ aske thy selfe that art nevv borne againe in Christ Lately thou wast farre from life a stranger from mercy and being invvardly dead banished from the way of health and suddenly professing the Lawes of Christ and by vvholsome mysteries renued diddest passe into the body of the Church not by sight but by beleefe and of the childe of perdition wast thought worthy by a secret purenesse to be made sonne of God by adoption abiding stil in thy visible measure and inuisibly made greater then thy selfe without increase of quantitie For although thou wast the very selfe-same man before yet by augmentation of Faith thou art become farre another in the outvvard man nothing is added and all is changed in the invvard man and so man was made the Sonne of Christ and Christ was formed in the minde of man Euen as therefore the former basenesse set apart thou hast suddenly put on a nevv dignitie and as in that God hath healed those things that were amisse in thee put avvay thy imperfections vviped avvay thy spots thy eyes are not trusted withall but thy senses so when thou goest vp to the reuerend Altar to bee fed with the spirituall meat behold in thy faith the holy Body and Blood of thy God honour it marueile at it touch it vvith thy minde take it in the hand of thy heart and especially receiue it whole vvith the thirstie draught of the invvard man Eusebius Emissenus declareth by this similitude what maner of change is made in the sacrament how earthly things namely bread and wine be turned into the substance of Christ and what maner of substance that is surely like vnto that change wherewith wee be changed in Baptisme and such a substance as we put on in the washing of regeneration when we passe into the body of the Church where nothing is changed in our outward part but all in our inward man which is called a new man and a new creature and for that cause doeth Emissenus terme this substance A secret purenesse and new dignitie In like maner also he calleth the bread of the Lord which hath gotten a nevv substance that is to say a secret power and nevv dignitie Spirituall food which we behold with faith touch in minde take in the handes of our heart and receiue with the thirstie draught of our inward man If it be well and diligently weighed how Emissenus Ambrose and the other fathers haue vsed the termes of Nature and Substance it may easily be vnderstood how vainely they trouble themselues which appoint a carnall eating of the flesh and doe not apply the wordes to the matter intreated of For that which we see done in other disciplines that the words do change their significations according to the matter that euery kinde of learning treateth of as Genus Species Figura and other such like do signifie one thing with the Grammarians another with the Logitians and another thing with other writers the same also ought we to obserue in diuinitie when they intreat of the Sacraments The fathers make mention of Nature and Substance not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is not as naturall Philosophers speake but men disputing of diuine matters do apply the terme of Nature and Substance to grace vertue and efficacie forasmuch as the nature of the Sacrament so requireth The like maner of speaking doeth Chrysostome vse when he saith But that not onely by loue Chrysostome but euen in very deed we should be turned into that flesh that is wrought by the meat which he hath giuen vs. We be turned in very deed into the flesh of Christ but that conuersion is spirituall not carnall And thus much by the way of the signification of the words Epiphan in Ancho Epiphanius in Anchorato For we see that our Sauiour tooke into his handes as the Gospel containeth that hee rose in the Supper and tooke this and when he had giuen thankes he said This is mine c. And we see that it is not equall nor like neither to the image that is in the flesh nor to his inuisible Godhead nor to the features of his members For this is of a round shape and without sense as farre as pertaineth to power and therefore his will was to speake by grace This is mine c. and euery man beleeueth his word for he that doth not beleeue that he is true as he said he is fallen from grace and health But we beleeue that we haue heard that it is his for wee know that the Lord is all sense all indued with sense all God all mouing all working al light all incomprehensible but yet as one which hath giuen vs this with grace We admonished you before that Epiphanius doth in this place goe about to proue that man being made after the Image of God hath verily the Image of God not according to the proper nature of diuinitie but after grace and vseth the similitude taken of the sacrament of Thankesgiuing the which according to the proper maner of a body he denieth to be the body of Christ since it hath neither the forme of a true body neither can feele or moue and yet is beleeued by grace to be verily his body Idem lib. 3. cont Haer. To. 2. He is of the same opinion Lib. 3. against Haeresies To. 2. where he speaketh thus of the sacraments Christ went downe into the waters rather giuing then receiuing rather offering then needing giuing them light making them mighty for a figure of those things that were to be wrought in them whereby they that beleeue on him in trueth and haue the faith of trueth might learne that he was verily made man and was verily Baptized and that so by his ascension they also might come and receiue the vertue of his comming downe and might be made lightsome by his giuing light that the saying of the Prophet may here bee fulfilled in the change of power that was giuen for saluation the vertue I meane of the bread that was receiued from Ierusalem and of the strength of the water so that here the vertue of the bread and strength of the water may be made of force in Christ that the bread should not be the strength in vs but the vertue of that bread And the meat surely is bread but the vertue in it is it that quickneth And not that water alone should cleanse vs but that in the strength of water by faith and efficacie and hope and perfection of mysteries and calling vpon the sanctification might be wrought for vs the perfection of saluation This place doeth make the other somewhat more plaine There he said that the bread of the sacrament of Thankesgiuing is the body by grace here he attributeth vertue to the bread as strength to the water in Baptisme often repeating this terme Vertue and confirming that this vertue and strength doth sanctifie The
meat saith he is bread but the vertue in it doth quicken and he declareth that this vertue of the bread doth sanctifie and strength of the water is made by grace not naming it with one word but describing it more fully with many wordes saying That these things be done by faith and hope and the perfection of the mysteries Idem in Anacephaleosi and calling vpon of the sanctification for the perfection of saluation The same Author rehearseth almost the same words in Anacephaleosis Cyprian de Coena Dom. The same was also Cyprians opinion There is giuen saith he an immortall food differing from common meats retaining the shape of bodily substance but prouing by inuisible working that the presence of a diuine povver is there Thou hearest the presence of a diuine povver thou hearest an inuisible working that is to say the grace of God Againe By the wonted effect of things the weakenesse of our faith being aided is taught by a sensible argument that the effect of eternal life is in the visible sacraments And againe Euen as in the person of Christ humanitie was seene and diuinitie hid so into the visible sacraments vnspeakeably doth the diuine substance powre it selfe Againe These words be spirit and life neither doth the carnall sense pearce the vnderstanding of so great a depth vnlesse faith be added The bread is food the blood is life the flesh substance the body the Church A body for the agreeing of members in one bread for the conformitie of nourishment blood for the working of quickning flesh for the propertie of the humanitie taken In this place Cyprian witnesseth that this sacrament is called flesh and blood for the working of the quickning and for the propertie of the humanitie which Christ tooke that is the proper vertue thereof namely spirit and life And foorthvvith he addeth Christ doth othervvhile call this sacrament his body otherwhile flesh and blood othervvhile bread with the corporal nature whereof according to these visible things he hath communicate the portion of euerlasting life And againe The sacraments as much as in them is cannot be without their proper vertue neither by any meanes doeth the diuine Maiestie absent it selfe from the mysteries These termes which Cyprian commonly vseth The diuine povver The working of quickning The effect of eternall life The portion of life The diuine substance The diuine Maiestie what other thing doe they set out to vs then that which Augustine said that according to his Maiestie according to his vnspeakeable and inuisible grace Christ is with vs euen vnto the end of the world especially since that he shutteth out the carnall sense and requireth a spirituall as we haue in another place more fully expounded Neither thought Cyrillus any othervvise writing in this sort to Calosyrius Cyril ad Calos For that we should not abhorre flesh and blood being set vpon the holy Altars God fauouring our frailtie putteth a force of life into those things that be offered turning them into the trueth of his proper flesh that a body of life as it were a certaine quickning seed may be found in vs. That trueth of body which Cyprian calleth The working of quickning The effect of eternall life The portion of life the same doth Cyrillus terme the force of life a body of life a quickening seed meaning the spiritual power grace as he expoundeth himselfe vpon Iohn lib 4 ca. 17. Idem in Ioan. lib. 4. cap. 17. saying thus Euen as a little leauen as Paul saith doth sowre the whole lumpe so a little blessing of God doth draw the whole man into himselfe and doth fill him with his grace and in this sort doeth Christ abide in vs and we in Christ By this meanes he reiecteth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to say the eating of mans flesh and withdraweth the minds of the faithfull from vntrue meanings worldly thoughts and affirmeth to Euoptius Idem ad Euopt that this mysterie is receiued in an onely pure and exquisite faith as we haue mentioned before For it is necessary that such an eating be spirituall and made by grace Athanasius was of this opinion Athanas de Pecca in Spiri Sanct. In his booke of the sinne against the holy Ghost he writeth in this sort For this cause made hee mention of the Ascension of the Sonne of man into Heauen that hee might withdraw them from a corporall imagination that they might afterward learne that the heauenly meate that commeth from aboue and the spirituall food which he giueth is called the flesh of Christ For the wordes that I haue spoken to you saith he be Spirit and life Which is asmuch as if he should say The body which is shewed and slaine shal be giuen for the food of the world that it may be spiritually distributed in euery one and bee made a preseruation for all to the resurrection of eternall life For this cause sayeth Athanasius mention was made of the Ascension of the Sonne of man that he might call vs away from corporall imagining of his presence and might aftervvard learne that the grace or spirituall povver which he termeth the heauenly meat comming from aboue and spirituall food and affirmeth that it is spiritually distributed is called the flesh of Christ To these agreeth Chrysostome vpon Matthew cap. 26. Chrysost in Matth. cap. 26. Homil. 83. Hom. 83. Will ye not see saith he with what a chearefulnesse of minde Infants doe snatch the breast with what appressing do they fasten their lips to the nipples Let vs with no lesse desire come also to this Table and spirituall nipple of this cup yea rather with a greater coueting let vs like sucking babes sucke the grace of the Spirit Idem ibidem Let vs haue one griefe and heauinesse of heart if we be depriued of this spirituall food The same man in the same Homily saith That it is an insensible thing which is giuen vs in this sacrament but by things sensible euen as in Baptisme These be the words Since therefore he saith This is my body let vs haue no doubt but beleeue and behold it with our vnderstanding For no sensible thing is deliuered vs from Christ but by sensible things and yet all things which he deliuered be insensible So also in Baptisme by water which is a sensible thing that gift is granted but that which is wrought in it namely regeneration and renuing is a certaine intelligible thing For if thou haddest bene without a body hee would haue giuen thee the gifts barely without body but because thy soule is ioyned to a body in sensible things to be vnderstood are giuen thee O hovv many do now a daies say I would I might see his forme and shape I would I might see his garments also his shooes I would I might see Thou doest therefore see him touch him eat him thou desirest but to see his garments but he giueth thee himselfe not only that thou maiest
the which notwithstanding either they meant to signifie some other honour and reuerence meet for holy matters then that which is cōmanded of God when he saith Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God and him onely shalt thou serue So that worshipping may be defined to bee of two sorts the one wherewith we worship God himselfe The other wherewith we worship the prescribed signes diuine mysteries according to that saying Worship yee his footstoole which thing most men vnderstand to be spoken of the arke of couenant other interpret it to be of the humanitie of Christ Or admit that there is one manner of worshipping in both places wee might say that the flesh of Christ is to be worshipped though it bee a creature for the diuinitie ioyned therewith that the arke of couenant was to be worshipped for the presence of the diuine maiestie which God himselfe promised should be there present After the which sort also we may worship the sacrament of Thankes-giuing for the vnspeakeable and inuisible grace of Christ ioyned therewith as Augustin saith not honouring that which is seene and passeth away but that which is beleeued and vnderstood This also is worthy to be marked that the worship in old time was not done by the idle lookers on but by them which did receiue the mysteries and were made partakers of their grace For he that worshippeth receiueth to him it is the body of Christ not to him that worshippeth receiueth not For to this intent was that meat ordained that wee worshipping should eate and not that wee should worship it when others eate Thus much bee said concerning the worshipping But in that it is denied that euill men can eate the body of Christ which thing should necessarily be done if the spirituall vertue grace be ioyned with the bread it may be answered That there is a distinction to be vsed For if we haue regard to the very nature of the sacrament the diuine povver can by no meanes be absent from the signe in that it is a sacrament serueth to that vse but if we regard the manners inclination of the receiuer it is not life grace to him vvhich othervvise of the ovvne nature is both because the vvickednesse of euill men cannot be partaker of so great a goodnesse suffereth it not to bring forth fruit but contrariwise to them is it death damnation For euen as diuers kinds of meats bee of their owne nature wholesome but if they be put into diseased bodies they increase the euill and oftentimes shorten their time not through their nature but through the fault of the receiuer so also commeth it to passe in the sacrament vvhose proper vertue is alvvayes present till it hath performed the office thereof although an euil man when he receiueth it cannot be partaker of so great goodnesse nor perceiue any fruit thereof Cyprian de Coena Domini confirmeth the very same Cyprian de Coena Dom. The sacraments truely saith he as much as in them is cannot be without their proper vertue neither by any meanes doth the diuine Maiestie absent it selfe from the mysteries But albeit the sacraments permit themselues to be receiued or touched of vnworthy persons yet for all that they cannot be partakers of the Spirit whose infidelitie or vnworthines doth resist to so great an holinesse And therefore these gifts to some be a sauour of life to life and to some a sauour of death vnto death For it is altogether right that the despisers of grace be depriued of so great a benefit that the puritie of so great grace should haue no dwelling in the vnworthy Augustin against the letters of Petiliane lib. 2. August cont literas Petill. lib. 2. cap. 47. ca. 47. Therefore remember that the maners of ill men do nothing hurt the sacraments of God to make that either they be not sacraments at all or be lesse holy but the hurt is to the ill men themselues that they should haue them for a testimony of damnation and not for a helpe to saluation The same man in his fift booke of Baptisme Contra Donatistas cap. 8. Idem de Bapt. lib. 5. For euen as Iudas to whom the Lord gaue a sop made place for the deuil in himselfe not by receiuing that which was euil but by ill receiuing it So euery man that receiueth vnworthily the sacrament of the Lord maketh it not euill because he is euill or that he receiue nothing because he receiueth it not to his saluation For it was the body of the Lord the blood of the Lord also to them to whom the Apostle said He that eateth vnworthily Idem contra Crescen lib. 1. cap. 25. eateth drinketh his owne iudgement The same man contra Crescen lib. 1. cap. 25. Albeit the Lord himselfe say Vnlesse a man eate my flesh and drinke my blood he shall haue no life in him doth not the same Apostle teach that this becommeth destruction to them that vse it ill For he saith He that eateth the bread and drinketh of the cup of the Lord vnworthily is guilty of the body and blood of the Lord. Behold how diuine and holy mysteries do hurt those that vse them ill Why not Baptisme in like maner By these many other places it is euident that the sacrament of Thankesgiuing asmuch as pertaineth to the nature of the sacrament is verily the body and blood of Christ and is verily a diuine and holy thing albeit it be receiued of the vnvvorthy where notwithstanding they be not made partakers of the grace holines thereof but they draw thereout death and damnation For neither doth so great a goodnes remaine in them or enter into them to the intent to remaine but to condemne them Neither doeth the touching of the Lords body any more profit them then it did the Iewes that crucified Christ to touch his body that was hallowed alwaies indued with his grace Wherefore let this be certaine that the sacraments as long as they be sacraments doe retaine their vertue neither can they be separated from it For they alwayes consist of their parts heauenly and earthly visible and inuisible inward outvvard whether good men or euill worthy or vnvvorthy receiue them And also that change of signes and passage of elements into the invvard substance which wee often find in the old writers can by no meanes stand if we separate the vertue from the signe or would haue the one receiued apart from the other But this is so to be vnderstood as long as the signe serueth to that vse and is applied to that end for the which it was ordained according to Gods word For if we apply it to other vses and abuse it contrary to Christs institution either it is no sacrament at all or else it ceaseth from being a sacrament Therefore they commit no light offence which do not direct the signes of bread and wine to that end which Christ ordained them
for but do consecrat them for a pompe farre off from Gods word and yet notwithstanding doe thrust them to the simple people in stead of sacraments For although they be ministred orderly and according to their lavvfull vse yet when that vse and doing of their proper office doeth cease they retaine no longer neither the name nor vertue of sacraments which thing the old custome of the church doeth proue For when the Communion was ended men did eat their common supper and spent together in the Church those things that remained of the sacraments as Hierom doth witnesse vpon the 1. Cor. cap. 11. Hlerom in 1. Cor. cap. 11. And partly those things that remained vnspent vvere streightway cast in the fire Hesych in Leui. lib. 2. cap. 8. as Hesychius teacheth In Leuit lib. 2. cap. 8. whereof neither was lawfull to be done vnlesse they had ceased to be sacraments Wherefore neither is that doubt of them that receiue it vnvvorthily of any force to subuert this opinion which we haue set forth but that neuerthelesse remaineth safe and vnhurt and worthily to be imbraced of men desirous of trueth and concord First because the dignitie due honour of the sacraments is not hurt but remaineth whole and vnblemished whilest we confesse both the trueth of his body and the nature and substance of the same to be receiued of the faithfull together with outward signes which thing the ancient Fathers do testifie to be done Againe if we receiue that distinction which the same Fathers diligently obserued betvveene that proper assumpt body of the Lord or that he tooke vpon him and this figuratiue body or sacrament of his body there is no offence committed against the rule of our faith which by no meanes is to be wronged since that we attribute to either body their due For we say that his proper and assumpt body is in a place and limitted within the space of a place for the maner of his true body as Augustine saith As the true maner of humane nature requireth and the true beleeuing fathers against Marcion Eutyches and other heretikes do stoutly affirme Which thing they that deny and appoint that body to be euery where doe by that meanes deny the true nature of his body and fall into the errors and heresies of them And yet there is no let but the trueth of his mysticall body because it is a spirituall and diuine matter is as largely spread present as the celebration of the sacrament is spread according to the opinion of the same true beleeuing Fathers Furthermore no absurdities follow this doctrine as very many doe insue both that grosse Transubstantiation also that carnal coupling with the bread namely that mise beasts desperate men doe gnaw chew or swallow that precious body of the Lord which was taken of the Virgine whereas it is lawfull for no man to eat of that body no not for a godly man as Hierom witnesseth Beside this is no doubtfull doctrine nor hard to be perceiued but open and very cleare as farre as the nature of the mysteries do permit And albeit this controuersie doth otherwise seeme to many intricate and like a maze this exposition is easie no darkenes in it no wordes of the Scriptures nor testimony of the Fathers be against it but all they do agree friendly accord Adde hereunto that this maner of handling this matter is old constantly deliuered to vs frō the ancient Fathers not new sprung nor at this time first inuented as the matter it selfe declareth therefore it maketh them more friendly to obtaine the peace and tranquility of the Church since that all men may vnderstand that it is no new opinion made out of our owne heads but the ancient opinion of the true beleeuing Fathers called to memory againe especially since it is of such sort as can iustly offend no part but moue exhort all men to be content There be some that take in ill part that the sacrament of Thankesgiuing is called a signe or figure as though it were a bare signe or vaine figure Here they heare that it is not only a signe but the thing it selfe not onely a figure but also the trueth Not being contented herewith they vrge the Fathers they require the nature of his body in the sacrament Here also they do heare that the presence of his nature is taught and that there is a naturall participation Yet they goe further and command vs to confesse a substance of his body They see also that the substance is by vs affirmed to be present and that our communion with Christ naturally and if I may so say substantially is here set out but yet that these termes ought to bee vnderstood not as Philosophers but as Diuines vse to speake Neither would wee striue so much about that terme of Transubstantiation albeit it be barbarous nothing necessary if so be they would interpret it to be such a change of substance as the ancient Fathers acknowledged that is to say a sacramentall alteration such also as is made in a creature that is regenerat by Baptisme which is made a new man and a new creature and such also as is made when wee be turned into the flesh of Christ which examples the ancient Fathers vsed We do not so much eschew the termes themselues although there is also respect to be had of them but we require the significatiō of them which the Fathers themselues taught and earnestly demaund And onely that 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is to say the deuouring of flesh which by no meanes they allow but condemne as foolish and wicked we reiect as farre off from the Scriptures and farre from the interpretation of the Fathers and finally directly striuing with the true faith and we iudge that a spiritual meaning is necessary in the eating of this flesh follovving therein Christ himselfe the Author and the consent of the best allowed interpreters that we haue Surely it is a marueilous matter to see hovv in other controuersies we be Aristotle men and oftentimes take hold of distinctions more curious then necessary and in this disputation of Sacraments we admit no difference we allow no equiuocation although both the nature of the thing requireth it and the authoritie of the old writers doe as it were point vs to it with a finger and seeing that neither the Scriptures nor the holy Fathers do speake of the diuine mysteries after a naturall sort but after an high and diuine maner as becommeth men that treat of diuine matters and inspired with God comparing spiritual things with spirituall things Againe if there be any man that thinketh that there is here too much attributed to the elements it is not so but their due reuerence is giuen to the outward signes for the holy vse of them But the invvard povver which commeth by the force of the word of God is onely that which the mind of the faithfull doth respect which sanctifieth the body and the minde of him that vseth it But if there be any that require a miracle for some of the Fathers called the sacrament of Thankesgiuing a notable miracle surely it is no lesse to be marueiled at that the bread and wine being earthly creatures and ordeined to feed the body onely doe possesse that force in them and so mighty an efficacie by the vertue of the mystical benediction that they cleanse nourish sanctifie and prepare to immortalitie both minds and bodies so that they make vs members of Christ and one body with him Yea this miracle hath more weight more dignitie greater profit and more agreeable to the maner of the mysteries then any grosse Transubstantiation or naturall and humane flesh-eating can comprehend Wherefore the seeds of contention and discord bee now taken away and there remaineth no cause why but the Churches of Christ especially those that professe the desire of the Gospel may agree in one with quiet minds and coupled affections which now disagree among themselues with bitter hatred These things my brethren I haue thought meet to gather together touching this controuersie full of thornes as it seemed to many surely at the first not with this intent to set it abroad in print but to haue some certaintie whereto I may leane in a matter so full of controuersie and yeeld a reason of my opinion But now that me thinketh I haue taken some fruit of this worke vvhateuer it bee I am not vnwilling if it may bring any profit to others also This I know in my owne conscience that I haue sought for no other thing in this Treatie but godly and modestly to profit my selfe and others I beseech the GOD and Father of our Lord IESVS CHRIST to remooue from the mindes of Pastours Doctours and Ministers of the Church the greatest confusion of the Church 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is desire to striue and rule and dispose their mindes to peace and brotherly concord in Christ that they may not abuse this notable bond of loue deliuered and commended by the Lord himselfe to his Church wresting it to the nourishing of contentions and factions And vouchsafe to inspire with his Spirit the hearts of Princes and Magistrates that they may aboue all things regard what doeth most become the rule committed to their charge and aduance Gods glory and not respect vvhat may grovv to their coffers by this troublesome time with the cruell vexation of their Subiects and common calamitie of their Common-weales