the day thou eatest thou shalt dy the death infolded an implicit Covenant for al his Posterity to be liable therto as Traitors Children are tainted Hereof Saint Paul saith As by one Rom. 5. 12. man sin entred into the World and death by sin so death went over al men sith al hav sinned viz. in him and by him for when the Parents eat sour grapes the Childrens teeth were set on edg and the whol race of man liable to duple death damnati S. Bernard antequam nati forlorn before born 3. The Soul sinned in consenting and lusting the Body in tasting and eating so both are guilty 4. Neither Soul nor Body apart is the adequat subject of sin but both united or the whol man the Body subjectum a quo of derivation the Soul in quo of inhesion the whol de quo of predication to whom al accidents of both parts are denominatly ascribed 5. It cannot properly be stiled sin til the Souls infusion becaus the Embryo is inanimat and imperfect but the rational Soul must first animat yet it can be stiled sin For whatever is not capable of Gods Image as seed is not is not liable to its privation becaus the habit and privation belong to the same subject 6. The Principium a quo is derived by seed from Parents begetting a depraved disposition in Man wherto a polluted womb ads more fuel which by the Souls union breaks forth into a flame and sets the whol hous on fire both parts together corrupting and being corrupted by a kind of emanation So before 't is infused we are said to contract sin from Parents as Infants draw diseases Stone Gowt Lepry c. that is the impression or inclination only 7. This sin is no simple privation as blindness which deprivs sight for ever but potential only including a positiv propension therto 8. Ther be three degrees of purity 1. Absolut of God 2. Subordinat according to the creatures capacity of Angels and Man in innocence 3. Comparat when being created pure they decline from it So our Souls being formed subordinatly pure soon degenerat by natural concupiscence being in respect of Adam and Angels less pure becaus procliv to sin 9. The maner of imparting it from Adam to al Posterity is rather to be beleeved saith Doctor Whitaker then inquired and better inquired then explored but easier explored then expressed For its nature is most arcane and the conveiance much more obscure 10. Parents Souls work to frame the whol compound Man not by giving being to the new Soul but by preparing a place to unite it with the Body So they may be said to concur in its production cuasaly by disposing the Body to receiv it not formaly by procreating it as Peter Lombard and his School Sectators define Thes are their curious Cautions and best bulworks of defens yet al too little To the Question Why God sends a pure Soul into a polluted prison They say becaus she hath a natural necessary pronenes therto being ordained to unite with a Human Body and both guilty of Adams sin For 't is not created a simple Spirit to subsist by it self but in the Body with relation to it which being derived from Adam draws the guilt of his sin by that preparation and union without carnal traduction so she becoms guilty both privativly and positivly yet God no Author Actor nor Abettor therin This sin then folows creation by accident for at Adams Souls infusion was mens sana in corpore sano but in every union since is sin So we must distinguish between Gods making and Adams marring for he creats every Soul in substance sound but concupiscence which S. John sais is not of the Father 1 Joh. 2. 16. creeps in instantly by Gods desertion sith every Soul even before 't is infused is virtualy guilty of Adams fal as he was Father and Fountain of al Mankind both in morals and naturals becaus God covenanted either explicitly as Cumel contests or implicitly as Sotus saith that he should stand or fal for himself and al his Of-spring by his proper power of unrestrained Free-wil The Schoolmen dissent diversly whether original sin be positiv privativ or mix'd If positiv whether Re or Ratione whether God doth necessitat the act or entity and Man the defect or obliquity whether he pacted explicitly with Adam or implicitly only but such subtle nicities shal be left to the Schools Zanchy the best Patron of Soul-creation ads mo Propositions 〈◊〉 2. de Hom. â—reat c. 5. 1. That God decreed al things eternaly to be executed in time and creats no mo nor fewer Souls then predecreed and as they becom stained by union 2. That his Decrees are just and immutable nor is it unjust to unite pure Souls with sin-tainted Bodies 3. Though he made al Decrees at once in respect of himself yet must they be effected or executed successivly in respect of the things as his decree to permit sin and deriv it by one to al Mankind subservs to the decree of Election and Reprobation 4. When Adam received integrity he had it as the root of al whence his righteousnes is stiled original and we were created in him just after Gods Image 5. His disobedience and fal was semblably ours becaus the Precept Thou shalt not eat belongs to al in him the Stock-father 6. His transgression being the Head is justly imputed to us as Members and the coruption of Nature or proclivity to evil inflicted as the penalty thereof This Saint Paul plainly proclaims in the Antithesis betwixt Adam and Christ whos Rom. 5. 15. righteousnes wherby we are justified hath two parts 1. The Grace or gift which with remission of sins by his obedience is imputed ours 2. Regeneration or Renovation of Nature as the effect So original sin is Adams disobedience imputed to us together with its guilt and corruption of Nature not only a sin but a punishment on al which sinned by his fal 7. When the Soul is said to be stained by union with the Body 't is not meant properly by any Physical impression but so soon as both are united a man is formed to whom the guilt of Adams sin is instantly imputed and by it a propension to al evil inevitably folows becaus the Command and Commination was given to al Mankind in Aâ—am Thus he is driven to decline sins inhesion inferring that the Soul is not infected by the Body as Wine by a muâ—y Cask but by union of both a Man is born Adams son to whom his disobedience is only imputed but the corruption or contagion imposed as a puâ—â—shment by divine decree and not by any action of the Body This is a kind of Gallimaufry how sound let Divines define but certainly original sin is inherent in the principles of Nature like Gehezais lepry in al Adams Progeny and not imputativ only Hinc lolium infoelix â—vae hinc oriuntur aâ—verbae Hence baleful tares doo sprout From hence
be guilty of sin if his Soul com immediatly from God sav only by propagation Or how can Adam be our Father if the whol Man descends not from him One cannot be a proper Father of the whol unless he beget both parts for to supply meer matter which is elementar makes not a Father sith the Form only denominats which if he doth not generat he can no more be a Father then to Fleas and Lice which are bred of his Body Nay if Fatherhood consists chiefly in giving the Form God is rather the tru Father from whom the principal part proceds then Parents which beget the baser The Soul is Mans essential part without which he is no Man How then can he procreat a Creature like himself if he produce not the Soul specialy sith al agree that he propagats such an accident as sin which inheres in the Soul as its sole subject Can he propagat an unnatural accident Sin which cannot be without the Soul and not a natural essence the Soul without which can be no Sin The faculty of propagation pertains to the Soul so wel as Body yea hath its chif seat in the Soul soly for the Body is as a Pen in the Writers hand but the Soul principal Scribe or Secretary sith then such as the caus is such is the effect the Soul must produce a Soul and whol Man a whol Man not an inform lump which without a Soul is neither Man nor Beast but the Soul stil accompanies the Seed at first conception and gradualy builds the Body fitly framing al the organs from the first rudiments to ful perfection Nor can such effects be doon Exerâ— 6. 55. 5. but by a Soul as subtle Scaliger provs He allegeth many mo Arguments against Infusion and answers al advers Reasons but becaus they are already produced on both parts 't is nausity to serv forth twise sod Coleworts but having refuted Infusiasts and rejected Traductists he vents his own novel Invention His Grounds are thes 1. God created three sorts of spiritual A new opinion Natures 1. Angels so sublime as they cannot join with Bodies 2. Beasts Souls so material as they cannot be separat from Bodies 3. Mens Souls in a mean which can both liv without Bodies after death like Angels and unite with Bodies in this life like Beasts Souls So he ordained That Angels shal neither increas nor decreas Sensitiv Souls both increas and decreas But Rational increas or multiply not decreas or perish Hence he infers that Angels are crated immediatly by God only Beasts Souls procreated mediatly one from another But Mens Souls partly produced by Gods immediat power and partly by mediat propagation or such a production as coms neerest to creation 2. Mans Soul is indued with power to use bodily organs in attaining knowledg of al sensible things yea our knowledg of God ariseth ordinarily from Sens ordered by Reason which is a mean between Beasts sens and Angels Intelligence Therfore God united the Soul with a Body which it naturaly desires being incomplet without it nor knows ought ordinarily but by it As then al ordinary faculties and works are doon mediatly by corporal Natures so is their origin or Of-spring or els could not hav such sympathy with a Body Yet as the Nature and Works therof are som way extraordinary without abov al Elementar Natures so God proportioaly hath a supernatural extraordinary work in producing it different from al others 3. Elementar Natures cannot be produced without a more excellent external efficient then themselfs viz. the Sun and celical bodies by their light motion and influence for so al sublunars depend on them for being beside the matter wherof they are particularly compounded and peculiar Forms but the Soul having a Spiritual kind of composition nobler then the rest from Parents by seed requires a spiritual extern efficient beside it self which must needs be God the Father of Spirits sith Stars being bodies cannot produce Mans Soul to which they are far inferior 4. Human conception often fails and is not so frequent as in other Creatures which argues it is not of Nature alone but by Gods more special power and providence then in other generations If then he acts more in Mans conception why shal not the Soul be produced then without a duple task of creating and infusing at quickning When Rachel rashly cried Giv me Children els â— dy Jacob wisely answered Am â— in Gods stead so 't is said of Ruth The Lord gav hir conception who only opens and shuts the Womb but 't is no wher said he creats Souls For he sets a constant cours with his conserving blessing concurring that like shal produce their like 5. As God eternaly decreed of Man both who shal com into the World how many and when so he works in his conception more then in al others which must needs be as immediat efficient of his Soul wherby he blesseth or blasteth conception ordering it by a special providence according to his decree contrarily sundry inconveniences arise from creation that som Children are fully formed which dying before the Soul is infused cannot com to Judgment that God may be glorified and so his work shal be frustrated 6. 'T is evident in promiscuous copulations of Men or Women with Beasts that Gods efficient power is joined with the Souls propagation sith such bestial births are not indued with Reason nor shal com to Judgment though their sensitiv Entelechy is sharper and subtler then other Animals as Apes and Baboons are supposed to spring primitivly from such unnatural mixtions or conjunctions Nor is the Soul immediatly created by God sans natural means sith Children begot in Incest or Adultery hav it which God shal seem to approv or further when he might hinder it being not bound to infuse Souls This Reason may be retorted sith he is not bound to assist at such coitions being a most free Agent and not a Natural so he cannot be an external efficient as the Sun is in other generations 7. Sith Nature by divine Ordinance produceth daily out of dead Elementar matter admirable powers of Seing Hearing Phantasy Memory belonging to brute Beasts the maner wherof our Reason cannot conceiv how much more can the God of Nature produce out of Mans more excellent Nature others like to it though we cannot comprehend the manner how Nor is corporal Seed which is of far purer temper and subtler Spirits then in other Animals an unfit Instrument to propagat a Rational Soul specialy sith the Spirits in Seed are of sublime Nature which hav neer affinity with the Soul 8. God hath set a natural order That a whol Man shal beget the whol both Body and Soul yet not one the other nor Soul a Soul alone or Body a Body but the Soul a Soul immediatly by the Body and Body a Body by the Soul but both jointly a whol Man for they are Individualy united and their operations concur so Man propagats like other
Animals but by Gods immediat power in maner aforsaid 9. The Soul being not produced simply by Natures power nor made of meer corporal matter transcends the common condition of al corporeal Creatures and is in it self immortal having God the extern efficient to produce it 10. The Soul being propagated from Parents is polluted with Natures stain contracted from Adams sin which is derived from Parents to Children with the whol Man as the adequat subject of it yet God in no fault sith our Souls are not corrupted by him but from our Parents and our selfs If any cannot conceiv how one Soul produceth another which is the hardest knot let him consider how it can be united to a Body and organized with it which wil allay the difficulty For if Angels hav aereal bodies as many Antients deem or at least are not pure Spirits compared to God muâ—h more may Mens Souls hav such a spiritual composure as meerly resembles Matter and form in Bodies which may wel accord with the maner of propagation prespecified and no way repugn the Souls divine essence If this way oppugn Reason yet 't is safer then that which repugns Religion By this Card our Author sailing betwixt Scilla and Charybdis Conclusion discovered Pachinus a middle Promontory in Sicil as Columbus did Cuba viz. that as the Sun is external efficient in the general generation of al Sublunars beside their internal particular principles so is God in the special production of every Mans Soul beside the peculiar Parents Souls working virtualy in the seed as his pretended premisses prov Which he farther confirms thus 1. Ther is no diametral Conformation difference between Soul and Body but they may be naturaly coupled together For though the Soul be not visible yet hath it a spiritual substance not simply pure but the lowest degree of Spirits prone to unite with corporeal natures and so may be propagated with them as united to them 2. Every Nature the more excellent 't is hath a neerer union with the first Being on which it depends and is more immediatly moved by it whence it folows that the Soul being more excellent and neerer to God then any corporal Creature in which he works more immediatly then others after they are made so he doth in the first production of it 3. Nothing is generated but hath som extern efficient Caus which in Coporeals is the Celical bodies whence 't is said the Sun and Man be get a Man as the Sun and Lion a Lion But the Soul being a Spirit and made at first by God can hav no other extern efficient sav the same immediat power So it may more truly be said God and Man generat the Soul God as efficient and Parents as his procreant instruments to produce what how and when he pleaseth according to his eternal Decree Nor is it absurd that Man hath two extern efficients but rather an honor that God and Nature concur to his generation 4. Mortality proceds not from natural generation but divine malediction for had not Man sinned his Body should be eviternal so wel as Soul Ergo if it were compounded and generated in a corporal way which is not so yet it folows not to make it mortal 5. Whatever hath being immediatly from God cannot be annihilated but by his immediat power which is the tru caus of immortality Hence the Body being produced soly by Natures power doth dy or perish yet the Soul produced by immediat act of the Deity can never dy but by the same power which gav it life Thus it appears that though the Soul be produced as aforesaid yet is it immortal sith 't is neither made of corporal matter nor generated in meer natural maner Nor is God faulty though we be sinful sith being wholy in Adam and actualy one with him our whol Nature is so defiled and Gods pure ordinance in producing Souls depraved that a total corruption passeth in the very conception and we stained with original sin at our very first being To cleer the Case he frames som objections against this middle way 1. Ob. If the Soul be resolved into a first principle of Adams Soul whence al are derived as Mixtils are into Elements it must needs be mortal as al such are Ergo 't is not so derived or els 't is mortal Sol. The comparison is unlike for Mixtils are compact of Elements into which they resolv but Mens Souls not compounded of Adams no nor Bodies nor one of another but of the same nature and so simple as his Nor doth it folow if the Soul be compounded like Elements it must inevitably be mortal for death and corruption coms not from composition or propagation but meerly from malediction for sin the wages wherof is death 2. Ob. If God cooperats with Man in producing Souls he no less rests from his works then in jugial creating them of nothing for the thing is the same and terms little differing Ergo this novity of a middle way to make God the external efficient is very vanity and of no validity Sol. Here is no creation of nothing but production of a thing from former principles Nor doth it repugn Gods creatifie rest to concur in other works of providence government and the Souls spiritual acts nor in assisting its production as an extern efficient which tends only to preserv Mankind specialy sith it hath no mediat maner in ordinary cours of nature sav only Gods immediat concurrence in extraordinary maner 3. Ob. If Man cannot generat his like without Gods special extraordinary help he is in this behalf inferior to Beasts as Traductists urge against Creation Ergo c. Sol. Not so for Beasts beget also by the Heavens help as exterior efficients If then Mans Soul for excellence hath a far sublimer supercelical efficient And he acts so much in generation of his like as other Creatures doo in theirs 't is rather a dignity abov al then any disparagement at al. So this exception holds against jugial creation wherin Man no whit concurs which may seem a derogation but not against natural propagation 4. Ob. If God be immediat extern efficient of our sin-polluted Souls by natural propagation he is Author or accessary to sin rather then by creation Ergo c. Sol. Nothing less for he is only external efficient of the Soul not of sin which coms from corrupt Parents who supply the internal matter of the whol Man wherin sin consists sith generation is not of Parts but Persons it being his just ordinance in nature That as the Tree is so shal the fruit be Sith then he made Man perfectly good at first to beget Children perfect like himself who prevaricated and polluted al his Progeny or Posterity God performs his part stil to confer his efficient power in the perpetual production of Mankind And as he first infused his Soul so he stil concurs in producing it though not in the same sort yet sin is meerly accidental in respect of
Mankind so by propagation al Mankind proceds out of one and as that sin overspreads the whol Man so both parts being infected must needs be propagated Again as this sin is seated specialy in the Soul so 't is chiefly propagated according to Natures cours Hence three points rest to be proved 1. That original sin passeth only by propagation as Scriptures universaly testify By one man death passed upon al becaus al sinned in him and 't is imputed to his Posterity becaus al were in him as the Root or Stock and al descend out of him so his sin becoms ours both by imputation and propagation but by the first becaus of the last For 't is not anothers sin imputed which is not ours but that made ours by propagation actualy which before was only potentialy This is cleer by the Antithesis between the first and secund Adam as in one al dy so in Christ shal al be made aliv The one being Root of Mankind in whom al are by Nature the other Head of the Elect in whom they are al by Grace Such then are deceived as deem Adams sin only imputed like Christs righteousnes sith this last is the Creators voluntary Institution and work of meer Mercy but the first a necessary operation of the Creature and work of Justice So the Antithesis holds tru thus As in Christ we fulfilled the Law suffered death and attained salvation being members of his Body by Grace So in Adam we eat the forbiden fruit becam Satans bondslaves and were in state of damnation being al members of his Body by Nature So Christ derivs his righteousnes to his Children by spiritual regeneration as Adam did his sin to al Men by natural generation Ergo as Christs righteousnes is not imputed but by means of regeneration wherby we becom members of his Body So Adams sin cannot be imputed but by generation wherby we descend from him as his members If Adams sin be simply imputed becaus we are Men as he was who received or lost for himself and al Mankind then must it be imputed to Christ as Man so wel as to us which is not so for our sinning in him and being sinfully propagated from him makes us liable which Christ was not becaus sanctified in the womb by the holy Ghost at first conception but al els derived from him and his sin to us through one anothers loins 2. Original sin cannot be propagated unles the whol Man and both Parts be which necessarily flows from the premisses for except the whol Man descends from him the whol cannot be infected sith neither Soul nor Body alone is the subject of sin but the Person Or if the whol be not the subject 't is not properly sinful The Law likewise is given to the whol and the Person punished or rewarded 3. The whol Man cannot be propagated unles the Soul be sith the whol consists of its parts To say the Soul coms from Adam quoad existentiam unionem non quoad essentiam is sly Sophistry not real or rational for then Man contributs but the worst part not the whol nor half Nor is it tru that Adam is caus of the union but rather God if he creats the Soul Nor if the Soul be infused can any tel how long time after conception during which space the Woman works alone But if the whol Man be said properly to proced from Adam becaus the body doth much more may it be verified to com from God becaus the Soul doth so the union rather to be ascribed to God as the noblest suprem Agent then to Man the baser and inferior If then the whol Man and both parts be not propagated it results that we were in Adam wherin we are not viz. the Person that we sinned in him without that without which he could not sin viz. the Soul That the whol Man was in Adam yet never cam from him That we lost in him which we never had of him viz. original righteousnes That he shal stil be ful of Souls which he never had That the whol person proceds from him yet not that which makes the whol 4. Christs Soul was not created but his whol Humanity taken from the Virgin for his birth life death are curiosly and circumstantialy recorded by the Evangelists but no Soul creation which they would not omit being so pregnant a proof that he was without sin if it was created pure Nor is any Souls creation since Adams specified in Scripture Christ is caled the seed of the Woman and Davids seed according to the flesh which imports the whol Humanity as opposed to his Deity but if his Soul was created the imputation of Adams sin to al Men must be likewise lâ—able to him as Man Ad hereto That the Soul and Body as 't is in al others were conceived at once for the divine Nature being immediatly united to the Soul and by it to the Body the Soul must be produced in the moment of conception with the Body or els the Deity was first united to a brute Body which is brutish to imagin The truth is his Soul being united with the Body into one Nature at first conception becam one Person with the eternal Word by a miraculous working of the holy Ghost who purified the Womb that the Birth becam exempt from sin So his whol Humanity Soul and Body was deduced from Adam and separated from the Virgin by the holy Ghost But a Soul cannot be produced by Natures ordinary cours no more then a Body without concurrence of both Sexes Souls yet being performed by supernatural power 't is a tru Soul and so is the Body both which joined in one Person make a perfect Man as Eve was a very Woman though taken out of Man and Christ tru Man taken only out of Woman For in Mans quadruple production â—â— a duple concordance Adam made immediatly by God without Man or Woman Eve mediatly out of Man without Woman Christ immediatly out of Woman without Man but al els mediatly by both 'T is said the holy Ghost sanctified part of the Virgins substance assumed by the Godhead to make Christs Person which terms are tru if wel understood For by part of hir substance is meant the whol Nature or both parts not Body only whereof his Humanity was framed By sanctifying is not meant clensing that portion from sin but consecrating it to that holy purpos indowing it with gifts fit for so divine union yet was it free from sin or rather never sinful by reason of this union For al substances were created exceeding good and depend immediatly on God Nor is sin essential to Mans Nature but accidental cleaving to the person by Adams fal and not properly in the substance of Human Nature Nor are evil actions or affections stiled simply sinful but the Man sith sin consists not in any pravity of matter but in the corrupt Wil or intent of the dooer Nor is ther any Law to punish parts or substances
the whol and every part to make a perfect Woman so caled becaus taken totaly out of Man sans mention of any Soul infusion It appears not that the Soul therein died nor can her Soul be caled part of his more then her body though both extracted from him nor can two be confused but the same transfused in al and every part as the Souls Nature is whol in the whol and whol in every part of the body Of Christ S. Luke speaks God sent the Angel Gabriel to a Virgin espoused to Joseph who said Hail Mary lo thou shalt Luke 1. 26. to the 36. bear a Son and cal his name Jesus Then said she How shal this be sith I know not a man He answered The Holy Ghost shall com upon thee and power of the most high overshadow thee therefore that holy thing to be born of thee shal be caled the Son of God So the manner of his conception was metaphisical or miraculous without male-seed ineffably and incomprehensibly by the Holy Ghost yet was he according to his whol humanity conceived formed fostered in the womb nine Solar moneths or 39 weeks the usual time or term of womens gravidation as other Embryons being like to us in al things save sin only from which he was priviledged becaus the Vessel divinely purified So that if other Souls be created his was if generated his was likewise The debate then concerns al mankind and every individual Soul which is a perplexed knot to unty and intricat Maze to tread aright This blindness bewrais our innat ignorance who scars know what a Soul is whence it proceeds or how 't is produced Nosce teipsum being the hardest lesson to learn which none ever wel attained Ignorant Homines quae sit Natura Animai Lucretius Nata sit an contra Nascentibus insinuetur An simul intereat nobiscum morte direâ—pta An tenebras Erebi visat vastasque lacunas An Pecudes alias divinitus ingrediatur What the Souls nature is men know not wel Nor whether bred or in Babes infus'd can tel Whether by death with us it quit doth quel Or els goes to the dark deep Cels of Hel Or by Gods power in other Creatures dwel God knows himself and â—hen al things intuitivly in himself but man other things betteâ— then hiâ—self yet how can one take measure of any thing saith Pliny that is ignorant of himself To pass by al abstrus virtues of Vegetals arcane miracles of Minerals admirable properties of precious Stones and view their outer surface or color only Who can tel why Grass is green a Ruby red or Pearl pale But what strange strife hath been about the principles of our Nature and production of both Parts For the corporeal how doe Phisitians and Philosophers jar or jangle about the seed whence it should proced Archelaus asserts it a milky slime or mud drawn from the earth A cold muddy conceipt Pythagoras the scum or froth of our best blood A frothy fancy Alcmaeon part of the Brain A brainless buz Plato a distilling marrow of the back bone Democritus a substance extracted from al members Zeno Mans spirit and spoil of his Soul Epicurus a fragment both of Body and Soul Hippocrates a portion of radical moisture Aristotle an excrement of the last concoction in the solid parts Others blood refined by heat of the Genitals Al which are lame not expressing the efficient matter or form For seed materially consists both of Blood and Spirit concocted into a white frothy humor by the Testicles which Females hav latent tho not prominent for the use of procreation and from them not of brain back bone or other part soly derived But whether females send or spend any operativ geniture is much controverted The Perepatetics deny it But Galenists contest that no conception can be without concurrence of both Parents seed which is indubitably the truest Opinion The spiritual part affords much more matter or fuel of altercation about the Soul 1. What it is Aristole refels divers Tenets but his own description halts at last 't is easy to say what 't is not not what ' t is It is no temper of elements nor blood nor energy of life nor Galens Crasis but in general an essential quickning form which givs Plants a life vegetant Beasts a sentient comprising the Former and Men an intelligent including both as a Pentagon contains a Tetragon and that a Trigon For Souls being Forms and thos relativs not subsisting alone but as parts of compounds are hatdly defined or disquired 2. What manner of substance it is whether corporal or incorporeal for God only is simply immaterial and al things els in som sort corporal tho not visible as neither is pure Air. Hence divers Divines aver Angels to be corporeal becaus finit and limited to place being bounded as it were with a superfiâ—ies that they cannot be ubiquitants every wher or elswher at once Much more then Mens Souls which liv in Bodies The Schools say a Body is in place circumscriptivly a Spirit definitivly be it so but is not definit so to be here as not to be elswhere Doo not Spirits ascend descend and change place Is not their motion made in time tho very swift Are not thes acts proper passions of a Body though impalpable invisible imperceptible God then is a Spirit in creat purely immaterial Angels creat comparatly material and so are Souls separat much more thos in Bodies But what maner of substance whether aereal etherial or subtler sublimer essence none save the Father of Spirits can define or determin 3. How it attains or acquires knowledg Whether by remembrance of what it knew before as Plato affirms supposing a precreation which is improbable Or by the senses service as Aristotle asserts which is ignoble Or by her own inbred seeds of understanding which is most honourable the senses conduce much to manure the mind and improv science but our Soul of it self apprehendeth judgeth retaineth reasoneth resolveth without instruction though better or wors according to the various temper or symetry of the brain hir chief organ For 't is absurd that so divine an essence should rely on vile deceitful sens which only comprehends accidents color sound savor odor not the forms or nature of things much less Natures secrets or universal insensible objects Nay if science com from sense then such as hav sharpest sight hearing c. should be wisest or wittiest which oft befals contrary and men born deaf dumb or blind are of acutest entelechy therfore that principle of Peripatum Nothing is in the intellect which was not first under sens can scars stand sound for though it be furthered by sens yet it depends not thereon sith the senses are subordinat and know nothing without it 4. How many Souls cohabit in one body whether three or but one Som say three whereof the Vegetativ and Sensitiv dy with the body but intellectiv livs eternaly The most orthodox allow only one
sour Grapes grow out The grounds thus laid and materials brought in place the building will be better framed But for fuller disquisition the Infusiastists Arguments with the Traductists Answers shal first be fairly filed then their Objections with the others Solutions orderly mustered Arg. Dust saith Salomon shalreturn to earth as it was Eccls 12. 7. and the Spirit to God that gav it Ergo every Soul or Spirit coms from God Answ This evidently relats to the first creation of both for no mans body since Adams is made of dust as his was but of Seed and Blood and God gav or inspired his Soul whence al others derivativly or secundarily com and shal return to the original Giver as the body shal to earth its Mother so this provs the Souls immortality but no way disprovs the Traducibility sith every particular Soul proceds mediatly from God the first Fountain Arg. The Lord saith Zechary spred the Heavens laid the Zech. 12. 1. Earths foundation and formed Mans Spirit within him Ergo God created it in the Body Answ This is the pregnantst place and best proof in al sacred Scripture for intrinsecal infusion by creation but intends apertly as the former did covertly the protoplasm or primordial production for when God spread the Heavens and founded the Earth he then formed Mans Soul within him but ever since ceased to creat either new Spirits or Souls so this is no plain evidence for jugial creation of every particular Soul Arg. S. Paul makes an Antithesis between the Father of Heb. 12 9. our Bodies and Father of Spirits Ergo God is sole Author and Creator of Souls not the Pâ—â—â—â—ts Answ God is the Father of Spirits as wel in regard of Angels and Saints which is not the Apostles aim as spiritual regeneration ther intended without reference to Soul-creation yet becaus he breathed the first Soul whence al since are derived he may be caled the primitiv Father of Souls though one immediatly beget another Arg. God in Isaiah saith I have made the breath meaning Isaâ— 57. 16. Mans Soul which he originaly breathed in Ergo he only creats it nor is it carnaly generated Answ This is meant in S. Pauls sens in him we liv mov and hav our being or it may be referred to the first Souls inspiration without successiv creation Arg. Zedekiah swore to Jeremy As the Lord livs that made Jer. 38. 16. us thes Souls I wil not sâ—ay thee Ergo 'tis evident that he makes al mens Souls Answ Som interpret it by Synecdoche like the seventy Souls issued from Jacobs loins the principal part for the person as the Lord livs that made us both som literaly of life as the Lord livs by whom we liv I wil not bereav thy life Yet the words may be granted to imply the Souls creation though he meant not properly or purposly the Souls production rather then persons or lifes for 't is a greater emphasis in the Oath as the Lord liveth who created our Souls I wil not take away tâ—ine which he created Howbeit in this sens he could not destroy the Soul it self sav only sever it from the body but life the effect therof Take it either way or any way the words may be aptly applyed to the Souls primitiv creation sans exception or contradiction Arg. Godfashions Mens Hearts saith David and understands Psal 133. 14. al their Works Ergo he forms our Souls ther understood by Hearts as 't is usual in Scripture Answ The inference is infirm for by Hearts here is meant the Wil and Affections but by fashioning disposing Other Scriptural Texts are pressed but of no moment Arg. Whatever is generated shal be corrupted which is an irrefragable principle in Philosophy and Theology Ergo Mans Soul if procreated must be mortal Answ This authentic Axiom properly concerns compounds which are the adâ—quat subjects of generation and corruption not principal parts which are only ingenerated or congenerated but 't is verified in al things bred of a corruptible matter els not For God the Son is begoâ— of his Father and the holy Ghost proceds from both yet eternal without beginning so Angels and Mans Soul were created ex nihilo yet eviternal without ending but al the rest intire composed of the common Chaos Heavens Elements Meteors Mixtils Vegetals Animals and Mans Body which are corruptible in whol or parts and of thes that Maxime is rightly understood not of Mens Souls which are generated of Parents Souls having al a divine faculty by divine blessing to beget an immortal essence like itself Arg. 'T is a disparagement to Man the noblest Creature that his divine part should proced of impure seed like Beasts Ergo this opinion is to be exploded Answ 'T is his chief dignity that he hath power of or in himself to beget both parts specialy one so noble and divine els were he wors then Beasts in that behalf nor doth it proced of seed but from an Animific virtu of the Parents Souls conveied with the seed If then it be immortal as undoubtedly 't is what skils it in that respect whether it be created or generated and what difference whether God be immediat Plastes or giv man power with his general blessing to produce it by successiv propagation having the same power of immortality which the first had by himself infused and power to beget the like incorruptible essence by his special benediction Repl. If any Animific virtu be conveied with the seed then must it be reduced to act instantly at first conception which is most imperfect or gradualy which argues divisibility But both thos are absurd and abhorrent in Nature Ergo no such virtu can be conveied with the seed much less proced from it Answ Both Soul and Body are begot in an instant as every conception is made but as bodily lims and lineaments are gradualy shaped and strengthned from weak waterish rudiments to more maturity so the Soul exerciseth hir vegetativ functâ—ons of nutricion sensitiv of motion and intellectiv of reason daâ—ly by slow degrees as organs are apparated or accommodâ—â—ed whiâ—h argues no divisibility For al things in Nature as God proceded at Creation attain to perfection by divisible degrees yet no division in the Forms or Souls which are conceived in a moment Arg. If ther be virtu in or with the seed to beget a Soul then when 't is shed spilt or spent upon barren or gravid wombs so many Souls are lost which is harsh and horrid to hold Ergo no such Animific energy is conveied with the seed but al Souls proced from God Answ No Souls are lost by loss or sterility of seed but only a power or possibility to produce and procreat them which being not reduced into act perisheth or is frustrat so is the said virtu void to beget so many Bodies and prepare them for reception of Souls which is alone and no absurdity ariseth of either but presseth both sides alike Arg. If Souls be begot
then every efflux shift and abortiv is a Man But what maner of Man wil such a shapeless sensless substance be at the general Resurrection when every one shal resum his identic numerical Body Ergo the generation of Souls is subject to sundry absurdities in Nature and common Reason Answ Such as hold Infusion at time of conception as Traductists inferences violently inforce are liable to the same difficulties so are they that set it at quickning for if it miscarries the day after which a few hours distance makes no difference what maner of Man wil that be cannot God perfect the one so wel as the other doo not al bodies turn to dust doo not Divines say al shal rise in such stature as at Christs age Why not then the first coagulation so wel as an inform infirm Embryon cannot omnipotence extend a Body into any dimensions so wel as amend al imperfections Thes are arcan mysteries known only to him that knows al and can doo al in al But Insusiasts are equaly engaged to answer it sith the power to prepare a Body for the Souls union is defeated or destroyed and by consequence so many Souls lost which by divine preordination should be created and infused but it crosseth not Traduction and men must be wise to sobriety not searching into Gods secrets Arg. 'T is improbable that impure material seed should be the conduit to convey a power of producing so pure a substance or divine Spirit Ergo c. Answ No more then that the Body a meer putrid mass should be the seat or subject of the Soul it self which is a divine immortal immaterial essence Arg. Spirits doo not multiply or beget one another nor can Angels propagat or generat becaus Spirits but Mans Soul is a Spirit so scripturaly stiled Ergo c. Answ Simple Spirits cannot propagat and Angels are individuals subsisting alone but human Souls organized and united to Bodies wherin they exist being so ordained to preserv the race of Mankind Som distinguish that Compounds generat and principal parts only propagat but this is a vain evasion no veritable satisfaction for propagation properly pertains to Kinds generation to Individuals and both to Compounds nor are the terms convertible in the abstract for every generation is not propagation but in the concret or subject what ever is generated is propagat and reciprocaly To apply it neither Soul nor Body is truly said to beget or be begot but the whol Man who begets and is begot completly but the parts incompletly Arg. Marsilius Ficinus prescribes three sorts of production 1. The making of Mans Soul from nothing into being caled Creation 2. The mutation of a lifeless Body into an Animal by the Soul hight Formation 3. The change of an Embryo into the whol Compound clyped Generation The object or Terminus of Creation is immortality of Formation a Soul not considered simply but as in a Body of Generation an Animal consisting of both Now saith he in every Generation is a decision of somthing from the Begetter which a Soul hath not becaus it admits no division nor decision Ergo it cannot generat Answ The Traductists exclud the fiâ—st branch except with reference to Adams Soul soly yet grant immortality to be the Terminus in production of al. The other two they apply to Compounds only wherein the Soul sends no material seed or substance by decision as the Body doth but only a procreativ virtu with the spirit of seed to produce the like spiritual substance the maner wherof is inscrutable as is also original sin for Man is Natures miracle and Epitomâ— of al Creatures yet differs from al having an immortal spirit in a corruptible casknet and his generation wonderful Arg. Beasts Souls dy becaus bred of seed or with it Ergo if Mens Souls be ingendred in the same sort by or with the conveience of seed they must likewise perish Answ This is non causa pro causa for Beasts souls dy not soly becaus bred of seed but specialy becaus formed at first intirely of the common corruptible Chaos But God made mans Body of dust wherto it must return but infused or inspâ—red a Soul which is immortal or eviternal like Angels partaking the same divine origin Arg. If the Soul proceds from both Parents Souls then either two grow into one or their Souls are extracted and they remain Soulless or part of their Souls passeth and so are divisible But al thes are gross enormites and neither possible Ergo Traduction is no way tolerable Answ Al thes inferences are impertinent for both Parents concur to beget the Body too yet two grow not together nor are they impaired but God ordained in cours of Nature that both Sexes shal cooperat in generation so from their Bodies flows a material seed with a corporific virtu to beget a Body and from their Souls proceds an animific power with the seeds spirit to produce a Soul both which conjoining is cald Prolific in regard of the Compound yet neither are the Parents Souls nor any part of them no more then their Bodies extracted or exhausted but only an energy issuing from them to generat a new Arg. The Soul exerciseth her essential operations to Wil and Understand without help of bodily organs as appears being separat Ergo it needs no Parents seed to its production for as every thing works so is its essence and contrarily as Aristotle avers who concluds mans Soul not to depend of the body L 2. de gen Anim. c. 3. becaus it works within it Answ The Soul while it is in the Body useth its organs in hir chief operations of Wil and Intellect though when separat she needs them not nor is Parents seed the efficient of producing to depend theroâ— but only the instrum ut to carry virtu of producing a new Soul with the seed which impeacheth not the exerciâ—e of hir chief operations without organs in the Body nor is ther any sap or solidity 〈◊〉 this Argument against Traduction any way however wrested Arg. The Soul dies not with the Body Ergo 't is not generated with it For ther is the same reason of generation and corruption sith the Souls presence is the caus of life as the Suns is of light and absence of death as his is of darknes so if the Bodies procreation caus the Souls production its death must be hir perdition Answ This is pithier then a former viz. whatever is generated shal be corrupted But the Bodies generation doth not caus the Souls production sith 't is generated with it not by it and though it giv the Body life as the essential Form yet dies not with it as not proceding from it but from the Parents Souls Arg. Aristotle asserts That the Mind or Intellect alone coms from without and is of divine origin Ergo not generated by Parents as Bodies be Answ 'T is thought thos words Sola mens foris adveâ—it were foisted into the Text without any coherence
to antecedents or consequents for no man by meer reason can conceiv the mystery of Soul-creating nor doo they infer infusion for that is doon within the Body Haply he might learn of his Master Plato that al Souls were created at once and descend daily into Bodies designed for them but he taught the Souls immortality more confidently being Natures principal Secretary by many evidences of common reason which if any Traductist or other Sectist shal doubt or deny he is wors then an Ethnic or Atheist sith both Natures light and Scriptures lore so evidently demonstrat it to every ey nor doth Traduction oppose it Arg. Scaliger holds the Soul to be created apart and infused after du organization becaus if it be introduced at the instant of conception that first coagulation must be a Man which is most absurd Ergo 't is not infused til the time of quickning much less ingendred by way of Traduction Answ His opinion is no Oracle and the reason resolved afore That 't is no more absonous to cal the fiâ—st coagulation a Man imperfect or incomplet then a weak waterish Embryo at instant of quickning Or that a Beasts soul being begot by seed should denominat the first rudiments of conception a Beast being brought gradualy to more maturity til time of parturition but the quickning is or may be retarded by many human contingents Arg. Thâ— Sâ—hool-men say That Eves Soul was created els Adam would hav added she is Soul of my Soul so wâ—l as bone of my bone and flesh of my flesh being a nâ—erer relation then those carnal ones as Divines define Ergo as their two first Souls were created so consequently are al others from generation to generation Answ So say they but other learned Clercs gainsay Scaurus ait Varus negat utri creditis yet the consequent halts sith their two productions differ from al els becaus neither had two Parents and al els except Christ begot by carnal coition but specialy becaus created within the first six dais wherafter God rested from al creatific works To the Antecedent and reason therof 't is answered That she was formed intirely of an animaâ— Rib and the Soul therin becam hirs by divine operature as the Text seems to speak for 't is said of Adam God made Man meâ—â—ing the material part of dust not made dust a Man as if both parts cam from dust But of Eve the Rib made he a Woman intirely both Body and Soul not the Woman of a Rib as importing the material part only Al parts were built of that bone why not then the Soul too by diffusion so wel as the integrals by extension but sith Scripture is silent let it pass in suspens Repl. If Eves Soul cam of a Rib and had no divine origin then either women hav no Souls as som Dotards dream or thos material which wil sâ—ars relish their palats Answ Not so nor so for that Rib had a Soul which God by diffusing made hirs as he did her Bâ—dy by distending the material part so both savour of their several principles one of spirituality immarcescibility the other of materiality and mortality but both apt or able to beget alike substance indowed with the same qualities Arg Christs Soul was not traducted from Adam for then it should be tainted with his sin which is blasphemy to assert Eâ—go not ours sith he is like us in al things except only sin Answ He was the Womans seed and Son of Adam according to his whol humanity and his Soul produced in the same sort as ours whâ—â—her by creation or generation is the main Question being lik◠〈◊〉 things 〈◊〉 sin For ours if creâ—ted are infused no less 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 his and his by union with a polluted Body no freer from sin then ours so this Stork bites both before and behind alike for if he took from his Mother inanimat flâ—sh only his Soul must therby be stained though created pure as others are defiled but one salv shal heal both sores for albeit she was conceived in sin and Luk. 1. 47. needed a Saviour as she her self confesseth which Dominicans grant and Franciscans deny yet was sanctified from al stain and purified from guilt by the wonderful working of the Holy Ghost being made a clean Vessel to receiv and conceiv that holy thing caled the Son of God even the immaculat Lamb without spot slain before the beginning of the World who could contract no pollution from hir that had none being perfectly purified though he should assume both Body and Soul from hir Repl. Zanchy saith Som Traductists forced by this Argument confess That Christs Soul wâ—s created but al els traducted but the production is like Ergo al created Answ Haply he dreams so but ther is no necessity of any such confession or concession for the Argument is already plenarily satisfied Certes Christ had his whol human Nature from his Mother by the Holy Ghosts miraculous operature in the same maner by creation or generation as others hav from Parents Arg. Three Sects or Septs of Heretics held Traduction 1. Luciferians by Souls transfusion 2. Marsilians who denied al Creation 3. Tertullianists and Apollinarians who assert that Souls generat Souls as Bodies doo Bodies Ergo Traduction is an Heretical Tenet condemned by the Church Answ They were condemned Heretics but Traduction no condemned Heresy nor a matter de fide and inserted for aggravation as crossing the common received opinion to fil up a number which was usual yet the two first erred circumstantialy in that point But al Hereticks held som verities and the best Orthodoxists som falsities sith al Mortals are obnoxius to manifold errors Thes are the Infusiastists chief Arguments with the Traductists Answers sincerely exhibited Next follow the Traductists Objections or offensiv weapons and Infusiastists defensiv Solutions taken from their best Armories Ob. God bid Man bring forth fruit and fil the earth but this Geâ— 1. 28. Precept concerns the whol compound conflated of Soul and Body Ergo both parts proceed from Parents Sol. Man is said in som sort to beget the whol becaus by producing and preparing the material part he is Author of the union wherin consists the whol Humanity which sufficeth to univocal generation though the principal part be not product by him How satisfactory this is shal be left to Arbitrement Ob. God ceased from al creatific works the seventh day 〈◊〉 2. 2. wherof the infusing of mans Soul was one Ergo he doth not creat multituds of Souls every moment Sol. He ceased from creating Compounds and Species or Kinds but not from forms or Essential parts such as Souls be Repl. If he creat al individual Souls ther being numberless births every instant in the vast univers then he concurs as a particular Agent or third Parent but he is only universal Father of al Creatures Ergo no particular third Parent in Mans production Sol. God is Omnipotence and Infinity in the Abstract who can creat
Humanity becaus when the Body is prepared God hath decreed to infuse a Rational Soul This is soon said gratis but by what warrant or wher doth it appear that God so decreed Repl. Flesh animat is Mans whol Nature not inanimat Ergo the Flesh which he assumed had a Rational Soul at first conception Sol. Som say that Flesh was potentialy animat to be indowed with a Soul in du time Others which hold Soul-creation at conception grant it was actualy animat But as she is caled Mother of God in regard of the Hypostatic union though he had only his Humanity from hir So Parents may be said to beget the whol Man in relation to the union which God hath decreed in du time though they beget only the bodily part apt and apparated to entertain the Soul which sufficeth for denomination Repl. The reason reacheâ—h not right sith Men are Parents to Children becaus the whol Nature is derived from them as Christs Humanity was from the Virgin but she is stiled Deiparent not in respect of his Deity which depends not on hir but for the said hypostatic union of both Natures in one Person having his humanity intirely from hir Ergo the Godhead shal be better tied to his whol Manhood by Traduction of both parts then barely to cloth him with inanimat Flesh Beside she is caled Mother of God for the hypostatic union actualy in being but Parents are said to beget a whol Man in regard of the union to com Sol. He had his whol Humanity from hir in maner foreshewed For when the Body is accomplished and accommoded the Soul shal be necessarily instilled or infused in du time which is al that can be answered in this point of the whol Humanity derived from Parents Ob. The Womans seed shal break the Serpents head but Christ fulfilled this promiss and prophecy chiefly in Soul which descended into Hel to lead Captivity captiv and bind the strong Man in his own Kingdom as his body triumphed over Death in his dominion the Grave by his tridual Resurrection for how is he the Womans seed unless he had his whol Humanity from hir Or how can the Body break the Serpents head Or how could this victory be atchieved if his Soul had not descended Ergo he assumed his Soul also from the Woman by the Holy Ghosts cooperation Sol. Divers Divines deny Christs descent into Hel in Soul but that may rest in debat sith it concerns not the production sav only to shew that by it he brok the Serpents head Touching the promiss and prophecy it was performed principaly by his Soul or rather person and that derived potentialy or preparativly from the Woman in manner foretold but primitivly and actualy from God the Creator or Infuser Ob. To bind up sundry bunches of sour Grapes in one bundle If the Soul be created pure how can it be defiled in an instant by inanimat flesh not capable of sin Or why doth God cast his own workmanship into a stinking Prison purposly to be polluted Or how can a spiritual substance be stained by a material mass specialy sith sin inheres soly in the Soul which is primarily guilty by willing or consenting and the Body only in obeying the one activly as efficient the other passivly as Instrument Upon this ground of the Soul created pure and in capacity to be polluted by lifeless flesh Pelagius built his branded Teneâ— That Children are born free from original sin And S. Austin seeking to crush this Cockatrice in the Eg like such as bow or bend a stick back to bring it right broched another error That al dying unbaptized are infallibly damned or deprived of Beatific vision being liable to the lack or loss of Heavenly happines though not to the pain of Hellish torments whence be is stiled durus Infantum Pater Lastly our Protoparents personal sin becam like sap derived from the root participatly ours not by imputation as Zanchy contests but by tru inhesion infecting the whol Nature which hereditary corruption or conâ—agion is contracted linealy from Parents loins Ergo the Soul as seat source and subject is ex Traduce Sol. This Gordian knot many hav essaied few extricated or cut it asunder like Alexander who shadow it with a vele of windy words but no real resolution Som say the seed is stained ex traduce which like levan sours the whol lump and the Soul supervening receivs stain from it as new Must put into a musty cask which the best Divines disclaim For ther can be no proper physical action of material upon immaterial and the Soul shal be polluted passivly only which sufficeth not to make it guilty unless it be a voluntary Agent yea the similitud halts for ther the Vessel taints the Wine here the Soul was first soiled and principal efficient ther both be material here the chiefest spiritual nor can inanimat flesh be capable of sin before it hath a Soul Zanchy and others hold That as Christs righteousnes so Adams guiltines is ours imputativly only but Natures corruption insuing a just punishment by divine Decree Out alas this sin is a lepry cleaving clos to the flesh and consequently corrupting our whol Nature or els could not beget and bring forth such a serpentin spawn of actual sins Peter Moulin professeth plainly that the Soul is not vitiated by the Body for to incarcerat an innocent Creature his own operature in a plaguy Bridewel purposly to be infected repugns Gods Justice and Goodness but sin being a spiritual vice of the Wil first seizeth the Soul before the Body becoms accessary as Adam first sinned in Wil and Consent yer he stretched his hand to touch or cast so sin passeth from the Soul to the Body not contrarily For the maner of spreading He saith God creats the Soul spotless but destitut of supernatural light which Man lost by his fal hence flows or folows perversnes of Wil purblindnes of Mind and proclivnes to al evil even from inordinat self lov not guided by metaphysical illumination and the temper of Body doth much incens or increas this contagion according to every complexion yet are not humors the causes but incentivs to sin nor doo impress or imprint on the Soul but only incline it therto Quot homines tot sensus so many men so many minds but al driven to sundry shifts how sin can be propagated without traduction of the Soul which being granted wil soon satisfy al scruples Repl. This last devise being newest takes best but is scars soundest for sin is an effect of natural corruption which is more then a defect of supernatural illumination and a positiv depravation of Wil far beyond deprivation of Grace Man indeed lost metaphysical light by his fal yet if our Souls be created spotless they must at first infusion be sinless so al the doubts rest intire how they can so suddenly contract this hereditary pollution diffused over our whol Nature unless the Soul bring that stain with it for
or discussed not boldly decided or determined Spiritus an jugiter genitus sit five creatus Quim Deus infudit lis violenta manet Whether Mans Soul which God breath'd and created Be stil infus'd or bred 't is much debated In dubio lis est an Mens ex Traduce nata Aliter Sit cujusque Hominis sive creata magis 'T is doubt whether ech Mans Soul be generated From Parents Souls or rather by God created Particula in nobis divinae Spiritus aurae Alias Quaeriter an genitus sive creatus inest The Soul 's in us a Part by God inspired Whether begot or creat 't is inquired Nescit Homo an sua mens generetur sive creetur Secus Se tamen ostentat noscere cuncta miser Poor Man knows not if's Soul be bred or moulded Yet boasts that he hath al things els unfolded Appendix Additionalis An additional Appendix THe ensuing Theory is taken mostly from Mr. Henry Woolnots Treatis intituled The tru original of Mans Soul which is brifly extracted God hath a duple voice one speaking in Scriptures which is his written word of Grace another in the Preamble Creatures which is his wrought Word of Nature For as Natural Works are his ordinary power and miraculous extraordinary so Nature is his ordinary Voice and divine Oracles extraordinary What God spake in his Word he hath wrought in the World whos Words and Works agree for secret things belong to him but reveled to us and our Children Wher he hath no toung to speak we may not hav an ear to hear nor heart to inquire but as Creatures we must submit to our Creator and as Christians beleev wher reason cannot reach Now to the Question The Rational Soul whether produced immediatly from Thesis God or mediatly by Man is of immortal Nature yet stained with our first Parents first sin by propagation but how can we know how 't is made before it be in being sith we cannot conceiv what it is being made For though we know 't is a spiritual substance realy subsisting in a Body yet what maner of metaphysical matter 't is made of none knows No marvel then if we be ignorant of the origin which is harder to explore For 't is spiritual and such are difficiler to discern or disquire then corporals subject to sens specialy sith ours is an incomplet Spirit or part of a Creature Man being composed of a mortal Body and immortal Soul the one indued with senses to receiv al corporeal Images the other furnished with a faculty of Reason which from thos Images draws discurses and consequents wherby it gets knowledg of causes and effects wherof Sens is incapable Hence it happens that when we discurs of spiritual Natures which transcend Sens we are put out of our usual way and wander as half lost in incertainty without any exact knowledg to content the Mind Whatever excellences be in inferior Natures are much more perfectly in superiors as thos of other Animals more eminent in Man chiefly in his Soul thos of his Soul more conspicuous in Angels and al perfections of al most trascendent in God So the knowledg of inferior Natures is comprehended in superior but not contrarily Nor can any sav God who hath no superior know it self purely or properly but only by reflexion as the Ey which sees al things cannot behold it self sav in a Glass Nor can we know our own Soul but as 't is shewed in a myrrhour of the Works and as by it we know other things so by them we hav a glimps of it To omit several Opinions of Pagan Philosophers and Christian Opinions Heretics The orthodox jointly agree that Mans Soul is either immediatly created by God or mediatly generated by Man both which are bipartit In point of Creation Hilary with others hold it to be formed without the Body and then infused But the general Tenet is that 't is created and infused in the Body which runs most current So for propagation Som suppose it a corporeal substance and begot in bodily maner which is generaly exploded Others hold it spiritual so produced like light from light which was the mind of most Western Doctors but S. Austin and Eucherius stood in suspens between both inclining chiefly to Creation The case is very dubious and difficil For how can Spiritual substances beget one another If it be daily created of nothing how can it stand with Gods rest from farther creating or his setled cours of al things to multiply their Kinds 't is a silly shâ—ft to say That he rests from creating new Kinds and Compounds but not from Individuals or principal Parts for the words imply no such limitation nor any place els in Scripture so 't is spoken gratis without warrant and a bare begging of the Question or meer fiction for they grant it tru in al things els except only this their own exception which they obtrud without reason when Moses makes it general of al Gods Works A greater obstacle occurs how it can stand with original sins propagation This made the Pelagians and Anabaptists who hold Soul-creation to deny ther is any such sin sav by imitation yea divers Divines seeing the absurdities arising therhence assert Traduction This makes the cheif Patrons of Creation stagger who decline it as a curious Question sith they cannot giv sufficient satisfaction exhorting to Faith beyond Reason and forbid farther disquisition for if the Soul flow immediatly from God how is it defiled being created sinless the Body cannot doo it being drawn into sin by it Nor can this contagion com from the union sith that is Gods Work who wil not put a Soul in it self simply good and his own workmanship into an unclean Vessel purposly to make it guilty of death and damnation for anothers fault shal not the judg of the World doo right 't is a poor position that 't is created in infusing and infused in creating which is al one as to say 't is made in marring and marred in making Nor is it safe to say God so willed or decreed sith it cannot be proved and being unjust is justly disproved It stands not with his Justice that Adams sin should be imputed to us or reputed ours sav as 't is our own by sinning potentialy in him as the root nor is it ours by imputation sav only in respect to propagation but inhesion for if we were simply sinless as a new created Soul is his sin cannot justly hurt us God may punish al for Adams sin yet not soly for it sith he saith The Son shal not bear the Fathers iniquity Ezek. 18. 2â— but becaus by his sin they becam sinful or rather sinned in him they are justly punished for their own sin so propagation is the sole source of original corruption Now if we receiv the worst part only from Adam which is not the subject of sin sith not the parts but whol Person sinned How can a Man
Image Life Knowledg of good and il liberty of Wil in Natural Moral and Civil things Conscience accusing or excusing are stil left after the fal which though given at Creation and so belong to Nature yet to retain them is of Grace both by giving capacity to contract or Covenant and to be a beginning of his restauration but sith thes alone be not able to rais him or recover righteousnes or keep the new Covenant by his old remains God being no hard Task-master or Covenant maker supplies by his Spirit what is farther needful to keep it sith none is bound to impossibilities Upon this keeping the new Covenant depends the eternal Bliss or bale and wo of every Man which he must obediently observ 10 Caling 10. Dispensation of the Covenant by Caling which is a proclaming therof from time to time by preaching the Word els it would soon be forsaken forgoten and slighted This S. Paul Rom. 8. 30. conjoins with Predestinating as he puts Prescience before it which is defined to be a revelation or proclamation of the Gospel Covenant injoining repentance toward God and faith in the Lord Jesus Christ promising remission of sins and life eternal to al that obey It consists of two essential parts or divine acts to make one complet work of Vocation viz. the extern preaching of the Word wherto belong Sacraments Blessings Corrections and intern operation of the Spirit accompanying or assisting the outer means This Caling hath bin dispensed diversly by Gods Wisdom and good Pleasure according to the difference of Times 1. In the old Testament before Christs coming as an outward means and measure of the Spirits operation with effects sutable to both When the bounds were narrower the Word obscurer the Sacraments more mysterious the Spirit more sparing and obedience slenderer then under the new Testament for from Adam to the Confusion of Toungs the caling was universal being al one language under the righteous Patriarchs But afterward God permitting Men which forsook their Religious Ps 147. 19 26. Fathers to walk their own waies renewed his Caling or Covenant with Abram and his Seed contracting the bounds Eph. 2. 12. of his Church The Gentils then were al under wrath and Satan without God in the World Aliens from the Covenant of Promiss For as the Church excommunicats ungodly persons so God excluds unworthy Nations for many generations to punish their ingratitud and contempt of his Word or to make future Ages cleav faster to him by default of former being left to themselfs The mystery of whos Judgments why he one while shuts out Gentils admitting the Jews another extruds the Jews receiving the Gentils is admirable and inscrutable Rom. 11. 25. 33 But why he left al to Covenant with Abram and his Seed no reason can be rendred sav only his free Grace not of Works but Rom 9. 10 11. of him that caleth 2. Under the new Testament after Christs coming which outwardly hath the Word and Sacraments exhibiting Christ with his benefits more cleerly And inwardly more abundant measure of the Spirit intended to multituds of Nations with greater fruits of mens conversion then under the old Testament This is termed the caling of the Gentils when Jews were shut out til their time shal com Here Gods Judgments are to be admired why he witholds from the Jews his inward illumining Spirit and softning Grace which he grants to Gentils keeping stil his word or outer Caling from many Nations which never heard of Christ no more then the old Heathen But we that be under the Grace of Gods caling must be more thankful for it and more careful that it be not conferred in vain upon us Divers Divines make Caling duple 1. Outward of the Word only common to Reprobats and never obeied with truth of heart being ineffectual 2. Inward of the Spirit joined with the Word peculiar to the Elect and never disobeied which is effectual This is not orthodox sith ther is but one Caling both of the Word and Spirit as Body and Soul which is effectual in it self to al under it but if it fail the fault is in the Caled which obey it not For the Spirit goes not so with the Word as to make Man perform what he can by natural strength sith 't is given to help Natures failings but to keep it waking and attentiv So if the Spirit be not present with the Word to som 't is becaus they are not present to it through their stupid supine security Nor is the concurrence of Word and Spirit natural necessary or inseparable but free or arbitrary in Gods good pleasure For as Grace is annexed to the Sacraments so is it to the Word by divine ordinance Hence the Church before Sermons prais for the Spirits illumining power to concur with the Word which God expects he should ask who is to pray for himself and others Another defect why the Spirit doth not stil work with the Word is when 't is not duly and diligently asked Som also are past Grace given to Reprobat sens to whom the Spirit is not present with the Word for former contempt or neglect in their Visitation when God caled who now givs them up to blindnes and hardnes holding back the light of his Spirit and dew of Grace from the Word preached in their hearing though Men know them not in particular and so admit al. We must distinguish betwen the word Caling Persons Caled and operations of the Spirit with the Word in them The Word is duple 1. The Law which hath two parts viz. the 1 The Law Precepts to accuse or convince and the Curs for al transgressors therof to wound or kil The Persons Caled by Gods Minister using the Law are al natural unregenerat sinners or Regenerats relapsed into grievous sins who are either ignorant of their evil estate to whom Law-precepts must be preached to make them know their sin or know it but are secure and sensless of their carnal condition and to such the curs must be denounced The Spirits operations on thes by Laws ministry are to open their eyes and prick their hearts with fear of the Curs which effects the Spirit with the letter of the Law ordinarily produceth by working on thos remains of light left in the mind and of Conscience accusing which works are wrought in many Reprobats who hav som initial parts of Grace as Papists grant 2. The Gospel which hath a Precept to repent of sin shewed 2 Gospel by the Law and beleev in Christ who givs life wher the Law-Curs killeth with a Promiss of sins remission and eternal life Acts 2 38 39. to al that repent and beleev The Persons caled in the words of the Gospel are al sorts of sinners but convict terrified wounded Mat. 11. 28. ful of compunction and self-condemning wrought by the Spirit in preaching the Law The Spirits operations on such by the Gospels ministry are to open their eyes to see
treats only of the Bodies resurrection or immortality of Men who shal liv again He means thos Patriarchs were immortal becaus God in meer grace confers eternal life on the faithful who tho dead liv stil to God being writ in the Book of life with thos that are absolved of their sins to reviv at resurrection but not by any property consequent to Mans essence or Soul For to make it a living entity independent after separation on the Body and in it self immortal or that any Man is immortal except Enoch or Elias hath no cleer warrant Job 14. 10 12. in the word Job complains of Mans mortality by nature Man dies and wasts away yea givs up the Ghost and wher is he Down he lieth and riseth not til the Heavens be no more Which 2 Pet 3 7. 13. St. Peter shews shal be at the universal Resurrection when the Heavens and Earth shal be dissolved by fire but new expected according to promiss wherin dwels righteousnes So wher Job saith Man riseth not til the Heavens be no more 't is as if he said immortal life for Life and Soul in Scripture sens is the same begins not in Man til the Resurrection or day of Judgment and the caus of it is Gods promiss as St. Peter tels not Mans specifical Nature or Essence Now sith Gods Kingdom is a civil Common-wealth wher he-self is Soveraign by virtu first of the old and now since of the new Covenant it evidently appeers that when Christ shal com again in Majesty and Glory to reign existently and eternaly his Kingdom shal be on Earth as God was in Israel So Gods Enimies and their torments after Judgment shal be on Earth for the place wher al remain til the Resurrection is usualy stiled in Scripture under ground in Latin Infernus or Inferi Greecly Hades wher Men cannot see or dy implying the Grav so wel as any other deep place but the damneds place after Resurrection is not designed in al holy writ by any note of situation but only by their company wher such wicked Men were whom God in miraculous maner had cut off Touching Hel 't is no real place in any part of the created Hel what World but a Metaphorical word signified by wicked Men ther being 1. 'T is caled Infernus Tartarus or bottomless Pit from Corah Dathan and Abiram swalowed alife into the Earth 2. 'T is said to be under water becaus the Giants mighty Men in Noahs dais caled Greecly Heroes were drowned in the Deluge 3. Becaus Sodom and Gomorrha consumed by Fire and Brimstone becam a bituminous Lake 't is caled a Lake burning with fire and brimstone which is the secund death So Hel fire is expressed by Sodoms fire indefinitly Rev 21. 8. taken for destruction as 't is said Death and Hel were Rev. 20. 14. cast into the Lake of fire or destroied for after the last day Men shal dy no more nor go into Hades 4. 'T is termed from Egypts triduan deep darknes utter or extern darknes viz. without the habitation of Gods elect which is ful of Light 5. Neer Jerusalem is the Vally of Hinnon in part wherof caled Tophet the Jews most Idolatrously sacrificed their Children to Moloch wher they cast out their Carrion and to clens the Air made continual fires whence Hel is caled Gehenna or Vally of Hinnon and from thos incessant Fires cam the name or notion of everlasting unquenchable Fire Now none is so sensless to expound any of thes literaly as if the damned after rising from death shal be for ever under Earth or Water both which are but one Globe like a Pins point compared to the Heavens in a bottomless Pit or that they shal be eternaly punishd in Gehenna the Vally of Hinnon or shal liv in utter darknes not one to see another or be scorched for ever with Fire and Brimstone Ergo the meaning is Metaphorical and must be disquired by the nature of the Torments and Tormenters The Tormenters are termed Satan or Enimy Diabolus or Tormenters Accuser and Abaddon or Destroier which significant titles set not forth any individual Persons like proper Names but only an office or faculty and are very Appellativs which should not be left untranslated as they are becaus therby they seem to be proper names of Demons and Men sooner seduced to beleev the Doctrin of Devils then Pagan Religion contrary to Christs So becaus the Enimy in Gods Kingdom of the Jews is meant by Enimy Accuser and Destroier if Gods Kingdom after the Resurrection shal be on Earth the Enimy and his Kingdom must be ther also as it was when the Israelits deposed God and chose Saul sith Gods Kingdom was in Palestin and the Nations round about Enimies whence it appeers that Satan signifies any Enimy of the Church Metaphoricaly it may but is not Satan properly or literaly Quaere Rev. 12. 〈◊〉 a foul Fiend Enimy to Mankind as the great red Dragon that old Serpent was who deceived Eve and since the whol World Are al the Dialogs between betwen God and Satan about Job conterfet Chimaeras When the seventy rejoiced that the 〈◊〉 10. 17. 18 20. Devils were subject to them Christ said I saw Satan as lightning fal from Heaven but rejoyce not that the Spirits are Mat 12. 24. 〈◊〉 Cor. 5. 5. subject to you Here Christ cals Devils Spirits and names Satan as one yea Beelzebub is named Prince of Devils Excommunication 1 Tim. 1. 20. is caled a delivery to Satan is this meant only a Jailor or temporal Enimy Hel torments are somtime caled weeping and gnashing Torments of teeth somtime the worm of Conscience of time fire wher Dan. 12. 2. the worm dieth not which is never quenched but by Daniel shame and contempt Al which Metaphoricaly denote great grief or discontent of Mind from sight of others felicity which they lost by their own disobedience and incredulity but becaus others felicity is known only by comparing it with their own misery it results that they shal suffer such bodily pains and calamities as Men that liv under cruel Governors having God the King of Saints their eternal Enimy Yea beside al torments of Body and Mind they shal likwise endure a secund Death For tho the general Resurrection be evident yet it 1 Cor. 15. 42 no eternal life promised to Reprobats St. Paul to the question with what Bodies Men shal rise saith 'T is sown in corruption and raised in incorruption sown in dishonor raised in glory sown in weaknes raised in power but Glory and Power cannot comply to wicked Mens Bodies nor the name of secund Death apply to such as can never dy but once Howbeit tho a calamitous everlasting Life may Metophoricaly be termed eternal Death yet can it in no property of speech be stiled a secund Death Everlasting fire prepared for the Damned is an estate wherin Secund Death none can liv after the Resurrection
but the chief charms are reserved for the Children to be Baptised as appeers in their Ceremonies The like are used in Mariage Visitation of the Sick extrem Unction consecrations of Churches and Church-yards to expel Phantasms Faieries and imaginary Spirits al which belong to the Kingdom of Darknes being effects of our natural ignorance Another error is from misinterpreting the words eternal Life everlasting Death and secund Death of which three in order Adam had an estate to liv for ever not by nature in himself Eternal Life or any part of his but by eating the Tree of Life which he had leav to doo so long as he obeied God but was thrust out of Paradise so soon as he sinned lest he should feed theron and liv for ever Now Christs death is a discharge of sin and restitution of Life eternal to al the faithful who beleev in him and to them only Yet the general doctrin of Divines is that every Man hath eternal life by nature of his immortal Soul so that the flaming Sword at entrance of Paradise may hinder him from tasting the Tree of Life but not from immortality which God bereaved Nor shal he need Christs sacrifice for recovery of the same sith not only the faithful or righteous but the wicked and Heathen shal enjoy eternal Life without Death much less a secund everlasting death To salv or shadow this they say by secund everlasting Death is meant a secund everlasting Life but Torments which is a figure never used sav in this very case Is not secund Death an eternal being both of Body and Quaere Soul in Hel-fire under Satan This tenet of the Souls immortality is founded on som obscure places of the new Testament which yet in a different sens of his own mint are cleer enough and unnecessary to Christian Faith For suppose when a Man dies nothing remains but his Carcas cannot God who made clay a living Creature by his word rais it again by another word Yes but not to the same life which vanished to nothing wheras the Soul being immortal persists identical Soul in Scripture stil signifies either Life or a Living Creature and Body jointly with Soul a Body alife As God saith Let the Waters produce Reptile animae viventis the creeping thing with a living Soul we translat that hath life Again God created Whales omnem animam viventem in English every living Creature but of Man God made him of dust and breathed in his face the spiracle or breath of life factus est Homo in animam viventem and Gen. 8. 21. Man was made a living Creature So God said when Noah cam out of the Arc I wil no more smite omnem animam viventem Deut 12. 23. every living Creature Eat not the Blood for 't is the Soul or Life But if Soul signified a substance immortal existing after separation from the Body it may be said of any other Animal so wel as Man Is it said of any other that God having made the Body of Quaere Earth breathed into his face spiraculum Vitae the Spirit of Life Which al interpreters expound of creating and infusing the Soul together He goes on the Souls or Lifes of the Faithful which being accidents that annihilated when the Bodies died must be new made are by Gods special Grace not of their own Nature to remain in their raised Bodies for ever after Judgment Wher 't is said in the new Testament that any shal be cast Body and Soul as if they were distinct Quaere parts into Hel-fire it imports Body and Life how can Life be cast being a bare accident That they shal be cast alife into Rev. 19 v. 20. Gehenna So 't is said The Beast and fals Prophet were both cast alife into a Lake of fire burning with Brimstone This dark doctrin of the Souls subsistence after separation opens a sluce to let in the superstitious superstructures of Purgatory and Indulgences Ghosts or Goblins and Exorcisms invocating of Saints yea Heaven and Hel too with som others For Men before Christs coming being taught from the Greecs Demonology that Mens Souls were distinct substances which after separation must subsist somwher by their own Nature the Doctors of the Church long doubted wher they resided til the general Resurrection supposing they lay under the Altars but finding that Martyrs Souls of them slain for Gods word if they hav Souls why not others Quae c. Lay under the Altar the Church of Rome for their profit Rev. 6 9. erected Purgatory Surely they doo al for profit to maintain their pomp pride power and prodigality Beza to prov Gods Kingdom began at Christs Resurrection Mat. 16. 28. and continues stil urgeth his words Verily I say to you som of them which stand here shal not tast of death til they hav seen Mat. 16. 28. Marc 9. 1. Luk. 9. 37. Gods Kingdom com with power Ergo either Gods Kingdom cam shortly after and is now in this World or els som then standing by Christ are yet alife Sol. This is a darke difficil place which provs nothing necessarily but if Gods Kingdom began at Christs Resurrection why doo we stil pray thy Kingdom com Therfore 't is not meant therof Yea after his Resurrection the Apostles asked Wilt thou now restore the Kingdom of Israel He answered 'T is not for you to know the time or season which the Father hath put in his own power but ye shal receiv power by the holy Ghosts coming on you and shal be my Witnesses in Jerusalem in al Judea and utmost part of the Earth So he told them his Kingdom was not com nor shal they foreknow when 't is to com Christ said to Peter of John If I wil that he tarry Joâ—n â—1 v. 22. til I com what is that to thee Which bred a beleef that he should not dy yet the truth of it was neither confirmed nor confuted by thos words but left as a dark saying and so must this Howbeit sith Christs transfiguration is the next Act handled by al three Evangelists haply he cals that Gods Kingdom which som ther should see being a representation or vision of his glory and Majesty as he shal com in his Kingdom which cannot be proved to begin til the day of Judgment Wher is it proved that any terren Kingdom shal commence Quaeâ—e then Then shal the Faithful rise with glorious spiritual Bodies inlifened and becom Christs Subjects in his Kingdom wher they shal not eat drink marry as they did in their natural Bodies but liv happily in their individual Persons for ever The elect then alife shal be suddenly changed and their Bodies made spiritualy immortal but Reprobats shal rise to receiv punishment yet not eternaly in their individual Persons nor can any place prov it As after the Resurrection the Elect shal be restored to Adams estate before he fel so Reprobats shal be in the
Press but with this difference or dissonance Dictio Praeconis tenues cito transit in auras Scriptorum at remanent dogmata saepe diu A Preachers wordst ' empty Air turn again But Writers works oftimes doo long remain Al Men are apt to er but the modest ready to acknowledg and amend it if detected or displaied as I vow in presence of our great God freely to doo if any shal fairly shew it nor ever wil be found a Beast perversly to persevere therin I wil serv no Person Sect or Faction for fear favor or flattery but only deliver my privat personal Judgment how weak or worthless soever sincerely according to verity or verisimility This such as know my constant resolut disposition wil easily beleev but others may take it on trust til they shal hav time to try the contrary Al the Theses are too redious but ther prolixity consists more in multitud of matter then words for I could hav made the Work twise so voluminous with half the toil but doo study brevity to spare the Readers Purs and Pains The Speculations are somwhat sublime but stile facil and familiar fit for vulgar understandings Let every one take or leav and take al in good part Farewel Rustica Ruricolae Fabrique Fabrilia tractent Tangere nec Medicos dogmata sacra decet Let Clowns the Plow and Smiths their Forge attend Nor should Phisitians to things sacred bend Articuli Fidei Anglicae 39 Articles of our Faith THE Articles of Religion concluded in Convocation and confirmed by Act of Parliament under Queen Elizabeth Anno 1562. but ratified or reestablished under King James by the same duple authority Anno 1604. which are here presented to satisfy or gratify al lest men like Lynces should seem sharp sighted to look into the Confessions of other Reformed Churches abroad and Lamiae or blind Beetles at home in being ignorant of our own Principles and Doctrins the general Catalog of which follows in order 1 Of Faith in the holy Trinity 2 Of the Word which was made Man 3 Of Christs descent into Hel. 4 Of his Resurrection 5 Of the holy Ghost 6 Of the Scriptures sufficience to salvation 7 Of the old Testament 8 Of the three Creeds 9 Of original birth-sin 10 Of free wil. 11 Of mans justification 12 Of good works 13 Of works before justification 14 Of super trrogation 15 Of Christ alone without sin 16 Of sin after Baptism 17 Of Predestination and Election 18 Of obtaining salvation only by Christ 19 Of the Church 20 Of the Churches authority 21 Of general Councils 22 Of Purgatory 23 Of ministring in the Congregation 24 Of speaking ther in an unknown toung 25 Of the Sacraments 26 Of the Ministers unworthines which hinders not their effects 27 Of Baptism 28 Of the Lords supper 29 Of the wicked who doo not eat Christs Body and Blood 30 Of both kinds 31 Of Christs Oblation finished on the Cross 32 Of Priests marriage 33 Of Excommunicat Persons how they are to be shunned 34 Of the Churches Traditions 35 Of â—omilies 36 Of Consecrating Bishops c. 37 Of the Civil Magistrat 38 Of Christians goods which are not common 39 Of a Christian mans Oath The Particulars insu Article 1. THere is but one only tru living God everlasting without body parts or passions of infinit power wisdom and goodness maker and preserver of al things both visible and invisible in unity of which Godhead ther be three Persons of one substance power and eternity the Father Son and holy-Ghost Article 2. The Son who is the Word of the Father begot of him from everlasting the very eternal God of one substance with the Father took mans Nature in the womb of the blessed virgin of hir substance so that two whol perfect Natures the Godhead and Manhood were joined in one Person never to be severed wherof one Christ consists perfect God and very Man who suffered was crucified dead and buried to reconcile his Father to us and be a sacrifice not only for Original guilt but also for al actual sins of men Article 3. As Christ died for us and was buried so 't is to be beleeved that he went down into Hel. Article 4. Christ truly rose from death and took again his body with flesh bones and al things pertaining to the perfection of Mans Nature wherwith he ascended into Heaven and ther sits til he shal return to judg al men at last day Article 5. The holy Ghost proceding from the Father and the Son is one substance majesty and glory with the Father and Son very eternal God Article 6. Holy Scripture contains al things necessary for Salvation so that whatever is not read therin nor may be proved therby is not required of any man to be beleeved as an Article of Faith or be thought needful to salvation By the name of holy Scripture we understand thos Canonical Books of the Old and New Testament whos authority the Church never doubted of and the other Books as saint Jerom saith the Church reads for exemple of life and instruction of maners but doth not apply them to stablish any Doctrin All the Books of the new Testament as commonly received we receiv and reput them Canonical See their names and number in the holy Bible Article 7. The old Testament is not contrary to the New for in both everlasting life is offred to mankind by Christ who is the only Mediator between God and Man being both God and Man Therfore they are not to be heard which fain that the old Fathers looked only for transitory promises though the Law given of God by Moses touching Ceremonies or Rites doo not bind Christians nor the civil precepts of necessity to be received in any Christian Commonwealth yet no Christian man whatever is free from obedience of the Commandements caled moral Article 8. The three Creeds Nicen Athanasius and that commonly caled the Apostles ought throughly to be received and beleeved for thes may be proved by most certain warrants of Scripture Article 9. Original sin stands not in imitating Adam as the Pelagians vainly talk but is the fault and corruption of every mans Nature that is ingendred of Adams ofspring wherby man is far gon from original Righteousnes and inclined to evil so that the flesh lusteth against the spirit and therfore in every person born into the world it deservs Gods wrath and damnationthis infection of Nature remains yea in the Regenerat wherby the lust of the flesh caled in Greek 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which som expound the wisdom som the sensuality som the affection som the desire of the flesh is not subject to the Law of God and though ther is no condemnation to them that beleev and are baptized yet the Apostle confesseth that Concupiscence hath of it self the nature of Sin Article 10. The condition of man after Adam's fal is such as he cannot turn or prepare himself by his natural strength and good works to Faith for
Christ in the Gospel viz. Baptism and the Lords Supper thos fiv commonly caled Sacraments Confirmation Penance Orders Matrimony extrem Unction are not properly Gospel Sacraments being such as hav grown up partly of corrupt interpreting the Apostles and partly are states of life alowed in Scripture but hav not like nature of Sacraments with the oâ—het two for they hav no visible sign or Element ordained by God The Sacraments were not instituted by Christ to be gazed on or carried about but that we should duly use them and in such only as receiv them worthily they hav a wholsom effect or operation but they that receiv the same unworthily purchas to themselfs damnation as saint Paul saith Article 26. Though in the visible Church the evil be ever mingled with the good and somtime hav chief authority in ministration of the word and Sacraments yet sith they doo not the same in their own name but in Christs and minister by his Commission or authority we may use their ministry both in hearing Gods word and receiving the Sacraments nor is the effect of Christs Ordinances taken away by their wickednes nor the grace of Gods gifts impaired from such as by Faith rightly receiv the Sacraments ministred to them which are effectual by reason of Christs institution and promiss tho they be ministred by evil men Nevertheless it appertaâ—â—s to the Churches Disciplin that inquiry be made of evil Ministers and that they be accused by thos which hav knowledg of their offences and finaly being found guilty by just judgment be deposed Article 27. Baptism is not only a sign of Profession and mark of distinction wherby Christians are disâ—erned from others not Christned but is also a sign of Regeneration or new birth wherby as by an instrument they that receiv Baptism rightly are grafted into the Church the promises of sins fâ—rgivnes and our adoption to be sons of God by the holy Ghost are visibly signed and sealed Faith confirmed and Grace increased by virtu of praier to God The Baptism of young Infants in any wise is to be retained in the Church as most consonant to Christs institution Article 28. The Lords Supper is not only a sign of Christians lov which they ought to hav among themselfs but rather a Sacrament of our Redemption by Christs death so that to such as worthily receiv the same the Bread which we break is partaking of Christs body and the cup of Blessing is a partaking of his Blood Transubstantiation or change of the substance of Bread and Wine cannot be proved by holy Writ but repugns the plain words of Scripture overthrows the nature of a Sacrament and givs occasion to sundry superstitions Christs Body is given taken and eaten in the Supper only after a spiritual heavenly maner and the mean wherby 't is received and earen is Faith This Sacrament by Christs Ordinance was not reserved carried about lifted up or worshipped Article 29. The wicked and such as be void of life by Faith tho they doo carnaly and visibly press with their teeth as saint Austin saith the Sacrament of Christs Body and Blood yet in no wise are partakers of Christ but rather doo eat and drink the Sign or Sacrament of so great a thing to their condemnation Article 30. The Cup of the Lord is not to be denied to lay people for both parts of the Lords Sacrament by Christs Ordinance and commandement ought to be administred unto al Christian men Article 31. The Offering of Christ once made is that right perfect Redemption Propitiation and Satisfaction for al sins of the whol world both Original and Actual and ther is no other satisfaction but that alone Wherfore the Sacrifices of Masses in which it was commonly said the Priests did offer Christ for quick and dead to hav remission of pain and guilt are blasphemous fables and dangerous deceipts Article 32. Bishops Priests and Deacons are not commanded by Gods Law either to vow the estate of single life or to abstain from mariage but 't is also lawful for them as for al other Christian men to marry at their own discretion as they shal judg it to serv better to godlines Article 33. That person which by open denunciation of the Church is rightly cut off from the unity therof and excommunicat ought to be taken by the multitud of the whol Faithful as an Heathen or Publican til he be openly reconciled by penance and received into the Church by a Judg that hath authority therto Article 34. It is not necessary that Traditions and Ceremonies be one or utterly like in al places for they hav bin divers and changed at al times according to diversity of Countries Times and mens maners so that nothing be ordained against Gods word Who ever doth willingly or purposly on his privat judgment openly break the Churches Traditions and Ceremonies which be not repugnant to holy Writ but be ordained and approved by common authority ought to be rebuked openly that others may fear to doo the like as one that offendeth against the public Order of the Church and woundeth the consciences of weak Brethren Every particular or Nationall Church hath authority to ordain change and abolish Ceremonies or Rites of the Church ordained only by mans authority so that al be done to edefying Article 35. The secund book of Homilies whos several titles are joyned to this Article contain Godly wholsom doctrins and necessary for thes times as the former book doth set forth under Edward 6 therfore we judg them to be read in Churches by al Ministers diligently and distinctly that the People may understand them Their names are thes 1 Of the right use of the Church 2 Against peril of Idolatry 3 Of repairing and keeping clean Churches 4 Of good Works first of Fasting 5 Against Gluttony and Drunkennes 6 Against excess in Apparel 7 Of Prayer 8 Of the place and time of Prayer 9 That Common Prayer and Sacraments ought to be in a known toung 10 Of the reverend estimation of Gods Word 11 Of Alms doing 12 Of Christs Nativity 13 Of Christs Passion 14 Of Christs Resurrection 15 Of the worthy receiving the Sacrament of Christs Body and Blood 16 Of the Gifts of the holy Ghost 17 For the Rogation days 18 Of the state of Matrimony 19 Of Repentance 20 Against â—â—lenes 21 Against Rebellion Article 36. The Book of consecrating Archbishops and Bishops and ordering of Priests and Deacons set forth under Edward 6 and then confirmed by Parliament contains al things necessary to such consecrating and ordering nor hath it ought that of it self is supersticious or ungodly Therfore whoever are consecrated or ordered according to the Rites of that Book since the secund yeer of that King to this time or hereafter shal be consecrated or ordered according to the same We decree all such to be rightly orderly and lawfully consecrated and ordered Article 37. The Kings Majesty hath chief Power in this Realm of England and his other
the maners of the Mind and Faculties of Soul depend wherin Children may resemble their Progenitors though in countenance complexion or constitution more like to strangers so ther is no certain or convincing Argument for Traduction to be taken from such variable observations Ob. If aformativ faculty in seed to build the Body proced from Parents Souls then doth also an animific virtu to produce the Soul But al sides grant the one Ergo the other folows For if Parents Souls impart to it a power to prepare a place that power is able to beget a Soul Sol. The formativ animific or rather Prolific faculty preparativ to sit the matter for union proceds from Parents Souls but not procreativ to beget a Soul being only able to build the bodily part and make it ready for reception of the Soul when it shal be infused Repl. This seems a meer Postulatum without proof not rendring any reason why 't is able to prepare a place and not procreat the Soul For what belongs to every Kind cannot sans derogation or disparagement be denied to the noblest Creature but the intire production of Individuals with their principal parts both matter and form pertains to al Species els Ergo to Mankind also Sol. 'T is no disparagement but a dignity that God deigns to creat in Man a divine paâ—t yet he may be said to beget Individuals intire for perpetuity of his Kind viz. praeparando uniendo though he begets not the Soul it self hic murus abeneus esto this is the main Anchor-hold Ob. David saith Man is conceived in sin which either is Psal 51. 5. impressed before the Souls infusion or the Soul corrupted at conception and first creation or an inanimat Embryo the subject of sin or els the Soul is traducted which salvs and saâ—isfies al scruples but the three first are absonous Ergo the last alone authentic Sol. Som say Parents sin committed in procreation is ther meant but that in al lawful Marriages is sanctified and who can cal that polluted which God hath cleansed Others fly to the Souls infusion at first conception which must eeds be els it wil not hold water But most say the very seed is defiled with an hereditary stain as 't is with the seeds of sundry diseases which is not properly sin til the Soul be infused being the sole subject therof â—trum horum mavis for men wil never agree in this intricat Maze Ob. Al Accidents folow their Form nor can subsist without their Subject but vegetation is visible and vigorous in an Embryo before the quickning or motion Ergo the Soul or Subject must needs be ther at conception and consequently traducted or generated Sol. Zanchy answers how orthodoxly judg ye that in building L. 2. de Hom. creat c. 5. Mans Body as it hath first the form of blood next of milk then of flesh and last a human shape so at first is no Soul but only an energy in the spermatic spirits to produce a vegetant Soul when the Embryo livs as a Plant then that Soul perishing the Sentient is generated and that livs as an Animal which being also extinct the Rational succeds or supervens not produced from the same energy nor from Parents Souls but created and infused by God This implies a duple death upon extinction of the two first Souls Others say the Vegetant powers arising from seed spirits and blood are cherished by warmth of Natures Garden the Womb til time of motion but ever after the new infused Soul exerciseth al functions til it brings the Embryo to birth and perfection Thus they are puzled touching the time when 't is infused but certainly the quickning is very uncertain Repl. The proper source and principal subject of al such Faculties is a Soul not seed spirits or blood Ergo either the seed had a Soul begetting energy or they were faculties of the succeding Soul and so subsisted alone without a subject or els are Creatures distinct and remain divided but the two later assertions are gross absurdities and the first rests irrefragable that the seed carries an animific virtu or Soul-begetting energy from the Parents Souls by natural traduction which best salvs the propagation of original sin Sol. Som say thos Faculties predepend on the Seminal Form til infusion of the Intellectual yet how can that being inanimat be the subject of vegetation or motion Or if it were a Soul how did it vanish it died not as Zanchius dreams nor is swalowed up of the succeding Soul nor can ther be any coition or coalition of Souls Others forced by thes pressures hold 't is created at conception which is more tenible of the two exercising hir functions gradualy as organs are apparated and accommodated For that time is fixed but the quickning sooner or later according to the Embryos vivacity and other various contingents but God is not tied to creat Souls upon al human casualties til his set appointed time yea Christs conception at the Angels salutation Ave Maria is cald his incarnation which is the production of his whol Humanity and his Mother went immediatly to hir Cosin Elizabeth then impregnant of John Baptist who being filled with the Holy Ghost caled hir the Mother of our Lord so that he was then Luke 1 43. perfect God and Man at first conception and the Babe leaped in her Womb for joy being before quick as plainly appears Ob. Mans Soul is impure at first conception and the whol Man polluted for what is born of flesh is flesh saith Christ but God John 3 6. creats nothing impure Ergo the Soul is not created but conceived and generated impure from the Parents Souls Sol. God creats the Soul in substance found sans stain but corruption or contagion caled Concupiscence is not of the Father saith S. John but of the World for the guilt of original sin is imputed to the whol Man so soon as both parts are united Ob. Adams Rib was made a complet woman and the Soul therin becam hirs no new being infused Ergo every Soul is not created Sol. The School-men say Eves Soul was created and infused though it be not expressed yet the extraordinary creation of the first Woman extends not to the ordinary production of al others nor is it clear that the Rib was animat or the Soul therof made hirs Repl. In this case it holds for the Infusiasts infer that al Mens Souls are created becaus Adams was Ergo it folows of al Women from Eve Sol. The reason is not semblable for he was the root of al Mankind Male and Female therfore al our souls infused as his was but not she of Womankind so it skilleth not whether hirs was created ex nihilo or diffused from that animat Rib sith 't is not reveled Ob. Christ took his whol Humanity from the Virgin by the Holy Ghosts overshadowing Ergo both Body and Soul cam from hir Sol. He took only Flesh from her which includs the whol
Thes Texts tend al to the Registry of Gods simple Prescience and Providence which tho they be no causes of any effects yet are certain in the events and cannot be frultrat but make nothing for absolut Decree of a prefixd period to our dais Dr. Charlton debats this point acutly and accuratly part wherof shal be decurted God the giver of life sole moderator but not Author of death for al natural motion proceds from one first mover God whence S. Paul saith In him we live mov Acts 17. 28. and hav our being The term Life is taken either for the period of every Mans dais caused by a sensible decay or dissolution of al ligaments which chain the Soul to the Body or by an extinction of his vital flame upon consumption of the Radical fuel when no preternatural causes interven to anticipat the dissipation of that elementar temper on which Lifes subsistence necessarily depends or els for the end of every Mans Life in general by what means or whensoever be it by diseases or violent accidents without respect to the gradual decay and consequent cessation of natural temperament in old age From the first acception arise 2. Questions 1. Whether this term of Life circumscribed by a natural deflux of the Body which is a kind of mature facil faling away of Natures ligaments like ripe Apples be definitly fixd by divine Ordinance to leav every in dividual in his own moderation without prescribing or procuring that this decay of temperature should hav more or less duration then what may naturaly occur from the more or less durability therof 2. If Life be thus fixd by Gods decree not to prolong it beyond the point of its natural durability whether he can without altering his own established cours of Nature being moved by Mens praiers or pitty as he added 15 yeers to Ezekiahs dais correct thos depravities procured by excess sicknes or other extraneous means and so hinder the dissolution therof That is whether if God hath predetermined that none shal exced the term to which the durability of his individual temper or strength of constitution may probably extend his special Providence doth not permit that the temperament may be vitiated impaired or ruined by putrefactiv destructiv preternatural causes obvenient and so not hold out to that point of time which otherwise by its primigeneous nativ condition it might hav reached unto For the secund acception of Life in general by what means of dissolution soever sicknes surfeit shipwrack suffocation famin war wounds or other-wais this question occurs whether the immature pâ—â—eâ—natural period therof be so precisely prefixd that no Human prudence or providence can prevent or prolong it nor fortuitous accidents accelerat or prevert it In brief whether the Catastrophe of ech Mans life be prefined in the Book of Fate or Divine Decree Life is said to be fixd in a duple sens 1. In respect of som absolut Decree antegredient to Gods Presâ—ience of al secund instrumental causes so that Man cannot possibly prorogue it beyond or fal short of that fatal term 2. In respect of som conditionat Hypothetic Decree whos alteration or accomplishment is superseded by the electiv liberty of mans Wil either as guided by supernatural light of divine Grace to pursu the real tru good or seduced by delusion of its own sensual judgment to wander in the devious tracts of error and so chus seeming fals Good Now it skils not whether this conditionat Decree be grounded on certain prenotion of al concomitant circumstances and corollary relations concerning Mans election of adhering to good and evil Objects and his consequent virtuous or vicious cours of life Or whether it be made without any such infallible prenotion or volition yet with a positiv deliberat sentence certainly to be executed in du time when the right use or abuse of Freewil shal be fulfilled Hence arise 3. Opinions 1. Som hold the term of every 1 Opinion very Mans life with al causes and clauses conducing to be flatly fatal or immovable by Gods irresistible Wil and Decree according to the vulgar saying his time is com this is a Stoical devise used as a spur to excite magnanimous spirits against dangers of death that every Mans destiny is writ with invisible indeleble characters in his forhead which al Mahometans maintain doctrinaly and many Christians ignorantly But 't is in it self impious if not blasphemous to confine Confut. Gods chief attribut of infinit Omnipotence within the definit lists laws or limits of secund causes and it derogats from the liberty of Mans wil leaving nothing in his power to elect or eschew nor to act or shun For if Fatal necessity be defended al our actions shal be but so many accomplishments of ineluctable Destiny and results of Counsil the decrees of Fate so al human pruâ—ence is palpable folly 〈◊〉 study of Wisdom painful vanity and al Laws meer tyranny siâ—h thâ—y injoyn only what must hâ—vâ—in doon otherwise or restrain what would els be checked by coercing fatality Thus shal al praâ—ers be fruitless vows hopelâ—ss exhortations to good needless dâ—hortations from evil frivolous and acts of piety or devotion superfluous with a â—â—yriod of other incongruâ—ties appendent if absolut fatality be admitted which is inconsistent to the rules o. Reason and Râ—ligion 2. Others assert a fixed fatality of every Mans life 2 Opin a posteriori not to be extended beyond the natural condition of each particular constitution but not a priori sith it may be contracted or abbreviated as 't is commonly but simply said one may shorten tho not exced his time appointed by divine Dâ—cree Certes God made no such absolut decrees for the length Confut. of any Mans life but leavs every Man free to be his own Carver in al temporal mundan affairs 3. Divers defend that Mans life may be lengthned or 3 Opin shortned more or less of what it usually is in most Men by the right use or abuse of means according to Gods prenotion or Hypothetic determination leaving the means to every mans Freewil This is perpendicularly proved by many plain places and Confirmat pregnant instances extant in holy Writ but none that hav any color for a fixed fatal period Salomon saith The Prov. 10. 27. fear of the Lord prolongeth dais but the wickeds yeers shal be shortned For God promiseth long life to them that honor their Parents and generaly to al such as shal keep his Commandements Yea he said to Salomon If thou wilt 1 Kings 3. 14. walk in my wais as thy Faâ—her David did I wil lengthen thy dâ—is And David definitly saith Bloody and deceitful Men shal Ps 55. 23. Ps 102. 24. Ps 6. 4 5. Ps 30 Ps 8â— not liv out half their dais Again Take me not away in the midst of my dais The like he praied in sicknes That God would not cut off the thâ—ed of his Isâ— and givs thanks for preserving him from death
Witchcraft Witches justly punished with death for their fals beleef that they can doo such mischief and a wil or purpose to act it their Trade being neerer to a new Religion then a Craft or Science Such as are content to be poor may easily resolv to Censure be honest so thos that hold Hel to be no real place and Devils meer Metaphors must of cours deny Witchcraft yea many who pretend to be wise pious professors are too incredulous of Witches contrary to the faith of al Gods People Exod. 22 18. both Jews and Christians who wil not suffer a Witch to liv as God commanded The best is only privat persons deny it but al public Princes and Christian Common-wealths make strict Laws against it Saul destroied Wisards and such as had familiar Spirits yet in distres caused a Witch of Endor to rais Samuel as the spectre seemed with whom he consulted Serjeant Glyn who at last Lent Assises in Cornwal condemned eght Witches upon pregnant presumptions and personal confessions can scientiously satisfy any Man that ther be such impious confederats with Satan els al Laws and Magistrats that question them for their fals imaginations or intentions to work mischief if they can doo none were most unjust and to execut them bloody De Regno purae Caliginis Of pure Darknes Kingdom BEside al Soveraign powers Divine and Human precited Eph. 6. 12. Mat. 12. 26. Mat. 9. 34. Eph. 2. 2. John 16. 11. the Scriptures specify rulers of this Worlds Darknes even the Kingdom of Satan and Principality of Beelzebub over Devils or Phantasms in the Air as Satan is stiled Prince of the power of the Air and Prince of this World becaus he rules in this Worlds darknes So they under his dominion in opposition to the Faithful caled Children of the Light are properly Children of Darknes The Kingdom of Darknes is a confederacy of Deceivers who Kingdom of Darknes to get dominion over Men in this World devise erroneous doctrins to extinguish the Light both of Nature and Scripture p. 333. c. therby to seduce silly Disciples and so disprepare them for the Kingdom of God to com Fabula narratur mutato nomine de te Let the name changed be The tale is told of thee The darkest part of Satans Kingdom is without Gods Church among such as beleev not in Christ yet doth not the Church like the Land of Goshen enjoy al Light necessary to the work injoined by God but as Men born blind hav no Idaeâ— of any bodily Light nor can any conceiv greater then he hath perceived somtimes by his own senses so is it with the Light of the Gospel and understanding too that none can imagin any greater degree therof then he hath attained Ther be four causes of spiritual Darknes 1. By abusing or abolishing the Scriptures Light for weer 1 Caus not knowing the Scripture the chief is wherto almost al the rest are consequent or subservient wresting it to prov Gods Kingdom so oft cited to be the Church or multitud of Christians now living or that shal rise at last day but the Kingdom of God was first erected by Moses ministry over the Israelits so saith he but none els cald his peculiar People which after ceased when they refused to be longer governed by God and chose Saul Since which time God had no proper Kingdom by pact or covenant but only as he ever was is and shal be universal King of al Creatures ruling according to his absolut Wil and infinit Power Nor are any now under any King or Kingdom by pact sav our secular Soveraigns til Christ shal com again to reign eternaly on Earth Succedaneal to this said error is that Christ now in Heaven hath som one Man or Assembly by whos mouth he speaks givs Laws and which represents his Person This regal power under him the Pope claims generaly over al the Church but in particular stats the Pastors or Presbyteries of thos places which begets such darknes in Mens understandings Hence results another error that a Christian Kingdom had need to receiv his Crown by a Bishop as if the claus of Dei gratia depended on that Ceremony So al Ecclesiastics assume the title of Clergy caling al others Laity or People simply Hence also arose the distinction betwen Emperors Civil Laws and Popes Canons which last were but bare Canons or Rules voluntarily received by Princes til Charlemaign becam Emperor but afterward as the Popes power increased becam commands or Laws and Emperors allowed them For the Pope pretending al Christians to be his Subjects makes it capital for any not to be of Roman Religion but tolerats Jews Mahometans and Pagans to enjoy their own Rites if they offer no scandal A secund abuse of Scripture is turning consecration into conjuration or inchantment for to consecrat is to offer giv or dedicat decently and devoutly any thing to God by separating it from common use or prophane to be holy and peculiar for Gods service by his Ministers hands but when Papists pretend to change the nature or quality of a thing as in the Lords Supper to make Bread and Wine by saying this is my Body this is my Blood to be Christs very Body and Blood it must either be Gods extraordinary work which 't is not being doon daily and frequently or a vain impious conjuration wherby they would hav Men beleev a change of Natures contrary to the testimony of their sight and other senses If the Aegyptian Sorcerers who turnd their Rods to Serpents and Waters to Blood or at least to seem so had made no change in shew but only outfaced the King that they were Serpents which looked like Rods would not al Men tax them for Liers Thus Priests tel the People that they hav turned Bread into a Man nay a God requiring Men to worship it which is gross Idolatry The words this is my Body or represents my Body can extend soly to the Bread which Christ consecrated with his own hands for he said not the Bread wherof any Priest shal say this is my Body shal be instantly transubstantiated into it nor was this doctrin harched in the Church of Rome til under Innocent the third not 500. yeers ago when the Popes power was at highest and Peoples darknes heaviest that Men could not see the Bread they eat specialy being stamped with Christs figure on the Cross as if the very wood was transubstantiated which they ate together with the Body So at Baptism they use many Charms in name of the holy Trinity with the sign of the Cross at naming ech Person as in consecrating holy Water the Priest saith I conjure thee Creature of Water in the name of God the Father Almighty and Jesus Christ his only Son our Lord and by virtu of the holy Ghost that thou becom conjured Water to driv away al the Enimies powers c. The like is doon in Benediction of Salt and Hony mixd therwith
certain Philosophia prima on which al other ought to depend consisting chiefly in right limiting the fignifications of most universal names or appellations to avoid ambiguity or equivocation in reasoning Such are caled Definitions as of Body Time Place Matter Form Essence Subject Substance Accident Act Power Finit Infinit Quantity Quality Motion Action Passion c. necessary to explane a mans conceptions concerning the Nature and Generation of Bodies which Theory is termed Metaphysics Thes mixd with Scripture to make School Divinity teach that ther be certain Essences abstract or separat from Bodies caled substantial Forms for interpreting which Jargon take these solid grounds 1. The univers or Mass of al created things is corporal or an aggregat Body having the Dimensions length bredth depth of maâ—nitud so is every part of it a Body with like dimensions but what is not Body is no part of it and consequently Nothing or No wher becaus the univers is al in al. Yet it follows not that Spirits are Nothing or No wher sith they hav dimensions though commonly caled incorporeal 2. Of Words som are the names of things conceived as of al Bodies in the World som names of Ideas Images and Imaginations of things which we see or remember as Definition Affirmation Negation Syllogism Interrogation Promiss Covenant and other forms of Speech som names of names or several sorts of speech as Universal Plural Singular som to shew the dependance or repugnance of one name to another as when 't is said a Man is a Body being but several names of the same thing Man by coupling them together with the word is in Latin est which signify their consequence and may be expresd by placing two names in order without est or is if it were the custom But what then wil becom of thos terms Entity Essence Essential derived from it with many mo depending on them as commonly applied so they are no names of things but signs which notify how we conceiv the consequence of one Name or Attribut to another as when we say a Man is a living Body we mean not that the Man is one thing a living Body another and Is or Being a third but that Man and living Body is one thing becaus the consequence is tru being signified by the word Is so to be a Body walk speak see and lik Infinitivs which signify just the same are the names of just Nothing 3. This doctrin of separated Essences built on Aristotles vain Philosophy frights men with empty names as Birds are scared from Corn with a bare doublet hat and crooked stick from obeying the Laws of their Country for hence 't is inferred that a Mans Soul or Lâ—f can walk after death and is seen among Graves that the figure color and tast of bread hath being ther wher they say is no Bread but Christs Body that Faith Wisdom and other spiritual Virtues are somtime poured into a Man somtime blown from Heaven which beleefs lessen Subjects dependance on Soveraign power for who wil obey his Country Laws if he expects obedience to be blown into him or who wil not obey a Pâ—irst that can make God rather then his Soveraign or God or who that fears Ghosts wil not honor such as can make holy water to chase them away This Error of separated Essences draws on divers other absurdities for if thos forms be real they must hav som place but becaus they hold them incorporeal they doo not but only invisible sans dimension and Place must be filled with corporals they are driven to devise a ridiculous distinction that they are in place Definitive non circumscriptive when circumscription is the defining or determining of a thing to its place and so both terms of their distinction are the same Touching Mans Essence Soul they say 't is al in the whol and al in every part who wil swalow such gudgeons or beleev thes gulleries Yet they must who beleev the real existence of a Soul or Spirit separat from the Body If it be asked how a Soul can be tormented with fire being incorporeal They only say it cannot be known how fire can burn Souls Sith motion is change of place proper only to Bodies they are troubled to resolv how a Soul can go hence to Heaven Hel or Purgatory without a Body Or Mens Ghosts with Cloths can walk by night Haply 't is definitive non circumscriptive or spiritualy not corporaly and temporaly Are not inanimats compounds consisting of two constiâ—ntiv Quaere parts matter and form which last distinguisheth one kind from another as a Stone from Iron And are not animats so differenced by their several specifical Souls as a Man Mous Marygold If it be said they differ in external shape of Body which is sufficient how doo we differ from Mairmen in shape not at al sav only in rational Souls which they hav not nor any use of Reason more then brute Beasts Much more may be alledged 4. For eternity they wil not hav it an endless succession of time for then they can render no reason how Gods Wil or Decrees to com should not be before his Prescience of the same as an efficient caus before the effect or Agent before the action but a standing stil of the present caled in Schools Nunc stans which they nor any els understand more then they can Hic stans for an infinit immensity of place or the like Wheras we hold a Body having many parts to hav many places for them they teach that by Gods Almighty power one may be in many places or many in one at once as if it were a magnifying of Divine power to say that which is is not or that which has bin hath not bin Such incongruities with many mo Men fal into who disputing Philosophicaly of divine nature in stead of admiring or adoring it heap absurdities one upon another Of Physics or natural Philosophy they render no secundary Physics subordinat causes of events but empty words if ye ask why som Bodies sink down to Earth and others ascend They say from Aristotle 't is through heavines if ye ask what heavines is they say an endevor tending to the Earths Center or to be below is not this like a Horsin a Mâ—â— to say Bodies ascend or descend becaus they doo They say 't is becaus the Center is a resting place for al heavy things wher they desire to be as if stupid inanimats can discern the place they aim at or desire rest like animals or a peece of Glass were less safe in a window then faling to ground If yâ— ask why the same Body without adding or subtracting seems somtime greater somtime lesser They say it only seems so being ratified or condensed as if ther can be matter which hath not a determined quantity and one Body greater then another or as tho a Body were made without any quantity and more or less of it put in afterward to appeer more or less dens
This is meer obscurity fuâ— of contradiction as if the form of water in mixtils be less a form then formerly continuing stil the waters form yet cannot be caled water having changed its kind and becom another Bâ—dy Therfore 't is truer that Elements forms receiv intension and remission which variation provs them to be accidents not substances and when their just temperament is taken away they transcend or are transmuted into new Kinds So thos are idle questions touching Elements essential forms or integrity in mixtils of generation and corruption in an instant as if a form were educed or perisht in a moment with many mo of like bran For water is made gradualy in time by changing its temperament so in mixtils Stone Apple Flesh corruption corns by depraving the temperament which if vitiated beyond the utmost degree of proportion a dissolution folows by breaking the bonds of union which is doon by mixture of qualities Repl. If the temperament be varied definitions of things must also be altered but they are alwais constantly the same til the forms be changed Ergo form is no temperament Sol. This is Childish for definitions are made of things intire or perfect and abstracted by imagination of the intellect but if things be considered as they are in nature definitions must be changed as nature varies Can fading Flowers rotting Apples putrifying Flesh or sickly Bodies retain the same definitions of sound Shal the essence be changed by mutation of accidents and not varied with them Let such as so think feed on corrupt carrion til they acknowledg ther is one definition of sound food another of putrid Flesh or let them languish so long til they learn to distinguish betwen Corpus sanum aegrum nutrum What is substantial or material in Elements and mixtils that remains invariable but al accidental or formal is changed generated and corrupted by degrees as temperaments alter according to which definitions must be changed Now touching Souls ther be three sorts Vegetant Sentient Intelligent but for better explication he premiseth som Aphorisms 1. Ther be three Principles of Bodies viz two constitutiv matter of subject and accidents or qualities and one transmutativ the contrariety of thos accidents or qualities 2. Matter is al that is substantial in natural Bodies 3. Matter is indifferent to receiv al accidents yet is not simply the fountain or root of al. 4. The origin of accidents and subjects is one viz. Creation and concreation 5. The accidents of matter are duple 1. Som which immediatly folow its essence and coexist with it as passiv power quantity or extension place and time or successiv duration of which matter is the fountain 2. Such as make existence in a specifical kind as al first and secund qualities which doo not inhere primarily by necessity of nature but at the Creators pleasure to distinguish kinds 6. Both thes qualities are impressed immediatly like light in the air needing no intermediat substance to unite them 7. As quantities inhere immediatly in the matter so the operations and powers of working flow directly from the qualities 8. Al first qualities light heat cold humidity siccity and sundry of the secund thicknes thinnes heavines lightnes fluidnes firmnes existed the first day of Creation 9. The material substance of Heaven wherof Philosophers know little is common with inferior Bodies being made of one chaos so are the first accidents but thos of the secund sort differ by the discrepant conjunction of first and secund qualities 10. Ther be three Elements Air Water Earth needful to mixtion and haply two wil serv 11. Thes Elements essentialy differ in their proper qualities given by God in the Earth are conjoined cold siccity density gravity consistence in the water cold moisture remisser density gravity fluidnes in the Air remiss heat weak moisture levity tenuity and fluidnes 12. Fire is only intens heat whether in Elements or mixtils but no Element Body or Substance 13. Heat in Air or Mixtils is partly implanted at Creation partly infused or introduced by the Sun Soil and Elementar Fire if any such be but the implanted soon decais without supply of infused 14. Composition is duple 1. Of Matter with both sorts of qualities as in the Heavens and Elements 2. Of Matter so qualified and new mixture of qualities arising from the other as in al Bodies els 15. The union of qualities in Elements is most simple but in Mixtils more compound as 't is said of Colors that whitnes and blâ—â—â—â—es are made with the various mixture of bright and dark but middle colors rise from the mixtures of whit and black 16. The measure and maner of al Temperaments is founded on the first Creation from which primary patern if nature devâ—at in excess or defect a deformed Monster is bred 17. To beget a like is the property of al activ qualities in Inanimats and Animats as God bid them by his benediction to increas and multiply 18. The qualities doo so diffuse themselfs and beget others that they make the matter proportioned to exercise their forces or functions 19. The formativ faculty is founded on the very qualities which the more simple so much the more uniform configuration they produce but if compounded of divers qualities they make more diversity or difformity in figuring the material parts 20. Mixtion the less simple the more subtle for 't is a great Art to unite so many varieties of unlike qualities into one crasis or temper but the more compound the weaker becaus it consists of so many contrary qualities 21. Ther is a recripocal propagation of Temperaments in Animats viz. of the Seed and life of the Seed 22. The Prolifical power in the Seed proceds not from any spiritual substance inherent in it but only from a subtle temper of qualities in a pure spirituous matter 23. This energy is actualy in the Seed stil but asleep or unactiv til it meet with a fit Patient or rather Coagent to excite that virtu as the strong spirits which ly hid in Barly Wheat Plants Grain or Seeds are easily extracted by destillation 24. In Plants the Earth is a Womb to bring forth Seeds by supplying heat from the Sun and moisture from Soil wherby the Spirits in Seeds swel and extend the matter to fit proportion of several Figures 25 In Egbreeders Male and Female must concur to make them fertil but to hatch and inlifen them any heat natural or artificial if wel ordered wil suffice becaus the yelk is moist enough and needs only help of heat to rouz up the whits spirits 26. In perfect Animal-begetters both Sexes must actualy join to make one mass of Seed which being aptly mixd spirituous substance of that mass is blown up and augmented by heat of the Matrix and moisture of menstâ—ual Blood which begins to form the Birth and in fine brings 〈◊〉 to perfection 27. To the generation of living Creatures Seed is not simply necessary but a mixture of inâ—â—fening qualities in