XIII It was requisite that God and man should be united in one person that he might be a Mediator between God and us He was therefore the medium between God and man that is he was at the same time God and man that he might performe those things which were to be effected towards God and man Heb. 5.1 These works of God and man do require both natures in the same person of which in the next Chapter more at large The parts of Christs Incarnation are two to wit the Conception and the Nativity In the Conception three things for the better understanding are considerable the forming the assuming and the personal union of the humane nature The forming of the humane nature of Christ is that whereby it was produced without the help of man of the Virgins blood by the operation of the Holy Ghost The RULES I. The holy Ghost is not the material but the efficient cause of Christs conception For he was conceived not of his substance but by his power not by generation but by his commanding force and benediction Aug. II. The next or proximate matter was the blood of the blessed Virgin III. The form of Christs conception consisteth in the preparing and sanctifying of the Virgins blood by the Vertue of the holy Ghost in the forming of the body whereby together at the same instant it was made perfect and not successively as the bodies of other men are lastly in the inspiring of the reasonable soul. Whereas forty dayes are appointed in ordinary generation for the time of forming the Embryo the body of Christ was perfected in a moment otherwise not Christ the man but an Embryo had been conceived IV. The end of Christs miraculous conception was that he might be free from Original sin for this sticks close to all that are of and by Adam that is to all who are naturally descended from him but it was needfull that Christ should be born without sin that we might have a Holy High-Priest Heb. 7.26 The assumption of the humane nature is whereby Christ assumed truly a humane soul and body with all their affections properties and infirmities yet without sin The RULES I. Christ assumed not man but the humanity not the person but the nature For otherwise he had not been God-man and one person but two persons and so there had been two Christs The Scripture stiles him Emanuel because the same who is with us that is to say who is man is also God Isa. 7.14 the same eternal Word is said to be made flesh Iohn 1.1 and the same is called both Davids Son and his Lord Matth. 22 42. c. II. And not onely did he assume a true humane body consisting of three dimensions and a true soul but also the essential Properties III. Yea and he took our infirmities too but not those damnable ones but such as were faultlesse and miserable Thâ—se infirmities are either of the body or of the soul. Again the infirmities of the body are from external causes as the calamities and torments inflicted by enemies Or they have their being from some internal cause and they follow wholly our nature since it fell from its primitive happiness as to be cold to be hot to thirst to hunger to be in paine to grow weary and such like But the infirmities of the soul are sadnesse fear ignorance c. IV. So likewise he took upon us our affections but free from all disorder or inclination to evil The personal Union is whereby the Person of the Son of God did communicate his Hypostasis or Personality to the humane nature and he so knit it to himself and with his divine nature that the properties of both natures being entire he is in one Person God and Man The RULES I. Christs humane nature hath no other or particular Hypostasies or subsistence than that of the Word that is of the Son of God In this point Christ differs from all other men because every man hath a peculiar Hypostasis or manner of subsistence by which he differs from other Persons besides his essence consisting of body and soul but Christs humane nature wanting a proper subsistâ—nce is assumed into the fellowship of the Hypostasis of the divine nature neither do we inferre from hence that the humane nature in Christ in this point is more inferior than in other men for it is so much the more excellent in Christ by how much the subsistence of the Son of God doth exceed other creatures II. For the better conceiving of this mystery it is expedient that we shew how the humane nature was and was not united to the Son of God III. It was not united coessentially as the Persons in thâ— God-head are united not essentially only and virtually as the essence of Christ is present to all not by way of assistance or by the presence of grace only not naturally as the matter and forme are united not by way of conveniency as one friend to another not mystically onely as Christ dwells in the faithfull not Sacramentally as he is in the holy Supper but Hypostatically personally that is to say that we may more fully explain our selves for the avoyding the Eutychian Nestorian Heresie 1 Immutably without changing of the divine Person 2. Indivulsably without pulâ—ing the natures asunder with Nestorius 3. Inconfusedly without confounding the natures with Eutyches 4 Inseparably IV. There are three effects of the Personal Vnion the communication of properties the excellencie of the human nature and the cooperation of both natures in these common works of God and man V The communication of properties is a manner of speaking whereby that which belongs to either nature is predicated of the Person of Christ which way soever it is called This is either directly done or indirectly directly when that which belongs to the divine nature is predicated of the Person so nominated from the divine nature even so are things denominated from the humane nature which belong to the humane nature Joh. 1.1 In the beginning was the word and the word was with God and the word was God c. Luc. 18.32 The Son of man shall be delivered to the Gentiles he shall be mocked and spitefully entreated and spit upon Indirectly when that which belongs to the Divinity is enunciated or said of Christ as man and what appertains to the humanity is spoken of Christ as God as Joh. 3.13 No man hath ascended to Heaven but he that descended to wit the â—on of man wâ—ich is in Heaven Act. 20.28 God hath purchased the Church with his own precious blood VI. This communication is verbal or real verbal in respect of the manner of speaking but real in respect of the foundation to wit of the personal union For as both natures truly subsist in the Person of the Son of God so the propertâ—es of both natures are common to him VII But here we must distinguish the concrete words from the abstract for those belong to the
Person but these to either Nature Therefore I may truly say God is man man is God but not likewise the Deity is the Humanity or the Humanity the Deity for even in natural things there is this difference many things are opposite in the abstract which in the concrete are but diverse or subordinate for we say rightly that is corporeal which is animate and something corporeal is animate but we cannot say that the soul is the body or that the body is the soul so all Christ is every where but not all of Christ or both Natures VIII The excellency of Christ 's humane nature consisteth partly in those gifts which proceed from the grace of union and partly in the honour of adoration IX Among his gifts we are chiefly to consider his Knowledge and Power X Although that eternal knowledge which is an essential property of the Divine nature is not transfused into the Humane nature yet in this humane nature there is a threefold knowledge to wit a donative an infused and an experimental XI The donative called also the Knowledge of the blessed is that whereby the humane nature being most neerly united to the Divine essence seeth the same though it cannot comprehend it For a finite thing cannot comprehend an infinite it seeth God all but not altogether or totally XII The infused knowledge is that whereby Christ being anointed by the holy Ghost knoweth all heavenly things which otherwise cannot be seen but by the light of grace XIII The experimental knowledge is that by which Christ knows the things that are intelligible by the light of nature conceiving the effects out of their causes and the causes out of their effects XIV Albeit both in his donative and infused knowledge he excelleth Angels and Men yet this differs from his eternal omniscience XV. Ignorance is opposite to his experimental knowledge which ignorance is attributed to Christ for in this kind of knowledge he is said to increase Luk. 2.25 XVI Such is the power of his humane nature that in this also it is superior to men and Angels for it received an instrumental power to work miracles but the principal or omnipotent power was reserved for the Word which maketh use of the humane nature as of an instrument XVII The adoration of the humane nature is an honour that follows upon the Personal union yet this adoration is not of the flesh as flesh nor of the creature but of God in the created flesh XVIII The third thing that followes upon the Hypostatical union is the meeting of both natures in those works which are called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is God man and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Perfections in which these foure things are considerable 1. The worker Christ himself 2. The principles by which he works to wit the two Natures 3. The force or enargie or the twofold action according to the twofold nature 4. The external work it self in which those actions are united This is made clear by the â—â—mâ—ly of a Fiery sword in which 1. We see the unity of the Sword 2. The two principles of working to wit the Sword and the fire 3 Two actions cutting and burning 4. One work the thing cut and burned So much of Christ's Conception His Nativity is whereby Christ according to the usual time being carried in the Virgins womb was at length born and brought forth to light Luc. 2 6 7. So it was that while they were there the dayes were accomplished that she should be delivered and she brought forth her first-borne Son The RULES I. We firmly believe Christs nativity against the Iews The confirmation is twofold The fiâ—st out of the Prophets because the places in which he should be born educated in which he should teach and suffer are wasted and the time is past in which according to Prophetical oracles he was to come For he was to be borne in Bethlehem Mich. 5.2 to be educated in Nazaâ—eth Esa. 11.1 and to enter Ierusalem while the second Temple stood Zach. 9.9 Hag. 2.7 9. and that when the fourth Monarchy was abolished Dan. 2.44 the Scepter not being totally departed from the Jews Gen. 49.10 But Bethlehem Nazareth Ierusalem and the second Temple are long since destroyed that fourth Monarchy is abolished and the Scepter totally departed from Iudah the Messiah then is doubtlesse come The second confirmation is taken from the agreement of Luk's Evangelical History conceâ—ning Christ his nativity with the prophetical oracles concerning the time of the Messiah's coming Gen. 49.10 of his Pedegree Ier. 23.5 of the Virgin his mother Esa. 7.14 of his Country Mich. 5.2 Lastly concerning his condition Esa 53.2 II The Nativity to speak properly is not of the humanity but of the man Christ not of the nature but of the person III. There be two generations of the Son the one eternal to wit of the Father the other temporall namely of the Virgin his mother There be also two filiations or Sonships by the one whereof he is the Son of the Father by the other the Son of Mary IV. Yet we must not say there is a double Son or two Sons for he is not two Persons but one Person and two Natures V. Therefore Mary is to be named not onely the Mother of Christ with the Nestorians but also the mother of God VI. The Nativity of Christ is both natural and supernatural Natural as he was born in the usual time by the opening of the womb Supernatural as he was begot of a Virgin The Papists under pretence of maintaining Mari's Viâ—ginity affirme that Christ was born of Maâ—y without pain the womb being shut Now although we leave it as a thing doubtful whether Mari's Child-bearing was without pain or not as the Ancients thought yet we deny that Christ came out the womb being shut when in plain terms the Law is applied to her which requireth That every male which opens the womb shall be holy to the Lord Luc. 2.23 Neither doth Mari's Virginity consist in this that her womb was not opened in her Child-birth but in this that she was known of man VII We believe also that Mary continued a Virgin after her child-birth For her marriage with Joseph did not consist in the generation of children but in her education holy conjunction of life with him VIII Although Christ had no other brothers born after him yet he is rightly called Mari's first begotten Son In Scripture Christ is called the first born four manner of wayes 1. In respect of eternal generation by which he was begot before all creatures Col. 1.15 2 In respect of election dignity whereby he is the first-born amongst brethren Rom. 8.29 3. In respect of his resurrection whereby he is the first-begotten from the dead Col. 1.18 4. In respect of his nativity of the Virgin Luc. 2.7 Now he is not onely called first-born whom other brothers do follow but he also who is born before others although he
and his posterity As out of a venemous root nothing can proceed that 's wholsome so all that are come of Adam naturally are born guilty of that primitive sin X. That primitive sin therefore is not only personal but natural also because by it whole Nature is destroyed of which also Adams prosterity is held guilty to wit all that are naturally sprung from Adam Christ then is excepted from this guilt for he was born of Adam but not by Adam not by naturall generation but by the vertue of the Holy Ghost XI As therefore the Person infected Nature so afterward Nature infected the Persons XII We religiously believe that our first Parents were received into favour by God CHAP. X. Of Original Sinne and Free-will THat Sin which is derived from the first or primitive Sin is either original or actual original Sin is that native corruption derived into the whole man and to the whole race of man naturally descending from Adam whereby man having utterly lost his freedom to good becomes prone to evil The RULES I. This sin in Scripture is named by way of excellency Sin and the Body of sin Sinful-sin Inhabiting-sin The law of our members The Old-man Flesh II. It is called also Concupiscence Rom 7.7 I had not known lust or concupiscence unlesse the Law had said thou shalt not covet or lust or Jam. 1 14 15. III. Therefore the Papists doe erroniously exempt it from being a sin reckoning it among the works of God By the name of Concupiscence is understood either that natural faculty of desire which was in man even before his fall or that corruption which naturally adheres to it as it is in it in the first act and as it inclines man onely to evill IV. The proximate cause of Original sin is the guilt of the first sin in respect of which it is a most just punishment from God to wit a part of that death which God threatened to man V. Although the soul is immediately infused by God into man yet being united to the body it is made guilty presently of the first sin imparted to the whole man and therefore is infected with Original contagion VI. Neither for this cause doth Original sin cease to be sin in that it is not wittingly nor willingly committed for it is sufficient that the irregularity of our nature is present though spontaneousnesse be absent VII From this Original sin except Christ alone no man is free not the blessed Virgin Mary Neither is it only in Infants but it is in the Embryo scarce as yet conceived and before the birth and it appears still more and more as the rapacity of Wolves shews it self in their whelps Psal. 51.7 Behold I was borne in iniquity and in sin hath my mother conceived me 2 Cor. 5.21 For he hath made him to be sin for us who knew no sin VIII Original sin doth consist not onely in an impotency and inaptitude to goodnesse but also in pronenesse to evill neither is it onely the amission of Original good but also the immission of the contrary evill IX By Original sin our natural gifts are corrupted but supernatural are utterly lost X. The Vnderstanding remained but darkened the Will remained but depraved the inferiour Appetite remained but altogether vitiated XI Hence it is that in natural and civil actions an irregenerate man can do no good without special grace XII Without this special grace no excellent thing could be performed by the Gentiles XIII Whatsoever good then that was which they did it was mixed with much vanity so that their chief vertues were in Gods sight but glorious enormities XIV For those are not good works which are good in themseâ—ves but which are done well A work is said to be good either univocally or equivocally univocally so such a work is simply good in respect of all circumstances equivocally a work is good in it self but withall vitious either in respect of the subject or object or means or the end for if we look upon the actions of the Gentiles we shall finde that they aimed more at their own than at Gods glory in them XV. Although the affections of the wicked are kept in by God as with a Bit yet they are not healed XVI But supernatural gifts were utterly lost to wit the claritie of the intellect the rectitude of the will and the conformity of the appetite with reason XVII Hence there is no principle of knowledge or performance of spirituall things in us either in act or in possibility XVIII They seek then the house in the ashes who ascribe to an unregenerate man free-will or other faculties by which he may do well or prepare himself to his own conversion or to the acceptation of Gods grace For this is the errour of Pelagians and Semi-pelagians XIX Mans will remained free from coaction but not to good and evill XX. Yea it is free to evill onely and therefore deserves rather to be called servile than free As for the understanding the natural man comprehends not the things that are of Gods Spirit 1 Cor. 2.14 If you look upon the will the imagination of mans heart is onely evill Gen. 8.21 Finally the Scripture cries out that the whole man having lost his spiritual life lieth dead in sin Ephes. 2.1 Col. 2.13 XXI Although this sin is pardoned in the sanctified Parents notwithstanding by generation it is tansmitted to posterity The reason is because the corruption dwelling in us is not altogether taken away by pardon although the guilt be done away and as faith is the gift not of generation but of regeneration so man not as he is regenerate but as man begets man even as seeds being winnowed from the ears chaff and husks do spring up again with the same CHAP. XI Of actual Sin SO much of Original sin Actual sin is whereby Gods Law is broken by thoughts desires words or deeds The RULES I. According to the diversity of circumstances there are diverse sins II. From the efficient cause sin is either of publique or of private persons as they are in more or less dignity III. From the matter which are things thought desired said or done IV. From the form it is either of commission or omission V. From the end it is either of incogitancy or of affectation and against conscience and that rather of malice than of infirmity or contrarily rather of infirmity than malice VI. From the subject it is of the soul chiefly or of the body or of both VII From the object it is either committed against God or our neighbour VIII Sin committed against God is either with a kind of unwillingness or with a full desire this later sin the Scripture cals the sin against the holy Ghost and to death Matth 12.32 1 John 5.16 IX The sin against the Holy Ghost or to death is when one is convicted in his conscience by the testimony of the Holy Spirit resisteth notwithstanding the same
Law was as it were a hand-writing and testimony of that guilt by which all men were held bound Col. 2.14 And puting out the hand-writing of Ordinances that was against us which was contrary to us he even took it out of the way and fastened it on the Crosse. IV. The Ceremonial Law was then abolished by Christ 's death V. The use of it before Christ 's death was profitable after his death until the Gospel was spread abroad it was indifferent but after the promulgation of the Gospel not onely was the observation of Ceremonies unwholsom but also mortal Hence Paul in the beginning caused Timothy to be circumcised because of the weaknesâ— of the Jews Acts 16 3. but after the Gospell was more fully manifested he would not suffer Titus to be circumcised Gal. 2.3 And â—urely at this day to observe the Jewish Ceremonies were to deny Christ his death aâ—d comming in the flesh VI. Therefore as the opinion of the Encratites other ancient Hereticks whereby they prohibited certain meats as of themselves unclean was damnable so the error of Papists is to be abhorred who obtrude upon the Church Ceremonies partly Iewish partly Heathenish The precepts of the ceremonial Law are either of holy persons or of holy things holy persons were in general all that were initiated by Circumcision whereby they were obliged to the observation of the other Ceremonies and then were put in mind of Sanctification by Christ. In particular holy persons were the Ministers both ordinary and extraordinary the ordinary were the Priests and Levites the Priests were they who administred the Law by expounding sacrificing making intercession and blessing such things as were to be performed to God and men The RULES I. The High Priest was a type of Christ the High Priest II His rich clothing ornaments almost equal to regal robes were types of Christ's dignity and chiefly of his most perfect juâ—tice See Zac. 3.5 III. The chief ornaments were the Ephod â—r cloak and Breast-plate fastened to the â—loak on the Ephod were the names of the twelve Tribes engraven upon precious stones on the breast-plate were Urim and Thummim from whence the Church received Oracles The Cloak then represented the Church Vrim and Thummim that is light and perfection did signify Christ the Word and Interpreter of the Father our light and perfection the Ephod represented Christ as he performed the things that concerned us the Breast-plate shewed him as he performed the things concerning God The Levites were they who being used in stead of the first-born were to attend the Priests to keep and to carry the Tabernacle with its utensils The extraordinary Ministers were the Prophets and Nazarites The Prophets were they who by divine inspiration teaching and reforming the Priests and people were types of Christ the great Prophet The Nazarites were they who by a special vow abstaining from wine and consecrating themselves to God were types of the holiness of Christ. In the holy worship we are to observe the instruments and the manner of it The Instruments were the Tabernacle and the utensils thereof to wit the Ark the Altars the Table and brazen Laver. The RULES I. The Tabernacle was the Type of the Deity which was to dwell in Christ bodily John 1.14 He dwell amongst us as in a Tabernacle Col. 2.9 In him dwelt the whole fulnesse of the Deity bodily II. The artificial structure of the Tabernacle was a type of the spiritual Fabrick of the Church which was to be grounded upon Christ. Ephes. 2.20 21. III. The removing of the Tabernacle did figure the Christian Churches pilgrimage here on earth IV. The uniformity of the Temple signified the Vnity of Christ and the Church V. The parts whereof were three the Court the Holy-place and the Holy of Holies VI. The Court in which the people met was a Type of the visible Church in which are good and bad VII The Holy place was the Court for the Priests and a type of the true members of the Church that elect and royal Priest-hood 1 Pet. 2.9 VIII The Holy of Holies into which none entered but the High Priest and that but once a year did shaddow out the Sanctuary of Heaven into which Christ was to enter for our good IX The vaile of the Temple garnished with Cherubims did signifie Christs flesh covering as it were the Divine nature X. In the Court was the Altar of Burnt offerings overlaid with brasse representing Christs flesh united in the Divinity and withall his strength of suffering any thing for us the Altar also of incense intimating Christs Intercession for us XI There also was the brazen Laver appointed for washing which signified that we are purged by the blood of Christ that we may offer to God acceptable sacrifices XII In the Holy-place or Court of the Priests was the Table and on it the Shew-bread and the golden Candlestick by which was taught that Christ is to his people meat drink and light to life eternal XIII In the same place were the Vessels of gold ready for sprinkling and Incense representing both Christs death and Intercession XIV In the Holy of Holies was the golden Censer proper to the High Priest alone and there was also the Ark of the Covenant XV The Ark was made of Cedar-wood and covered with gold which represented both Christs natures XVI The Tables of the Law the Manna and Aarons rod kept within the Ark represented Christ as he teacheth nourisheth and ruleth his People XVII The cover of the Ark called the Propitiatory together with the Cherubims from whence God promised to speak with Moses was the type of Christ covering our sins defending us by his Angels and expounding to us the word and counsel of his Father The manner of the Levitical service consists partly in the things that were offered to God partly in holy times The things that were offered to God were sacrifices both Expiatory or of Propitiation and Eucharistical or of thanksgiving The Expiatory Sacrifice or Peace-offering was when the faithfull witnessed by the killing and offering of living creatures that they in themselves were guilty of death and that they placed their confidence in the blood of Christ as of that immaculate Lambe who was to be offered afterward for the sins of the World The Sacrifice Expiatory was offered either for all sins or for some certain sins The sacrifice that was offered for all sins was called a Holocaust or Burnt-offering for it was performed by burning the whole sacrifice The sacrifice for certain sins called the Sacrifice of Redeâ—ption was either for the sin it self or for the guilt thereof The Sin-offering was when a sin was expiated which had been committed out of errour or ignorance See Levit. 4.2 3. The sacrifice for the guilt called Trespass-offering was when a sin was expiated which had been done wittingly but yet out of infirmity Levit. 5 and 7. The Eucharistical sacrifice or Offering of Thanksgiving was to testifie the gratitude of the
poor and riding upon an Asse CHAP. XIX Of Christs Exaltation THus of the state of his Humiliation the state of his Exaltation is that wherein Christ being raised from the dead was exalted to heaven and being set down at his Fathers right hand was crowned with the highest degree of glory The RULES I. The efficient cause of this Exaltation wa◠〈◊〉 whole Trinity II. But Christ considered according to dispensation is the object thereof III. The exaltation of Christs person was according to both natures IV. According to his humane nature he was exalted by laying aside the infirmities which he assumed by obtaining those gifts which before he wanted For he attained as great a perfection both in his body and soul as the creature was capable of V. He was exalted according to his divine nature not by accession of any dignity to it being considered in it self but by the manifestation of that majesty which before was hid under the form of a Servant VI. Christ attained to this exaltation by his obedience not as it were by merit but as it were by the means or way VII The end hereof was to witnesse that he faithfully performed the office enjoyned him in his humiliation and to manifest his divine power by which he doth powerfully apply his merit to us The parts or degrees of this are three His Resurrection his Ascension to Heaven and his sitting at the Fathers right hand His Resurrection was the first degree of exaltation by which Christ having overcome the power of death was raised the third day in that very flesh which he had laid down that he might live to God for ever The RULES I. Christ was not onely the object but also the efficient cause of his resurrection Rom. 1.4 Being declared with power to be the Son of God according to the Spirit of sanctification by the resurrection from the dead 1 Peâ— 3.18 He died concerning the flesh but was quickned in the Spirit II. The matter of the Resurrection is â—he same body that was crucified but â—ndowed and glorified with new quaâ—ities III. Neither was it so changed as to lose its quantity and three dimensions For otherwise it had been no body not had Christ remained man in his Resurrection IV. The Form consisteth in a new and indivisible union of soul and body V. Although Christs Resurrection was altogether miraculous yet it is false that his body passed through the stone which covered the grave or that it passed through the doore after his Resurrection Matt. 28 2 The Angel of the Lord rolled a way the stone Joh. 20.19 The doors being shut not through the doors that were shut VI The end of his Resurrection besides that general end which was mentioned before is the assurance of our Resurrection both from the death of sin as also from death corporall Rom 6.1 2. c. and 1 Cor. 15.12 c. His ascension into Heaven was the second degree of his Exaltation in which Christ after he had conversed forty days with his Disciples upon Earth ascended into Heaven The RULES I. Christ ascended both according to his divine and humane nature according to his humane as the object according to his divine as the efficient cause II. The form consisteth in Christs real and local translation from this World to the highest Heaven III. Here we need not trouble our selves about penetratâ—on of bodies both because Heaven is not a solid thick or iron body as the Philosophers would have it as also because one body can easily yield to another and the creature to the Creator IV. The doctrine of Christs corporal presence here on Earth doth utterly overthrow that of his ascension V The special end of Christs ascension is to assure us of our threefold ascension the first is of faith and godlinesse in this life the second of our souls in death the third of body and soul in the last day The sitting of Christ at his Fathers right hand is the highest degree of his Exaltation by which being placed in Heaven he is exalted above all power Eph. 1.20.21.22 He hath set him at his right hand in the heavenly places far above all principaâ—ities and powers and might and dominion and every name that is named noâ— in this world onely but in that also which is to come and hath made all things subject under his feet and hath appointed him over aâ—l things to be the head to his Church which is his body and the fulness of him that filleth all in all things The RULES I. To sit at Gods right hand is to have the next power after God After the manner of Kings who use to set them on their right hand to whom they will give the chief honor next to themselves Psal. 45.10 The Queen is at thy right hand 1 King 2.19 When Baâ—â—sheba came to Solomon to speak unto him for Adoniiah the king rose to meet her and bowed himself to her and sat down on his Throne and he caused a seat to be â—et for the kings mother and she sat at his right hand Matt. 20.21 Command that my two Sons may sit the one at thy right hand the other at thy left in thy kingdom II. Christ according to both Natures sits at Gods right hand III. The Humanity was so exalted that yet it was not made equall to the divinity he received glory above all creatures yet not equall to that essential glory which he hath in common with the Father and the Holy Ghost In this highest degree of Exaltation Christ hath not left to do his office He performs his Prophetical office by furnishing his Ministers with gifts of old extraordinarily but now by ordinary meanes propagating his Gospel through all the World with most happy successe Ephes 4.11 Some he gave to be Apostles c. His Priestly Office he exerciseth not in offering himself again or in casting himself with cries and sighs at his Fathers knees but in appearing before his Father for us with the merits of his most full satisfaction and in applying the same effectually to us Psal. 110.4 The Lord hath sworn and will not repent thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchisedek Heb. 9.24 He hath not entred into the Sanctuary made with hands which are similitudes of the true Sanctuary but is enâ—red into the very Heaven to appear now in the sight of God for us Lastly He useth Kingly office not onely by ruling the Triumphant Church but also by gathering together the Militant Church by preserving protecting and delivering it as also by overthrowing the Enemies thereof Psal. 110 1. The Lord said to my Lord sit thou at my right hand until I make thine Enemies thy foot stool The RULES I. This Kingdom of Christ is not that essential which from eternity he obtained with the Father and Holy Ghost but a personal donative and oecumenical which as our Head and Mediator he had of the Father II. Yet he hath for ever administred this
Psal. 47.6 Ezek. 48.35 Like testimonies are in the New-Testament Mat. 26.26 27 28. While they were eating Iesus took bread and when he had blessed brake it and gave it to his Disciples saying Take eat this is my body likâ—wise taking the cup and having given thanks he gave to them saying Dâ—â—nk ye all of this for this is the blood of the New Testament c. See the like places in Marke Luke and 1 Cor. 11. so 1 Cor. 10.4 And the Rock was Christ. Eph. 5.26 That he might sanctifie his Church having purged her with the washing of water Col. 2. v. 12 â—eing buried with him in baptisme Heb. 9.13 For if the blood of buls and of goats and the ashes of an heâ—fer sprinkling the unclean sanctifieth to the purifying of the flâ—sh Yea the very same is seen in other speeches besides sacramental as Gen. 4â— 27 The seven cows are seven years that is types and figures of seven years Râ—velations 17 9. The seven heads are even hills and verse 12. The â—on horns are ten Kings XIX This kinde of speaking is called a Sacramental Metonymie of the thing signified for the signe Now it is not material whether the trope be in the attribute or in the copula or coupling of the words for though the trope may be in the attribute yet the cause or ground of the trope is in the copula The material cause of a simple enunciation consisteth in the subject and attribute but the copula being affirmed or denied makes up the formal part by which it becomes true or false Proper or figurative for as often as things of different natures are affirmed or joyned by the copula that speech is false or tropical the seal therefore of the trope is in the predicate but the cause thereof is in the copula Whereas then the copula is in this enuntiation This is my body conjoints things of different natures to wit bread and â—hrists body necessariâ—y the speech must be false but to say so were blasphemy or else tropical Therefore the interpretation of such speeches is plain bread is the body of Christ that is a Sacrament of his body Circumcision is Gods covenaÌ„t that is a sign or sacrament thereof seven kine are seven years that is figures of seven years so we are said to be cleansed with water sacramentally because baptisme or washing is the sacrament of cleansing so sacramentally the sacrifices of the Old Testament are said to expiate because they were tipes of expiation by Christ XX. The end of Sacraments is the sealing of the Covenant of Grace XXI The effects of the Sacrament are not justification or sanctification as if it were by the work wrought but the confirmation and sealing of both benefits This is plain by the example of Abraham who before he was circumcised was justified Rom. 4.11 Therefore the Pontificians falsely affirm that the Sacraments confer remission of sins and such like benefits by their own inward vertue out of the work wrought These Places then of Scripture in which such things are spoken of the Sacraments are to be expounded by a Sacramental Metonymie as is said XXII Sacraments are common to all that are in the covenant in respect of the signes but proper to the Elect in respect of the thing signified XXIII Sacraments are necessary to salvation not simply and absolutely as if they were the prime causes thereof but hypothetically as they are ordinary means of salvation to be used as Christ hath commanded Hence saith Bernard Not the want but the contempt damneth XXIV The Word and Sacraments agree in substance for what the testament promiseth the seal confirmeth but they differ 1. In that the word is received by the ear the Sacraments perceived by the eye so that the Sacrament is a visible word 2. Because the word of the Gospel is general but by the Sacrament the promises of the Gospel are applied to every believer 3. Because by the Word faith is ordinarily begot and confirmed by the Sacrament Sacraments are of the Old Testament or of the New Of the Old Testament there were two principal and ordinary to wit Circumcision and the Passeover Of these we have handled in the doctrine of the Ceremonial Law Of the New Testament there are two Baptisme and the Lords Supper The RULES I. The Sacraments of the Old and New Testament agree in the thing sâ—gnified in respect of substance to wit Christ with his benefits which is the kernel of all the Sacraments Heb. 13.8 Iesus Christ yesterday and to day is the same and for ever Rev. 13.8 The Lamb slain from the beginning of the world to wit sacramentally in the sacrifices and Passeover II. Baptisme doth answer Circumcision analogically so doth the Lords Supper the Passeover For as Circumcision was the Sacrament of initiation or of ingrafting into the Covenant of regeneration or spiritual circumcision so is Baptisme And as the Passeover was the Sacrament of spiritual food even so is the Lords Supper Hence the Holy Supper succeeded the celebration of the last Passeover III. The difference between the Sacraments of the Old and New Testament consisteth 1. In external signes 2. In the manner of signifying for there was signified that christ was to be exhibited here exhibited 3. In number For besides Circumcision and the Passeover they had also other Sacraments We have none besides Baptisme and the Lords Supper 4. In amplitude for the New-Covenant doth not extend it self to one and the same people 5. In continuance for those continued only till Christs first coming but these remain to the end of the World 6. In clearnesse IV. The difference then which the Pontificians feign is false â— That the Sacraments of the Old Testament were types of the Sacraments of the New Testament 2. that the Sacraments of the Old Testament did only shadow out justifying grace but that ours have really in themselves the Body of spiritual good things As for the first dâ—ffâ—rence it is one thing to be a type of Christ another thing to be types of the Sacraments in the New Testament That Circumcision and the Passeover were types of Christ is said but that they were types of our Sacraments I deny â—or it were most absurd to think that they were instituted onely to represent ours The other dâ—fference also is false for both in those Sacraments and in these Christ with his benefits are the mattâ—r and marrow But the diffâ—rence betweene the Sacrament of the Oâ—d and New Testament is rather this that they were shadows of â—piâ—itual good things whereof Christ was the body Col. 2.17 V. Neither will it follow that therefore the Sacraments of the New Testament are not better than these of Old because they do not conferre justifying grace for the work wrought for their prerogatives remain as they are expressed in the third Rule chiefly the second and sixth Here it is wont to be objected that if we acknowledg not this their fictâ—tious difference the Sacraments
the Churches union is shewed 1 Cor. 10.17 We being many are one bread and one body for we are all partakers of that one bread XIII The words This is my body can neither be meant of transubstantiation nor of consubstantiation but the meaning is This to wit the Bread is the Sacrament of my body The Papists interpret the words thus That which is contained under the kind of Bread is my Body The Lutherans thus in with under this is my Body The reason of our interpretation is explained in the former Chapter They say that it is absurd to use tropical phrases which are obscure in Christs will and Legacie But 1. This supposition of theirs is false that tropical phrases are obscure for we use tropes oftentimes to illustrate 2. It is false also that tropes are not used in Wills and Testaments for Iacobs Will shews the contrary Gen â—9 And Moses's Deut. 33. David's 2 Sam. 23. Tobias 4. Matathias 1 Mac. 2.3 If there be no trope in the Lords Supper then let them shew how the Cup can be called the New Testament in his blood without a trope That saying of Austins Advers Adimant Maniâ— cap. 12. is worthy here to be set down The Lord doubted not to say this is my Body when he gave the Signe of his Body XIV It is one thing to say that Christ is present in the Bread and another to maintain his presence in the Supper for Christ is present in his Deity and Spirit he is present also in his body and blood by a Sacramental presence 1. Of the Symbol not that he is present in the Bread but that he is presented by the bread as by a symbol 2. Of Faith whereby we apply Christ with his merits to us 3. Of Vertue and efficacie XV. The proper end of the Supper not to speak of others is to seal our spiritual nutrition or preservation to life eternal by the merit of Christs death and obedience whence depends the union of the faithfull with Christ and with themselves XVI It is an intolerable abuse to take this Sacrament to prove ones innocency in the courts of justice to confirm mens covenants to prosper our purposes and actions c. XVII The Lords Supper must be often times taken As often as you shall eat this bread c. 1 Cor. 11.26 XVIII The Supper differs from Baptism not only in external signes but in its proper end because Baptism is the sign of spiritual Regeneration but the Supper of nutrition also in the object or subject to which for Baptism is given to Infants the Supper to those onely who are of years and have been tryed they differ also in time for Baptism is used but once the Lords Supper often times XIX The Popish Masse is altogether repugnant to the Lords Supper 1. The holy Supper is instituted by Christ the Masse by the Pope 2. the Supper is a Sacrament instituted in memory of Christs sacrifice which was once offered but the Masse among Papists is the sacrifice it self to be offered every day the Ancients indeed called the Lords Supper a sacrifice yet not expiatory for sins but Eucharistical and such as is joyned with prayers and charitable works which are acceptable sacrifices to God 3. Christ did not offer himself in the Supper but on the Crosse but â—hey will have Christ to be offered in their Mass. 4. Christ instituted his Supper for the living but the Masse is celebrated for the dead also 5. In the Holy Supper Christs body was already made by the virtue of the Holy Ghost not of bread but of the Virgins blood In the Masse Christs body is made anew by the Priest uttering his five words and that of bread 6. In the holy Supper there was and remained true Bread and true Wine and it obtained this name even after consecration In the Masse if we will believe it there remain onely the outward species of the Element and the accidents 7. In the Holy Supper they all drank of the câ—p as Christ commanded in the Masse the Lay-people are denied the cup. 8. In the Supper Bread was broken to represent Christs body broken on the Crosse In the private Masse the bigger Hoast is broken into three parts the first is for the triumphant Church the second for the Church in Purgatory the third for the Church here on earth CHAP. XXV Of the Nature of the visible Church HItherto of the outward communion of the Covenant of grace Now follows the external society of the visible Church where by all that be called are accounted for members of the Church For the Church is considered either in it self or in opposition to the false Church the Church is considered in her self in respect of her own nature and outward administration The visible Church then is a visible society of men called to the state of grace by the Word and Sacraments The RULES I. The name of Church and Synagogue is the same with the Hebrew Kahal and Edah but the society of Christians is mâ—re usually called the church II We must carefully here observe the distinction of the word that we may know of what Church we speak III. For whereas it is distinguished into the triumphant and militant that belongs to the doctrine of the state of glory this is for our present consideration IV. The militant Church is divided into the visible and invisible V. The invisible Church is the company of the Elect onely This is called invisible not as if the men that belong to her were not visible as they are mâ—n but that they are not perceived as they are elect for the Lord knows only who are hiâ— 2 Tim. 2.19 VI. This belongs to the doctrine of special vocation for by her proper effects to wit faith charity and such like the elect which are the invisible Church are known VII The visible Church is the company of all that are called in common as well Reprobates as Elect. VIII This word Church visible is ambiguous for properly it is meant of the universal Church dispersed through the whole World more strictly of any particular Church as of France England Holland c. but most strictly of the representative Church or the company of Pastors and Elders IX Her efficient cause in common is the holy Trinity in particular Christ. X. The matter of the Church are they who are called in common and received into the Covenant of grace and Infants that are born in the Church XI Neither unbaptised Infants nor Catechumeni nor excommunicate persons are to be excluded out of the number of the Churches members The two foâ—mer soâ—ts of men belong to the Church by the righâ— of covenant though nâ—t of profession but for the third kinde though they be cast out of some particular Church yet they are not simply ejected out of the catholike though the Papists excommunicate them XII The form of the Church consisteth in a double union the first is of her conjunction with Christ her
in part whereby blindnesse shall remain upon the Reprobates doth no wayes prejudice the elect of that same Nation but they also and so all Israel shall be saved See Calvin on this place VII The signe of Christs presence shall be doubtlesse an incredible brightness and majestie in which he shall appear For he shall come in the cloudes of Heaven Matth. 26.64 with incredible glory Matth. 25 31. accompanied with the whole army of his Angels â—ib with a great shout and voice of the Archangel 1 Thess. 4.16 By reason of his brightness the Sun and and moon shall be darkned as lesser lights by the greater and Stars shalâ— fall from Heaven that is they shall seem to fall from Heaven and the powers of Heaven shall be shaken Mat. 24.29 c. Mar. 13.24 c. yea at his sight Heaven and earth shal seem to fâ—ie away Rev. 20 11 Thus of Christs coming The resurrection of the dead is whereby the bodies of the dead shall be raised but the bodies of those that remain alive shall be changed and shall be again united to their souls by an indissolveable union The RULES I. The Resurrection called by the Greeks 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is First or Second That is a resuscitation from the death of sin to the life of righteousnesse This is a revocation from death corporal to life Rev. 20.6 Blessed and holy is he who hath part in the first resurrection II. The Scripture proves the Resurrection of the dead by testimonies examples types and reasons III. Though the Resurrection of the dead is above nature and mans corrupt reason yet it is neither against nature nor against right reason For right reason teacheth that the dead can be raised and shall be raised That is gathered from his omnipotencie this from his justice For as it is just that some sins be punished after this life so it is just likewise that what was the companion of sin should be the companion of pain IV. The general efficient cause of the Resurrection is the whole Trinity the particular is Christ our Lord. Christ is the efficient cause of this three ways 1. As God 2. As the Judge of the world 3. As Mediator The first two wayes he is the efficient cause of resurrection both in the elect and in the reprobate but the third way he is the cause of the resurrectâ—on of the faithful by his merit efficacie and inchoation V. The matter is the same numerical body that man had in this life Besides Iobs testimony Iob 19.26 the reason annexed to the third Canon taken from Gods justice proves this VI. The form consisteth in the reunion of body and soul and restoring of the dead to life and in the sudden change of those that remain and in their freedom from corruption 1 Cor. 15.51 VII The end is the declaration of Gods justice and mercy of that in raising the wicked to condemnation of this in raising the godly to life eternal Dan. 12.2 Joh. 5.28.29 VIII In the Resurrection the godly shall be freed not only from corruption and bodily defects but shall be crowned also with glory 1 Cor. 15 42 43 44. It is sowed in corruption it is raised in incorruption it is sowed in dishonor it is raised in glory it is sowed in weakness it is raised in power it is sowed a natural body it is raised a spirituall body CHAP. XXXV Of the last Iudgement SO much of the antecedents of the last Judgement The Judgement it self is that most glorious act whereby Christ shall judge the whole Word The RULES I. The certainty of the last judgement is proved by the same arguments by which we proved the certainty of Christs comming and of our resurrection II. The general efficient principal cause is the whole Trinity the particular is Christ our Lord in the assumed humane nature but glorified III. The chief power of Iudicature shall be in Christ for to him all power is given and from whom no appeal can be made to any superiour IV. This Iudge shall be visible and conspicuous to all both in respect of his brightnesse and majesty in which he shall appear as also of his humanity But so that his sight shall be terrible to the wicked joyfull to the godly V. The instrumental cause are the Angels whose service he shall use both in gathering together those that are to be judged and in separating the godly from the wicked Matth. 22.31 And he shall send his Angels with a great sound of the Trumpet and they shall gather the elect from the four winds and 25 32. And all Nations shall be gathered bâ—fore him and he shall separate the one from the other as the shâ—pherd separates the sheep from the goats VI. The matter shall be all men who must appear before Christs tribunal Rom. 14.10 2 Cor. 5.10 VII But the gody shall be judged one way and the wicked another way For they shall be judged but not condemned these shall be judged and condemned In this sense the Scripture denieth that the faithful shall be judged Ioh 3.18 and 5.29 VIII Neither matters it that the wicked are said to be judged already For it is one thing to be judged in private another in publike and openly IX The form is expressed by the manner of proceedings in the Courts of justice to which belongs 1. The cognisance of the cause 2. The pronouncing of the sentence 3. The execution thereof X. The cognisanse of the cause is expressed by the similitude of records or books in which their works are registred Rev. 20.12 And the Books were opened c. By these Books are meant partly Gods omniscience and partly mens conscience X. The wicked shall be judged according to and for their works but the godly according to the works of their faith but not for their works Hence Rev. 20.12 Another Book is said to be opened which is â—he book of life That we might know That our salvation depends not on our works but on Gods eternal grace whereby we are written in the Book of life XII The infidelity and impiety of the wicked shall be so laid open before their eyes in their own conscience that they shall not be able to deny or gain-say any thing Psal. 50. â—1 I will reprove thee and set these things in order before thine eyes Matth. 12.36 But I say unto you whatsoever idle word 〈◊〉 shall speak they shall give an accâ—unt thereof in the day of judgment XIII Although the Elect shall remember their sins yet they shall be so fiâ—ed with the joy of the Spirit that the remembrance thereof shall not sad them XIV Both Reprobate and elect shall hear the sentence of the Iudge to the one it shalâ— be full of horror to the other full of comfort Mat 25 34. Come ye blessed of my Father possess the Kingdom prepared for you from the beginning of the world and v. 41. Go ye cursed
blessed 2. For the production of this visible world which was not altogether destitute of form but of perfection separation and beauty which by degrees then it received 3. For sending in of the primitive Light which was neither the Elementary fire nor a bright Cloud nor any other body but a Quality sent into the air by God who is that inaccessible light This created quality of Light was afterward the fourth day placed in the Stars IX The second day the Firmament was created or the Aerial heaven which by its lower part separates the waters above that is the â—louds from the waters beneath that is the Sea X. The third day God 1. separated the inferior waters which as yet covered the earth and gathered them into certain channels that the rest of the earth called dry land might afford a commodious habitation for man and beast 2. He gave to the earth a fructifying power to produce herbs and plants without the hâ—lp of seed or sun XI The fourth day the Stars and great Luminaries wâ—re placed in heaven whose motion proceedeth not from a soul or any assistant intelligence as the Philosophers affirm but from that power which God gave them in the beginning no otherways than the earth by its innate power stands immovable XII There is a threefold use of the Stars 1. To distinguish the day night 2. To note the times seasons of the year 3. To impart their vertue to inferior bodies XIII The fifth day were made the Birds Fishes and creeping things XIV The sixth day after the earthly Creatures were produced and this whole Vniverse as a large house was furnished with all kinde of furniture Man at last was created Of all these Creatures Men Angels are chiefly considered in Divinity because on them God bestowed his Image The RULES 1. Although the whole World be the Looking-glass of Gods power wisdom and bounty yet properly Gods Image is attributed to Angels and Men onely 2. Gods Image doth partly consist in natural gifts to wit in the invisible and simple substance of Angels and Mens souls in their life understanding will and immortality partly in supernatural gifts to wit in their primitive blessednesse in the uprightness of their intellect will in their majesty dominion over the other creatures Angels are intelligent Creatures void of bodies The RULES I Angels are not accidents nor qualities but true substances II Angels are void of bodies and are not subject to destruction III. The bodies in which the Angels appeared were not meer apparitions nor yet united to them hypostatically but were freely assumed to perform some service in IV. Angels are in a place not by way of circumscription but by way of definition V. Angels cannot be together in many places VI Angels truly move from place to place Man is a creature whose body originally was formed of earth but afterwards is propagated of seed by traduction consisting of a reasonable soul infused into him by God immediately Here we disallow not the Philosophers definition by which they call man a reasonable creature but we describe man in the Divinity-School more fitly for our purpose as we have now described him The RULES I. There 's a threefold miraculous production of mans body mentioned in Scripture the first was of the dust of the earth without Father and Mother the second production was out of Adam's rib without a Mother the third was of the blood of the Virgin without a Father II. The soul of man is not propagated of seed by traduction but is immediately created by God and infused into the body Of mans creation Moses writes thus Gen. 2. ver 7. The Lord breathed into his nostrils the breath of life and man became a living soul. In this place three things are mentioned 1. The immediate Creation of the soul for it is call'd the breath of God 2. His breathing for he saith He breathed into his nostrils 3. The personal union of body and soul in these words And he was made a living soul metonymically that is a living sensitive creature But that the souls now are immediately created by God infused into the body is proved by these subsequent Reasons 1. Because otherwayes our souls should have another original than Adam's had for ours must proceed of some pre-excistent matter where as Adam's proceeded of none Neither will that objection hold concerning the dâ—fferent way or reason of generation and creation for nothing is generated of matter but what in the beginning was created of matter 2. Because the soul of Christ was not formed of seed by traduction for he was conceived not by the the help of man but by the operation of the holy Ghost of the blessed Virgins blood 3. Because the Scripture when it speaks of the original of our souls it speaks as of a work of Creation not of nature Iob. 33.4 The spirit of God hath made me and the breath of the Almighty hath given me life Zac. 12.1 The Lord stretcheth out the heavens and layeth the foundation of the earth and formeth the spirit of man within him where it is plain that this is reckoned among the works of Creation 4. Such is mans generation as his dissolution is but mans dissolution is that his body returns to dust and his spirit to God that gave it Eccl. 127. VVhereas then in mans dissolution the spirit returns immediatly to God doubtless it was immediatly formed by him 5 Because the Scripture doth plainly distinguish between the parts of bodies spirits Heb. 12.9.6 Because the soul is indivisible into parts therefore cannot be produced but of nothing 7. Because if it were generated by traduction either it must be generated of a soul or of a body or of a soul and body together but it is not generated of a soul because of that which is incorruptible nothing can be generated not of a body because it is not corporeal not of a body and soul together because so it should be partly corporeal partly incorporeal seeing then it is produced of nothing it must be produced by God alone whose alone property it is to make things of nothing III. These physical Axiomes like begets like and Man begets man remaine true also in this case both because man begets man a person begets a person as also because by the work of the Parents the body is begot as it were the subject of the soul and so is united to the soul which is infused by God and thus the whole man is brought into this World by generation 'T is true that man is the efficient cause of man but not according to all his parts for as he is said to kill a man that kills only his body so man is said to beget man though he begets not the soul. Neither again is man in this respect nobler than other living creatures whereas rather for this very cause mans generation is more excellent in that Gods immediate operation concurs
with natures work IV. Mans soul is immortal not simply as though God could not annhilate it but by Gods ordination and that it cannot be destroyed by second causes V. The faculties of the soul are realâ—y different from the soul as qualities or proper accidents from their subject The reason of this is taken from the event because the essence of the soul remains entire when the faculties are shaken and weakned VI. The souls faculties are either meerly organical as the vegitive and sensitive facultie or are such onely in part and for a time as the understanding and will the former appears not when the body is corrupted but these without the help of the body can exercise themselves and appear when the body is destroyed VII Liberty from coaction is an essential property of the will Otherways the will were no will CHAP. VI. of Gods actual Providence GOd's actual Providence is that by which not only he preserveth his creatures but also according to his great wisdom goodness power justice and mercy he governs all things The RULES I To deny this Providence is to deny God himself II. Actual Providence differs from eternal as the execution from the Decrees III. As in God's eternal â—rovidence the will of his good pleasure so in this his revealed will is chiefly seen IV. Providence doth not only consist in knowledge but also in the Government of all things both great and small V. Gods providence takes not away but establisheth the second causes VI. What things are contingent in respect of the second causes are necessary in respect of Gods providence but this necessity is of immutability not of coaction VII Gods providence is far different from the Stoicks fatall necessity For the Stoical fate ties God to the connexion of secondaâ—y causes but the Christian fate makes a subordination of the second cause to Gods most free will of which he makes use voluntarily not of necessity out of indulgence rather then indigence VIII By Gods Providence both good and evil are governed IX Good things are ruled by an efficacious action or effectual working to which belong the preventing concomitant and subsequent assistance of Divine power X. Evil things are ruled by an actual permission and so they are permitted directed and determined XI Gods Providence remaineth ordered and undefiled even in those actions that are disordered and sinfull For in evil actions two things are observable the action it self and the irregularity thereof The action it self as all naturall motions is performed by Gods effectuall operation but the irregularity or vitiosity comes to passe by Gods actual permission For sin is ordered 1. By permitting it 2. By determining and containing it within its bounds 3. By directing it to a good issue Now God cannot be said to be author of sin by any of these wayes Not by producing the matter of it or the natural action for as there is one cause of the horses motion another of his halting even so it is one thing to be the cause of the action and another thing to be the cause of the adhering vitiosity Not by permitting the evil action because God is not forced by any law to hinder sin Not by determining it for as he who quenches a fâ—â—e that it may not spread further is not the cause of the fire so he that setteth bounds to sin is not the cause of sin Not by directing it to a good end for as it is a main skill to prepare wholsom Medicines out of venomous creatures so it is the glory of God to create light out of darkness good out of evil Hence it is apparent how frivolous their device is who that they might vindicate God from any contagion of sin they flie to a bare and idle permiâ—sion of sin XII Though the Scripture ascribes many times the same action and the same work to God to the devil and to wicked men yet sin cannot be in any wise imputed to God In this case we must not have recâ—uâ—se to a bare permission but we must give an estimate of these actions according to their scope and end for in one and the same action God hath one purpose Satan another and wicked men another Iob's affliction is imputed to God God gave saith Job and God hath taken the same is ascribed to Satan to the Sabaeans also and Chaldeans but according to the end we must judge of each of them â—t was Satans purpose to make Iob despair It was the Chaldeans intent and Sabeans to enrich themselves by plundring that holy man but God determined to try and make manifest the faith of his servant So in the crucifying of Christ it was Pilates purpose to continue in the favour of Caesar and of the Jews the Jews drift was to satisfie their desire with hatred and revenge but Gods end was to redeem mankind Hence they are said to do nothing but what the hand and counsel of God had determined Act 4.28 XIII The hardening of the wicked is ascribed to God as a most just Iudgment so as God can neither be blamed as faulty nor can the wicked be axcused The wicked are in this inexcusable because God onely hardeneth those who harden themselves neither doth he harden the soft hearted but in his just Judgment he increaseth the hardnesse of them who were hardened before Now they hardened themselves by abusing those graces which should have softned them I. Gods long suffering Rom. 2.4 5. Or dâ—spiâ—est thou the riches of his bounty patience and long suffering not knowing that the bountifulnesse of God leadeth thee to repentance But thou after thy hardnesse and heart that cannot repent heapest unto thy self wrath II. Gods Word 2. Cor. 2 15. For we are unto God the sweet savour of Christ in them that are saved and in them which perish to the one we are the savour of death unto death to the other the savour of life unto life III. Gods correction rod by which as an Anvil they are made harder Ier. 5.3 Thou hast stricken them but they have not sorrowed thou hast consumed them but they have refused to receive correction they have made their faces harder then a stone and have refused to return For this reason then are they most justly hardned by God who harden themselves who so often said of Pharaoh I will hold I will make obstinate I will harden his heart For not only doâ—h he harden by permission but also 1. By letting loose the bridle with which he held in their exorbitant lusts Rom. 1.24 He dilivered them up to their own lust and v. 28. God gave them up to a reprobate mind II. By delivering them to Satan as to a Hangman 1 King 22.21.22 And there came forth a Spirit who stood before the Lord and said I will perswade him to wit Achab and the Lord said to him where with And he said I will go forth and I will be a lying spirit in the mouth of all his prophets
the end of the Law Rom. 10.4 when it is called a School-master to lead us to Christ Gal. 3.24 and when the Law is said not to be contrary to him who doth the works of the Spirit Gal. 5.22 23. For that righteousness which the Law requires that the Gospel exhibites in Christ to the Believer and albeit we cannot in this life yield full satisfaction to the Law yet the regenerate begin to obey it by the grace of sanctification CHAP. XVI Of the Person of Christ God and Man THe parts of the Gospel concerning Christ our Redeemer are two the first is of his person the other of his Office In respect of the Person the Redeemer is God and man that is Gods eternal Son being incarnate or made man in the fulnesse of time John 1.14 And the word was made flesh and dwelt amongst us Gal. 4 4. But after the fulnesse of time came God sent his Son made of a Woman 1. Tim. 3 16. and without controveâ—sie great is the mystery of godliness God made manifest in the flesh The RULES I. The Incarnation of Christ originally is the work of the whole blessed Trinity but terminatively or in respect of the object it is the work of the Son alone For the son onely assumed mans nature which the father in the Son by the Holy Ghost formed of the substance of the blessed Virgin II The person of Christ is considered either disjunctively as the Word and the eternal Son of God or conjunctively as God and man the first consideration is according to Divinity the latter according to Oeconomie or Gods gracious dispensation III. Likewise the divine nature is considered either in it self and simply or relatively as it is in the Person of the Word by dispensation IV. Althâ—ugh then it be true that Christ-God is become man yet it follows not that therefore the Divinity is incarnate or because the Son is Incarnate that the Father also and Holy Ghost are Incarnate V. The matter out of which the Incarnation was effected is the seed of the Woman or of the blessed Virgin Gen. 3.15 VI. The forme of it consisteth in the Personal Vnion whereby the word was made flesh and Christ remained the same he was and became what he was not VII The end is Gods glory and our salvation VIII Both the truth of God as also our salvation do evince the necessity of Christs incarnation IX The truth of God because in the Old Testament it was uttered by divers Prophesies and was shaddowed by divers types These are the chief Prophesies Gen 3.15 I will put enmity between thee and the Woman and between thy seed and her seed it shall bruise thy head and thou shalt bruise his heel Gen. 22.18 In thy seed all nations shall be blessed Esa. 7.14 Behold a Virgin shall conceive and bring forth a Son and they shall call his name Emanuel Esa. 9.6 7. For unto us a child is borne and unto us a Son is given Jer. 23.5 Behold the dayes shall come in which I will raise to David a righteous branch and a King shall reign and prosper and shall execute judgement and justice on the earth In his dayes â—udah shall be saved and Israel shall dwell safely and this is his name whereby he shall be called The Lord our righteousness But his types were the Tabernacle the Arke of the Covenant and such like of which we have said but chiefly Melchisedeck without father without mother Hebr. 7.3 and that humane shape or form in which he appeared of old frequently to the Fathers X. Our salvation for this cause doth evince and prove the necessity of his Incarnation in that we could not be saved but by such a redeemer who was both God and Man in one Person or God-man XI That he should be God was requisite in respect of both parties on the one side the Majesty of God required it on the other side our wants the greatness of the evil that was to be removed and the good that was to be restored Such is the Majesty of God that no man could interpose himself but he who was one with the Father the very Angels durst not do this because they also stood in need of Christ the Mediator Col. 1.16 17. Because they being compared with God are unclean Ioh. 15.15 and for this cause they cover their faces in Gods presence Isa. 6.2 How much lesse then could any man intercede whereas there is not one just person Rom. 3.10 The evill that was to be taken away was sin and the consequents of sin the wrath of God the power of Satan both temporal and eternal death Now I pray by whose suffering could that infinite Majesty be satisfied which was offended unlesse by his suffering who was also Infinitâ— By whose Intercession could the wrath of God be appeased but by his onely who is that best beloved son of God By whose strength could Satan with the whole power of darknesse be overcome except by his who in power exceeds all the Devils who finally could overcome death except he who had the power over death Heb. 2.15 But the good things that were to be â—estred were perfect righteousness adoption into sons the Image of God the gifts of the holy Ghost life eternal and such like but now who could bestow that righteousness on us except he who is justice it self Who is so fit to make us the sons of God as he who is by nature the Son of God Who was so fit to restore in us the image of God as he who is himselfe the Image of the invisible God who can bestow on us the holy Spirit so assuredly as he from whom the spirit proceedeth Who at last can give us life eternal but he who is life it self Iohn 1.4 XII That he might be man the justice of God required which as it leaves not sin unpunished so it punisheth not sin but in that nature which sinned The first branch of this Rule is plain both by the justice and by the truth of God By his justice because God by this doth not onely resist but also punish sin Psal. 5.4 5 6. For thou art not a God that hast pleasure in wickednesse nor shall evil dwell with thee the foolish shall not stand in thy sight thou hatest all workers of iniquity thou shalt destroy them that speak lies the Lord will abhor the blody and deceitful man Now by the truth of God because the threatning which was given before the fall could not be in vain therefore Socinus is idle and foolish who that he might overthrow the merit of Christ feigns such a justice of God which doth not necessarily inflict eternal death or require satisfaction and which in this respect can be content to loose its own right but if sins were to be punished they were surely to be punished in our nature for to man the Law was given and to man death was threatned therefore it lies upon man to suffer the punishment