Christ as one God with the Father and the Spirit so Satisfaction is made to him Consider Christ as Mediator and so he is that Person that makes the Satisfaction Every sin is an offence committed against the Divine Majesty Now for as much as all the Trinity have the same Essence of the Divinity in them therefore we must of necessity suppose that when Satisfaction is made to one of the Persons Satisfaction is made to the other also because they have all one and the same Essence and it is the Divine Majesty that is offended in all The Son therefore the second Person in Trinity considered as God so Satisfaction is made to him as well as to the Father and the Spirit but now consider him as God-man and Mediator so he is the Person that makes the satisfaction and Christ considered as Mediator makes satisfaction to himself considered as God Hence are those expressions Tit. 2.14 Who gave himself for us that he might redeem us from all iniquity and purifie unto himself a peculiar people Here we see how Christ hath redeemed and purified to himself a peculiar people So Eph. 5.7 That he might present it to himself a glorious Church Neither is it incongruous or improper to say that Christ hath made satisfaction to himself because amongst men one man doth not satisfie himself but one man makes satisfaction to another I say this is not incongruous or improper in respect of Christ and the reason is because Christ may be considered two ways 1. Christ may be considered in respect of his Divine Nature as he is one with the Father Hence it is said I and my Father are one Joh. 10.30 In this respect Christ is the Person offended Consider Christ in respect of his Divine Nature meerly so he is the Person offended 2. Christ may be considered as to his Office which he voluntarily undertook and so though he were the Person offended yet was he willing to take our nature and in that nature to become a Mediator between God and us by his own voluntary condescension so that the same Person after a different respect or consideration receives the satisfaction and also gave it Christ received the Sacrifice of Atonement considered as God he also offered the Sacrifice as Mediator as God-man in a way of voluntary condescension 2. Another thing that is to be laid down is this We say that Christs Satisfaction is one of his Mediatorial actions because there was the concourse of both the Natures in Christ in this work of his Satisfaction Christ is Mediator according to both Natures and in all the Mediatorial actions of Christ the Person acts in both Natures influencing each nature to do that which is proper to it self It is a known Rule in Divinity Vtraque Natura agit cum communione alterius Each of the Natures in Christ acts with a communion of the other Nature The work of Satisfaction is neither accomplished by the Divinity without the Humanity neither is it performed by the Humanity without the influence and virtue of the Divinity The Divine Nature in Christ is the principal efficient cause and the humane Nature is to be considered as the ministring or subservient cause Joh. 6.63 our Saviour tells us That the flesh profits nothing it is the Spirit that quickens Although the actions and sufferings performed by him in his Humanity were the matter of his satisfaction yet it was the Divinity that gave virtue and efficacy unto all It is in the humane Nature that Christ obeyed suffered dyed but it is by virtue of the Divine Nature that his obedience becomes meritorious and his sufferings become satisfactory 2. We say in the description That the Satisfaction of Christ is one of his Mediatorial actions and particularly an act of his Priesthood To understand this we must consider that there were two things that did belong to the Office of the Priests under the Law 1. To offer Sacrifice 2. To pray and intercede for the People Christ therefore being made of God a High-Priest according to the order of Melchisedec Heb. 6.20 he also must have some Sacrifice to offer without a Sacrifice he could not be a Priest This the Apostle teacheth clearly Heb. 8.3 Every High-Priest is ordained to offer gifts and sacrifices therefore it is of necessity that this man have something also to offer If Christ be a Priest he must have something to offer there must be some Sacrifice that he must offer 3. The third thing we have to inquire into is this What the matter of this satisfaction is for we say in the description Christ offers himself a Sacrifice for our sins I know it is commonly said That the humane Nature was the Sacrifice that was offered Now although this expression if rightly understood may be admitted because it is said Christ suffered in the flesh for us so we have the expression 1 Pet. 4.1 That for as much as Christ hath suffered for us in the flesh that is in his Humanity it was by means of the humane Nature that Christ was capable of suffering and it was in that nature that he did suffer also we read that Christ had a body prepared for him and that body was offered up Heb. 10.10 By the which will we are sanctified by the offering up the body of Jesus once for all Yet notwithstanding this is evident that the Scripture when it speaks of the Sacrifice of Christ doth most commonly and frequently call it the Sacrifice of himself There are many Texts to this purpose Gal. 1.4 He gave himself for our sins Gal. 2.20 He gave himself for me Eph. 5.2 Christ hath loved us and given himself for us Eph. 5.25 Christ loved the Church and gave himself for it Tit. 2.14 Who gave himself for us that he might redeem us from all iniquity and purifie to himself a peculiar people Heb. 1.3 When he had by himself purged our sins sate down on the right hand of the Majesty on high Heb. 7.27 This he did once when he offered up himself Heb. 9.14 By the eternal Spirit he offered himself without spot to God And he put away our sins by the sacrifice of himself And it is an emphatical Scripture 1 Pet. 2.24 Who his own self bare our sins in his body on the tree 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ipsemet sui ipsius oblatione ut simul Sacerdos esset victima Beza in loc By all these expressions it appears that Christ himself was the Sacrifice we may not exclude either of the Natures in Christ in any of his Mediatorial actions Christ is our Mediator according to both Natures and he is Prophet Priest and King of the Church according to both Natures and in this work of his Satisfaction he gave himself according to both Natures For though it were the humane Nature only that was capable of suffering yet the Divine Nature was united to the humane nature in the time of Christs suffering The Word
is it said Every one That so Christ himself saith he might not be excluded Christ who was blessed in his own Righteousness was yet accursed for our sins The curse prevailed so far as to take away Christs life to separate his soul from his body It is true the curse could not prevail so far as to separate either from his person to separate his soul or his body from his person the Person of the Son of God the second Person in Trinity remained united to the soul and body of Christ even when his body and soul were separated each from other and it is our greatest happiness that it was so viz. that the curse could not reach the Person of Christ if I may so express it that is reach his Person so as to dissolve the Union of the two Natures for if the curse could have reached the Person of Christ in the sense I am now speaking of that is if the curse could have extended it self to the Person of Christ so as to dissolve the Union of the two Natures this would have made the death of Christ ineffectual if death could have dissolved the personal Vnion Christs death would have been no more than the death of a meer man of a just man and so his death could not have been meritorious and have satisfied for the sins of the world But though the curse could not take hold of Christs Person so as to dissolve the union between his Person and our nature yet the curse took hold of our nature united to Christs Person The curse did prevail so far as to separate his humane soul from his body To understand this a little more clearly let us consider the Divine nature in Christ was above the Law and above the curse the curse could not reach his Divine nature it could not possibly hurt that but now Christ having assumed our nature and voluntarily made himself subject to the Law and to the curse in our nature the Law hath to do with our nature in Christ We being under sin and under the curse the curse had dominion over us therefore the Apostle tells us That sin reigned unto death Rom. 5.21 Now Christ being our Surety and the Law finding our nature in Christ and that Christ had transferred the guilt of our sins upon himself the Law armed with the curse deals with Christ as a sinner and it proceeds so far as to make the utmost breach upon our nature that it can it rends his holy soul from his pure body And thus for a time the curse seems to triumph over our nature as it stood in Christ Hence is that of the Apostle Rom. 6.9 Christ being dead dyeth no more death hath no more dominion over him This plainly intimates that death and the curse had dominion over Christ for a time and the curse proceeded so far as to the extinction of his natural life his soul was separated from his body though the union between the two natures was not dissolved I come to the third and last Particular and that is this How it was possible for this to be Christ was most blessed in himself how then was it possible for him thus to be made a curse The curse implies anger wrath displeasure in him that pronounceth and inflicts it as hath been shewn how then was it possible for Christ to suffer the wrath of God that was always beloved of God To this several things are to be answered 1. Consider Christ in himself and so he was always beloved of God Mat. 3.17 This is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased Isa 42.1 Behold mine Elect in whom my soul delighteth And Christ as he was man had more titles than one to his Fathers love 1. Christ had a title to his Fathers love as his Humanity is taken into so near a relation to the natural Son of God The humane nature in Christ is made one in person with the natural Son of God so that there is not another subsistence of the second Person in Trinity and the humane nature but there is one subsistence to the second Person in Trinity and to the humane nature therefore the humane nature being taken in as it were to have its subsistence in the person of the natural Son of God being taken into the unity of the same person must needs be beloved of the Father upon that account above all creatures 2. Christ is beloved of the Father as he is a just and an innocent person and he must needs be beloved of the Father upon that account Isa 46.8 The Lord loveth the righteous Christ being a just and a righteous pâ—â—son the Father could not but love him as considered in himself 3. The Father loved Christ upon the account of his obedience Joh. 10.17 Therefore doth my Father love me because I lay down my life for my sheep and in the next verse This commandment have I received of my Father Christ obeying his Father in laying down his life for his sheep is one title he hath to his Fathers love therefore consider Christ in himself so he was always beloved of the Father 2. Christ suffered the wrath of God as he was our Surety and as he stood in our stead 1 Pet. 4.1 Christ hath suffered for us 1 Pet. 3.18 Christ hath once suffered for sin the just for the unjust This is a clear Text Christ was a just person in himself and as he was a just person so he was always beloved of God and could not but be beloved of him But now as he that was a just person in himself gave himself to suffer for the unjust so it was that he bare the wrath of God The wrath of God was due to the unjust Tribulation and anguish indignation and wrath upon every soul of man that doth evil Rom 2. Therefore if the just will suffer for the unjust in their room and stead he must then suffer what they must have suffered It is a true speech of Austin Mors Christi fuit conditionis non criminis Aug. The death which Christ underwent was not in respect of any crime or offence that he himself had committed but it was in respect of the condition that he brought himself into that is Christ suffered the wrath of God not for any crime or offence of his own but in the condition of a Mediator because of our sins Hence is it said That he was delivered up for our offences Rom. 6. ult So in that of the Prophet Isa 53.5 He was wounded for our transgressions he was bruised for our iniquities the chastisement of our peace was upon him Christ took upon him the discharge and payment of our debt therefore though he was always beloved of God in himself yet as personating and representing us who were sinners so it was that he sustained the wrath of God All we like sheep have gone astray saith the Prophet and the Lord hath laid on him the iniquity of us all Isa 53.6 We
EMMANVEL OR THE LOVE of CHRIST Explicated and Applied in his INCARNATION Being made under the LAW AND HIS SATISFACTION IN XXX Sermons Preached by JOHN ROW Minister of God's Word AND Published by SAMUEL LEE LONDON Printed for Francis Tyton Book-seller at the Three Daggers near the Inner Temple-Gate in Fleetstreet 1680. TO THE PIOUS READER THIS Treatise here presented to thine eyes first sounded in the ears of a gracious Society by that Gospel-Trumpet Mr. John Row It was a Darling-child brought forth from a judicious head and a sanctified heart The Ancients compared John to the Eagle in the Vision of Cherubims because soaring high in the contemplation of our Lords Divinity Our John as if he had lain in the bosom of that John who lay in the bosom of our Saviour hath sweetly attempted to descant upon the Song of Angels about the Vnion of Heaven and Earth God and man together Luk. 2.10 The heavenly Host answered in a heavenly Anthem to that single Angel who brought the good Tydings of great joy for all people to the Shepherds of Bethlehem and behold here one of the Shepherds of Zion sings his Epiphonema to theirs Glory to God in the highest Indeed the union of two Natures in one Person and of three Persons in one Essence are Mysteries unaccountable by Angels but the joy of its influence shall never forsake the Harps of Angels or Saints to all Eternity None but who is assumed into that glorious Vnion can exhaust the Treasury of Divine Wisdom Rev. 5.5 John the beloved Disciple could not unloose the seven Seals of these Mysteries but must weep at the foot of the Lamb to do it Yet what is to be believed admired adored may and ought to be the subject of our most profound Meditations and delight What God hath revealed let none presume to count impertinent to dive into though they can feel no bottom they will find more amiable Gemms than Pearl and Coral adhering to the sides of the adamantine Rocks in this unfathomable Abyss True none can fully explain this Vnion but he that injoys it To delineate some glittering rays that stream from it requires deep communion with the person in union We are not able to conjecture what pleasures flow in upon the palates of Angels as they stand drinking of the beams of the Divine Essence neither can they transfuse or pour out those Paradise-rivers into our broken cisterns How far this holy man hath added to the point I rather leave to the Candidates of these Mysteries than determine Each may see deeper into their own Notions than others and it is far easier to conceive than express and yet there is infinitely more left for all Ages in the remainder of the Spirit than ever was uttered or can be thought of Yet I think with respect had to others he hath rendred some things more intelligible and many things more applicable and useful to common capacities The Cherubims that stood looking down upon the crowned Mercy-seat might 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Exod. 25.11 1 Pet. 1.12 but could not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 they might gaze upon it but not through it It was not transparent Gold like the streets of Jerusalem Rev. 21.21 but too thick a plate of Ophir for an Angels eye to pierce They may pry into the state of Saints in Glory but not the contrivance of Grace to bring Saints thither Much less can man and man fallen receive or sustain wings strong enough to fly into the depth of this amazing Firmament What God bath made on the back-side of the exteriour Heavens hath a terminating bound because a Creature though it pose Astronomy it self to measure and square the Circle of the Heavens so what God hath written is infinitely true though our finite and crooked thoughts can never unfold or draw a parallel what Scripture reveals though it do not fully unveil it is our duty both to study and embrace Divine love say the Platonists made the Vniverse and therefore more capacious and were it not more comprehensive than all created love it would never take a Saint He finds a bottom in all created joy and not like the Sea the fresher at the bottom but sometimes more salt and bitter but uncreated love hath no shoars nor centre but the bosom of God and the depth is upward still higher and sweeter These things are reserved for such as pass Kidron and Olivet let us a while step into the Sanctuary and study to grow in the Mystery of the Father and of Christ and pray that the Spirit would reveal in us what the Son hath revealed to us from the Father Joh. 1 1◠and then draw spiritual and sweet consequences from above Did the Son of God come down from Heaven to earth was it not to take the sons of men from earth to Heaven Did not the second Person partake of the humane Nature that we might partake of the Divine He took not the persons of Enoch or Abraham or Paul that they only might be happy but the nature of the first Adam that all who by faith are united to the second Adam in Grace may triumph in Glory Did not he lye in Davids Inn at Bethlehem that we might lye in the Son of Davids mansions that are above in that Zion of Zions Was not he made of a woman in Canaan to restore us to a better Paradise than what was lost by the woman of Eden Was not he made under the Law that we might be new born under Grace Was not he exalted on the Cross this Josephs Son to speak with reverence to erect a more firm and sublime Ladder into Heaven than Jacob's That Patriarch saw only a Vision of Angels by star-light but we by this Ladder ascend up to the Angels themselves that are singing in the Noon of Glory Was not his most precious Blood poured out as a Ransom for many to the remission of sins that ours might not be poured out like oyl to feed the perpetual Lamps in the flames of Hell Did not the Father make his love honourable as the Prophet speaks by his Son 's more honourable obedience and justifie his Justice by his Son's Righteousness and quench his anger in the Ocean of his Son's love Thus doth our blessed Author from the Son's Deity proceed to the great Doctrine of his most meritorious Sufferings and full Satisfaction for the sins of all the Elect. The Father by his Eternal love made way for his Temporal anger to his beloved Son that he might redeem his adopted sons from eternal wrath and made a way through the heart of his Son for them to pass into eternal love This point he no less sweetly than substantially clears against the Socinians venom who aim by darkning the Deity of Christ to extinguish the glory and honour of his Satisfaction Act. 20.28 For if it had not been the Blood of God it could never have purchased the Church But it is that
shall open that in several particulars 1. In that the Son of God came into a nature so inferiour to his own What comparison is there between God and the creature That the eternal God should joyn himself so nearly to the nature of his own creature this is admirable This was that made Bernard say When I consider the person of him who comes Dignationis magnitudinem expavesco I cannot comprehend the excellency of his Majesty when I consider to whom he comes I tremble at the greatness of his condescension To whom was it that this great person came He came to us poor men who dwell in houses of clay And will God indeed dwell with men Yea he dwells with man The Word was made flesh 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and dwelt among us Joh. 1.14 He pitched his Tent and Tabernacle in a part of our nature he did not only converse familiarly and was seen among men but he pitched his Tent and Tabernacle in a part of our nature Without controversie great is the mystery of godliness God manifested in the flesh God was in that very flesh which the Son of God assumed God was in that flesh that was once seen here on earth and was afterwards given as a Sacrifice for the life of the world yea so in it as to dwell personally in it Therefore doth the Son of God call the flesh he assumed his own flesh Joh. 6.53 Now consider it what a disproportion is there between God and our flesh Yet the eternal Word is made flesh he who was with God in the beginning and who was God this very Word is made flesh Joh. 1.14 It is a notable expression one useth to illustrate this Although it was not suitable to humane flesh according to the condition of its own nature to be united to God in the unity of person yet this was becoming God in the infinite excellency of his own goodness It was nothing but infinite goodness could move God to condescend so low as to take a part of our flesh and cloath himself with it 2. The condescension of Christ in his Incarnation appears in this in that the Son of God took a part of our nature after humane nature had been infected and when the whole mass of humane nature lay infected with original sin Let none mistake here that part of humane nature which was united to the person of the Son of God had no taint or pollution of sin in it but thus we ought to conceive of it The mass of humane nature out of which this part or particle of humane nature was taken was infected with original sin and in the same moment that the Word the second person in Trinity joyned himself to our nature that part or parcel of humane nature that was joyned to his person was sanctified by the Holy Ghost so that in the same moment or instant the union was made that part of humane nature which was assumed was sanctified by the Holy Ghost neither was it sanctified before assumed nor assumed before sanctified but both were done in the same instant as soon as there was flesh so soon was it the flesh of the Word We must not suppose any instant of time when that part of humane nature that was joyned to the Son of God should have a subsistence of its own before it was united to his person no but at the same time it was flesh 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 at the same time it was the flesh of the Word but this is that which commends the love of Christ and his great condescension that he should take part of our nature when the whole mass of it lay under the contagion of original sin God who was Purity and Holiness it self might justly have loathed and abhorred such impurity as ours he might justly have disdained to have sought out a habitation for himself among such polluted creatures None of the children of Adam was exempt and free from the contagion of original sin no not the Virgin her self who was the Mother of our Lord now that God should seek out and prepare for himself a habitation out of such an impure sink as our nature was by reason of sin this is that which greatly commends the love and condescension of the Son of God 3. The greatness of Christs love in his Incarnation with respect to his condescension appears in this in that he took our nature together with its infirmities He was in all things made like to us sin only excepted The Son of God did not only take flesh but he took passible mortal flesh such a nature as was subject to suffering and death this was a great commendation of his love For we must know the Divinity inhabiting in Christs humane nature could have prevented all suffering and death the Godhead which was personally united to the humane nature could have made the humane nature impassible and above suffering Therefore it is observed by a Learned man It was by the good pleasure of the Divine will Beneplacito Divinae voluntatis permittebatur carni pati operari quae propria that it was permitted to the humanity to do and suffer the things which were proper to it self The great end why the Son of God assumed our nature was that he might satisfie for the sins of men Now one is then said to satisfie for the offence of another when he takes upon himself the punishment that is due for such offences now suffering and death was the punishment due for sin By one man sin entred into the world and death by sin Rom. 5. Therefore the Son of God out of his great love to us was not only willing to take our nature but also the infirmities of our nature Isa 53.4 He hath born our griefs 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and carried our sorrows That which was not assumed was not healed if Christ had not born our infirmities our infirmities had not been healed 4. The greatness of Christs condescension in his Incarnation appears in this in that he suffered the glory of his Divinity to be hid and veiled for a time in our nature after he had assumed it This is that which the Scripture calls his emptying himself 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Phil. 2.7 We read it He made himself of no reputation in the Original it is He emptied himself How did Christ empty himself The former words compared with those that follow do acquaint us He was in the form of God Now that he that was in the form of God should take upon him the form of a servant should be made in the likeness of men and was found in fashion as a man there was his emptying himself He might always have continued in the form of God only without taking to himself the form of a servant or if he will take the form of a servant he might presently and immediately shew forth the glory of his Divinity in that humane nature which he
humane nature assumed so that the humane nature as it is well exprest by one is by means of this union rooted in the Divine stock To understand this we must know that the Son of God was a person before his Incarnation and subsisted in the Divine nature by the work of his Incarnation the humane nature having no subsistence of its own hath the Divine person of the Son communicated to it and so subsists in and by that person so that now here is one and the same person that subsists in two natures The same person who subsisted in the Divine nature only before his Incarnation after his Incarnation subsists in both natures the Divine and humane nature All this is implied in that great Scripture Joh. 1.14 The Word was made flesh The Evangelist speaks of Christ the Son of God the eternal Word The Word was made flesh that is the Son of God the second person in Trinity was made flesh or became man That Christ was a person and had his subsistence in the Divine nature before his Incarnation that the Evangelist had shewn us in the two first verses In the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was God Here the Evangelist shews us plainly that Christ had his subsistence before his Incarnation he subsisted in the Divine nature he subsisted with the Father in the same Divine Essence Now after he comes to acquaint us that this very person whom he calls the Word and who did first of all subsist in the nature of God only did afterwards become man and was made flesh and after his Incarnation subsists in both natures the nature of man as well as the nature of God who before his Incarnation subsisted in the nature of God only The Word was made flesh How is this to be understood made flesh Not by any conversion in the natures as if so be the Divinity was absorpt by or turned into the humanity or as if so be the humanity was swallowed up into the Divinity but the Word is made flesh thus we ought to conceive of it the Word that is the eternal Word the second person of the Trinity who was a person before draws the humane nature into the Vnity of his own person so that the natures remain distinct and unconfounded but the person is but one The Word who was a person before his Incarnation assumes and takes the humane nature destitute of any personal subsistence of its own into the unity of his own personal subsistence so that now by means of the Incarnation of the Word there is one and the same person of the Word and the humane nature assumed This is in short the sum of that Doctrine which we call the Hypostatical or personal Union which is therefore called the Hypostatical or personal Union because both the natures the Divine and the humane nature are united into that one Hypostasis or person of the Son of God Now consider the greatness of Christs love in this Union This union the union of the two natures in that one person of Christ is the greatest of all unions next to the union of the three persons of the Sacred Trinity which indeed may not so properly be called a Vnion as a Vnity Summa illa TrinÃtas nobis hanc exhibuit Trinitatem The highest Trinity hath exhibited to us this Trinity that these three the Word the flesh and humane soul of Christ should be one one not by any confusion of substance but one in person In the Sacred Trinity the persons remain distinct but the nature is one in the personal Vnion the natures remain distinct but the person is but one Now this is the highest of all unions next that of the three persons in the Trinity in one and the same Essence namely that a created nature as the humane nature in Christ is should be made one person with the Son of God who also himself is God By this union God communicates himself after the highest manner that was possible unto the creature and the nature of the creature is united to God in the most perfect manner as it was possible for the creature to be united to God In the Incarnation of the Son of God man who is the last creature in Creation is joyned with his first Cause and Principle in such a union as that there is none greater under God To illustrate yet farther the greatness of this union that is made in the two natures in the person of Christ consider There is a presence of God and an inhabitation of his Spirit in the Saints but this falls far short of the personal Vnion which we are now speaking of for notwithstanding the mystical Union notwithstanding the inhabitation of the Spirit in Believers yet a Believer remains a true person the person of a Believer and the person of Christ remain distinct persons though Christ and Believers be one mystically and spiritually The Scripture He that is joyned to the Lord is one Spirit There is a mystical spiritual Union between Christ and Believers yet Christ and Believers remain distinct in their persons but in this other union the personal union the union of the two natures in the person of Christ the humane nature of Christ hath no subsistence of its own but subsists wholly in and by the person of the Son of God who was a person from Eternity and gives his own person to the humane nature destitute of any personality of its own so that could we suppose it were possible for the humane nature to be deserted by the Divine person that supports it it would be reduced to nothing so that here is a vast difference between this union and all other unions Yet a little farther to illustrate this It is the observation of a Learned Divine this Union is so near individual inseparable indissoluble that the Divine nature of the Son will not cannot ought not to be thought on sought for apprehended out of this union which it hath with the humane nature but it ought to be thought of sought for apprehended in that most near union and conjunction it hath with the humanity and the humane nature which is assumed ought not not to be thought of conceived or apprehended out of but within the most intimate embracings of the second person in Trinity who assumed it And that God is not to be sought for any where but in Christ is clear from that passage 1 Joh. 5.20 The Son of God is come and hath given us an understanding that we might know him that is true and we are in him that is true even in his Son Jesus Christ this is the true God The sum of this Scripture saith Calvin is this When once we have Christ then we have the true and eternal God because God is to be sought for no where else The Son of God hath so assumed a part of our nature as that he hath made it his own proper flesh so
that that body which he hath assumed is not the body of any other person or individual but it is the proper body of the Son of God therefore is it called the Temple of his body Joh. 2.21 elsewhere it is said Feed the Church of God which he hath purchased with his own blood Act. 20.28 And we have that expression The body of his flesh Col. 1.22 That particle or parcel of our nature which the Son of God assumed and took up was so individually inseparably indissolubly united to him that it became his own proper flesh therefore is it said The bread I will give is my flesh Joh. 6.51 To sum up this particular what love is this that the Son of God so great a person as we have heard should take up a part of our nature joyn it to himself in the bond of near union and doth wear it and will wear it to all Eternity 5. The admirableness of the work of Christs Incarnation appears in this in that by means of the Incarnation all the Trinity are brought near to us and by the Son incarnate we come to have communion with all the Trinity Hence is that expression of the Apostle John 1 Joh. 2.24 If that which ye have heard from the beginning shall remain in you ye also shall continue in the Son and in the Father By continuing in the Son we come to continue in the Father This is the order we must continue in the Son if ever we mean to continue in the Father He had said before He that denies the Son the same hath not the Father now he saith By abiding in the doctrine of the Son we shall continue in the Son and in the Father What is the doctrine of the Son which if we continue in we shall continue in the Son and in the Father The doctrine of the Son is That the Word is made flesh Compare this with 1 Joh. 4.2 and 2 Joh. 7. and we shall see it clear that the doctrine concerning the Son is That the Son is come into the flesh or that the Word is made flesh Now by continuing in this doctrine we shall continue in the Father by continuing in the doctrine of the Son incarnate we shall continue in the Father How so He that hath the Son hath the Father The Divinity of the Father is brought down to us in the person of the Son incarnate It is a great speech of a Learned Divine Divinitas in una sui hypostaseâ—â—â— tota nobis communicavit The whole Divinity hath communicated it self to us in the Incarnation of one of the Persons To understand which we must know although the Son only be the person who is incarnate not the Father or the Spirit yet both the Father and the Spirit are to be found in that one person of the Son who is incarnate and the reason is because the Divine persons although they are distinct yet they have an inbeing in each other Joh. 14.10 The Father is in the Son and the Spirit proceedeth from the Father and the Son so that in the person of the Son who only is incarnate the other persons are to be found Hence is that speech of Luther and it is a great speech Vbi ille Deus Christus Jesus est ibi est totus Deus seu tota Divinitas ibi invenitur Pater Spiritus S. Luther Where that God Christ Jesus is there is whole God or the whole Divinity there the Father and the holy Spirit is found The Son hath assumed our nature now the Father is in the Son and the Spirit proceeds from the Father and the Son therefore in the Son incarnate all the Trinity are represented to us We begin first of all at the flesh of Christ we conceive first of all of the humanity of Christ and from thence we ascend to the contemplation of the Divinity of the Son inhabiting and dwelling in the humane nature and by that means we come to communion with the whole Trinity This may be illustrated further to us by two Considerations 1. At the same time we apprehend the Divinity of the Son we do also apprehend the Divinity of the Father Joh. 14.9 He that hath seen me hath seen the Father There is one and the same undivided Divinity Trium personarum una eadem individua est Divinicas Essentia Omnipotentia Sapientia Essentia unius personae est essentia alterius Essence Omnipotency Wisdom of all the three persons therefore when we apprehend and conceive of the Divinity of the Son we do at the same time apprehend the Divinity of the Father and Spirit which is common to all the three persons The essence of one person is the essence of another We must not fancy or imagine because we speak of more persons than one in the Deity therefore there are more Deities as if there were as many Deities as persons no all the three persons are but one and the self same Deity or Godhead and when we apprehend the Divinity or Deity of one of the persons we apprehend the same Deity that is common to them all 2. By the apprehension of the person of the Son we are led into communion with the Father so that we may say with the Apostle 1 Joh. 1.3 Truly our fellowship is with the Father and with his Son Jesus Christ The Divinity of the Father and the Son is the same so that when we apprehend the Divinity of the one we must necessarily apprehend the Divinity of the other Yet there is a distinction between the Father and the Son the distinction is not in point of Essence for there is one and the self same Essence or Divinity common to them both Therefore if there be a distinction between the Father and the Son and that distinction be not in point of Essence the distinction must necessarily be conceived to be as to the person of the one and of the other each person includes the whole Essence and when we conceive of one person we must conceive of the whole Essence Yet thus we ought to take it the same Essence is to be conceived after a distinct manner of subsisting in the Father and the self same Essence is to be conceived after a distinct manner of subsisting in the Son Or we may take it in other words thus One and the self same God after such a manner of subsisting is the Father one and the same God after such a manner of subsisting is the Son For that which we call a person in the Godhead is nothing else but the Divine Essence it self distinguished by some proper manner of subsisting as for instance When we conceive of the Father we conceive of him as the first person in the Deity who is of himself and from no other and gives being to the Son as the Son this is his manner of subsisting When we conceive of the Son we conceive of him as the second person in the
Deity who hath the same whole and intire nature of God in him as the Father hath yet as he is the Son so we conceive of him as begotten by the Father and proceeding from the Father by eternal Generation this is his manner of subsisting Here is one and the self same Essence still the Father hath the whole Essence in him and is depending upon no other the Son hath the same Essence but as he is the Son so he is begotten by the Father and proceeding from him by eternal Generation Now by the person of the Son incarnate we are brought in to communion with the Father How so Whilst we apprehend and conceive of the person of the Son who is incarnate we may reflect upon the Father from whom the Son proceeds and between whom and the Father there is the most perfect communion of natures the nature of the Son being the nature of the Father also and thus by having fellowship with the Son we have fellowship and communion with the Father also It is a great Scripture to illustrate this Joh. 14.1 Ye believe in God believe also in me Fides in Christum non est praejudicio fidei in Deum Patrem c. Nihil vetat quò minùs sit fides in plures personas modò essentia sit una eadémque Roloc in Joh. 14. It is the observation of a Holy man and Learned Divine upon that Text Faith in Christ is no prejudice to faith in God the Father neither is faith in the Holy Ghost any prejudice to faith in the Father and in the Son for there is one and the same God although the persons are distinct in that one nature of God And he adds Nothing forbids us but that faith may be in more persons than one so we be sure to retain one and the self same Essence To understand which we must consider When we conceive of one person in the Trinity or direct an act of faith to one person we must take in the whole Deity or whole God in our apprehension or conception when we conceive of another person or direct an act of faith to another person of the Trinity we must take in the whole Deity or Essence in our apprehension we must take heed that we never part or divide the Essence in our conception of any of the persons When you conceive of each person be sure you take in the whole Essence in that conception as for instance When I conceive of God the Father I conceive of the first person in the Deity whole God subsisting in the Divine Essence after such a manner when I conceive of the Son I conceive of the second person in the Deity whole God subsisting in the Essence after such a manner The Essence is common to all the persons and the persons do subsist in the self same Essence therefore in the conception of each person we must be sure to take in the whole Essence Now by the Son incarnate we are brought to communion with the Father the humanity of Christ leads us to the Divinity we begin at the humanity and we ascend from thence to the consideration of that person who assumed the humane nature Now in this one person is whole God there is the Divinity of the Father and of the Spirit now when by the eye of faith we can contemplate the Divinity in the person of the Son we may be the same eye of faith reflect upon the person of the Father as subsisting in the same Divinity and who is no otherways distinguished from the Son but by his relative property Nihil absurdi est dum concipimus Deitatem Patri Filio Spiritui communem si intuitus Filii mentes nostras reflectit ad Patris personam Calvin It was a wise and great speech of Calvin to this purpose There is nothing of absurdity in this if when we do conceive of the Deity or Godhead which is common to the Father Son and Spirit the aspect and contemplation which faith hath of the Son do reflect and turn back our minds upon the person of the Father for the distinct respects which are between the Father and Son as such make no division or partition in the Essence although the Son be not the Father nor the Father the Son yet both the Father and the Son are one and the same God and there is one and the same Essence common to them both I and the Father am one Joh. 10.30 Therefore when by the eye of faith we cast an aspect upon the person of the Son and see him subsisting in the Divine Essence we may by the same eye of faith reflect upon the person of the Father and see him subsisting in the same Essence and thus our fellowship is both with the Father and his Son Jesus Christ as the Apostle speaks Learn from what hath been opened Vse 1 that they who leave out Christ in their Religion or do fancy or imagine to themselves any other Christ besides the Word incarnate can never attain to God or communion with him Marvel not at such an inference as this is this doth naturally arise from the doctrine I have delivered and this is no other conclusion than the Apostle lays down 2 Joh. vers 9. Whosoever transgresseth and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ hath not God Whosoever he be who transgresseth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 whosoever he be that swerves or turns aside from Apostolical doctrine the doctrine delivered by Christ himself and the Apostles concerning Christ the same hath not God he that continues not in the doctrine of Christ What is the doctrine of Christ Christ is the name of that person who subsists in both natures Christus est nomen personae in duabus subsistentis naturis Christ is the name of the person of the Mediator which is constituted of both natures the Divine and humane nature neither is the Divine nature without the humane nature nor the humane nature without the Divine that Christ which the Scripture reveals but both natures united in the person of the Son of God Who is that Christ the Scripture reveals to us His name shall be Emmanuel God with us God manifested in the flesh declared to be the Son of God according to the Spirit of holiness Rom. 2.3 The Scripture when it speaks of Christ as Meâ—iator when it speaks of that person who must bring us to God it speaks of him as that person that subsists in both natures in the nature of God and of man They therefore who deny the Divine nature to be in Christ as the Socinians do and they who deny the truth of his humanity by affirming Christ hath no longer any humane body these cannot be said to continue in the doctrine of Christ and all such have not God all that continue not in the doctrine of Christ have not God Whatsoever knowledge of God men may pretend unto unless they owne God in the person of the
same glory as the Father had from Eternity now he prays that that glory which he had as the Son and as God might be manifested in and by the humane nature therefore we must remember the Divine nature received nothing but only a new manifestation of the glory it had before in and by the humane nature assumed but the humane nature is that which hath properly Power and Authority given to it Hence is that speech of one of the Ancients Vthomo accepit quod ut Deus habebat Theodor. Christ received that as he was man which he had always as he was God As he was God he always had Power and Authority invested in him now he received that as man which he had always in him as God The Son as he was God did always reign with the Father before his Incarnation And hence that speech of Christ My Father worketh hitherto and I work Joh. 5.17 But although the Son did reign before his Incarnation yet it was then as God nakedly and simply considered as God not as yet cloathed with our flesh Vt Deus sine carne but since his Resurrection and Ascension into Heaven he reigns as God manifested in the flesh Aâ—tè regnabat ut Deus nudus seu suâ tantùm gloriâ in latus at pòst ut Deus carne nostrâ etiam vestitus Before his Incarnation saith a Learned Divine he reigned with the Father as God nakedly and simply considered as cloathed with his essential glory but after his Incarnation he reigned as God cloathed with our nature That is says he God the Father did not account the Son unworthy of this Honour and Authority although covered with our vile flesh and admitted him as the Son incarnate into a Copartnership with him in his Kingdom casting this honour upon the humane nature because it was joyned to his own Son in personal Union Just as if a Kings Son had taken some old garments to himself and cloathed himself therewith far inferiour to the dignity of that Relation he bears unto his Father and his Father should admit him with those garments to sit down with him in his Throne so the Son of God though cloathed with our nature covered with our flesh is not divested of his Government but he together with the Father governs this World This was that which made one of the Ancients use this expression That he who is God should sit with God that he who is the Son should reign with the Father is no such wonderful thing for he that hath the sameness of nature may well have the same power and dominion but that a part of our nature should have the same honour with him that assumed it this is that which exceeds all wonder But when Divines say whole Christ that is Christ not only as God but as man hath power over all creatures or the humane nature in the person of the Son of God reigns over all creatures we must understand this aright We must not suppose that Christ considered as meer man without his Divinity or that the humanity separate and abstract from the Divinity hath this Soveraignty and supreme Dominion over all creatures for supreme Power Dominion and Soveraignty over all creatures is proper to God only it is such a Dignity as is proper to God only therefore is it said Isa 45.22 I am God and beside me there is no other and what follows To me every knee shall bow every tongue shall swear He must needs be God to whom every knee must bow and every tongue must confess therefore it is not compatible to any creature simply and by it self considered to have dominion over all things But we ought thus to conceive of it The humanity of Christ is to be lookt upon as an Instrument that is conjoyned with the Deity the Son of God because he hath the humane nature united to him exercises all Rule Power and Authority by the humanity as by an instrument conjoyned with him The Power remains in the Divine nature primarily radically and fundamentally and this Power is exercised by the humane nature secondarily and ministerially that is to say whatsoever Christ wills by his Divine will the same doth he will by his humane will whatsoever he doth in the Church as God he doth it also as man Not that the humane nature is omnipotent but the person who subsists in the humane nature as well as in the Divine is omnipotent and there is a concourse of both natures in every action the person working by each nature what is proper to each nature We come now to make some use of what hath been opened there are several Uses will arise from the Doctrine that hath been delivered We may learn from what hath propounded Vse 1 that there is a vast difference between Christ and Believers Believers have Union with the Father and the Son yet the humane nature in Christ or Christ as he is man hath a preheminence above all Believers and that will appear by reflecting a little upon what hath been spoken 1. Consider this the humane nature in Christ hath that relation to the Trinity that no Believer in the world hath It is a Maxime with Divines The humanity of Christ belongs personally to the Trinity Humanitas Christi personaliter pertinet ad Trinitatem Now when Divines say That the Humanity of Christ belongs personally to the Trinity their meaning is not that the humanity of Christ brings in a new person for then there would be a Quaternity four persons instead of three but when they say the humanity of Christ belongs personally to the Trinity their meaning is the humanity of Christ belongs and hath relation unto the Word who is one of the persons in the Trinity and that it stands in personal Union with him so that the second person in Trinity subsists personally in the humane nature assumed which he doth not in any other creature whatsoever So that none of the Elect hath that kind of relation to the Trinity which the humane nature in Christ hath for the humane nature in Christ doth not subsist of it self out of the second person in Trinity but the second person in Trinity takes the humane nature into the subsistence of his own person so that the humane nature in Christ hath that relation to one of the persons in the Trinity to whom in person it is united and thereby to the whole Trinity that no other creature whether Angels or men ever had or shall have 2. The humane nature in Christ is the Temple of the Divinity God manifests himself to us in and by that humanity which the Son hath assumed This cannot be said of Believers For though it be said of Believers that they are the Temple of the Holy Ghost and that the Spirit of God dwells in them yet it is no where said of Believers Col. 2.9 that the fulness of the Godhead dwells in them bodily It is a
he expresseth it thus Of his fulness we receive and grace for grace which expression intimateth thus much That the humanity of Christ is the first receptacle of all grace To understand this we must know that our nature had lost original righteousness our nature was deprived of the image of God was alienated from the life of God and the way was barred and shut up as to our reception of grace for our iniquities had separated between God and us as the Prophets expression is Isa 59.1 The Son of God therefore by his Incarnation hath so united the Divine nature to the humane that he hath brought down and deposited as it were the whole fulness of the Godhead in the humane nature assumed that so grace life salvation from which we were estranged and alienated by sin might be brought near to us again and grace being now deposited in a part of our nature from this part of our nature which is taken into personal union with the Son of God which is a nature consubstantial with ours and near akin to us grace life salvation might be derived to us from his fulness we might receive grace for grace Heb. 2.14 Because the children were made partakers of flesh and blood he also took part of the same Now saith the Apostle elsewhere No man ever as yet hated his own flesh He that is a brother indeed it is no grief to him to part with some of his substance with some of the goods he is possessed of to his own brethren who are flesh of his flesh and bone of his bone It is a great Scripture yet farther to illustrate this As the Father hath life in himself so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself and hath given him authority to execute judgment because he is the Son of man Joh. 5.26 27. Calvin observes from that expression because he is the Son of man Christ was therefore ordained by the Father to be the Author of life that so we might not have life to seek afar off Christ received nothing for himself as if he needed any thing for himself but he received that wherewith he might inrich us and the sum of these two verses he makes to be this That is laid open to us in Christ man which did before lye hid in God because the Majesty of God as it is at a great distance from us is like to a spring that lyes hidden and latent Habemus promptum expositum fontem ex quo haurire licet Calvin therefore God hath displayed himself openly to us in Christ We have in Christ a fountain that is near and ready at hand and that which lyes open to us from whence we might receive all grace 10. The love of Christ in his Incarnation appears in this In that by means of the Incarnation of the Son of God grace is not only brought near to us but it is made most firm and sure That which a meer man received might be taken away and lost as it was in Adam therefore grace was deposited in the hands of one who was God as well as man that so grace might be made most sure and firm The best of creatures are mutable things and subject to change hence is that expression Job 4.18 Behold he puts no trust in his servants and his Angels he chargeth with folly The Angels themselves which are the highest rank of creatures are subject to change the good Angels who never sinned yet might have sinned and fallen had they not been confirmed by Divine grace And that they might have done so it appears plainly by the instance of the evil Angels The evil Angels were created at first in the same state of dignity and glory as the good Angels were but they being left to the mutability of their own will fell from God whereas the good Angels were confirmed by grace It is a wise speech of Austin God Deum sic ordinâsse Angelorum hominum vitam ut in ea priùs ostenderet quid posset liberum arbitrium deinde quid posset gratiae suae beneficium Aug. saith he hath so ordered and disposed concerning the life of Angels and men that he hath shewn first of all what free-will could do and then what the benefit of his grace could do Free-will both in Angels and men discovered it self to be a mutable thing therefore that grace might be laid sure it was laid in the hands of one who was God as well as man Austin observes Christ was predestinated to be Head of the Church and we are predestinated to be his members Now grace in the Head of the Church is laid most sure The Godhead in Christ is an indeficient never failing Principle of grace So that the humane nature of Christ had not only created habits in it as Adams soul had but the Godhead was personally united to it so that unless we could suppose a dissolution of the Hypostatical or personal Union it is impossible that the humane nature in Christ should cease to be filled with Divine grace Hence is that expression of Christ Joh. 6.57 As the living Father hath sent me and I live by the Father It is as much as if our Saviour had said The Godhead is a living spring a living fountain of grace It is usual with Christ when he speaks of those things which belong to the Divine nature which is common to him and the Father to attribute them to the Father therefore he saith I live by the Father The Father is the first person in the Deity and although the Son be possessed of the same Deity yet when Christ speaks of such things as belong to the Deity or the Divine nature he useth the name of the Father in which expression his own Divinity is comprehended So Joh. 14.10 The Father that dwelleth in me he doth the works his meaning is the Divine nature The Divine nature is common to him and the Father but he expresses it thus The Father in me doth the works Now saith he As the living Father hath sent me and I live by the Father his meaning is the Divinity which is united to my flesh is a living Spring and fountain of grace my humanity receives all grace life and virtue from the Divinity inhabiting in it The Divine nature in the person of the Son holds the humane nature in the nearest closest and most indissoluble union and being so nearly and strictly united to the humanity fills the humanity with all grace So that the firmness and sureness of grace to the Elect depends upon a treble Basis or foundation 1. It depends upon the firmness and indissolubility of the Union that is between the two Natures in Christ 2. It depends upon the Indeficiency of grace and the inexhaustible Fulness that is in the Godhead 3. It depends upon a Believers Union with Christ 1. If the personal Union can never be dissolved then the humane nature which always abides in the nearest union
us to himself by Jesus Christ And that passage of our Saviour is most remarkable to this purpose Joh. 17.7 where he makes this to be the property of the Elect They have known that all things that thou hast given me are of thee The Saints do know that whatever Christ is that God himself is to them by Christ so that as God hath brought himself near to us in that way in the first place to make himself more facile and easie to be apprehended by us and to render himself more sweet and kind for us to approach to him so God in Christ doth actually communicate and give himself to us and God in Christ is the Author of our salvation and doth all that is done in the business of our salvation 13. The thirteenth Proposition for the clearing of this great Mystery is the love of Christ in his Incarnation is seen in this In that by means of the Incarnation of the Son of God as God is brought near to us so we are brought near to him Christ is the bond of our union unto God Nexus unionis nostrae ad Deum Christus est Cyril Quod homo est Christus esse voluit ut homo posset esse quod Christus est Cyprian Christ is he that ties the knot between God and us Christ as man is united unto us Christ as God so he is naturally united to the Father It was a good speech of Cyprian Christ would be that which man is that man might be that which Christ is This will be illustrated by considering that great Scripture Joh. 14.20 At that day ye shall know that I am in my Father and you in me and I in you These words are some of the most mysterious words in all the Book of God and I remember Cyril saith of this Text It is a difficult Text and prays for Divine grace to help him to understand it I shall modestly give as I am able the interpretation of this Text here are three great Vnions insinuated in this Text. 1. The essential Union 2. The Incarnation of the Son of God the Vnion of the two Natures in the person of Christ 3. The mystical Union All these three great Unions are held forth to us in this Text. 1. The essential Union the Union of the Son and Father in the self-same Essence In those words In that day you shall know I am in my Father that is you shall know that I am the natural Son of God and that the Father hath communicated all his perfections unto me by eternal Generation Joh. 16.15 All that the Father hath is mine You shall know that I am in the Father by the unity of the Divine Essence Inspecto Christo videtur illa unitas essentiae ac gloriae Patris ac Filii Or else as another Learned Divine expounds this Phrase You shall know that I am in the Father Christ being once looked upon and beheld by the eye of faith the unity of the Essence and the glory of the Father and the Son is seen both at once You shall know that I am in the Father that is you shall know me to be the Son of God true God of one and the same Substance Essence and Divinity with the Father 2. There is the Union of the two Natures in Christ implied in these words You shall know that you are in me Percipietis Divinae meae incarnationis mysterium that is as a Learned man expounds those words You shall perceive the Mystery of my Divine Incarnation by means of which the humane nature is united to my Divinity and taken into unity of person with the Son of God by means of which you also after a sort may be said to be in me To understand this we must know although it be true that the Son of God assumed humane nature not the whole mass or lump of it but in a certain part and particle of it and hereupon that part of humane nature which is taken into personal union with the Son of God hath a nearer relation to the Trinity than any creature whatsoever yet the Son of God assuming a part of our nature into personal union with himself all the Elect being united to Christ by faith are included in Christ as Members relating to the Head and so injoy the benefit of his Incarnation Heb. 2.14 For as much as the children are partakers of flesh and blood he also himself took part of the same So that although the union be personally made in one part of humane nature viz. that part which was personally united to the Son of God yet all the seed have benefit by Christs Incarnation and being implanted into Christ by faith are made members of his body Sicut membra in capite sicut contentum in continente sicut palmes in vite sicut effectus in fontali principio of his flesh and of his bone and are comprehended in him as in their Head You shall know that you are in me that is as one explains this Phrase As the members are in the head as the thing contained in the thing containing as the branches in the Vine as the effect is in its fontal Principle This interpretation is further confirmed by that Scripture Eph. 1.10 That in the dispensation of the fulness of time he might gather together in one in Christ The word in the Original is an emphatical word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which Chrysostome interprets thus To reduce all things under one head All the Elect are reduced and brought under Christ as their common Head and thus we are said to be in him You in me We are in him as members in the head And it is observed further by a Learned man That the Elect are said to be in Christ in respect of both his natures 1. As Christ is man Per communionem naturae ut in causa servante conservante sicut in ultimo fine so we are said to be in him by communion of nature 2. As Christ is God so we are in him as in the saving and conserving cause and as in the last end Hence are those expressions Preserved in Jesus Christ Jude 1. Col. 1.16 All things were created by him and for him 3. Here is the Mystical or Spiritual Union set down and I in you As Christ is in the Father by Vnity of Essence we in Christ as being taken in to be members of his body and standing related to him as a Head so Christ is in us by his Spirit 1 Cor. 6.16 He that is joyned to the Lord is one Spirit This is another part of the love of Christ in his Incarnation that by this means we are brought near to God as one of the Ancients expression is Consummati sumus reductique ad unionem Dei Patris mediatione Salvatoris Cyril We are consummated and brought back again into union with God the Father by the mediation of Christ our Saviour This
and help us True indeed God is love in himself his name is the Lord gracious merciful long-suffering pardoning iniquity transgression and sin but God being at such a distance from us and also a God of such infinite Purity and Majesty we are apt to doubt whether God will take any notice of such vile and sinful worms as we are therefore in a way of condescension God is come down into our nature that so faith may have the greater incouragement that since God dwells in the nature of man he will not shut up his own bowels against them who are his own brethren and kindred Christ is akin to us nearly allied to us in respect of his humanity one in nature with us in respect of his humanity as he is nearly allied to his Father and one in nature with him in respect of his Divinity Heb. 2.11 The Apostle here speaks of Christ and his Members He that sanctifies and they that are sanctified are of one that is they are one and the same nature of one and the same common nature We may well suppose that part of our nature which Christ wears will put him in mind to be kind to us if he were not otherwise inclined unto us There is a common Law of humanity which commands some compassion in all men even in those who are most degenerate by sin the Law of common humanity will force some bowels from the worst of men to them that are in great distress How powerful then is this Law where the force of it is not abated by any allay from sin but where this Law is heightned and elevated by the greatest measures of grace and the presence of the Divinity inhabiting in the humanity Thus it is in Christ Christ hath the greatest perfection of grace in him and the presence of the Divinity inhabiting in his humanity Hence it is our Saviour comforts the hearts of his Disciples upon this account Joh. 14.1 Ye believe in God believe also in me It is as much as if he should say You take this for granted this is a confessed Principle among you you ought to believe in God now you believe in God believe also in me Our Saviours meaning is this Look upon God come down into a part of your nature behold God in my humanity Ye believe in God believe also in me Faith in Christ is no prejudice to faith in God the Father at the same time we believe in Christ we believe in God the Father for the Divine Essence is one and the same in all the three persons at the same time we believe in the Son we believe in the Father Now our Saviour to incourage us to believe would have us to behold God in the glass of his humanity You believe in God believe also in me As much as if he should say I that am now speaking to you am God and man in one person you cannot think that I your Lord and Master who have been conversing with you so long and of whose tenderness and compassion you have had so much experience should want any bowels or tenderness in me to do you good now I am God as well as man if you think I am inclined to pity you as I amman I want no power to help and relieve you as I am God 15. The love of Christ in his Incarnation is seen in this In that by means of his Incarnation there is a foundation laid for the work of his Mediatorship in general and also for executing those three great Offices of Prophet Priest and King in particular My design is not at present to treat of Christs Mediatorship at large nor to speak largely of his Offices but only to shew how Christs Incarnation or his taking of our nature lays the foundation for his undertaking the work of Mediatorship in general and also of executing those three great Offices in particular of a Prophet Priest and King and also to shew how his love is demonstrated to us in this 1 Christs undertaking the Office of Mediatorship is the great demonstration of his love to us for Christ as Mediator brings us back to God we were at variance with God now we being at a distance from God and at enmity with him by reason of sin there was need of a Mediator to reconcile the difference and bring God and us together Now here was the great demonstration of the love of Christ that the Son of God would undertake the Office of Mediator and that he might do so he was willing to take up our nature in his Incarnation that he might perform the Office of Mediator in it Hence is that expression of the Apostle 1 Tim. 2.5 There is one Mediator between God and man the man Jesus Christ The Apostles intention in using this expression the Man Christ Jesus is not to exclude the Divine nature from the person of the Mediator for it is here observed by Calvin when the Apostle calls him Man he doth not hereby deny him to be God for this is a sure Rule in Divinity The person of the Mediator accomplisheth the work of Redemption according to both natures so that the work of Redemption is the work of the person working in both natures that which is proper to each nature Hence is it that a Judicious Divine observes By a wonderful temperament it is so ordered that the Hypostatical union of the two natures is made in the person of Christ Vt esset mediatrix humana Divinitas Divina humanitas August that he who is our Mediator should be Man-God and God-man therefore we ought thus to conceive of it Christ took up our nature that he might perform the Office of Mediator in it and this is expressed by the Apostle Heb. 10.5 When he cometh into the world he saith Sacrifices and burnt-offerings thou wouldst not but a body hast thou prepared me When he comes into the world Christ came into the world by his Incarnation by his Assumption and taking up of our nature and wherefore did he come into the world It was to perform the Office of a Mediator to reconcile us to God to offer up the great Sacrifice for sin Other Sacrifices would not serve the turn and therefore the Son of God would offer the great and true Sacrifice namely the Sacrifice of himself and by this means reconcile us to God Now what must Christ do that he may perform the Office of Mediator and reconcile us to God He must take a true humane body Sacrifices and burnt-offerings thou wouldst not but a body hast thou prepared me The Son of God must assume mans nature if he will be a Mediator between God and man It is the office of a Mediator to conjoyn and unite those between whom he is a Mediator The extremes are united in some middle and he that is Mediator had need to have some interest in both parties to be reconciled Christ therefore being to reconcile us to God and to unite
us to him that he might be a fit Mediator takes upon him the nature of man that so being God and man in one person and having interest in both parties he might bring God and man together Hence is it that the Mediator hath this appellation of Christ given to him Luk. 2.17 Vnto you is born this day a Saviour which is Christ the Lord. Christ you know signifies the anointed Under the Old Testament Kings Priests and Prophets were wont to be anointed Now Christ being to undertake the office of Mediator in general and those three Offices in particular of Prophet Priest and King he also is anointed Christs Vnction or Anointing properly belongs to his humane nature Act. 10.38 God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Ghost For although it be true that Christ is the name of the person subsisting in both natures and the name of Christ doth not only agree to Christ as he is man but as he is God manifested in the flesh yet Christs anointing properly respects his humane nature As God he needed not any anointing for he had all fulness in himself therefore he was properly anointed as man If it be asked what this anointing of Christ was I answer It is that plenitude and fulness of the gifts of the Holy Ghost yea the fulness of the Godhead which dwells personally in the humane nature assumed whereby he is qualified to perform the office of Mediator Christ being to undertake the Office of Mediator hath his humanity filled with all habitual grace and also the presence of the Divinity inhabiting personally in his humane nature So that Christs assumption of our nature anointing it with the Spirit of all grace lays the foundation for the great work of his Mediatorship It is well observed by a Judicious Divine That we may more firmly believe Chemnitius that the benefit of Redemption doth belong to us therefore did the Son of God assume a nature that was of the same substance with ours and near akin with us by which in the virtue of the Divinity he might accomplish our Redemption that as by humane nature in Adam sin and death entred into the world so by the same nature in Christ righteousness and life might be restored to the world 2. As the Incarnation of Christ lays the foundation and prepares the way to the work of Mediatorship in general so by the Incarnation Christ is fitted and prepared as it were to enter upon the execution of those three great Offices of his the Office of a Prophet Priest and King 1. The Lord Jesus assuming mans nature performs the office of a Prophet to the Church in the humane nature assumed The great work of the Prophets of old was to be the Messengers of God to the people the Interpreters of Gods mind and will they were to reveal Gods mind and will to the people The Lord Jesus undertaking our nature is the great Messenger of the Covenant the Interpreter of the Fathers counsels he hath revealed the whole will and mind of the Father to us Heb. 1.2 God hath in these last days spoken unto us by his Son Joh. 15.15 All things that I have heard of my Father I have made known unto you Should God speak to us immediately from Heaven we should be affrighted at his presence and terrified with his Majesty as they were when they heard God speaking to them from Mount Sinai and said Let not God speak to us but let Moses speak to us Exod. 20.19 Therefore hath the Son of God assumed our nature and appeared visibly in flesh and conversed among men like one of us that we might receive the Law at his mouth The humanity of Christ is the Organ of the Divinity And this is one great commendation of the office of the Ministry as Peter Martyr hath observed That the Son of God who was God over all blessed for ever was pleased to take up humane nature that he might perform the office of a Minister in it Therefore is Christ called Rom. 15.8 A Minister of the Circumcision that is to the Jewish Church There is some Controversie among Divines concerning the knowledge that was in the humane soul of Jesus Christ but this is certain Christ as man had all things made known to him that did concern our salvation now whatsoever the Lord Jesus as man received from the Father that as the great Prophet of the Church he hath faithfully revealed to his people Joh. 17.8 I have given unto them the words which thou gavest me Christ as man receives all from the Father and he gives out all to the Church Thus his Incarnation prepares him for the execution of his Prophetical Office 2. The Son of God by assuming mans nature is prepared for the execution of his Priestly Office Two great works were incumbent on the Priests under the Law 1. To offer Sacrifices and make atonement for the people 2. To intercede and pray for the people 1. One Office of the Priest was to offer Sacrifice and make atonement So Heb. 8.3 Every High-Priest is ordained to offer gifts and sacrifices 2. Another office of the Priest was to pray for the people Therefore saith Samuel God forbid that I should cease to pray for you Now the Son of God by assuming our nature is qualified to perform both these works of a Priest 1. Christ by his Incarnation is fitted to offer Sacrifice God took no delight in the Sacrifices of beasts and cattle Sacrifices and burnt-offerings thou wouldst not therefore did the Son of God take a true humane body and offered himself for a Sacrifice Heb. 9.26 Now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself Christ is Priest Altar and Sacrifice Christ is the Sacrifice that is offered so vers 28. Christ was offered to bear the sin of many Christ is the name of the person subsisting in both natures so that there is a concourse of both natures the Divine and humane nature in the work of Satisfaction The humane nature was the nature suffering and the Divine nature that sanctified the sufferings of the humanity The Divinity was in the humanity in the time of its offering that body which hung upon the Cross which suffered and dyed was the body of him who was God it was filled and replenished with God the Godhead did personally inhabit in it in the time of its suffering Although the Godhead did not put forth its operation as it might have done but did rest and suspend its operations for a time 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that it might give liberty to the humane nature to suffer for if the Godhead should have put forth its operation as it might it could have hindred all passion and suffering in the humane nature yet the personal union always remained the Son of God did always retain and keep the humane nature in the bond of personal union in the height of his sufferings and he
my God why hast thou forsaken me He was deprived of the sense and comfort of his Fathers love Secondly Christ suffered natural death his humane soul was truly separated from his body Now Christ having satisfied that Law In the day that thou eatest thou shalt dye the death by suffering the penalty of that Law hath fully delivered his people from the curse Gal. 3.13 Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the law being made a curse for us A Learned man observes Because according to the sentence of the Divine Judgment in that day Adam fell and sinned humane nature ought to have been punished with eternal perdition therefore the Son of God offered himself to assume humane nature and afterwards did assume it that so man might not dye the death And the same Learned man hath another expression to the same purpose Because humane nature was depraved and lost so that it became the body of sin and death therefore the Son of God in lieu thereof was pleased in the humane nature assumed to condemn sin and abolish death and in his own person restore humane nature to righteousness life and happiness Christ having dyed for sin once dyeth no more death hath no more dominion over him Rom. 6.9 10. Our nature as it is in Christ it is above death and the fear of death O let us think of these things these things are the most solid grounds of comfort Our nature in Christ is above death and the fear of death it is possessed of life and immortality and brought to perfect happiness Hence is that expression 2 Tim. 1.10 Christ who hath abolished death and hath brought life and immortality to light through the Gospel Christ hath already brought life and immortality into our nature Christ doth already stand possessed of immortality in his own person And this is the singular comfort of Believers that they may see a part of their own nature set above sorrow misery and death and brought to the greatest happiness they can wish or long for and that they may be assured they shall be possessed of the same happiness in their measure which Christ their Head is possessed of This Christ assures them of Joh. 17.22 The glory which thou hast given me I have given them Christ had glory with the Father from Eternity as he was his natural and coessential Son this he speaks of vers 5. Glorifie me with thy self with the glory which I had with thee before the world was Now besides this there is a glory which is given to him the glory which thou gavest me I have given them Christ had a glory given to him as man and Mediator Now the glory which was given to Christ as man and Head of the Church is given to the Elect so that all the Elect do participate and share in it in their measure The glory which thou hast given me I have given them Calvin observes upon that Text The Samplar or pattern of perfect happiness is so exprest and set forth in Christ that nothing is confined to Christ only but Christ was therefore inriched that he might inrich Believers the glory which thou hast given me I have given them Christ and his Members share in glory in common only reserving the difference between Head and Members Christ hath the glory of the Head Believers have glory as Members Christs glorification is the surest pledge of our glorification for how is it possible that he who is our Head and is now in glory with the Father should leave us to those miseries we are now obnoxious to whenas we are so nearly related to him we being members of his body of his flesh and of his bones Eph. 5.30 and he that is joyned to the Lord is one Spirit The Church being so nearly related to Christ and Christ being in glory how is it possible Christ should leave them under those miseries they are now subject unto 17. The greatness of Christs love in his Incarnation appears in this In that by means of the Incarnation all the Elect shall have a standing Monument before their eyes wherein they may see and behold the infiniteness and transcendency of the love of God to all Eternity And the reason of this Proposition is this Because the Hypostatical or personal Union shall not be dissolved in Heaven the humane nature shall remain and abide united to the Divinity to all Eternity As in Heaven we shall be admitted to the sight of God we shall see the Unity in Trinity and the Trinity in Unity we shall see the Unity of the Essence and the three persons Father Son and Spirit subsisting in this one Essence of God so in Heaven we shall see the great Mystery of the personal Union the Mystery of the two Natures in the person of Christ more than now we can And this will be one part of the happiness of Heaven that we shall see our nature united to the Divinity in the person of the Son of God and by this means we shall come to understand the greatness of the love of God by seeing how near our nature is taken unto God in the person of our Head The Hypostatical or personal Union is the foundation of the mystical Union viz. of our union and communion with God God hath taken a part of our nature into personal union with himself and by means of this we have union and communion with him Now in Heaven we shall have a clear sight what that glory is which Christ our Head is advanced unto by the personal union And this I take to be carried in that great Text Joh. 17.24 Father I will that they also whom thou hast given me be with me where I am that they may behold my glory which thou hast given me The happiness of Heaven will be to gaze upon the glory of Christ as a Learned Divine expresseth it That they may behold my glory as if so be this would be Heaven enough for the Elect to see the glory their Head is possessed of And what glory is this That they may behold my glory certainly the glory of his Divinity Christ had glory with the Father before the foundation of the world Joh. 17.5 He was in the form of God saith the Apostle now all the Elect shall see and behold his glory that is they shall see the glory of his Divinity and how so They shall see and behold the glory of his Divinity shining forth through his humanity The humane nature is united to the Divinity in the person of the Son now the Elect in Heaven shall see that person who hath assumed their nature to be true God and to have all the glory of the Divinity in him As the second person in Trinity is true God and hath all the glory of the Divinity in him so the Elect in Heaven shall see the humane nature united to the Divinity in the person of the Son Therefore is it added in the close of the verse For
great difference between these two Propositions to say That the humane nature in Christ is a creature and to say that Christ is a creature for Christ is the name of the person that subsists in both natures Therefore though it be true Christus est nomen personae in duabus subsistentis naturis that one of the natures in Christ is a creature yet the person is Divine and no creature and therefore the Apostle saith Rom. 9.5 that Christ though he came of the fathers concerning the flesh yet he is over all God blessed for ever Although Christ as to the flesh and in respect of his humanity came of the Fathers and we say truly and properly his humanity is a creature yet his person is Divine and Christ is still God blessed for ever 2. We must know that the humane nature of Christ never in any moment of time subsisted of it self or by it self but always had its subsistence in the Divine person and the reason is this If we should suppose the humane nature at any time subsist in it self out of the Divine person that would necessarily infer there were two persons in Christ which is most contrary to the Doctrine of the Scriptures Therefore although we do suppose the humane nature simply in it self considered to be a creature and in a state of subjection yet considering that the humanity was always personally united to the Divinity and the humane nature never subsisted out of the Divine person we must conclude that Christ was no otherways in a state of subjection than what he brought himself into by his voluntary condescension Therefore the Apostle tells us He emptied himself and took upon him the form of a servant and became obedient As it was part of his condescension he would take upon him the form of a servant so this was another part of it he would become obedient for our sakes 3. We must consider it was a voluntary act in Christ to assume our nature Christ took our nature indeed but he was not bound to it it was his own free and voluntary act that he did assume it 4. We must also consider that Christ did not lose the Digniey of his person by his assumption of our nature He was the Son of God before his Incarnation and so he was after he was God before he took mans nature and so remained still It is true Christ in the state of his Humiliation was content to have the Glory of his Divinity hid and obscured for a time and this is that the Apostle calls his emptying himself But yet Christ did not neither could he divest himself of his Divinity neither did he lose the essential Dignity of his person He was the Son of God and God after as well as before his Incarnation 5. Christ might if he had pleased without running such a course of obedience here on earth have glorified the humane nature when first he assumed it For this is granted by Divines That Christ by virtue of the personal Union had a natural right unto Glory The Son of God incarnate and become man continues to be the Son of God yea the natural Son of God And hence is it the School-men do truly say That Christ-man is the natural Son of God Therefore the Apostle tells us That Christ is more excellent than the Angels because he hath obtained a more excellent name by inheritance than they Heb. 1.4 And what name is this to be the Son of God Consider vers 5. To which of the Angels said he at any time Thou art my Son this day have I begotten thee Now the Apostle tells us Christ had this name by inheritance that is he was naturally the Son of God and therefore naturally an Heir to all the Father was possessed of Now as he was the Son of God before his Incarnation so he did not cease to be the Son of God by his Incarnation Therefore Christ had a natural right to Glory and might if he had pleased have glorified the humane nature when he assumed it Now then as the result of all that hath been said follows That Christ would become and put himself into a state of subjection and obedience this was for our sakes and it was his voluntary condescension so to do Nay the Apostle tells us expresly in the Text He was made under the Law to redeem them that were under the Law So that it was for our sakes Christ put himself into this state of subjection and it was his voluntary condescension so to do We may not suppose Christ was necessitated to be in this state of subjection True indeed it is said of Christ as man and Mediator That the Father is greater than he Joh. 14.28 and Christ as man is under God as his Head 1 Cor. 11.3 The head of every man is Christ and the head of the woman is the man and the head of Christ is God But then we must still remember 1. It was at Christs liberty whether he would have become man yea or no. He was not bound to take our nature till he did freely of his own accord ingage to do so 2. Remember inequality of Office makes no inequality of Person or Essence although Christ as Man and Mediator be inferiour to the Father in a state of subjection to the Father yet that makes him not to be inferiour to him as to his Person or Essence Consider Christ as the second Person in Trinity he accounts it no robbery to be equal with God that is with the Father Consider him as God so he and the Father are one Now that he who was equal with God and so above all Authority should take upon him the Office of Mediator and put himself into a state of subjection this was marvellous condescension O stand and admire this love How great was his love that would come to serve and obey who was Lord of all and had all obedience of right due to him from all creatures 2. The greatness of Christs love in being made under the Law appears in this That although Christ was free from the Law yet by his own voluntary condescension he made himself subject to the Law as much as any of us This the Apostle sets forth Heb. 2.11 12 13. For both he that sanctifies and they who are sanctified are all of one for which cause he is not ashamed to call them brethren Saying I will declare thy Name unto my brethren in the midst of the Church will I sing praise unto thee And again I will put my trust in him and again Behold I and the children which God hath given me Christ doth here put himself into the rank of his brethren and he performs the same duties in common with them To praise God in the Congregation to trust in God to obey God all these are moral duties now Christ having assumed our nature performs these duties in common with the rest of his brethren 3. The third Proposition is
weigh and ponder these things you may well cry out O the depths O the depths of Christs love 3. The third Particular is this The Heart of Christ was much in this work As Christ was ready and prepared to dye and what he did was free and voluntary of his own accord without any necessity compelling him thereunto but what he voluntarily brought himself under so the heart of Christ was much set upon this work of laying down his life for us Lo I come to do thy will O God Heb. 10.7 I have a Baptism to be baptized with and how am I straitned till it be accomplished Luk. 12.50 The Heart and Spirit of Christ as he was man was most intent upon this work yea there was the concourse of both his Wills his Divine and humane will in laying down his life for us Here I shall shew a little how there was the concourse of both Christs Wills his humane and Divine will in this work 1. Christ as man according to his humane will was willing to suffer and dye for us For though he prayed Father save me from this hour Joh. 12.27 and thereby shewed the verity and truth of our nature in him and the greatness of the sufferings he was to undergo yet presently he adds in the very next words Nevertheless for this end came I to this hour hereby plainly declaring that although the Verity of humane nature which was in him had a natural aversness in it from suffering yet such was his love to the Father and to our Salvation that that love overcame that inclination of nature if I may so call it or that natural aversness rather which was in humane nature from suffering Save me from this hour for this end came I to this hour Though Nature would have abhorred suffering and spared it self take it as to its natural inclination and tendency yet such was his love to his Father and us that it made him lay aside the inclinations of Nature and to break through that natural aversness that was in humane nature from suffering 2. Christ who was God as well as true man according to his Divine will was willing to dye and suffer even in that nature of ours which he had assumed The Divinity did not suffer could not suffer but the person who was God as well as man according to his Divine will as well as according to his humane will was willing to suffer and dye in that nature of ours which he assumed Joh. 17.19 For their sakes sanctifie I my self For what was it that Christ was sanctified he sanctified himself to be a Sacrifice for our sins he sanctified himself by his Death and Sufferings so is this Text generally expounded by Divines I sanctifie my self to suffer well but how did Christ sanctifie himself he sanctified himself in that nature in which he suffered and dyed he suffered in the humane name therefore it was in that nature that he sanctified himself O but who was the person sanctifying all this while It was I I sanctifie my self None but God can say I sanctifie my self no meer creature can say I sanctifie my self Christ therefore that was God could say I sanctifie my self Christ therefore as he was God or according to his Divine will sanctifies himself as man to be a Sacrifice for our sins Hence is it that we have that expression Heb. 10.10 By the which will we are sanctified even by the offering up the body of Jesus once for all By the which will we are sanctified The will here spoken of is the will of God the Father as is plain by the Context Now then this will of the Father and Christs will as he is God is one and the same for as the Father and the Son have but one Essence so they have but one Will. Now by the Divine will which is one and the same in the Father and the Son are we sanctified By the which will we are sanctified by the offering up of the body of Jesus once for all saith the Apostle It was the Divine will that the body of Jesus should be offered up and Christ according to his humane will was willing to offer himself up for the Son being in our nature speaks to the Father after this sort Lo I come to do thy will so that as I said there was the concourse of both wills in Christ the humane and Divine will in offering up himself in laying down his life for us And this I speak to shew how willing how infinitely willing Christ was in this work of offering himself and that his heart lay wholly in this work both his wills his will as God and his will as man was ingaged in this work of laying down his life for us 4. The fourth Particular is this As Christ was ready and willing to give up his life for us so he did actually lay down his life for us Eph. 5.24 Christ loved the Church and gave himself for it that is he gave himself actually for the Church It was not only in the purpose and intention of his heart to do it but he gave himself actually for the Church Christ did actually offer up his life a Sacrifice for us Eph. 5.2 Christ hath loved us and given himself for us an offering and a sacrifice to God for a sweet-smelling savour In every Sacrifice there is the thing sacrificed the Altar the Priest and the Oblation or the offering up of the Sacrifice Now Christ did actually offer up himself a Sacrifice for us It was not enough that the beast to be sacrificed was brought to the Altar but he must be slain there and offered up upon the Altar Thus Christ gave his body to be crucified and he actually offered himself to Divine Justice for us hence is it said that He was delivered up for our offences 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 4.25 Who was delivered up that is delivered up to death delivered up to death and suffering by the Fathers will and pleasure and by his own voluntary offering up of himself Hence is it that we read of the offering up of the body of Jesus once for all 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Heb. 10.10 By the oblation of the body of Jesus Christ made an offering or oblation of himself to the Father Heb. 9.26 Now once in the end of the world hath he appeared to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself The meaning is Christ hath appeared in our nature to destroy and abolish sin by offering up himself a Sacrifice for sin 5. The fifth and last Particular is this That Christ in laying down his life for us intended it as a price and ransom to expiate and take away the guilt of our sins The Socinians the great Adversaries to Christian Religion cannot bear this They will not admit that Christ laid down his life as a price or ransom or by way of satisfaction to atone God for the sins we have committed They tell
flow from persons It was therefore the person of the Word that made satisfaction for our sins Now that a person of that infinite worth and excellency as the Son of God the second Person in Trinity should come to subsist in our nature and being in our nature should be the person satisfying for our sins this was great condescension and abasement Thus the Son who was yet equal with the Father in respect of his Divine nature by his Incarnation and sufferings doth not only make himself inferiour to the Father but to himself also The Son though he was one of the persons offended yet he comes to make the satisfaction and considered as Mediator as God-man doth not only make satisfaction to the Father but to himself considered as God simply The fourth Consideration is this That whole Christ or the whole person of the Mediator was the price of our Redemption 1 Joh. 2.1 If any man sin we have an Advocate with the Father Jesus Christ the righteous and he is the propitiation for our sins It is Christ then that is the propitiation for our sins Now Christ is the name of the person subsisting in both natures When we speak of Christ Christus est nomen personae in duabus subsistentis naturis we understand that person who subsists in both natures in the nature of God and in the nature of man Christ doth not signifie one of the natures simply but Christ is the name of the person subsisting in both natures Now this is he who is the propitiation for our sins that person who is God and man he is the propitiation for our sins Persona Christi sive Christus satisfecit pro peccatis tanquamquod It was the person of Christ or Christ that did satisfie for our sins as the Principle making satisfaction To understand this we must consider that which was before hinted That Christ is our Mediator according to both natures he is not our Mediator as to one of his natures only but according to both natures and as he is Mediator according to both natures so he gives himself for us according to both his natures For though it were the humane nature only that suffered yet it was the Divine nature that sanctified the sufferings of the humane nature and gave virtue to them therefore is it said Himself bare our sins in his own body on the tree and that by himself he hath purged our sins Heb. 1.3 It is not said By his humane nature meerly though it is true it was the humane nature only that was capable of suffering but it is not so expressed but by himself Christ himself is the Sacrifice for our sins Gal. 2. He loved me and gave himself for me and Christ was once offered up Heb. 9. And that expression of the Apostle Peter is very emphatical 2 Pet. 2.24 Who his own self bare our sins in his body on the tree 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Christ himself who was God-man made satisfaction for sins and laid down the price of our Redemption yea he himself was the price of our Redemption God hath redeemed the Church with his own blood To understand this two things are to be considered in the Satisfaction of Christ as Alvarez hath observed 1. One is that species or kind of humane actions by which Christ did satisfie and this proceeded from the humane nature as the formal principle of them Thus the Son of God obeyed suffered dyed in the humane nature 2. There is another thing to be considered in Christs Satisfaction and that is the infinite value and worth that was found in it Now the infinite value and worth that was in the Satisfaction of Christ proceeded from the person satisfying that is from the Divine Word or the person of the Son of God subsisting in the humane nature the actions and sufferings of the humane nature are the matter of his Satisfaction but that which gives the virtue and value to them is the Divinity Hence are those expressions of the Ancients If he had not been true God he had not brought a remedy for us Si non esset verus Deus non afferret remedium Quia ille qui moriebatur erat Deus Another observes That therefore did the death of Christ bring salvation to the world because the person who dyed was God And another hath a passage to this purpose Death saith he becoming as it were the death of God hath demolished death for the person that dyed was God and man both the sufferings of Christ being made the sufferings of that person who was God received their virtue from the Divinity As much as if he had said By virtue of the Divine person which suffered in the humane nature those sufferings received their virtue to save us and to make satisfaction for our sins This is another thing that discovers the humiliation of Christs person That he who was God and in his Divine nature simply considered was the person offended yet as God man was pleased to become a ransom for us 1 Tim. 2.6 He gave himself a ransom for all That person who gave himself a ransom for all is the Mediator and who is the Mediator but God-man 1 Joh. 1.7 The blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin There is a great Emphasis upon those words Jesus Christ his Son It is the blood of that person who was no other than the Son of God and God which cleanseth us from all sin It is a memorable speech of Luther He gave saith he not silver not gold neither was it a meer man that he gave neither did he give all the Angels but it was himself that he gave as the price of our Redemption than which nothing was greater neither had he any thing greater to give Consider this price aright and we shall find it infinitely greater than the whole Creation 5. In the sufferings of Christ we may see the humiliation of his person from hence namely that in the death of Christ the glory of his Divinity seemed to be most obscured and darkened and suffered the greatest Eclipse What more unworthy of God than suffering and death What more absurd and incongruous in the eye of carnal reason than a crucified God Now herein did Christ commend the greatness of his love to us That he permitted the glory of his Divinity by means of his death and suffering to be eclipsed for our sakes That he who was the immortal God should expose himself to suffering and death for our sakes as if he had been no more than a passible and mortal man for though he were really and indeed the Son of God and God the Lord of Glory yet by reason of his death and sufferings he was by the generality of men thought to be but as an ordinary man This is that which the Apostle intimates 1 Cor. 2.8 Whom none of the Princes of this world knew for had they known it they would not
themselves cannot be supposed to be infinite for the habits cannot exceed the capacity of the subject if the humane soul of Christ be but a created thing then the habits of grace which are in it are not simply infinite yet notwithstanding this the love which is to be found in Christs humane nature is exceeding great and a love surpassing the love of men or Angels and the reason is the humane soul of Christ hath the Divinity inhabiting in it now as the Son receives all the Father hath in the eternal Generation the whole substance of the Father is communicated to the Son in the eternal Generation there is no perfection that is in the Father but it is to be found in the Son therefore by consequence it follows that the love of the Father must necessarily be communicated to the Son and doth reside in the Son and there is but one and the same Divine love both in the Father and in the Son Now the Son the second person in Trinity taking our nature both the love of the Father and the Son for as an Holy man observes Sweet is this contemplation doth in some sort abide and reside in our nature therefore the humane Soul of Christ being inflamed and set on fire with the fire of Divine love which is so near it which inhabits and dwells in it must needs be fuller of love than any creatures heart ever was The humane nature of Christ by means of its Union and Conjunction with the Divinity takes in the influence of the Divinity and the Divinity thus personally united to the Humanity must needs fill his soul with that love that no creature was ever filled with therefore we must necessarily suppose there was the greatest love imaginable in Christs humane soul the greatest as was possible there could be in any created nature The Godhead dwelling in Christ bodily that infinite love of God must be supposed in some sense to dwell in the heart of Christ Man How loving how tender how affectionate must that heart be that hath all the love of the Father and the Son poured out into it For consider it the Son receives all from the Father by eternal Generation the Son takes up our nature and dwells in it the humane nature united to the Son takes in the influence of the Fathers and the Sons love by means of its personal Union with the Son And thus the humane nature is not only warmed but wholly set on fire by the Divinity inhabiting in it Therefore it is well observed by one of the Ancients There is some warmth some heat that comes from Christ the eternal Word into all the Saints hearts In hac anima ipse ignis divinus substantialiter requievisse credendus est Orig. but in Christs humane Soul the very fire of Divine love dwells substantially there it rested substantially for in him the fulness of the Goahead dwells bodily Col. 2.9 Therefore there is the greatest love imaginable to be found even in the humane Soul of Christ More particularly the love that was in the humane Soul of Jesus Christ may be described and set forth under three considerations 1. The heart of Christ-Man was filled with the most sweet tender merciful compassionate dispositions that ever any heart was filled with Hence is it that we have those expressions that he is a merciful and a faithful High Priest Heb. 2.17 that he is touched with the feeling of our infirmities Heb. 3.15 We read also of the bowels of Christ the meekness the gentleness of Christ 2 Cor. 10.1 Never were there such words of love and sweetness spoken by any man as by him never was there such a loving and tender heart as the heart-of Jesus Christ Grace was poured into his lips Psal 45.3 Certainly never were there such words of love sweetness and tenderness spoken here upon this earth as those last words of his which were uttered a little before his Suffering and are recorded in the 13 14 15 16 17 Chapters of John Read over all the Books of love and friendship that were ever written by any of the sons of men they do all come far short of those melting strains of love that are there expressed So sweet and amiable was the conversation of Jesus Christ that it is reported of the Apostle Peter in the Ecclesiastical History that after Christs Ascension he wept so abundantly that he Quoties recordaretur illius suavissimae conversationis Christi was always seen wiping his face from the tears and being asked why he wept so he answered He could not chuse but weep as often as he thought of that most sweet conversation of Jesus Christ 2. The love of Christ as Man or which was in his humane nature may be seen in the compliance of his humane will with the Divine will in point of suffering It is true it was the Divine will that gave up the humane nature to suffer Joh. 6.51 The bread which I will give is my flesh which I will give for the life of the world It was the Divine will that gave up the humanity to suffer yet his humane will complied with the Divine will Father not as I will but as thou wilt There is a will and a will in Christ a Divine will and a humane will and the humane will complies with the Divine will Father save me from this hour nevertheless for this cause came I to this hour Joh. 12.27 Hence is it that the Apostle tells us he was obedient unto the death Phil. 2.8 The Lord Jesus knew right-well how great a burden the weight and pressure of his Fathers wrath was and yet he was content to undergo this burden for our sakes The cup which my Father hath given me to drink shall not I drink of it Joh. 18.11 I have a baptism to be baptized with and how am I straitned till it be accomplished Luk. 12.50 It is true had he not been God he could never have stood under such a burden as the burden of Divine wrath and had not his love been more than a created love had his love been the love of a meer creature he would never have undertaken such a work But being supported by the Godhead he was inabled to undergo his Sufferings and also his humane will influenced by the Deity was made willing to suffer therefore it is said For their sakes I sanctifie my self Joh. 17.19 There was a concurrence of his Divine and humane will in his suffering the Divine will in the person of the Son sanctifies and sets apart the humane nature to suffer the humane will concurs with the Divine and is made willing to suffer Joh. 10.17 18. Therefore doth my Father love me because I lay down my life The person that lays down his life is the Son of God incarnate the life which he lays down is the life of his Humanity for the life of his Divinity could never be laid down Now the Divine person had the
one of the persons of the Trinity the number of the persons was not increased but the same Trinity still remains But here we may observe the singular advancement of our nature which is all that I aim at in what hath been spoken By what we have heard we may see how by reason of the Incarnation a part of our nature stands in so near a relation to the Trinity The humane nature in Christ hath a nearer relation to the Trinity than any creature whatsoever Humanitas Christi licèt sit creatura tamen quia sola nulla alia ita adhaeret Deo ut una sit persona cum Divinitate oportet igitur tam altiorem supra extra omnes alias creaturas esse tamen sub solo Deo Luther whether Angels or men It is a speech of Ambrose Humane nature is not to be despised which is taken into so near society and fellowship with the holy Trinity And it is a great speech of Luther The humanity of Christ although it be a creature yet because this only and no other creature doth so adhere to God as that it is one person with the Divinity it is higher than all other creatures and above all other creatures yet under God alone 3. The third Consideration is this the advancement of our nature by the work of Christs Incarnation appears in this In that by means of the Incarnation a part of our nature is become the Temple as it were of the Divinity Destroy this Temple and in three days I will raise it up but he spake of the Temple of his body Joh. 2.21 Here we see the body of Christ or the humanity of Christ is plainly called a Temple and whose Temple was it the Temple of the Divinity Destroy this Temple and in three days I will raise it up He that could raise up the Temple of his body when it was destroyed by death must needs be God therefore the person dwelling in this Temple was God so that Christ calls his own humanity the Temple of his Divinity Col. 2.9 In him dwells all the fulness of the Godhead bodily The fulness of the Godhead dwells in the humanity of Christ as in its proper seat or Temple It is a saying of one of the Ancients Totum ejus corpus implet tota Divinitas The whole Divinity fills his whole humanity Yet we must take this aright when we say that the humanity of Christ is the Temple of the Divinity we must not suppose that the God head is or can be circumscribed but thus we ought to conceive it that by means of the personal Union the Godhead dwells in the humane nature of Christ so as it dwells not in any other creature whatsoever Now what an advancement is this to our nature that a part of our nature should be as it were the proper seat and Temple of the Divinity That God should manifest himself in by and through our nature assumed that the Divinity should shine through our nature and shew it self to us by our nature A notable Scripture to illustrate this in Joh. 1.14 The word was made flesh and what follows We beheld his glory as the glory of the only begotten Son of God The meaning is we beheld some rays and beams of the Divinity breaking forth through that flesh of his God was made visible to us in the person of his Son who had assumed a part of our nature Hence is it that the body of Christ or the humane nature of Christ is called a Tent or Tabernacle Heb. 8.2 9.11 Why is the body of Christ or the humane nature of Christ called a Tabernacle For this reason Look as the glory of God filled the Tabernacle of old so the glory of the Divinity hath filled his humane nature The body of Christ or his humane nature as Calvins expression is up on that place It is that Temple in which the whole Majesty of God dwells Templum in quo tota Dei Majestas habitavit Calvin 4. The fourth and last Consideration to shew how our nature is advanced by the Incarnation of the Son of God is this By means of the Incarnation Christ-man hath supreme Authority Jurisdiction and Dominion over all creatures and the Government of the World and the ordering of all the affairs of it are committed to him by the Father There are clear Texts of Scripture to prove this Joh. 5.22 27. The Father judgeth no man but hath committed all judgment to the Son And hath given him authority to execute judgment because he is the Son of man Matth. 28.28 All power and authority is given to me in heaven and in earth Psal 110.2 The Lord said unto my Lord Sit thou at my right hand Hence is that speech of Austin Est haec fiducia gloriatio nostra quòd nostrûm singulorum portio caâ—o sanguis sedeat in coelo ad dextram Dei Patris aeterni August This is our confidence and the matter of our rejoycing that a part of our nature flesh of our flesh bone of our bone sits at the right hand of God the eternal Father Christs sitting at the right hand of God imports two things 1. His advancement and preheminence above all creatures God hath given him a Name above every name Phil. 2.9 2. It imports his supreme Power Authority Jurisdiction and Dominion over all creatures Eph. 1.22 Psal 8.6 He hath put all things under his feet The Radix or root of this Power which Christ is said to have over all creatures lyeth primarily and originally in the Divine nature of the Son The Son the second person in Trinity as he is one and the same God with the Father and the Spirit hath power and dominion over all creatures and as he is the Son incarnate as he is made man so he hath all power in a way of Dispensation all power is committed to him and he exerciseth that power ministerially as the Delegate of the Father which yet is in him originally and essentially as he is one God with the Father Hence is it that Divines observe If the question be asked According to which nature it is that Christ is said to sit at the right hand of God The answer must be That it is according to both his natures for as Christ is appointed to be Mediator according to both natures so he is King of the Church according to both natures only there is this difference to be observed The Divine nature in Christ receives nothing new which it had not before When all Power and Authority is said to be given to Christ the Divine nature in Christ receives nothing new which it had not before only there is a new manifestation of the Divine power and glory by the humane nature as Christ prays Joh. 17.8 Glorifie me with the glory which I had with thee before the foundation of the world As he was the eternal Son so he was possessed of the
standing in such near relation to Christ as to be his body a part of himself this is the reason that Christ hath preserved it and will preserve it to the end of the world Mat. 18. I will build my Church See here he calls it his Church he challengeth a peculiar interest in it Feed the Church of God which he hath redeemed with his own blood Act. 20.28 Therefore the Church standing so nearly related to Christ no wonder Christ takes such care of it Learn from hence to whom to attribute all the deliverances of the Church it is our faithful omnipotent sympathizing compassionate Head that hath been the Author of all the preservations and deliverances we have seen and upon him we must depend for the time to come Lastly Vse 5 This may serve as a ground to confirm our faith touching the certian glorification of the Saints A part of our nature is already in the Head of the Church Christ man who is the Head of the Church is exalted to the highest state of glory God hath highly exalted him c. Phil. 2.9 Now though it be true Christ must be allowed his preheminence the head hath a preheminence above the members yet the members shall follow the head they shall have their measure of glory though not the same degree of glory In Heb. 6. ult we read how Christ is entred into heaven as our fore-runner If Christ be in Heaven the Saints who are members of his body shall certainly follow after It is the last passage in that last prayer of our Saviour That the love wherewith thou hast loved me may be in them and I in them Joh. 17. ult It is the inestimable priviledge of the Saints saith Calvin upon this Text that Christ was beloved of the Father for our sakes that we might be partakers of the same love If the Father hath glorified Christ he will certainly glorifie us if we be his members Only we must consider what is spoken in the last clause of all and I in them As we expect to be comprehended in that love with which our Head is embraced we must be sure to be in him We must see that we be in Christ and Christ in us we must have true and real union with him and if we be thus united to him then the love wherewith the Father hath loved him shall be communicated to us therefore let us endeavour to make sure of our Union with Christ and in-being in him and then as the Father hath commended his love to him the Head of the Church in glorifying him he will also commend his love to us in glorifying us in like manner The end of the fifth Sermon SERMON VI. Eph. 3. vers 17 18 19. That Christ may dwell in your hearts by saith that ye being rooted and grounded in love May be able to comprehend with all Saints what is the breadth and length and depth and height And to know the love of Christ which passeth knowledge 7. THE seventh Particular to demonstrate the greatness of the Love of Christ in the work of his Incarnation is this The love of Christ in his Incarnation appears in this In that by means of the Incarnation of the Son of God our nature as it is in the Head of the Church is restored to its ancient purity integrity and perfection It is a good observation of one of the Ancients Filius Dei naturam nostram sibi conjunxit ut eam in se primò per seipsum ad pristinam pulchritudinem restitueret Cyril The Son of God hath joyned our nature to himself that first of all he might repair our nature in himself and by himself restore our nature to its ancient beauty To understand this we must know that Adam had lost original Righteousness infected and corrupted mans nature with the contagion and taint of Original sin Now the Son of God by his Incarnation hath repaired our nature and restored it to its primitive beauty and perfection The first Adam by his Fall left our nature under the contagion of Original sin the Son of God in his Incarnation took up our nature without sin and as the second Adam represents our nature in himself pure and spotless Such an High-Priest became us who is holy harmless undefiled separate from sinners Heb. 9.26 So that this is the singular priviledge of Believers although they be poor sinful creatures in themselves groaning under the body of sin and death yet they have this to glory in that their Head the Lord Jesus is without sin and presents their nature pure and spotless before the Throne of God In him is no sin 1 Joh. 3.5 He doth not say In him was no sin that is true indeed for in him was no sin neither was there any guile found in his mouth But the Apostle saith here In him is no sin It is as much as if he should say As Christ was without sin here on Earth so he is without sin in Heaven he presents our nature pure and spotless before the Throne of God This is the singular priviledge of Believers that they may glory in Christ their Head when they have nothing to glory in of their own Hence is it that which the Apostle faith We glory in Christ Jesus or we boast in Christ Jesus c. Phil. 3.3 as much as to say We do not boast in our selves we do not glory in our own righteousness but we glory in the Righteousness of Christ we glory and boast in this that we have that righteousness and perfection in our Head which we have not in our selves 8. The love of Christ in his Incarnation appears in this In that by means of the Incarnation of the Son of God there is a foundation laid for our acceptance with God This is my beloved Son in whom I am well pleased Mat. 3. ult This is spoken of the Son incarnate after he was made man God the Father delights in the Son when incarnate To understand this we must know as he was the eternal Son the express image of the Fathers person proceeding from the Father by eternal Generation so he was eternally his delight This is clear from Prov. 8.30 I was daily his delight Now that which we are farther to consider is As the Father delights in the Son as his eternal Son so he delights in the Son when incarnate when made man he delights in the Son when cloathed with our nature the eternal Son being the object of his Fathers delight and complacency and the Son taking our nature into personal Union with himself the love delight and complacency of the Father redounds and overflows if I may so express it unto the humane nature assumed Joh. 3.35 The Father loveth the Son And how doth he love him Not only as the Son simply considered but he loves him as the Son incarnate he loves him as the Son come into our nature he loves him as he is Mediator To open this a little
further we may consider that the humane nature by means of the Incarnation of the Son of God hath its standing as it were in the Divine Person yea I find how some of the Ancients go further 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 suae personae Damasc Pertinet ad integritatem Verbi incarnati Chemnit Damascene's expression is That the humane nature is a part as it were of his person And a modern Divine observes The humane nature belongs to the integrity and compleatness of the person of the Word incarnate Yet to prevent all mistakes we must understand this cautiously That person whom the Scripture calls the Word or the Son which is the second of those three the Scripture speaks of There are three that bear record in Heaven the Father the Word and the Spirit was a Person from Eternity and the humane nature is not properly and strictly a part of his person neither doth it add any thing to the compleating of his person simply considered but on the contrary the humane nature having no personal subsistence of its own receives personality from the Word or the Son of God who was a person from Eternity Hence is it that Divines observe That the person of Christ in one respect may be called a Person that is simple and uncompounded look upon Christ simply as the second person in Trinity and so his person is most simple and uncompounded and his humanity adds nothing to it but in another respect look upon him as he is Mediator in a way of Dispensation and so they say Christs person is a person that may be said to be compounded that is to say in plain terms consider Christ under the notion of Mediator so the humane nature is not to be excluded from the person of the Mediator it is not to be excluded from the consideration of Christ as Mediator For Christ is not Mediator according to one nature meerly not according to his Divine nature meerly nor according to his humane nature meerly but Christ as Mediator is Mediator according to both natures and is to be considered as Mediator according to both natures Christus est ex duabus naturis in duabus naturis Christ as Mediator is to be considered as consisting of both natures and as subsisting in both natures It is a passage of one of the Ancients It is a thing of equal danger to believe Christ to be God only without believing him to be man or to believe him to be man only without believing him to be God for the Mediator is to be believed to be both God and man the Mediator is both God and man in one person Now to return to what was first proposed The Mediator being both God and man the love of the Father extends it self to the whole person of the Mediator who is man as well as God and all the complacency and delight of the Father is taken up in him so that a part of our nature being taken into unity of person with the Son of God there is a foundation laid for the Fathers delight and complacency in us Hence it is said He hath made us accepted in the beloved Eph. 1.6 Christ is first beloved and we are beloved in him The Father hath a part of our nature always before him which is ever in his eye which stands in personal union and communion with his own Son and Christ man hath no sin in him but is perfectly pure and righteous and being so is perfectly pleasing and delightful to the Father and he being Head of the Church all that are members of his body are looked upon in him and are accepted in him To understand this more clearly we must consider that our nature by sin is alienated and estranged from God lyes under wrath and the curse but now by the Incarnation of the Son of God our nature is again brought near to God The Son incarnate and made man is perfectly the object of the Fathers delight and our nature being represented pure and spotless before the Thone of God in the person of the Son of God the Father reflecting on our nature as it stands in personal union and conjunction with his Son accepts of us and delights in us through his Son so that by means of the Incarnation of the Son of God there is a foundation laid for our acceptance with God 9. The love of Christ in his Incarnation appears in this In that by means of the Incarnation of the Son of God Grace is brought down deposited and lodged as it were in our nature as in a fountain near at hand that we may know where to go and have recourse for all grace The Godhead it self is the original spring and fountain of all grace it is proper only to God to create grace therefore is it we have that expression The God of all grace 1 Pet. 5.10 But look upon the Divinity or Godhead simply or absolutely considered and so it is as a spring that is more remote and kept hidden and secret from us but in the Incarnation of the Son of God God is manifested in the flesh and so the Godhead which is the Original and head-spring of all grace is brought near unto us With thee is the fountain of life Psal 36.9 Now in Christ the fulness of the Godhead dwells bodily therefore the fulness of the Godhead dwelling in Christ bodily by necessary consequence the fulness of life and grace must necessarily dwell in Christ The Divine nature empties it self as it were into the humanity of Christ and from God in Christ we receive all grace Hence is it said Joh. 1.14 The Word is made flesh and what follows upon that full of grace and truth Immediately upon the Words being made flesh the humane nature which the Word assumed comes to be replenished with grace and truth Observe the order or gradation that is here set down first the Word the second person in Trinity assumes our nature the Word is made flesh what follows upon this The Word being made flesh he having the Godhead in him fills the humane nature with all grace Hence is that expression The Word is made flesh and dwelt among us full of grace and truth What follows upon this Out of his fulness we receive grace for grace The Word incarnate the Word made flesh the Son of God becoming man he is now the proximate and next fountain of grace to us The Godhead of the Son which is one and the same with the Godhead of the Father is the original fountain of all grace and the Son in our nature is the proximate and next fountain of grace to us and hence is it that the Ancients call the humanity of Christ the Receptacle of grace 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The humanity of Christ is the first receptacle of all grace Of his fulness we receive and grace for grace The Evangelist doth not say Of him we receive grace for grace that is true but
The twelfth Proposition for the clearing of this Mystery and shewing the greatness of Christs love in the work of his Incarnation is this That by means of the Incarnation of the Son of God God hath brought himself down to us rendred himself more facile and easie to be apprehended and conceived by us and also more sweet for us to approach to him We have shewed before how that by means of the Incarnation of the Son of God grace is brought down to us lodged in our nature now we shall shew how that by the Incarnation of the Son of God God himself is brought down to us brought near to us so that we may the better apprehend and conceive of him and also he is made more sweet for us to approach to him 1. By means of the Incarnation of the Son of God God hath brought himself down to us and rendred himself more facile and easie to be apprehended and conceived of by us If we consider God in his simple and absolute nature God dwells in light inaccessible and of him it is said Whom no man saw nor can see 1 Tim. 6.16 The naked simple absolute Divinity is too bright an object for our weak eyes to look upon therefore God who is invisible in himself hath made himself visible as it were in the person of his Son therefore is it said Christ is the image of the invisible God Col. 1.15 and the light of the knowledge of the glory of God shines in the face of Jesus Christ 2 Cor. 4.6 In the face of the Son incarnate we may see and behold all the glory of God Joh. 1.18 No man hath seen God at any time the only begotten Son who is in the bosom of the Father he hath revealed him It is Calvins observation That as Christ is the Mediator of Reconciliation so he is the Medium of Revelation he reveals God to us and by him we come to the knowledge of God To understand this more clearly and distinctly we must know Eadem natura Divinitatis tota perfecta est in singulis personis this is a sure Maxime The same nature of the Divinity is whole and perfect in each of the persons The Godhead is not divided each person is whole God therefore doth our Saviour say Joh. 14.7 If ye had known me ye should have known my Father also When the Divinity of the Son is known Quaelibet persona est totus Deus the Divinity of the Father must needs be known there being but one and the same Divinity common between them both Now then when the Son of God the second person in Trinity assumes our nature the whole nature of God is brought down to us in Christ This is the true God 1 Joh. 5.20 And he that hath seen me hath seen the Father Joh. 14.9 There is but one and the same Divinity common between the Son and the Father therefore he that sees and apprehends the Divinity of the Son doth at the same instant apprehend and see the Divinity of the Father Now the humanity of the Son is the Medium by which we come to see and apprehend the Divinity of the Son and of the Father The humanity is not the Divinity yet the humanity is the Medium by which we are helped to conceive and apprehend the Divinity and that is the meaning of that expression He that hath seen me hath seen the Father That is as a Learned man expounds that passage As my Divinity is seen and apprehended by this assumed flesh of mine Sicut mea Divinitas per hanc carnem assumtam videtur ita etiam videtur Divinitas Patris quae eadem est so also is the Divinity of the Father apprehended by this assumed flesh of mine which is one and the same Divinity Hence is that expression of our Saviours Joh. 12.44 Jesus cryed and said He that believes on me believes not on me but on him that sent me Our Saviour lays much stress upon it he crys and saith as if he would proclaim it to all the world and would have all the world take notice of it And what is the truth he proclaims with so much solemnity He that believes on me believes not on me but on him that sent me What believe in Christ and not believe in Christ this is a seeming contradiction But the plain meaning is this he that believes in me believes not in me only but he believes on him that sent me Our Saviour would have all men take notice of this That his Divinity and the Divinity of the Father was one and the same therefore he saith He that believes on me believes not on me but on him that sent me As much as if he had said The Father is in me the Divinity Power Majesty Essence all the Divine perfections of the Father are found in me and ye need not seek for God any further than in me therefore he saith Joh. 14.1 Ye believe in God believe also in me Our Saviour doth not here intimate that there is a double object of faith as if the Father were one object of faith and he another for though the Father and the Son be distinct persons yet the Divinity common to them both is but one and the same and there is but one object of faith in both When therefore he says Ye believe in God believe also in me his meaning is that we should direct our faith to God inhabiting in him inhabiting in his humane nature It is a great help to faith that we may conceive of God in and by the humanity of Jesus Christ The humanity of Christ is the Temple of the Divinity as hath been shewn heretofore In this Temple it is we must seek for God and here we may find him In the days of the Old Testament the Ark of the Covenant was the Symbol of Gods presence and that external Symbol was some help to their faith The people of God in those days directed their prayers to God before the Ark and they worshipped him that dwelt between the Cherubins In the days of the New Testament Christ is our Ark God hath manifested himself to us in and by the flesh of his Son Col. 2.9 In him the fulness of the Godhead dwells bodily It is the observation of a Learned man That one fruit of the Incarnation of the Son of God Bishop Vsher and of the conjunction of the two natures the Divine and humane nature in Christ is this That whereas God hath no shape comprehensible either to the eye of the body or the soul and the mind of man cannot rest but in a representation of something that his mind and understanding can in some sort reach unto man considering God in the second person of the Trinity who hath taken our nature whereby God is revealed in the flesh hath whereupon to stay his mind Faith begins at the humanity of Christ and then by degrees climbs up to the Divinity this
is that our Saviour prays for in that great and famous Prayer of his Joh. 17.21 That they all may be one as thou Father art in me and I in thee c. And vers 23. I in them and thou in me that they may be made perfect in one That which our Saviour intends in this passage is not only that the Faithful should be united among themselves but that they should be united unto God This is the most firm binding and knitting together of things when God is in Christ Christ is in us and the Faithful united among themselves God the Father is the root Christ the stock the holy Spirit as the sap we the branches and the graces of the Saints are the fruits And that this union may be effected Christ took from us a part of our nature on the other hand he hath given to us his own flesh and blood and that we might be united to God he hath given to us the holy Spirit Is it so Vse 1 that by the Incarnation of the Son of God there is a foundation laid for our Adoption and being made the sons of God then learn what course we are to take if we desire to be the children of God Who is there that would not desire to be a child of God If we would be the children of God here we may see the ready way how to attain this priviledge If we desire to be the sons and daughters of God we must chuse and close with Christ the natural Son of God A great and choice Scripture 2 Cor. 6.18 I will be a father unto you and ye shall be my sons and daughters saith the Lord Almighty If we will be the sons and daughters of God we must first see that we close with Christ the natural Son of God God saith of Christ I will be unto him a Father Heb. 1.5 God is first a Father unto Christ before he is or will be a Father unto us Now we must close with the natural Son of God as ever we desire to be the adopted sons of God Joh. 1.12 To as many as received him he gave power to become the sons of God We are by nature children of wrath children of hell children of the curse and are we contented to abide so always Are we contented always to abide in that condition of distance and estrangement to God If you would have God a Father you must get into Christ God out of Christ is a sin revenging God Let us therefore look well to our faith Gal. 3.26 We are the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus If our faith be not right if we have not closed with Christ in a right manner we have no evidence that we are the children of God There is a spurious a bastard faith a false faith that is not a true faith there is a meer historical faith which is a consenting that the Scripture is true there is a temporary faith when there are some flashes and pangs of affection towards Christ but then there is the faith of Gods Elect let us look after this You will ask What is this faith That faith takes a man wholly off himself takes him perfectly from his own bottom and makes him look to another for wisdom righteousness sanctification This is faith to go out perfectly out of our selves and to live perfectly upon another as to all the parts of our salvation and this is the faith that the just must live by If we be in Christ by faith then shall we be the sons of God If by means of the Incarnation God hath brought himself down to us Vse 2 and rendred himself more facile and easie to be apprehended by us this may inform us how we may best conceive of God The way for us to conceive of God is for us to conceive of God in Christ The Saints of God do find it a difficult thing to conceive of God to have right thoughts and conceptions of God Now would you know how to conceive of God O learn to conceive of God in Christ God is at so great a distance from us that if we set our selves to think or conceive of him in his naked absolute simple nature our thoughts would soon lose themselves or else be overwhelmed with the greatness of his Majesty So true is that saying Scrutator Majestatis opprimetur à gloria He that thinks to dive into the Abyss of the Divinity will soon find himself overwhelmed with the Divine glory The Lord hath said No man can see his face and live We cannot behold the Sun in the Firmament in its noon-day glory we can much better behold the Sun in a cloud than behold it in its simple glory so God hath veiled his glory in the flesh of his Son and the way for us to behold God is to contemplate God in the face of Jesus Christ It is far more easie for us to conceive of the humane nature in the person of Christ than to conceive of the naked simple and absolute Divinity When we conceive of the humane nature in the person of Christ the mind hath something to rest and stay it self upon and by the humanity we climb up by degrees to the Divinity It is true faith ought not to terminate it self in the humanity but by the humanity we ought to climb and ascend up to the Divinity By him we believe in God 1 Pet. 1.21 It is Calvins opinion Tunc remoto velo palà m cernemus Deum in sua Majestate regnantem neque ampliùs media erit Christi humanitas quae nos ab ulteriore Dei conspectu cohibeat Calv. in 1 Cor. 15. That in Heaven when God shall be all in all we shall then see God without the veil of Christs flesh then say she the veil being removed we shall behold God openly reigning in his Majesty neither shall the flesh of Christ oppose it self as a Medium to hinder us from the farther sight of God How far and with what limitation this opinion of his may take place I shall not now inquire but sure I am whilst we are here on earth we cannot behold God without this veil the veil of Christs flesh Whilst we are here on earth the new and living way into the holiest is consecrated for us through the veil that is to say his flesh Heb. 10.19 20. Upon this Text Calvin himself hath this passage No man shall ever find God but he unto whom Christ-man is the door and the way The flesh of Christ is that veil which covers God and by this veil we must come into the holy of Holies and have admittance into the Divine presence It is dangerous for us to think of God or to approach to him any other way but in Christ He is the way the truth and the life and no man cometh to the Father but by him that is no man can come to the Father but by him They are weighty and memorable passages Luther hath
concerning this point Qui scrutando volet non errare nec à Majestatis gloria opprimi is fide tangat apprehendat Filium Dei in carne manifestatum Luther with which I shall close this Use He that in searching would not erre nor be overwhelmed by the glory of the Divine Majesty let him by faith touch and apprehend the Son of God incarnate the Son of God manifest in the flesh In another place he saith Let us not hear them who say the flesh profits nothing let us rather invert the words and say Without the flesh God profits nothing our eyes ought to be fastened upon the flesh of Christ and we ought to say We neither apprehend nor know any God out of that flesh Dei Filius incarnatus est illud involucrum in quo Divina Majestas cum omnibus suis-donis se nobis offert Luther out of that humanity The Son of God incarnate is that covering in which the Divine Majesty offers himself to us with all his gifts This is that only aspect of the Divinity which in this life is facile and possible for us here is no seeing God out of Christ If we would conceive of God aright let us direct our faith to God in Christ If by means of the Incarnation we are brought near to God Vse 3 learn from hence to labour that our faith may be deeply rooted in Christ Our happiness lies in this In being taken into Christ in being comprehended in him in being made members of his body Our nature by means of the Incarnation of the Son of God is brought near to God Now if we would be brought near to God we must be implanted into Christ by faith and made members of his body Par◠prays for himself Phil. 3.9 That I may be found in him An emphatical expression found in Christ Paul would not for a thousand worlds be left out of Christ no he would be found in him And for the Ephesians he prays That Christ might dwell in their hearts by faith Eph. 3.17 Our happiness lies in conjunction with our Head standing and abiding in relation to Christ as our Head in being comprehended in Christ as it were this is our happiness This is the misery of the fallen Angels and all Unbelievers they have nothing to do with Christ as their Head and this is the great happiness of all the Elect they are gathered under him as their Head Behold I and the children which God hath given me Heb. 2.13 Wherefore let us see that our faith take deep rooting in Christ and then we are on a safe bottom Christ is the Captain of the Salvation of the Elect and by him many sons are brought to glory Heb. 2.10 If our faith hath taken deep rooting in Christ then are we safe then are we comprehended in him and where the Head is there the members shall be also The end of the seventh Sermon SERMON VIII Eph. 3. vers 17 18 19. That Christ may dwell in your hearts by faith that ye being rooted and grounded in love May be able to comprehend with all Saints what is the breadth and length and depth and height And to know the love of Christ which passeth knowledge SEveral Propositions have been mentioned already to illustrate the greatness of Christs love in the work of his Incarnation I shall add three or four more and so I shall finish this subject 14. The love of Christ in his Incarnation is seen in this In that Christ becoming true man and wearing a part of our nature the consideration of his humanity may be a great help and strengthening to our faith to assure us of his propension and readiness to supply us in all our wants and also to sympathize pity and compassionate us in all our afflictions Hence it is that one of the Ancients brings in Christ speaking thus Ego corpus illorum gesto I do wear their body and carry about with me a part of their flesh Christ wears as it were the flesh of the Elect Now no man ever yet hated his own flesh but nourisheth it and cherisheth it as the Lord the Church Eph. 5.29 That common humanity wherein Christ shares with us cannot but incline him to be most kind sweet benign to his own kindred who participate of the same nature with him Because the children were made partakers of flesh and blood he also took part of the same Heb. 2.16 Christ was a man of sorrows therefore he knows how to pity us in our sorrows Christ was deserted therefore he knows how to pity us in our desertion Christ was tempted in all points like to us sin only excepted therefore he knows how to succour us in our temptations Christ in the humane nature assumed hath felt the same miseries and afflictions that we are subject unto and therefore he knows experimentally by what he himself hath felt and endured how to pity us The Apostle sets this down as one great fruit of the Incarnation Heb. 2.16 17. Because the children were made partakers of flesh and blood he also took part of the same What is the fruit and advantage of this Why was it that Christ took a part of our nature The next verse tells us It was that he might be a merciful and a faithful High-Priest Calvin observes upon this Text When all sorts of miseries do oppress us we ought to remember there is nothing befals us which the Son of God hath not experienced in himself neither ought we to doubt but he is so present with us to help and pity us as if he himself were afflicted with us The experience of our miseries doth so bend and incline Christ to compassion that he is exceeding solicitous of obtaining help from God for us Hence is it said in the last verse For in that he himself hath suffered being tempted he is able to succour them that are tempted Christ having been exercised with the same miseries and afflictions that we are is most propense and ready to afford help and relief to us Christ now he is in Heaven hath not forgotten his own sorrows and sufferings here on earth and the remembrance of his own sufferings cannot but incline him to pity and compassionate his people who are a part of his own nature in the like sufferings It is true Christ as he is God wants no love neither needed Christ to have known what sufferings and afflictions were experimentally to have inclined him to a merciful disposition for God is love God is so in his own nature and it was the love that was in the Divine nature that inclined him to assume our nature but because we could not be otherwise perswaded that there was so much kindness in his heart therefore in condescension to our infirmity and for the strengthening of our faith Christ would become man and taste of sufferings and affliction that having done so we might be the better assured he would be the more ready to pity
thou hast loved me before the foundation of the world Let us take heed how we mistake here the Love of the Father was not the cause of the Divinity of the Son although the Son be begotten of the Father yet the Generation of the Son proceeds not from an act of Gods will the Father did not first love the Son and then beget him but the Generation of the Son was natural the Father begets the Son from Eternity and cannot but beget him God doth necessarily understand himself therefore his eternal Son is his natural Image Therefore in this last clause For thou hast loved me before the foundation of the world Christ speaks of himself as man the humanity of Christ was beloved of the Father from Eternity above every creature that humanity of his was so chosen and beloved above all creatures as to be united to the Divinity Now in Heaven the Elect shall see that Christ is in the possession of that which he was elected and chosen unto from Eternity And this will be one singular demonstration of the love of God to them that they shall see themselves taken so near to God in the person of their Head For although it be true there will always remain a vast difference between Christ the Head and the Elect that are Members to him none of the Elect have or can have that personal union which his humanity hath to the Divinity yet all the Elect in the glory of their Head shall see and behold the greatness of the love of God to themselves for it was for their sakes he took part of their nature into personal union and a part of their nature being united to God all the Elect are confirmed in their Head and by means of their Head are brought into the nearest communion with God they are capable of So that I say this will be matter of wonder to the Elect to Eternity to see a part of their nature placed so near to the Divinity yea to see a part of their nature so intimately united to the Divinity in the bond of personal union and to become the seat and Temple of the Divinity to all Eternity Vse And now I shall winde up all in one short word of Application From all that hath been said let us learn to admire and adore the infinite and transcendant love of Christ in his Incarnation Here may we cry out with the Apostle O the heights and lengths and depths and breadths that are in the love of Christ in his Incarnation I have shewn you in seventeen Propositions how great the love of Christ is in the work of his Incarnation and when we have dived never so much into this Mystery it is but little that we do understand of the glory of it in comparison of what it is in it self O study more this great work of the Incarnation of the Son of God this is the greatest of all the works of God the greatest work that ever he hath done or that ever he will do The Incarnation of the Son of God is more than the glorification of all the Saints in Heaven O therefore study this Mystery the more we study it the more will our hearts be ravished with it and the reason why we are no more affected with it is because we know and understand so little of it And let us not only labour to understand the greatness of the thing it self but also of what importance this work of the Incarnation of the Son of God is to our salvation The work of the Incarnation is that which hath laid the foundation of the whole work of Redemption The Son of God therefore took our nature and became true man that he might transact the business of our Salvation in the humane nature assumed Vnigenitus venit in hominem propter hominem Hoc Deus in nobis salvavit quod pro nobis accepit 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 They are memorable passages which the Ancients have The only begotten Son of God came into the nature of man for man If the Word had not been pleased to have become flesh no flesh could have been saved God hath saved that in us which he hath assumed and took for us And it is a common saying among the Ancients That which was not assumed was not healed If Christ had not assumed the whole of our nature our whole nature had not been healed and restored We have heard somewhat of the Mystery of Christ in his Incarnation let us meditate on what we have heard Our work will be to meditate on these Truths all our days The best of us have arrived but to a little understanding in the Mystery of Christ The Apostle prays for the Saints Col. 2.2 That their hearts might be comforted being knit together in love and unto all riches of the full assurance of understanding to the acknowledgment of the mystery of God and of the Father and of Christ Let us pray for great affection to Christ Great love to the Person of Christ will procure great manifestation of Christ So Christ hath promised Joh. 14.21 He that loveth me shall be loved of my Father and I will love him and will manifest my self to him The more you love Christ the more fond you are of his person if I may so speak the more will Christ discover himself to you The more you love him the more will Christ lead you into the understanding of those Mysteries concerning his Person Divinity the Union of his Natures his Offices his Grace which the rest of men are little acquainted with They that love most shall know most Love Christ much and then Christ will manifest and discover himself much to you and the more Christ discovers himself to you the more sweet will you find the knowledge of Christ to be from day to day The end of the eighth Sermon SERMON I. Gal. 4. vers 4. But when the fulness of the time was come God sent forth his Son made of a woman made under the Law THat which hath been in my desire hath been to unfold as I am able some part of the Mystery of Christ and to speak something concerning the great dimensions of the Love of Christ And as a bottom to build upon I pitched upon that Text Eph. 3.18 19. That ye may be able to comprehend with all Saints what is the breadth and length and depth and height And to know the love of Christ which passeth knowledge Now to shew what these dimensions of Christs love were I propounded to speak to three things 1. To shew the Properties of Christs Love 2. To shew that this love of Christ is surpassing great as it is to be found in both his Natures in his humane and in his Divine nature And here we considered the love of Christ distinctly the love that was found in his humane nature and in his Divine nature 3. To shew that the love of Christ is surpassing great if we consider the great
Privatio prâ—mii beaâ—â—â—ci Perfectionis ad quam erant apti nati carentia ex peccato causatae and the pain of sense The pain of loss is the want of blessedness or else it is the privation of the beatifical reward Other School men describe it more largely thus The pain of loss is the want of that perfection which men were capable of and is brought upon them by reason of sin Now in this pain of loss the damned are deprived of all good things they are deprived of all peace all joy all comfort all solace and refreshment they are deprived of the fellowship of the Saints and Angels but amongst all the pains of loss which the damned undergo the greatest of all is the want of the sight of God and therefore some of the School-men describe the pain of loss only by this Privatio visionis fruitionis Divinae That it is a deprivation of the Divine vision and fruition not but that the damned are deprived of all other comforts and good things but the sight and fruition of God comprehends all the rest being deprived of the sight and fruition of God the chief good they must necessarily be deprived of the comfort of other particular goods Now this deprivation of the sight of God being part of the punishment that is due to us for our sins this pain of loss our Saviour underwent for us in his dereliction and desertion His humane soul was deprived of that clear sight and vision of the Deity for a time We by sin deserved to be deprived of the sight of God and Christ in his dereliction his humane soul was deprived of the sight of God for a time Divines are wont commonly to say That Christ from the moment of his conception had the sight of God his humane soul being immediately united to the Deity Christ from the very moment of his conception had the sight of God Now for our Saviour who had known experimentally how sweet the comfort of his Fathers face had been and had lived all his days under the warm beams and influences of the Divinity and had had his soul all along refreshed with the sense of the Divine presence for him to be left in that horror and darkness as to have no taste of comfort no glimpse of the Divinity breaking in upon his humane soul how great an affliction must that needs be unto him This spiritual dereliction as was formerly hinted which our Saviour underwent was part of the punishment due to us for our sins When Adam had sinned he was driven out of Paradise he was banished out of the presence of God man forsaking God God forsook him and withdrew himself from him now that dereliction which we deserved in Adam Christ suffered for us Hence is that of Cyril When Adam had transgressed the Divine commandment humane nature was forsaken of God and made subject unto the curse and to death Now these words of our Saviour when he crys out My God my God why hast thou forsaken me are the words of Christ manifestly discharging or paying that debt of dereliction that was come upon us by means of sin and pacifying God this way Hence also is that expression of another of the Ancients Deseritur cum desertis c. Christ was deserted with them who were deserted and Christ paid the tribute for that nature which he had assumed that is Christ paid our debt Christ was forsaken with us who were forsaken that so Divine grace and favour might return again to us the face of God was hid from him for a time that so it might not be hid from us for ever Now if it be asked But what was this dereliction I shall 1. Shew negatively what it was not and 2. Positively and affirmatively what it was 1. What it was not It was not a dissolution of the union of the two Natures The union of the two Natures in Christ continued notwithstanding this his dereliction for if the personal Union of the two Natures had been dissolved if it had not continued in the time of the sufferings of Christ then it would have followed that it was not God that was the Person that suffered and so the merit and efficacy of Christs sufferings would have been enervated and taken away but the Scriptures tell us That it was God that redeemed the Church with his own blood Act. 20.28 the Person suffering was God though it was in our nature that he suffered Also they tell us That they crucified the Lord of glory 1 Cor. 2.8 the Person suffering was God although it was in and by the flesh that he suffered Joh. 6.51 I am the bread that came down from heaven if any man eat of this bread he shall live for ever and the bread which I shall give is my flesh which I will give for the life of the world The flesh which is given for the life of the world it is the flesh of the Word the flesh of the second Person in Trinity The Word was made flesh Joh. 1.14 that person who is called the Word the second Person in Trinity who came down from heaven by his Incarnation and took flesh gave that flesh for the life of the world The Word is the Person who takes flesh the Word the second Person in Trinity who takes a part of our flesh is not disjoyned or disunited from his flesh all the time of his sufferings it is his flesh still The bread which I will give is my flesh which I will give for the life of the world The Word the second Person in Trinity accounts it his flesh whilst he suffers it was the flesh only that was capable of suffering but the Word the second Person in Trinity stood related to that flesh in the time of his suffering yea he was one with it in the bond of personal Union therefore it is said 1 Pet. 4.1 Christ suffered for us in the flesh It is a remarkable expression Christ suffered for us in the flesh the person suffering is Christ the Son of God though it was in the flesh in the Humanity that he suffered the humane nature is only capable of suffering but yet the person of the Son of God was united to that nature in the time when he suffered there was no dissolution of the union of the two natures Non dissolutione unionis sed substractione visioniâ— Christs dereliction was not by the dissolution of the Vnion but by the substraction of Vision as one of the Ancients speaks 2. This dereliction or desertion of our Saviour was not a desertion in point of grace Christ had all along the same presence of Divine grace with him to carry him out to all acts of obedience There was no failure as to any one act of obedience in Christ If Christ had been deserted in point of grace and any one act of obedience had been interrupted then his obedience had not been perfect and compleat and if his
art and unto dust thou shalt return Gen. 3.9 Here is a present denunciation of evil upon sin and the general sentence of the Law is The soul that sins shall dye 4. We are under the Curse in as much as many penal evils are already inflicted upon us as part of the Curse and part of the punishment that is due to us by reason of sin Sickness pain infirmity of the body anguish grief sorrow in the mind are part of the miseries that we suffer in this life and these things materially considered are part of the Curse for as much as if there had been no sin there had been none of these things It was sin that brought in sickness infirmity pain grief and whatever miseries men have experience of in this life and these are part of the Curse and therefore the happy state of the New Jerusalem is described by this That there shall be no more curse there Rev. 22.3 When sin shall be removed the effects of sin all those miseries which sin hath brought in shall be removed 5. We are under the Curse that is we are liable to destruction of soul and body in Hell for ever as the just revenge which God executes upon us by reason of sin this is in the nature of the Curse that it brings destruction with it So that when we are said to be under the curse the meaning is that we are liable to the destruction of soul and body in Hell for ever The Curse hath not spent it self it hath not exhausted all its venom till it hath brought the sinner to the utmost degree of misery that the sinner is capable of Therefore when our Saviour pronounceth the sentenco of punishment upon the damned he expresseth it thus Depart from me ye cursed into everlasting fire Mat. 25.41 It is as much as if he had said You are cursed persons the Curse hath taken hold of you the Curse is come in its full power and strength upon you and there is none to deliver you from it therefore will the Curse carry you into everlasting fire prepared for the Devil and his Angels Nothing will satisfie the Curse but the utmost misery and destruction of the sinner 2 Thess 1.9 Who shall be punished with everlasting destruction from the presence of the Lord. That which the Curse aims at is destruction Now wicked men are punished with destruction from the presence of the Lord destruction is brought upon them by the Curse as the just punishment of their sin Though wicked men have a being still in Hell yet their well being is taken away the Curse takes away their well being and brings them to the utmost degree of misery that they are capable of The second thing we have to speak unto is How it was that Christ was made a curse for us Christ hath redeemed us from the curse of the Law being made a curse for us Gal. 3.10 This I shall endeavour to open in some Particulars 1. Christ was made a curse for us in that the displeasure of God and his indignation against us for sin was poured forth upon Christ to the utmost Our Saviour began to conflict with the sense of Gods wrath in his Agony in the Garden there he saw the wrath of God approaching to him But now in his sufferings upon the Cross there it was that he bare the Curse fully there was the wrath of God fully poured out upon him The Curse speaks anger and displeasure as we have heard if therefore Christ be made a curse for us as the Scripture affirms plainly that he was then of necessity it follows that he must bear Gods wrath and anger in some sort or other for us Benedictus in justitia sua maledictus ob peccata nostra Aug. Maledictum est Deo quod odit Deus Beda It is a speech of Austin Christ that was blessed in respect of his own Righteousness was yet cursed by reason of our sins Another Learned man hath this expression If Christ were accursed then was he as one loathed and abhorred That is said to be cursed of God which God loaths and hates Isa 53.3 it is said there That Christ was despised and rejected of men He was cut off from the land of the living as a person not fit to live that was a sign that he was accurst of men But that is not all Christ was not only accurst of men but in some sense he was accurst before God himself For in that Text in Deuteronomy which I shall touch upon hereafter he that hangs upon a tree was accounted accursed by God himself So that Christ was not only accurst before men but in some respects he was said to be accurst of God himself Christ was accurst of God not in respect of himself as I shall shew more hereafter when I come to shew you how this could be that he that was most blessed could be made a curse but in respect of us whose sins he bare Yet Christ in respect of us the guilt of whose sins he bare was accurst of God The Apostle tells us that Christ was made a curse Who hath redeemed us from the curse of the Law being made a curse for us Gal. 3.10 If Christ were made a curse of whom or by whom was it that he was made a curse Of his Father certainly He that made him sin for us made him also a curse for us Now who was it made him sin for us That was God himself so the Apostle tell us 2 Cor. 5.20 He hath made him to be sin for us He that might be made sin for us might be made a curse for us Christ was made sin therefore he was made a curse and it was God that made him sin therefore God that made him a curse If Christ then were made a curse by God himself for us then he was not only accursed before men and in the sight of men but as he was our Surety and as he bare the guilt of our sins though he were an innocent person in himself and as considered in himself always beloved of God he was accursed by him by whom he was made a curse That which also confirms this is this consideration That Christ was made a curse for us as undergoing that punishment the Law exacted so the Apostle teaches us He hath redeemed us from the curse of the Law being made a curse for us If therefore Christ be made a curse in conformity to the Law he must sustain that Curse that the Law threatens and will inflict Now this is certain that the wrath of God is comprehended in the curse of the Law for what is the curse of the Law The curse of the Law is this Indignation and wrath tribulation and anguish upon every soul of man that doth evil Rom. 2.8 9. Therefore if Christ bare the curse of the Law he must of necessity bear the sense of Gods wrath in his soul for us Neither let us wonder at this That
the love of God because he laid down his life for us Still we see when the Scripture speaks of the love of Christ it expresseth it by what he suffered for us Now the greatness of Christs love the heights and depths and lengths and breadths of Christs love in his sufferings and in the work of his Satisfaction may be illustrated by several Particulars And I shall propound several things for the clearing up of this truth 1. That the sufferings of Christ were the lowest degree of his humiliation The Scripture speaks of Christs Exinanition or emptying himself Phil. 2.7 He made himself of no reputation so we translate it the word in the Original is he emptyed himself out of all 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Ex omni seipsum ad nihilum redegit exhausit Tertul. he reduced himself to nothing One of the Ancients renders the expression he exhausted himself Now this Exinanition or emptying of the Son of God was his own voluntary laying aside of his own glory as to manifestation and also his subjecting himself to the lowest abasement for our sakes The Son of God did not could not divest himself of his essential glory he did not cease to be the Son of God and God in the lowest state of his humiliation but he did strip and divest himself of his manifestative glory he was content not to appear to be what indeed he was and he submitted-himself to the lowest abasement for our sakes Now there were two parts of Christs Exinanition or emptying of himself The first was his Incarnation his assumption of our nature The second was his suffering death for us and the Apostle speaks of both these in this place The first part of Christs Exinanition was his Incarnation He made himself of no reputation or emptied himself How so He took upon him the form of a servant he was in the form of God saith the Apostle and made himself of no reputation and took upon him the form of a servant That he who was in the form of God should take upon him the form of a servant this was emptying himself indeed That the eternal God should become a mortal man this was great humiliation indeed He was in the form of God saith the Apostle and yet he was made in the likeness of men and was found in fashion as a man These expressions must cautiously be understood we must not understand them as some ancient Hereticks did that Christ only had a fantastical body that is the shew and appearance of a body because it is said here the likeness of men and that he was found in fashion as a man I say we must not understand them as if Christ only had a fantastical body not a true and a real body for the Scripture tells us plainly That Christ was made of the seed of David and he was in all things made like unto us sin only excepted And it is a true expression that of the Ancients 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That which was not assumed was not healed If the Son of God had not had the verity of humane nature in him humane nature could never have been restored If he had not assumed a true humane soul and a true humane body our fouls and bodies which were tainted with original sin could never have been recovered therefore when it is said He was made in the likeness of men and found in fashion as a man we must not understand it as if Christ had the likeness of a humane body and not a true humane body but these expressions Made in the likeness of men and found in fashion as a man not only set forth the greatness of his humiliation and condescension that he that was God blessed for ever that he who was so far above men did yet take to himself the common nature of men He was made in the likeness of men and found in fashion as a man The plain meaning seems to be That the Son of God taking our nature appeared among men as to his external visage and appearance as another man as one like the rest of men It is true spiritual eyes could behold the beams of the Divinity breaking through the veil of his flesh Joh. 1.14 The Word was made flesh and dwelt among us and we beheld his glory as the glory of the only begotten of the Father full of grace and truth The Apostles and other Believers who saw Christ in the days of his flesh with spiritual eyes and hearts that were given to them could see the beams of the Divinity breaking through his Humanity they could see something more than a man in him But look upon him as to his external form and habit and so he appeared to the generality of men like one of the rest of men he was wrapt up in swadling cloaths laid in a Manger he was subject to his Parents he did hunger and thirst and eat and drink and he was subject to the same common infirmities with other men and therefore doth the Apostle say He was made in the likeness of men and found in fashionas a man that is as to his external form and habit he seemed to be like to the common sort of men Hence are those expressions of the Prophet He was as a root out of a dry ground He hath no form nor comeliness and when we shall see him there is no beauty that we should desire him Isa 53.2 This is the first part of Christs humiliation Creator ac Dominus omnium rerum unus voluit esse mortalium that he who was in the form of God should yet take to himself the form of a servant He that was the Creator and Lord of all things as Leo expresseth it would yet become one of mortal men and he that abiding in the form of God did also make man himself the very same person taking on him the form of a servant himself is made man The second part of Christs Exinanition or emptying himself was his subjecting himself to death for us This is that which the Apostle takes particular notice of in the Text Phil. 2.8 He humbled himself and how did he humble himself He humbled himself and became obedient to the death even the death of the cross It is observable that when the Apostle had spoken of Christs Incarnation or his taking our nature he calls that his emptying himself so likewise when he comes to speak of Christs sufferings he calls that his humbling himself He humbled himself and became obedient to the death This was great humiliation indeed that the Lord of glory should be crucified that the Prince of life should be killed and hung upon a tree Impassibilis Deus non dedignatus est esse homo passibilis immortalis mortis legibus subjacere Leo. He that was God impassible did not yet refuse to become a passible man and he that was immortal did not refuse to subject himself to the laws of death It was a
have crucified the Lord of glory The Apostle here speaks of Christ crucified as the Wisdom of God this the Princes of the world knew not The Rabbies among the Jews the Philosophers among the Heathen knew not this Wisdom of God they were not acquainted with it they little knew the Lord of Glory was in that body that was crucified pierced and that hung upon the Cross they were ignorant of the Divinity of Christs person the Son of God containing and keeping in the rays of his Divinity and permitting his flesh his humane nature to suffer they thought him to be but as another man Hence was it that the spectators mockt him with those words If thou be the Son of God come down from the cross they took it for granted that he that was the Son of God and God would not have suffered in that manner Now this was the great the wonderful and stupendious humiliation of this great Person that the Divinity in Christ hid it self and withdrew its lustre as it were in the time of Christs suffering that so the Humanity might suffer It is true there were some rays of his Divinity let forth in the time of his suffering that the veil of the Temple was rent from the top to the bottom that the rocks clave in sunder that the Sun was darkened and the graves were opened and the bodies of the dead Saints arose Such prodigious things as these were manifest tokens that the person that suffered was more than an ordinary person therefore the Centurion and those that were with him said Truly this was the Son of God But yet these things had not such an influence upon the generality of men but that the Cross of Christ was to the Jews a stumbling-block and to the Greeks foolishness the world hath not been able to bear the Doctrine of a crucified Saviour and as Luther hath observed There is no Doctrine of Faith that the world is so offended at as this That whereas the wisdom and love of God hath been laid out to the uttermost in this way namely to save men by the death of his Son this hath been the greatest offence to the world Such is the pride and ignorance of men that they cannot think of being saved by one that was crucified But what doth the Apostle say The foolishness of God is wiser than men and the weakness of God is stronger than men Christ crucified is the power of God and the wisdom of God 1 Cor. 1.20 24. Whatever the world thinks of it this is the way of God and the wisdom of God to save men by the death of his own Son And herein did the greatness of Christs love to us appear That he who was so great a Person would suffer the glory of his Divinity to be obscured and darkened by his death and sufferings whenas he knew what he did and suffered for man would expose him to the disesteem of men and minister an occasion to them to think the more contemptuously of him than ever they would have done had he not stooped so low to do and suffer such things as he did for their sakes Behold Vse how great the price of our Redemption was the Word the second Person in Trinity was united to the flesh that suffered as we have heard God incarnate is the price of mans Redemption God hath redeemed the Church with his own blood Act. 20. This is notably set forth by the Apostle Peter We were redeemed not with corruptible things as gold and silver from our vain conversation but with the precious blood of Christ 1 Pet. 1.18 Precious blood indeed which was the blood of that person that was God as well as man It is well observed by Cyril It was not the blood of Peter or Paul or some other particular Saint that was but a meer man that we were redeemed by but it was by the blood of Christ God-man whose name is Emmanuel God with us Tanta medicina salus requiritur Divinitas incarnata sanguis ipse Filii Dei Luther This should teach us to have high thoughts of the work of our Redemption and of the price that was laid down for it O that the work of our Redemption should cost the death of so excellent a person as the Son of God! So great aremedy so great salvation says Luther was required that Divinity it self must be incarnate and the very blood of the Son of God must be shed for us O let us labour to get our hearts more deeply affected with these things The end of the eighteenth Sermon SERMON XIX Joh. 15.13 Greater love hath no man than this that a man lay down his life for his friends THE second Use is this Vse 2 Learn from what hath been opened how great a sin the contempt of Christs person and of his sufferings is If so excellent a person as the Son of God and God was the person that suffered for us and wrought out redemption for us how great a sin then must it be to contemn this person and his sufferings The Apostle joyns both these together Heb. 10.29 Of how much sorer punishment shall he be thought worthy who hath trodden under foot the Son of God and hath counted the blood of the Covenant by which he was sanctified an unholy thing The Apostle here speaks 1. Of the contempt of Christs person Who hath trodden under foot the Son of God 2. Of the contempt of his sufferings And counted the blood of the Covenant an unholy thing So that to be guilty of the contempt of Christs person and of his sufferings must needs be the most hainous sin 1. As for the contempt of Christs person the Apostle calls it a treading under foot the Son of God 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Treading upon a thing is an argument of contempt and scorn we tread upon nothing but what is vile and of no esteem we tread upon a worm as upon a poor abject thing a thing of no account yea sometimes treading upon a thing is an argument of hatred thus we tread upon spiders and other venemous creatures Now that so excellent a person as the Son of God one and the same God with the Father that he should be contemned and looked upon as a vile person what an indignity is this which is offered to so excellent a person 2. The contempt of Christs sufferings is set forth in that other expression And hath counted the blood of the Covenant wherewith he is sanctified an unholy thing We may render it thus 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Who hath counted the blood of the Covenant a common thing To count the blood of the Covenant the blood of Christ as common blood to count the sufferings of Christ but as the sufferings of a common ordinary man this is great contempt The blood of Christ is the blood of that person who is God as well as man and therefore to reckon his sufferings but as the sufferings
him giving himself to us for these are no vain words This is my body which was broken for you setting aside those gross conceits of the Papists That the bread is transubstantiated into the body of Christ and that Christ is corporally present under the outward form of the Elements I say setting aside their gross conceits there is certainly a real though spiritual presence of Christ to every believing soul in the Sacrament The humane nature of Christ indeed is really present in Heaven therefore is it said Whom the heavens must contain till the time of the restitution of all things Act. 3. Yet the virtue of Christs body and blood is still really communicated to every believing soul Corpus ipsum in quo passus est resurrexit yea not only so saith Calvin Not only the virtue of his Death and Resurrection but that very body that dyed and rose again this is offered to us in the Sacrament these are great Mysteries indeed Now not to have a due reverence to such great and sublime Mysteries as these are to come to these as if they were common and ordinary things or to come to them with a common and slight spirit this is to come unworthily 2. Then do we come unworthily to the Sacrament when we live in the practice of any gross sin or retain the love of any sin We profess by our coming to the Sacrament that we believe that Christ dyed for such and such sins and yet we love these sins or continue in the practice of those sins that cost Christ his life this is to offer the greatest indignity to the Son of God This is as if a Traitor should come to sit at Table with the King to dine or sup with him and yet never repent of his treason but retain a traiterous mind and intention in his heart all the while When a man sits at the same table to eat and drink with another it is a sign of friendship no one would willingly admit another to his table but whom he accounts to be his friend When we come to the Lords Table we profess the highest friendship to Christ now when we profess the highest friendship to Christ and yet retain that in our love and practice that is most directly contrary to the honour and glory of Christ this is the greatest indignity that can be This is that the Apostle calls the crucifying the Son of God afresh and putting him to an open shame Heb. 6.6 What is this but crucifying Christ afresh and making Christ as contemptuous as possibly we can whenas we profess to expect salvation by the death and sufferings of Christ and yet in the mean time love harbour entertain and practise those very things we say we believe Christ dyed for Certainly every loose Christian that makes a profession of Christ and yet lives in gross open sins makes a plain mock of Christ and his sufferings for he professeth that he believes he shall be pardoned by the sufferings and death of Christ and yet he continues in the love and practice of those sins as if so be the end of Christs death were that men might continue in their sins and not be delivered from them 3. Then do men come unworthily to the Sacrament when they come without examining themselves Let a man examine himself and so let him eat of that bread and drink of that cup 1 Cor. 11.28 It is observable the Apostle opposeth this examining a mans self to his eating unworthily In the former verse he had said He that eats this bread and drinks this cup of the Lord unworthily shall be guilty of the body and blood of the Lord now he adds But let a man examine himself so then if a man do not examine himself then he eats unworthily But it may be said Object What ought a man to examine himself about Concerning two things Answ 1. Concerning his state 2. Concerning the present frame and dispostion of his heart 1. A man ought to examine himself concerning his state whether he be in Christ whether he have a right to such an Ordinance 2 Cor. 13.5 Examine your selves whether ye be in the faith prove your own selves Know ye not your own selves how that Jesus Christ is in you except ye be reprobate We must examine our selves concerning our fundamental estate whether that be good yea or no to examine what standing we have in Christ 2. We ought to examine our selves concerning the frame and disposition of our souls whether we be in a fit frame to partake of such an Ordinance We ought to examine our selves whether our hearts be strongly bent and inclined to any sin whether we be under the power of any sin this is the examination of our repentance We ought to examine what the frame of our hearts is God-ward whether the bent of our hearts be towards God and the ways of God this is the examining of our other graces Now when we rush upon the Sacrament without reflexion and examination of our spiritual state this is unworthy coming And here let us observe That the children of God themselves may in a degree come in an unworthy manner for there are several degrees of unworthy receiving They that have slight and contemptuous thoughts of this Ordinance they that live in gross and scandalous sins they are guilty of unworthy receiving in the highest degree But then they that have true grace and do not retain in their hearts the love of any sin yet if they are remiss in searching into their hearts to find out their secret corruptions and to judge themselves for them they come unworthily in a lesser degree and God may correct his own children for their spiritual remisness in this kind The Apostle tells us For this cause many were sickly and weak and many were fallen asleep 1 Cor. 11.30 that is for coming to the Sacrament without due preparation Others who grosly profane this Ordinance that come to this Ordinance and live in gross sins and continue to live and dye in them God punisheth them otherwise he punisheth them with eternal condemnation He that eateth and drinketh unworthily eateth and drinketh damnation to himself or judgment to himself as the word may be rendred The godly themselves coming in a rude and careless manner to this Ordinance may and oftentimes do bring the judgment of temporal chastisement upon themselves for not coming in a right manner to so great an Ordinance But such as are profane who come to this Ordinance and yet live in sin they eat to themselves the judgment of eternal condemnation Now to return unto what we first propounded to come unworthily to the Sacrament is one way of contemning Christs sufferings And if it be asked What is the reason of it why is the unworthy receiving of the Sacrament a contemning of Christs sufferings I answer 1. Because the Sacrament is a plain revelation and exhibition of Christ crucified This is my body which was broken