Selected quad for the lemma: nature_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
nature_n	bind_v	law_n	moral_a	2,795	5	9.5816	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A79851	A second voyce from the temple to the higher povvers. Wherein is proved that the decrees and institutions of popes and popish counsels, which have been established by the law of the land, and have been continued and confirmed throughout divers ages, by several acts of Parliament, against Jesus Christ, in the way and order of the Gospel (the same yet standing) ought by the present supream authority of this nation to be taken away. Moreover; here is shewed, some particular decrees of popes, which have beeen established by several acts of Parliament, viz. A nationall ministry, tythes, prohibiting men from publick preaching of the Gospel, unlesse elected and ordained after a popish manner, &c. All which as they are the institutions of popes, formerly confirmed by the law of the land, so now, to be abrogated. By John Canne.	Canne, John, d. 1667?	1653 (1653)	Wing C442A; Thomason E710_19; ESTC R207195	25,656	36

Vigandus to please him or his followers is will-worship Of this judgement were e in Hos 2.16 Junius f Loc. com de trad p. 421 422. Musculus g Tract theol vol. 3. p. 210. Beza h in Psa 16. Mollerus i de Polit. p. 72. Sipperus k Contr. Mon. pag. 70. Sadeel and others Now men approve countenance and give honour to the wayes of Antichrist by paying Tythes to Priests we have shewed before 4. It is vitious and superstitious to simbolize with Idolatery By the l Deut. 12.30 Lev. 18.3 Exod. 23.24 Gen. 25.2 3. Deut. 14.1 Lev. 19.17.27.28 Isa 27.9 Scriptures we are forbidden all conformity with them in any of their way order custome traditions manner of worship or religious observations And the Saints in all ages have carefully shun'd it as might be shewed by several examples It was the m Herodot in Thalco Becan in Anolog vetet nov test c. 5. custome of the Arabians and other Heathens in imitation of Dionysius that is Bacchus to round the corners of their head now this the Israelites n Lev. 19.27 might not doe though a thing indifferent as o Calv. in Levit. 19.17 Calvin observes because God would not have them to be like Idolaters 5. Superstition is committed when more estimation is had of a thing more dignity and excellency placed in it and more regard had to it then God alloweth or can stand with his will revealed in his word and so much p lib. 1. de vit ext cult oppos col 504 505. Zanchy proves by sundry instances And in this regard also paying of Tythes is superstitious because that thing is honoured and embraced which we find not in the New Testament to be lawful and thus an idol is set up Tanquam deus ex parte though not deus simpliciter 6. This may be further proved by the testimony of learned men For to have any thing common with Idolaters or to serve God after any way of theirs or to take up and make use of any of their rites orders customes observations institutions they hold it utterly unlawfull Thus have the q Tertul. de coron mil. Greg. l. 1. epist 44. ad Leon. Theod. l. 1. c. 10. August ep 86. ad Casul old Fathers affirmed so our later writers r Pareus in 1 Cor. 10.14 Bucer in Mat. 18. f. 143. Beza Tract theol vol. 3. p. 210. Calvinists ſ Cen. 4. c. 13. col 406. Chemnit exam theol Melane par 2. p. 491. Luthervns t B. Jewel upon 1 Thess 5. p. 219. Sutclief chal p. 62. Formall Protestants u Perth Assemb p. 55 56. Altar Damosc p. 539. Reformists x Bellar. de monac c. 40. de ester● sac l. 2. c. 31. sect 10. Rhem. Annot. on 1 Cor. 6.14 and 1 Tim. 6. sect 4. and in Rev. 1.1 Papists yea many y See Mr Ainsworth on Levit. 19.27 Jew Doctors and some a Taledo can 5.40 Laodec c. 38. Brac. can 32. and 73. Councels have thus concluded and the b Deor. pa. 2. caus 26. quaest 27. c. 13. c. 14. Cannon Law speaks so too Thus much for the first particular that Tythes ought not to be paid as being in it selfe superstitious The next is not to be paid to an unlawfull and Antichristian Ministry as is this nationall ministery essentially derived from the Sea of Rome Our Reasons are 1. Because this is little better then to rebel against Christ and to seek what in us lies to uphold that thing which the Lord will cast downe and utterly destroy 2. It manifesteth the great want of that zeale and love of God which all Christians should have specially here the Higher powers as to disown and abrogate all Decrees of Popes and Popish Counsels which have been confirmed by idolatrous Princes for the payment of Tythes to an unlawfull Clergy 3. To pay Tythes to this Nationall Ministry is to serve Antichrist according to that saying His servants yee are whom yee doe obey 4. To doe this it is to condemn the Generation of the righteous who have suffered under Popery and Prelacy for refusing to pay Tythes to the ministers of Antichrist and to destroy what the others built 5. So long as Tythes are payable by Law to this ministry it grieves the hearts of the righteous and gives just cause of offence to the Churches of the Saints Now wo unto that man by whom the offence cometh 6. The continuance of Tythes will be an occasion to harden the Nationall ministry in their error and sin as to think their unsanctified places are lawfull and good because the Law allowes them maintenance And indeed they have little else to say for themselves their calling being so contrary to the order and way of the Gospel 7. This paying of Tythes strengthens every where the ignorant people in their superstition and blindnesse and is a means to hinder them from the light and knowledge of a Gospel-minister For how can they otherwise but believe that their Parish Priest is sent of God and Tythes due to him so long as by the Law of the Land his ministry is onely owned and justified And he shall say Cast yee up cast yee up prepare the way take up the stumbling-block out of the way of my people Isaiah 57.14 Before I end this point I shall answer two Objections and I know no more of weight which are usually brought against the taking away of Tythes 1. That it is injurious 2. Irreligious First Injurious to alter or abolish them seeing the Law of the land hath vested and setled them in persons Ecclesiasticall and so are their right and possession We might send these pleaders for Tythes to what hath been said before as a full and sufficient Answer to this Objection Notwithstanding we shall further add 1. This is no more then what the Bishops Deans Prebends c. and before them Monks and Fryers might have said and upon as faire pretence ground and reason so that in taking away their Tythes if no injury was done them then none here the case being clearly one and the same 2. Acts of Parliament are Acts of men not Oracles from Heaven A Parliament as well as a Councel may be led by wrong principles and so err and make Lawes and Acts that are unjust We doe not think though Tythe-takers would be glad if it might be so that Acts of Parliaments are like the Lawes of the Medes and Persians that never alter But the same power that made such an Act can repeal it againe yea and is bound so to doe if it stand not with the rule of justice and equity contained in the morall Law of God and nature or sound natural reason And this is the case here viz. that those Acts and grants confirming Tythes to Priests were not agreeable to the moral Law of God nor to the Law of nature or sound naturall reason not according to the