Math. 9.36 Iohn 2.17 Ioh. 11.33.35 Mat. 26.37.38 that he ascended visibly and locally into heauen and thence that he shall come againe to iudgement l Act. 1.9.11 Why must Christ needes be true man 1. The iustice of God required it should be so that the disobedience committed in our flesh might in the same be repaired m Rom. 5.17.18.19 Hebr. 2.14 2. The reason of our adoption for it pleased the Sonne of God to take the nature of man vpon him and to become our brother and by that means to become our nearest kinsman and most neare allied vnto vs that we being made his members might be made the sons of God Gal. 3.26 and that he might haue right to redeeme and ransome vs n Ier. 32.8 Ruth 3.12.13 Hence is matter of comfort in euery kind of temptation Therfore the Apostle to the Hebrewes 2.17 4.5 saith He tooke not vpon him the nature of the Angels but the seed of Abraham and in all things became like to his brethren that he might haue compassion of his brethren 3. For the confirmation of our resurrection for in that Christ tooke on him our nature and hath raised it vp and giuen vnto it immortalitie and hath exalted it in the heauen by vertue of that communion which we haue with him shall we be raised vp at the last day and this our vile bodie shall be made conformable to the glorious bodie of Christ Phil. 3.21 1. Cor. 15.22 As in Adam all are dead so in Christ shall all be made aliue Why was neither the Father nor the holy Ghost incarnate but the Sonne 1. Because it was meet that the world should be redeemed and all things restored by him by whom all things were created or that man should be redeemed from death by him by whom he was first created and should haue bene brought vnto life eternall if he had not sinned 2. It would haue bene vnconuenient that there should be two Sonnes one in the diuine nature another in the humane nature 3. It was the eternall decree of the Father whereby he purposed to saue mankind by the Sonne a Heb. 2.10 Whether is Christ God and man diuided or ioyned together Ioyned and vnited but not diuided By what kind of vnion Not by inhabitation onely as God dwelleth in the Saints not by consent onely b Ioh. 17.21 as the faithfull are one in the Father and the Son not by mixture as when water is mingled with wine not by combination as two boords be ioyned together lastly not by composition whereby of the mixture of two things there ariseth a third but by personall vnion which the Greekes call 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 incorporation 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 because neither the whole Deitie nor any part of it is subiectiuely communicated to the humanitie of Christ but onely the humane nature was assumed of the Sonne of God into the same person Leu. 2.16 What is the personall vnion in Christ It is that whereby the person of the Sonne of God being a person from all eternitie existing did assume the most pure nature of man wanting all personall existing of it owne into the vnitie of his person and made it his owne the proprieties of each nature being preserued Or as Paul defines it Colos 2.9 Whereby in Christ doth dwell all the fulnesse of the godhead bodily Whereof we haue a manifest resemblance in the vnion of the soule and the bodie but that it doth not fit in euery point For in man from the nature of the soule and the nature of the bodie there ariseth a third nature compounded of two which is called the nature of man But in Christ there is not made a frame of one third nature of the diuine and humane but each remaines pure and vnconfounded Neither doth that similitude of the iron red hote agree in euery point because the heate and the light in the iron being hote are but qualities not the very substance of the fire And therefore the Apostle doth well call it a great mysterie of godlinesse 1. Tim. 3.16 How is this vnion made Without all confusion without all conuersion of one nature into the other indiuisibly inseparably The difference of the natures by no meanes being taken away by the vnion but rather the proprietie of either nature being saued and ioyned together or concurring into one person and one subsisting as the Calcedon Synode speaketh in the historie of Euagrius lib. 2. cap. 4. And from that time that the Word did assume our humane nature he neuer left it no not in his death And to this purpose make those verses Sum quod eram nec eram quod sum nunc dicor vtrumque Ignoras nisime stirpe ab vtraque tenes I am that I was nor I was that I am now both am I called Thou knowest me not except thou know me subsisting of both natures By what testimonies will you proue that the diuine and humane nature in Christ did ioyne together into one and the same person Esa 7.14 9.6 Luk. 1.35 That which shall be borne of thee shall be called the Sonne of God Ioh. 1.4 And the word was made flesh not by sacramentall vnion in which respect Christ was said to be a rocke not by confusion of the natures not by commutation as water is turned into wine Ioh. 2.14 but by assuming the flesh into the vnitie of the person The voice of God speaketh thus of Iesus the sonne of Marie This is my welbeloued Sonne Mat. 3.17 He that descendeth is euen the selfe same that ascended aboue all heauens that he might fulfill all things Ephes 4.10 God sent his Sonne borne of a woman Gal. 4.4 But what meanes this that the flesh of Christ is said by Damascene and Gregorius Nyssenus to be deified Not because it is turned into the diuine nature but because it is ioyned vnto it into one person and we must vnderstand it of the bestowing of gifts vpon it whereby the humane nature of Christ doth excell all creatures yet so as they do not abolish his nature Why is it necessarie that Christ should be both God and man in one and the same person 1. To the end he might reconcile God and man or that he might make God and man one 2. That he might be a fit Mediator betweene God and men by reason of his participation and affinitie with them both a 1. Tim. 2.5 Heb. 8.6 3. That he might reconcile God vnto vs by his death which if he had bene God alone he could neuer haue suffered if onely man he could neuer haue ouercome 4. That the workes of redemption performed in the flesh of the Sonne might become a sufficient price for sinne whereby God that infinite good was offended For although certaine actions do properly proceed from the diuine nature and some are done by the humane nature yet all of them do equally receiue their price and worthinesse from the diuine nature So the
senses all which truely together cannot bee deceiued vnlesse they bee withholden as in the two Disciples which did thinke the Lord to be some stranger and in Marie Magdalene which supposed that he had beene the gardiner Luk. 24.16 Ioh. 20.15 Whether vnlesse the bodie of Christ be determined to be euery where by this is it separated and pulled asunder from the Diuine nature which is eueriewhere and to which it selfe is personally vnited or hath the body of the Lord obtained that by the vnion that it should be wheresoeuer the word is In no wise because of those things which are equally vnited so as one doth not stretch further then another one cannot be in any place where the other is not but if the one doe stretch further then wheresoeuer the lesse is there also is the greater but not contrariwise as wee may see in a precious stone and in a ring Because therefore the diuinitie of Christ doth exceede the humanitie wheresoeuer the humanity is there is the diuinitie with it not on the contrarie Neither is the personall vnion a making euen of the humane nature with the Diuine or an effusion of the properties of the Diuine nature into the humane that the humane nature may haue the same properties which the diuine hath but it is such an vnion wherby the humane nature doth subsist in the person of the word so as it may be as it were a part therof neither may it subsist by it selfe or without the word But it doth not follow Epist 57. ad Dard. saith Augustine that that which is in God is euery where as God is Moreouer seing that the deitie is euery where whole not by parts not as in a place it cannot be that the humane nature which it assumed can be said to be separated any where from it although it be contained onely in it owne place so as the inuiolable truth thereof doth beare But also the bodie of the sunne and the light thereof haue betweene themselues a naturall and extreme coniunction yet notwithstaÌ„ding to what places soeuer the light doth extend it self the body doth not come to them really So also the eye the sight are verie neerly ioyned together between themselues yet the sight goeth to many things to which the eye doth not extend it selfe Finally rightly said those ancient fathers in the general council of Chalcedon that the difference of natures in Christ is not taken away for the vnion but rather that the propertie is kept of both natures concurring into one person or one hypostasis But whether did that which Christ said Ioh. 3.13 No man ascendeth vp to heauen but the sonne of man which is in heauen make the humane nature of Christ while it was in earth to haue beene also at the same time in heauen No for the Sonne of man in this place signifieth the whole person of Christ which also is the Sonne of God but the humane nature doth signifie onely one part of that person which was assumed in time of the virgin Therefore that which is spoken of this person which is not man onely but also God is amisse said to be spoken of the humane nature also For by this it should be gathered that the humane nature was before Abraham before it was conceiued in the wombe of the virgine But it is certaine that the sonne of God when hee did speake in earth was in heauen in the same manner wherein hee descended from heauen For Christ doth speake of one and the same subiect that is of the sonne of man that he descended from heauen concerning whom he said that he is in heauen But the son of maÌ„ is said to haue desceÌ„ded not because his flesh fell downe from heauen but because the diuine nature is from heauen and tooke vnto it humane flesh Therefore the sonne of man when hee was vpon earth is so said to haue beene in heauen not because the humane nature but because the diuine nature of this sonne which alwaies filleth heauen and earth was in heauen namely by the Trope Synecdoche wherby both the whole is plainely vnderstood Booke 6. cap. and a part is named of the whole saith Cassian It is not vniust to subiect the nature of Christs glorious body which is called spirituall to the lawes of common nature In no wise because the glorie abolished not the trueth of the bodie nor changed it into a spirit but altogether made it subiect to the spirit a Luk. 24.36 Acts. 1.9 10 11. 7.55 56 Aug. Whether doe the Orthodoxall Fathers when they write that the bread which the Lord did reach to the Disciples not changed in forme but in nature by the almightie power of his word was made flesh Cyprian Serm. de caena domini In prologe Psal 33 That Christ bare himselfe in his hands Augustine That the bodie of the Lord doth enter into our mouth That the tongue is made bloudie with the bloud of Christ and that Christ himselfe is seene touched broken and that teeth are fastned to his flesh whither doe they I say b Chrysost Hom. 83. vpon Math. 45. vpoÌ„ Iohn hom 24 vpoÌ„ 1. Cor. speake properly and without trope No seeing that the senses themselues and experience do witnesse the contrarie and these things cannot bee spoken properly without great and Capernaiticall blasphemy Therefore those speaches of the fathers are figuratiue whereby the name and effects of bodie and bloud are giuen to bread and wine and in like manner those things which are done in the signes are attributed to the bodie and bloud of Christ but yet although somewhat hardly and by an hyperbole to commend the worthinesse of the mysterie they doe shewe in these most expresse figuratiue and Metonimicall phrases how certaine and effectuall the mystery is of our communion with Christ or our spirituall eating of Christ namely of such sort that we may bee flesh of his flesh and bone of his bones that is that being truely made one with him wee may enioy all his goods b Ephe. 5.30 In epist vpon Ioh tractat 1 serm de Crâ—mate Epist 102 ad Euodium Otherwise saith Augustin We cannot with the hand handle Christ fitting in heaueÌ„ but we can touch Christ by faith And Tract vpon Io. 50. The bodie of Christ ascended into heauen some body may aske How shal I hold him being absent How shal I send my hands into heauen that I may hold him sitting there Send thy faith thou hast hold on him And vpon Ps 73. he writeth that he did beare himself in his owne hands after a sort namely because he did beare in his own hands the SacrameÌ„t of his bodie And Cyprian saith that Sacraments haue the names of those things which they doe signifie And the same Augustin Neither let it moue thee saith he that somtime the thing which doth signifie doth take the name of that thing which it signifieth for so the rock is called
flesh of Christ hath power to quicken because it is the flesh of that person who is God the obedience of the man Christ doth iustifie because it is the obedience of that person who is God the bloud of Christ redeemes the Church because it is the bloud of God Act. 20.28 Of the Phrases What is the communication of proprieties IT is called of the Grecians 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which cannot well be englished and it is not the effusion of the proprieties of one nature into the other or a mutuall confusion of proprieties but the attributing by Synecdoche a part for the whole or an affirmation one of the other whereby because in Christ the two natures and one person is * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Dial. 3. one thing and another and not one person and another that which is proper to one nature in Christ is attributed not to the other nature but to the person taking the name of one of the natures whether it be the diuine or humane As Theodoret saith Those things which be common to the person are made proper to the natures by reason of the identitie of the person as Damascene saith and the affinitie of the natures one towards another and because there is but one person Orthod fid lib. 3. cap. 3. 4. Or else it is such a manner of predication whereby those things which be proper to the natures are indifferently attributed to the person of Christ which is but one and that because Christ in his two natures is both to wit perfect God and perfect man to whom therefore those things are truly and indeed attributed as well which are proper to God as those which be proper to man Therefore it is well and truly said God or else the Son of God was borne of the Virgin Marie suffered was crucified and God purchased vnto himselfe the Church with his owne bloud 1. Cor. 2.8 Act. 20.28 Not simply principally and by himselfe as he is God but by accident and in another respect or in regard of another thing because that which is proper to one nature namely to be conceiued borne crucified to die is not attributed to his diuinitie but to the person taking the name of one namely the diuine nature For this word the Sonne of God or God which is the subiect of the proposition is the Concrete and not the Abstract and signifieth not the diuine nature but the person who is God and man Therefore it is well said The Sonne of man or Christ man is eternall almightie al-present saueth raiseth the dead giueth eternall life And Ioh. 31.13 No man ascendeth into heauen but he that commeth downe from heauen both in respect of the vnion seeing that the selfe same person is both man and God for as God by reason of the vnitie doth account those things which belong to the humane nature proper to himselfe saith Cyril of the incarnation of the onely begotten cap. 26 so as he is man by reason of the vnion doth account those things which belong to the diuine nature to be proper to it selfe and also because the Sonne of man is a word Concrete which signifieth the person of Christ being but one consisting of the diuine and humane nature and therefore whole Christ is euery where present but not all that is in Christ Totus Christus non totum Christi est vbique On the contrarie it is wickedly said that the diuinitie of Christ was borne of the Virgin suffered and that the humanitie of Christ is eternall euery where present almightie for the diuinitie is a word abstract which simply signifieth the diuine nature in Christ which is most free from all manner of suffering Now the predication of diuerse natures by reason of the hypostaticall vnion is of no force but in those things which are signified as whole and perfect Supposita for as we do not vse to say the bodie is the soule or the man is the soule so neither do we say this God Christ is the bodie of Christ or the soule of Christ but onely God is man Is the communication of proprieties verball onely or reall It is a true and reall speech because the person of whom by the trope Synecdoche as well the diuine as the humane either names or proprieties or effects are indifferently and equally affirmed containeth all those things in it selfe truly and indeed which do agree to very God and very man those things which be diuine as he is God those also which be humane as the same is man but not in respect of both natures but according to the one and the other as in the same place Cyrill teacheth For then should be brought in the Eutychian heresie of the confounding of the natures or proprieties and it should cease to be a speech by Synecdoche But those titles which belong to the office of Redemption are they to be attributed to the natures seuerally a sunder or to the person To the person as Christ is a Mediator Pastor Priest according to both natures although each of them in that worke retaineth his owne 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 proper efficacie or operation What is the effect of that personall vnion The bestowing of gifts whereby the humane nature in the person of Christ is adorned and whereby it excelleth all other creatures in wisedome goodnesse holinesse power maiestie and glorie which the Fathers call the Deifying of the flesh the Schoolemen Habituall grace of the communion of proprieties which is mutuall one of another and the reciprocation of the names altogether distinct How manifold is the state of Christ Twofold one of humiliation whereby he willingly vndergoing the burdens reproches and punishments of our nature did humble himselfe to the death of the crosse the Diuinitie in the meane while according to Irenaeus resting or hiding it selfe that he might be crucified and die The other of exaltation whereby after his death his humane nature did lay aside all the infirmities of his humane nature but not the essentiall properties and was wonderfully exalted aboue all creatures vnto most great honor yet not in any case matched and equalled to the diuine nature of Christ a Phil. 2.7.9 What are the doctrines contrary to this The 1. heresie of Macedonius and Valentinus who affirmed that Christ brought with him a celestiall body from heauen as also of Apelles who said his bodie was ayrie his flesh starlike and that he passed from the virgin as water from a pipe 2. Of the Manichees who fained vnto him an imaginarie bodie 3. Of Apollinaris who denied that Christ did assume a reasonanable soule but that his Diuinitie was vnto him in stead of his mind 4. Of Eunomius who affirmed Christ to be a meere man and that he was called the sonne of God by adoption and of Ebion who said that Christ was borne by humane generation 5. Of Nestorius who taught that as there be two natures in Christ so there are two persons and that
the Diuinitie is present with the humanitie by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 circumstance and combination but not by personall vnion Therfore he denied that Marie was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the mother of God or brought forth God and affirmed that man not God was crucified of the Iewes 6. Eutyches heresie contrary to the former for he taught that the humane nature after the vnion was endued with the proprieties of the Diuinitie 7. Of the Manichees who auouched that Christ had but one onely will not two a diuine and humane will 8. Of the Vbiquitaries who attribute to the humanitie of Christ the essentiall properties of the Diuinitie altogether forgetting that saying He that taketh away the proprieties taketh away the nature and on the contrary He that attributeth the proprieties attributeth the nature and of whatsoeuer the Essence cannot be affirmed no more can the essentiall proprieties thereof be affirmed of the same Of the office of Christ How manifold is the office of Christ THreefold Propheticall Priestly Kingly as it is expressed Heb. 2.10 What is his Propheticall office It is that office whereby he hath reuealed to mankind the Gospell that is the secret counsell of the Father concerning the redemption of mankind by the Word by the holy Ghost by the Sacraments both by himselfe as also by the Ministers of the word Ioh. 1.18 Ephes 4.10.11 Shew some testimonies Deut. 18.18 I will raise a Prophet like you c. Esa 61.1 He hath sent me that I should preach the Gospell to the poore Math. 17.5 This is that my welbeloued Son in whom I am well pleased heare him For this cause he is called a Pastor a Esa 40..1 John 10.11 the publisher of peace b Zach. 9.10 Ephes 2.17 the most faithfull witnesse of God c Iohn 3.32 Reu. 1.5 which office he doth execute vntill the end of the world d Ephes 4.11 What is his Priestly office It is that whereby he is Mediator betweene God and man or that whereby he hath set himselfe a Mediator betweene God and men e 1. Tim. 25. Heb. 11.24 which agreeth to no man saue to Christ alone f Heb. 2.17 How many parts be there of this office Two his satisfaction whereby he fulfilled the law g Mat 5.17 Rom. 10.4 and paid the ransome for the sins of the world h Mat. 20.28 In respect of which part of his office he is called a Redeemer i Mat. 20.28 Gal. 3.13 and a Sauior k Esa 25.8.9 53.4.5.6 Iohn 3 17 1. Pet. 2.24 and a Lambe or a sacrifice l Esa 53.7 Ioh. 1.29.36 Reuel 13.8 And his intercession whereby Christ doth instantly desire that his sacrifice may continually preuaile with God his Father for the reconciliation of his elect m Rom. 8.24 Heb 7.25 According to which nature is Christ a Mediator and a Priest According to neither of them asunder but according to both his diuine and humane ioyntly together n Gen. 3.15 22.18 Dan. 9.17 2. Cor. 5.15 Heb 4.15 9.14 1. Because he is in one and the same person the same God man 2. Because he was after the order of Melchisedech without father as man and without mother as God 3. Because he must be partaker of them both that he might reconcile God to man and man to God as Irenaeus saith It was necessary by reason of his habitation with both that he should reduce both into loue and concord and procure that God should receiue man and that man should be restored to God 4. Because the workes of the Mediator are of him that is both God and man that God might accept them 5. Because none could satisfie Gods iustice but God none ought but man Was Christ Mediator before his Incarnation He was because in the foreknowledge predestination and acceptance of God the two natures were reputed as vnited and with him things done and to be done present and to come are all one Thus Heb. 13.8 Iesus Christ is to day yesterday and the same for euer So 1. Pet. 1.20 And as the Lambe is said to be slaine from the beginning of the world Apoc. 13. so the prayers then powred out for the Church in Gods acceptation may be said to be made How doth the Sonne make intercession to the Father Surely as a person but yet as man but so as that the dignitie of those prayers issue from the excellencie of his Diuinitie which in Christ is personally vnited with his humanitie Have you any pregnant testimonie concerning the Priesthood of Christ Psal 110.4 The Lord hath sworne and it shall not repent him Thou art a Priest for euer after the order of Melchisedech who was a type of Christ a Heb. 7.3 as were Aaron also and Isaac b Gen. 22.6.9 May the Ministers of the Gospell be called Priests They may but onely in two respects 1. Because they together with others are ingrafted into Christ and so farre forth as they be true Christians 2. Because they teach the Gospel and sacrifice men themselues and offer them vp a liuing sacrifice vnto God by the Gospell For this cause Paul testifieth of himselfe that he had offered a sacrifice when he had sacrificed the Gentiles by the Gospel that they might be an acceptable sacrifice vnto God being sanctified by the holy Ghost Rom. 15.16 Yet in no place in the new Testament the name of Priest is attributed peculiarly to the Ministers of the Gospell because Christ hath no copartners of his Priesthood What is the Kingly office of Christ It is that whereby he doth according to both natures wittingly and willingly moderate rule and gouerne the whole world Shew some plaine testimonies concerning this office Psal 2.6 He hath set his King vpon his holy mountaine Mat. 28.18 All power is giuen me in heauen and in earth Ioh. 13.3 All things are giuen me of my Father And for this cause he is called the eternall King c Esa 9.7 Psal 45.7 Luke 1.33 the King of righteousnesse d Heb. 7.2 the King of Kings e Reu. 7.2 How manifold is the administration of this office It is two-fold in this world Generall or powerfull whereby he rules all creatures by his power Speciall or of grace whereby he doth in speciall manner and peculiarly rule defend and gouerne his Church and doth enrich it here on earth and glorifie it in heauen In which respect he is also properly called a King f Psal 2.9 1. Because he hath redeemed his Church which Satan had inuaded g Psal 20. 2. Because he hath vanquished the prince of darknesse 3. Because he doth defend and make blessed all those that flie vnto him Who are citizens of this kingdome and what be the lawes The citizens are Christians so called of the King Act. 11.26 1. Pet. 2.3 the lawes are the word of God the enemies are sinne Satan hell death and the rewards are the things of this
Sonne but by adoption and grace or discretiuely to the end they might be distinguished from the sonnes of men Of their office they are called Angels For their dignitie and power they are called gods and Satan is called the god of this world b 2. Cor. 4.4 so also they are called principalities and powers in heauenly places c Eph. 3.10 By the effect they are called Seraphim whom Dionysius calleth * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 fierie because they burne with the loue of God and in loue towards godly men They are called a flame of fire Hebr. 1.7 not as though they were of a fierie nature and substance but because they be the auengers of Gods anger which do like fire consume the wicked as often as need requires From the manner of appearing they be called Cherubin of this word Cherub which signifieth any figure that hath wings whether it be of a man or of a beast d Heb. 12.19 also men e Gen. 3.24 Exod. 25.18 and the men of God f Psal 18.11 Zac. 1.5.6 From their ministerie they be called Watchmen and the keepers of the world a Dan. 4.14 How many wayes haue Angels appeared vnto men 1. In sleepe or in dreames as Mat. 1.20 it is said that the Angell appeared to Ioseph the husband of Marie in a dreame b Mat. 2.13 2. In vision as namely to the Prophets and that either without a true bodie but yet not without some bodily forme or else taking vnto them manifestly true bodies c Gen. 18.2 Tertul. de carne Christi and these either created by God of nothing or else then first formed not borne of some matter that was before for they came not to die therefore not to be borne or else in some other natural bodies which had bene before either of men as in Zacharie the Prophet the Angell spake Zac. 2.3 As Augustine vnderstands it Enchir. to Laurent chap. 59. or else of other liuing creatures as when the Angell spake in Balaams asse as Zanchius vnderstands it no otherwise then the euill Angel in the Serpent spake in old time to Eua d Gen. 3.1 And diuels haue entred into certaine men and by Christ were cast out againe yea also into hogges e Mat. 8.28 They tooke not bodies from the starres or the heauens as Apelles thought nor had they proper bodies making an aâ—gelicall substance but their bodies were earthly as appeareth by the feeding feeling and washing of them as Tertul. proueth Whether might Angels when they assume vnto them true humane bodies be called men No because they did not ioyne the humane nature hypostatically vnited vnto them but they tooke vnto them and put from them those bodies as Augustine saith euen as it were a garment What became of those bodies after their ascension to heauen They being made of nothing returned to nothing or made of earth returned to earth or into nothing for it is all one with God to create of nothing and to bring into nothing Do Angels moue out of their places and dispatch their businesse within the space of time Yes indeed because they be finite spirits though not circumscribed because they are not measured by their place but limited because they are so in one place as they cannot be in another And Luk. 1.26 The Angell Gabriel was sent of God into a citie of Galile and Heb. 2.14 they are called ministring spirits sent for the seruice of the elect They are said to descend from heauen and to ascend into heauen as in Iacobs ladder Gen. 28.12 and whatsouer is done is measured with time But they be so nimble and so swift that they are moued in an vnconceaueable time and dispatch their businesse speedily And for that cause they are said to flie and to haue wings b Esa 6.2 Reu. 14.6 How many Angels be there Dan. 7.10 Daniel is said to haue seene million millions of Angels and ten thousand hundred thousands Heb. 12.22 You haue come to the innumerable companie of Angels innumerable indeed to men but easily numbred of God c Mat. 26.53 Iude 15. All which notwithstanding were created of God so many in number at the beginning and not multiplied by procreation one of another Are there orders and degrees of Angels No man that is conuersant in the Scriptures can deny but that there is some order among the Angels because order and distinction in all things is an excellent and diuine thing for some are called Cherubins other Seraphims some Angels other Archangels But this order is not from the dignitie and excellencie of the nature of the Angels as though some were more excellent then others by nature but rather from their diuerse kinds of offices Hereupon Paule Colos 1.16 calleth them thrones seates dominations principalities which is an Hebrue kind of putting the Abstract for the Concrete the substantiue for the adiectiue because God vseth their ministerie in the administration of Empires kingdoms and commonweals But that there be Hierarchies and degrees of Hierarchies among the Angels as the Papists imagine it cannot be proued by any testimonie of Scripture For he is called the Archangell not who is more excellent in nature or superior by affectation of gouernment because there as Basill saith all ambition ceasseth but he who is designed of God for the execution of some speciall hard and difficult seruice or else he that is set apart of God for a time with many other Angels for the executing of Gods commandement So those names thrones dominations powers principalities are borrowed by a similitude from mens affaires to signifie the excellencie of the Angels and their offices and how many and diuers and great workes God doth bring to passe by them d Psal 18.11 Hath each of them his proper name Those names are not proper but appellatiues or common names which are imposed vpon them for a time according to the offices which are giuen them in charge or else according to those diuerse meanes in respect of vs whereby they do execute the will of God mightily performe it and appeare vnto men As Dan. 8.16 9.21 Luk. 1.19 mention is made of Gabriel which name doth signifie the Might of God because by him the Lord did shew foorth his power Againe Dan. 10.13 mention is made of Michael which is Who is like vnto the strong God Tob. 3.19 is mention made of Raphael which name is taken from Curing or healing for he came to heale Sara and Tobie as also of Vriel 4. Esdr 4.1 Deriued of the light because he came to illuminate and to instruct Esdras Haue the Angels any knowledge of things They haue 1. natural which God put into them in the creation for they be vnderstanding spirits Whereupon Christ saith Ioh. 8.44 that some of theÌ„ did continue in the truth or in the knowledge of the truth but others did not Besides they haue reuealed knowledge or by the reuelation of God as Dan. 8.16 and
is patient toward vs deferring his comming onely vntill the number of the Elect were fulfilled and that all might haue oportunitie to conuert themselues vnto God What is the execution of predestination It is the disposing vse and application of all second causes or meanes whereby as it were by degrees God doth passe to the end of his highest decree Of how many sorts are those meanes Of two some are common as well to the Elect as the Reprobate wherein the Elect and the Reprobate are made equal others proper and speciall to either wherein the elect are discerned from the reprobate Those that are common are threefold namely the Creation of man male and female in the vpright state that is in righteousnesse and holinesse a. Gen. 1.26 Eccles 7.29 but changeable For God alone is vnchangeable 2 The Fall of man whereby he defiled himselfe with sinne most fouly b. which could not haue happened without both the ordinance and will of God that mans wretchednesse might giue place to God his mercie and the transgression of man to Gods iustice neyther yet can any thing be said to fall out without the knowledge of god or God being against it and vnwilling or vnaduisedly from whose will and pleasure not the little sparrowes are excepted Matth. 11.29 Neuerthelesse the fall of man was from his owne accord and of his owne will and therefore the fall of Adam sticketh as a fault in his free aâ—d vncompelled will wherewith he obeyed the serpent rather then god and not in the onely bare will of god whereupon it was very well said of Prudentius Nemo nocens si fata regunt quod viuitur et fit Imo nocens quicunque volens non quod licet audet No man is bad if fate doth rule and cause men liue in ill Yea he is bad who lawlesse liues and liues so with his will 3. The spreading of that sinne that is of the guilt and punishment from Adam ouer all men for no cleane thing can bee bred of an vncleane d. Iob. 14.4 from whence it commeth that all men by nature not by imitation and custome are the children of wrath Ephes 2.3 For seeing that God before he created mankind had determined both to shew a notable token of his mercie euen in the saluation of the Elect and also to declare his iust iudgement it was necessarie that eyther should bee included vnder sinne namely that he might haue mercie on them that beleeued and againe that hee might finde argument of iust condemnation in those to whom it is giuen neither to beleeue nor to vnderstand the mysteries of God Matth. 13.11 By these ruines of mankind therefore God all-wise decreed to separate some to himselfe to choose them and to bring them to life as vessels of his mercie and to leaue others in their corruption and to reserue them vnto punishment as vessels of his wrath against sinne and that with such wisedome that all the praise of the saluation of the Elect should wholy be referred to the mercie of God and the whole fault of the condemnation of the Reprobate should remaine in themselues Hovv many are the proper and peculiar meanes ordeined by God for the Elect They are sixe which being referred to Election or the Predestination of the Elect are properly the effectes thereof but compared one with an other and to the ende of Election may bee called both the causes and effects And three are like mediate causes the other three like the effects The first meanes is Christ not as the word is singly 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 consubstantiall and equall with the father in all pointes for so is he the first cause of our Election together with the father and the holy Ghost and not the second Iohn 13.18 I knowe whom I haue chosen but as hee is the Mediatour in whome the father might choose according to that saying of the Apostle In him wee were chosen before the foundations of the world were layed Eph. 1.4 and through whom being applied to the Elect God would both remit sinnes as also impute perfect righteousnesse by which name Christ himselfe beeing defined 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is called a man as it were appointed Act. 17.31 and which was ordeined before the foundation of the world but was declared in the last times for our sakes 1. Pet. 1.20 Therefore the Father hath ordeined his Sonne that he might assume an humane nature into the vnitie of his Person who suffered and was dead for the satisfaction of the Elect that hee might redeeme them from iniquitie and might rise againe for their iustification a Rom. 4.25 Finally who to the Elect which apply him to themselues through faith might be VVisedome and righteousnesse Sanctification and Redemption 1. Cor. 1.30 In choosing and appointing which meane all these miracles of God saith Bernard doe at once concurre 1. Gods iustice his mercie towards his Elect as also his iustice in punishing their sinnes in his beloued one 2. In one and the selfe same person of Christ God and man 3. One and the same woman a mother and a virgin 4. One and the same Sonne 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 without father without mother 5. And the same Christ our Iudge and Aduocate The second meane is Vocation effectuall vnto true repentance and acknowledging of Christ through the inspiration of the holy Ghost b Rom. 8.30 ad Tit. 2.14 3.7 Ordinarie in them that are of yeeres through the preaching of the Gospell Extraordinarie also as in Infants that are elected as namely Iohn Baptist in his mothers wombe c. Luk. 1.44 and in some that are deafe the meane thereof beeing vnknowne vnto vs. The third meane is faith in Christ or the applying of Christ by faith whereupon our most straight coniunction with him our vnion our incorporation or societie and ingrafting into him followeth d Iohn 15.5 17.21 Gal. 3.27.28 Ephes 3.6 1. Iohn 1.3 Rom. 11.17 From these follow three effects Iustification before God which consisteth in the imputation of Christs righteousnesse Iustification by which the Elect hauing the holy Ghost freely bestowed on them are renewed in the spirit of their minde and are made new men which by them also worketh good workes which are pleasing and acceptable to God for Christs sake and Glorification through the same Christ which very meanes Gods Predestination ordeyned from the beginning these and euery of them God of his meere grace applyeth to euery of the Elect by the effectuall preaching of the Gospell whensoeuer hee pleaseth sometime sooner sometime later euen as God himselfe doth will and decerne most wisely and most mercifully And this is the true golden chaine of Saluation and indissoluble knot which leadeth from the supreme cause thorough meanes ordeined and applied to the last effect The ende therefore cannot be hoped for without the meanes thereof neither ought th end to be separated from the meanes neyther may we omitting the meanes runne from one
ouer all things authoritie of iudging and euen the decree it selfe Dan. 7.9.10 The auncient of daies did sit and he sat in iudgement and the bookes were opened and Iohn 16.8 When the holy Ghost commeth he will reproue the world of sinne of righteousnesse and of iudgement 2. The vrgent cause in vnbeleeuing men is originall and actuall sinne against the law of god also the contempt of the gospell but in god most vpright iustice being an auenger of iniquitie and a maintainer of pietie according to the eternall decree of god himselfe 3. But as concerning the manner or exercise of the iudgement the Efficient cause and helper of iudgement or the Iudge that shal be is Christ the sonne of God as he is man or the sonne of man For truely euen he shall iudge who was iudged himselfe that the wicked may behold his glorie whose meekenesse they despised Ioh. 5.22 The father iudgeth no man but hath committed all iudgement to the sonne And ver 27. To him he hath giuen power to execute iudgement in that he is the sonne of man Act. 10 42. He commaunded vs to preach vnto the people and to testifie that euen Christ is ordained of God a Iudge of quick and dead And chap. 17 31 God hath appointed a day in the which he will iudge the world in righteousnesse by the man whom he hath appointed Ro. 2 16 There shall be a day wherein God shall iudge the secrets of men by Iesus Christ 2 Tim. 4 1. Iesus Christ shall iudge the quick dead in that his glorious cōming in his kingdom 4. 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The Angels shall be ministers who shall be present to serue Christ in the execution of his iudgement for they shall gather before him all people they shall separate the elect from the reprobate they shall carie the elect to meete Christ in the ayre they shall cast of the reprobate with the diuell and his Angels into euerlasting fire a Math. 25.31 Shall then the sonne without the father and the holy spirit be the iudge and execute that iudgment Not simply but after a sort that is according to the argumēts and reasons which in this separate him from the father because the father iudgeth no man namely a part as the Iewes thought but hath committed all iudgemēt to the sonne that is to say that he might iudge and gouerne all things by the sonne Ioh. 5.22 Or because the sonne is wisdome and trueth begotten and proceeding from the father and representing him perfectly and iudgement ought to bee performed in wisdome and trueth therefore is the power of iudgement giuen to the sonne of God by a certain appropriation that as the father worketh all things by the sonne Ioh. 1.3 for as much as he is the cunning of the father saith Augustine lib. 6. de Trinit So likewise doth he iudge all things by the sonne for as much as he is the wisedome and trueth of the father which is signified Dan. 7.9 13 where first it is said that the auncient of daies did sit and after is added that the sonne of man came euen to the ancient of daies who gaue him dominion and honour and a kingdome whereby is giuen vs to vnderstand that the authoritie of iudging is in the father from whome the sonne receiueth power to iudge Therefore is not the father said to iudge in that day for in the iudgement to come the father shall not appeare in visible forme but the sonne shall in the forme of a seruant which truely is not the forme of the father but of the sonne saith Augustine neither is it that forme of the sonne wherein he is equall with the Father but wherein hee is lesse then the father that in iudgement hee may bee cleerely perceiued of the good and bad and may performe those parts which belong to a Iudge Math. 24.30 Doth the povver of iudging accord in Christ as he is man and not as he is God onlie It doth because the father hath giuen him power to execute iudgement in that he is the sonne of man not truely for the condemnation of humane nature for nothing could let all men to be iudges but for the glorious condition which followeth the personall vnion of the diuine and humane nature because in his humane nature he is head of the whole Church a Eph. 1.12 Col. 1 18 God hath subdued all things vnder his feet 1. Cor. 15.27 and because of the entercourse of the Diuinitie to the soule of Christ it is meete for him to knowee and iudge the secrets of all hearts Therefore the iudiciall power accordeth in Christ not onely as he is God together with the father but also according to his humane nature for the agreeablenesse and affinitie betweene men and him moreouer they that are to be iudged shall behold him their iudge Who shall sit in companie vvith Christ the Iudge The Apostles and the rest of the Saints Mat. 19.28 a luk 22.30 I appoint vnto you a Kingdome saith Christ that ye may sit on seates iudging the twelue tribes of Israell And 1. Cor. 6.2 Know yet not that the Saints shall iudge the world that is the route of the vngodly and that we shall iudge the Angels meaning the wicked b Iud. 14 Reue. 20.4 which is said therfore to be 1 In as much as the Saints are the members of Christ the iudge 2 Because God hath ordained to gather all his aduersaries before himselfe and before the assembly of the Church c Ioel. 3.2 3 Because the Apostles shall iudge the world by their doctrine which they haue preached and shall approue the sentence pronounced by Christ and to his iudgement shall all the godly subscribe 4 The godly also shall iudge the wicked by the example of Faith and repentance by which meanes the Apostles faith shall take away all excuse from the Iewes for as Christ saith of the Queene of the South and of the Niniuites Luk 11 31. that they shall rise in iudgement and shall condemne that generation which was not moued at his preaching Who are they which shall be iudged All men without exception as many as haue bin since the creation of the word as it is in the Creede he shal come and iudge the quick namely whom he shall finde remaining on liue at his comming who shall be changed in a moment that is they shall bee translated from a mortall condition to an immortall and all the dead that is which are departed this life before the last day whom he will raise vp from death d Rom. 14.12 2 Cor. 5 10. We must all appear before the iudgement seat of Christ 2 And the Angels which sinned and kept not their first estate but left their own habitation are reserued in euerlasting chaines vnder darknes vnto the iudgement of the great day 2. Pet. 2.4 Iud. 6. 3 The man of sinne himselfe especially that sonne of Perdition Antichrist
of the Couenant whereby God doth testifie that he doth truely receiue the beleeuers into his Couenant How doe the Sacraments of the old and new Testament differ 1. By outward adiuncts and the circumstance of time For those continued vntill the time of Restitution for those things are said to bee 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 right which passe not with a certaine crooked turning course but are directed straight vnto their marke but these must endure vntill the end of the world or vntill the state of glorie in which all trueth shall clearely and perfectly bee made manifest and therefore there shall bee no neede of Sacraments a Heb. 9.19 2. In the manner or condition of their signifying for the Sacraments of the old Testament foretold Christ as it were to come but the Newe declare him as it were exhibited And â—â—erefore they cannot possibly both stand together seeing the time to come can neuer bee the time past and the time past can neuer make the time to come to bee more ancient b Heb. 8.13 3. In the diuersitie or qualitie of the signes or in the signes and ceremonies which differ much for there bee some signes of the Olde and other of the Newe Testament 4. In the number measure of signifying vertue and easinesse 1 For ours saith Augustine are fewer in number whereas in the Old Testament the signes were more in number because the people of Israell were as yet vnder the gouernment of the Law and therefore as children vse to bee were kept vnder more figures and rites 2. Ours were better in regard of the profit 3. More excellent or manifest not in outward shew or worldly pompe but in the vnderstanding and signification of heauenly and diuine things 4. Ours are greater in force that is of greater efficacie to confirm our faith 5. More easie to bee done for there is nothing in Baptisme or the Supper of the Lord which is hard troublesome or bloudy But Circumcision and the Sacrifices were more troublesome bloudie and required greater paines Yet all this maketh not that our Sacraments and the sacraments of the ancient fathers should not be the same in substance What Doe not the Sacraments of the old Testament differ from ours in the effect because those did only shadowe forth and signifie grace which these offer present vnto vs No because in either testament there is the same grace of Christ yea the same Christ propounded And the Apostle testifieth that the old Fathers did eate the same spirituall meat with vs and drinke the same spirituall drink 1. Cor. 10.3 I say the same with vs not as some expound it only amongst themselues which is vnderstood by the purpose of the Apostle the tenour of the text the name of Christ and the word baptizing there vsed and receiued the seale of the righteousnesse which is of faith and therfore that they were made paâ—takers of Christ which is righteousnesse to all that beleeue in all ages Rom. 4.11 And yet I grant that the sacraments of the fathers were figures pictures and shadowes of ours not in regard of the things themselues but in as much as they shadowed things more darkly and obscurely signified by them a 1 Cor. 10.6 In which respect they may be called types of ours but types not without trueth Why then doth Paul say Gal. 4.9 that the Sacraments of the Fathers were weake and beggerly and carnall Elements which were not able to sanctifie the conscience because of their weaknesse and vnprofitablenesse Heb. 7.19 9.10 1. Because he speaketh of them not simply as that they were naked elements which could offer or seale no grace but in some respect as now abrogated by Christ 2. Hee speaketh of them as he saw them receiued of the Iewes seuered from Christ and his promise that is as they are considered in themselues and by themselues seuered from the things signified in cogitation and as bare signes because the sanctification dependeth not of the signes either old or new but wholie and only of the vertue of the holy Ghost Did the Fathers eate the flesh of Christ seeing that as yet it had no beeing actually and corporally in the nature of things Yes because although it was not extant simply or actually in regard of his bodily substance yet in some respect namely as it was to bee giuen for the life of the world it was that spirituall meat which might no lesse bee eaten of them then that Lambe which was slaine from the beginning of the world is eaten now of vs by faith b Reu. 13.8 2. Because Iesus Christ is the same to day yesterday for euer Heb. 13.8 one and the same Sauiour of both Testaments In whome alone it pleased the Father to gather together all things Ephe. 1.10 3. Because those Fathers were indued with faith which maketh those things to be which are hoped for and doth demonstrate those things which are not seene Heb. 11.1 And therefore although in those ancient times the humane nature was not assumed of the word yet it was preseÌ„t to the faith of the godly in former times which did conioyne them then with Christ that should be borne So that that which had no beeing as yet in the order of nature yet neuerthelesse had euer a being by the force and efficacie of faith Therefore Christ saith Abraham sawe my day and reioyced Ioh. 8 56. But they did eate the flesh of Christ which should be giuen for them wee eate it being alreadie giuen for vs. The times are changed saith Augustine but faith is not shall bee giuen and is giuen shall come and is come in Ioh tract 4 these words differ saith hee but yet Christ is one and the same Doe the Sacraments giue remission of sins and doe they conferre or containe grace and are they ordained to iustifie and to regenerate or whether is grace tyed to the Sacraments No. 1. Because they are the signes not the causes of grace 2. That which is proper to God ought not to be bestowed on the creature 3. The subiect of grace is not the body but the spirit 4. No bodilie thing doth worke vpon spirituall things Againe not by the work done or as an efficient cause by them selues or their owne vertue working any thing or flowing from their essence as they speake in the schooles but ministerially or Instrumentally yet effectually so farre forth as they support nourish our faith Not by any inward power or vertue of their owne but by vertue of the principall agent or worker in that sence that Paul affirmeth the Gospel to be the vertue and power of God to saluation to euery one that beleeueth Rom. 1.16 1. Tim. 4.16 he saith that the remedie of the holy Scripture doth saue a man not that there is any magicall vertue in the letters syllables or sound of the words for the Apostle saith Heb. 4.2 The word profited not them beeing not mingled with faith but because
good 1 Thess 5.21 1 Cor. 14.34 And seeing the office of preaching is not permitted to women as neither the administration of the Lords Supper Why should they take vpon them to baptise Also the ancient Church appointed that baptisme should onely be celebrated in the Church or congregation of the faithfull in which place the Apostle plainly chargeth women to be altogither silent much lesse then would he that they should administer the Sacraments Therfore do they twise offend when they administer baptisme in that feined case of necessitie in that they baptise without any commandement nay against the commandement of God and besides they tye to the externall action eternall saluation which is to be sought in the death of Christ that couenant of his grace onely As for that example of Zephora who circumcised her sonne it is eyther to be held as a rash vnlawful act of a foolish and angry woman or as a singular action not to be followed For the Angell was well pleased that the child was circumcised not because she did circumcise him The same may be iudged if any priuate or lay man as they call it should take to himselfe the administration of Baptisme Heb. 5.4 No man taketh that honour vpon him but hee that is called of God as Aaron was Neither doe wee admit that case of necessitie if it compell vs to violate the orders prescribed of God For wee hold this Theoreme Not the priuation but the contempt of Baptisme doth condemne Besides the baptisme of weomen was not long since absolutely condemned in the fourth Councill of Carthage Can. 100. Neither is Augustine to bee allowed in his writing that If a Lay man vpon vrgent necessitie do baptise it is either no sinne at all or a veniall sin No doubt but care should bee had that the Infant may bee baptized by the lawfull and fit Minister but if that may not bee obtained it is to be commended to God that he may Baptise it with the baptisme of his spirit For wee must beleeue that the childrē of faithful Parents be alreadie baptized with the baptisme of the ✿ Flaminis spirit being within the Couenant VVhether forasmuch as Peter Act 10.34.48 preached the Gospell to Cornelius but baptized him not and Paule also did the same as we read 1. Cor. 1.16 Doth it follow therefore that they whose helpe the Apostles vsed in bapzing the faithfull were Lay men No indeede but they were either Euangelists or Elders or Deacons whom for the most part the Apostles tooke with them who sometimes also administred the word of whom at that time there was a great companie Moreouer they did it not of themselues but by the commaundement of the Apostles therefore it was not they but the Apostles that baptized by their hands For he that doth any thing by the ministery of others may be said in a sort to doe it himselfe And whereas Paule in the place before alledged saith that he was sent not to baptise but to preach the Gospell it is to bee taken 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or Comparatiuely For it signifieth that hee had not receiued of God peculiarly or principally the office of baptizing but of preaching the Gospell which manner of speaking we find Ier. 7.22 I spake not c. Neither doth he extenuate the dignitie and fruite of baptisme that whereas few had in Charge the office of teaching many might baptize and many might bee taught at once together but baptisme could not bee administred but in order by one and one therefore Paul who excelled in the gift of preaching was instant intēded vpon the most necessary work leauing that to others which they could more easily performe Whether may that baptisme be allowed which is administred by Hereticks or Papists If it bee meant of such hereticks as denie the principles of heauenly Doctrine and vtterly corrupt the essentiall forme of baptisme as the Arrians Somosatenians Manichaeans and Macedonians which are not sincere in the Doctrine of the Trinitie baptizing so in the name of the Father of the Sonne and of the Holie Ghost that they denie neuerthelesse that the sonne and holie Ghost are coeternall coessentiall of equal honour with the Father or that the sonne of God did truely assume the humane nature then such baptisme is not to hee ratified but to be accursed For the essentiall forme being once taken away the matter it selfe is also taken away And therfore it is to bee thought that such are not so much to be rebaptised but as that indeede they should rather be first consecrated with true baptisme who being conuerted to the knowledge of the trueth desire to bee ingraffed into the Orthodoxall Church And this agreeth with the decree of the Nicen Councill But we must iudge otherwise of the baptisme of some other hereticks as the Nouatians and Donatists who deliuered the true doctrine of the Trinitie or of Papists who are out of the way of truth in some part of doctrin who possesse the place of pastors vse the publick ministerie either by cōmon error by long sufferance or by force though they be not to bee accounted as truly called Wherein although there be many things needlesse and superstitious yet stil Christ is retained held at least in title to be the matter it selfe the chiefe head and essentiall forme of the institution and the natiue meaning without idolatry of the words of Baptisme I baptize thee in the name of the Father of the Sonne and of the Holy Ghost is retained Moreouer it pleased God in mercie to conserue a remnant of his Church in the middest of Popery it selfe euen as the Israelites continued the vse of Circumcision though they embraced a false and impious seruice of God and the vowes are made in the name of Christ and not of Anti-christ or of any Idoll Therefore that baptisme is not void but of value force for it is the Ministerie of those person but of the Church as yet couerd or hidden in popery They I graunt did sprinkle the head or body but Christ baptized inwardly And therefore such Baptisme is neither to be annihilated neither doth it require Anabaptisticall rebaptizing But forasmuch as they teach wickedly in other matters they giue iust cause why the faithfull should necessarily depart from them as it is written 1. Iohn 5.21 Fly Idols VVhether may they that are truely instructed in Christian Religion with good conscience bring their children to bee baptized of Popish Priests No. 1. It is one thing the validitie of a thing receiued another thing to seeke that is falsly and many waies superstitiously administred 2. Because we should giue no occasion by our example to approue and confirme the corruptions both of the Doctrine and of the Sacraments as also of the superstitious worship of the false and vnlawfull calling of the Ministers of Antichrist for that wee must abstaine from all appearance of euill and from communicating with the sins
should teach the way thereunto What is the vse of this Doctrine 1. The exaltation of Christ doth shewe that the Mediator was not onely a man but truely and essentially God that so our trust in him might bee the more stedfast 2. It lifteth vp our mindes to heauen and causeth vs to be there conuersant in minde and affection where our head is euen as now wee are in him out of this world 3. Wee see what wee also must hope for that are the members of Christ Both which vses the Apostle doth vnfolde Phil. 3.20.21 Our conuersation is in heauen from whence also wee looke for the Sauiour euen the Lord Iesus Christ who shall change our vile bodie that it may be fashioned like vnto his glorious body according to the mightie working whereby hee is able to subdue all things vnto himselfe· 4. Heb. 4.16 Let vs goe boldly vnto the throne of the grace of God seeing that Heb. 8.1 Wee haue such an high Priest that sitteth at the right hand of the throne of the maiestie in heauen What is contrarie to this Doctrine 1. Their errour who do call the personall vnion of the Diuine and humane nature the sitting at the right hand of God or do affirme that Christ then sat at the right hand of God when the two natures began to bee vnited or doe apply the personall vnion of the two natures for the expounding of his sitting at the right hād of his father for by that meanes they confound the Articles of our beliefe 2. The errour of the Vbiquitaries who doe cal the sitting at the right hand of God a measure of maiestie whereby they thinke the flesh of Christ was made omnipresent or to haue a beeing in all places at once which is to take away from Christ the trueth of his flesh 3. The errour of the Papists in their intercession and protection of Angels and Sainrs deceased as if these were our Patrons aduocates and Mediatours to procure grace for vs by their praiers and merits and to present our prayers to God contrarie to that that is saide 1. Tim. 2.5 There is one Mediatour betweene God and man the man Christ Iesus And contrarie to the commaundement of Christ Iohn 15.16 and 16.23 Whatsoeuer yee aske of the Father aske it in my name And to that Esay 63.16 Abraham is ignorant of vs and Israell knoweth vs not The nine and twentieth common place Of Faith Whence is Faith deriued THE Latine word Fides is deriued from fio to bee done because that is done that is spoken or promised by any man and sometimes it signifieth actiuely sometimes passiuely as in him that promiseth it signifieth to giue a mans faith or to keepe a mans faith in him that beleeueth the promise it signifieth to haue faith In Hebrewe it is called Emunah from the firmenesse and constancie of words and promises and is deriued from the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 It was true from whence commeth Amen a word knowne to euery man Let it be true or firme or ratified The Grecians call it 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from the third Praeterperfect tense Passiue 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 from whence commeth 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I am taught I am perswaded I assent and I doe plainely beleeue as Rom. 8.39 I am certainely perswaded that neither death nor life nor any thing else shall separate vs from the loue of God in Christ Iesus The verbe Actiue is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I perswade I teach as 1. Iohn 3.19 Wee shall before GOD assure or perswade our hearts The preterperfect tense meane is 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I perswade my selfe As Romanes 2.19 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 thou perswadest thy selfe that thou art a guide to the blinde And Phil. 1.6 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 I am perswaded or I doe certainely knowe or beleeue this same thing that hee that hath begun this good vvorke vvill performe it vntill the day of Iesus Christ So that the word faith 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 doth well answere his originall that it should bee a daughter 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 of a teacher or perswader Hence it is that Valla thinketh faith to bee rightly termed a perswasion or firme assent vnto a thing Hereof commeth the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 to assent to beleeue to assure as in that of Phocylides 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That is to say Beleeue not the common people for it is an inconstant rabble one while allowing another while disalowing this thing or that thing What differeth faith from opinion and knowledge That is said to bee opinion which inclyneth to one side not without feare or doubt of the trueth of the other side Knowledge ingendreth a firme assent Syllogismus scientificus but yet by the application of demonstration for demonstration is a Syllogisme which causeth knowledge But faith rests vpon authoritie and yeeldeth free assent vnto the word of God as it maketh for vs by the inspiration of Gods spirit and relyeth vpon the authoritie of GOD himselfe What are the significations of Faith in the Scripture They are diuers and those diuerse significations make diuerse kindes and sorts of faith 1. It signifieth fidelitie trueth and constancie in the keeping of promises and couenants Rom. 3.3 And so it is vsed in the cōmon verse of Sophocles 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Faith dieth vnfaithfulnesse buddeth 2. It signifieth the Doctrine of faith or the Gospell which we do beleeue for the master of the Sentences in his third booke and 23. distinction learnedly saith That faith sometime is that wherwithall wee beleeue and sometimes that that wee doe beleeue Gal. 1.22 Hee which persecuted vs in times past now preacheth the faith which before he destroyed Tit. 1.13 Rebuke them sharply that they may be found in faith 3. The profession of religion whether it be true that is to say the zeale of religion Rom. 1.8 Your faith is published throughout the whole world that is to say your profession of the Christian faith is commended or whether it be onely a fained and outward profession Iam. 2.24 A man is iustified by workes and not by faith only And this faith is called a dead faith vneffectuall and hypocriticall a Math. 17 20. b Mat. 14 3◠4. It signifieth the bare knowledge of the benefit of Christ and the perswasion of the whole word of god as in the same place of Iam. 2.24 And so the Diuels beleeue and tremble Iames. 2.19 This is called an Historicall faith common both to the godly and the vngodly and therefore groweth onely from the light of nature from arguments which mans reason is able to comprehend without any peculier enlightning of the holy spirit 5. It signifieth a knowledge assent and perswasion of the grace of God but yet brickle and vnconstant as not taking roote in Christ as it is taught in the parable of the seed Luk. 8.13 But it is as a tree which being not
compulsion nor by this necessity proceeding from God but from the voluntary corruption of man for no man is an offence to another against his will or through inconsideration but of purpose with deliberation Therefore though it be necessary that offēces come yet woe vnto the world because of offences VVhat are the ioint causes or by how manie meanes is an offence giuen Foure First By false doctrine and false worship such be heresies errors worshipping of idoles superstitions the traditions of men whereby the weake are withdrawne from the simplicity of the word 2 By word or speach and that either filthy cursed or blasphemous 3 By life and behauiours repugnant to the law of god such are filthy gestures hainous offences and euill examples in the abuse of Christian libertie whereby the weake are discouraged from christianity but for the most part the offences giuen by doctrine do more harme then the offences by manners because they worke more closely presently assault the faith but these other doe sooner appeare and doe lesse hinder our faith as in the beginning the deuill gaue Eue a deadly wound putting into her a false perswatiō a Gen. 3.2 And Solomons idolatrie brought forth the worshipping of idols for a long time after VVhat punishment is appointed for the authors of this scandall Christ Math. 18.17 doth threaten that lamentable sentence or horrible woe against them woe be vnto the world because of offences and. verse 6. he pronounceth that it is better for that man by whome the offence is giuen that a milstone being hanged about his necke hee should be cast into the bottom of the sea VVhat is an offence taken That which men take vnto themselues from the doeings or sayings of other men either from true doctrine and the outward forme of the Church or else in generall from any other things whatsoeuer But in speciall some speach of ours purpose or deede which is godly iust and of it selfe honest or at least not done wickedly and vnseasonably By meanes whereof notwithstanding some mā doth iudge ill of vs but without cause either of some frowardnesse ill will or a certaine sinister spitefulnesse of the minde or else vpon error and taketh it as an occasion of offence How manifold is an offence taken Double either from man or from the deuill from man which also by deuision of Accidents into the subiects is double of the wicked and of the godly The scandall of the wicked is of worldlie men as of the wise men of this world and of hypocrites who are offended 1. at the poore estate humility and crosse of Christ in our flesh assumed 2 At the absurdity imprudently conceiued of the nouelty simplicity of the doctrine of the gospell and preaching of grace whereby we are taught that all men being by nature sinners subiect to the wrath of god are iustified and saued thorow grace or by faith alone in Iesus Christ and by the article of election predestination and the mortifying of the old man 3 By the life and actions of the godly whereby they imagine themselues to be controlled in the free vse of the thinges of the worlde 4 Lastly by the crosses and persecutions which goe hand in hand with the profession of the gospel which offence because it springeth from the malice of them that are offended and from their spite it is called the offence of the Pharises of which Math. 15.12 The discples said to Christ dost thou not know that the pharises are offended hearing this speach of thine So Christ and the gospell were to the Iewes an offence taken and to the Grecians foolishnesse 1. Cor. 1.23 And the stone of offence And the rocke of offence to the twoe houses of Israel a. Esa 8.19 Luk. 2.34 1 Pet. 2.7.8 to witt by accident and priuatiuely as Christ being despised and reiected is the author of iust condemnation whereas in truth and by himselfe but to the elect he is the way the truth and the life and the fountaine of all good Concerning this we must obserue the warning of Christ Blessed is he that is not offended in me Math. 11.5 So the sermon of Christ concerning the eating of his flesh was a scandall to the Capernaites b Ioh 6.41 57 60 So the Iewes were offended with Peters going in to the Gentiles c gal 2.12 So the righteous actions of the godly are an offence to the wicked d Psal 56.6 7 So the disciples of Christ pulling the eares of corne are an offence to the Pharises e Math. 12.2 So many are offended by reason of the iarres which follow the preaching of the Gospell to condemne it VVhat are the causes of this offence taken The principall efficient cause is the iust prouidence of God which doth decree and execute this although men stumble through their owne malice as it is written Behold I put in Sion a stumbling stone and a rocke of offence The second cause is Satan who prouoketh the wicked to take all things in the worst parte The instrumental cause are the men themselues who are offended at the godlinesse of others The causes assisting are the blindnes of mans reason the corrupt iudgment of the world the affections of the flesh enuy malice rash curiosity the neglect of the holy scripture bad opinions conceiued the perswasion of a mans owne righteousnesse the desire of gaine and keeping credite hating to be instructed occasions are the confessing and preaching of sound doctrine the behauiours life deeds and crosses of the godly the condition of the truth As for the forme or manner it is expressed in diuers examples Is this kinde of Scandall to be auoided No but not to be regarded according to the comaundement of god Deut. 33.9 He that shall say to his father or to his mother I know you not he that shall not acknowledge his brethren and his sonnes these do keepe thy law o Lord. And according to the rule of Christ concerning the Pharises which were offended at his word Math 15.14 Let them alone they are blinde and the leaders of the blinde that is neglect them neither take care for offending them and of the Apostles Acts. 5 29. we must obey god rather then men And of Bernard It is better an offence should come then that the truth should be forsaken Besides we must preferre the first and second commaundement before all the duties to men according to the example of Elias against Achab a. 1. King 18 18 and of Paule against Peter those which plaid the Iewes b Gal. 2 3.4 5 11.14 What is the offence of the Godly taken Which is taken only of such as be yet weake in the Church or not wicked but is greedily taken of them that be more malicious that they may make the doctrine of the gospell doubtfull and vncertaine to the simple sort either by the calamities of the church the punishments of the innocents the heresies dissentions which
together in act circumscribed and not circumscribed because these things are contradictorie But contrariwise we retort the argument drawne from omnipotencie God is omnipotent therfore he can bring to passe that we being in earth may partake of the true bodie of Christ being in heauen and therfore we do so though we are vpon earth and so need not a corporall Manducation Is it true which our aduersaries take for granted that Christ when he appeared to Paule in his iourney Act. 9.17 and stood by him in the Castle Act. 23.11 was in bodie both in heauen and on earth together No For it was a heauenly vision as it is said Act. 26.19 Which helpeth nothing the presence of the bodie of Christ in earth For Christ is said to haue talked with Paule not placed in earth but from heauen eyther without a corporall voyce the Lord powerfully imprinting into him the conceipt of speech or by a voyce framed from heauen which came to his cares like thunder And Act. 23.11 Noe man but seeth that it was a nocturnall vision which appeared not to his eyes but to his minde eyther in waking or dreaming But yet for some peculiar and extraordinarie apparitions wee must not depart from the vniuersall rule of faith whereby Christ is beleeued to possesse heauen in his bodie and there to remaine vntil the end of the world Yet notwithstanding we must not denie but that Christ in euerie moment is wheresoeuer and howsoeuer it pleaseth him according to his Maiesty not corporally but spiritually Is hee a manifest denier of the power of God which denieth that by his absolute power he doth bring to passe that the bodie continuing in his propertie may be in many places after another and diuers maner Hee is not yea rather because we denie that God can bring it to passe wee openly affirme the omnipotencie of God For seeing God is so ommipotent and effectuall that he is not contrarie to the truth he can in no manner of wise bring to passe that a thing may together be and not be that the same bodie may remaine in his propertie that is to retaine his dimensions and circumscripton and be the same bodie together and at one time present in many places and separated by a long space betweene Rightly therefore Cyrill Wilt thou grant also to another nature not diuine Book de Trin. 5 besides the diuine nature that it can fill all things and passe through all things and follow in all things No verily Is the contradiction taken away in the diuersitie of respects and of these names if it be said that the bodie of Christ in truth and verie deed is in heauen according to the naturall properties of a true bodie circumscriptiuely locally visibly and after a naturall manner and that it is by the power of God also in truth and in verie deed in many places or euerie where or in the supper but sacramentally inuisibly supernaturally illocally after a celestiall and miraculous manner and if it be said that the nature of Christ in the propertie of his nature is circumscribed and visible but in regard of the vnion vncircumscribed and inuisible In no wise because these distinctions or manners cannot bee prooued out of the scriptures Moreouer all such manners doe not alwaies excuse a contradiction as if one say that the bodie of Christ was dead according to the manner of death and at the same time was aliue according to the manner of life Finally contrarie modi or manners which doe destroy one another when they are put in doe not take away but confirme a contradiction But yet such a diuerse respect cannot bee graunted wherein one and the same thing may bee the same and bee not the same in trueth which is the first lie of the aduersaries neither is a manner to be feined which may take away the essence of a thing Wherefore seeing the bodie of Christ assumed is in act organical Physicall tempered together disposed and finite in his parts it cannot bee in act in many places by any meanes not Organicall vndisposed infinite or in manie planes although it bee adorned with vnspeakeable glorie because God is vnchangeably true neither will hee that an affirmation should be a negation against a principle vnmoueable Quodlibet est aut non est that is euery thing is or is not Whether as the eye hath not the force of seeing in it selfe but by reason of the vnion with the soule and receiueth it in the vnion so the flesh of Christ receiueth not those proper things in it selfe but hath them truely and really in that wonderfull vnion No because things vnlike and in kinde diuers are compared together For the eye is so ordained by nature that it is a naturall proper and necessarie instrument whereby the sensitiue life doth exercise and accomplish her facultie of seeing and without which it cannot bring forth this faculty into effect But the flesh of Christ is so ordained by nature that it is a naturall proper and necessarie instrument whereby the diuine nature alone may shewe forth his omni presence and inuisibilitie and so necessarie that without it the diuine nature in the Act it selfe cannot be omnipresent norinuisible Furthermore the flesh of Christ is not considered in it selfe or out of the vnion seeing that that flesh neither is nor hath beene nor euer shall be out of that vnion Moreouer one nature receiueth not any contrarie thing or diuers in it selfe 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is it selfe but it is a thing diuerse farre vnlike to be circumscribed in a place and to be euery where Otherwise wee should say that the humane nature of Christ hath a beginning in it selfe and hath not a beginning in the vnion that it is created in the proprietie of it owne nature and that it is not created in the vnion That it is lesse then the Angels in it owne nature but in the vnion equall to the father finally that it is dead in it selfe and not deade in the vnion or for the vnion or for the cause and respect of the vnion Must wee altogether abandon mans reason and the principles of Philosophie in those things which are affirmed concerning the body of Christ No so farre forth as mans reason beeing made spirituall after Regeneration beareth true witnesse to the creatures and affirmeth true principles concerning things proper to mans bodie For it is written Be yee not like a horse or like a mule which vnderstand not Psal 32.9 besides God is the author of all trueth in Logick Ethicks and Physicks Moreouer Christ after his resurrection appearing to the Disciples when hee would proue his owne bodie to be substantially present he reasoneth from his adioyned visibilitie and palpability and appealeth to the verie senses of the Disciples a Luk. 24.36 Like as from all the accidents of the bread of the Eucharist it is rightly gathered that it is the substance of bread by experiment of all the