Selected quad for the lemma: nature_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
nature_n	assume_v	humane_a	union_n	3,291	5	9.5119	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A15824	A modell of divinitie, catechistically composed Wherein is delivered the matter and method of religion, according to the creed, ten Commandements, Lords Prayer, and the Sacraments. By Iohn Yates, Bachelour in Diuinitie, and minister of Gods word in St Andrewes in Norvvich.	Yates, John, d. ca. 1660.; Yates, John, d. ca. 1660. Short and briefe summe of saving knowledge. aut; Richardson, Alexander, of Queen's College, Cambridge.	1622 (1622)	STC 26085; ESTC S103644	253,897	373

a separation of his two natures though body and soule parted for a while Wee must therefore hold that neither the God-head is at any time changed into the manhood nor yet the manhood into the God-head Luk. 24.39 1 Pet. 4.1 Furthermore we are to learne that Christs humane nature is like vnto ours in all things but in sinne and manner of subsisting Phil. 1.7.8 Heb. 2.17 and 4.15 Q. What is the personall vnion of these two natures A. Whereby the nature assuming and nature assumed make one Messias or Mediator betwixt God and man the nature assuming is infinite and his action is incomprehensible yet this we may safely affirme that the second person in Trinitie immediately assumes and then the God-head so that our flesh is first taken by a person and hence our nature assumed is without all personall subsistence in it selfe and is inseparably conioyned with the divine nature and doth wholly subsist that is the whole manhood subsists in the whole God-head for whole God is in heauen whole God is on earth because the divine nature hath no parts and so our flesh is not in a part of the God-head but wholly in the whole And yet not euery where with the whole For the assumption is not by way of extension as a forme extends his matter but of ineffable vnion humane nature hauing no standing of it selfe but by the divine nature It is locally circumscribed as hauing quantitie and consists as a finite thing within the limites of essence being truely compounded of matter and forme And yet it hath neither parts nor passions essence or accidents which are not assumed vnto the divine nature when body and soule were asunder and locally in diverse places then were both of them inseparably knit vnto the God-head Ioh. 1.14 Colos 2.9 The Papists say Christ was Mediator according to his humane nature which is contrary to this personall vnion for as the person assuming giues the nature assumed subsistence so action and it is not able to doe any thing without it Therefore according to both natures Christ redeemes and the worke is not to be devided Furthermore we say the second person assumes not the first for he is principally offended not the third for he is to testifie of the reconciliation yet such is the vnion that wee come by it both to the Father and the Spirit For immediately the second person assumes then the Deitie and hauing fellowship with that wee haue it also with the Father and Spirit Now if the divine nature should first assume then would the action be the Fathers or if the Spirit then should the Father haue two Sonnes c. CHAPTER XXIII Of Christs humiliation Question VVHat are the parts of Redemption Answere Two His humiliation and his exaltation Psal 110.7 Isa 53.12 Rom. 8.34 Eph. 4.9.10 Phil. 2.8.9 And the reason is giuen by S. Luke chap. 24.26 Christ must of necessitie both suffer and be glorified c. Q. What is his humiliation A. Whereby he was made subiect to the iustice of God to performe whatsoever the same might require for the redemption of man Rom. 10.4 Gal. 4.4 Heb. 7.22 Christ became our Suretie and so bound himselfe to pay all our debts Papists say Christ is a Mediator betweene himselfe and vs but they are ignorant how a sinne may more peculiarly be against one person then another as the manhood it selfe is more properly vnited to the second person then any other Christ doth principally mediate betwixt the Father and man and yet the justice of the whole Deitie and consequently of euery person is satisfied Q. What did the iustice of God require A. Two things Satisfaction for the trespasse or payment of the forfaiture and righteousnesse answerable to the law for the payment of the principall The one frees vs from death the other brings vs to life By the first wee are made no sinners by the second wee are made iust The law stands still in force for death and life sinne and die is by Christs death satisfied doe and liue is by his life fulfilled Dan. 9.24 Christ reconciles to God by suffering and of enemies makes vs friends but wee neither deserue nor can iustly desire any thing vntill he bring his owne righteousnesse for vs. Rom. 4.25 Q. Wherein consists all this A. In the conformitie of himselfe both for himselfe and vs to he image of God and the law its performing perfect obedience thereunto as also in vnder going for his such death and dolors as were requisite As Adam was made in the image of God and bound to keepe the law for himselfe and vs so Christ must be conformed in nature to Gods image and in all his actions to his Pathers will He is holy and iust both for vs and himselfe but his sufferings are onely for vs and not himselfe And here two questions arise first whether his originall righteousnesse and actiue obedience were onely for himselfe his passiue onely for vs and sufficient for our saluation It may be obiected by his bloud we are saued c. Ans Here a part is put for the whole for we are saued as well by his life as by his death and they are both of them both actiue and passiue Christ suffered in being concelued and he was no looner made man made vnder the law but he began to pay for vs for as Adam dyed as soone as he had sinned so Christ suffered as soone as he became our suretie therefore his whole life death are for vs and our payment He that dies by the law is not acquitted or iustified but condemned He that makes false Lature may be pardoned or punished but not iustified Euery law acquits when men are found to haue done nothing against it but it moreouer rewards when subiects are found to performe the vtmost required by it Christ therefore is to suffer and satisfie but that will not iustifie vs except further be found in him that he hath done nothing against the law nay also that he hath to the height and ful measure fulfilled it We haue need both of originall and actuall righteousnesse to bring vs to heauen and out of him it is not to befound The second controuersie is about the second death which is the punishment of the damned and therefore not fit for Christ to suffer Concerning this we acknowledge that Christ did not neither could truely and properly suffer the second death which is a casting out and banishment from blessednesse and the fauour of God God forbid that any Christian should haue such a thought of our Lord Christ who euer since his conception was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and could not be other for any moment of time He and his Father were neuer separated in loue and affection because Christ even in vnder going of this obeyed his Father yet were they for a time separated in apprehension and representation God punishing his Sonne iustly for vs in as much as he stood in our stead

Hence Christ was not borne sinnefull because of the holy Ghosts separation not onely of the seed of Mary but likewise of Mary from Ioseph Mary her selfe could not be without sinne because propagated this is onely the priviledge of her sonne who of vnholy seed by the secret operation of the Spirit and separation of a part from the whole tooke that which was most pure and holy CHAPTER XXII Of Redemption Question HItherto of mans Apostasie what is mans Anastasie or returne to God againe Answ It is the ioyfull reduction or bringing of man againe into favour with God Rom. 5.8.9.10 1 Thess 5.9 Here we need not doubt vnder Christ without feare of premunire or offence to the crowne and dignitie of the iustice of God to affirme of faith in the merites of our Saviour that its Gods strong arme and power to the enliuing and sauing of euery soule So that now with a Non obstante we may looke vp to God in Christ and without the law of workes receiue a better estate by the Gospell then ever we inioyed Q. What are the parts of our rising againe A. Two Redemption and application Ioh. 3.14 There is a lifting vp of Christ on his Crosse and a beleeuing in him for life ver 16. Gods loue in giuing his sonne for vs and then application of him by the Spirit Q. What is Redemption A. A satisfaction made vnto the instice of God for man by a Redeemer Rom. 3.24.25.26 And here comes in the speciall worke of the second person thus farre wee haue gone with the Fathers worke both in Creation Providence and now in a speciall manner the Sonne doth manifest himselfe for the Father can goe no further without him How is it wrought A. By a Mediator who doth intercede betwixt God and man the Father is offended and cannot be reconciled without some mediation All was made vnholy when the first Adam sinned It is the second Adam that must rectifie all Moses the servant built the house with a partition wall in the midst Eph. 2.24 Christ the sonne pulled downe that Screene and cast all into one bringing both Iew and Gentile into favour with God The worke therefore is more properly a mediation then a redemption or a redemption by mediation 1 Tim. 2.5 Q. Who is the Mediator A. Iesus Christ both God and man who yesterday to day and for ever is the Saviour of mankinde They that were yesterday yea from the worlds beginning were saued by him alone so they that liue to day or shall come afterwards into the world doe all expect for salvation by him Heb. 13.8 He redeemes because we are captiues he mediates because there is a controversie betwixt God and vs and that continually because Gods wrath would ever be breaking forth except our Mediator stood in the gap for vs. Q. Why is Christ called Iesus A. Because the end of his mediation was to bring vs to saluation Moses brings the people into the wildernesse but Ioshna a type of Christ into Canaan Moses dies in the desert and sees not the promised land shewing plainely that the law can lead vs into desolation but Christ and the Gospell must bring vs out of it Zerubbabel a Captaine of Gods people and a type of the law carries them out of captivitie so the law when it sayth Doe and liue shewes plainely how man may be saued but Ioshua a priest or sacrificer must be ioyned with him or else in Canaan it selfe the people were to be cast out againe These were liuely types of Christ by whom alone wee are brought to heaven and confirmed in the happinesse of it Math. 1.21 1 Tim. 2.5.6 Q. Why Christ A. As Iesus is the proper name so this is the name of his office and it signifies his anointing Kings Priests and Prophets were all anointed as types of Christ to come Henee the name Messias in whom the materiall anointing ceaseth he receiued the thing signified by it aboue all his fellowes Psal 45.7 Luk. 4.18 Act. 4.27 and 10.38 Heb. 1.9 1 King 19.1 Lev. 8.12 1 King 19.16 Both the Testaments tell vs of Christ bequeathed and teach vs that hee was that Christ that is described in both hence in the old Testament we haue Priestly Princely and Propheticall Bookes so in the new the Gospels are regall shewing that Christ was that King of the Iewes The Epistles are more sacerdoticall beginning for the most part with prayers and supplications And the Revelation of Saint Iohn is meerely Propheticall And all these are necessary in Christ to make him a complete Saviour we stand in need of them all and of their daily exercise Q. Why should Christ be a Prophet A. That he might reveale vnto man the will of his Father and be the onely Doctor of the Church Luk. 4.18 Christ was anointed to preach the Gospell Deut. 18.15.18 Math. 21.11 Luk. 7.16 Q. Why a Priest A. That he might make a full ationement with the Father for man and reconcile vs daily vnto him both by his expiation and intercession Math. 20.28 Luk. 4.18 1 Ioh. 2.2 4.10 Psal 110.4 Zech. 6.13 Heb. 5.6 7.3 Q. Why a King A. That he might rule and governe them whom as a Prophet he had taught and as a Priest he had reconciled to his Father subduing his and their enemies and procuring them peace and prosperitie continually Psal 2.6 Math. 21.5 Rev. 17.14 19.16 Q. Why God and man A. That he might redeeme vs by paying a price sufficient as likewise being Mediator he might communicate with both natures which were by him to be reconciled that being inferior to his Father as touching his manhood and superior to man as touching his God-head he might the better bring both together againe Gal. 3.20 Phil. 2.6.7 1 Tim. 2.5 Heb. 8.6 and 9.15 and 12.24 Hence in Hebrew the name Immanuel and in Greeke Theanthroopos Isa 7.14 God-man or God with vs and in our flesh Q. What is here to be observed A. Two things The distinction of these two natures and their personall vnion Io. 1.1 The word was God v. 14 The word was made flesh Truely God truely man and yet but one Mediator Q. What is the distinction A. Whereby the two natures remaine distinct in him both in themselues and their properties Math. 28.20 Vbiquitie is proper to the divinitie of Christ and not his humanitie Ioh. 16.7 Absence proper to the humane nature 1 Tim. 3.16 God manifested in the flesh not confounded with it 1 Pet. 1.18 Dying and quickning are proper to the distinct natures of Christ Yet this we are to vnderstand that there is a tropicall communion of properties in regard of the whole wherein these parts are vnited as God dies that is he that is both God and man The people thought Christ did contradict himselfe and the Scriptures Ioh. 12.35 Messias abideth for ever and thou sayest he dieth c. Both these are true Messias liueth when he dieth and dyeth when he liueth There was never