passed his substaunce into the flesh begotten but because in miraculous sort hee formed in the Virgins wombe of her substance the body of Christ so that it should not be contaminated or polluted with original sinne For neither could Christ bee in that sort conceiued by the holy Ghost as that his fleshe shoulde issue from the spirits substance and that for these causes 1. Because if this were graunted then were he not borne man of the Virgin or propagated of the Virgins substance 2. Because God is not changed into flesh 3. Because the Word tooke the flesh but was not changed into it 3 Obiection Jn God are not two natures Christ is God Therefore there are not two natures in him Aunswere Meere particulars doe enforce nothing For if the Maior bee taken vniuersallie it is false whosoeuer is God in him are not two natures this generall proposition is false The Maior therefore is true as touching God the father and God the holy Ghost but not as touching God the sonne incarnate Replie 1. But nothing can bee added vnto God by reason of the great perfection and simplicitie of his nature Christ is God therefore the humanitie could not be added vnto his diuine nature Aunswere Nothing can be added to God whereby his essence may bee changed and perfected But in that God the Word ioined the humane nature vnto him personallie there came no chaunge or great perfection thereby to the Word which tooke it but to the nature which was taken Replie 2. Humane nature cannot come vnto him who dwelleth in the light that none can come vnto 1. Tim. 6.16 Aunswere This is true if so God doth not assume and take it vnto him Replie 3. But it is ignominious for God to be a creature Christ man is God Aunswere The chaunging of the Godhead into a creature woulde haue beene ignominious and reprochful vnto the Word but that the godhead shoulde bee vnited vnto a creature is is most glorious vnto god as who by that meanes hath demonstrated and made knowen his infinite both goodnesse and wisedome and iustice and power to the whole world 2 Whether Christ be one person or mo IN Christ are two perfect natures whole and distinct and double properties also and operations naturall but one person which subsisting in both these natures diuine and humane is truely designed by the concrete termes or voices of both natures For it was requisit that one the same should be Mediator both by merit by power But they who make two persons make also two Christs with Nestorius the one a man passiue and crucified the other God not crucified and onelie assisting the man Christ by his grace 1 Obiection Jn whom are two things which in themselues make two whole persons in him also are two persons But in Christ are two things which make two whole persons namely the Word which is by it selfe a person subsisting from all eternitie and the bodie and soule which beeing vnited make likewise a person Therefore in Christ are two persons Aunswere We denie that part of the Maior to wit That the bodie and humane soule doe as in other men so also in Christ concurre to make a created person of the humane nature and diuers from the person increate and eternall of the Woordc For albeit the humane nature in Christ compounded of a bodie and a reasonable soule is an indiuidual and particular or singular substance as being from other indiuiduals of the same nature distinguished by certaine properties and accidents yet neither was it or is it a person or subsistence For first A person is that which is not onelie a particular or singular thing but also it selfe consisteth and subsisteth in it selfe and by it selfe not susteined in or of anie other But CHRISTS humane nature now from the verie first beginning thereof dependeth and is susteined by the person of the Word For it was at once both formed and assumed of the Word into vnitie of person and made proper vnto the Word before and without which assumption or personal Vnion it neither was nor had beene nor shoulde be so that this Vnion being dissolued and loosed it must needes follow that that this flesh and this soule should be brought to nothing Therfore Christs humane nature hath not any subsistence or person proper vnto it selfe Secondly Jt belongeth to the nature or definition of a person that it be an indiuidual incommunicable and also no part of another But the nature which the Word took and assumed belongeth to the substance of one Christ a part also of whom it is after a sort Therefore in it selfe and by it selfe it is no person Reply That which appertaineth to the substance of a person and is a part thereof cannot be a person The word appertaineth and belongeth to the substaunce of Christ and is after a sort a part of him as well as the humanitie Therefore neither shall the word be by this reason a person Ans The Maior proposition if it bee vnderstood simplie or vniuersally is false For a reasonable soule existing in the bodie is not a person but a part of an humane person which the soule together with the bodie doth make yet notwithstanding the same soule being loosed from the bodie is a person by it selfe not that compound and mortall person whereof it was a part that is an humane person but a person most simple and immortall such as are the Angels because it subsisteth out of the bodie by it self neither is part of another So may it be said of the Word if it be constred aright with indifferencie that the Word in it selfe and by it selfe is not the whole person of Christ or the Mediatour as he is Christ and Mediatour that is is not that whole thing which is Christ who is not onely God but also man and yet is in it selfe and by it selfe the perfect and whole person of the Godhead truelie subsisting before the flesh was that is the onelie begotten sonne of God For this selfe same person existing in it selfe from euerlasting and remaining for euer most simple and vncompound is by the assuming of humane nature made in time after a sort compound that is the Word incarnate Wherefore in respect of the person considered in Vnion or incarnate the Word is rather considered as a nature and both it selfe and the humane nature may be called as it were the parts of whole Christ are so called also of many of the auncient Fathers which were sound in faith not that the flesh assumpted did adde any part to the subsistence of the Word or as if of the Persons of the Word and the humane nature as being vnperfect parts was made another perfect person of a certaine third Essence consubstantiall with neither of those natures of which it is compounded but because the person of the Word altogether one and the same which before the flesh was taken consisted in the diuine nature onely doth now after the taking
the flesh taken or assumpted is truely vnited both to the person and to the nature of the Word For the person is not any seuerall thing or reallie differing from the essence but is the essence it selfe yet is it well saide that the flesh is vnited to the Word in person only and Likewise that the person onely of the Word is incarnate The reasons hereof are 1. Because not the Father nor the Holy Ghost were incarnate but the sonne onely 2. Because the first and neerest terme of this vnion is the person onely of the Word assuming and taking the flesh but not the Godhead For the person onely is proper vnto the Word the essence of the Godhead is common to him and the same with the Father and the Holy Ghost This is plainely taught by the 6. Toletan Councel Cap. 1. in these wordes The son onely tooke the humanitie in singularity of person not in vnitie of diuine nature that is in that which is proper vnto the son not which is common to the Trinitie And Rusticus in his dialog against the Acephalists Not god the Word by the diuine nature but the diuine nature by the persō of god the Word is said to be vnited to the flesh And a little after Wherefore both God the Woorde and his nature is incarnate hee by him selfe in that he is himselfe his nature not so but by the person God the Word then as touching himselfe is vnited to the flesh for he is made one person and one subsistence with the flesh but as touching his nature hee is conioyned rather than vnited because there remaine still two natures Wherefore either foule shamefull is the follie or notorious the malice and slaunder of certaine smatterers that of this verie orthodoxall and sound position not of the schoolmen onely but of Councels also and auncient Fathers The flesh is vnited to the Word in person onely or according to subsistence and this onely maketh the proper difference of personall vnion they inffer that by this meanes the diuine nature of the Woorde is drawen away from the personall vnion But let them againe and againe looke vnto it least by that their reall communicating of the essentiall properties of the Godhead which are the verie diuine essence common to the sonne with the Father and the holy Ghost which communication they will haue to bee the personall vnion which they define by it they ouerthrowe as well the eternall Godhead of Christ man as also the manhood it selfe and withall plainlie incarnate the whole Trinitie That then one and the same Christ is and is called truly and reallie the verie eternall God immense omnipotent creatour and true naturall man finite weake subiect to passions and sufferinges and a creature the onely cause is the vnitie of person subsisting in two natures perfect whole and reallie distinct diuine and humane For euerie indiuiduall and person is denominated or named of the natures or formes and their properties and operations cōcurring or subsisting in it Wherefore seeing in the same indiuiduall person of the Word doe truely subsist and belong to the substance of one Christ these two most diuers natures vnto one and the same Christ of which soeuer nature he be called do agree are affirmed of him all the attributes and properties both diuine and humane but after a diuerse manner For the attributes which agree to Christ in respect of the personall vnion are of two sorts some are attributes or properties of the natures others of his office The naturall attributes are those which are proper to ech nature whether the same bee essentiall belonging to the essence of the thing or which necessarily followe accompanie it without which the nature can not consist or accidentall which may bee away and wanting without the destruction of the nature The essentiall properties and perfections of the Godhead are to be eternall vncreate immense euerie where present not to be circumscribed in place omnipotent omniscient and the like which are the verie essence of the Godhead as also to create to giue the Holy Ghost to regenerate The essentiall attributes of the humanity are to haue a soule vnderstanding immortall and a body compounded of elements consisting of skinne bloud flesh bones veines and sinowes hauing a certaine and definite greatenesse figure proportion and collocation or localnes of partes and therefore to be circumscried in one place to be solid visible palpable and such like These Christ reteineth for euer because without these nothing can bee a humane nature The accidental properties of the humanitie are those infirmities which ensued vpon sinne which infirmities Christ together with the humane nature it selfe assumed and tooke without sinne For he tooke the forme of a seruant which by his resurrection and ascension hee laide down againe The attributes of his office are called those which agree not to one nature onely but to both together that is it agreeth to the whole person according to both natures as being the compound of both A rule to be obserued as touching the attributes or properties of both natures in Christ BOTH natures and their properties are truely and reallie affirmed of the person and of themselues interchangeably in concrete termes or voices yet so that the proper predicate which is proper vnto one nature is attributed to the person not according to both natures but according to that onely to which it is proper The reason is for that one and the same person subsisting in two natures hath and reteineth for euer reallie the properties of both natures and also because one and the same person is signified by the concrete voices of both natures As therefore one the same man is liuing and corporeal according to diuerse natures and the corporeal is liuing by the soule onely and contrarilie the liuing is corporeall by the bodie onely For both soul and bodie are of the substance and essence of the same man So likewise one the same Christ is God eternal immense omnipotent according to the God-head onely is man the Virgines sonne created finite infirme and did suffer according to his humanity onely So likewise God is man borne of a Virgine annointed with the holy Ghost and suffered according to the flesh And man is God eternal creatour omnipotent giueth the holie Ghost not according to the humane nature but according to the diuine For the sense and meaning of these speaches is The person which is God creatour of thinges omnipotent by reason of the God-head the selfe-same person is man a creature infirme by reason of the flesh subsisting in it But notwithstanding one nature and the properties thereof whether they bee vttered in abstract or in concrete voices cannot be affirmed of the other nature or forme truly and really The reason is Because the vnion is not made in the nature that is two natures are not made one nature and because in neither nature the properties of the other doe reallie exist neither can exist
in outward appearance and imagination 4. Hee ascended not truely into heauen but it shall be saide to haue beene onely a vaine and imaginarie and phantasticall spectacle if hee were in his bodie substantiallie there before hee visiblie ascended thither and after he was ascended thither he remained yet in the substantiall presence of the same bodie no lesse truely than before on the earth yea and in the verie bodies also of the faithfull If these thinges so fel out in the truth of the thing it will follow that the same bodie of Christ was indeede at once and together both weake and omnipotent base and glorious subiect to sufferinges and not subiect dead and aliue limited and vnlimited which is horrible to affirme For auoiding therefore of these prodigious and impious absurdities they will except that he was not as touching his body otherwise than limited weak subiect to passions and mortal in the time of his humiliation because he had debased himselfe and would not shew forth that maiestie communicated vnto his bodie before his resurrection Aunswere They interpret amisse that debasing of himselfe of all the glorie and maiestie of his humanity hidden and kept close for a time whereas it is to bee vnderstoode in respect of the diuinitie of the Worde in that hee woulde take the forme of a seruant that is the masse of our nature and become man Moreouer it will folow that christ did shew forth the communicated power and maiesty of his flesh euen then when he was indeed weak and limited or circumscribed in bodie as when shedding teares he raised Lazarus from the dead and when being apprehended by the Iewes hee healed Malchus whom Peter wounded Now what is it else to raise the Marcionites vp againe from hell or in the greatest matter of all others impiously to blaspheme if this bee not THE SECOND ARGVMENT THE blasphemie of Samosatenus Arrius the late Antitrinitaries is this That Christ man is not properlie and by nature God but onlie by an accidental participation of diuine properties maiestie honour power and vertue The Vbiquitaries also maintaine the same consideration of the God-heade of Christ man while they define the personall vnion by his communicating alone of properties whereby the flesh of Christ is made omnipotent and euerie where So that now that man is and is called God not that he is properlie by nature God but because infinit power maiestie and glorie is giuen him from God and all the gifts of the holie Ghost are bestowed on him without measure Now this accidentall bestowing of the Godhead and all the properties doth not make christ to be properlie and by nature God but onelie by diuine grace or God vnproperlie so called Because it is not the verie essential God-head of the Word but a certaine participation thereof in vertue and effâ—cacie And therefore was it obiected by the sounder Fathers vnto the Arrians that they tooke awaie the true and eternall God-head of christ when they made him a God not by nature but by grace by participation onlie of dignitie and maiestie Therefore seeing the Vbiquitaries also equalling our Immanuel with God by participation of properties onlie take awaie his true and eternal God head wee doe disclâ—me and accurse this their doctrine as blasphemous and heretical And that they doe this Brentius in recog p. 20. Andrae Thes 20. disp Tubing and Thes 25. and 26. And Apol. Ing. 26. their owne words and opinions witnesse as Brentius and Iacobus Andraeas and others of them in their writings Whence wee conclude that the Vbiquitaries holde the same opinion with the Arrians and Antitrinitaries of the God-head of Christ manâ— that is that all these esteem him for God not by nature but onely by grace of participation new temporarie created adopted If these thinges bee true Christ shal not bee God and man but a diuine man such as the Vbiquitaries also repute him who as Seruetus Lib. 1. de Trinicate hold this opinion That God can communicate the fulnes of his God-heade giue his diuinitie maiestie power and glorie vnto man But wee execrate and detest the same blasphemie of both THE THIRD ARGVMENT NEstorius taught That the vnion of God the Word with man was wrought by the participation onelie of equality as touching maiesty honour power vertue and operation Neither doth he make the differeÌ„ce of the dwelling of the Word in mans nature which himselfe tooke and in other Saintes to consist in anie other thing than in those giftes and graces bestowed by God on man The selfe same also doe the Vbiquitaries teach because they crie that there is no difference betweene the inhabiting and dwelling of the God-head in Peter and in Christ except it bee taken from the communication of the giftes or properties of the God-heade And they contend that by this means this man which was takeÌ„ by the Word is God because the Word doth nothing without him but al things by him This is nothing els than to make christ man onelie God by an accident Wherefore the doctrine of Vbiquitie is altogether the same with Nestorius heresie Tertullian saith Tertul. lib. de Trinit p. 610. Jf Christ be man onlie how then is he present eueriewhere being called vpon and inuocated seeing this is not the nature of man but of God to be able to be present in al places By this testimony is refuted the Vbiquity of the human nature in Christ Obiect But the vnion of the diuine human nature in Christ is vnseparable Therefore wheresoeuer the diuine nature is there is also the humane nature Aunsw It is true which is said that the vnion is vnseparable The Worde neuer forsaketh the nature once assumed and taken But the Word is not in the humane nature as the soule is included in my bodie Wheresoeuer my bodie is there must my soule needes be neither is my soul at the same time without my bodie But the Worde is not so in Christ man but hee is so vnseparably and personally in the humane nature as that he is together also without the humane nature in all the partes of the world as hee filleth al and in holy men and Angels by his special presence The personall vnion of both natures dooth not euert the general action and woorking of his presence and maiestie neither doth it let or hinder the speciall woorking of his presence because the Word is effectual and worketh forcibly in the regenerate The generall points wherein the churches which professe the Gospell agree or disagree in the controuersie concerning the Lordes Supper They agree in these points FIRST that as wel the Supper of the Lord as Baptisme is a visible pledge and testimonie annexed by Christ himselfe to the promise of grace to this ende chiefly that our faith in this promise might be confirmed and strengthned Secondly that in the true vse of the supper as well as in al other sacraments two things are giuen by god vnto vs
and of saluation and euerlasting life 4 At length also assuming taking vnto him humane nature to teach as by his voice the will of god concerning vs and towards vs and to confirm this doctrine by Miracles 5 Not only to giue oracles and prophecies to open the will of god by prophets and to teach expound it himselfe present in humane nature but also to ordaine institute the ministery of the woord and sacraments that is to call and send Prophets Apostles and other ministers of the Church and to furnish them with giftes necessarie to this ministerie Iohn 20.21 As the Father hath sent mee so send I you Ephes 4.11 He Christ hath giuen some Apostles and some Prophetes some Doctours Luk. 21.15 I will giue you a mouth and wisedome where-against all your aduersaries shall not be able to speake nor resist So 1. Pet. 1.10 The spirit of Christ is saied to haue spoken by the prophetes 6. To giue the holy Ghost Mat. 3.11 Hee will baptise you with the holy Ghost and with fire 7. To be through his owne and others ministerie effectuall in the hartes of the hearers that is by his spirit to lighten our mindes that wee may vnderstand those thinges which hee teacheth vs of God and his will either by his own voice or by the voice of others Luk. 24 45. Then opened hee their vnderstanding that they might vnderstand the scriptures 8. To effectuate also that which by the efficacie of his spirit he speaketh in our heartes that is to moue our will that wee may yeeld our assent and obedience to those thinges which by his teaching wee learne and knowe Eph. 5.25 Christ gaue himselfe for the Church that he might sanctifie it and clense it by the washing of water through the worde And these thinges Christ did doth performe euen from the beginning of the church to the end of the world and that by his own authority and power and for this very cause is hee called the Word Mat. 11.27 No man knoweth the Father but the Sonne and he to whom the sonne wil reueile him Ioh. 5 21. As the Father so the Sonne quickneth whom he will By these things which haue beene now spoken is also vnderstood what difference there is betweene Christ other Prophets both of the old and newe testament why he is the chiefe prophet doctor The difference eminency consisteth in his nature office 1 Christ is the verie sonne of God god and lord of all doth immediatly vtter the woord of the Father is the embassador and mediator sent of the father Other prophets are only men his seruants called sent by him 2 Christ is autor reueiler of the doctrine therefore the Prince of all Prophets Others are s gnifiers of that which they haue receiued from Christ For whatsoeuer knoweledge and Propheticall spirite is in them all that they haue from Christ reueiling and giuing it to them Therefore is the spirit of christ said to haue spoken in the prophets Neither hath he opened only to the prophets the doctrine which he teacheth but also to all the godly Ioh. 1.16 Of his fulnes haue we all receiued that is al the Elect euen froÌ„ the beginning of the world vnto the end Ioh. 1.18 No man hath seen god at any time the only begotten sonne which is in the bosome of the father he hath declared him 3 His Prophetical wisedome is infinit and perfect therefore in al gifts he excelleth others 4 This Prophet christ appointeth the ministery sendeth ordaineth Prophets and Apostles he giueth the holie Ghost gifts necessarie for the prophets Apostles al ministers of the word to the perfourming of their duty Ioh. 16.14 He shall receiue of mine shall shew it vnto you He will lead you into al trueth 5 Christ himselfe is not onlie autor of the doctrine erectour maintainer of the external Ministery but also by his own other Prophets voice outward ministerie he preacheth effectuallie to men inwardlie through the vertue and working of the holy ghost Others are onely the instrumentes of Christ and that arbitrarie and at his disposition and direction 6 The Doctrine of christ which beeing made man hee vttered by his owne and his Apostles mouthes is much more cleare ful than the doctrine of Moses the Prophets of the old Testament Christ therefore hath authoritie of himselfe others from him if Christ speake wee must beleeue him for himselfe others because Christ speaketh in them These things are expresly prooued by these places of holy writ Hebr. 1.1 At sundrie times and in diuerse manners god spake in the old time to our Fathers by the Prophets Jn these last daies he hath spoken vnto vs by his Sonne And cap. 3.3 This man is counted woorthie of more glorie than Moses in as much as hee which hath builded the house hath more honour than the house Ioh. 16.14 The spirit of truth which I will send you shall receiue of mine and shal shew it vnto you Mat. 17.5 This is my beloued sonne in whom I am well pleased Heare him Luc. 10.16 Hee that heareth you heareth mee and hee that despiseth you despiseth mee and him that sent mee 3 WHAT CHRISTS PRIESTHOOD IS A priest in general A Priest in generall is a person ordeined by god to offer for himselfe and others oblations sacrifices to pray for others and to instruct Vnder praier is comprehended blessing which is to wish them good from God A typical priest There is one Priest which is signifieng or typical another signified The typicall Priest was a person appointed by God 1. to offer typical Sacrifices 2. to make intercession for himselfe and others 3. to declare to the people the doctrine of the Law and the promise of the Messias and true Sacrifice which was to come Such were al the Priestes of the old Testament For these three properties which we haue reckned were common to the High-Priest with other inferiour Priestes The High priest But some thinges the High-Priest had proper peculiar to himselfe 1. That he alone entered into the Tabernacle called the Holiest of al or Sanctuarie that but once euerie â—eare not without blood which he offered for himselfe and the people burning incense there and making intercession for the people 2. That his rayment was more gorgious 3. That he was set ouer the rest 4. That he onlie was consulted of questions or matters doubtful waightie and obscure whether appertaining to religion or to the common-wealth and did returne the aunsweres of God for the Princes and the people 5. and therefore did gouerne and order some counsels and offices of the state and kingdom did see that al things were lawfully administred The inferiours were all the other priests of the old Testament whose office it was to sacrifice to praie to teach the doctrine of the Lawe and the promise of the Messias to come
and to make intercession for themselues and others Wherefore though all the Leuitical priestes were a type of Christ yet the most notable type was the High-Priest for that he in mo thinges represented Christ our very true celestial perpetual high-Priest Obiection But it was the Prophets office to teach The difference between the Priestes and prophetes in the old Testament Therefore the Priestes differed nothing from the Prophetes Answere Both of them both the Prophets and the Priestes did teach the people and it might so fal out also that the same was both a Priest and a Prophet as it is reade of Ieremie But this was not perpetual but accidentarie Because 1. the Priestes were ordained out of one certaine tribe namelie the Leuiticall but God raised vp Prophetes out of anie tribe 2. There is a great difference found betwixt them as touching their function of teaching For the Prophets were called extraordinarilie and and immediately by God himselfe and so receiued from him the doctrine which they were to declare vnto men 3. They were so guided by the special motion of the holie ghost that they coulde not er in that doctrine which they vttered vnto men in the name of god But the Priestes as Priests 1. were ordinarie ministers of the oulde Church 2. were appointed by men 3. were tied to the doctrine of Moses and the Prophetes which they learned not from GOD immediatelie but mediatelie by men 4. They might erre in doctrine and counsels and did erre often when they departed from the rule of the Prophetes Wherefore as touching their function of teaching the Prophetes differed from the Priestes of the oulde Testament after the same sort as in the new Testament the Apostles from other ministers and teachers of the Church The signified and true and onelie High-Priest Christ the true and prefigured high priest Christs Intercession is the Sonne of GOD immediatelie ordained by GOD the Father himselfe and annointed by the holie GHOST to reueile vnto vs the secret will of GOD his counsell towardes vs by assuming humane nature to offer himselfe a Sacrifice propitiatorie for the sinnes of all man-kinde to obtaine for vs by his intercession vnto the Father remission of sinnes and eternall life and lastlie to applie effectuallie his Sacrifice vnto vs both by imputing it and also by illightening and moouing the elect by his woorde and spirit to receiue it with a true faith hauing this testimonie that he is certainly heard of his heauenly father for all those for whom he maketh intercession and withall hauing power to collect and gather his Church Wherefore there are foure principall parts of Christes Priesthoode First To teach men both outwardly by his voice and the voice of his ministers and inwardly by the efficacy of his spirite Secondly To offer himselfe a sacrifice and ransome full-sufficient and acceptable vnto GOD for the sinnes of the woorlde Christs Intercession Thirdly To make continuallie intercession for vs vnto the father For this intercession is proper vnto the Sonne First not onelie beecause himselfe liuing on earth in the time of his flesh was made a suppliant and a Sacrifice for vs vnto his Father Secondly but also because he earnestly and desirously wil according to both natures that the Father for his sacrifice once accomplished on the Crosse remit vnto vs our sins and restore vnto vs righteousnesse and life Thirdly that the Father looking vpon the sacrifice and wil of his onely beloued Sonne receiueth all beleeuers into his grace and fauour Wherefore the Sonne in respect both of his merite will to saue vs of his fathers continual beholding looking thereon hath from euerlasting made intercession and also doth nowe and for euer in heauen appearing before his Father make intercession for all the elect chosen To praie for the people is a thing common to all priestes but to make intercession both in heauen and earth vnto the Father for vs that our sinnes may bee pardoned vs is onlie belonging to this high and onelie Priest Fourthly to apply his sacrifice vnto all those for whom hee praieth Christs applying of his merit vnto vs. And hee applieth it First when hee procureth by praier the Father to impute it vnto vs that is to receiue vs for it into fauour and for it to loue vs Secondly when himselfe also for the same his sacrifice sake dooth receiue vs into fauor Iohn 17.19 Father for their sakes sanctifie I my selfe Thirdly hee endueth vs with true faith whereby wee also may apply his satisfaction vnto our selues that is maie bee assured and thinke that it is our righteousnesse whereby wee may stande in the presence of the Lorde Heereby also it is cleare in what other Priestes differ from Christ 1 These teâ—ch onlie by their outward voice â—n difference â—eâ—â—een Christ and â—ther Priests and not by the inwarde woorking also of the holie Ghost 2. They doe not make continual intercession neither do they alwaies obtaine what they aske 3. These applie their benefits vnto no man 4. They offer not them-selues a Sacrifice for the sinnes of others For all these thinges can bee and are perfourmed by CHRIST alone WHAT IS CHRISTES KINGDOME A King is a person ordained by God A King in generall to gouerne in a people and beare rule alone according to honest Lawes and to haue power to reward the good and punish the bad to defend his subieâ—tes against their enimies hauing no superiour gouernuor aboue him The King of Kings CHRIST Christ a King is a person immediatelie ordeined of GOD to gather and rule by his woorde and spirite his church purchased by his blood and to defend her beeing subiect vnto him and seruing him against all her enimies both corporall and spirituall and to rewarde her with eternall rewards but to cast her enimies into euerlasting paines and torments Wherefore CHRISTES royall office is First Christs Kingdome to rule by his woorde and spirite his Church gathered out of all nations from the beginning of the woorlde For that it may go â—ell with vs vnder this King it is not enough if hee outwardly teach vs what hee wâ—uld haue vs his subiectes to perfourme vnlesse also by his spirit he moue our heartes and cause vs to bee obedient to his commaundements Secondly To defend and preserue this his Church in this life against al both inward and outward domesticall and forraine foes which also he dooth perfourme while not onlie by his power-ful hand hee is euer present with vs but furnisheth vs also with those weapons wherewith our selues also may constantlie and happilie enter the combat against our most mighty foes and vtterly vanquish and discomfit them This sacred haâ—nesse and war-like furniture is described Ephese 6.13 Thirdly To make his church partaker of the blessings of his kingdome and to adorne her raised vp from dead with euerlasting glorie blisse Fourthly To ouercome rule his enimies by his
would haue the same to be the person of the father and the son the holy ghost which in respect of diuers functions actions is now called the Father nowe the Son now the holy ghost And therefore were they called Patripassians also against Seruetus who coâ—foundeth the sonne and the holie ghost The third is whether he bee equal vnto the father The fourth is whether he be consubstantiall that is of one and the same substance and essence with the father Those two namelie equal and consubstantiall are trulie and iustly maintained against Arius Eunomius Macedonius c. and the Tritheits of our time who make either the father alone to be eternall and the sonne to haue beene created of the father before other things or make the sonne also coeternall with the father but inferior vnto the father Wherfore by these mens opinion the father and the sonne are two essences and two spirits by a consequent two gods according to Arius neither eternall nor coequall according to the Tritheites coeternal indeede but vnequall A double way of gathering Testimonies of scripture Moreouer there is a double maner of gathering arguments out of the scriptures whereby the diuinitie of the sonne and the holy Ghost as also other things questioned in diuinitie are confirmed One is when the testimonies of scripture are gathered according to the order of the bookes of the Bible The other when as certain orders or sorts of arguments or proofes are set vnto which the Testimonies of scripture thereto belonging are referred Both waies are good and both verie often necessarie for a Diuine when hee priuately considereth examineth or discusseth controuersies and disputes of Diuinitie and searcheth what is true in them The first way is more laborious and repeating of the same things the latter is more short and compendious and more fit and appliable both for teaching and also that the groundes of the pointes and opinions of Christian religion may the more easily bee conceaued of the minde and more firmely sticke and abide in the memorie for whatsoeuer neede or vse thereof to come THE FIRST CONCLVSION The sonne of God is a subsistent in the flesh borne of the Virgin and before the flesh THE orders or sortes of Argumentes which confirme this Conclusion are eight in number To the first belong those testimonies which expresly teache and distinguish two natures in Christ as that the humane nature was taken by the diuine nature The argument is framed thus He that assumed the flesh is other from the flesh and a subsistent euen before the flesh The word tooke flesh Again That which commeth into the flesh is other from the flesh into which it commeth but the sonne of God or the Word is euen the verie same who assumed and tooke the fleshe and came in it Iohn 1.14 Heb. 2.14.16.1 Iohn 4.2 Therefore the sonne of necessitie is another nature from the flesh taken and a subsistent euen before the flesh borne of the Virgin For that which is the sonne and putteth on and carrieth flesh it must needes be that the same is a person and was subsisting before the flesh was taken Hither also beelong all those testimonies which oppose in Christ his diuine nature to his humane nature or flesh and distinguish that from this as Rom. 1.3 His sonne made of the seede of Dauid according to the flesh Rom. 9.5 Of the fathers concerning the flesh Christ came Therefore there is another thing in Christ besides his fleshe according to which he is not of the fathers nor of the seede of Dauid Phil. 2.6 Who being in the forme of God tooke on him the forme of a seruaunt Wherefore the forme of God in Christ is one thing namely his diuinitie most perfect and the forme of a seruaunt another thing euen his humanitie weake base and seruile Mat. 22.44 Christ is called the sonne and Lord of Dauid Therefore there be diuers natures in him Iohn 2.19 Destroie this temple and in three daies I will raise it vp againe Wherefore there is one thing in Christ which is destroyed euen his bodie and another thing likewise which raiseth vp his destroyed bodie which is the Word who Ioh. 1. is called the onelie begotten sonne 1 Obiection The Word in Iohn dooth not signifie anie person which was subsisting before the fleshe borne of the Virgin but onelie that visible Preacher or teacher Iesus who was made flesh That Iohn meaneth by the Word a person subsisting before the flesh that is was a man weak miserable and abiect Ans This is a notorious manifest impudent corrupting of this place For it is easie for any man to shewe out of the very narration of Iohn that the Word signifieth an hypostasis or person which was existing before Iesus borne of the Virgin For the Word 1. was in the beginning that is was now before existing when thinges were created 2. And that Word was God 3. By whom all thinges were made 4. Who is the author of all life and light Therefore he is a person existing before all thinges 5. Which lighteth euerie man that commeth into the world that is all if not with spirituall yet with naturall light therefore he is their illuminatour who were before the flesh which was born of the Virgin 6. Who being in the world and not knowen 7. Yet came vnto his owne 8. being made flesh that is The word was made flesh by taking flesh not by any conuersion into flesh assuming and taking humane nature of the Virgin Mary For that these woordes the Word was made flesh haue this meaning namely that he who now from the beginning was in the woorlde was made fleshe that is man which before hee was not not by any chaunging or mutation of himselfe but by assuming and taking humane nature other places of Scripture doe demonstrate Heb. 2.14.16 Hee was partaker of the flesh he tooke the seede of Abraham 1. Tim. 3.16 God was manifested in the flesh The Woord therefore assumed and tooke flesh but was not conuerted into flesh that is the diuine nature was distinct from the flesh taken and assumpted Moreouer that Christ man was such a teacher The word was a Teacher from the beginning of the world who not onely in the time of his fleshe but also before that was borne euen from the beginning of the world preached the will of his father vnto men and quickened them both this very narration of Iohn and other very many places doe plainly shew He was the life and the true light which lighteth euerie man Iohn 1. No man hath seene God at anie time the onelie begotten sonne which is in the bosome of the Father he hath declared him Iohn 6.51 I am the liuing bread which came downe from heauen and giueth life vnto the woorld 1. Pet. 3.19 Christ went by the spirite in the daies of Noe and preached vnto the spirits that are in prison which were in time passed disobedient
or moe substaunces of the same nature and essence So two men are vnited in naturall properties and perfections because they haue the same in kinde or the like and therefore are of the same humane nature The Aire in the Chimney which getteth the perfections or qualities of the fier as beeing nowe become a flame and the fier of the burning coales which fiereth and inflameth the Aire next vnto it are two substaunces of the same properties and fierie nature and therefore are saide to bee vnited in nature and essentiall properties that is they are two fiers in number but in kinde and nature they are one Likewise the three diuine persons are vnited in essential properties that is haue the same essentiall properties which is nothing else but that they are one essence one and the same God 2 WHAT IS TO BE VNITED IN PERSON THOSE things are said to bee vnited in person which are one person that is which although they differ in naturall properties yet exist in one and the same indiuiduall subsistence or haue altogether the same subsistence So the soule and bodie of man are vnited and concurre vnto one person because they beeing vnited doe make one person or one subsistent incommunicable not susteined in another or of another The Father the Sonne and the holy Ghost are not vnited in person or personall properties because they haue these not the same but distinct By this which hath beene saide it is manifest That the Vnion in nature and naturall perfections is an equalitie of properties and nature but the personall Vnion is when two vnlike natures are coupled so that each reteineth his naturall properties and operations whole and distinct but yet haue both one and the same subsistence wholie or it is the ioining of two natures different in properties to constitute the substaunce of one indiuiduall or person that is such a connexion and knitting of them together as that they are one indiuiduall subsisting by it selfe or the substaunce of one indiuiduall But that in Christ the Vnion of the flesh with the Woorde is not essentiall made in the nature or anie essentiall propertie of the God-head is shewed by these reasons First Of the God-head and the fleshe assumpted there ariseth not anie third Essence but eache is and abideth an Essence so perfect and whole as neither especiallie the Diuine as beeing in it selfe a person and simplie voide of all change commeth into the composition or compounding as wee properlie take this Word of the other Secondly Jf the Vnion of the fleshe with the Word were essentiall it would follow that the humanitie once assumpted and taken was equalled with the Godhead in essentiall properties and so by a consequent to bee made of the same nature essence with the Word So Vigilius in his fourth booke sheweth that the Eutychians held two substances to be in Christ of the same nature Wherefore they who will haue the essential properties of the Godhead to be reallie communicated and common with the fleshe so that the fleshe shoulde truely and reallie bee and bee called omnipotent omniscient and whatsoeuer else the God-head is they indeede howsoeuer in woordes they mightily stand against it holde this Vnion to bee made in essentiall properties and in nature and both with Eutyches and Schwenckfield they confounde both natures and take away the difference betweene the creature and the Creatour and also with Nestorius they frame and make two persons and so bring in a quaternitie For albeit they say that they in that their confusion or as themselues call it with their Master Schwenkfield Deifiyng and Maiesticall exaltation of the fleshe doe retaine the substance of the fleshe yet two substaunces hauing reallie the same and like perfections are two Subsistents or persons of one nature as are two men and whatsoeuer other indiuiduals of the same kind or nature Lastly with Sabellius and the Patripassians they incarnate the whole Trinitie For there is one and the same Essence in number of the diuine persons and the same essential properties Wherefore that which is vnited and equalled with one of these three according to essence must needes be also vnited and equalled with the rest Wherefore the Vnion of both natures in Christ is personall or according to the subsistence proper vnto the Word both natures keeping and retaining in that vnion their properties whole and vnconfounded For the Word did not by vniting humane nature vnto it make the same the Godhead or GOD and omnipotent immense and infinite but it tooke the manhood which reteineth still the properties belonging vnto it and so did ioine and knitte it vnto it selfe as to bee one person with it and the substaunce of one Christ Neither is it absurd that a thing which neither is made or is one with another in kinde neither any Homogeneal part thereof shoulde yet exist in the same subsistence with it or shoulde subsist in it selfe where-with it is vnited For a graffe hath his subsisting in a tree of another nature or kinde The same is the subsistence both of the sprig engraffed and of the tree susteining the sprig that is they are one and the same indiuiduall tree yet haue they and so doe retaine natures in properties most diuers The like reason is there in the two natures of Christ both subsisting in or of the same person of the sonne Obiection The humane nature is vnited with the Word in person but not in nature Therefore the person is diuorced and sundered from the nature Againe The person onelie of the sonne is vnited with the humane nature therefore not the diuine nature it selfe of the Word Aunswere In both these Arguments is a fallacie from that which is no cause as if it were a cause and both offend in this for that they who so reason against the maintainers of true doctrine and men sounde in faith either knowe not or are not willing to distinguish betweene these two Phrases of speech To bee vnited in nature and to be vnited too or with a nature when notwithstanding the difference is very great and most familiar and knowne vnto the schoolemen For to bee vnited in nature is to bee equalled that is to bee made one essence or nature with another To bee vnited too or with a nature is to bee coupled and ioined therewith to one subsistence or personalitie Wherefore the fleshe is vnited to or with the the Woorde not in nature or in Essentiall propertie that is it is not made with the Woorde one essence neither made equall vnto it in omnipotency wisedome and nature for so shoulde the whole Trinitie bee incarnate Yet is it vnited to the omnipotencie wisedome nature and essence of God not simplie but of god the Worde Now this is nothing else than the flesh to be vnited to the person of the sonne or to the Worde in person which person is the verie diuine nature or essence omnipotent wise and whatsoeuer else is proper to the Godhead But albeit
the verie essence it selfe of the God-head c. Therefore if Gods omnipotencie bee really communicated to Christs humanitie so that this also is by reason of the omnipotency communicated vnto it reallie omnipotent of necessity then by reason of the same omnipotency really communicated Christes humanitie shall bee indeed an essence subsisting of it selfe and by it selfe incorporeall eternall immense creatres of all thinges that is God himselfe blessed for euer and so by consequent the diuine person For an essence intelligent subsisting by it selfe which also is God must needs be the person And these are the fruits of reall communicating of properties in natures The participation of the God-head exaltation and maiestie of the flesh and such like is not a real communicating of the essentiall properties of the God-heade made into the humane nature or an omnipresence omniscience omnipotency that is a God-head of the man-hood For such a communicating should not perfect but destroy the man-hoode and conuert it into the God-head and dissolue the personal vnion of distinct natures but it is First the verie vnion of the humanitie with the Word in such sort as it being created finite doth together with al the essential properties therof subsist not in a created person of the same humane nature but in the increate and eternal person of God the Word by reason of which vnion God the Word but not the God-head is is called trulie man and contrarie man but not the manhood is and is called truly eternall God No dignitie eminence can be imagined greater than this neither doth it agree to anie but to the flesh of Christ onely Secondly Jt is the excellencie of gifts For these christs humanitie receiued without measure that is all whatsoeuer and most great and most perfect that maie fall into a created and finite nature Thirdly The office of the mediator to the perfourming whereof the vnited but yet distinct properties and operations of both natures doe necessarily concur Fourthly The honor and worship which by reason of the Mediatorship agreeth is giueÌ„ to whole christ according to bâ—th natures keeping still as was before saide the difference of properties and operations in natures Now whatsoeuer testimonies some bring either out of the Scriptures or out of the Fathers which were sound in faith thereby to proue that their Eutychian transmutation and a third kind of communicating forged by themselues that is exequation or equalling of natures all those testimonies indeed belong either to the grace of vnion of the natures which is signified by the communicating of properties or to the grace of Christes Headship which compriseth the office and honour of the Mediatour which are affirmed of whole Christ by waie of communicating or to the habituall grace that is the created giftes which Christ receiued without measure which are properly affirmed of the flesh or humanitie These giftes which are also called graces are not properlie effectes of the personal vnion as are the attributes or properties of the natures and office First because they are communicated to the manhoode as well of the Father and the Holie Ghost as of the Word or Sonne For he is said to haue receiued of the Father the spirite without measure that is aboundauntlie likewise to be annointed with the Holy Ghost And if the giftes were effects of the vnion it would follow of necessity that the flesh was vnited not to the Son only but to the Father also and the holy Ghost Secondlie The vnion of the flesh with the Woord was from the verie moment of the conception alwaies most perfect But the consummation and perfection of giftes was not vntil the accomplished time of his resurrection ascension For hee was indeede humble weake and contemned he was indeede ignorant of some things he did indeede encrease in wisedome stature and in fauour not with men onely but also with God himselfe Thirdly The flesh when it was in the state of humility had not immortality or a nature not subiect to sufferings or the like and yet remained it alwaies vnited with the Woorde Wherefore the habitual giftes or graces of the humanitie for which it is also in it selfe reallie wise mighty iust holie follow not the personal vnion in respect of dependency as the effect followeth and dependeth of this cause but onely in respect of order Because namely the humane nature was first to subsist and bee before it were enriched with giftes and it subsisteth vnited to the Woord in the very first moment of the conception But after what maner the humanitie is vnited vnto the Sonne of God hath beene said before For by the special and miraculous working of the holy Ghost in the womb of the virgine of her blood was the flesh of christ formed sanctified and vnited according to subsistence or personally vnto the Wâ—ord 4 Why it was necessarie that the two natures should bee vnited in the person or subsistence of the sonne of God FOR what cause Christ our Mediatour was to bee together both a true and perfect iust man and true that is by nature GOD hath beene declared of vs before in the common place of the Mediatour in the 4 question pag. 237. For the woorke of our redemption could not haue bin compassed and finished by the Mediator without the concurrence of diuers natures operations in the same person For albeit he suffred died in the flesh yet his passion and suffering would not haue that force and efficacy to redeeme iustifie sanctifie vs neither could christ haue applied those benefites vnto vs except he had bin withal true and natural God Of the Incarnation of the Word the confession made by the Fathers of Antioch against Paulus Samosatenus TAKEN OVT OF THE ACTES OF THE FIRST EPHESINE COVNCEL VVEE confesse our Lord Iesus Christ begotten before all worlds of his Father but in the last times borne according to the flesh of the Virgine by the holy Ghost subsisting in one person onely made of the celestiall God-head and humane flesh Whole God and whole man Whole God also with his bodie but not according to his body god Whole man also with his God head but not according to his God head man Againe whole adorable also with his bodie but not according to his bodie adorable Whole adoring also with his Godhead but not according to his godhead adoring Whole increat also with his body but not according to his body increated Whole formed also with his Godhead but not according to his godhead formed Whole consubstantial with god also with his body but not according to his body consubstantiall as neither also according to his Godhead he is coessentiall with men but hee is according to the flesh consubstantiall vnto vs existing also in his Godhead For when wee say hee is according to the spirit consubstantiall with God wee doe not say hee is according to the spirit coessentiall with men And contrarily when wee affirme him to bee according to the
euerie where according to the maner of maiestie Beeing demaunded what they mean by maiestie they aunswere omnipotencie and immensitie To saie then Christes bodie is euerie where as touching the manner of maiestie not as touching the manner of a natural bodie is no thing else euen by their owne iudgement than Christes bodie to bee euerie where according to the manner of immensitie or infinity and not to bee euerie where according to the manner of finitenesse Now they trimlie take awaie the contradiction by thus distinguishing For the manner of immensitie is nothing else but immensitie and immensity and to bee immense are both affirmed of the same Wherefore as these are contradictorie to be euerie where to change place or not to bee euerie where so are these also contradictorie The same bodie to bee immense and to bee finite immensitie and finitenesse to agree vnto the same or the same bodie to be euerie where or immense according to the maner of immensity or maiestie and not to be euerie where but to change place and to bee finite according to the manner of finitenesse or a natural bodie Wherfore it is manifest which was before also confirmed That Christ ascended locallie and that therefore this Article is to be vnderstoode of Christs local ascension 4 Obiection Contraries or opposites ought to bee expounded after the same maner that the contrarietie and opposition maie be kept But these Articles Hee ascended into heauen Hee descended into hel are opposed one to the other Therefore as the Article of Christes descension is taken in a figuratiue meaning that is of his great humiliation so ought also the Article of his Ascension to bee taken of his great maiestie not of any local motion Aunswere We Aunswere first vnto the Maior Opposites are to bee expounded after the same maner except it be disagreeing from the articles of faith from other places of scripture But this article the scripture it selfe vnderstandeth of a locall Ascension Act. 1.11 He shall so come as ye haue seene him go into heauen 2 Wee denie the Minor For these two articles are not opposed For his ascension into Heauen is not the furdest degree of his glorie as his descension into hell is the furdest degree of his Humiliation But the furdest and highest degree of his glorie is his sitting at the right hand of the Father Therefore as touching this article of his sitting at the right hand of his Father we grant the Maior For vnto this article is the descension into Hel opposed whereupon also the Scripture dooth not interpret properly but figuratiuely these two articles of Christes descension into Hell and of his sitting at the right hand of his Father 3 If christs ascension be constered of any equalling of his manhood with his God-head all the other articles concerning the true humanity of christ shal be vtterly ouerthrown Fourthly Christ ascended visiblie into Heauen For his assumption and taking away from his Apostles was conspicuous and apparant to the sight Act. 1.9 While they beheld he was taken vp And they beheld him ascending vp so long vntil a cloud tooke him vp out of their sight Fifthly He ascended by the power and vertue of his God-head as also by the same he rose Acts. 2.32 This Iesus hath god made being exalted by his right hand by his diuine power Lord and Sauiour Sixtly Hee ascended when he had conuersed on earth fourtie daies after his resurrection and that therefore 1 That hee might assure men of his resurrection of the truth of his fleshe Act. 1.3 To whom also he presented himselfe aliue after that hee had suffered by many infallible tokens 2 That he might instruct his Disciples and recall into their minds that which he had spoken before and farther ad some other things and so might make not them onely but vs also certaine of his resurrection of the trueth of his flesh or humane nature Seuenthly He so ascended that he returneth not before the daie of iudgement Act. 1.11 Hee shall so come as yee haue seene him go into Heauen Act. 3.21 Whom the Heauens must contain vntill the time that all things be restored Obiection But christ promised that hee would bee with vs vnto the end of the woorlde Aunswere Hee is with vs in that spirituall vnion whereby we his members are ioined to him our head And further he speaketh of his whole person to which hee attributeth that which is proper vnto the God-head In like manner he saith before his passion when as yet hee conuersed on earth with his Disciples Iohn 14.23 J and my Father will come vnto him and will dwell with him this hee speaketh as touching his God-head which was and is in heauen as the Father is with vs so is hee otherwise wee might reason also thus J go awaie saith Christ Therefore he is not at all with vs. But it is attributed improperly to his other nature namely to his humanitie that he abideth with vs in respect of that personall vnion which is the secret wonderful indissoluble vniting and knitting of the two most diuerse natures of Christ diuine humane into one person so that these two natures being in such wise linked conioined absolue the essence of Christs person and one nature should be destroied if it were sundered from the other both notwithstanding reteining their peculiar and seuerall properties whereby one is distinguished from another Therefore of no force is this Obiection In Christs person the two natures are ioyned in vnseparable vniō Therefore wheresoeuer Christes Godhead is there also must his humanity needes bee For these two natures remaine in such sort ioyned and vnited that their propertie remaineth distinct and neither is turned into other Replie Those two natures whereof one is not where is the other are sundered neither remaine vnited but are separated In christ are two natures whereof one which is his humanitie is not where is the other which is his godhead Therefore the two natures in christ are not vnited but separated Aunswere The Maior is true being vnderstood of two finite natures but not of those whereof one is finite and another infinite For the finite nature can not be at once in moe places but the infinite nature may be at once both whole in the finite nature and whole without it and this may we indeede consider and obserue in christ For his humane nature which is finite is but in one place but his diuine nature which is infinite is both in christs humane nature and without it euen euerie where Reply There must notwithstanding be made a separatiō in another part where the humane nature is not though there be no separation where it is Aunswere Not at all Because the Godhead is whole the same in the humane nature and without it Gregory Nazianzene saith The Word is in his temple and is euerie where but after a speciall maner in his temple Reply If christs humane nature bee
of the angels said hee at any time sit at my right till I make thine enimies thy foot-stoole Muchlesse will God speake this vnto man Obiection But it is said Reuel 3.21 To him that ouercommeth will J grant to sit with me in my throne Auns We shall sit there by participation where this must bee also granted that the same is the throne of the Father and the Sonne In the same throne many may sitte but not in the same dignitie And so christ will not giue that chiefe dignitie and glorie giuen him of his Father vnto any other Reply But to sit at Gods right hand is also to liue gloriouslie and blessedlie But this agreeth to vs. Therefore wee shall sit there Aunswer This is not a ful and sufficient definition because a blessed life agreeth both to vs Angels but the sitting at gods right hand doth not Whereupon these two articles are well adioined together He Ascended into Heauen he sitteth at the right hand of God the Father Now let vs in few wordes expound the definition which wee brought of Christes sitting at the right hande of the Father Christ sitteth then at the right hande of God the Father that is he is that person omnipotent by which the Father gouerneth al things immediatly But especially by which he defendeth the church against her enimies That this definition may be more ful and clear let vs briefly sift euery part thereof The Session therefore of Christ at the right hande of the Father is 1. The perfection of Christes diuine nature that is the equality of the Word with the Father which he did not receiue but euer had 2 The perfection of christes humane nature This perfection or excellency of Christes humane nature compriseth First The personall vnion of the humane nature with the Woord Coloss 2.9 In him dwelleth all the fulnesse of the godhead bodily Secondlie The collation or bestowing of giftes farre greater and more in number than are bestowed on al men or Angels and therfore in which he far excelleth both men and Angels Ioh. 1.16 Of his fulnesse haue al we receiued And cap. 3.34 God giueth him not the spirite by measure 3 The perfection or excellencie of the office of the Mediatour that is the Propheticall Priestly and Roiall function which christ now as the glorified Head of his church doth in his humane nature gloriously exercise in heauen This excellency of christs office is the very exalting of Christ in his Propheticall Priestly and Princely function that is the laying down of the infirmity of Christs humane nature and the perfection of glory which was due vnto Christ both in respect of his office as being a Prophet King and Priest in respect of his person as beeing God 4 The perfection of christs honour that is the adoration worship and reuerence which is yeelded vnto Christ both of men and Angels Heb. 1.6 Let all the Angels of God worship him Phil. 2.9 Hee hath giuen him a name aboue euerie name By these the like speeches are signified the partes of Christs sitting at Gods right hand But the name whereof is spoken in the wordes of the Apostle before aleaged is the excellencie of the person and office of Christ and a declaration of both by his visible maiestie that all may bee forced to confesse that this is the King by whom God ruleth all thinges So also did Stephen see him adorned with visible maiestie and glorie Christ had some partes also before of his excellency both of his office and of his person but he then came to the full perfection of all when being taken vp into heauen he was placed at the right hand of the Father By these partes nowe of christs sitting at the right hand of the Father the definition of his sitting may bee made more full in this wise when christ is said to sit at the right hand of the Father hee is saide to haue the same and equal power with the Father to excel all men and Angels in his humane nature both in giftes bestowed on him more and greater than on them as also in visible glorie and maiestie to shew himselfe Lord of men and Angels and of all things that are created In the name of the Father to rule and administer immediatly his kingdome in heauen and the whole world chiefely to gouern by his power immediately the church lastly to bee acknowleged and magnified of all as chiefe Lord and Head Many Obiections are by this definition refuted As 1. The Holy Ghost also is equal with God Therefore wee may truely say that hee also sitteth at the right hand of God Aunswere It doth not folow because the reason is grounded of an ill definition For although the Holy Ghost bee as well as the Father and the sonne Head and Lord and ruler of the Church yet doth it not agree to the Holy Ghost but to christ alone to sit at the right hand of the Father Because hee alone tooke humane nature was humbled dead buried rose againe ascended and is Mediatour And furder the Father woorketh immediately by the Sonne onely but by the holy Ghost the Father doth not worke immediatly but through the sonne For the same order is to be kept in their operation and working which is in the persons The Father worketh by him selfe but of himselfe because he is of none The Sonne worketh by himselfe not of himselfe because he is begotten of the Father The holy ghost worketh by himselfe but from the Father and the Sonne from whom he dooth proceed Therefore the father woorketh immediately by the Sonne because the Sonne is before the holy ghost yet not in time but in order but mediately the Father woorketh by the holy Ghost and therefore the Sonne is rightly saide to sitte at the right hand of the Father but not the holy Ghost 2. Obiection Christ before his Ascension was alwaies the glorious Head and King of the Church Therefore he cannot now be first after his ascension said to sitte at gods right hand Aunswere Againe this reason also is grounded vpon a bad definition Christ was alwaies glorious but hee was not alwaies aduaunced and exalted in the office of his Mediatorshippe to wit in his kingdome and priesthood Now first he began to haue the consummation and perfection of glory which before hee had not that is gloriously to rule and administer his kingdom and Priesthood in the Heauens Christ is called our Head 1 In respect of his perfection excellencie both as God and man And as concerning his godhead there is no doubt of it And as concerning his humane nature it is true because Christs humanitie is adorned with far greater gifts than is any creature especially by reason of the vnion thereof with the Word 2 Jn respect of his office and that 1 in regard of his merite then by reason of his power and efficacie For as the Head is the seat of al the exteriour and interiour senses wherein are seated
the vnderstanding will and whence the vitall spirites flow So from Christ as the Head flowe downe into vs the giftes and graces of the Holy Ghost 3 Whether Christ did alwaies sit at the right hand of God THIS Question shoulde not bee needefull except mens curiositie had made it such To the explication thereof is required the distinction first of natures then of time Now as coÌ„cerning Christs Diuinitie 1 That alwaies sitteth at the right hand of the Father as sitting signifieth an equal power and honour which Christ hath euen the same with the Father For Christs diuine nature was from euerlasting equal with the Father in honor and power Likewise as To sit at the right hand of the Father signifieth to be the Head of the Church For by the Woorde the Father did from the beginning alwaies preserue the Church as also by him hee created all thinges In this sense Christ was placed by his eternal generation at the right hand of the Father 2 Christ according to his diuinitie also dooth so sitte at the right hand of the Father as he was ordained to this his office from euerlasting 3 He dooth alwaies sit according to his diuinity at the right hande of God in that hee begunne from the verie beginning of the world to execute hath executed this his office And christ according to his diuinity was in this respect after his asceÌ„sion into heauen placed at the fathers right hand in that his diuinity then began to shew it selfe glorious in the body which in the time of his humiliation had hid it selfe froÌ„ being openly manifested declared For in the time of his humiliatioÌ„ which was wheÌ„ christ liued on earth his God-head also had humbled it selfe not by making it selfe weaker but by hiding it selfe onely and not shewing it selfe abroad Therefore thus Christ also according to his diuine nature was placed at his Fathers right hand namelie by laieng downe that humility which he tooke on him for our sake and by shewing foorth that glorie which hee had with his Father before the foundations of the woorlde were laide but had hid the same in the time of his humiliation not by adding any thing vnto it which it had not before neither by making it more bright powerfull neither by manifesting and declaring it before God but vnto men and by vsing fully and freely his right and authoritie which right and authoritie Christes diuinitie had as it were laid downe in the taking vp and assumption of humane nature Therefore he saith Iohn 17.5 Now glorifie mee thou Father with thy owne selfe with the glorie which J had with thee before the world was This glorie he had not with men Therefore he praieth that as hee had it alwaies with the Father so he might manifest it vnto men Wherefore this is not to be taken as if the Word receiued any change or alteration of his God-head but in that sense only which hath been said Now as concerning christes humane nature according to it hee was then first placed at the right hand of the Father when he asceÌ„ded into heauen then he attained to his glorification when he receiued that which before he had not Obiection Hee that sitteth at Gods right hande is euerie where Christ sitteth at Gods right hand Therefore he is euery where Aunswere This reason wee graunt in respect of the communicating of the properties to the person But if it be further concluded that according to the flesh he is euerie where there wil be more in the conclusion than was in the premisses Againe wee denie the consequence of the whole reason because the right hand of God and to sit at the right hande of God is not all one Neither yet is it simply true that hee which sitteth at Gods right hand sitteth euerie where For a part of the sitting at gods right hand is also that visible glorie and maiesty wherewith Christes humane nature was endowed and wherewith Stephen beheld him endued in heauen This is not euerie where but only in that placc where his body is seated and remaineth Obiection Hee ascended into heauen to fill al thinges that is with the presence of his flesh Aunswere It is a fallacy in misconstring the word He ascended to fill all thinges that is with his giftes and graces not with his flesh bones and skinne These are the monsters and dotinges whereby the Diuell carrieth Gods glory into derision Reply That nature which hath receiued omnipotency is euerie where christes humanitie hath receiued omnipotency Therefore it is euerie where Answere That nature which hath receiued omnipotency by a reall transfusion and communication of the properties is euerie where but not that which hath receiued it by personall vnion onely as the humane nature of Christ But yet notwithstanding manie thinges haue beene bestowed by reall transfusion on Christes humanitie to wit other qualities than which hee had on the crosse and in his humiliation Likewise far more and greater giftes than those which are bestowed either on Angels or on men and in respect of those giftes bestowed on him Christ is placed according to his humane nature at the right hand of his father but according to his diuinitie he is placed at the right hand of the Father as he being glorified and taken vp into heauen hath shewed forth the same hath attained vnto the perfection of glory or to the highest degree of glorification as touching his humanity 4 What are the fruites of Christes sitting at the right hand of the Father THE fruites of Christes sitting at the Fathers right hand are all the benefites of the kingdome and Priest-hoode of christ glorified As 1. His intercession for vs. 2. The gathering gouerning and garding of his church by the Worde and spirit 3. His defending of the church against her enemies 4. The abiection and destruction of the churches enemies 5. The glorification of the church The fruites or benefites of the kingdome of christ glorified â—â—e that he ruleth vs by the ministery of the Word and the holy Ghost that hee preserueth his ministery that hee giueth his Church resting places and is forcible by doctrine in conuerting the chosen that hee will at length raise vp from the dead his chosen and elect abolish all their infirmities glorifie them wipe away all teares from them enthronize them in his throne and make them Priests and Kings vnto his Father The fruite of the Priesthoode of Christ glorified is that he appeareth presenteth himselfe and maketh request and intercession for vs in heauen that forcibly so that the father denieth vs nothing through the vertue and force of his intercession Hence ariseth that consolation and comfort Because our Head our flesh and our brother sitteth at the right hand of the father he shall at length glorifie and quicken vs and that both in respect of his brotherly loue as also in regard of his office who is our Head Because also we haue such a High-Priest which
all three senses as a little after we shall vnderstand 3 To hallow or sanctifie is in Scripture vsed after three waies 1 Of vs. 2 Of God 3 Of Christ 1 Of vs it is affirmed after a double manner first when wee hallow and sanctifie our selues others And we sanctifie our selues and others when as touching externall and outward thinges we prepare our selues and others to glorifie God For there commeth some holinesse vnto vs by glorifieng of God but none to God Secondlie When we hallowe and sanctifie God Now we sanctifie God 1 When we acknowledge god to be holie or when we acknowledge God to be such as hee hath declared himselfe in his word and woorkes that is when we know and thinke the same of Gods Essence of his wil works of his omnipotency goodnesse wisedome and other his properties which God in his woorde hath commaunded and reueiled that we should know and thinke of them Secondly When we professe God to be holie and so magnifie him according to his will that is when our confession whereby we confesse god to be holy is agreeing with his diuine will And then is it agreeing with his diuine will when we professe the Holines of God both in minde and woorde and also in deede and woorkes Thirdlie When we refer the true doctrine knowledge and profession of Gods holinesse and likewise our praiers and actions and euen our whole life vnto that end whereunto wee ought and whither God hath commanded it to bee referred namely to the glorie and woorship of God himselfe And so wee are said to sanctifie God after the selfesame three waies after which a thing is saide to be holy Wherefore when we desire that the name of God may be hallowed or sanctified wee desire 1 That God would illighten vs with the knowledge of his holinesse 2 That he would giue vs a minde to professe the same in wordes deeds or that he would giue vs faith repentance whereby we may glorifie him and whereby wee may seuer him from Idols and prophane things or lastly that he would regenerate vs and this first by knowledge then by profession and lastly by conformitie according to this his commandement Be yee holie euen as I also am holie 3 That hee would giue vs a mind to professe that holinesse of his diuine Name to his own praise and glorie Hither may be referred that of Austen Giue what thou commaundest and commaund what thou wilt and then shalt thou not commaund in vaine Obiection God is holie enough there is no cause therefore why we should desire that he be hallowed or sanctified Aunswere God is holy in himselfe But wee desire that wee may acknowledge him to be holy and so magnifie him He sanctifieth vs by making vs holy wee sanctifie and hallow God himselfe when we speake that of him which he will haue vs to speake and knowe of him Obiection 2. What belongeth vnto vs to do that should we not desire another to doe But it belongeth to vs to hallow and sanctifie the name of God Answ What belongeth vnto vs to doe that wee ought not to desire another to doe if so we be able by our selues by our own strength to perfourme it But we are not able to doe this Therefore we must desire of God that he will giue vs strength wherby his diuine name may be of vs hallowed sanctified The worde hallowing is affirmed of God not that hee halloweth himself or that another halloweth him seeing he hath none aboue him but because he halloweth and sanctifieth others And others he sanctifieth inwardlie and outwardly Jnwardly by his holie spirit Outwardlie by his woorde Which he effectuateth 1 By separating them from their sinnes 2 By reuiuing quickning them by his holie spirit 3 By the continuing of both 3 The same worde is affirmed of Christ two waies Namely both passiuely and actiuelie Passiuelie 1 Because the Word was ordained and consecrated by the father to the office of the Mediatour 2 Because the humane nature of Christ was cansecrated out of that whole lump or masse that is was selected from among all creatures to the vnion with the Worde 3 Because his humane nature was preserued from sinne for the perfourmance of the Mediatourship The same is also affirmed of him passiuelie because Christ is hallowed and sanctified of vs. Now it is vsed of him actiuely because Christ sanctifieth both himselfe others He sanctifieth halloweth himself as he is the Word and Mediatour The Word did sanctify with his Father that flesh which he tooke by preseruing the same from sinne and by endowing it with al giftes and this so as the Father also himselfe preserued it from sinne and would that christ shoulde become our Ransome As he is Mediatour he sanctified himselfe by his voluntarie obedience towardes his father in offering himselfe a sacrifice for vs. He sanctifieth vs 1 By imputing his own righteousnesse 2 By a reall communicating of his holinesse which is wrought by the holy ghost Concerning all these read Zanch. de trib Eloh lib. 4. cap. 10. The same Zanchius in the same booke cap. 3. pag. 89. cap. 10. pag. 154. setteth downe three waies whereby Christ sanctifieth vs. 1 The Jmputation of his righteousnesse which is considered in his whole humiliation and obedience vnto death 2 The Jmputation of his most perfect holinesse for which he alleageth the place of Paul 1. Cor. 1.30 3 The reall communicating thereof But notwithstanding it is to bee obserued that Zanchius when he expoundeth the place of the Epistle to the Hebrues maketh that holinesse of Christ to cōsist in his voluntarie passion in which sense if we take it it seemeth not much to differ from the imputation of his iustice and righteousnesse which consisteth in obedience THE SECOND PETITION THY kingdome come Thy kingdome come that is let it by continual encreases be augmented and alwaies by a new enlargement and accession let thy kingdome bee extended and multiplied which thou O god in thy Church dost hold and possesse The special Questions concerning the kingdom of god 1 What the kingdome of god is A Kingdome in general is a certaine forme of ciuil gouernement wherein the soueraigntie of rule belongeth to some one person who is furnished with giftes and vertues aboue the rest and ruleth ouer al according to iust honest and certaine Lawes in requiring obedience making Laws defending the good punishing the bad The kingdome of God is the sending of the Son from the father euen from the beginning of the world who should ordain and maintaine a ministerie and should by the same be effectual forcible in working should gather a Church by the woorde and the holy ghost out of all mankinde rule and preserue the same raise it from death adorne it with heauenly glorie that so God may be all in all and maie be magnified by the Church of Angels and men for euer Out of this definition wee may gather
nor spirite but that good Angels are cogitations and motions raised by GOD in men or happie euents proceeding from GOD and bad Angels euil and wandring affections or lustes or purposes and deuises which come of the corruption of nature For except they were liuing substaunces and forcible in working they woulde not assume carrie and mooue bodies and visible shapes Moreouer the Scripture attributeth manie thinges to them euery where which agree not but to natures subsisting by themselues liuing and vnderstanding For the good Angels were those ministers by whom the lawe was deliuered in mount Sina Actes 7. Galat. 3. They shall come with Christ when he shal iudge the quicke and the dead Mat 25. They knowe not the daie of iudgement Mat. 24. They alwaies beholde the face of the father which is in heauen Math. 18.10 They reioice for the saluation of men Luke 2. and 15.1 Pet. 1. The elect shall be like vnto them Math. 22. Christ is made more excellent than the Angels Hebrewes 1. They defend the elect Psalm 34. But the euil Angels did not abide in the truth Iohn 8.44 They appeare amongest the children of god Iob. 1.6 They inuade and possesse the bodies of men and beastes Math. 8. They shall be punished with euerlasting torments Math. 25. Angels are also finite that is of a limited essence or nature 2 Angels finite both in nature and in properties and endewed with a certaine measure of strength and wisedome For although spirites are not circumscribed in a certaine compasse of place as bodies yet their substaunce is neither infinitelie extended neither in more places than one at the same time neither is able in wisedome or power or other properties to match and equall the immensnes of the Creator For they are saide to goe from one place to another and to be absent from one place when they are in another as Luk. 1. Act. 10. 12. Dan. 10. They were created by god of nothing 3 They were created in the verie beginning of the world Psal 148. Praise ye him al ye his Angels praise him al his armie For hee commaunded and they were created Col. 1.16 By him were all thinges created which are in heauen and which are in earth thinges visible and inuisible whether they bee thrones or dominions or principalities or powers c. Wherefore albeit in Moses there is no mention made Moses made mention of the Angels in general though not in particular in the storie of the creation seuerallie of Angels as who applying himself to the common capacitie of men especially recounteth the visible workes of god yet whenas he saith that heauen earth and al the host of them was created he implieth also Angels which both are these verie heauenly hosts and ministers of god and are often mentioned among them by Moses himselfe And whereas they are called Iob. 1. 38. The children of god it is not to be vnderstood of any coeternity and propagation of their substance out of god but of their creation and conformitie with god and of the mutuall loue betweene god and them as in like sort also may bee saide of men They were created al good and holy that is in their creation 4 They were created in holynes they were enriched with strength wisedome libertie of wil holines and righteousnes whereby they might be conformed and like to god as it is saide He sawe all that hee had made and lo it was verie good And of the good Angels it is said Psal 103.20 Ye his Angels that excell in strength that do his commaundement in obeying the voice of his word Mat. 18.10 Their Angels alwaies beholde the face of my father which is in heauen Mat. 22. The elect shall be in the resurrection as the Angels of god in heauen Luc. 9. they are called holie Likewise Isai 9. Seraphin that is flaming or shining namely with puritie and diuine wisedome and with the loue of god But of the bad Angels it is saide Iohn 8. Hee abode not in the truth And in the epistle of Iuda The Angels which kept not their first estate but left their owne habitation 5 And confirmed therein Now as these former to bee spirites finite created by God of nothing and created good and holie are in the Scripture deliuered as common both to good and bad Angels So also the Scripture deliuereth those things whereby a huge and exceeding difference appeareth betweene them For the good Angels by the especiall grace of their Creator were so confirmed and established in that sanctitie and blessednes wherein they were created that albeit they serue their Creator with an exceeding and most free wil yet can they neuer reuolt from him or fall from that state of righteousnesse and felicitie wherein they stand Wherefore 1. Tim. 5. They are called elect Angels Mat. 18. They are saide alwaies to beholde the face of the father Of those who are elected to euerlasting life it is said Math. 22. That they shal be like the Angels And this perseueraunce in their state they haue not by the peculiar excellencie and vertue of their nature as it is saide Iob. 4.18 He found no stedfastnes in his seruaunts and laid follie vpon his Angels But of the meere and free bountifulnes of God towards them by the sonne of God keeping and guiding them that they may be ioined to him as to their head and remaine together with elect men the euerlasting Church and Temple of God magnifiyng and praising God for euer Colos 1. All thinges consist in him Likewise Ephes 1. It hath pleased the father to gather together in one all thinges both which are in heauen and which are in earth in Christ 6 To worship and magnifie God The good Angels were both created and confirmed 1 Euerlastingly to knowe and magnifie God for his goodnesse and bountie towards them and mankind Psal 103. Praise the Lord al ye his hosts Isa 6.5 They crie Holie holie holie the Lord of hosts the whole earth is ful of his glory And Luc. 2. They laud praise God for the manifestation of the Messias 7 To be the ministers of God for the sauing of his chosen 2 To be the ministers of god for the accomplishing and maintaining of the safetie and saluation of the chosen when as God by them declareth his wil deliuereth the godly out of daungers defendeth them against the Diuels and wicked men Or also to punish the wicked who oppugne the Church Psalme 34.7 The Angel of the Lord pitcheth rounde about them that feare him and deliuereth them Psalm 91.11 He shall giue his Angels charge ouer thee to keepe thee in all thy waies They serue also for the wicked Nowe although the wicked also and reprobate are defended by the Angels and receiue other benefites not seldome at the handes of God as Iohn 5. When after the waters of Bethesda had been troubled by an Angel whosoeuer then first stepped in was made whole
manie waies men are called sonnes 2 How Christ is and is called the sonne of God 3 Why his onelie begotten and first begotten 4 Whether the sonne be coeternal with god the father 1 HOW MANIE WAIES MEN ARE CALLED SONNES EVery sonne is a sonne either by nature or by grace A natural sonne A son by nature or a naturall and proper son is hee who is partaker of his fathers nature and essence or who hath the essence or nature of him whose sonne he is communicated vnto him and that either wholie as Christ in respect of his Godhead for vnto him the father by begetting him communicated his essence whole and the same or in part as men vnto whom is communicated some little seuered portion of their fathers essence Wherfore a naturall sonne beginneth at one and the same time both to be and to be a sonne A son by grace is he who hath the right and name of a sonne A sonne by grace not by nature that is not that he was procreated out of his substance whose sonne he is called but onelie by a free gift of his and by fauour So is he said the son of God by grace who not by nature but by Gods gift is called his sonne Nowe the sonnes of god by grace are of three sorts some by grace of creation The sonnes of God by grace of creation some by grace of adoption some by grace of vnion The sonnes of God by grace of creation are Angels and our first Parents before their fall For that God shoulde create them and conforme them vnto himselfe that is make them righteous and blessed and that now also he maintaineth those blessinges in them it is his benefite and gift proceeding of his grace And therefore God created them that hee might account them for his sonnes and they againe acknowledge and magnifie him as their bountiful and benigne father And although they were not borne of the substance of God yet neither were these at any time not his sonnes but at one and the same time beganne both to bee and to bee the sonnes of GOD. A sonne by grace of adoption or an adopted sonne is he Sonnes by grace or adoption who not by birth but onelie by the law and will of the adopter receiueth the right and name of a sonne so that hee is in the same place with him as if he had been borne of him whereas before hee had beene no sonne Wherefore an adopted sonne beginneth not at the same time to be to be a son but he sometime was when yet he was not a sonne After this sort that is by adoption are our first Parents after their fall so also are all the regenerat the sonnes of god For these by nature are the childrē of wrath but are adopted to be the sonnes of god are made Christs brethren not by any merite of their owne Our fraternitie and brotherhood with Christ but freely by for Christ Eph. 2. Furdermore our fraternitie brotherhood with Christ consisteth in these fower thinges 1. In the likenes and similitude of our humane nature For hee is true man procreated of the bloude of Adam the common father of vs all 2. In the fatherlie loue and bountifulnes of god towards vs who for Christs sake embraceth vs as his sonnes heapeth vpon vs his benefites 3 In our conformitie correspondence with Christ which is wrought by the holy Ghost whom hee bestoweth on vs. 4. In the consummation and accomplishment of his benefites that is in perfect eternal righteousnes blessednes and glorie In respect of the three latter we are the sonnes of God by adoption The sonne of God by grace of conception or vnion is Christ alone The sonne of God by grace of vnion in respect of his humane nature which by the special working of the holy ghost being conceiued formed and sanctified in the Virgins wombe was personally vnited vnto the word A TYPE OR FIGVRE OF THE SONNES OF GOD. Euerie Sonne of God is ether By nature and proper as is the WOORD onelie who hath by birth his fathers nature and substance communicated vnto him whole and the same By Grace either of Creation as Angels and Adam before his fall Conception and vnion as Christ according to his humanitie Adoption as Adam after his fall and all the regenerate 2 HOW CHRIST IS THE SONNE OF GOD. CHrist is the sonne of God according to both natures Christ is the sonne of God by nature according to his Godhead but in diuers respects According to his Godhead hee is the sonne by nature and his natural or proper and onely begotten sonne because according to this nature he alone was from euerlasting begotten of the substance of his father after a manner altogether ineffable beeing of the same nature and essence with him Ioh. 5.26 As the father hath life in himselfe so likewise hath he giuen to the sonne to haue life in himselfe The eternall father therefore hath communicated vnto his sonne the life whereby both himselfe by himselfe necessarily is and maketh all other things to be which life is that one eternal Deitie creatresse and defendresse of all thinges Christ is the sonne of God by grace of vnion according to his manhood According to his humanitie hee is not the naturall and proper sonne of god because his humanitie as touching it selfe is not the person and it issued from the substance of his mother not from the substaunce of GOD But he is the sonne of god by grace not of adoption because he was at no time not his sonne as that hee shoulde bee made of no sonne or of the sonne of wrath the sonne of God but by grace of conception by the holie ghost and of vnion with the word For his humanitie was from the very wombe sanctified and vnited to the Godhead of the Word which Godhead is the sonne by nature That Christ according to his flesh was a sonne by grace not by merit of his humane nature And that a masse of fleshe in so maruelous manner by the power of the holy Ghost shoulde bee seuered out of the fleshe of the Virgin and that thereof beeing sanctified shoulde bee formed a true humane bodie that is quickened with a humane soule the same to be vnited to the verie sonne of god into one person subsistence was not the merite of his humane nature as which had not as yet any being is in it selfe but a creature but the speciall free gift or benefite of God as Paul in plaine woordes declareth Colos 1.19 It pleased saith hee the Father that in him should all fulnesse dwell And Phil. 2.9 God hath giuen him a name aboue euerie name Christ therefore as touching his humane nature was as the Sonne of GOD by grace euen presently from that very moment when hee beganne to bee borne man and that therefore because by the vertue of the holy Ghost
in mind Moreouer hee is expressely called the proper sonne of God Therefore he is the natural sonne of God who hath the nature and essence of his father and that the same with his father because the Deity is but one in number creatresse of al things also he hath the same whole entire because it is indiâ—isible Wherfore the man christ is the same eternal god with the Father Châ—ist iâ— the pâ—oâ—er sonne of God by nature not by grace by reason of the Deity which he hath simply al one the same with the father for there are not two eternals he is also the natural coeternal Son of the father because he is another from the father as touching his person Reply 1 Christ is called the proper Son of God because he was made by God as also the church is called the proper people of god Aunswere This is a corruption of a place of Paul For Paul Rom. 8.3 and 32. opposeth the proper Sonne of God to vs and also to the Angels For both the Angels and wee are made the Sonnes of God in respect either of our creation adoption and regeneration by the holy Ghost or also in respect of both as the regenerate Therefore wee beeing compared with Christ are not the proper Sonnes of God For so he could not be called the proper and onely begotten Sonne Wherefore hee is and is called the proper Sonne of God in that hee alone was begotten of the substaunce of God the Father Reply 2. The word saith Seruetus was indeede alwaies in god but it was not the sonne but in respect of the filiation or Sonne-hoode which was to come in the wombe of the Virgine or in respect of man to bee borne of the Virgine that is The Word in it selfe was not anie inuisible hypostasis and substance which being begotten of the substance of the Father and distinct from him was truly subsisting before the flesh borne of the Virgine but was a certaine relucencie or reflexed shining in God that is that visible image or shape which appeared vnto the fathers in the olde Testament afterwards passed into the flesh or into that visible man Iesus who alone is the sonne in respect of whom also The Woord or that visible shape which alone hee will haue to be the person is called the sonne Answere 1. By this is denied that Christ is the proper Sonne of God Because his humanity issued not from the substance of god 2. The woord is such a sonne as vnto whom the father gaue to haue life in himselfe as hee himselfe hath it in himselfe who when thinges were created was euen then god by whom all things were made who was the life the light of men c. The woord therefore was and that before Iesus borne of the Virgin a liuing intelligent working hypostasis or substance 3. There should haue beene no hypostatical or personal difference betweene the Father and the Sonne because the Woorde according to Seruetus doctrine had not his proper hypostasis whereby hee should differ from the Father 2 Obiectâ—on Hee who is not named in the Scripture before the taking of flesh the sonne of god was not the sonne of god before the flesh was borne But Christ is not called in the Scripture the sonne of god before his natiuity of the Virgine Wherefore hee was not the sonne of god before To this our answere is double First we denie the Maior For wee knowe that Gods reuelation and manifesting in the newe Testament is clearer than in the olde And therefore albeit it were true which these woulde That the sonne of God is not called the Sonne but after the assumption of the fleshe yet notwithstanding seeing in many places it is shewed most clearely that the Sonne who tooke fleshe was before he tooke flesh as The woorde who is the onely begotten of the Father was in the beginning By the Sonne all things were made My Father worketh hitherto and I woorke it may not bee saide that therefore the Sonne was not before hee tooke fleshe because hee was not called before by this name And Secondly the Minor is not true Christ named in the scripture the sonne of God before he tooke flesh For how euer the olde Testament bee more obscure and darke than the newe yet is he called by Salomon the coeternall wisedome of God begotten of God Likewise it was foretolde that the Messias should bee God and the sonne of God and after an other maner than other sonnes Isay 7. His name shal be called Immanuell Isay 9.6 He shall cal his name wonderfull counselour The mightie God The euerlasting father Iermie 23.6 This is the name whereby they shall call him The LORDE our righteousnesse Psalm 27. The Lorde hath saide vnto mee Thou art my Sonne this daie haue I begotten thee Againe Kisse the Sonne 2. Sam. 7. I will bee his Father and hee shall bee my Sonne Wherefore long before was hee signified both to bee and to bee the Sonne of GOD who afterwardes was to bee man 3 Obiection If the diuine nature of Christ was without his humane nature the Sonne of god Christ but one sonne though coÌ„sisting of two natures there shall bee made thereby three sonnes namelie his Diuinitie his humanitie and whole Christ consisting of both natures Wherefore there was not anie Sonne before Iesus was borne To this wee aunswere that the Antecedent is most false For seeing the Woorde did take ioine and vnite personallie vnto himselfe not another person or Son of God but another nature this assumption or taking maketh not moe persons or sons but it is one the same person or one Sonne hauing in him two natures 4 Obiection If the god-head of oulde without the fleshe was the Sonne and nowe two natures are one Sonne there shall bee neuerthelesse two Sonnes one incorporeall the other corporeal Wherefore there was not any sonne before the flesh Answer Neither is this Antecedent true For one and the selfe same Sonne is of olde incorporeal of one only nature and only God but now corporeal of two natures and existing both God and man 5 Obiection The humanity by it selfe is not the Sonne Therefore neither the Diuinity by it selfe is the Sonne Aunswere This reason doth not followe because there is great dissimilitude of the natures which are compared The Woorde existed and was a person and the Sonne before the fleshe was taken and assumpted But the humanitie was neither before the assumption neither beeing assumpted did it make the person by it selfe And therefore the humanity seuerally is not the Son but is in the Son or is the other nature of the Sonne but the Word both separate and knitted to the flesh is the same Sonne as touching it selfe it is the Sonne of GOD by nature but as touching the assumpted nature or humanitie the naturall Sonne of of man and the Sonne of GOD by grace of personall vnion To the second classe of argumeÌ„ts also
belong those sayings which teach the man Christ to be the onlie begotten Sonne of god Iohn 3.16 So god loued the woorld that he gaue his onelie begotten Sonne Ioh 1.14 We saw the glorie thereof that is of the worde incarnate as the glory of the onelie begotten Sonne of the Father For the onely begotten is he who hath not any brethren of the same generation and nature But Christ as touching his humane nature hath brethren Heb. 2.14 For asmuch as the children were partakers of the flesh and bloode hee also himselfe likewise tooke part with them And a little after He in no sort tooke the Angels but he tooke the seede of Abraham Wherfore in al things it became him to be made like vnto his bretheren And a litle before He that sanctifieth they which are sanctified are all of one that is of the same nature humane Wherefore hee is not ashamed to call them bretheren Wherefore there is in CHRIST another nature according to which hee is the onely begotten Sonne of the Father besides his humanitie according to which both he hath many bretheren and is sprung not of God but of the seede of Dauid Christ is called the onely begotten by nature not in respect of the manner of his generation Obiect The man Iesus is called the onely begotten because he onely was begotten of the Virgin by the Holy Ghost Aunswere It is a misconstring and corrupt interpretation of the word 1. For hee is so the onely begotten that hee is also the proper or naturall sonne Now such a one is saide to be the onely begotten not for the special manner onely of begetting but because he onely was begotten of his substance whose sonne hee is called or because hee onely hath his essence issuing from the substaunce of the Father 2 Because hee the verie same by whom all things were made and are preserued who is in the bosome of the Father euen from the beginning of the world reueiling God vnto the chosen who being sent from heauen into the woorld tooke flesh came in the fleshe c. hee is called the only begotten sonne of the father Ioh. 1.18 1. Ioh. 4.9 Iohn 1.14 We saw the glorie thereof that is of the Worde but not of the man Iesus as hereticks would haue it For there is no other antecedent in that place but the Woord For these words go before The Woorde was made fleshe and dwelt among vs then it followeth and we sawe the glorie thereof If then the Woorde it selfe be called and is the onely begotten then Christ is called the only begotten in this place not in respect of the manner of his generation of the virgin but in respect of his generation from euerlasting of the Father 3 The Words generation of the father is often in scripture discerned and distinguished from christes generation of the virgin The Euangelist as wee see calleth the Woord the only begotten of the Father Of wisedome it is said Prouerb 8.25 that before the mountains that is from the beginning it was formed or as the Chaldee paraphrast interpreteth it begotten but we reade in Matthewe that Iesus who is called Christ was borne of Marie 4 The only begotten is opposed to Angels men But Angels and men are the Sonnes of God either by creation or by adoption or by sanctification after what sort soeuer this be wrought by the holy ghost Therefore Christ must needes bee called the onely begotten for this cause euen for that he is his Son by nature For after this manner he is the Sonne of God onely and truely and simply seuered from other Sonnes Wherefore to this second ranck or classe those places also should be referred which shew that we are the Sonnes of God by adoption by and for that only begotten Sonne For seeing grace is opposed to nature and we are Sonnes by Grace it must needes be that Christ is the Sonne by nature To the third classe belong those testimonies of Scripture God is and is called the sonne which attribute the name of sonne manifestly to the other nature also in christ which subsisted by it selfe before and besides the flesh assumpted and did woorke all thinges And seeing Seruetus others are hereâ—n an vprore as it were and fight for this that onely the man Iesus borne of the Virgine but not God or the God-head is called the Sonne in Scriptures and that therefore before Iesus was borne there was not any Sonne of God subsisting wee are diligently to gather and collect those testimonies wherein the name of Sonne is not attributed to the humane nature only but also to the diuine The third argument therefore is this That which subsisting before the flesh borne of Marie created the woorld and from the first beginning hitherto woorketh the same thinges with the Father the same is a person and that without the flesh and before it But the sonne of god is called that which subsisting before the flesh created the woorld and from the first beginning hitherto worketh the same things with the father Therefore the sonne is a person and subsisting euen without the fleshe and before it that is Christ Iesus borne of Marie hath another nature besides his humane nature in respect whereof Christ euen before his humane nature was truly existed is is called the Sonne of God The Maior of this reason is manifest For that which worketh all woorks and that with the same authoritie liberty and power wherewith the Father doth must needs be a liuing and vnderstanding substance that is a person Nowe the Minor is prooued by testimonies of Scripture For the very same who is before all thinges for whome and by whome all thinges were created and doe consist who dooth all thinges likewise himselfe which the Father dooth is called the beloued sonne of God the first begotten of all creatures by whome god spake vnto vs in the last daies Coloss 1.16 Hebr. 1.1.2 Hebr. 2.10 Iohn 5.19 c. But the fleshe or humanity of CHRST is not before all thinges is not creatresse but created in the last times doth not vpholde or sustaine all thinges with his woord beck and effectuall will but is it selfe sustained and vpheld by the Woorde who did assume and take it Therefore in Christ besides his flesh is another nature which also before the flesh was miraculouslie conceiued in the Virgins wombe was subsisting did woorke and is the Sonne of God Againe John 3.17 God sent not his Sonne into the world to condemne it The Father sent the Sonne into the woorlde but the humanity of the Sonne was borne in the woorlde Therefore he was his Sonne before he was sent into the woorlde Ioh. 5.21 The sonne quickneth whom he wil. Matth. 11.27 No man knoweth the Father but the Sonne and hee to whome the Sonne wil reueile him But in the old Testament before Iesus was borne of the Virgine some were raised from the dead and quickened for there were some from the
is a consuming fire Fourthly That wee might know that whatsoeuer this sonne speaketh it is the will of God and the truth For whatsouer is borne of flesh which is sinful and not sanctified is flesh falshood and vanitie Obiection But he was borne of a Mother which was a sinner Why then should not Christ haue sinne Aunswere The Holy Ghost doth best know how to seuer sinne from mans nature for sinne is not of the nature of man but came else-whence euen from the Diuel Mary therefore was a sinner but that masse of flesh which was taken out of her substaunce was by the operation of the Holy Ghost at the same instant sanctified when it was taken The third thing which is signified 3 The vniting of his flesh vnto his Godhead in that Christ is saide to bee conceiued by the holie Ghost is the vnion of the humane nature with the Woorde For the fleshe of Christ was together both created or formed and also sanctified and vnited to the Sonne of the holy Ghost immediatelie but of the Father and the Sonne by the spirite It is added furder in the Creede Born of the Virgin that he was borne of the Virgine Mary that is of the Virgins substance and that cheifely for these causes 1 That we might know 1 The seede of Dauid Christ our Mediatour to be the true seede of Dauid that is to be true man and our brother who hath humane flesh made not of nothing neither else-whence but issued from the seede of Dauid Isaack and Abraham of whome also the virgine Mary hir selfe came yea of the selfe same masse of Adam whereof both they and we are 2 That it may certainly appeare vnto vs 2 Messias That this Iesus borne of the Virgine is that Messias promised vnto the Fathers For it was foretolde by the Prophets that the Messias the redeemer of mankind should be born of the stocke of Dauid and that by a miraculous conception birth hauing a Virgin for his Mother Wherefore seeing both that is both the prophecies and the miracles are in this Iesus fulfilled there can bee no doubt but that this is the Messias true Man and true God the reconciler of GOD and man 3 That this Christes birth of a Virgin might be a testimonie that he is pure and without sinne 3 Without sinne sanctified in the wombe of the Virgin by the vertue of the holy Ghost 4 That it might bee a figure of our regeneration 4 A figure of our new birth which is not of blood nor of the will of the flesh nor of the wil of man but of God Iohn 1.13 Wherefore to beleeue in Christ which was conceiued by the Holie Ghost â—â—d borne of the Virgin Mary is to beleeue That this naturaâ— Sonne of God conceiued and borne after this maner is made true man after a marueilous order and the same to bee one Christ hauing two natures vnited by personall vnion one to another which are his diuinity and his humanitie and to beleeue farther that he was holy from his mothers wombe to redeeme sanctifie me and that I for this Sonnes sake so conceiued and born haue the right of the adoption of the Sonnes of God For he cannot be Mediatour betweene God men who is not himselfe man who is not righteous who is not vnited with the Woorde that is true and by nature God man of sufficiencie and abilitie to bestowe his purchased saluation for vs on vs. Next after this article of the conception and Natiuitie of Christ for the better vnderstanding thereof followeth not vnfitly the common place Of the incarnation of the Sonne of God or Of the two natures in Christ THE COMMON PLACE OF THE TWO NATVRES IN CHRIST The Questions here to be obserued 1 Whether there be two natures in the Mediatour 2 Whether they be one or two persons 3 If they be one person what maner of vnion that is of them and how made 4 Why this personall vnion was necessarie to be made 1 WHETHER THERE BE TWO NATVRES IN CHRIST OVR MEDIATOVR Two natures in Christ WHAT there are two natures in Christ this one reason doth shewe by good demonstrance Essentiall properties which are opposite caÌ„not be in the same nor be affirmed of the same thing in respect of the same nature or cause Vigilius lib. 4. One nature dooth not receiue in it selfe a thing contrarie diuerse But in one and the same Christ are are affirmed of him properties diuerse contrarie diuine and humane finite infinite passible impassible and such like Therefore there must needes be diuerse natures in him humane and diuine And that the very diuine nature creatresse of all thinges is in Christ Christ true man and of our kinde and nature hath bin alreadie proued It remaineth that we shew a true humane nature to be in him that such as ours is and perfect consisting of a bodie and a reasonable soule of which as of essentiall parts is made a third substance to wit this particular humanitie which the Word hauing taken once into the vnity of person doth neuer laie awaie againe Which we are to holde against heretickes both oulde and newe whereof some deny Christes fleshe to haue bin formed of the Virgins substance but will haue it brought down from Heauen into the Virgin or begotten in her of the substance of the holy Ghost Others fancie Christ to haue in steede of true fleshe the likenesse semblance and appearancie of a mans bodie Others acknowledge indeede that hee hath a true bodie but not a humane soule the roome whereof is supplied by the Woord vnited vnto the body Against these the like errors the sentence doctrine of the church is confirmed First by plaine places of scripture which testify christ Maries son to haue bin made like vnto vs in al things that is in essence in properties in infirmities sin only excepted Lu. 1.31 Loe thou shalt coÌ„ceiue in thy womb bear a son Seeing then the Virgine conceiued this her sonne in her womb bare it vntil the vsual time of deliuery and was deliuered of it as other weomen vse to bee of their children it followeth that his flesh was not brought from heauen or elsewhere taken which should but passe only through the womb of the Virgin but was formed in the Virgins womb of her seed substance Heb. 2.11 He that sanctifieth and they which are sanctified are al of one wherfore he is not ashamed to cal theÌ„ Bretheren And a litle after For asmuch as the children were partakers of the flesh and blood he also himselfe likewise took part with them Again In al things it became him to be like to his brethren Therfore he hath a humane nature of the same kind wholy with ours Heereof hee is called the fruite of Maries womb Luk. 1.42 the first begotten son of Mary Luk. 2.7 made of a woman Gal. 4.4 The seed of Abraham Gal. 3.16
of the flesh subsist in two perfect natures diuine and humane suffering no commixtion confusion or mutation that is The person of the Mediatour is saide to bee constituted of two natures diuine and humane as it were of partes because those two are necessarilie required and doe concurre to the absoluing and accomplishing of the woorke of our redemption In this sense therefore both by auncient and latter Diuines and also by Schoolemen are vsed well and without daunger these Phrases and speeches Christs person is compounded The two nature are as it were the partes of Christ The person of Christ is consisteth is constituted is made of or in the two natures of God and man the two natures concurre come together into one person and subsistence they make one hypostasis or subsistence Both natures belong and concur to the substance of one Christ Both are of the substance of Christ the humanitie with the Worde or contrarie the diuine person or subsistence with the humane nature doth constitute or make the substance of one Christ Of the worde and the flesh assumpted as of substantial parts doth one Christ consist By these and the like phrases of speech vsed of this mysterie singular and surpassing all capacitie of mans wit the Orthodoxal that is men of a right and sound iudgement in pointes of faith will signifie and some way expresse this onely that the two natures are so vnited and linked in that one person of Christ as that they exist wholy in the same person or subsistence which is perfect and whole proper vnto the word from euerlasting by nature and is whole made in time the person of the humanitie also now assumpted and destitute of the proper personalitie thereof and this it is made by grace of vnion so that the diuine subsistence or person of the Word being in it selfe most simple and most perfect doth notwithstanding subsist truely and indiuiduallie in the two natures Wherefore seeing the thing it self is cleare agreed vpon among them who are of right iudgement and sound in faith wee are not odiously to iar about words especially since that concerning these supernatural thinges no wordes of humane speech can be found which way at all suffice for the expressing of them But as it is not well said the person took the person or the nature took the person So these speeches are true agreeable to faith The person tooke the nature Likewise the Nature tooke the Nature For the diuine Nature is not here considered absolutely or essentially but in the person of the word or personallie 2 Obiection That which subsisteth not by it self is more vnperfect than that which subsisteth by it selfe Christes Humanitie doth not subsist by it selfe and ours doth subsist by it selfe therefore Christs humanitie is more vnperfect than ours Aunswere First if that which subsisteth by it selfe be opposed to an accident which existeth by being in another this part of the Minor Proposition is false that Christs humanity doth not subsist by it selfe because that also is a substance But in this disputation Subsisting by it selfe is opposed to that which is indeede substance but yet dependeth of another and consisteth in another So we say that mankinde and the vniuersall or generall kindes of all thinges doe not subsist in themselues but in their singulars as the common nature of all men consisteth not by it selfe but in particular men Wherefore for further aunswere wee say that the Maior proposition beeing simplie and generallie taken is false For the soule of man beeing loosed from the bodie dooth subsist by it selfe the same while it remaineth in the bodie consisteth not by it selfe but vnited with the bodie Neither yet is it therefore to bee thought more vnperfect when this rather dooth most make to the perfection thereof For it is created of GOD to this purpose that it shoulde together with the bodie constistute and absolue the Essence of man and shoulde bee a part thereof So the soule and bodie of CHRIST were created to that ende as to bee the proper soule and bodie of the sonne of GOD and to depende personallie of him That therefore CHRISTS humanitie hath his subsistence not in a created person proper vnto it by nature but in the eternall hypostasis and person of the Worde it is so farre from bringing any imperfection thereunto for the subsistence or manner of subsisting doth not change the nature or essence of a thing that rather the greatest ornament glorie and eminencie commeth thereby vnto it and this is the chiefe and principall difference whereby it differeth and is discerned from all men and also from the blessed Angels 3 Obiection A dead and an euerliuing thing are not the same subsistent or person Christ was dead and yet euer-liuing Therefore hee is not one person Aunswere The Maior is either particular or beeing taken generallie it is false For one and the same subsistent truely and indiuidually subsisting in diuers natures euen as Christ is may bee saide dead and euerliuing as one and the same man is both mortall and immortall in respect of diuers natures whereof he is made and doth consist 3 What manner of Vnion this is of the two natures in Christ and how made THE Vnion of the flesh with the Worde was not made in the Essence or nature or in any essentiall property but in the person of the Word That this may be the better vnderstood we must obserue 1 What is to bee vnited in nature or into nature 2 What likewise to be vnited in person or into or vnto one person or according to subsistence 1. WHAT IS TO BE VNITED IN NATVRE FIRST Those thinges are saide to bee vnited in nature or Essence which as essentiall partes are coupled to the ful perfection or constitution of one nature or essence or kinde that is which make a perfect and whole essence or kinde and are one essence or substaunce So the soule and bodie are vnited to constitute or make the kinde or essence or nature of man that is are some one and perfect man Whatsoeuer thinges then are essentiall partes of a perfect thing they are saide to bee vnited in nature and vnto or into one nature Secondly those things also are saide to bee vnited in nature or essence which are one in nature essence or kinde or which are one essence or of one essence and nature or haue one common-essence or vnitie of nature or are ioined and agree in one essence So two men are saide to bee vnited in nature that is are one in kinde or of the same humane nature The three persons of the God-head are vnited in essence that is are one in Essence or are of one and the same diuine essence in number or haue the same Godhead in common So likewise To bee vnited in properties or perfections naturall or essentiall is to gette or haue the same or like equall properties essentiall Which is indeede nothing else than to bee made and bee one nature
is communicatings or such as make thinges common the properties and operations of natures are to be distinguished from the office of the person froÌ„ the honor which in respect of the office is due vnto the person Likewise one effect or act theandricall that is both of god and man or woorke or benefite from one operation or action as the whole from a part The office is common to both natures but the natures proper faculties of woorking and actions in exequuting that office are not common to both natures For that the same shoulde bee both proper and common doth implie a manifest contradiction So the worke and benefite of whole Christ is a certaine whole thing and is as it were compound and common to both natures but there are two partes heereof and diuerse operations proper to each nature which are wrought yet iointlie and belong to the same person which is Christ God and man that is both are wrought of one person according to diuerse causes and originals of woorking or according to diuerse natures but not by one and the same nature By these groundes it is easie to dissolue assoile most of the Sophismes and cauils with which at this time both the Schwenkefildians and Vbiquetaries are woont to glose and blanch that their real communicating of essential properties in natures and their Eutychian deifieng of Christs flesh to thrust the same vpon the simple for the true glory maiestie of Christ himselfe For thus they reason The offices benefits of the Mediatour his redemption intercession purging froÌ„ sins quickning sitting at the right hand of the Father his dominion and Lordlie power ouer al creatures his presence with the church beholding ruling al things raising the dead iudging both quicke and dead al these agree to Christ according to both natures Therefore the humanitie as wel as the diuinitie is also it selfe reallie omniscient searcher of harts omnipotent present in the substance of his bodie at the same moment in al places doth of it selfe know al things hear our coÌ„plaintes praiers giue the holie ghost work by him in the hearts of the chosen faith and conuersion to conclude in respect of these things the humanitie it selfe also is for it selfe adorable to be adored as wel as the godhead To these and the like there is one and a readie aunswere namelie That it is ill going from the person and from the office honor of the person to the properties operations of the natures Or The societie and coniunction of the office and honor dooth not cause or inferre the same properties or operations of both natures Or In the affirmation of the office honor are not signified the same properties of both natures nor the working of the same operations but the coniunction or concurrence of distinct operatioÌ„s proceeding froÌ„ distinct properties to the same effect or action theandrical that is of god and man The reason is because of redemption quickning adoration the like which are the functions benefits worship of the whole person there are moe and diuerse manners and parts which all agree reallie to one the same person but not to one the same nature but some to the god-head onlie some onlie to the manhood Wherefore this Maior of the reason is false Whatsoeuer thinges agree vnto Christ god and man according to both natures the same also doe agree after the same manner and as touching all parts to both natures For it doth not followe because the godhead is redemptresse therefore also it suffered and was dead Now that those things which in the person office of the Mediatour are and abide proper vnto one nature neither are made nor are by reason of the vnion common to both natures maâ—â— be shewed at large but now let these few suffice First Such as is the vnion of the natures such is the communicating of the properties But the vnion of the natures was not made in the natures or into one nature but in the person or vnto one person Therefore the communicating of the properties was made in the person not in the natures that is the vnion maketh the properties of both natures common not to one nature but to one person For not one nature but one person hath truly as two natures so also double properties and operations and those infinitely differing created and increate finite and infinite Wherefore as by vnion the man-hoode was not made the God-head or God so neither is it immense infinit and omnipotent But contrariwise man neuerthelesse is trulie and reallie as God eternal so omnipotent also and eueriewhere and giuer of the Holy Ghost The reason is Because not the manhood but the Man Christ hath indeed in his substance the eternall and immense God-head Secondly That which is proper to one can not bee common to moe that is can not exist or be found together in other subiects also of diuers nature For to be proper and to be common are contradictory therfore in fardest repugnancie Thirdlie There can not be made one omnipotencie and one omnipotent operation to be of both natures whereby as well the manhood as the Godhead should be reallie omnipotent and worke diuine thinges but there must needes be also one essence of both whereby the manhood also must bee reallie God For the omnipotency which they wil haue one and the same to be communicated vnto the flesh is the Godhead it selfe Fourthly If Christs humanitie in the office of the Mediator doth it selfe reallie effectuallie perfourme not onely that which belongeth vnto the flesh but also those thinges which are proper vnto the Godhead then either his Godhead shall bee idle and doe nothing in the woorke of our redemption or surelie the fleshe assumpted shall doe more and more shall be due and yeelded vnto it than to the Word which assumed and tooke it Fiftly Jf the flesh because it is saide to bee quickning is also omnipotent and doth by proper vertue regenerate mens hartes after the same sort also may it bee saide that the God-head also because it is redemptresse is subiect to suffering and did suffer For both quickning and redeeming are properties of the office common to both natures but not after one and the same manner Sixtly The whole maiesty of the God-head is that it is an essence existing not of another but of it selfe and subsisting by it selfe spirituall or incorporeal eternall immense vnchaungeable of infinite power wisedom goodnes c. That is the whole Maiesty compriseth all the perfections and operations proper vnto the Godhead But omnipotencie is the whole maiestie of the God-head according to the supposition of the Vbiquetaries For so Schmideline writeth in the 142. conclusion of his disputation of the Lords Supper of the communicating of the properties had at Tubinge in the yeare M.D.LXXXII In the word omnipotencie I comprise the whole maiestie of the godhead And in his 143. conclusion Omnipotencie is
flesh câ—nsubstantiall with men we doe not affirme him to bee according to the fleshe consubstantial with God For as according to the spirit he is not consubstantial with vs For according to this he is consubstantial with God So of the other side he is not according to the flesh coessentiall with god but according to this he is consubstantiall with vs. And as wee pronounce these to bee distinct diuerse one from the other not to bring in a diuision of one vndiuided person but to note the distinction and vnconfoundablenes of the natures and properties of the Word and the flesh so we affirme and worship those as vnited which make to the manner of the vndiuided vnion or composition Vigilius Lib. 4. against Eutyches IF there be one nature of the Word the flesh how then seeing the Word is euery where is not the flesh also found euery where For when it was in the earth it was not verily in heauen and now because it is in heauen it is not verily in the earth and in so much it is not as that as touching it wee looke for Christ to come from heauen whom as touching the Word we beleeue to bee in the earth with vs. Wherefore according to your opinion either the Word is coÌ„teined in place with the flesh or the flesh is euery where with the Word where as one nature doth not receiue any contrarie or diuers thing in it selfe and it is a thing diuerse and far vnlike to be circumscribed in place and to be euerie where and seeing the Word is euerie where and the flesh is not euerie where it is apparent that one and the same Christ is of both natures and is euerie where as touching the nature of his Godhead but is not euerie-where as touching the nature of his manhood is created and hath no beginning is subiect to death and cannot die the one he hath by the nature of the Word whereby hee is god the other by the nature of his flesh whereby the same God is man Wherefore that one son of God and the same made the sonne of man hath a beginning by the nature of his flesh and hath no beginning by the nature of his Godhead was created by the nature of his flesh and was not created by the nature of his godhead circumscribed in place by the nature of his flesh and not conteined in any place by the nature of his Godhead is lower also than the Angels by the nature of his flesh and is equal with the father according to the nature of his God-head died by the nature of his flesh and neuer died by the nature of his Godhead This is the Catholique faith and confession which the Apostles deliuered the martyrs established and the faithfull hitherto holde and mainetaine Now haue wee in few wordes expounded those articles of the Apostolique creede which intreate of the person of Christ and haue withall declared in the exposition thereof those things which are necessarie for vs to knowe both of the diuinitie of Christ and of his humane nature which was taken by the Word of the seede of Dauid vnited personally with the Word by the vertue of the holy ghost and begotten in maruelous nanner of the Virgines substance And it was requisite not to suffer that any sinne should passe or bee deriued into his substance 1. Because hee was to satisfie for sinne 2. Because it was not conuenient or meet that the Woorde the sonne of God should take a nature defiled with sinne To beleeue then in the son of God conceiued by the holy ghost is to beleeue 1. That he was made man after a marueilous manner and that hee was made one Christ of a diuine and an humane nature 2. That hee being so holily conceiued and borne doth purchase for vs the right and power to bee the sonnes of God Because this person is sufficient able to recouer for vs our lost righteousnes and to bestowe it on vs. For hee is vnited with the Worde that is hee is true and naturall God and man such as the Mediatour ought to bee Hee will also performe this because he was borne to this end euen to sanctifie vs. Of al these euerie one of vs may certainlie collect and conclude That this Christ is our Mediatour And the reason of this collection and consequence is Because by this that he is the only begotten Sonne of God it is manifest that Christ is true God consubstantial coeternal and equall with the Father By his holy conception and natiuitie it is also manifest that hee is true man and that perfectly iust and vnited with the God-heade or Woord and such a one was it requisite our Mediatour should be OF CHRISTES HVMILIATION THE course of order requireth that now consequentlie we expound and declare those Articles which treat of the office of Christ and first of al of his humiliation or humbling which is the former part of Christes office whereunto belong these Articles Hee suffered vnder Pontius Pilate was crucified dead buried descended into hel After we haue expounded these we wil come vnto the rest of the Articles which speake of his glorification which is the other part of Christs office HE SVFFERED VNDER PONTIVS PILATE I Beleeue in Christ which suffered that is I beleeue 1. That Christ froÌ„ the verie moment of his conception susteined calamities mesâ—ries of al sorts for my sake 2. That at that his last time he suffered all the most bitter tormentes both of bodie and soule for my sake 3. That he felt the horrible and dreadfull wrath of God thereby to make recompence for mine and others sinnes and to appease his ire and wrath against mankind These two are different To beleeue that christ suffered and to beleeue in Christ which suffered For that is to haue onely an historical faith of Christes passion neither to repose anie confidence in him but this is to beleeue not onlie that Christ suffered but also to repose and place our trust and confidence in Christs suffering and Passion OF CHRISTES PASSION THE Passion of Christ onelie doth followe next his conception and natiuitie 1. Because in his Passion consisteth our saluation 2. Because his whole life was a Passion suffering and calamitie Yet notwithstanding many things maie and ought to be obserued out of the storie of the whole race of his life on earth For that 1. doth shew This person to be the promised Messias seeing in him concur and are fulfilled all the Prophecies 2. That storie is a consideration or meditation of that humility or obedience which hee perfourmed vnto his Father The chiefe questions of Christes Passion are these 1 What Christ suffered 2 Whether he suffered according to both natures 3 What was the impellent cause of Christes Passion 4 What the final cause or end thereof 1 WHAT CHRIST SVFFERED BY the name of Passion is vnderstoode the whole humiliation or the obedience of his whole humiliation all the miseries
is begunne by the holy Ghost neither is confirmed by the Word but by an inward working and efficacie and they who are borne in the Church to those in their infancie appertaineth the couenaunt and the promise 4. The Woorde is necessarie and sufficing vnto saluation in them who are of an vnderstanding age 4 In their necessitie For faith commeth by hearing But the Sacraments are not preciselie and absolutelie necessarie vnto all For that saying of S. Augustine is most true Not the want 5 In their manner of working 6 The word may be effectuall without the sacraments but not the sacraments without the Worde 7 The Worde is confirmed by the sacraments 8 The Word may not be preached vnto Infants some sacrameÌ„ts may bee giuen them but the contempt of them condemneth 5. The Sacraments by gesture the Woorde by speech declareth vnto vs the will of God 6. The Woorde may be without the Sacraments as both in priuate and publique expounding of the scripture and that effectually also as was apparent in Cornelius Act. 10. But the Sacraments cannot be so without the Word 7. The Woorde is that which is confirmed by signes annexed vnto it the Sacraments are those signes whereby it is confirmed 8. The Word is to bee preached vnto those onelie who are of vnderstanding the Sacraments are to be giuen vnto Infants as Circumcision and Baptisme Austine saide That a Sacrament is a visible Word most brieflie and most aptly expressed he both the agreeing differing of the Word Sacraments For when he saith That a Sacrament is a Word he sheweth in what the Worde Sacraments agree which is in that they teach the same When he addeth Visible he sheweth the difference that is that they differ in rite ceremonie 5 How the sacramentes of the olde and new Testament agree and how they differ The Sacraments of the old and new Testament differ 1 In rites 2 In number 3. In signification THey differ first in rites whereof chaunge alteration was made at christs coÌ„ming that thereby might be signified the ceasing of the old TestameÌ„t the beginning or succeeding of the new Testament 2. They differ in multitude and number There were mo and more laborious here fewer and more easie rites 3. In signification Those signified christ to come these Christ that was come The significatioÌ„ is diuerse as the circumstance of time is diuerse which the sacraments of the old and new Testament signifie For the sacramentes of the old church signified the time to come of christ which should come our sacramentes signifie the time past of Christ already manifested in the flesh 4. In the persons whom they bound 4. Jn binding and obliging men The old bound only Abrahams posterity ours bind the whole church of all nations countries 5. In continuance 6. In clearnes 5. Jn continuaunce The ould were to endure but vntill the comming of the Messias the new vntill the end of the world 6. Jn clearenesse Those are more obscure and dark because they signifie things to be manifested but these more clear and plaine because they signifie thinges already manifested They agree 1. In the Autor 2. In substance They agree 1 Jn the author 2. Jn the thinges signified or in substaunce For by the sacramentes of both testamentes the same thinges are offered signified and promised vnto vs euen remission of sinnes and the gift of the holy ghost and that by christ alone This is prooued in the Epistle to the Hebrues Jesus christ yesterday and to daie the same is also for euer But these are not in respect of rites and ceremonies the same therefore they are the same in respect of the thing by them signified 1. Corinth 10.2 The Fathers vnder the Lawe were baptised in the cloude and in the Sea and did al eate the same spiritual meate Coloss 2.11 By christ ye are circumcised with circumcision made without handes that is In Baptisme we receiue the same benefites which they did in circumcision without Christ therefore who is the thing signified of all the sacramentes both of the ould and newe testament no man was euer saued or now is or euer shall be saued Whence it followeth that the Fathers in the old testament had the same communion with christ which also we haue that it was no lesse signified confirmed then vnto them by the word and sacraments than it is now vnto vs in the new couenaunt Wherefore it is not only idolatry to seeke another communion of christ than is in the word but also to seek another communion of christ in the sacraments of the new Testament than which was in the sacraments of the old testament 6 What the sacramental vnion is THE foundation or matter in the Sacraments are the rites ceremonies or externall visible actions instituted by God which are perfourmed by men after a certaine solemne maner are called by a relatiue or respectiue name signes or sacraments The terme respected or correlatiue is Christ al his benefits or the internal spiritual working of God in vs according to the promise of the gospell this is called the thing signed or signified by the sacrament because it is signified and confirmed by the outward rite The relation it selfe that is betweene these which maketh both to become relatiues or respectiues being in their own nature absolute thinges is the order instituted by God the signifieng of a spirituall thing by a corporall thing and the sealing of the thing signified The correlatiues are the things signified and the signes Heereby now appeareth that this coniunction of thinges with their signes or sacramentall vnion is not corporall or local Nowe this vnion consisteth in two things 1. Jn a similitude and proportion of the signes with the thinges signified 2. In the ioint-exhibiting or receiuing of thâ— thinges and in the lawfull and right vse The faithful onely in the lawful and right vse receiue the signs of the ministers and the things signified of Christ and when we so receiue both that is the signe and the thing signified the same is called sacramental vnion For in these it consisteth and not in a presence of the thing and the signe in one and the same place and much lesse in any transmutâ—â—ion or transsubstantiation Sacramentall vnion therefore is such as agreeth to all sacraments and such as was the vnion of Christ with the ould sacraments such is it also now A sacrament is a respectiue or relatiue word The foundation we said to bee a ceremony instituted by GOD Christ or the communion of Christ and al his benefits are the terme The relation is the ordination of that rite or ceremony to the thing signified that is both Christ himselfe his benefits or the coÌ„munion and participation of christ and his benefits For in euery sacrament are these two the thing signified and the signes Now the thing and the sacrament differ as the relatiue and the
the Charter promise the same also Semblablie God perfourmeth his benefites after the same manner and vnto the same persons after which manner and vnto which persons hee promised them But vnto the wicked hee hath promised nothing so long as they remaine in their vnbeliefe 3. Wee receiue spiritual thinges by faith The wicked haue not faith Therfore neither do the wicked receiue spiritual things 4. To be wicked and to receiue the sacraments entirelie implieth a contradiction 11 How manie sacraments there are of the new Testament IN the newe Testament are onelie two sacramentes But two Sacramentesâ— the new Testament the vse whereof in the Church is perpetuall vniuersall by the consents of Ambrose Austine Baptisme which succeeded in the place of circumcision and other purifiynges of the law and the Lords supper which the Paschal Lambe shadowed and prefigured These two and no more did Christ institute For those are onelie sacraments of the new Testament which are 1. Ceremonies 2. Jnstituted of Christ for the whole Church 3. Hauing the promise of grace adioined vnto them But there are onelie two such sacraments as appeareth by their definition Wherefore Pennance priuate absolution matrimonie The Papists other fiue Sâ—craments are no Sacramentâ— vnction and laying on of hands are no sacraments For it is certaine that pennance and priuate absolution are onely the declaration and preaching of the Gospell But the preaching and publishing of grace must not bee confounded with the annexed seals of the promise of grace Vnction and laying on of hands are indeede ceremonies but neither were they instituted of Christ for the whole Church neither haue they the promise of grace adioined The thing signified by extreme Vnction hath ceased in the Church Matrimonie is no ceremonie but a moral worke The Papists recken it among sacraments because the old latin translation translateth the Greeke woorde 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is a mysterie by the woorde Sacrament Ephes 5.32 where the Apostle speaketh of marriage But Paul himselfe is to be heard rather than the latin interpreter No man is ignorant that mysterie is of as large ample extent in signification with the Grecians as arcanum which signifieth any secrete or hidden thing is with the Latins Wherefore they must confesse and graunt all arcane and secrete thinges to bee sacraments And so if Matrimonie bee the seuenth sacrament the will of God shall bee the eight sacrament and the calling of the gentiles the ninth For so doth the same interpreter in the same Epistle interpret the same greeke word Eph. 1.9 and 3.9 But Saint Paul in that place cap. 5.32 vseth the woorde mysterie to designe and signifie the coniunction of Christ and his Church and not the coniunction of man and wife Certaine Conclusions of the Sacraments in generall 1 GOD hath alwaies adioined vnto his promise of grace and eternal life some signes and rites which the church calleth sacraments Circumcision was commaunded and enioined Abraham By Moses the sacrifices and rites were encreased which endured vnto Christ who instituted Baptisme and the supper 2 Sacraments therefore are the signes of the eternal couenant betweene God and the faithful that is they are rites commaunded prescribed to the church added vnto the promise of grace whereby as by visible and certaine testimonies God might signifie and testifie that hee communicateth and imparteth Christ and his benefites to al those that vse and receiue these tokens and symboles with a true faith according to the promise of the gospel and that hereby also hee might confirme in them a full perswasion and trust of his promise that the church also of the other side might by the participation of these symboles and tokens professe publiquelie their faith and thankefulnes towardes God and binde themselues vnto it preserue and propagate the memorie of christes benefites be discerned from all other sects and obliged and stirred vp to a mutual dilection and loue vnder one head christ Jesus 3 Rites and ceremonies which are not commaunded of God or are not instituted to this end as to bee signes and tokens of the promise of grace are not signes and tokens of the church for a signe can confirme nothing but by his consent and promise from whom the thing promised and signified is expected and looked for No creature therefore can institute anie signes or pledges of Gods will 4 Two thinges are to be considered in all sacraments the visible terrene and corporal signes which are the rites and ceremonies and the visible and corporal thinges which God exhibiteth vnto vs by his ministers and we receiue corporallie that is by the parts and senses of our bodies And the things signified inuisible celestial and spiritual that is christ himselfe and all his benefits which are communicated vnto vs of God by faith spirituallie that is through the vertue and working of the holie ghost 5 The mutation and change of the signes is not natural but respectiue and in relation neither is wrought as touching their nature or substance which remaineth still the same but as touching their vse whereby they are resemblances of other things 6 The coniunction also or vnion of the signes and the thinges signified is not natural or local but respectiue by the ordinaunce and appointment of God whereby thinges inuisible and spirituall are represented by visible and corporal things as it were by visible words and are exhibited and receiued together with the signes in their right vse and administration 7 The names and properties of the things signified are attributed to the signes and contrarie the names and properties of the signes vnto the things in respect of the similitude or of the signification of the thinges by the signes and in respect of the ioint exhibiting and receiuing of the thinges with the signes in the right vse 8 The right vse of the sacraments is then when as the faithful keepe those rites which God hath commaunded to those ends for which the sacraments were instituted by God The institution consisteth in the rites persons and endes the violating whereof breedeth an abuse 9 Jn this vse the things signified are alwaies receiued together with the signes Therefore the signes are not emptie or voide and without the thinges although the thinges are receiued after one manner and the signes after another 10 Without the vse instituted by God neither are the ceremonies anie sacrament neither are the benefites of God which are signified by them receiued together with the signes 11 The signs are receiued of the godly to saluation of the wicked to condemnation But the things signified onely the godly can receiue to their saluation 12 In the Elect notwithstanding after they are conuerted the fruit also of the sacrament vnworthily receiued doth at length follow And in them also that vnworthinesse which by reason of their defectes concurreth in their receiuing albeit they are sometimes chastised for the same yet neuerthelesse is it pardoned them so that that
Luk. 22.19 Do this in remembrance of me Lastly they are also bonds of loue because they who are confederated with God are vnited also among themselues Ep. 4.5 One Lord one faith c. 1. Cor. 10.17 We being many are one bodie The confirmation of the fourth Conclusion The distinction there deliuered is manifest in it selfe The receiuing of the signes is corporall externall But the thinges especiallie signified are not receiued without faith because they are promised to beleeuers onely And the signes are no otherwise true than the promises vnto which they are annexed Again the signes declare the same to the eyes which the promise declareth vnto the ears As therefore the promise is but an emptie sound without faith So also are the ceremonies vaine spectacles Again The thinges signified are the communion of Christ and all his benefits But this can no man haue otherwise than by faith either in the vse or without the vse of the Sacrament The confirmation of the sixt conclusion Such is the coniunction of all signes with their things signified as that they represent the things signified and confirme the acceptation of them For the pledges or tokens and symboles testifieng other thinges are though not in the same place yet together with the thinges testified and signified The Reason is Because to make one thing a signe of another thing is not to include or tie the thing with the signe as that they should be in one place but to ordaine the signe to signifie the thing the signe being in the same place with it or in some other place Again the nature of the things signified by the sacrament doth not admit this local vnion For some are subsisting forms some accidents not inherent in the sacramentall signes but in the mindes of men as the gifts of the holy ghost Some are corporeall and in one place only and not locallie existent wheresoeuer the sacraments are vsed as the flesh and bloud of Christ The confirmation of the seuenth Conclusion The scripture speaketh thus of the Sacramentes Circumcision is the couenaunt The Lambe is the Passeouer The bloud of the sacrifices the bloude of the couenant the expiation of the sacrifices the Sabboth the euerlasting couenant The mercie seate of the Arke Baptisme a clensing washing Bread and wine the bodie and bloud of Christ And so the scripture expoundeth it selfe when circumcision is called the signe of the couenant The Pascal Lambe the signe of the passouer The Sabboth a perpetual signe of grace and sanctification The ceremonies types and shadowes of true thinges The beleeuer and baptized shall bee saued and of the signes and symboles of the Lordes supper it is said that they are to bee receiued for our reconciliation The confirmation of the tenth conclusion The signes of the couenant confirme nothing vnto them who keep not the couenant or who referre them to another ende But the sacraments are signes of the couenant whereby God bindeth himselfe to giue vnto vs remission of sinnes and eternall life freely for Christs sake and wee binde our selues to the yeelding and performance of faith and new obedience Therefore they confirme not neither â—ssure them of Gods grace who are without faith and repentaunce or vse other rites or to some other end than God hath appointed Moreouer Jâ— is superstitious and idolatrous to attribute the â—â—stifâ—cation of gods grace either to the external woorke rite without the promise or to anie other woorke inuented by men Wherefore the abusing or not right vsing of the sacraments hath not the grace of God accompanying it or assureth any man of it As it is said Rom. 2.25 Circumcision is profitable if thou doe the law c. The confirmation of the 11. conclusion The figure of Baptisme beeing correspondent to the Arke of Noah doth also saue vs not the outward washing away of the filth of the flesh but the inwarde testification of a good conscience towardes god The bread which wee breake is it not the communion of the bodie of Christ And seeing the sacramentes are an externall instrument whereby the holy Ghost fostereth and preserueth faith it foloweth that they serue for the saluation of beleeuers as doth the word But contrary the wicked through the abuse of the sacramentes and the contempt of Christ and his benefites which are offered vnto them in his woorde and sacraments and through the confession of his doctrin which they embrace not with a true faith purchase vnto themselues the anger of God and euerlasting paines according to the saying of the Prophet Esay cap. 66 3. He that killeth a Bullock is as if he slew a man he that sacrificeth a sheep iâ— as if he cut off a dogs necke And saint Paul 1. Cor. 11.27 Whosoeuer shall eate this breade and drinke the cup of the Lorde vnworthilie shall be guiltie of the bodie and bloud of the Lorde But the things signified because they are receiued by faith onely and are either proper vnto saluation or saluation it selfe as Christ and his benefites they cannot be receiued of the wicked neither can they at all be receiued but vnto saluation The confirmation of the 12. coÌ„clusion A promise the signe of a promise hauing a condition of faith and fidelitie adioined vnto it are ratified whensoeuer the condition is perfourmed But such is that promise which is signified and confirmed by the sacraments Therefore if in the vse of them faith doth accompany which beleeueth the promise the things promised and signified are receiued together with the signes Eze. 16.59 I might deale with thee as thou hast done when thou diddest despise the oth in breaking the couenant Neuerthelesse I will remember my couenaunt made with thee in the daies of thy youth and J will confirme vnto thee an euerlasting couenant The confirmation of the 13. conclusion The iterating of circumcision or Baptisme hath beene no where receiued or admitted Neither is the reason hereof obscure or vnknowen because those sacraments were instituted to bee an initiating or solemne receiuing of men into the Church which is alway ratified vnto him that is penitent and persisteth therein But the vse of other sacraments is commaunded to be iterated as of the sacrifices the Passeouer worshipping at the Arke Cleansings as also of the Lords Supper The cause is because they are a testimonie that the couenant which was made in Circumcision and Baptisme is ratified and firme to him that repenteth And this exercising of our faith is alwaies necessarie The confirmation of the 14. conclusion That there is one common definition agreeing to the sacraments both of the olde and new testament hath beene shewed before That the difference of them consisteth in the number and forme of the rites is apparent by a particular enumeration of them For in the newe testament it is manifest that there are but two because there are no other ceremonies commaunded of god and hauing annexed vnto them the promise of grace And that the olde sacraments
necessities of al men 6 Christ saith Luk. 15.10 That the Angels of God reioice for one sinner that conuerteth Therefore the Angels beholde the hearts of men The same is likewise prooued of the Angels out of Daniel cap. 9. and 10. Therefore the Angels beeing in heauen beholde repentaunce in mens heartes which are on earth Aunswere A cause is ill gathered and concluded of an effect when that effect may come of other causes For it is not necessary that Angels should know those things by the beholding of mens harts which they may know either by effects or by signes tokens or by diuine testimony reuelation For it agreeth not to the Angels onely but vnto all the godly also on earth to reioice for the conuersion of one sinner neither yet do they behold the hearts of men 7 The soule of the rich glutton sawe from hell Abraham and Lazarus being in heauen implored Abrahams help and knew the state of his brethren in this life and Abrahams soule likewise did heare and see the soule of the rich man Therefore the soules of the Saintes in heauen see and heare the state and praiers of them that conuerse here on earth Ans First they do amisse to take that properly which Christ spake allegoricallie and by way of parable in translating his speech from corporall thinges vnto spiritual things not thereby to shewe that these are like vnto them but by applying his speech as might best fit our capacity to aduertise vs of the state of the godlie and wicked after this life For soules haue not either bosomes wherein to receiue one another or eies to lift vp or tonges to be dried with thirst or fingers to dip into water neither doe they vse any mutual parly or conference from hell and heauen Christes purpose therefore is by these figures of words to expresse the thoughts affections tormēts state of the wicked abiding in paines after this life Moreouer were it so that these things had been in such wise done as they are reported against which yet the very words themselues are yet could nought be hence prooued for the beholding of minds neither yet for the knowledge of all external things For neither Abraham nor the glutton is said to haue vnderstoode the secret thoughts and cogitations of each other but to haue knowledge of them by speech And Stephen also being on earth saw Christ being in heauen and Paul heard Christ speaking from heauen neither yet doe al the Saintes see or hear what is done in heauen neither did Stephen and Paul see or heare these things at al times 8 Christ according to his humanity maketh request vnto the Father for vs all and therefore according to his humanitie hee knoweth the desire necessities of them that cal vpon him in all places at al times Wherefore the saints also haue communicated vnto them from God the beholding of harts the hearing of praiers Ans The example is vnlike For the humane vnderstanding and mind of Christ vnderstandeth and knoweth and his bodilie eares and eies also heare and see al things whatsoeuer according to his humane nature he should or would behold either with his minde or with his outward senses by reason of his godhead which sheweth them vnto his humanitie vnited thereunto or also giueth vnto his senses a vertue and force of perceiuing of thinges which are fardest distant Neither yet is the force or wisedome of his humane nature infinite as is the power and wisedome of the God-head neither doth he know by any transfused vertue into him the thoughts of mindes and hearts For of the measure of knowledge conuenient for his manhood it is said Mar. 13.32 Of that day and houre knoweth no man no not the Angels which are in heauen neither the Sonne himselfe saue the Father Of the reueiling of the secrets of men vnto him by his diuinity it is said Mar. 2.8 When Jesus perceiued in his spirit that thus they thought with themselues c. But nowe that all things are reueiled vnto Angels and Saints which are reueiled vnto the humane vnderstanding of Christ by his God-head they will neuer be able to prooue out of the Scripture For Christs humane nature dooth excell and surpasse in wisedome all Angels and men both in respect of the personall vnion thereof because it is vnited to his God-head and also by reason of his Mediatourship which office his humanity beareth executeth together with his diuinity yet so that there is still kept in the administratiō thereof the difference of both natures Wherefore this example of Christ doth not proue that the Saints know al things either by beholding the things themselues or by diuine reuelation from God 9 Jn the diuine essence shine all the Jmages and formes of things But the Angels and Saints departed behold the essence of God Mat. 5 18. Therefore they behold in God al thinges which we doe suffer and thinke Aunswere First the Maior proposition which they put is doubtfull and vncertaine For it is manifest that God knoweth all thinges and doth in his wisedome comprehend the most perfect and perpetuall knowledge of all thinges but whether that vnderstanding of things doth so shine in God that it may bee also beheld of creatures this verilie they haue not as yet prooued out of Scripture Secondly neither is the Minor true namely That the blessed behold the essence of God whereof it is saide No man hath seene God at any time Iohn 1. Lastly albeit there is no doubt but the holy Angels and men in the heauenly life enioy a cleare knowledge an immediate manifestation of God whatsoeuer it is yet wee are not to imagine that they naturally know all things that are in God For then should their wisedome be infinite that is equal vnto Gods wisedome which is absurd and flat against the testimonies of Scripture whereas Angels also are said not to know the day of iudgement Likewise 1. Pet. 1. Jnto which the Angels desire to looke And Ephes 3.10 To the intent that now vnto principalities and powers in heauenly places might be knowen by the Church the manifold wisedome of God They profit therefore and encrease in the knowledge of wisedome and of the counsels of God by the very exequution and contemplation of Gods woorkes Nowe seeing that which they speake of is no naturall but a voluntarie glasse or rather a diuine manifestation or illightening that is the Angels and blessed men haue not this in their own nature to view and see in God his whole wisedome but God according to his good wil and pleasure doth manifest communicate vnto euery one such a part thereof as seemeth good vnto him as it is said No man knoweth the Father but the Sonne Mat. 11.27 and he to whom the Sonne wil reueile him we affirme therefore the inuocation of Saints so long to want a ground and foundation so to be superstitious and idolatrous vntill they shewe out of
From what euils he saueth vs 433 How he saueth 434 VVhom he saueth 437 Of Christ What is signified by the name of christ 437 What Christes vnction or annointing is 438 What his Prophetical function 444 VVhat his Priesthood 448 VVhat his kingdome 451 Of the communion of the faithful with Christ vvhat the Annointing of Christians is 452 In what sense christians are called prophets 456 vvhat is the Priesthoode of christians 456 vvhat is the kingdom of christians 458 Of Christ the Sonne of God How manie waies men are called sons 461 How christ is the son of God 463 vvhy christ is called the only begotten and first begotten sonne of God 464 Of Christs Diuinitie The sonne of God is a subsistent in the flesh borne of the virgin and before the flesh 467 The sonne of God Christ is a person reallie distinct from the Father and the holy Ghost 498 The Worde is equall consubstantial with the Father 500 503 Other rules whereby the obiections of the Arrians are dissolued 507 The principall arguments against the Diuinitie of the Sonne and the Holie Ghost with the answeres vnto them 509 Of Christ our Lord. In what sense christ is called Lord 514 For what causes he is our Lorde 515 Of christs conception by the holy ghost and birth of the Virgin Marie 518 The common place of the two natures in Christ vvhether there be two natures in christ our Mediatour 520 vvhether christ be one person or moe 525 vvhat maner of vnion this is of the two natures in christ and how made 529 A rule to bee obserued touching the proprieties of both natures in christ 536 A rule to bee obserued touching the proprieties of christ the Mediatour 544 vvhy it was necessary that two natures should bee vnited in the person or subsistence of the sonne of God 550 Of Christs humiliation that is of his Passion vvhat Christ suffered 554 According to which nature christ suffered 556 The causes impellent or motiues of christes Passion 55â— The final causes oâ— ends of his Passion 558 Of Christs death How christ is said to haue beene dead 561 vvhether it was requisite and necessary that christ should die 562 The fruit of christs death 564 His burial 566 His descension into hel 567 Of Christs glorification that is of his Resurrection vvhether christ rose againe 571 How christ rose 571 For what cause he rose 572 vvhat are the fruits of christes Resurrection 576 Of Christs Ascension into heauen vvhither christ ascended 580 How wherefore christ ascended into heauen 582 587 vvhat is the difference between christs Ascension and our 588 vvhat are the fruits of christs AscensioÌ„ 589 Of Christs sitting at the right hand of GOD. vvhat the right hand of God signifieth 591 vvhat is to sit at Gods right hand 591 vvhether christ did alwaies fitte at the right hand of God 595 vvhat are the fruites of christes sitting at the right hand of the father 597 Of Christs comming to iudgement vvhether there shal be any iudgement 599 vvhat the last iudgement is 601 vvho shal iudge 603 vvhence and whither christ shal come 604 Howe christ shall come to iudgement 605 vvhom christ shal iudge 605 vvhat shall be the senteÌ„ce executioÌ„ 606 For what cause that iudgemeÌ„t shal be 607 vvhen it shal be 608 vvherefore God woulde haue vs certaine of the last iudgement 608 For what causes God would not haue vs certain of the time of iudgement 609 For what cause GOD differreth that iudgement 609 Whether the last iudgement be to bee wished for 610 The third part of the Creede of the Holie Ghost the sanctifier What the name spirite signifieth 610 Who and what the holie Ghost is 611 What the office of the holy gost is 617 Of whom the holie Ghost is giuen and wherefore 621 To whom the holie Ghost is giuen 622 How he is giuen receiued 624 How the holie Ghost is reteined 625 Whether and how the holie ghost may be lost 625 wherefore the Holie Ghost is necessarie 626 Howe wee may knowe that the holie ghost dwelleth in vs. 627 Of the Church What the Church is 627 How many waies the Church is taken 629 What are the tokens and markes of the church 631 Why the church is called Holy Catholicke 633 In what the church differeth from the common weale 634 Whence ariseth the difference of the church from the rest of mankinde 635 Whether any one may be saued out of the church 636 Of Predestination Whether there be Predestination 636 What Predestinâ—tion is 641 What are the causes of Predestination or Election and of Reprobation 642 What are the effects of Predestination 644 Whether Predestination be vnchangeable 645 How far forth Predestination Election and Reprobation are known vnto vs. 645 Whether the elect be alwaies meÌ„bers of the church the reprobate neuer 646 Whether the elect may fall from the church and the reprobate abide alwaies in the church 648 What is the vse of this doctrine 649 Of the communion of Saints 649 Of the remission of sinnes What remission of sinnes is 651 Who giueth remission of sinnes 652 For what remission of sinnes is graunted 653 Whether remission of sinnes agreeth with Gods iustice 653 Whether remission of sinnes be freely giuen 654 To whom remission of sins is giuen and how 655 Of the Resurrection of the flesh What the Resurrection is 656 The Errours concerning the Resurrection 656 Whence it may appeare that the Resurrection shall certainely be 657 For what end the Resurrection shall be 659 By whom the Resurrection shal be 660 How the Resurrection shal be 660 When the Resurrection shal be 661 What bodies shal rise 661 Whether the soule be immortall 662 Of euerlasting life What euerlasting life is 670 VVho giueth euerlasting life 672 To whom euerlasting life is giuen 673 For what cause euerlasting life is giuen 673 VVhen how euerlasting life is giuen vnto vs 674 675 VVhether wee can bee assured in this life of euerlasting life 675 Of Justification VVhat iustice or righteousnes is in generall how manifold it is 677. 678 In what iustice differeth from iustification 679 VVhat is our iustice 680 How Christs satisfactioÌ„ is made our iustice and righteousnes 681 VVhy Christs satisfaction is made ours 683 VVhy Christs satisfaction is made ours by faith onely 684 Obiections against this doctrine of iustification aunswered 685 Of Sacraments VVhat sacraments are 694 VVhat are the ends of sacraments 697 In what sacraments differ from sacrifices 699 In what sacramentes agree with the word and in what they differ from it 700 How the sacraments of the old new Testament agree how they differ 702 VVhat the sacramentall vnion is 703 In what the thinges differ from the signes 704 VVhat phrases and formes of speaking of the sacraments are vsuall vnto the church and scripture 705 VVhat is the right and lawful vse of sacraments 705 VVhat the wicked receiue in the vse administration of the sacraments 706 How