Selected quad for the lemma: nature_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
nature_n	assume_v	humane_a	union_n	3,291	5	9.5119	5	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A11363	A treatise of Paradise. And the principall contents thereof especially of the greatnesse, situation, beautie, and other properties of that place: of the trees of life, good and euill; of the serpent, cherubin, fiery sword, mans creation, immortalitie, propagation, stature, age, knowledge, temptation, fall, and exclusion out of Paradise; and consequently of his and our originall sin: with many other difficulties touching these points. Collected out of the holy Scriptures, ancient fathers, and other both ancient and moderne writers.	Salkeld, John, 1576-1660.	1617 (1617)	STC 21622; ESTC S116515	126,315	368

they so appearing and speaking did alwayes represent the maiestie of their maker repeating for the most part Gods owne words which hee had immediately infused into their vnderstanding Againe if the aforesaid opinion of the assuming of our humane nature is to bee vnderstood by a personall vnion betweene God and man then questionlesse God hath beene twice incarnate and twice vnited to our humane nature which is contrary to the holy Scriptures Or if there was no reall vnion or assumption of our humane nature but only a shade or similitude of the same as wee reade that Angels haue oftentimes assumed humane bodies how then was it truly said let vs make man to our image and likenesse seeing that similitude of humane nature could not in any wise be the image of God neither could it be truly said that Adam was made to the image of God if so be that we vnderstand by the image of God not any true humane nature but the shade only and similitude of mans nature Hence I conclude the first opinion to be the best as which is most grounded in the sacred text and most followed of the holy Fathers and other expositours CHAP. XVI Whether the woman be made to the image of God or no. IT might seeme rashnesse to doubt of this if S. Paul did not giue vs some ground denying as some thinke that woman was made to the image and likenesse of God auerring her onely to be the image of man in that he contraposeth woman as the glory of man to man as the image and glory of God His words be these 1. Cor. 11. 6. Man ought not to couer his head forasmuch as hee is the image and glory of God but the woman is the glory of the man for the man is not of the woman but the woman of the man The woman therefore is not the image and glory of God but immediately only the glory of the man otherwise there could be no difference in this betweene the man and the woman contrary to the inference which S. Paul maketh in the precedent verse Neuerthelesse euen the text it selfe doth clearly confute this opinion for after that it had beene said let vs make man to our owne image and likenesse presently it is added hee made them both man and woman Wherefore as man was made to the image of God so likewise was the woman made to the same Aug li. 12. de trinitate cap 7. S. Austine is very large in giuing the reason of this conclusion but briefly this is the answer If wee consider the principall reason why man is said to be the image of God to wit as hee is an intellectuall creature and as he is indued with the properties therevnto annexed so is it euident that this word image doth equally signifie and may be equally attributed both to man and woman seeing that they both participate of reason and vnderstanding both bee indued with an immortall soule both partakers of free will both capable of supernaturall gifts both of grace and glory But againe if this word image be taken in a more large and improper signification as hath beene already explicated we may well say that man was made to the image of God woman framed to the image of man Because as God is the end to whom man is immediatly referred so likewise man in some sort is in regard of the woman because man is the head of the woman by whom shee ought to be directed vnto God This explication seemeth to be grounded in the afore-said place of Paul 1. to the Corin. 11. chap. for when hee had said that man was the image of God and woman the glory of the man he presently giueth the reason ver 8. For man saith he is not of the woman but the woman of the man ver 9. for the man was not created for the womans sake but the woman for the mans sake Neuerthelesse if the similitude of God in man and woman be considered not according to their naturall gifts but to the supernaturall of grace and glory then questionlesse it hapneth often-times that some women are more adorned with these supernaturall graces and gifts and consequently are more like vnto God then many men As wee piously beleeue of the blessed Virgin who as shee was pronounced by the Angell of God to bee blessed amongst all women so no doubt but shee hath receiued an eternall blessing aboue all Angells and men our Sauiour only excepted both God and man CHAP. XVII Whether man be made to the image of God euen according to his body and corporall proportion shape and lineaments or doth in any wise represent the diuine maiestie THE subiect of this question is so certaine of it selfe and without all coutrouersie that for the resolution thereof wee haue more neede of the subtlety of distinction then of any profound diuinitie or learning For seeing that the diuine maiesty is a most pure spirit as infinite in essence as in all and euery of his diuine attributes infinite how is it possible that there should be any comparison similitude or likenes with him in that which is altogether corporall limited and most base such as is our humane natute according to the body Neuerthelesse seeing the body doth in some sort represent the soule like as the soule also is the image of God hence peraduenture it may be inferred that the body may in some sort be said to be a representation or similitude of God in as much as the body if wee consider it in his full perfection is an immediate glasse similitude or representation of the soule the which most perfectly representeth Almighty God Wherefore though in regard of our corporall substance considered immediatly in it selfe without any relation vnto the soule wee be no better then bruite beasts yet if we consider it in regard of our soule and as it is the receptacle of the most excellent image of God it may after a remote manner and mediately be said to represent euen God himselfe Wherefore S. Austin propounding this question August lib. 6. de Gen. ad literam cap. 12. in what doth a man exceede the brute beasts seeing they are both made of earth he answereth in nothing but because he is made to the image of God not in body or corporall substance but according to his soule and spirituall powers Though true it is also that he hath euen in his body a certaine property which doth in some sort demonstrate the rectitude of his soule as that he is made vpright to the end that hee might vnderstand how hee ought not to abase himselfe to the terrene vile and base trash of the world like vnto the bruite beasts and other most base creatures who as they are framed prone and haue their bodies inclined towards the earth can neuer erect themselues to any spirituall or heauenly thing Hence Bernard well noteth that God made man vpright in stature and erected towards heauen to the

end that his corporall rectitude and vprightnes of his shape might stirre him vp to preserue the spirituall rectitude and righteousnes of the inward man who was made to the image of God and that the beauty of our corporall substance and outward proportion and right disposition of the lineaments of our body might correct the inward deformitie of our soules and the powers thereof For what can be more vgly deformed and abominable in the eye of that all-seeing God then a sinfull and defiled soule in a beautifull body Is it not a shamefull and detestable thing that an earthly and corrupt vessell such as the body is should contemplate the heauens view the Planets and be delighted with the aspect of the incorruptible spheares and motions of the starres and that on the contrary side the spirituall and celestiall creature far more perfect then all the celestiall globes and heauens the soule I meane of man should alwaies haue her eyes that is hir inward powers and affections debased and cast downe to the terrene trash and basest creatures of this world Consider therefore ô man thy dignitie of nature the perfection of thy powers thy priuiledges of grace the immortalitie of thy soule the excellencie of thy creation the nothing of thy selfe and lastly the infinite price of thy redemption by the most precious blood and death of the Lambe thy Creator and Redeemer and let not this so base and transitorie trash of this world so alienate thy minde and bewitch thy vnderstanding that thou preferre the filthy and base pleasures of the body before the spirituall and eternall of thy spirituall and immortall soule CHAP. XVIII Whether the image of God may be wholy lost and blotted out of the soule of man ORigenes Epiphanius ep ad Iohannē Hierosel Aug lib. 2. contra Adamantiam Manich. l. 83. quaest q. 66. lib. 6. de Gen. ad literam cap. 27.28 and S. Austine do seeme to affirme that man lost the image of God Epiphanius and diuers other of the Fathers doe peremptorily deny it out of Gen the Psalmes and S. Paul but I thinke this controuersie rather to arise by reason of the diuers vnderstanding of the image of God which is in man then of any true difference in their opinions for who can doubt but if wee consider man according to the supernaturall gifts first infused into the soule of Adam but that he lost the diuine similitude or likenesse of God and that wholy nothing remayning but onely the deformity of sinne Gen. c 9. Psal 38. 1. ad Cor. cap. 11. in the deformed and sinfull soule but if we consider him againe according to the naturall substance of the soule and her naturall faculties consequent therevnto it is equally indubitable that shee retained this likenesse of God though not in the same perfection which shee possessed before but rather much defaced blemished and deformed My reason is because there proceeded a more excellent beauty and perfection vnto this naturall substance by reason of the supernaturall qualitie of originall iustice and consequently the depriuation of this supernaturall gift which was also a sufficient cause of natures greater perfection and more admirable beauty was a depriuation and defacing of the said beauty of nature which otherwise had beene a perfect type and portraiture of the diuine nature and being CHAP. XIX Why God made man to his image and similitude MAny and most excellent reasons may be giuen of this but which I must needs confesse are rather morall congruencies grounded in the infinite goodnesse of God then in any other forcible convincing reason plainely deduced out of the sacred Text. The first whereof may be this that God therefore made man like vnto himselfe that thence it might be manifest how much the infinite goodnesse of God exceedeth the malignitie enuy and malice of man for God being infinite in his goodnesse yea in all other his attributes infinite yet doth he not disdaine our of his infinite goodnesse that that which in vs is limited and finite should be compared and likened to that which in him is infinite and beyond all comparison he enuieth not the perfection of our nature he maketh it more perfect by grace and by a sacred league and vnion he combineth both that by both we may be like vnto him in both who is the author of both And this with such a degree of participated perfection that man doth not only become like vnto God but also may bee called and is truly the adopted Sonne of God So that all men may now participate of the grace which one onely possessed by nature insomuch that as he being the naturall Sonne of God is a perfect patterne of his eternall Father by nature so wee also be a participated likenes and similitude in some degree by nature but most perfectly by grace The second reason may be this if so be that we may compare these inferiour things of this world to those supreme and infinite of God like as a temporall Prince hauing for to shew his power magnificence and maiestie built furnished beautified adorned and deck'd some excellent Citty in which hee himselfe doth meane to remaine doth there erect in some principall part thereof his owne image or statue in some precious porphire marble or other more excellent matter euen so Almighty God hauing out of his infinite wisdome made this maine Machina and beautifull Citty of the world for the manifestation of his glory to the end that it might be knowne and acknowledged who was the only author and architect of all hee was pleased to place in the midst thereof in the garden of paradise his owne image and similitude man I meane who by his soule and the three principall powers thereof should represent the vnitie and trinitie of his maker yea and by his outward shape and forme in some sort likewise represent the inward and consequently though not immediately euen God himselfe Insomuch that as it is said of the portrature of Venus painted by Apelles that none could perfect it but onely Apelles who first began it so likewise was it not possible that any should bring our soule to her first perfection but only God who was her first Creator Hence it is that like as he who defaceth the image or statua of an earthly Prince is iustly condemned of high treason so a fortiori who depraueth his owne nature and by offending his maker depriueth it of grace the which is the seale signe and similitude of the diuine power nature and maiestie is worthily condemned of high treason against the same power and maiestie The third motiue why God created man to his image and similitude may be this to the end that all corporall things might be subiect and each after their manner seruiceable to man as who of all other creatures was the expresse similitude of their lord and maker vnto which it seemeth that God did allude when he said vnto Noe the feare of you and the