de Turc moribu◠c. 4. p. 130. it was their custom to use these words In the name of God of Mercy and of their Spirit If any shall be so in love with his private Sentiments as to deny this Truth which has gained so universal a Testimony upon the account of some difficulties which our shallow Intellects cannot reach to the bottom of he may with the same reason assert there is no such thing as the Ocean because he cannot by his line find the depth of it in every place If all this will not satisfie let him exercise his reason about some difficulties in nature and he will find the existence of things very plain where their contexture is so concealed and intricate that the greatest Wits are at a loss in their disquisition about it If the intricacy of some modes in natural things be no reasonable inducement to deny the reality of the things themselves much less is the ineffable union betwixt the Divine Essence and Subsistence a justifiable plea for the denial of the Sacred Trinity He that shall think fit to try the acuteness of his Intellect about some knots in Philosophy will find the edge of his reason so much blunted in the encounter that it will not be easie for him to perswade himself that it is sharp enough to penetrate into all the Mysteries in Divinity If this will not prevail without an engagement with those difficulties which this Truth is usually assaulted with let a Catalogue be made of them and it will not be difficult for him to make his way thro' them who is armed with the following considerations 1. Altho' there be Three Persons or Subsistences in the Godhead yet there are not three Essences Every Person distinctly considered has an Essence but every person has not a distinct Essence 2. Tho' one finite individual Nature cannot be communicated to Three Persons yet an infinite may If the whole Divine Essence is intimately in all created persons at the same time there is no reason to think but that it may be communicated to three increated Whatsoever is alledged against this Communication holds as strong against the Universal Presence which all acknowledge but those who deny the Deity 3. Finite and infinite perfect and imperfect are not proper predicates of Subsistence but of Being So that when we are interrogated whether the three persons in the Holy Trinity are finite or infinite perfect or imperfect if by Person is meant only a mode of subsistence without the Nature it is a very incongruous question For infinity and finity perfection and imperfection are but modes of Entity and every mode imports variation and one variation cannot properly be predicated of another If by Person is understood the Divine Essence subsisting in a peculiar manner then we answer that every person distinctly is infinitely perfect tho' every person has not a distinct infinite perfection 4. Altho' the three Persons have one and the same Nature yet the Son cannot be said to be the Father or the Spirit the Son The same specifical Nature agrees to Joh Moses and Daniel Every one of them has the whole nature of Man yet we have no reason to assert that Moses is Job or Joh Daniel As there is some thing not contained in the common Nature which doth individuate them So there is a characteristical property appertaining to the Father the Son and holy Spirit whereby they are distinguisht altho' they are all equally interested in the same infinite Essence 5. When it is said that the only God is the Father Jesus Christ is the only God therefore Jesus Christ is the Father the major proposition is peccant For in every proposition the predicate is never less comprehensive than the subject but always of a greater latitude and therefore bears the title of the major term But here the predicate Father is less comprehensive than the subject the only God Now I have finished the Third Proposition The Three Persons are One God 4. This One God is to be Worshipped If we consider him essentially his peerless perfections do justly challenge the deepest veneration They being infinite cannot admit of any additions All that We are capable of doing is to own them with the decent significations of the most humble and submissive regards It is an Article in the Jewish Creed Fag in Deut. c. 14. v. 1. The Blessed God is worthy to be Worshipped It is a principal part of the Confession of the Christian Church Thou art worthy O Lord to receive Glory and Honour It was usual among the Heathens to worship the Head of great Rivers Sax. Will-worship He who considers God as the fountain of all that goodness which circulates in the veins of the Creation can conclude no less than that the most profound veneration is due to him If the Deity be considered personally every person doth require Divine Worship to be directed to him The Father Jo. 4.23 The Son Heb. 1.6 Psal 2.12 Phil. 2.10 S. Stephen directed his Prayer to him Act. 7.59 Ananias enjoyned S. Paul to call upon him Act. 22. v. 16. Salvation is promised to those who express a conformity to this command Rom. 10.13 When we say the Son is to be Worshipped we do not consider him without his humane Nature but as a person consisting both of Divine and Humane Supreme Adoration is given upon the account of the infinite excellency of the Divine Nature This excellency is communicated to the Person which has assumed our Nature and advanced it to the dignity of an Hypostatical union but not to the nature it self And therefore the Worship which is due must not be terminated upon the nature considered abstractedly but the person who is clothed with it This induced Athanasius to say Epist ad Adelph 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 c. Let them know meaning the Arrians that when we Worship the Lord in the flesh we do not Worship a Creature but the Creator cloathed with a created body Neither must our blessed Lord be considered without his Mediatorship Tho' supreme Adoration doth not immediately terminate upon the relation of a Mediator yet it doth upon him who is invested with that Relation Our Saviour in this respect is inferiour to the Father and nothing inferiour to the Deity can challenge Supreme Adoration The taking up the mediatory Office was an act of free Grace and by consequence might not have been done Now that which might have been or not been must be inferiour to that necessary and immutable excellency which is the proper Object of the highest Veneration We must distinguish betwixt the foundation of Worship and the Motives to it Tho' the free acts of the Divine Benignity as redeeming mediating c. are vigorous inducements to Worship yet the sole foundation and immediate object is infinite excellency which will not permit any thing which is inferiour to share with it in the same degree of Honour A Subject may have many motives from the
of Worship we may add Hearing Reading receiving the Sacraments The Liturgy joyns together the setting forth the Praise of God and the hearing his Word when we with holy reverence hearken to it we set forth the Praise of his Wisdom and Goodness which by our devout and serious attention we acknowledge to be sufficient and ready to instruct us He who reads the Scripture as the Word of the living God with an intention to be made wise unto Salvation by it doth thereby manifest his deep sence of the incomprehensible and profound understanding of the Author of it When Proselytes are admitted into the Church by Baptism and have the remission of their sins sealed unto them upon the terms of the new Covenant it is an evident indication of their humble resentments of the infinite goodness of God in granting an act of Amnesty and pardon after the violation of the first Covenant Their being baptised in the name of the Father Son and Holy Ghost is an expression of a reverential acknowledgment of and an entire devotion to the sacred and blessed Trinity The receiving the Symbols of the body and blood of our Lord imports a laudatory agnition of him It is not an empty remembrance which is intended but a solemn commemoration attended with the most emphatical expressions of Praise and Gratitude It is stiled a shewing forth in allusion to the Jewish 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which was a declaration made in praise of the benignity of Heaven in procuring redemption from the Aegyptian servitude The Wine is stiled by S. Paul 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Cup of Blessing and the Bread by Justin Martyr 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Bread of Thanksgiving These two Sacraments were not designed for the primitive times only but to continue to the last period of the World The reason of their continuance is common to all Ages we have now as much need to renounce our ghostly enemy profess our repentance promote sanctification be received into the Church commemorate the death of Christ renew our covenant gain a fuller Communion as they which lived in the first age And it is not now inexpedient that we should be taught by some visible signs our intellectual powers are in as much dependence upon sence as formerly Were the attainments of the present Age equal to the state of Paradise this way of instruction would not be disagreeable Eden was not without Two Sacramental Trees Their permanency is likewise ascertained to us by a Divine Revelation In the Commission to Baptise it is said I will be with you to the end of the world To interpret baptising nothing else but an initiating by Doctrine without Water and the end of the world the end of the age in which the Apostles lived is to offer too much violence to the Text. The proper Notion of Baptism includes Water We are not to depart from the proper signification of words and comply with a Metaphorical without a peremptory necessity The Context is so far from obliging us to this departure that on the contrary it holds forth a manifest discrimination betwixt baptising and initiating by Doctrine v. 19. v. 20. The first is expressed by the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the second by 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 That phrase 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is of the same importance with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Mat. 13. v. 40. and there without controversie it signifies the last period of the world when the Angels shall sever the wicked from the just If 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 import the Age it must be remembred that the Jews divided the time from the Creation to the dissolution of all things into two Ages the first expiring at the coming of the Messias the second at the final period of the Universe and so I will be with you to the end of the age is as much as I will be with you to the end of the world The Age before the coming of the Messias cannot be understood he being in our nature when he spake these words therefore the age after must When the Apostle says as often as ye eat this bread and drink this cup ye shew forth the Lord's death till he come He evidently declares that the institution of the Supper is to continue till the last appearing of Jesus Christ There are but four comings of his usually spoken of The First in the Flesh when he assumed our nature the Second in the Spirit to sanctifie and rule his Church the Third in his vindicative Justice to destroy Jerusalem the Fourth in the last day to Judge the World The two first cannot be understood They were past when the Apostle wrote his Epistle The Messias was then come in the Flesh to all mankind In the Spirit at the solemn feast of Pentecost and in particular to the Corinthians they were sanctified in Christ Jesus 1 Ep. 1.2 But the coming which the Apostle aims at is future until I come Neither can we understand his coming to destroy Jerusalem For these words are inserted with a design to awake the Corinthians to a greater degree of circumspection in their preparations for the holy Communion intimating that it shall continue till Christ come to summon them before his Tribunal and judge them for their unworthy Approaches There was no summons of the Corinthians at the overthrow of Jerusalem and therefore the last coming must be understood These Acts which have been enumerated some in savour of the Mass would perswade us that sacrificing is to be added as a part of Divine Worship under the Gospel If this be so it must be warranted by some Divine Law and this must be either natural or positive Natural it is not as will be evident by the following considerations 1. A Sacrifice is an Oblation of some material thing unto God and in the offering destroyed The essential difference whereby it is distinguished from other Oblations is the destructive mutation This change cannot reasonably be esteemed an act of Worship but so far as it is an acknowledgment of some excellency appertaining to the Divine Nature as Sovereignty Wisdom Goodness c. In its self before it has an institution enstamped upon it it imports no such agnition Were we left to the conduct of natural light it would rather induce us to believe that the Godhead is dishonoured than worshipped by a dissolution of the creature in whose composure divine Power and Wisdom are eminently conspicuous 2. If the light of nature leads us to this practice it must be because it conduceth to the Honour of God and if so we being under an obligation to honour him in the superlative and most exalted degree the same reason will dictate that mankind the most excellent part of the visible Creation is to be singled out for this sacred purpose Nay that Abraham wanted not the warranty of a revelation for the offering up of Isaac but was sufficiently instructed by the light of Nature in that concernment
perswade them that no such thing was done Not only Bellarmine as I have before intimated but likewise Sirmondus acknowledge That Transubstantiation was not exposed to a clear light before the Ninth Century In the following Ages the profound ignorance of the people and the ambition of the Priests gave a great advance to it The Priests being desirous of deference and respect from the people knew no method more expedient to promote their purpose than to adhere to that doctrin which has a direct aspect upon it What could more readily commend them to the first place in the thoughts and opinion of the Vulgar than to perswade them that they were so highly favoured in Heaven as from thence to be invested with a power to turn Bread into the body of Christ This if sincerely believed must inevitably be as efficacious to secure to themselves an eternal veneration as the doing the greatest miracle recorded in the Sacred Oracles After all the commotions about this doctrin and the definition of Innocent the Third in the Fourth Lateran Council the greatest men for learning were at a loss what to six upon Joannes Parisiensis did afterwards publickly maintain That the Bread after Consecration really remains as the humane nature of Christ does after its being advanced to the dignity of the Hypostatical Union At the Council of Trent This business was brought to its perfection yet when the definition was to be made the Dominicans and Franciscans could not agree but fell into warm contests insomuch that at the last the General Congregation did prudently resolve to use as few words as possible and to make an expression so Universal as might be accommodated to the meaning of both parties All this to which much more might be added is sufficient to assure us of the novity of Transubstantiation and to give us some light into the steps which it took before it could arrive at the dignity of being an Article of Faith in the Church of Rome Now if we will give our selves leisure to sum up what has been spoken we shall find too much reason to suspect that the error of the Romanists about the Annihilation of the Bread and Wine in the Sacrament doth not arise from the nature of the Object but a voluntary distemper in the Subject and therefore can contribute little to an excuse from the Charge they lie under of alienating the Divine Honour when they give supreme Worship to the Sacrament And now I have done with the first particular the terminating 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 upon the Eucharist 2. Invocation of Saints The Romanists in this do that which is highly injurious to the peculiar Honour of God When they direct Mental Prayer to the Saints the action in its own nature imports an acknowledgment That they understand the Heart which is a priviledge appropriated to the Supreme Being in the Holy Scripture Thou only knowest the hearts of the children of men 2 Chro. 6.30 There is not a tittle in any part of Divine Revelation whereby it appears that God makes known our Hearts to them but on the contrary many clear intimations That he reserves this knowledge entirely to himself When Vocal Prayer is made to them for Grace and Glory it involves a confession of a power residing in them to confer that which is the gift of God alone thro' Jesus Christ If it be said That they are invocated not as Authors but Intercessors for these things they contradict the stile of their Devotion O Maria gratiosa dulcis mitis formosa applica nobis gratiam O Maria gloriosa in deliciis deliciosa praepara nobis gloriam In the Psalter of the Virgin all the Addresses made to God of whatsoever nature are directed to Her It is said That God the Father has done for Her what Assuerus promised to Esther given one moiety of his Kingdom namely That of Mercy to Her reserving the other of Justice to himself But let it be so That one thing is spoken and another meant which is not decent at any time much less in the Worship of God and the Saints are prayed unto as Intercessors yet this action cannot be excused from the blame of usurping the Honour of the second Person in the Sacred Trinity who is appointed to be the only Mediator betwixt God and Man We know of no other in the Scripture and it is not for mortal Man to appoint new Advocates in the Kingdom of Heaven and make them Rivals with the great Master of Requests who is of God's designation An Earthly Prince looks upon it as an insufferable insolence for Subjects to appoint who shall be his great Officers without his Order and Command If it be said That the Saints are invocated not as co-ordinate Intercessors but subordinate to Christ this will not much mend the matter For whether they be the first or last yet it is plain that when one particular Saint is Invocated the same hour and instant in diverse places for things of a different nature a capacity is supposed in that Saint to hear all their Petitions at once and by consequence to have an infinite Understanding A Finite Intellect tho' in the fruition of the greatest advantages either from the Revelation of God or Relation of Angels can understand but one object at a time To have an actual apprehension of more than one at the same moment is a peculiarity belonging to an unlimited and infinite capacity If it be added that the Sense of the Church is That we must have recourse to the Prayers of the Saints departed as we have to them while they are living here this will not amount to any reasonable satisfaction There is not the same reason for praying to Saints in Heaven as there is for our desiring our Brethren here to pray for us 1. They are at a distance These are present If a man residing in England should fall upon his knees and supplicate his friend in the Indies to assist him with his Prayers the very Action in its own nature would import an attribution of an immensity to him which is peculiar to God If he should daily use his picture to excite his devotion and kneeling before it make such religious applications as are usually made to the glorified Saints before their Images every one would look upon him as a person doing that which is highly prejudicial to the Divine Honour There is as much reason to believe that the Saints on Earth may hear our Prayers at a distance as the Saints in Heaven There is not one Syllable in the Bible to assure us to the contrary Abraham is ignorant of us Isa 36. And if Abraham the Father of the Faithful is a stranger to our concerns much more his Children who are in his Bosom God and Angels may reveal our necessities to our friends in any place yet no man looks upon this possibility as a sufficient ground to pray unto them when they are at a distance from us The Prayer