Selected quad for the lemma: nature_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
nature_n	adam_n	sin_n	sin_v	5,192	5	9.5484	5	true

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A52204	The middle way of predetermination asserted. Between the Dominicans and Jesuites, Calvinists and Arminians, or, A scriptural enquiry into the influence and causation of God in and unto humane actions; expecially such as are sinfull.	Humfrey, John, 1621-1719.; Baxter, Richard, 1615-1691.; W. M.	1679 (1679)	Wing H3692A; Wing M95B; ESTC R10732	43,527	48

If he himself Indeclinably Predetermineth them to the very thing which he dehorteth them from and Worketh in them both to will and to do so as that they can do no otherwise No Man can form a Conception of God more repugnant to the Notions that the Scripture hath given us of his Nature and Properties If I mistake not Amos 2 11 12 13. Arg. 3. The former Hypothesis of Physical Predetermination It over-turneth the Doctrine of Original Sin And of its Traduction If on the one Hand God did substract his Gift from Adam before he Sinned and deprive him of that Light and Ability which he once had and without which he could no longer stand before any fault or forfeiture of his and so determined him to fall in Execution of his Decree as is sometimes said by what Rule should his Posterity be Obliged still to have that which though the Nature of Man was capable of it yet was never due to it and which God h●mself took away or why should it be termed Sin to want it when it 's by no fault of his that it 's wanting nor was it ever by God intended to be continued It must be a meer Negation no Privation Since there could not be debitum inessendi any due Obligation of having it if their Supposition be true No more than is on a Beast to Reason Shall the Lord and Master of the Family take the Candle out of the Room not the Servants Extinguish it and then make it an Offence that they are in the dark and challenge them for their not working or will it solve the matter to tell them that it 's a Privation Darkness a non-Entity and therefore he could not cause it So on the other Hand If that which is termed the Corrupt Nature dwelling in Man be ens as it is a Quality or Habit and all that hath Entity be the Workmanship of God as they say it is or else Man must have a Creative Power and also good why then do we call it sin and Original sin or if it be nihil a non-Entity how then doth it descend How is it Traduced Joh. 3.6 and said to be ours by real Inhesion and Contagion as the whole Church consesseth saith Davenant Arg. 4. It staineth the Glory of free Grace in the Pardon of Sin and casteth a Blemish upon the Whole of the Meditation of Christ Wha● Conviction can possibly possess the Mind of Man of the Riches of Gods Grace in the Pardoning of sin whilst it 's maintained that the abounding of sinful Actions not to say sin is as well from God the Efficient and Predeterminer unto them as the Superabounding of Grace in the Remission of them Rom. 3.7 and 5.20 What sense can abide upon the Soul of the Grace of Christ in his being made Flesh and bearing the Wrath of God for those Tran●gressions whereof himself as God was the Prime Efficient and the which man by his own Influence and Causation was Indeclinably Predetermined unto He that shall Cause or Determine another supposing him a Rational Agent and capable of such an Impr●ss freely and willingly to do that wh●ch in the Issue will prove Rottenness in his Bones as Prohibited or Illegal Actions will do Job 20.11 Psal 38.5 will Receive little thanks for his Cure whatever Cost he may be at When himself caused the Disease and the which had he not done it there had been no need of a Remedy for it Arg. 5. If the Doctrine of our Adversaries be true What meaneth then the Combating of the Spirit of God against sin or Mens being said to grieve and to Quench the Spirit 1 Thes 5.19 it must according to th●●r Hypothesis be God on both parts His own Counteraction in the Subject And if all the first motions of the Imagination all Distraction in Religious Duties all the vain Thoughts emerging out the Heart of Man in their Numberless Operations be from God as the first Mover and Determiner why then should Man be r●quired at his Peril to dislodge them Jer. 4.14 What is it that he can do Or should he Enterprize the Eviction and Expulsion of the ataxie or Obliquity of them whilst that God himself keepeth the Entity of them in possession and in actual Operation Deut. 15.9 Arg. 6. It layeth the Axe to the Root of all Repentance for what is done and past It raseth the Foundation thereof and Excludeth the very Idea of it A Man may bewail Impreventable disaster but cannot prevent him of that which he could never have helped 2 Cor. 7.11 I appeal to the sense of any man living whether his Heart be wont to reproach him for the doing of that wherein he was no way wanting to himself or for that the which were it to do again must be done and could be no otherwise on no Account whatsoever within his Power now nor ever before If Man by the Necessity of his Being and from the Exigency of his Condition as a dependent Being cannot move save that way he is premoved and cannot but act that way that he is Predetermined or acted why then when he sees the Event should he wish it were Undone and Repent him that he did it or not rather that God did it if that be true Repentance is not founded in the Obediential Subjection of the Creature namely that God could have caused him to do otherwise or barely in the Capacity of the Subject to receive such an Impress from the first Cause but on the Evitability of the Fact or Possibility of the contrary from a Principle Intrinsick and Connate to himself Yea who or where is the man that dare go to God in Prayer with such a Notion in his head and hold to it that he is not to Confess that he could have done more Good and omitted more Evil than Eventually he hath Neh. 9.16 17 26 29. Ezra 9.10 14. had not David just Cause to Repent him of his Lye that he told to Abimelech 1 Sam. 21.2 and to acknowledge it a preventable Act which is the Sole aggravation of S●n and true Reason of it though all Sin is not now Preventable as some is though I know not why or how he should so do were it true which is by some Affirmed that in linea physicâ to the Entity of the Act he was Predetermined of God to speak every Word and Syllable that he did whereof there was never a one true equally as in the using of his Tongue in the pra●sing of his name Arg. 7. It leaveth not the least Foundation whereupon to bottom Gods Judicial Process against Man in the Day of Judgment To resolve mans Damnation into meer Dominion and Sovereignty is abhorrent to God and Cross to all Scripture Nor is there any thing more Repugnant to the Notions of Justice and Righteousness which are the Attributes of God to be Displaied towards all that shall then be Cast or Peri●h Rom. 3.5 2 Thes 1.5 than that he should be thought to Adjudge