as Psal 19.7 when it is said that the Law of God converts the soule which is the most proper effect of the Gospell it is evident that in that place under the name of the Law the Psalmist must understand the Gospell too As likewise when he tells us that his delight is in the Law of God which sustained his spirit that he perished not in his afflictions Psal 119.92 he must of necessity understand Gods promises aswell as the precepts of the Law seeing they be the promises rather then the precepts that support the soule in times of triall when we know whom we beleeve who is both able and willing and ready to make good what he hath promised as his children find by experience that there failed not ought of any good which the Lord had spoken unto the house of Israel but all came to passe Iosh 21.45 But as for the Promises especially those that concerne the Kingdome of Christ which were revealed to the Patriarchs delivered by the Prophets and lastly enlarged and more fuly and clearly opened by the Evangelists and Apostles we shall consider them apart hereafter But only the Commandements For the present we have now in hand only that which is properely and most commonly understood by the name of the Law which containe those commandements and rules of practise which God hath given to his Church for her direction and left upon record in the Scriptures Now these we know are distinguished by the names of Laws morall Judiciall Ceremoniall Morall ceremoniall and judiciall which by Moses in sundry places are promiscuously called Laws Statutes Judgements and Ordinances Of these severall sorts of Laws that which we call Morall comes to be handled in the first place Of these this which is called the morall Law because it was given by God for regulating of mens manners and conversation is of all the rest of the Laws most ancient Which is the most ancient of all Laws most generall and most perpetuall First most ancient Psal 119.160 as being given to our first Parents in Paradise As given to Adam in Paradise that is to man assoone as he had any being I grant indeed that we have no record of any other Laws given to Adam but those which we find mentioned Gen. 2. which are only some branches of the Second Commandement in the tree of life of the Fourth in the Institution of the Sabbath of the Seventh in the Law of Marriage and of the Eight in appointing them to keep Paradise which are all of them positive Laws and therefore need to be expresly set down or else they could not have been known whereas the rest of the Laws being all Lawes of nature and therefore discernible by naturall right reason for which cause they are said to be written in mans heart might be known although they were not recorded and therefore are omitted by Moses in that briefe history But that the rest of the morall Precepts were given unto Adam although perhaps not by word of mouth Either by word or written in his heart but written in his heart at the same time must needs be granted unlesse we conceive that God made Adam more imperfect then any other of his creatures for that he gave all the rest of the creatures rules of their motions and operations either imprinted in their natures if they want sense or by the direction of sense in those that have it is as cleare as the light Now that God should either give no law or which is almost one an imperfect law to man who most needed was most capable and best able to make use of a law must needs much disparage either his kindnesse to mankind or his wisdome in rendring the most eminent and serviceable of all the creatures upon earth unusefull and unprofitable at the least for most part if he had no perfect law to guide him It must therefore be necessarily granted that the whole morall Law was given to Adam that is to mankind in Paradise And consequently most universall as given to the whole nature of man in him and by necessary consequent must be acknowledged to be of all laws the most ancient and upon the same ground must necessarily be generall or universall seeing it was given in our first parents to the whole nature of man which when that law was given was wholly in them It is true that the change of mans condition by Adams fall hath seemed to cause some small alteration in the law as it is not a duty that now binds us to labour in Paradise or to abstain from the one or to eate of the other of the trees that stood in the midst of it Notwithstanding even by that law all men in generall are bound to labour in such employments as God cals them unto and to abstain from all things that God forbids and to make use of all such ordinances as the Lord appoints for the confirmation and strengthening of their faith So that those laws given to Adam bind all men still in the grounds and scope of them although they oblige not his posterity in those things which had relation to that state wherein he then stood and from which afterwards he so sodainly fell And upon the same ground it must as necessarily follow Upon the same ground those morall lawes must needs be perpetuall that those laws which were given to Adam are perpetuall to continue as long as men have a being on earth For seeing they were given to him as the root of mankind they necessarily bind his posterity in succeeding generations to the end of the world We never find any new law given to the Church in any age It is true that the law given to Adam hath been since renewed perhaps to Noah after the floud Which have been renued as may be probably guessed by that which we read concerning murther Gen. 9.6 And it may be to Abraham after God called him out from Vr of the Chaldeans seing we find him commended for keeping Gods commandements his statutes and his laws Gen. 26.5 But most fully and cleerly it was renewed and restored by Moses upon mount Sinai But not altered And that the law then published for the substance of it was no new law appears by comparing the law given to Adam which is in effect the same with the second fourth seventh and eighth commandements of the decalogue with which in a generall consideration they are all one if they be compared together That this which we call the Morall law was founded for ever as the Psalmist witnesseth Psal 119.152 and was to remain and to be observed as a rule of life unto Gods Church our Saviour himselfe witnesseth in expresse words Mat. 5.18 where he professeth that untill heaven and earth passe that is till the worlds end one jot or one tittle shall not passe from the law Wherefore whatsoever was praescribed in that law we may observe and guide our selves
innocency in which he then stood then the nature of man in generall and are therefore excepted in the Major proposition wherein is asserted no more but that these laws are perpetuall which were given to Adam as a man not as to perfect man This proposition thus understood is founded upon this ground of truth God made his Covenant with Adam in respect to his nature not to his person that God established his Covenant with Adam principally in respect of his nature and not so much in respect of his person so that by consequent it must follow that all who are partakers of that nature are bound by that Covenant Of this faith we have an evident demonstration in the punishment which light upon the whole nature of man for Adams transgression which of necessity supposeth the sinne of mans whole nature in Adams person in whom it was then included seeing otherwise we know the sonne shall not beare the iniquity of the father Ezek. 18.20 So that the argument holds strongly and convincingly in this manner As appeares because the nature of man becomes guilty of the breach of that Covenant If Adams breach of Covenant made between God and him brought guilt upon all his posterity that is upon the whole nature of man then it must needs follow that the Covenant obliged the whole nature of man it is utterly impossible that one should become a guilty person by breach of a Covenant to which he was never bound But the punishment inflicted upon the whole nature of man makes it evident that the whole nature of man was made guilty by Adams transgression wherefore the whole nature of man was bound in the Covenant which God made with Adam and consequently is obliged by the Law which was given in that Covenant Unto this argument Secondly Christ urgeth the Law of mariage given in Paradise as then in force may be added another proofe taken from our Saviour Christs reasoning with the Scribes and Pharisees Mat. 19.48 about their question concerning divorce which they pretended to be permitted by Moses his Law Deut. 24.1 2. For in disputing with them our Saviour grounds his argument against the divorce pretended to be permitted by the Law of Moses because it crossed that Law given unto Adam So that all the strength of our Saviours argument against their divorce must rest upon this Maxime Implying that the Law given in the beginning is unalterable That which the Law given to Adam in the beginning did not allow that ought not to be allowed which is all one as if he had said that the Law given to Adam from the beginning is unalterable and therefore remaines still in full force so that all men to the worlds end are bound to yeeld obedience thereunto Some perhaps may object Objection 6 that this answer of our Saviour Christ unto the Pharisees is applied by him to that particular case alone which was then proposed but extends not farther and therefore determines no more but that the law of marriage which was given to Adam in the beginning stands still in force but resolves nothing concerning the Obligation of the rest of the Laws which were given to Adam at the same time whether they be of force still or no. Answer To which exception two things may be answered First we say that seeing our Saviour resolves that the divorce supposed to be permitted by the law of Moses is therefore not to be allowed because it was contrary to the law of marriage given by God to Adam in the beginning then by all the rules of Logick and reason it must necessarily follow that whatsoever is contrary to any Law established in the beginning must needs be unlawfull because the reason of disallowing that kind of divorce is not drawn frō any thing that is peculiar to the Law of marriage but from that which is cōmon to all the rest of the Laws which were given at the same time as well as to that particular namely that the Law given by God from the beginning did not permit it Secondly if our Saviours answer to the Pharisees wherein he condemnes the divorce pretended to be permitted by the law of Moses be restrained to Marriage only and extend not to the rest of the Lawes given at the same time it leaves unto the Pharisees a faire ground of exception against such a resolution of the question proposed For they might easily have replied that this law was not in force any more then the rest of the Laws given at the same time to our first Parents now it is absurd to imagine that our Saviour who knew their cavilling humours by experience would leave them that starting hole Wherefore when he condemnes the divorce pretended to be permitted by Moses for that only reason because it was contrary to the Law given to Adam in the beginning he must necessarily inferre that the Laws which were then given are still in force both unto us and unto the end of the world The major proposition of that syllogisme that concludes the morality and perpetuity of the Sabbath namely that all laws given to Adam which had respect to his nature and not to his present condition are morall and perpetuall being thus fully cleared and confirmed there remains only the minor or second proposition to be made good which consists of two branches Now the law of the Sabbath was given from the beginning The first that this law of the Sabbath was given to Adam in Paradise The second that it was given to him in respect of his nature and not of his person that is to him as a man not as an innocent or perfect man Of these two branches the opposers of the morality of the Sabbath meddle not with the latter but oppose only the former affirming that the institution of the Sabbath by God was not from the beginning The reasons of which opposition we shall examine after we have given our reasons for the proving of the contrary namely that the Sabbath was instituted by God from the beginning The dispute concerning the day in which Adam fell whether it was on the sixth day on which he was created or on the next day which seems more probable if all things be duly weighed as also of the time when the Sabbath day was first instituted whether it was before Adams fall while he was yet in Paradise or after his fall when he was driven out of Paradise is not of any great moment to the point which we have in hand although seeing in the series of the history written by Moses we find the giving of this and diverse other laws recorded before Adams fall we have reason to think all things to have been done in the same order in which they are related unlesse we had better arguments then meer surmises to induce us to judge otherwise it is enough to our present purpose to have that acknowledged which no man denies that the law was given
to be taken away For as for those allegations that the rest of the Sabbath was a type of Christs rest in the grave and a part of the Iewish bondage how little force they have we have shewed before Now then if it evidently appear to all that will consider things with any indifferency by all that we have said that neither the resting from our labour one day in seven nor the continuing of that rest for the whole day nor yet the strictnesse of any rest enjoyned by the fourth Commandement are either as ceremonious or upon any other ground to be altered neither that the particular day of rest which now by Christs resurrection is altered from the last to the first day of the week is there commanded otherwise then in a generall rule equally communicable both to the Iewish and Christian Sabbath there appears no necessity of granting any thing to be mutable in this fourth Commandement more then in any of the laws of the Decalogue It hath been intimated before that mens mistake of the right interpretation of the fourth Commandement hath been a great occasion of questioning the perpetuity and immutability of the morall law and of how dangerous consequent it is to admit that there is any thing mutable therein experience teacheth us when we find how ready men are to embrace and hold that dangerous errour of casting aside the whole law and that so far as to deny it to be a rule of direction unto us Christians in the course of our practice whereby they open a wide gap to all licentiousnesse and by that means overthrow the very life and power of godlinesse to the high dishonour of God and to the extream perill of their own souls so that we see how neerly it concerns all such as have any true zeal for the furthering of Gods honour and their own salvation and their brethrens to endeavour by all the means that they can the establishing and maintaining of this truth that the morall law given by God to Adam in the beginning and renewed afterwards by Moses upon mount Sinai is an everlasting rule left by God unto his Church for the right ordering and guiding them in all their ways The premises then being duly weighed and layed together we have a sufficient ground to argue in this manner All the laws written in the Decalogue are morall and immutable in all things But the fourth Commandement concerning the observation of the Sabbath day is one of the laws of the Decalogue Therefore this law of the Sabbath is perpetuall and unchangeable in all things which are concerned therein And so much concerning the morality and perpetuity of the fourth Commandement in the Decalogue by way of digression SECT IV. A continuation of the consideration of the rest of the Laws recorded in the Scripture with such instructions as may be drawn from them HAving now established the perpetuity of that Law which we call Morall in all the Commandements thereof it is time to returne to that from which we digressed namely the delivering of rules for our direction in drawing out observations from the Laws recorded in Scripture for our instruction and there being three kinds of these Laws Morall Judiciall Ceremoniall as we have shewed before of these the Morall law comes first to be considered Now that Law being given to Adam the roote of mankind and that not so much to his person as to the nature of man which was wholly in him when he received this Law from God and consequently binding all those who are partakers of that nature it must needs be acknowledged that whatsoever commands we find therein we must guide our selves by as the rule of our practice Which that we may the better doe it will be needfull to lay before us some rules All duties to God and man are commanded in the Morall Law that may direct us in the right interpretation of these Commandements Before we give these rules it will be necessary to lay before us this evident ground of truth that these ten words as they are called comprise all the heads of duties to be performed both to God and man This is clearly manifested by our Saviours answer to the Lawyer that tempted him Luke 10.26 enquiring what he might doe to inherit eternall life to whom Christ replies that whatsoever duty was needfull to the attaining thereof was to be found in the commandements where he wils him to seek it Now these precepts being delivered in such briefe expressions as they are it must needs follow that every one of the tearms in them must needs be of exceeding large comprehension First therefore Rules for interpreting the Law whereas we find these Laws of the Decalogue penned some in the form of a command and most of them in the forme of a prohibition Rule 1 we must conceive that under every command there is implied a prohibition of whatsoever is contrary to what is commanded All the Commandements forbidding any sinne command the contrary duty and commanding the duty forbid the opposite sin and in every prohibition a command of all duties opposite to that which is forbidden For example in the second Commandement which under the name of Images forbids the inventing or using of any form of worship of mans devising there is withall commanded the worship of God according to his own will in the use of the ordinances prescribed and warranted by his Word as prayer and hearing of the Word receiving the Sacraments c. And in the third Commandement under the prohibition of taking Gods name in vaine is commanded the taking up of it with all holy reverence and feare Secondly Rule 2 under the name of any duty commanded there is required not only the performance of the outward act of that duty The Law besides the outward act requires the obedience of the heart but withall the inward obedience of the heart to the Law which requires it Rom. 6.17 and the letting out of all the affections of the soule in the performance of it as Psal 119.167 the Prophet professeth that his soul had kept Gods Testimonies and that he did love them exceedingly whence it is that both our Saviour Christ and his Apostles after him both comprise all duties commanded in the Law under the name of Love being an affection of the heart and tell us that the holy affection of love is the fulfilling of the Law Rom. 13.10 implying that whatsoever the act be which we perform yet if it proceed not from that holy disposition of the heart And the use of all helps to any duty commanded it is not answerable to the Law Againe together with the duty commanded in any Law there is required the use of all helps and meanes which may further us thereunto on the other side where any sinne is forbidden there the inward roote of that evill And forbids the originall corruption of the heart with all motions flowing from thence even as far
made a curse for us hath taken off from us and redeemed us from this curse of the Law Gal. 3.13 and seeing this exact obedience which the strictnesse of the Law required is now made impossible unto us by reason of the weaknesse of our nature corrupted by Adams fall God through Christ hath been pleased to moderate unto us the rigour of the Law in respect of the obedience required therein and is pleased to accept our sincere constant and faithfull endeavours to performe to the uttermost of our power what we are able to doe although we come short of what the Law requires and are accepted where there is a willing mind according to that which we have and not according to that which we have not 2 Cor. 8.12 The Second benefit which we have by Christ in relation to the Law 2. And from exacting our obedience to Justification is that whereas the Law requires of us perfect obedience to every commandement thereof to be performed by us in our owne persons for the attaining of eternall life as our Saviour implies in his answer to the young man Mat. 19.19 Now Christ having in his own Person perfectly fulfilled the whole Law Mat. 3.15 his Righteousnesse apprehended by Faith is imputed to us and accounted ours as if we our selves had performed it is accepted by God for the justifying of us before him Phil. 3.9 Rom. 5.18 19. so that we have thereby a just title to eternall life which otherwise we could have laid no claime unto by any righteousnesse of our own which is so farre from justifying of us before God that the best of it before him is no better then filthy rags Jsa 64.6 rendring us abominable in his eyes which are purer then to behold evill So that in his sight no man living in himselfe can be justified Psal 143.2 Lastly 3. And from that ill effect of the Law to quicken our lusts by Christ we are freed from an ill effect which the Law wrought in us yet only occasionally not properly by it selfe for the Commandement is holy just and good Rom. 7.12 But sinne taking occasion by the Commandement slew us so that the Commandement which was ordained to life we find unto us to be unto death Rom. 7.10 11. because the Law laying a restraint upon our corrupt lusts but bringing with it no power of the Spirit to enable us to subdue and conquer them by making a barre against them caused them to swell the higher and to rage the more violently as waters doe when they are penned by a damme that is made against them which the Apostle calls the reviving of sinne when the Commandement came Rom. 7.9 But Christ bringing with him the Spirit of grace and Sanctification by which those corrupt lusts are in some measure mortified and subdued the Spirit of Christ taking away that enmity and contrariety of the flesh against the Law and working our hearts to a complyanie therewith By giving his Spirit to work us to a compliance with Law causeth it to work in us a quite contrary effect to that which it hath in naturall men an exceeding love unto Gods Testimonies Psal 119.167 an holy delight in them ver 77. Rom. 7.22 for the sweetnesse which we find in them Psal 119.103 so that our hearts incline to performe them alwaies even to the end v. 112. This gracious effect of the Spirit working with the Law in the hearts of the godly is part of that new Covenant which God promiseth to make with his people unlike the Covenant which he made with their fathers which they brake to write his Law in their inward parts Ier. 31.32 33. and 32 40. A DIGRESSION CONCERNING THE MORALITY OF THE Fourth Commandement BY Iohn White Master of Arts and Preacher of Gods word in Dorchester in the County of Dorset LONDON Printed for Richard Royston A Digression concerning the Morality of the Fourth Commandement SECT I. That the Law of the Sabbath in the fourth Commandement is Morall and therefore perpetuall FOr the evidencing of this truth The first Argument it was given to the whole nature of man in Adam our first Argument shall be drawn from the Institution of this day of holy Rest immediately upon mans creation recorded Gen. 2.3 which upon the examining thereof will appeare so strong and cleare in it selfe that it might be sufficient to convince any man that is not forestalled before-hand by too much prejudice And it may be thus framed What Law soever was given to our first Parents in the beginning without relation to their present state bindes all mankind to the worlds end But such was this Law of the Sabbath It is true that there happened upon the fall of our first Parents a change in the Law Two changes of the Law given to Adam occasioned by his fall which was given them by God in the beginning The First change happened to the whole Law in respect of the conditions and in part of the use of it For whereas of man in the state of innocency and perfection full and perfect obedience to the whole Law was required 1. In respect of the whole Law perfect obedience thereunto being then possible to be performed by him in his own Person whereunto he was sufficiently enabled by the perfection of his nature in which he was created but by the fall of Adam that ability was so farre weakned that such obedience was made impossible to him or any of his posterity after him But by his fall made now impossible the righteousnesse of Christ is accepted for us now in stead of our personall obedience the Righteousnesse of Christ who in our nature fulfilled the whole Law is imputed to us for our justification and our obedience is required only as a fruit of that faith by which we are justified This makes so great a change in the Covenants made betweene God and man before and since the Fall that they are usually esteemed to be two diverse Covenants the former before the Fall we call the Covenant of workes and this latter since the Fall we tearme the Covenant of Grace The Second change which happened in the Law 2. In respect of some Laws given Adam in respect of his condition rather then of his nature by occasion of Adams fall was in respect of some duties commanded in the Law the Sacramentall tree of life and the whole use thereof were of necessity taken away because the promise whereof that tree was the Seale was voide by Adams breach of the Covenant to which it was annexed And the charge of keeping and dressing Paradise was by like necessity utterly voide when man for his rebellion was cast out of that Garden Other commandements as those concerning mans labour and womens subjection to their husbands were made straighter then they were before but the substance of these Laws remained still And these changes happened only in such particulars as respected rather the state of mans
the Sabbath was altogether needlesse and superfluous Thirdly they insist strongly upon this that if God had given Adam such a law at that time then had the Patriarchs been bound to the observation of that law Now say they if the Patriarchs had been bound to the observation of that law they had certainly kept it but that neither all or any of them observed any such is manifest by the history of their lives written by Moses wherein there is no mention of any such thing For the first of these three arguments which is Answer to the first that it was impossible for Adam in Paradise to keep a Sabbath they reason thus The Sabbath say they was appointed for the publike worship of God 1. That supposeth publick worship to be the whole duty of the Sabbath as all men must needs acknowledge But Adam and his wife could not make a publike assembly nor consequently worship God publikely nor by the same observe a Sabbath according to the Law To this we answer in the First place Though publike worship be the principall yet it is not the sole duty of the Sabbath Honoring God forbearing to do ones own waies or to find his own pleasure or to speake ones own words are duties of such an holy day of Rest as God delights in Isa 58.13 as well as publike worship And the Fourth Commandement which sets apart an whole day unto the Lord entirely and commands therein a totall cessation from all our employments in our ordinary calling makes it evident The sequestring of our selves from our ordinary secular affaires for religious duties is the full scope of that fourth Commandement which if a single person shut out by sicknesse or any other casuall accident from publike Assemblies perform he keeps an acceptable Sabbath unto God though he cannot joyne with the Congregation in the duties of publike worship Againe why may not two persons where there are no more 2. Two where no more are may be esteemed a publike assembly be esteemed to be a publike Assembly It is cleare that our Saviour esteems the meeting of two or three for prayer a gathering together Mat. 18.20 And then it 's plaine that Adam and Eve meeting together in Paradise and employing the whole day in prayer and other holy and religious exercises may in a true and proper sense be said to worship publikely so that in this argument brought against possibility of keeping a Sabbath by Adam and Eve in Paradise 3. It is no good argument Adam could not then keep the Sabbath therefore he had no Law for it the propositions are both faulty Besides this is no good argument Adam and Eve could not at that present keep a Sabbath therefore they had no Law given them by God to command it The fifth Commandement prescribing the duties of Parents to their Children is questionlesse a Law of nature shall we say that this Law was not at the least written in Adams heart from the beginning because he had then no child We think it wisdome to make laws for warres in time of Peace although there can be no execution of them for the present The Next Argument against the Institution of the Sabbath in Paradise Answer to the second is that then Adam needed no Sabbath neither for his body nor for his mind For his body they say he needed no Sabbath because that he being exercised in no painfull or toylsome labour but exercised only in such work as might be accounted rather a recreation then a labour needed no rest at all or refreshing of his body thereby 1. Ease by rest though it be a consequent is not the scope of the Sabbath To this we answer that the ease of man and beast from labour although it be a consequent of the rest of the Sabbath yet was it never the scope of it seeing the moderation of labour belongs properly to the same commandement which enjoynes labour that is unto the Eight as the Apostle also interprets it Eph. 4.28 The Fourth Commandement forbids labour indeed but not so much for mercy as for Piety nor so much for easing of the toyle of the body as for the preventing of the distraction of the mind by labour seeing we know the body cannot labour but the mind must needs be more or lesse employed withall which therefore at that time cannot so freely be wholly exercised in Spirituall duties as it ought So that Adam might have use of a Sabbath in Paradise although he needed it not for the ease of his body 2. Adam might make use of the Sabbath in respect of his minde Yea but say they Adam much lesse needed a Sabbath in respect of his mind then he did in respect of his bodie because his mind in that state of Innocency being continually filled with heavenly thoughts he could not choose but keep a perpetuall Sabbath To this Objection we have answered in part already that the Sabbath requires of us not only the filling of the mind with heavenly Meditations but besides a totall sequestration of the whole man to the exercise of all holy duties forbidding us to finde our own pleasure or our own waies Isa 58.13 that is take up any employment either of body or minde about any of those affaires which may properly becalled our own such as are all our secular affaires Now although Adam in Paradise had not in that ease and pleasure of his in keeping the Garden his minde so wholly taken up with that businesse as ours are now in our more toylsome works yet it must needs be and was his duty too to attend and to have his minde exercised in the thoughts of those things that he tooke in hand which on the Sabbath ought to be wholly laid aside In one word Adam was and ought on other dayes to be wholly heavenly minded in the use of earthly things but on the Sabbath day he was to be wholly heavenly minded in the use of heavenly things All then that can be made good in this parcular is only this that Adam in some respects lesse needed a Sabbath then we doe whence cannot possibly be inferred that he therefore needed none at all nay upon the same ground it will follow that because he being riper in knowledge stronger in faith and more quickned and fervent in affection lesse needed the Sacraments or other like helps as we doe it was not fit for him to have any Sacrament at all As well as of the Sacraments c. Rather we may conclude that because Adam infinitely excelled us in all these abilities therefore though he lesse needed yet he was more fit to keep a Sabbath then we are having more leisure and being more heavenly minded then we are All this while we speake of the Sabbath as if it were given to man only for his own good whereas the principall scope of it is the honouring of God which was Adam duty as well as ours So that in respect of
make in our own persons neither by our wealth which is no ransome for souls Psal 49.7 Either by ourwealth of by our righteousnesse 2. Or by any other creature 8. nor by our righteousnesse seeing if we could fulfill the whole law it is but duty Luke 17.10 and therefore can make no satisfaction for sins past All other creatures we finde in the same condition with our selves debtors to God for all that they have or can doe and therefore unable to satisfie for us and as unable to defend us from Gods power 2ly Pointing out the onely way of making our peace Christ Jesus 1. Holy in himself 2. Accepted of his Father 3. Satisfying his Justice to the full as they are to work our reconciliation So that our salvation by any creature appears to be utterly impossible The heart of a sinner being by this means brought to despair of help unto salvation by any creature the Word points out unto him that fountain which God hath opened for sin and for uncleannesse Christ Jesus himself the only Son of his Father the holy one in whose mouth no guile was found Isa 53.9 In whom God is well pleased who was bruised for our iniquities so far that God did see the travell of his soul and was satisfied Isa 53.12 and who in our flesh fulfilled all righteousnesse and that for us This means of reconciliation 4. Tendered to us by God himself the Scripture tels us God offers to all that will embrace it and that upon his faithfull Word which is truth it self Psa 119.142.151 Yea makes it manifest that this mercy is of inestimable value and beyond belief yet that it becomes God to doe things incredible to cause his mercies to exceed not onely the mercies of men but even mans apprehension as the love of Christ passeth knowledge Eph. 3.19 that all men may be astonished at the consideration of his mercies as well as of his judgments and generally of all his ways Rom. 11.33 Thus Gods Word shews A means 1. Suiting with Gods Justice 2. Magnifying his Mercy 3. Discovering his Wisdome that this way of saving sinners suits well with Gods justice because he pardons not without sufficient satisfaction with his mercy because it sets out the plentifulnesse of his compassion Psal 86.15 103.11 with his wisdome because this is a way past finding out as all his judgements are a great deep Psal 36.6 and consequently makes a sinner confident that a way of peace proposed by God himself ratified by his faithfull promise and of such advantage to further his own glory every way 4. And consequētly advancing his glory is really intended upon which the distressed soul is encouraged to follow that only way by which he sees hope of escaping the vengeance to come which he could never have known unlesse God had revealed it in the Scriptures Rom. 16.25 26. which must therefore be acknowledged to be the Word of God 2ly The nature of cōversion consisting Now if the grounds of mans conversion could be found no where but in the Word of God much lesse could the act it self of conversion be wrought by any other instrument then the same Word For whereas conversion is the turning away of the heart from all creatures himself and all unto God which consists in two main acts self-deniall and totall subjection to God it is evident that neither of these two can be wrought any other way then by the power of the Spirit working by the Word To begin with self-deniall 1. In self-denial impossible to nature consisting in the abandoning of ones own wisdome righteousnesse ability to doe any good desires and endeavours after his own ends in credit profit pleasure or any other way what wise man among the Heathen guided by the light of nature ever taught it much more practised it Or how is it possible that corrupt nature should conquer it self Indeed it is true that naturall wisdome hath prevailed upon men to change them from a vicious disposition to morall honesty perhaps somewhat out of conscience or more out of self-respect to grace themselves by the honour of a vertuous disposition but to deny ones self one cannot be possibly perswaded but by something that is not himself Again 2. In a totall subjection to Gods wil. it is impossible that the whole spirit of man with all the thoughts thereof should bee brought under to a free and chearfull submission to Gods will unlesse the very temper and frame of it be altered For that Gods desires should be our desires his will our will his delights our delights our wisdome in this state of corruption being enmity against him Rom. 8.7 can bee wrought by no other way Which nature opposeth And therefore must be new framed after Gods image to bring it to this subjection but by making our nature answerable to Gods Nature which necessarily requires the destroying of the corruption therof the creating of it after God in wisdom and holinesse Eph. 4.24 Col. 3.10 Now the changing and new creating of the heart is beyond mans power effected onely by him that made it at the first wherefore even in respect of our new birth we are said to be his workmanship Eph. 2.10 receiving this spirituall as well as our naturall life from him to whom it properly belongs to quicken the dead Rom. 4.17 to raise up whom he will John 5.21 as having life in himself v. 26. wherefore the renuing of the heart being a work above nature and properly the effect of a divine power it necessarily follows that the Scriptures which are found by experience to be the instruments of that high and supernaturall work must have a divine original and consequently be the Word of God The last of the divine and supernaturall effects The third supernaturall effect of the Word reviving wounded spirits To be effected only by Gods Word that wounded them wrought by the word is the sustaining reviving of distressed wounded spirits Now that this can be effected by no other means then the Word is manifest not only by experience which makes it evident that humane wisdome or eloquence can doe nothing to purpose this way but besides by the consideration of the cause whence the affliction of the spirit ariseth For seeing it is the apprehension of Gods wrath provoked by sin that breaks the heart it must needs be granted that it cannot be healed but upon a perswasion that God is pacified as we see in that wounded spirit Job 33.25 and in David 2 Sam. 12.13 which must be wrought by a message comming from God himself as it is God that must cause David to hear the voice of joy and gladnesse ere the bones that he had broken could rejoyce Ps 51.8 It must therefore be the same hand that hath smitten that must heal Hos 6.1 wherefore seeing it is onely Gods Word that wounds the soul as hath been shewed the Word that restores and heals
considered As being grounded on a mistake a temporary Beleevers taste of heavenly things we shall finde to arise out of a double mistake First of the Nature of the Benefits offered to us in Christ 1. Of the nature of the benefits offered as Holinesse Peace Joy and which he conceives to be outward holinesse morall honesty carnall content sensuall joy like that of the foole Luke 12.19 Now this conceit of some carnall and temporall good which is to be found in Christ may worke in a man some desire after him and delight in the Word in which he is published and proposed such a conceit that Christ should be a temporall Prince wrought upon the Iewes and wonne them to entertaine our Saviour for a time but when they saw that his Kingdome was not of this World as himselfe speakes Iohn 18.36 they soone forsooke him so Ioh 6.15.24.66 This first Mistake is seconded by another 2. Of the conditions under which they are tendered no lesse them the former wherein they misunderstand both the conditions under which Christ is offered and the services which he requires For a Carnall man hearing of the large offers of Salvation and Peace so freely tendred desires them and hopes to gaine them at an easie rate But upon farther enquiry finding that neither Christ nor any of his benefits are to be had without renouncing the World nay denying himselfe Mat. 16.24 he is offended Mat. 13.21 and turnes away with a sad heart Whereupon he may be moved to doe or fuffer some thing for Christ and discontented like the young man Mat. 9.21.22 Such a man it may be at his first entertaining the Word while his affections are warme and fresh for Christs sake may sustaine some reproach and make some small losses and sacrifice some of his weaker lusts at Gods command hoping to satisfie him thereby as Saul attempted to doe by destroying the rascall multitude and carion cattle of the Amalekites 1 Sam. 15.9.13 So dealt Herod with Iohn Baptist Marke 6.20 when he saw that nothing would satisfie him unlesse he would part with his Darling Herodias he forsooke him and became his utter enemy ver 17. And no marvell if onely a taste of Spirituall things But can never be brought to denie the World much lesse himselfe which a man neither throughly understands nor if he did would much desire as being altogether unsutable to his carnall disposition be insufficient to take off his heart from the love of these outward and Carnall things which are every way so agreeable and pleasing to his carnall disposition much more to move him to abhorre him selfe with that holy man Iob 42.6 to accompt himselfe a foole a beast with David Psal 73.22 to condemne all his righteousnesse Esa 64.6 Phil. 3.7.9 to renounce all ability to do any good 2. Cor. 3.5 to abandon his owne lusts 1 Pet. 4.2 and his owne ends that he may live wholly to the will of him that died for him and rose againe 2 Cor. 5.15 fetching all from Christ 1 Cor. 1.30 and referring all to him 1 Cor. 10.31 Which a true Beleever yeelds unto 1. As throughly understanding the emptinesse of the Creature For till corrupt nature be changed it can neither deny it selfe nor be wholly subject to Gods Law Rom. 8.7 These considerations which a temporary beleever cannot brooke a true Beleever easily submits unto As well upon a full discovery of the vanity and emptinesse of all things save Christ Phil. 3.7 8. 2. And finding them unsutable to his renewed Nature as also upon the cleare manifestation of the infinite value of Christ and all the Heavenly Treasures which are laid up in him which moved Moses to make more accompt of him with reproach then of the treasures of Aegypt Heb. 11.26 And besides his nature now being altered all those things that were agreeable 3. And lastly finding that what he abandons for Christ he gaines in him 3. Of the Duties required of him and sutable unto him before he finds now unsutable and unserviceable And lastly for selfe-deniall which nature can never digest one who is now by faith become a member of Christ findes that whatsoever one loseth for him he receives againe in him with infinite advantage Mar. 10.29 30. Again a temporary beleever mistakes the duties required of a Christian as much as he doth the conditions For conceiving them to consist in outward performances with the Pharisees Mat. 5.21.27 he thinkes them an easie taske with the young man Mat. 19.20 But finding upon better enquiry that in hearing the heart must tremble Isa 66.2 in prayer the Soule must be powred out Isa 26.16 that outward performances are nothing unlesse the thoughts be brought under to the obedience of Christ 2 Cor. 10.5 and the flesh with the lusts crucified Gal. 5.24 finding these things impossible to flesh and blood he cryes out with the Capernaites An hard saying Iohn 6.60 Whereas a true Belecver stickes neither at the condiditions nor the Duties and renounceth his service ver 66. But a true Beleever as he sticks at no condition so he stickes at no service which Christ requires He findes a heart melting at Gods word 2 King 22.19 A Spirit helping his weaknesse in Prayer Rom. 8.26 enabling him to powre out his complaint Psal 102. in the title He not onely esteemes Gods Commandements equall Psal 119.128 and good ver 39. but himselfe able to runne the way of them when God enlargeth his heart verse 32. able to doe any thing through him that strengthens him Phil. 4.13 in despite of his corruptions that hinder him Rom. 7.23 Desiring that his whole heart may be inclined to Gods Testimonies Psal 119.36 sound in his Statutes verse 80. and his steppes ordered in Gods wayes ver 133. Considering his wayes for that purpose ver 59. and making the Word a light unto his steps ver 105. All this he doth with much cheerefulnesse knowing that he serves for his owne good Deut. 6.24 having his fruit in Holinesse and the end everlasting life Rom. 6.22 Thus he delights in Gods Law Psal 119.11 Rom. 7.23 and abhors his owne corruptions ver 24. Thus then a temporary beleever Wherefore Temporary Beleevers must needs fall off at last but a true Beleever stands fast to the end grounding his resolution to embrace Christ and his Law upon such grosse errours must needes waver and fall off when he finds his mistake Whereas a true belever understanding truly what Christ is whom he chooseth and what are his Lawes and conditions and finding by experience his bargaine no worse then he conceived it stands still to his first choise and as Boaz liking the woman as well as her inheritance willingly tooke them both Ruth 4.9 10. which his Kinsman refused because he could not have the land alone being all that he sought after So the Godly liking Christ and his Lawes aswell as the benefits that he brings with him take them both Whereas