he sinned if he performed not one Act of Love and Obedience to his Maker This Fancy I dismiss § 17. Others say That if he had overcome one Temptation he should have been confirmed but I find no Promise or Proof of it in Nature nor in Scripture and I suppose they feign not a secret conditional Will of God § 18. Though it be agreed on by most Protestants That Adam had been an Heir of Death and Hell if he committed the least Sin even an idle thought or word though he had not eaten the forbidden Fruit and so that the Law of Nature made Hell the due punishment of the least Sin and doth so still if it be not pardoned yet the Law of Nature in our lapsed state is herein somewhat dark and the Scripture not so clear for it as some imagine But thus much methinks Nature it self still speaketh § 19. 1. That the least sin deserveth some degree of Punishment 2. That God hath various degrees of Punishment suited to the degrees of Sin 3. That the least Sin hath a tendency to more and that still to more till Man be utterly miserable And that both in its own Nature and in the forfeiture of some measure of God's Grace or Help 4. That if you suppose that vain thought or word to consist still with true Love to God God could not immediately hate and damn that Soul that so loved him But if that Person perish it must be by that idle thought or word producing worse till it had turned his love from God to the Creature 5. That antecedently to Gods undertaking to be the Ruler of Man no doubt but as an absolute Owner he might have taken away all that he gave him even his Life and Being without any fault in Man for he may do as he list with his own And therefore he might have done the same for the smallest fault which he might have done without it And therefore he might have inflicted any Pain which to Man is not worse than Annihilation for ever But whether his three forementioned Acts 1. Antecedently placing Man as he did 2. Making him such Duty as he made him 3. And such Inclination to better do not imply that God would not punish him unless he sinned and then but according to the degree of his Sin I leave to Consideration § 20. But whether God must and whether he might punish the least Sin with Hell are different questions Whether by the Law of Nature he must do it or be unjust and so a vain thought was not pardonable by or under that Law and so Adam was an Heir of Hell when his thought first failed before he did eat or consent to eat the forbidden Fruit are questions which I cannot resolve from Nature and are to me more difficult in Scripture than to wiser men § 21. The supernatural part of the Law is known to us only by Scripture but perhaps the Fathers before the Flood might know more of it by Tradition than God hath thought meet to write for our times § 22. The preceptive part was the not eating the forbidden Fruit and consequently the overcoming all Temptations thereto The Law of Matrimony and the Sabbath also are partly supernatural called Positive § 23. The Penalty is called Death which signifieth Undoing and Misery But whether it was only temporal Death or also Hell Divines are not agreed They that are for the former seem chiefly drawn to it by comparing the Law with the Iudgment and Execution thinking it indecent to say that God fulfilled not his Threatning but dispensed with it And therefore seeing Temporal Death only is in the Sentence and Execution they think that no more was meant And consequently that Christ did not by Redemption prevent the sentence and execution of that Death but only when it was fulfilled deliver us from continuance under it by a Resurrection § 24. But I would have such remember 1. That the Soul was made naturally immortal that is not tending to Annihilation unless God should against Nature or settled Course annihilate it And if it were not annihilated it must be in some state good or bad If it was to be penally annihilated Christ prevented that And such an annihilation is as little desirable as a tolerable degree of Pain 2. And that God's Law determining directly but de debito poenae what should be Man's due and not absolutely and peremptorily then de eventu God reserved to himself a pardoning Power so it were done upon valuable Considerations more fully glorifying him and his Government and Law than Man's Destraction would have done And thus to dispense with his Law is no dishonour to God § 25. It is the Wrath to come that Christ delivereth us from and Hell and the Power of Satan that he redeemed us from Therefore it seemeth that it was no less that our Sin deserved And spiritual death is contained in Sin and Apostacy it self § 26. What the Reward was to be besides what I said before from Nature it is not easie to gather out of Scripture nor to find there any plainer a Promise of Life but in both I think it is certainly implied § 27. It is ordinary to say That the Condition of Adam's Confirmation was That he should have eaten first of the Tree of Life But to find that among the Commands much less the Condition with a Promise of Confirmation requireth more discerning than I have notwithstanding the words Lest he eat and live c. from which they gather it § 28. How far this Law is yet in force is also difficultly disputed In brief 1. The general Command of perfect Love and Obedience for the future and the Commands of the unalterable Duties of Nature are still so far in force as to oblige us 2. But whether sub poena mortis is the doubt Punishment is due either absolutely and statedly and so it maketh it due only to the Impenitent and Unbelievers Or only in primo instanti inceptively with an annexed Remedy And so every Sin maketh Punishment so far due to the Faithful as that they have need of the Grace of Christ and the new Covenant to pardon it 3. But the premiant part of the Law of Innocency from whence it is named a Covenant is now truly null Which maketh our Divines say That the Law of Nature which they call moral bindeth as a Rule of Duty but the Covenant ceaseth § 29. This was not done by GOD but Man who ceased to be a capable Subject of that Covenant Promise or Reward And so the Condition Innocency or perfect Obedience being become naturally impossible we must not feign God to say to Sinners On condition you be no Sinners you shall live But Cessante capacitate subditi cessat promissio conditionalis transit in sententiam But of the Cessation of the Law and Covenant of Innocency see more after Sect. 5 § 32 c. § 30. They pervert this Covenant by their unproved Fictions who
mistaken ones so seduce that one Error in the Order leads to many § 28. Yet even Catechumens and young Christians should learn what they learn in method And that is first the said Baptismal Covenant and our Relation to the Trinity thereby and all that is added to their Knowledge daily be it never so little should be methodically added For a weak head may perceive the true method of the few Essentials being great and plain though the strongest cannot follow the due Distribution of innumerable Integrals and Consequent Truths As the first partitions of the Tree into its greater Boughs are easily perceived though not the innumerable sprigs thence arising § 29. Accordingly a wise Teacher will proceed with Infidels in proving the Christian Religion yea and with himself and will first prove the Truth of the Essentials which are delivered us both in Scripture and other infallible Tradition before he undertake to prove all the Scriptures to be the Word of God For he that will begin here 1. Must shew the Book which he will so prove and when he cannot vindicate it from variety of Lections and the Errors of Scribes and Printers to say nothing of the greater of Translators it will stop him in his Designs 2. And when he hath so many thousand Words to prove to be Divine and so many Integrals and Accidentals to make good he maketh his Work difficult by allowing his Scholar to doubt as much of the Essentials of Religion as he shall doubt of the Truth of any particular Book or Text History Genealogy c. in the whole Scripture A blind Zeal for Scripture hath led some to this dangerous way but the ancient Churches did otherwise and so will all that well understand what they do And really on supposition it could be proved as it cannot that any Penman of the Scripture erred in a Ciâ—ation a Genealogy the Circumstance of a bye-History c. it would not follow that we must be therefore uncertain of all our Religion even the Essentials and they ignorantly betray their Faith that say It would so follow § 30. So far is it from being true that the Scripture is too narrow as to the matter of Divine Faith and Duty without the additional matter of Tradition that indeed as the compleat Body of a Man hath more than his Essentials yea or Inteâ—rals even Hair and Nails as Accidents so hath the Holy Scripture as to the matter of Divine Faith and Duty There is more than is absolutely necessary to Salvation but not less § 31. They that in peevish opposition to others tell us That Christ made no Law and that the Gospel is not a Law if they strive not about equivocal Words but mean that Christ is not a Legislator nor hath a Law and Covenant by which he will govern and judge the World do deny all our Christianity at once For Christ is not Christ if he be not the King of the Church nor is he King if he be not a Lawgiver nor doth he Rule and Iudge if he have no Law which is so far from Truth that there is now no Law of God that we are under but what is truly the Law of Christ For he is Lord of all and Head over all things to his Church and all power in Heaven and Earth is given to him and the Father alone or meerly as Creator by the Law of Innocency judgeth no man but hath committed all Iudgment to the Son as Redeemer and Universal Administrator The lapsed World and the Law which they are under as rational Creatures are now delivered up to the Redeemer whose Law as is aforesaid hath two parts 1. The Law of lapsed Nature commonly called the Moral Law 2. The Remedying Law of Faith of which before § 32. But it is not to be supposed that the very preceptive part of the Law of Innocency is now in force to us as it was to Adam For it bound him to be perfectly innocent in Act and Dispositions But to a Man that hath lost his Innocency and is already in Act and Habit sinful it is not to be supposed that the Law saith Thou shalt be innocent For that were to command not only a Moral but a Physical absolute impossibility as saying Thou shalt not have sinned § 33. Obj. God changeth not his Law when man changeth his capacity Therefore the Law may be the same as in Innocency both as to the Precept Threatning and Promise God may still say 1. Sin not or be innocent 2. And if thou be perfect thou shalt live 3. Else thou shalt die And if man will make himself uncapable it 's his own change § 34. Answ. I spake to this before and now further add God's Law is not to be taken for a meer script of Words considered as standing in a Book not obliterated or as written on stone and not broken or cast away The signum materially may stand and the Law be changed and the signification cease As a repealed Statute may be still in the Books and Records God's Law is signum voluntatis divinae debitum constituentis Therefore if it signifie not God's Will as constituting what shall be due from us and to us it is no Law And that it may so signifie his Will and constitute Dueness Debitum or Ius or as they use to say oblige and give the Subject must be in a natural capacity For where there is no Subject to be obliged there is no Law And where natural capacity ceaseth as in a dead corps there is no Subject to be governed And the Law is Instrumentum regiminis So that if you do not only say This was God's Law but This is God's Law you must mean Thus he nâ—w obligeth man and This he threatneth now and This he conditionally giveth him So that if it be an unchanged Law to us just as it was in Innocency you must make this the sence of precept threat and promise 1. Preserve thine Innocency and sin not in act or habit but be thou a peâ—fect Obeyer of my Laws and this to one that hath sinned already and is habitually inclined to more q. d. Let not that be which is or quod factum est infectum fiat 2. If thou sin thou shalt be an Heir of Death When we are Sinners and Heirs of Death already 3. If thou be and continue sinless and perfect thou shalt not die but live When we are Sinners and dead before In which Case all Law and Reason saith That the Law doth transire in sententiam vel rem judicatam § 35. So that as was before-said the Covenant of Works is ceased yea the Law or Precept bindeth not now as it is a Law of Innocency made to innocent Nature for its preservation for Nature is not innocent But the Law of Nature is now the Law of lapsed redeemed Nature and not of innocent Nature And it obligeth us for the future to as much perfection of Duty as we are naturally
to this day § 8. God doth not impute Adam's Sin to us because he will do it without any real participation of ours no nor beyond our true natural participation but according to it Otherwise God should have made us sinners meerly because he â—ould do so and not Adam § 9. We receive our Original Guilt and Pravity immediately from our next Parents and but remotely from Adam It could never have come to us but through them from whom we receive our Nature from them we receive the guilt and pravity of our Nature § 10. Therefore thus far at least our next Parents communicate Guilt and Pravity to us and not Adam only In which we see that God's Imputation goeth along with real Natural Participation § 11. It seemeth to me a strange oversight in too many Divines who deny or observe not our Guilt of all the rest of our Parents Sins while we were in their Loins as well as of Adam's seeing 1. there is that same reason of both save what the change of the Covenant maketh of which after And 2. Scripture is so full and express about it § 12. 1st If I have a guilty and deprayed Soul from my Parents it is because I was once in them Virtually or Seminally as truly and naturally as I was in Adam And had not the Guilt been theirs it had never been miâ—e And if it be mine because it was theirs why not one part of theirs as well as another § 13. It will be said Because God so Covenanted with Adam that he should stand or fall for himself and his Posterity I Answer That there was any such Covenant that if he stood his Posterity should all stand or be Confirmed and Saved is more than ever I found in Scripture or can prove or do believe But that it would have been to the benefit of his Posterity I doubt not And that his fall was to the Guilt and Corruption of his Posterity I doubt not but as I said not without and beyond their natural Interest in him and Derivation from him as the reason of it And we were as much naturally in our next Parents And the Covenant of Innocency and the Covenant of Grace do not so far differ as to exempt us from the Guilt of our next Parents sins For the difference lieth not in this That the first only made Death the due reward of all Sin nor that the first did interest Children in the Guilt of their Parents sin But in this that the first made us Guilty without a Remedy But the second giveth us a Remedy presently for Pardon and Recovery and so our Guilt is not so full because it is but a half Obligation having the Pardon annexed The first Law said If thou sin thou shalt be filius mortis and so shall those that are Propagated of thee The second Covenant saith For thy Original and Actual Sin death is thy due but I give thee a Pardon and Remedying Grace procured by the Righteousness of Christ. But note That this Covenant pardoneth our Original Sin as from Adam And yet it followeth not that we had none because it is pardoned Even so it pardoneth our guilt of our next Parents sins and therefore we had it to be pardoned Both are pardonable to us therefore we had both § 14. 2. And the Scripture is more copious and as plain in making punishment due to Children for their next Parents sins as for Adam's though Adam's only was the Original of all Sin and Misery I have elsewhere proved it at large The Case of Cain's Posterity and Cham's and Ishmael's and Esau's and Achan's Family and Ahab's and many more do fully prove it And more fully the Second Commandment and God's declaration of his Name to Moses Exod. 34. and many a Threatning to the Seed of the Wicked and Christ's express Words in Matth. 23. 36. so that Scripture puts us out of doubt § 15. The common Objection is that their Guilt would be greater on us towards the End of the World than on them at the Beginning because all our Ancestours Guilt would be ours But I answer 1. If it were so it would be but many Obligations to the same Punishment when it amounteth to that which God seeth our Nature capable of For a Finite Worm is not capable of more Suffering than is proportioned to his Nature 2. And this Objection vainly supposeth that none of our Ancestours Sins were pardoned Whereas all are pardoned to the Faithful and their Seed and much Temporal Punishment is pardoned to many of the Unsanctified And God himself by limiting it to the third and fourth Generation seemeth to set bounds to his own Justice 3. And the Guilt of our Parents Sins being of a more Diminute Nature than that of our own Actual Sin Coeteris paribus it falleth not so fully on us as it did on the Committers themselves nor as our own do 4. And God offereth us the full pardon of our own and all together And as long as the Law which tells us of our desert of punishment doth also give us a free pardon we have no Cause to complain § 16. That we have all Original Sin is proved in that else Infants should be saved without a pardoning Saviour or a cleansing Sanctifier which cannot be § 17. He that seeth the universal inclination of Mankind to Evil even in their Childhood and their backwardness to Good even that Evil and that Good which Nature it self assureth us are such must needs believe Original Pravity or else think hardly of God's Work § 18. He that seeth still that Drunkenness Gluttony Lust c. do vitiate both the Soul and Bodily Temperament of the Sinner and how frequently a diseased distempered Body inclining Men to particular Vices and an extraordinarily vitiated Soul is in their Children the plain fruit of the Parents Sin may the easilier believe that we drew down Pravity from Adam also when we derive so much from nearest Parents § 19. And they that consider that Mans Soul being made Holy for God this unholiness is not only a Negation but a Privation not of Sensitive and Natural only but of Moral Rectitude will not deny but that the name of Sin or Moral Pravity belongeth to it § 20. And they that consider that Parents Cause not Children as an Artificer maketh an Engine but by Generation which is a Communication of their own Essence and what Natural Interest Parents and Children have in each other and that it is real Sin that is in both and that the Moral Privation in its Nature containeth much of Mans misery will easily grant that it is both a Sin and Punishment and a Moral Cause of further punishment properly enough so called § 21. They that lay that Reason of their denying Original Sin upon the difficulty of understanding whether Souls are new Created or Derived from Parents do too little suspect their frail understandings and their own â—deductions and too easily suspect the
true difference of God's Laws and Covenants let him tell me more and I suppose we shall agree de re though not de ratione nominis And let it now suffice to tell you how I would be understood my self Though the word Law be some time taken more narrowly and the word Covenant oft for Mutual Contract which is but a Law consented to yet being to speak of each term as signifying that Regulating Frame by which God Ruleth us and will Judge us and by which he giveth us his Gifts and Rewards I mean the same thing in several respects called by the several names The absolute Antecedent Gifts of our Great Benefactor being supposed inclusively in both SECT I. Of the Law or Covenant of Innocency made to Adam § 1. I Shall in this order Treat briefly of the Divine Laws I. Of the Law of Innocency to Adam II. Of the Law of Mediation to Christ. III. Of the Law of Grace to fallen Man And there 1. As in the first Edition to Adam and Noah 2. As in the same Edition joined with the Jewish Law of Peculiarily to Abraham and of Works by Moses to Abraham's Seed 3. Of the Law of Graces as in the second Edition by Christ § 2. 1. The Law of Innocency contained a Precept and Prohibition and a Retributive part to which Adam was bound to be a Voluntary Subject and therefore to Consent which will allow it the name of a Covenant But here the brief Narrative in the Scripture calleth to us to distinguish of things certain and things uncertain whoever assert them § 3. 1. The Preceptive part was revealed by Nature or Supernaturally by Voice or Inspiration or Vision c. The former being Lex natura integrae the Law of Intire Nature though the Chief is least spoken of in Gen. because it is supposed legible in Nature it self § 4. The Law of Nature properly so called is in esse Objectivo that signification of God's Will concerning Man's Duty which was discernible in the Universa rerum Natura in all God's Works but principally in Mans own Nature as related to God and all Persons and Things about him § 5. But Improperly or Metonymically so called the Law of Nature is in esse subjectivo the Communes notitiae which Man had and was to have from the said Objective Law of Nature But properly this is rather the Knowledge of the Law than the Law it self being not perfect in Adam himself at first but was to be perfected as he came to know more and more of the Works of God and varying much now in several Persons Yet may it well be called God's Law written in the Heart when we have the Knowledge and Love of his primary proper Law § 6. This Law of Nature bound Adam to perfect Devotedness to God as his Owner and perfect gratitude to God as his Antecedent Benefactor and to perfect Obedience to God as his Ruler and to perfect Love to God as his ultimate most amiable End And this perfect Obedience was to be perpetual § 7. It was Adam personally that the Law bound to this perfect perpetual Obedience and not another for him or that he should obey by a Representative or a Delegate a Servant or by any other § 8. Nature even in its depraved state now telleth us that all Sin against God deserveth Punishment Therefore the Law of Nature had a Penal part § 9. It is a great doubt with many Divines whether the Law of Nature had any premiant part or promise and so was a Covenant because say they Duty obligeth not God to reward us But it seemeth to me as far past doubt as the penal part For the question is not what our Duty performed obligheth God to much less in point of Commutative Iustice where no Creature can Merit of God Iob 35. 6 7 8. If thou be Righteous what givest thou him c. But it is presupposed that God first became Man's Benefactor and his Ruler and his Law is the Instrument of his Government and his Promise is but the signification of his Will what he will give and on what Terms And God in Nature signified his Will to bless the Obedient and love those that love him For as a Ruler he is Iust and if he differenced not the Righteous from the Sinner what were his Justice Were there no other Reward but the Continuance of the Paradise-Blessing freely given him which Sin would forfeit it would have been a great Reward And if God equally take away his Gifts from Good and Bad it is not Governing Iustice though as the Act of a Proprietor it be neither Iust nor Unjust so that the very essence of Undertaken Government containeth a discovery of God's Rewarding Will which is the promissory or premiant part of the Law of Nature § 10. The Degree and Kind of the Natural Reward must be gathered 1. From the state that Man was in 2. From the nature of his Duty 3. From the state of Perfection which his Nature was made inclined to desire and seek § 11. 1. Man being freely placed in the state of Innocency and God's Favour in the Earthly Pleasures of Eden as a Sanctified state of Communion with God seeing Sin was to be punished with the privation of these we may gather that the Innocent should not have been deprived of them § 12. 2. Man's great Duty being to Love God perfectly according to his present Ability and to please him and delight herein we may gather that the Innocent should have the felicity which is herein contained even in the Delights of loving and pleasing God § 13. 3. Man's Nature being not made in its utmost perfection but in via with a desire of knowing God loving him pleasing him and delighting in him yet more according to his Capacity we may gather That obedient Man should have attained that Perfection For God maketh not the capacities dispositions and desires of Nature in vain § 14. But whether all this should have been given on Earth or in Heaven is not so clear in Nature or Scripture But 1. The Translation of Henoch and Elias maketh it probable that so Man should have been translated 2. And so doth the Glory purchased by the Redeemer 3. And the matter is the less because where-ever the place be the same state of Enjoyment would make it a Heaven to such a person § 15. Neither doth Nature now tell us How long Man must have obeyed before he had merited the full Reward of his Perfection But only that he must conquer all the Temptations that God would try him with and must persevere till God should please to translate him not appointing him any determinate time Nature and Scripture favour this § 16. There are some who considently conclude without either natural or Scripture-proof That had Adam performed but one Act of Obedience to God before his Sin he had been confirmed is the Angels as his Reward And what a Sinner do they make Adam before
use and by one he merited this and by the other that when though each part of his Condition or Duty had its proper reason yet it was only the entire performance that was the Condition of the Benefits and so of our Iustification and Salvation § 17. But I say before his Exaltation because the Benefits being of several sorts some of them were given upon Christ's merit presently and some upon Man's believing and some not till long after by application But to all these what Christ did only as under the Law of Mediation was properly his merit by which they were procured But his undertaking what he after did in gathering his Church and interceding and ruling may be numbered with the parts of his foresaid merit and still as a Creature he is under his Creator's Law even the Law of perfect uniting Love and so doth eminently merit § 18. It was neither the Covenant nor Will of the Father and Son that we should either have full possession deliverance or right thereto immediately upon Christ's Merit and Sacrifice as we should if we had done all by him as our Person But that we and all things being delivered to Christ's Power and Will he should convey the Benefits of his Death and Merits upon terms and in an Order suitable to the interest of his Wisdom Love Mercy and Justice even by a Law of Grace and a Ministry and Means adapted to the end and in the time and degrees which his Wisdom should make choice of Which accordingly is done This Covenant which giveth Right and Reward to Christ is not it that giveth any Right or Reward to us SECT III. Of the Law or Covenant of Grace in the first Edition § 1. AS God delivered the Law of Innocency partly by natural and real and partly by supernatural and verbal significations of his will so hath he done the Law of Grace which is the signification of his Will concerning Pardon and Life granted to guilty Sinners and the terms thereof § 2. The Promise Gen. 3. 15. The seed of the Woman shall break the Serpents head c. was a Breviate of the supernatural signification but it is not unlikely that God did more fully acquaint them with his Law of Grace and Redemption than those words alone could make us understand Because we find in their sacrificing some such intimation and in other signs § 3. God's actual Continuance of forfeited Life Liberty Health and other comforts and his actual Collation of many great Mercies by the course of Nature to such as by Sin have deserved present Damnation is a degree of signification of his pardoning will and mercy by these natural signs which they were not before sin and forfeiture § 4. Man being after guilt of death thus reprieved and enriched with manifold Mercies and his life and faculties continued with many instructing providential helps and means the very Law of Nature now obligeth him to love and thankfulness to God that sheweth him so great kindness § 5. And the same Law of Nature obligeth him to take that God still for a God of Love and Mercy and to believe that what Mercy he hath already shewed the World and us is on terms which he knoweth to be very well consistent with his Holiness Truth and Justice And it obligeth us therefore to seek to him for Mercy and to use all possible means for further hope and pardon and recovery and not to sit down in despair § 6. The common sence of all Mankind from Adam to this day acquainteth us by that experience That these Hopes and Duties are found in the Law of lapsed Nature For all the World that never heard the Gospel do yet take God to be a merciful forgiving God and take themselves to be under some duty for the obtaining of further mercy recovery and felicity § 7. Though want of the sense of Sin and its desert and Man's misery may be thought by some to be the only cause of this and so that it is but sinful presumption and no part of Nature's obligation yet this upon trial will prove false Though what they alledge be one part of the Cause For 1. These men do acknowledge themselves Sinners and to deserve punishment from God 2. They find some misery and fear more 3. It is not presumption to judge God to be merciful when they and all the World do find him so 4. It is not presumption to judge that he can and will pardon Sin when full Experience assureth us that he hath already pardoned much To remit the Sin is as we now speak of it to remit the deserved punishment And He that giveth Man forfeited life health time and all the abundant Mercies which the World is full of doth thereby so far actually forgive Sin Saith Christ Whether is it easier to say thy sins be forgiven thee or to say arise take up thy Bed and walk that is Executively to forgive them which is the full forgiveness by taking away the punishment 5. It is no presumption to believe such Duty to be incumbent on us as the remaining Law of Nature doth oblige us to 6. Nor yet to take God's own Encouragements to seek our own recovery and felicity § 8. The Light and Law of lapsed Nature doth convince men of the duty of repenting and returning to God and oblige them to it So that as Perfect Obedience was the duty of entire Nature so Repentance is the duty of laepsed Nature And I think few will say that all men are not hereby obliged to repent and that in hope of mercy § 9. Hence it is that it is found among the Communes notitiae and all the World as well as Christians acknowledge it and plead for it § 10. They that by God's Patience and Mercy are invited to Repentance which is a return from sin to God and are by Nature obliged to it ought to believe that it is not made their Duty in vain nor shall they lose by it if they perform it for that were to accuse God of making Mans Duty in vain or to his loss which is not to be suspected § 11. Therefore they are bound not to despair of Paâ—don and Salvation for an obligation to use means as tending to recovery is inconsistent with an obligation to despair Therefore hope of Mercy and use of some means Mankind is obliged to by the Law of lapsed Nature § 12. This is not the obligation of the Law or Covenant of Innocency for that Law bound us only as Innocent to keep our Innocency and perfectly therein obey But it giveth no pardon nor appointeth Man any Duty in order to pardon and recovery Whatever doth this is a Law of Grace § 13. The sum of that Duty which the Law of Nature now obligeth Man to is To consider of all the Mercies which God vouchsafeth Sinners and thankfully to improve them to repent of sin and turn to this God who sheweth himself a merciful â—aeâ—doniâ—g God To resign
per se and independant for so none is good but God only And all this is the Effect of Grace § 45. 2. But saith Ian senius there is some grace which is not gratiâ— Christi the grace of Christ and such is all that cometh from meer fear without Love which is a kind of providential preparatory grace but not the grace of Christ. Ans. It is not that eminent and special grace of Christ But to think that it befalleth men without Christ's procurement and is not a commoner sort of Christ's grace when all Power in Heaven and Earth is put into his Hand and he is made Head over all things to the Church is below a Christian Divine to imagine and too injurious to Christ. But by all this it appeareth that even Iansenius differeth from others more about the Names of Good and Christ's Graces than about the Matter CHAP. XIV Of Mans Power and Free-will since the Fall § 1. SO much is said Chap. 9. of Mans natural Power and Free-will and so much now Chap. 13. of grace and the Power given by it as may allow me to be short in what is here to be added § 2. All that natural Power and Liberty which was essential to the Will remaineth in it since the Fall For Man is of the same Species § 3. The Will is still a self-determining Principle supposing 1. God's necessary Influx as he is the first Cause of Nature 2. And the Being and convenient Position of Objects 3. And the Perception of the Intellect 4. And the concourse of necessary concomitant second Causes § 4. The three Faculties of mans Soul are all vitiated by sin 1. The vital active Power is so far dead to God and Holiness as to need the cure of quickening and strengthening and exciting Grace 2. The Intellect is so far blinded as to need the cure of illuminating grace 3. And the Will is so far turned by Enmity from God to the inordinate Love of carnal self-interest and Creatures as to need the cure of converting sanctifying Grace § 5. Grace healeth the Will of this Enmity and vitious perverseness so far as it prevaileth which is 1. common Grace enableth it to common good and prepareth it for better 2. Special Grace causeth it actually and habitually to will and love special Good that is God as God and the Creature for God and Holiness as his Image 3. Perfecter Grace bringeth up the Will to perfecter holy Acts and Habits § 6. Nature it self is not in lapsed man divested of all moral or Divine Principles Abilities and Inclinations In the Intellect there are commen Notices of a Deity that is That there is one God who is infinitely powerful wise and good And in the Will there are some Inclinations still to good as good and therefore to God as far as he is truly conceived of as good and so far as that conception is not conquered by a cross Conception of some Enmity And so of other Good § 7. Nature and common Grace may cause a man to go as far in Love and Religion as those whom we call the highest Hypocrites or almost-Christians may do which our practical Preachers do frequently tell the People at large in Books and Sermons § 8. Such may have a common sort of Faith in Christ even formerly to the working of Miracles and of Repentance and Reformation and of good Desires and love to goodness and good Men yea to God himself § 9. For men are not so corrupt by Nature much less under the Effects of common grace as to hate all goodness or to hate all that is in God They may love God as he is the Almighty Creator Preserver and Natural-Orderer of the World and the Cause of its Being Motion Beauty Harmony and all natural Good And they may love him as he is the Giver of life and all natural Blessings to themselves and as he is the Preserver of them and their only Security and Help in Danger and not only as his Blessings gratifie their Senses but as all their Hope of everlasting Happiness is in his Power and Love They may love him as he doth this good to others also and is the common Benefactor to the World without whom it could not subsist a moment And they may love him as he maketh such Laws as preserve their lives and Properties and Rights from Fraud and Violence and by making other Men conscionable just and charitable to all do both gratifie themselves and tend to the common Order Peace and Welfare of Societies and of Mankind § 10. I am not able to confute or deny what Adrian afterwards Pope hath written in his Quodlibets That an unsanctified Man not in a state of Salvation may so far love God even above himself as to consent rather to die and be annihilated than were it possible God should be annihilated or not be God For a Heathen might consent to die for his Country And he is a Bâ—ast and no Man that would not rather be annihilated than all the World yea or all the Kingdom or all the City should be annihilated or than the Sun should cease to be or to shine And he that knoweth that if there were no God there could be no World no Being Motion Knowledge Goodness or Felicity in the World besides that which is worse the Cessation of the Infinite Good himself must be yet more unmanly if he would not rather be annihilated alone if per impossible you suppose he could live alone than all this greater Evil should come to pass He that tells men that they shall be saved if they would rather be annihilated than that there should be no God doth make them a promise which God hath not made § 11. But as the same Author observeth that which the unholy cannot do is to love God as God as the ultimate Object and most amiable Good to be known and by Love and Holiness enjoyed and pleased by a holy Soul and this above all sensual terrene Delights and to love him as the holy Ruler of the World who forbiddeth all sinful sensuality and all mens inordinate Conceits Desires Delights and Practices and requireth holiness and purity of Mind and Life and Sobriety and Temperance and Self-denial in all that will be saved And as he is a just Judge who will execute all these Laws and condemn the ungodly to endlers Misery They love not God as he is the holy Goâ—â—â—â—our and righteous Iudge of men that would restrain them from their sinful Wills and Pleasures and damn them if they will not be holy And consequently they love not his Laws and other means by which this is to be done Because loving the pleasure of their Lusts and being averse to things spiritual high and holy they love not that holiness and rectitude in themselves which God commandeth Rom. 8. 5 6 7 8 c. § 12. Though God as the Fountain of Nature continue the natural power and liberty of the Will yet its moral
gifts But it is perverseness in some School-men who make common Grace and special at least as to Faith to be differenced only in the Causation one being not infused and the other infused but the same in act and so that no man can know whether he have infused or acquired Faith which some call but a Moral Virtue CHAP. XVIII Of the necessity of Faith in Christ where the Gospel is made known § 1. INfidels take scandal from Christ's making Faith in himself to be so necessary to our Salvation as if it tended only to his Honour and were in its own Nature of no necessity to our happiness but arbitrarily made so § 2. And their reason also against this necessity is because believing is an act of the Intellect and Intellection is not free and in its self is no moral Act. A man cannot know or believe what he would no though he most earnestly desired it And will God condemn men for that which they fain would do and cannot Especially when mens intellectual Capacities do so greatly differ that some seem to differ but little from the Brutes § 3. This Scandal ariseth from their not well understanding the Nature and Reasons of our Faith in Christ. 1. They falsely suppose it to be only an Act of the Intellect where many Divines have given them the Scandal 2. They falsely suppose That the Intellect herein is necessitated to unbelief 3. And they consider not the Ends and Uses of our Faith § 4. 1. The true nature of our Faith is our Trusting in Christ as our Saviour who hath reconciled us to God by his Sacrifice and Merit that he may bring us to God by Iustification Adoption Sanctification and Glory It containeth Assent Consent and Affiance though through penury of Words we are fain to call it by some one of these names oft-times as the occasion requireth But indeed the very sence of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 fides and Trust includeth all And when the Act of the Intellect only is named it is as including or informing both the other § 5. 2. Though the Intellect be not free of it self it is free by participation being quoad exercitum under the Empire of the Will that is free And the Will by commanding it to act search think of the Evidences of Verity may do so much towards the specifying of the Act as that the meer weakness of Understanding without the fault of a vicious Will shall keep no man in damnable Unbelief § 6. For Christ hath many ways provided against meer Weakness of our Understanding 1. By the fewness and plainness of necessary Articles of Faith 2. By the fulness of Evidence of Credibility 3. By great Means and Helps for our Faith which he appointeth 4. And by the powerful Helps of his Spirit which is ready to illuminate us by these means § 7. No man was ever yet known that could say I have done my best to have obtained Faith and did not obtain it Though many can say I earnestly desired to believe and could not Because those may desire it that yet use not the means aright and faithfully and that indulge their own Prejudices or carnal Lusts which hinder it § 8. 3 In the saving of Sinners there is considerable 1. The great Benefits already given in the Purchase Merits and Covenant 2. The greater Benefits offered and to be received hereafter 3. The Means to be used on our part for obtaining them 4. The danger and loss if we miss of them 5. The ultimate End of him that giveth them § 9. And 1. will not any reasonable Infidel confess That Thankfulness is naturally due for great and inestimable Benefits And how can a man be thankful for that which he believeth not was ever done for him or given him Or can he be thankful to he knoweth not whom § 10. 2. Do not great Benefits freely offered require Acceptance And how can a man accept of that which he believeth not was ever purchased procured or offered him Will you accept a shadow § 11. 3. Christ never meant to carry Sluggards asleep to Heaven but to save them in the use of his appointed means 1. They must learn and obey his Doctrine and can they obey it that believe it not 2. They must take Heaven procured by a Redeemer for their Hope and Portion and love desire and seek it above all And who will do this that believeth it not and the Word that promiseth it 3. They must take Christ for their Guide and Mediator and Intercessor to bring them thither and they must forsake all here that stands in competition that they may obtain it And can you do this and not believe and trust him that must save you Will you venture your life in the Hands of a Physician and take his Medicines if you believe not that he hath Skill and Will to cure you Will you leave your Country and follow one over Seas that promiseth you a Kingdom if you trust him not § 12. 4. And who will avoid Sin Temptations and Hell that believeth not him that tells them of the evil and of the danger that is before him § 13. 5. And God can have no lower End ultimately than Himself and the Glory of our Redeemer is more excellent than mine or yours And therefore if We have the Salvation it is meet and necessary that God and our Redeemer have the Love and Thanks the Praise and Glory of it § 14. Yet hath not God arbitrarily made Faith more necessary than it is in the true Reason and Aptitude of it to its Ends. He hath not made to all a Faith so necessary of Christ and his Intercession and therefore though Infants and Ideots cannot actually believe they may be saved by Christ And though those before Christ believed not all that we must now believe nor the Gentiles before so much as the Iews yet neither of them were thereby excluded from Salvation § 15. Quest. Hath not Christ made the Case of Christians harder than it was before his Incarnation to Believers by making so many more Articles of our Faith and those of necessity to our Salvation Ans. No no more than it is our Misery to accept of more Mercies and Benefits than were offered to others Our Belief is not of numerous unnecessary difficulties but it is of such things as we must receive and be Partakers of it is the means of our use and fruition Who would take it for a Misery to believe that the King will give him a Lordship or that a rich Man will give him so much Money if he will come and thankfully accept it Every act of belief is but a means to some Benefit to be received § 16. As Christ is the way to the Father and the Mediator is to bring us unto God so Faith in Christ is the Mediate or healing Grace to help us to Holiness or the Love of God which being its End is as much more noble than Faith in
capable of performing at that time though viciously indisposed it being only natural disability and not moral vicious unwillingness that hindereth Obligation But though not to do all that we can be peccare yet it is not to sin unto Death or Damnation if he perform so much as is made by Christ the Condition of life In short 1. Before mans sin he was under the proper Law and Covenant of Innocency which made perfect personal Innocency the Condition of life 2. Immediately after sinning before the Promise man was not under any Promise of life on condition of Innocency nor yet under the Command of being innocent nor of seeking and hoping for life on that Condition For upon the Impossibility these ceased without a Repeal cessante capacitate subditi But man was then under no Covenant or premiant Law But under 1. The Command of perfect Obedience for the future 2. The Obligation to Punishment not peremptory but due for every sin unless it should be pardoned on due satisfaction These two Obligations man was under between the Fall and the Promise 3. But next sinful condemned man with his said Obligation was delivered into the hands of the Redeemer who now continueth the said Law of lapsed Nature making perfect Obedience de futuro due or Death for sin in primo instanti but adding the Remedying Law of Grace giving Christ Pardon and Life to penitent Believers § 36. The Question What Punishment is due to Venial sin must be resolved from the sence of the Law that obligeth us And the Question is not what Punishment would have been due to the smallest sin if the Covenant of Innocency had continued but what is due to it by the Law of Redeemed Nature and of Grace which is in force § 37. There is a three-fold Dueness or Desert here considerable without distinguishing of which many such Questions cannot be answered 1. A Dueness of natural Congruity without any Remedy which the Law gave or took notice of So Death was due for every sin by the Law of Innocency as I think 2. A Dueness of natural Congruity with an affixed Remedy which hindereth the guilt from being compleat and fixed And such is the Dueness of punishment to the least real sin by the Law of Redeemed Nature to which the Law of Grace is annexed giving a Conditional Pardon to all the World for the Merits of the Redeemer As if God said Thy sin in strict Iustice is worthy of death but I will forgive thee if thou repent and believe in Christ. Here is so much Dueness as needeth pardon but it is virtually conditionally pardoned as soon as committed and so it is not a plenary Obligation to punishment 3. A Remediless Dueness or Guilt by natural Congruity and peremptory determination of the Law-giver And such was the Guilt of temporal death for sin against the Law of Innocency at least the eating of the forbidden Fruit for so far it is not forgiven and the Guilt of perpetual misery to impenitent Unbelievers and ungodly Ones that so die § 38. By this it appeareth that sins of meer Infirmity consistent with sincere Faith Repentance and Holiness in the second sence deserve punishment not all alike but according to the degree of the Offence But not in the first sence or the last § 39. Accordingly a great Question must be determined Whether the sins of the Faithful deserve any more than a temporal Chastisement And whether they may pray for pardon of perpetual punishment or need any such pardon Ans. The sins of the Godly deserve everlasting punishment in the second Sence or Degree of Desert or Dueness which is so far as to need a Saviour and Pardon and so as they must pray for and receive that pardon But not in the first or third Sence § 40. It is the Law of Christ or of Grace which is norma officit judicii and by which we must be judged at the last day § 41. It is of great importance in the Controversies of Justification to know whether or how far we shall be judged by the Law of Innocency or whether only by the Law of Grace He that is judged by the Law of Innocency must be justified by personal perfect perpetual Obedience not by anothers or be condemned But he that is judged by the Law of Grace must be justified by Christ's Merits and Sacrifice or Righteousness as purchasing his Grant of a Pardon and life or Right to Impunity and Glory given by the Covenant of Grace conditionally with his own performance of that Condition CHAP. XIII Of the Universality and Sufficiency of Grace § 1. IT was not only the Nature of the Elect but of all Mankind that Christ assumed in his Incarnation § 2. It was not to Adam only as the Father of the Elect but as the common Father of Mankind lapsed that God made the Promise or conditional Law or Covenant of Grace Gen. 3. 15. And so renewed it with Noah § 3. It was not the sin of the Elect only but of all Mankind that were the occasion of Christ's sufferings called by some An assumed meritorious Cause because by his consent they were loco Causae meritoriae § 4. It is not to the Elect only but for all the World as to the Tenor of it that Christ hath purchased and given a conditional Pardon of sin and a conditional Donation of Life eternal in the Covenant of Grace both of the first and second Edition That is the conditional Grant is Universal Whoever believeth shall be saved Though the Promulgation of it may have many stops § 5. It is not to the Elect only but to All that Christ hath commanded his Ministers to proclaim this Law or Covenant and offer the Benefits and require their Consent as far as the said Ministers are able § 6. It is not only to the Elect but to all Mankind that many Mercies procured by pardoning and reconciling Grace are actually given which were forfeited or not due by reason of sin against the Law of Innocency § 7. These Mercies given to all Mankind after sin and contrary to desert are not given by Gods Mercy alone without respect to the Blood and Merits of Christ But his Blood and Merits are the Cause of them as truly as of the greater Mercies of the Elect. And they that say That God doth give all these Mercies without a Saviour's Merits as the Cause prepare the way for Infidels to inferr That then he might have done so by the Mercies of the Elect. § 8. All these actual Mercies given to mankind contrary to Merit are a degree of Promulgation of the Law of Grace telling all the World That God doth not now rule and judge them meerly by the Law of Innocency but upon Terms of Mercy as is aforesaid § 9. Hereby it is signified to all the World that God is as he proclaimed his Name to Moses Exod. 34. 5 6 7. The Lord the Lord God merciful and gracious long-suffering and