Selected quad for the lemma: nature_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
nature_n adam_n law_n moral_a 4,944 5 10.5377 5 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A15525 A commentarie vpon the most diuine Epistle of S. Paul to the Romanes Containing for matter, the degeneration of our nature by Adams Fall; and the restauration thereof, by the grace of Christ. Together with the perfection of faith, and the imbecillity of workes, in the cause of iustification of elect sinners before God. For forme and maner of handling, it hath the coherence and method, the summe and scope, the interpretations & doctrines the reasons and vses, of most texts. All which, are set downe very familiarly and compendiously, in forme of a dialogue, betweene Tlmotheus [sic] and Silas, by Thomas Wilson, one of the six preachers in the cathedrall church of Canterbury. Wilson, Thomas, 1563-1622. 1614 (1614) STC 25791; ESTC S120148 882,533 1,268

There are 20 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

sorts First it maketh appeare vnto vs what is euill and sin and what is not Secondly it brings vs to behold the nature of sin how vile and filthy it is being against a righteous lawe and an infinite diuine iustice Thirdly it reueales the danger of sin what hurt it bringeth to the committers of it to wit no lesse then euerlasting destruction in hell after all the miseries of this life Lastly it giues a feeling of sinne in our hearts troubling our Consciences by some certaine byting and sting This experimentall knowledge is that which is chiefely meant heere where we are further to note that howsoeuer all Lawes both ciuill ceremoniall and iudicial as the law of nature also serueth to manifest sinne yet the morall Law of God being written by Moyses and rightlie vnderstood doth performe this office of reuealing sin most fully and feelingly because it striketh at the roote discouering our hidden and secret euil thoughts causing vs to seele the force of sin inasmuch as God himself in this Law doth with great power speake to the conscience for it hath his spirit ioyned with it which deserying and laying open our hidden naughtinesse and our bondage to it breeds terror in vs Rom. 8 15. Tim. What may be the vse of this first instruction Sila First it doth admonish all men to bee conuersant in the Lawe of God and to studie it if they do desire to be more and more acquainted with their own sins and wofull estate thorough the same Secondly it renders a reason why men haue so slender a sight of sins eyther their owne or others because they are ignorant vnsensible of the Law Thirdly it warneth the godly to bee thankefull vnto God who hath giuen them the Law to be as it were a Sentinell to bewray their enemy to them and a scourage to driue them forward to lesus Fourthly this directeth vs how to reade and heare the Law with fruite namely when wee finde out some thing by it which must bee forgiuen by mercie and repented of or amended by grace Lastly it serueth to pul downe our stomackes and hearts by the viewe of our owne sinfull estate to force vs vnto Christ and to make much of his grace and merites Thus farre of the first instruction Tim. Now tell vs of what knowledge the Apostle speaketh when he saith He had not knowne Lust c. As also what Law he speaketh of Silas He meaneth the morall Law or ten Commandements as is plaine by the instance of Lust which is sorbidden or condemned in euery one of them as the root whence springeth all other sinnes As for knowledge he meaneth both speculatiue and experimentall but rather this so as the sence is this I had neuer vnderstood lust to be a sinne at all or felt it to be so grieuous a sinne as now I doe without the helpe and light of Gods Lawe which forbiddeth Lust. Hence wee are put in minde againe how diligently the Law of God is to bee learned and weighed of vs seeing without it the hidden sinnes of our nature cannot bee espyed and knowne nor the force of sin so throughly felt as to enforce vs to Christ. Tim. But what Lust may it be that this our Text mentioneth for there be sundry sorts of Lusts some be good lusts which he cannot meane and sinful lusts be not all of one kind Shew vs which of them is vnderstood heere Sil. It is true as ye say for there be naturall Lustes when things tending to preseruation of our own nature are desired there is also a spiritual lust an hungring thirsting for iustice which is a desire of heauenly things that come from the Spirite and also there is carnall sinfull Lust which is of things contrary vnto God These be meant heere but not all these For of sinnefull lustes there be sundry kindes As first Originall lust which is the fountaine roote and spring of all other sins being that which is called byrth-sinne or corruption of Nature This Originall Lust is an impotencie of mans heart whereby it is inordinately disposed to this or that euill Secondly actuall lust which is euerie euill motion and desire of the soule against the law of God This proceeds as a fruite from the former Rom. 6 12. of which there are two degrees the one is an euill motion of the minde suddenly conceiued without consent of will this is called voluntarie Lust. The other is an euill motion which goeth together with consent and is ioyned with purpose and deliberation lames 1 15. This is called voluntary lust because it hath the consent of our will and is not onely in desire but in resolution to effect it if occasion serue Now our Text doth not speake of our voluntary lusts which are consented vnto by our will and resolued vpon First because without the morall Law Paul might know these lusts to be sinne by the light of naturall reason as many Heathens did Secondly by that which followes in this Chapter it appeares he speakes of such lusts as be resisted and irkesome to a godly minde which doe leade the Saints captiue euen against their will making them cry out O miserable men and therefore it is an originall lust which is the prauity of nature disposed to euil which is meant here and also the first degree of actuall lusts to wit such as go before consent the moral law being rightly vnderstood of the Apostle gaue him light to see that those lustes were sinnes deseruing eternal death which before he knew the law he did not perceiue or once surmise it to be so or to sticke so deeply in his nature and so to make him obnoxious to Gods wrath Tim. Let vs now heare what doctrines and lessons we are to gather from hence Silas The first is this the miserable estate wherein all men stand by Adams fall hauing their nature wholly poysoned and corrupted by sin Iusting after euill things alone in so much as if we should neuer thinke speake nor doe euill yet our very corruption of nature beeing the breach of Gods eternall law maketh vs guilty of eternall wrath Secondly our euill desires and motions though they be misliked and striuen against yet they be sinnes and deserue Hell fire because they are transgressions of the Law Tim. What vse and profit is to be made of these doctrines Silas First euery one must see that they haue need of the death and bloud-shedde of Christ euen for the least vaine and sinnefull thought or imagination yea for healing their infected dead nature Secondly that euery one must be humbled mourne and with sighes craue pardon for such thoughts and for their naturall inclination to sinne Thirdly all Christians stand bound not onely to take care and heed of their words and workes but euen of their thoughts and desires for there must a Conscience be made not onely of what men speake and doe but what men thinke and desire Fourthly it serues to
Sathan trueth or vnrighteousnesse Tim. Which of these Lords is it best to be seruant vnto Sil. Vnto Christ and his truth because this seruice bringeth liberty wealth pleasure safety dignity and honour Prou. 3. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. Tim. How may we know whether wee serue trueth or lust Sil. First we are seruants vnto that which we are obedient vnto Secondly our seruice is knowne by our loue and care what wee like best and take most care and paines to please that is our lord Tim. But are Gods children wholy freed from vnrighteousnesse Sil. No surely but they are not seruants to it it still abideth in them but it reigneth not ouer them it hath force and might to drawe them aside from the trueth of reason and of faith but without dominion ouer them Tim. Which lord do the wicked serue Sil. Vnrighteousnesse and lust by which seruice they gaine shame bitter griefe horrour of conscience daunger of this life and far more in the life to come Tim. What remaineth for them in the life to come Sil. Tribluation anguish wrath and indignation Tim. What did we learne out of these words Sil. That euill men after they are dead must suffer for sinne Secondly that the paines which they must suffer are extream Thirdly that their paines shal be both very great and sundry or of diuers sorts as the change of the wordes doeth imply Lastly this should serue to keepe men from sinning against God also to stirre vp men after they haue sinned vnto serious repentance Tim. How many things consider we in this Text Silas Three things First what is meant by persons and respecting of persons Secondly in what things it may appeare that God doth not respect persons Thirdly how farre forth we are to respect persons without sinning Tim. What is meant by persons Sil. The outward qualities as riches pouerty birth country friends some of these qualities are of our own election as to be a Captaine a Souldior a Magistrate a Minister Some put vpon vs by God as Country birth riches and pouerty The meaning then of these wordes is this that God is not moued with any of these qualities to loue or to hate to refuse or to receiue any to fauour no nor yet with any guifts either naturall as wit memory vnderstanding or gotten by labour as Learning Arts experience Tim. But was is not a respecting of persons when all men being alike in Adam he chose some to saluation and refused others Sil. It was not for these reasons First persons in this phrase of Scripture doth not signifie men and woemen Secondly Gods decree was before eyther there were men or woemen that is before they had any being Thirdly there must needs be a reiecting of some where some be elected Fourthly that which moued him to make this difference was not any condition or qualities in the parties but his good pleasure Fifthly the elect are not saued but by the merits of Christ the others are not condemned but by the desert of their sinnes adde hereunto that God is not tyed vnto any law and therefore cannot wrong any or offend against equity Tim. In what things may it appeare that God respecteth no persons Sil. In these two things First in bestowing his spirituall guifts and graces which he giueth to poore and meane ones as well as to great and rich ones as his effectuall calling faith repentance Secondly in inflicting his iudgements for sinne which he punisheth in great and rich ones as well as in poore and meane ones Tim. What vse are we to make heereof Sil. That we ought to be like vnto God heerein not to respect persons but to iudge according to the cause Tim. In how many things are not we to respect persons Silas In foure things First the Minister in deliuering Doctrine Math. 22 Thou teachest truely and respectest no mans person Secondly the Magistrate in administring iustice Deut. 16 19. Thirdly all Christians in their censure and iudgement of actions good and euill Fourthly in hauing the precious faith without respect of persons Iames 2 1. Tim. But there is some case wherein it is good to respect persons Sil. True as in giuing reuerence to euery man according to his estate and guifts examples heereof we haue in Abraham towards the Hittites in Ioseph towards Pharao in Salomon towards his mother the reason whereof is the authority and guists of our betters to whom ciuill reuerence is due DIALOGVE VIII Verse 12. For as many as haue finned without the Law shall perish without the Law and as many as haue sinned in the Law shall bee iudged by the Law Tim. VVHat is the purpose of the blessed Apostle in this present Text and how proceedeth hee Sil. The same as before to proue the iudgement of God in punishing sinners to be iust and himselfe to be no accepter of persons because howsoeuer the Iewes and Gentiles be vne quall in knowledge yet he will indifferently punish both both being sinners And heere Paul draweth neere to the particular obiections of Iewes and Gentiles preuenting them in that they would plead and lay in against this equity of Gods distributiue Iustice which the Iewes thought it should not take hold on them beecause God had graced and adorned them with the benefit and priuiledge of the Law by hauing whereof they looked not to be condemned but iustified the Gentiles seeing they wanted the Law deemed it hard to bee condemned whereunto he saith in this verse that it shall no whit helpe the Iewes that they had the Law northe Gentiles that they lacked it for notwithstanding this difference both were worthy to perish seeing both had in them sinne the proper cause of damnation This is the drift and sum of this verse and thus Paul proceedeth Tim. But why saith be of the Gentiles that they are without a Law as hauing no Law Silas This is spoken in comparison the Gentiles had not the Law so plainely deliuered in writing as the Iewes had yet were they not without a Law which he proueth afterward by two manner of wayes in the verses 14 15. the one externall doing some good things the other internall the testimony of Conscience Tim. How can they be said to sinne seeing sinne it the transgression of the Law which they were without Sil. They did sinne by breaking such a Law as was giuen them though they wanted Moyses Law Also they were finners against the Law of Creation which when Adam did breake he wrapt himselfe and all his posterity euen Infants in damnation Tim. What meaneth he when hee saith they shal perish Silas That their ignorance of Moyses Law should not excuse them from guilt and punishment of sin because they shall bee iudged by that Lawe of Nature against which they sinned Tim. What instructions are to be receiued from hence Sil. Two First that God giueth not the knoledge of his will to all alike For the Iewes had more knowledge and the Gentiles had lesse Secondly that
shall no flesh be iustified in his sight for by the Law commeth the knowledge of sin Tim. WHat is the drift of this Text Silas Hauing hitherto at large proued all to be sinners he will proue that Iustification and absolution from sinne commeth not by the workes of the Lawe which now he proueth by this reason the Law sheweth vs our sinne and conuinceth vs as guilty of sinne therefore it doth not absolue and quit vs from sin The reason is taken from the Law of contraries which cannot at once in one respect be affirmed of one thing Tim. What doth he meane by the workes of the Law Silas Not simply the workes of the Law as they are commanded of God but as they are performed of vs vnperfectly and with many slips For the Law simply considered without relation to vs could iustifie vs. Tim. What doth he meane by Law Silas Hee meaneth the Lawe both of nature and of Moyses and by workes hee meaneth not ceremoniall workes onely but the morall That the moral is chiefly meant may appeare vnto vs by these reasons First because he had cited testimonies which speake of morall vices Secondly this effect to know sinne is chiefely by the morall Law Thirdly moral workes are greatest cause of glorying Fourthly because all kinde of working is set against beleeuing as contraries and repugnant the one to the other in the cause of forgiuenesse of sinnes and saluation of sinners Tim. What meaneth he by No flesh Sil. No man but the Apostle saith rather no flesh then no man especially to note what men are without Christ to wit a lumpe of flesh and corruption full of weaknesse sinfull infirmity being vnapt of our selues to bring forth any thing which is good Tim. What doth Iustifie import signifie Silas To pardon sinne to absolue and acquit sinners and to approoue one for righteous and not either to declare iust so works iustifie or to make actually iust This were perfection of inhaaerent Iustice which none hath Tim. What was learned from this Sil. That the Apostle speaketh not against the doing of workes but against the trust in them and putting merit of righteousnesse in them we ought to labour in the doing of good workes but wee cannot claime forgiuenesse of sinnes and eternall life by the worthinesse of them Tim. What is that he saith In his sight Silas This phrase is vsed heere not to note hypocrisie but the imperfection of the best workes for hee teacheth that the most perfect workes of the best men come farre short of beeing able to abide the rigour of Gods Iustice because the best workes of Gods Saintes haue both wants and staines in them and cannot therefore endure the seuere and strict iudgement of God in whose fight it is Christ alone that makes beleeuers holy and vnblameable Col. 1 22. Tim. What should this worke in vs Sil. Humility and lowly conceite of our owne best doings which God might worthily cast out and the doers of them if with a iust eie he did behold them Tim. What is meant hereby that the knowledge of sinne is said to come by the Law Sil. That the law serueth both to shew vs what is sinne and doth also argue or reproue vs of sinne and for this end is this alleadged euen to make it plaine that righteousnesse and pardon of sinne doe not come from the law For as a felon or Traytor conuicted by some statute lawe of a capitall crime it were solly and madnesse for such an one to looke to be acquitted by that law which did shew and condemne his crime to death In like manner it is spirituall phrensie to looke for absolution and life from the law of Moyses seeing it is giuen to conuict vs as guilty of death through sinne Yet such mad furious fooles our Papists be as they presume to finde righteousnesse and life where nothing but sinne and death can be found therefore doth the law reueale sinne and terrifie the Conscience and shew death and condemnation to be due vnto transgressors which is contrary to iustifying DIAL XI Verse 21. But now is the righteousnesse of God made manifest without the law hauing witnesse of the law and the Prophets Tim. VVHat is the drift of this Text Sil. To teach how Gods elect doe attaine vnto true and perfect righteousnesse before God to wit not by their workes but euen by the faith of Iesus Christ for seeing there is no other way to haue righteousnesse but either by workes or faith and by workes it cannot be had therefore by faith Tim. How many things are heere to be considered Sil. Foure First the circumstance of time Now. Secondly what is the 〈◊〉 of God Thirdly how this is manifest and how manifest without the law Fourthly what witnesse it hath from the Prophets Tim. What is meant by Now this particle of time Sil. That is at this present time wherein Paul and the other Apostles of Iesus Christ did preach the word Tim. What did we learne from this circumstance Sil. That God hath his appointed time for all his works Eccles. 3 1. which should teach patience and waiting vpon God Secōdly that the time of the gospel hath a more cleer reuelation of Gods good will to the elect then that of the law which should breed thankfulnes for so great a mercy Tim. What is heere called the righteousnesse of God Sil. Not that whereby himselfe is righteous for that is his owne essence and is not communicated to vs but that righteousnesse which is after called the righteousnesse of Christ and the righteousnesse of faith euen that righteousnesse which is by faith in Christ who is made perfect iustice to all which doe beleeue in him Tim. Why is this called the righteousnesse of God of Christ and of Faith Sil. It is called the righteousnes of God both from the cause and the effect in asmuch as it is not of vs and our workes in part or in whole nor from any man but it is the guift of God Secondly it is that onely which God in his strict iustice approueth and for which we are accepted with him also it is called the righteousnesse of Christ and of Faith because Christ in his man-hood wrought it by his obedience to death and our faith is that instrument wherby we attaine to it and receiue it that it may be our owne for our full Iustification before God vnto life eternall Tim. How did the Apostles make this manifest to the world Sil. After this sort First they preached repentance setting before mens eyes their sinnes and their iust and fearefull condemnation thereby Secondly they gathered together out of the Scripture the properties of that Christ which should heale these euils Thirdly they applied the same properties to Iesus of Nazareth Fourthly they beseech and exhort all men to beleeue in him as their onely Sauiour See Acts 2 22. and 10 36. and 13 26. Tim. What followeth in such as belieue such
are offenders of vs being ready to receiue them to fauour whensoeuer they truely repent Tim. Howe vnderstand ye this that all men are vnder death Sil. After this sort first euery man so soone as hee is borne is euery houre apt to die Secondly euery man at his birth is spiritually dead quite destitute of Gods grace and holy spirit Ephe. 2 1. till his regeneration Thirdly euery person deserueth this death to become eternall euen euerlasting separation from GOD and his presence and felicity Tim. What equity or iustice is there in this Sil. The equity is iust for that one mans sinne was euery mans sinne for Adam was the roote of our kinde and therefore this fault is not personall resting in himselfe but reaching to all his posterity which were then in his loynes as Leuy was in Abrahams loynes Heb. 7 10. For such iuice as is in the tree commeth to all the branches also such as is the water in the fountaine such it is in the riuer and some such diseases as be in the parents descendeth to the children also amongst vs men the father beeing a Traytor the whole bloud is tainted Lastly the righteousnesse of Christ the head is conuayed ouer to the members so it is here againe God who is most iust so decreed and would haue it that the grace which Adam had hee should keepe or loose for himselfe and all mankinde who were to stand and fall wih him thus it appeares to be very equall Tim. What instructions learn ye hence Sil. First it reproues the vulgar conceit that God will not punish but for actuall sinnes Secondly it reprooues some Papists which exempt the Virgin Mary from this generall condition of sinne and death Thirdly it doeth admonish vs of our most wofull condition which wee are in without Christ. Fourthly it puts vs in minde of mutuall compassion seeing our case is equall one no better then another all alike 〈◊〉 and wretched Fistly it teacheth the necessity of a Sauiour not onely to know there must be one and who he is and what he hath done but to gette him to become ours by beleeuing the promises of him Tim. What are we to be put in minde of by the connexion and ioyning together of sin and death Sil. First that euery one is bound to make account of dying euery moment hauing sinne the matter and means of death still about him Secondly that the dāme of such a brood that is sinne which causeth no lesse then death is most carefully to be auoyded and abhorred euen to be fled from as one would flie from death Moreouer think that if an others sinne could doe this as to make thee culpable of death what will that sinne do which thou doest in thine owne person for Adams sinne is thine in account not in act yet so as this proueth Adams sinne to bee euery mans owne proper sinne as if he had himselfe acted and done it because else he should not dye for it for men in iustice are not to suffer death for any sinne saue that which is their owne by act or imputation Christ had had wrong done to him to be brought to death if sinne had no way belonged vnto him for death is not inflected but with reference to sin DIAL XI Verses 13 14. For vnto the time of the law was sin in the worlde but sinne is not imputed where there is no lawe But death raigned from Adam to Moyses euen ouer them that sinned not after the like manner of the transgression of Adam Tim. WHat is the drift of this scripture Sil. He proceedeth in his purpose to proue all men euen to the yong In fants newly borne to bee through Adam sinnetull by bringing in a secret obiection and answering it Tim. What is the obiection and how is it answered Sil. The obiection is this there could be no sin nor sinners before Moses seeing there was no law where there is no lawe there is no sinne This obiection the Apostle doeth answere two wayes first by a distinction betweene being and reputing sinne was in the world before Moses law yet not so reputed and esteemed so vile and soule seeing yet no law was giuen them Secondly hee prooues there was sin by the effects of sinne which is death whereunto euen before Moses law both olde and young were subiect which is a sufficient proofe that then all men sinned death being the stipend of sinne Tim. Now expound the wordes and tell vs what is meant here by this vntill the time of the law Sil. That is to say all that time that passed betweene Adam and Moses so expounded verse 14. Death raigned from Adam to Moyses Tim. What is meant hereby that sinne was in the world till then Sil. That is to say men which liued in this world had sin in them as well before the law as afterwards Tim. But howe could that bee seeing that yet there was no law and sin is the transgression of some law and indeede what law could be giuen to some of them as to Infants which had no vse of reason Sil. Therefore the Apostle in affirming that notwithstanding this there was sinne in the world hee meaneth there was a sinne euen afore the Law by which sin al men were borne sinners being both guilty of wrath and corrupted euen from the wombe This is the sinne of Adam in whose sinning all men were comprehended he being head and roote of our kinde as was sayd verse 12. Tim. Belike then this is now the scope of the Apostle to proue That as al men are guilty by their owne sinnes vvhich they do in their owne persons and haue in their owne Nature so there is a sinne of Adam by guilt whereof al men are obnoxious and culpable of death Sil. True this is in verie deede that which is intended and wherein Adam is like Christ the one being fountaine of sinne vnto death the other of righteousnesse to life Tim. What meane ye heereby in that it is saide Where no Law is there sin is not imputed Silas That afore the Law was giuen sin was not so thoroughly knowne and reputed but when the law was published it was better knowne and became more greeuous Tim. But may not these words carrie another sence which may wel stand with the Apostles minde and drift Silas They may so as thus that such as liued in the world after Adam though they wanted Moyses Law yet they wanted not a Law altogither Tim. How makes he that appeare Silas Heereby because that sinne was imputed and men became thereby guilty of wrath Tim. What Law might that be Silas The Lawe of nature giuen them in their Creation Tim. What examples can yee giue that sin was imputed to men before the giuing of the Law by Moyses Sil. Sundry and very manifest First the punishment of Caines murther Gen. 4 11. Secondly the reprehension of Abimelech Gen. 20 6. Thirdly the ouerthrow of the world by a flood Gen. 7 20.
in men before they knew the Commandement seeing he saith they are wrought by it Sil. Yes these wicked motions are both in vs and are somewhat knowne of vs before we haue the knowledge of the commaundement which forbids them but they are not knowne so fully and absolutely nor the great force of them so fully felt as after the true knowledge of the Law is once had Tim. What do these words wrought in me put vs in mind of Sil. That if this happen to Paul what may happen to vs The case of Paul is euery mans case for wee are all by nature alike peruerse and our naturall peruersenesse will be as ready vpon the Doctrine of the Lawe forbidding and condemning our lustes and inward euill motions to breake out and more to be enraged and encreased by that which should do it good which though we do not perceiue till afterwards as Paul did not yet when it is perceiued it should moue vs to iustify the law and condemne our selues after Paules example Tim. Is there any other Doctrine out of the former wordes Silas Yea namely that originall Concupiscence is more then a defect of Iustice as sickenesse is a defect of health but it is a very sin offending God and making Nature culpable being condemned in the Law and the very proper cause be getting all vicious motions and actions within and without man Tim. What is it to be without the Law Silas To want the true knowledge of the Lawe for it cannot be saide that any are simple and altogither without the Law seeing all men haue the Lawe of Nature written in them Two sorts want the true knowledge of the Moral Law as Infants and Children which for want of age cannot attaine the vnderstanding of the Law Secondly men of yeares which either do not at all consider it or but slenderly On the other side they may bee saide to know the Lawe which so know the true meaning as therewithall they do thinke vpon it so long till they see feele their sins and the deepe danger of them except men know the Law to this purpose they had better be without the Law Tim. What then is the instruction from thence Silas That whosoeuer do heare the Law and Gospel without application to themselues for humbling and strengthning of them it may bee truely saide that they are without the worde of God whatsoeuer knowledge they get as a man is without the Sun without Riches when he hath no vse of them though hee haue riches c. Tim. What is the vse of this doctrine Sylas To reproue such as heare the word and content themselues with some generall confused knowledge and not ponder it nor apply it to themselues that they may be touched throughly with it of these it is true which is written They heare and do not vnderstand and they see doe not see which is a most heauy iudgement of GOD and worse than famine plague and sword Silas What is the meaning of this that hee sayeth sinne is dead Sil. That is without the due knowledge of the law sin lyeth still voyd of force and power as if it were dead neither is it knowne to be so grieuous as it is for as a Dogge which while hee sleepeth he seemeth to be dead but if you awake him he will fly in your throat or as a body is sayd to bee dead when it wants strength and moues not so sin before the true knowledge of the law because it doth not stir and rage is therefore said to be dead Tim. In what sence doth Paul say he was aliue without the law Sylas Not that he liued indeed but that hee seemed to himselfe to liue to God-ward because hee was not troubled nor his conscience made afraid of Gods iustice and vengeance til the law was well knowne vnto him and duly considered of him which his case may be declared by the similitude of one who hath an enemy and growes secure because hee is quiet and stirres not thinking himselfe safe So Paul while sinne was not impelled and stirred by the law tooke himselfe to bee aliue indeede and out of all perill of perishing by eternal death Tim. What is the instruction that is to bee gathered from these words being thus opened and expounded Silas In the person and case of Paul we learne what is the estate of all naturall men while they are ignorant of or duely regard not the law so long they doe little or nothing feele their sinnes or feare their owne damnation but contrariwife iudge themselues to bee happy and aliue though they bee dead and miserable This their fearefull estate may be set forth vnto vs by the comparison of one being sicke neare to death yet complaynes not but sayeth he is not sicke because he feeles not his disease euen so it fareth with all vnregenerate men before they haue the right vnderstanding of the lawe and of their sinnes and danger thereby they take themselues to be in blessed case hauing their sinnes forgiuen them because they are blockish without al true sence and feeling of their sinnes which how dangeraus a case it is may hereby be perceiued For as a man not feeling his sicknesse neglecteth the meanes of health and dyes without remedy so these not feeling their multitude of sins doe thinke that they are well already therefore they neuer earnestly seeke after Christ but doe perish in their sencelesse estate And this is the condition of many thousands which doe liue in the Church of God Tim. What is the profit to be made of this poynt of doctrine Sylas First it may prouoke such as neither felt the sting and force nor feared the damnation of sinne to mistruit their owne estate greatly that they are not aliue to God howsoeuer it seemes otherwise to them for the reason why their conscience is quiet and their mindes at rest as if they did liue and were in blisse it is because sinne is dead and quiet in them through their ignorance or ill regarde of the lawe Secondly that Christians must reck on it a great mercy of God to haue the law truely expounded and wisely applyed to themselues that they may come to feele their sins and their owne miserable condition as they may bee prouoked by that meanes to seeke a remedy Lastly such as are disquieted and vexed about their sinnes through the threatnings of the lawe are in better plight then many which neuer knewe what trouble of minde meant because they are nearer vnto Christ then the other bee Tim. Now expound the other part of the ninth verse and 〈◊〉 playnely what is meant by the commandement and the words following Silas That commandement which forbiddeth lust or all euill desires which is said to come vnto one when it is rightly vnderstood without which the commandement is as it were absent from vs as the Sun when it shineth not also sin is sayed to reuiue when in
written in the Preter tense or in the time past to signifie that our iustification is perfect in this life wheras when he speaketh of our vnperfect Sanctification he vseth a word signifying time to come Romanes 7 24. Who shall deliuer me c Tim. Who are the parties that are partakers of this freedom and deliuerance Silas All beleeuers without any difference of sexe age stature condition or nation whether Iew or Gentile Tim. Why then doth the Apostle vse this phrase saying Hee hath freed me rather then hee hath freed all the faithfull Silas First as hee set himselfe before an example of weakenesse and spirituall strife so now also of confidence and of the victory Secondly heere hee would teach all men to make application of this comfort vnto themselues saying and beleeuing Christ freed me there is no condemnation to me for this is the power of true faith to appropriate generall promises contrary to the Papists who will haue faith to be nothing else but a generall assent to the Scriptures without particular affiance in the promise of Christ. Tim. From what thing are we deliuered by Christ Silas From Sinne that is from our vnregenerate nature as it is corrupted by sinne Death also is ioyned to it because it makes vs guilty of and subiect to death and destruction which followes all kind of sin as the night followes the day and shadow the body Tim. What meaneth hee by putting this word Law vnto sinne Silas Because the guilt of our sinnefull nature is as a bond to make vs bound vnto eternall death Secondly because in such as are not regenerate it doth exercise a mortiferous tyrannical power and gouernment Tim. Now shew vs what benefit we may make of this whole verse thus expounded Silas It affoords vs an instruction a comfort reproose and confutation The instruction is that not onely Christ his obedience in his life and the sufferings in his death but the sanctificatiō of his humane nature is ours and is as verily belonging to the faithfull as if they had bin borne without sinne Secondly the comfort is that such as are in Christ may in all their temptations in life and death comfort themselues with this assurance that the sinnes neither of their actions nor of their nature shall euer be imputed to them Though they may oftentimes feele their wicked and rebellious nature stirre and resist Gods law yet such as doe resist the motions of sin yeelding themselues obediently to the motions of the Spirite are secured and made certaine that their remaining sinne shall neuer condemne them because Christ hath freed and deliuered them from it perfectly allowing them his owne sanctification to bee theirs It is a maruailous comfort to them that haue neede of it and can apprehend it Thirdly this doth reprooue the ignorant dissolute Christian who neuer thinkes what an euil his corrupt nature is nor is euer troubled with those euill motions and desires that suddenly spring from it full little doe they consider that the Sonne of God must descend from Heauen and humble himselfe to become a man that hee might free vs from the impurity of our humane nature And lastly it doth consute our blinde erring Papists of whom the very wisest of them neuer came so farre as to know that naturall concupiscence is a sinne in the regenerate and stands in neede of a Sauiour DIAL III. Verse 3. For that that was vnpossible to the Law in as much as it was weake because of the flesh God sending his owne Son in the similitude of sinfull flesh and for sinne condemned sinne in the flesh Tim. VVHat is the drift of this Text Silas It renders a reason to prooue that the most perfect holinesse of Christs humane nature called in the former verse the Spirit of life being imputed vnto beleeuers doth free them from sin and death that is from the remainder of sinne sticking still in their nature and the punishment of eternall destruction due to it This reason is taken from the end of Gods purpose in sending his Sonne to take mans nature into the fellowship of his person for he was sent to take flesh vpon him to helpe and succour the infirmity of our flesh Or more plainely thus Christ was sent of his Father to take the nature of man in the wombe of a virgin free from sinne by the worke of the Holy-Ghost to this end that he might restore our nature vnto such a perfection of righteousnesse as the exactnesse of Gods law doth require For though the lawe did teach a perfect righteousnesse both of nature and actions yet it is very vnable to bring vs there-vnto because wee doe lacke strength and power to performe and keepe it both before and after our regeneration From whence doth follow that seeing by the strength of the Law wee cannot attaine perfect righteousnesse and saluation with freedome from sinne and death because of the infirmitie of our flesh therefore it was of necessitie that Christ shold take our Nature full of holinesse to do that for vs which the Law could not do that is to destroy sin and death and to make them which by Faith lay holde on him so absolutely righteous as the Law requires For thus the case standeth that not onely our thoughts wordes and workes should be free from sinne and wholly vpright but also that our nature euen the verie faculties of our reason and will should be in all things conformable to Gods will reuealed in his Law as Adam was in his creation and according to that which is written Loue God with all thine heart c. Now because none no not the godliest do euer get this perfection while they are here their nature still remaining corrupt in part and rebelling against God Rom. 7 22. therefore all must needes haue perished except our nature had bin fully sanctified in the man Christ who is freely allowed to the faithfull to free them from condenmation Tim. Diuide the Text now into his seuerall parts Silas It hath these two parts First the end for the which God sent his Son into the world to wit that the infirmity or weaknesse of the Law by occasion of vs our sinne should be no let or hinderance to mans saluation Secondly what Christ Iesus did being sent come he did by sinne condemne sinne in the flesh Tim. What Law is meant heere and what is it that it cannot do Silas By Law is heere meant not the Ceremoniall but the Moral Law which is impossible to iustifie a man before God or to bestow perfect righteousnes vpon him as appeareth by the beginning of the next verse Silas Yet it was said in the seauenth Chapter that the law was ordained vnto life Tim. The Apostle sheweth there what it is able to doe in his owne nature and heere what it is not able to doe to vs that are sinners For the Law by Gods ordinance could iustifie vs and bring vs to life eternall Tim. But how
obedience chap 12. v. 1. God ordainer of powers and is obeyed or resisted in them and how many waies ch 13. v. 2 3. God of peace of patience and consolation why so called ch 15. v. 5. God sent his Sonne out of loue to mankinde and why ch 8. v 32. God the onely auenger and why ch 12. v 19. God with him no vnrighteousnesse or cruelty either in execution of decrees or in the decrees themselues Ch 9. v 14 19 20. chap 11 v 35 36. God no respecter of persons ch 2. v 11. Howe persons may bee respected Gods will supreame cause of all his counsel and works ch 9. v 11 15. Gods will not to bee registred how it is to be vnderstood ch 2. v 19. Gods glory in manifestation of his mercy iustice the vtmost 〈◊〉 of all his counsels ch 9. v 22 23. Gods wrath and Iustice how fearfull a thing ch 3 5. and ch 5. v 6. and 8. Gospell of God why so called ch 1. v 2. and 15. verse 16. Gospell what it signifyes preached by the Prophets the authority excellencie antiquity and efficacy of it ch 1. v. 2. Gospell wherein it differs from the Law ch 1. verse 17. Gospel not to be ashamed of ch 1. v 16. Gospell how the power of God ch 1. v 16. Gospell how called a form or mould ch 5 v 17. Gospell what a blessing to enioy it ch 3. v 2. Gospell good holie iust ch 7. v 12. Gospel to be delighted in ch 7. v 22. Gospel how to bee esteemed and receiued Chap 1. v 2 3. Gospel preached both is obiect and instrument of Faith Gospel how the Iewes enemies to it Ch 11. v 28. Gospel why at first confirmed with myracles Chap 15 v. 19. Gospel a sacrificing sword ch 15. v 16. Gospel bow cause of death being a word of life Gospel word of faith and why Ch 10 v. 8. Gospel brings Spirit of Adoption Ch 8. v 14. Good why the Law so entitled Ch 7 v. 12. Good earnestly to bee sollowed Ch 12. v. 9. Good purposed when it cannot be effected Ch 15 verse 22. Good which we would we cannot alwayes do Chap 7. verse 15 16. Good is wrought out of al things toward the elect ch 8 v 28. Good doers may looke for praise and neede feare no punishment Chap 13. verse 3 4. Good by the wise GOD drawne out of euil Ch 8 v. 28. Ch 11 v 11. Good by sinne conuerted to euill Ch 11. v 9. 7. Grace what it signifies how manifold the spring of all good giftes Chap 1 ver 7. Grace howe holinesse so called Chap 6. v 23. Grace how Apostleship so tearmed Ch 1 verse 5. Ch 15 15. Grace extolled by Faith suppressed by the Law Ch 4 16. Grace in cause of Iustification contrary to works Ch 11 verse 6. Grace more abounds wher sinne abounds how to bee vnderstood ch 5. v 20. What it is to bee vnder Grace ch 6. v. 15. Grace of Christ how preuailes aboue Adams sin ch 5. v 16 17 c. That Grace may abounde we may not sin Ch 6. v. 1. Grace of God how necessary for all beleeuers Cha 16 v. 20 and 24. Griefe what it is cha 10 verse 2. We must grieue mourn with such as mourne how Ch. 12. v. 15. Griefe in Paule great for the abiection of the Iewes Chap 9. verse 23. and Ch. 10 1 2. H. Heart what it signifies ch 10 v. 9 10. From the heart what it is ch 6 17. From the heart prayers must come if they be accepted ch 10 15. Heart-hardnesse what it is how manifo'd how procured how to be cured how dangerous fearfull when it is whollye and for euer Markes to know it by the causes of it ch 2. v. 5. Chap 11 v. 7. Hast an effect of vnbelief and cause of shame ch 9. v last Head of the Church not Peter or Pope but Christ. Ch. 12. v. 4. Hearing how Faith by it Ch. 10 14. Heauens howe vnder vanity how to bee glorified New heauens what Ch. 8. v 21 22. Heathen their calling to Christ prophefied of ch 15. v. 9 10. 11. Heathens how a wild Oliue ch 11. v. 17. Of their grafting in and how partakers of the fatnesse of the Oliue Heathens how beholden to Gods bountifulnes chap. 11 v. 18 19 20 21. Holy how Scriptures bee so why the law is so entitled ch 1. v 1 2. Christians sacrifice how holy ch 12. v. 1. Holinesse way to heauen ch 6 v. 23. Holy how the branches so because root is so ch 11 16. How our children beso ib. Hope what it is how manifold how Christian hope differs from 〈◊〉 see ch 5. v. 5 6. and c. 8. v. 24 25. Hope how it makes not ashamed Hope how saued by it Hope the office of it Hope how the fruite of experience and ioyned euer with patience ch 8. v. 24. Hope is of good things to come only of eternal glo ry chiefly See ch 8 24. Hope a temedy of afflictions ch 12 v 12. I. Iesus what it meanes ch 1 1. 3. Ignorance of God how great a sinne why to bee auoided ch 2. v. 12. Ignorance how it excuses Ignorance polluteth zeale Ignorance ioyned with pride and rebellion against God ch 10 v. 2. 3. Ignorance how dangerous in a guide and teacher Ch. 2 v. 19 20. Image of God vnlawfull how Image and Idol all one ch 1. v. 23. 25. Iustice imputed inherent Iustification how differs from sanctification Causes and effects of it Ch. 〈◊〉 v. 14. Iustified how wee are by Christs resurrection ch 4. verse last Iustification the partes of it how it is the grounde of peace ch 5. v. 1. K. King how Christ is so ch 1. v. 3. Kingdome of Christ spirituall Kingdome of God what be the conditions and parts of it ch 14. v. 17. Kissing the Booke in an Oath ch 9. v. 1. Kisses how vsed in the primitiue Church ch 16 v. 16. Knowledge of the worde how excellent and necessary ch 13. v. 12. Knowledge part of faith ch 14. v. 14. Knowledge of sinne speculatiue and experimental both by the Law ch 7. v. 7. Knowledge of the Lawe what it worketh ch 3. v. 20. and 4. v. 15. L. Law how many significations ch 3. 19. Law how manifold of nature of Moses Ceremonial iudiciall morall how abrogate Chap. 2. v. 14. and Ch 10 4. Law how spirituall and what to be learned by it ch 7 v. 14. Law how called iust ch 7 v 12. Law impossible to be kept and why ch 8. v. 3. Law how ordained to life and occasion of sinne and death Chap. 7. verse 10 11. Law of members and of minde what they be ch 7. v. 23. Lawe how to be delighted in and why ch 7. v. 22. Law cannot iustify vs and why ch 8. v. 3. Law the righteousnesse of it neither easie possible cer taine or comfortable chap. 10. v. 4 5 c. Law how the inheritance is not by it ch
the constitution of body in equall tenour during the handling of this Epistle the Reader therefore may not looke for equal exactnesse of stile and stuffe in euery part of this Booke 5. I had a care to accommodate my selfe as for manner so for matter to my Auditory in that regard haue pressed some points further then some other and passed by or lightly passed ouer more pertinent to the text to driue home some others more fitting to the times and persons where and with whom I do liue Howbeit this thou shalt finde vniuer sally thorow the whole Booke that both the naturall sence of words and phrases and the Analysis or artificiall disposition of the Text with Summe Scope and Coherence of euery Sentence is constantly and faithfully I trust deliuered But for as much as there was an Ocean of hard and dark some both things to be entreated and Texts to be interpreted wherein I mette with great diuersity of Opinions among Expositors so as it was difficult if not imposible for such an one as I am to hit the marke in euery passage of this Epistle therefore in my best humblenesse and reuerence I submit my Spirit vnto the Prophets being not onely desirous but beseeching the Learned Teachers and guides of our English Church in loue to shew me my faylings whereof I feare they shal find not a few not slight ones Concluding with the Poet Si quid nouisti rectius istis Candidus imperti si non his vtere mecum What righter things thou knowst impart Or what I bring thee take in good part Thine in the Lord Tho. Wilson THE EPISTLE OF the Apostle PAVLE to the Romanes Explained and Opened Familiarly in Forme of a Dialogue betweene TIMOTHEVS and SILAS Wherein ye haue for the most part 7. thinges performed on euerie Text. 1. The Scope 2. Summe 3. Method 4. Interpretation with their 5. Doctrines 6. Reasons 7. And Vses of euerie Text. DIAL I. Timotheus WHat was the chiefe Argument and Occasion of Writing this Epistle Silas A Difference and dissention betweene the Iewes Gentiles which was abused by the malice of Satan and was likely to haue much hindered the course of the Gospell yea to haue stifled and choakt it in the verie Cradle and beginnings For the Iewes which did beleeue did thinke thorough the suggestion of some false Apostles Acts 15. that the Legall Ceremonies were to be still obserued as necessary to Saluation that vnlesse men were circumcised and kept the Law they could not be iustified and saued by Christ. Whereas the beleeuing Gentiles did knowe by the Doctrine of the Gospell their exemption from Moyses Law being taught that in the death and passion of our Lord all Legall rites were fully determined and that Faith alone in Christ was sufficient to Iustification before God Heereuppon arose no small discorde betweene Iewes and Gentiles which were mixed together the Iewes bearing themselues insolently because of their priuiledges despised the Gentiles as enemies of Moyses Law and the Gentiles insulting ouer the Iewes as reiected of God for the contempt of Christ. To compound this dissention Paul the Apostle framed this Epistle First shewing that neyther Gentiles by their naturall Woorkes or Iewes by their Legall deeds could be Iustified for somuch as the one violated and brake the Law of nature and the other the Lawe of Moyses therefore both the one and the other were to be Iustified thorough Christ alone apprehended by a true and liuely Faith After this generall Doctrine reaching vnto the ninth Chapter there he doth in more perticular sort represse both the insolency of the Iews by prouing that the promises were giuen and became effectuall onely to the true Israel euen to such as were of the faith of Abraham to all the Elect of God which beleeue in Christ and not to the carnall seede which came of Abraham onely according to the flesh Then in the 11. Chapter conuerting him to the Gentiles he perswadeth them vnto humility that they should modestly behaue themselues toward the Iewes forsomuch as diuers of them were dayly called to the Faith and towardes the second comming of Christ God would graffe in againe the whole Nation and make them the Members of the Christian Church When the fulnesse or bodie of the Gentiles should enter into the same then the blindnesse of the Iewes should cease it being neyther totall nor final but only in part and for a time In the 14. Chapter againe Paul setteth vppon Iewes and Gentiles exhorting them both with many and waighty reasons vnto Brotherly loue and peace not to be diuided one from another or to iudge and contemne one another about Dayes and Meats and such things as were of a middle nature The rest of the Epistle is spent in exhortations to Morrall Good-workes both speciall in respect of a Calling and generall belonging to all Christians Chap. 12. and part of the 13. where politicall duties be vrged both of the Maiestrate and of the Subiect Finally after diuers salutations and familiar matters he doth verie grauely conclude the Epistle with admonition to take heede of false Teachers with giuing of Thankes and praises of God Tim. What is the scope of this Epistle Silas To teach the way of obtaining true Righteousnesse which is not by works but by a liuely faith in Christ Iesus Tim. Are there any more matters handled in this Epistle Silas Yea sundry and most waighty as namelie about Originall Corruption Sanctification Spirituall Combate the vse of the Law of the remnants of sinne the benefites of afflictions the Constancie of Beleeuers Election Reprobation Reiection Prouocation of the Iewes Morrall Ecclesiasticall and Politicall duties Christian Liberty familiar matters Tim. What Reasons may mooue vs to loue and Studie this Epistle Sil. 1. The worthinesse and variety of the Matter 2. the Method and order of writing being verie exacte 3. the Dignity of the Instrument or Pen-man being an Apostle that had seene visions and Reuclations 4. the Maiesty and Wisedom of the Author being the God of Wisedome and Maiesty Tim. Into what Parts may this Epistle be diuided Into two parts 1. the Title and Inscription The Epistle c. 2. the Treatise Paul an Apostle c. The Treatise hath a preface ad Verse 16. wherein Paul Saluteth the Romaines wishing them good thinges and describeth the person of Christ also testifieth his pur pose of visiting them after the Preface is a Doctrionall institution vnto Chap. 12. and another exhortatorie vnto the end of the Epistle Tim. What Significations be there of this worde Epistle Sil. It hath two the one vnproper and borrowed the other proper and naturall by the vnproper signification signifieth any thing that representeth the minde of another Thus the Scriptures bee Gods Epistles also the Corinthians are called Pauls Epistles because their conuersion by his preaching as an Epistle of recommendation did commend him for a true Minister of Christ 2. Cor. 3 2. Secondly in a proper signification it
by wicked affections Tim. Who doe with-hold the truth in vnrighteousnesse Sil. Such as by force suppresse or keepe it backe as if they would imprison it least it come abroad when it is not onely not followed and obeyed but resisted and the quite contrary to the direction of truth is done then it is as it were fettered in the Giues and Manacles of our lusts which keepe it backe Tim. Taketh the truth any hurt thereby Sil. None at all but the hurt is to our selues euen great vexation and vnquietnesse of mind Secondly a greater inclination and pronesse to all manner of euill this may be declared and illustrated by the similitude of prisoners kept in prison against their will also by the example of such Gentiles Iewes and Christians as knowing what they ought to doe yet did against their knowledge Rom. 1 32. Rom. 2 17 21. Phil. 3 18. Tim. What counsell was giuen heere Silas That all men endeuour to take part with the knowne truth against their affections and endeuour to doe according to that truth which they know For first if men will not haue truth to guide them they shall haue their corrupt filthy lusts to be their guides Secondly if men keepe truth in Prison by their disobedience themselues at last shall bee cast into the prison of darkenesse whence they shall neuer come out where the fire neuer goeth out and the worme neuer dyeth DIALOGVE XI Verse 19 20. For asmuch as that which may be knowne of God is manifest in them for God hath shewed it vnto them For the inuisible things of him that is his eternall power and God-head are seene by the Creation of the world being considered in his workes to the intent that they should be without 〈◊〉 Tim. WHat coherence and agreement hath this Text with the former and how doth Paul proceeds Sil. This verse with the rest that follow to the end of the first Chapter doe by a very plaine and distinct order more fully explicate and declare the matters briefly and concisely set downe in the 18 verse as first what that truth is which the Heathens did vniustly detaine viz the principles of Nature imprinted within them both of God and of morall dutyes and how they came by this naturall light in this verse and next Secondly how by vniust detaining that truth they proued impious to God by vnthankfulnesse and Idolatry and iniurious towards themselues and their Neighbours from verse 20 till 32. in which verse lastly is taught what that wrath and punnishment is which is from God in Heauen reuealed and sent vpon such wickednesse of men Now the first word or Particle of this present Text Because or For bewraieth this verse to depend vpon the former as a reason thereof taken from the effect He had said the Gentiles violently oppressed truth and as a Iaylor his Prisoner so they kept in the same which yet desired to burst out into actions as the Sun out of the Clouds this he proueth thus because such as had a certaine light and knowledge to leade them to God in some sort to know him and to discerne betweene good and euill in common life could not commit such impieties toward God such vncleannesses against themselues and such Iniustice to their Neighbours but that they must bee iudged guilty of vnrighteous detention and suppression of the truth If happily any would alleadge for the Heathens in their defence that they wholly wanted the knowledge of the truth and so are vntruely charged for with-holding it for answere to this secret obiection he affirmeth that the Gentiles had the knowledge of God both by light of Nature verse 19. and by the view of Gods works v. 20. Tim. What is the drift of this Text Sil. To shew what truth that is which the Gentiles detained in vnrighteousnesse it was a certaine knowledge of God which they learned by naturall instinct and by the workes of Creation and that they are iustly charged for with holding the same knowledge Tim. How many things may be considered in this Text Sil. Fiue thinges First that the Heathen had the knowledge of God that c. Secondly that they had it from God for God shewed it them Thirdly what things they knew touching God his eternall diuine power Fourthly out of what bookes they learned it not Scriptures but Creatures from his workes not from his word Lastly what was the euent of their knowledge Tim. Did the Gentiles know all that was to be knowne of God Sil. No but knew somuch as they were capable to knowe according to such meanes as they had yet the Philosophers and wise men knew much of God which they did not reueale to the common people There are some things to be knowne of God which are incomprehensible simply and cannot be known of Gods regenerated Children much lesse of Philosophers as his perfit diuine essence most glorious maiesty which dwels in a light that none hath accesse or aproach vnto 1 Tim. 6 16. Also the reasons of his will and counsell touching the gouernement of the worlde and especially of mankind for they ought not to be searched nor can be traced and found Rom. 11. 33. And other things there be which though they bee comprehensible yet are not known without reuelation of the word and spirit which Heathens lacked as the Doctrine of the Trinity of Christ his Incarnation free Iustification by Faith Remission of Sinnes by a crucified Christ Resurrection c. By that therefore which may be knowne is meant that which by ir-bred principles of truth remayning in man after the fall as some sparkles and fire-brands after a great fire and by strength of naturall reason as also by sight of the creature the Gentiles coulde attaine vnto viz. that there was a God he insensible and spirituall and for properties most mighty most iust most wise and good which things they saw God the first cause could not bee without seeing men which were his effect and work had such qualities in them Whereas this knowledge is said here to be manifest in them it is expounded by Chap. 2 vers 15. written in their hearts neither in the Creatures nor in the Philosophers nor among them nor to them but in themselues euen within their hearts by which it is plaine that he now speakes not of the Iewes which had their knowledge of God from the word but of the Gentiles and of those inward notions and principles which be natural whereof some be contemplatiue shewing them of God that hee is and what one he is and some practicke teaching them the difference betweene that is godly and wicked iust wrong honest and vnhonest morally good and euill Hence outwardly did arise the seeds of Arts Sciences and Disciplines and within a conscience iudgeing of a mans owne deedes whether good or ill and admonishing of the diuine iudgement approouing and rewarding what is well done abhorring and reuenging euill actions as Chap. 2. 15. This iustifieth that saying
the elect also his obedience putteth vpon the faithfull a righteousnesse which meriteth a farre better condition then wee lost by Adams vnrighteousnesse this vnlikenesse is pointed at verse 15 and further laide open verse 16 17. Tim. What be the profits that will arise of this comparison Sil. These First it will serue to confirme our minds touching the certainty of hauing the righteousnesse of another giuen to vs to make vs happy this beeing as reasonable as that the vnrighteousnesse and sinne of another should be deriued to vs to make vs guilty Secondly it will serue much to humble Gods Children to consider well the nature and force of sinne and what hurt they haue taken by it Thirdly the great benefit they haue from Christ will bee better knowne more hungred after and esteemed of vs more greatly by setting before it the contrary euill as a cure is more commended being compared with the danger of the disease Tim. What be the parts of this 12 verse Silas Two First a proposition of the double harme which is come vpō the whole world by Adam through whom all men are vnder sinne and death Secondly a reason heereof in as much as all men were in Adams loynes when he sinned and so sinned in him In whom wee all haue sinned Tim. Now to the words and tell vs what is meant by that one man heere spoken off Sil. Adam as verse 14 vnder whom Eue also is contained for sinne came by them both Psal. 51 5. but the man is named and not the woman because hee being the man was the more worthy person Secondly because hee was more in fault then Eue in regarde of his more eminent power and grace Thirdly sinne is propagated and deriued to vs rather by the Father then by the Mother because he is the principall agent in generation Tim. What were we taught heereby that Adam beeing but one man so great and generall a mischiefe came of him Silas Two thinges First the infinite hurt that may come of one person being euill the meruailous good that may redound to many by one being good Tim. Whereunto should the knowledge heereof serue vs Silas First to admonish Parents verie carefully to looke to the education of euery one of their Children Secondly that it behooueth the publicke state much what manner of person he is that beareth gouernment Thirdly it behooueth them who haue gouernement to watch ouer the manners of all men vnder their charge because one man neglected may marre all as Achan did Iosh. 7. Tim. What was the other thing gathered from hence Silas An exceeding comfort to great offenders so they turne and beleeue the Gospell which may bee raised thus Adam and Eue which sinned so heynously also wrapt their whole kind euen a worlde of people within sinne and destruction were yet receiued to mercy and saued therefore let no sinner how horrible soeuer be out of hart if they come to the throne of grace for pardon with trust to haue it Tim. What is further to bee obserued from this that it is saide Sin entred by one man Silas Euen this that God is not to bee blamed as cause and author of sinne seeing it came in by thorough man For whereas Adam might haue refused the temptation if he would he freely obeyed and willingly yeelded and so sin entred by him without any fault in God who had made him righteous and giuen him freedome of will Tim. Was there not a necessity herein that Adam shold yeeld Silas True there was so in regards of Gods counsel who had decreed not to strengthen his wil in the temptation but to forsake him yea further that being left to himself he shold follow the suggestions that so there might be occasion of giuing and sending his Son to redeem the world to the manifestation of his Iustice and mercy But notwithstanding this yet Adams disobedience was voluntary because Gods decree tho it ruled the euent businesse yet offred no force to Adams wil which could not be compelled therfore of it own accord enclined it selfe to fulfill the motions of the Serpent and his wife and therefore the whole fault of our fall lieth vpon Satan and our first parents as the proper cause of sinne For God made man righteous but they found out sundry inuentions Eccles. 7 31. Tim. What was further learned by this that sinne entred vpon al by meanes of one man Sil. That sinne is not by creation but came in afterwards Secondly how dangerous it is to hearken to ill counsell by meanes whereof Adam being depraued did depraue the whole world Tim. What is meant heere by the world Sil. The men which dwell in the world whither elect or reprobate as it is expounded afterwards Death came ouer all men The word World somtime signifieth that fabricke or frame of heauen earth as Iohn 1 10. The world was made by him Secondly it signifieth elect mē onely which are the chiefe part of the world Ioh. 3 16. And God was in Christ reconciling the world 2. Cor. 5 19. Thirdly it signifieth the wicked reprobate onely Iohn 17 9. Fourthly the corrupt qualities and fashions of the world 1 Iohn 2 15. Loue not the world Fiftly the whole masse of mankinde good and bad as here in these words Sin entred into the world Tim. What is meant heere by sinne Sil. That hereditary disease called commonly originall sinne or birth-sinne spread ouer our whole kind as a Leprosie and hath tainted the whole race of vs. That this onely is heere meant may appeare First because he vseth the singular number but when he speaketh of the fruites of it he vseth the plurall number Secondly that which he calleth sinne heere he afterwards in verse 17. calleth disobedience of one man which must needes be the first or Originall finne Thirdly hee saith verse 17. by this sinne many are made sinners and this is only by originall sin Fourthly there was no other sin brought death ouer all men except that therefore that sinne is onely meant heere In that I call it hereditary it is because as a disease which resteth in any stocke and descendeth from father to sonne so is this sinne it runneth from Adam through his whole progeny from Parents to the Children euen to the worldes end as it is sayde heere It came ouer al men Tim. What may this teach vs Sil. That this sinne is hard to be expelled out of mans Nature as hereditary diseases are hard to be cured and therefore must the more be striuen against Secondly that Children haue no faults which they doe not borrow and deriue from their parents of whome they haue corruption which is the spawne of all sin which should cause in parents commiseration and patience towardes their Children Tim. How many things are contained in this sinne Silas These foure thinges First guilt or fault Secondly deseruing of punishment Thirdly corruption of nature Fourthly priuation or absence of Originall integritie euen
of that innocencie wherein man was created Tim. How proue ye guilt or fault and deseruing of punishment thereby Silas There is guilt or fault because wee are made sinners by it verse 17. and there is deseruing of punishment because this cannot be seuered from the former Also it is expressely saide that by it death went ouer all Tim. How do ye proue that there is corruption of Nature Silas Because it is written That weee go astray from our Mothers wombe Psal. 58 3. Againe that the frame of mans heart is onely euill continually Gen. 8 21. and that we are borne in sinne Psal. 51 5. and man borne of a woman cannot be cleane Iob 25 4. Tim. What doe ye call the corruption of our Nature and what be the fruites of it Silas It is a naughty vicious quality in our Nature whereby it is enclined to all euill naturally and vndisposed vnto any good yea enemie to God and disposed against all good as Titus 3 3. Hating God Col. 1. Minds set vpon euill workes The fruites of this our corrupt Nature are all sinnes whatsoeuer euen all those sinnes reckoned vp Ro. 1. 29 30 c. Gal. 5 19. Tit. 3 3. Col. 3 5. or in any other place euen all maner of sinnes not blasphemy against the Holy-Ghost excepted Tim. By what degrees doth this corruption proceede and go forward Silas First it begetteth lust which is an euill motion or desire sweruing from Gods will this is the spawn of all sinne The second is obedience to this lust Rom. 6 12. which we call consent when the will yeelds vnto the euill motions with purpose and resolution to do it this is called of Iames the conception of sinne Iam. 1 15 Then thirdly there followes an euill action in word or deede this is called of the same Apostle the bringing forth of lust it bringeth forth sinne that is some outward grosse acte in speech or action Lastly the going ouer this sinnefull acte by custome and continuance in it this is called the perfection or finishing of sinne vpon all this there succeedeth death as the terme last period or full point of this proceeding and course in sinning wherein it resteth Tim. But how proue ye that Original sin hath priuation or absence of Originall righteousnesse Silas This is the consequence vpon all the former for we could not be guilty deserue punishment and be corrupt if we had our first perfection Secondly except we had lost that we should not need to seeke and fetch that from another euen from Christ as ver 17. Thirdly when the Scripture saith God made man righteous but they found out many inuentions Eccl. 7 31. This prooueth that the perfect righteousnes giuen vnto vs in our creation is not only lost but thorow our owne fault lost Tim. Why is this sinne called Originall Silas First because it is from the beginning Secondly because it is first in vs before grace Thirdly it is the first head beginning of all sins Lastly it is in vs from our beginning euen from our very conception Tim. What vse of all this Sil. First it confuteth the errors of such which say it is nothing but priuation of righteousnes Also such as say it is nothing but the inclination of our nature to euill Secondly it sheweth the most heauy case in which we are all by birth we being all ouer-couered with corruption and sinfull putrifaction rotten and ful of sores and not so full of euill as voide of all goodnesse and so hatefull to God whose pure eyes cannot but hate vs abhorre vs and therefore we are called the children of wrath Eph. 2 3. See Ezck. 16. No leaper no lazar no Iob to be compared to vs if we saw our selues wee should loath our selues Thirdly the knowledge heereof must humble our stomacks and courages Fourthly it must stir vp great care of being washed and clensed from this spot all the water in the sea is too little to wash this one staine all care in the world is not great enough to get it scoured out Psa. 51 2 6. either repentance for this sinne or for no sinne Fiftly it must stir vp a desire and a thirst after the pure and holy conception of Christ which is the couer to hide the Salue to cure this originall sore Sixtly it may make vs compassionate and mercifull one to another especially to our children being all alike infected and they by vs and therefore in our chiding and corrections were should bee moderate Seauenthly it must keepe vs from extolling nature and the goodnesse of nature for all natures euen the best is poysoned there being nothing good in vs till grace come and plant goodnesse in vs for can one gather figges of thistles or grapes of thornes Math. 7. Tim. What is meant here by death Sil. Properly a depriuation of life vnproperly all such things as are forerunners and furthereis thereof all miseries sicknesses paynes the 〈◊〉 of death Tim. What life did Adam liue before sin Sil. A twofold life first of grace being led by the holy Spirit which moued him wholy to celestiall and diuine things this is called spirituall life The second is of nature wherby he was moued to follow those good things which tend to preserue nature and the estate of his body of both these kinde of liues Adam was depriued and so dyed a spirituall and naturall death for beeing before ioyned to God in his fauour mooued by his spirit hee now hauing sinned was turned from God lost his sauour and spirit and so could not aspire to any diuine thing but had his heart wholy set vpon euill and touching his naturall life he was threatned that to dust he should go Tim. Did not his sin deserue eternall death Sil. It did so but eternal death is nothing saue the continuance of spirituall death Tim. Yet naturall death was not inflicted vpon him after his sin for he liued still in the world and that a great while Sil. He did so howbeit he may be said to be naturally dead so soon as he had sinned First because by the guilt of his sinne hee was presently subiect vnto it Secondly God streight way gaue sentence of death vppon him and therefore hee may bee saide straight way to haue dyed as condemned persons are called dead men though they bee respited Thirdly the messengers and souldiers of death presently tooke hold on him and arrested him as hunger thirst cold heat diseases dayly wasting of his natural moysture to the quenching of life but God did spare him that the sentence was not presently executed to commend his patience and to giue Adam thereby occasion of saluation for the promise beeing giuen and hee called to repentance faitb by that meanes attained a better life through Christ then he lost through sin Tim. What did this shew Sil. That God doth not delight in the death of sinners but rather that they should returne and liue Secondly it teacheth vs patience towards such as
Righteous Tim. WHat doth this Scripture containe Silas First a rehearsall of the comparison betweene Adam and Christ begun in the twelfth verse Secondly a laying forth the ground of this whole comparison Tim. Declare the comparison as it is rehearsed in the 18. Verse Silas As by the offence of one Adam guiltinesse came ouer all men to make them subiect to death so on the contrary part the righteousnesse of Christ imputed to beleeuers through Gods free fauour iustifieth them that they may become partakers of eternal life Or thus as by Adam guiltinesse came on all men to death eternall so by Christ righteousnesse is giuen to all beleeuers vnto life eternall Tim. What is the ground of all this comparison Silas That Adam and Christ by the decree of God are not as two particular persons but as two rootes or stocks or heads of all mankinde that as out of the one springeth sin and death by Nature so out of the other springeth righteousnesse and life by Grace Tim. Whereunto tends all this Silas To make vs to vnderstand that we are iustified not by our owne workes but by Faith in Iesus Christ. For hauing in our selues by meanes of Adams offence guiltinesse death how can our workes iustifie vs and if they do not then Christs his obedience apprehended by faith must be our Iustice before God Tim. Now let vs expound the words and gather instructions What doth he meane heere by the offence of one Silas The sinne of Adam which was but one sinne as himselfe was but one person Tim. What learne yee by this That guiltinesse came on all men to condemnation Sil. That there is not one that came of Adam by naturall generation which escaped the condition of sinne and death Christ onely is exempted who was conceyued by the Holy ghost and not by the seede of man Tim. What do ye obserue heerein Sil. This namely how dreadfull a thing the offence of Gods Iustice is when but one sinne done in a moment could wrap a world of men in euerlasting death and paine Tim. What learne ye heereby That the Iustifying or righteousnes of Christ is set against the offence of one Silas That as the offence is without vs which makes vs all guilty so is the righteousnesse which iustifies vs not in vs but in Christ. Secondly that iustifying is an absoluing or acquitting vs from guilt and condemnation Tim. What meanes he by all men Silas All the Children of God which beleeue whereof there is an vniuersality as there is an vniuersality of the Reprobate Tim. Why doth he ioyne life vnto Iustification Iustification of life Sil. Not onely by the custome of speech peculiar to the Hebrewes but to teach that life is knit to righteousnesse and heereof it is also that faith and life are so often ioyned together because it is by Faith that wee take hold on righteousnesse which bringeth with it life as a proper and necessary effect Tim. What learne yee generally out of the whole 19. verse Sylas That Adam and Christ are not to be considered of as other particular persons bee but as two heades or rootes of all mankind which depend on them Tim. What seuerall and speciall things do ye now learne out of the 19. verse Sylas That Adams offence was disobedience to Gods word Secondly this disobedience ought to be familiarly known and what hurt we get by it therefore by an excellency called that disobedience as exceeding al others both for the quality and effects Thirdly this disobedience is communicated to all men to the making of them sinners which is done by an action called imputation and so it is euery mans owne sin no lesse then Adams Fourthly that distrust or doubting is the roote of all sinne and so to bee greatly taken heed of Adams fall began at doubting that carried him to disobedience Fiftly that wherein we disobey Gods will therein we bewray old Adam whose children wee shewe our selues to bee by our disobedience against Gods blessed commandement Tim. What do ye call disobedyence Sylas It is a vice which causeth vs not to beleeue God promising or threatning nor to obey him forbidding nor commanding either because the commandements be troblesome or because we cannot see the reason of them Tim. Now tell vs what was that whereby righteousnes and life entred into the world Sil. The obedience of Christ Iesus Tim. What is obedience Sil. It is a power by which a godly man is ready to do and to obey the will of God though the reason of it bee not vnderstood nor it appeare to be any way profitable Tim. Wherein did Christ shew his obedience to God Sil. Throughout his whole life doing alwayes in all things what his Father appoynted without any regard of men but especially in his death wherin he submitted himselfe wholy to the will and pleasure of his Father Tim. Is the actiue obedience of Christ in fulfilling the morall law by doing it necessary vnto the iustification of a sinner before God or his passiue obedience in sufferiug death doth it alone iustifie vs for the Scripture ascribeth our purging remission of sins and saluation to his bloud and death in many places it may seem that Christ kept the Law not for vs but for himselfe to make him a meete high Priest Sil. Iustification hath two parts First the forgiuenesse of sinnes secondly the making of vs iust For as we owed vnto God a satisfaction by death for the breach of the Law so we were bound to performe subiection to God with all power of body and soule and all the might of those powers euen from the time of our being Therefore as we needed the passion of our Lord to discharge the first debt of paine and punishment so the other debt of homage and conformity to the will of God was answered in the obedience of his life that so we might not onely escape death but finde an entrance into life eternall which without perfect obedience to the commandement might not bee granted according to the tennor of the Law Doe this and liue Leuit. 18 5. By which words it is plaine that by meere passiue obedience wee could not haue possession of life which is promised to doing all that is required in the Law for euen Christ himselfe by his doing the Law may claime and challenge eternall life and it cannot be denied him in rigor of iustice because hee fulfilled the condition of workes enioyned by the Law and how should we think to haue life without the Law done which not beeing possible by our selues therefore Christs obedience in his life must be imputed to make vs capable of life For seeing euery iote and tittle of the Law must bee done Mat. 5 18. therefore the sum and substance much more Now the summe of the lawe is to loue God with all our harts c. and this cannot be done by vs which are sinners then there must be a translation of the lawe from
we must rise out of sin to liue a godly life And the power whereby wee can do this is deriued from the death and resurrection of our Lord as the grifte liueth by the life of the stocke to which it is ioyned Tim. What doth this similitude of planting teach vs Sil. Sundry things First that naturally we are strangers from Christ beeing in the stocke of rotten Adam whence we must be taken that we may be one with him Secondly that whiles we remain in Adam out of Christ we can no more do any good then a grift can bring forth fruite being alone and seuered from the stocke Thirdly to the end we may liue spiritually to God wee must first be vnited to Christ as the plant or grift is vnited to the Tree into which it is planted Fourthly whatsoeuer power is in vs to do good or to leaue sinne it is al from Christ not from our selues As the graft set in a stock taketh now no life from it selfe but from the stocke into which it is grafted By this is quite ouerthrown the concurrence of nature and grace Tim. What are we to learne from hence that the Resurrection of Christ is heere annexed and ioyned vnto his death and mentioned after it Sil. These two things First wee learne that as Christ had no way opened vnto his resurrection but by death so till we depart from sinne we cannot be raised vp and renewed to a righteous life Secondly as Christes death and resurrection be ioyned together so our death to sin is euer accompanied with a newe and vnblameable life which can no more bee seuered from mortification then the resurrection of Christ can be seuered from his death and therfore our Apostle hath truly affirmed before that such as bee dead to sin cannot liue in it verse 2. for nowe they lead their liues according to God Tim. I haue heard you speake of the likenesse between a grift and the elect and what we are to learne by it shew me nowe in this likenesse what dissimilitude and vnlikenesse there is Silas It is a sure truth that no similitude doth holde in all things it is sufficient to holde in that for which it is applied as in this present similitude which is brought to shew that as a slip passeth from one tree to another and hath life from that stock into which it islast planted so the elect passing from Adam to Christ are partakers of his spirit but as in euery other similitude there is a dissimilitude so in this likenes there is an vnlikenes and it doth consist in two things first the slippe or grift is taken from a good tree and fastned to a wilde Secondly it retaineth still his olde nature though it be planted into a new stocke now it is not so in this spirituall planting of men into Christ. For wee are plucked from an vnfruitfull tree and wild Oliue euen from the corrupt nature of Adam and are grafted into Christ as a most noble stocke a tree of righteousnesse whose very leaues are wholesome also we put off our old nature which we had afore and leaue the affections which spring of our birth-corruption are partakers of the spirit of Christ whose nature and properties we put on Rom. 12 14. Tim. When may we be said to leaue off our olde nature and affections of sinne and by what meanes are wee best furthered to it Silas When wee begin perfectly to know our selues that whatsoeuer commeth of our nature is in vs without Christ is naught and vicious and are moued to bee displeased with it and to abhorre it with an earnest and constant endeuour to leaue and forsake whatsoeuer is from our corrupt nature whereunto wee are much furthered and holpen by the faithful and fruitefull meditation of Christs painefull death when wee doe consider the shame and bitternesse thereof to bee occasioned by our owne sinnes it will cause a mans heart to rise against them as a mans heart ariseth against his enemy prouoking vs speedily to shake and cast thē off which cast our beloued and blessed Sauiour into such a bloudy agony and hell of sorrowes for who can beleeue that Christ was made a curse for his sinnes and yet still liue in the loue and seruice of sinne Tim. When may it be said of vs that we haue put on the nature and properties of Christ into whom we are newly planted Silas When we doe feele wrought in vs by his spirit such feelings and affections as he had putting on like mercy loue faith meekenesse patience long-suffering ioy goodnesse temperance and kindnesse as the man Christ had being meeke and lowly as he was c. DIAL IIII. Verse 6 7. Knowing that this our olde man is crucified with him that the body of sinne might be destroyed that henceforth we should not serue sinne for he that is dead is freed from sinne Tim. WHat is the substance of this Text Silas It rehearseth the principal argument to proue that beleeuers are dead to sinne taken from their Communion with Christ and his death with him Secondly it mentioneth the kind of death by which he merited for them the spirit of Sanctification by the death of the Crosse Crucified Thirdly it layeth foorth the ende of our Sanctification which is the destruction of sinne that the body of sinne might be destroyed Fourthly the duty of sanctified persons that hencefoorth they serue not sinne Lastly a reason thereof because they that are dead are freed from sinne verse 7. Tim. What is meant heere by the olde man Silas The vniuersall corruption of our nature as wee are conceiued and borne in sinne whereby we are prone vnto all euill and vndisposed vnto any good the which corruption is therefore called olde because it hath been in mans nature euer from our first parents Adam Secondly because it is in euery Child of God before that new quallity of holinesse for which they change their olde deformity at their new birth And for other two respects the name of Man is attributed vnto our sinnefull corruption First to shew how neerely the euill and poyson of sinne cleaueth to vs being as it were a mans selfe Secondly to note how men are addicted vnto it before they be sanctified they do not thinke themselues to be men without it so striuing for the maintenance of their dearling sinnes as they would doe for the safety of soule or body one were as good plucke out a mans hart as seeke to pull him from his beloued sinnes as good kill the man himselfe as his sinne Tim. In what sence is our olde man saide to be crucified Silas To haue our olde man crucified is to haue the strength of our sinne enfeebled weakened and broken by little and little as Christs body was weakened vpon the Crosse till he dyed Tim. What may this word Crucifie put vs in minde of Silas Of the kinde of death which Christ suffered namely the cursed death of the Crosse by which death he
newes to all beleeuers that they shall not be condemned yet this comfort should be most effectuall to the godly poore because amidst many worldly wants and miseries which trouble them it may and should excedingly ioy their heartes to thinke vppon what great good thinges they haue by Christ as forgiuenesse of all sinnes freedome from all punishment of sinne from Gods anger and hell fire yea and more then this euen perfect righteousnes and eternall life of which things the least is more worth then a whole world and therefore whosoeuer cannot reioyce in these thinges whatsoeuer their worldly crosses be it argueth deepe vnthanksulnesse and is a signe of vnbeleefe Finally touching the godly rich they are to be admonished here that they are more to cheere themselues with the comfort of this freedome then with all their wealth and worship Tim. But seeing none shall haue this comfort but such as are in Christ and walke after the spirit tel vs what it is to be in Christ Silas To be knit and ioyned vnto him through faith as members be to the head or as branches be to the vine Tim. What are we to learne from hence Silas First that none saue the faithfull are capable of the former comfort because onely they are in Christ therfore howsoeuer hypocrites and other wicked men yea prophane men and Atheists do lay claime to this comfort yet it doeth not at all belong vnto them because they are out of Christ. Secondly wee cannot be partakers of any benefit by Christ except first we be in Christ as the members must be one with the head and the branches with the vine ere they can draw any life from them Thirdly such as beleeue in Christ and abide in this faith may be sure and certaine to be saued the reasons hereof bee first because euery beleeuer is iustified and is freed from the guiltinesse of his sinnes and therefore must needs be saued Secondly hee is one with Christ in whome there is nothing but righteousnesse and life therefore he is free from sinne and damnation Tim. Yea but though hee is freed from sinnes past and the punishment of them yet euery beleeuer by his dayly sins makes himselfe worthy and guilty of death Silas True beleeuers neede not feare neither sins past present nor to come for this vniuersall negatiue particle No excludes all sinnes the beleeuer being iustified from sins past sinnes present are pardoned and sinnes to come shall not be imputed therefore he needs feare no destruction Tim. Will not this doctrine make men secure and carelesse Silas This doctrine shakes out of mens heartes the feare of condemnation and therefore in that behalfe they may bee spiritually secure but it nourisheth the feare of God beeing an enemy to carnail security Psalme 130 4. Rom. 12 1 2. Tim. Yea but we cannot be so certaine of our saluation as S. Paul who had his certainty by speciall reuelation Silas This is not so for first Paul speakes not here of his owne particular assurance but giues a generall comfort common to all the faithfull therefore he writeth not there is no condemnation to mee but to them Secondly the signes and tokens of this comfort to wit to bee in Christ and to walke after the Spirit are common with Paul to all other true Christians verse 1. Therefore the certainty of saluation and the comfort from thence must needes be common Tim. Yea but it is no where written that thou art in Christ and that thou shalt not be condemned and it is the doctrine of Protestants to beleeue no more then is written and therefore no man can be assured to be saued Silas When wee teach that no more is to be beleeued then is written it is to be vnderstood of vniuersall doctrin and generall points of sauing trueth to which wee are not bound to giue credit nor can we firmly assent vnto them vnlesse wee finde them in the written word which is the onely sufficient perfect rule of faith and manners Iohn 5. 29. and 21 24. and 2 Tim. 3 16. Secondly wee affirme and hold that the certainty of euery mans owne saluation is written in the fleshy tables of his heart by the finger of the Holy Ghost for as this vniuersal trieth that there is no condemnation to such as are in Christ is written in the word so this particular assumption of the faithfull but I beleeue and am in Iesus Christ is written in his owne heart by the Spirit which alwayes togither with Faith workes and engenders a feeling and testimonie of his owne Faith whereby he knowes he is a beleeuing person 2 Cor. 13 5. 2 Timoth 1 12. Marke 9 24. all which places shew that a man hath in himselfe a witnesse of his owne Faith Now wee are bound no lesse certainely to beleeue the inward particular witnesse written by the Spirite in the hearts and consciences of ieuery faithfull person then that outwarde vniuersall testimony which is written in the word for both these testimonies come from one Spirit and the sence of faith is as firme as an article of faith Tim. Yea but this singular Faith what is it else but a singular presumption For how common is it for euery euill liuer to say I trust to be saued Silas It is verie true that such as haue no faith and so be not in Christ if they say they trust to bee saued it is presumption but for a truely faithfull man to beleeue and to say it is no presumption but dutie and godly submission to him that commands to beleeue in his Sonne Tim. But how shall we bee able to know the presumption of the Flesh from the assurance of faith they be so like the one to the other Sil. By this marke which the Apostle himselfe giues vs that such as haue Faith and be in Christ walke after the Spirit that is by the Spirit they do mortifie the flesh and the workes thereof Tim. What other instructions ariseth there hence Silas It teacheth vs the exceeding priuiledge of a true Christian beleeuer in that he is freed from all feare of condemnation and eternall punnishment in Hell fire Tim. But tell vs whether it may be knowne who they are that are knit to Christ by faith Silas Yes it may surely be knowne though not to others yet to themselues for otherwise this freedome priuiledge from condemnation could bee no ground or matter at all of any comfort Secondly the taking of an elect soule out of Adam and the corruption of nature to graft it into Christ is not such a sleight worke but that it may be knowne and percciued of him in whom it is wrought being a person come to yeares and discretion For it is the opening the eyes of the blinde the quickening of the dead the translating from darkenesse to light the healing of the withcrcd hand the making of the lame to walke the setting at liberty him that was in prison All which shewes this work to be both mighty
their owne spirits that they are adopted of God to be his sons and daughters Tim. Into what parts may wee resolue the matter of this text Silas Into two parts it may fitly be deuided to wit into a case and a resolution of that case The case is this how the children of Adam by nature may be sure that they are the children of God by grace Tim. What do ye iudge and esteeme of this case Silas That it is a case of all cases of most woorth and waight a most excelent important case of greatest consequence and vse It is of great worth and excellency because it tendeth to gaine certainety of a thing which is of al other most precious to wit our adoption and Son-ship euen of our right to the kingdome of heauen that most glorious inheritance Also it is a case of importance and waight because it doeth behooue and import men very much to know how they hold their earthly inheritance it must needs then greatly concerne Gods children to haue ready their euidēces of their heauenly inheritance Again it is a very haynous offence for any Christian to call God Father and not to feele assuredly that hee is his Childe but of custome and in hypocrisie with his tongue onely and not in truth which is farre more greeuous and dangerous then if one should counterfeit himselfe the sonne of an earthly king which yet is a capitall crime and yet furthermore it is of great consequence and vse for it wil stay and strengthen the heart in soule-temptation and conflict Also it will quicken to a chearefull performance of duties and lastly it will nourish hope and patience in all afflictions For one being perswaded of Gods loue then followes ready seruice confident prayer and patient hope Tim. Now tell vs from whence we are to fetch the full and firme resolution of this case Silas From that witnesse which the holy Spirite doth beare to our Spirite or from the witnesse of Gods Spirite and of our spirite Reade it eyther to our or with our spirit it commeth much to one effect onely this ods that it implieth but one witnesse if we reade it our spirite but importeth two if it be read to spirite Tim. What is meant by the same Spirite and what doe yee call the witnesse of it Silas By same spirite is meant the spirite of adoption spoken of in the former verse euen the holy Spirite it doth giue testimony to Gods Children of their owne adoption and the witnesse of the Spirite is a motion of a soule resting steadily on the mercies of God thorough Christ inspired and stirred vp by the Spirite Tim. How and after what sort doth the holy spirite beare this witnesse to beleeuers that God is their Father Silas These two wayes ordinarily not by extraordinary reuelation but first by that cry mentioned before stirred vp in the hearts of the faithfull by the Spirite which mouing them effectually to call God their Father with filiall and childlike trust in his goodnesse heereby they are assured of their adoption None can say Iesus is the Lord but by the Spirite of God 1. Cor. 12 6. Likewise none can truly call God his Father but by the motion of the spirit of Adoption Whosoeuer therefore in their Prayers can call God their Father in truth they may thereby be perswaded that he is so seeing the Spirit of adoption is peculiar to Gods sonnes as in verse 14. we haue learned Thus Chrysostom expounds declares this witnesse of the cry of the heart engendered by Gods Spirit Secondly the Spirit beareth witnesse by a practick Sillogisme or reason framed thus Euery beleeuer is the Childe of God and shal be saued This is the summe of the Gospell But I am a beleeuer this is the worke of the Spirite making euery faithfull person to know and feele this in himselfe 2 Tim. 1 12. 〈◊〉 Cor. 2 10. Therefore I am the Childe of God and shall bee saued in heauen This conclusion is the testimonie of the Spirit vpon the former premises Thus these two Seruants of the Lord Paroeus Perkins expound declare this witnesse of the Spirit Tim. By what reasons can ye proue that this witnes of the holy Spirit cannot deceiue vs Silas First because it is the Spirit of truth which cannot lie and deceiue Iohn 14 17. Titus 1 2. Secondly this holy Spirit searcheth all thinges euen the deepe things of God 1 Cor. 2 10. Thirdly he is Lord of all therefore worthy of credit and beleefe If a man or Angell or Archangell should preach vnto vs this adoption we might doubt of it but seeing the Spirit who is Lord of all doth witnesse it what place is there of doubting saith Chrysostom Tim. But how may a godly Christian discerne this witnes of Gods Spirit from the delusion of Satan and from the presumption of Hypocrites and wicked men Silas By these waies First by the grounds reasons of the witnesse which are not mans own merit or common graces or outward blessings but they be the truth power and mercy of God the Father also the merits of Christ the Sonne and the workes and fruits of this Spirit of Adoption These are such firme grounds as cannot possibly faile him who rests on them Secondly by the manner of the testimony which is certaine and firme as an earnest or seale putting vs out of doubt setling the conscience in such quiet and sound tranquilitie as farre differeth from numbnesse and deadnesse of hypocrites and of ciuill men Thirdly by the effectes of this Testimony as 1. Ardent prayer 2. Sincere loue of God and our Brethren for his sake 3. Willing and constant obedience to Godward vnto which we may ioyne these sixe meanes following as good helpes to descry this difference First presumption is naturall from our birth but this testimony of the Spirit is supernaturall and is not in vs before the grace of conuersion Secondly this Testimony ariseth from the vse of holye meanes as hearing reading Sacraments c. and is thereby confirmed whereas presumption is from security and not from the vse of meanes which presumptious persons neglect or contemne Thirdly presumption is most confident neuer doubting or making question of election or saluation This Testimony of the Spirit is much assaulted with doubts and feares more or lesse at one time or other as in Iob and Dauid Therefore he that saith I neuer doubted I thanke God I haue alwayes had a strong beleefe hee speakes from presumption Fourthly presumption is cuer ioyned with worldlinesse and prophanenesse but this Testimony is neuer seuered from a desire to liue holily and righteously Fiftly presumption presumes of Gods loue in the time of Gods benefits onely but in aduersitity vanisheth This testimony is constant and permanent in aduersity aswell as in prosperity Lastly this testimony of the Spirite commeth by the application of faith also it throughly perswadeth and giueth not
and whom he loueth Tim. How manifold is Gods election Silas Twofold also one is to an office as Iudas was elected to an Apostleship The second is to grace and glory as Peter and Paul were elected I haue not chosen you all one is a Diuell yet Iudas was chosen one of the twelue Tim. But is there any such thing as election or be there any such persons as be elect Sil. Yea there be because holy Scripture mentioneth both in this and sundry other places as Tit 1 1. Ephe. 1 4. Rom. 11 5. 2. Iohn 1. 1. Thes. 1 4. 2. Thes. 3 13. else-where mention is made of elect Angels and men Tim. Seeing there is an election tell vs what it is Silas It is an eternall decree of God purposing out of lost mankinde some persons to bee saued by faith in Christ to the praise of God and not chusing others but refusing them and appointing them to wrath Herewith agreeth Augustine saying Predestination is a purpose in God to haue mercy on some for Christ and reprobation is the purpose not to haue mercy Tim. How doe ye proue that election is eternall Silas Because it is written God loued Iacob ere hee was borne Rom. 9 11. Also Paul saith so expresly Ephe. 1 4. before the foundation of the world was laid The word predestination and fore-knowledge prooueth it for they note a precedent eternall counsel Tim. Then they erre which thinke election to bee all one with calling Silas They doe so for calling is a fruite of election and is done in time after wee are borne but election is before all time and is the cause of our calling as Chapter 8 30. Tim. Also if some onely be chosen then they are deceiued which will haue all to be chosen of God Sil. True First then should all beleeue and be saued because God changeth not Secondly because where all be chosen there is no election which is a chusing of some out of many Thirdly we haue examples of Reprobates as Caine Esau Iudas c. Tim. Is there then a decree of reprobation as well as of election Silas There is so for election is not the chusing and taking of all as appeareth by Gideon Iudges 7 7. and Deut. 7 6. but a taking of some with a forsaking of others Secondly Scripture speaketh of appointment to wrath 1. Thes. 5 9. and of an ordination to disobedience 1. Pet. 2 7. and to damnation Iude 4. Thirdly experience teacheth this because many vnbeleeuers and wicked men haue beene and be in the world which sheweth that many be reprobates refused from whence it commeth that they cannot haue faith and godlinesse Iohn 10 26. They beleeue not because they be not my Sheep yet the proper cause of all misery is sinne which stickes in mans nature euen his Originall infection Rom. 5. Paul speakes heere of the whole purpose of God as it containeth both election and reprobation as the two examples proue and verse 15. Whom he will be hardeneth This makes against Huberus who is for vniuersality of elect and Stapleton who restraineth this place to the elect Also it appeareth that some be reprobated because elect and reprobates bee opposed as contrarie in Esay 41 9. Lastly God hath made Vessels some to mercie and honour and some to wrath and dishonour Rom. 9. And finally our experience telleth and teacheth this whilest daily wee see some called and altered others abyde in their sinne Tim. The decree of Election and reprobation whether hath it respect to the lumpe of man pure or corrupt that is were men chosen and refused as they stood vpright in Adam or as they are corrupt in him In which estate of these twaine did GOD consider them when he elected some Silas As they are corrupt by Adams fall so Gods decree of election and reprobation respects them that is to declare it more distinctly God purposed to glorifye himselfe by mankinde Prou. 16 4. God made all things for himselfe Rom. 11. God did purpose to create all righteous in Adam and to suffer him to fall for causes knowne to himselfe and of men being thus falne hee purposed to saue some by Christ these be chosen and not others these be Reprobates For such as we are when God iustifieth vs such he decreed to iustifie and choose but at our iustification we are vngodly and enemies Rom. 4 4 5 8 9. therefore such he chose and decreed to iustifie Secondly Christ the remedy must needs in order of causes be purposed to be giuen to such as were falne for man in his pure estate needed not Christ therefore they were not then chosen in Christ. Augustin saith that God of the same lost man originally as a Potter made one vessell to honour and another to dishonour Tim. What is the foundation and ground of election Silas Christ Iesus into whome hee purposed to ingrast vs as members into an head whome hee purposed to saue see Ephe. 1. 4. The reason hereof is because wee are chosen with respect of Christes merites as the materiall cause or meane whereby all elect ones were to be saued Tim. What cause moued God to elect some and not others Silas The cause is in himselfe his own purpose and wil calling vs to himselfe of his meere purpose and good pleasure Ephe. 1. 5. Iohn 3. 18. Not workes past for men are chosen from euerlasting nor workes present for Iacob was loued and chosen ere hee was borne not woorkes foreseene for men were all corrupt in Adam and not by workes which in none are good by nature but euill in all contrary to Palagians not foreseen faith for it is giuen according to election whereof it is a fruite and then wee had chosen God and not hee vs yea nor Christ is not the impulsiue or moouing cause for the loue of God moued him to giue his Sonne And finally not our worthinesse or vnworthinesse for by naturall corruption wee are all alike vnworthy for Iacob and Esau were equall in this Tim. Giue vs some reasons to proue that nothing in man could moue God to chuse him Silas First then election should not remaine firme by him which calleth but depend vppon some good thing in our selues be it faith or workes that the purpose of GOD might remaine firme by merites which is directly against the text here Secondly then we should haue some good thing in vs which God giueth not Thirdly then grace should not be the high and soueraigne cause of all good if there were something in vs before it as a moouing cause Fourthly election is deriued from grace and not from ought in vs Rom. 11. 6. Fiftly all good things come after the grace of election as effects and fruites of it Ephe. 1 4. Sixtly election is referred to the will and mercy of God in this Chapter verse 16 Seauenthly God hath as much right ouer men as a Potter ouer his pots which for his will
predestination whereas God expresly faith that he sheweth mercy where hee will and sheweth not mercy where hee will not these wicked men contend with God and charge him to be cruell and tyranicall when they heare it taught out of Scripture that for his meere will sake GOD doeth reprobate some forgetting thēselues to be vnmatches with God pulling vpon themselues worthily that woe threatned to things formed which striue with their Former Esay 54. 9. Secondly from hence are reprooued such as mislike any of Gods workes as their owne estate or condition of life or of the weather or such like workes of God as they which suppose and sticke not to speake that it had bin better for them that they had been made rich or of more strēgth c. what is this but for the thing formed to picke quarrell or prescribe lawes to the maker Thirdly heere is a warning vnto all the children of God to holde themselues content in all things with that which pleaseth God doe it neuer so much exceede their reason or crosse their affections adoring with reuerence and humility such iudgements of his as they are not able to conceiue the true causes after the example of Iob chap. 1. and of Dauid 2. Sam. 15. 23. Tim. What other doctrine are we to gather out of the 21. ver Silas That the power and right that God hath ouer men as touching their finall ends is absolute and vndependant without any respect at all to any thing or merite in man good or bad either to their sin actuall or originall or to theis holinesse faith and good workes For albeit it is most true that good workes are loued of God and freely rewarded in heauen and there are neuer any condemned in hell but for their sinnes either of birth as in Infants or of life too as in men of yeares which is enough to cleare God of iniustice and cruelty that he neuer executes any iustice vpon his creature but for his foregoing iniquities yet the Apostle when hee lookes backe to the high and soueraigne cause of Gods decree touching mens finall estate hee setteth downe none other but the absolute power and will of God that hee may appoint of euery man as hee pleaseth for God doeth whatsoeuer hee pleaseth both in heauen and earth Tim. How may this doctrine bee gathered from this text Silas The very text giueth power to the Potter to put vpon the pot what forme and vse he will with as good yea and much better reason it standeth that the like power be ascribed vnto God the reason is because there is no proportion betweene God and a Potter who is by infinit degrees inferiour to God Secondly the Potter hath the clay made to his hands but Gods hand made all men and therefore his right ouer men is farre greater then can bee the Potters ouer the Pot which is onely formed and not created by him For as touching God his right is such and so absolute that he might haue made man or not haue made him hauing made him vpright hee might haue brought him to nothing as he made him of nothing and all being corrupt in Adam he might haue reprobated and refused all without any wrong nay most iustly concerning all which none could haue controuled him sithence hee did all this not of any necessity of his nature but out of the liberty of his will and absolutenes of his power which as it is vnsistable so it is vncontroulable by flesh bloud yea by any creature in earth or in heauen the greatest men are vnder another God at least is aboue them but God is supreme and hath none aboue him Tim. But what difference is then betwixt God and such other tyr annicall rulers as for their pleasure sake destroy their subiects as the Muscouians the Turkes c. Silas Yes there is great difference first these Princes made not their subiects Secondly their power is limited by law and conscience or religion they be set vp by God and must raigne for God Thirdly being sinfull men their luste and desire is sinfull whereas Gods will is pure Lastly tyrants respect wicked endes to satisfie their sauadge cruelty whereas Gods purpose in sauing or destroying respects the praise of his 〈◊〉 and mercy most holy and good ends Tim. Tell vs what vse we are to make of this doctrine Silas First it reproues such as make Gods decree of reprobation to depend vppon Gods fort seeing sin in men Tim. What reasons haue we against this Silas First a plaine text verse 9. and 15. Secondly 〈◊〉 abridgeth the absolute will and power of God and subiecteth his will to mens merites Thirdly then all mon being sinners by nature must needs be 〈◊〉 and cast away Fourthly then had there beene an cause to obiect iniustice to God for euery one will confesse it iust to reprobate for originall sin foreseene but without respect of vnworthines to do it argueth iniquity Tim. What other vse of this doctrine Silas It serues to teach all men patience in 〈◊〉 and thankfulnesse in prosperity for seeing all which hapneth dependeth on Gods will it is reason to bee patient if ought fall out not well and thankfull to God if all be well Tim. What other doctrine from this 21. verse Silas That all men are not elect because there are vessels to dishonour Againe the similitude of a pot doeth warne vs of our 〈◊〉 and britle estate howsoeuer strong wee soeme to be yet we are broken asunder very quickly euen as a pot is so one quashed so is man as an earthen vessell which consideration should serue to worke both humility seeing we are so feeble and mortall and watchfulnesse also seeing wee know not when the pot will breake at what houre the thiefe wil come death being euer at our elbowes and the time as vncertaine as the thing is certaine DIAL XIIII Verse 22. What and if God would to shew his wrath and to make his power knowne suffer with long patience the vessels of wrath which he hath prepared to destruction Tim. IS the reading of this verse full or is there somthing lacking to perfect the reading Silas There must be a supply of a word or two as thus who shall accuse God or what hast thou to obiect against him Tim. Tell vs now the drife and purpose of this text Silas The purpose is to cleare the counsell of Gods reprobation from al tyranny by rehearsing the true causes reasons why God electeth some and reiecteth others all being equall both by creation and coruption of nature this is the argument Whosoeuer hath absolute right wil doe nothing but vpon good causes and reasons can be no tyrant Such an one is God our celestiall Potter therefore hee is not guilty of iniustice or cruelty though he appoint some to glory and others to punishment eternally for all his endes bee as righteous as his power is soueraigne Tim. Declare vnto vs these finall
haue I stretched forth my hand vnto a disobedient and gaine-saying people Tim. VVHence are these two testimonies fetched Silas Out of the Prophet Esay Chapter 65. verse 1 2. wherein the first verse which is heere by Paul set latter is the former in Esay and the former heere is latter there the last wordes of the first verse of Esay being quite left out and some words in the second changed but the meaning kept entire Tim. What is the summe of these two texts Sil. The one is a consolatory Prophesie foretelling the vocation of the prophane Gentiles how they should be accepted of God vnto mercy the other is a menacing prophesy threatning reiection casting off to the rebellious and stubborn Iewes or the refusing of the Iewes for their obstinacy Tim. What meaneth Paul when hee sayeth that Esay is bold Silas The meaning is that though hee well knew that the Iewes would hate and persecute him for his foretelling so plainely the abiection of themselues and the adopting of the Gentiles to be Gods people in their stead yet hee did not couertly and fearefully but openly and confidently speak of it without feare of their cruelty or respect of danger This grace is commended in Paul Acts 28 31. in Peter and Iohn Acts 4 13. for where there is no perill proposed there is no cause of boldnes but boldnes and liberty of speach argueth that it could not bee sayed without hazard Tim. What instructions may we learne from hence Silas First the condition of the Ministers of Christ that they shall fall into dangers if they bee faithfull and ready to speake the truth freely as the Galathians became enemies to Paul Achab to Elias Herod to Iohn Baptist the Pharisies to Christ and all because they spake the trueth this lewd vnthankfull world can affoord no better wages to the seruants of God Secondly that Ministers of the word may not for feare of dāgerconceal the truth because that God who commandeth them to declare his will without feare can will recompence them with good things if they doe their duty and with euill thinges if they fainte because of men see Ieremy 1 17 18. Tim. What learne ye hereby that God was found of them that sought him not Silas The woefull estate of the Gentiles euen of vs all by nature as we are corrupt in Adam The reason hereof is because we are naturally ignorant of God and careles of him of his fauor and worship we neyther of ourselues seek him or so much as aske after him Such are all men by nature without the Spirite of Christ as is to bee seene in the example of Paul Acts 9. and Zacheus Luke 19. and the Thiefe on the crosse and by testimonies of Scripture Psal. 14 1 2 3. Rom. 5 7 8. Gal. 4. 8. Ephe. 4 18. Titus 3 3. Wee doe more thinke of God before our conuersion then the lost groat on her which lost it or the lost sheepe minds his sheepheard from whome he strayed Tim. What vse of this poynt Sil. It serueth to humble vs in our owne eyes when we shall meditate vppon our old estate and to cause vs to extoll the loue and mercies of Christ freely of his own goodnesse calling vs to him and seeking vs vp when we not so much as once minded him no more then a dead man mindeth the things of this world Tim. It is elsewhere written that such as seeke God shall finde as Esay 55 6. I am found of them that seek me and Mat. 7 7. Seeke and ye shall finde how then is it sayd here that he is found of them who sought him not Sil. This is vnderstoode of the time going before their first conuersion and calling of the elect which seeke not God till hee first seeke and finde them but the other places and texts speake of such as beeing once conuerted and moued by the Spirite of Christ doe henceforth seeke him and by seeking find him When God inwardly stirreth the elect then they seeke him Iohn 6 44. and by seeking find but before they be first found of God they no more seeke him then a dead man seekes life or a sleeping man foode Tim. What doth the 21. verse contayne Silas It doeth describe Gods exceeding great mercie towards the Iewes their wicked ingratitude in despising it being louingly and constantly offered but more particularly it doeth set forth two excellent vertues in God and two notorious vices in the Isralites Tim. What be the two vertues in God Sil. First Gods kindnes signified in stretching forth the hand which is a speeech borrowed from mothers who allure their wanton children to them by casting abroad their handes therein shewing howe ready they are to embrace them when they come in like manner God by benefites threatnings exhortations promises yea by al meanes faire or foule inuiteth and calleth to faith and repentance the obstinate Iewes that he might reclaime them The second vertue in God is his patience perseuerance noted hereby that hee stretched out his handes all the day with great continuance euen all the time of the lawe of Moses euer since they first came out of Egypt God tooke speciall care of that people and neuer ceased one way or other to prouoke them to come to him as appeareth in 2 Chron 36 15. 16. Tim. What is the profit to be made hereof Sil. First it teacheth that wicked sinners perish through their owne demerite and the cause of their destruction can at no hand be imputed to God O Israel thy destruction is of thy selfe Hos. 13 9. Secondly it admonisheth all Christians but Ministers especially how to proceede in their rebukes and exhortations namely with al manner of kindnes loue and continuance leauing nothing vndone which may turn to the amendment of others doing it constantly without wearinesse euen so long as there is any hope 2 Tim. 2 25 26. also 2 Tim. 4 2. and while Ministers doe thus men are to consider that now God doeth spread abroad his hands to receiue them the contempt of which kindnesse will draw on remediles and most grieuous plagues vpon whole Churches as the seauen Churches of Asia Reue. 2 and 3. Chapters and on whole countries as Iuda and Israel and innumerable other kingdomes which for contempt of this kindnesse tendred in the ministery of the worde lye vnder Paganisme or Papisme by whose example let vs bee admonished to beware and learn to come when God calles to answere when he speakes to repent when hee inuiteth vs thereunto Thirdly we are here admonished that if we lose our paines patience yet not to be discontent seeing God himselfe had no better speed and it is well if the seruant be as his Lord. Tim. But what be the two vices in the Iewes Sil. First rebellion or disobedience in the heart in refusing to beleeue the promises and to do the commandemēts of God Secondly their contumacy in gaynsaying the
the elect Tim. What doctrine ariseth from these word thus opened Silas That nothing that is in men their thoughts words deeds do not auail any thing to election or saluation in such sort as to be causes to moue God to chuse and saue some and not others this comes not by willing and running out of our merits Tim. Must wee vnderstand this dectrine of vnregenerate onely or of the faithfull also Silas Of all sorts of men both one and the other it is not the desires and deedes of any whereupon their saluation and election depends as vpon 〈◊〉 motiues or efficient causes Tim. What is it then that you iudge of the will and deedes of naturall men Silas Euery man before his new birth hath in him the power of willing euen from his birth the force and power of his will is to will freely euery thing that is euill freely to will some good things for the will cannot bee compelled it willeth freely whatsoeuer it willeth The good things which it willeth are either naturall and ciuill good things that belōg to this life as to eat rest take phisick c. or to resraine the outward 〈◊〉 of vices and to doe the outward actions of vertues yea and in diuine thinges a man hath power naturally to will that which is outwardly to bee done yet so as with this power of willing there commeth the effectuall power of God moouing all things and prolpering that which men do well Tim. Why doth the Apostle say it is not in man that willeth or runneth if it be so Sil. He doth not absolutely deny that men do wil or run or forbid vs simply either to desire or endeuour or doe any thing but he teacheth that God eternally did see nothing that was to bee naturally in man to moue him to elect him to life or that ought which a man doeth or willeth before his new birth is acceptable to God and auailable to saue himselfe Tim. But are we not to iudge otherwise of the workes and wils of 〈◊〉 persons Silas No otherwise as in this regard 〈◊〉 they should haue any stroke in their election to moue God thereunto indeede they please God through Christ because they are the fruites of his Spirite though vnperfect as also they be the way wherein the godly walke towardes heauen But as they cannot merit our saluation by the doing of them so the foresight of them did not moue God to elect vs or yet to call or iustifie or adopt and sanctifie vs and saue vs. Tim. But are not Gods children bound to will and to do good duties to beleeue and to repent Silas True they are and without them none of yeares can be saued but not to ascribe their election vnto them because many Infants are chosen who neuer coulde doe good Tim. Shew vs the reason of this doctrine Silas First all the goodnesse which is in the woorke and will of man proceedes from Gods purpose and election and therefore can be no cause of it 1. Tim. 1. Ephe. 1. 4. Secondly there is that contrariety in the matter of election and saluation betweene mercy and workes grace and merite that if in any sort it doeth depend vpon workes it doeth in no sort come from grace and mercy as the opposition in this text shewes and the plaine words of chap. 11. verse 6. Tim. What is the vse hereof Silas It confutes such as set vp free will and make the beginnings of their saluation to come from themselues which as it directly crosseth the Scriptures which teach that in our will or vnderstanding there is no goodnesse till GOD put it in so it derogateth much from the glory of Gods mercy also too much exalteth and puffeth vp flesh and bloud Secondly though this may not quench and kill our care and endeuour of well doing yet it must serue to humble vs euen for our best desires and endeuours for as much as they doe wholly spring from Gods mercy and are of no value in the cause of election and saluation Tim. What doctrine are wee to learne from the second part of this text Silas That Gods mercy is the whole and all-sufficient cause of mans election as also of all our willing and running well yea and of our heauenly inheritance Tim. If all must be committed to Gods mercy what then are we stocks and stones doe we nothing Sil. Yea 〈◊〉 the godly doc both will and worke but they are impelled thereunto by his Spirite which they receiue from his grace Gal. 4. 5. Rom. 8. 15. Phil. 1 Iohn 15 without mee ye can doe nothing God preuenteth the vnwilling to make him willing saith Augustine and followeth him being made willing least he do will in vaine Tim. Then it seemes that our working and Gods shewing mercy doe together get vs to bee saued as God calleth by the voyce of the Minister and by Parents brings children into the world and Magistrates rule through the helpe and blessing of God and he giues life by foode and light by the sunne so men are saued by his mercies and their owne endeuours Silas Indeede some haue so taken these wordes of willing and running as if they alone by themselues were not sufficient without Gods mercy and so they part the matter of our saluation betweene God and man mercy and workes so as that wee doe were nothing in comparison of that which Gods mercy performeth yet were of some force but it may as well be saide that mercy is not sufficient without our willing and running Secondly mercy is here so set by the Apostle against our will and courses as that the setting vp one of these is the putting downe of the other 3. It is the mercy of God that doth enable men to will and to doe well giuing them faith and repentance and perseuerance in these graces so as mercy is all in all it begins and finisheth our saluation What I am I am by the grace of God Tim. Why would God haue all that belongs to our saluation referred to his mercy Silas First that all might be free as from grace of God not merit of men and he might haue glory of all Secondly that such as would reioyce might reioyce not in themselues but reioyce onely herein that they know God to be mercifull praysing him for putting into them good willes and power to doe good workes and finally for crowning his owne gifts and all of his mercy Phil. 2 13. Tim. What is the vse heereof Silas It admonisheth all Gods children to thinke of themselues and all that they can doe most basely most highly of the rich mercies of God in Christ louing them praysing them and studying to imitate them also to depend vpon his mercy for the beginning proceeding and end of their saluation and to abhorre all conceit of iniustice in God in respect of his eternall election sithence all being lost in Adam hee might according to iustice haue left
all to themselues to be hardened in their sinnes it being his most merciful nature and nothing else which moued him to exempt some from that common misery that being freede from sinne and death by Christ they might partake in his heauenly glory to the glory of his grace DIAL X. Verse 17. For the Scripture saith to Pharaoh for this purpose haue I stirred thee vp that I might shew my power in thee and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth Tim. VVHat is the Apostles drift in these words Silas Hauing cleared God before of iniustice in respect of his electing some out of lost mankinde because hee did it out of the prerogatiue of his absolute and most free mercies as Paul confirmeth by testimony of Scripture so now he like-wise proueth by Scripture that God is not vniust in the matter of reprobation out of Exodus 9 16. Tim. What argument doth Paul take out of this Scripture to proue his purpose Silas From a particular example of Pharaoh whom God did not chuse but reiect very iustly as appeareth two wayes First from the quality of Pharaoh beeing a man hardened by sinne noted in this word raised vp as Paul expounds it in the next verse for seeing Pharaoh was hardened and became obstinate before hee was destroyed therefore God could not be vniust in appointing him vnto destruction for sinners doe perish iustly therefore God is not vniust when he doth appoint them vnto destruction Secondly from the end which hee propoundeth to himselfe of his owne counsell namely the declaration of his owne power and iustice to the praise of his name Now that cannot bee vniust which is done of God to so good an end if withal it be considered that Gods glory is the cheefest good thing and that he hath an absolute right in all his creatures to dispose of them as he thinkes best for his owne glory Tim. But how fitly doth Paul gather a generall doctrine touching all reprobates from this one example Silas Very fitly because the cause and case of all reprobates is one and the same for none of them perish but in regard of their foregoing sinne and God is glorified in the destruction of euery one of them therefore if God dealt iustlye in reprobating Pharaoh vpon these grounds hee is also iust in the reprobating and refusing all other appointed to damnation Tim. What are the parts of this Text Silas Two First a preface and secondly a testimony of Scripture Tim. What is meant by Pharaoh Silas It was a name common to the Kings of Egipt signifieth an auenger as afterwards their Kings were called And the Kings of Gezar Abimelech and the Emperors of Rome Caesar. Tim. What is meant by Scripture Silas Generally euery thing that is written but more especially the holy writings of Moses and yet more particularly the booke of Exodus and therein this one sentence And further by Scripture wee may vnderstand God speaking in the Scripture as appeareth by comparing this place with verse 25. as also by reason for the Scripture is the word of God Tim. What instruction doth arise from hence Silas That euery clause and sentence of holy Scripture must be spoken of and heard and vsed with all religious reuerence firme beleefe The reason heereof is because the most glorious God is the author of it and hath inspired them 2 Tim. 3 16. 2 Pet. 1 21. Tim. What vse is to be made of this point Sil. It reprooues such as faile in excesse of reuerence to the Scriptures ascribing diuine force to the Letters and Syllables pronounced as if God had enclosed his vertue in them which is a meere inchantment and sorcery Secondly such as faile in defect and want of reuerence receiuing Gods words as the worde of a man prophanely denying authority and obedience to them Thirdly it warnes vs in the hearing of the word to remember that we haue to do with God whosoeuer bee the Instruments to deliuer this vnto vs Acts 10 33. Tim. What other doctrine will arise from this Preface Silas That the doctrine of reprobation ought by the Ministers of God to be taught vnto the Church but warily and with circumspection as the mindes of the people be not estranged from God by the rash handling of it For the doctrine of reprobation is a part of the holie Scripture and is reuealed therein therefore it belongeth to vs to take knowledge of it Deut. 29 29. Also this doctrine is profitable and necessary to be knowne for it serueth well to commend Gods mercie toward the elect and to encrease their thankefulnesse finee they know that he freely elected them to life 〈◊〉 they were no lesse corrupt and miserable then those whom he refused Also it teacheth all men to iudge and speak aright of God to wit that he hath absolute power ouer men to appoint them to what ends it pleaseth him without any vnrighteousnesse at all Ti. Is there any other things to be collected out of this Preface Silas Yea two things First that not only the whole Bible but euery particular sentence therein is to be accounted the word of God Lastly it confutes such papists as say that the Scriptures be mute and dumbe for God speaketh in them it is a speaking Iudge Let Christ iudge saith Augustine and the Apostles with him for in them Christ speakes Tim. What are we to learne out of the testimony being the second part of the Text Sil. Three things First that God is the author of reprobation Secondly by what degrees and meanes that counsell is fulfilled Thirdly the vtmost end of this decree of God Tim. How is the first gathered from this Text Sil. Because it is saide I that is I God haue stirred thee vp also that God hated Esau verse 13. and that God prepareth vessels to wrath verse 22. Adde heereunto 1. Thess. 5 10. Tim. What profit of this Sil. First it confutes such as will not haue reprobation depend vpon the will of God but vppon the workes and will of men Secondly such as affirme that there is no decree of reprobation at all Sil. But if God for his wil sake reprobate men is he not herein vniust Silas No because betweene the decree of his reprobation and the execution of it there alwaies goes the sinne of the party as the meritorious cause of theyr destruction Also God refuseth for most holy ends and lastly his will is the rule of righteousnesse Tim. What is meant by the stirring vp of Pharaob Silas It containes those degrees and meanes by the which Gods counsell was performed vpon Pharaoh The degrees be these First that he was created of God iust in Adam but in him suffered to fall Secondly that God had aduanced him to the kingdome Thirdly that amids the great plagues of Egypt he preserued him aliue when others were destroyed Exod. 9 15. Fourthly that GOD withdrew grace from him that hee could not profit by those wonderful