he choosed the Nation to be a peculiar people holy to himself Deut. 7.6 7. but not with another new distinct Covenant but in the same Covenant 8. But because the Lord loved you and would keep the oath that he had sworn to your fathers to wit to Abraham Deut. 10.15 He chose their seed after them even you above all people not above all houses Amos 3.2 You only have I known of all the families of the earth So the externall Church Covenant and Church right to the means of grace is given to a society and made with Nations under the New Testament Isa. 2.1 2 3. Psal. 2.8 9. Psal. 22.27 Psal. 87.2 3 4. Rev. 11.15 Matth. 28.19 20. And not any are baptized in the New Testament except the Eunuch and Saul Acts 8.39 who were baptized firstly but they were baptized as publick men representing a seed also societies are baptized All Judea Mat. 3.3 All the land of Judea Mark 1.5 All the multitude all the people Luke 4.7.21 Sure the fathers were so Christianed and Baptized as their children had right to the same seal So Joh. 3.22 23 26. Cornelius his house and all with him were baptized Acts 10.33 47. Three thousand at once Acts 2.39 40 41. The Jayler and his house Acts 16.33 servants and friends The houshold of Stephanas 1 Cor. 1.16 was Baptized And this 3. is holden forth as the Church as the houshold of Narcissus which are in the Lord Rom. 16.11 Aquila and Priscilla and all the Church at their house v. 5. The Church at the house of Philemon Phil. v. 2. which teacheth that the Covenant holinesse is of societies and houses under the New Testament as in Abrahams house and as Abrahams house was Circumcised so are whole houses under the New Testament Baptized 4. Paul aptly calls it the holinesse of the lump or Nation and the first fruits root-holinesse the holinesse of the root and the branches Of the Olive Tree and the branches Rom. 11.16 17. 5. The speciall intent of God in sending the word of the Covenant must evidence this he sends not the Gospel unto and for the cause of one man to bring him in but to gather a Church and his elect ones by a visibly and audibly Preached Covenant to a society to a City to Samaria Acts 8. To the Gentiles Acts 13. To all Nations Mat. 28.19 20. that they and their children may have right to salvation and to the means thereof and to the Covenant and therefore we are not curiously to inquire whether the faith of the father be real or not if the Gospel be come to the Nation to the House to the Society The Lord in one Abraham in one Cornelius in one Jayler whom he effectually converts as far as we can gather from the Scriptures choises the race house society nation and gives them a Covenant-holinesse the mans being born where the call of God is does the turn as much as the faith of the Parent For by the root is not necessarily meant the Physicall root the father For Abraham was not the Physicall root and father nor Cornelius of all the servants and friends in the house But if a friend be in the house or society and professe the Gospel he and his obtain right to Baptism and the means of salvation But as touching real holinesse it is not derived from a beleeving father to make the son a beleever Scripture and experience say the contrair Nor 2. is internall and effectuall confederacie with God that by which one is a son of promise Rom. 9. and predestinate to life a nationall favour For 1. no man is chosen to life in his father because the father is chosen A chosen father may have a reprobate son 2. Election to life is not of nations or houses or societies but of single persons It is not said before the nation had done good or evill I chosed this nation all and whole not this but I loved this man not this man Q. What is the formall reason and ground that any hath right to Baptism Ans. If we speak of a passive right if the Eunuch beleeve Act. 8. and if such have received the Spirit Acts 10. they may receive baptism The Eunuch moves not the Question whether Philip should sin in baptizing him or not The Eunuch was troubled to make sure his own not Philips Conversion They who bring that Argument 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Acts 8. and that Mark 16. to prove that only such should be baptized who beleeve actually and are come to age They prove that the Church sinneth if they baptize any but such as are predestinated to life and really beleeve For the faith that Philip asked for was reall with all the heart not as the faith of Simon Magus And the faith Mark 16.15 is real saving faith that brings salvation he that beleeves is saved 2. It can not be visible faith only for that is in Simon Magus he doth visibly so beleeve and is baptized Yet upon that faith he was not saved being in the gall of bitternesse 3. He that beleeves not is damned The meaning must be he that beleeves not savingly is damned Or then he that beleeves not visibly as Magus and Judas is damned but this is most false for Peter beleeves not as Judas and yet he is not damned Or then the meaning must be he that beleeveth both really savingly and also professedly and visibly is saved And that is true but it concludes that none are to be baptized but both real and visible believers 4. If it be true that none are to be baptized but Covenanted ones as Acts 2.39 And if none be Covenanted ones under the New Testament but real beleevers and such as are predestinated to life as our Anabaptists teach from Rom. 9. then must the Church without warrant of the Word baptize Magus Demas Judas 5. Then must also all Judea all the Generations of vipers baptized have been both real and visible beleevers for they were all baptized Mat. 3.3 4. Mark 1.5 Luke 1.7.21 Let Independents consider this and what D. Fuilk and Mr. Cartwright Paraeus Calvin Beza and our Divines speak on these places against the auricular confession of all the huge multitude 6. It is a wonder that any man should dream that the Eunuch made a case of conscience Acts 8. whether it was lawfull to Philip to baptize and not whether he himself did beleeve and could worthily receive the seal Act. 8.36 here is water saith he 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 7. So none can warrantably baptize any but persons dying in faith and it s not certain these have the faith that is Acts 8.37 Mar. 16.16 But for the formall warrand of such as baptize neither are the aged as the aged nor Infants as Infants to be baptized for so all the aged and all Infants even of Pagans are to be baptized Nor 2. are all in Covenant to be baptized For such as are only really and
single branches of the house of Judah so that all and every one are taught of God none excepted Jer. 31.33 34. Isa. 54.13 Joh. 6.45 not so in the visible externall Covenant if it be but externall not any is taught of God but all are taught of men 5. The reall personall Covenant is everlasting like that Covenant with the Moon and Stars 2. The night and the day 3. Of the motion of the Sea Jer. 31.35 36 37. There is perseverance absolutely promised Jer. 32.40 I will make an everlasting Covenant with them that I will not turn away from them to do them good It s sure in Gods part for he changeth not Nay but we change and turn away from God he obviats that I will put my fear in their hearts that they shall not depart from me So Isai. 54.10 Isa. 59.21 but all such as Nationally visibly only and in profession only are in Covenant may fall away 6. Jer. 31. â—â— Behold 〈◊〉 day 〈◊〉 come saith the Lord that the City shall be built to the 〈◊〉 c. There is a promise of spirituall right in Christ made to the blessings of this life to these that are personall Covenanters As Jer. 32 4â— Ezek. 11.17 18 19. Ezek. 36.26 27 28 29 30 33. Ezek. 37.24 25 26. Ezek. 34.23 24 25 26 27. which promise though not repâ—â—ted in the New Testament when the Prophesies of 〈…〉 cited Heb. 8.8 Heb. 10.16 17. but of purpose 〈…〉 because the promise of temporal blessings is not so expresse 〈◊〉 Yet in other places of the New Testamant it is clear that we have bread by Covenant-promise Matth. 19 20. 1 Tim. â— 8 Heb. 13. â— 6. 1 Pet. 3.10 11 12. which 〈…〉 only 〈…〉 Covenant externally c. These six differences are clear Jer. 31.33 c. so that it is evident that all and every one of the Visible Church are not really and personally confederates so that though the Lord say to both I will be their God and they shall be my people yet not one and the same way Hence there is no ground at all nor truth in what Arminians say that the Covâ—â—ant of Grace is made with all and every one of mankind as was the Covenant of Works For this must be true that in Paradice the Covenant of Grace was made with Adam and all his seed But a Covenant so universall ought to be proclaimed to all the 〈◊〉 but thus was not For the Lord published and made it to Abraham and his seed and the Lord choised Israel above all the people on earth Deut. 5.1 2 3. Deut. 7.6 Deut. 10.15 and shewed his judgements and statutes to them not to other Nations And therefore there can be no subjejective revealing of Christ by universall grace given to Heathen and all others and by an objective revealing of Christ in the works of Creation the heaven and earth night and day as some teach citing the Ps. 29.1 2. For so 1. God choised Americans Indians and all the wild Savages to be his people as well as he choised the Jews and if the sound of the Gospel went out to the ends of the earth that is to all and every one as they expound Psal. 19.3 4. Rom. 10.18 then it must be the purpose of David and Paul that the Doctrine of the Covenant of Grace and of Christ crucified by whose alone name men are saved and by whom only 〈◊〉 come to the Father Acts 4 1â— John 14.6 is written in the Firmament which must declare the glory of God manifested in the flesh day unto day and must preach Christ crucified to all Nations who see the Sun rise and go down â—or sure that sound Psal. 19.4 goeth through all the earth Sure Paul must give a dark interpretation Rom. 10. of that Psalm 〈…〉 2. If the hearing Rom. 10.18 but I say have they not heard be the hearing of God Creator his sounding 〈◊〉 in the Firmament Night Day and Sun as it is Psal. 〈◊〉 by all that see the Sunne and also the hearing of the joyfull sound of Christ Preached in the Gospel written and objectively 〈◊〉 in Sun and Moon Night and Day as Amyrald and his do expound it Then may all that see the Sun call upon the name of the Lord revealed in Christ and believe in Christ for of their beleef Moses speaks Deut. 30.14 and Paul Rom. 10.9 â—â— and all have the benefite of the Preached Gospel and sent Prophets whose feet are beautifull upon the mountains publishing 〈…〉 of peace vers 15. as Nah. 1.15 Isai. 52.7 and â—ll that see the Sunne are the same way saved by Jesus Christ that Jewes and Gentiles are who hear the Gospel But Paul strangely crosseth this How shall they call upon him as God revealâ—â— iâ— Christ in whom they believe not 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 How shal they 〈◊〉 him of whom they have not heard And how shall they hear without a Preacher And how shall they preach except they be 〈◊〉 Now if the sound of the Preached Gospel be to be heard in the Firmament Sun rising and going down as Amyrald and some Libertines do say whom I heard Preach the same thing at London Paul might receive an easie and a short answer The Gospel of Christ crucified written on the Firmament Sun and night and day is as lawfull an Ordinance and a book upon which Americans and all that see the same may read the glad tydings of salvation and so may call upon and beleeve in God and winne and earn by 〈◊〉 industrie and hearing of the Gospel by sent Preachers as the Preached Word of God and therefore Paul cannot deny but faith comes by hearing of some other Preacher then a Gospel-Preacher or one that is sent for Paul Rom. 1.16 17 18 19. and David Psal. 19.1 2 3. v. 7 8 9. distinguish the two Books There is not such an Objection dreamed as Amyrald imagines of Rom. 10.18 If God will have mercy on the Gentiles how is it that they have not heard the Gospel For the Lord hath not declared his minde to them He answers God did not so keep up his good will to the Gentiles in former times but by the Ministery of the Heavens ac veluti voce providentiae and as it were by the preaching of the Word of Providence he spake to them which things should be spoken to no purpose by Paul if they be understood of a revelation of God as Creator only and not as Redeemer for what hath that revelation to do with the Gospel Therefore Calvine saith he speaketh of the revelation by the creatures preparatory to the Gospel It is true there is an Objection in these words v. 18. But I say have they not heard A learned Countrey-man Charles Fermin But the Israelites saith he have not heard the Gospel Then if faith be from hearing and saving calling upon God be from faith then believing Israelites shall be of the number of them that call
Judas nor was grace to beleeve and repent purchased by the death of Christ to Judas by these Authors though they boast of the amplitude of Christs death nor did the Lord by that will of purpose ever decree or intend the salvation of Judas Therefore 3. this that the death of Christ is of its own nature preachable to all Nations in every age is not true For the phrase is neither in Scipture in Old or New Testament nor is the thing it self in Scripture For the meaning is either GOD may send Apostles in any age to all the Nations of the world to Preach If that be by his extraordinary power he may save all the damned that way That Preachablenesse is not the object of our faith Nor is that Preachablenesse a fruit of Christs dying for all If it be meant that God by his ordinary power may send Apostles in any age to all Nations How is that to be said Except we say God hath decreed in his will of purpose to send Preachers to all That cannot be except his decree be disappointed Oâ— 3. If it be his command and revealed will that the Gospel be Preached to all Nations every age they grievously sin who Preach not the Gospel to the Brasilians and Antipods whether they can speak in their Language or not And if the Doctrine of the Covenant of its own nature may so be Preached to all Nations without exception in every difference of time then must all the Nations of the earth in all differences of time be in a capacity to be a Covenanted people of God the Church of Christ the Vineyard of the Lord his inheritance the Spouse of Christ his Body his Called and Chosen flock For to have the Doctrine of the Covenant fixedly Preached to a Nation and Christ offered to them is to be the planted Vineyard of the Lord for to Preach to Macedonia fixedly they willingly hearing is indeed the Lords entering in Covenant with Macedonia and his choising them to be his confederate people and the Lords planting a Vineyard and building a Wine-presse in it and setting up a Ministry therein and therefore the Lord was not in Covenant with them before Indeed to Preach the Word simply to scoffers who reject it and that occasionally in the passing so as there is no sort of accepting of the Covenant nor any fixed Ministry there is not a renewing of the Covenant with them nor does it presuppose a Covenant before made with them 2. It is against the wisdome of God that 1. there should be such a band of love the greatest love that ever was Joh. 15.13 lying upon all mankind Brasilians Americans binding them to thankfull Gospel-obedience that Christ died for them yet this obligation of the greatest love is neither written in their heart as the Law of nature nor is it ever revealed to them that they are under so much love by Covenant 2. How can the Lord say I choosed you O Israel among all the people of the earth and entred in Covenant with you and your seed only For 1. there is no need of a new establishing of the conditionall Gospel-Covenant for it was established with Israel and with all the world before he choosed or called them 2. He cannot be said to enter in Covenant with them only For all the world ever was thus Covenanted with God 3. All the world must be an invisible Covenanted Church and the fit matter to be a Church For the Evangel may be Preached est de se annunciabile not to stones and to rocks but to all Nations quovis seculo 4. Since the Preaching of the Gospel to some Nations and not to others is an act of the Soveraign pleasure yea and of the free grace of God to such as this Sun-light graciously doth visit by this way the sinfull neglect of such as refuse to Preach shall be the cause of the perishing of the elect a dream 2. CHRIST may be said to die for us as if we had substituted him in our place in so rigid a sense as if he had been made our surety to fulfill both the preceptive and active and also the satisfying and suffering part of the Law in our room This may please Antinomians but a doubt it is if it stand with the truth For then what ever we yea all mortall men be for Christ died for them all as many teach most wicked yet Christs active and surety and cautionary righteousnesse should be ours and though we should never beleeve yet Christ who fulfilled the Law and preceptive as well as the threatning part must have beleeved for all that he died for and what need we then in our persons either beleeve or repent It s true we need not perform any active obedience as a part of active fulfilling of that Covenant of Works which either must have all or no obedience If it be said that alio titulo upon another account of thankfulnesse to our ransom-payer we owe active obedience Yet all that CHRIST died for both actively and passively must be perfectly righteous and justified having payed the most perfect active and passive obedience that the Law required though we never beleeve and Christ must have payed the active part of justifying faith for us And why but we should be formally justified in him without faith also As also God not we laid our sins upon Christ Isai. 53.6 2 Cor. 5.21 and therefore we did commissionate and substitute Christ to die in our room Socinus Crellius the Raccovian Catechism Arminius contend that Christ died for all finaliter for to procure good and salvation to all so they beleeve and yet through their own fault they may haply never be saved not that he satisfied for us but died for example as a Martyr say Socinians as Paul suffered for the Church so as we beleeving in Christ as in the only chief Martyr and witnesse who as the only Author declared the Gospel not as a sufferer and ransom-payer who redeemed us from the Law are saved And as Arminians he died for our good not that he died in our room and stead so as the sins of the Elect were actually taken off them and translated upon Christ so as wee are actually freed from the punishment of sin as if we had substitute a Saviour our selves and payed our debt our selves to God and so according to the rigour of Justice we might crave by the Law of buying and selling deliverance from punishment and life eternall from God But this way they will not have Christ to die in the place and room of any but only for their good so as they may die eternally themselves for whom Christ died Hence 1. It follows that Christ died for them but gave no ransome of blood for them for whom he died 2. Arminians will not have the sins and punishment satisfactory to justice for of such punishment we speak actually upon Christ and translated off the sinner and laid upon
3.13 Rev. 21.1 Isa. 65.17 and they shall be above the heavens that are when the mysticall body shall be perfected yea and the dust into which the bodies of the Saints are resolved keeps a spirituall Covenant relation to God in Christ As Exod. 3.6 Mat. 22.32 Joh. 6.39 Rom. 8.21 22 23. for no joint or part of the body but it must share of Covenant glory We look little to any thing but to have and injoy the dead lump and body of Gold dead lands without Christ. See Hos. 2.18.22 Ezek. 34.25.27 Ezek. 36.29 Lev. 26.6 Psal. 37.9 11 29. 1 Tim. 4.8 Heb. 13.5 6. Math. 6.25 26. Psal. 34.10 O fair inheritance 4. As to the second which is the main controversie to injoy life and being is the substance of the act no sin Men contraveen a Law to be so and so born to wit in sin for it s forbidden by a Law But to be born and live is no sin but by order of nature before Originall sin Nor is it forbidden more to man to be born and live then its forbidden to beasts nor to eat sleep wake then to them So neither is it commanded by a Law to die but it is commanded and commended to die well to fall asleep in Christ 1 Thes. 4.14.16 to be faithfull to the death Acts 7.60 Rev. 2.10 Rev. 14.13 2. The Elect who are born heirs of wrath as others Eph. 2.3 And all the Reprobate should kill themselves or be killed from the birth if to live and eat were sin in it self But only the Lord of life and death and his Minister the Magistrate hath power to take away life and being no man can be his own burrio But if it were sin in it self to live they ought to expire and restore an usurped life which they possesse malâ fide to the owner the Lord as a theef is oblidged to restore stollen goods 3. The dominion of Reprobats over the creatures is a part of the good Image of God Gen. 1.26 27. and they breath live ride sail and are no more then the Elect to lay these aside then they are to lay aside the naturall knowledge of God by which they are to glorifie God as God Rom. 1.19 20 21. Rom. 2.14 15. Act. 14.16 17. Now the Reprobates have not utterly lost the Image of God as to know there is a God to honour their parents to hurt no man 4. This opinion looks the rather like a fancie that it is a temptation in weak ones under a sad desertion Sathan riding upon their Melancholie a complexion not sanctified usefull to Sathan and if sanctified a seat of mortification and humble walking for they judge it sin to eat and drink and sleep they having no right thereunto but so they have no right to live and are oblidged to kill themselves and upon the same ground it was sin to Adam to speak to answer God to breath to hear the news of the blessed seed which all are acts of life and so acts of sin and upon the same ground that they cannot perform these without sin they should not pray for in praying they cannot but take the Name of God in vain For we are not to abstaine from a duty because of the sinfulnesse which adheres to the duty by reason of our corruption for in Christ the sinfulnesse is pardoned and the duty accepted 5. It necessarily must follow if it be sin to eat because the non-converted have no right spirituall in Christ to bread the converted may spoil by their grounds all the non-converted of their goods houses gold gardens vineyards lands and upon the same ground for the crime of non-regeneration they must also deprive them of their lives and kill them For they have alike right that is no right these men being Judges to either life or goods And so Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thy self must be meant of the converted neighbour but with fire and sword all other neighbours may be killed and spoiled and so there should be no stealing no oppressing no crushing of the widow the stranger the fatherlesse the weaker not grind the faces of the poor though their Redeemer be strong contrair to the Scripture Prov. 23.11 Jer. 50.33 34. Psal. 94.5 6 7 8. Psal. 14.4 Exo. 22.26 27. Isa. 3.12 13 14 15. Mic. 2.3 and so it were lawfull to take Crowns Kingdomes inheritances lands dignitie and honour from all the unregenerate Princes powers and rulers on earth to cut off with the sword all the heathen Nations who as yet know not Christ and it were lawfull for the regenerate sons and brethren to kill and spoil Father Mother Brethren Sisters Kings Potentates Countrey-men strangers Orphans exiled captives prisoners sick weak imprisoned all infants that are by nature the heirs of wrath upon this ground the converted ones judge all non-converts to be void of all due right to life or goods and so in these men the societies Churches of Christ must cease Obj. These who injoy that of which they deserve to be deprived have no due right to that of which they deserve to be deprived but are usurpers and so sin But all the non-regenerated are such or they who use that to which they have no right do sin in the act of using it Ans. 1. They who injoy that of which they deserve to be deprived they sin and have no due right to use it Is not universally true They who injoy that which they may and ought by their own private power restore such as ill conquished goods They sin in using that true Prov. 3.27 Exod. 22.26 27. Luke 19.8 It s a sin to withhold the rayment though laid in pawnd which should cover the poor mans skin in the night and they have no right to injoy that But they who injoy that what ever it be of which by sin they deserve to be deprived they have no due right to that it is denyed For if it be life being eating sleeping and such things as only can be taken away by a judiciall power and by God the Lord of life and death and cannot be taken away by themselves for it is lawfull for no man to punish himself and take away his own life nor by any other except for capitall crimes they have due providentiall right to keep and injoy all such things untill the same power that gave them remove them nor do they sin in using them And it is most dangerous to say that Devils and the damned in Hell who dishonour the Majesty of God by their living and being and so by sin deserve to be annihilated and deprived of their being do sin in that they live and are not annihilated and that all the Elect before their conversion sin in that they injo◠being and life A judge sentenceth a man to die for killing his father within 24. houres but by invincible providence he is rescued out of the hand of the Magistrate and lives diverse years after the sentenced
invisibly in Covenant and do make no profession of Christ at all are not warrantably by the Church to be baptized Only these whether old or young that are tali modo visibili federati such as professedly and visibly in Covenant and called Acts 2.39 are warrantably baptized Hence they must be so in Covenant as they be called by the word of the Covenant for they cannot be baptized against their will Luke 7.29.30 Q. What warrand is there Act. 2.39 for Infant Baptisme Ans. I shall not contend for the actuall baptizing of them at that instant But every one of you be baptized 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 father and sons Why the promise is to you and to your children break the Text into an hundred pieces and blood it as men please the Genuine Thesis which cannot be neglected is These to whom the promise of the Covenant does belong these should be baptized 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But the promise of the Covenant is to you and to your children Ergo you and your children should be baptized The assumption is the expresse words of Peter and the Proposition is Peters Every one of you be baptized 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 for to you is the promise of the Covenant Calvin Bullinger Brentius Gualther clear it 2. Who they are who are in the nearest capacity to be baptized he explaines when he showeth that the Covenant promise is made to these who are far off to the Gentiles whom the Lord shall call then all that are under the call and offer of Christ in the Preached Gospel as Prov. 9.1 2 3 4. Math. 22 bid them come to the wedding Luke 14.16 17 18. c. are externally in Covenant and such to whom the Covenant is made and should be baptized it s presumed they give some professed consent to the call and do not right down deny to come else they should be baptized against their will 3. Calvine showes Acts 2.39 that the Anabaptists in his time said the promise was made to Believers only but the Text saith it is made to you and to your children to infants to the children of the Prophets and of the Covenant made with the fathers Acts 3.25 Now what ground doe Anabaptists give that all infants believe or that some believe since to them their children were as Pagans without Christ without the Covenant if to the children when they come to age and shall believe but what need to adde and to your believing Children for these are not children but men of age their fathers and they both being believers Now Peter sets down two ranks the aged who heard the word with gladnesse and were pricked in heart v. 37.41 and the children and to both the promise is made and what ground is their to exclude sucking children for the word Acts 2.39 is Math. 2.18 1 Cor. 7.14 where sure the word is taken for sucking children of whose actuall faith the Scripture speaks not 2. The promise is to you and to your children can have no other sense then the promise and word of the Covenant is preached to you and to your children in you and this is to be externally in Covenant both under the Old and New Testament If it have another sense it must be this the Lord hath internally Covenanted with you the 3000. who have heard the word and with your children and you are the spirituall seed and sons of promise predestinate to life eternall as Rom. 9. they expone the seed in Covenant But 1. Were all the 3000. Ananias and Saphiâ—a and their children the spirituall and chosen seed for he commands all whom he exhorts to repent to be baptized And 2. Now to Simon Magus and Demas and numbers of such Peter could not have said the promise is made to you and to your children if it be only made to reall and actuall believers as they say Peter therefore must owne them all whom he exhorts to repent as the chosen seed But if the former sense be intended as how can it be denyed to wit the word of the Covenant is preached to you an offer of Christ is made in the preached Gospel to you Then it cannot be denyed but the promise is to all the Reprobate in the Visible Church whether they believe or not for Christ is preached and promises of the Covenant are preached to Simon Magus to Judas and all the Hypocrites who stumble at the Word to all the Pharisees as is clear Math. 13.20 21 22 23. Acts 13.44 45. Acts 18.5 6. Math. 21.43 1 Pet. 2.7 8. 3. The promise I will be your God and ye shall be my people must be one way expounded in the Old Testament to wit you are externally only in Covenant with God But in the New Testament it must have this meaning I wil be your God 2 Cor. 6.16 that is you are all predestinate to life and the sons by promise and the spirituall seed to whom I say I will be your God But so it may well be said there were no internall Covenanters in the Old Testament and there be none but only internall Covenanters in the New Testament so that when the Lord sayeth Rev. 11.15 The Kingdomes of the earth are mine and my sons He must say the Kingdomes Egypt Assyria Tyrus Ethiopia c. are chosen and the spirituall seed and these Covenanted Nations and the Kingdomes of the Gentiles are all internally and effectually called and there are no Visible Churches in the New Test. but only all invisible and saved 4. If these words The promise is to you and to your children be limited to as many as the Lord shall effectually call either fathers or children But Mr. Stev Marshel judiciouslie observes there is no more a Covenant-favour holden forth to their children then to the children of Pagans for the children of Pagans if God effectually call them have the promises made to them 5. It s clear that externall Covenant-holinesse is to these men ceremoniall holiness now out of date and then externall calling the only means of internall and effectuall calling Math. 22.14 1 Cor. 1.18.23 24. Luke 15.1 2. and the fixed Church-hearing of the Preached Gospel is a ceremony 2. That God should be the God of Infants of the seed of the Jews a mercie to fathers and sons coming from free love Deut. 10.15 Gen. 17.7 Deut. 7.6.7.8 and Prophesied as a mercy to the Gentiles by all the Prophets was a ceremony removed now in Christ. Yea 3. externall Covenanting and adopting and choising of Israel is no mercy except that a Pedagogie of the Law is a mercy for a time 4. The promise is to you and to your children must be in a contradictorie way expounded to wit the promise is no more made to your children so long as they are Infants then to Devils Yea fathers and children not beleeving though chosen to life are excommunicated from Visible adoption calling hearing the Gospel promises for there is no Covenanting now under
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 suffer little children to come Now he should then have given marks to discern predestinate children and suffer them 2. And receive them only as Disciples in my Name Mar. 6.36 37. 3. He should have laid his hands upon some Infants as predestinate to glory and forbidden others to come And the Parents should have known what children are predestinate to life and should come and what not 6. The Text evidences that the Disciples had a prejudice and a carnall one at infants thinking they understood nothing of Christ and of the Kingdom of Grace The Disciples 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 rebuked these that brought them as Anabaptists do And Christ rebukes them and instates infants of beleeving Parents as members of the Visible Church 7. Nor was it extraordinary when Christ said suffer little Children to come but he would have the spece instated members of such a Kingdom Ergo some of the kind must be saved and examples must be verified saith Mr. Cobbet judiciously in some particulars 8. Of such is the Kingdome of God of such in Covenant relation is the Kingdome of God of such subjects For if Christs reason be of such for humilitie meeknesse want of malice and invy as 1 Pet. 2.1 2 3. Math. 18. Psal. 131.1 2 is the Kingdome of God he must mean by the Kingdome of God the Kingdome of Glory and the triumphing Church this sense is refused by Anabaptists 2. The Infants of Pagans and of all men by nature within and without the Church are as well marked resemblances of converts as they And we must say that Christ would have taken in his arms and blessed all the Pagan Infants and when they grow to age they should be for no fault but for age only Excommunicate from the blessing for Pagan Infants as well resemble humility and harmlessenesse if only the personall qualifications of converts and heart-converts not the Covenant and Church-holinesse of visible Professours be here meant as Infants within the Visible Church 9. There was no other designe and purpose in Christ in that emphatick expression forbid them not to come 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Math. 19.14 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Luke 18.16 to me their Saviour as well as the Saviour of the aged but to hold forth the common interest of the whole spece of infants 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 within the Visible Church their Covenant interest in Christ for there is no imaginable reason but the conceit of want of understanding the prejudice of Anabaptists only why the Disciples should have aimed to debar them or any poor sinners from accesse to the Saviour of sinners 10 Christ took them in his armes layed his hands on them blessed them Now this was a personall reall favour bestowed upon infants had infants been meer symbolick and doctrinall resemblances of the humilitie of reall converts and the young ones as much without the Covenant as Pagans and as uncapable of Covenant grace and Covenant seals because void of actuall faith now under the new Gospel administration as horses or beasts let the opposites of their Baptisme show what sort of blessing it was that Christ bestowed upon them if it be not 1. Of more value then Jacobs blessing of Ephraim and Manasseh or at least as reall and certain Christ the Lord from heaven must as Soveraigne who had power to curse the fig tree and it withered by his Soveraigne power have blessed in them the whole race of infants in the Visible Church and declared them Covenanted Church members under the New Testament in this eminent act of blessing the children and in commanding that all such might have free accesse to him as King since the young ones were Subjects of the Kingdome of God as well as the aged and expressely forbids that in time to come they be hindered to come to him Mark 10.14 Luk. 18.16 Math. 19.14 and three Evangelists are three sufficient witnesses 2. Christ the Lord is the Supreme and Soveraigne Lord of blessing and cursing for in him all the Nations of the earth and with them young ones a considerable part of the Covenanted Nations must be blessed 3. If Isaac blessed Jacob and he must be blessed Gen. â—7 29.33 and Jacob blessed the twelve Tribes Gen. 49.28 and Moses the man of God blessed Israel before his death Deut. 33.1 2. c. with Covenant blessings and they were really blessed Christ must as really with Covenant blessings have in this blessed the whole race of infants of Covenanting parents except Anabaptists say that it was some complementall salutation for the fashion that Christ bestowed upon infants when the Evangelists say he blessed them Math. 19.13 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Mark 10.16 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 4. by the glosse of the Adversaries Christ blessed them symbolick and doctrinall resemblances of the humilitie and docility of reall converts and they were blessed as meer signes as the Elements in the Sacraments are blessed or as new made crucifixes are blessed and dedicated to divine worship as resemblances of Christ crucified and as Popish Images are symbolicallie blessed a strange devise are rather a strong delusion 4. If Christ prayed for infants as Matthew sayeth the mothers or parents sought that of him Math. 19 13. his prayers must be grounded upon the word of the Covenant and what could he seek for infants peace in these but Covenant mercies and salvation for Christ was not to work a miracle upon them and he satisfied the desires of these who brought them on their armes and therefore could not go on their feet nor give a confession of their faith they were born as the man sick of the palsie Math. 9.2 5. Now as Christ is always hard in his prayes Joh. 11.42 so his blessing he bestowed upon them though Anabaptists will have them without Christ and the Covenant and under the curse of God must either be a blessing of the Covenant of Grace or of the Covenant of Works for a third sort of blessing the Scripture knows not Moses takes all blessings up in these two Deut. 27.12 15 16. Deut. 28.2 3 15 16. Deut 30.19 I set before you life and death blessing and cursing and so doeth Paul Gal. 3.10 13 14. Heb. 6.7 8 14 15. But Christ could not bestow the Law blessing of Works upon these infants for they had not fulfilled the Law in their persons nor can infants or any flesh be justified by the Law Rom. 3.20 therefore must Christ have bestowed upon them the blessing of the Covenant of Grace Gal. 3.14 Heb. 6.14 let it be the blessing of remission and life or reall right to the Kingdome of God it is a blessing of the Covenant 6. The faith of the parents that brought them is holden forth Math. 19.13 Then were little children brought unto him that he might lay his hands on them and pray then had they faith in Christ that his praying and blessing should be availeable to infants it
Covenant-resurrection nor any Covenant-salvation can be given or promised if they be not in Covenant The New Test. Kingdome of CHRIST is spirituall though there be in it external signes and seals How faith does sanctifie the unbelieving wife to the beleeving husband Mr. Rich. Baxter plain Scripture proof for Infant Baptism 4 Arg. on â— Cor. 7. p. â—8 99. Of federall holinesse The Covenant external is made with a society or visible Church that out of them God may gather heirs of glory What federal holines is The being born where the Gospel sounds of that nation race is the ground of Covenant-holines as well as the faith of the nearest parents The faith required of these to be baptized Act. 8.37 Mar. 16.16 is real saving faith not visible only The formal grouÌ„d of baptizing These to whom the promise is made should be baptized But the promise is made to children Act. 2. The sense of the words the promise is to you and to your children If all be really believers that are in Covenant with God under the New Testament al the Kingdomes of the world which are the Lords and Christs Rev. 11.15 must be believers internally in Covenant with God How these words and to your chilâ—dren are not limited Externall Covenanting the blessing of the Gospel Preached to the Nation is but a Ceremony to the opposers of Infant baptism contrair to all ancient Prophesies Isa. c. 2. c 19 Jer. 23. Isa 11 c. If there be no Covenanting under the N. T. but that of real beleevers there can be no Covenant obligation upon the non-converted to hear to beleeve the Gospel to receive the seals A conditional Covenant hath the compleat essence nature of a Covenant and they are truly in Covenant that are under it Anabaptists provide no sâ—lvation by Law or Gospel or by JESUS CHRIST for the saving of Infants born of beleeving parents more then for saving of Pagans and their Infants It s false that the promise is made to infants to the aged only upon condition of believing How visible professors are really within the Covenant not really within it The new heart is not promised to all who ought to repent and to be baptized What is promised Act. 2.39 whether a new heart be therein promised or excluded Mercies of the Covenant are not alike and the same way promised to the Parents in covenant to wit Elect and Reprobate The Covenant of Grace is considered two ways in abstracto in concâ—â—to The new heart is promised to such special Covenanters not to Covenanters in general and as Covenanters The new heart is considered as a duty commanded And 2. as a blessing freely promised The Reprobate are not in the Covenant of Grace as touching some speciall promise How the Lords Argument for Circumcision fits us for Baptisme A comparing of the command of Circumcision and of the command of baptism in three If actuall faith be required in all to be baptized there shuld be a command of self-examining in the N. T. of all before they be baptized How many wicked absurdities must follow the excluding of Infants from the Covenant of Grace Remonstrant Scrip. Synod ar 1. p. 2. Thes. 9 10. Infants not predestinate to life in CHRIST not redeemed in CHRIST Infants neither capable of heaven or hell by this way Infants saved without Christ not capable of Grace of remission justification Of the children brought to Christ. Of infants as infants the Kingdome of God is not Hyeronymus increpant non quia nollent iis salvatoris manu voce benedici sed quod non dum habentes plenissimam fidem putarent eum in similitudinem aliorum hominum importunitate lassari Chryso Hom. discipuli expellebant pueros causa dignitatis Christi Christs taking in his armes the children blessing them did not act mere resemblances and Emblems The efficacy of Christs blessing the children They came that hee should pray for them Christs blessing of the children not as when the elements are consecrate His blessing either a Law blessing or a blessing of the Covenant of Grace A Covenanted seed is prophecied to be added to the Iews under the New Testament There is Covenanted visible seed prophesied to be under the N. T. Calv. in loc Haec promissio Abrahae data ad totum populi corpus spectabat The Covenant promise is prophesied to belong to such a certain seed If there be not a Covenanted seed under the New Test. the children of beleevers under the New Test. must be a cursed seed It s a state of coÌ„mon grace to be within the Visible Church It s grace that Reprobats are instrumentall to the in-coming to the world and to the Visible Church of the heirs of glory God is a God in truth to some and how to others The cause why we believe is because God is thus and thus in Covenant with us Calvin unde Colligimus ad hanc quoque aetatem extendi ejus gratiam Quid vero ilâ—is precatus est nisi ut reciperentur inter Dei filios Beza Ipsi quoque Infantes in gratuito Dei foedere comprehenduntur The Covenant blessing of the house is the Covenant blessing of the seed The place Rom. 11.16 if the root be holy so is the branches opened The Jews to be born are intentionally holy in the root and when they are born they shall be actually holy The same Covenant in the substantialls is in the Old and New Test. The one Covenant of Grace is called the Covenant of the Lord by way of excellency in the Old and New Test. A short opening of Ro. 11. to v. 17 By the holy root cannot be meant the predestinate to glory only Paul Rom. 11. speaks of a visible not an invisible body Infants of the Jewes are cut off with the root and shal be re-ingraffed with the root The seed are in Covenant not by birth as birth but by such a birth so so graciously priviledged Covenant-holinesse externall is not the adequat and compleat cause of ingraffing really in Christ. Considerable differences between externall and internall Covenanters Personal Covenanters cannot fall away but Nationall conditionall and visible Covenanters may The Covenant of grace is not made with all and every one of mankinde Psal. 147.19 20. There is no universall revealing of CHRIST to Americans and to all mankind which is either subjective by a power or universall grace given to all or which is objective by the light of nature in the works of CreatioÌ„ pointing out Christ as the place Psal. 19 4. mistaken is cited The place Psal 1â— 4 vindicated Carol. Fermaeus in Analys ad Romanos c. 10. p. 205. The true Exposition of the place Psal. 19 4. by our Interpreters P. Martyr in loc Deus ut inquit Psalmâ—s voluit notitiam suam naturalem per creaturas coelestes publicari in universum orbem Ergo Euangelium curavit identidem evulgari Quomodo igitur potestis dicere