it selfe But as Abraham in the like temptation when Gods former promise and his present commandement seemed to bee contrarie yet shewed his obedience not doubting of the truth of Gods promise So Moses relieth upon the same ground and foundation of Gods promise though the Lord seemed for the present to be otherwise minded Simler 2. He prayeth therefore first directus spiritu being guided by Gods Spirit so to doe Gallas and God moved Moses to pray two wayes primò interius incitando first by stirring him inwardly to pray then movebatur exterius verbis Dei outwardly he was moved by Gods words though not directly Tostatus for the Lord in saying Let me alone as he did not directly bid him pray so secretly thereby he did insinate that by prayer his judgement might be staied Iunius 3. Moses prayeth with a vehement interrogation Why doth thy wrath wax hot which is not an expostulating with Gods justice but rather admonentis de benignitate of one admonishing God of his clemencie and gracious promise Borrhaius Neither doth Moses thus speake why c. as though God had no cause to bee angrie for it was well knowne to Moses that God had but too just cause at this time against his people but though God had just cause his meaning is Non debere irasci quia redundaret in ipsius dedecus That he ought not now to be angrie because it would redound to Gods dishonour Tostat. 4. Further it is said that Moses intreated the face of God as the Hebrew phrase is whereby is signified the earnestnesse of Moses in his prayer Et magnamentis elevatio usque ad faciem Dei And the great elevation of his minde even unto Gods face and presence And in that it is said Elohai to his God whom he calleth also Iehovah Magna describitur fiducia orantis Hereby is shewed the great confidence of Moses in his prayer Cajetan 5. And whereas Moses regardeth not the personall promise made to him that the Lord would make a great nation of him therein he sheweth his great charitie and love to his people as Chrysostom well noteth Ne id audire sustinuit He endured not to heare any such thing Sed potius una cum his qui sibi crediti erant perire quà m sine illis salvus esse ad majorem dignitatem assumi praetulit But rather chose to perish together with those which were committed to his trust than without them to bee advanced to greater honour QUEST XXXIII How the Lord is said to be angrie WHy doth thy wrath wax hot God is not subject to wrath and anger and other humane passions as man is But he is said to be angrie when he taketh revenge of sinners 1. Vltio divina furor vel ira dicitur The divine revenge is called rage or anger Hierom. And this is spoken to our understanding and after the manner of men Quia homines non puniunt nisi irati Because men use not to punish but when they are angrie therefore God is said to be angrie when he punisheth because he so seemeth to be unto us Tostat. qu. 16. 2. Another reason why God is said to be angrie is in respect of us Quod nos qui delinquimus nisi irascentem audicrimus Dominum non timeamus Because we when we sinne unlesse wee heare that God is angrie will not feare and stand in awe of him 3. Againe God is said to be angrie for the more ample commendation and setting forth of his mercie Facillimus enim ad deponendam iram For he is most readie to lay aside his anger not like unto earthly Princes that being angrie will admit no reconciliation Cyril This therefore doth more set forth the mercie and clemencie of God that being as it were inflamed with anger is so soone turned unto mercie as in this place his anger is mitigated by the prayer of Moses QUEST XXXIV Of the reasons which Moses useth in his prayer AGainst thy people c. Moses useth divers forcible and effectuall reasons to perswade the Lord in this his earnest and zealous prayer 1. Non excusat peccatum c. He doth not excuse their sinne but acknowledgeth and confesseth it Ferus 2. His second reason is à peculâ—o haereditate from the peculiar inheritance of God he calleth them thy people Pelarg. Occurrit sermoni Domini piè corrigit c. He doth as it were correct the Lords speech in a pious and dutifull manner the Lord had called them Moses people but Moses returneth that speech unto the Lord and calleth them his people Lippom. Not therein contradicting the Lord but relying upon his promise 3. From the memorie of Gods benefits which thou hast brought out of the land of Egypt all which should have beene in vaine if the Lord would now destroy his people Pelarg. Iun. 4. From the inconvenience that would ensue that while he thought to take revenge upon his enemies saviret in se he should in a manner rage against himselfe the hurt would redound unto God his name would thereby bee blasphemed Oleaster So praetendit gloriam Dei hee pretendeth the glory of God which was like to bee obscured and hindered by this meanes for the Egyptians would take occasion hereby to blaspheme and to accuse the Lord of malice against his people and of weaknesse and impotencie Iunius Pelarg. This argument is most forcible and therefore our blessed Saviour teacheth us to pray Hallowed be thy name Ferus 5. Lastly he putteth God in minde of his promises made to Abraham Izaak and Iacob which promise the Lord bound with an oath and two things the Lord promised the multiplying of their seed and the inheritance of Canaan And so Moses saith in effect if thou change in these things Nemo tibi amplius credet No man will give credit unto thee hereafter Ferus QUEST XXXV Why the Egyptians were more like thus to object than any other nation Vers. 12. WHerefore shall the Egyptians speake c. 1. Other nations likewise might so object as the Amalekites Moabites Edomites Canaanites which were all enemies unto Israel and were afraid of them as Moses saith in his song of thanksgiving chap. 15.15 Then the Dukes of Edom shall be amazed and trembling shall come upon the great men of Moab all the inhabitants of Canaan shall wax faint-hearted and therefore they would have rejoyced likewise in the destruction of Israel 2. But instance is specially given of the Egyptians in this place and yet Numb 14.14 both the Egyptians and other the inhabitants of Canaan are brought in thus speaking for these causes 1. Because they had endured more for oppressing the Israelites than any other nation even those ten grievous plagues sent upon Egypt 2. They had lost more than any other people in a manner halfe their substance when they gave unto the Israelites at their departure jewels of gold and silver 3. They for Israels cause were overthrowne and drowned in the red sea
here said to come of the Casluhims 5. This Palestina then was first inhabited by the Cananites which were expelled by the Capthorims Deut. 2.23 and though afterward it was inhabited by the Philistims yet it was part of the land of Canaan and so of right belonged to the land of promise QVEST. XXII Of the progeny of the Cananites Vers. 15. ANd Canaan begat Zidon c. 1. He was the founder of Sidon a City in Phaeniciâ— called great Sidon Iosu. 19.28 because it was a famous City more ancient than Tirus which the Prophet nameth the daughter of Sidon Isay 23.12 Iustinus thinketh it was so called of the abundance of fish for in the Phaenician language a fisherman is called Said but it is more like that Sidon beareth the name of the founder to this day 2. Cheth or Heth from him came the Hethites that dwelt about Hebron as it may appeare by the cave which Abraham bought of them Genes 23.19 This was a warlike people and of them were there gyants men of great stature of whom the Syrians were afraid lest the King of Israel had hired them 2 King 7.6 3. Iebusi the founder of the City Jebus afterward called Jerusalem Iosua 18.28 from whence they could not be expelled till Davids time 2 Sam. 5. 4. Emori father of the Amortheans or Amorites which inhabited about Bashan and Gilead whose king was Og their country fell to the lot of Gad and Ruben and the halfe tribe of Manasses Num. 21. these Amorites were dispersed into divers parts of the land of Canaan and therefore the whole country beareth their name Genes 15.16 the wickednesse of the Amorites is not yet full their stature of body was great therefore compared to the Cedars Amos 2.9 But their wickednesse was greater as the Prophet to set forth the sinne of Israel saith their father was an Amorite c. Ezech. 16.3 5. Girghashi of whom came the Gergasenes Matt. 8. by the lake Tiberias where was the Towne of Ptolome called Gerasa of Iosephus Cesaera of Pliny Gelasa hence some thinke the lake Genesar had the name Mercer 6. Hivi of him came the Hivites these dwelt under mount Hermon Iosua 11.3 which is a part of mount Lebanon Iud. 3.3 toward the East belonging to Trachonitis Perer. some of the Hebrewes take the Hivites and Rephaim for all one and for that cause Genes 15.20 where the nations of the Cananites are rehearsed the Rephaim are named and the Hivites omitted 7. Arki who built the City Areas over against Tripolis under Lebanon Hierom. 8. Sivi of whom the desart of Sin tooke the name Perer. and the City Sin not farre from Lebanon Hierom. of him came the inhabiters of Capaâ—orsa Hierosal a towne in Idumea not farre from Jebus toward the south Ptolom 9. Arvadi of whom came the Aradians that inhabited the Island Aradus famous for their skill in sea-faring Ezech. 27. v. 8. 10. Zemari Hierom placeth the Semareans in Colo Syria with their city Edessa Hierosol taketh them for the Emisseni in Syria whom Pliny calleth Hemiseni But it is most like that he was the author of those that inhabited Zemaraim Iosua 18.22 of whom also the mountaine Zemaraim was so called 2 Chron. 13.4 11. Chamathi two Cities of this name Chamath we read of in the Scripture one in the land of Canaan which belonged unto the possession of Nephthaly Iosua 19.35 called Hamoth Dor one of the Cities of refuge Iosua 21.32 The other was a chiefe Citie of Damascus Ierem 49.23 Tou the King of this Hamath was in league with David 1 Chron. 18.9 This Chamath the sonne of Canaan was the father of the Inhabitants of this Country which Zeiglerus would have to be Ithurea Iosephus and Hierome and Hierosol thinke this Hamath to be Antiochia the chiefe City of Syria Iunius taketh it for the Province Camatha which extendeth from Lebanon to Arabia deserta the chiefe City whereof in time past was called Amathus QVEST. XXIII Of the Perizzites BUt whereas Genes 15.20 21. two other Nations are named which inhabited the promised land the Canaanites and Perizzites whereof no mention is made in this place The reason hereof may bee 1. either because those were of some of these kindreds the one called Canaanites as being the chiefe among them the other might be the Samareans as Pererius or some other so called because they inhabited the plaine Countrey in unwalled Townes for so the word is taken Esther 9.19 where the Jewes are called Perazim that is dwelling in Villages 2. Or which is most like as all these eleven sonnes of Canaan dwelled not in Canaan as the Arvadians and Camatheans so some forrainers of other kindreds might inhabite amongst them which came not of Canaan as the Kenites Kenizites Cadmonites whose Countrey is promised to Abraham Gen. 15.19 Such were the Philistims that came of the Capthorims which expelled the Anims Deut. 2.23 Iosua 13.3 There were also the Geshurites and Maachathites Iosu. 13.13 Such also might these Perizzites be 3. And beside these people of the Canaanites the ancient Inhabitants being expelled and removed might change their names Mercer QVEST. XXIV Of the borders and bounds of Canaan Vers. 9. THen the border of the Canaanites c. 1. Moses doth carefully limit the Countrey of Canaan because it was that land which the Lord had promised to the Israelites 2. The foure bounds of the Countrey of Canaan are Zidon in the North and Gaza on the South on the West side and on the East side the five Cities Sodoma with the rest Zoar is not named because it was but a small Towne and of no great account Gen. 19.20 in the North corner and Lasha in the South the same is Calirrhoe as Hierome thinketh where was a Bath of hot waters 3. This is the descrption of the whole land of Canaan which comprehended the seven Nations of the Canaanites expelled by the Hebrewes But that land of Canaan which is described by Iosua 13.3 was but one Countrey on the West toward the Sea a part of this great Country of Canaan which was the land of the Philistims QVEST. XXV Iapheth the eldest sonne C ham the youngest 2. THe brother of Iapheth the elder It is rather thus to bee read then the elder brother of Iapheth 1. Some thinke that Sem was the youngest sonne of Noah and C ham the next and Iapheth eldest as Lyranus Tostatus Genebrard But the contrary is evident Gen. 9.24 where Cham is called the younger sonne in respect of Sem and Iapheth 2. Neither was Sem the eldest as Augustine thinketh lib. 16. de Civit. Dei cap. 3. and Cajetanus Vatablus and some Hebrewes as Kimhi for Noah was five hundred yeare old when he beganne to beget his children Gen. 5.32 and when the floud came he was 600. yeare old Gen. 7.6 Now â—wo yeare after the floud Sem at an hundred yeare old begat Arphacsad Gen. 11.10 but then
Chaldea for Abraham was ready to have left his kindred if they had refused to goe with him And Terah is made the Author of this journey not as though they went forth without Gods calling but for that hee was willing to goe with Abraham whether for griefe of his sonnes death as Iosephus or for that though hee was somewhat superstitiously bent hee was desirous to goe out of that Idolatrous countrey therefore Terah Abrahams father being the head of the family is named as the chiefe QVEST. V. Of divers kinds of calling and renouncing the world THere are divers kinds of callings some are called immediately of God either by manifest revelation as Abraham or secret inspiration some are called by men as the Israelites by the Prophets some are called by affliction as Psal. 88.34 When hee slew them they sought and returned And three wayes doe men forsake the world 1. by actuall leaving and forsaking all they had as Abraham here and the Apostles under Christ. 2. by mortifying their affections as David was like a weaned childe Psal. 131.2 3. by sequestring their thoughts to the contemplation of heavenly things which S. Paul calleth the having of our conversation in heaven Phil. 3.20 QVEST. VI. Seven great blessings upon Abraham Vers. 2. I Will make of thee a great nation c. 1. God calling Abraham from his countrey leaveth him not destitute but promiseth a great recompence for his countrey hee is brought into a better land for a small kinred a great nation shall come out of him he is called from his fathers house but God will make him a father of many nations 2. The Lord bestoweth upon Abraham seven great blessings Pe-Perer ex Cajetan 1. I will make thee a great nation either because many and populous nations came of Abraham by Hagar and Ketura Gen. 25. or in respect of the people of Israel which was great not so much in number as renowne because of the Kings Prophets wise and vertuous men that came of them 2. I will blesse thee This blessing was able to make his barren wife Sara fruitfull Vatablus I will make thee rich prosperous Musculus Or I will blesse thee spiritually Rupertus 3. I will make thy name great 1. Abrahams name was reverenced even among the heathen as Iosephus sheweth lib. 1. antiquit 2. It was great in respect of the faithfull that are called the children of Abraham 3. Great because the Lord vouchsafeth to call himselfe the God of Abraham Isaak and Iacob 4. Great in respect of Christ that came of Abraham Matth. 1.1 Perer. 4. Thou shalt bee a blessing 1. It signifieth the certainty of this blessing whom man blesseth they are not alway blessed but he that God blesseth shall surely bee blessed 2. The excellency of this blessing he shall not only bee blessed but a blessing it selfe 3. And he should be a forme of blessing as they should say the God of Abraham Isaac c. blesse thee Calvin 5. I will blesse them that blesse thee c. Abrahams friends should bee blessed for his sake as Lot Gen. 14. Ismael 25. therefore Abimelech being a King did desire to make a league with Abraham because he saw God was with him 6. I will curse them c. So perished Pharao Og Sehon the Assyrians Chaldeans were punished for their enmity against the people of God Luther Therefore Balaam durst not curse the people of God because the Lord had not cursed them Numb 23. 7. All the families of the earth shall be blessed in thee 1. Not only because they shall take up a forme of blessing as the Hebrewes interpret the Lord blesse thee like Abraham for this forme among all the families of the earth was not used the Romanes in the coronation of their Emperours were wont to say â—is falicior Augusto melior Trajano be more happy than Augustus better than Trajane 2. Neither so onely because all Gentiles should be blessed for imitating the example of faithfull Abraham 3. Non tantum significat ipsum fore exempler sed causam benedictionis it signifieth he should not only be an example or patterne but a cause of blessing because in Christ the seed of Abraham as the Apostle expoundeth Galath 3.16 all the nations in the world were blessed Calvin QVEST. VII Of the computation of the 430. yeare mentioned by S. Paul Gal. 3.17 FRom this promise made to Abraham are we to account the 430. yeares which S. Paul saith were betweene the promise and the law Galath 3.17 1. Hereunto agreeth the computation of Moses that the Israelites dwelt in Aegypt foure hundred and thirty yeares Exod. 12.40 not in Aegypt onely but in Aegypt and Canaan as the Septuagint doe interpret that place for so long it was since Abraham first began to sojourne in Canaan at what time also by reason of the famine hee went into Aegypt so Iosephus maketh his computation to the building of Salomons temple from the departure of the Israelites out of Aegypt 592. yeares and from Abrahams comming into Canaan a thousand and twentie so that there shall be betweene Abrahams arrivall in Canaan and the deliverance of the Israelites out of Aegypt by this account foure hundred twenty eight 2. Genebrard then is greatly deceived that counteth six hundred yeares from Abrahams comming into Canaan to the Israelites going out of Aegypt for both Saint Paul is directly against him who as Genebrard would enforce hath no relation in that number to the time of the Israelites dwelling in Aegypt neither doth the computation of the yeares agree for from Abrahams comming to Canaan till Iacobs going into Aegypt are but yeers 215. which are gathered thus from the promise to the birth of Isaak 25. from thence to the birth of Iacob 60. from thence till hee went into Aegypt 130. and the time from thence till the Israelites going out though it cannot bee so certainely gathered is thought not to exceed two hundred and fifteene yeare more as shall bee shewed when wee come to that place of the fifteenth chapter 3. Though Saint Paul make mention of that promise which was made to Abraham and his seed which seemeth to bee that Gen. 22.18 yet by the account of the yeeres it must bee referred to this promise for the other renewed when Isaak should have beene offered up was fifty yeeres if Isaak were then 25. as Iosephus or if hee were 37. as some other Hebrewes thinke it was 62. yeeres after and so many yeeres should we want of foure hundred and thirty And then the same word seed is not here used yet there is the same sense for the Lord in saying in thee shall all the families of the earth bee blessed meaneth his seed 4. Further whereas Abraham is said to bee seventy five yeere old at his departure out of Charran and the promise was made before hee came out of Chaldea his time of abode could not bee long there not five yeares as Iunius supposeth but I
is interpreted to spoile conquer or overcome and so they say that God did here invert or overcome the order of nature in causing the barren to beare But Oukelos Hierome Pagnine Iunius doe better translate Omnipotent God then is called Shaddai that is omnipotent and all-sufficient for his omnipotencie includeth also all-sufficiencie QUEST III. Of the change of the name of Abram to Abraham Vers. 5. NEither shall thy name any more bee called Abram but Abraham 1. Hierome thinketh that the Hebrew letter he is borrowed from the name of God Iehovah added to Abrams name tradit in Genes 2. Ferus maketh this mysticall signification of it that God by giving Abraham a letter of his name doth thereby give even himselfe unto him as also thereby is signified that God should also bee borne of the seed of Abraham and this should bee in the fourth millenary or thousand yeare after the beginning of the world as this letter was added in the fourth place 3. Chrysostome thinketh that Abram signifieth one that passeth over because hee passed over the river mistaking the name Abram and Hebrew for the same whereas the first beginneth with aleph the other with am 4. Philo interpreteth Abram an high father Abraham the high father of the voice and so divideth Ham the syllable added from Hamah that signifieth to make a sound or noise thereby insinuating that Abram of an high father who was given to the contemplation of the starres and high things was now become a perfect wise man for hee is a wise man that is a master of words and guideth his tongue 5. But all these are mens conjectures the Lord himselfe sheweth the reason of this change because the Lord had made him Abh hamon a father of a multitude so that Ham the last syllable of Abrahams name is the first of the word Hamon that signifieth a multitude sic Eugubinus Munster Iun. and hereupon the Hebrewes well observe that God to those which he loved added a letter of his owne name Iehova as the letter He to Abrahams and Sarahs name the letter jod to the name of Iehosuah who was called Hoshea before 6. But yet it appeareth not why the letter Resh remaineth still in the name of Abraham 1. Ab. Ezra thinketh that it is borrowed from abir which signifieth strong and so Abraham betokeneth a strong or mighty father of a multitude 2. Rasi thinketh it is inserted to shew him to bee father of Aram his owne Countrey 3. Some of the Hebrewes thinke that Resh is not taken away though He be added because God doth not use to take from names but to put to them which observation is not true for the Lord taketh away one letter from the name of Sarai namely jod and putteth to He. 4. Mercerus thinketh that Resh is of rabh which signifieth much or great and so maketh this to be the sense of Abrahams name a father of a great multitude 5. But I preferre the common opinion that Resh remaineth of Abram and nothing is changed but onely He added and so Abraham signifieth an high father of a multitude Now whereas it is the opinion of the Hebrewes that it is a sinne and transgression of Gods commandement to call Abraham any more by the name of Abram it appeareth to be otherwise for Nehem 9.7 he is called Abram therefore where the Lord saith thy name shall be no more called Abram it is not so much a commandement as an honourable favour vouchsafed to Abraham in the change of his name Mercer QUEST IV. The reasons why circumcision was instituted Vers. 10. LEt every man childe among you be circumcised Of this institution of circumcision divers reasons are alleaged 1. Philo alleageth foure the fore-skinne was commanded to be cut off for the better preventing of the disease called the carbuncle that the whole body might be kept more pure or cleane and that no soile or filth should be hid under the fore-skinne that they might be more apt to generation that the part circumcised might better expresse the similitude of the heart 2. Moses Aegyptius saith that circumcision helpeth to bridle and restraine inordinate lust and concupiscence of the flesh but the contrary appeareth for no Nation is more given over to carnall lust than the Egyptians Saracens Turks that are circumcised 3. Some thinke circumcision in that part was prescribed for the greater detestation of the superstition of the Egyptians and other Nations that did adore that part and make an Idoll of it under the name of Priapus and did carry it about in open shew in their wicked Idolatrous solemnities But there are better reasons for the institution of circumcision and more fruitfull signification The use then of circumcision is partly politicall partly morall partly theologicall The pollice consisted herein that circumcision at the first was a note of difference and distinction betweene the holy people and all other Nations though afterward other Nations as the Idumeans Arabians Aegyptians tooke up the same rite to be circumcised Thus David called in disdaine Goliah the uncircumcised Philistim as hereby discerned from the people of God 1 Sam. 17.36 Beside by circumcision they were admonished to separate themselves from all other Nations neither to joyne with them in marriage nor to learne their manners Thus the sons of Iacob said to the Sichemites we cannot give our sister to an uncircumcised man Gen. 34.14 For this cause Theodoret noteth that circumcision was neglected all the time of the sojourning of the Israelites in the desart because there was then no feare of conversing with other Nations in those solitary places The morall use of circumcision was to teach the inward mortifying and circumcising of the heart as Irenaeus well observeth out of Deuteronomie chap. 10. vers 16. Circumcise the foreskinne of your heart Ambrose noteth another morall point Vt puderet unumquemque provictioris aeta is labors vel dolorâ— cedere quorum utrumque tenera infantia vicisset that men of yeares should be ashamed to give place to labour or griefe which they overcame in their infancie The Theologicall use of circumcision was partly commemorative of the covenant which God made with Abraham and his seed which served as a sure bond to keepe them in obedience to walke uprightly before God Gen. 17.10 Partly demonstrative in expressing by the part circumcised the instrument of generation that originall contagion which is derived by naturall propagation And so Augustine and Bede doe understand those words vers 14. the uncircumcised man childe shall be cut off because he hath broken my covenant Illud significatur pactum quod cum primo homine iniit Deus that covenant is meant which was made with the first man which transgression even Infants by their originall corruption are guilty of Partly it is figurative both typicall in shadowing forth faith in Christ for remission of sinnes and therefore is called by the Apostle The seale of the righteousnesse of
a fresh out of the old roots or as Tostatus the earth might bring forth wilde Vines of it owne accord which by Noahs husbandry are made fertile some of the Hebrewes thinke he might keepe them in the Arke 3. And mention is made rather of Noahs planting of Vines than sowing of Corne wherein he no doubt was occupied also not because the invention of things necessary he would leave unto God and of things for pleasure unto man as Ambrose supposeth for there is no doubt but that Wheat was in use before the floud but for that it ministreth occasion to the story following 4. Neither hath it any ground that there was no use of the Vine before the floud when as they were given to such sensuality and pleasure but that Noah brought the grape to more perfection and therefore it is said he planted a Vineyard not Vines to make drinke thereof which might be otherwise used before and herein Berosus conceit is not much to be misliked that Noah was called Ianus because of the invention of Wine which in Hebrew is called Iaiiâ—â— QVEST. XV. Of Noahs drunkennesse Vers. 21. HE was drunken and uncovered c. 1. Though Noahs drunkennesse may have some excuse as in that being an old man and unaccustomed to this kinde of drinke and being ignorant of the force and nature thereof he was the sooner overcome yet it can have no just defence 2. For Noah was so oppressed and intoxicate that he forgat himselfe as a man for the time not regarding comelinesse for he lay uncovered not as Aben Ezra thinketh by Canaans meanes but by his owne negligence and oversight and that in the middest of the tent as it were in the floore and pavement some Hebrewes say that it was in his wives tent to whom he went in some thinke againe that his wife was not living because she would have covered his nakednesse but these things are uncertaine ex Mercer 3. Wherefore the simplicity of the divine story appeareth that concealeth not the infirmities of the most perfect men that by such examples we should rather take heed for if the strong may be thus overtaken how much more circumspect ought the weaker sort to be QVEST. XVI Of Noahs nakednesse ANd was uncovered 1. Adam and Eve were naked and uncovered in Paradise and were not ashamed because as yet they felt not the rebellion of the members a just recompence of mans rebellion and disobedience to his Creator 2. But now man is ashamed of those parts rather than any other because whereas other parts even in the heat of mans affections a voluntate moventur are not moved without the will of man but as Augustine saith Gentalia libâ—do juri suo mancipavit potestati voluntaris â—ripâ—it lust hath subdued those members to it selfe and taken them from the power of the will 3. Hereof it is that even the barbarous nations that onely have nature to guide them doe yet cover and hide their secret parts It was therefore so much the greater shame for Noah so reverend a Patriarke so undecently to lie uncovered QVEST. XVII Of Chams sonne Vers. 22. ANd when C ham the father of Canaan saw c. 1. Theodoret noteth out of the opinion of a certaine Hebrew that Canaan first saw Noah thus lying uncovered and therefore he is named with his father and told his father who chideth not his sonne for it but desireth to see the same â—ight also This might be one step of Chams prophanenesse 2. To let passe either the opinion of some Hebrewes as Rabbi Levi reporteth that Cham did cut off his fathers privie parts as the Poets feigne of Saturne or that of Berosus that C ham being given to Magicke who in stories is called Zoroaster did impudently handle his fathers privities and enchanted them that he was ever after unapt for generation we need not devise any such matters to exaggerate Chams disobedience it was great enough as it is here described 3. These then were the degrees of Chams sinne 1. that he doth not ignorantly or by chance but wittingly gâ—ze upon his fathers secrets 2. He doth it to his father to one by whom he was not onely begotten but for his sake preserved in the Arke and being the youngest sonne and so much the more beloved of his father his disobedience was so much the greater as Absaloms rebellion was against David Muscul. 3. Himselfe not a childe but now above an hundred yeare old Calvin 4. Neither is he content thus to disport himselfe but he telleth his brethren thinking to corrupt them also to deride their father 5. He rejoyceth in his fathers fall and as Ambrose saith improbâ— laetatur affectu he wickedly pleaseth himselfe as the ungodly doe rejoyce at the fall of the godly Like as Vultures ad â—als olentia feruntur as Basil saith doe passe over sweet meadowes and pleasant places and light upon carrions so the wicked delight in the beholding of things that are evill and uncomely 6. Berosus writeth of Cham that he was after this given over to all lewdnesse corrupting mankinde with his evill manners and taught them by his owne example approving the same that it was lawfull as the wicked use was before the floud to lye with their mothers sisters daughters with the male and bruit beasts and therefore was cast out from his father and dwelt in Egypt where he was made a God under the name of Saturne and they built him a Citie called Chemmin that is the Citie of Cham the Inhabitants whereof were called Chemâ—nitae â—erer QVEST. XVIII How Noah know Chams sonne Vers. 24. KNew what his younger sonne c. 1. He neither needed any revelation to know this thing as Elizeus discried Gehezi his corrupt dealing neither is it like that Sem and Iapheth did voluntarily declare their brothers fault to their father for feare of grieving him But it is most like that Noah espying his sonnes garment upon him did question with his sonnes and so learned the truth Muscul. Mercer 2. This younger sonne was not Chanaan as Theodoret thinketh nor is hee called the younger not in yeares but in manners as Ambrose neither as Chrysostome that he was indeed elder than Iapheth but lost his eldership because of his sinne as Ruben did neither is hee called the younger onely comparatively in regard of Sem as Perer. neither is it like that Sem was the youngest as some Hebrewes conjecture but preferred before the rest because of his holinesse and great prerogatives as of whom descended the Patriarkes Kings and Prophets but Cham was indeed the youngest of the three as shall bee further shewed in the explanation of the 10. chap. v. 21. QVEST. XIX Why Canaan is accursed by name rather than Cham. Vers. CVrsed be Canaan c. 1. It is not like that Canaan was yet unborne as Origen Ambrose think when this curse was pronounced 2. Neither that hee was the eldest sonne of Cham
for the better if our sinnes let not and I hope to use the saying of Moses that their eyes shall looke till they fall out of their heads Deuter 28.32 before that shall befall us which they have so long desired True it is that this land aboundeth with many sins which God grant may be purged from among us but we trust that God will chastise us as a loving father with his owne hands and not give us over to bee punished of a nation more wicked than our selves though we are great offenders yet not as the Amorites an uncircumcised nation but as the Israelites the Lords owne people It is therefore great presumption in this popish writer to sit in Gods place to make them Amorites that are no Amorites and to threaten judgement where the Lord purposeth to blesse Ambrose upon those words in the Psalme 119.106 I have sworne and will performe thus writeth Noli usurpare exemplum sacramenti qui implendi sacramenti non habes potestatem c. let this example bee no warrant unto thee to take an oath unlesse you had power to keepe an oath so this prophecy against the Amorites can be no ground to the Frier of such false application unlesse he were appointed to be Gods Minister for the execution CHAP. XVI 1. The Method and parts THis Chapter hath two parts the giving of Hagar by Sarai to Abraham from v. 1. to 5. the sequele thereof from thence to the end In the first part 1. There is the cause that moved Sarai to give Hagar on her part because she had no children v. 1. on Hagars part shee hoped to have a childe by her v. 2. 2. The manner is expressed how Hagar was given and when v. 3. 3. The effects and fruits Hagar is conceived with childe v. 4. Secondly the sequele of this marriage is first the departure and flying away of Hagar v. 5. to 7. then her returne with the occasion thereof Hagar flyeth because Sarai corrected her this she did by Abrahams leave Abraham gave leave because Sarai complained because Hagar despised her v. 4 5. In Hagars returne 1. the Angell biddeth her goe and humble her selfe to her mistresse v. 8 9. 2. the Angell prophesieth of the number of her seed v. 10. of the name of her sonne v. 11. his quality and condition v. 12. 3. Agars thankfulnesse and obedience is expressed ver 13 14. 4. the accomplishment of the prophecie concerning the birth and name of her sonne 2. The difference of translations v. 3. she tooke Agar the Egyptian H. then Sarai Abrahams wife tooke Hagar caet v. 5. thou doest me wrong H.S.B.G. I have judgement against you C. the injury done to me be upon you Tr. mine injury is upon thee P. heb It is more like that Sarai maketh Abraham the cause of her wrong because he corrected no Hagars male pertnesse than that she wished evill unto him v. 7. which is in the way toward Sur in the wildernesse H. which is in the way Agara C. which is in the way to Sur. caet the Sept. have not this clause v. 11. The Lord hath received thy prayer C. marked thine affliction T.P. heard thy tribulation caet 12. His hand against every man and every mans hand against him caet but the Chalde hath he shall stand in need of all men and all men of him 13. I have seene the things behind him that seeth me H.P. I have seene him face to face that seeth mee S. I have looked after him that seeth me B.G. I doe see after him that seeth me Tr. that is I have seene God and live 14. Betweene Recam and Agara C. Cades and Bered 3. The explanation of doubts QVEST. I. Whether Sarai gave Agar to Abraham by Gods instinct Vers. 2. I Pray thee goe in unto my maid c. 1. It is most like that this Agar as Philo noteth though by nation an Egyptian yet in religion was of Abrahams faith for he would not be unequally yoked with one of a divers faith 2. It is also probable that seeing Abraham did goe in unto her only for procreation that after she conceived hee did no more company with her as Philo also observeth lib. de Abraham 3. But it is unlike that Sarai gave this counsell to Abraham to take her maid by Gods instinct as Iosephus thinketh for God would not goe against his owne ordinance they two shall bee one flesh Gen. 2.4 Neither did Sarai this so much for desire of procreation and to try as Chrysostome conjectureth whether the cause of sterility were in her or her husband but chiefly in regard of the blessing which was promised to Abrahams seed in which respect her fault is somewhat excused yet it cannot be defended because she faileth in the meanes 5. Neither is it like that this Hagar was Pharao his daughter as some of the Hebrewes but some of the maids rather of Pharao his house that were given to Sarai Gen. 12.16 QVEST. II. Why ten yeares of Abrahams dwelling are mentioned 3. THen Sarai tooke Hagar c. after Abraham had dwelled ten yeares c. 1. Plutarke hath the like story of Stratonica that being barren gave unto Dejotarus her husband Electra by whom he had children thus the heathen were readie to imitate the infirmities of holy men and women but not to follow their vertues 2. Mention is here made of tenne yeares not because this time is set as the Hebrewes imagine for the triall whether the wife is like to be barren or fruitfull for Rebecca was twentie yeares barren neither as Cajetan to shew that Sarai was past hope of children who was now 75. yeare old tenne yeare younger than Abraham but rather as Chrysostome noteth both to shew Abrahams constant and chaste love toward his wife that notwithstanding this experience of her barrennesse did content himselfe with her and his faith toward God that staying thus long after the promise yet despaired not of the performance thereof Perer. QVEST. III. Of Hagars sinnes Saraies faults and Abrahams infirmity Vers. 6. SArai dealt roughly 1. In Hagar divers faults are discovered first her unthankfulnesse and contempt toward her mistresse that had so much honoured her secondly her obstinacy in refusing to be corrected but flying away then her froward mind in taking the way by Sur into Aegypt thinking never to returne Oecolamp and so to play the Apostata from her faith which she learned in Abrahams house 2. Sarai also diversly sheweth her infirmity first her patience in being so much moved at the insolency of her maid then her rashnesse in charging Abraham without cause and wishing God to bee judge against her selfe Musculus thirdly her too great sharpnesse and severity against Hagar as Ambrose noteth which was constrained to escape her hands by flying away immoderatius permissa ultione utitur c. Sarai in her anger doth intemperatâ—ly use the power committed to her lib. 1. de Abraâ— c. 4. so also
must be expounded by that prophecie Gen. 16.12 v. 20. of Mesopotamia H.S.C.B. Padan Aram. T.G.P. v. 22. why have I conceived H. C. why am I thus cat they leaped within her S. strove together or beat one upon another cater ratzatz to beat hurt or bruise v. 23. the elder shall serve the younger B. G. the greater shall serve the lesse cater v. 25. as a rough skinne S. H. as a hairie or rough garment cat adâ—reth a garment v. 26. held his brother by the heele H. Esaâ— by the heele cater v. 27. an husband man H. a man going into the field C. a field man or wilde man cat v. 27. Iacob a plaine man without deceit S.H.G. a perfect man cat minister of the doctrine of the house C dwelt at home S. dwelt in tents cat v. 31. sell me thy birth-right H. sell me thy birth-right even now or to day câ—t v. 34. pottage of Rice B. of Lentils cater guadash a Lentill a red kinde of pulse 3. The explanation of doubtfull questions QUEST I. Why Abraham tooke a wife in his old age Vers. 1. ABraham tooke another wife 1. Not giving way unto his lust or of any incontinency as some of the Hebrewes as Baal haturim saith it is a griefe to see a man eat if he eat not with him 2. Neither was this done for any such mystery as Origen supposeth to signifie the spirituall marriage of the minde with wisdome which is most ripe in old age hom 11. in Genes 3. And yet this use may be made of Abrahams second marriage to convince such heretikes as condemne second marriage Augustin lib. 16. de civit Dei c. 34. as also whereas the sonnes of Abraham by Hagar and Keturah were the greatest adversaries to the Isrâ—elites as the Ismaelites the Madianites so they which beare the name of the Church as papists and other heretikes are the greatest enemies to the Church of God 4. But the speciall cause why Abraham married in his old age was to shew the efficacie of Gods blessing in increasing him with a large posterity as the Lord said unto him I have made thee a father of many nations Genes 17.5 Mercerâ— as also to have a comfort in his olde age now living a part from Isaack and having committed over to him the affaires of the houshold Cajetan QUEST II. How Abrahams body being said to be dead at one hundred yeares yet was able for procreation at one hundred forty yeares BUt whereas Saint Paul saith that Abrahams body was even now dead being almost 100. yeares old Rom. 4.19 how was it not now more dead being 40. yeares elder for Isaack was now 40. yeares old when he married Rebeccah Gen. 25.20 who was borne in Abrahams 100. yeare To this some answer that Abrahams body was said to be dead only in respect of barren Sarah Mercer But that seemeth not to be so because the Apostle maketh mention together both of the deadnesse of Abrahams body and Sarahs wombe wherefore I preferre rather Augustines opinion that Abrahams body though dead in it selfe was revived by the power of God not onely for the generation of Isaack but this strength of nature continued a long time after for further procreation Calvin QUEST III. Whether Keturah were Hagar CAlled Keturah some affirme that this was Hagar upon these grounds 1. Because the Madianites which came of Keturah are called Agarenes Psal. 83.6 the Ismaelites Moab and Agarenes 1. Chron. 5.19 They made warre with the Hagarenes with â—ethur Naphish and Nadab which were the sonnes of Ismael Hieron tradit Hebraic in Gen. 25. Answer These places prove not the Mâ—dianites or any other of Keturah to be called Agarenes but that the name Agarenes was common to all that came of Ismael whereof some were called Ismaelites some Itureans some Nabeans c. Iunius in 1 Chron. 5.19 2. Keturah signifieth incense whereby is signified that Hagar all this while living continently was consecrated to God as incense and therefore Abraham Sarah being dead sent for her Lyranus Answer Concerning the signification of this name it skilleth not but that Hagars name was not changed it may appeare for that vers 12. she is called by the name of Hagar still 3. But it was most fit and beseeming seeing Hagar had beene Abrahams lawfull wife and yet living that he should rather take her than any other Thomas Anglic. Answer Shee was not Abrahams lawfull wife but his concubine and seeing she was a bond-woman there was no reason that she should succeed in a free womans place and rather because of that mystery which the Apostle noteth which maketh Sarah and Agar figures of two mothers one of the carnall sort the other of the fafthfull and spiritual seed 4. Therefore Ismael and Isaack are said to have buried Abraham as being returned to fraternall society Thom. Anglic. Answer No such thing can be gathered hereby that Hagar and Ismael were restored to Abrahams house but the reason why Ismael only is ioyned with Isaack in performing this last duty is this because the other sonnes were sent farre away in Abrahams life time into the East country But Ismael being neare dwelling for Isaack at this time had his habitation about Hagars fountaine which she named Beer-la-hai-roi vers 11. would not be wanting in this office toward his father Wherefore the true opinion is that this Keturah was some other woman and not Hagar 1. The words of the text give it that Abraham proceeded or added this and tooke him a wife c. but if she had beene his wife before then Abraham had not added or proceeded to doe as it were a new worke Cajeâ—an 2. Agar is called by her owne name in this chapter verse 12. therefore she was not Keturah 3. Hagar could not be lesse now then 80. yeares old Abraham being 85. when hee tooke Hagar and now 140. some 55. yeares before and Hagar being supposed then to be 25. at which yeares it is not like she could bring Abraham so many sonnes seeing it was a great miracle for Sarah to beare at 90. Tostatius 4. Abraham is said to have concubines therefore more than one concubine namely Hagar and Keturah is directly said to be Abrahams concubine 1. Chron. 1.32 Mercer QUEST IV. Keturah not married in Sarahs lifetime ABraham had taken him another wife c. 1. Abraham did not take this wife while Sarah lived as some thinke Calvin Genevens in hunc locum for Moses setteth downe the story in order and seeing he tooke not Hagar but at Sarahs instance and because he had no sonne it is not like that having two sonnes he would grieve Sarah with assuming another wife and where it is objected that Abraham should have staied a widower 3. yeares if he married not Keturah till now this need not seeme strange that he deferreth his second marriage both because he would first provide a wife for Isaack and for that he mourned no lesse time for his wife than
verse Vers. 10. THe scepter shall not depart 1. The word is shebet which is sometime taken for a tribe Psal. 78.68 and so Iunius readeth here it signifieth also a scepter Hierom Mercer Pagnin agreeable whereunto the Septuagint and Chalde read the Prince shall not faile c. and the next word giveth it because it belongeth to the Prince to make lawes 2. The word mechochech doth not here properly signifie a Captaine as H.S. translate nor a Scribe C. but a Law-giver as it is taken Psal. 60.7 Iudah is my Law-giver Iun. Mercer 3. From betweene his feet not because Kings or Judges use to have Scribes sitting at their feet as the phrase is taken Deut. 33.3 Vaâ—ablus Calvin but the meaning is that Iudah should alwaies have a Law-giver borne of his posterity so is the phrase used Deut. 28.50 and brought up as upon his knees Gen. 50.23 Iun. The Latine and Greeke Translator keeping the same sense read a Captaine out of his thigh the Chalde from among his sonnes which in effect is the same Mercer 4. Shiloh some derive of shalah which is to be peaceable Mercer Some of shalach to send reading cheth for he Hierome Some read shiloh making it two words which signifieth which to him supplying are due or laid up which is the meaning of the Septuagint Oleaster But it is most like to come of shil which is a son and he is put for van shiloh then is his son and it seemeth to be derived of shiliah which signifieth the burthen or after-birth and is taken for the childe contained therein Deut. 28.57 but is more specially understood of Christ who proceeded from the womb of a virgin 5. The people shall be obedient unto him rather than shall be gathered or he shall be the expectation of the Gentiles as Hierome as is shewed before in the divers readings and therefore we need not busie our selves with Pererius to search how Christ should be said to be the expectation of the Gentiles either with Augustine to understand it of the expectation of his second comming or that the Gentiles stood in need of Christ and therefore ought to expect him or to understand it of the converted Gentiles that looked for Christ Perer. for the true reading of these words will ease us of this labour though I deny not but that Christ was also the expectation of the Gentiles as he is called the desire of the nations Hagg. 2.8 so called of the effect that considering the great salvation which Christ brought to the Gentiles he ought to be desired of all and was desired after the light began to appeare unto them QUEST XII Against the Iewes who deny the prophecie of the comming of the Messiah to be fulfilled Vers. 10. THe scepter shall not depart 1. The Hebrewes doe but câ—vill that by shebeth which signifieth a scepter or rod doe understand affliction for neither is it true that affliction departed not from Iudah till Messiah came and the next words nor a Law-giver from betweene his feet doe shew that it is here taken for a scepter rather than a rod or scourge and Iacob prophesieth all happie and prosperous things to Iudah 2. Neither is this the sense that after Messiah is come who should restore the kingdome of Iudah the scepter should never depart for beside that Iacob speaketh not of the spirituall but temporall regiment of Iudah the words will not beare that sense which are guad che untill not after Messiah is come 3. Rab. Salomons conceit is without shew of reason who holdeth that the scepter is not yet departed from Iudah and therefore concludeth that the Messiah is not yet come for it is notoriously evident to all the world that the Jewes have no common-wealth at this day or regiment but are tributaries and subjects to other Kings as to the Persian the great Turke and others 4. Some Hebrewes take Shiloh for the proper name of that Citie where the Arke of God continued a long time as though the meaning should be this that Iudah should not lose his dominion till a King came that should be annoynted in Shiloh which they tooke to be Saul Contra. 1. Saul was not elected King in Shiloh but in Mizpeh 1 Sam. 10.17 Shiloh was then forsaken and became desolate the comming of Shiloh is then improperly taken for the desolation and ruine thereof 3. After this Iudah began to have thescepter in David and therefore it is an impudent and shamelesse glosse to make the regiment of Iudah then to have an end when it tooke beginning 5. And it is absurd to make this Shiloh Nabuchadnezzer who should be the man sent of God to punish Israel and by whom the scepter was taken from Iudah which is the opinion of some Hebrews for after the captivitie Zerubbabel the sonne of Selathiel was the Prince of Iudah and a Captaine and lawgiver to the people Ezra 2.2 Hagg. 1.1 6. Some say that this promise for the continuance of the regall authoritie in Iudah untill the Messiah came was only conditional if their sinnes did not deserve otherwise Contra. 1. No such condition in Scripture is expressed not here inserted by Iacob 2. It is to be observed that the promises concerning the Messiah are absolute and not conditionall as that he should come of the seed of Abraham and of the root or stock of David and that he should be born of a virgin and that in Bethlehem as these prophecies had no condition annexed no more hath this ex Perer. QUEST XIII How this prophecie of Iudah was accomplished WHerefore the Jews doe but cavill and in vaine seeke to obscure this prophecie of Iacob concerning the Messiah But a greater question ariseth among our selves how and when this prophecie tooke place for seeing the Israelites had foure kinde of governments 1. They were governed by Captaines Moses and Iosua 2. By Judges 3. By Kings till the captivitie 4. By the high priests that were as Kings untill Herod in all these changes unlesse onely under the Kings the government was least of all exercised by the tribe of Iudah for Moses was of Levi Iosuah of Ephraim two onely of the Judges Othâ—niel and Ibzah were of Iudah and from the returne out of the Captivitie the high Priests were the chiefe commanders and many of them crowned Kings how then can it be justified that the scepter did not depart from Iudah till the Messiah came 1. Some thinke that the scepter and kingdome is not strictly tyed unto Iudah but onely a principalitie in respect of other tribes which might be though other tribes had the regall authoritie Euseb. lib. 8. de prapar Contra. 1. But Iacob directly saith the scepter shall not depart from Iudah the S. and C. reade the prince shall not faile from Iudah 2. How could Iudah have the principalitie when another tribe had the imperiall authoritie there is no question but that after the Captivitie the tribe of Levi having the crowne had also
the Physitians c. 1. At the first it seemeth that Physitians were not much regarded seeing the servants were Physitians so also it was among the Romans but afterwards they grew in credit and were much honoured Plini libr. 29. initi 2. It seemeth also that some among the Egyptians were especially deputed for this service to embawme the dead Diodâ—r writeth that they used to come to the house of the dead to know in what manner they would have the buriall solemnized for there were three degrees of buriall some after a costly manner some in a meane some poorely had their funerals kept and of these embawmers some did only cut the body and take out the excrements who were hated of all some did embawme them with spices and these were greatly honoured Diodor. lib. 2. cap. 5. 3. Divers countries had divers fashions of buriall The Hircani devoure dead bodies with dogs the Iberi expose them to the vultures the Nasamones bury them in the Sea the Garamantes in the sand the Celtae drinke in dead mens bones the Scythians hang them up upon poles to waste and consume the Indians hang them up in their houses the Romans from the dayes of Scylla untill the time of the Emperours Antonini used to burne them the Egyptians to embawme them 4. The Persians burne not the dead because they hold fire to be a God and therefore not fit to feed of dead carkasses the Egyptians burne not because they hold fire to have life and to devoure and when it hath devoured it dieth it selfe Perer. ex Herod lib. 2. QUEST II. Of the time and continuance of the Egyptians mourning Vers. 3. SO 40. dayes were accomplished 1. These 40. dayes of embawming are part of the 70. dayes of mourning that is they embawmed him 40. dayes and mourned 30. dayes more Mercer not as Diodorus that they embawmed 30. dayes or as Herodot that after the embawming they salted the corps 70. dayes or as Comestor the Egyptians did mourne forty dayes the Hebrewes thirty for the Egyptians are said to have mourned seventy dayes 2. Before the times of the Gospell when the hope of the resurrection was not so common the Hebrewes used more ceremonies in buriall and the Egyptians and other nations that had not that hope more than they so that this use and custome of the Hebrewes borrowed of the Egyptians which they retained in burials of great persons as Asa was laid into a bed of spices 2 Chron. 12. 3. Ioseph did not observe this custome of embawming for feare to offend the Egyptians but partly to honour his father with this solemnity without superstition and partly of necessity because they were to carry the corps a long journey Mercerus 4. The Egyptians are said to have mourned because it was no wonder that he was bewailed of his owne children and family neither doe they mourne because by Iacobs comming into Egypt they escaped two yeeres of famine as the Hebrewes imagine for there were seven yeeres of famine compleat but they mourned to shew their love unto Iacob and their reverence to Ioseph 5. Here the Egyptians mourne seventy dayes the Israelites for Moses mourned thirty dayes following the Egyptian use Numa Pompilius alloweth mourning of some ten moneths the mourning for Constantine the great at Nicomedia continued twenty dayes the custome was divers for the time but the usuall stint was seven dayes Ecclesiast 22.13 so long mourned Ioseph for his father Iacob v. 10. so many dayes did the Romans bewaile the Emperour Severus Herodian lib. 4. Iun. QUEST III. Why Ioseph moved Pharaoh by others not by himselfe Vers. 4. IOseph spake to the house of Pharaoh 1. Ioseph used other intercessors to Pharaoh because he had need of a great company to goe with them which could not be done without Pharaohs leave Muscul. 2. Ioseph also mourned and therefore was not fit to present himselfe before the King for such used not to come in the Princes presence Esther 4.2 Iun. 3. Beside it was least suspicious for this matter to be moved by others lest if Ioseph had spoken himselfe hee might have beene thought to have despised the land of Egypt and therefore he maketh mention of his fathers purpose before for his buriall and the oath wherewith he bound him Calvin 4. Pharaoh also might have thought that Ioseph had intended to leave Egypt and therefore promiseth to returne againe Mercer 5. Beside seeing the Egyptians moved for him it was better accepted because he had the consent of the whole court Mercer 6. The Hebrewes thinke that Ioseph did in policie set others a worke to decline the suit of the countries who would have beene instant with Ioseph to bury his father in Egypt QUEST IV. Why Iacob is said to have digged or made a grave for himselfe Vers. 5. BVry me in my grave which I have made or digged for me 1. This is not understood of the purchase of the place of sepulture made by Iacob as the word carah to dig sometime signifieth as Deut. 2.6 Thou shalt dig that is buy water for money for Iacob did not buy this double cave but Abraham 2. And Iacob cannot be said to buy it because Abraham bought it as Lyranus for Abraham every where is said to have bought it and not Iacob Gen. 49.30.50.13 3. That also is but a fable of the Hebrewes that Iacob is said to have digged or gotten it because he bought out Esaus right with a summe of gold 4. And it signifieth more than that Iacob appointed himselfe a certaine place of buriall there Perer. 5. Therefore it is most like that in deed Iacob did cause a place of sepulture to be digged and made ready for himselfe against he died though this be not else where mentioned August qu. 170. in Genes and so was it the use for men in their life time to make their sepulchers as Asa did 2 Chron. 16.14 and Ioseph of Arimathea Matth. 27.60 Iun. QUEST V. Why Christ refused to give leave to his disciple to bury his father yet Pharaoh granteth it to Ioseph Vers. 6. ANd Pharaoh said Goe up and bury thy father It need not seeme strange that Pharaoh an heathen King giveth leave to Ioseph to bury his father and yet our Saviour would not grant so much to one of his disciples for the case was not alike 1. This disciple was called to preach the Gospell and he could not attend that businesse unlesse he neglected his calling 2. His meaning was not presently to goe bury his father and come strait againe but to stay with him till he died 3. Beside his father was none of the faithfull or beleevers but he was of their number that were spiritually dead and therefore it had beene dangerous for the disciple to converse with such 4. Neither was he bound by an oath to performe that duty as Ioseph was here Muscul. QUEST VI. Why they left their children and cattell behind Vers. 8. ONly their children and their sheepe
choice of this out of Moses not onely as Hierome writeth because the Sadduces received no other parts of the old Testament but the five bookes of Moses but seeing the Sadduces out of Moses had made the objection against the resurrection it was fittest also out of Moses to confute them Perer. QUEST XIV How God is said here to descend Vers. 8. THerefore I am come downe to deliver them 1. As before their crie is said to ascend unto God chap. 2.13 so God here descendeth unto them as being moved unto pity by their grievious crie and complaint Borrh. 2. Yet God properly neither ascendeth nor descendeth but this is spoken according to our sense then God is said to descend out of heaven the seate of his glory when he sheweth some visible signe of his presence as here in the firy bush Piscator 3. God is said to descend sometime to take revenge and to shew his judgements as he is said to descend unto Sodome Gen. 18. sometime to shew mercy as here to deliver his people Simler 4. Here also some relation is had unto the situation of Egypt which was a low countrie and therefore the Lord here is said to cause them to ascend hence Borrh. 5. And alwayes this is to bee marked that when God is said to descend some notable event followeth when God is said to descend to see the sinnes of Sodome then that horrible overthrow of the City followed and when he came downe to hinder the building of the tower of Babel the strange confusion of languages was sent upon them so upon Gods descending here followeth the miraculous deliverance of Israel and Gods just vengeance upon Egypt Ferus QUEST XV. In what respect the land of Canaan is called a large country Hierome INto a good land and a large 1. Palestina in it selfe was no large country Hierome saith that in length from Dan to Bershebah it was not above 160. miles and in bredth from Joppe to Bethlehem not above 46. miles Hecateus Abderita as Iosephus writeth describeth Judea to conteine about thirty hundred thousand jugera that is akers of fertile ground both in length and breadth and in the whole content And the furlong or aker is so much ground as a yoke of oxen can plow in one day which is in length 240. foote and 120. foote broad that is fourescore yards long and forty broad counting 3. ordinarie foote to a yard It seemeth then that of it selfe it was no large countrie not altogether so big as the Kingdome of Naples in Italy It is therefore called a spatious and large countrie in comparison of the land of Goshen in Egypt where the Israelites were pent up and seeing seven nations more populous than the Hebrewes inhabited the land of Canaan it was abundantly sufficient for them neither when the people were most increased did they complaine of want of roome Perer. QUEST XVI Of the great fruitfulnesse of the land of Canaan A Land that floweth with milke and honie 1. These fruits are named for the rest by the figure called synecdoche where a part is taken for the whole the meaning is that the land abounded with the best fruits Iun. And these fruits are named which need least labour and travell of the rest Simler 2. And concerning the wonderfull fertility of this land the scripture giveth plentifull testimonie for first the spies that were sent to search the land found it to be very fruitfull as they shewed by the fruit thereof A land flowing with milke and hony Numb 13.28 which is an hyperbolicall speech that is it abounded Againe the land of Canaan is commended Deut. 8.8 for these foure commodities for wheat and barly for fruitful trees for springes of water and for mettals further considering the great number of inhabitants as in Davids time there were numbred 15. hundred thousand fighting men 1. Chro. 21. which is commonly esteemed but at the fourth part of the inhabitants for women and aged men and children all under twenty yeeres are excepted this countrie being of no greater circuite was of exceeding great fertility that was able to nourish so many hundred thousand 3. Hereunto also forren nations beare witnesse Hecateus before spoken of who lived in the time of Alexander the Great saith there were in Judea thirtie hundred thousand akers of most fruitfull land Aristeas in the time of Ptolomy Philodelphus King of Egypt giveth this testimony of this land that it abounded with Olive trees Vines and Palmetreeâ— with all kinde of spicerie gold and precious stones brought in by the Arabians with most fruitfull and pleasant fountaines and rivers and especially hee giveth commendation of Jordan the plaine medowes whereof contained 60. thousand akers of ground and that it did use to overflow the ground as Nilus and beside that unto the great City meaning Jerusalem sometime the people flocked out of the parts adjoyning to the number of 60. myriades that is 600. thousand whereof every one possessed an 100. akers of ground Likewise Iosephus much about our Saviour Christs time shewed that the fruitfulnesse of that land still continued and that all the fields in generall were very fruitfull both of corne and other fruit being compared with other countries but the fields of Jericho and Hierusalem exceeded all the rest and especially of Jericho where the Palme trees were so fat that they might presse out oyle by treading upon them Bochardus that lived 300. yeeres since and spent ten yeeres in the diligent search of that country after that it came into the possession of the Saracens of his owne knowledge and experience commendeth it for abundance of corne which groweth in great plenty out of the ground halfe tilled without any dung or compasse the fields are like unto our gardens full of all sweet herbes wine oyle hony there aboundeth and he strangely reporteth of a certaine fruit called the apples of Paradise which grow like unto a cluster of grapes an hundred together and every one of the bignesse of an egge the leaves of it are as long as a man and so broad that two of them will cover a man the tree lasteth but three yeeres and then out of the roote thereof springeth another Conies Hares Partridge Quailes Deere are there in great number and great store of Lions beares and other wild beasts hee himselfe had seene 3. thousand Camels in one heard 4. Therefore both Strabo lib. 16. and Hierom. are deceived which report even the Countrie about Jerusalem which Iosephus affirmeth to be more fruitfull than the rest to be dry and barren full of rockes and mountaines and therefore hee understandeth the flowing of it with milke and hony spiritually Ex Perer. QUEST XVII Whether the fruitfulnesse of the land of Canaan doe yet remaine NOw this fruitfulnesse of the land of Canaan 1. was partly naturall for it was fruitfull even when the Canaans did inhabite it before the Israelites possessed that Country and it so continued â—n part after they
were expelled thence and the Saracens surprised it as it is shewed before 2. But this fertilitie was much increased by the blessing of God as the Lord promiseth unto his people if they would feare him and serve him Levit. 26.4 5. and specially the extraordinary blessing of God upon the 6. yeere is an evident argument thereof which did yeeld increase sufficient to serve them for three yeeres for the seventh yeere the land did rest and the eight yeere they began to sow so that they did eat of the fruit untill the 9. yeere Levit. 25.22 3. But this blessing of increase and abundance was after turned into drinesse and barrennesse because of their sinne as the Lord threatneth that their heaven should be as iron and their earth as brasse Levit. 25.19 And in the time of the Macchabees the great increase of the sixt yeere was much abated for their store was soone eaten up so that they were oppressed with famine 1. Macchab. 6.53 54. Perer. And therefore it is no marvell if the fruitfulnesse of that land now being inhabited by the enimies of God be not answerable to the commendation given unto that Country in former times QUEST XVIII Whether the Cananites were a peculiar people by themselves INto the place of the Cananites 1. Iunius thinketh that this was the generall name of all those nations which inhabited the land of Canaan and that the particular and severall kindes of people are named afterward 2. But though sometime this name be generall unto all the rest as they are mentioned among the sonnes of Canaan Gen. 10.15 yet here and in some other places the Cananites are taken for a severall nation from the rest as Gen. 15.20 there are ten severall kindes of people rehearsed that dwelt in Canaan of which number the Cananites are reckoned in the eight place Piscator 3. And indeed it may diversly appeare that the Cananites were the same whom the Grecians call Phoenicians as Andreas Masius hath well observed in his learned commentaries upon the booke of Ioshuah for first the Septuagint in the fifth of Iosuah for the Cananites reade Phoenicians and the woman whom our Saviour dispossessed of a Devill by Matthew is called a Cananitish woman by Markâ— a Syrophenician beside these Cananites are said to dwell by the sea Num. 13.30 where the Phoenicians also inhabited likewise as Homer setteth forth the Phoenicians by their merchandise and traffike by sea and so consequently their deceit in bargaining so also the Cananites are noted in scripture for their craft Hosâ—a 12.7 and their marchandise insomuch that a merchant is called a Cannanite as Prov. 31.24 She giveth girdles to the Cananites or merchants Perer. QUEST XIX How many nations of the Cananites and why they were cast out THe Cananites the Hittites and the Amorites c. 1. There are here but six nations rehearsed the Girgashites are omitted the same number is not alwayes observed sometime they are all comprehended under the name of the Amorites Gen. 15.16 sometime of the Hittites Iosh. 1.4 sometime 3. nations are only numbred for the rest as the Hevites Cananites and Hittites Exod. 23.28 sometime ten nations are rehearsed as beside the usuall seven the Kenites Kenazites and Kadmonites Gen. 15. But usually these seven are named the Hittites the Girgashites the Amorites Cananites Perizzites the Hevites and Jebusites as Deut. 7.1 and so S. Paul testifieth that seven nations were cast out of the land of Canaan Act. 13.19 2. The Girgashites are omitted some thinke because they willingly gave place to the Israelites as the Hebrewes thinke and Augustine reported that the countrie people of Africa being asked whence they are will answer that they were Cananites they might then depart out of Canaan into Africa Siml But the contrary appeareth Iosh. 11.20 that all the Cananites were hardned saving of the Gibeonites It is more like that they were not a nation of any great power and therefore are not reckoned here by themselves but counted among the rest 3. Now in that God promiseth unto the Israelites their Country beside that the Lord may freely dispose of the earth being the supreme Lord thereof these Cananites were of the posterity of Cham and so under the curse and beside because of their sinnes wherein they continued without repentance they deserved justly to be deprived of their Countrie Ferus QUEST XX. What made Moses so unwilling to take this calling upon him Vers. 11. WHo am I that I should goe unto Pharaoh 1. Moses doth not of diffidence or disobedience refuse but of humility and modesty excuseth himselfe as Esay saith hee was a man of polluted lips Isa. 6.5 and Ieremie that he was a child Ier. 1 6. Simler And thus by making himselfe unable and unsufficient the Lord enableth him Pellican 2. Moses excuseth himselfe both by the unfitnesse of his person and the greatnesse and difficulty of the worke Iun. And hee knew that both he was odious to Pharaoh and all the Egyptians as also not well accepted of his brethren as appeared by that unthankfull Hebrew that upbraided him in whom was discovered the minde and affection of the rest Simler 3. But this is to bee marvelled at that Moses being so couragious and forward in Egypt in slaying of the Egyptian should now bee so unwilling wherein the like thing might befall him which was seene in Peter who offered himselfe to suffer much for Christ untill the time came so Moses might then of a forward spirit put forth himselfe having not yet weighed the weightinesse of the calling which was an act of his faith yet mixed with some humane infirmitie Simler QUEST XXI What signe it was that the Lord promised to Moses Vers. 12. THis shall bee a token unto thee that I have sent thee c. The most here doe understand this signe and token to bee that which followed afterward that they should serve God in that mountaine as the Lord gave Hezekiah a signe of deliverance which came to passe afterward that two yeeres they should eat of the frâ—it of the earth that sprang of themselves and the third yeere they should sow and reape 2. King 19.29 which things were fulfilled afterward Simler And the reason is because that which God promiseth nothing can hinder and certainly shall bee accomplished and therefore the signes which are to come doe helpe to confirme the faith Pellican Contra. But this seemeth not to bee the sense 1. Because of the perfect distinction athnah comming betweene which breaketh off the first clause of the sentence from the latter part 2. That instance given of the signe to Hezechiah proveth it not for at that time by reason of the invasion of the enemies which had invaded the Country by the space of two yeeres they lived of such things by the extraordinary blessing of God as the earth brought forth of it selfe Iun. and therefore that signe was in part fulfilled already 3. It is true that whatsoever God promiseth cannot be hindred
Chaldeans S. Paul in his Epistles citeth the saying of Aratus Epimenides and Menander Perer. QUEST XLIX Of the number of the Israelites that went up out of Egypt Vers. 37. ABout six hundred thousand men of foot 1. Because the Latine translator readeth ferè almost six hundred thousand Pererius thinketh that there wanted some of this number But that is not like for seeing within one yeere they were numbred to six hundred thousand three thousand five hundred and fifty men Exod. 38.26 it is like that at their comming out of Egypt they were not under that number 2. Neither yet doe I consent unto Thostatus who thinketh there were about 635000. and odde for he to justifie this number alleageth the corrupt Latine text which readeth Exod. 32.28 that there fell of the people which were slaine of the Levites viginti tria millia three and twenty thousand which number he would have added to this summe here set downe whereas in the originall mention is made only of three thousand and so also the Chalde and Septuag reade and it must be admitted for a great oversight in the Latine interpreter to reade three and twenty thousand for three thousand to say that Hierome followed the true Hebrew coppy which might since be corrupted and that the Latine is in many places more perfect now than the Hebrew as Thostatus alleageth is to ground an uncertaine conceit upon meere imaginations and supposals for is it not like that the Hebrew Scriptures should be kept freer from corruption than the Latine seeing that the Jewes which are otherwise adversaries to the Christian faith have beene most diligent keepers of the old Testament and if this be admitted that the fountaines are corrupt and impure there will be no certainty of the Scriptures And further that place of the Apostle 1. Cor. 10.8 That there fell in one day three and twenty thousand doth not helpe Thostatus for there the Apostle speaketh of those that were slaine for the fornication committed with the daughters of the Midianites at Baal Peor Numb 25. where though the number agree not in shew with the Apostles account for Moses maketh mention of 24. thousand the Apostle nameth 23. thousand the right solution is not to say with Thom. Aquin. that it is the fault of the writer or with Lyranus and Cajetane that the number of 24. thousand includeth also 23. thousand as the greater number containeth the lesse but the Apostle only comprehendeth those which were slaine with the sword whereas Moses putteth together not only them but those also of the chiefe which were commanded to be hanged which might bee about a thousand Iun. 3. Therefore I thinke rather with Iosephus that there were full out 600. thousand not fewer but rather more for as Thostatus therein well collecteth there were numbred not long after within a yeere and 14. dayes in the first day of the second moneth 603550. men of warre from 20. yeeres and upward Numb 1.46 in which number the Levites were not counted who from 30. yeere old to 50. yeere made 8580. Numb 5.48 4. This number also is only of these which were fit for warre as appeareth in the summes of the people taken afterwards Exod. 38.26 and Numb 1. so that the women and children are excepted out of this number Now according to the common estimate they that are fit for warre in any country are as two first partes of the whole as forty is to an hundred then â—y this proportion as 40. is to an 100. so six is to fifteene there being then 600. thousand fighting men the whole summe comprehending women and children will amount to 1500. thousand beside the great numbers of other people and strangers among them which might make the whole number above 2000. thousand 5. Herein appeareth the wonderfull blessing of God in increasing seventy persons to such a multitude in the space of 215. yeeres for so long was it and no longer from the comming downe of Iacob into Egypt unto their going out And thus the Lord made good his word unto Iacob I will there make of thee a great nation Gen. 46.3 Iun. 6. And further as God herein abundantly shewed his mercy in so greatly multiplying the Israelites so his justice and severity appeared that of all this great multitude which came out of Egypt only two of them Caleb and Iosua entred into the land of Canaan all the rest because of their idolatry and disobedience died in the wildernesse as the Lord threatned them Numb 14. 7. Hence also appeareth the error of Manethon and Cheremon two ancient Writers who affirmed as Iosephus reporteth lib. 1. cont Appionem that the Israelites at their comming out of Egypt were but 250000. men whereas they were six hundred thousand as Moses here writeth QUEST L. Of Rahmesis from whence the Israelites went Vers. 37. THen the children of Israel tooke their journey from Rahmesis to Succoth 1. This Rahmesisâ—s â—s the same which is mentioned Gen. 47.11 divers from that spoken of Exod. 1.11 For the first Rahmesis is with shevah under ain the other Rahmesis with pâ—tach under ain and beside the first is called the land of Rahmesis the other the City of Rhamesis Rahmesis then seemeth to be the name of the whole country from the which the Israelites went not of a City for one City could not containe such a multitude Pellican and whether that country were capable of them is uncertaine it is like the Israelites were dispersed into some other parts of Egypt before but hearing that they were shortly to goe out of Egypt they might gather into this country the other Rahmesis seemeth to have beene a chiefe City of this province see before quest 11. v. 1. QUEST LI. Of Succoth where the Israelites pitched their tents going out of Egypt TO Succoth 1. This Succoth is a divers place from that which Iacob so called when hee came out of Mâ—sopotamia Gen. 33.17 Piscator 2. Yet both that place and this have the same derivation of the name so called of Boothes and Tents which Iacob there and the Israelites here pitched as Leviâ— 23.43 Iun 3. But this place is so named by anticipation for it was not yet called Succoth before the Israelites came thither it afterward had that name given of the rearing of Tents and Tabernacles there Piscator 4. It is thought to be a part of the region Troglodytis by the red Sea Simler 5. Iosephus calleth it Laâ—â—polis where he saith Babylon was afterward built when Cambyses invaded Egypt Ioseph lib. 2. Antiq cap. 5. QUEST LII What this mingled company was that went out with the Israelites Vers. 37. ANd a great mingled company 1. These were not like to come of those servants which Iacob might bring downe with him into Egypt for it is like the famine being so great that Iacob had no great number of servants in his family beside his children as Abraham had who was able to army three hundred and eighteene persons of hâ—s owne
Israels departure out of Egypt are just 430. yeeres as is shewed before quest 56. 6. Wherefore the best computation of all is to begin the 430. yeere from the 75. yeere of Abrahams age when hee came into the land of Canaan both because while hee remained with his father and kindred in Haran he could not be said to sojourne or be a stranger and for that if we begin the account before the 75. yeere of Abrahams age there will arise more than 430. yeeres Thus Iosephus reckoneth these 430. yeeres Postquam Abraham in Canaan venit After Abraham came into the land of Canaan so also Eusebius A septuagesimo quinto anno Abrahae usque ad egressum Hebraeorum ex Aegyptâ— supputanâ—ur anni quadringenti triginta From the seventy five yeere of Abraham unto the going of the Hebrewes out of Egypt are counted foure hundred thirty yeeres and this computation Augustine followeth quaest 47. in Exod. QUEST LXII When the terme of 430 yeeres ended AS we have seene where this terme of 430. yeeres must take beginning so it is to be considered when they were to determine and end 1. Epiphanius hath here a singular conceit by himselfe who extendeth these 430. yeeres unto the time of the Israelites entring into the land of Canaan as Pererius thus collecteth Epiphanius terminat in eo tempore quo terram promissionis intrarant Epiphanius doth determine them at that time when they entred into the land of promise But this cannot be for the Israelites continued 40. yeeres in the desert before they were admitted to the possession of Canaan Epiphanius saith they were in the desert 50. yeeres but he is therin also deceived if this terme of 40. yeeres be comprehended in the 430. yeeres it will follow that from Iacobs comming downe into Egypt untill the Israelites returne from thence are not above 175. yeeres which were indeed 215. yeeres as is shewed before quest 56. 2. Therefore these 430. yeeres doe determine and expire at the very time of the Israelites departure out of Egypt as Moses here saith When the 430. yeeres were expired even the selfe same day departed all the hostes of the Lord out of the land of Egypt And S. Paul also extendeth these yeeres but unto the giving of the Law in mount Sinai Gal. 3.17 Thus Eusebius and Augustine following him quaest 47. in Exod. define these yeeres so also Iun. Simler Osiander Pererius Ferus with others QUEST LXIII How the terme of 400. yeeres foretold to Abraham and Moses summe of 430. yeeres doe agree together NOw whereas the Lord telleth Abraham that his seed should be a stranger in a land not theirs and be evill entreated 400. yeeres Gen. 15.13 and the same is repeated by S. Stephen Acts 7.6 that summe of yeeres very well agreeth with this number of 430. for this summe beginneth at Abrahams first comming into Canaan when he was 75. yeeres old 25. yeeres before the birth of Isaack for there the Lord speaketh of the sojourning and hard usage of his seede and even then the first manifest affliction of Abrahams seede in Isaack began by Ismael of Agar the Egyptian 2. But from Isaacks birth unto the going downe of Iacob into Egypt are in precise account 220. yeeres and so the whole time is 405. yeeres from Isaacks birth unto the going out of Israel from Egypt for if from Abrahams 75. yeere there are 430. yeeres from Abrahams 100. yeere when Isaack was borne are 405. yeeres to make the summe even the od 5. yeeres are omitted which thing is not unusuall in Scripture as in one place David is said to have reigned in Hebron 7. yeeres and 6. moneths 2. Sam 5.5 in another place the yeeres of his reigne in Hebron are counted 7. yeere even and in Jerusalem 33. yeeres 40. yeere in all 1. King 2.11 the odde moneths are omitted Augustine also hereof thus writeth Non mirum si quaâ—ringentos quinque annos sumae solidae quadringenâ—es voluit appellare scriptura c. No marvell if the Scripture call 405. yeeres in one round summe 400. yeere which useth so to set downe the times that what is over or under the perfâ—ct number is not counted quaest 47. in Exod. Hence then both Lyranus and Cajetane are found to bee in an error who therein following some Hebrewes doe account but 210. yeeres for the time of the Israelites abode in Egypt reckoning but 400. yeeres strictly from Isaacks birth unto the departure of Israel out of Egypt 3. But Procopius would thus reconcile these two summes he would have both the 400. yeeres and the 430. begin together and that the Lord saith not that after 400. yeeres expired the Israelites should returne but simply after 400. yeeres so that the other 30. yeeres also may bee included M. Calvin also somewhat to the same effect saith Restabant plures anni quà m quadringenti nempe viginti vel circiter There remained more yeeres than foure hundred as twenty or thereabout but because the Lord purposed onely to prepare them unto patience he defineth not a certaine number of yeeres But herein is their error they would extend these 400. yeeres beyond the time of their deliverance out of Egypt whereas the Lord setting the end of this time saith The nation whom they shall serve will I judge and afterward shall they come 〈◊〉 with great substance Gen. 15.14 then immediately after the expiration of these 400. yeeres the Israelites must come forth of the land of their bondage with great substance QUEST LXIV When the 400. yeeres prefixed to Abraham must take their beginning NOw concerning the beginning of these 430. yeeres here commeth to be examined and discussed a singular and private opinion of Zeiglerus who beginneth the account of these 430. yeeres from the 10. yeere of Abrahams sojourning in Canaan 15. yeeres before the birth of Isaac and he endeth them in the tenth yeere of Moses exile in the land of Midian where he continued 40. yeeres when hee saith the captivity of Israel should have ceased but because Moses would have prevented the time and delivered Israel ten yeeres before when he slew the Egyptian the Lord did punish his presumption with 40. yeeres exile and deferred the deliverance of Israel 30. yeeres longer both to fulfill the 40. yeeres of his penance and because the Lord purposed to appoint no other Captaine of his people but Moses Thus we reade that the Lord hath observed this proportion and number of forty at other times also for the time of penance as the Israelites wandred 40. yeeres in the wildernesse it rained 40. dayes upon the old world 40. dayes are set for the repentance of Niniveh sic Zeigler Contra. 1. This terme of 400. yeeres limited for the sojourning and servitude of Abrahams seede cannot begin before Abraham had seede and therefore not 15. yeeres before the birth of Isaac 2. Gods purpose and determination altereth not mans infirmity cannot make the counsell of God of none effect therefore seeing the Lord who
gathered in the fruits of the yeere Simler And this moneth when all things began to revive and spring was answerable unto the state of the Israelites who now were revived by their joyfull deliverance from the winter and boistrous stormes of Egypt Borrh. QUEST V. Why the Israelites are charged to keepe the Passeover in the land of Canaan and not before Vers. 5. NOw when the Lord hath brought thee into the land of the Cananites 1. Hence it is evident that the Israelites were not bound to keepe the passeover in the wildernesse neither do we reade that they kept it more than once there in the second yeere Numb 9. and the next passeover was kept under Iosuah Ios. 5. eight and thirty yeeres after Simler The reason whereof might be this because they were not circumcised after they came out of Egypt for the space of 40. yeeres and the law was that no uncircumcised person should eat of the passeover this also signifieth that we shall not keepe our full and perfect passeover till we come into our heavenly Canaan Pellican 2. The reasons why they are charged to keepe the passeover in that plentifull land that abounded with milke and hony was partly to stirre them up to be thankfull unto God for his benefits and abundant liberality Calvin As also to admonish them that they should remember God in their prosperity and take heed that their full estate did not make them forget him 3. But now in that so fruitfull and pleasant a country as Palestina was is become barren and desolate this judgement hath befallen the Jewes and their country for their sinnes Pellican 4. Five nations only are here named that inhabited Canaan the Cananites Hittites Amorites Hivites Jebusites but the rest also are understood Iun. QUEST VI. Whether the keeping of the passeover was the cause of their deliverance or that the cause of the other Vers. 8. BEcause of that which the Lord did unto me 1. Some doe make this the sense of the place and read thus For this did the Lord doe so unto mee Septuagint Chalde Iun. Vatab. and would have this to be the meaning that God did shew all these wonders in Egypt and deliver them from thence to the end that they should keepe a memoriall of them 2. Others doe reade thus as is set downe supplying the word which and make this the reason of keeping the passeover because the Lord delivered them out of Egypt Simler Calvin Latine Genevens Pagine Montan. And this seemeth to be the more agreeable exposition both for that the cause of a thing goeth before the use thereof the wonders which the Lord did were first done and then the passeover commanded in remembrance thereof this was because of the other rather than the other because of this And againe the children aske not a reason of those things which the Lord did for them but they demand the cause of their service which they performe unto God as is shewed chap. 12.26 and chap. 13.14 Piscator QUEST VII How these things should be as signets upon their hands Vers. 9. IT shall be for a signe upon thine hand c. 1. This phrase is not only used as a similitude that they should alway have the benefits of the Lord in remembrance as a thing alwayes in their sight and that the passeover should as a signet on their head and as a frontlet betweene their eyes call to their remembrance their deliverance out of Egypt Sic Simler Pellic. though in the Proverbs this phrase is used in that sense by way of similitude as Prov. 1.9 They shall be as ornaments to thy head and as chaines to thy necke and chap. 6.21 Bind them to thy heart and tye them to thy necke And by these three to put it on the hands and forehead and to have it in the mouth are signified the faith in the heart the confession in the mouth and the operation of the hands whereby we expresse our thankfulnesse unto God Borrh. 2. Yet this is not all the meaning of this place but it is like also that they used some externall signe as in wearing signets upon their hands and frontlets upon their browes to put them in minde of the Law of God as for the same cause they were commanded to make fringes upon their garments Numb 15.38 And as they were commanded to write the Law upon the postes of their doores so also to binde them 〈◊〉 signets to their hands Deut. 6.6 for like as the Idolatrous nations did weare earings and frontlets in honour of their Idols as the Romane Gentrie were knowne by their rings and their Priests and their wives by their tutuli their foretops so the Lord would have the Israelites to use these ornaments as ensignes of their profession Simler Thus M. Calvin approving the first exposition yet assenteth also unto this if any man thinke that Moses alludeth unto those Qui tarditatis suae conscii subsidia memoriae sibi conficiunt non repugno Which because of their dulnesse doe use these things as helpes to their memory I will not gainsay Iunius also giveth this note Deut. 6.8 upon these words Thou shalt bind them as a signe to thine hand Typus accurata observationis atque perpetuae This was a type of the exact and continuall keeping of the Law Therefore there is no inconvenience to thinke that as they used fringes upon their garments so also frontlets and signets that should be alwayes in their eyes to put them in minde of the Law of God as reverend Beza very well noteth also Erat hic ritus quem postea Iudaei suis superstitionibus contaminarunt a Domino constitutus ut esset veluti 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 legis beneficiorum This rite which afterward the Iewes corrupted with their superstitions was appointed of God that it should be as a remembrance and monument of the Law and of the benefits which the Lord had bestowed upon them Annot. in Matth. 23.5 3. Yet this being admitted I cannot see how the Jewes out of this place can prove that use and custome of writing some part of the law in scroules of parchment and so binding them to their foreheads and to the wrests of their hands as they doe at this day Simler For whereas they write in those parchments certaine sacred lections which they call parashoth Beza which are the foure places where mention is made of these signes upon their hands and frontlets betweene their eyes two out of this Chapter vers 9. and 16. two out of Deut. chap. 6.8 and chap. 11.18 what warrant can they shew for the excerpting of these foure texts rather than any other this seemeth then to be a tradition of their owne without any ground in Scripture 4. But that superstitious use of the Jewes who doe place the greatest part of their religion in carrying about with them their tephillim and zizim their frontlets and fringes as they call them thinking that thereby they are preserved from evill
the red sea and of his mercie in sending them Manna from heaven and water out of the Rocke whereby they were confirmed against their enemies this experience should they have wanted if they had gone the other way 3. Now if they should have purposed to flee from Amaleke they could not because they had the sea on their backes which would have beene no let unto them to escape from the Philistims if they had beene afraid of them 4. The Amalekites did but set upon the Israelites by the way and cut off the hindmost and feeblest of them Numb 25.18 but if they should have gone thorow the middest of the Philistims countrey they should all have beene in danger they were also a stranger and more warlike people than the Amalekites Perer. QUEST XV. Of the reasons why the Lord lead his people about by the wildernesse THe reasons then why the Lord thought good to lead his people about partly here and in other places of Scripture expressed are these 1. Because he would not yet put his people being weake and not confident upon the Lords helpe to such hard combats as they were like to have with the Philistims but first he would teach them and prepare them even as the Eagle first teacheth her young ones to flie before they altogether forsake the nest and trust to their wings So Moses saith hee led him about and taught him as an Eagle stirreth up her nest flâ—ttereth over her birds Deut. 33.11 Like as the infant first is fed with pappe before hee eat strong meat and as a souldier first exerciseth himselfe with the weapon at home before he goe to battell against his enemy so the Lord would have his people first exercised and prepared before they should bee employed in the Lords battels against the Cananites Perer. 2. Another reason is here touched lest they might have repented and turned backe into Egypt for if afterward having no such occasion yet they often purposed to have retired into Egypt much more now the way being so ready and easie to returne Simler 3. Therefore the Lord to cut off all such purposes and after thoughts of theirs did lead them thorow the red sea that it might have stopped their flight backe againe into Egypt Ferus 4. Beside the sinne of the Amorites and of the other Cananites was not yet full and therefore the Lord purposed to bring his people about and to stay till their wickednesse was come to their height Simler 5. The Lord also would have the Philistims spared both because of their kindnesse shewed to the Patriarkes Pellic. as also to keepe them in store for the exercising of his people and chastising of them when they transgressed Ferus Rupertus 6. If they had gone the neerer way by the Philistims countrey the Egyptians might more easily have overtaken them and joyning with other nations have put them in greater danger Calvin 7. Further then the Lord had not gotten himselfe such honour in the overthrow of the Egyptians in the red sea if the Israelites had not gone that way 8. But the chiefest reasons of all were these two that the Lord might shew his wonderfull and miraculous workes in feeding and leading his people in the wildernesse and that he might try and prove them whether they would be obedient both these reasons are shewed Deut. 8.2 Thou shalt remember the way which the Lord thy God led thee forty yeeres in the wildernesse for to humble thee and to prove thee what was in thine heart whether thou wouldest keepe his commandements or no c. he made thee hungry and fed thee with Manna which thou knewest not c. thy rayment waxed not old upon thee neither did thy foote swell those forty yeeres Perer. QUEST XVI Whether the Israelites came up armed or five in a ranke Vers. 18. ANd the children of Israel went up well appointed c. 1. Here we refuse the translation of the Septuagint that they went up 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 in the fift generation for howsoever some goe about to justifie this translation because they came out in the fifth hundred yeere foure hundred and thirty yeeres being already expired as Augustine or in counting five generations from Iacob Levi Coath Amram Moses and Iacob himselfe to make the fift as Augustine also quaest 44. in Exod. or in making the computation by Iudah where we have five generations Pharez Ezrom Aram Aminadab Naâ—sson who was the Prince of the tribe of Iudah when the Israelites came out of Egypt as hee is named among the Princes Numb 7. though if the count be made by Levi there are but foure generations from the comming of Israel into Egypt and their going out Coath Amram Aaron Eliezer who divided the land Hierom. epist. 125. Notwithstanding these excuses and devices the interpretation of the Septuagint is neither here agreeable to the Hebrew which hath not the word doth or any such that signifieth a generation and chamushim signifieth quinque five not quinta the fift in the singular as Hierome well observeth in the foresaid place neither is it consonant to the Scripture which saith they should returne into Canaan in the fourth generation Gen. 15.16 for from Coath to Eleazer who helped to divide the land Iosuah 14. are foure generations 2. Neither doe I approve their opinion that read they went up armed for as Oleaster gathereth it is not like that the Egyptians would suffer them to have any armour and they being but servants in Egypt how should they get so much armour If they say as Pererius answereth to justifie the Latine translation herein that when they asked of the Egyptians their jewels they might receive of them armour likewise it is not like that they would cumber themselves with such carriage but rather take the most precious things beside it doth more set forth Gods glory that the people were defended having no weapons or armour but being protected by God only Borrh. Pererius further answereth that they were not without weapons because presently after their departure they fought with Amaleke Contra. This sheweth indeed that some weapons they had and yet their victory was obtained not by their weapons but by the prayer and lifting up of Moses hands but this proveth not that all of them had armour even six hundred thousand for a few only chosen from the rest did fight with Amaleke Therefore Iosephus opinion is probable that the Israelites came forth of Egypt unarmed and that after the Egyptians were drowned in the red sea their armour and weapons being driven to the shore were distributed by Moses among the people 3. If then it be not like they went up armed then their construction seemeth lesse probable that because the word chamushim signifieth five they were appointed with five severall kinds of weapons for this had beene sufficient to have loaden them whereas they carried their dow on their backes and rayment with vessels of gold and silver which the Egyptians had given them 4.
for that heathenish conceit of the Philosopher that vertue is not properly said to be in women it is contrary to that position of the Apostle that in Christ there is neither male nor female Galath 3.28 the spirit of God can plant grace and vertue in the hearts of women as well as of men nay often the Lord chuseth the weake things of this world to confound the mighty things 1. Cor. 1.27 And the examples of so many vertuous and good women in the Scriptures of Sara Rebecca Anna the Shunamite and the rest in the old of Marie Anna Martha Lydia Dorcas and many other in the new Testament doe evidently confute that prophane paradox of the Philosopher 4. And to deliver the regiment of women from the Cardinals vile and impure slaunder this country and nation of ours as is hath found the government of a woman the worst in the late Marian persecutions when more good men and women Saints of God were put to death than in any three Kings reigne beside so have we seene it in the next change the best of all other Princes reignes that went before famous Queene Elizabeths government as for flourishing peace honourable fame and name enriching of the Land subduing of forraine enemies enacting of good lawes may be compared with the reigne of any former Kings So for the advancing of true religion increasing of learning propagating the Gospell none of her predecessors came neere her That as the refining of coine being reduced from base money to pure silver and gold was her honour in the Civill State so the purging of religion according to the purity of the word of God in the Church shall bee her everlasting fame in the world and is her eternall reward with God 4. Confut. That Christ shall have no Iudges under him at the latter day but shall be the only Iudge himselfe Vers. 22. LEt them judge all small causes Origen upon these words hath this private conceit Hanc sâ—guram Iudicum non solum in hoc seculo sed etiam in futuro servandam c. 〈◊〉 this forme of Iudges shall be observed not only in this world but in the next And then he alleageth that text Matth. 18.28 That when the Sonne of man shall sit in the throne of Majesty yee which have followed me in the regeneration shall sit upon twelve seats and judge the twelve tribes of Israel Whereupon he inferreth that Christ at the day of judgement shall appoint other Judges beside himselfe Qui judicent populum de mineribus causiâ— c. Which shall judge the people in smaller causes referring the greater to him The Rhemisnis and Romanistes whose manner is to scrape all the refuse of the Fathers affirme likewise That the faithfull shall judge and give sentence with Christ at the latter day wresting the same text in Matthew to the same purpose Contra. 1. The Apostles and Saints are said indeed to judge the world but not in that sense as Christ is said to be the Judge of the world but as he saith his Word shall judge them at the latter day Ioh. 12.48 that is be a witnesse against them so the Word preached by the Saints in their life and their conversation following the same shall be a witnesse against the world and so their condemnation like as in the processe of judgement here in earth the evidence that is brought in and the witnesses produced are said to condemne the guilty partie and to judge them though the Judge only give sentence Thus Ambrose fitly expoundeth this phrase Iudicabunt Sancti hunc mundum quia exemplo fidei illorum perfidia mundi damnabitur The Saints shall judge the world because by example of their faith their perfidiousnesse shall be condemned 2. For otherwise if Christ should observe the same forme which Moses did to appoint coadjutors because he alone sufficed not this were to derogate from his all sufficient power who needeth not as man any assistants or fellow helpers Vers. 22. Every great matter let them bring to thee Upon this president the Romanistes would ground the papall reservation of cases from whom no appeale say they is to be made as there was not from Moses Tostat. quaest 11. in 18. cap. Exod. Contra. 1. There is great difference betweene the reservation of matters to Moses and of certaine cases to the Pope for Moses was set over but one nation which at this time encamped together within the compasse of not many miles and so they might with ease bring the weighty causes to him But the Pope challengeth to be the supreme Judge over all the world and so without infinite trouble the greater causes cannot be brought unto him 2. Moses judgement was sought for because hee could not erre having often conference with God to direct him as the Pope hath not and this Testatus confesseth Romanus pontifex c. The Roman Bishop though he have great power sometime is not a man very vertuous and though he be because he hath not God present to answer unto all his demands facilius errare potest he may more easily erre therefore that is but a foppish and fawning conclusion of the Canonists that the Pope hath Omnia jura in scrinio pectoris All lawes in his breast 3. Whereas Iethro intended in this device the peoples ease not to goe farre for their causes and Moses ability to performe his office neither of these inconveniences is helped in making appeales to Rome for neither is the Pope able to amend all such causes and the people would be infinitely molested to be hurried to Rome 4. And if it were not for the advantage of the Court and Consistory of Rome they would desire to bee eased rather of than cumbred with such appeales But Moses herein only sought the profit of Gods people not his owne Simler 6. Morall Observations 1. Obs. To take heed of idle and vaine talke Vers. 8. THen Moses told his father in law c. Moses did conferre with Iethro about the wondrous workes of God which the Lord had wrought for them Vnde arguuntur hi qui vanis colloquiis delectantur They then are reproved which are delighted with vaine talke Ferus Which may serve as a good motive in our dayes to cut off idle if not very prophane conference when wee meet remembring ever that of idle words we must give an account B. Babington 2. Observ. Workes must be joyned with faith Vers. 12. THen Iethro tooke burnt offerings c. Having beene thankfull in words now he addeth deeds for S. Iames calleth that a dead faith where workes want if we joyne both these together as Iethro did we shall fully give assurance both to others and to our selves of our true faith B. Babington 3. Obs. That we should doe all our workes as in Gods sight Vers. 12. THey came to eat bread with Moses father in law before God Hereupon Origen well noteth Sancti manducant bibunt in conspectu Dei c. The
because hee thinketh that the law was not given by God himselfe but by an Angell representing Gods person and speaking in his name which is his errour that now followeth in the next place to bee discussed QUEST XX. Whether Iehovah Christ Iesus appeared not in the old Testament but only or usually the Angels TOstatus opinion is that this was not the Lord himselfe that came downe in this thicke cloud in the mount but an Angell in the person of God And he hath beside these positions concerning the apparition of Angels in the old Testament 1. Not only in this place but in all other where any act is said to be done by God we must understand that the Angels did it Nisi sit talis actus qui excedit potentiam creatam Vnlesse it be such an act which exceedeth the power of a creature 2. The reason why notwithstanding God is said to doe those things though they were performed by the Angels is lest the Hebrewes hearing that the Angels wrought such great workes for them as in bringing them out of Egypt in giving them the law and such like should have worshipped the Angels as authors of these benefits As in like manner the Heathen made them Gods that had beene meanes to bestow some benefit as Minervae for the invention of divers arts Ceres in Grecia for finding out the art of measuring Saturne in Italy for teaching of husbandry Phoebus for soothsaying Aesculapius for Physicke 3. Yet sometime the Angels are said to doe those acts when as either they are but small matters and not such admirable or great workes as when the Angel appeared to send Hagar home againe to her mistresse which was no great matter and when the Angels were sent to destroy Sodome which was no admirable thing to destroy a City or when the worke though it be a great worke concerne but a private person and not the whole nation as when the Angell came to purifie the Prophet Isayes lips Isay 6. 4. Yet sometime God is said to doe those things which were not in themselves so great because the persons were but weake with whom the Lord had to deale for the strengthning of their faith 5. Sometime great workes are said to be done by the Angels but then mention is made also of God in the same place as in the vision of Iacobs ladder the Angels are said to ascend and descend but God stood upon the top of the ladder 6. And though while yet the Hebrewes were weake and as it were in their nonage the greater workes done by Angels are ascribed unto God yet afterward Cum Hebraicus populus in cognitione Dei firmior factus est When the Hebrew people were more confirmed in the knowledge of God Angelus illa magnalia quâ— ad Deum pertinebant se fecisse dicebat The Angell is said to doe those things which appertained unto God as Iudg. 2. the Angell of the Lord c. said I made you to goe up out of Egypt 7. But concerning the law it was given by Angels as the Apostle sheweth Galath 3. they made the thunder and caused the voices in the mount they wrought the wonders in Egypt and brought out the people thence and conducted them in the wildernesse To this effect Tostat. quaest 6. 7. Contra. All these are untrue and uncertaine positions as shall be shewed in their order 1. S. Stephen saith that the God of glory appeared unto Abraham in Mesopotamia and bid him come out of his country Act. 7.2 This was a matter which exceeded not the power of an Angell to bid Abraham to goe out of his country yet was it done by the Lord himselfe and not by an Angell for an Angell without blasphemy cannot be said to be the God of glory Againe to appeare in the likenesse of a flame of fire in a bush and the bush not consumed is not an impossible worke to a created Angell yet it was God himselfe even Christ the Sonne of God that so appeared for he is called the God of Abraham the God of Izhak Exod. 3.6 which could bee no Angell And Moses pronouncing a blessing upon Ioseph saith The good will of him that dwelt in the bush shall come upon the head of Ioseph Deut. 33. 16. but God only hath the power and authority of blessing as Iakob also saith concerning Ioseph By the God of thy father who shall helpe thee and by the Almighty who shall blesse thee Gen. 44.24 To blesse then belongeth properly and originally for ministerially wee deny not but that both Angels and men may blesse to him that is able to effect the blessing but so doth only the Almighty to whom nothing is impossible But Angels are not omnipotent or Almighty It was God therefore and not an Angell that appeared in the bush Now then by these places given in instance it is evident that some things said to be done by God in the Scriptures not exceeding the power of Angels were so done by the Lord himselfe and not by the Angels And so the first position of Tostatus faileth 2. Neither is that a good reason why in the rehearsall of the great workes the name of the Angels is concealed and they are ascribed unto God lest the Hebrewes might have worshipped the Angels as their patrones and authors of those benefits 1. Because there is no such danger when as the Angels doe shew themselves to be but the ministers and messengers of God and speake in the name of God As Lot could make a difference betweene the Angels who were but Gods ministers as they say Iehovah hath sent us to destroy the City Gen. 19.13 and Iehovah himselfe to whom Lot afterward turneth himselfe vers 19. Not so my Lord c. whereas speaking before to the Angels he calleth them Lords in the plurall 2. Rather by this meanes if the Angels did the workes and the Scripture saith God did them they ignorantly should have worshipped the Angels in Gods stead knowing none other but that God himselfe appeared when it was but his Angell 3. And beside where in the same place mention is made both of the Angell of Iehovah and of Iehovah himselfe as Exod. 3.22 it is said the Angell of the Lord appeared who is called Iehovah vers 7. If it had not beene the Lord himselfe but an Angell this would have given them occasion to thinke that the Angell was the Lord. 3. It was Iehovah the Lord Christ and not a ministring Angell that appeared to Hagar Gen. 16. as it is evident vers 13. she called the name of Iehovah that spake unto her and the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah was the Lords worke wherein notwithstanding hee used the ministry of the Angels as it is expresly said Iehovah rained upon Sodome and Gomorrah brimstone and fire from Iehovah c. These places therefore are impertinently alleaged And further wee shall finde in Scripture that in small workes and such as concerned particular persons God is said to
now his law unto his people seeing from the beginning of the world there was no written law but as it was by the law of nature inprinted in their hearts 1. God did not therefore now first give unto his people the Morall law written as though he were either mutable in changing his first determination or that in processe of time he had found out a more profitable way than hee knew before as some wickedly have objected Sed quia superfluâ—â—â— fuit hoc fieri stante adhuc lege natura But because this was superfluous and needlesse to be done the law of nature yet standing firme By the light of nature before the floud they discerned good from evill just from unjust and therefore the old world that sinned against this law of nature was justly punished of this law printed in the heart the Apostle speaketh They shew the effect of the law written in their hearts their conscience also bearing them witnesse and their thoughts accusing one another or excusing Rom. 2.15 Now then when this law of nature began more and more to bee obscured and iniquity to abound the Lord thought it needfull to give unto the people a written law Lippom. Ex collation Patrum 2. Another cause of giving the law was Ne sibi homines aliquid defuisse quererentur scriptum est in tabulis îquod in cordibus non legebant Lest that men should complaine that somewhat was wanting that was written in tables which was not written in the hearts August in Psal. 57. Therefore to take away all excuse and pretext of ignorance the Lord gave his written law 3. Another end of giving the law was to prepare and make a way for the Gospell Vt te ad faciendum legem de tuo vires non habere monstraret c. To shew that thou hast not strength of thy selfe to doe the law and so being poore and beggerly shouldest flee unto grace Augustine likewise in Psal. 118. 4. Further the law was given as a supply of the weakenesse and ignorance of man that whereas there was no certaine rule before to know what was good what was evill but men according to their blind fansies and carnall imaginations placed happinesse some in one thing some in another the law was to correct their erroneous opinions and to teach one constant and sure rule of truth and vertue And further such was their errour that though in civill and politike matters the wise among the Heathen by the light of nature and experience attained to some perfection yet they were utterly ignorant of the true knowledge and worship of God which is set forth in the law Tostat. quest 1. 5. Further because the law of nature was more and more obscured the Lord would have his law written in tables of stone that it might ever be kept and remembred and be no more drowned in oblivion Ferus And though those tables of stone wherein the law was written are not now to be found yet the copy of the same law is extant in the Scriptures there to be seene and read which shall continue to the end of the world 6. Lastly The Lord in giving this law to this people therein sheweth his love to his people committing unto them the greatest treasure in the world as Moses saith What nation is so great that hath ordinances and lawes so righteous as all this Law which I set before you this day Deut. 4.8 QUEST VII How the Lord spake all these words and why Vers. 1. GOd spake all these words saying 1. Some thinke that God is said to speake whereas it was an Angell in respect of the opinion of the people that thought Moses spake with God Paul Burgens But it is before shewed chap. 19. quest 40 that it was God himselfe that spake these words who nameth himselfe Jehovah vers 2. which name is not given to any Angell yet this word also is said to have beene spoken by Angels Hebr. 2.2 because God did therein use the ministry of the Angels in framing of that audible voice which was heard So that the Angels speake not now as in the person of God as his messengers as at other times but here they attended only as Ministers Longe aliter hic loquitur quà m ad patres adhuc locutus est the Lord speaketh farre otherwise here than hee spake hitherto to the Fathers Ferus But to them hee spake by the ministry of Angels This question also is well decided by Cajetane You will aske saith he how God is said to speake Cùm ista locutis fieres per Angelum c. Seeing this speech was framed by an Angell The answer is ready Quia ipse Dominus loquebatur in Angelo ad populum c. Because the Lord himselfe spake in the Angell to the people not as the King speaketh by his Embassador or Interpreter Sed ut presens mens in Angelo formans verba hujus sermonis magis quam Angelus But as present in the Angell and so framing the words of his speech rather than the Angell So Cajetane So that God spake as the Author and enditer the Angell spake as the tongue or pen-man of God 2. The Hebrewes have this opinion that this was that great Angell of such eminency Vt citra essentiam Divinam Angelus faciei nominetur that setting the Divine essence aside he is called the Angell of Gods presence Isay 63.9 Paul Burgens addition 1. Nay this Angell of Gods presence that heard them when they cried in their troubles and saved them as there the Prophet saith was none other than Iehovah himselfe the Lord Christ as S. Paul expoundeth 1. Cor. 10.9 Let us not tempt Christ as some of them tempted him and were destroyed of Serpents And in this Angell was the very divine essence of God as the Lord saith Exod. 23.21 My name is in him 3. Burgeus Reason to prove that it was an Angell and not God himselfe that spake because he saith in the third Commandement Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vaine in the third person not in the first as Thou shalt not take my name in vaine and so likewise in the fourth Commandement Which sheweth saith hee that it was an Angell that spake and not God This reason is of small force and may easily be answered 1. The Lord useth the third person because although now the Lord as present in Majesty spake by voice yet this law was to bee delivered afterward written in tables of stone which being a perpetuall monument unto the people of the Lords will was more fitly expressed in the third person because the Lord would no more in like manner as now deliver the law with his owne mouth 2. Beside in the first and second Commandement the Lord useth the first person Thou shalt have no other Gods before mee and I am the Lord thy God a jealous God 3. And further it is observed to be an Hebraisme and an usuall phrase in Scripture that the Lord
shalt make a vaile of blew silke c. 1. Though the quantitie of this vaile be not expressed either for length or breadth as in the other curtaines yet it may be easily conjectured that it hung all the breadth of the Tabernacle which was ten cubits and the height of ten cubits because it was to separate the most holy place and to keepe it secret Simler 2. The pillars were here but foure but in the doore of the Tabernacle there were five because that being in the entrance was to be opened in more places than one but this was seldome to be opened Simler 3. These pillars had sockets of silver not sharpe at the one end to goe into the ground as Lyranus thinketh but they were plaine to be set upon the ground as the sockets of the boords were their heads what they should bee made of is not expressed and therefore Cajetane thinketh they were of wood as the bodie of the pillars were but overlaid with gold as the bodie or shanke of the pillars was and so it is said in direct words chap. 36.38 He overlaid their Chapters 4. The next word vavim some translate heads Latine Chalde some the chapters and little knops in the head tops Septuag 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 capitâ—llâ— the chapter or uncinos the knops above Vatab. Oleaster thinketh that in this place it is taken for the hookes but in the next ver 16. for the heads But it is evident Chap. 38.28 where both these words are used vavim and rasheheâ—â— their chapters that the first word signifieth hookes made like to the letter 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 vaâ— with turning heads Lippom. So also Iunius readeth uncos hookes which were set in the pillar-heads to hold up the cords upon the which the vaile did ride QUEST XXV What â—aches or hookes the vaile haâ—ged under Vers. 33. THou shalt hang the vaile under the â—â—ches 1. Iunius readeth In stead or In place of those taches for the word tacheth signifieth both under and in stead and his meaning is that the vaile hung up in that place where the second of the neerest great curtaine mentioned v. 3. began which had no taches for the last of the first five had no loopes and the first of the second five had no taches and so the most holy place should begin where the length of the holy place ended But this seemeth too curious neither is it like that the second great curtaine began there but lapped over the end of the other for otherwise the five curtaines containing twenty cubits in breadth would have covered the most holy place being ten cubits wide and the backe side being other ten in height downe to the ground whereas it came short a cubit on each side as is evident vers 13. and so there should not have beene observed an uniformity in the hanging of the curtaines 2. Tostaâ—us thinketh that this covering curtaine had rings or hookes and that this vaile did hang by those rings quest 6. But that had beene superfluous seeing these pillars had hookes made of purpose for that end 3. Some take these to be the same with the hookes mentioned in the former verse Genevens and thinke that they were in the top of the chapiters or heads of the pillars and upon those hookes might some pearches or rods be whereon the vaile hanged But seeing the word here used is kâ—râ—sâ—â— which before vers 6. is interpreted taches and the other word is vavim two divers things are signified neither were these taches upon the top of the pillars for then it had beene superfluously added Thou shalt hang the vaile under the taches non enim pendere poterat nisi sub unciâ—â— for it could not hang otherwise than under these taches Cajetane especially seeing it is said before Thou shalt hang it upon the foure pillars therefore hereby it is insinuated quòd â—â—cini sui erant inter colâ—mnam cap tellum that these taches were set betweene the pillar and the chapter Cajetane 4. Therefore the meaning is that this vaile should hang by taches as the other curtaines did Cajetane thinketh there were certaine golden chaines upon the which the vaile did hang mediantibus uncinis aureis by these golden taches comming betweene Lippoman thinketh better Inserebatur velum â—unibus sustentandum per aureos circulos The vaile was held up by cords going thorow golden rings whereby it might more easily be drawne to and fro So Iosephus Anulis à suniculo pendens It hung by rings upon a cord c. which cord or line went thorow the hooke which were fastned to the pillars spoken of in the former verse and upon this cord did hang the vaile by rings or taches QUEST XXVI In what part of the Tabernacle the vaile was hâ—ng up and why Vers. 33. THou shalt hang the vaile upon the taches c. 1. Though the place be not expressed where this vaile did hang yet it may easily be gathered that whereas the whole Tabernacle was thirty cubits long the most holy place tooke up the third part ten cubits thereof for where the first five curtaines joyned in one ended which were in breadth twenty cubits there the most holy place begun Iunius and to that end it seemeth the curtaines were divided into two parts five being put together and five together Beda and Cajetane doe gather as much by the proportion of Salomons Temple which was 60. cubits long whereof the third part twenty cubits was for the most holy place and so it is like that Moses from whom Salomon tooke his proportion allowed for the place of the Arke the third part of the length of the Tabernacle which was ten cubits 2. Hence also it is evident that the most holy place was just foure square ten cubits long ten cubits broad and ten cubits high 1. Because Salomon observed the same proportion in the Temple the place of the Oracle was twenty cubits broad twenty cubits long and twenty cubits high 1 King 6.20 2. This most holy place was a figure of the celestiall Jerusalem which was foure sâ—â—are the length breadth and heighth were equall Revel 21.16 3. And this vaile was hung up to separate the most holy place from the rest of the Tabernacle for these reasons 1. That the Arke might have a peculiar place for greater reverence from whence the Lord spake unto Moses 2. That the Lord might hereby magnifie his people when it should be knowne to other nations that God had his habitation among them 3. That the people might have the greater confidence in God whom they had in a manner visibly present Tostat. qu. 14. QUEST XXVII Why the table was set on the North the candlesticke on the South Vers. 3. THou shalt set the Table without the vaile and the candlesticke over against the table on the South-side c. 1. Tostat. quaest 16. giveth this reason why the candlesticke was set on the South-side the table on the North Quia lux corporum coelestium venit
mercie in judgement signifying se posse teneri that he could be stayed Ferus 4. Yea hereby he incourageth Moses rather to pray for the people like as a father being angrie and making as though he would smite his son saith to one standing by Ne retineas me à percussione Hold me not from smiting meaning the contrarie that he would have him interpose himselfe and mediate for his sonne Lyran. Tostat. Mosen hortatur ne cunctotur precari c. He exhorteth Moses not to deferre to pray for the people Procopius Because he otherwise might have beene afraid to have prayed considering the greatnesse of their sinne So also to the same purpose Gregorie Quid est servâ— dicere dimitte me nisi deprecandi ausum prabere What is it for the Lord to say unto his servant Let me alone but to make him bold to pray But indeed Non his verbis mandat c. God doth not command Moses to pray in these words directly but sheweth what it was that would stay him from punishing Iunius 5. And now the Lord was contented to accept of Moses prayers because he was not in his secret counsell appointed to destroy them But the same Moses who at this time appeased the wrath of God toward the people could not pacifie him concerning himselfe when he provoked God at the waters of strife because prayer then will not serve the turne Cum semel Deus aliquid ab intimis irascendo disponit When once God being throughly provoked hath determined to doe a thing Gloss. ordinar Ex Gregor QUEST XXX Whether the Lord changed his minde in saying I will destroy them and yet destroyed them not Vers. 10. FOr I will consume them Yet God consumed them not 1. Not that there is any mutabilitie or changing in God as though afterward he saw which he did not before for these comminations Secundùm hypothesin accipienda sunt are to be taken conditionally and sometime the condition is expressed sometime it is understood as the Lord suspendeth the execution of his judgeâ—ents either upon mens repentance or being intreated by the prayers of his servants Et propter Mediatorem veniam dat But most of all he giveth pardon for the Mediators sake Simler 2. And thus the Lord threatneth yet stayeth his hand Quia necessarium est nosse nos benignitatis qua in Deo eminentiam quanta vis orationum sanctorum Because it is necessarie for us to know the exceeding great loving kindnesse which is in God and what force there is in the prayers of the Saints Cyrill 3. And further this was not the will of God to destroy them that will of God qua vocatur beneplaciti which is called the will of Gods good pleasure because this is alwaies fulfilled but it was voluntaâ— signi his signified or revealed will according to the which he shewed that they had deserved to bee destroyed But in his secret will he had ordained that Moses should pray for them and that hee would be intreated by his prayer Tostat. qu. 16. QUEST XXXI How the Lord promiseth to make a great nation of Moses Vers. 10. I Will make of thee a mightie people 1. Some thinke that God indeed did performe this promise to Moses for now the Christian world which farre exceedeth the people of Israel Mosi obtemperat obeyeth Moses Rupertus Ferus So also Gloss. interlinear by this mightie people understandeth Generationem sanctorum The Generation of the Saints But that which the Lord promiseth here to Moses was conditionall that if he at that time destroyed the people he would make a great nation of Moses seeing the first was not done neither did he performe the second 2. Bernard saith Ego hoc munus puto servatum sponsâ— I thinke this gift to become a great nation to be reserved for the spouse the Church now dispersed over all the world But this upon the former reason is not the meaning 3. Tostatus thinketh the meaning to be this that Deus proponeret cum in ducem genti magna God would set him over a great nation not that a great nation should come of him So also Vatablus Lippom. Tostatus reasons are these 1. Because if the Lord should promise to increase Moses to a great nation he should have no great comfort by it seeing he was old and could not see many generations 2. Whereas the Lord saith in the like words Numb 14.13 I will make thee a nation mightier than they there is comparison made betweene the nation which should come of Moses and the nation of the Israelites but the seed of Moses could not be distinguished from the seed of the Israelites for he also was of Israel 3. And the Lord promiseth Moses a recompence Ne grave ei sit tam nobilem principatum amittere Lest it should be grievous unto him to lose such a noble principalitie and government Calvin But if his posteritie onely had beene multiplied there should have beene no recompence made for that losse Contra. 1. Moses expected not neither desired any greatnesse in the world but onely the fulfilling of Gods promise toward Abraham Isaak and Iacob and therefore though Moses had not presently seene this promise effected in his time yet hee might have comforted himselfe as Abraham did in the very propounding and making of so gracious a promise by faith relying upon God for the fulfilling thereof 2. Moses posteritie might have beene as well compared with Israel as Iacob and Esaus ofspring are of whom the Lord saith one people shall be mightier than another Gen. 25.23 and as it is said Ephraim shall be a greater people than Manasseh Gen. 28.28 3. Moses that wished himselfe for Israels sake to be raced out of the booke of life expected no compensation of his principalitie if it had seemed so good vnto God to destroy Israel 4. Therefore the meaning is that God would so increase and multiplie Moses posteritie as that he should grow into a great nation 1. Because in the same sense the Lord saith to Abraham Faciam te in gentem magnam Genes 12.2 I will make of thee a great nation Gallas Oleast 2. And the Lord saith in effect Inte praestiturus quae majoribus promisi I will performe in thee that which I promised to the fathers But if in the other sense the Lord should onely have set him over a great nation then had not Gods promise to Abraham beene performed Borrhaius QUEST XXXII Of Moses prayer in generall and the manner thereof Vers. 11. THen Moses prayed c. why doth thy wrath wax hot against thy people 1. Although the Lord seemed unto Moses to be purposed to destroy the people yet Moses in praying doth not oppose himselfe to Gods will for his prayer Dei promissione nititur was grounded upon Gods promise made unto the fathers this therefore shewed a singular faith in Moses that giveth not over no not when verbum Dei inter se committitur the word of God seemeth to fight with
Therefore they had a greater spite at Israel than otâ—er nations and would have beene most readie thus to have objected Tostat. qu. 17. QUEST XXXVI In what sense the Egyptians would say The Lord brought them out to slay them Vers. 12. HE hath brought them out maliciously or of an evill minde Iun. Or for a mischiefe rather Vatab. Oleast To slay them in the mountaines 1. Not because the Egyptians might imagine that God could not slay them in Egypt the constellations of heaven and aspects of the planets hindring the destruction of the Hebrewes there and serving fitly in the wildernesse and mountaines for seeing no such constellation could hinder the servitude of the Israelites but that the Egyptians most cruelly oppressed them much lesse could it prevent Gods judgements And if the constellation had beene against the Hebrewes after they were come out of Egypt into the desert how came it to passe that the red sea gave way unto them the Egyptians there were drowned Manna from heaven was given and water out of the rocke all these things were for Israel in the desert and against the Egyptians Tostat. quast 18. 2. Neither doe the Egyptians so say because some of their Astrologers by calculating the time of the Hebrewes departure as some Hebrewes affirme did prognosticate because they went malo sydere in an evill signe that much bloud should be shed in Israel and that many of them should die in the wildernesse and therefore when Ioshua had circumcised the Israelites in Gilgal the Lord said he had taken away the shame of Egypt Iosh. 5.9 because that which the Egyptians had foretold was now turned ad sanctitatem non opprobrium not to their shame but their holinesse and honour Contra. 1. By shame is there meant no such thing but onely that their uncircumcision was then taken away which is called the shame of Egypt because therein they were like unto the uncircumcised Philistimâ— 2. And if it had beene spoken in any such sense this had beene to confirme and justifie the superstitious calculations and prognostications of the Egyptians 3. The Israelites indeed perished in the desert but not all onely those which were above twentie yeare old and they died not by any naturall death which onely may be foreseene and in some sort by prognostication ghessed at but their death was procured by their sinne then as their sinne being an act of their will could not by any such constellation bee foretold so neither could their extraordinarie death caused by their sinne be foreseene by any such meanes And this being an act of Gods justice like as mans will and the acts thereof are not wrought upon nor ruled by constellations much lesse are the Lords judgements which he worketh most freely Tostat. qu. 19. 3. Neither could the Egyptians say thus as though the Lord could not have destroyed the Israelites in Egypt seeing he plagued both the Egyptians and their gods or that he could not for want of power have brought them into the land of Canaan as the heathen would have objected Numb 14.16 For he that was able to overthrow Pharaoh and his host and all the power of Egypt and that wrought such great wonders for them in the desert was of power sufficient to plant them in the land of Canaan casting out their enemies before them Tostat. qu. 17. 4. But the Egyptians of malice onely without any ground nay against their owne knowledge Occasione saltem levissima licèt omnìa falsa cognoscerent quaecunque tamen possent in Deum Hebraeorum probra conjicerent Upon a light occasion although they knew all to be false would upbraid what they could the God of the Hebrewes Tostat. qu. 18. QUEST XXXVII Why Moses maketh mention in his prayer of Abraham Isaak and Iacob Vers. 13. REmember Abraham c. 1. The Hebrewes thinke that mention is made of these three to escape a treble punishment as if the Lord were to bring downe fire from heaven upon them Abraham was cast into the fire in Hur of the Chaldees if the Lord would punish with the sword Isaak had offered himselfe to be slaine in sacrifice by his father if with exile and banishment Iacob had before indured it and therefore these three are mentioned that by their merits and deserts the people might escape these three judgements Sic Lyran. Lippom. But Tostatus well refuteth this conceit 1. Because these three are mentioned as well when any blessing is craved of God as when any judgement is prayed against 2. God hath other judgements beside these whereby to punish his people therefore in other eases the mentioning of these had beene insufficient Tostat. qu. 20. 2. Yet Tostatus also misseth the marke saying that Iâ— meritis istorum fiebat salus posteris eorum For the merits of these their posteritie were preserved for Abraham himselfe was not justified by merits but by faith as the Apostle sheweth Rom. 4. Abraham believed God and it was counted to him for righteousnesse therefore much lesse was his posteritie saved by his merits 3. Therefore Moses in bringing in Abraham Isaak and Iacob only putteth God in minde of the promises made unto them which proceeded onely of the meere grace and favour of God toward them as the Lord himselfe saith Because the Lord loved you and because he would keepe the oath which hee had sworne to your fathers the Lord hath brought you out with a mightie hand Deut. 7.8 Simler Osiander QUEST XXXVIII How the Israelites are promised to possesse the land of Canaan for ever Vers 13. THey shall inherit it for ever 1. This promise that the Israelites should inhabit the land of Canaan for ever may diversly be understood 1. It is taken for a long time not limited nor determined and so they enjoyed that land many yeares about 1400. Tostat. qu. 20. 2. Or it may bee likewise understood during the time of the Law and ceremonies which were to continue but untill Christ as Aarons Priesthood is said to be for ever chap. 28.43 and the keeping of the Passeover is said to be an ordinance for ever Exod. 12.17 Tostat. 3. Or it may be applyed to the spirituall seed of Abraham which are the heires of the true Canaan Genevens aâ— not Gen. 13. vers 14. 4. But in these temporall promises a secret condition rather must be supplyed that if they had continued in obedience to Gods Commandements then they should have had a perpetuall inheritance in Canaan And this is the best interpretation as appeareth by the like Psal. 132.10 If thy sonnes keepe my covenant and my testimonies which I shall teach them thy sonnes also shall sit upon thy throne for ever Tostat. qu. 20. See this question handled more at large Hexapl. in Genes cap. 13. vers 12. QUEST XXXIX How the Lord is said to repent Vers. 14. THen the Lord repented of the evill 1. This is spoken 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 according to the passions and affections of men yet 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉
burning of the rest of the seditious with fire Numb 16. But as well this as all other wonders which the Lord did for his people must be here comprehended seeing the covenant was made with them all 6. Wherefore here are understood better all those wonders which God wrought for the people in the desart by Moses and afterward in Canaan under Ioshua Iun. Marbach As the destruction of the foresaid rebellious company the dividing of the waters of Jordan the standing still of the Sunne Lyran. The overthrow and subversion of the Cananites and the victorious conquest over them Calvin Balaams asse spake and God miraculously turned his cursing into blessing Simler To know then what these marvels were we must learne out of the rest of the bookes following what great things the Lord did for his people Gallas Osiander QUEST XXIII Why the Girgashites are here omitted Vers. 11. I Will cast out before thee the Amorites c. Here are only six nations of the Canaanites rehearsed the Girgashites are omitted 1. Lippoman thinketh this to be the reason thereof because before the entrance of the Israelites into the land of Canaan forte de terra illa recesserat it may be that they were departed out of the country But it is like that they would rather have made a league with Ioshua as the Gibeonites did than have forsaken their country for feare of the Israelites 2. Some thinke they are not named because they did not fight against Ioshua Ex Tostat. quaest 79. in Exod. 23. But the contrary appeareth Iosh. 4.10 where the Girgashites are rehearsed among those nations whom the Lord would cast out before them And none of the Canaanites saving onely the Gibeonites are said to have made peace with Ioshuah Iosh. 11.19 3. The Septuagint whose manner is to supply out of one place that which is wanting in another doe here also insert the Girgashite But this is too great boldnesse to adde any thing to the authenticall originall 4. Wherefore the Girgashites either being a small people might be comprehended under the rest Tostat Or by a Synecdoche when part is taken for the whole under these nations here named the other also are signified which is the reason that sometime two or three of these nations are set downe often for all the rest Calvin QUEST XXIV How it stood with Gods justice to destroy all the inhabitants of Canaan I Will cast out It may seeme both a cruell edict decreed of God for the utter extirpation of these inhabitants of Canaan and as cruelly to have beene executed by the Israelites 1. The equity of God in decreeing this to be done may thus appeare 1. If God might rightfully assigne that country unto his people as the earth is the Lords and the fulnesse thereof he may dispose of it at his pleasure then by the same right it was lawfull for the Lord to expell and root out the former inhabitants 2. Yet there is another reason beside of Gods equity the Lord had now spared them a long time even 400. yeeres expecting their repentance and they waxed worse The Lord said in Abrahams time and to Abraham the sinnes of the Amorites were not yet full Genes 15.16 Now then after so long patience in forbearing these wicked nations non fuit crudelitas poenae gravitate moram pensare it was no cruelty with greatnesse of punishment to recompense the long stay thereof Calvin 3. The earth is said to have spued out this people for their great impiety Si mortuo elemento intolerabilis est impietas c. If their impiety were intolerable to the very dead element how much more might the Lord exercise his judgement with rigour Calvin 4. Againe the Lord having decreed to plant his people in Canaan was to expell the idolatrous inhabitants lest they might have beene a ruine and occasion of falling to his people Marbach 2. And as the Lord decree was just againe these wicked inhabitants so the execution thereof by the Israelites in destroying them all was also just 1. Because non est hominiâ— revocare pâ—â—am c. It is not in mans power to revoke the punishment decreed by the Lord for then they should have incurred the same penalty themselves as the Lord by his Prophet said to Ahab who had let Benhadad goe Because thou hast let goe out of thine hand a man whom I appointed to dye thy life shall goe for his Marbach 2. Seeing the victory and conquest of those nations was only of the Lord it was just and right ipsum leges victoriae statuere that he should set the lawes of the victory who were to be spared who not therefore the Israelites could not alter any part of Gods will on that behalfe Gallas 3. And if the Israelites had spared them privassent se legitima haereditate c. they had deprived themselves of the lawfull inheritance which was ordained them of God Calvin QUEST XXV Why they were to make no compact with the Canaanites Vers. 12. THou shalt make no compact with them 1. The Israelites are specially warned to take heed of the Canaanites to make no league with them because they were most in danger to be corrupted by them seeing they were not all destroyed at once but many remained and dwelt among them not only in Cities by themselves as the Canaanites had their Cities in the midst of Ephraim and Manasses Iosh. 16.10 and 17.16 but they dwelt among them in the same City as the Jebusites did in Jerusalem Iosh. 15.63 there was not so much danger to be feared by the nations which were further off and therefore when they tooke any of their Cities they might save their persons alive but if it were a City of the Canaanites they were to save none alive Deut. 20.15 16. Tostat. quaest 12. 2. Another cause of this prohibition was the great impiety and wickednesse of the Canaanites among whom was practised all ungodlinesse for the which cause their land spued them out Levit. 18.28 And this reason is touched here Lest they bee the cause of thy ruine this amity and league betweene them might be a meanes to draw them to idolatry Marbach 3. Further the Lord had appointed the Canaanites to destruction and therefore with such as were Gods enemies no league was to be made Simler 4. By this meanes also legitima sua haereditate privarent they should deprive themselves of their lawfull inheritance which the Lord had promised to Abraham Isaack and Iacob and to their seed Simler 5. Duos pessimos fructus illiciti foederis numerat He reckoneth up two very bad fruits of this unlawfull league the land should be defiled with their altars and superstitious monuments which they would erect under the colour of this league and beside humanitatis praetextu populum corrumpent they will corrupt the people under pretense of humanity in calling them to their idolatrous feasts Calvin 6. But all kinde of league and entercourse is not forbidden with nations of
to idols see likewise concerning other meats forbidden by Moses Law great question did arise betweene the converted Jewes and the beleeving Gentiles for the deciding of which controversie Saint Paul giveth two rules first That they should not judge one another Rom. 14.13 that he that did eat should not condemne him that would not eat secondly that they should not grieve or offend one another with their eating ibid vers 15. that they should abstaine from eating such things at the least in their brothers presence And after this the Church came together and decreed that for a time in regard of the weake they should abstaine from strangled and bloud Act. 15. Tostat. quâ—st 13. 4. But this further must be considered that Christians now have a greater liberty than the Israelites had for they are simply forbidden to goe unto the Gentiles feasts or to have any fellowship with them lest by little and little they might be drawne to partake with them in their idolatry But S. Paul allowed Christians to goe unto the feasts of the Gentiles and to eat of their sacrifices so it might be done without offence 1 Cor. 10.27 Gallas 5. And the reason hereof why the Israelites are forbidden to communicate with the Gentiles and to eat and drinke with them may thus further be declared For the communion of some is forbidden to the faithfull two wayes either in poenam illius cui communio fidelium subtrabitur for a punishment to him from whom the company of the faithfull is withdrawne as the incestuous young man was excommunicate among the Corinthians or ad cautelam eorum quibus interdicitur for their warning and heed-taking which are so forbidden others company And if so the faithfull be strong in faith and are more like to win the Infidels than to be corrupted by them they are not forbidden their company but if they be weake and such as easily may be drawne away the company of Infidels to such is dangerous Thomas And of this sort were the Hebrewes who were weake and prone to idolatry and therefore the Lord forbiddeth them all entercourse and communion with the Gentiles QUEST XXXIV Why marriages with the Idolatrous were forbidden and in what cases Vers. 16. LEst thou take of their daughters to thy sonnes 1. The Israelites were forbidden to take wives unto their sonnes from the idolatrous Heathen lest they might draw them also unto idolatry men must not deceive themselves in such marriages and thinke that they may draw their wives or the wives the husbands rather unto the true religion which they professe then to be corrupted by them For how knowest thou a man te uxorem lucrifacturum that thou shalt gaine thy wife to thy religion or thou woman that thou shalt perswade thy husband Gallasius Shall a man thinke himselfe more wise than Salomon whose heart was perverted by his wives and to please them he fell to most grosse idolatry Simlerus 2. Yet it was lawfull for the Israelites to take to wives such of the Gentiles as were converted to their religion as is evident Deut. 21.13 as Boaz married Ruth who had then imbraced the true religion and worship of the God of Israel as she said unto Naomi Thy people shall be my people and thy God my God Ruth 1.16 3. But the example of â—â—hlan and Chilian will be objected the sonnes of Elimeâ—ech who tooke unto them wives of the Moabites Orpah and Ruth who were not then converted to the faith of Israel for then Naomi would not have bid them returne into their country as shee did Ruth 1.12 for that had beene to give them occasion to commit idolatry Therefore this marriage is excused by the necessity of that place where Mahlan and Chilian sojourned namely in Moab for the space of ten yeeres where were no women of their religion and so they were faine to take them wives from the Moabites 4. Now further as it was unlawfull to take wives to their sonnes from the Gentiles so was it also forbidden that they should give their daughters to their sonnes Deut. 7.3 which of the two was the more dangerous 1. For the man is the head of the woman and so the Israelitish wife should come in subjection to a Pagan and by this meanes dishonour her nation 2. The man being of greater power might use more violent meanes to force the wife to Gentilisme than the wife could to draw the husband 3. The children also were more likely to be corrupted which are brought up according to the fathers minde Tostat. quaest 14. An example whereof we have in that blasphemer that was stoned to death who was the sonne of an Egyptian and of an Israelitish woman Levit. 24. QUEST XXXV Why the images are called molten gods Vers. 17. THou shalt make thee no molten gods 1. The Gentiles so called their idols communi populari errore by a common and popular errour as now among the Romanists the common people call their images their Saints But the wiser sort among the Heathen did not take the idols to be their gods but only representations of them yet that excused not their idolatry no more than the like pretense now among the Papists that they use images only to put them in minde of God Simler 2. But an idoll is farre from being God or having any divine thing in it that as the Apostle saith It is nothing in the world not in respect of the matter but of the signification for it neither representeth the true God who is a Spirit and hath no bodily shape nor yet the false gods which are nothing at all in the world Marbach 3. By one kinde of molten images all the rest are forbidden whether they be graven carved painted locutio est à parte totum significans it is a manner of speech taking a part for the whole Augustin Iunius But he giveth instance of molten images because of the molten calfe which they had lately made Lyranus 4. If it were unlawfull for them to suffer the Gentiles idols to stand but they were to breake them downe much more were they not to make them new Simler And so often is this Law repeated because of their pronenesse to idolatry Tostat. QUEST XXXVI Why the principall feasts of the Israelites are here rehearsed Vers. 18. THe feast of unleavened bread 1. The Lord renuing now his covenant with his people which was interrupted by their apostasie and falling away doth also againe prescribe unto them these festivall solemnities which they should observe unto him therefore renovato foedere repetuntur the covenant being renued they are also repeated Borrhaius 2. Another reason of this repetition is ne otiosus populus ceremonias Gentium aemuletur lest the idle people should have followed the ceremonies and superstitious festivals of the Gentiles the Lord prescribeth them certaine feasts wherein they should be occupied in setting forth of his praise Lippom. 3. Rupertus giveth this note Haec iteratiâ— praeceptorum Iudaeis carnalibus
the true service of God should not be inferiour unto the false worship of the Gentiles and involutum fuit Christi corpus Christs body was wrapped up in these ceremonies they were types and figures of things to come Simler 4. Now such sumptuous cost is not required in Gods service his worship being spirituall for the body being come the shadowes are ceased only a comelinesse and decencie is to be observed in the edifiers belonging to Gods service with seemely ornaments Simler QUEST IV. Whether one may offer himselfe to the calling of the Ministerie Vers. 10. ALL the wise hearted shall come c. Moses willeth such as God had endued with gifts to offer themselves to doe the service of the Tabernacle So it is not unlawfull for those which know themselves to be fitted and prepared with gifts to offer themselves in a modest and orderly sort unto the Ministery of the Gospell these conditions being observed 1. They must humbly acknowledge to have received all their gifts at Gods hands and that without his grace and helpe no vocation or calling can prosper as Iohn Baptist saith A man can receive nothing unlesse it be given him from heaven Iohn 3.27 and therefore their desire must be to referre all their gifts to Gods glory 2. They must submit themselves with lowlinesse to the judgement and triall of those penes quos est legitima vocatio unto whom belongeth the outward lawfull calling and approbation of men for the Apostle saith The spirits of the Prophets are subject to the Prophets 1 Cor. 14.32 3. They must take heed they enter not by unlawfull meanes as by gifts and bribery to corrupt those to whom the allowance and approbation of them belongeth that are to enter In this manner for one to offer himselfe is not to be an intruder but such an one is rather to be held as called of God Marbach QUEST V. Of the liberall and franke offering of the people Vers. 21. THou all the Congregation of the children of Israel departed c. 1. In that they departed from Moses it sheweth their deliberation and consultation with themselves which commendeth their discreet liberality that they would doe nothing rashly for it falleth out oftentimes that hee qui subitâ— fervore beneficus est which is liberall upon a sudden heat doth afterward repent him 2. They came and offered willingly not of constraint Marbach Some thinke this is added Every one whose spirit made him willing came and brought to shew a difference betweene the willing and unwilling but it rather sheweth that there was none found but brought willingly according to their ability 3. As by the manner their liberality appeareth so by the persons that offered not onely men but women not the Princes only but the people and as well the poore as the rich Pelargus 4. So also it is made manifest by the gifts which they offered not onely silver gold but even the Jewels and ornaments of their bodies earings rings bracelets even the nice and dainty women were willing to forgoe such things Marbach 5. And herein their repentance did shew it selfe that quae luxui antea servierunt c. the things which before they abused to wantonnesse and superstition are now consecrated to the service of the Tabernacle Simler QUEST VI. Why the women offered by themselves Vers. 22. THe men came with the women 1. The word is ghal which signifieth upon which Oleaster understandeth thus that the women were most forward and came first and then the men came upon them that is after them 2. Or he thinketh mention is made of men and women to signifie the great throngs and companies that came men and women together 3. But direct mention is made of the women to shew their ardent affection in not sparing to give their owne jewels Marbach And herein also was signified Deum non aspernari operas mulâ—â—rum That God despised not the service of women toward the worke of the Tabernacle Lippom. 4. The women offered by themselves but not without their husbands consent for all things were done in order the superstitious women alleage Ierem. 44.19 That they did not powre out their drinke offerings to the Queene of heaven without their husbands much more would not these devout women offer to the Lords worke without their husbands consent And though the husbands onely should have offered for themselves and their wives by mutuall consent it had come to one effect and should have beene alike acceptable unto God yet it contenteth the devout women better that they offer with their owne hands As when a summe was taken of the people every one put in halfe a sicle for himselfe Tostat. quaest 2. QUEST VII Why the workmen are named Vers. 30. THe Lord hath called by name Bezaleel 1. Marbachius thinketh that this narration of the workmen went before the offering of the people that they knowing who should have the disposing of their gifts might be more incouraged to bring but it is like that as the Lord after the description of the Tabernacle and what every one should bring toward it last of all made mention of the workmen chap. 31. so Moses observeth the same order 2. Cajetane saith that Moses signifieth who should be the chiefe workmen ne â—riatur contentio inter artifices that there should be no contention among the workmen 3. But that other note of Cajetane is not so good that whereas it is said Hee hath filled him with the spirit Elohim of God he by elohim understandeth a Iudge that God had made him a Judge or Umpire relativè ad alios artifices in respect of other artificers 4. I preferre rather Osianders collection that out of these words Iehovah filleth him with the Spirit of God proveth the Trinâ—â—y for there is one person of Iehovah which filleth another of the Spirit wherewith he is filled and the third of the Sonne of God whose Spirit it is 4. Places of Doctrine 〈…〉 Law of the Sabbaticall rest how morall Vers. 3. 〈…〉 The Sabbath is taken two wayes either precisely for the seventh 〈…〉 of the Law and is abolished or simply for a day of rest set apart for the 〈…〉 there is no nation almost which had not some festivall dayes for the 〈…〉 wherein although they diversly erred yet it sheweth that it was 〈…〉 and consequently was morall that some time should be appointed 〈…〉 2. Doct. The libertie of Christians is greater in the Sabbaticall rest than of the Iewes BUt yet the rest of the Lords day is not so strictly now injoyned as under the Law sed nunc liberalius nobiscum agit but now under the new Testament God dealeth more liberally with us some works are such as doe hinder the service of God which are by no meanes now to be done nisi cogat necessitas unlesse necessity constraine other works there are which are not such an impediment unto Gods service which may be done upon the Lords day yet so as God be first