way of grace And its poverty of Spirit when we see we have no grace and Saltmarsh Denne Crispe Eaton Towne and the Antinomians reject all comforts assurance or rejoycing from acts of Sanctification and works in the regenerate and say that its a seeking of righteousnesse in our selves and sure then it must bee a worke of the flesh to exercise our knowledge that way to discerne our selves to be sonnes because wee walke in love and after the Spirit Paral. II. Libertines said All sinne was but an opinion that we sinne and under opinion they comprehend conscience scruples remorse sense of judgement That Christs worke of Redemption was to destroy opinion and sense of sinne and then are men new creatures And there is no Devill no sinne no world that are our spirituall enemies David Georgius placed the spirituall life of his in committing Adulteries without sense of sinne and that publickely without shame and that faith in Jesus Christ was the way to abolish this shame in acting this filthinesse which shame was the fruit of the first Adams disobedience And that they should confesse all their sins to their shame again and again in the publike assembly till all pride and glorification of the flesh bee crucified that grace and mercy may be seene to be more glorious And they must goe in this selfe-denyall while they be deaden or to the opinion of any propriety of goods or possessions or wives or Marriages and then they come naked to the new Kingdome of David Georgius where they are to live above all lawes of marriage c. or consanguinity or the like Antinomans doe well neere border with this way onely that which Libertines doe call opinion or discerning of sinne Saltmarsh Eaton and Den call sense Towne calleth it sense or unbeliefe all call it sinning not before God but before men and in the conversation So they say the Adulteries Murthers committed by the justified are seeming sinnes sinnes in mens account saith Saltmarsh but not so before God and to the eye of Faith Now to live by faith is Antinomian Sanctification or Mortification or these sinnes saith Towne before God are no sinnes to faith they are meere nullities but to our sense and flesh they are sinnes So Saltmarsh and Eaton to sense reason experience or to unbeliefe that can but lye and deceive they are sinnes to faith and before God who seeth no sinne in us they are no sinnes Or as Master Denne saith They are sinnes in the conversation before men not in the conscience and before God and all come from this the Justified are under no Law of God and so cannot sinne if then they thinke their adulteries to be sinne that is sense unbeliefe ignorance of their Christian liberty and the erronious opinion of the old Adam Faith beleeveth Adultery to bee no sinne at all It s true to the beleever it is no condemning sinne no sinne such as actually bindeth them over to eternall wrath say we but not a nullity for that not for that an exorbitancie against no Law of God as the Libertine and his brother Antinomian say Then no sense of sinne no trouble of minde for sinne as good Saltmarsh saith can be in beleevers because where there is no transgression there is no Law and no trouble of minde for a breach of the Law This is an opinion of faith that Christ hath purchased a power to beleeve sinne to be no sinne and this is with David Georgius not to thinke shame of sinne but to be deadned to all sense of sinne and so Faith pulleth the conscience out of the justified man hee may sinne with ease CHAP. LXXV Libertines Familists and Antinomians free us from all Law and that we neither sinne nor are to be rebuked for sinne Paral. III. LIbertines said Wee were freed from all Law either directing commanding or condemning And so did David Georgius and so teach the Libertines of New England These that are in Christ are under no Law and Antinomians as Towne Saltmarsh Crisp Denne say We are freed from all the Law of God in all its offices to direct give light rule binde oblige or command as well as to threaten and condemne Paral. IV. Libertines taught That when we are once regenerate we can sinne no more but are as Angels So Libertines of New England and Antinomians say A beleever is as free from Hell Law and bondage on earth as if he were in heaven nor wants he any thing to make him so but to beleeve he is so And Hee that beleeveth saith Eaton that Christ hath taken away his sinnes is as cleane from sinne as Christ himselfe And to Faith there is no sinne and the beleevers person and works are perfect before God and free of sinne and sinfull imperfections Paral. V. When Libertines were rebuked for sin they said It s not I that sinne but my Asse or sinne dwelling in me and they cited that text 1 Joh. 3. He that is born of God sinneth not It s true Paul saith Rom. 7. Not I but sin dwelling in me but his meaning was it s not I as regenerate who sinne because I make not sinne my taske and worke nor doe I evill with the whole bensell of my soule the whole strength of my mind affections and will in regard the unrenewed part protesteth against sinne but I as unrenewed and as fleshly in part as halfe a sufferer I sinne being as a captive sighing in my fetters and complaining that I am wretched through necessitie of sinning I doe the evill I would not doe Rom. 7.17.18.22.23 But the Antinomians conspire with Libertines in the same sense for Towne saith That the old Adam and all his works are shut up under the Law and wrath of God So it is but the Old Adam the flesh the Law of the members that doth sin but it was never the Apostles minde to deny that a beleever once justified can sinne any more For in many things we sinne all Jam. 3.2 And if wee say we have not sinne we are lyars 1 Joh. 1. But Antinomians deny that beleevers can more sin then Christ himselfe or then the gloryfied in heaven and to a beleever there is no sinne God can see no sinne in them Now sure Libertines who said the state of the regenerate was an Angelike puritie did thinke sinnes acted by their Asse the flesh were no sinnes as Antinomians deny Adulteries and cousening and robbing done by the justified to be sinnes but seeming sinnes as Saltmarsh and no sinnes before God as Eaton saith CHAP. LXXVI Libertines and Antinomians destroy Scripture and make the Spirit all and some Paral. VI. LIbertines saith Calvin are so spirituall in their owne fancie that they count no more of the sacred word of God then of Fables except when it serves their turnes The places of Scripture
our or his owne lusts for us but in reall and personall acts of obedience to be deadned to to the world Gal. 6.14 To abstaine from fleshly lusts that warre against the soule from fornication uncleanesse inordinate affection evill concupiscence and such sinnes for which the wrath of God commeth on the Children of disobedience to wit on the Gentiles that never heard the Gospel now in reason wrath cannot come on the heathen who never heard of Christ because they beleeve not that he of whom they never heard hath crucified those sinnes for them on the crosse CHAP. XL. Antinomians the perfectists of our time say wee and our works are compleatly perfect ANtinomians ascribe not onely an imputative perfection in that Christs perfect righteousnesse is made ours but also an inherent perfection to the Saints But wee judge our state and persons through Christ to be perfect but our duties and begunne sanctification are not perfect but is so in growing as the Moone as a vessell not full to the brime and banks of the soule it receives quarts and gallons more It s true justification removeth the evill of works as touching all guilt or obligation to eternally revenging justice But as Christs grace addeth to our good works no dignity and perfection of meriting as Papists say so doth it not remove the inherent blot of sinne that cleaveth to our good works so as it should give to these works inherent perfection and remove their sinnefull defects for as sinne dwelleth in our persons after wee are justified though it bee not imputed so doth sinne cleave to our most gracious acts but is not accounted on our score because the surety hath answered our bill and removed the sinnefull imperction from them but hath not made them inherently perfect so as there should remaine nothing in the works of the justified that is contrary to the Law of God But the truth is Antinomians with no face of truth can say that Christ removeth the sinnefull imperfections that adhere to our good works done by the Grace of Christ when we are in the state of justification because if nothing wee doe in the state of justification be sinne since pardoned sinnes to Antinomians are no sinnes and have lost the nature and being of sinne being remitted and pardoned before they be committed these sinnes that cleave to our good works are no sinnes and so the good works must be perfect as the person is perfect 1. Because Antinomians go upon this ground that nothing inherent in the persons not the in-dwelling corruption of nature nor the adherent sins that cleave to our works nor any thing a justified man can doe is sinne or contrary to the Law but that person or works being pardoned both are as perfect as the person and works of Christ. A most blaspemous ground for what we want of perfect sanctification and wee want much in this life so farre are we sinnefully imperfect 2. Paul acknowledgeth his sinnefull imperfection I find a Law in my members rebelling against the Law of my minde not as if I were already perfect 3. In many things we offend all If any man offend not in word the same is a perfect man Hence the man that is perfect sinnes not but there is none in the earth that sinneth not and doth good 4. Wee crave pardon of sinnes as we seeke dayly our dayly bread It s contrary to Christian humility to say wee are perfectly cleane Object God can accept nothing that is unperfect and sinnefull because they are accursed Gal. 3.10 For God is veritie it selfe and will not suffer the losse of the least jot of the righteousnesse the Law requireth But all our best works are polluted with sinne Towne Answ. This proveth with the Papists that God cannot judge us righteous by faith because wee are sinners in our selves 2. God cannot accept sinnefull works as no sinnefull works at all he cannot accept of sinnes as no sinnes and of our good works as not polluted with sinne in themselves his judgement then should not be according to truth true but he can well accept our works though polluted with sinne as pardoned and washen not from their sinnefull imperfections inherent or adherent to them for then they should be intrinsecally perfect and God should judge amisse of them but as washen from their guilt and obligation to eternall wrath so he can well judge them perfect in Christ. 3. Legally cleane so as they shall never actually condemne us and 4. that of meere grace CHAP. XLI Antinomians say we are compleatly saved in this life as in heaven SO we thinke Antinomians faile wickedly with Libertines who say We are as actually saved and as perfectly as the glorified in heaven and not in hope onely or in reall beginning in regard of Christs sitting in heaven and therefore good workes can no more bee the way to heaven saith Towne then my walking in the Citie in which I am already can be my walking to the City But so while we are absent from the Lord in the body even in this life wee should be in heaven whereas the dissolution of our earthly tabernacle the raysing of us up at the last day are betweene us and the full redemption of our bodies And this is that which Libertines and Familists say that all the resurrection of the body and life eternall they know is our union with Christ in this life the Grammar of Hymeneus and Philetus who said the Resurrection was already past 3. We know but in part our love is not perfected in this life 1 Cor. 13.11 12 13. And we are not perfect men in Christ till we meet all in the unity of Faith Ephes. 4.13 3 The generall assembly of all the first borne is not yet convened we need a Temple and Ordinances and a Sunne and a Moone in the other life the Lambe shall be our Temple 4. The other life is such as in it wee can neither marry nor dye but are as the Angels Luk. 22.36 37. Phil. 3.20 21. 1 Cor. 15.40.41 5. Antinomians say this dreaming that we are as cleane of sinne as Christ and so Christed and Goded with Christ as the Libertine Pocquius said Calvin in Opus pag. 463. and Nicholas the Libertine cap. 34. 6. Paul saith Wee are saved by hope and wee hope not for what wee have already Our life is hid with Christ in God 1. He that beleeveth hath life not in the compleat and full fruition yet really in the certaintie of faith and hope 2. In the right claime purchased by Christ. 3. In the beginning first fruits and the degrees of grace tending to glory CHAP. XLII Our happinesse is in sanctification as well as in justification OUr happinesse is not meerely passive as Towne saith and in being justified as if that were all for though our blessednesse be in justification as the cause and fountaine in that sinne
in our selves but that the justified must be as free of all indwelling sinne as Christ Jesus or as the glorified in heaven and so absolutely perfect in our person and our works maketh all sanctification no sanctification before God and that inherent holynesse rendreth us not a whit lovely and acceptable to God more then if wee were wallowing in our lusts and serving the Devill contrary to the Scripture that saith That our sanctification is the will of God that our service is holy living and acceptable that God is well-pleased with our sacrifices of almes in Christ Jesus And that a holy and sincere profession and walking doth take the love and ravish the heart of Christ yea by this way we sinne onely in dishonouring Christ and in not walking in him contrary to the end of Redemption which calleth us to sanctification not in the sight of God but meerely declaratively for Eaton tells us that if any more be ascribed to Sanctification but a meere declaration to the eyes of men that we are healed we goe on with Papists and Bellarmine to make sanctification the onely formall cause why we are justified But the man is farre out Bellarmine and Papists say that God so farre accepteth works of inherent holynesse that without Christs imputed righteousnesse we are justified for these works we acknowledge that God for Christ loveth and accepteth works of sanctification and obligeth us to them by a command to doe them except we would sinne in omitting them but that God loveth and accepteth them as the cause of our righteousnesse in part or in whole in the matter of our justification wee utterly deny Antinomians would have all acts of sanctification meerely arbitrary and of courtesie and to come from no obligation of a command or Law and so that these acts being omitted are no sinne before God and being omitted they are but arbitrary no declarations we are not healed or discourtesies to Christ no sinnes against a Law and being performed God loveth them no more then he doth Adulteries or Murthers acted by justified persons Master Eaton ignorantly objecteth That God by justification shall place us in two contrary states of salvation and damnation to bee the members of Christ and of the Devill that God shall come short of his end of Redemption if wee be sinners in our selves then cannot the bloud of Christ clense us from all sin divers other things that are Characters of weakenesse and poore Divinity he objecteth as all his gang doth Answ. Sinners are taken two wayes in Scripture 1. For wicked men servants of sinne sinne having a dominion and Lordship over the party as in many Scriptures is cleare So we say not that we are both righteous before God and sinners in our selves we should then be both sanctified and not sanctified members both of Christ and of Sathan as hee objecteth But we take sinners in this for these that are sinnefull and have sinne dwelling in them and for such as If they say they have no sinne they are lyars and so the Scripture also taketh sinners Now Antinomians deny the justified to sin at all or to have any sinne dwelling in them because Christ hath washed away all sinne But ignorant men they should know that justification is a forinsecall and judiciall freeing us from all sinne that is from the Law-guilt and condemnation of all sinne and so all our sinnes are removed as a cloud are taken away as if they were cast into the bottome of the Sea but justification is not a Physicall washing away and expulsion of all indwelling and inhabitation of sinne and an introduction of the contrary habit as when heat commeth in the same subiect in the place of coldnesse light in the place of darkenesse whitenesse in the subject in which blacknesse did reside as Antinomians with Papists fondly conceit this is sanctification which is imperfect and graduall in this life not justification and so it followeth not that one and the same person because sinne dwelleth in him after justification but subdued and having lost his dominion is now both under the dominion of Sathan and also a member of Christ. 2. Christ obtaineth his end in Redemption which is to free the sinner from sinnes condemnation in justification fully and in sanctification by degrees not fully while we be perfected in glory Christ can well dwell in the heart by faith where sinne dwelleth as an underling but not where it dwelleth as a King and Tyrant in its full dominion which dominion is not removed formally by justification though the state of justification and the full dominion of sinne cannot stand together in the same person but properly and formally by sanctification It s true God seeth sinne pardoned and the sinner freed from the guilt but he seeth it dwelling in us not to our condemnation for the Lord imputeth it not and therefore it followeth not that the Lord both seeth us righteous in Christ and not righteous in Christ but onely hee seeth us righteous in Christ by imputation of grace and freed from condemnation and sinnefull in our selves by the inherencie and in-dwelling of sinne pardoned and subdued which is the doctrine of Prophets and Apostles delivered in the Scripture CHAP. LXXXIX Antinomians are ignorant of Faith to dreame that its Faith to beleeve against sense that our sinnes are no sinnes IT is the true nature and essence of Faith say Antinomians To beleeve cleane contrary to that which we see and beleeve in our selves if God hath spoken the contrary as if God were not able to abolish that sinne which wee dayly feele dwelling in us out of his owne sight above our reason sense and feeling The Mystery is this as for the Adulteries Oppressions treacherous Covenant-breach Lying that justified Antinomians commit Faith is to beleeve they are no sinnes before God against no Law but meere nullities in the Lords Law-court as Towne saith though Lying and deceiving reason beleeveth them to be sins for its true faith To beleeve the contrary of what sense and reason apprehendeth because God so saith and giveth his Sonnes bloud to cleanse us from all sin and sweareth the same But this is a dead false lying faith of Antinomians 1. Because the light of faith discovereth the sinnes of a justified person to bee hainous provocations of the majestie of God so David I acknowledge my transgression and my sinne is ever before me And the Church For our transgressions are with us and as for our iniquities we know them And Paul in the New Testament I know that in me that is in my flesh dwelleth no good And I find then a Law that when I would doe good evill is present with me And I see another Law in my members rebelling against the Law of my minde and bringing me into captivity to the Law of sinne which is in my members these three words 〈◊〉
Recantation of the Antinomian errour in an Epistle of D. Luther to Mr. D. Guthel containing the minde of Luther touching Antinomians as a Sect that had their rise from the Devill 69 70 71 72 73 74 Luther is for the Law 70 71 That none is perfect in this life and we are to sorrow for sin 73 74 Islebius recanted his Recantation and returned to spread Antinomianisme after Luthers death 80 81 The tenets of Islebius Antinomians in Luthers time 81 82 The Antinomian way of Paulus Crellius in Luthers time 182 183 184 How Antinomians stated the question of old 83 How the Law is a patient to beleevers 84 Of the Antinomianisme of Michael Neander 84 85 Divers distinctions touching the use of and freedome from the law tending to cleare Luthers mind 86 87 Three speciall uses of the law according to Luther Ibid. Luther refuteth Antinomians in terminis and is most contrary to them 86 87 89 How faith only justifieth as Luther saith 100 How faith and works are contrary 101 How according to Luthers minde the Law hath power over the flesh and not over the renewed conscience 102 103 How Good workes conforme to the law are not necessary 103 The law the same now and under the covenant of works Ibid The law is given properly to the new man not to the flesh 103 104 How the terrified conscience is freed from the law 105 106 How the law condemneth and terrifieth how not 106 107 How the law is given to the New man how not 108 109 Excellent replyes of a beleever to the accusing law 109 110 The tempted beleever freed from challenges of the law 110 111 How a tempted beleever is to comfort himselfe against law-temptations in the conscience 112 113 Luther is for conditions in the Covenant and for preparations before conversion 114 115 Sundry excellent answers to Satan and the law what a sinner is at the brink of dispaire 115 116 117 118 How we are patients in justification how not 118 119 How the law is weak 119 How good workes are naught 120 121 How the law is abolished how not 121 122 That the law is to be preached to all 119 120 Of the union betweene Christ and a beleever opposite to the phancied union of Familists and Antinomians who say that a beleever is Godded and Christed 123 124 125 Of our legall union our union by faith our union by marriage by nature and the intervening of interests and conditions with Christ and a sinner 125 126 127 Luther makes sin to dwell in the justified contrary to Antinomians 129 130 How it is in them and how removed pardoned sinne is essentially sin 131 132 133 134 How we are under the law and under grace in regard of the flesh and the Spirit 134 135 The divers respects of Law and Gospel 138 How the law is a dead Letter 139 Of the Letter and the Spirit 139 140 Luther detesteth allegories 139 How the beleever needeth not the Law in the Letter 142 143 None are perfect in this life as Luther saith contrary to Antinomians 143 144 We must then have patience 144 145 Sin in the beleever rageth to their feeling and yet is made lesse sin 145 146 Luther taught that the Jewes were Justified and actually pardoned by faith as we are contrary to Antinomians 146 147 148 Ch. IX Of Christian liberty and of true false sense 148 149 c. Luther in the point of Christian liberty is against the Antinomians 148 149 How the Law hath nothing to doe with the conscience according to Luther 149 150 151 152 Antinomians distinction that we sinne not against the Law but against Christ removed 151 Luther unduly chargeth these he calleth Sacramentarians with making the Spirit without the word their rule it being the doctrine of Antinomians in his time 153 154 How wee are to judge of our spirituall estate by sense how not 153 154 Luthers minde of freewill and contrary to Antinomians therein 155 156 How the will is a patient rather then an agent in good 157 158 Of the subjective and active power of freewill 158 159 Thirteen considerations of the Author touching freewill 160 161 162 163 An absolute independent power in the will to doe without the predeterminating grace of God neither peculiar to the Covenant of workes before the fall nor to the Covenant of grace after the fall 160 161 Chap. XIV Of the piece called Theologia Germanica and of the Bright starre 163 164 c. Libertines sprang from the Gnosticks Familists from Libertines Antinomians from both 163 164 165 Of John Waldesso who hath sundry principles of Familisme and Antinomianisme in his booke 164 165 God is the creature saith Theologia Germanica 165 To ascribe any thing to the creature is sinne the new man is Christ. 165 166 How creatures are under-causes of their owne working 166 The hell and heaven of Familists 167 The Familists acknowledge no Christ but a metaphoricall Christ. 167 168 So Theol. Germanica and the piece called the Bright-star The workes of H. Nicholas 168 Familists of England dissemble their grossest points Their Petition to King James 168 Vent their malice in the Petition against Puritans were tollerated by Prelates because they railed against non-conformists 169 The contents of the Petition of the Familists in England to King James 168 169 170 Chap. XV. Of the Familists and Antinomians in New England 171 Their rise ib. Their tenets 171 172 173 The Saints suffering are God manifested in the flesh as Saltmarsh and Familists say 172 173 174 Saltmarsh Chaplaine to the Generall Sir Tho. Fairfax goes along with the Familists of N. England ibid. Ordinances of preaching reading hearing Sacraments are not to be seperated from the Spirit nor the Spirit from them 175 Chap. XVI Of the first Authors of Antinomianisme and Familisme in N. England as Mistresse Hutchison M. Wheelwrit their preaching seditious railing and foule tenets 176 177 178 Mrs. Hutchison bold maintained she might preach to a Congregation and alledged the example of Priscilla 178 Her abominable tenets in which she denied the immortality of the soule the resurrection Christ heaven sanctification asserted revelations beside and without the word of God 178 179 A Generall Assembly at Cambridge in N. England confuted and condemned M. Hutchison M. Wheelwright and others 180 M. Hutchison bare thirty formed monsters 181 Was excommunicated banished to the Road-Iland killed by the Indians she and all her house 181 182. as is reported Mrs. Dyer a Familist the wife of William Dyer a prime Familist brought forth a terrible monster 181 182 Chap. XVII Of the late Familists banished out of N. England in Massachusets and now inhabitants of Shaw-omet otherwise called Providence 188 The blasphemous tenets of Sam. Gortyn a wicked Familist who preacheth openly in and about London 183 184 185 Gortyn and these Familists deny God incarnate and say every suffering Saint is Christ and there is not another Christ. 184 185 186 So doth M. Beacon
as abrogate How little Antinomians esteeme Moses and the Prophets wee all know 15 The third rancke called Apostolici said we must become young with children Antinomians abandon sense nature reason and say we must live by faith only So hony-combe Towne Saltmarsh Den. 16 The third ranke were Spiritualists who abstained from cloathing meat feasts musicke to Saltmarsh all externalls are legall and carnall 17 The fourth ranke were the holy and sinlesse 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and would not pray the Lords prayer forgive us our sinnes and contended for Saints in this life without spot or wrinkle Crispe and other Antinomians say the beleevers are as cleane from sinne as Christ himselfe and cite the same place Ephes. 5.25 26. for it So Del the spirituall Church is led and taught by the anoynting the carnall Church by councels letter of the word 18 These denyed originall sinne in infants Antinomians deny it in all the elect who are justified from eternity or from Christs Death or from the time of their beleeving 19 The fifth ranke were Silentiaries tacentes they denyed necessity of preaching as Antinomians doe because the anoynting is sufficient they thought it indifferent to deny their Religion 20 The sixt ranke prayed only which Antinomians doe never but praise onely 21 The seaventh were arreptitiously and Enthysiastically inspired and fell in transes and saw visions of lyes Antinomians hold revelations and rapts of the Spirit without the word for their rule 22 The eight rank were these in higher Germany that are called libâ—ri fratres free brethren they were abominable impure and so uncleane that they were excommunicated by the rest they said they were delivered by Christ from all lawes covenants vowes paying of tithes or debts as Saltmarsh saith to doe any thing from these grounds is law-bondage free grace pag. 180 they owe no obedience unto Magistrates they said marriage was free with any of neerest blood that men could not be saved except they were Publicans and Harlots they held men might have many wives at once that after rebaptization they cannot sinne as Eaton the Antinomian saith hony-comb c. 3 p. 25. that not they but the flesh sinned as Towne saith asser pag. 35. 23 The ninth ranke were called also liberi fratres they said baptizing of infants Magistrates oathâ—s were things indifferent preaching â—earing scriptures were needlesse because we shall be all taught of God Sacraments are but common signes that beleevers need not it was free and indifferent to confesse Christ before men if danger be God delights not in our blood nor requires he that we dye for his truth we may dissemble our religion deny Christ before men so we keepe the truth in our hearts I often prove Antinomians to run in this straine 24 The tenth sort were called Huttites from Iohn Hut these took on them to cut off all the Cananites that is all the ungodly with the sword and gave away their goods because they said the day of judgement was neare at hand Ioh. Hut and the like false Prophets in their owne name could not learne wit from Cochebaâ— the Jew the son of a starre who called himselfe the Starre of Iacob and Redeemer of Israel but proved Benchozba the sonne of a lye he and his were destroyed by Tynius Ruffus president of Palestina he arose in time of Aelius Adrianus An. 118. or 120 Eusebius eccle Hist. l. 4. c. 5. nor would learne wit from the folly of a Jew who rose Anno. 379 in the time of Theodosius the great he called himselfe Moses promised to lead the people to Canaan drye through the sea caused the Iewes leap into the sea who drowned themselves and beat out their brains in the rocke and counterfeit Moses it may be the Devill disapeared and was seen no more Tripart Hist. l. 12. c. 9. Nicep l. 14. c. 4. 25 The eleventh ranke were called Augustinians from one Augustine a Bohemian Enthysiast they were ruled by scriptureles dreames 26 Anabaptists deny that scripture can prove any thing by consequence but it must be in so many syllables logicke and consequencies say Antinomians are to be abandoned in divinity 27 Melchior Hoffman a Skinner an 1529 said Strasburg was new Ierusalem 2 He was to be called an Apostle from heaven 3 Leaned to Enthysiasmes 28 Hoffman said he was Elias and Cornel Polterman Enoch 29 Menno Simonz the sonne of a secular priest borne in Frizland neere Harlingen about an 1532 rejected Enthysiasmes and yet slighted the scriptures 2 rejected apostolick calling 3 maintained the grosest Pelagianisme that the saints live free from all sinne as Eaton the Antinomian honie-combe CHAP. IIII. Of David George DAvid Georgius born in Delâ— was the son of a Mountebank or Iugler say some by trade a painter he vented his heresie an 1540 he was a composed plaistered hypocrite austerer than any bare footed Fryer or Capucian did often fast three dayes together was eloquent he taught that He himselfe 1 was the sonne of God the true and spirituall David borne of the spirit where as Iesus Christ was borne of the flesh 2 He was sent to restore the house of Israel not by death but by grace 3 The doctrine of Moses the Prophets Christ and the Apostles was unperfect carnall litterall Antinomians reject all written law and Gospell as a legall covenant of works and his was spirituall and perfect 4 He said the law was abolished as doe also Antinomians and he was the true and living law to his discipâ—es Antinomians say the Spirit of life in beleivers is all their law Del. Ser. pag. 26. Saltmarsh free grace 146. 5 He transformed the scriptures in allegories said Angels were but motions in the minde of man so do Familists and Antinomians Randel the Familist preached that because Christ preached parables therefore it is lawfull to expound the scriptures in allegories and that all things in nature and art were sacraments of the supernaturall mysteries of the Gospell therefore they expound God manifested in the flesh to be a believer Godded and Christed with the being of God in Faith and love The pâ—ice called Philosophy dissected maketh all the workes of Creation Articles of faith 6 He said to act adulteries and all villanies without sense of sin and shame as with a deadned conscience was the onely spirituall mortification and new birth his followers should labour for and then and not while then were they borne of the Spirit the same Libertines taught and so doe Antinomians and Familists that to repent sorrow and mourne for sin or to be touched with any sense thereof or from this sense to confesse sin is from fleshly unebeliefe and the old Adam then to sinne without sense is faith and mortification and this is cousen German with the Libertines regeneration and nearer 7 All marriage of nearest of bloud though under Moses and Christ they were forbidden yet are they now lawfull under this mâ—re spirituall
Solomons song were but one particular beleever which is a demonstration that the particular actings of the spirit of grace cannot be written in the scriptures yet are they not to be thought unlawfull revelations and destitute of the word no more then we can say all the particular actings of Devills of all wicked men since the creation of whoring swearing Idol-worship lying stealing oppressing mis-beleeving c are not contrary to the expresse law of the Holy Ghost speaking in the word because these sinnefull actes are not particularly all specified and written in scripture with the names of the actors There is a 3 revelation of some particular men who have forefold things to come even since the ceasing of the Canon of the word as Iohn Husse Wickeliefe Luther have foretold things to come and they certainely fell out and in our nation of Scotland M. George Wishaâ—t foretold that Cardinall Beaton should not come out alive at the Gates of the Castle of St. Andrewes but that he should dye a shamefull death and he was hanged over the window that he did look out at when he saw the man of God burnt M. Knox prophecied of the hanging of the Lord of Grange M. Ioh Davidson uttered prophecies knowne to many of the kingdome diverse Holy and mortified preachers in England have done the like no Familists or Antinomians no David George nor H. Nicholas no man ever of that Gang Randel or Wheelwright or Den or any other that ever I heard of being once ingaged in the Familisticall way ever did utter any but the fourth sort of lying and false inspirations Mrs Hutchison said she should be delivered from the Court of Boston miraculously as Daniel from the Lyons which proved false Becold prophecied of the deliverance of the Towne of Munster which was delivered to their enemies and he and his Prophet were tortured and hanged David George prophecied of the raising of himselfe from the dead which was never fulfilled now the differences between the third and fourth revelations I place in these 1 These worthy reformers did tye no man to beleeve their prophecies as scriptures we are to give faith to the predictions of Prophets and Apostles foretelling facts to come as to the very word of God they never gave themselves out as organs immediately inspired by the Holy Ghost as the Prophets doe and as Paul did Rom. 11. prophecying of the calling of the Iewes and Ioh. Revel 1.10 and through the whole booke yea they never denounced Iudgement against those that beleeve not their predictions of these particular events and facts as they are such particular events facts as the Prophets and Apostles did But Mrs. Hutchison said Rise Reigne pag. 61 art 27. That her particular revelations about future events were as infallible as any scripture and that shee is bound as much to beleeve them as the Scripture for the same Holy Ghost is author of both Mr. Câ—â—mwell and Familists of old England say she and heâ—s were the more spirituall and only Saints in New England and the rest were but Antichristian persecutors It s knowne they held revelations without and beside the word of God Rise reigne er 4â— and said the whole letter of the Scripture holdes forth a covenant of workes er 9. And so the whole letter of the Scripture Law or Gospell is abolished to beleevers and doth no more oblige them then the covenant of workes can curse those that are under grace For T Collier marrow of Christianity pag. 25.26 sayth many spiritually enlightned of late are brought to Gospell-inioyments some other way which is spirituall then by verball preaching but Familists take the word preached for the printed inkie letter or the aire dead sound of the Gospell we take it for letter and sound of preaching as it includes the thing signified to wit Christ and all his promises in which sense the sounding of the Gospel heard worketh many yeares after it is preached and the word long agoe preached may be awaked up by a sad affiction an inspiration from God and produce the worke of conversion and still it is the word of truth in the scripture that produceth faith as it is the same seed that lyeth many monthes under the clod and groweth and bringeth forth fruit after And we know Antinomians reject the scriptures and build all upon inward revelations as their binding and obleiging rule Del ser. pag. 26 Saltmarsh free grace pag. 146. 2 The events revealed to Godly and sound witnesses of Christ are not contrary to the word But Becold Iohn Mathie and Ioh. Schykerus who kild his brother for no fault and other Enthysiasts of that murthering Spirit Sathan who killed innocent men expresly against the sixt command Thou shalt not Kill and taught the Boures of Germany to rise and kill all lawfull Magistrates because they were no Magistrates upon the pretence of the Impulsions and Inspirations of the Holy Ghost were acted by inspirations against thâ— word of God All that the Godly reformers foretold of the tragicall ends of the proclaimed enemies of the Gospell they were not actors themselves in murthering these enemies of God nor would M Wishart command or approve that Norman and Ioh. Leslyes should kill the Câ—rdinall Beaton as they did 2 They had a generall rule going along that Evill shall hunt the wicked man onely a secret harmelesse but an extraordinary strong impulsion of a Scripture-spirit leading them carried them to apply a generall rule of divine justice in their predictions to particular Godlesse men they themselves onely being foretellers not copartners of the act 3 They were men sound in the faith opposite to Popery Prelacy Sociâ—ianisme Papisme Lawlesse Enthysiasme Antinomianisme Aâ—minianisme Arrianisme and what else is contrary to sound doctrine all these being wanting in such as hold this fourth sort of revelations we cannot judge them but Satanicall having these characters 1 They are not pure and harmelesse but thrust men on upon bloody and wicked practises forbidden by God though â—od bad Abraham kil his only son for him to try his obedience yet God countermanded him and would not have him act accordingly these Spirits actually kill the innocent upon a pretended Spirits impulsion 2 They have no rule of the word to countenance them and if they lead men from the Law the Testimony it s because there is no light in them Esa. 8.20 3 These revelations lodge in men of rotten and corrupt minds destitute of the truth and they are opposite and destructive to sanctification 4. They argue the scriptures to be imperfect and to be a lamed and manâ—ked directory of faith and manners contrary to Scripture Psa. 19 7 8 9. 2 Tim. 3.15 16. Luk. 16.30.31 Ioh. 20.30 31. Act. 26.22 Psal. 119.105 c. 4 Then the Scripture shal not decide all controverted truthes nor be that by which we shall finde the truth and the rule of trying of the Spirits whether they be of God or no contrary to Io. c. 39.
or the flesh and old man in every man So say the English Antinomians that the precepts of a Christian conversation doe onely obleige the hypocrites under the law that are mixed with true beleevers so doth Towne all the duties Mat. 5. Blessed are the meeke c. are performed by the beleever in Christ and Christ presseth not these â—uties as obleiging the beleever but that he may destroy all vaine boasting and confidence in mans owne righteousnesse of workes bred by the Scribes and Pharisies which is an abominable doctrine for then there was no beleever on earth blessed through personall meekenesse spirituall poverty hungring for Christ and the Apostles and beleevers were not blessed nor had any reward to looke for in heaven in that they were persecuted and killed for Christs sake the contrary is cleare in scripture The putting on of the new mâ—n said they and walking in newnesse of life is nothing but externall discipline and hath nothing common with the Spirit So Eaton Crispe Den Saltmarsh it s but to walke according to the outward conversation honestly as in the sight of men not as in the sight of God yea walking contrary to new obedience and after the lusts of the old man in beleevers is no sinne which God can see in beleevers say Eaton Towne Saltmarsh in Luthers time Christopherus Petzelius wrote a bitter peece for Antinomianisme against Ioannes Wigandus Crellius in spoâ—gia contra Ioâ—n Vigandum and others as Petrus Paladius in catalo aliquot haereseor relateth Antinomians now as of olâ— pretended that Luther is of their mind and alleadge diverse testimonies out of Luther But Luther instituted six publicke disputations at Wittingburg against the Antinomians but the style of Luther was according to his Spirit and zeale hot hyperbolicke vehement against justification by works and therefore these distinctions are to bee observed to cleare Luthers minde 1 Luther speaketh one way of the Law and the workes of the law in the matter of justification and a far otherway of the Law and workes simply as they obleige all 2 To Luther the law teaching squaring commanding is one thing the law in strict terms commanding perfection under highest eternal paine compelling terrefying cursing condemning is another thing 3 The Law compelling legally and condemning that it may condemne is one thing and the Law compelling and condemning materially not that it may destroy and condemne but condemning to the end it may chase the sinner to Christ and save intentionally is a farre other thing 4 The conscience simply is one thing and the conscience terrifyed crushed shaken with dispaire a far other thing Luther constantly â—aught that the law obligeth the conscience of believers as well as unbelievers and yet that the law ought to exercise no dominion over the terrified affrighted conscience of a believer to presse him to despair 5 The Law according to Luther hath three speciall uses 1 That it may reveale sinne and wrath and by this be a paedagogue 〈◊〉 lead the sinner to Christ. 2 To be a rule of a holy life 3 To discipline and compesce with the fury and feare of wrath hypocrites and wicked men that they may be disciplined externally and not goe with loose raines after their lusts 6 The Law in its rigour as it sounds out of the mouth of Moses and is violated and presseth us to absolute obedience out of our owne strength without a Mediator or a Mediators free grace is to the beleever a rough and bloody enemy and preacheth bloody tragedies and craveth and exacteth hard things but the Law as pacified with the blood of a surety and as it is the sweet â—reathing of the love of Christ through the Spirit and as it saith walke in love through the strength of him that hath loved you to death it is a sweet warme kindly lovely freind and leadeth us being willing 7 The law is eternall the law condemning forceing cursing a believer is not eternall but ceaseth to the believer in that bloody office through the satisfaction of Christ. 8 Luther highly magnifieth good works in themselves but as the agent resteth on them with confidence he abaseth them 9 The law without the Spirit is a poore thin liueles hopeles useles dead letter the law animated with the Spirit and tempered with some ounces of Gospel-breathings of free grace concurreth instrumentally to convert quicken revive us and to promote salvation 10 The law as it teacheth directeth commandeth obligeth bindeth to duties for the authority of the law-giver and is ever an active rule to the believer and never a passive thing But as it condemneth and â—urseth it is to a believer a meere passive and a naked stander by and hath no activity nor can it act in that power upon any in Christ as the law of Spaine is meerly passive in condemning a free borne man dwelling in Scotland 11 The binding authority in the law laying on the sinner an obligation to doe and act is different from the binding power of the law to suffer punishment for transgressing of the law The former agreeth to the Law simply as it is a Law the latter agreeth to the Law aâ— it is violated and disobeyed 2 The former is eternall urgeth the believer unbeliever before the fall after the fall in the life to come the latter is removed in Christ to all those that are in Christ for the law fully satisfied neither condemneth nor can it condemne to eternall suffering for Christs passive obedience removeth all possibility of our passive obedience for sin in a satisfactory way 12 The Law admonishâ—th but helpeth not Hence these conclusions for the clearing of the truth and of the minde of Luther more fully 1 Conclusion Luther expresly declared himselfe against Antinomians by that title and name They are saith Luther pernitious teachers who in our time moved by ways I know not what contend that the law should not be preached in the Church wouldest thou not preach the Law where there is truely a people for Law to wit men greedy proud unclean usurers Idolaters In the Antinomian sect saith Luther this is a peculiar proposion if any was an adulterer a murtherer c. let him only believe that God is gratious to him and that 's enough but what a Church is this in which so horrible a voice doth sound But we must teach that there be two sort of sinners some who acknowledge their sin some who securely please themselves therein I intreat Saltmarsh Eaton Crispe Den Towne Del Randel Simson who are so much against all preparations for Christ and for sole beleeving and cry out so much against strict walking with God to consider this How can the preaching of the Law bee excluded out â—f the Church doe ye not also exclude the fear of God and a great part of the works of God The Antinomians these new prophets contend that men should
this sanctification of life is not a jot the way of that justified person to heaven I perswade my selfe Luther had an eye to Antinomians when he said 〈◊〉 feared after his death that the doctrine of the true office of the law should be obscured Luther to 3. fol. 102 admoneo pietatiâ— amatores praecipue qui aliquando sunt futuri doctores ut diligentèr ex Paulo disâ—â—â—t intelligere verum et proprium usum legis qui ut timeo post tâ—mpora nostra interim obscurabitur et prorsus obruetuâ— to 4.106 timeo quod ista doctrina de vero legis usu nobis extinctiâ—â—bscurabitur 3 Conclusion Luther saith the New man needeth no law it s the flesh the old man the body of sin that is under the Law The law in a Christian ought not to exceed his bounds and ought onely to have dominion over the flesh which is subject to it and remaineth under it but oh law wilt thou invade the conscience and exercise dominion there and accuse the conscience of a justified beleever none terrified of sin and take away the joy of heart thou dost this beyond thy office When I behold Christ I am all holy and pure knowing nothing of the Law as it curseth and condemneth the beleever but if I behold my flesh I finde avarice lust wrath pride feare of death sadnes horror hatred murmuring and impatience against God in so farre as these are present Christ is absent or if he be present he is weakely present here there is need yet of a paedagogoe who should exercise and vex this strong asse the flesh that by this paedagogue sinnes may bee diminished and a way prepared for Christ. Luther Lex in Christiano non debet excedere limites suos sed tantum dominum habere in carnem quae et ei subiecta sit et sub ea maneat hoc ubi fit lex consistit intra suos limites lex si tu vis ascendere in regnum conscientiae et ibi dominari loquitur de conscientia hominis justificati sub tentationibus terrefacta et eam arguere peccati et gaudiâ—m cordis tollere hoc praeter officium tuum facis Si Christum inspicio totus sanctuâ— et purus sum nihil plane sciens de lege Si vero meam carnem inspicio sentio avaritiam libidinem iram superbiam timorem mortis tristitiam pavorem odium murmurationem et impatientiam contra Deum quatenus ista adsunt catenus abest Christus aut si adest infirme adest hic opus est adhuc paedagogo qui fortem asinum carnem exerceat et vexet ut hac paedagogia minuantur peccatâ— et Christo via paretur I grant the Antinomians now as Town Saltmarsh Den and the old Antinomians in Luthers time spoke after the same Grammer and stile and so did the Libertines in Calvins time say non ego pecco sed Aâ—inus meus It s not I that transgresse the law and am under the law but my asse But they have a farre other minde then Luther for the Antinomians as Schlusfelburgius saith cato heriti l 3. p. 53 54. taught that the flesh only and the unrenewed man was under the law but the renewed and justified man was under no law more then if it had beene never given to him and the law was no rule of life and obedience to a beleever Luther cryeth against this as most false and Luther saith those that beleeve in Christ must be daily mortified by daily Law-rebukes and arguenda sunt peccata et proponenda ira dei propter incredulos qui in ecclâ—sia sunt imo etiam propter credentes ne adhaerescenti peccato et innatae imbicillitati indulgeant lex manet inquit ante evangelium et justificationem in justificatione et post justificationem Luther verum tunc amplius non sunt opera legis sed Christi in nobis per fidem operantiâ— et viventis per omnia ideo non possunt sunt Mogis omitti quam ipsa fides nâ—c sunt minus necessaria quam ipsa fides Caeterum opera legalitâ—r perfecta quae verè sunt legis ficta et falsa sunt Good workes saith Luther are not any more the workes of the law compelling under the paine of damnation for he saith in the same place libere et gratis facienda sunt but workes of Christ working in us by faith and every way living in us therefore they can no more be omittted then faith it selfe and are no lesse necessary then faith it selfe Observe this in reading Luthers works that he taketh the law as opposed to justifieing grace and as it may condemne or justifie and so as an instrument of the Covenant of works exacting perfect obedience in a legall sence otherwise neither Luther nor any of our Divines will say good works absolutely perfect and in all things conforme to the Law are necessary to salvation for it is false all beleevers are saved by faith in Christ without any such good workes or perfect legall obedience Then we must hold this to be Luthers minde that if good workes be commanded to the renewed man in the law as well as faith and be as necessary as faith then the renewed part is under the law commanding good workes as well as it is under the command of faith but Luther saith the former Antinomi say nothing sins but the flesh nothing is under the law but the flesh so nothing is under a command and an obleiging rule of law or Gospell to doe good workes and beleeve but the flesh a senselesse untruth For it is the new man by the Spirit of Christ saith Luther from the word of truth that doth good workes and beleeveth So Luther to 4. fol. 499 in Psal. 130. 2 and excellently saith Luther to 1 fol. 436 Christiana lâ—bertas est quando non â—utata legâ— mâ—taâ—tur homines ut lâ—x eadem quae prius libero arbitrio odiosaâ—uit iam defusa per spiritus saâ—ctâ— charitatem cordibus nostris iucunda fiat Hence Luther saith two things that contradicts the Antinomians 1. The Law is not changed when the sinner is changed but that which was hatefull to free will before is the same law but now sweet and pleasant to the heart then if the law be not so much as changed it is not abolished to the beleever it s made of hatefull pleasant 2. That Law that is pleasant to the heart and sweet it is not given to the flesh and unrenewed part but especially to the renewed part 3 The renewed part in the beleever doth either do good workes by the grace of Christ and so keepe the law though unperfectly or not doe good workes at all If the latter be said the renewed part is not renewed but dead and is the very old man which is a contradiction but if thâ— former be said that it is the new man or renewed part that
that being once justified and having obtained the Spirit they are not obliged by any obligation of a command involving sin in case of disobedience to either read heare or meditate in the Scriptures but are so freed from the signe having obtained the thing that they are not under the letter of law or Gospel written or preached or under any outward command or Ordinance or Law or Sacrament or sin or obligation at all but are led by a free arbitrary Spirit separated from all letter of the word A vain dream For Luther holdeth the letter of the Law to be an erroneous false and wicked seeking of righteousnesse by the works of the Law and a living to sin and from the oldnesse of the letter in this sense we are freed by the Spirit of faith and Luther explaineth himselfe when hee saith Obtentare jam signo non opus having obtained the Spirit we need not the letter He meaneth nothing lesse then when we have received the Spirit we need not the written Scriptures or the Commandement or any outward Ordinances nor any commanding Sure Sathan devised that sense it came never in Luther never in Pauls minde but he meaneth having obtained the thing that is the Spirit we need not the signe that is the letter of the Law only without the Spirit now the letter of the Law only commandeth perfect and exactly absolute obedience under the paine of eternall damnation But Luther explaineth himselfe in the very next words Ideo obtenta re Spiritu jam signo non opus Itaque neque justo lex ost posita What is that Luther to 4. fol. 178. Lex justo non est posita sic enim justus vivit ut nullâ lege opus habeat c. He so liveth that hee hath not need of the Law to teach and command without Christ that he must performe absolutely pâ—rfect obedience to the Law otherwise he is eternally condemned this is the letter of the Law for the just man is in Christ. Ideo Lex saith Luther there non potest accusare reos agere credentes in Christum the Law cannot accuse and condemne beleevers in Christ in the same sense saith Luther to 1.451 Justus non debet bene vivere the justified man ought not to live holily according to the letter of the absolute commanding Law enjoyning obedience under paine of eternall condemnation for faith looseth him from this debet and from this Law debt yet vivit bene hee liveth holily and he ought to live holily in an Evangelick sense and that this is Luthers minde is cleare the just man is loosed from that Law that the unjust and beleever is under as Luther saith in the same place Injustus debet bene vivere Now the beleever being under the Law he is a full debter to pay active and passive obedience to the brim he owes in a manner as much as Christ paid to the Law 2. Luther saith in the same place Hoc totum urget c. God presseth all this that we seeke not a letter-righteousnesse that is righteousnesse by the workes of the Law for the Law in its letter requireth absolute obedience under the paine of death But Christs intention sense is not that the â—etter of the Law Cursed be he that obeyeth not in all that is written in the Law to doe it shall stand against the beleever but that the spirituall sense shall stand that the beleever shall bee cursed in his head Christ suffering for him and that he shall fulfill the Law not in the letter that is perfectly and compleatly for so the old letter is now out of date and passeth away to the beleever but in the Spirit that is an Evangelick obedience to the Law 8. Conclusion Antinomians hold that a justified man is perfect and free from sin both in person and works as if he were in heaven and that the naturall civill and religious works of beleevers are made perfect in the sight of God Then must they perfectly keep the Law and Christ must make our good works exactly conforme to the Law what can hinder us then to be justified by works Randal the Antinomian and Familist said These are ever learning and never come to the knowledge of the truth who say That perfection is not attainable in this life So Bullinger l. 1. c. 8. tells of the fourth sort of Anabaptists in his time that said they could not sinne and the Church was without spot and wrinckle they left out in the Lords prayer Forgive us our sinnes and said we are justified by workes and could keep the Law perfectly Sure Luther denyes the beleevers to be perfect in this life Say not I am perfect I cannot fall but be humble and fear thou that stands to day mayst fall to morrow Luther So is the life of a Christian that he who hath begun may seem to have nothing therefore Paul saith I beleeve not that I have apprehended Phil. 3. because nothing is more pernitious to a faithfull man then that presumption as if he had apprehended it and there were no need to seeke so many make defection and whether through security and negligence So Bernard to stand in the way of God is to goe backe then to him that is be-back then to him that is begun to be a Christian this remaineth to esteem himself not a Christian but to seek to be a Christian. A Christian is not at his end but in his way that he may glory with Paul I am not but I desire to be and as many of us as are perfect let us remaine in this rule then he that is a Christian is no Christian that is he that beleeveth he is made a Christian when he is to be made a Christian we endevour toward heaven we are not in heaven so he is already in heaven who indevours toward heaven because God counts him to be in heaven woe to him that is wholly renewed that is who beleeveth he is renewed Then woe to Towne Saltmâ—rsh for these that are as free from sin as Christ must be perfect Luther The minde of man when it is in temptation and danger with difficulty rests on this consolation for thus it doth perpetually complaine What shall be done when shall it be done where shall it be done I answer then wait on wait on if it be longer deferred and the mind ask againe when shall it be say thou I have no other advice but that thou indure and wait on longer one two three years he that commeth will come and will not â—arry Luther Ne dicas ego perfectus sum non possum labi sed humiliare et time ne hodie stans cras cadas Luther Sic est vita Christiana ut qui caeperit sibi videatur nihil habere sed tendit pergit ut apprehendat unde Paulus non arbitror me apprehendisse Phil. 3. quia re vera nihil pernitiosius est homini fideli
of these three and it is that the sinlesse creature should yeeld its beeing lust will and desires rather to be trampled on dispised or turned to nothing before God be dishonoured All the essentiall attributes of goodnesse holinesse wisdome grace justice power soveraignty c. that are all infinite in God proclaime that there is an infinite distance between the Creature and the Creator but if we speak of a borrowed beeing and a borrowed working at the second hand and by loane then it is no sin for creatures to say they are creatures for the Holy Ghost saith it and biddeth man say that he is clay and a living soule nor is it sin to the Creature to ascribe doing of good to it self as the Church saith I have sought thee O Lord Isa. 26. and David I love thee O Lord and Paul I have laboured more abundantly then they all though it was a labouring borrowed from grace and sure the Creature acts sin and against a law and not in subordination to God as Law-giver acting him against a Law 4. Error Obedience is to deny selfe The creature is all good in the Creator and to value and esteem all beeing and all good God himselfe Theol. Ger. c 13. 5. All creatures the body and soule of man were hid potentially in God and shall returne to silence and to nothing after This is cleare against the immortallity of the soule that Scripture saith seeth God injoyeth his face goeth to Paradise or torment after death 6 Hell standeth in these 1. when a man seeth himselfe worthy of all ill 2. Perpetually damned and lost 3. Neither wils nor conceives comfort from any â—â—eature 4. Yet he waiteth for deliverance 5. Beares nothing waywardly but sin 6. And when he cannot think ever to be delivered or comforted He is in heaven when he regards nothing desires nothing but the eternall good so this becomes his he may often in one day passe from heaven to hell and from hell to heaven and is safe in both This is a hell and a heaven unknown to Scripture 1. They are within the bounds of this life hell and heaven are after death and buriall Luk. 16. 2 There is a marcet way between this heaven and this hell But Luk. 16. there is a gulf and no passage between the right-heaven and Scripture hell Luk. 16. 3. These may end the true hell and heaven are eternall Mat. 25. last Psal. 16.11 7. When God alone works in man and leaves undone in him without any I to mee or mine there is true Christ and no where else Theol. Germ. c. 22. Christ crucified in Mount Calvary is but an imagination to suffer with Christ is Christ crucified Our sufferings and Christs are one by union of will and Spirits Bright star c. 18 â—89 190 191. c. 200. Then is Christ not true man 2. nor dyed he really but only Spiritually in us when we suffer with the like meeknesse and patience as he dyed and suffered and yet he is but an Allegorick or phancied man to the Familist The like Familists say of his Resurrection Ascention and judging the world It s but to doe what is already done to open these rotten graves any farther These two pieces so fleshly and abominable agree well with the Tenents of H. Nicholas and are now set out An. 1646. by the Familist Randel to the insnaring of the soules of many thousands in London In the yeare 1â—75 the Familists of England published a confession before King James came to the Crowne of England but laxe and generall I know not what for H. Nicholas wrote bookes of sundrie sorts As his exhortation 1 c. 6. § 5.7 8 9. His instructions of the upright and Christian baptisme his crying voyce his first exhortation and these saith hee may bee confessâ—d among the adulterous and sinnefull generation and the false hearts of the scripture learned for so hee called all the godly in England and all that are not of his way But for his love-secrets hee saith yee shall not talke of your secrets either yet utter your mysterâ—â—â— openly or nakedly in the heaâ—ing of your young children or disciples but spare them not in the â—ares of your Elâ—â—rs which can understand the same or are able to beare or away with the sound thereof But they have their private Traditions and unwritten verities saith H. Nichol. in his Elidad § 5. By which they grow up in love according to the requiring of her service where all things needfull to bee knowen or declared are alwayes according to the capacity of their understanding brought and declared to them to the § 17 young or new borne children according to their youngnesse to the weak according to their weakenesse and to the eldâ—râ— according to their driednesse or old age where § 18 neither some heare all nor all heare some private mysteries but the confession might have a sound meaning Though as they ment there is nothing sound in it About the yeare 1604. the Familists of England presented with this fraudulent confession a supplication to King James which was printed at Cambridge anno 1606. And answered by one of the Universitie in the supplication they hid their soul tenets and say Wee doe beseech your Princely Majesty to understand that the people of the Familie of love or God doe utterly disclame all obsurd and selfe-conceited opinions and disobedient and erroneous Sects of the Anabaptists Browne Penry Puritans and all other proud-minded Sects and Heresies whatsoever protesting upon pain of our lives that we are not of consent nor agreeing with any such brain-sick Preachers nor their rebellioâ—s or disobedient Sects whatsoever but have beene and ever will be truely obedient to your highnesse and your Laws to the effusion of our blood and in this part of their supplication the Reader may see the bloody persecuting minds of Familists for they exhort King James to persecute all the truely godly that were non-conforme to Prelates and went under the name of Puritans and tacitly praise King James for executing the Laws against such as in conscience durst not bow to the then Prelaticall Baal and the Familists principles carry them to esteem any Religion indifferent yet half an eye may see how desirous they are the Sword should be drawn against the godly whom they all Puritans and therfore judge if Antinomians and Familists now in England who cry out against the use of the Sword for matters of Religion and plead for a Catholick licence and tolleration to all Religions that themselves may be tollerated also if they had the Sword and Power if they would not be most bloody Dragons in cutting the flesh and drinking the blood of those they call Presbyterians and Puritans for thinke not their doctrine is different from that doctrine of their fathers So here they quit the Protestant Doctrine maintained by those that are called but unjustly Puritans and promise to conforme to all Popish Ceremonies to Arminianisme
the crosse all the naturall faculties power and excellencies that the Creator gave to us when we were created and nailing these to the crosse was Christs crucifying of the flesh and we are the same way crucified with Christ as so many joynt Saviours with him by suffering afflictions and in place of this crucified flesh all the Saints have the Spirit to act in them and our conversion to God or restauration in the second Adam is in that we are made againe in Christ partakers of the divine nature and of the substantiall being of God or godded with the new heavenly being of God in love and Christed with Christ and turned when we are perfectly renewed into all spirit Saltmarsh Sparkles of glory pag. 71. And the naturall faculties of our soule mind will affections are in our conversion removed and in place of them comes the very Holy Ghost in person and very Christ himselfe acts in us Rise Reigne Ruine of Antino art 1. art 2. pag. 1. and lives in us not by faith and created grace but substantially and personally and for this they alledge Gal. 2.20 I live not but Christ lives in me and so neither our naturall power or any thing nor is created grace any thing but Christ is all in all CHAP. XXX Familists will have all externals indifferent 2. SAltm saith Christians should live in the unity of the Spirit under their severall formes and attaintments Now by forms and attaintments he meanes Prelacie Presbyterie Independencie yea Poperie and all outward worship and ordinances of which he saith there is no forme nor model in the letter of the Scriptures and so he maketh the Scriptures as unperfect as the Papists doe the one dreaming of a Spirit in the breast of the Pope and cursed Clergie to be the master of our faith the other an Anabaptisticall Spirit of unwritten revelations to be our leader and they reproach the word of God as formes characters figures a faith Ceremoniall and figurative services out of the knowledge of the Scripture as H.N. saith Evang. ch 34. sent 10. And by Christians he meanes Saints of divers and contrary sects wayes Religions such as is the Chaos of a Church in the Sectaries Army in which there are Arrians that say Christ was but a mere godly man Antitrinitarians Socinians Arminians Seekers Anabaptists most of them all being Arminians Familists Antinomians Enthysiasts and all these should agree in the unity of the Spirit and as he saith after pag. 20. in these outward things they ought to please one another to edification Rom. 13.10 Rom. 8.2 Col. 2.20 the Law of love and spirit or life being more royall and excellent then any worldly rudiments whatsoever Now it is cleare that his meaning is they should keep the unity of the Spirit and please one another in all outward things as Rom. 15.1.2 so I thinke he should cite the place that is doe as Anabaptists among Anabaptists be a Presbyterian among Presbyterians an Independent among Independents Prelaticall among Prelaticall men that we offend not one another because the Law of loving our neighbour is above being baptised or not baptised and using of the signe of the crosse or not using it and all the five Popish bastard Sacraments are lesse then loving our brother upon this ground Familists make all externalls free and indifferent and so doth Oliver Crumwell in his letter to the House of Commons 1645. which I set downe here that many in both Kingdomes who looked on him as a godly man may be satisfied toward him whether he favour Familisme or no for it smelleth rankly of that fleshly sect it was printed before by Authority Presbyterians Independents all have here the same Spirit of faith and prayer the same presence and answer they agree here know no names of difference pity it is it should be otherwise any where All that beleeve have the reall unity which is most glorious because inward and spirituall in the body and to the head for being united in formes commonly called uniformity every Christian will for peace sake study and doe as far as conscience will permit and from Brethren in things of the minde we looke for no compulsion but that of light and reason in other things God hath put the sword in the Parliaments hands for the terror of evill doers and the praise of them that doe well if any plead exemption from it he knows not the Gospell if any would wring it out of your hands or steale it from you under what pretence soever I hope they shall doe it without effect that God will maintaine it in your hand and direct you in the use thereof is the prayer of Now because this Letter was publickly Printed and containes doctrine unsound and scandalous to me and many other every Christian is obliged to be ready to give an answer to every man that asketh a reason of the hope that is in him with meeknesse and fear 1 Pet. 3.15 especially when he giveth a publick scandall of unsoundnesse in the faith I thought my selfe tyed in conscience and others are debters to me for the same freedome of conscience in the truth which they crave to themselves in errors and hereâ—ies to shew how scandalous and unsound this Letter is Presâ—yterians Independents all have the same Spirit of faith and prayer the same presence and answâ—r Answ. This is no just enumeration to prove the inward and spirituall unity in the Army which he intends for there bee in the Army Socinians Arminians Anabaptists and by name Jo. Saltmarsh Mr. Del and Seekers who in Print disclaime both Presbyterians and Independents and to my knowledge there is not this day in England any that is a mere Independent which maintaineth nothing but Independencie with moâ—t of these of N. England and does not hold other unsound and corrupt tenets especially that of Liberty of conscience which bordereth with Atheisme Scepticisme and with all faiths and no faith 2. I am not of the Authors minde that Presbyterians and Independents as now they are can have the same spirit of faith and prayer except we say with H Nicholas the first Elder of the family of love that all externalls in Religion Presbyterians Independents Popes Cardinals Bishops Priests Deacons Sextons Services Ceremonies yea and the Church of Rome till contentions arose about these as H N. Evangelie c. 32. c. 33. saith are indifferent and no wayes unlawfull H. N. saith his followers are subject to no Gods no Lawes or Ceremonies but only to the Lord their God and to his most holy service of love they are not likewise subject in bondage unto the creatures neither yet to any created thing but only to the Creator c all their life minde and delight only is in God and God himselfe likewise with his mind life or Spirit is in them and they are even so of one conformity or substance with each other namely God and his people of peace Spirit l. and c. 55. l. 9. No
Then Familists who seeke no more but love in the heart will be glad that all externals be cut off now there is nothing then of Religion but Opinions knowing beleeving hoping fearing loving for bowing to Idols perjury adoring of the Devill vocall covenanting with Sathan these have nothing to doe with Religion for they are not things of the mind I observed before that H. Nicholas epistle to the two Daughters of Warwicke said Christ gives leave to any man to deny his Religion before men if the heart be good Christ is not so cruell nor taken with the blood of men as to will any to lose his life his houses children brother sister lands for him and the Gospel Hee may deny God and Christ and both Law and Gospel before earthly Judges if hee keep a good heart to God he failes not against Religion or any of the first foure commands for Religion is fettered within the circle of the minde 2. If all Religion be a thing of the minde If any think and beleeve he may take fifteene wives and offer his childe a sacrifice to God as Abraham did and that hee may take his neighbours goods because the Saints are the owners of the earth and may marry his wives sister his owne mother in law he cannot act according to his faith because he may be compelled to unact and abstaine from such things of the mind by the power of the sword Now this is great compulsion to things of the minde 3. I know not any that ever I read or heard said the sword of men can compell the minde or compell men in things of the minde for let the persecuting Emperors and all the Tyrants on earth armed with the fury and power of the Prince of the bottomlesse pit torture torment or kill they cannot reach soule minde will conscience and affections we never said that the sword is a meanes of converting soules to Christ or that Religion is or can be compelled but wee hold that the sword is an externall though not simply necessary meanes to hinder wolves and grievous foxes to destroy the soules of others by bringing out of their corrupt mindes in word writing teaching professing another Gospel such as fleshly and abominable familisme now the not perverting of the soules of others the only object of the Magistrates sword is not the conversion nor any signe that the false teacher thus hindered to hurt the flocke is converted to the faith The Magistrate then defendeth only and guardeth the Law of God and Church from pestilent heresie but neither he nor his sword is hereby made a means way or cause of conversion of soules or propagating the Gospel who ever usurpe the sword to defend ravening wolves that with such doctrine destroyes the flocke of Christ they give their power to the beast and their hornes and strength to the false Prophet and I writ it God shall deliver soules out of their captivity for the elect cannot finally be seduced Matth. 24.24 and shall make their carcases fall as dung upon the open field and as the handfull after the harvest man and none shall gather them and make them as a wheele and as stubble before the wind and fill their faces with shame But if conscience ought to bee the ruling principle in all we doe in acts of the second as well as the first Table of the Law yea in eating and drinking 1 Cor. 10.31 the sword hath no place at all over Christians or any at least professing Christ these that marry many wives at once and sacrifice their children to devills and thrust men out of their possessions and take them to themselves because they being Saints are the only just owners of the earth and the meeke shall inherit the earth these that sweare a Covenant when they are low as Familists doe professe they may and deny their Religion before men as H. Nich. taught and divers Anabaptists and Nicodemits in Calvins time and then unsweare and perjure and breake their Covenant with God and men when they have the sword in their hand will sweare and suffer for it that they doe all these from meere conscience and upon Religious grounds in the minde and the Magistrate is as much obliged to beleeve that conscience leads them in all these as he is to beleeve all Religions are to be suffered and the justified man cannot sinne cannot steale murther swear whore blaspheme cosen and he ought not to compel with the sword godly men in some things of the minde and not in all things except he be partiall in the Law In other things God hath put the sword in the Parliaments hands for the terror of evill doers If any plead exemption from it he knows not the Gospel Answ. If for the terror of evill doers then for the terror of false teachers who are grievous wolves not sparing the flock Act. 20.29 evill workers Phil. 3.2 and make these that receive them in their houses and farre more in an Army of Saints partakers of their evill deeds 2 Joh. v. 10 who subvert whole families Tit. 1.11 make their followers twofold more the children of hell then themselves Matth. 23.15 2. If by other things the Author meane all things but Religion then Parliaments have no place to be Nurse-fathers to the Church they have done usurpingly to sweare to defend the Reformed Religion of the Church of Scotland to extirpate heresies and what is contrary to sound doctrine that is to root out Familisme Antinomianisme Socinianisme Arrianisme Antiscripturisme Papists Prelates Seekers Arminians 3. If any plead exemption from the Parliaments sword he knowes not the Gospel that is a poor punishment vale at totum many of the Authors way subvert the doctrine of the Gospel as all the familists But the Author saith not hee shall feele the weight of his sword but only he knowes not the Gospel then many Anabaptists who hold this thing of the minde under the new Testament there ought to bee no Christian Magistrate no Christian ought to beare the sword cannot know the Gospel there are of these that thinke they know the Gospel as well as this Author And Saltmarsh the prime Chaplaine of the Army professeth he knowes more of the Gospel then Wicklef Calvin Luther and all Protestants generally Yet he sets the Magistrates up for worldly societies and more principally for the people of God in the flesh Sparkl glo p. 138. but the Saints in this life saith he attaine to all Spirit pag. 71 72 198 206 207. and are above the flesh and Ordinances and to returne to a dispensation of the flesh that needeth Magistracie is to come backe and remaine in Sodome pag 75. when the Lord hath bid you come out pag. 121.122 The Author and M. Saltmarsh must herein renounce H. Nicholas and they are so neare of kin that all the water in Thames cannot wash their bloud asunder the one from the other for H.N. saith Spirit Laud. c. 34. s. 8.9 The family of
for sinnes that Christ hath so blotted out that they have neither name being nor nature of sinnes is unlawfull and we are obliged by no Commandement of God say they to duties the Spirit maketh us willing but the word and Spirit are not contrary as we conceive the Spirit doth oblige as it goes along with the obliging word for if ye commit murther or lie say they being justified yee sinne not but the flesh in you 2. Wee are not guilty therein because the Spirit acted us not to forbeare 3. It was pardoned and remitted before it was committed and so hath neither name nor nature of sinne for the right end of duties we know no other but to glorifie God to be land-marks or a way to our countrey and to testifie we love our Redeemer we make them not one penny of payment for heaven â— I am not against the settlement of Church-government prudently as now Ans. If Prudential-government be from Christ and his Testament it is not enough not to be against Christ but ye must be with him if it be not of Christ the more shame to you and all your way not to be against that which hath not Christ for its Father and Authour 2 The King of the Church in all substantials hath set out a plat-forme in his word Humane prudence is too bold to prescribe to Christ how he should rule his House But this way Saltmarsh is not against the Church-government of Rome by Popes Cardinals Patryarchs Metropolitans Arch-Bishopes and the Government abjurd in his Covenant for these be prudential Church-governments 3 It is a wide Familisticall conscience to teach there is no Church no ministry no preaching no censures now on earth as you and all Seekers doe and yet not to bee against a Church-government in a prudential way in which the Magistrate sits as a Church-Officer to judge But this is the detestable Neutrality of Antinomians in all Religions to be neither hot nor cold this nor that 6 Nor is this any cause or reason why Saltmarsh should not be against the Prudentiall Government of mans devising because God hath his people under severall attaintments and measures as in Queen Maries Martyrdome for then because God hath saved some under Prelacie some under Poperie yea before Christs comming some under Gentilisme as Saltmarsh thinketh of Job for then Saltmarsh and Familists should not be against the settlement of Prelaticall Government and of their Romish Ceremonies not against Popish and Heathenish Prudentiall and Idolatrous Church-Government I thinke then Saltmarsh will be any thing in externals Paganish Popish or Prelatical no wonder then that Familists in their Petition raile against Puritans for none-conformity and professe in their Petition to King James their obedience to all the Prelaticall will-worship CHAP. XXXI Saltmarsh and Familists teach that there is salvation in all Religions I Am onely against a forme as it becomes an Engine of persecution c. Ans. So Saltmarsh here opens a great mystery of Familisme which is Liberty of conscience and salvation under all Religions for if any forme of Religion never so sound be commanded even by a Law of God and ratified politically by a Law of man and none left free to mens owne Spirit as to the only binding rule though it be a Spirit of Sathan it is no lawfull Religion to Saltmarsh Now that this is his minde is cleare from that he saith Spark 171 172. In books of controversie we can but set letter to letter and Scripture to Scripture and argument to argument and nothing can be judged till the day or time of more revelation of truth till the Holy Ghost and fire sit upon each of us trying every mans worke and burning up that in us which is hay and stubble in which words beside that Saltm judgeth and condemneth himselfe in writing this same booke of Controversie in favour of the Familists condemning in expresse words the Protestants in all the articles of their faith he will have no man to see truth or to judge any otherwise or know what he beleeves but by conjectures till the day of revelation come that he turne Familist and become all Spirit and all glory so all the Protestants that are not Familists set but letter to letter and are literall legalists and have no certainty what they beleeve and when this Spirit commeth he teacheth not by the word setting letter to letter and Scipture to Scripture but by immediate inspiration above and beyond the word 2. This Spirit even having come upon Saltmarsh as hee plainly saith p. 68. And in his Epistle to the Parliament p. 2.3 does but dictate to him errors hay and stabble that must be consumed for if he so do when he hath taught these toyes hee teacheth the contrary the next day what a spirit is this 3. If the Scripture be not the judge of controversies by setting letter to letter Scripture to Scripture understood according to the naturall and genuine grammaticall sense which the words yeeld without constraint then is the Scripture as Scripture and in its native sense a nose of wax and hath no native sense but wee are to expect a higher spirituall allegorick sense then the letter can beare that from the Spirit We have by this way then no certain rule of faith the unâ—â—able then may lawfully wrest the scripture to their own desâ—ruction Paul proveth Jesus to be the true Messiah and that convincingly he confounded the Jewes 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 confuting them that they were confounded in their mind and strongly proved with violence and strength of Scripture light that this is the Christ 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Act. 9.22 and Christ remitteth the Jews to the Scriptures as the judging rule Act. 5.39 If the Scriptures be so dark uncertain doubt some to naturall men void of the Spirit ye shall not convince Cain by the 6. Commandement that he is a murtherer nor Achan by the 8 Command that he is a theef nor Ananias that he is a lyar All may say the Spirit hath the coÌ„trary sense that truly by this way And in the following words he would not be against an Assembly or Synod at Westminster though he deny there is any such Ordinance of God now as Synod or Ministers or Church if they would minister as they have received that is propound to all the Kingdome he saith not all the Churches what they are perswaded of in their conscience and leave it without compulsion to the Spirit of God to perswade for this were true liberty where we see to minister as we receive 1 Pet. 4.10 to Saltmarsh is to teach and propound to others and walke themselves and accordingly beleeve as they have received that is according as they are perswaded in their conscience then if the Assembly of Divines were perswaded in their consciences that to one man to have fifteen wives at once as John of Leyden and his beleeved and that the Alcaron were the
not ergo the invisible Church at all times and finally may simply fall from the sound faith of fundamentalls necessary for salvation more then this is a good consequence this particular beleever may in one particular fundamentall point erre fouly and grossely for a time ergo he is not infallibille simpliciter but may finally and totally fall away And that of our Saviours I have prayed for thee that thy faith faile not Luke 22.32 though it free not Beleevers from particular failings both in doctrine of faith and conversation of life and that grossely and fouly yet it secures them by Christs intercession in a state of infallibility in fundamentalls and in a condition of indeclinability in conversion so as beleevers are infallible in point of faith touching fundamentalls necessary to salvation except Familists hold the Apostacie of the Saints or that all may goe to heaven finally doubting Pag. 174.175 Sparkles Saltmars tells what are the tradions of man and for Mark 7.9 he citeth Matth. 9. or heresies Now a heresie saith he is something against the doctrine of faith in the word or Scriptures not against any interpretations doctrins conclusions glosses comments or preaching of men who speak not Scripture originally nor infallibly as the Apostles did but so far as that is the very Scripture they speak so far as they speak the truth in Jesus and in the Spirit of God else they teach for doctrines the traditions of men Answ. Traditions of men are not necessarily errors in fundamentalls except only by a remote consequence as all errors are against the fundamentalls 2. There are heresies that are by good consequence against fundamentalls else the Saduces their denying of the resurrection Mat. 22. was no heresie for Christ proveth by a good consequence that they denyed the Scripture I am the God of Abraham when Abraham was then dead when God spake out of the bush to Moses Exod. 3. yet they denyed but conclusions deduced from Scripture 3. There is another strange ingredient in heresie according to Familists and that is because God speakes not now immediatly his word to us as he did to the Apostles no man is an hereticke that denyeth the whole faith except he that denyes the Scripture as the Scripture and except he deny it in so farre as teachers speake the truth in Jesus and in the Spirit of God else that is if they be not Familiâ—ts that teach and speake not in the Famisticall spirit they teach for doctrines the traditions of men that is heresies for Gods truth then to speake heresie is to speake only against fundamentall truths when a Familist in the Spirit of God speaketh them 2. But then when a hereticke readeth in the word this fundamentall Christ came in the world to save sinners 1 Tim. 1.15 though he deny it and spit at it that is no heresie because the paper and printed booke speaketh not in the Spirit of Jesus 3. The written word of God is not the word of God but only the word is spoken by a Familist in the Spirit of Christ. 4. When Preachers void of the Spirit speake that which is the very word of God and fundamentalls of faith these truths are not the word of God but the traditions of men and heresies so his Master H.N. taught the Scripture preaching to be but figurative service the word of God was never published to the world till H.N. the least among the holy ones of God was made alive through Christ anointed with his godly being manned himselfe with H N. and godded H.N. with himself published the light of glory H. Nicholas Evangelic c. 34. sent 9. Pag. 175. Schisme is a dividing from Christians who are in an outward profession of truth Now there may bee schisme iâ— visible Churches or fellowships of Saints upon this account but there can bee none in the true body of Christ or the spirituall Church for they that are joyned to the Lord are one spirit and they are made perfect in one Answ. There is no outward Schisme or renting but it begins at the heart Schisme is a dividing of the hearts as well as a visible parting with the Church or a part thereof else schisme were no sinne which yet Paul reproveth as a sinne 1 Cor. 1. 1 Cor. 3.1 2. The Church of Corinth and these that made a rent were both the visible and the invisible Church that they were the visible Saltm cannot deny they were the invisible Church also 1 Cor. 1.13 Christ was crucified for them and they were babes in Christ fed with milke 1 Cor. 3.1.2 and built upon one only foundation v. 10. Saltmarsh must say they were all unconverted that made the schisme 3. Familists will have none the true body and spirituall Church of Christ but the invisible Church so that upon this account they that beleeve and visibly professe neither Christ nor his truth before men yea who all their dayes deny Christ and so shall be denyed of Christ before the Father and his holy Angells Matth. 10.32 33. may be and are the true body of Christ and the Spirituall Church so H. Nicholas Epistle to the two daughters of Warwicke 4. May not a schisme and seperation fall in these that are both the true body and spirituall Church when of a Church of beleevers effectually called consisting of foure hundred two hundred seperate from two hundred I think they may as well as Barnabas a good man and full of the Holy Ghost seperated from Paul But in so farre as they are saith he in that one Spirit they cannot be divided Ans. True but Saltm speakes lyes in hypocrisie when he saith the spirituall Church are made perfect in one Lord in this life upon the same reason as they are one and as united to the Lord they cannot lye whore steale murther but out of some remnants of corruption they can sinne But Familists put them in a condition they can in this life sinne no more or if they sinne their transgression is not sinne it is not they but their Asse the flesh that sinnes as Libertines said but that is no violation of the Law of God CHAP. XXXIII Saltmarsh Sparkles pag. 22â— Familists minde touching Prayer ALL constant speakings to God in this as they call a conceived way or impremeditate or extemporary way is taken commonly amongst Christians for prayer in the Spirit and for that Spirituall way which the Disciples of Christ used in the Gospel who were growne up from the infancy and childishnesse of formes or words taught them which is but a meer natural or outward thing as they say which any may perform by strength of naturall parts as wit and memory and affections Saltmarsh here first condemneth prayer morning and evening under the words of constant speakings to God because he will have no praying but when the Spirit acts immediatly 2. All extemporary prayers goe not for praying in the Spirit among Christians commonly he belyeth Protestants and the truly
and the blowing of the last Trumpet 52. and the swallowing up of death in victory 55 56 57. as if all these should come to passe in this life agreeable to this saith H. N. Evangel ch 35. se 9. In which resurrection of the dead God sheweth unto us that the time is now fulfilled that his dead or the dead which are fallen asleepe in the Lord rise up in this day of his judgement and appeare unto us in godly glory which shall also henceforth live in us everlastingly with Christ and reigne upon the earth wherein the Scripture commeth to be fulfilled in this present day And Saltm willeth these that are as spirituall as himself and his Familists to beleeve this and receive it that is except we make shipwracke of faith and say the resurrection is past in this life as did Hymeneus and Philetus wee are all legall literall men and void of the Spirit 2. Saltmarsh is unwilling to contradict the truth of God 1 Cor. 15.24 too openly to wit that in the end the Kingdome shall be delivered up Now whether this be meant of Christs reigning no more in his Church in this life by Ordidinances or as Chrysostome doth expound the place it be the rendering up to the Father his conquâ—isâ—d and purchased people as it is most agreeable to Eph. 5.27 I dispute not now but Saltmarsh saith faintly This is not only done on the whole body of Christ at the last but also here He dares not say this rendering up is not onely at the last day but also in this life yet the Apostle is cleare he thought of no rendering up of the Kingdome in this life as Saltmarsh by this new spirit supposeth for the text is cleare v. 22.23 every man shall rise againe from the dead Christ first and then his members 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Then is the end when he shall deliver up the Kingdome to the Father Then there is no rendring up till the dead in Christ be raised v. 23.24 but the dead in Christ in their bodies of which undoubtedly the Apostle speaketh 1 Cor. 15.1 2 3 4 c. doe not rise in this life 2. This rendering up is not till the end then shall the end be 3. It is when all rule and authority shall be put downe v. 27. This is not in this life 4. It is when the last enemy shall be subdued 26. 5. When God shall be all in all 28. These are not in this life therefore Saltm dreames Saltmarsh Sparkles p. 165. Jer. 38 2. He that goeth forth to the Chaldeans shall live but if yee stay in the City yee shall be consumed this is a figure of abiding no longer under any dispensation Law Christ in the flesh Gospel Spirit then God and his presence appeares upon it Ans. We know not this Spirit that dreames of phansied types and allegories without shadow of reason in the holy Scripture wee have no ground to beleeve that the Holy Ghost intends any thing of this kinde only Saltmarsh his Popish Spirit saith so the Scripture is silent Saltmarsh pag. 145.147 148. he saith Mal. 3. ver 18. Ye shall discorne betweene the righteous and the wicked proveth the Spirit of discerning by which we shall know false teachers Antichrists as in the Apostolicke Church and who feares God truely who not as the sense knows its object Answ. By this Familists deny the spirits and hereticks are to be judged by the word but that man is the Hereticke the Legalist though never so heavenly if he be a Puritan the spirit of Familists discerns him to be a Cain or a Judas 2 The place of Malachie is this ver 14 15. Ye say it is in vaine to serve the Lord and there is no reward for it But serve ye God and ye shall finde in your owne experience a reward and comfortable fruit in differencing betweene him that serveth God and serveth him not for ch 4.1 Christs trying day cometh Saltmarsh also sparkles p. 70 71. abuseth these Scriptures Gal. 41. and 1 Cor. 3.1.2 He applyeth the former to the Disciples of Christ under Johns ministery and Christs in the flesh but these words The Heire so long as he is a child differeth not from a servant though he be Lord of all Touch not the times of John Baptist or of Christ in the dayes of his flesh though in these times the Ceremonies were still in vigor but the Heir under nonage and Tutors Gal. 4. is the Church of the Jews under the bondage of the Law and the Ceremonies thereof and the Rudiments of the World it was not the Holy Ghosts mind to speake of Christ in the flesh as a Mosaicall Lawgiver or that his heavenly Sermons he preached Matth. 5. Matth. 23. John 10. Joh chapters 13 14 15 16. his heavenly Prayer John 16. hâ—s death and sufferings and resurrection was a dispensation to be layd aside as the tutory of the law and beggerly Ceremonies Sabbath and shadows he speaketh of Gal. 4. for then the Apostles in vaine call us to mind of the words and commandements of our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ as hee commanded them to doe Matth. 28.19 20 21. 1 John 1.1 2 3 4. 2 Pet. 1.15 16 17 18 19. and though Christ promised at his ascending to send the Spirit this was not to abolished the doctrine of John and that which Christ had taught them in the dayes of his flesh for of that Spirit he promiseth to send he saith Joh. 14.16 Yee know that Spirit for he dwelleth in you for the present and shall be in you in a larger measure when I shall send him Act. 2. But Familists and Antinomians must have no ministration of the Spirit till Christ ascended to heaven And for the other place Paul 1 Cor. 3.1.2 calleth the Corinthians carnall and could not write to them as spirituall not because they were under the doctrine of Iohn Baptist and Christ as Saltmarsh dreameth for that doctrine taught no carnall divisions but he calleth them carnall on this ground v. 3.4 Whereas there is among you envying strife and divisions are ye not carnall and walke as men For while one saith I am of Paul another I am of Apollo are ye not carnall if the Apostle call the Corinthians carnall as Saltmarsh saith because they were under the doctrine of John Baptist and Christ in the flesh of which there is not a syllable in that text or in all the Scripture then must Christ and John Baptist have taught their hearers striving envying schismes and one to say I am of Paul and another I am of Apollo which is blasphemous Now it is against sense and reason that ever God ordained any ministration so carnall as that these under it were carnall because of their striving and envying Saltmarsh tells us as I observe every man should stay under the ministration he is in till the Spirit say come up hither then Paul calleth the Corinthians to abide in this carnality of
〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 carried rolled moved acted immediately by the Holy Ghost for God used not reason or humane discourâ—ing as an intervening organ or acting instrument to the devising and inventing of spirituall or Gospell truths 2 Pet. 1.20 21. but yet this immediately inspiring Spirit spake written Scripture commanded the Ordinance of actuall prophesying commanded the Prophets to write and the people to hear and to read the words of the Prophesie Antinomians and Familists conceive that now when divine truths are framed and come forth to the immediately inspired Scripture that the same immediately inspired Spirit must act the Saints as meere passive organs to preach in the Spirit immediately to pray to heare to write in the Spirit but then Familists should be as infallible as the Prophets both in preaching praying interpreting Scripture but the ordinary actings of the Spirit doth include and carry along the actings of reason minde will and affections but elevated above themselves The Spirit is opposed to carnall and wilde logicke and ratiotinations and so all carnall thoughts and sinfull 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 discourses are Sathans fortifications and Souldier-works against the knowledge of God 2 Cor. 10.5 6. 1 Cor. 2.1 2 3 4. 1 Cor. 1.17 but the Spirit siteth upon and acteth reason to make our whole service 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 reasonable service yea and all the Scripture is a masse and booke of discoursive refined reason unbeleevers are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 absurd unreasonable men going against sense and sound reason And the spirit goeth on in a perswading way 2 Cor. 5.11 Gal. 1.10 Paul Act. 13.43 perswaded them to continue in the grace of God Act. 18.4 he perswaded the Jewes and Greeks Act. 19.8 hee perswaded the things concerning the Kingdome of God So doth the Spirit carry us along with exhorting Act. 2.40 2 Cor. 9.5 2 Thess. 3.12 2 Tim. 4.2 Heb. 3.13 1 Pet. 5.1 Jude v. 3. 5. Amongst the characters of a spirituall state and condition Some concerne the state some the actions For the state a renewed man is said to be in the Spirit Gal. 5.25 If ye live in the Spirit let us also walke in the spirit So as the Spirit is the life of the man in his spirituall walking so are we as touching our state said to receive the Spirit Gal. 3.2 Rom. 8.15 to be borne of the Spirit as receiving a new spirituall nature Joh. 3.6 Gal. 4.29 and the Spirit said to dwell in us Jam. 4.5 and the spirit is given to us Rom. 5.5 For the actings the Spirit determineth the action according to the nature and specification and rendereth the action spirituall so as they are led in their conversation by the Spirit and so are knowne to themselves to be the Sonnes of God Rom. 8.14 If ye mortifie through the Spirit the deeds of the flesh ye shall live Rom· 8.13 Paul was pressed in Spirit and testified to the Jewes that Jesus was Christ Act. 18.5 Apollos fervent in Spirit spake and taught diligently Rom. 8.25 For wee through the Spirit wait for the hope of righteousnesse by faith 6. The exercise of spirituall acts is managed most from the Spirit when there is more Spirit and lesse Law in our acts of obedience But that this may be rightly understood give me leave to distinguish in the Law 1. Directive and obliging light revealing the binding will of God 2. The setting of it on with power and life upon the minde will and affections 3. The compelling rigor of the Law in exacting highest and superlative perfect obedience in thought word and deed and the terrifying threatning Directive and obliging light being the commanding will of the Lawgiver revealed to us in the written word is not contrary to the Spirit but written to us by a divinely and immediately inspiring Spirit as all Scripture and as the written letter of the Gospel 2 Tim. 3.16 17. though to us naturally fallen in sinne in the second respect or in regard of the setting on of this directive obliging light upon the soule with power and life to produce actuall obedience the written and preached Law as Law and as a Covenant of workes is void of the Spirit and hath no more power to cause us obey then dead and spiritlesse figures and characters written on â—â—one can worke men to bow their necke to obey the Law of God 2 Cor. 3.6 7. yea but so the written and preached Gospell externally proposed without the Spirit is a dead letter also I grant the Gospell in its letter both promiseth a new heart and a new spirit which the Law as the Law doth not and when the Spirit joynes with the preached Gospel and the Law also doth prepare the sinner for Christ by the word of the Gospell the Spirit is given and so the Apostles and Pastors are Ministers of the New Testament not of the letter but of the Spirit But 3. The Law in compelling under the paine of eternall death to superlatively perfect obedience hath the Spirit by accident and extrinsecally conjoyned with it as it is the Spirit of the Mediator that makes use of it to cause the broken man see his unpayable and to him impossible debts and cause him heare the tinkling and noise of the fetters and chaines of hell that he may flye to the Gospell-surety which the same Spirit reveales to him in the Gospell Now this is an extrinsecall use of the Law For 1. The Law should have its intire and perfect essence and full operation in rewarding or punishing if we suppose there never had beene a surety for sinners nor a Gospell 2. It s a Gospell-spirit that makes this use of the Law above its nature for that which can but reveale to the broken man debts unpayable by him and incloseth him in an eternall jayle and gives no strength nor way of redemption cannot have of it selfe any influence to lead the broken man to a surety But this the Law doth of it selfe hath not of it selfe one fourth part of an ounce of Gospell-courtesie or grace to bestow on the sinner But 2. The compelling rigor of the Law as touching perfect and eternally active and passive obedience must bee considered in its severall branches as it commands perfect active obedience or as it obligeth to passive obedience it respects two sorts of persons the man Christ in the dayes of his flesh and the elect Angels or 2. fallen sinners In the former consideration the Law in it selfe as the Law eternally and immutably presseth perfect active obedience but gives not strength to obey but supposeth strength to these to whom it is first given but if so be that these to whom it is given have abundance of the Spirit and strength to obey perfectly as Christ in the dayes of his flesh and the elect Angells have the Law in its highest rigor of commanding perfect obedience it is not properly rigor though we must use the word but strictnesse hath no compulsive power
over them for ye cannot say that a willing man or a man delighting to obey God is compelled to obey God But if we speake of man fallen in sinne who is unable to performe perfect active obedience the Law stands over him in a highest pitch of morall compulsion for whether he be willing to obey or have the Spirit or be unable and void of the Spirit the Law standeth above him exacting a summe of ten thousand talents from him that cannot pay the hundreth part of halfe a talent or an halfpenny as he ought And the man out of Christ and under the Law is still compelled in both active and passive obedience the letter of the Law and this ministration of death without the Spirit hailes and draws him as the literall prisoner fettered by a extremely exacting Law void of all Spirit and conferring no saving strength on him to doe or suffer the penalty of the Law And for the beleever in Christ the rigor of the Law is abated not that the Law as the Law requireth lesse of him then absolutely perfect obedience but because in what hee comes short in performing of new obedience from a new principle to wit a Gospell-spirit in him he is pardoned in Christ and the rest is accepted for Christs sake as if it were obedience Now in this new obedience the Spirit so oyleth the wheeles of free-will as obedience in its kinde is as free connaturall delightfull being sweetned with the love of God as if there were not an awing Law but a sweetly alluring and heart-drawing free love so that the beleever obeyes with an Angell-like obedience then the Spirit seemes to exhaust all the commanding awsomenesse of the Law and supplyes the Lawes imperious power with the strength and power of love if we suppose there had been no Law commanding Christ absolute obedience yet if we suppose a meer directing light without any compelling to shew him what is good and agreeable to Gods commanding will so did Christ obey perfectly from a principle of love and so doth the justified beleever give obedience though imperfect yet sincere to what is Gods will then it followeth 1. The higher and larger measure of willingnesse or the more superlatively the will be bended the light of a divine Law shining on the minde and will the more of the Spirit because the Spirit is essentially free Ps. 51.12 2 Cor. 3.17 the more freenesse and the more freenesse the more renewed will in the obedience and the more renewed will the lesse constraint because freenesse exhausteth constraint and especially when constraint looketh toward eternall punishment and the Law compelleth under pain of eternall death those that are under Law-obligation to obey Now fear of eternall wrath is wholly swallowed up where a free spirit of love and strong delight to obey intervenes between obedience and such feare as is cleare in the man Christ in the dayes of his flesh and the confirmed Angels and though I doubt nothing but feare of the second death was in its way and so farre as was congruous and convenient for a state of sinlesse innocencie to worke upon the will of the first Adam and Evah to deterre them from sinning otherwise that threatning of God In the day thou eatest thou shalt dye had no intrinsecall end nor was it rationall which cannot be said yet Law-threatnings had no influence on the will of the confirmed Angells much lesse on the perfect and holy will of the second Adam which was so filled with God so balasted with so many talent weights of sweet delight and free love Ps. 40.7 8. Joh. 4.34 as Angels and Christ obeyed without any eye-looke or glance of their thoughts to Law-threatning And the justified beleever◠now obeying as a Sonne not as a bond-slave yeeldeth willing obedience from a free leading Spirit the Spirit of adoption proper to sons who obey their father out of an instinct of love not out of a principle of commanding awing and terrifying Law as slaves under bondage doe obey their masters Rom 8.14 15 16 17. And the Law of the Spirit of life commeth in into the place of the compelling and cursing Law not that the directing and obliging power thereof is removed and acteth a beleever to obey as if there were no Law over him at all and freeth him from the Law of sinne from the dominion of the Law in binding him over to a curse Rom. 8.2 Rom. 7.1 2 3. as if there were not a Law given to a justified man 1 Tim. 1.9 And looke how wee say the willing free obedience of men consisteth well with the necessity of Gods absolute decree so sweet delightfull freenesse of a Gospel-spirit led by God does well consist with the necessity of an obliging and strongly commanding Law though the sting of the cursing and threatning be removed 7. Now the fond conceit of Waldesso consideration 63. is utterly to be rejected for he saith the Scripture shines as a light in a darke place untill the day-star arise in the heart 2 Pet. 1. and then the man hath no more need to seeke that of the holy Scripture which departs of it selfe as the light of a candle departs when the Sunne-beames enter even as Moses departed at the presence of Christ and the Law at the presence of the Gospell But 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 untill noteth not a certaine time of the removing of the light of the word since Peter there preferres it to the revelation at Christs transfiguration Matth. 1.25 Joseph knew her not untill she brought forth her first borne it followeth not ergo he knew her after so Matth. 11.13.15 the Law and Prophets are 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 untill John then no more Law and Prophets after John it followeth not Matth. 12.20 he shall not breake a bruised reed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 till he bring forth judgement to victory therefore when he has brought forth judgement to victory he must then break the bruised reed and be no longer tender to weak ones Matth. 14.22 he constrained his Disciples to goe to the other side till he send the multitude away then he sent not the multitude away when the Disciples were come to the other side it is absurd So Matth. 16.28 they shall not taste of death untill they see the Kingdome of God come ergo they shall live no longer then they see the Kingdome of God come it followeth not Matth. 22.44 Sit thou at my right hand till I make thine enemies thy footstoole ergo after Christs enemies are subdued he shall sit no longer at the right hand of the Father Joh. 5.17 My Father worketh untill now and I worke 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ergo my father works no more after this in his providence in governing the world what more absurd 1 Tim. 4.13 Till I come give attendance to reading to exhortation to doctrine then must Timothy read exhort and preach no more after Paul is come The place presseth us to wait on
that the dead which are fallen asleep in the Lord rise up in this day of his judgement and appeare unto us in godly glory which shall henceforth live in us everlastingly with Christ and reign upon the earth is a detestabl hereticke But H.N. teacheth so Evangel c 37. sect 9. Whosoever teacheth that to bee borne of the Virgin Mary out of the seed of David after the flesh is to bee exponed of the pure doctrine out of the seed of love is a detestable hereticke But H.N. teacheth so Document sent c. 3. sect 5. Whosoever teacheth that Jesus Christ is come againe unto us according to his promise to the end that they all which love God and his righteousnesse and Christ and perfect being might presently enter into the true rest which God hath prepared from the beginning for his elect and inherit the everlasting life is a detestable hereticke But H.N. Evan. c. 1. sect 1. teacheth so c. Having examined these reasons with the books of H.N. we doe finde that in truth he holdeth these heresies and we think in our hearts and of our own knowledge affirm that H.N. is in these heresies a detestable heretick promising faithfully befor God and your honours never hereafter to have any dealing with his bookes and doctrin nor to go about to bring any to the love liking or reading of them and that we now speak is the true meaning of our heart as we look for mercy at his hands which searcheth the heart It shall never be well with England till the like abjuration of the doctrine of H.N. of Wil. Del Joh. Saltmarsh of Town Eaton Den Crispe and the scandalous Antinomians be tendered to most of the Army of Sir Thomas Fairfax and all the Sectaries in England but the Arme of the Lord must still bee stretched out against the land in fury and indignation till it be destroyed and till he throughly avenge the quarrell of the Covenant with so high a hand and so presumptuously broken by the Kingdome of England A MODEST SVRVEY of the secrets of Antinomianisme with a briefe refutation of them from the word of truth CHAP. I. Antinomians unjustly aceuse us IT cannot be judged either a wounding of the weake who side with Familists for a bastard love with Antinomians for a dead and rotten faith with Libertines the enemies of holy walking with God to answer those that aske a reason of our hope especially when we are nick-named Legalists Antifidians Pharisees Antichristian teachers enemies to free Grace because we stand for a rule of righteousnesse in the Law repentance from dead workes strict and close walking with God against all which that is to me a wall of brasse As deceivers and yet true as unknowne and yet well knowne Yet I give a briefe account of those saving and innocent Doctrines of the hoast of Protestant Divines if possibly truth may pierce through their eye-lids who winke because they will not see Of old the Albigenses were called Hereticks but saith an indifferent man genus haereseos nunquam nominant So now neither the heresie nor the Protestant Divine can be named that teach that the Law and Gospel are mixt in the matter of justifitation or that teares of repentance wash us from our sinnes that the covenant of grace is a covenant of works that we are to seeke righteousnesse in our selves CHAP. II. Antinomians are Pelagians WEe are farre from Pelagian grace that an unconverted man can leave sinne because sinne hath an earnest desire of soule-saving comfort cannot speak nor doe but in feare of sinne that an hypocrite under the Law can in good earnest and down-rightnesse of heart yeeld himselfe wholly to the law of God as a wife to her husband to bee instructed and ordered in all things inwardly and outwardly after the minde of God in the Law So Saltmarsh telleth us of a Legally-Gospel-way of conversion in which Christ in truth is received Much like to that of Familists of New England that a Legalist for truth may attaine the same righteousnesse that Adam had in innocency before the fall and a living faith that hath living fruits may grow from the living law We judge that an unconvert is so farre from a conformity to the Law that his conscience is burnt with a hot iron and he never saw his keepers face hee being under the law a captive in thick darkenesse and therefore all his faire vertues are white sinnes 2. Hee is an ill tree that cannot bring forth good fruit 3. True mortification is wrought by the Gospel-spirit 4. The law cannot give life 5. An hypocrites faith who is under the Law is dead CHAP. III. We hold no morall preparations with Pelagians Papists and Arminians going before conversion WEe teach not that which Saltmarsh falsely chargeth us that Vowes and undertakings never ascending to Christ fit us for conversion nor doe we too much burne or bear the wine of Gospel-grace with the Law-fire of workes and conditions For 1. we deny against Antinomians and Arminians any such Gospel-promise he that doth this and this and is so and so fitted with such conditions quallifications as money and hire in hand shall be converted as a reward of his worke The question touching preparations is not whether an humbled soule because humbled hath a good warrant to beleeve and receive Christ. We conceive the bottome of no mans faith is within himselfe but the common ground and Royall charter warranting all to beleeve is the free and money lesse offer of a precious Saviour who ever will have Christ and pay not a penny of condition or law worke for him take him freely But the question is of Christs order of bringing us to beleeve and close with Christ and the question is whether a damned Pharesee on his high horse of merits and law-righteousnesse an undaunted Heifer a Simon Magus a despitefull Atheist Elymas a Witch never broken nor convinced by the law must in that distance to Christ and the Gospel be charged to beleeve an everlasting love of election toward himselfe and without more adoe be led into the Kings chamber of wine to the slowings of soule-redeeming bloud or must he first bee humbled convinced of sinne burdened with everlasting burning due to him and so led to Christ. Antinomians say Sinners as sinners belong to Christ and have Christ offered to them as sinners and none can beleeve too hastily in Christ but sure they can beleeve or presume too misorderly and arrogate Christ to themselves as you teach them while they know no sinne-sicknesse for Christ. For 1. some too hastily will bee Christs Disciples before they make their reckoning what it will cost them 2. The Lords order is to cast downe and then convert first he draweth away some of the ill bloud and rancke humours and pricketh the heart and then bringeth the sicke to the Physitian the trembing Publicane
the preaching of Faith by which the Spirit is given which renewes a beleever and makes him the very Law himselfe and his heart the two Tables of Moses For 1. perswasions and commands may wâ—ll stand together and all Law-inforcings are but meere reasonings and morall and objective acts on the minde and will and so the Law no more inforceth then the Gospel 2. Holinesse and Sanctification commeth by the Law animated by the Spirit as well as by the Gospel for the Law converteth the soule but it doth this saith the Antinomians not as the Law but as the Gospel revealing Christ. But I am sure neither can the Gospel â—â—terally onely revealing Christ and being void of the Spirit it cannot convert the soule and the Law as animated by the Spirit leadeth to Christ as a Pedagogue I meane as mixed with the Gospel For the Law without the Gospel can never sanctifie nor lead to Christ and neither of them without Christs Spirit can doe any thing And I find Saltmarshes Euthysiasticall pulse and straine of Familisme when hee saith that the Preaching of Faith is the Spirit given to a beleever and it makes him the very Law it selfe For 1. the Preaching of Faith or the Gospel preached even to hardened Pharisâ—â—s cannot give the Spirit renewing the Pharisees for Faith was preached to them by Christ and his Apostles but they stumbled at Christ and never beleeved 2. The preaching of Faith and the Spirit differ as much as the principall cause and the instrument now who can say the writing of the penne is the writer 3. Antinomians meane by the Gospel or the preaching of Faith here divided from the Law not the glad tidings of peace preached but the renewing Spirit without all letter or word of promise or command that is the teaching spirit and thâ— inward annointing without the Law or Gospel either Now Sanctification in this sense must bee wrought without Law Gospel Precept Command Promise and wee may lay aside the Bible then and all Ordinances and therefore no wonder then Antinomians tell us so often of the Letter and the Spirit for to them old and new Testament and all the sweet promises are a very Letter and in the new Testament we are not to serve God according to the Letter and therefore all Preaching Commands Exhortations Promises Threats of both Law and Gospel must be laid aside The Lord keeps us saith Towne under the Gospel in righteousnesse without all Law Ceremoniall and Morall and every where thâ—y say 〈◊〉 serve God now according to the Spirit not 〈◊〉 to the Letter outward Ordinances then to Antinomians are matters of meere courtesie CHAP. XII Antinomians deny actuall pardon of sinnes to the Jewes ANtinomians deny that the knowledge of actuall and eternall remission was an Article of the Jewish Creed but a mystery not revealed till the Gospell But then David and the Fathers Abraham and others were justified by the impâ—â—ed righteousnesse of Faith as wee are also David must Psal. 2.1 2. describe an happinesse he knew not what David saith Thou forgavest the iniquity of my sinne vers 5 2. We beleeve through the grace of the Lord Jesus we shall be saved as well as they 3. All the Fathers dyed in the faith 〈◊〉 did eat the same spirituall meat and did all drink of the same spirituall Rock and the Rock was Christ. 4. The Scripture foreseeing that God would justifie the heathen thrâ—ugh Faith reached before the Gospel to Abraham Esaiah prophecied of Christ as an Evangelist Daniel of the slaying of the Messiah and everlasting righteousnesse through him The Prophets testified before hand the sufferings of Christ and the glory that should follow actuall remission then was no mystery to them Abraham rejoyced to see Christs day and saw it CHAP. XIII Of the nonage of the Jewes what it was NOr was the tutorie bondage or nonage of the Jewes any thing but 1. A lesse measure of the Spirit then is now 2. A harder pressing of the Law on them 3. A keeping of that infant Church as a child under Pedagogues and Tutors in regard of the Elements of Ceremonies partly teaching them rudely and partly warning them by blondy Sacrifices and diverse washings of the desert of sinne and the filth of it but this is nothing to prove the Jewes were under the Law For 1. then should they be under the curse and so must eternally perish contrary to the Word nor was their pardon of sinnes by halfes and quarters 2. Then must they be saved by works Paul saith They came short of righteousnesse because they sought to establish their owne righteousnesse and stumbled at the stone laid in Zion and sought it not by faith And it was never lawfull for them more then us to seeke righteousnesse and justification by works of the Law so they were in this under no Law-Spirit more then we but justified the same way that we are 3. Yea many sweet Evangelike promises are made to them as to us Ho every one that thirsts come to the water c. Behold I lay on Zion a stone c. The just shall live by fath Who is a God like unto thee that pardons iniquity I even I am he that blotteth out thy transgressions for mine owne sake and divers other Scriptures prove this 4. The Prophets cryed against legall and outward service and pressed washing in Christs bloud and faith and repentance as the Apostles doe And to Christ gave all the Prophets witnesse that through his name whosoever beleeves in him shall receive remission of sinnes There is much of the Spirit of adoption of spirituall liberty in praying wrestling with God giving no rest to God Heavenly boldnesse and accesse to the throne of grace in Jâ—â—kob David Moses and sweet Evangelike and Gospel-familiarity between Christ and his Spouse the Church in the Song of Salomon Feasting and banqueting together only the Lawâ—s administration was wrath by accident through our corruption lesse gloâ—ious because of darke typs and a spaâ—â—r measure of the Spirit 2 Cor. 3. Ephes. 3.9 10. and Paul heightneth Gospelâ—glory and lesseneth the Law in the vaine sense that false Apostles and legall Teachers put on it in over-â—xalting it as if without Christ it could save or with Faith it could justifie 6 All under the Gospel Elect and Reprobate must be freed from the Law if the Jewes were under it all to whom the Gospel is preached must bee freed from it and to Deâ—ne and Moore who are both Arminians and Antinomians all and every one of mankinde must bee under â—race none under the Law of Commandements for the argument holdeth for all in opposition to the Legall Jew CHAP. XIV The old mâ—n or the flesh to Antinomians is under the Law the new Man freed from all Law IT is admirable that Towne will
have the Old man in beleevers shut up under the Law and the New man above all Law or subject to none at all as Familists and Libertines when they sinned said Non ego pecco sed asinus meus not I but the flesh doth sinne or sense reason the Old man doth sinne because the Old man onely is under the Law not the New man 2. Guiltinesse and sinne is a thing that falleth on the person not on a part of man 3. The command is given to the person the person is the subject of punishment and condemnation not his sense only 4. Thus Denne and Saltmarsh say Faith righteousnesse light joy and peace is in conscience in the sense fâ—â—sh conversation is sinne yet nothing that can condemne because the conscience is washed in justification but sinne is in the conversation saith Denne and in the sense reason or flesh saith Saltmarsh so here originall sinne shall be no sinne CHAP. XV. Antinomians hold the justified to sinne before men and as touching their conversation not before God and as touching their conscience SO Antinomians say the justified have no sinne in their conscience nor can God see any sinne in their conscience yet there is sinne in their conversation and flesh But 1. sin Originall and the flesh lusting against the Spirit dwelleth inherently in its essence being a blot in the conscience and whole man though guilt and actuall condemnation bee removed so was Paul a wretched man onely for sinne in mind will conscience affection no ill but the ill of sinne could make him cry out of his wretched condition 2. The justified must be as perfect as Angels if no sinne dwell in them and they need not pray for pardon wanting all sin 3. Sin in conversation as murther in the hands oppressing of men blasphemy in the tongue are against the Law of God and must be sinnes in the conscience else they are against no Law of God which make the sinnes of the justified and their doing golden graces CHAP. XVI Justification is close mistaken by Antinomians when they judge it to be an extirpation of sinne Root and branch as Papists fancie venials to remaine onely in the justified IUstification to us is not as Antinomians dreame an utter extirpation of sinne in its essence root and branch for Papists conceive of justification so as nothing that is sinne remaineth in the justified but some gentle venials which we can satisfie for our selves but we judge justification to be a judiciall and law-removall of the guilt or obligation to eternall punishment 1. It is a judiciall and forinsecall Law-declaration that is opposed to condemnation but this removeth Law-guiltinesse to die not the intrinsecall inherent blot of sinne as if the sinner had never sinned and were now no sinner 2. By it the sinner is not as Antinomians say as righteous as Christ because Christ could say in truth I have no sinne but wee even being justified are lyars if we say we have no sinne 3. Sin dwelleth not in Christ at all nor was there in him flesh and concupiscence lusting against the Spirit as in us For it is cleare from the Scriptue that sinne dwelleth in the justified CHAP. XVII Christ not formally the sinner as Antinomians dreame NOr was Christ so made sinne as the intrinsecall guilt of sin was laid on him as Crispe saith Christ was onely the Adulterer the Idolater the sinner imputatively not inherently and formally in that he did beare the satisfactory punishment of wrath and hell due to our sinne 1. Christ was so made sinne not in the imagination but really suffering in our person yet so as sinne physically and inherently in its blot remaines in us and after wee are justified wee have sinne We are sold under sinne and carnall in many things wee offend all Now its blasphemy to say that Christ was so sinfull as we are 2. Nor is the surety the principall any way save onely legally penally imputatively the debtor there is no injustice in the surety as in the principall in borrowing money and profusely wasting it and wronging his brother nor can the surety bee called formally the unjust man the waster though he be legally the debtor and holden in justice and really not in imagination to pay the summe so was Christ never inherently and formally the sinner as the snow is formally white because Christ in himselfe in his physicall person and natures was innocent holy harmelesse undefiled separated from sinners even while he was a surety for sinners 3. Scripture expoundeth Christs bearing of our sinnes not as if the essence forme and intrinsecall fundamentall and essentiall guilt of sinne had been on him then he should have been a sinner as we are and so not a sinlesse sacrifice for sinne but in bearing the punishment due to us in his owne body on the tree in being wounded for our transgressions but it s the Antinomianâ— way to confound Sanctification and Justification and to make us as inherently and intrinsecally in our very persons holy sinnelesse righteous free of the indwelling of Originall sinne and the old man and the flesh as Christ himselfe and this is the Familâ—sts principle That Christ hath Goded and Christed a Saint and Christ is incarnate and maned in the beleever so that the beleever is God manifested in the flesh and dwelling personally in us all the sinnes that a beleever commits are no more sinnes then the actions of Christ for all our sinnes were swallowed up and annihilated in Christ He that is borne of God say they cannot sinne and M. Towne telleth us that justification is regeneration and to faith there is no sinne CHAP. XVIII That we are not justified untill we beleeve WEe hold against Antinomians that we are never justified till we beleeve They say from eternity we were justified or from the time that the Messiah dyed all sins were finished and wee justified or from our birrh But justification in Gods decree and purpose from eternity is no more justification then Creation sanctification glorification the crucifying of Christ and all things that fall out in time for all these were in the eternall purpose of God 2. In justification our sinnes are in their guilt fully done away as a thick cloud cast in the bottome of the sea remembred no more sought for and not found if all this was done from eternity beleevers were never sinners never children of wrath really as Paul saith never dead in sinnes never enemies to God or ungodly they were onely such in a mentall consideration 3. It is true God loved his chosen ones from eternitie to salvation and from that love sent his Sonne to die to wash justifie and sanctifie them but this is not their justification but a fruit of justification in time When our time is the time of love and wee are dying in our owne
the beauty of grace and gracious actings are in Christ pure spirituall cleane abstracted In us in whom there dwelleth a Law in the members it is muddie clayie in dregs and concretion abstracta sunt puriora concretis 5. What we over-behold that we over love what we over-love in that wee over-confide the affections both in their flowings and their over-banke-flowings are linked together so we see not that actings of grace are made secret substituted Mediators with Christ but these flow from the corruption of our nature not from the straine of our Doctrine in these points CHAP. LVII Of the liberty which Christ hath purchased to us by his death ANtinomians generally contend for a Christian liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free and we contend for the same but the question is wherein the liberty consisteth it concerneth us much that we take not licence for liberty We thinke 1. We are freed by Christ from not onely the Ceremoniall Law so as Christ profiteth us nothing if we come under that yoake againe but also from all Commandements of men for all these Ceremonies being now not commanded but forbidden of God become the Commandements of men from which both Jewes and Gentiles were freed in Christ. 2. We are freed and redeemed from the Morall Law as cursing and condemning by the Son of God who makes us free indeed 3. We are redeemed from the dominion of sin by the Spirit of grace for where this Spirit is there is liberty and Christ freeth us from this service of sin in regard that the Law is a Lord by irritating our corruption more and more though this be accidentall to the Spirituall Law that bringeth forth in us sonnes and children to death and over-aweth and compelleth us to keep the Law as a manifestation of wrath whereas the Spirit of the Lord is a free sweet lovely-constrayning-Spirit in the Gospel-working in a farre other way obedience to the Law then the Law-spirit of bondage doth And upon these are we 4. freed from a necessity of being justified by the Law or the works thereof 5. From all conquering Law-power of all enemies But we are not delivered and freed from the commanding directing obliging and binding power of the Law as a binding rule of life so as beleevers once being beleevers sinne not because they are under no Law farre lesse is it such a freedome as is that which is from the yoake of the Ceremoniall Law as Towne saith But if we be free from the Law with this kind of freedome which is licence it is free to us to sinne whereas the end of our Redemption is to change the yoake of a condemning and cursing Law in a sweet easie yoak of Christ to serve God in holynesse and righteousnesse the compend of the two Tables of the Law to deny ungodlinesse and worldly lusts 2. The Word of God calleth freedome from doing Gods will a not using our liberty in Christ as an occasion to the flesh and commandeth doing and fulfilling of the Law in loving our neighbour as our selfe 3. The service of sinne is the greatest bondage that is and the sinner is overcome by this Tyrant now the Sonne of God hath freed us from this bondage Whosoever committeth sin is the servant of sin if the Son make you free then are ye free indeed And to serve God is a free mans life as David saith I will walk at liberty for I seek thy precepts and Christ hath loved us and washed us in his bloud and made us Kings and Priests unto God Now Kings are of all men the freest on earth but Kings and Priests to God are Lords over their owne lusts which is more then to take a walled City and are to offer themselves and their bodies as a holy living and acceptable sacrifice which is their reasonable service 4. And the whole Gospel urgeth the same for it subjecteth us to Gods externall Commandement of honouring father and mother of having our conversation honest amongst the Gentiles in abstaining from fleshly lusts of walking in Christ as we have received him and it is the Commandement that the Apostle gave by the Lord Jesus which is our sanctification and that we should abstain from fornication and the whole doctrine of the Apostles that we be holy as he is holy nor doth the Law cease to be the Law to beleevers as Towne saith Because it neither can nor actually doth condemne and curse these that are in Christ and consequently it cannot oblige them as a commanding rule for you cannot separate the condemning power of the Law saith he from the commanding power of it If the Law cannot condemn it loseth the being of the Law and Luther saith it is no more Law Lex non damnans non est Lex not one jot or title of the Law can perish But the truth is the Law as it is an instrument of the covenant of works and justifieth or condemneth ceaseth to be the Law to the beleever as Luther saith it ceaseth to be the Law of life and righteousnesse and the way to heaven according to the tenour of the first covenant which is He that doth these things abiding in all things written in the Law in thought word and deed perfectly without the least breach in one Iota by his own strength he shall live that is he shall be justified and obtaine eternall life by the Law without a Mediator and shall be saved but not be in Christs debt nor obliged in one graine to the grace of the Gospel But where liveth I pray you this good man Neither in heaven nor earth except the man Jesus Christ. So the Law is not such a Law as can save to any man now under sin so Luther saith right but it was never Luthers mind that the Law simpliciter ceaseth to be the Law commanding and obliging to holy walking So it is a sophisme a 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 ad dictum 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 the Law 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as it justifieth and saveth Legally is no damning Law and loseth its being as it is a covenant of works to all beleevers True ergo it is in no sort a Law to them it followeth not such a just Judge and King condemneth not this guilty man because his Sonne the Prince and heire suffered for him ergo he is not a Law-judge condemning the poore guilty man true but ergo he is not King and Judge to command this man to be obedient to all his good Lawes and ergo this pardoned man is in all other things and good Lawes loosed from this oath of allegeance and the band of loyalty and hee is no more the the Kings subject so as if the man now break the Kings Lawes and he doth not sin against the King as Law-giver or his Lawes surely it cannot
Law of God but hee commandeth not as a condemning Judge the curse is removed from the Law Gal. 3.10 Not the Law it selfe nor the authority majestie nor spirituall holynesse of the Law or Lawgiver and so God both commandeth in the Gospel as a God and Law-giver even as our God a consuming fire to such as are not under grace and as a Father to his owne in Christ. Diff. 3. The Law saith hee commandeth by promises and threatnings blessings and cursings the Gospel rather perswadeth then commandeth and rather by promises and exhorts rather then bids and reasons us to duty rather then inforceth and rather drawes us then drives us and setting forth promises and priviledges and prerogatives done on Gods part and Christs part for us rather argues us to doing and working and loving reflections againe and Christ is chiefly proposed to us for holinesse obedience mortification newnesse of life So the Gospell commands rather by paterne then precept and by imitation then command Hebr. 12.12 13. Answ. 1. The Law did also perswade by promiseâ— Doe this and live and argueth out of highest love with all the heart to obey the Gospel I confesse addeth a transcendent and incomparable motive which is the soule-conquering love of God to give his bloud and precious life a ransome for his enemies But I pray why doth not Saltmarsh speake accurately in setting downe the differences between the Law and Gospel For they are the very hinges of the controversie betweene Antinomians and us he speaketh doubtfully neither denying nor affirming but the Gospel commandeth onely he saith it rather perswades and argues then commands If hee meane it commandeth not the same way that the Law doth that is that we give personall perfect obedience of our own purse and stocke without the grace of a Mediator under pain of everlasting burning then he should not have said it rather perswades nor commands which is as much as it commands but swaies more to the perswading hand but thus it commands not at all any in Christ it speaks its commands and issueth forth royall mandats as a King to his owne Subjects that is to these onely that are under the Law not to these under Gospel-grace But if Antinomians state the difference between Law and Gospel aright to speake against us the truth is the Gospel commands not by their way of obedience to the tenne Commands to a beleever so as the beleever doth sinne against any Command or Law of God call it as you will or violate any authority of the Law-giver if he disobey 1. Because the Law-giver in the Gospel gives up all his authority as Law-giver to command beleevers as well as he resigneth his Law-giving Authority to curse and condemne beleevers for the same way that God by no Law can condemne and curse beleevers becausâ— Christ was condemned and made a curse for them so neither can the Lord command by the authoritie of a Law-giver any duty in the ten Commandements to a beleever as a beleever For saith Towne with the Antinomians What Christ performed for us that wee are freed from by him but Christ not onely was made a curse for us but also performed compleatly all active obedience that the Law commanded us Therefore wee are freed from all active obedience to the Law So 1. as an arbitrary command is not properly a command but rather a will-counsell and free advise that one friend giveth to another so that the friend refusing the counsell sinneth against no Law just so is it here Antinomians may say Beleevers sinning against Gospel-hortations for commands of God they are not sinne against the love and deepest and broadest grace of God which is a higher offence then to sinne against a Law of God and so it s not arbitrary to them to obey I answer 1. Sinne is no sin if it be not now under the New Testament a transgression of the Morall Law but wee are no more under the Law say Saltmarsh Crisp Towne and Denne then an Englishman can fail against the Lawes of Spaine and where there is no Law to the same purpose saith Saltmarsh there is no transgression nor trouble of minde for sinne 2. If offending against the love of Christ be a greater sinne then offending against the Law then it is a sinne but this is false for sure if it were a sinne in them God who seeth all should see it to be a sinne in them now this God cannot doe for there is no more sinne in a beleever say they then in Christ then the Gospel-exhortations must bee arbitrary Commandements that is no Commandements of God 3. If God in the Gospel give up and denude himselfe of authority of commanding then came Christ to dissolve the Law contrary to his owne Word Math. 5.18 19 20. For nothing is more essentiall to the Law then its commanding authority even to command us to doe and teach others to doe all even to the least of the Commandements 4. The Gospel saith he perswades rather then commands But say we it both commands as the Law doth and with a more strong obligation of the constraining love of Christ beside the authority of the Lawgiver and also perswadeth so here be no differences at all for Christ hath not redeemed us from the curse of the Law to free us from active obedience by his grace to the Law that we should be Sonnes of Beliall from under all yoake but that with a stronger tye we should live in holinesse and righteousnesse to him who dyed for us O then saith Towne I am sure if we bee faster tyed to the obedience of the Law then before we have no helpe by Christ but rather hee hath made our case more miserable why doe you unloose the coards and abate so much of the rigour of the Law Answ. Miserable bee they with Herod and Pilate who call it a miserable case that Christs silken coards of love and tyes of free Gospel-bands oyled and sweetned with the love of Christ renders us no helpe but makes our yoake and Law-chaines heavier It is happinesse not misery and sweetest liberty to serve God But to Antinomians Puritanicall walking and strickt adhering to the Law of God as a rule of righteousnesse sweetned and perfumed with Gospel-grace to performe any personall obedience they lay all on imputative mortification abused not rightly expounded to God is bondage 2. The rigour of the Law is not in commanding holinesse the Law then should be unjust but in that it now obligeth us to obedience under a curse when we are utterly unable to obey but Christ abateth the rigour of the Law in that 1. He removeth the curse which Towne seemeth to esteeme a poore courtesie Christ hath done us 2. Giveth grace to obey 3. Pardoneth in Christs bloud the sinnefull defects of obedience 4. Justifieth us not by Law that doore to heaven is shut never to be opened to sinners but by faith which is his
only the illuminated Elders in the godly wisdome which walk in the house of love And in the Epistle Let no man saith he boast himselfe in any of the works of righteousnesse or take on the same to salvation neither to condemnation before that hee in the Spirit of Christ through the love of the Father be renewed in all righteousnesse of life not that I meane in the Elementish Ceremoniall righteousnesse which the man setteth forth or occupieth out of his owne prudency but I meane in that righteousnesse which according to the heavenly truth is in the being of Christ and is set forth through the Spirit of God So this abominable wretch maketh all reading or hearing or beleeving the Scriptures to be Elementish carnall righteousnesse and that wee are to doe no good works to obtaine salvation nor to eschew any evill to be freed from condemnation but to study an inward righteousnesse in being Goded and Christed and in communicating with the essence and godly being M. Towne also maketh the Law a sort of directorie of walking as doth H. N. Assert grace pag. 38. I know not where to learne my duty to my Superiour but in the matter of the fift Command nor what Murther or Adulterie is but in the sixt and seventh But Towne forgetteth himselfe and pag. 3. saith We are from under the Law in all its authority dominion offices and effects yea hee denyeth that wee are under the power and teaching of the Law And Saltmarsh will have us not to borrow one beame of directing light from the Law so as he seemeth to stomach and to bee angry that the old Testament but especially the ten Commandements are printed in the Bible Yet what ever direction of walking wee have from the Law I find them in all their writings grudging at any Law or Gospel written because writing speaking vocall covenants are the dead and killing Letter fruitlesse and livelesse and that the Spirit immediatly acting is all our rule Paral. VII Libertines speake disgracefully of the Pen-men of Scripture and called Paul a broken vessell John stolidum juvenem a foolish young man Peter a denyer of God Mathew an Vsurer The Church was in her infancy said Da. Georgius Vnder Abraham and the Prophets in its young age under John Baptist Christ in the flesh and the Apostles it s grown and now presently under David the Christ its spirituall and perfect So many Antinomians turne perfectists Who say they having the Holy Ghost as well as the Prophets and Apostles can pen and speake Scripture from the same Spirit The New England Libertines are so farre on this way that they disgrace the Apostle Peter as a halfe-Legalist and say Peter leaned more to a covenant of works then Paul and that Pauls doctrine was more for free grace then Peters And Saltmarsh maketh all the Prophets in the Old Testament Legall men and Christ in the flesh and his Apostles preached free grace but in degrees and parts but we dare not saith hee preach the Gospel so in halves and quarters as yee doe And Christ and the Apostles preached grace faith repentance new obedience in scantling of Doctrine as they are meerely and barely revealed in the history of the Gospel or Acts of the Apostles where onely the Doctrine is not so much revealed as the practise But we Antinomians preach Christ the power of all the fulnesse of all that we may exalt him whom God hath exalted at his owne right hand Hence Saltmarsh 1. saith the Antinomians in England reveale more free grace and fulnesse of Christ in their Sermons then Christ and the Apostles did in the halfe of the New Testament or all the Prophets in the Old 2. Christ and the Prophets and Apostles except in the Epistles were Legall Preachers What be Legall Preachers that I wrong not Saltmarsh as he doth Christ the Prophets and Apostles I give it in his owne words Legalists are 1. such as compound and bargaine with God for salvation and submit not to the righteousnesse of God and lye downe in the sparks of their owne kindling are Christ his Prophets and Apostles such Such as from the notion of a covenant conceive a little too Legally of free grace Such as have neither the use nor freedome of the heavenly inheritance that are subject to death and bondage Such to whom God appeared onely as it were upon tearmes and conditions of reconciliation Such as in fasting and other acts of obedience dealt with God to get some love from God which Christ himselfe had not gotten for us So belike the Prophets that dyed before Christ went not to heaven but to some chamber or higher roome in hell called Limbus Patrum or to some other place for Saltmarsh saith they had neither the use nor freedome of the heavenly inheritance whither then went their soules after death 2. They were chosen to salvation some other way then Jaakob Rom. 9. they purchased the love of free election by fasting and pennance 3. Their sinnes were not pardoned nor they reconciled to God a belying of the Old Testament 4. The Prophets submitted not to the righteousnesse of God but sought righteousnesse by the works of the Law All these how they agree in part to Christ John Baptist and the Apostles in the first halfe of the New Testament let Saltmarsh and Antinomians see and consider Paral. VIII Libertines said The whole Scripture was nothing but the Spirit of God and the Letter of the Scripture not Scripture but the Spirit was both Christ and the Scripture and a godly life must be the Spirit So the Libertines of New-England There is a Testimony of the Spirit and voice unto the soule meerely immediate without any respect unto or concurrence with the Word And from this Wee are not to keepe a constant course of praying at set houres or alwayes but as the Spirit move us And all doctrines and revelations must bee tryed by Christ that is Christ dwelling in us in a spirituall manner not by the Word of Christ or the Scripture In this same Grammer speake Antinomians So Saltmarsh The Law now is in the Spirit What is that And in the Gospel for a beleever to walke by nor is saith he holinesse and sanctification now such as is fashioned by the Law or outward Commandement but by the preaching of Faith by which the Spirit is given which renewes and sanctifies a beleever and makes him the very Law of Commandement in himselfe and his heart the very two Tables of Moses This is to say the Word begetteth not Faith but onely Historically instructeth the flesh and expressely in terminis the Libertines sense and minde is that the Word is changed in a Spirit without Scripture and the Christian in his walking and conversation which to Antinomians is all in faith is the Spirit it selfe Towne is much in this through his whole booke to
Rise raigne er 20. pag. 4. er 32. pag. 6. er 42. p. 8. er 64. pag. 12. er 70. pag. 53. 6. A beleever must have the actuall influence of the Spirit to know these things that are freely given him of God A Moralist needeth no supernaturall light to know that he hath a masse of Morall vertues Temperance Fortitude Justice and his owne Spirit teacheth him that he is a temperate valerous just man 6. A beleever cannot act according to his supernaturall habits except actuall grace stirre him a Moralist needeth but naturall reason the stirring of his owne Spirit with a common influence of God to cause him act according to his Morall habits 7. The Moralists habits of vertue are of no better house then his owne conqueise the new heart and the habits of grace are of a higher and nobler bloud being from heaven and infused by the Spirit of grace Ezech. 36.26 Deut. 30. vers 6. Zach. 12.10 Saltmarsh doth little lesse then blaspheme when hee saith the supernaturall knowledge of the Spirits impression by signes which is wrought by the Holy Ghost 1 Cor. 2.12 1 Joh. 2.3 1 Joh. 3.18.19 Rom. 8.15.16 Is as low as the feelings of flesh and bloud for flesh and bloud cannot assure us that we are translated from death to life because we love the brethren this knowledge is given us by that Spirit which the World knowes not 1 Cor. 2.12 CHAP. LXXXVIII That we are both righteous in the sight of God being justified and yet sinners in our selves is proved against Antinomians ANtinomians hold That we cannot be both righteous in the sight of God and also sinners in our selves It is thus farre true we cannot both be righteous by Christs imputed righteousnesse and freed from the guilt of sinne and not righteous by imputation and not freed that should involue a contradiction 2. It is thus farre true we cannot be both righteous by imputation before God and in our selves sinners by sinne bearing a dominion over us as a Tyrant doth over a slave because whoever are justified they are also sanctified and sanctification abateth the dominion full vigour and lordship of sinne but doth not remove it root and branch so as it doth not dwell in the Saints so long as they dwell in the body 1. David Psalm 51. vers 7. saith Purge mee with Hysope and I shall be cleane wash me and I shall bee whiter then the snow Then he was cleane in the sight of God being pardoned And Rom. 4.6 Psalm 32.1 David describeth the righteousnesse of the man unto whom God imputeth righteousnesse without works 1. Saying Blessed are they whose iniquities are forgiven and whose sinnes are covered And so was Abraham justified and Rom. 4.23.24 Now it was not written for his sake alone but for us Then David and Abrahams sinnes were covered and they freed from the guilt of all sinne in the sight of God yet Paul Rom. 3. proveth that David and the most righteous on earth sinned because there is none that doth good there are none righteous they are all gone out of the way c. all the world was guilty before God verse 19. then they were sinners if David was a Jew and one that went out of the way as the Law of God maketh no exception Antinomians cannot say that before David was justified and converted and while hee was yet in the state of nature he sinned but being once converted and justified he was no more a sinner then Christ but as righteous as Christ as saith Crispe as cleane from sinne saith Eaton as Christ himselfe I confesse this is to helpe the Papists not a little for Paul speaketh of all that are justified by Faith and not by Works now David converted was justified by faith and not by works done either before conversion by the strength of nature or after conversion by the power of saâ—ing grace therefore David must sinne and goe out of the way after conversion when he was free from all guilt of sinne and so justified and righteous before God and yet a sinner though he sinned not as under the full dominion of sinne 2. The Lord pardoned and covered the sinnes of his people in Christ in the Old Testament tooke away their iniquity and purged their sinne blotted out their transgressions and remembred not their sinnes and that as a thicke cloud God described himselfe to Moses not Prophecying what he was to be under the New Testament but what hee was at that time actually as he was then as now the Lord the Lord mercifull and gracious long suffering and aboundant in goodnesse and truth even a God keeping mercie to thousands of the Jewes forgiveing iniquitie trangression and sinne then multitudes were then justified and righteous in the sight of God and freed from the guilt of sinne and yet even then there was not one man on earth justified or not justified who inherently and in himselfe was righteous did good and sinned not or that could say he had made cleane his heart or was pure from sinne or that could stand before God if hee should marke narrowly his iniquities nor was there any flesh could bee justified in his sight Not a righteous Job a none-such on earth and so justified before God yet in himselfe is so sinfull as his owne garments should defile him though hee should wash himselfe with Snow-water Job 9.30 31. 3. Paul a man not under the Law justified and sanctified regenerated and triumphing in Christ as freed from sinne before God as touching the guilt and condemnation thereof yet remaineth a sinner in himselfe carnall sold under sinne sinne dwelleth in him no good dwelleth in his flesh there is rebellion in him against the Law of his minde captivity to sinne wretchednesse under the body of sinne 4. So the Corinthians were justified washen sanctified and yet these of them who were judged and punished that they should not perish with the world did grievously sinne in not descerning the Lords body if there were no sinne in these who were justified and espoused to Christ more then in Christ how could Paul feare that as the Serpent beguiled Evah so their minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ Jesus If there was not sinne dwelling in them how thought they Paul a foole slighted him and extolled the Messengers of Satan the false Apostles 5. The Apostle John and his fellowes and the Saints to whom he writeth Had fellowship with the Father and the Sonne were purged from all their sinnes had an Advocate who interceeded for them in heaven were Fathers young men babes in Christ and so righteous in the sight of God yet sinners For if we say saith John we have no sinne we deceive our selves and make him a lyar 6. This Novatian and Familisticall opinion that we cannot be both righteous before God and sinners
of Love H.N. Epistle to the two daughters of Warwicke What H. Nicholas called hâ—mâ—elf H. Nicholas his wicked doctrine (a) H. Nicholas evangel c. 15. b Beacon catâ—â—chis 155 156. c Rise reign er 53 54. d H.N. eâ— â— c. 5. e Rise reig er 11. M. Del and H. Nicholas the familist sympathizâ— in the same Grammer and itâ— to be feared in the same doctrine touching God manifested in the flesh M. Del inclines to deny Christ God incarnate It were good he would cleare himselfe of Familisme and of this point in particular What Christ God manifested in the flesh is to Familists f H. N. â— â—xh cap. 7. g H. Nich. 1 exh c. 17. sect 26. Sect. 9 Sect. 9. Sect. 10. h H. N. Evan. c. 13. Se. 2. H. Nicholas with Antinomians M. Del. M. Beacon reject all ordinances and repute all externall worship and confessing of Christ before men all controversies in religion indifferent this wicâ—ed opinion is reâ—uted by 8 arguments Christ is truely and really perfect man not a holy dispoâ—â—tion as H. N. blasphemously saith Scriptures are not to be exponed allegorically but where the Holy Ghost so exponeth them (a) Luc Osian â—er epiâ—o hist. eccles Centur. 16. l. 2. c. 29. (b) Schlusselburgiâ—â— S. Theol. Doctâ—r Gymnasio Tralesundâ—nsiâ—iâ— pomerama in suo â—atologo â—aerâ—ticorum lib 4. p. 35 36. (c) Osiander ibi (d) Sleidanus 〈◊〉 l. 7. (e) Gualterius in tabula Chronographica sâ—cul â—6 c. 36. D. M. Luth. vehement against Antinomians who abolish the Law setteth downe the Recantation of John Islebius in the name of Islebius (a) This was no custome in the Apoâ—â—oâ—â—cke Church but by superstition keeped for the times being the dawning of Reformation Contrary to thâ—s Towne the Antinomian saith assert â—ree grace p. 3. we are â—reâ—d from the Morall Law or Decalogue with all its authority domiâ—ion offices and effects so Saltm free grace p. 140. (b) But our Antinomians say we can no more sin being once Justified then Christ himself Eaâ—on honey comb c. 3. p. 25. Saltmar fr. g. 140.146.41 honey com c 4.5 Satan removing the law which is deeply ingraven in the heart would drive men to all kind of sensuality Justifâ—ed persons have sin dwelling in them yet is it the cuâ—rent doctâ—ine 〈◊〉 the Antinomiâ—â—s of our time to teach that a beleever is not to sorrow for sin nor to fear either ill of sin or punishment but to live for ever in a merry pin yeâ— he waâ—ts nothing that the glorified in heaven have saith Saltmarsh frâ—e gra p. 140. but beleeve he is in heaven and is in heaven The preaching of the Law necessary both before and after conversion 〈◊〉 Town asser grace p. 76.77 pleadeth for perfection both of persons and works of beleevers all Antinomians doe the same as I prove Antinomians will not yeeld it lawfull to a beleever to pray for remission of sins Towne saith David in the flesh and out of weaknes prayed for it Psal. 51. asser p. 103. The Law preached witâ— Christs sufferings for the preaching therof terrifieth more Germany a stoole for Catts Antiâ—omians are against all Law humiliation that goeth before conversion contrary to Luthers method in this passage Conceit of singulariâ—y an occasiâ—n of Antinomianisme 1 Luthers suffering from Sects 2 A warning to the following generations to look for sectaries such as Antinomians Familists Anabaptists and yet to beleeve that the power of Christ shall preserve his owne Church Lucas Osiander ubi enim Lutherus docet ut saepe com supeâ— epis ad Galatas paeniâ—entem peccatorem non debere audire Mosâ—m per legem peccata accusantem sed in Christum salvatorem oculos conjiciendos qui sanet co â—rita corda inde Eislebius et alij colligerunt legem non esse docendam The tenents of Eislebius and other Antinomians in Luthers time (d) Schlusselbu cat hereticorum l. 3. p. 45 46 47. (e) Town asser p. 35. (f) Saltmarsh free grace· 154. (g) Honey combe c. 3. pag. 35. (h) Saltm fr. gr p. 140. i. Sermon the man of sin discovered rather vailed p. 10.11 The old Antinomians are not so grose as Saltmarsh and our new Antinomians Sclusselbur p. 46 47 48 49. The state of the question touching the Law as the old Antinomians framed it Antinomians say that the Law is a meer patient to a beleever and doth neither command direct nor give him any glance of light to doe Gods will the spirit is his onely light k Saltmarsh fr. gr p. 146 147. l Town asser gr p. 10. what if it be affirmed that even in true sanctification the law of workes is a meere passive thing as the Kings high way which a christian freely walketh iâ— you can never have face to deny it Psal. 119. â— 2. (i) Saltmarsh free grace 140. pag. 142. (k) Towne asser grace pag. 34. (l) Schlusseâ— catalogo haeriticorum l. 3. pag. 47 48 49. Novus homo â—ustus regeneratus renatus perfectus in Christo Iesu et completus in ipso Sanctus justus innocens unum cum Christo caro de carne et os ex ossibus eius illud ipsum denique ex gratia side et imputatione quod Christus est natura in quo Christus vivit loquitur facit et operatur omnâ—a nam omnia opera eius sunt opera Christi â—uius ipse est mera passiva maâ—er a. (m) Towne ass grace pag 41 42 43. (n) Mâ—t. 10.18 19 20. Ioh. 16.1 2. Luk. 21.15 â—6 17 18 19 20. Ioh. 21.18 19 20. 1 Pet. 3.14 15 16 17. (o) Schluss cat haer l. 3. p. 82. (p) Honyâ—co c. 4 43 44 45 46 47 48 c c. 3.23 24 25. (p) Honyâ—co c. 4 43 44 45 46 47 48 c c. 3.23 24 25. (q) Tow. ass gra p. 95 96 97 c. (r) Salt free grace 144 145 146. c. Mart. Luther more agâ—inst Antinomiaâ—s then any man Divers usefull distinctions touching the law and the beleevers freedome from it tending to cleare the minde of Luther and Protestants Three speciall uses of the law according to M. Luther (a) Luther to 2 in Gen. c. 18. fol 18. b Luther writeth against the Antinomianâ— by name Luther â—o 2. in Gen c. 18 f. 119. Luthâ—r â—â—fuâ—eth the Antâ—nomians under the name of Antinomians is enemies to the law of God c Luther to 2. in Gen. c. 18. fo 119. d 19. fo 118. e Luther to 2. in Gen. c. 19. f. 132 f Luther tom 2 in Gen c 2. fol 132. g Luther tom 1. pa 555. Luther extolleth good works against all Antinomians h Luther tom 3. fol. 109. I Luth. ttm. 3 fâ—l 165 l Luth tom 1 fol 449. m Luth tom 1 fol 522. n Luther to 2 in Gen. c. 15. fol. 57. (o) Luther to 2 in Gen. Luther teachâ—eth that only faith justifieth and yet faith is not alone with out good workes Luther tom 2 fol. 517. How faith and workes are contrary to Luther (a) Luther to 2 in Gen.
c. 18. fol 18. b Luther writeth against the Antinomianâ— by name Luther â—o 2. in Gen c. 18 f. 119. Luthâ—r â—â—fuâ—eth the Antâ—nomians under the name of Antinomians is enemies to the law of God c Luther to 2. in Gen. c. 18. fo 119. d 19. fo 118. e Luther to 2. in Gen. c. 19. f. 132 f Luther tom 2 in Gen c 2. fol 132. g Luther tom 1. pa 555. Luther extolleth good works against all Antinomians h Luther tom 3. fol. 109. I Luth. ttm. 3 fâ—l 165 l Luth tom 1 fol 449. m Luth tom 1 fol 522. n Luther to 2 in Gen. c. 15. fol. 57. (o) Luther to 2 in Gen. Luther teachâ—eth that only faith justifieth and yet faith is not alone with out good workes Luther tom 2 fol. 517. How faith and workes are contrary to Luther q Luther to 4 fol. 6. r Luth. tom 4 f 114. r Luth tom 4. fol 114. How according to Luther his mind the law hath power ouer the flesh and not over the renewed conscience q Luther to 4 fol. 6. r Luth. tom 4 f 114. r Luth tom 4. fol 114. How according to Luther his mind the law hath power ouer the flesh and not over the renewed conscience s Towne ass p. 35.73 t Salt free grace 154.152 w Den. ser. man of sin p. 9.10 x Schluss cat heret l. 3. p. 53.54 55. y Cal. adv lib. c. 18 452 a Luther tom 2 in Ge. c. 18. fol. 119. b c. 19 f. 132. c Luther contra Anti. disp 3. propos 27. dis 4 pro. 33. d Luther tom 2. fal 5â—9 d Luther tom 2. fal 5â—9 How good workes conforme to the Law are not necessary The new man is under the same law as a rule of life which was in the covenant of workes and though we be changed the law is the same The Law is given to the new man 〈…〉 of lifâ— and not properâ—y to the flesh but as a sinne condemning law (e) Luther to 4.178 Eaton (f) Hony-com c. 3. pag. 25. (g) Saltm free gracâ— pag. 140. (h) Hony-com ch 5 73 74. Crispe vol. 2. ser. 4.136 137 138 152 153 154 157. (i) Hony-com c. 71 72. (k) Hony-com c. 7.134 (l) Saltm free grace 145. (e) Luther to 4.178 Eaton (f) Hony-com c. 3. pag. 25. (g) Saltm free gracâ— pag. 140. Crispe vol. 2. ser. 4.136 137 138 152 153 154 157. (i) Hony-com c. 71 72. (h) Hony-com ch 5 73 74. (k) Hony-com c. 7.134 (l) Saltm free grace 145. How Luther according to Scripture saith the new man and terrified conscience in the beleever is simply freed from the law and the Law is abrogated to him and hath only power over his flesh m Luther tom 4. fo 178. n Luther tom 4. p. 112. o Luther tom 4.119 How the law condemneth terrifieth and how not p Luther tom 4. fo 47. q Luther to â— p. 112. r Luther to 1 128. How the renewed man iâ— freed from the Law s Luther tom 1. fo 546. n Luther tom 4. p. 112. o Luther tom 4.119 How the law condemneth terrifieth and how not p Luther tom 4. fo 47. q Luther to â— p. 112. r Luther to 1 128. How the renewed man iâ— freed from the Law s Luther tom 1. to 546. t Schlusselburgiuâ—â—at hereticâ— l. 3. p. 53. w Towne ass grace p. 35. p. 3. How the Law is given to the new man and how not Luther tom 1. f. 541. Luther tom 2. l. 253. a Luther tom â— f. 5â— The guiltâ— conscience 〈◊〉 beleever noâ— under the 〈◊〉 b Luâ—her tom 4 f 5. Excellent replyes of a beleever to the accusing Law c Luther tom 4. fo 15. d Luther to 4 fo 40. e Luther to 4. f. 46. A tempted beleâ—ver freed from the chalinges of the condemning Law Luth tom 4.117 g Luth tom 4. f. 11â— h Luther tom â— f. 118. Luther tom 1. f. 541. Luther tom 2. â— 253. a Luther tom â— f. 5â— The guiltâ— conscience 〈◊〉 beleever noâ— under the 〈◊〉 b Luâ—her tom 4 f 5. Excellent replyes of a beleever to the accusing Law c Luther tom 4. fo 15. d Luther to 4 fo 40. e Luther to 4. f. 46. A tempted beleâ—ver freed from the chalinges of the condemning Law Luth tom 4.117 g Luth tom 4. f. 11â— h Luther tom â— f. 118. i Luthâ—r tom â— f 154.55 A tempted sâ—nner is 〈◊〉 from a sensitive 〈…〉 impâ—ted rigâ—teousnesse i Luthâ—r tom â— f 154.55 A tempted sâ—nner is 〈◊〉 from a sensitive 〈…〉 impâ—ted rigâ—teousnesse k Luther tom 4.54 Christ on the crosse is to bee eâ—ed to comfort the weake beleever against his own sin m Luther tom 3 f. 376. The wayes of overcomming Law temptations n Luther tom 3 f. 396. o Luther tom 3 376. p Luther tom 3. fo 489. q Luther tom 4 f. 6. r Luther tom 4 f. 76. s Luther tom 4. f. 14. k Luther tom 4.54 Christ on the crosse is to bee eâ—ed to comfort the weake beleever against his own sin m Luther tom 3 f. 376. The wayes of overcomming Law temptations n Luther tom 3 f. 396. o Luther tom 3 376. p Luther tom 3. fo 489. q Luther tom 4 f. 6. r Luther tom 4. f. 76. s Luther tom 4. f. 14. Luther is for conditions in the Covenant of grace and for preparations before conversion Antinomians deny both t Luther tom 4 f. 112. x Luther to 4 10â— z Luther tom 4 f. 156. a Luth. 9. tom 4. f. 289. b Luther to 4. f. 289. Temtations and how they are resisted in the conscience c Luther tom 4 f. 147. d Luther tom 4 f. 387. e Luther to 4.391 t Luther tom 4 f. 112. x Luther to 4 10â— z Luther tom 4 f. 156. a Luth. 9. tom 4. f. 289. b Luther to 4. f. 289. Temtations and how they are resisted in the conscience c Luther tom 4 f. 147. d Luther tom 4 f. 387. e Luther to 4.391 f Luther to 4 f. 400. g Luther tom 4. fo 413. h Luther tom 4 â— â—92 i Luther tom 4 f. 502. k Luther tom 4 758. in Ps. 2. l Luther ex ad Cus. Aquilam an 1528. f. 393 m Luther to 2. in Gen. c. 21. f. 188. f Luther to 4 f. 400. g Luther tom 4. fo 413. h Luther tom 4 â—â—92 i Luther tom 4 f. 502. k Luther tom 4 758. in Ps. 2. l Luther ex ad Cus. Aquilam an 1528. f. 393 m Luther to 2. in Gen. c. 21. f. 188. How we are patients in justification how not n Schlusselburgius iâ— Caâ—â—logo heretico l. 3. p 49. Towne ass 3.9 10. o Luther tom 4 f. 399. p Luther to 4.130.131 q Luther â—â— â— 95. r Luther tom â— f. 52. o Luther tom 4 f. 399. p Luther to 4.130.131 q Luther â—â— â— 95. r Luther tom â— f. 52. s Luther tom 4. f. 451. How the law is abolished and how not s Luther tom 4. f.
ministerie and the Apostles are made different by Familists and Papists Sparkles of glory 71 7â— The different ministration of law Gospel and all Spâ—rit and that the lâ—fe to come is alrâ—â—dy in this lifâ—â—â—coâ—â—ing to 〈◊〉 way of â—amilisâ—s Familists say the day of judgement is in this life Saltmarsh Sparkles of glory Saltmarsh is for the ceaâ—ing of all ordinancâ—â— since the 〈…〉 now Apâ—stles â—â—se Separation from Rome lawfull There are no new lights nor doctrines more to be expected after the canon of holy Scripture is closed The place Mat. 28.19 â—0 proveth that a ministery there must be and a Church till Christs second comming what ever Seekers and Saltmarsh say on the contrary Saltmarsh taketh away all ministery and calling thereunto and maketh all Saints Preachers without industry and study in his third orb or circle of ministration Mr. Saltmarsh indifferent in all externall worship H.N. Spirit land c. 34. Sect. 8 9 c. 37. Sect 9 c. 8 4. One man of God â—orâ—eth not ovâ—â—â—nother that were slavery Of the discerning of the Spirits that Familists have certain knowledge they 〈…〉 know one anothâ—r Familâ—sts are against all wars The first second Adam men only in figures not truly and realy by the way of Saltmarsh Praying is to Familists a part of Legall bondage Saltmarsh holdeth that neither written law nor Gospel is any obliging Rule to the creature Calvin Inst. advers Libert c. 13. c. 14. c. 15. p 445 446 447 448. We are Christ and made very Christ God manifested in the flesh by the Familists way Sparkles of glory 256 57 Familists fancy a day oâ— iudgement in this life in which we cast of all our former ministrations and enter into a new ministration of all Spirit and glory Of the Lords Prayer Saltmarsh and Familists are against the Lords day Familists are against the written Scripture Sparkles 269. The minde of Saltmarsh and his Familists concerning ordinances such as scripture praying preaching sacraments c. What is meant by leâ—ter and Spirit in the Gospel Saltmarsh and Familists call it Idolatry to seâ—ve God in ordinances the contrary is proven Ordinances are not bare shadowes and Figures Naturall men do not stumble at the letter of the Gospel but at the thing signified thereby Sparkles of Glory p. 274. Sermon on Wisdom iustified of her children p. 204 Of assurance joy and sorrow in our acts as suitable or not suitable to the rule of the law or word of God The mind of Saltmarsh concerning high Familisme and other administrations that to him are lower and touching the law repentance duties Synods Church government Episcopacy Presbytery Saltmarsh denyeth that Jesus Christ is come into thâ— flesh Christ really crucified and dyed and not in a figure as with his Familists saith Saltmarsh H.N. 1. Exh. c. 16. The Elders of love are godded with God incorporated to God in all love with whom God in one being and power of his holy Spirit is homified or become man and this is their God incarnate H. N. Evang. Saltmarsh with H. Nicholas teacheth that every creature is God or a substantiall part of God See Saltm Sparkles p. 19 200 201 20 A Letter Printed by Authority under the name of Oliver Crumwel opened and found to câ—ntain many secrets of 〈…〉 Saltmarsh writeth that God manifested in the flesh is nothing but God by his Spirit discovâ—ring new lights of Familisme and other damnable heresies What Uniformity 〈…〉 in thiâ— Coâ—â—â—nant Uâ—â—formiâ—y examined pa. 10. No rule for Uniformity of doctrine worship Government in the word Familists make the fancy of a spirit without the word the only rule The sword a meanes of defending souls from being perverted from the truth but no means at all by our doctrine to or for the conversion of men to the truth or propagating of the Gospel That we must in outward things please one another in love as if all outward acts of Idolaâ—ry murther perjury were indifferent is taught by Familists Saltmar Beacon and others The place Gal. 6.15 neither circumcision nor uncircumcision avaleth c. cleared 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Familists will it lawfull for no man to come out of Prelacy Popery or any unlawfull way till the spirit effectually draw them How Saltmar is against Duties Saltmarsh is for any Church government of mens devising Saltmarsh and Familists â—each that there is salvation in all Religions Every mans owne conscience and owne spirit is his only Bible and obliging rule in all Religions to Mr. Saltm and Familists A twofold infallibity Saltmarsh with Familists denyeth the personall union of the two natures in Christ God-man What a new union between Christ God and man devills and Angels Saltmarsh hath devised A twofold certainty one Propheticall another of faith the former was peculiar to the pen-men of Scripture the other to all beleevers What infallibility agreeth to the Saints and the Church Catholick and invisible How Familists define heresies The Schisme that Familists acknowledge Saltmarsh will have as many publick preachers as are in covenant with God Salmarsh maketh Christ comming in judgement to have beene these 1647 years as H. Nicholas did before him and Hymeneus and Phyletus said the resurrection was past H. N. evangel ch 34 and ch 35 ser. 8. Sâ—ltmarsh proves by perverted Scriptures that there is no baptizing with water Christ crucified is nothing but the Saints Godded Christed with grace and with all the Sâ—â— suffering patiently as Familists say All externalls Idolls and wil-worship to Saltmarsh are indifferent The story of Adam and his fall but a figure to M. Saltmarsh The doctrine of John Baptist is gone and away if we beleeve Saltmarsh Saltmarsh with Socinians and Papists will have the love of our enemies not commanded under the Old Testament Sparkles p. 64.65 Revel 21. Saltmarsh dreames of a Church on earth that shall not need Ordinances The place Gal 4.1 of the Heir under the law corrupted to grosse Familisme by Salâ—marsâ— Spark p. 70.71 The place 2 Cor 3.1 2 3. wheâ—e the Apostle calleth the Corinthians carnall perverted by Saltmarsh We have free liberty to all externall worship to take or leave do or leave undone at will as Saltmarsh saith Heb 12. How Saltmarsh would have the spirits tryed Christs Disciples not under a stinted liturgie in the dayes of our Saviours conversing with them on earth as Saltm sayes at which time they were the anointed of God as well as afterward Saltmarsh esteemes our Reformers Calvin Luther men that had little of the spirit much of the letter and legall straine Saltmar 13 4 135. Saltmarsh mocketh the Scriptuâ—e in exponing Peters sword and the laying of it aside to be a type of glorifying his Disciples with the glory that Christ had with the father before the World was The place Exo. 33 is corrupted by M. Saltm Heb. 13.7.17 1 Tim 5.17 1 Tim. 3.1 2 3.4 v. 12. 1 Tim. 5.19 Rev. 1.16 Rev. 2.1 Of the knowledge of such as are under actuall vision in