lismaninus_n and_o blandrata_n be_v very_o active_a lismaninus_n who_o be_v first_o infect_v by_o the_o endeavour_n of_o laelius_n socinus_n and_o confirm_v in_o his_o heresy_n by_o george_n blandrata_n fall_v into_o suspicion_n take_v heart_n and_o in_o a_o letter_n to_o stanislaus_n ivanus_n karninscius_fw-la bold_o defend_v blandrata_n but_o that_o he_o may_v do_v his_o part_n to_o remove_v all_o ground_n of_o jealousy_n touch_v his_o orthodoxy_n he_o preface_v his_o epistle_n with_o a_o short_a prayer_n to_o god_n the_o father_n from_o who_o be_v all_o thing_n through_o the_o lord_n christ_n by_o who_o be_v all_o thing_n consubstantial_a and_o coeternal_a with_o the_o father_n and_o the_o holy_a ghost_n and_o in_o the_o epistle_n itself_o he_o give_v a_o summary_n of_o his_o own_o faith_n and_o of_o the_o faith_n of_o they_o who_o dwell_v at_o pinczow_n in_o these_o word_n we_o believe_v in_o god_n the_o father_n from_o who_o be_v all_o thing_n who_o be_v infinite_a without_o beginning_n and_o from_o who_o not_o only_o all_o creature_n be_v but_o also_o the_o divinity_n and_o bonity_n of_o the_o son_n and_o holy_a ghost_n as_o nazianzen_n teach_v in_o his_o apology_n we_o believe_v also_o in_o our_o lord_n jesus_n christ_n the_o son_n of_o god_n who_o be_v the_o incarnate_a word_n god-man_n god_n of_o god_n light_a of_o light_n true_a god_n of_o true_a god_n consubstantial_a coeternal_a and_o coequal_a in_o essence_n or_o nature_n power_n glory_n authority_n and_o honour_n with_o the_o father_n and_o we_o believe_v in_o the_o holy_a ghost_n the_o true_a god_n of_o the_o father_n and_o the_o son_n or_o as_o the_o greek_a doctor_n teach_v in_o a_o unutterable_a manner_n from_o eternity_n proceed_v from_o the_o father_n by_o the_o son_n consubstantial_a coeternal_a and_o coequal_a with_o the_o father_n and_o the_o son_n in_o his_o essence_n power_n majesty_n glory_n authority_n and_o honour_n blandrata_n in_o a_o synod_n at_o xiansia_n anno_fw-la dom._n 1562_o declare_v his_o belief_n 130._o lubien_fw-fr hist_o ref._n pol._n l._n 2._o c._n 6._o p._n 130._o in_o one_o god_n the_o father_n in_o one_o lord_n jesus_n christ_n his_o son_n and_o in_o one_o holy_a ghost_n each_o of_o which_o be_v essential_o god_n a_o plurality_n of_o god_n i_o abhor_v say_v he_o for_o with_o we_o there_o be_v but_o one_o god_n only_o who_o essence_n be_v indivisible_a i_o do_v confess_v that_o there_o be_v three_o distinct_a hypostasis_n that_o the_o deity_n of_o christ_n and_o his_o generation_n be_v eternal_a and_o that_o the_o holy_a ghost_n be_v true_a and_o eternal_a god_n proceed_v from_o both_o in_o these_o confession_n there_o be_v the_o denial_n of_o a_o plurality_n of_o god_n and_o a_o profession_n that_o the_o son_n and_o holy_a spirit_n be_v of_o the_o same_o essence_n consubstantial_a coeternal_a coequal_a with_o the_o father_n in_o word_n as_o full_a as_o its_o possible_a for_o the_o vindicated_n author_n who_o hold_v the_o person_n of_o the_o trinity_n to_o be_v three_o distinct_a essence_n to_o express_v it_o howbeit_o these_o man_n be_v just_o charge_v with_o the_o tritheistical_a heresy_n peter_n martyr_n as_o lubieniescius_fw-la report_n do_v in_o a_o letter_n anno_fw-la dom._n 1558_o 126._o hist_o ref._n pol._n l._n 2._o c._n 6._o p._n 126._o speak_v of_o blandrata_n bring_v into_o the_o deity_n a_o certain_a kind_n of_o monarchy_n deny_v the_o essence_n of_o the_o father_n and_o the_o son_n to_o be_v the_o same_o from_o whence_o a_o a_o plurality_n of_o god_n do_v follow_v which_o thing_n as_o he_o be_v tell_v gribaldus_n do_v in_o express_a word_n assert_v in_o like_a manner_n lubieniescius_fw-la himself_z tell_v we_o that_o lismaninus_n and_o blandrata_n agree_v in_o this_o that_o unless_o it_o be_v settle_v 131._o ibid._n pag._n 131._o that_o god_n who_o in_o the_o holy_a scripture_n be_v call_v the_o father_n of_o jesus_n christ_n be_v the_o most_o high_a god_n no_o satisfy_a answer_n can_v be_v make_v to_o stancarus_n nor_o can_v that_o worship_n which_o be_v due_a unto_o the_o most_o high_a god_n he_o give_v he_o for_o christ_n himself_o do_v say_v my_o father_n be_v great_a than_o i_o these_o man_n and_o their_o follower_n notwithstanding_o these_o confession_n be_v so_o far_o from_o believe_v the_o father_n son_n and_o holy_a ghost_n to_o be_v coessential_a coeternal_a and_o coequal_a that_o as_o gentilis_fw-la make_v the_o father_n to_o be_v the_o essentiator_n and_o the_o son_n and_o spirit_n to_o be_v the_o essentiati_n so_o these_o be_v positive_a that_o there_o be_v a_o pre-eminence_n of_o causality_n in_o the_o father_n above_o the_o son_n and_o holy_a ghost_n that_o the_o essence_n of_o the_o son_n and_o holy_a spirit_n be_v not_o vnoriginate_v vncause_v and_o from_o itself_o only_o but_o from_o the_o essence_n of_o the_o father_n that_o be_v to_o say_v the_o father_n be_v the_o essentiator_n and_o the_o son_n and_o spirit_n the_o essentiati_n and_o make_v the_o essence_n of_o the_o son_n and_o spirit_n so_o very_o distinct_a from_o the_o essence_n of_o the_o father_n they_o be_v for_o three_o essence_n in_o the_o trinity_n three_o distinct_a essence_n and_o therefore_o be_v call_v trideitae_n which_o be_v not_o only_o the_o observation_n of_o beza_n but_o the_o confession_n of_o lubieniescius_fw-la who_o say_v that_o they_o be_v injurious_o by_o the_o adversary_n call_v trideitae_n though_o nothing_o more_o manifest_a than_o that_o they_o be_v the_o worshipper_n of_o god_n the_o father_n by_o jesus_n christ_n the_o only_a mediator_n be_v therefore_o in_o transilvania_n call_v unitarian_n the_o notion_n then_o of_o gentilis_fw-la lismaninus_n and_o blandrata_n be_v that_o the_o son_n and_o holy_a ghost_n be_v consubstantial_a coequal_a and_o coeternal_a in_o essence_n with_o the_o father_n they_o be_v of_o one_o and_o the_o same_o nature_n and_o yet_o three_o infinite_a and_o eternal_a distinct_a essence_n and_o spirit_n which_o be_v the_o same_o for_o substance_n with_o what_o our_o vindicated_n author_n so_o vehement_o contend_v for_o whence_o i_o argue_v if_o our_o author_n assert_v one_o individual_a essence_n or_o deity_n will_v secure_v his_o three_o infinite_a essence_n or_o mind_n from_o heresy_n it_o must_v also_o clear_v gentilis_fw-la lismaninus_n blandrata_n and_o their_o disciple_n ay_o severus_n and_o theodosius_n too_o from_o the_o same_o charge_n but_o if_o it_o will_v clear_v they_o from_o be_v heretical_a it_o can_v sufficient_o vindicate_v he_o but_o this_o tritheism_n be_v not_o only_o as_o i_o have_v already_o intimate_v a_o heresy_n but_o the_o same_o that_o the_o italian_a heretic_n pitch_v on_o to_o introduce_v their_o samosatenianism_n and_o whoever_o will_v make_v a_o close_a search_n will_v see_v that_o it_o have_v a_o tendency_n thereunto_o not_o only_o as_o hereby_o a_o trinity_n of_o person_n be_v make_v a_o trinity_n of_o god_n to_o the_o set_v the_o mind_n of_o many_o against_o the_o truth_n itself_o but_o as_o this_o their_o principle_n lead_v its_o embracer_n to_o take_v into_o their_o faith_n the_o several_a consequence_n which_o natural_o and_o necessary_o flow_v from_o it_o for_o answerable_a to_o the_o various_a capacity_n inclination_n and_o interesis_fw-la of_o they_o who_o will_v have_v it_o that_o the_o person_n in_o the_o trinity_n be_v three_o distinct_a essence_n sundry_a error_n do_v arise_v but_o 〈◊〉_d to_o insist_v upon_o they_o to_o escape_v the_o blasphemous_a absurdity_n which_o flow_v from_o their_o aâ—â—erting_fw-mi three_o distinct_a infinite_a essence_n spirit_n or_o mind_n as_o for_o instance_n their_o make_v they_o three_o distinct_a infinite_a coequal_a god_n they_o ascribe_v unto_o the_o father_n a_o hyperoche_n a_o pre-eminence_n and_o superiority_n above_o the_o son_n and_o holy_a ghost_n but_o then_o the_o inequality_n which_o do_v immediate_o follow_v from_o the_o pre-eminence_n and_o superiority_n assign_v to_o the_o father_n be_v such_o as_o be_v in_o every_o body_n judgement_n inconsistent_a with_o the_o son_n and_o holy_a ghost_n be_v consubstantial_a and_o coequal_a with_o the_o father_n they_o be_v at_o a_o loss_n how_o to_o explain_v themselves_o a_o inequality_n as_o to_o the_o oeconomy_n dispensation_n and_o office_n they_o look_v on_o as_o insufficient_a the_o arian_n and_o samosatenian_o therefore_o say_v it_o must_v be_v a_o inequality_n of_o essence_n but_o this_o be_v so_o gross_a a_o contradiction_n to_o the_o son_n be_v and_o holy_a ghost_n be_v of_o the_o same_o nature_n and_o coequal_a with_o the_o father_n server_n we_o gentilis_fw-la with_o the_o pinczovians_n will_v not_o at_o first_o express_o allow_v of_o more_o than_o a_o inequality_n as_o a_o cause_n or_o principle_n make_v the_o essence_n of_o the_o father_n to_o be_v the_o principle_n or_o cause_n of_o the_o essence_n of_o the_o son_n and_o holy_a ghost_n affirm_v that_o though_o the_o essence_n of_o the_o father_n be_v vnoriginate_v and_o from_o itself_o yet_o so_o be_v
not_o the_o essence_n of_o the_o son_n and_o holy_a ghost_n these_o essence_n they_o say_v be_v cause_v the_o one_o by_o a_o eternal_a generation_n from_o the_o father_n the_o other_o through_o a_o ineffable_a procession_n from_o the_o father_n by_o the_o son_n thus_o by_o a_o derive_v distinct_a essence_n from_o the_o essence_n of_o the_o father_n they_o reject_v the_o autotheiry_n of_o the_o son_n and_o spirit_n and_o with_o their_o causality_n bring_v in_o such_o dependency_n of_o the_o son_n and_o spirit_n on_o the_o father_n as_o interfere_v with_o a_o be_v absolute_o infinite_a in_o every_o perfection_n and_o thus_o in_o a_o more_o artificial_a manner_n they_o run_v the_o same_o length_n with_o the_o arian_n and_o socinian_n as_o to_o the_o inequality_n for_o that_o essence_n which_o be_v not_o of_o itself_o be_v not_o can_v be_v in_o a_o strict_a proper_a sense_n god_n for_o the_o essence_n of_o god_n be_v only_o from_o itself_o uncause_v unoriginated_a a_o essence_n that_o have_v a_o beginning_n and_o be_v cause_v can_v be_v absolute_o eternal_a for_o what_o be_v absolute_o eternal_a never_o have_v a_o beginning_n never_o be_v cause_v never_o receive_v its_o essence_n from_o another_o there_o be_v a_o great_a difference_n between_o cause_v a_o distinct_a essence_n and_o a_o communicate_v the_o same_o individual_a essence_n to_o another_o for_o though_o the_o cause_v another_o necessary_o imply_v that_o the_o cause_v essence_n be_v from_o another_o a_o communicate_v it_o do_v not_o so_o the_o father_n be_v communicate_v his_o own_o essence_n unto_o the_o son_n do_v not_o argue_v the_o son_n essence_n be_v from_o another_o for_o it_o be_v still_o the_o same_o it_o be_v before_o it_o be_v communicate_v but_o the_o father_n cause_v a_o essence_n distinct_a from_o his_o own_o import_v imperfection_n in_o the_o cause_v essence_n even_o the_o want_n of_o a_o true_o proper_a and_o absolute_a eternity_n and_o independence_n and_o necessary_o infer_v a_o inequality_n of_o essence_n which_o be_v the_o thing_n the_o arian_n and_o samosatenian_o see_v and_o assert_v and_o the_o pinczovians_n intend_v who_o as_o they_o observe_v their_o disciple_n prepare_v to_o embrace_v this_o error_n insinuate_v it_o this_o appear_v from_o blandrata_n endeavour_v in_o a_o epistle_n which_o beza_n have_v of_o his_o 〈◊〉_d apost_n 81._o p._n 364_o 〈◊〉_d to_o persuade_v gregorius_n pauli_n a_o tritheist_n to_o close_o with_o the_o opinion_n of_o samosatenus_fw-la and_o from_o what_o petrus_n statorius_n a_o companion_n of_o blandrata_n when_o he_o dwell_v at_o pinczow_n from_o which_o place_n the_o tritheist_n have_v their_o name_n of_o pinczovians_n with_o who_o franciscus_n lismaninus_n martin_n crovicius_n schomannus_n gregorius_n pauli_n â—relius_fw-la 48._o biblioth_n antitrin_n p._n 48._o tricessius_fw-la and_o as_o sandius_n observe_v ochinus_n stancarus_n alciatus_fw-la &c_n &c_n have_v their_o habitation_n do_v offer_v in_o a_o synod_n at_o pinczow_n about_o the_o insufficiency_n of_o the_o answer_n which_o a_o synod_n hold_v in_o the_o same_o place_n do_v some_o time_n before_o give_v unto_o remianus_n chelmius_n about_o what_o he_o write_v against_o the_o invocation_n of_o the_o holy_a ghost_n the_o story_n be_v thus_o remianus_n chelmius_n send_v to_o a_o synod_n hold_v at_o pinczow_n the_o 12_o of_o november_n an._n 1559_o a_o letter_n in_o which_o several_a thing_n be_v object_v against_o the_o invocation_n of_o the_o holy_a ghost_n peter_n statorius_n who_o 48._o biblioth_n antitrin_n p._n 48._o as_o sandius_n suggest_v instill_v this_o opinion_n into_o chelmius_n do_v with_o gregorius_n pauli_n and_o other_o move_v that_o the_o doctrine_n of_o the_o trinity_n may_v be_v diligent_o examine_v and_o try_v by_o the_o holy_a scripture_n a_o answer_n be_v send_v from_o this_o synod_n unto_o chelmius_n but_o statorius_n in_o a_o synod_n hold_v at_o the_o same_o place_n november_n the_o 19_o 1561._o declare_v that_o chelmius_n be_v not_o satisfy_v with_o the_o answer_v send_v unto_o he_o the_o synod_n therefore_o oblige_v he_o to_o return_v a_o full_a one_o which_o he_o do_v but_o in_o such_o a_o manner_n pol._n epit._n hist_o orig._n unit._n in_o pol._n that_o no_o one_o can_v tell_v what_o it_o be_v he_o himself_o hold_v stoinius_n who_o be_v grandson_n to_o statorius_n represent_v matter_n of_o fact_n thus_o in_o this_o synod_n anno_fw-la 1561_o statorius_n be_v direct_v to_o write_v a_o answer_n unto_o chelmski_n which_o he_o do_v but_o so_o that_o it_o do_v not_o appear_v what_o he_o himself_o believe_v of_o it_o he_o only_o say_v that_o blandrata_n be_v represent_v by_o calvin_n as_o one_o who_o have_v drink_v in_o the_o poison_n of_o the_o serverian_n impiety_n as_o for_o the_o opinion_n which_o he_o propose_v to_o the_o synod_n it_o be_v acceptable_a to_o all_o but_o question_v by_o he_o whether_o the_o relief_n that_o the_o father_n be_v one_o unbegotten_a and_o the_o son_n beget_v do_v not_o infer_v a_o plurality_n of_o go_n but_o all_o they_o they_o be_v statorius_n his_o own_o word_n that_o dwell_v with_o blandrata_n be_v suspect_v for_o hold_v some_o heresy_n but_o if_o they_o be_v heretic_n who_o according_a to_o the_o holy_a scripture_n believe_v the_o father_n son_n and_o holy_a ghost_n i_o do_v cheerful_o say_v he_o acknowledge_v myself_o to_o be_v of_o that_o number_n etc._n etc._n lubieniescius_fw-la pass_v by_o what_o regenvolsâ—ius_n in_o his_o history_n of_o the_o sclavonian_a church_n say_v of_o statorius_n do_v out_o of_o budzanius_n tell_v we_o that_o statorius_n succeed_v paulus_n orsacius_n in_o the_o government_n of_o the_o school_n at_o finczow_n profess_v the_o true_a faith_n affirm_v that_o the_o invocation_n of_o the_o holy_a ghost_n be_v idolatry_n that_o there_o be_v not_o one_o text_n in_o the_o holy_a scripture_n either_o for_o the_o deity_n or_o invocation_n or_o adoration_n of_o the_o holy_a spirit_n 149._o lulâ—en_n hist_o l._n 2._o c._n 8._o p._n 149._o or_o for_o faith_n in_o he_o that_o the_o holy_a ghost_n be_v not_o the_o three_o person_n of_o the_o deity_n nor_o god_n but_o the_o power_n and_o gift_n of_o god_n on_o this_o occasion_n there_o arise_v several_a dispute_n among_o the_o learned_a at_o which_o time_n statorius_n persuade_v many_o to_o embrace_v this_o opinion_n notwithstanding_o which_o and_o although_o alexius_n rodecius_n tell_v statorius_n to_o his_o face_n that_o he_o learned_a this_o principle_n from_o he_o yet_o do_v he_o in_o the_o year_n 1567._o open_o deny_v it_o declare_v that_o the_o spirit_n be_v god_n and_o to_o be_v worship_v as_o god_n and_o whoever_o teach_v otherwise_o be_v of_o his_o father_n the_o devil_n for_o which_o reason_n budzinius_n look_v on_o he_o as_o a_o proteus_n forsake_v of_o the_o holy_a spirit_n and_o orphinovius_n say_v god_n entrust_v he_o with_o sundry_a talent_n which_o he_o do_v not_o employ_v in_o defence_n of_o the_o truth_n but_o the_o trinitarian_n be_v the_o strong_a party_n he_o do_v at_o last_o turn_v unto_o they_o thus_o these_o pinczovians_n vid._n lismaninus_n gregorius_n pauli_n ochinus_n statorius_n stancarus_n alciatus_fw-la etc._n etc._n their_o partisan_n do_v not_o only_o set_v up_o tritheism_n with_o a_o design_n to_o bring_v in_o the_o samosatenian_a heresy_n but_o form_v themselves_o into_o sundry_a shape_v and_o be_v unwearied_a in_o their_o attempt_n first_o to_o turn_v the_o three_o person_n into_o three_o distinct_a essence_n insinuate_v a_o inequality_n among_o they_o ascribe_v to_o the_o father_n a_o pre-eminence_n and_o then_o bring_v the_o deity_n of_o the_o holy_a spirit_n into_o doubt_n and_o make_v the_o lord_n christ_n a_o subordinate_a god_n and_o thus_o establish_v their_o socinianism_n that_o learned_a doctor_n therefore_o who_o have_v confute_v this_o pinczovian_a heresy_n of_o three_o distinct_a essence_n in_o the_o trinity_n deserve_v great_o from_o the_o church_n of_o god_n for_o by_o turn_v his_o strength_n against_o the_o notion_n of_o three_o distinct_a infinite_a essence_n substance_n spirit_n or_o mind_n he_o have_v take_v a_o effectual_a course_n to_o break_v those_o socinian_n measure_v which_o be_v most_o likely_a to_o expose_v the_o bless_a trinity_n and_o prepare_v the_o mind_n of_o many_o to_o take_v in_o their_o vnitarianism_n or_o rather_o bideism_n and_o they_o who_o have_v condemn_v the_o assertion_n of_o three_o distinct_a essence_n or_o mind_n for_o heretical_a have_v do_v honourable_o to_o their_o eternal_a praise_n when_o the_o old_a socinian_n game_n be_v play_v over_o again_o and_o some_o who_o pretend_v a_o zeal_n for_o the_o trinity_n walk_v in_o the_o same_o path_n and_o plead_v for_o three_o distinct_a essence_n as_o the_o italian_a heretic_n heretofore_o do_v it_o be_v time_n for_o the_o orthodox_n to_o look_v to_o themselves_o they_o can_v be_v too_o cautious_a in_o a_o matter_n of_o such_o consequence_n and_o what_o person_n soever_o be_v industrious_a in_o their_o endeavour_n to_o propagate_v this_o doctrine_n
with_o socinianism_n etc._n plures_fw-la deos_fw-la si_fw-la non_fw-la ve_fw-la bo_o re_fw-mi taâ—en_fw-mi ipsa_fw-la profâ—tentes_fw-la epist_n 19_o p._n 129._o vid._n epist_n 81._o p._n 361_o etc._n etc._n that_o their_o first_o effort_n against_o the_o trinity_n be_v a_o set_n up_o of_o tritheism_n not_o avowed_o but_o clandestine_o be_v affirm_v by_o beza_n in_o the_o beginning_n say_v he_o they_o be_v for_o the_o most_o part_n tritheist_n transform_v the_o three_o person_n into_o so_o many_o essence_n then_o do_v they_o appropriate_v the_o appellation_n of_o the_o one_o true_a god_n unto_o the_o father_n to_o who_o they_o also_o ascribe_v a_o hyperoche_n a_o pre-eminence_n or_o superiority_n above_o the_o son_n this_o be_v the_o principle_n which_o at_o first_o they_o advance_v as_o most_o likely_a to_o bring_v the_o bless_a trinity_n of_o person_n in_o one_o undivided_a essence_n into_o contempt_n against_o which_o calvin_n zanchy_a and_o the_o reform_a do_v set_v themselves_o as_o against_o a_o most_o pernicious_a and_o hurtful_a heresy_n as_o undoubted_o it_o be_v for_o it_o be_v affirm_v that_o every_o person_n have_v a_o peculiar_a substance_n of_o his_o own_o there_o must_v be_v as_o many_o substance_n or_o essence_n as_o there_o be_v person_n which_o be_v of_o the_o same_o nature_n must_v be_v as_o many_o god_n as_o they_o be_v person_n which_o be_v tritheism_n three_o distinct_a infinite_a substance_n or_o three_o eternal_a spirit_n can_v be_v less_o than_o three_o go_n but_o though_o be_v affirm_v 1_o that_o it_o be_v gross_a sabellianism_n to_o say_v that_o there_o be_v not_o three_o personal_a maunds_z or_o spirit_n or_o substance_n 2_o that_o a_o distinct_a substantial_a person_n must_v have_v a_o distinct_a substance_n of_o his_o own_o proper_a and_o peculiar_a to_o his_o own_o person_n yet_o if_o it_o be_v own_v that_o there_o be_v not_o three_o god_n but_o one_o god_n or_o one_o divinity_n which_o be_v entire_o and_o inseparable_o in_o three_o distinct_a person_n or_o mind_n it_o can_v be_v heresy_n as_o a_o very_a learned_a person_n aver_v because_o in_o this_o case_n say_v he_o the_o fundamental_a article_n be_v believe_v and_o the_o error_n be_v only_o a_o mistake_n in_o the_o explication_n however_o the_o doctrine_n of_o three_o distinct_a substance_n have_v be_v not_o only_o learned_o as_o well_o as_o sharp_o charge_v with_o tritheism_n but_o condemn_v for_o be_v impious_a and_o heretical_a i_o will_v therefore_o it_o lie_v so_o much_o in_o my_o way_n venture_n humble_o to_o offer_v what_o incline_v i_o to_o conclude_v that_o this_o turn_v the_o three_o person_n into_o three_o essence_n be_v heretical_a for_o though_o i_o be_o far_o from_o hereticate_a every_a one_o that_o differ_v from_o i_o in_o matter_n of_o moment_n or_o from_o make_v every_o erroneous_a explication_n of_o a_o fundamental_a article_n to_o be_v heresy_n yet_o i_o be_o persuade_v that_o the_o doctrine_n of_o the_o trinity_n of_o person_n in_o one_o undivided_a essence_n be_v of_o such_o a_o nature_n that_o many_o in_o their_o explicate_v it_o have_v fall_v into_o divers_a heresy_n and_o that_o thus_o it_o be_v in_o the_o present_a case_n the_o doctrine_n condemn_v for_o heretical_a be_v a_o make_v the_o person_n in_o the_o bless_a trinity_n to_o be_v three_o dictinct_a substance_n or_o individual_a nature_n which_o be_v as_o direct_v a_o contradicton_n to_o the_o one_o entire_a and_o indivisible_a nature_n of_o god_n as_o can_v be_v three_o individual_a essence_n be_v as_o much_o oppose_v to_o one_o individual_a essence_n as_o three_o person_n be_v to_o one_o person_n and_o three_o person_n may_v be_v as_o well_o one_o person_n as_o three_o individual_a essence_n be_v one_o individual_a essence_n the_o author_n therefore_o of_o this_o notion_n can_v in_o reason_n be_v suppose_v to_o believe_v these_o contradictory_n proposition_n to_o be_v both_o true_a and_o be_v so_o vehement_a in_o his_o assert_v three_o individual_a nature_n as_o to_o make_v the_o denial_n thereof_o to_o be_v heresy_n and_o nonsense_n we_o must_v be_v so_o civil_a to_o he_o as_o to_o suppose_v that_o he_o do_v not_o believe_v the_o essence_n of_o god_n to_o be_v one_o entire_a indivisible_a essence_n which_o i_o do_v the_o more_o ready_o suppose_v because_o it_o be_v so_o common_a for_o tritheist_n to_o do_v so_o it_o be_v own_v that_o photius_n grant_v that_o conon_n and_o his_o follower_n hold_v a_o consubstantial_a trinity_n and_o the_o unity_n of_o the_o godhead_n 24._o phot._n bibl._n cod._n 24._o and_o so_o far_o be_v orthodox_n but_o then_o add_v they_o be_v far_o from_o it_o when_o they_o assert_v proper_a and_o peculiar_a substance_n to_o each_o person_n i_o have_v not_o that_o bibliotheke_n by_o i_o but_o suicerus_fw-la in_o his_o account_n of_o the_o tritheist_n say_v they_o hold_v three_o substance_n and_o nature_n in_o all_o thing_n alike_o and_o yet_o will_v by_o no_o mean_n own_o three_o divinity_n or_o three_o god_n and_o refer_v to_o the_o bibliotheca_fw-la photij_fw-la where_o it_o be_v thus_o these_o man_n vid._n severus_n and_o theodosius_n speak_v many_o thing_n excellent_o well_o 16._o cod._n 24._o p_o 16._o as_o that_o there_o be_v a_o consubstantial_a trinity_n of_o the_o same_o nature_n and_o but_o one_o god_n one_o divinity_n 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d etc._n etc._n but_o they_o blaspheme_v when_o they_o say_v the_o father_n the_o son_n and_o the_o holy_a ghost_n have_v their_o proper_a nature_n and_o divinity_n or_o particular_a substance_n and_o so_o contradict_v themselves_o as_o well_o as_o the_o truth_n etc._n etc._n so_o that_o their_o assert_v the_o consubstantiality_n of_o the_o trinity_n and_o it_o be_v be_v of_o the_o same_o nature_n can_v not_o secure_v their_o make_v the_o three_o person_n three_o distinct_a substance_n from_o be_v blasphemy_n but_o what_o i_o most_o press_v be_v this_o consideration_n that_o if_o the_o contradictory_n affirmation_n of_o three_o individual_a essence_n be_v but_o one_o individual_a essence_n will_v clear_v the_o notion_n from_o be_v heresy_n than_o valentinus_n gentilis_fw-la lismaninus_n blandrata_n and_o the_o many_o other_o propagator_n of_o the_o socinian_n abomination_n must_v be_v also_o for_o the_o same_o reason_n clear_v from_o heresy_n i_o will_v begin_v with_o gentilis_fw-la who_o hold_v 107._o lubien_fw-fr histor_n ref._n l._n 2._o c._n 5._o p._n 107._o that_o there_o be_v three_o distinct_a eternal_a spirit_n or_o mind_n in_o the_o trinity_n that_o the_o son_n be_v beget_v from_o eternity_n ante_fw-la saecula_fw-la in_o latitudine_fw-la aeternitatis_fw-la thus_o much_o lubieniescius_fw-la and_o gentilis_fw-la himself_n in_o his_o epistle_n to_o the_o minister_n at_o geneva_n be_v positive_a that_o the_o father_n only_o be_v true_a god_n and_o the_o son_n also_o true_a god_n 661._o tract_n theol._n p._n 660_o 661._o and_o yet_o not_o two_o but_o one_o and_o the_o same_o god_n because_o christ_n have_v one_o and_o the_o same_o essence_n with_o the_o father_n and_o therefore_o say_v he_o i_o be_o neither_o arian_n nor_o servetian_a lismaninus_n and_o blandrata_n hold_v the_o same_o for_o substance_n with_o gentilis_fw-la to_o clear_v thus_o much_o i_o must_v observe_v what_o lubieniescius_fw-la report_v of_o laelius_n socinus_n who_o be_v one_o of_o the_o forty_o italian_a combinator_n it_o be_v to_o this_o effect_n laelius_n socinus_n say_v he_o travel_v first_o into_o helvetia_n then_o into_o italy_n britain_n and_o germany_n and_o about_o the_o year_n 1551._o he_o get_v into_o poland_n from_o whence_o after_o he_o have_v instill_a his_o error_n into_o the_o heart_n of_o lismaninus_n and_o many_o other_o he_o go_v into_o moravia_n and_o then_o return_v to_o helvetia_n that_o in_o moravia_n paruta_n gentilis_fw-la darius_n and_o alciatus_fw-la of_o the_o same_o combination_n with_o laelius_n do_v their_o part_n to_o spread_v their_o notion_n send_v into_o poland_n their_o thesis_n about_o the_o trinity_n and_o doubtful_a phrase_n in_o the_o holy_a scripture_n there_o be_v near_o twenty_o thesis_n about_o the_o trinity_n 1._o ubi_fw-la sup_n l._n 3._o c._n 1._o which_o they_o do_v put_v into_o the_o hand_n of_o their_o friend_n prosper_n provana_n who_o commit_v they_o to_o the_o care_n of_o budzinius_n he_o no_o soon_o read_v they_o but_o give_v they_o unto_o johannes_n pustelnecius_n from_o who_o stanislaus_n lutomirskius_n get_v a_o copy_n which_o be_v communicate_v to_o sundry_a other_o the_o controversy_n about_o the_o trinity_n have_v there_o its_o rise_n some_o firm_o adhere_v to_o the_o faith_n receive_v from_o the_o lord_n christ_n and_o his_o apostle_n other_o ensnare_v by_o the_o objection_n raise_v against_o it_o by_o the_o italian_a combinator_n vehement_o oppose_v the_o truth_n not_o that_o they_o do_v it_o open_o but_o as_o our_o vindicated_n author_n displease_v with_o the_o old_a offer_v their_o new_a explication_n in_o the_o very_a same_o manner_n he_o have_v do_v among_o other_o
of_o three_o infinite_a mind_n or_o spirit_n be_v just_o suspect_v especial_o since_o it_o be_v in_o a_o case_n where_o solemn_a protestation_n sacred_a subscription_n and_o oath_n have_v be_v use_v only_o as_o a_o blind_a to_o delude_v the_o orthodox_n 104._o respond_v ad_fw-la comp._n mat._n sladi_n seg._n 104._o conradus_n vorstius_n make_v many_o a_o protestation_n of_o his_o orthodoxy_n in_o this_o very_a point_n express_o declare_v that_o he_o be_v neither_o arian_n nor_o socinian_n i_o can_v say_v he_o with_o a_o good_a conscience_n solemn_o testify_v and_o declare_v as_o in_o presence_n of_o god_n and_o man_n that_o i_o have_v not_o design_v the_o promote_a either_o socinianism_n or_o arianism_n etc._n etc._n and_o in_o his_o preface_n to_o this_o answer_n he_o set_v down_o a_o confession_n of_o his_o faith_n and_o in_o the_o close_a of_o what_o he_o have_v say_v of_o the_o trinity_n he_o declare_v that_o the_o faith_n of_o the_o holy_a trinity_n of_o the_o person_n and_o office_n of_o our_o lord_n jesus_n christ_n he_o will_v by_o the_o grace_n of_o god_n constant_o and_o religious_o adhere_v unto_o for_o which_o reason_n he_o add_v i_o can_v without_o manifest_a injury_n be_v condemn_v for_o hold_v either_o the_o arian_n samosatenian_n or_o any_o other_o such_o heresy_n howbeit_o he_o be_v positive_a that_o the_o three_o person_n be_v three_o distinct_a real_a entia_fw-la or_o being_n and_o that_o it_o be_v a_o contradiction_n that_o any_o thing_n shall_v true_o exist_v that_o have_v not_o its_o proper_a essence_n it_o be_v therefore_o manifest_a say_v he_o that_o in_o the_o trinity_n there_o be_v distinct_a thing_n that_o no_o one_o can_v deny_v thus_o much_o unless_o he_o do_v with_o praxea_n and_o sabellius_n hold_v only_o three_o name_n or_o respect_n and_o office_n etc._n etc._n as_o we_o observe_v every_o be_v have_v a_o certain_a peculiar_a essence_n and_o it_o undoubted_o follow_v that_o each_o person_n have_v a_o certain_a proper_a essence_n of_o his_o own_o 221._o vor_v apol._n exeg_n c._n 9_o p._n 37_o 38._o vor_v de_fw-fr deo_fw-la vid._n not._n ad_fw-la disput_fw-la 3._o p._n 208_o 220_o 221._o so_o vorstius_n who_o nevertheless_o express_o assert_n that_o the_o substance_n of_o god_n be_v but_o one_o numerical_a or_o individual_a substance_n that_o he_o be_v so_o one_o as_o to_o be_v a_o individual_a that_o can_v be_v divide_v either_o into_o species_n or_o part_n this_o be_v vorstius_n his_o notion_n which_o notwithstanding_o his_o solemn_a protestation_n of_o adhere_v unto_o the_o orthodox_n faith_n he_o do_v his_o uttermost_a to_o propagate_v he_o himself_o as_o i_o have_v already_o prove_v in_o the_o 70th_o page_z of_o this_o discourse_n live_v and_o die_v a_o antitrinitarian_n and_o as_o it_o be_v thus_o with_o he_o so_o it_o may_v be_v now_o with_o other_o they_o may_v profess_v to_o believe_v one_o divinity_n which_o be_v entire_o and_o inseparable_o in_o three_o distinct_a person_n or_o mind_n and_o hold_v these_o three_o person_n to_o be_v three_o distinst_a essence_n with_o a_o design_n to_o introduce_v socinianism_n for_o from_o what_o i_o have_v say_v its_o clear_a that_o the_o italian_a consult_v profess_a to_o believe_v there_o be_v but_o one_o god_n and_o pitch_a on_o the_o doctrine_n of_o three_o distinct_a essence_n that_o from_o thence_o they_o may_v introduce_v a_o inequality_n of_o essence_n assign_v a_o pre-eminence_n and_o superiority_n to_o the_o essence_n of_o the_o father_n and_o make_v the_o son_n but_o a_o subordinate_a god_n which_o be_v the_o point_n the_o socinian_o will_v be_v at_o these_o be_v some_o of_o the_o method_n which_o the_o foreign_a socinian_o have_v take_v to_o expose_v the_o trinity_n and_o propagate_v their_o heresy_n and_o whoever_o will_v consult_v the_o write_n of_o our_o english_a gentleman_n who_o be_v their_o offspring_n will_v see_v that_o there_o be_v a_o set_a of_o man_n among_o we_o who_o have_v in_o imitation_n of_o the_o italian_a heretic_n enter_v into_o a_o combination_n to_o bring_v into_o contempt_n the_o same_o bless_a truth_n after_o the_o same_o manner_n their_o predecessor_n have_v do_v sect_n ix_o the_o socinian_n trinity_n propose_v their_o explication_n of_o it_o mysterious_a they_o affirm_v the_o holy_a ghost_n to_o be_v eternal_a and_o yet_o not_o god_n nor_o a_o creature_n that_o jesus_n christ_n be_v but_o a_o creature_n and_o yet_o god_n that_o the_o father_n be_v the_o most_o high_a god_n but_o not_o infinite_a immense_a or_o omniscient_a by_o what_o have_v be_v hitherto_o assert_v of_o the_o english_a socinian_n it_o be_v apparent_a that_o whatever_o their_o religion_n be_v they_o be_v not_o prepare_v as_o yet_o for_o that_o concord_n as_o to_o be_v able_a to_o compose_v and_o publish_v a_o exact_a scheme_n of_o it_o but_o do_v they_o bend_v their_o strength_n rather_o to_o tear_v up_o old_a foundation_n cover_v themselves_o in_o such_o a_o manner_n under_o general_n that_o it_o be_v impossible_a to_o sin_v out_o what_o they_o will_v in_o particular_a be_v at_o and_o that_o they_o may_v strew_v the_o way_n for_o the_o most_o easy_a make_v proselyte_n they_o apply_v themselves_o to_o such_o method_n as_o i_o have_v in_o the_o forego_n section_n observe_v and_o whereas_o the_o different_a explication_n give_v of_o the_o trinity_n by_o some_o orthodox_n divine_v be_v make_v by_o they_o the_o matter_n of_o so_o much_o triumph_n i_o will_v as_o a_o agreeable_a return_n show_v how_o mysterious_a theâ—_n self_n be_v in_o explain_v their_o trinity_n it_o must_v be_v acknowledge_v that_o about_o the_o year_n 1562._o these_o heretic_n do_v their_o uttermost_a to_o engage_v the_o minister_n to_o abstain_v from_o philosophical_a term_n or_o humane_a form_n of_o speech_n hist_o epit._n hist_o and_o as_o stoinius_n observe_v it_o be_v this_o year_n conclude_v in_o a_o synod_n at_o pinczow_n that_o the_o minister_n do_v not_o use_v any_o philosophical_a modes_n of_o speech_n about_o the_o trinity_n essence_n generation_n or_o mode_n of_o proceed_v but_o that_o every_o one_o shall_v confine_v himself_o to_o the_o term_n use_v in_o the_o write_n of_o the_o prophet_n and_o apostle_n and_o in_o the_o apostle_n creed_n but_o notwithstanding_o this_o decree_n sarnicius_fw-la contend_v earnesty_n against_o gregorius_n pauli_n for_o their_o use_n on_o which_o occasion_n stanislaus_n szafranicius_n do_v in_o a_o synod_n meet_v the_o same_o year_n at_o rogow_n labour_v to_o compose_v the_o difference_n between_o they_o but_o in_o vain_a only_o it_o be_v then_o decree_v that_o they_o shall_v tolerate_v one_o another_o and_o abstain_v from_o such_o form_n as_o be_v unscriptural_a but_o 167._o hist_o ref._n pol._n l._n 3._o c._n 1._o p._n 167._o say_v lubieniescius_fw-la in_o june_n the_o year_n follow_v viz_o 1563._o another_o synod_n meet_v which_o write_v unto_o prince_n radzivil_n that_o although_o they_o can_v not_o because_o of_o some_o weak_a brethren_n whole_o suppress_v the_o use_n of_o the_o word_n trinity_n yet_o they_o have_v in_o a_o great_a measure_n purge_v it_o from_o the_o present_a abuse_n and_o in_o the_o year_n 1567._o it_o be_v decree_v that_o the_o trinity_n be_v to_o be_v pious_o and_o religious_o retain_v on_o this_o condition_n that_o brotherly_a love_n according_a to_o the_o rule_n give_v by_o the_o son_n of_o god_n be_v observe_v each_o one_o bear_v with_o the_o infirmity_n of_o one_o another_o etc._n etc._n the_o orthodox_n adhere_v so_o firm_o to_o the_o use_n of_o those_o term_n as_o what_o do_v most_o clear_o express_v the_o truth_n and_o distinguish_v it_o from_o error_n that_o the_o socinian_n party_n judge_v it_o convenient_a to_o continue_v the_o use_n of_o these_o term_n and_o therefore_o have_v their_o trinity_n too_o though_o they_o oppose_v a_o trinity_n of_o person_n in_o the_o godhead_n yet_o they_o still_o profess_v to_o believe_v in_o god_n the_o father_n son_n and_o holy_a ghost_n andrea_n dudicius_n in_o a_o epistle_n to_o beza_n set_v before_o he_o a_o confession_n of_o the_o socinian_n faith_n and_o the_o athanasian_n creed_n with_o his_o reason_n on_o the_o one_o and_o the_o other_o their_o confession_n be_v very_o short_a in_o these_o word_n we_o believe_v in_o one_o only_a true_a god_n the_o creator_n of_o heaven_n and_o earth_n 529._o socini_fw-la oper._n tom._n 1._o p._n 529._o and_o of_o all_o thing_n in_o they_o or_o elsewhere_o gen._n 1.24_o ex._n 20._o deut._n 4.6.27.32_o see_v the_o refutation_n of_o johannes_n sommerus_n lib._n 1._o cap._n 4._o we_o believe_v also_o in_o our_o lord_n jesus_n christ_n by_o who_o be_v all_o thing_n cor._n 8._o etc._n etc._n vid._n ibid._n we_o believe_v that_o the_o holy_a ghost_n be_v the_o spirit_n of_o god_n the_o father_n and_o son_n mat._n 3.10_o luc._n 4._o rom._n 8._o that_o he_o proceed_v from_o the_o father_n joh._n 15._o that_o he_o be_v give_v to_o they_o who_o believe_v by_o the_o son_n
of_o king_n and_o lord_n of_o lord_n from_o who_o all_o thing_n be_v and_o on_o who_o they_o depend_v the_o name_n god_n take_v less_o proper_o may_v be_v apply_v to_o such_o creature_n as_o have_v power_n and_o superierity_n give_v they_o of_o god_n as_o moses_n and_o cyrus_n have_v etc._n etc._n who_o be_v god_n not_o by_o nature_n but_o grace_n 2._o that_o the_o lord_n jesus_n christ_n be_v call_v the_o true_a son_n of_o god_n and_o god_n because_o he_o receive_v his_o deity_n from_o god_n the_o father_n be_v true_a god_n of_o true_a god_n god_n of_o all_o creature_n not_o god_n of_o the_o father_n who_o subject_n all_o thing_n to_o he_o moreover_o the_o father_n himself_o who_o alone_o be_v by_o nature_n god_n from_o himself_o be_v lord_n and_o god_n of_o the_o son_n as_o the_o son_n himself_o express_v it_o john_n 14.28_o the_o son_n be_v fall_v of_o the_o deity_n and_o yet_o the_o superiority_n the_o father_n have_v over_o the_o son_n remain_v whence_o though_o the_o son_n be_v make_v to_o we_o by_o â—â—e_z father_n lord_n and_o god_n and_o our_o head_n yet_o the_o father_n be_v god_n and_o head_n of_o the_o son_n and_o the_o son_n as_o our_o god_n and_o head_n â—â—ognizeth_v the_o deity_n and_o superiority_n of_o the_o father_n over_o he_o see_v then_o how_o the_o scripture_n do_v constant_o distinguish_v between_o god_n and_o the_o son_n of_o god_n if_o we_o diligent_o search_v we_o shall_v find_v that_o except_v in_o three_o or_o four_o place_n the_o scripture_n do_v simple_o and_o absolute_o call_v the_o father_n god_n and_o jesus_n his_o christ_n and_o son_n the_o divinity_n of_o the_o son_n differ_v from_o that_o of_o other_o god_n he_o be_v the_o true_a natural_a and_o in_o a_o proper_a sense_n the_o son_n of_o god_n we_o the_o adoptive_a son_n of_o god_n to_o he_o the_o deity_n be_v give_v without_o measure_n to_o we_o in_o measure_n the_o deity_n power_n and_o glory_n of_o the_o son_n be_v adequate_a to_o that_o of_o the_o father_n and_o equal_a with_o it_o but_o receive_v from_o the_o father_n not_o equal_a with_o respect_n to_o the_o father_n but_o equal_a with_o the_o father_n with_o respect_n to_o the_o creature_n this_o equality_n the_o son_n will_v not_o abuse_v by_o turn_v it_o into_o tyranny_n or_o rapine_n philip._n 2._o the_o agreement_n then_o between_o valentinus_n gentilis_fw-la and_o servetus_fw-la lie_v in_o these_o point_n they_o both_o affirm_v three_o distinct_a essence_n to_o be_v in_o the_o trinity_n that_o the_o father_n only_o be_v 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d 〈◊〉_d that_o the_o essence_n of_o the_o son_n be_v not_o from_o itself_o but_o from_o the_o father_n that_o there_o be_v but_o one_o most_o high_a god_n so_o that_o although_o gentilis_fw-la will_v cover_v himself_o under_o a_o vizor_n that_o it_o may_v not_o appear_v he_o be_v a_o embracer_n of_o servetusâ—s_a â—s_z error_n and_o therefore_o take_v a_o different_a way_n to_o explain_v himself_o yet_o it_o be_v plain_a enough_o that_o their_o notion_n for_o substance_n be_v the_o same_o and_o notwithstanding_o their_o pretend_a zeal_n for_o the_o unity_n of_o god_n they_o be_v a_o sort_n of_o tritheist_n however_o it_o must_v be_v acknowledge_v that_o their_o design_a obscurity_n be_v such_o that_o it_o be_v not_o easy_a to_o understand_v what_o principle_n servetus_n will_v substitute_v instead_o of_o a_o trinity_n of_o person_n in_o the_o god_n head_n only_o they_o general_o plead_v for_o the_o pre-eminence_n and_o superiority_n of_o the_o father_n essence_n above_o the_o son_n be_v as_o it_o have_v a_o necessary_a tendency_n towards_o the_o subversion_n of_o the_o trinity_n and_o to_o this_o very_a end_n servetus_n talentinus_n gentilis_fw-la and_o gonesius_n a_o polonian_a tritheist_n against_o who_o zenchy_n write_v urge_v it_o this_o gonesius_n 41._o biblioth_n antitriâ—_n p._n 41._o as_o sandius_n observe_v be_v the_o first_o that_o oppugn_v the_o doctrine_n of_o the_o trinity_n in_o poland_n and_o as_o wissoâ—atius_n he_o assert_v the_o pre-eminence_n of_o the_o deity_n of_o the_o father_n above_o that_o of_o the_o son_n compead_n nurat_n compead_n for_o the_o most_o part_n according_a to_o the_o placita_fw-la of_o servetus_fw-la and_o gentilis_fw-la stoinius_n in_o his_o epitome_n affirm_v the_o same_o of_o genesius_n and_o so_o do_v lubieniescius_fw-la add_v that_o in_o a_o synod_n hold_v ann_n 1556_o he_o own_v it_o and_o out_o of_o simâ—er_n 116_o hist_o ref._n pol._n l._n 2._o c._n 6._o p._n 111._o 116_o lubieniescius_fw-la tell_v we_o that_o as_o in_o transiâ—vania_n franciscus_n davidis_n be_v servetus_fw-la illustratus_fw-la so_o gonesius_n be_v in_o poâ—and_n kazonovius_n and_o farnovius_fw-la be_v of_o the_o same_o mind_n with_o gonesius_n but_o that_o they_o may_v be_v the_o more_o successful_a they_o take_v another_o method_n to_o introduce_v three_o essence_n into_o the_o trinity_n still_o find_v that_o to_o be_v the_o most_o likely_a way_n to_o expose_v the_o faith_n of_o the_o orthodox_n touch_v this_o bless_a doctrine_n which_o be_v thus_o manage_v stankarus_fw-la perhaps_o of_o the_o same_o faction_n with_o gentilis_fw-la and_o his_o disciple_n start_v a_o peculiar_a notion_n about_o christ_n mediatorship_n affirm_v that_o the_o word_n god_n in_o scripture_n signify_v trinity_n that_o when_o it_o be_v say_v there_o be_v one_o god_n the_o mean_v be_v there_o be_v vnus_fw-la deus_fw-la trinitas_fw-la for_o which_o reason_n if_o christ_n be_v mediator_n as_o god_n the_o trinity_n say_v he_o must_v be_v the_o mediator_n or_o christ_n must_v be_v god_n of_o a_o distinct_a essence_n from_o the_o father_n and_o inferior_a to_o he_o and_o the_o orthodox_n believe_v christ_n to_o be_v mediator_n as_o god-man_n be_v accuse_v by_o stankarus_fw-la for_o be_v arian_n this_o notion_n occasion_v great_a distraction_n among_o the_o reform_a in_o poland_n as_o appear_v from_o what_o some_o of_o â—em_v write_v to_o calvin_n crave_v his_o thought_n of_o it_o and_o from_o what_o felix_n cruciger_n gregorius_n pauli_n stanislaus_n latomirski_n paulus_n gilovius_n martinus_n crovitius_n franciscus_n lismaninus_n and_o sundry_a other_o who_o meet_v in_o a_o synod_n at_o pinczow_n do_v anno_fw-la 1562._o send_v to_o the_o professor_n of_o divinity_n and_o pastor_n of_o the_o church_n at_o argentine_n where_o be_v a_o particular_a account_n of_o mankarus_n his_o error_n with_o a_o confession_n of_o the_o true_a faith_n but_o as_o calvin_n sear_v blâ—ndrata_n and_o his_o partisan_n pretend_v a_o great_a zeal_n for_o the_o doctrine_n of_o the_o trinity_n do_v in_o a_o seem_a opposition_n to_o stankarus_fw-la own_o the_o consequence_n he_o have_v saâ—â—ed_v on_o the_o doctrine_n embrace_v by_o the_o orthodox_n as_o what_o do_v natural_o flow_v from_o christ_n be_v mediator_n as_o god-man_n and_o a_o table_n be_v soon_o publish_v 683._o taâ—â—â—am_fw-la nusâ—â—â—_n poâ—â—â—_n ediâ—am_n quae_fw-la christum_fw-la &_o spiritum_fw-la sanctum_fw-la alios_fw-la a_o patre_fw-la deo_fw-la facit_fw-la noâ—_n sine_fw-la moerore_fw-la inspexi_fw-la calv._n tract_n theol._n p._n 683._o in_o which_o they_o declare_v jesus_n christ_n anc_fw-la the_o holy_a ghost_n to_o be_v two_o god_n distinct_a from_o the_o father_n and_o that_o the_o three_o person_n be_v three_o distinct_a essence_n this_o table_n as_o calvin_n apprehend_v be_v write_v by_o blandrata_n but_o sandius_n say_v that_o gregorius_n pauli_n in_o a_o epistle_n to_o the_o tigurine_a minister_n own_v himself_o to_o be_v the_o author_n of_o it_o for_o though_o gregorius_n pauli_n latomirski_n lismaninus_n and_o many_o other_o subscribe_v a_o sound_a confession_n of_o faith_n in_o opposition_n to_o the_o error_n of_o stankarus_fw-la yet_o do_v they_o fall_v in_o with_o blandrata_n and_o though_o calvin_n send_v they_o a_o admonition_n in_o which_o he_o dehort_v they_o against_o take_v the_o three_o person_n to_o be_v three_o essence_n lest_o they_o shall_v frame_n to_o themselves_o three_o god_n yet_o it_o be_v say_v beza_n to_o very_o little_a purpose_n for_o the_o polonian_a minister_n 363._o epist_n 81._o p._n 363._o be_v bewitch_v with_o blandrata_n hypocrisy_n be_v general_o ensnare_v to_o a_o closure_n with_o his_o error_n and_o blandrata_n himself_o observe_v how_o efficacious_o this_o engine_n wrought_v stator_n an_fw-mi docuit_fw-la te_fw-la dei_fw-la verbum_fw-la multiplicari_fw-la posse_fw-la dei_fw-la essentiam_fw-la epist_n bez._n ad_fw-la pet._n stator_n call_v in_o the_o help_n of_o valentinus_n gentilis_fw-la and_o petrus_n statorius_n who_o with_o matthaeus_n gribaldus_n and_o other_o be_v indefatigable_a in_o their_o labour_n to_o establish_v a_o sort_n of_o tritheism_n as_o the_o most_o effectual_a mean_n to_o introduce_v their_o samosatenian_a heresy_n and_o their_o success_n this_o way_n be_v answerable_a to_o their_o industry_n and_o expectation_n for_o in_o a_o little_a time_n to_o the_o admiration_n of_o the_o orthodox_n in_o other_o part_n of_o europe_n many_o of_o the_o reform_a in_o poland_n be_v ensnare_v into_o a_o closure_n