and shall haue God gratious vnto him to eternall life This God hath promised saith Augustine Aug. Psalm 88. this God hath said and if that bee but little God hath sworne it Therefore because the promise is sure not according to our merits but according to his mercies no man ought to publish that with feare wherof he cannot doubt And that is wel to be marked against the Papists who because they wil haue iustificatioÌ„ to depend vpon their workes if not wholly yet at least in part as it hath been sayd before Alsons de Castro in voce gratia Bern. serm 68. sup Cant. Serm. 3. de 7. fragm and they themselues doe not dissemble it they can neuer iudge of this certaintie of grace But as Bernard said excellently well Why is the Church carefull for merits seeing there is surer and safer matter of reioycing in the purpose and mercie of God And elsewhere I consider three things wherein resteth my whole hope the loue of adoption the trueth of promise and the power of rendring Now let my foolish thought murmure as much as it will saying who art thouâ— or how great is that glorie An excellent saâ—ing and worthy rememberance or by what merits thinkest thou to obtaine it I confidently answere I know whom I haue beleeued and I am certaine because in great loue he hath adopted me because he is true in his promise because he is able to performe it This is a threefold corde that is hardly broken sent vs from our heauenly countrey into this prison let vs firmely keepe and hold it Ambrose also agreeth hereto in Luk. 1. Not euery one that is iust before men is iust before God He is surely blessed that is iust in Gods sight He is blessed of whoÌ„ the Lord vouchsafeth to say Behold a true Israelite A true Israelite seeth God and knowes himselfe to bee seene of God and giueth to him the secrets of his heart Places obiected by the Papâ—sts for doubting Against these things the aduersaries who bid our consciences stand in doubt whether we receiue remission of sinnes obiect some places of Scripture concerning the imperfectioÌ„ of good works in this world yea in the most holy men whose confession is this Psalm 19. 1. Cor. 4. Who vnderstandeth his faults Clense me Lord from my secret sinnes Also I know nothing by my selfe yet therein am not iustified But these places are wrongfully alleadged against vs who make account that wee are iustified before God not for our owne worthines and workes but through the death and satisfaction of Christ alone For to him giue all the Prophets and Apostles witnesse Acts 10. that whosoeuer beleeueth in him receiueth remission of sinnes through his name Eccles 9. But nothing is more common for the opinion of the Papists than that of Salomon in Ecclesiastes A man knoweth not whether he bee worthie of loue or hatred but all things to come are vncertaine as the old translation hath which according to the Hebrew veritie is euen loue and hatred a man knoweth not all things alike befall to all men there is one and the same euent to the iust and vniust person c. But this fortresse is made of figge leaues For what is it obscure in the doctrine of the Church whether they that are in Christ and liue according to the spirit do please God and contrariwise whether theeues fornicators adulterers drunkards Idolaters and such like doe displease him 1 Cor 6. Gal. 5. of whom the Apostle so euidently pronounceth that such shal not possesse the kingdome of God But as for the saying of Salomon Aben-Ezra one of the Hebrew writers referreth actiuely loue and hatred vnto men that there is no man that knoweth the things that men loue or hate that is the prosperitie or aduersitie that shall come vnto them Yet the sense is more plaine that Olympiodorus also vpon Ecclesiastes giueth The true sense of Salomons works that by the outward euents of this life it cannot be knowne whether a man bee in loue or hatred with God Which meaning that which followeth in stead of a reason plainly confirmeth that all things happen alike to all righteous and vngodly to him that serueth God and to him that despiseth him This Alphonsus considering freely confesseth that this testimonie Contra Haeresâ—â— vt suprà that had seemed before most manifest to him as to many other in Poperie doth little or nothing proue this point It is obiected also out of Ioel. 2. that the Prophet exhorting the people of God to turne with all their heart to the Lord Ioel 2. saith who knowes if the Lord will turne and forgiue Ion. 3. and leaue behinde him a blessing As also the king of Niniuie perswading the people to repentance said Amos 5. who knowes if he will turne and repent him that we perish not And in Amos wee reade Hate euill loue good peraduenture the Lord of hosts will be mercifull to the remnant of Ioseph Such also is that that Peter said to Simon Magus Repent and pray to God Acts 8. if peraduenture the thought of thy heart may be forgiuen thee All these things seeme to be against the certaintie of grace But the Papists deale very vnaduisedly alleadging such places vnles they would denie that God doth forgiue them their sinnes that with all their hearts repent which thing is easily proued by sixe hundred places of Scripture yea the very sayings from whence that shew of doubting ariseth manifestly proue the same thing when the Lord saith in Amos seeke me and ye shall liue and the Lord your God shall be with you As Ioel also testifieth if they repent it shall come to passe that the Lord in great zeale will spare his people for he is louing gratious and of much mercie Obiection To what purpose then doth the spirit of God speake doubtfully sometimes by the Prophets and Apostles touching the hope of pardon Answere 1 First albeit God forgiueth their faults that truly repent yet he doth not alwaies put away corporall calamitie as it appeareth by Dauids example 2. Sam. 12 but that the punishment to such as repent is turned into a fatherly chastisement Secondly learned interpreters do admonish vs that doubting which the Scripture after the maner of men speaking of God sometime vseth is not in respect of God but in respect of men because it is vncertaine of them whether they will repent Thirdly in grieuous sinnes it is in stead of holesome medicine to propound the hardnes of pardon that they that haue sinned may haue in the beginning some taste of the grace of God and by little and little may gather courage and in the meane while not straightwaies rise vp to securitie but carefully come to God with a great confession and crauing of pardon for their faults A fine similie So the Phisition wil not straightwaies asswage the griefe but wil see what may be more expedient
saith very cleerely The band of death drawne together by the sinne of one was loosed by the death of one who alone owed nothing vnto death His personall dignity in that he was both God and man III. The third cause which is greatest of all the death of Christ was not a meere mans death although innocent and iust but it was his death who is both true God and man in one and the same person And this exceeding great dignitie of this person is the cause that this price of his blood death although it was temporall if the continuance of it be respected yet it is of infinit force to saue them for euer who come vnto God by it Which the Author to the Hebrewes chap. 9. teacheth saying If the blood of buls and goates and the ashes of a yong heifer sprinkling the vncleane do sanctifie to the puritie of the flesh how much more doth the blood of Christ who offered himselfe by the eternall spirit without blame to God purge your consciences from dead workes to serue the liuing God And Acts chap. 20. Paul is witnesse that God by his owne blood redeemed his Church Not that the deitie hath flesh or blood for God is a spirit but that person which suffered death for vs is both God and man and so this blood is and is truly called the blood of God whose excellencie therfore and dignitie is exceeding great To these this is annexed that beside his power diuine His Lordship ouer vs and his neerenes in blood vnto vs. and abundantly sufficient to deliuer our commō Redeemer had also the full and perfect right of redemption both because he is Lord of all also because he is neere vnto vs in blood For by the right of Lordship it is meete that the seruant bee redeemed of the master and the subiect of his prince and by the right of kindred the father doth well redeeme the sonne one brother another and one kinsman another And hither may be referred that which we reade Leuit. 25.25 to be specially ordained touching the right of neerenes of kindred Thirdly also this hath been a question 3. question Why must we be redeemed by his death rather than by some other meanes as touching the meanes of redemption whether the deliuerance of vs could not possibly haue been by some other meanes then by the death of the Sonne of God Wee answere with Augustine lib. 13. de trinit that another way was possible to God vnto whose power all things are subiect but this was the meetest way and most fit with God to heale our miserie Or as Thomas part 3. quaest 46. decideth this doubt we do distinguish betweene possible or impossible simply and that which is after a sort To speake simply and absolutely it was possible to God to deliuer man by another meanes then by the death of Christ because nothing is impossible with God Luk. 1.37 But after a sort Because no other was possible or by supposition of Gods foreknowledge and fore appointment it was impossible as the Lords words do plainly shew Matth. 26. Father if this cup cannot passe away vnles I drinke of it thy will be done Whereupon Hilary saith Therefore the cup cannot passe vnles he drinke it because we cannot be restored but by his passion because of the decree of Gods will Moreouer it is plaine that that way is most fit with God and meetest to cure our miserie Because this way was most iust with God which God vsed through the passion of his Sonne For it was a iust thing that for the sinnes of mankinde the iudgement of God should be satisfied thorow punishmēt and that the same nature which had sinned should also giue a recompence for sin Further it was agreeable to the trueth and goodnes of God Most agreeable to his truth Gen. 2.17 to the trueth because a threatning had gone before What day so euer thou shalt eate of the tree of knowledge of good and euill thou shalt die the death and it was promised and euer by continuall testimonies shewed and by diuers ceremonies shadowed that the sonne of God borne of a woman should dye for vs and so should confirme the new couenant by his blood To his goodnes and mercy And to the goodnes of God it agreeth because seeing man of himselfe could not satisfie for sinnes God of his exceeding great mercie gaue vnto him a satisfier euen his only begotten sonne Whereupon it was said of Christ himself Iohn 3. Rom. 5. Ioh. 3. So God loued the world that he gaue his sonne c. And Paul God doth set out his loue towards vs that when we were as yet sinners Christ died for vs. And truly this was a token of a farre more abounding mercie that he did not spare his owne sonne for vs then if he had remitted our sins without satisfaction Ephes 2. so that wee may worthily now say with the same Apostle God who is rich in mercie because of his great loue wherewith he hath loued vs euen when we were dead thorow our offences hath quickned vs together through Christ by whose grace we are saued This was most expedient to money to loue God again Besides that way of deliuerance was most expedient for our saluation For so we know by the greatest experiment of all how much God loueth vs and we are prouoked to loue God againe Then an example is giuen vnto vs of obedience loue humilitie sufferings and glorie which when all miseries are ouercome we doe expect as Peter saith 1. Epist 2. Christ suffered for vs and left vs an example that wee should follow his steps Likewise Paul Phil. 2.5 and 2. Cor. 8.9 and elsewhere To suffer afflictions for his sake propounding the example of Christ exhorteth vs to the duties of loue and other vertues Further because we are redeemed by the death of the Sonne of God To keepe our selues from sinne 1. Cor. 6. A notable saying and washed from our sinnes in his blood a greater necessitie lieth vpon vs To keep our selue from sinne 1. Cor. 6. A notable saying that we should keepe our selues to God vndefiled in bodie and soule as the Apostle saith Ye are bought with a price therefore glorifie God in your bodie and spirit which are Gods And thus much of the meanes of redemption a mysterie altogether wonderfull and vnspeakeable which the Author of Meditations in Augustine chapter 7. excellently setteth out in these words O state of wonderfull reformation A notable saying and disposition of vnspeakeable mysterie the vniust sinneth and the iust is punished the guiltie transgresseth and the innocent is beaten the vngodly offendeth and the godly is condemned what the euill deserued the good doth endure what the seruant hath done the master doth pay what man doth commit God doth suffer and abide This is a heauenly medicine O good Iesu this is the preseruatiue of thy loue CHAP. VI. The
sent me that whatsoeuer hee hath giuen me I should lose none but should raise it vp at the last day And that it pleased the father to saue vs by the offering vp of his Sonne it commeth wholly from his diuine fauour Nothing moued the father to send his son to saue vs but his meere loue and mercie to mankinde loue and goodnesse towards mankinde as the Lord witnesseth Ioh. 3. So God loued the world that he gaue his Sonne Wherevpon Paul also saith Rom. 5. God setteth out his loue towards vs that when we were sinners Christ died for vs. And Ephes 2. God who is rich in mercie of his great loue wherewith he loued vs euen when wee were dead in sinnes quickened vs through Christ And most cleerely of all to Titus chap. 3. The goodnes and loue of God our Sauiour towards men appeared and saued vs not by the righteous workes which wee had done but by his mercie The sayings of the Prophets consent hereto Esay 54.7 In a moment of my wrath I haue hid for a while my face from thee in euerlasting mercie I haue compassion on thee saith the Lord thy Redeemer I euen I am he Esay 43.12 who doth blot out thine offences for mine owne sake and I will not remember thy sins He saith for mine owne sake that is not for your sake but for my holie name as it is expounded Ezech. 36. Neither doth that tend to any other end which Esay chap. 9. prophesying of the incarnation of the Sunne and of the redemption of the Church by him from the yoke of sinne and death concludeth the whole matter with this notable sentence in the ende The zeale of the Lord of hostes shall bring this thing to passe as if he should say I foretell of great things but they be true and the almightie father enflamed with eternall loue and minding to saue them to whom he hath promised the kingdome of heauen A double vse of the loue of God Christ towards vs. will bring this thing to passe See also what Moses Deuter. 7. speaketh of the cause of the redemption of the people of Israel from Egypt which was a type of this eternall deliuerance The first vse Further the vse of this consideration is that wee should humble our selues vnfainedly before God and that hee that reioyceth should reioyce in the Lord and not in his workes or own worthines For the opposition of the mercie of God and of the righteousnes of workes is to be obserued and vrged alway in the matter or cause of saluation as Paul did oppose these things Tit. 3.5 Not by the workes of righteousnes which we had done but by his mercie he saued vs. And the same Antithesis is repeated 2. Tim. 1. vers 9. and Dan. 9. vers 18. The second The second vse is that wee also pondring in our minde the deeper sea as Damascene speaketh of Gods loue towards vs Damas lib. 3. cap. 1. orth fid should loue God againe and that not in word nor tongue onely but in deede and trueth as he hath loued vs and giuen his life for vs 1. Ioh. 3. And chap. 4. ioyning both vses together in excellent words thus he writeth Hereby the loue of God is made manifest vnto vs that he sent his owne Sonne into the world that wee might liue thorow him In this is loue not that we loued him but that he loued vs and sent his Sonne to be the propitiation for our sinnes And straightway addeth Beloued if God so loued vs wee ought also to loue one another And a little before the end We loue him because he loued vs first If any man shall say I loue God hateth his brother he is a lyar But seeing by the death of Christ we are reconciled vnto God as saith the Apostle Ephes 2. An obiection He hath reconciled vs to God thorow his crosse slaying enemitie by it How God did both loue man and hate him it seemeth to disagree with that we haue said that through the loue of God he was deliuered to death for vs. For if we were before loued of God to what end is reconciliation If any say reconciliation was needfull in respect of vs that we might cease to bee at enemitie with God and among our selues the Iewes with the Gentiles and Gentiles with Iewes Ephes 2. Colos 1. he neither saith nothing nor speaketh all by the witnesse of Paul For first of all it was the part of the reconciler to pacifie the wrath of God against vs for sinnes and to make him fauourable and gratious vnto vs. How then can it stand that God preuented this reconciliation of his free fauour and loue in giuing his sonne vnto vs The reason is thus made The same thing is not the cause and the effect But the loue of God is the effect of reconciliation Therefore it is not the cause of it Answere But the maior is true in respect of one and the same thing But the loue of God is the effect of reconciliation not simply as though then at the length he began to loue vs but respectiuely as farre forth as reconciliation by the blood of his sonne remoueth sinne whereby wee were made enemies of God and children of his wrath according to that saying Sap. 14. The wicked and his wickednesse are alike hated of God And Psal 5. Thou hast hated all that worke iniquitie And Esay crieth Esay 59. Our iniquities haue made a separation betweene our God and vs and our sinnes are the cause that he hideth away his face from vs and heareth vs not This whole matter Augustine notably expoundeth in his 110. treatise vpon Iohn After a wonderfull and diuine maner saith he God loued vs Augustines answere God hateth sin in vs but loueth his work when he did hate vs. For he hated vs as we were such as he had not made vs that is for sinnes And because saith he our iniquitie had not altogether destroyed his worke he knew in euery one of vs both to hate what we had done and also to loue what he himselfe had made and this may be vnderstood in all men according to the saying Sap. 11. Thou hast hated nothing that thou hast made For in that which he hateth there is somewhat also that he loueth For he hateth and misliketh the fault which swarueth from the patterne as it were of his workmaâ—ship yet he loueth that which is his owne euen in such as are corrupted Furthermore seeing hee hateth nothing of those things which he hath made peculiarly as Augustine there teacheth he loueth the members of his onely sonne But specially he loueth vs as we are members of his sonne For how saith he should he not loue the members of his sonne who loueth his sonne for there is no other cause of louing his members but because he loueth him Therefore he loueth vs because we are his meÌ„bers whom he
the Minor of the argument is false for he that hath knowledge knoweth himselfe to beleeue as before hath been shewed And whosoeuer beleeueth A man may know himselfe to haue faith and so to haue Christ Luk. 22. Matth. 26. is partaker of the merits of the death and humiliation of our Lord Iesus Christ as he saith this is my body which is giuen for you and this is my blood the blood of the New Testament which is shed for you as Luke hath or as Matthew saith which is shed for many for remission of sinnes Why saith he for many Because albeit the blood of Christ be shed for all as touching sufficiencie yet it was shed for the regenerate onely as touching efficiencie as I shewed before out of Innocentius Whereupon Basil saith All of vs as many as do beleeue Exhortat Baptis are redeemed from sinnes by the grace of God which is through his onely begotten sonne our Lord Iesus Christ who said This is my blood the blood of the New Testament which is shed for many for the remission of sinnes which exposition he twise repeateth in his Sermon following of Baptisme for many that is for all beleeuers the blood of Christ was shed CHAP. XVI An answere to the residue of the Absurdities HVber goeth on and that he may maintaine any way his opinion he obiecteth also other absurdities so horrible that a godly minde cannot but tremble in thinking of them as Hubers blasphemies that God is accused of fraud and lying Of fraud in that he saith one thing and thinketh another Of lying in that by word he offereth and commandeth to receiue things which in the meane while by his irreuocable iudgement he forbiddeth to receiue Also that Christ by his passion hath mocked God and men and that the mightie and holy Lord of hosts is worthily accused of crueltie iniustice reioycing at mens harmes and of other great euils agreeing rather to a most cruell tyrant then to God For such and so many words doth his rude and shameles mouth vtter often or rather roreth out But these be the sleights of the aduersarie issuing out of the same forge that his other lyes and slanders doe too too presumptuous truly But because those obiections and mocks excepting only the last saue one respect not so fitly the doctrine of Redemption as of Predestination which treatises Huber here and there without order confoundeth and are long agoe largely confuted by Doctor Luther in his booke of seruile freewill I will not suffer my selfe in refuting them to be carried beside the matter I haue in hand One or two places onely of Luther I will alleadge for their sakes who depend vpon that mans authoritie that they may vnderstand that the doctrine of Luther is wounded through our sides He therefore in his answere to the place of Ezech. 18. Luther de seruo arbit cap. 107. seq J will not the death of a sinner confirmeth the receiued distinction of a double will in God which truly was wont to bee so distinguished for our capacitie And one will he one while calleth secret fearefull and vnsearchable other while the most reuerend secret of Gods maiestie sometime the hidden God but the other will A double will in God he calleth one while the reuealed will other while the word preached sometime God preached and worshipped How God willeth and willeth not the death of a sinner Eze. ca. 18. and proceedeth after this sort God doth many things which he hath not shewed vs in his word and he willeth many things which in his word he doth not shew that he willeth So he will not the death of a sinner in his word that is in his will reuealed in his word but he willeth it by his vnsearchable will Therefore it is well said If God will not the death of a sinner wee must impute it to our will that we perish well I say if it bee vnderstood of God preached For he willeth that all men be saued while he commeth vnto all by the word of saluation and it is the fault of the will which doth not admit God as Matth. 25. it is said How often would I gather thy chickens and thou wouldest not But why Gods maiestie taketh not away this fault of our wil or changeth it in all or why he doth impute it vnto man seeing he cannot want it we may not inquire and if thou wouldest inquire yet thou shalt neuer finde it as Paul Rom. 9. saith Who art thou then that reasonest with God Againe it is sufficient saith Luther to know that God so willeth and this will it is meete we should reuerence loue and adore restraining the rashnes of our reason Here Luther sufficiently sheweth that it pertaineth to his reuealed will that God willeth the conuersion and saluation of all and to his hidden will that he neither giueth nor purposeth to giue conuersion and saluation to all but to whom he will according to his meere good pleasure Neither are these cōtrarie one to another The hid and reuealed will are not contradictorie therefore no suspition of fraude or lying in God as though God spake one thing and thought another when we say that he willeth that is commandeth that all repent and beleeue the Gospell to saluation and yet that he will not worke in all men faith and repentance Euen children may perceiue that here is no contradiction because of the diuers signification of the word will The same man cap. 160. God is not vniust or one that reioyceth at mans miserie This surely offendeth common sense and naturall reason that God of his meere will forsaketh hardeneth and damneth men as though he who is said to be of so great mercie and goodnes delighted in the great and eternall paines and torments of miserable persons This seemeth wicked cruell and intolerable to imagine of God But here the most mercifull God ought to be honoured and reuerenced and wee must referre freely some thing vnto his diuine wisedome that he may bee beleeued to be iust A notable saying where he seemeth to vs to bee vniust For if such were his iustice as might be iudged by mans capacitie to bee iust it should not be altogether diuine and should differ nothing from humane iustice But seeing God is true and one wholly incomprehensible and inaccessible by mans reason it is meete yea necessarie that his iustice also be incomprehensible c. Therefore what peruersenes is this that wee should destroy the iustice and iudgement of God These and many other such things hath Luther against such as contend with their maker Esay 45. Brentius in 1. Sam. 2. v. 25. Brentius also vpon those words touching Elies sonnes They heard not the voyce of their father because the Lord would slay them subscribeth vnto this doctrine and concludeth this whole question in these words Therefore that they may be punished according to the worthines of their deserts the Lord
respect of all and euery one who euer haue been are or shall be which how vaine it is is taught by many testimonies of the Scriptures Act. 14.16.17.30 Eph. 2.12 Psal 147.19.20 Besides looke what wee haue spoken in the sixt chapter of this booke Secondly the Apostle saying They that haue sinned without the law shall perish also without the law and they that haue sinned in the law shall be damned by the law doth not onelie grant that the Gentiles for the most part wanted the knowledge of the law written much more the knowledge of the promises of the grace of the Gospell published by Moses and the Prophets but also alleadgeth the reason of the iust damnation of the Gentiles from the breach of the law of nature making no mention of the contemned grace of the Gospell Thirdly what shall we say of so many millions of infants without the Church who haue bin preuented by death from the beginning of the world and are daily preuented before they can heare the least tittle of the grace of the Gospel what contempt is there of grace what lothing of saluation Fourthly the Lord in the Gospell saith Ioh. 15. If I had not come and spoken vnto them they should not haue had sinne but now they haue nothing to cloake their sinnes withall Augustine tract 89. Augustines iudgement of this question aduiseth vs to vnderstand this place not of euery sinne but of the great sinne of vnbeleefe and mouing the question whether they vnto whom Christ commeth not nor speaketh vnto them haue excuse for their sinne answereth not truly for euery one of their sinnes but for this sinne that they haue not beleeued in Christ they haue a plaine excuse and they cannot therefore auoide damnation according to the saying Whosoeuer haue sinned without the law shall also perish without the law and whosoeuer haue sinned in the law shall be iudged by the law And such he saith are they who when they heare contemne or else gainsaying resist or with hatred pursuing them by whom they heare Also Epist 99. ad Euod speaking of such as are in hell according to his owne and the common opinion of others maketh difference between such as here would not beleeue the Gospell preached those that haue not here contemned saith he that which they would not heare and are cast into hel without any guiltines of the contempt of the Gospell The like he writeth in his booke of nature and grace lib. 4. If with these sayings of ancient fathers we compare the phrases of new Sectaries we shall see a flat contrarietie And let these be spoken for confutation of those things so much as the state of our purpose seemed to require THE THIRD BOOKE OF CHRISTIAN REDEMPTION CONSISTING IN CONFIRMATION Or a demonstration of the true opinion who be partakers of Redemption CHAP. I. The proposition and partition NOw we are come to the confirmation of true doctrine And that is The summe of our opinion touching mans redemption by the death of Christ that albeit the death of the sonne of God our Lorde Iesu Christ as touching the greatnes of the price be the redemption of whole mankinde none excepted yet the proprietie of redemption belongeth to those who are not now the vessels of the deuils but the members of Christ by faith and the grace of regeneration the rest who liue without faith and regeneration not belonging to this redemption from sinne and death T it 1. And because faith and regeneration pertaine not to all but to the elect it is truly also auouched that redemption belongs to them and not to the reprobates This opinion we purposing to proue will vse also a threefold ranke or order of proofes The first shall be of certaine testimonies of Scripture out of the old and new Testament wherein spiritual redemption purchased by Christ is restrained to the Church which certainly is not the vniuersalitie of whole mankinde but a certaine companie of mankinde chosen to eternall life out of euery tribe language nation and people In the second ranke wee will produce diuerse arguments drawne from the analogie of faith or the apostolicall and catholike rule of faith whereunto euery Ecclesiasticall exposition and decision of whatsoeuer controuersies of saith ought to be agreeable Lastly the third ranke shall haue testimonies of godly antiquitie whereby it shall more cleerly than the light appeare that nothing is here taught or produced of vs that all the best and worthiest writers of old haue not with great consent taught according to the Scriptures CHAP. II. Certaine places of the new Testament with an admonition concerning Hubers maner of disputation VVE begin the more willingly our purposed confirmation from the expresse testimonies of Scripture because the aduersarie doubted not to blab it out Thes 627. The admonition touching Hubers maner of disputing as though we had no word of our opinion in the Scriptures and went about to draw and expresse it from consequences only And that thou maist the more marueile Christian reader at the negligence and follie of the man in so great a matter it appeareth that while he was writing and daily meditating of this controuersie yet he was long in this opinion to wit till being admonished by the positions of Doctor Tossan hee saw he had neede of an appendix as if all the proofe of our opinion would come to this Enthymeme There is an eternall predestination of God wherin he hath decreed in Christ to haue mercie vpon some vnto saluation and not vpon others Ergo Christ died not for all With which error afterward being carried away his chariot regarding no bridle he raiseth vp a great dust to darken the trueth of the doctrine of predestination and that not onely in place altogether vnfit and by very straunge expositions but also by an error so full of words that for one page of places of Scripture cited by M. Pareus touching Predestination he groweth into a 100. pages and 350. Theses or positions In which whole disputation it is his continuall sleight vnfaithfully and with a craftie head to propound the arguments of our side concerning Predestination for herein he onely sticketh as I said whereas he ought to handle redemption and in stead of answers hee singeth euery where his cuckowes song de repetitione principij which the schooles of Logicke vse not to call repetition but petition that is the begging of a thing as granted which is the chiefe point in controuersie It is a part of the same nay of grosser ignorance that in his appendix to D. Tossans reasons he wonderfully pleaseth himselfe in his other cuckowes song I deny the consequent We alwaies deny the consequent O miserable disputer as bad a Logitian as he is a Diuine He doth not yet vnderstand that we must neuer answer an Enthymeme by denying the consequent but either by distinguishing or deniall of the antecedent or els by denying the consequence For it is as foolish
draweth thee to repentance But this is the question whether faith and repentance bee not the gifts of God which he giueth to some and not to others and that according to the vnsearchable counsell of his owne will This certainly is more cleere than that it can be denied of any one that is not a Pelagian How God willeth all to repent Therefore it is well said That God willeth all men to repent that is he calleth and inuiteth all to repentance but he effecteth it not in all neither doth he will it surely because he hath mercie on whom he will and whom he will he hardeneth Luth. de ser arb Cap. 109. A distinction of Gods will After this sort Luther also distinguisheth He will not the death of a sinner to wit in his word for in the word of saluation he commeth to all but he willeth it in his vnsearchable will And at large there sheweth the difference between the secret and published will of God not that properly there is a diuerse will in God but the speech of his will is diuerse because this name is diuersly taken The published or reuealed will of God is whatsoeuer from the beginning of the world either by God himselfe immediatly or by his ministers hath been offered to men by precepts exhortations menacings and benefits But his hidden will is that secret will in God concerning the euent of things that is whom and what men endued with faith by speciall grace he will haue to be partakers of mercie when it is preached and offered Brentius Brentius also followed this same distinction in 1. Sam. 2. discussing the place of the sonnes of Eli and expli Catechis vpon the petition Thy will be done This let the indifferent reader obserue against the outcries of some who though they would be heard as the right issue of Luther and Brentius yet by cauils and sophistications they labour to make odious this distinction receiued and grounded in the word of God For as it is written 2. Tim. 2. 2. Pet. 3. 1. Thess 5. Matth. 23. that he wil that all men be saued and that he is patient toward vs being vnwilling that any should perish but to come to repentance and that our sanctification is the will of God Also how often would I gather thy children and thou wouldest not Esay 46.10 Psalm 115.3 Rom 9.18 19. So wee haue heard and read in the diuine Scriptures My counsell shall stand saith the Lord and I will fulfill my will Whatsoeuer the Lord would that he did He hath mercie on whom he will and whom he will he hardeneth Also Who shall resist his will In which places and the like there will be great contrarietie vnlesse a distinction be vsed according to which Marke this distinction we may vnderstand that something is done against the will of God that is against his commandement and prohibition which yet is not done beside and contrary to that will which is he himselfe For great are the workes of the Lord and his will is perfect towards all so that it is not done beside his will that yet is done contrary to his will because it could not be done if he would not suffer it and truly he doth not suffer it against his will but willingly neither being good himselfe would he suffer euill to be done vnles being almightie he were able out of euill to make that which is good as August saith ad Laur. ca. 100. See also lib. 1. Sentent dist 45. and in the other that follow Voluntas beneplaciti signi where the Master largely speaketh of the double will of God his good pleasure and reuealed will as the Schoolemen call them If any thinke good let him also peruse Chrysostome Hom. 18. ad Heb. Secondly it is obiected The 2. Obiection that the promise of grace is vniuersall and therefore that none is reiected from grace or reprobated in respect of God Answere I answere The first way how the promises of grace be vniuersall the promise of grace is vniuersall in respect of the beleeuers as farre forth doubtles as no man of what nation or condition soeuer is excluded from saluation so that he beleeue truly in Christ Contrariwise vnbeleeuers of what nation or condition soeuer are expressely shut out from the fruite of the promises according to the sayings Mark 16. He that beleeueth and is baptized shall be saued c. Euery one that beleeueth in the sonne Ioh. 3. Ioh 6. Acts 13. Rom. 3. shall not perish This is the will of the father that whosoeuer beleeueth in the sonne should haue eternall life In him whosoeuer beleeueth is iustified The righteousnes of God in all and vpon all that beleeue for there is no difference And oftentimes after this sort is repeated the promise of life and saluation made to euery beleeuer the vnbeleeuers on the contrary being excluded For the promise requireth faith which because it belongeth not to all but to the elect as Paul witnesseth therfore the efficacie of the promises remaineth doubtles with the elect as the Apostle also teacheth to the Romanes Rom. 9. That the promises of God pertaine to the true Israelites to the spirituall seede that is elected of God not of workes but through the grace of the caller Yet here we are to bee admonished Note this well that albeit the promise bee proper to the beleeuers and the elect as touching efficacie yet it must be preached indifferently in the eares of all faithfull and Infidels elect and reprobates The 2. way And in this sense also we grant that the promises are vniuersall to wit in respect of externall preaching because the minister of the word cannot or ought not to discerne the elect from reprobates Rom. 11. In the meane while not all attaine vnto the grace that is preached and offered to all but the elect obtaine it and the rest doe not and so to vse Luthers words all things depend vpon predestination c. The third obiection The third obiection Whosoeuer appertain to the Church are called elect But to the Church pertaine as well the bad as the good Hub. thes 751. 752. Ergo the bad as well as the good are elected none at all omitted Answere But this obiection is faultie in two points First it is the vse of the Scriptures to call them elect whosoeuer belong to the account of the Church but not all therefore are elected of God to eternal life according to his purpose For many are elect to vs in the iudgement of charitie and are not to God and contrariwise according to the diuerse signification of the word set downe before Secondly there is more in the conclusion than in the premisses For the consequence is of no force within the compasse of the Church and of the elect there be as well euill as good in the sense aforesaid Therefore all men are elected This is all one as if
and his mercie followeth vs. It preuenteth vs being vnwilling that we may be willing it followeth vs being willing that we may not will in vaine 9. The Apostle concluding vpon both that is vpon mercie and iudgement saith Aug. ad Laur. cap. 99. Therefore he hath mercie on whom he will and whom he will he hardeneth He hath mercy doubtles of his great goodnes and he hardeneth through no vniustice because on whom there is no mercie shewed to him there is no vniustice but iudgement done But why both mercy and iudgement I meane doth deliuer or not deliuer this man rather than another it is attributed to Gods will which alone separateth such as shall be deliuered from them that shall not be deliuered seeing the common cause doth wrap all men in the lumpe of perdition 10. It maketh for our cause what the Apostle bringeth of the potter and the diuersitie of vessels The Potter for the potter not considering the deserte of the clay at his owne pleasure onely of the same clay formeth vessels of all sorts to honor and dishonor Therefore much more God is to be said to follow not the merits of men but his owne will onely in choosing and reprobating and yet with the safetie of his iustice whereof hereafter Notably saith the Wiseman Ecclesiastic 33. As clay is in the hand of the potter which he handleth at his pleasure so men be in the hand of God their creator to euery one of whom he rendereth according to his owne iudgement or will In like maner the Apostle Hath not the potter power ouer the clay to make of the same lumpe one vessell to honor and another to dishonor And he annexeth concerning both vessels of wrath and mercie that those are made for destruction these are prepared of God for glorie But if God when he electeth or reiecteth should respect workes that power were nothing and any potter could doe more then God Vessels of wrath And although in the contrarietie of the vessels of two sorts it be not in expresse words set downe by whom the vessels of wrath are said to be made vnto destruction yet the similitude of the Apostle easily taketh away that doubt For the potter of the same clay maketh at his pleasure vessels to honour and dishonour Wherefore either this similitude of the potter will not aptly serue or else we shall frankly confesse that both vessels are prepared of God and appointed to their vses Lib. 2. de nupt concup ad Vuler cap 16. according to his purpose Hereupon Augustine plainely saith Are not the vessels of wrath vnder the deuill but because they are vnder the deuill doth any other make them than he that maketh the vessels of mercie or els doeth he make them of some other The vessels of wrath are vnder the deuill yet God made them for himselfe and he doeth vse them to good purpose and not of the same lumpe Neither yet doth God make vessels for the deuill but for himselfe as he that knoweth to vse them to his righteous and good workes euen as hee himselfe vseth the deuil The same man Ad Simpl. lib. 1. q. 2. Of the number of the vngodly whome God doeth not iustifie hee maketh vessels to dishonour neither doeth God hate in them that he himselfe made in his creation or ordinance to wit as they are men and as they are vessels but yet in that he maketh them vessels of perdition he maketh them to some vse that the vessels which are made to honour may profite by their ordained punishments What it is to be a vessel of wrath Epistle 105. And in the same place addeth that it is the work of the diuine ordinance that of the conspersion of the vngodly are made vessels of perdition for to be a vessel of wrath as elsewhere he expoundeth is for a man to be for his sinnes appointed to punishment who was created for the God of nature Therfore who may doubt that it pertaineth to Gods ordination Ad Moâ—â—num Marke this whereunto â—eâ—seâ—s of wrath are made So Fulgentius sayth Whereunto God predestinated the vessels of wrath thereunto he made them that is saith he to destruction and not to sinnes Let those whom this speech offendeth marke these things concerning the vessels of wrath prepared of God for destruction But therefore it offendeth them because they vnderstand it amisse as though it were concerning sin it selfe and not as touching the punishment for sin In which sense we also confesse that God doth not make vessels of wrath but find them rather CHAP. IX Answeres to certaine exceptions THese things might suffice for this place for the defence of Gods free election whereby out of mankinde freely and according to his owne power he chooseth some to eternall life and passeth by others without any respect either of worthines or vnworthines of workes in the men themselues But because a deceitfull minde that flieth the trueth and yet cannot auoid it seeketh many craftie shiftes and wayes to escape we must answere to certaine exceptions before wee proceed to other proofes out of other places of the Scriptures Erasmus in his booke that hee made of freewill The exceptions of Erasmus against the former doctrine by peruerting the places of Gen. 25. Mal. touching Iacob and Esau against which Luther sharpely opposed himselfe seeing the disputation of the Apostle concerning Iacob and Esau to stand against him excepted that the Oracle of God Gensis 25. The elder shal seure the yonger pertaineth not vnto the saluatioÌ„ of a man but vnto a temporarie thing and that God is able of his own free will to appoint that a man should become a seruant and poore will he nill he and yet be not reiected from eternall saluation And with the same purpose hee wresteth that place of Malachie that Paul alleaged Iacob I haue loued and Esau I haue hated that the Prophet doeth not seeme to speake of that hatred whereby a man is damned for euer but of a temporary affliction only of Esau his posterity that their countrey should be wasted without hope of repairing But hereto tende these exceptions as though Paul vnfaithfully which God forbid cited the scriptures or els produced those things for testimonies that could make little to his purpose As Erasmus was not ashamed to referre to this place that Aâ—â—ll speech of Hierome which Hieronyme elsewhere too proudly surely and vnchristianly yea prophanely writeth that in Paul those things disagree which are not repugnant in their places Which thing if it be true the Apostle abused the simplicity of the vnskilfull as wicked Prophyrie reprocheth him Answere But to the point First it is answered by granting that albeit propheticall testimonies should speake onely of corporall things which is not true The elder shall sâ—rue the younger yet that could nothing at all hurt Pauls purpose or ours For the weight of the argument lyeth herein that Iacob through the
him CHAP. XIII A wicked eye without cause suspecteth God of vniustice Obiection THat obiection now followeth which arising from the rashnes that I may not say the impietie of humaine reason greatly troubleth the mindes of the simple And that is that the wicked eye of mans wit suspecteth God of iniquitie if without any merites of good or euill men he chuse one The reasons of the obiection and refuse another of his meere will for it seemeth vniust in distributions if wee distribute vnequally to them that be equall But men if we set aside the difference of merits are equall Therefore if without difference of merites God doth vnequally distribute chusing one and refusing another it seemeth that there is vnrighteousnes with him Further how shall we defende the righteousnes of God if of his meere will he hath predestinated so many thousands of men not moued with any merite or worke of theirs vnto eternall torments This seemeth vniust cruell and intollerable to iudge of God and herewith so many and great men in so many ages haue been offended and who would not be offended saith Luther De ser arbit Answere to the first reason of the obiection when he had largely answered this very obiection Concerning inequalitie already before I haue answered that it appertaineth to iustice in those things that be distributed of duty that vnequall things be not distributed to them that be equall but not in those things which a man of his owne accord and of fauour distributeth without any iniurie of another As that householder reproued them that murmured Friend I doe thee no wrong take that thine is and goe thy way I will giue to this last as vnto thee May I not doe what I will with mine owne Is thine eye euill because I am good Let them therefore learne to restraine that wicked eye who murmur against God as vniust and an acceptor of persons Obiection But say they it is an vniust thing that in one and the same euill cause one man is deliuered and another punished because it is a iust thing that both be punished Answere Yea both are iust whether the creditor require his debte or forgiue his debter so it be without defrauding any man but it is vniust onely to require that which is not due August epist. 105. Therefore Let vs as Augustine godly aduiseth vs giue thankes to our Sauiour seeing that we see not that rendred vnto vs that we knowe in the damnation of thē that are like vs to haue bin also due vnto vs. Neither let vs be vnthankefull De bono perseuer cap. 8. that our mercifull God according to his good pleasure to the praise of his glorious grace hath freed so many from so deserued destruction that if hee should deliuer none from thence yet he should not be vniust Answer to the second reason Further as for the multitude of such as perish I answere that neither in respect of them is there any vnrighteousnes in God For on whom there is no mercie shewed Enchirid. ad Laur. cap. 99. them God iudgeth he dealeth not vniustly with them And as vndeserued grace is giuen to such as are freed so no other but due punishment is rendred to them that are damned that neither they can boast themselues to bee worthie nor these complaine that they are vnworthie Epist 105. For because the whole lumpe is worthily condemned iustice rendereth due dishonour and grace bestoweth due honour not through the prerogatiue of desert nor by necessitie of destinie nor by rash fortune but through the depth of the riches of the wisedome and knowledge of God De bono perseu cap. 8. epist 106. If therefore Gods goodnes bee vnderstood in forgiuing debt and his equitie in requiring it there is no way iniquitie found in God He commendeth mercie that is set free and he that is punished blameth not iudgement Do praedest grat cap. vlt. I will say somewhat more with Augustine If mankinde that at the first was created of nothing should be borne without the due originall of death and sinne yet the omnipotent creator would for euer condemne some of them to destruction who could say to the Almightie Creator why hast thou done thus For he that freely gaue them their being when they were not had power to appoint to what end they should be Neither could the rest say why should Gods will vary all mens merits being alike because the potter hath power of the clay But now seeing iust punishment is rendered to such as shall be damned and vndeserued grace is bestowed vpon such as bee saued what man forgetting mans condition may discusse the secrets of Gods minde Obiection But some man will say Why will he in the same matter punish me rather then him or free him rather than me Answere I answere that it is in Gods will and not in ours as it is not in their will that bee debters but in his to whom a debt is due that he either requireth Ad Simpl. lib. 1. q. 2. or forgiueth the debt Hereupon Augustine In Adam we all die and we are one lumpe of sin owing punishment to the diuine and high iustice which whether it bee exacted or pardoned there is no vnrighteousnesse And it is an arrogant part in debters to iudge of whom it is to be required and to whom it is to bee remitted It belongeth to God to require it of whom it pleaseth him and to forgiue it to whom it pleaseth him who doth not require that which is not due neither forgiueth that which is none of his The same writer elsewhere Epist 105. Why God doth thus to one man and otherwise to another his waies are vnsearchable and his iudgements past finding out the great depth whereof we ought rather to reuerence than curiously to search out that wee may escape a dangerous downfall Therefore repressing the impudencie of this question let vs say with the Apostle Rom. 11. O the depth of the wisedome and knowledge of God how vnsearchable are his iudgements How the mouthes of wicked men must be stopped about this doctrine and his waies past finding out Also O man who art thou that reasonest with God Doth the pot say to the potter why hast thou made me thus Hath not the potter power ouer the clay Neither let it grieue vs thus to stop the mouthes of exclaimers For if they be not ashamed to gainsay not vs but Paul why should it irke vs to tell them this againe and againe that the Apostle hath said De verbis Apost serm 20. Augustine notably following the Apostle saith Thou man expectest from me an answere and I am a man Therefore let vs both heare him that saith O man who art thou Better is faithfull ignorance than vndiscreet knowledge Seeke for deserts thou shalt finde nothing but punishment O height Peter denieth the theefe beleeueth Marke this notable saying O the depth Seekest