Selected quad for the lemma: master_n

Word A	Word B	Word C	Word D	Occurrence	Frequency Band	MI	MI Band	Prominent
master_n	king_n	lord_n	sir_n	7,148	5	6.1921	4	false

Text snippets containing the quad

ID	Title	Author	Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication)	STC	Words	Pages
A88153	The afflicted mans out-cry, against the injustice and oppression exercised upon; or, An epistle of John Lilburn, gent. prisoner in Newgate, August 19. 1653. to Mr. Feak, minister at Christ Church in London.	Lilburne, John, 1614?-1657.	1653 (1653)	Wing L2078; Thomason E711_7*; ESTC R212915	13,792	15

The Afflicted Mans Out-Cry against the Injustice and Oppression exercised upon OR An Epistle of JOHN LILBURN Gent. Prisoner in Newgate August 19. 1653. to Mr. Feak Minister at Christ Church in London Honoured Sir THough I cannot say I am acquainted with you yet I have heard so much worth of you and of your tendernesse and zeal for the honour of the Lord Jehovah my long and sensible injoyed lot and portion that I am imboldned to present you with a few lines by way of complaint of that sad and unjust dealing that I find from those that would be reputed Christian and righteous Judges that now would take away my life upon a most unjust Act of Parliament grounded upon the most notorious Lye in the world and in which I am no more concerned in Law or Truth then the child in the Mothers womb for it is an Act for the execution of a Judgment past in Parliament against one Lieu. Col. John Lilburn the 15 of January 1651. for high Crimes and Misdemeanors but there was never any such Judgment either the said 15 day of Jan. 1651 or any day before or since p●st against me in Parliament in the least And therefore in Law and Verity I cannot be any more concerned to be the man mentioned in that unrighteous Act then the child in the Mothers womb And that there never was any such Judgment past in Parliament against me I give these Reasons for it Fi●st there was never any Charge Indictment or Information in the least filed or preferred in Parliament against me that ever I was summoned unto in the least to answer neither did the Parliament call me by any due process of Law in the least so much as to hear any Charge Information or Indictment read against me nor never so much as called me to their Bar to demand of me what I could say for my self why they should not pass Judgment against me Neither was I ever in all my life out-lawed for not appearing So that I do again with confidence aver it before God and all his People that I am no more in Law Reason Truth or Verity concerned in that Act upon which I am indicted for my li●e then the child in the Mothers womb Neither hath any man of honour conscience or common honesty the least ground in Law to say that I am the man meant in that Act for executing of a Judgment past against one Lieu. Col John Lilburn Jan. 15. 1651. for high Crimes and Misdemeanors And yet upon the Tryal for my life although the said Judgment be the foundation of the Act and the Act the foundation of the Indictment yet am I denied by the Court at Old bayley the hearing or seeing of that Judgment which is and ought to be the foundation and ground of all and which saith all the Councel I can speak with or hear from is the highest injustice that can be acted against a man in England by those that in the least professe themselves to be Judges or Executors of the Law Yea and when I desire from the Court but liberty from the pure and undefiled Law of God the true fundamental laws of England and multitudes of the late Parliaments own Declarations to prove that I ought to see and hear the said judgment And when in the first place I begun with Gods righteous and just dealing with Adam and although God was absolute supream over him yet he would clear up the justice of his wayes even to Man and therefore gave Adam a plain law to walk by Gen 2. And when Adam had transgressed and broken it although God knew well enough he had so done yet he abhorred to deal unjustly with him and condemn him without summoning him to answer for himself and therefore he sits him by saying Adam where a●t thou as much as if he had said Come forth and stand up for thy self and answer to the Bill of Indictment against thee for breaking the pure and undefiled Law of Me thy Soveraign Lord and King and speak the utmost that thou canst why thou shouldst not be condemned for thy Rebellion against me thy endeared Lord and Master But Sir while I was thus speaking steps up Col. John Barkstead the present Lieutenant of the Tower of London who as he is a souldier no more fit to be a Judge in a legal Court for a mans life then a Surgeon or a Butcher is to be a Jury-man for a mans life and he cryes out to me and commands me to hold my vain babling for what have we saith he to do with the law of God O rare Judge indeed and a fit man under the colour of justice and magistracy to murder the innocentest man in the whole world for the best and chiefest of the law-books of England do aver and glory in it that the foundations of the true law of England is built upon the pure law of God And saith the notable and ancient law-book called The Doctor and Student chap. 2. pag. 4. The law of God or law of Reason is written in the heart of every man eaching him what is to be done and what is to be fleed and because it is written in the heart therefore saith he it may not b● put away no it is never changeable by no diversity of place no time And therefore against this Law Prescription Statute nor Customs may not prevail And if any be brought in against it they be no Prescriptions Statutes nor Customs but things void and against justice And he saith this law of God or Reason ingraven in the heart of man teacheth that good is to be loved and evil is to be fleed also that thou shalt do to another that thou wouldst another should do to thee and that we may do nothing against Truth and that a man must live peaceably with others that justice should be done to every man and also that wrong is not to be done to any man In which Opinion that great and excellent Oracle of the law of England the Lord Cook sully concurs and therefore stiles the true and fundamental law of England the perfection of Reason But above my du●l commendation is that learned rational laborious and excellent piece or law-book entituled Rights of the Kingdom Or Customs of our Ancestors printed in London by Richard Bishop 1649. and commonly called Mr Sadler the Town Clerk of London's Works who is now a Parliament man and member of the Council of State Whose rare expressions in that excellent useful and profitable book especially in the first part pag. 91. and the 2d part pag. 60 63 68 74 123 159 160 161 164 168 170 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 184 185 186 188. are worthy to be written and printed in letters of Gold some of which although Time at present is exceeding precious to me I shall think it very profitable and useful here to insert and the first shall be out of his second part pag. 63. where he saith

institutes chapt High Court of Parliament folio 39 which book by two special Orders of house of Commons in their purest purity is published to the special view of the Nation expresly saith That by order of Law a man cannot be attainted of high Treason unlesse the offence be in Law high Treason he ought not saith he to be attainted by general words of high treason by authority of Parliament as sometime hath been used but the high treason ought to be especially expressed seeing that the Court of Parliament is the highest and most honourablo Court of Justice and ought as hath been said to give example to inferiour Courts And the Lord Cook in the last recited chap. sheweth that Empson and Dudley two privy Counsellours to Henry the 7th were indicted as a couple of Traitors for acting without Juries contrary to the fundamental Law of the land although they had an Act of Parliament made in full and free Parliament by Kings Lords and Commons to bear them out in what they did And yet for all this and twenty times more that in law I am able to say for my self wherefore I ought not to be past upon adjudged or condemned without due processe of Law and having Crimes particularly and distiuctly laid unto my charge must I be over-ruled in all manner of law that I can all●dge for my self and be indeavoured to be hanged because I am so honest and just that my adversaries neither have can nor dare lay any crime in Law unto my charge But in the second place although the great sword men of England be the present Lords and Rulers of England and my grandest and principallest prosecutors at this time And although several of their Declarations against their quandam Lords and Masters the Parliament they appeal to all men whether it be just or tollerable that any priviledge of Parliament should contrary to the Law of Nature make a mans adversary judge in his own cause and concernment And therefore they declare they cannot any longer suffer the same but shall take some speedy and effectual course whereby to refrain them viz. several Parliament men from being their own ours and the Kingdomes Iudges in those things wherein they have made themselves parties And yet contrary to the expresse Law of England the Law of Nature and their own foresaid Declarations the great Sword men my present chiefest adversaries have constituted one of my grandest and maliciousest enemies that I have in the world viz. Mr. Attorney General Prideaux to be one of my principallest Iudges and that also in his own concernment And that he is so I thus make appear First he was in October 1649 at Guild-hall my chiefest most bloody and cruel Prosecutor without Law or Reason to take away my life and was so malicious and unjust in his prosecution of me as that he did avowedly again and again in open Court aver that there was a Statute made in Queen Maries days that did expresly take away and abolish those two Statues of Edward the sixth viz. Ed. 6.12 and 5 and 6 Ed. 6. chap. 11. that I insisted upon to save my life by at those that require two plain and evident witnesses to prove every fact of treason against any man that are charged therewith And if in that particular I had not understood the Law as well as himself he had taken away my life with a consident lie and f●lshood 2dly he produced two of his sevants Mr. Nutleigh and Edward Radney and Nutleigh who the other day at the Sessions took two of the strangest contradicting oaths that ever I heard from the mouth of a man in my life And he swore that he was with the Attorney General in his chamber when he see me give to his Master the Atturney General this specifical book intituled A Preparative to Hue and Cry after Sir Arthur Haslerig and he did own it saith he and called himself the Author of it save onely the errataes of the Printer The same said Edward Radney but being both demanded by me whether to the words there was not this addition saving the Printers errataes which are many and they both denied them although Col. Francis West the then Lievtenant of the Tower who sate all the while betwixt Mr Prideaux and my self swore these were the words viz. here is a book which is mine which I will own the errata's of the Printer excepted which are many And besides I did not see either of the foresaid servants of the Attorney General in the room although I often looked diligently about me and were it the last thing that ever I were to say I am not able to say there was so much as one person in the room at that time besides the Attorny Gen. Prideaux Col. West then Lievt of the Tower and my self Again about a term or two before I left England the said Attorny General Prideaux before the Lord chief Baron Wild and Baron Thorp at the open Exchequer Bar preferred and caused in open Court to be read against me one or more most false forsworn and perjured affidavits which in the substance of them did declare That I was in the head such a day as the Ringleader of a great Rabble of people and set them on to pull down about four score houses and set them on to do it in my own person in the Isle of Axom After the reading of which I told the Lord chief Baron Wild that I was amazed and confounded that a man that pretended to have any thing of common honesty durst be so impudent and audaciously wicked as contrary to his own particular knowledge and conscience with his own hands and tongue to present such abhominable false and perjured oaths into a Court as Mr. Prideaux that day had done against me when in his own conscience and knowledge in open Court I did then appeal to that Mr. Attorney very well knew that for so many days before the day mentioned in the said oaths that the houses were pulled down and upon that very day the act was done and for so many days after I was constantly day by day without intermission at the Parliament doors or at a Parliament Committe with Mr Prideaux himself a managing and negotia●ing that very affair of my honest Cliants of the Isl● of Axome and therefore then told the Judges That if Mr. Attorney General did deny this which I was confid●nt in his own kn●wledge he kn●w to be true I had witnesses enough at that Bar to prove every circumstance of it and therefore being I was constantly in London and Westminster both before the day the fact was committed and upon the very day it was acted and so many days a●ter it was done it was impossible for Mr. Prid●aux his oaths to have any shadow of truth in them unlesse he could prove that I had such a body that could be at Westminster and in the Isle of Axholm about 7 or 8 score miles from Westminster at one and