of William Ellis and of all others Deputies of the said Richard Lyons throughout the Realme Parl. Anno 1. R. 2. n. 32. 33. ITem William Fitz-Hugh Goldsmith of London preferred his bill in Parliament in form as followeth To our thrice excellent thrice noble Lord the K. and to his thrice Honourable and thrice sage Councell shewen the poore Commons of the mysterie and company of Goldsmiths in the City of London that Iohn Chichester Iohn Botesham and many other Gentlemen and ricâ— goldsmiths of that mystery in the same City by their compassing and subtill devising deceitfully have caused many of the said company to enseale severally divers obligations and those who refused so to doe were taken and imprisoned and in danger of death by many grievous threatnings of the said goldsmiths who had sealed severally divers obligations as their poore companions had done before to cause that the said poore Goldsmiths should not buy nor sell to any Merchant Cutteller Ieweller Vphoulster nor to any other forraigner nor Denizen any goods of their working except they sold the same at a treble value and that none of them should carry gilt nor any other thing of gold or silver to any Ladie or other person to make profit thereof and if they did that the paine comprised in the said Obligations should incurre upon them as before the major Sheriffe and Aldermen of the sâ—id Citie as by the confessions of the said rich Goldsmiths it was proved wherupon it was unreasonably debated so that it was put by good mediation and advice to the said Maior and many of the Aldermen of the City the said rich and poore Goldsmiths put themselves in Arbitrement of three good men for a finall accord of all the debates and quarrells betweene themselves which Arbitrators assented upon certaine points rehearsed to the parties aforesaid and ordained the same points to be affirmed and inrolled in the Parliament for ever and thereupon the said parties were released But notwithstanding this Agreement the said rich Goldsmiths would not assent nor suffer that the sâ—id points bee inrolled and holden as the said Arbitrators adjudged And furthermore by their procurement many mischiefs doe from day to day arise to the wrong of the said poore Commoners so farre as they are like to be undone which God defend and have purchased likewise a new Charter against the said agreement to the great decay and hurt of the said poore Commons may it please you thrice gracious Lords to ordaine and command that the said Accord bâ—e affirmed and holden finally for good and that the said Charter and other things tending to the prejudice and losse of the said poore Goldsmiths bee made voide for Gods sake and in the worke of Charity And thereupon the said Iohn Chichester and Iohn Botesham and many other Goldsmiâ—hs of London came iâ— Parliament and haviâ—g heard the said Bill it was forthwith demanded of the said William Fitz-Hugh if hee would maintaine the said Bill and finde pledge to doe and answer that which the Law demandeth who said that he would doe so but afâ—erwards he could not bring in his surety nor pleadge to answer the said Bill so was the said William Fitz Hugh commanded to the Tower by the award of the Lords in Parliament Ibidem Anno 41. ITem the said 24. day of Decemb during yet this present Parliament Alice â—ierce was caused to come in the same Parliament before the Prelates and Lords for to answer certaine matters which by Letters should bee surmised against her in the Kings name and thereupon by commandement of the Prelates and Lords of the said Parliament Master Richard Scroope Treasurer Steward of the house of our Lord the King rehearsed in Parliament in the presence of the said Alice an Ordinance made in Parliament holden at Westminster the monday next after the feast of Saint George the yeare of the reigne of the King Vnckle of our Lord the King that now is the 50. in these words For that complaint is made to the King that many women have persued in the Courts of the King divers businesses and quarrells by way of maintenance and to have a share which thing displeaseth the King to defend and that hâ—nceforth no woman shall doe so and more especially Alice Pierce upon paine of whatsoever the said Alice may forfeit and to be banished out of the Realme and after this rehearsall made the said Steward surmised to the said Alice that it seemed to the Lords of Parliament that she had incurred the paine comprised in the said Ordinance and had forfeited against the said Ordinances in certaine points and more especially in two viz. that she stayed Master Nicholas Dagworth Chancellour when he was ordayned by the Councell of the late King to goe into Ireland for certaine urgent businesses which should have beene profitable to our late King and his Realme the said Alice after the said Ordinance made as aforesaid perswaded the said King in his Court at Havering that at her singular persuit and procurement the said Nicholas was countermanded and his voyage stayed from all that Island to the great dammage of our said late King and his Realme Item That whereas Richard Lions for misprisions wâ—ereof he was convicted at the said Parliament holden the said 50. yeare of our late King Edward submitted himselfe in the Parliament into the favour of the said King that is to say his Body all his Lands and Tenements and he gave some of them to the Earle of Cambridge and some of them to Master Thomas Woodstock now Earle of Buckingham for terme of their lives the which our late K. after having pitie of the said Richard was willing by the assent of his Councell to shew him favour and to pardon him the Imprisonment of his body and to restore him to certaine of his Lands goods and chattells aforesaid which pardon seemed to our late King and his Councell tâ— be a grace sufficient notwithstanding the said Alice so perswaded the said late King in his Court at Sheene that by the singular persuit and procurement of the said Alice our late King Edward granted to the said Richard all his Lands goods Tenements and chattels aforesaid together with the said Tenements which hee had given to the said Earles for terme of their lives as before said amongst the same pardoned the said Richard 300. l. of certaine Arrerages due by the said Richard in the Exchequer and also granted him a thousand marks of his Treasure to bee â—eceived of the said Ladie which persuit and procurement are contrary to the Ordinance aforesaid And the said Steward demanded of the said Alice how she would excuse her selfe of those Articles which Alice did answer and say that she was not guilty of those Articles and that she is ready to shew and prove by the Testimony of the said Master Iohn Iprâ— then Steward of the said King Edward William Street then controller of his house Allen Buxall Knight and
he was called to the King where hee found the Lady Alice Pierce Nicholas Currein and many other Knights Esquires which came with him and there it was rehearsed by the said Nicholas how the King had shewed favour to Richard Lions of his Tenements which were holden by the Earle of Cambridge and Master Thomas of Wooâ—stock and had given him a 1000. marks of his Treasury And as to that which was don the said Dame Alice Pierce prayed the same Mr. Allen that hee would declare to the said Earles the Kings will his chargings upon the blessing of their father to cease to extend the Tenements of Maâ—ter Allen and that they doe it voluntarily if the King commanded them to doe so And forthwith at the instance of the said Alice the King commanded and it was also done And as to the Article of Master Nicholas Dagworth he saith that he knoweth nothing but that hee heard the said Lady Alice say many timâ—s that it is not reason nor Law that the said Mr. Nicholas who was enemy to Master William Windsor should bee sent into Ireland to make Inquisition of him or against him Item Will Street late controller of the Kings house sworne in like manner and diligently examined saith that he was one day at Havering when Williamâ—f Yorke spake to the K. of William Windsor in presence of the Lady Alice Pierce for to disturb the passage of Master Niâ—holas and the said Lady Alice said that it â—as not reason that one Enemy shoulâ— bee Iudge of another And moreover the said William Streâ—t saith in his consciâ—nce that the said Ladâ—Alice was principall and motrix of the said cause as he verily beleeves And as to the Article of Richard Lions he knowes nothing before it was all finished Item John Beverill sworne in like manner and diligently examined saith that he heard not at any time the said Lady Alice speake to the King concerning neither the one Article nor the other and that she kept her selfe well from him that she spake nothing in his presence but hee thinks in his conscience that she was the promotrix in the said businesse for hee knowes no other which could have followed that matter and notwithstanding they were caused to come before the said Duke and the said Earles Mr. Robert Beauchampe Master Allen Buxall Master Iohn Burle Mr. Philip de la Page Mr. Iohn Foxley and Thomas Barre Knight Nich Currein Iohn Beauchampe of Holt John Beverly George Felborough John Salisbury William Street Pierce Cornewall Thomas Lurden Lolvin Legat Esquires of the house of the said late King Edward which doe say upon their oathes that the said Alice was principall promotrix to the said King at his Court aâ—Havering about the Feast of All Saints in the 50. yeare of his Reigne concerning that Article touching the revocation of the said Nicholas Dagworth and for that she was committed Item as to the Article touching Richard Lions they know well that the said Alice was well willing councelling and aiding to the said busines prevailing with the said King at Sheeâ— in the moneth of May last past and for that she is found guilty in the same impeachment and the Lords of Parliament that were at Parliament when the said Ordinance was made remember that their intention was witnessed and bearing the force of a Statute and by the generall words whatsoever the said Alice may forfeit extend as well to the forfeiture of Lands and Tenements as goods and Chattells and all other possessions considering the dammages and villanies by her done to the King and to the Realme for that it was in effect to restraine and punish the said Lady Alice only wherefore it is awarded in this present Parliament that the said Ordinance have the force and effect according to the intent aforesaid that she be banished out of the Realm and her Lands and Chattels Tenements and possessions as well in demeane as in reversion be forfeited to the King and seised into his hand and it is the Intention of the King and of the Lords of the Ordinances assented to in the same Parliament that all the Lands whereof she hath taken the profit or bargained to her own profit be forfeited because of the fraud which may bee presumed in which shee is most abounding for which câ—use the same shâ—ll 〈◊〉 â—orâ—eited to the King and seised as the oâ—her Lands And it is the Intention of the King and of the Lords that this Oâ—dinance and award made by the King for such odious things in this especiall case which may extend to a thousand other persons shall in no other case but this bee taken in Example Likewise it is ordained and assented that notwithstanding the said forfeiture if she purchased any Lands or possessions by foâ—ce or dures Bee it by fine or by deed in pais or deed inrolled or otherwise that the purchase bee holden for nothing and that the parties which perceiv themselves aggrieved may have remedy by processe in Chancery and by advice of the GRANDIES of the Councell right shall bee done to the parties and restitution made according to the case demanded so that the purchases made bona fide be not made voide nor disanulled bâ— any manner of way Et istud rotulum sic factum scriptum tradidit liberaâ— it Edmundus Bradwell Clericus de Corona c hoc in Parliamento assig Clerico Parliamenti Ex. Rot Parliam Anno 7. R. 2. N 11. ITem It is to be understood that the 23. day of May there was present one Iohn Cavendish of London priâ—oner in this Parliament before the Commons of England in their Assembly in presence of some Prelates and Lords temporall there being and afterwards before all the Prelates and Lords being in this Parliament and prayed the Lords that for Goâ—s sâ—ke they would hasten for the peace and safety of his life that hee may have iufficient surety of the peace of those wheâ—eof hee complained and especially demanded surety of the Peace of Master Nicholas de la Poole Chancellor of England and this request to him was granted and thereupon by Commandements of the Lords aforesaid the said Master Nicholas there present found Sureties to be peaceable towards the said Iohn that is to say the Earle of Stafford and the Earle of Salisbury and the said Iohn rehearsed how at the last Parliament hee had made persuit by one Savill against Gibbon Mansfield Robert de Parry Iohn Hawkins and WILLIAM HORSMAN to have Restitution of certaine goods and marchandizes of great value left upon the Sea in default of the said Gibbon Robert John and William at the time when he had undertooke the safeguard of the Sea and of the marchandizes passing and comming from Sea for the time against all Enemies out of the power Royall which Bill was endorsed in the said Parliament he confessed and acknowledged in the Chancery for to discontinue and determine the matter by composition according to
informed of the manner of this Iudgement the execution thereof shall be respited untill our Lord the King shall be informed thereof where it is commanded to the aforesaid Constable safely to keepe the said Iohn untill he hath other commandement from our Lord the King And it is to be remembred that Geffery Martyn Clerke of the Crowne was named in this record and delivered the same there in writing in this present roll by his own proper hand Ex. Rot. Parliamen 42. E. 3. M. 2. N. 22 23. c. WIlliam Latimer of the County of Dorset preferred a Petition in this Parliament in manner as followeth To our Lord the King and his Couâ—cell sheweth William Latimer of the County of Dorset That whereas ouâ— Lord the King otherwhiles in the pestilence granted to the Bishop of Salisbury the Wardship of the Mannor of Dentish and Devillish in the said County being in his hands by the minority of Robert son and heire of Robert Latimer Knight together with the marriage of the said Robert the son being then of the Age of sixe yeeres for a certaine summe of money to him payed which Estate the said William Latimer hath held untill Master Iohn Lee then Steward by procurement of Thomas Delaber sent one Richard Inworth Serjeant at Armes in Dorset to the said William Latimer to bring him to London in safeguard as prisoner with the Intent aforesaid that is to say the Monday next before the Feast of the Nativity of Saint Iohn the Baptist in the yeare of our Lord the King that now is the nine and thirtieth and the said serjeant also performed the same and the said Master Iohn Lee did charge and command the said William in the Kings name that he should not goe out of Town upon paine of a hundred marks untill he had surrendered the body of the said heire contrary to the patent of the King to the said Mr. Iohn Lee and outed the said William of his Charter and moreover made a deed of release whereupon the said Master Iohn Lee commaâ—â—â—â— to hold all the Lands and Tenements aforesaid untill the Feast of St. Michael then next ensuing for a certain summe of money and then the said Master Iohn Lee leased to the said William the Wardship of the said mannor of Devillish rendring forty pounds per annum whereof he was seised as prochein amy of the Infant viz. Pulchrain Helto Whitechurch Oxford Staket let the same to the said William and to divers other persons at his will by such duresse imprisonment and arresting the said William to the great mischiefe grievous dammages and losses to the great wrong of his simple estate wherof hee prayeth remedy To the points of which Petition the said Iohn Lee answereth and saith that because that the Mannors Lands and Tâ—nements of Inheritance there comprised in the said Petition were wickedly extended by the Escheator and leased out of the Kings hand at too small a value to the great dammage and deceit of the King he caused the same Mannors Lands and Tenements to be resumed into the Kings hands the Wardship of which Mannors and the marriage of which said heire the King had committed to him And likewise the said Iohn Lee was put to answer before the Lords of the affaires in such time as hee was Steward of the Kings houshold for that he had attaiched divers Gentlemen by their Bodies some by Serjeants of Armes and some by other wayes as William Latimer and others and caused them to come before himselfe as before the Counsell of the King in places where pleased him out of any of the Kings accustomed places to answer to divers things whereof the recognizances ought to appertaine to the Courts of the King Item It was debated concerning his authority of Stewardship that he within the verge had attaiched divers Gentlemen of the verge as Iohn Goddard and others to answer in the Marshallsea of things done out of the verge and caused some men to be apprehended and sent to the Tower of London of his owne Authority without Commandement of the King or his Councell It was likewise debated that Hugh Lavenham had appealed certaine Gentlemen of Felony and that before the Kings Iustices at Newgate and divers Gentlemen arraigned at his suit whereof some put themselves upon the Country and some defended themselves by their bodies and stayed in prison as the Law demanded and that an Appeallee of murder was let goe at large by Commandement of the said John Lee against the Law and command of the Iustices and that hee tooke the said Hugh by his owne Authority and let him goe at large and some that were not appeallees in roll of the Crowne at the suggestion of the said Hugh were taken and imprisoned as if they had beene appeallees It was also affirmed that whereas the said Iohn Lee was sworne to the King and his Councell he did bargaine with Master Nicholas Lovaine concerning the Wardship of the Mannor of Reinham in Kent being then in the hand of the said Nicholas by the under age of the sonne and heire of Iohn Stanton as appeared by certaine evidences as well by letters Patents under the Kings Great Seale as others which the said Iohn had in his keeping that very plainely the said Mannor was holden of our Lord the King in chiefe as of his Castle of Dover and Fort that the Wardship thereof appertained to the King to the great dammage and deceit of the King against his Oath Of which points and articles hee cannot duely and sufficiâ—ntly excuse himselfe by the Law and therefore was the said Iohn commanded to the Tower of London and there to stay as a prisoner till he had made fine and ransome to the King according to his will And it was commanded to Master Allen Buxall Constable of the Tower that he take safe keeping of him and so departed the Prelates Dukes Earles and Barons and afterwards by the commandement of the King the said Iohn was caused to come guarded from the Tower to Westminster before the Great Councell and at other times examined upon the points of the Petition the â—ad Williâ—m Latimer answered and said Thaâ— our Lord the King had committed the wardship of the Mannors Lanâ—s and Tenements of the said heire untill the Age of the said heire together with the marriage of the said heire and as intirely hee would render it into the Kings hands And then before the said Councell it was agreed and assented by them That the said Mannors Lands and Tenements and the body of the heire aforesaid ought to be released in the Kings hand and delivered to the said William Latimer to hold as hee held of the said Bishop untill the full Age of the said heire doing to the King in manner as it was before the said Iohn surrendered the same and that the Letters Patents of the King made to the said Bishop of the same ward and marriage and the Letters of the said
losse without necessary cause and also of Patentâ— made in destruction of the Staple of Callis and alsâ— of divers Impositions put upon woolls against the Statute of Parliament in that behalfe lately made he is awarded by the Prelates and Lords in full Parliament to prison to be kept in Ward of the Maâ—shall and to make raâ—som at the Kings will whereupon the said Commons beseech the King for that he is found in such defaults by his singular Counsels he being in all Offices of the King and especially one of the Kings Privy Counsell throughout all that time it was requested that the King would bee pleased to grant that the said Lord might go under baile whereupon the King willed and granted that the said Lord Latimer should find in Parliament certain Prelates Lords and others during the Parliament to have his body before the King and the Lords to answer further to the Articles wherof he was â—o arrested under a certain paine and forme comprised in a Schedule annexed And under such surety the Marshall of England let him go at liberty Ibidem N. 31. ITem Willâ—am Ellis of great Jermouth is impeached and accused in this present Parliament in divers manners first viz. by the surmise of the Commons made to him that the said William whilest he was Farmer to our Lord the King of his pety Customes in the Port of great Jermouth and Deputy of Richard Lions Farmour of the Subsidies of 6 d. the pound granted by our Lord the King of all Marchandizes passing out of the Kingdome and entring in the same for the safeguard of the Sea and of the Marchants passing by Sea and of their Marchandize he did take by him and his servants as well English as of Strangers in the said Ports and members thereof by way of extortion by colour of his said Offices many great summes of money and otherwise that he ought not to have done in great prejudice slaunder of the King and dammage of the said Realme and to the oppression and wrong of the Marchants aforesaid And the said William Ellis present in Parliament saith that true it is that he is one of the Farmours of the said pety Customes of the Marchants passing and comming saving the purport of the Commissions thereof made without that that he tooke the same or caused any thing to be taken by extortion more than was clearely due to the King and that hee was ready to prove to the King by whatsoever way way hee ought to do and the Commons replying said that the said William confessed to them in the Common assembly in the Chapter house within the Abbey of Westminster the day before that he had received the said 33 l. prayed that against his owne ackowledgement so openly and before so many persons he might not at other times be received to say the contrary And therupon the said Commons brought in Parliament John Botild Willi Cooper of Leiwstoft and two others that affirmed they had payed to the said William Ellis by the said Marchanâ— of Scotland the said 3â— l. for full Informâ—tioâ— of the matter aforesaid which John and William Cooper being thereof examined in Paâ—liament acknowledged that tâ—ey were obliged to our Lord the King and to the said William Ellis by their obligations or letters obligatory in the said 33 pounds together with the said Scot which was their hoast and payed at a certaine day for the said Subsidy of 6 d. the pound due of all the marchandizes in the said ship and the truth was that the said Scot discharged nothing of all the matters aforesaid at the day of payment but that they payed to the said William Ellis the 33 l. and therupon the said Commons prayed Iudgment upon the same said William Ellis who said that although that he had received the said 33 pounds of John Botild and of the other aforesaid be received it not but as supposing the same a gift and that without câ—ndition and that as often as concerning the â—ame hee should have a Writ or other Commandement of our Lord the King he would make deliverance thereof which otherwise he would not do voluntarily Item afterwards the said John Botild and William Cooper did put in the Bils in form which followeth To our Thrice doughty Lord the King and to his Sage Councell Sheweth John Botild of Lewistoft that the munday next after the Ascension of our Lord in the yeare of the raigne of our Lord the King that now is the nine and fortieth that there was chased by tempest in Kirke la Rode one Cockboat of Gotham in Pruse whereof the Masters name was Henry Luce charged with divers Marchandizes of the Marchants of Pruse that is â—o say Freeze and other marchandizes And the same day William Savage Clerke and servant to Wil. Ellis by commandement of the said William Ellis tooke of the said Cockboat for the marchandizes neither discharged the same from paying custome then 17 nobles and a last of leather the price of the last 10 pounds 16 s. at Lewistoft before the boat went out of Kirke la Rode to the great danger of the said Marchants And because that the said William Ellis knew that Wil. Cooper would come to this Parliament and shew this grievance others in aid of the Marchants and also set forth how the great Charter Huc Ang. might be amended in aid of the whole Realm the said Wil. by his false suggestion caused the said Wil. Cooper to be arrested and cast in prison for the space of 3 weeks May it please our thrice doubty L. the King his sage Councell to make remedy thereof in worke of charity Which Billes passed in absence of the said Wil. Ellis he saith that as to the said 17 nobles and skins called leather he could not sweare for him nor for any of the said Marchants of Pruse nor other whatsoever and the said John Botild and Wil. Cooper affirming the contrary at last it was said by the Lords in Parliament that those Billes touching the entry of the leather were now in the Kings Bench for Triall And as to the said Imprisonment the said William Ellis saith for that he was warned in coÌ„ming to London by many sufficient persons that the said John Wil. Cooper with 36 other persons of Lewist did lie in wait for the person of the said Wil. Ellis at Wickham market in Suffolke and going there in the high way of Gerneith from London at such time as the said W. was going towards London carrying with him a great summ of the K. money of the Customes Subsidies aforesaid and for that the said W. Ellis is awarded to prison to make fine ransom to our said L. the K. it is awarded to either of the said Iohn and William Cooper twentie pounds for their dammages and dispences during their said Imprisonment had and suffered Also it is awarded that the said Commissions be made to sufficient Gentlemen to enquire
and â—riors who gave their letters usually to Parsons Prebendaries Canonists and such like In that Parliament of Carlile under Edward the first the Bishop of Exeter sent to the Parliament Henry de Pynkney parson of Houghton as his Proxie The Bishop of Bath and Wells sent William of Charleton a Canon of his Church and in like for t other of the spiritualty of that time In the beginning of the 17th yeare of Richard the second the Bishop of Norwich made Richard Corqueanx being then Deane of the Arches Thomas Hederset Archdeacon of Sudbury and Iohn Thorpe parson of Epingham his Proxies by the name of Procuratores sive nuntij And in the same time the Bishop of Durhams proxies were Iohn of Burton Canon of Bewdley and Master of the Rolls and Iohn of Wendlingborough Canon of London and other like are of the same time By which also that of the Preamble of the Statute of Praemunire is understood where it is said that the advice of the Lords spirituall being present and of the procuratores of them that were absent was demanded The like under Henry the fourth and Henry the fift are found in the Rolls And under Henry the fift the Arch-Bishop of Yorke gives the proxie to the Bishop of Durham and to two other Clerkes of his Province And it is observable that in the making of proxies by the whole number of Bishops in case of Attainders upon Appeale their course was sometime to make a Gentleman beneath the degree of a Baron their Proxie as under Richard the second first they made their proxie for assenting in the Parliament but afterwards the Earle of Wiltshire had that place in the same Parliament But this of making others then Barons of Parliament proxies is carefully found in the cases of the Lords spirituall One speciall case of it is under Henry the fift in that of Thomas de la Ware who being a Clergie man had his Barony descended unto him and is stiled in the summons alwayes Magister Thomas de la Ware and not Dominus hee gave his Letters to John Franke and Richard Hulme Clerkes but the proxie Rolls for the Temporall Lords are for the most part lost The following Times especially ever since the first memorie extant of the Iournalls of the upper House which began the first of Henry the eight have kept a constant course of making parliamentory Barons onely proxies And it appeareth in those Iournalls that one two or three are joyned conjunctim divisim and most commonly Temporall Lords have given their proxies to temporall and spirituall men yet not without a Temporall Lords giving his letters of proxie to a Spirituall and Temporall Lord together And under Queen Mary Francis Earle of Shrewsbury made Anthony Viscount Mountague and Thomas Bishop of Ely his proxies And in the beginning of Queene Mary Stephen Gardiner Bishop of Winchester was joyned in letters of proxie sometimes with a Temporall Lord But the Lords spirituall have so much mistataken of late the Lawes of this Kingdome the Kings prerogative given by the Law and what and whence was the Originall of the Honours they themselves had obtained and have beene ready to inlarge the Dominions of Antichrist and to induce an arbitrary government by their writings and other apparent practises in so much as now they have lost both Priviledge and Vote in Parliament CHAP. II. Priviledges in Suites as well for their followes as for themselves during the Parliament IN a Bill exhibited under Henry the fourth is shewed that the Lords Knights c. and their men and servants c. should not be arrested or otherwise imprisoned by the custome of the Realme and it is prayed that if any be the parties offending may make fine and ransome and give dammages c. Hereunto the Answer is there is sufficient remedy in the case In the beginning of Queene Elizabeths reign Iohn Broxham being Plaintiffe in an Assise in the County of Lincolne against the Lord Willoughby it was ordained that an Injunction should goe out of the Chancery Subpaena 500. l. That the Plaintiffe should not proceed to Tryall To this head may bee referred that case of the Lord Cromwell cited in the Title of processe against them in English Courts in the Iournalls of Queen Elizabeth King James and our present Soveraigne the Testimonies of these priviledges for the servants of every Baron of Parliament are most frequent Hereunto may be added that of the first citation out of an Ecclesiasticall Court against the Earle of Cornewall which was served upon him in Westminster Hall as he was going to the Parliament at the Suite of Bago dâ— Clare and the Prior of Saint Trinity in London for the Earle sued them for the contempt and recovered 1000. Markes dammages And in the same Parliament the Master of the Temple petitioneth that he might distraine for rent in a house in London which it seemes the Bishop of Saint Davids held of him In qua non potest distringere in tempore Parliamenti But answer is non videtur honestum quod Rex concedat quod ille de consilio suo distringatur per Ostia fenestras prout Moris est CHAP. III. No Peere of the upper House to be called to answer in the lower House only THomas Philips complained of the Bishop of London upon divers Articles in the lower House and at first by Order of the House whence it was referred by reason of the slight nature of the offence c. whereupon the Bishop remembring the upper House of their Priviledges Ejus verbis auditis prâ—ceres omnes unâ voce dicebant quòd non consentantum fuit aliquem procerum praedictorum alicui in eo loco responsurum So where the Bishop of Bristoll had written the Booke of Vnion which was conceived to be derogatory to the honour of both Houses yet hee was complained of onely in the upper House and that so he might bee and not before the lower House alone it was acknowledged in the message delivered from the lower House touching him The like is the priviledge of the Bishops complained of in this present Parliament 1641. CHAP. IV. The Iurisdiction of the Lords of Parliament in matters of offences aswell capitall as not capitall and in errors out of the Kings bench THe power of Iudicature belonging to the Lords of Parliament is chiefly seene in their Iurisdiction upon Writs of error and their Iudgements of Offences as well capitall as not capitall which they give to any publicke mischiefe in State Of these Iudgements of such Offences many examples are of former times in the Records of Parliament and out of them are here selected some such as most of all conduce to the opening of the course of Accusation the forme of the Defendants answering the usuall wayes of Triall and other Incidents in their various kindes of Iudgements which are found arbitrary in cases not capitall so that they extend not to the life
Ports of England Ibidem N. 21. ITem William Lord Latimer was impeached and accused by the vote of the said Earles of deceits extorsions gâ—ievances and other mischiefs by him and others of his faction and Covin during the time he stayed as well under our Lord the King in Brittaine when he was in Office with the King as otherwise in England the time that he was Chamberlaine and of the privie Councell oâ— the same our Lord the King First of all concerning that when the said L. Lat. had bin long Captain of Becherell and Officer of the late King Edward in Brittaine if before or during the peace or truce it was committed And thereupon it was proclaimed and published under the King through Brittaine that no English man nor other Forreigner shall take Wines Victualls nor other things of any persons Towns Castles nor of others except they pay presently for them nor shall they take or ransome any Person Town Fortresse or other place upon paine of what they may forfeit notwithstanding all which the said Lord Latimer and his Lievtenants and Officers caused to be taken by wrong and violence of diverse Gentlemen of the Countrey much wines and victuals to a great value without paying any thing and likewise ransomed many by oaths and in taking and receiving ransoms unto the summe of 4 millions and 3 thousand pounds whereof our Lord the King enjoyed nothing to the great dammage and villany of the King and oppression of his people and the said parts and against the Proclamation and defence aforesaid as in a letter made and sealed with the seales of many Lords of Brittaine calâ—ed Ragman and sent into England to our Lord the King aforesaid more at large appeared but the said Ragman could not be found in any sort nor any man knew how to say in truth what become of it and yet he at another time was accused thereof that he had taken at Becherell and Plimoyson from thence unduly 153 l. w. of gold whereof the King had never any part nor any restitution made thereof and the parties from whom those summes were taken preferred a Bill in Parliament in forme as followeth It is to is to bee remembered that the proofes of parties that were ransomed at Becherell and Plymoison during the time of Truce have paid so much to Master John port-Constable of Bechâ—rell for the Lord Latimer and to William his sonne and to Hugh Middleton Receiver of the said Town or to the Lord Latimer departed out of Brittaine The yearly summe 40 Franks And likewise the said Constables William and Hugh have received of the ransomes of such as were wont to bee ransomed during the Warre more moneys than would have well payd all the Souldiers of the said Town The summe 50 Franks And likewise the said Countrey of Brittaine have paied to the said Constables William and Hugh for the death of divers Gentlemen liege men of our Lord the King that were killed upon the land of Brittâ—ine The summe 30 Franks And likewise the said Constable and William his son gathered upon the Countrey of Brittaine to send Monsieur Gakes from Plimouth dates to England The summe 12 Franks And likewise the said William for that he lost 20 Marks in the Isle of Garnesey in a Ship put a fane and ransome upon the said Becherell The summe 1000 Franks And likewise Robert Ravenstons boy had stollen stollen a hâ—lf salt-seller of silver and therefore the Land of Brittaine was ransomed The summe 2 Franks And likewise the said Constables William and Hugh Receivers of the said Town had received divers times for victuals sold as salt wine beefe and other commodities to the summe of 1000 Franks to the great losse of your poore liege-men and to the Town of Becherell For by these extortions which they had borne and sustained by the horrible necessity of the poore people and likewise of the Gentlemen was the said Town lost Wherefore they beseech our Lord the King and his Councell to cause the said Constables William and Hugh to come and answer the aforesaid receits so that our Lord the King may be served of that which belongeth to him and that your poore liege-men that were in the defence of the said Town may be paid their wages for the time that they were in the said Town if so it be your pleasure And likewise the said Lord Latimer was impeached by the Commons of divers loanes made to the use of the King without cause necessary to the great losse and and grievous dammage of the King and more especially of a loane that was made of late to the use of the King by the counsell of the Lord Latimer Richard Lions and others of his covin of 20 thousand markes where our Lord the King was obliged to his Creditors in the said Case to pay again 30 thousand marks and that was done by covin of the said Lord Latimer and others that were privy with the said Creditors to have part of the said Gaine and to be parties to the said deed or without answering the said loanes for it was furnished in speciall that the said money was the Kings own taken out of his Chamber or Treasury and also the proper money of the said Lord Latimer and Richard Lions who appeared as if oppressed by the said loane and also for that by like Covin between him and the said Rich. Lions for their singular profit gaine he had procured and counselled our L. the King to grant many Licences by Patents and Writs to cause a great quantity of Wools skins and Leather and other things to be carried to parts beyond the Sea other then to Callis against the Ordinances and defences made before time in that behalfe to the destruction of the staple of Callis and of the moneyage there to the great dammage of the King and of the Realme of England and hurt of the Town of Callis and likewise that by such covin done betweene him and the said Richard Lions for their singular profit he had causâ—d to be put upon the wools skins leather and other marchandises of the Staple divers new Impositions That is to say of every sack of wooll passing other where than to Callis by such Licence 11 s. more against the Statutes and Ordinances thereof made and also for that by his singular profit and ill government betweene our Lord the King and his Realme they have had and suffered many other grievances losses dammages and villanies without number as the losse of the Towne of S. Saviour in Normandy of the said place of Becherell and of other Fortresses which might have been well saved and kept if the King had been well counselled And also concerning certaine Spies and other felons taken and imprisoned by the King and after delivered by the Lord Latimer of his own proper authority without the knowledge or pleasure of the King taking upon him and incroaching notoriously in doing these things upon the Royall power
Nicholas Carrein Keeper of the privie Seale of the said King and others that did then belong to the said King and afterwards from him to the time supposed that she committed forfeiture and that they can discover the truth And thereupon day is given unto the said Alice untill Wednesday next by the Prâ—lates and Lords of the Parliament and it was ordained and assented that those Articles shall be tried by witnesses and by enquest of those that were of the houshold of the late King Edward whereby the truth may better be knowne and thereupon were certaine persons examined before the Earle of March the Earle of Arundell the Duke of Lancaster the Earle of Cambridge and the Earle of Warwick that is to say first Master Roger Beauchampe late Chamberlaine of the said King Edward sworne upon the holy Evangelists and diligently examined touching the Countermand of Master Nicholas Dagworth and upon the other Article concerning the said Kings pardon and favour to Richard Lions saith upon his Oath that in presence of the Ladie Alice Pierce a Bill was delivered to him which Bill he tooke and after hee had understood that the same contained the calling back of Master Nicholas Dagworth from Ireland for that he was an enâ—my to Master William Winsor to that which the Bill supposed he answered that hee durst not preferr it to the King for that the Counsell had ordained the contrary and the said Alice requested him and said that he might safely deliver it to the King and presently the King demanded of what matter they discoursed and the said Master Roger answered of a Bill that doth containe such businesse forthwith when the King had understood the Bill hee answered that the Petition was reasonable and when Master Roger replyed the Councell had ordained to the contrary the King answered that he himselfe was agreeing and that yet it seemed the Bill was reasonable and commanded him that the said Master Nicholas be caused â—o be called back which was likewise done but what day or moneth it was he remembreth not and as to the matter of Richard Lions the said Mr. Roger saith that he was Chamberlaine but an houre and so knoweth nothing more then he hath said Item Master Lanc. diligently examined before the Committees saith that he came one day to Havering and found the Ladie Alice Pierce there and forthwith Master Roger Beauchampe shewed him Billa and after the King understood the matter hee said thus that it seemed not reason that one enâ—mie should bee judge of another and the said Duke answered that hee was come betweene them but it was so that the said Maâ—ter Nicholas was sent for the profit of the Land and of all the Realme and therefore it was ordained before the King that the said Master Nicholas and Master William doe come before the Councell and if the said Master William could prove any cause for the Enmity betweene them that then the said Master Nicholas shall not goe if he well can prove such enmity otherwise the Ordinance of the Councell made in that behalf shall stand in force to which thing the King did well assent for that time but forthwith the King was assailed in his chamber by the said Ladie Alice and there came in the said Duke and prayed the King that he would not suffer in any sort that the said Mr. Nicholas bee called back who answered that it should bee no otherwise then it was afore ordained before the King and when hee came in that behalfe to crave a testimoniall favour hee could not obtaine it and the next morning when the said Duke did his obeysance to the King in his bed The King himselfe commanded upon his blessing that he suffer not in any manner that the said Master Nicholas goe into Ireland The Ordinance thereof made the day before to the contrary notwithstanding and likewise the said Master Nicholas was countermanded and as to the Article of Richard Lions hee saith in his conscience that the said Alice was principall promotrix of the said businesse but he was not present when it was done Item Master Philip de Bath sworne and diligently examined saith as to the Article of Master Nicholas Dagworth that he heard not the said Dame Alice speak to the King of the same matter but hee heard in the Kings house the said Ladie Alice make a great murmur and say that it was no reason nor Law that the said Master Nicholas who was an enemie to the aforesaid Master William should goe into Ireland to enquire and doe Iustice against him and more hee knowâ—s not how to say in this matter But as to the Article of the said Richard hee saith that he was one day at Sheene when the said Richard was brought before the King and that he was called into the Kings chamber to heare those things that were to be done and when he understood a little of the matter he would not stay in the chamber and further he saith that there were then in the Kings Chamber the said Lady Alice Nicholas Currein Master Allen Buxall Walter Walsham and many others saith that she was in the Court and that the said Lady Alice was an aider and friend in the businesse Item Nicholas Currein sworn as aforesaid and diligently examined saith that he was commanded by the King to come to Sheer there he found Rich Lions which Richard and Nicholas were commanded to come before the King to his bed and there they fouâ—d the Lady Alice Pierce sitting at the side of the bed and there it was shewen that the King would pardon the said 300. l. to which he was yet bound to the King as of the arrerages of his accompt in the Exchequer and also the King would give to the said Richard 1000. markes of his Treasure and further would make full restitution of the Tenements which had bin given to his sons of Cambridge and Woodstock as before said And thereupon the King commanded the said Nicholas to say from him his pleasure to his said sâ—nnes but he saith that hee remembreth not iâ— that matter were showne at that time before tâ—e King by relation of any other person or by the Bill of the said Richard there read or otherwise by the said Richard himselfe the said Nicholas remembers himselfe very well that he requested to come before the King who caused to come from behind â—hâ— curtaines Master Allen Buxall and others Knights and Bishops which then were there to testifie that which the King had said to the said Nicholas in the said commandements and so it was done and all the commandements of the King were râ—hearsed in presence of all those men And as to the matter of Master Nicholas Dagworth he saith that he knowes nothing but that Master Roger Beauchampe sent him to countermand the said Master Nicholas Item Master Allen Buxall sworne in like manner and diligently examined saith that one day at Sheen after the last Parliament
Clerk upon his Oath made in the case had fully excused his Master the said Chancellor that hee was not knowing of the said Obligation nor of the Covenant aforesaid otherwise then before set forth And for that also his said Officers Gibbon Robert and William were personally in this Parliament and examined upon their Alleageances to say the Truth of their part in this case answered expressely that they never gave any thing nor promised to give reward to the said Chancellor in private nor openly by themselves or any other person in the World the Lords aforesaid â—old the person of the said Chancellor for excused of whatsoever was comprised in the Accusation aforesaid And thereupon the said Chancellor prayed againe to the LORDS there for that as well the said Fishmonger had disavowed his Accusation in part and for that he might every way be excused thereof for any thing that could appeare to the Iudgement of every discreet person which heareth the said Accusation that for those words which the said Fishmonger had put in his Bill he the said Fishmonger might be arrested untill he had found sufficient sureties to tender him that which should be adjudged upon this matter and especially upon the false slander aforesaid which he had drawn upon him And therupon it was commanded by the Lords That as well the said Fishmonger as the said Clerke should be committed and so they were committed to priso◠〈◊〉 â—fterwards they were let go at large That is to say the said Fishmonger by the maine-prise of Thomas Spicer aâ—d Steven Skinner who wâ—re obliged body for boâ—y to have the said Fishmonger from day to day before the Lords aforesaid or before whatsoevâ—r Judges should be assigned And afterwards fâ—r that the Parliament was drawing to an end and the Lords were also greatly busied there amongst oâ—her great businesses of the Realm The said Suit by the Paâ—liament with all things therof was referred to the Iudges of the Kings Bench to be heard and determined as well for our Lord the King as for the parties In Schedula Record fact apud Westminsterium per Justiciarios c. ET postea die Martis proximo post octab Trin. viz. 14 die Junii Anno regni Domini Regis R. 2. post Conquestum 7 Robertus Tresilian capitalis Justiciarius in Banco ipsius Regis Robertus Belknap capitalis Justiciarius in Communi Banco Roger Fulthropp unus Justiciarius in Communi Banco vigore Commissionis Parliamenti dicti Domini Regis apud Novum Sarum ultimo tento fact authoritate ejusdem Commissionis unde in rotulo Parliamenti predicti mentio facta est specialis contra quendam Iohannem Cavendish de London Fishmonger qui Parliamento praedicto primo viz. Coram communitate regni Ang. Congregat. postmodum alia vite coram magnatibus ejusdem regni in eodem Parliamento de Michali de Poole Milite Cancellario dicti regni Iohanne Ottre Clerico ipsius Cancellarii de diversis misprisionibus sibi per eosdem factis ut asseruit graviter querelavit ipsum Cancellarium per hoc multipliciter accusavit aefamavit processi in hunc modum Imprimis viz. ipsum Iohann Cavendish Coram iisdem Iusticiariis apud Westminst. dicto 14 die Iunii assedentibus sibi tunc ibid. Hugone Seagrave Milite Thesaurario Angl. Magistro Walter de Shirlawe Custode privati Sigilli Iohanne Walâ—ham Custode Rotulorum Cancellariis nec non Waltero Clopton Willielmo Richell Iohanne de Lockon serviend ipsius Regis venire fecerunt qui ibidem comparens de accusatione sua praedict. fact in Rotulo Parliamenti praedicti plenius irrotuletur cujus matâ—ria una cum responsionibus per Dominum Canâ—ellarium in eodem Parliamento adhuc in excusationem suam datis prout continetur in Rotulo praedic pro majore parte recitat coram ipso Iohanne de Cavendish tuâ—c ibidem allocatum fuit per Iusticiarios praedic super hoc quaesitum fuit ab eodem si quid haberet pro se vel ulterius dicere sciret quare ipse poenam in Statuto contra hujusmodi defamatores edito subire non debeat maxime cum Idem Cancellarius se in Parliamento illo excusavit omni alio modo possibili se inde excusare est paratus qui quidem Ioh. ad hoc respondebat dixit quod ipse nunquam personam dicti Cancellarii in Parliam illo defamavit nec aliquid sinistrum sive inhonestum de persona ipsius Cancellarii clam vel palam in Parliamento ille dixit vel alias affirmavit quovis modo sed dicit quod quicquid per eum in hac parte fuerit hoc solum de praefato Ioh. Ottre Clerico ipsius Cancellarii in ista materia factum sententia verborum suorum ac modo forma eorundem nec non responsionibus ipsius Cancellarii aliorum ex parte sua hinc inde factis dictis ibidem debite ponderatis ulterius habenâ—a respondit ad hoc quod ubi praefatus Ioh. Cavendish dixit quod Justiciam coram dicto â—omino Cancellario praedict. prout alius praedict. Cancellarius allegavit in eodem Parlia. clare constare debeat cui cunque discreto intelligenti quod idem Ioh. Cavendish per accusationem suam praedictam ipsum cancellar. in eodem Parliam false defamavit Per quod consideratum est quod praefatus Ioh. Cavendish super defamatione illa convincatur idem cancellar. recuperet versus eum daÌ„na sua et quod Ioh. Cavendish praedict. committitur prisonae Domini Regis ibid. moratur quo usque tam preafato Cancellario de damnis suis praedictis quam dicto Domino Regi pro fine competenti sibi inde debito plenarie satisfecerit Rotulo Parliamenti Anno 10. R. 2. M. 4. 5. IN this Parliament all the Commons with one accord and in one assembly came before the King Prelates and Lords in the Parliament Chamber complayning grievously of Michael de la Poole Earle of Suffolk late Chancellor of England being then present and accused him by demonstrance of word of mouth in manner following that is to say First that the said Earle being Chancellor and sworn to do the profit of the King purchased of our Lord the King Lands Tenements and Rents to a great vaâ—ue as appeares by the Records and Rols of the Chancery against his Oath in thaâ— behalfe not considering the great necessity of the King the realm And moreover because the said Earle was Chancellor in time of the said purchase made the said lands and tenements were extended at a lesser value than they were worth per annum by a great summe to the deceiving of our Lord the King ITem the said Lords were assigned at the last Parliament to view and examine the Estate of the King and Realme and to declare their advice how the same may bee well amended and
make a patent against reason or law That such patent shal be repealed and such Iudgement reversed Without inflicting other punishment upon such Officer oâ— Iudge And the Commons replying to the Answer of the said Earle concerning the first Article did shew to the Lords the copy of his Oath made when he was created Chancellor in manner as followeth YOu shall sweare that well and loyally you will serve our Lord the King and his people in the Office of Chancellor and shall do right to all sorts poore and rich according to the Laws and Usages of the Realm and lawfully shall Counsell the King and his Counsell shall keep And you shall not be privy nor suffer any dammage nor disherison to the K. nor that the rights of the Crown be taken away if you can any way hinder it and if you cannot hinder it you shall make the same cleerly and expresly known to the K. Together with your loyall Advice and Counsell and you shall cause and purchase the profit of the King by all that lieth in you to do reasonably so helpe you God and his holy Gospell ANd praying that the same might be read well understood and the circumstances of the said Answer considered viz. That he had not denied that he received of the Kings gift after that he was made Earle being in the Office of the said Chancellor divers Lands and Tenements which are certaiâ— and sure of the value of 400 marks a yeare which he hath had upon the Custom of Kingston upon Hull which are casuall may deceive the King to his dammage in that behalfe And how he said that he had received part of the â—â—id Lands and Tenements so taken â—n â—xchange before he was Chaâ—cellor The Commons say that he was then of the privy Councell and afterwards sworne in the creation of the Office of Chancellor by the aforesaid Oath and he in that Office agreeing to the exchanges takes and receives the remnant of the said Lands and Tenements in full performance of the exchanges as by his Answer in Parliament aforesaid ANd in Answer to the second Article the Commons replying say That insomuch as he acknowledgeth in his proper protestations That he represented the Estate of the King while he was Officer and so extends his power upon all others wherfore although default was in others he cannot therefore be excused and especially of that which the King had commanded him to speake in Parliament as he had said he was the more bound to put the said matter in execution and to confesse what he denied not the dammages are no lesse than they have surmised They pray the Iudgement of Parliament ANd as to the Answer of the fourth Article the Commons replying say That it shall be found of record in the Exchequer the aforesaid Tydman to be debtor to the King in great summs as they suppose and for that cause the said rent appertaines to the King notwithstandiâ—g he had otherwise forfeited and so the King was deceived and they pray that the records may be examined And further say That one Neele Hackney was killed by his wife and his servant and the said Tydman for which felony the said woman and servant were arraigned found guilty and suffered the Iudgement and execution of the Sentence of the Law and the said Tydman as followeth ANd to the Answer of the fift Article the Commons prayed again proposing the example of one William Thorpe late Chief Iustice of the Kings Bench surmising that he tooke 20 l. of one party who had an Office in plea before him and for that he sold the Law for which cause he was judged to death forfeiture of his Lands and Chattels and say insomuch as the said Earle was so Chancellor and tooke 100 l. c. of the said provision there commanded to be delivered out of the Kings hands of his profits which hee ought to have done according to the command of the K. freely without taking any thing it seemeth to them that hee hath sold the Lawe and prayen Iudgement ANd to the Answer of the sixt Article the Commons replying said That it appertained to him as wise as he is to be well advised and counselled that he assent not nor do such a thing which may tend to the disherison of the King and oppression of his people as he would avoyd the Indurance of the Iudgement of Parliament ANd thereupon the said Earle replying to the Replication of the Commons touching his oath said That to take the words of the said oath without other speciall Intendment no Chancellor heraftet will inseale any thing of the Kings grant to any persons of Lands and Tenements or other Goods without offence of his Oath But the said Earle saith That it is not comprised in the said Oath nor forbidden him to take to himselfe of the Kings gift nor to any other person And for that the Kings gifts to other persons in the said voyage nor of divers other things before be not impeached not holden against the Oath of the Chancellor it seemeth to him that no more he ought to be impeached for the gifts given to his personall estate seeing that in the said Oath it is not forbidden nor restrained to him more than to others more especially for that the said Estate and the Gifts given are confirmed by Parliament and further saith that he accepted of his Oath of Chancellor according to his conscience and power and for the causes before expressed he saith as he shall answer before God that he thinks nothing done in the matters aforesaid against his Oath or understanding of his conscience but that the Chancellour may inseale the Kings guifts to the Loâ—ds for to maintaine their Estate or for other reasonable cause by the Kings warrant and that hee hath done nothing against his Oath c. And saith that that which is comprised in the Oath that hee suffer no dammage not disherison of the King c. That is to bee understood of that which is intended of matters wherof the King hath not cognisance and that appeareth by the clause comprised in the Oath that hee shall make known to the King cleerely and expressâ—ly And after that the King is informed in such manner the Chancellor may doe the Kings Commandement without offence of his Oath and sâ—ith that concerning his Estate and what the King gave him it was expressely done by the Commandement knowledge and will of the King and so not against his Oath and that it may not bee intended that hee should bee impeached concerning this matter ITem as to that that the Commons say that the said Earle hath deceived the King because he hath taken of the King the manner of Faxfleet in value 50. pounds which Mannoâ— was worth 200. l. per annum c. The said Earle answereth that Master William Morris hath reported to him that hee hath taken of the King the two parts of the said Mannor with the rent
in North Dalton to serve for 7. yeares for fifty pound a yeare and that hee hath lost by the said Farme in the said time a 100. marks and further saith that the said Mannor with the ten markes of rent in Dalton altogether are extended as appeares in the Chancery but at 41. l. 9. s. 3. d ob And for that that the said Earle understands by the Earle of Kent who hath had the said two parts of the said Mannor together with the said ten marks at the value of 50. marks that the intire Mannor could not bee above the value of 50. pounds And further saith that the said Mannor with the ten markes are not worth more And that under a certainâ— paine saith that whatsoever person will sustaine the charges of the said Mannor sufficiently and pay him for the two parts 50. markes for aid and as to the third part bee it what it will let him give security to pay for the said Mannor with the ten markes of rent 50. l. per annum that hee will so lease it with all his heart ITem as to that impeachment of the Commons of a 100. pound pension out of the provision of Saint Antâ—oâ—y and that the said Earle should sell the Lawes and put in an Example of Master William Thorpe c the said Earle answereth That the cases are nothing alike which the parties pleaded before the said Master William Thorpe as before their Iudge for the Lawes of England In which case no Iudges ought to take reward of any parties pleading before them But the sâ—id provision came to him with the help of Saint Pierce the Pope and not as a Chancellor or Iudge in this case but as Father and friend to John his son At which time a man knew not if the said Iohn had obtained it of the Popes favour or no Also faults were found by the Counsell of the said Earle in the Bulls of the said provision And from the same causâ— the said Provisour by his friends of his owne accord profered an annuall Pension of a 100. and 60. pound for to leave suit in the Court of Rome by his said Sonne and for that hee should not impeach the Bulls that the matters before said were not done as before a Iudge but by way of composition as may bee prooved by instrument and by witnesses in this Towne and so this matter touched not the Lawes of England and alwayes the said Earle intended not but that hee should bee holden to answer to the party in this case And thereupon after the answers of the said Earle given to the Accusations of the said Commons and the replications to them made of one part and of another the said Earle at the request of the said Commons for the greatnesses of the defaults so of him surmised was arrested by Commandement of the KING and Commons in ward of the Constable of England and afterwards let at Liberty upon bayle And for that the said Earle alleadged not in his answer that hee observed the effect of his Oath in that hee swore that hee would not know nor suffer dammage nor disherison cleerely and expressely to the KING together with his owne lawfull advice and Councell and that hee should cause and purchase the profit of the KING by all that he could reasonably doe and hee held the premisses although hee were principall Officer of the KING knowing the Estate and necessity of the KING and of the Realme and did take of the KING such Lands and Tenements as is supposed in the Impeachment to him in the said first article surmised although he alleadged in his answer that the deeds to him so made were confirmed by full Parliament there is no such accord in the rolls of Parliament wherefore it is awarded that all the mannors Lands Tenements rents services fees advonsons reversions profits with their appurtenances by him so received of the K. â—e reseised reprised into the K. hand to have to hold to our L. the K. the lands chattells of the said E. from thenceforth is not the Intention of the K. nor of the Lords nor that this Iudgement extend in the Law to cause the said E. to lose his name and title of Earle nor of the 20. pounds a yeare which the King granted him to take of the Issues of the County of Suffolk by the name and Title aforesaid And moreover for that the said E. lately denyed that he was of the K. privy counsel when he demaÌ„ded of the K. the said exchaÌ„ge had acknowledg'd that before the exchaÌ„ges performed hee was made Chancellor in which Office hee was bound by his Oath made in the forme aforesaid and hee so being sworne to the said Office tooke of the King the said 400. markes of Land by reason of the said Exchange agreeing to the said covenant of Exchange which hee also made before that hee was Chancellor in which Office hee was bound by his Oath And alleadged not in his said answer that the King gave him Mannors Lands and Tenements which are certaine and cannot very easily bee destroyed nor bee countervailed by the aforesaid 400. marks annuity which are leviable and demandable of the Customes and also as casuall and in divers cases there may losse insue It is awarded that all the Lands and Tenements so taken by the said Earle by the exchanges aforesaid bee resumed into the hands of our Lord the King to hold to him and his Heires in manner as hee held the same before the gift or deed in the said Exchange in which the Issues and profits aforesaid after the said exchange deducted if the said Issues and profits so taken after the Exchanges extend to a grâ—ater value then 400. markes a yeare that then the King shall have the overplus of the Lands and chattells of the said Earle from thenceforth hereafter And it is therefore awarded that as well the said Mannor of Flaxflreet and the ten marks of rents aforesaid with the appurtenances bee reprised in the Kings hand to hold to him and his Heires as hee held the same before the gift to the said Earle so as the Charter the pardon and Confirmation of the purchase of the said fifty pounds of rent bee certaine in the hands of the King and his heires in firme as it was before the purchase and it was since to the said Earle and that the issues profits received or owing to the use of the said Earle as well of the said Mannor oâ—Faxfleet and the ten markes of rent as the Issues and profits of the said fifty pound of rent which he thereof had taken by reason of the purchase aforesaid bee levied to the use of our Lord the King of the Lands and Chattells of the said Earle from henceforth And as to the Article containing the Provisions of Saint ANTHONY for that the Master of the House of Saint Anthony in which the profits were taken as proved in England was a Schismaticke and taxed
That the King would declare the certainty of it But the answer of it is onâ—y As at other times c. A like petition and answer is afterwards under the same King in a petition touching the same thing under Richard the 2 it is supposed that all ought to pay but those which come in Parliament by summons by writ and do stay there at their own charges c. In a Petition afterwards it is supposed that the Tennants of such lands as were immediatly held of the Lords of the Parliament contributed not to those expences but it is complained against and the answer is only Let it be as at other times and if that any found himself agrieved he should have remedy in the Chancery yet by a Statute which is not in the Rols of three yeares before the Tenants of the Lords themselves shall pay for such lands as of late times they have purchased before being contributary To this belongs that in Fitzherbert The villaines of Lords which come to Parliament shall not be therefore contributary to the expences of the Earles which come to Parliament And to this purpose the Lords may by Letters in their own names command the Sheriffe that he distraine not their villaines THE SECOND kind of their Priviledges Priuiledges or speciall Rights that concerne the Barons that have place in Parliament as they are every one single in their private estates CHAP. I. Touching the Oath and Protestation upon Honour ALL Oaths being either promissory or assentatory and the first being that which binds to a future performance of Trust The second that which is taken for discovery of a past or present truth The first kind they as occasion requir'd used in taking the oath of all the Barons for the maintenance of the great Charter and the like was under King John and H. 3 as also swearing of the Lords in ParliameÌ„t in the time of H. the 6. that they should not take parts in the great Controversie between the Earle Marshall and the Earle of Warwick and the oaths of divers Lords appointed for the keeping of the Parliament in 8 11 H. 4 where yet the Prince was not sworn being one of those appointed for the keeping of the ordinances Because of the highnesse and excellency of his honorable person As the words are in the Roll so under H. the 7. the Lords Spirituall and Temporal swoare in the Parliament to the Article of taking care for the preserving of the peace and under H the 8. to the Bill of Succession but under Richard the second the Arch-bishop of Canterbury challenged that neither he nor his predecessors were compellable to any oath but to the K. and this kind of Oath is frequently taken by such Barons as undertake the great Offices of the Kingdome and they are all liable to the like by their tenures by fealty and by Statutes of the Oath of Allegeance but of these kinds of Oaths for the Supremacy they are discharged by the first Statute that gives it and in the case of Essoynes wherein by the ancient Law the Essoiner was to sweare that the party Essoined should appeare at a certain day all Barons and Bâ—ronesses were excepted from the Oath and instead of the Oath they put in surety Ratio vero diversitatis saith Bracton talis esse poterit ut videtur quod ita nobiles dignae personae in warrantizatione Essonii non per se jurabant sed per procuratores scilicet plegios suos Assentary Oaths are in Cases of tryall by 12 or 24 witnesses defendants which proceed by Bill and Answer Plaintiffâ—s examined in actions of debt brought upon arrerages of accompt in cases of tryall by 12 they are discharged of the Oath that is in cases of tryall of their Peeres in which they answer guilty or not guilty only upon honour for in other tryals they have no part but are exempted from being impanelled in Juries Nisi eorum Sacramentum adeo sit necessarium quod sine illis veritas inquiri non possit and thence was it that some Barons under Edward the first of the Marches of Wales refused to swearâ— before the Iustices of Oyer and Terminer upon an Enquiry to be made by them and others of certaine outrages committed by Cilbert of Clare Earle of Gloucester against Humphrey of Bohun Earle of Hereford and Sussex those Barons were Joâ—n de Hastings John Fitz Raynold Roger de Mortimer Theobald of Weldon John Troger and â—efferey of Camvill to whom dictum est as the Roâ— saith ex parte Regis quod pro statu â—ure Regis pro conservatione dignitatis Coronâ— pacis sua apponit manum ad librum ad faciendum id quod eis ex parte injungetur qui omnes unanimiter responderent quod ipsi vel eorum antecessores hactenus in hujusmodi casu ad praestandum Sacramentum aliquid coacti fuerunt And afterwards the Oath being offered them they answered every one by themselves quod nihil inde facerent sine consideratione parium suorum Barons being witnesses in Cases of witnesses Examples are that they give in their Testimonies only upon Honour IN the Courts of the Delegates in the 3 of E. 6 in the proceedings against Gardiner Bishop of Winchester upon a speciall Commission from the King the then L. Chancellor and Marquesse of Northum and the Earle of Wiltsh and Bedfora are examined only upon their honor or somtime upon alleageance or fidelity to God the K. and this was upon the speciall priviledg of such persons for both by the Civill Laws and Common no testimony is taken regularly but upon Oath In Chancery in a Case between Jeffery and Jeffery and in another between Blighton and Dantrey Thomas Lord Buckehurst under Queen Elizabeth delivers his testimony only upon honour In the Court of Chivalery under Rich. the 2 in the great Case between Sir Rich. Scroope appellant and Sir Robert Gravenor defendant touching matter of Armes the Attestations taken by Commission from John of Gaunt the Earle of Darby the E. of Northumberland the Duke of Yorke and the Earle of Arundell are for ought appeares without oath for whereas others are sworne the Entry of their deposition is Pray and requests according to the right of Armes by the procurator of Master Rich. Scroope to testifie and say c. And amongst others the Earle of Devonshire was examined by Commission by Iohn Kentwood who in the returne of his Commission and the depositions certifies the Court that hee had swore all the witnesses there being none of the Nobility but only the Earle in his returne who was not sworne but spake in the loyalty of his Chivalery But in the multitude of witnesses of this cause divers Barons are sworn as the Lord Poynings the Lord Scales the Lord Gray the Lord Ruthen the Lord Basset To every of which names in the attestations is