Indeed humanity may induce us to give rest to the poor beasts that travel for us but doeth this base subject of the beasts rest deserve so noble and excellent a reason as the rest of God himself We must observe here one threed of the Lawgivers wisdom The Law of God contains many points which would be contemptible because of their meanness if there were not some provision against this now to prevent this slighting of them God hath authorised them by the highest reasons that can be by the severest comminations against those that infringe them and by the richest promises to those that observe them this is the reason why such grievous punishments are set down against him that shall taste leavened bread within the seven daies of Easter this is the reason why that he who findes a birds nest must content himself with the young ones and let the dam fly away hath the promise of length of daies which is the same that is annexed to one of the great Commandments of the Law for those who honour their Father and Mother Deut. 22.6 7. This is the reason why God forbids the eating of the flesh of creeping things and backs this prohibition with a reason taken from his own example Be you 〈…〉 holy because I am holy Lev. 〈…〉 This is also the cause why â—e inteâ—poseth his own example in commanding the rest of beasts for this ordinance being made in the favor of so mean a subject is the more considerable in that it is annexed to such an high and excellent matter to wit the rest that God took after the Creation Why none of the dead have been raised on the Sabbath day In my observations on the Creed upon the Articles of Christs Resurrection I promised to handle this question I must first then verifie the Hypothesis I say that on the Sabbath day our Saviour cured many diseases but never upon that day raised any that were dead neither in the Old nor New Testament do we read of any such resuscitation upon that day Not the Sunaimtes son that was raised by Elisha for the History saith expresly that it was not the Sabbath day and the journey of Elisha and Gehazi which they made to raise the dead child was against the rest of this day 2 Kings 4.23 c. neither he who was laid in the grave of the same Prophet nor the sons of the Widow of Nain which were carrying to be buried for they raised them there when they went to inter them now the sanctity of the Sabbath debarred them from burying on that day 2 Kings 13.21 Luke 7.15 Not Lazarus of Bethany for when he was raised many Jews were come to his grave which the holiness of the Sabbath would not have permitted Those pious women who had prepared spices to embalm our Saviour's body being prevented by the Sabbath rested all that day and went not to the Sepulchre till the next morning which was the 3rd day after his death not that those were raised with Christ and appeared in the holy City for these miracles fell not out till the day after the Sabbath not the daughter of Iairus nor Tabitha for then they were raised when their Friends were performing their Funeral Ceremonies for them Now these actions such as are the burying of their dead the washing and embalming of them yea the entring into an house where a dead corps lay all these were prohibited on the Sabbath as being incompatible with its sanctity Matth. 92.3 c. Acts 9.37 Not the Widow of Sarepta's son whose resurrection is mentioned without naming the day which had not been omitted if it had been on the Sabbath not Eutychus who was raised by St. Paul for this was on the first day of the week the Sabbath being already past and here it is remarkable that this young man the last of those that were raised recovered life the same day that Christ returned from the dead viz. on the Sunday Now why God never raised any on the Sabbath day two reasons may be given The first is because Christ himself who is the first born among the dead and the chief of those that were raised was not resuscitated on the Sabbath but he suffered this day to pass before he would come out of his grave besides as I observed on the Creed Christ was not raised on the Sabbath to shew the union between him and others that were raised of all which none received life this day The other reason may be this viz. This life is a time of travel and the Sabbath was the time of rest the wisdom of God would not that on the day which was ordained for the repose and rest of the living the dead should be taken from their ease and called back again to travel The V. COMMANDMENT Honour thy Father and thy Mother c. Whence comes it as they say commonly That Love and Affection useth to descend Difference between Faith Charity The words of Mal. 4.5 discussed VVE know why God the Law-giver hath ordained the duties of Children towards their Fathers but hath not expressed the duty of Fathers towards their Children the reason is because the affections of Parents towards their Children is naturally greater and needs fewer incitements then that of Children towards their Parents this is the meaning of that common saying that the Parents affection descends towards the Children but the love of Children towards their Parents doth not so easily ascend Now we demand how comes it that love rather descends then ascends The reason is because Love had its beginning in Heaven God is the first that loved I say Love had its original in Heaven and came down into the Earth and in this it differs from Faith which had its beginning on Earth and terminates in Heaven By a secret instinct and natural affection which is found in paternity imitates that of God which is Father of all and who loved us before we loved him as in affection the Father prevents the Child so the Love of God towards us doth infinitely surpass that which we bear towards him The Prophet in that passage which I quoted speaking of the reuniting of disagreeing Families saith That the heart of the Fathers shall be converted towards their Children and the heart of the Children towards their Fathers In the order of these words the conversion of the Father towards the Child proceeds the conversion of the Child towards the Father for we must presuppose that as the Paternal affection is the first and strongest so the heart of the Father is more easily reconciled and sooner appeased then that of the Child Why the Law expresseth the Childrens duty to Parents by the word Honour rather then by the word Love Surely the Honour which is commanded to be rendred to them doeth not exclude the Love which is due to them But whereas unreasonable Creatures Love their little ones and are beloved of them The Lawgiver wills that this natural affection which ought
them p. 35. Wherefore is Nathaneel called an Israelite or child of Israel rather then the child of Jacob Joh. 1.47 p. 36. God never works a Miracle to witness or prove that which a man may know naturally But why then did he cause so many miracles to intervene at the publication of the Law seeing it is naturally known to men p. 38. The I. COMMANDMENT Thou shalt have no other gods c. A consideration of the times wherein Athisme and Superstition have generally reigned p. 41. By the Example of the Pharisees and Sadduces is shewed that God rather pardons the superstitious then the profane p. 42. The true Religion the easiest The folly of the Pagans affecting plurality of Gods p. 43. A consideration upon the worship of Angels p. 44. Touching a kinde of Idolatry very subtil and usual p. 45. Wherefore is it that a man that hath false gods leaves them not so easily as another forsaketh the true p. 47. The II. COMMANDMENT Thou shalt not make to thy self any graven image c. Who is more wicked he that adds to the Ordinances of God or he that detracts from them p. 49. Of the nature of painting that represents the History of the Bible p. 51. None ever made any image of God except God himself p. 52. VVhy was it that God who often appeared in a visible shape would not manifest himself after this manner when he published the Law p. 53. If we had the true pourtrait and very resemblance of our Saviour Christ taken from his own body what account ought we to make of it p. 55. A notable difference betwixt one of the figures which represented Christ and those that represented the Angels And a consideration upon the matter p. 56. VVhence is it that in the Apocalyps Iesus Christ being man is decypher'd only in parabolical Figures rather then in the natural form of his own body p. 57. VVhat 's the reason that amongst all the wonders that God hath wrought he never made an Image to speak p. 58. Two sorts of sinners at which God mocks p. 59. The admirable proportion that God holds in the despensation of his judgments p. 60. Of whom are descended those Nations that go naked p. 66. The number of Generations named in the Promise p. 67. Strange Examples of divers Subjects in which God hath manifested both his Mercy and Iustice p. 69. Why did God sometimes take such particular care of the Patriarchs and their children even of these that were wicked and at this day he makes no such addresses as he did then to them p. 71. Why God spent but six daies in Creating the World and empleyed seven to overthrow the walls of Jerico p. 73. The II. COMNANDMENT Thou shalt not take the Name of the Lord c. Why God pronounceth the same word twice to the same purpose against idle oathes p. 75. Although in some things God hath dispensed with his law yet he hath never dispensed with faith also of the stability of Gods oathes p. 79. The IV. COMMANDMENT Remember the Sabbath day c. Why God never wrought any miracle on the Sabbath day before the coming of Christ p. 81. Seven Sabbath daies which Christ honored by his miracles p. 84. In what things our Saviour is to be immitated p. 86. Whence it is that in the History of the New Testament we do not read that ever the Sadduces appeared on the Sabbath day p. 87. Why the Law useth such an excellent subject viz. God's Rest as a reason for the beasts to rest p. 90. Why none of the dead have been raised on the Sabbath day p. 92. The V. COMMANDMENT Honour thy Father and Mother c. Whence comes it as they say commonly That Love and Affection useth to descend Difference between Faith Charity The words of Mal. 4.5 discussed p. 97. Why the Law expresseth the Childrens duty to Parents by the word Honour rather then by the word Love p. 99. Wherefore the Law commanded Children to fear those that brought them into the world namely the Mother before the Father p. 100. The Promise annexed to the fift Commandment Examples of that proportion which is found sometimes between good works and the recompence which they receive in this life p. 102. Why fifteen years were added to the life of Ezechias p. 104. The age of the Israelites when they passed out of the Wilderness into the Land of Promise p. 107. The measure and proportion of mans life from time to time since the first ages p. 109. None of the Kings of Juda exceeded the age of seventy years p. 111. Difference between the faithful of the Old Testament and those of the New concerning their desire of long life another difference about the reckoning of the yeas of their life p. 112. Three causes why men are loath to leave this life represented in him who died first p. 113. A moral observation upon the daies of Lazarus raised from the dead p. 114. The VI. COMMANDMENT Thou shalt not kill Why God in his titles doeth rather call Himself our Buckler then our Sword p. 116. Since Moses there have been but three men who received power to kill any miraculously and the same who have miraculously inflicted death on the living have also given life to the dead Reasons of the one and the other p. 117. The plot of the Priests in consulting to put Lazarus to death John 12.10 p. 119. A question If the punishment of a criminal being interrupted by some extraordinary accident intervening after the execution is begun is it just to discharge him of the punishment to which he was condemmed p. 120. An allusion in the Apostles words who ordains that the Sun go not down upon our anger Ephes 4.26 p. 122. The VII COMMANDMENT Thou shalt not commit Adultery Why God though he approves not Poligamy nor unlawful divorces which were freequent in the old Testament yet never forbad them but by the last of all the Prophets p. 124. VVhy men are more subject to be ashamed in the Act of any sin rather then in that of pride and why more in Luxury then in any other sin p. 127. What may be inferred upon this that the Holy Ghost describing under divers similitudes the spiritual beauty of the Church makes no mention of painting p. 128. A moral observation upon Sampson's loosing of his strength and sight and how he recovered the one but not the other p. 129. The VIII COMMANDMENT Thou shalt not steal Why Christ used the example of theeves to induce us to search for the Kingdom of Heaven p. 132. An observation upon this that among Christ's Disciples there is but one noted for avarice but all are taxed for ambition p. 135. To one man onely God by divine means did shew the way to become rich p. 136. A conjecture upon the Jewish opinion touching the just price of things vendible p. 138. A Question if he that hath made restitution of the goods unjustly detained as
also of all the profits and interests and recompenced all the losses hath he sufficiently discharged his conscience p. 140. Sacriledge the first crime committed in the Church of Israel after they entred into Canaan And the first in the Christian Church p. 142. The IX COMMADMENT Thou shalt not bear false witness c. Whether it be more injurious to call our neighbour fool or knave And why a man glorieth rather to be esteemed good then wise p. 144. An Oservation upon this That in the Scripture God is oftner angry with mans wickedness then he useth to laugh at their folly p. 146. Is it lawful to divulge false news if it may serve for the publick good p. 148. VVhy it is lawful sometimes to make shew of evil but never lawful to make shew of good p. 149. VVe may know a wicked man but it is impossible to know a good man p. 151. When the Scripture speaks of any man in Hell it never names the man and when it doth name him it never expresseth the name of Hell an observation upon this matter p. 152. The X. COMMANDMENT Thou shalt not covet c. A sin committed by rule and order is more enormous then that which is done in disorder and confusion p. 55. The diversity of conflicts in man against himself p. 156. Why some see more easily the defects of the memory and of other faculties of the soul then the defects of their judgment p. 159. Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart c. The correspondency that is between the two Tables of the Law p. 161. There is love in God but not Faith and Hope p. 162. Whether it is a greater defect to want Faith or Charity p. 163. In all the History of that time which was before the law the love of God was never mentioned in express termes but onely the fear of God p. 165. Of them who excuse their faults on this That God hath not given them more understanding and judgement p. 168. In the duties of man towards God forgetfullness is more culpable then ignorance p. 169. Thou shalt love thy Neighbour as thy self Whence comes it that contrary to all other affections this which man carries to himself hath no bounds and why this never faileth nor is subject to diminution p. 171. Why the older we grow the more we love our selves p. 173. VVhy we do not envy another mans goodness p. 175. Divers Duties of the Law A Conclusion of this Treatise Why Moses who wrought so great and many miracles never raised any from the dead p. 167. The Law continued from Moses who had an impediment in his speech till John the son of Zachary which Zachary was speechless Luke 16.16 p 168. Why God in speaking to man useth more words then when he is represented speaking to the creatures which want understanding and why he useth so many words and repetitions to effect mans conversation seeing he can convert him with one word onely p. 170. VVhy the Scripture speaking of Vertue and Vice doth command or prohibit one oftner then another p. 172. THE NATURAL MAN and HIS QUALITIES Divers sorts of good men in the World's opinion and but onely one indeed MAny men are honest Either for fear of men aw'd by the severitie of the laws Or for the good that may come to them of it as hee that is right and square that he may keep his dealings afoot Or for reputation as it may fall out that the onely desire of glory may carry a man to give all he has to the poor yea to expose his body to the flames 1 Cor. 13.3 Or for the apprehension of hell For many would be out of measure wicked wâ—eâ—e it not that this fear holds them in Or for the joyes of heaven as he that asked of our Saviour what he should do to have eternal life Or to satisfie their own conscience that presseth and soliciteth them to some vertuous action Or out of a meer desire they have to vertue it self as there are generous dispositions that seem to go with no other spring Now in very deed of all these sorts of good men there is none that is truly so This assertion generally taken may seem to be very unjust For one will haply grant that hee who is not godly but out of fear or some interest hee pretends either in this world or that to come hath no reall goodnesse but that hee hath a servile or mercenary soul But you 'l think it strange to say that he that works not but out of conscience and the sole love he hath to vertue should not be a good man for what is it to be an honest man if this be not and what is further needfull to have this quality It seems true that our actions cannot have a nobler principle then this viz. to satisfie conscience and to love Vertue for its own sake Yet this is not enough to be a right honest man Wee must then presuppose that to speak properly and according to the language of God There is no good work but that which is done in consideration and out of love of the soveraign Good which is God himself For is it beleevable that God may approve of a work in which himself is no way considered Or that hee may take him for good that neglecteth or is ignorant of the chief Goodness and hath no affection to it This granted it is evident why the onely love of Conscience or of Vertue makes not an honest man for neither Conscience nor Vertue are God they are amiable by reason of him that is the highest Goodnesse but whosoever loveth them without him knoweth not so much as what good is Such was the goodnesse of many the Pagans and even such is the goodnesse of many now adays Wherefore God was pleas'd that the Heathen should outgo the Saints in many vertuous actions It is certain that in the Heathen Histories we have more examples of Heroick Vertues then what are read in the Bible it self Let 's mention but some of them Wee praise the continencie of Joseph but that of Alexander and Scipio came not short of it We talk of the Midwives which refused to obey Pharaohs command by which they were enjoyned to stifle the Hebrew male-children as soon as born but among infidels there have been slaves that rather chose to be wrack'd in pieces then to let fall word that might have prejudiced their Masters We commend the faithful amity that was between David and Jonathan But how many examples of Pagans that would have died for their friends Wee have in esteem the zeal of Phineas that punished the Adultery of the Israelite with the Madianitish woman but is this act comparable to the justice of that Prince who had rather that one of his own eyes should be put out and another of his own son that had committed that Adultery then to baffle the Law that ordained to put out both the eyes of him
mentioneth none of them by name On the other side when it names any that is dead in perdition yet it never saith punctually that he is in Hell after Iudas the Traitor had hanged himself the Holy Ghost who inspired the Apostles was not ignorant where the soul of that wicked wretch was yet he saith nothing else but that he was gone into his place Acts 1.25 Now if God himself who knows the names of those which are in Hell doth still forbear to utter them how much more careful should we be to refrain our selves in our verdicts when we speak of the state and condition of those who are dead although that his end may in some sort induce us to judge sinistrously How rash then are they who dare insert into a Catalogue the names of those who are damned The X. COMMANDMENT Thou shalt not covet c. A sin committed by rule and order is more enormous then that which is done in disorder and confusion A Sin that is committed with judgment order and formality is so much the more detestible He that kills in cold blood at leisure and with Ceremony is more blamable then he that kills raishly and without formality the reason is because in the one the understanding which is mans Counsellor acteth with complacency but in him who is transported with passion it hath small power as then man is not man without understanding so it seems that he who offendeth without the concurrence of the intellect should not have his offence in so high a degree imputed to him hence it is that we excuse mad men when in their frantick fits they commit any outrage Briefly the more understanding there is in any crime the more enormous it is and a sin done orderly is the more irregular The diversity of conflicts in man against himself That which I am to speak here is known sufficiently touching the divers conflicts that be within man but after the descriptions which have been given by divers and will be material to reduce them into a brief summary now the chief combats we are to speak of be these Between one Passion and another as sometimes fear is opposite to covetousness and so one vice is encountred by another as ambition is sometimes restrained by avarice or pleasure Between reason and the passions as we have a thousand examples for this Between reason and natural sence so some will be content to lose an arm for the preservation of the whole body so David abstained from drinking the water of Bethlem although he was pinched with great heat and thurst 2 Sam. 23.16 17. Between the conscience and the will as oftentimes the one of these two resists the other Between the memory and the will as sometimes we remember that which troubles us and which we would willingly forget Between reason and reason it self that is one reason against another as St. Paul was inclosed on both sides having causes which obliged him to desire a continuance of his life and other reasons which made him willing to forsake the world and to be dissolved Phil 1.22 c. Between sense and faith as David having judged of things according to appearance concluded that in vain he had wasted his heart but faith made him retract his words and use a language quite contrary Psal 73.13 c. Between natural sense and godliness as the Martyrs which naturally abhor death yet they received it with much alacrity and as our Saviour expressing this reluctancy saith to St. Peter They will lead thee whither thou wouldst not John 21.18 Between the conscience and faith the one casts us down by setting our sins before us the other raiseth us up by the consideration of Gods mercy And lastly between the flesh and the spirit that is between corrupted nature and grace which do strive against each other in all the faculties of the soul as truth and falsehood justice and injustice purity and impurity This this is that intestine war which sets at variance the understanding will and affections and indeed the whole man against himself Rom. 7.15 c. Why some see more easily the defects of the memory and of other faculties of the soul then the defects of their judgment All unlawful desire presupposeth a corruption of judgment if reason which is the eye of the soul were clear all the other faculties would be pure Matthew 6.22 but its hard for man to know when his judgment destroys him or when it is deceived if our memory fail in any point we presently take notice of this defect and likewise if our affections be faulty but if our judgment miscarry it is a hard matter to find it The reason of this difference is because it is with the judgment as with the eye which seeeth all things except it self our judgment judgeth of the defects which be in the other faculties of the soul this is it which seeth and discerneth them but it seeth not its own defects except by a kinde of reflection which is very weak and feeble so that it can with facility judge of the other powers and qualities which are with it in man but it can hardly judge of it self whence it comes that a fool seeth not his folly though he seeth the other faults that are in him Thou shalt love the Lord thy God with all thy heart c. The correspondency that is between the two Tables of the Law THE first begins with the honour due to God from whom we have our being The second begins at the honour due to our parents by whom God hath given us being The first forbids to make any image of God The second forbids to deface the image of God that is to kill men The first prohibits spiritual adultry saying that God is jealous The second inhibits corporal adultery The first forbids to take Gods name in vain The second to bear false witness The first commands us to labour six daies that we may live onely upon our own The second prohibits to take the goods of another The first commands a Sabbath or corporal rest for our selves servants and cattle The second commands a rest and contentment of spirit forbidding us to covet our neighbours house servants and cattle And lastly the scope of the first is that we love God Of the second that we love our neighbour All these correspondencies proceed from that which is between God and man whence arise those relations resemblances which we finde between the Commandments of the first and second Tables There is love in God but not Faith and Hope Amongst the Prerogatives of love above these other two the Logical vertues this is considerable that God loveth but he doth not beleeve nor hope for to beleeve is an act of Faith which is of things unseen But what is ther that God seeth not and besides what can be wanting to him that he should stand in need of hope these two vertues are imcompatible with an infinite perfection This is
then one of the preheminences of love in that it is found in God yea God himself is called Love 1 Iohn 4.16 and in this respect it is greater then Faith and Hope Whether it is a greater defect to want Faith or Charity This question depends upon another viz. which of these two is the most difficult to wit Faith or Charity For though both the one and the other be the gifts of God yet the one may be more hard and difficult to us then the other Now though these two vertues are still together seeing it is impossible for the one to be without the other yet they are not alwaies equal and in the same degree the more common act of these two is charity for we see more examples of love then of faith many Christians love God earnestly who notwithstanding have much difficulty to assure themselves of his promises One cause that makes the motions of love more easie then those of faith is for that the objects of love are more intelligible and perceptible to our understanding for love hath for its object the goodness of God but faith hath for its object his truth now it is more easie for us to conceive that God is good then to understand how he is true in all points which appear not to us and yet we are commanded to beleeve As then the motion of faith is more difficult then that of love so he that wants the acts of charity is more blameable then he who is deficient in the acts of faith In all the History of that time which was before the law the love of God was never mentioned in express termes but onely the fear of God From the Creation till the Law are reckoned twenty five thousand years in which great interval of ages were many Patriarchs and other persons famous for piety to whom God spake many times and in divers manners The sacred storie marks out their vertues and names the fear of God as the most excellent amongst them but never expresseth their love towards God its true that this fear or reverence was not without a true divine love yet they are distinct qualities the one of which is named but we never read of the other Abraham being in Palestin said That in that place the fear of God was not Gen. 20.11 Jacob swore by the fear of Isaac his father that is to say by the name of the same God whom Isaac feared Gen. 31.53 Joseph confessed he feared God Gen. 42.18 the midwives of Egypt are commended for fearing God Exodus 1.17.21 In brief before the Law was published Religion and Piety was expressed by the name of the Fear of God and not by that of the Love of God and it is observable that the action of Abraham in offering his son for a burnt sacrifice whereby he did so highly witness his love to God this action I say is ascribed to his fear of God without mentioning the love which he had shewed to him Genesis 22.12 the first time that ever the Scripture did express this phrase of the Love of God was after the repetition of the Law Deut. 6.5 Now why the name of this great vertue was not uttered but after a long time and frequent mention of the fear of God Seems to proceed from this that among the perfections of God the first which he manifested to man as I observed upon the Creed was his power and greatness Romans 1.20 So when our understanding desires to know what the Divinity is by this word it conceives a power eminent above all others this is the first thought we have of this subject whence it followeth that the first impression it makes in man after he hath begun to know God is the fear which this supreme power gives to the soul and because this fear is the first motive by which man is induced to submit himself to God hence it is that in the holy song all religious affections have been comprised under the name of the fear of God and for this cause this Fear was for a long time named without mentioning expresly or particularly the Love of God but when the wisdom of God had given large instructions under the Law it afterward expressed the commandment of loving God distinguishing the same Love from Fear Deuteronomy 10.12 What is it that the Lord thy God requireth but that thou Fear him and Love him Of them who excuse their faults on this That God hath not given them more understanding and judgement These men willing to excuse themselves accuse God as if their faults were to be imputed to him whereas on the contrary the whole fault is in themselves the Law wils that we love God with all our mind thou alledgeth thou hast but little minde but how little soever it be hast thou imployed it all in the service and love of God Truly there is no man that hath lived according to the measure and proportion of that understanding and judgment God hath given him In brief if a fool excuse himself on this that God hath not given him more understanding a wicked man will excuse himself on this that God hath not given him more goodness for this is a gift of God as well as understanding In the duties of man towards God forgetfullness is more culpable then ignorance When we speak of divine things many complain that they cannot retain them in their memory the defect whereof they accuse but they think not how forgetfullness is a sin seeing the love of God requires a concurrence of all the faculties of our souls among which memory is one the defect of which is not a simple infirmity as the vulgar people useth to qualifie it but such a defect as should be reckoned among the sins of omission then when it imports a remembrance of a considerable point though it be not necessary nor possible to retain all the syllables in which it hath been pronounced or written As he who forgets God is more criminal then he that never knew God even so he who looseth a lesson which hath been taught him is more culpable then he that never learned it Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thy self Whence comes it that contrary to all other affections this which man carries to himself hath no bounds and why this never faileth nor is subject to diminution In the affections we have towards another we feel and know even to what degree we love him more or less but no man can tell to what hight he loves himself for this love hath no bounds but runs in infinitum Moreover the affection that one bears to another may be lessened or interrupted or quite annihilated yet turned into hatred but the love he bears to himself is never blotted out nor is it diminished though never so little Among the reasons of this diversity we may produce this between every one of us and another there are differences of proximity our affections move within these intervals which have their
measures and degrees Now within these distances many causes of diversion or aversion may intervene which intercept or turn aside the affections but as there is no distance between a man and himself even so the love which a man bears to himself it immediately fastens to its object so that between the one and the other there is no place that can admit the interposition of any contrary cause the affection we bear to another moveth out of it self but that which each man hath to himself moveth as it were in a circle continually round about it self Why the older we grow the more we love our selves It is hard to beleeve that this natural love whâ—â—â— every one bears to himself and 〈…〉 born with us can receive any â—â—â—â—ment it is already great and of a high stature even when we are as yet in the Cradle some will say then that nothing can be added to such an affection seeing it is so great in its very beginning But on the other side it seemeth that it increaseth still and gathers strength and vigour as man increaseth in years in witness whereof we may alledge that ordinarily a father doth more love those children which are born to him in his old age then those he had before as Jacob was more tender over Benjamin then over the rest of his children I know other reasons may be given for this increase of affection but perhaps they proceed also from this cause Though all the children of one father are his flesh and blood yet notwithstanding the fathers affection towards himself being greater in his old age then before this descends also in a greater measure towards those children which he begets in that age But there is another probability that sheweth the increase of mens affections to themselves with the increase of their age as long familiarity increaseth the love that is between two persons so that man that hath been long conversant with himself hath had long experience of his own fidelity and confident in his own directions hath reason to love himself more then before seeing he was not then so well acquainted with himself VVhy we do not envy another mans goodness He that loves his neighbour as himself will never envy him for this vice is incompatible with love 1 Cor. 13.4 It may be asked then why men do envy the greatness riches knowledge ingenuity courage and other qualities of their neighbours but are never envious of their goodness and piety for some will envy a man because he is in honor or because he is rich or valiant or eloquent but they will never envy a man because he is good This proceeds from divers reasons either from the small esteem that men have of goodness in comparison of other things or from this that every one perswades himself that he can when he pleaseth be as good as another or from this that goodness is so opposite to envy formally that it cannot be envies object being so contrary to it we cannot envy that in another which we cannot desire for our selves Divers Duties of the Law A Conclusion of this Treatise Why Moses who wrought so great and many miracles never raised any from the dead HE that turned the waters into blood who made fire and storms fall upon Egypt who divided the sea and drew water out of the rocks who wrought so many miracles upon all the Elements yet never restored any dead to life If one ask the reason why this kinde of miracle was not found among these other supernatural acts which made the Lawgiver so famous It wil be answered by som that this question is either unanswerable or unprofitable notwithstanding it is considerable and the solution is sufficiently clear for this answereth the quality of the law which was given by Moses The Law considered without Christ is a letter that killeth and the ministry of Moses is the ministry of death 2 Cor. 3.6 7. his office was not to give life but on the contrary to take it a way in testimony of which and to shew that the life and resurection is to be sought for elsewhere then in the Mosaical Law Moses never received power to raise any from the dead although there wanted not occasions which seemed to invite him to produce this miracle The Law continued from Moses who had an impediment in his speech till John the son of Zachary which Zachary was speechless Luk. 16.16 It were needless to speak of that again which is so well known to wit in what regard the Law was abolished and in what respect it yet continues The Oeconomy of the Old Testament chiefly since Moses required the observation of the Law as a means to obtain justice and life by if men did fulfil it and notwithstanding it made them understand that by reason of their sins the Law could not pronounce them just being in this regard impotent and having its mouth stopped Rom. 8.3 This seems to have been mystically intimated as well in the beginning as towards the end of that legal Oeconomy to introduce the Law God made use of a man who had an impediment in his speech for when Moses was injoyned to go to Pharoah he excuseth himself by reason of his defect of speech Exodus 4.10 And to signifie the abolition of the Law then when its time was almost expired to make way for a more perfect Covenant God made the legal Priests dumb who last his speech in the very Temple and at the time he should have pronounced the blessing on the people Luke 1.20 21.22 thus the Law as well at its entry as at its departure hath shewed that it cannot bring us that great benefit of justification with a full mouth Why God in speaking to man useth more words then when he is represented speaking to the creatures which want understanding and why he useth so many words and repetitions to effect mans conversation seeing he can convert him with one word onely God hath somtimes spoken or caused speeches to be utterred to the creatures which want either understanding or ears He commanded the Sun and Moon to stand still the Sea and Windes to be quiet the Whale that it should disgorge Jonas and the Feavers that they should be gone to obtain obedience from them he spoke to them but one word and the effect was as ready as the command for Heaven Earth Elements Plants and the beasts know the voice of their Soveraign Lord and submit themselves to it without contradiction but whereas man is naturally refractory and opposeth himself to the will of God he is not content to speak to him in few words what his pleasure is but incourageth him with reasons which he cleareth and inculcateth and withal adjoyneth promises and menaces Surely God could effect by one word onely that for which he useth such long remonstrances he makes himself to be obeyed sometimes in saying onely fellow me but to make men know how far they are departed from him and how difficult their conversion is ordinarly he doth not make them draw nigh to him but by degrees slowly and after many summons VVhy the Scripture speaking of Vertue and Vice doth command or prohibit one oftner then another For Example it speaketh oftner against avarice then against prodigality though it condemneth both So against excessive care oftner then against negligence and so likewise it oftner recommends to us liberality then frugality though it mention both the reason is plain enough because avarice is more general then prodigality and on the other side there be more frugal then liberal men therefore the more common a vice is the oftner it should be cryed down on the contrary a vertue which is found but seldom ought to be the oftner recommended We could produce many other passages upon these Subjects of Vertue and Vice but seeing we have undertaken onely these observations which concern the Decalogue in general in each one of the Commandments I pass to these which I am to handle upon the Subject of Prayer FINIS
to be in Man should be cloathed with a more noble quality then that which is found among beasts for these are capable of natural affections but man alone is capable of Honour as well to give Honour as to receive it Another reason why this Commandment speaks of Honour rather then of Love in some regard a man owes more affection to his wife and children then to his father and mother for he must forsake father and mother and cleave to his wife but in matter of Honour the Parents have alwaies the preheminence in our affections many times they have the second place but in Honour and reverence they should still be first Wherefore the Law commanded Children to fear those that brought them into the world namely the Mother before the Father The Decalogue saith Honour thy Father and thy Mother but in the 19. of Leviticus ver 3. it is said that every one should fear his Mother and his Father here the Mother is first named We must observe that in this passage the Law giver speaks of the fear which the children should have towards those that are the Authors of their Generation The love which they carry to the child causes sometimes that he fears them not therefore God commands him to fear them Now because the Mother hath the greatest part of this natural affection towards the child and consequently is less feared God hath inforced this obligation of the child towards the Mother naming her first before the Father in this commandment which injoyneth to fear them both So this duty towards the Mother being more subject to be infringed is made so much considerable in that it is put in the first place The Promise annexed to the fift Commandment Examples of that propertion which is found sometimes between good works and the recompence which they receive in this life IT is well known why God in this Commandment hath rather promised life then any other blessing From our Parents we have received our life hence it is that life is promised to him that shall Honour those of whom he hath received it for as the punishment sometime answers the offence by the Law of retaliation even so many times God remunerates a good work by some favour answering the same in some similitude So Abraham offered his onely son and God promised him thousands of children Gen. 22.16 17. So Jacob who had fed Joseph by the space of seventeen yeers was reciprocally fed by Joseph in Egypt the space of seventeen yeers So Abraham and Lot for their Hospitality to men had the honour to entertain Angels So Rachab having preserved the Spies in her house was her self preserved with her house So the house of Obed Edom was blessed for having received the Ark of God so Ezechias having raigned 14 years religiously received from God an addition of fifteen years a tearm longer then the former So Daniel and his fellowes refusing to desile themselves with the King of Babylons meat though they were fed onely with pulse and water yet they fared better then those that were fed with the Kings allowance So she that was blamed for pouring out a precious ointment on our Saviours head is praised at this day where ever the Gospel is preached So many for humbling themselves have been exalted ' Its true we finde not alwayes this proportion between the work and the reward but though God doth not still pay in the same kind yet he gives that which is equivalent yea infinitely better if he doth not bestow long life upon Earth he gives that which is eternal in Heaven Now why he gives to some a longer to others a shorter life there be other reasons but secret I will observe some examples Why fifteen years were added to the life of Ezechias He that could see the particular causes why God abridges and prolongs our life till such a minute of time will finde the effects of a marvailous dispensation The number of the years of the Patriarchs and many others famous in the Old Testament is full of such Mysteries take one which is notable We know that God having caused the sentence of death to be pronounced against Ezechias did notwithstanding add fifteen yeers to his life The common sort who see no farther then the superficies of the History perceive not of what importance this tearm of years was which God bestowed on this Prince this number of years was fignificative and carrieth a meaning that reacheth far We must observe that a little before Ezechias sickness the Kingdom of Juda was drawing towards its end it had been invaded by the Assyrians and as yet stood in aw of them for this cause God promiseth to Ezechias not onely the prolongation of his life but also the continuance of his Kingdom for at the same time that he assured his life for fifteen years he added that he would deliver him from the hands of the Assyrians and would defend Ierusalem the capital City so the fifteen years that were promised to Ezechias did express also the continuance and establishment of his Kingdom We must observe then that Ezechias was the fifteenth King that raigned in Iudea in which the true religion was preserved for from Saul who was the first King till Ezechias inclusively are reckoned fifteen Kings of Iuda to wit 1. Saul 2. David 3. Salomon 4. Roboam who was forsaken by the twelve Tribes and retained onely that of Iuda with a part of Benjamin 5. Abija 6. Asa 7. Iosophat 8. Ioram 9. Achaziah otherwaies called Hozias whom his mother Athalia followed but because she usurped the Kingdom her unlawful ragin is not counted among the true Kings 10. Ioas. 11. Amaziah 12. Hazaria 13. Iotham 14. Achaz 15. Ezechias As then the raign of Ezechias was the fifteenth in order of succession so God would give him fifteen years including as it were in this epitome all the former raigns and recapitulating them by the like number of years in the fifteenth King this was to confirm al together both the life and raign of Ezechias both which having been upon the point of expiration so that the life of this Prince being prolonged fifteen years was a pledge of the subsistance of that throne which had supported fifteen Kings The age of the Israelites when they passed out of the Wilderness into the Land of Promise This I observe here as an Historical circumstance only None of those who entered into Canaan aâ—ter the death of Moses had as yet attain'd the age of sixty years except Calib and Iosua whom God reserved as two ancient witnesses of the wonders he wrought in Egypt This may be easily verified for two years after the Israelites departure from Egypt they were all condemned to die in the desert except such as were then twenty yeers old and under Numb 14.29 30. since this sentence of condemnation there passed thirty eight years in which the sentence was performed and about the end of this tearm the survivers entred Canaan now if