Selected quad for the lemma: love_n

Word A Word B Word C Word D Occurrence Frequency Band MI MI Band Prominent
love_n abide_v keep_v love_v 4,382 5 7.4474 4 true
View all documents for the selected quad

Text snippets containing the quad

ID Title Author Corrected Date of Publication (TCP Date of Publication) STC Words Pages
A12492 A defence of the blessed masse, and the sacrifice therof prouynge that it is auayleable both for the quycke and the dead and that by Christes owne and his apostles ordynaunce, made [and] set forth by Rycharde Smyth doctour in diuinitie, and reader of ye kynges highnes lesson of diuinitie, in his maiesties vniuersitie of Oxforde. Wherin are dyuers doubtes opened, as it were by the waye, ouer and aboue the principall, and cheyfe matter. Smith, Richard, 1500-1563. 1546 (1546) STC 22820; ESTC S107328 113,500 390

There are 3 snippets containing the selected quad. | View lemmatised text

autē noster ille est qui hostiā mūdantē nos obtulit ipsam offerimus nunc quae tunc oblata quidem consumi non potest Hoc autem quod nos facimus in commemorationem quidem eius fit quod factum est Hoc enim facite Luc. 22. inquit in mei commemorationē That is Our byshop is he which hath offered an hooste or sacrifice Note this well reader ●gainst the enemies of the masse makynge vs cleane the same we offre also nowe the whyche than offered trulye can not be consumed but this that we do is done for a remembraunce of that thing whyche was done for christ sayd do ye this for remembraunce of me Who is so blynde that he can not see that Chrysostom a greake autour learned as excellentlye in the scripture as euer anye was of the greakes synce the apostles tyme and their scolers doth saye playnelye that we meanynge preistes of whom he was one him selfe do offre the selfe same sacrifice whyche Chryste ones for euer offered by deathe and bloudde shedynge on the crosse but we do it for remembraunce of that hys passion and blouddy sacrifice not withoute autoritie power and cōmaundemente as the whyche all three we haue of him saieng Hoc facite in mei commemorationem Luc. ●● do ye this for a remembraunce of me Wolde to God chrysten men wolde looke well on these wordes consyderynge bothe the auncientie of the wryter and also hys greatte learnynge and holynes whiche may cause them rather to beleue his sayenges thā any other nothynge lyke to hym in those qualities but it is better to let this passe and to here saynt Cypryan that holy martyr which wrote aboue twelue hundred and lxxx yeres past He this wryteth after Cyprianus ii ● epist 3 many wordes spokē of the holy sacrifice of the masse Qua in parte inuenimus calicem mixtum fuisse quem obtulit Vnde apparet sanguinē Christi non offerri si desit vinum calici nec sacramentum dominicum legitima sanctificatione celebrari nisi oblatio sacrificium nostrum passioni responderit That is In the whiche parte we do fynde that the cuppe was mengled or medled that is wyne water were therein mixed together whiche Christ dyd offre Whereby it doth appere that christes bloude is not offered yf there want wine in the cuppe or chalice neither is our lordes sacramente celebrate with halowynge accordynge to the lawe excepte our offerynge and sacrifice be lyke the passion In these wordes note that he sayth we fynd y● the cup whiche christ offred was mixed with wine water whyche was at none other tyme but onely at his last supper for at the time of his death he had no cuppe so medled nor then he offred not his bloud vnder forme of wyne but onely vnder the forme of bloude therefore he offered his bloud in sacrifice at his maundy after this holy martyrs mynde preistes do euen that same after his lawe and ordynaunce as he sayth lykewyse here agayne for thus he writeth Quo modo autē de creatura vitis nouū vinum cū christo in regno patris bibemus si in sacrificio dei patris christi vi nū non offerimus nec calicem dn̄i traditione dominica miscemus That is to saye Howe shall we drynke newe wyne wyth Christe of the creature of a vyne in the kyngedome of the father yf we Marke whose is the sacrifice of the masse offre not wyne in the sacryfyce of God the father and of Chryste or if we do not meddle or myxe the lordes cuppe after the teachyng or cōmyssyon of our lorde Lo oure lorde taughte the preistes at the masse to myxe in the chalyce wyne wyth water and so to offre in sacryfyce hys precyous bloudde whyche he dydde neuer but at his laste supper as it is euydente and therefore he dydde there offre hys bodye and bloude in sacryfyce and gaue commyssyon to hys apostelles and to all preystes in and by them to do the same Also in the same epystle he sayth agayne Ab euāgelicis praeceptis Cyprianus Luc. ●2 non est omnino recedendum eaque quae magister docuit fecit discipuli quoque obseruare facere debent We oughte not to goo from the commaundementes of the gospell and the dyscyples muste of duetye obserue and doo also those thynges whyche the mayster taughte and dydde Lo here Saynte Cypryane sayethe that Chryste offered him selfe and taughte hys scolers that same lesson and commaunded them also to offre sacryfyce as he hadde Matt. 26. Luc. 2● doone afore when he toke breade and so forth and thereby he bond them to kepe and doo the selfe same thynge that he dydde What woulde anye manne desyre more To proue all this he allegeth saint Paule the eleuenth chapter of the fyrste epistle to the 1 Cor. 11. Corinthians This holye martyr sheweth wherfore christ dyd myxe wyne and water together in the cuppe whiche he blessed and consecrated at his maundye sayenge that he so dyd because the water signifieth the people as we reade in the Apocalypse of saint Iohn Apoca 17. why water is mengl●d with wyne in the chalice when the preist sayth masse the .vii. chapter so that lykewyse as the water in the chalice is meddled and myxed together with the wyne and so meddled that the one cā not be separate from the other euen soo by shedynge of christes bloude the people whiche beleue in hym trust in goddes mercy promysed to thē for chrystes deathes sake feare god forsake their synnes thorough perfytte penaunce loue god and their neyghboure finally do kepe gods commaundementes and abyde therein nothing can separate or disseuer thē from goddes fauour and loue as Paule affirmeth the eight chapter to the Romaines But yet marke by the waye good reader that Cyprian doth saye that Christe dyd myxe wyne and water together in the cuppe which he dyd blesse and consecrate at his laste supper and dyd also teache and commaunde preistes to kepe and do that same as we now in dede do at our masses and yet there is no texte of all the scripture that maketh anye mention of this dede lesson and commaundement of our sauyour Christ therfore they are foule deceaued A verytye not wryttē in scripture thorough ignoraunce or rather malyce which affirme that we ought to beleue nothinge excepte it be mencioned in scripture But I wyll retourne eftesones to holye Cypryan and allege out of hym a fewe moo sentences for my purpose of the whyche this is one agaynste theym that putte onelye water in the chalyce at masse Quaerendum est enim ipsi quem sunt secuti●nam si in sacrificio quod Christus est non nisi Christus sequendus est vti● id nos obaudire facere oportet quod Christus fecit quod faciendum esse mandauit non debemus attendere quid aliquis ante nos faciendum putauerit sed
that truly write vpon the scripture euen from christes tyme to these our dayes What man or woman is so madde to be Luther denieth mās f●e wyll whiche dyd Symon Magus as S. Clement testifiethe that was the fyist heretik● after christe● byrth leue him which denieth the fre wyl of man and ascribeth both synne and vertue onlye to necessitie and ●othinge to man as Luther doth sayeng that we can not chose but synne when we do synne nor chose but we must neades do well when we do any good dede Is not this a great blyndnes What can be more against reason and goddes holye worde What doctryne can he more pestilent and noysome to good lyuyng For if this doctrine were true as it is moost false we shoulde neade no lawe of man nor of god no preachyng no teaching ●o good counsaile nor any sembla●le or lyke helpe to lyue the better with all Martyn Luther also de●●eth Luther sayeth that god doth gyue no grace by the sacramētes that god geueth any grace man thorow the blessed sacramentes Is not this man worthy● to be beleued of vs christē people● He teachethe that a christen ma● shuld not warre agaynst the Turkes Is not this holsome doctrine godlye yea is it not rather met● for a Turke thus to write then ▪ christen man Beware therefore good christen reader of his pestilent and contagious doctrine Reade not his bookes nor none o● Heresye bokes shold not be redde his disciples makynge They a●● full of poyson althoughe th●● seme neuer so good and frutefull● as commōly doth all heresy at th● firste taste and syght The kynge● maiesty lyke a most christē princ● hath put fourth a proclamation o● late straightly chargynge and cōmaundinge that no man or woman do kepe after the last daye o● August next insuinge any boke i● Englysh that conteyneth in it an● yll and hurtefull doctrine This godlye commaundemente ought to be obeyed of vs not only for feare of temporall and bodilye punishmente but to eschewe also gods displeasure and wrath whose ministre he is and by whome he Prouer. ● ●eygneth as the scripture affirmeth If thou hast ben deceaued by Luther Ro. 13. this blynde teacher retourne againe to the truth with a penytent hart Folow this holy Tobias Tobie 14. counsaile Serue the lorde in dread and truth Bye the truthe sell it not againe as Salamon Prouer. 23. doth coūsaile the. Instauntly pray with the holy prophette Dauyd Psal 118. saienge Ne auferas de ore meo verbum veritatis Let not o lorde the worde of the truthe be taken from my mouth Abyde in christe by loue and charite and kepe his commaundemētes and then thou shalt knowe the truth as our sauiour saith and the truth shall make Ioā ● the fre from al errour ignoraunce synne and wretchednes and bring the to the endles ioyes of heauen the which Christ the truth dyeng for the truthes sake bought moste dearly with the sheddynge of his precious bloude for his faythfull seruauntes to whome with his father and the holy gooste be glory and honour for euer Amen Take in good worthe this my laboure gentle reader thoughe in all poyntes the treatyce shall not lyke the and no maruayle for because it was made in haste within the space of a monethe whan I myght steale an houre from my other busines of studye At London the yere of our lorde M. D. xlvi The xx day of Iulye A certaine lesson or an instruction to discerne and to put difference betwene a false doctrine and a true TErtulian good Tertulianus 203. reader an auncient writer for he was within .clxxx yeres of Christes byrth in his boke made of the prescription agaynste heretiques declaring how we may knowe without al dout what doctrine is true and what is false and heresie thus writeth Christe in a certaine parable sayeth that good Math. 13. seade of corne was firste sowed of the lorde and afterwarde his ennemye the deuyll sowed cokle and euyll seade Ita ex ordine ipso manifestatur id esse dominicum verum quod sit prius traditum id vero extraneum falsum quod sit posterius immissum That is thus muche in englishe Luthers sede of doctrine againste the masse is cokle and erroneous doctrine bicause it was sowed after the good sede of the truth It is playne by the ordre of the sowynge of good seade of good and godlye doctryne whiche Christe fyrste sowed in the field his churche and the deuyls after sowynge of yll seade of false and erroneus doctrine in the same by heretiques his ministers that to be our lordes and true which is first taught and that to be straunge false that was after broughte in This sentence saythe Tertulian there shall abyde and remayne agaynst other heresies whiche shall hereafter ryse to whome no man that is constante in his faith and of a good conscience doth geue or graunt any thynge to defend that they haue the truth on their syde Lo good reader here thou hast an euydent lesson to perceyue that Martyn Luthers doctryne which Chrisosto homilia 17 in Heb. he dothe mayntaine agaynste the blessed masse and the holye sacrifice therof the very selfe same offerynge of our sauiours very flesh and bloud whiche he him self once offered to his father on the crosse to pacify his wrath is very straūge false and manifeste heresie for as moche as it was sowed by the deuyll in the church of Christ longe and many yeres forsoth no fewer than a thousand and fyue hūdred after that oure sauioure at his maundye and his holye apostels ●ad sowen the seade of that godlye doctrine teachinge the masse to be ● sacrifice profitable both for the quycke and the deade as I shall ●roue manifestly in this boke fo●owyng Moreouer the same auncient and great clarke Tertulian teacheth vs an other lesson to discerne ●n other tu●e to know heresie by from holsom true doctryne heresye from true doctrine sayenge That heresie by interpretation or exposition of the greake worde is that doctrine whiche a man of him selfe or of his owne chosinge doth institute set forth or take and maiteine being by an other mans choise afore inuented And therfore the apostle Paule dyd saye that an heretique was cōdemned euen by his owne iudgement and conscience Quia in quo damnatur sibi elegit because ●i 3. he hath chosen to hym that in the whiche he is condemned This rule also doth sufficientlye proue that Martyn Luthers doctrine Luter wa● by his owne iudgement and conscience condemned as al heretickes be againste the sacrifice of the masse is yll and that he was cōdemned euen by his owne iudgement for as much as he chose this doctryne of his owne heade hauynge neither scripture with him but agaynste hym nor any other good autorytie to defende that his wicked heresye as hereafter it shall be opened at large by
to the laste argumente whan I sayde that Vrbanus Regius his folowers saye vntruelye that we defendyng the masse to be a sacrifice do crucyfye christ again as much as lyeth in vs. Paule wolde that yf Christ shold sundry tymes offer him selfe in sacrifice in his owne fourme by pourynge out his bloude as he dydde ones on the crosse that than he must nedes oftentimes suffre death but so he doth not offre hym self at the masse but onelye vnder the forme of breade and wyne withoute all payne and sufferinge Sainte Ihon saithe in the Apocalypse Agnus occisus est ab origine mundi The lambe christ Ioh. i was sleane from the beginninge of the worlde not that christ thā suffered death but many yeres after whan Gala. 4. the tyme appointed as Paul saith was come but that thā it was appointed by gods prouydence that he shuld dye for mans offences that his death was fygured by the death of Abel and other lyke beynge at the begynnynge of the world so christ is offered in sacrifice at the masse not that he suffereth there ageyne but that there he is offered for the remembraunce of his death ones suffered on the crosse wherfore this reason is cleane wiped away the next anone shal be which is this cōpiled also of s Paules wordes y● x. to the Heb. where he thus saith Lex per singulos annos eisdē The syxte reason ipsis hostijs quas offerūt indesinēter nunque potest accedentes perfectos facere alioquin cessassent offerri c. The law saith Paule neuer could make them perfytte whiche came to it by the same hostes or sacrifices whyche the preistes euery yere do offre wtout ceassyng or elles they shuld haue ceassed to be offered for as moche as the haunters or kepers of it shuld not haue any lenger grudge or cōscience of sinne vpon these wordes thus they reason The sacrifices of tholde lawe were for that cause oftentymes as Paule saith offered because they were weake and not of strength to put awaye sinne to delyuer mēfrō grudge of synne in their cōsciences for yf they coulde haue done this they shuld haue cessed to be offred whā they had done it but the sacrifice of christes flesh bloud one 's offred vpō y● crosse was strōge sufficiente inoughe to take awaye the synnes of all the 1. Pet. 2. 1. Io. 2. Apo. 2. worlde as the scrypture witnesseth in sundrye places therefore by S. Paules reason Christe oughte no more after his death to be offered in sacrifice as he shold necessarely yf the masse were a sacrifice wherfore it is no sacrifice This reason hath some apparaunce The solution of truth though it be very false in dede For saint Paule mēt that the sacrifices of the olde lawe were of them selues vnperfit weake not able to put away mans synne and therfore it was nedefull that many and dyuers hoostes and sacrifices shuld one succede an other from tyme to tyme durynge that lawe now christ is not oftentimes offred in sacrifice at masse because his sacrifice done ones on the crosse was not able and sufficiēt to take away al mens synnes but because men do dayly synne and they haue neade to haue the vertue of that sacrifice done on the crosse ones for all applied to them which is done by the masse Agayne in the olde law there was not alway one and the same sacrifice offered but many and dyuers for their feblenes and insufficiēcy but so it is not in the newe lawe for there is continually one hooste and the very same is offered in the masse by the preist whiche Christe on good fryday offred vpon the crosse for our sinnes although in the masse it is offred vnder the fourme of breade and wine and was vpon the crosse vnder the forme of flesshe and bloud so that the sacrifice is one albeit the maner of offering it be not one but dyuers as the flesshe raw and rosted is one thinge thoughe it be altered in his qualities This is S. Chrisostoms mynd as it shall appeare in the soylinge of the nexte reasō which is this gathered also ho. 17. in He. out of Paules epistle to the Hebre. Vrbanus Regius abuseth thys autoritie againste the sacrifice of the masse as Luther his mayster doth the .x. chapter where he thus saith Vna oblatione consummauit in sēpiternū sanctificatos Christe hath made perfecte for euer with one oblation thē that are halowed or made holy Vpon these wordes Luther his scholers make this argumēt S. Paule doth affirme that The seuēth reason christe hath made perfecte for euer with one sacrifice vpon the crosse those which are sanctified therfore we nede none other sacrifice beside that to make vs perfecte before god and thervpon it folowethe that the masse is no sacrifice To this I saie that it is great The solution meruaile that Martyn Luther wyll take oute of thys epystle of Saynte Poule anye wytnesse agaynst the sacryfyce of the blessed masse For as muche as he denieth the autoritie of it and sayeth that Marke Luthers vnshame fulnesse it is not saynt Paules letter But suche is hys maner and others lyke to hym that they are not ashamed to denye the autoritie of some bookes of scripture the auctoritie of the churche and the holy doctours and yet whan they seme any thyng to make for the setting forth of their heresies than they wyl vse thē but let this go Saint Paule this mente by his wordes aboue rehersed that Christ our sauiour offring him selfe to his father a sacrifice of swete sauoure as Paule saith in an other place dyd make men beleuynge in hym and doynge penaunce for their synnes perfecte and dydde take awaye their synnes accordynge to saynt Iohn baptistes sayenge Ecce agnus dei ecce qui tollit peccata mūdi Lo the lambe of god se hym that taketh awaye the sinnes Io. 1. of the worlde This I saye Christ hath done for vs ones offerynge hym selfe on the crosse the whiche Moses lawe and all the sacrifices of it coulde neuer do as s Paule saith in this tenth chaptre though they were neuer so oftentymes offered and for this cause Christes sacrifice done ones on the crosse is perfecte and sufficient to doo awaye all the worldes offences whiche is not offered againe at masse vnder the fourme of breade and wine for the vnperfectenes and in sufficiency of it as I haue afore often saide but for the applyenge thereof to vs for the remembraūce of Christes death and the greate and tender loue which he shewed towarde vs in the tune of his passion that therbye we excited and moued sholde loue him tenderlye againe and finally for the attainement of that grace whiche Chryst dyd merite and purchase for vs offerynge hym selfe on the crosse to appease his fathers wrath Many Note how many men are deceued in valuinge of the vertu of christes death men are