is conveyed by an Angel into heaven lyeth corporally under the formes of bread and wine is really carried up and downe in the hands of the Minister and received by the mouth of the Communicants These forgeries are repugnant to the Articles of Faith the Incarnation the Ascension and Intercession and the returne of Christ unto Judgement and to the nature of Sacraments in which the signes must needs remaine and not lose their nature 3. The Lords Supper teacheth us That Christ is to be worshipped in heaven at the right hand of his Father For it overthroweth not but establisheth and ratifieth the Articles of Faith and doctrine of the whole Gospel which sheweth that Christ is to be sought and worshipped Above Colos 3.2 Seek the things which are above where Christ sitteth at the right hand of God Acts 7.55 And Stephen when he was stoned saw Christ and worshipped him Above standing at the right hand of God The ancient Church also sang in their Liturgy or common Service and Prayer Sursum corda Wee lift up our hearts unto the Lord. On the other side the Masse telleth us That Christ is to be worshipped in the bread which adoration and worship questionlesse is idolatrous For To worship Christ in the bread is to direct our worship in soule minde cogitation and as much as may be in the motion of our bodies to the place in which the bread is and turning hereto to yield reverence unto Christ as if he were present there more than else-where So of old they worshipped God at the Arke turning thereto with their minds and as much as might be with their externall grace and inclination of body That this is idolatry we prove 1. Because no creature hath power to tie the worship of God to any thing or place Exod. 25.22 29.42 1 King 8.33 12.29 10 31. Dan 9.11 2 Kings 12.13 Amos 4.4 wherein God hath not commanded by expresse word himselfe to be worshipped and wherein God hath not promised to heare us And hereby is the cause of that difference plainly seen why the Jews directing their prayer to the Propitiatory or Mercy-seat did notwithstanding withall in spirit worship the true God and were by promise from him assured to be heard but worshipping in Dan and in Bethel and in the high places and in the Temple of Samaria were Idolaters not knowing what they worshipped and the cause of this thing is more at large declared 1 Kings 17.9 2. Because in the New Testament all worship which is tyed to any certain place on earth is utterly taken away and spirituall worship only required stirred and kindled by the holy Ghost and done with a true faith and knowledge of God Joh. 4.21 22 23. So Christ teacheth Yee worship that which yee know not wee worship that which wee know But the houre cometh when ye shall neither in this mountaine nor at Jerusalem worship the Father But the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and truth Whereas Christ saith in spirit not in this mountaine nor at Jerusalem he doth plainly take away worship tied and restrained to any certaine place on earth Wherefore we must also take away and have in detestation this impious invention of Christs corporall presence in the Mass or in the bread and wine which is the foundation of idolatrous adoration or worship For this being put that Christ is in body present in the bread whether it be said to be done by Transubstantiation or Consubstantiation the Popish adoration standeth fast For as in ancient times before the Ascension it was not only lawfull but behoovefull also to worship Christ wheresoever he was so now also if he be in the bread he must be worshipped in the bread whether he be there seen or not seen For much more were we to beleeve the voice of God then any sense of ours if it expressed and specified any such matter Likewise of the contrary side the presence of Christs body in the bread is taken away if we take away by Gods commandement this foule and shamefull Popish adoration of Christs body lying covertly by their judgements under the formes of Bread and Wine Here the Ubiquiraries except against us on their behalfe that Christ is present in the bread not to be worshipped but to be eaten and that he commanded not himself to be adored but to be eaten Answ In both these asseraions they conclude no more then that which is in controversie for Christ commanded neither of these If he be in the bread he must there be worshipped because of the generall commandement Let all the holy Angels of God worship him Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God They therefore imagine Christ in the bread and yet say it is not lawfull to worship him which is an open deceit and mockery Wherefore Musculus and others to salve this sore are content to fall downe before the Bread and worship Christ therein But Heshusius replyeth against us thus The Divinity is not adored in all the creatures though it be present in all Therefore neither is it necessary that the humanity should be adored in the bread though it be corporally present therein Ans The examples are not alike The adoration of the Divinity is not tyed to all creatures but it is tyed to the humanity assumed as to a proper peculiar Temple Wheresoever then Christs humanity is there the Divinity will be worshipped in it and with it And indeed by this their own maine argument The Ubiquity of Christs manhood confuted by the Ubiquitaries own argument the Ubiquity of Christs manhood is quite overthrowne For seeing the manhood is not to be worshipped in all creatures and every-where it followeth that it is not present in all peares apples ropes cheeses c. as the Ubiquitaries write thereof These differences did D. Vrsine in the yeare of our Lord 1569. thus inlarge and deliver 1. The Supper testifieth that Christs onely sacrifice justifieth The Masse-Priests say that the Masse justifieth for the very worke done as they use to speake that is through the externall rite and action 2. The Supper teacheth us that Christ redeemed us by offering himselfe for us The Masse-Priests say that we are redeemed by Christ offered by them 3. The Supper telleth us that our salvation is perfected by Christs owne sacrifice The Masse-mongers report that it is perfected by infinite numbers of Masses 4. The Supper instructech us how we are ingraffed into Christ by faith by means of the holy Ghost The Masse falsly feigneth that Christ entreth into us corporally or wee are ingraffed into Christ by his corporall conveyance into us 5. The Supper teacheth us that Christ having ended his sacrifice ascended into heaven Our Massemongers tell us that he in his body is on the Aliar 6. In the Supper bread and wine remaine and change not their substance because Sacraments retaine and change not the substance of the signe The Masse-Priests declare unto us that
THE SUMME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION DELIVERED BY ZACHARIAS URSINUS First by way of CATECHISM and then afterwards more enlarged by a sound and judicious EXPOSITION and APPLICATION of the same Wherein also are debated and resolved the Questions of whatsoever points of moment have been or are controversed in DIVINITIE First Englished by D. HENRY PARRY and now again conferred with the best and last Latine Edition of D. DAVID PAREUS sometimes Professour of Divinity in Heidelberge Whereunto is added a large and full Alphabeticall TABLE of such matters as are therein contained Together with all the Scriptures that are occasionally handled by way either of Controversie Exposition or Reconciliation neither of which was done before but now is performed for the Readers delight and benefit To this WORK of URSINUS are now at last annexed the THEOLOGICALL MISCELLANIES Of D. DAVID PAREUS In which the orthodoxall Tenets are briefly and solidly confirmed and the contrary Errours of the Papists Ubiquitaries Antitrinitaries Eutychians Socinians and Arminians fully refuted And now translated into English out of the originall Latine Copie By A. R. LONDON Printed by James Young and are to be sold by Steven Bowtell at the signe of the Bible in Popes-head Alley 1645. TO THE CHRISTIAN READERS HENRY PARRY wisheth grace and peace through Jesus Christ our Lord. WHereas but a small and short remnant of daies is alloted unto every of us to try the hazzard and adventure of this world in Christs holy merchandize yet forty yeeres and the youngest may the oldest must depart I being subject to this common case and most certain uncertainty of our life neither knowing if perhaps at this present my staffe standeth next the doore have bin and am desirous and earnest in this behalfe so to bestow all my possible endeavours in this my Lord and Masters traffique as that I may not return unto him with a talent in a Napkin and withall may leave behinde mee some poore token and testimony of my love and duty towards him and his blessed Spouse with future posterity Which my desire and earnest deliberation struggling and striving so long within mee untill it had gotten the conquest of such shamefast and fearefull motions wherewith men are well acquainted who are at all acquainted with their own infirmities I was thereby at length drawn to this bold and hardy resolution as to commit something to the presse and so to the eyes of them whose great and sharp censures I have ever with trembling thought of heretofore and even now would fly them with all willingnesse Wherefore also in respect hereof and of the greennesse of my age so hath the flame and heat of my desire been slacked and cooled with the water as it were of feare wherewith I shake in mine owne conceit as I have not presumed to draw any shaft out of mine own quiver or to present the world with an untimely fruit of so young a tree but rather have made choice of a shaft out of the Lords Armory framed by the hand and skill of the Lords workman fit to make the man blessed who hath his quiver full of them If yet in this I have been presumptuous if bold if undiscreet if foolish my Brethren for your sakes have I been so for your sakes have I been presumptuous bold undiscreet and foolish even for you and for your children The greater is my hope and trust that these whatsoever my paines and labours shall finde favour and grace in your sights and receive good entertainment at your hands because for you they have been undertaken and the gaines and commodities that shall arise thereof if by the blessed will of God any shall arise shall redound unto you and yours for ever It is a case lamentable deserving the bowels of all Christian pity and compassion and able to cause the teares of sorrow to gush out and stream downe the face of a man who is not frozen too hard in security and in uncharitable carelesnesse when he shall but lift up his eies and see the waste and desolation of so many distressed soules who in so many places of this our land and country have been and are daily either pined away and consumed to the bone for lacke of Gods sustenance the Bread of life the Word of God the only preservative of the soule or through the deceitfull poyson of that old Sorceresse and Witches children infected and baned unrecoverably Alas poore soules faine would they have somewhat to keep life within them and therefore as famished and starved creatures which have been for a space pounded up and pin folded in a ground of barrennesse debarred of all succour and reliefe whenever they may light of any thing that may goe downe the throat be it as bitter as gall and as deadly as poyson they swallow bitternesse as Sugar and licke up death as sweet hony And yet I rue to speak it such is the hard heartednesse and brutish unnaturalnesse of many mercilesse men if yet men who have so flinted their fore-heads seared and sealed up their minds and consciences in all impiety as that they have entered as it were into a league and bond with themselves to forget Christ never to know the man more never to speak in the name of Jesus never to feed the flock of Jesus whose soules are even as great and deare to him as the price they cost him For had not these men sworn like * Of Valentinus the Cardinals religion who gracelesse man ab jured his Ecclesiastical vocation to be lifted up to a temporall Dukedome Sab. Enncad 10. lib. 9. sons of the earth to possesse the earth for ever and to leave heaven and the heires of heaven even the chosen of God to God himselfe to looke to it were uncredible nay unpossible were it that after so many threats and warnings from heaven from earth from God from men from their foes abroad and their friends at home they should not yet once not once descend into a dutifull consideration of this their heavie trespasse and so with a speedy industry and assiduity re-enter and recover those their forsaken Charges which a long while have languished and worne away for want of pasture and lye now the deare Lambs of Christ Jesus stretching on the ground for faintnesse fetching their groans deep and their pants thick as ready to give over and to yeeld up the ghost O Lord Jerem. 5.3 are not thine eies upon the truth thou hast stricken these men but they have not sorrowed thou hast consumed them but they have refused to receive correction they have made their faces harder than a stone and have refused to return Not the losses and unsupportable calamities of Christs people not the miserable Apostasie and grievous falling away woe to us therefore of multitudes of the ignorant and unlettered men from the Apostolike Faith and the Church of Christ not the certain dangers and hazzards of their own persons Wives Children and Kins-folks with all which rods
things of chusing Bishops and Deacons of widowes of women to be covered and to containe themselves in silence of not divorcing the husband if he be an Infidell of controversies between Christians But these men remember not that their authority is not equall unto the Apostles authority neither consider they that there is nothing in all these things appointed of Paul which is not agreeable to the rest of the Word of God contained in writing and that many of those things which they alledge are comprehended in the commandements of the Decalogue More trifling is it that they say the forme of Baptisme appointed by Christ was changed by the Apostles because it is read Acts 28.19 that they baptised in the Name of Jesus Christ. For in those places not the forme of Baptisme but the use is declared that is that men were baptised for to testifie that they did belong to Christ Neither yet by the example of the Apostles who interdicted the Churches things offered to Idols bloud and that which was strangled is it lawfull for Councels and Bishops to make decrees and lawes to tie mens consciences For first here againe there must needs be retained a difference between the Apostles by whom God opened his will unto men whereupon they also say It seemeth good to the holy Ghost and to us and other Ministers of the Church who are tied unto the Apostles doctrine Further as concerning this decree of the Apostles they decreed nothing else then what the rule of charity commandeth which at all times would have that in things indifferent men should deale without offence Now if they urge that these ordinances are called necessary yet it doth not thereupon follow that the traditions of Bishops are necessary especially such as are the Bishops of Rome Then that necessity whereof the Apostles spake was neither to last continually neither did it bind consciences for feare of the wrath of God if these things were not observed but it dured but for a time for their infirmity who were converted from Judaisme to Christ or were to be converted 1 Cor. 10. as Paul doth at large teach To these they adde the examples of the Church 4 Object Present examples whom they say even from the Apostles to these very times to have beleeved and observed some things not onely not delivered in the Scripture but contrary to the Scripture They bring forth the selfe same decree of Jerusalem concerning things offered to Idols and bloud which being made of the Apostles and expresly set downe in the Scripture was yet abolished by the Church But it hath been already said that that constitution was made not that it should last for ever but for a time for a certaine cause even for the infirmity of the Church which was gathered from among the Jewes and after that cause ceased that ordinance taketh place no longer Neither yet did it at that time fetter mens consciences as if the worshipping or offending of God did lye in it wherefore the abrogating of it is not contrary but doth very well agree with it To these also they reckon the observing of the Lords day We truly as we doe beleeve this to be an Apostolike tradition and perceive it to be profitable and a farre other manner of one then for the most part they are which they would faine thrust upon us under the Apostles name so we doe not put any worship of God to consist in this thing but know it to be left arbitrary unto the Church Even as it is said Let no man condemne you in respect of a holy day But they affirme also that some things not written are beleeved which yet to call to question wee our selves confesse to be unlawfull as That Infants are to be baptised That Christ descended into Hell Coloss â— That the Sonne of God is consubstantiall unto the eternall Father But they are too impudent if they take unto themselves a licence of hatching new opinions because the Church for to expound the meaning of the Scripture useth somewhere words which are not extant in the Scripture But impious are they and blasphemous if they say the doctrine it selfe which the Church professeth in these words is not extant in the Scripture 5 Object The holy Ghost to teach the Church therefore not the Scripture They say also that the holy Ghost is promised the Church that it may teach those things which are not delivered in the Scriptures as But the Comforter which is the holy Ghost whom the Father shall send in my name hee shall teach you all things And When the Spirit of truth shall come hee shall lead you into all truth But here they maliciously omit that which is added And shall bring all things to your remembrance which I have told you John 14.26 and 16.13 Againe Hee shall beare witnesse of mee Againe Hee will reprove the world of sinne of righteousnesse and of judgement Againe He shall glorifie mee for he shall receive of mine and shall shew it unto you For out of these it is manifest that the holy Ghost should speak nothing but that which was written in the Gospel and Christ himselfe had before time taught his Disciples so farre is it that he should bring any thing contrary to them For neither can he dissent from Christ nor from himself So also when they alledge that I will put my law in their inward parts Jerem. 31. 2 Cor. 3.3 and in their hearts I will write it And Yee are the Epistle of Christ written not with inke but with the Spirit of the living God not in tables of stone but in fleshly tables of the heart they do not mark that the Spirit cannot speak in mens hearts contrary unto these things which be revealed in the Scripture neither would God write any other law in mens hearts but that which is already revealed and written and that therefore the Apostle Paul opposeth not the matter written but the manner of writing in tables and hearts one against another because that the same was written in both but there with ink and here with the spirit of God It hath lesse colour which they go about to build out of that place If you be otherwise minded God shall reveale even the same unto you Phil. 3.15 If therefore say they the Church thinke any thing different from the written word that proceedeth from the holy Ghost For the Apostle comforteth and confirmeth the godly that albeit they did not understand somewhat of that which there hee had written or were of any other judgement in it yet that hereafter they should be taught it of God and should know those things to be true which he had written When as therefore it is denied that the holy Ghost reveales any thing diverse from that which is written the rule and mastership of the Spirit in the Church is not taken away but the same Spirit is matched with himselfe that is with the rule of the
be conformed and like to God as it is said He saw all that he had made and loe it was very good Gen. 1.31 Psalme 103.20 And of the good Angels it is said Ye his Angels that excell in strength and do his commandements in obeying the voice of his word Their Angels alwayes behold the face of my Father which is in heaven Mat. 18.10 22.30 Luke 9.25 Esa 6.2 The elect shall be in the resurrection as the Angels of God in heaven They are called holy Likewise Seraphin that is flaming or shining namely with purity and divine wisdome and with the love of God But of the bad Angels it is said Hee abode not in the truth The Angels which kept not their first estate John 8.44 Jude 6. but left their own habitation c. 5. And confirmed therein Now as these former to be spirits infinite created by God of nothing and created good and holy are in the Scripture delivered as common both to good and bad Angels So also the Scripture delivereth those things whereby a huge and exceeding difference appeareth between them For the good Angels by the especial grace of their Creatour were so confirmed and established in that sanctity and blessednesse wherein they were created that albeit they serve their Creatour with an exceeding and most free will yet can they never revolt from him or fall from that state of righteousnes and felicity wherein they stand 1 Tim. 5.2 Wherefore they are called elect Angels they are said alwayes to behold the face of the Father Mat. 18.10 22.30 Of those who are elected to everlasting life it is said that they shall be like Angels And this perseverance in their state they have Job 4.18 not by the peculiar excellency and vertue of their nature as it is said He found no stedfastnesse in his servants and laid folly upon his Angels but of the meer and free bountifulnesse of God towards them by the Son of God keeping and guiding them that they may be joined to him as to their head and remain together with elect men the everlasting Church and Temple of God magnifying and praising God for ever All things consist in him It hath pleased the Father to gather together in one all things Col. 1.17 Ephes 1.10 both which are in heaven and which are in earth in Christ. The good Angels were both created confirmed 1. Everlastingly to know and magnifie God for his goodnesse and bounty towards them and mankind 6. To worship and magnifie God Praise the Lord all ye his hosts Psal 103.21 Isa 6.3 Luke 2 13. 7. To be the ministers of God for the saving of the chosen They cry Holy holy holy the Lord of hosts the whole earth is full of his glory And they laud and praise God for the manifestation of the Messias 2. To be the ministers of God for the accomplishment and maintaining of the safety and salvation of the chosen when as God by them declareth his will delivereth the godly out of dangers defendeth them against the divels and wicked men Or also to punish the wicked who oppugn the Church Ps 34.7 91.11 John 5.4 They serve also for the wicked The Angel of the Lord pitcheth round about them that fear him and delivereth them He shall give his Angels charge over thee to keep thee in all thy wayes Now although the wicked also and reprobate are defended by the Angels and receive other benefits not seldome at the hands of God as when after the waters of Bethesda had been troubled by an Angel whosoever then first stepped in was made whole of his disease yet these benefits stretch no farther then the commodities of this life and as other things which befall unto the wicked in this life whether good or bad are turned to their destruction but serve for the defence and delivery of the chosen for whose sakes God oftentimes like as he punisheth the wicked They are the ministers of the elect by Christ so also he enricheth them with his benefits The ministery then and guard of Angels properly belongeth to the saints and chosen unto whom that being lost by sin is restored by the merit and benefit of Christ for he is the head of the Church which consisteth of Angels and men restoring that good will and conjunction which is between the members of the same body between men and Angels and using at his good pleasure the ministery of Angels to safeguard and defend his Ephes 1.10 Psal 97.7 Heb. 1.4 Matt. 23.49 Heb. 12.22 That he might gather together in one all things which are in heaven and in earth in Christ Let all the Angels of God worship him He shall send his Angels Yee are come unto the mount Sion and to the citie of the living God the celestiall Jerusalem and to the company of innumerable Angels Jacob saw a ladder which reached from earth to heaven on which the Lord stood and the Angels went up and down by it Gen. 28. â—2 which signifieth God and man the Mediatour Ye shall see heaven open John 1.51 and the Angels of God ascending and descending upon the Son of man Why God useth the ministery of Angels being able to â—râ—ng what he will to passe without them Now God doth many things by Angels and sometimes by many together which he could as well do either without them or by any one of them Partly in favour and regard of our infirmity which unlesse it see it self invironed with many succours defences and instruments of his divine power and bountifulnesse falleth presently of doubting of the providence safeguard and presence of God as it is manifest by the example of Elisha's servant 2 King 6 1â— and by those consolations and incouragements which promise unto the Church the aid of Angels Partly to shew his power also over his Angels who useth their labour and ministery at his pleasure Why the Angels are called 1. Powers 2 Thes 1.7 2. Principalities Ephes 1.21 Col. 1.16 3. The host of the Lord and the host of heaven Psalm 103.21 148.2 1 King 22.19 Rev. 19.14 4. Cherubins Hereof the Angels are called the powers of the Lord Jesus when he shall shew himself from heaven that is by whom he exerciseth his power Likewise they are called principalities might powers dominions created by the Son of God subject unto him being exalted at the right hand of God because by them hee sheweth and exerciseth his principality or rule might power and dominion Likewise The host of the Lord and the host of heaven because both the number of them is huge and great and God ruleth over all of them as a Captain over his souldiers and doth by them whatsoever he will Hereof also are they called Cherubins that is flying or winged because they perform and execute with all readinesse and celerity the hests and commandements of God and do each their own parts and
both are wrought of one person according to diverse causes and originals of working or according to diverse natures but not by one and the same nature By these grounds it is easie to dissolve and assoile most of the sophismes and cavils with which at this time both the Swenckfieldians ard Ubiquitaries are wont to glose and blanch that their reall communicating of essentiall properties in natures and their Eutychian deifying of Christs flesh and to thrust the same upon the simpâ—e for the true majesty of Christ himselfe For thus they reason The office and benefits of the Mediatour his Redemption intercession purging from sins quickning sitting at the right hand of the Father his dominion and Lordly power over all creatures his presence with the Church beholding ruling all things raising the dead judging both quick and dead all these agree to Christ according to both natures Therefore the humâ—â—â—y as well as the divinity is also it selfe really omniscient searcher of hearts omnipotent present in the substance of his body at the same moment in all places doth of it selfe know all things heare our complaints and prayers give the holy Ghost and work by him in the hearts of the chosen faith and conversion and to conclude in respect of these things the humanity it selfe also is for it selfe adorable and to be adored as well as the God-head To these and the like there is one and a ready answer namely That it is ill going from the person and from the office and honour of the person to the properties and operations of the natures Or The society and conjunction of the office and honour doth not cause or inferre the same properties or operations of both natures Or In the affirmation of the office and honour are not signified the same properties of both natures nor the working of the same operations but the conjunction or concurrence of distinct operations proceeding from distinct properties to the same effect or action Theantropall that is of God and man The reason is Because of redemption quickning adoration and the like which are the functions benefits and worship of the whole person there are moe and diverse manners and parts which will agree really to one and the same person but not to one and the same nature but some to the God-head onely some onely to the manhood Wherefore this Major of the reason is false Whatsoever things agree unto Christ God and man according to both natures the same also doe agree after the same manner and as touching all parts to both natures For it doth not follow Because the God-head is Redemptresse therefore also it suffered and was dead Now That those things which in the person and office of the Mediatour are and abide proper unto one nature neither are made nor are by reason of the union common to both natures may be shewed at large but now let these few suffice 1. Such as is the union of the natures such is the communicating of the properties But the union of the natures was not made in the natures or into one nature but in the person or in one person Therefore the communicating of the properties was made in the person not in the nature that is the union maketh the properties of both natures common not to one nature but to one person For not one nature but one person hath truly as two natures so also double properties and operations and those infinitely differing created and increate finite and infinite Wherefore as by union the manhood was not made the God-head or God so neither is it immense infinite and omnipotent But contrariwise man is truly and really as God eternall so omnipotent also and every-where and giver of the holy Ghost The reason is because not the manhood but the man-Christ hath indeed in his substance the eternal and immense God-head 2. That which is proper to one cannot be common to moe that is cannot exist or be found together in other subjects also of divers natures For To be proper and To be common are contradictory and therefore in farthest repugnancy 3. There cannot be made one omnipotency and one omnipotent operation to be both natures whereby as well the manhood as the God-head should be really omnipotent and work divine things but there must needs be also one essence of both whereby the manhood also must be really God For the omnipotency which they will have one and the same to be communicated to the flesh is the God-head it selfe 4. If Christs humanity in the office of the Mediatour doth it self really and effectually performe not onely that which belongeth unto the flesh but also those things which are proper unto the God-head then either his God-head shall be idle and doe nothing in the work of our Redemption or surely the flesh assumed shall doe more and more shall be due and yeelded unto it than unto the Word which assumed and took it 5. If the flesh because it is said to be quickning is sort also may it be said that the God-head also because it is Redemptresse is subject to suffering and did suffer For both quickning and redeeming are properties of the office common to both natures but not after one and the same manner 6. The whole Majesty of the God-head is that it is an essence existing not of another but of it selfe and subsisting by it selfe spirituall or incorporeall eternall immense unchangeable of infinite power wisdome goodnesse c. That is the whole Majesty compriseth all the perfections and operations proper unto the God-head But omnipotency is the whole Majesty of the God-head according to the supposition of the Ubiquitaries For so Schmideline writeth in the 142. conclusion of his disputation of the Lords Supper and of the communicating of the properties had at Tubing in the yeere 1582. In the word omnipotency I comprise the whole Majesty of the God-head And in his 143. conclusion Omnipotency is the very essence it selfe of the God-head c. Therefore If Gods omnipotency be really communicated to Christs humanity so that this also is by reason of the omnipotency communicated unto it really omnipotent of necessity then by reason of the same omnipotency really communicated Christs humanity shal be indeed an essence subsisting of it self and by it self incorporeall eternall immense Creatresse of all things that is God himselfe blessed for ever and so by consequent the divine person For an essence intelligent subsisting by it selfe and which also is God must needs be the person And these are the fruits of reall communicating of properties in natures The participation of the God-head exaltation and majesty of the flesh and such like is not a reall communicating of the essentiall properties of the God head made into the humane nature or an omnipresence omniscience omnipotency that is a God-head of the manhood For such a communicating should not perfect but destroy the manhood and convert it into the God-head and dissolve the personall union of distinct natures but
a benefit Christ is made unto us righteousnesse wisdome sanctification and redemption Ye are compleat in him 1 Cor. 1.30 Col. 2.9 which is the head of all principality c. The death of Christ is the impellent or motive cause in effectuating as well our justification as our regeneration in two respects 1. In respect of God because for the death of Christ God pardoneth us our sins and giveth us the holy Ghost and restoreth in us his image Being justified in his bloud Rom. 5.9 10 Gal. 4.6 Being reconciled to God through the death of his Son Because ye are sonnes God hath sent forth the spirit of his Sonne into your hearts which cryeth Abba Father 2. In respect of us also it is an impellent cause because they who apprehend Christs merit by a true faith and apply his death unto themselves for them it is impossible to be unthankfull or not indeavour to live to the praise and honour of his name which is to begin newnesse of life The application of Christs death and the consideration thereof will not suffer us to be ungratefull but forceth us to love Christ again and prove therein our thankfulnesse for so inestimable a benefit No man therfore may imagine any remission of sins without regeneration and he lieth unto himselfe and the world who boasteth of Christs death applied to himself yet hath no desire to live godly and holily to the honor of Christ For all after they are once justified prepare and addresse themselves to doe those things which are gratefull unto God For regeneration or the desire and endeavouring of obeying God cannot be separated from the applying of his death unto us nor the benefit of regeneration from the benefit of justification All who are justified are also regenerated and sanctified and all who are regenerate are also justified Object The Apostle attributeth our regeneration to Christs resurrection why then is regeneration here attributed to his death 1 Pet. 1.3 Answ It is attributed unto Christs death as touching his merit for he merited regeneration for us by dying And it is attributed to Christs resurrection in respect of the applying of it for by rising from the dead hee applyeth unto us regeneration and giveth us the holy Ghost Eternall life Eternall life is also the fruit of Christs death God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son that whosoever beleeveth in him should not perish but have everlasting life John 3.16 1 John 5.12 God hath given unto us eternall life and this life is in his Son The meaning of the Article I beleeve in Christ dead Now what is it To beleeve in Christ dead Ans It is to beleeve that Christ hath not only suffered extreme torments for my sake but also death it selfe and hath by his death obtained for mee remission of sins and reconciliation with God and consequently also the holy Ghost who beginneth in me a new life that I may again be made the Temple of God and at length attain unto everlasting life wherein I shall worship and magnifie God for ever Quest 44. Why is there added He descended into hell Ans That in my greatest paines and most grievous tentations I may support my selfe with the comfort that my Lord Jesus Christ hath delivered me by the unspeakable distresses torments and terrours of his soule into which hee was plunged both before a Psal 18.5 6. 116.3 Mat. 26.36 27.46 Heb. 5.7 and then especially when he hanged on the Crosse from the straits and torments of hell b Esay 53.5 The Explication Two things are here to be handled 1. The true sense and meaning of this Article 2. The use 1. What the true sense of this Article is or what the descent of Christ into Hell signifieth HEll in Scripture is taken three waies For it signifieth 1. The Grave Three significations of hell in Scripture Then yee shall bring my gray-head with sorrow unto hell Thou wile not leave my soule in hell neither wilt thou suffer thine holy One to see corruption 2. The place of the damned as in the story of the rich man and Lazarus The Glutton being in hell in torments Gen. 42.38 Psal 16.10 lift up his eyes and saw Abraham a farre off and Lazarus in his bosome If I lye downe in hell thou art there 3. The paines of hell that is the terrours and torments of the soule and conscience The paines of hell gate hold upon mee Luke 16.23 Psal 139.8 The Lord bringeth downe to hell and raiseth up that is into exceeding paines and torments out of which afterwards he againe delivereth Psal 116.3 In this third sense it is taken in this Article For it cannot be understood in the first sense of the Grave 1. Because it is said before Hee was buried If any say Why he I is not here taken for the grave that this latter Article is an exposition of the former he saith nothing For as often as two speeches expressing the same thing are joyned together so that the one is an exposition of the other it is meet that the latter be more cleere and open than the former which here is cleane contrary For. To descend into hell is more obscure than to be buried 2. It is not likely in this so brief and succinct a Confession that the same things should be twice spoken in other words Neither can this place be understood of the place of the damned Why hell is not here taken for the place of the damned as is proved by this division 1. If Christ did locally descend into Hell he descended either as touching his God-head or as touching his soule or as touching his body Not as touching his God-head For this is every-where Nor as touching his body For that rested in the grave three dayes as was prefigured by Jonas the type of Christ Because no part of Christ could be in hell neither rose it from any other place but from the grave Nor us touching his soule 1. Because Scripture no where expresseth and mentioneth it 2. Because Christ dying on the Crosse Luke 23.46 23 4â— Christs soule descended not locally said of his soule Father into thy hands I commend my spirit And to the Theefe This day shalt thou be with mee in Paradise Therefore the soule of Christ after his death was in the hand of his Father in Paradise not in Hell And that cavill little steadeth the Adversaries of this doctrine that hee might be also in the hand of his Fatheâ— that is in his Fathers protection even in Hell according to that Psal 139.8 If I lye downe in Hell thou art there that is there also will God have care of me and there also will he keep me that I perish not for one place interpreteth another And he had said before unto the Thief This day shalt thou be with me in Paradise Luke 23.43 that is in
remission of sinnes and eternall life freely for Christs sake and we binde our selves to the yeelding and performance of faith and new obedience Therefore they confirme not neither assure them of Gods grace who are without faith and repentance or use other rites or to some other end then God hath appointed Moreover It is superstitious and idolatrous to attribute the testification of Gods grace either to the externall work and rite without the promise or to any other works invented by men Wherefore the abusing or not right using of the Sacraments hath not the grace of God accompanying it or assureth any man of it As it is said Circumcision is profitable Rom. 2.15 if thou doe the law c. The confirmation of the eleventh conclusion The figure of Baptisme being correspondent to the Arke of Noah doth also save us not the outward washing away of the filth of the flesh but the inward testifying of a good conscience towards God The bread which we breake is it not the communion of the body of Christ And seeing the Sacraments are an externall instrument whereby the holy Ghost fostereth and preserveth faith it followeth that they serve for the salvation of Beleevers as doth the Word But contrary the wicked through the abuse of the Sacraments and the contempt of Christ and his benefits which are offered unto them in his Word and Sacraments and through the confession of his doctrine which they imbrace not with a true faith purchase unto themselves the anger of God and everlasting pains according to the saying of the Prophet Esay 66.3 He that killeth a Bullock is as if he slew a man he that sacrificeth a sheep 1 Cor. 11.20 is as if he cut off a dogs neck And S. Paul Whosoever shall eate this bread and drink the cup of the Lord unworthily shall be guilty of the body and bloud of the Lord. But the things signified because they are received by faith only and are either proper unto salvation or salvation it selfe as Christ and his benefits they cannot be received of the wicked neither can they at all be received but unto salvation The confirmation of the twelfth conclusion A promise and the signe of a promise having a condition of faith and fidelity adjoyned unto it are ratified whensoever the condition is performed But such is that promise which is signified and confirmed by the Sacraments therefore if in the use of them faith doth accompany which beleeveth the promise the things promised and signified are received together with the signes I might deale with thee as thou hast done when thou diddest despise the oath in breaking the covenant Ezek. 16.59 Neverthelesse I will remember my covenant made with thee in the dayes of thy youth and I will confirme unto thee an everlasting covenant The confirmation of the thirteenth conclusion The iterating of circumcision or baptisme hath beene no where received or admitted Neither is the reason hereof obscure or unknowne because those Sacraments were instituted to be an initiating or solemne receiving of men into the Church which is alwayes ratified to him that is penitent and persisteth therein But the use of other Sacraments is commanded to be iterated as of the Sacrifices the Passeover worshipping at the Arke Cleansings as also of the Lords Supper The cause is because they are a testimony that the covenant which was made in circumcision and baptisme is ratified and firme to him that repenteth And this exercising of our faith is alwayes necessary The confirmation of the fourteenth conclusion That there is one common definition agreeing to the Sacraments both of the Old and New Testament hath bin shewed before That the difference of them consisteth in the number and forme of the rites is apparent by a particular enumeration of them For in the New Testament it is manifest that there are but two because there are no other ceremonies commanded of God and having annexed unto them the promise of grace And that the old Sacraments signifie Christ which hereafter should be exhibited the new Christ who already was exhibited is apparent by the interpretation delivered of them in holy Writ whereof we spake in the definition Now they differ in clearnesse because in the New Testament the ceremonies are purer and signifying things complete and perfect In the Old were moe rites shadowing things to come all the circumstances whereof were not as yet declared The confirmation of the fifteenth conclusion What the Ministers doe in Gods name in the administration of the Sacraments and also that God by the Sacraments signifieth that is teacheth offereth promiseth us the communion of Christ was declared in the second confirmation Hereof followeth the next which is that the holy Ghost doth move our hearts by them to beleeve For seeing the Sacraments are a visible promise they have the same authority of confirming faith in us which the promise it self made unto us hath Of this followeth the third For that which serveth for the kindling or raising of faith in us the same also serveth for the receiving of the communion of Christ and his benefits And because we attaine to this by faith therefore it is said The bread is the communion of the body of Christ Baptisme doth save us Neither yet doth the holy Ghost alwayes confirme and establish faith by them as the examples of Simon Magus and of infinite others doe shew That the use of them hurteth without faith hath been proved in the second conclusion The confirmation of the sixteenth conclusion The Sacraments without the word going before doe neither teach nor confirme our faith because the meaning and signification of them is not understood except in be declared by the word neither can the signe confirme any thing except the thing be first promised An example hereof are the Jewes who observed and now doe observe the ceremonies but adjoyn thereto the not-understood promise of the grace and benefits of Christ Without the word those who are of understanding are not saved either by doctrine as by the ordinary means or by an internall and extraordinary knowledge He that beleeveth not in the Son John 3.18 Rom. 1.17 is already condemned Faith cometh by hearing and hearing by the word of God But they may be saved without the Sacrament because although by some necessity they be deprived of these yet they may beleeve as the theefe did on the Crosse Or if they be infants according to the condition of their age they are sanctified as John in the womb and many infants also in the womb who died before the day of circumcision The word also is to be preached unto the wicked because it is appointed to convert them But the Sacraments are to be administred unto them who are acknowledged for members of the Church because they are instituted for the use of the Church only Thou maâ—st be baptized if thou beleevest Acts 8.37 The confirmation of the seventeenth conclusion The confirmation thereof is manifest
in the place of bread The Minor That he is not to be adored in the Supper is easily proved because in the New Testament since Christs ascension it hath not been nor is lawfull to tie and binde invocation to any certaine place or thing without the expresse command and permission of God except we will commit open Idolatry For all adoration bound and restrained to any certaine place or thing on earth is abrogated and cancelled by Christ The houre cometh John 4 21 22 23 24. when ye shall neither in this mountaine nor in Jerusalem worship the Father Ye worship that which ye know not we worship that which we know for salvation is of the Jews But the houre commeth and now is when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and truth For the Father requireth even such to worship him God is a Spirit and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and truth Againe if Christ be so to be adored and worshipped in the Supper by our minds and motions of body converted unto the bread that whole oblation and sacrifice should consist in the hands of sacrificing Masse-Priests because they offer the Sonne unto the Father to obtaine remission of sinnes and so were his crucifying to be re-iterated Object Christ commanded not himselfe to be offered or adored but to be eaten Therefore we establish not the Papists offering up of Christ to his Father or their worshipping of him in the bread by that corporall presence which we uphold Ans This their reasoning is two waies faulty First they begge that which is in question whilest they say that Christ commanded us to eate him in the bread for this is no where found in Scripture 2. They shift and seeke to slide from the question in averring that Christ commanded not himselfe to be adored for we have a generall precept of adoring Christ in these words Psal 45.13 Psal 97.7 Heb. 1.6 He is the Lord thy God and thou shalt worship him And let all the Angels of God worship him This generall precept without any speciall exception or expectation of any particular injunction should no lesse binde us all unto obedience and to the adoring of Christ in the bread if we had any evident proofe of his invisible existence therein than if we beheld him present with our eyes Thus Thomas expecteth not some speciall expresse warrant but doth well in worshipping towards the place where he seeth Christ standing saying My Lord and my God Wherefore John 20.28 as long as the opinion of corporall presence standeth so long the Papists idolatrous adoration and oblation and their whole Masse must needs stand also For the Papists themselves will not have that we understand their offering of Christ in the Masse of any slaughtering or murthering him but only of a publique shewing him being there corporally present and of a craving and obtaining remission of sinnes for his sake whom the Priests beare in their hands and present unto God the Father 4. The fourth sort of Arguments drawne from like places of Scripture where namely the samething is delivered in words whereof there is no controversie 1. LIke phrases have a like sense and interpretation But all these phrases are accounted for like namely for sacramentall formes of speech wherein the names or proper effects of the things signified are attributed to the signe as Circumcision is the Govenant of God The Lamb is the Passeover of the Lord. Gen. 17.10 11. Exod. 12.11 31.16 Levit. 1.4 Exod. 24.18 Exod. 26.34 1 Cor. 10.3 Marke 2.26 Luke 22.20 Acts 22.16 Titus 3.5 1 Pet. 3.21 Gen. 17.11 Exod. 12.13 14. 13.9 31 17. The Sabbath is the Covenant of the Lord. The Leviticall sacrifices are an expiation or doing away of sinne The bloud of sacrifices is the bloud of the Covenant The covering of the Arke is the mercy seate The Rock was Christ The bread is the body of Christ The cup is the New Testament Baptisme washeth away sinne Baptisme is the washing of the new birth Baptisme saveth us c. Therefore their interpretation is alike Now God himselfe interpreteth some of them thus Circumcision is a signe of the Covenant The Lamb is a signe and memoriall of the Passeover The Sabbath is a signe of the Covenant Therefore we may justly interpret the rest on the same manner The Leviticall sacrifices signifie the attonement for sinnes made by the Messias The bloud of sacrifices is a Sacrament or signe confirming the Covenant or a signe of Christs bloud whereby the Covenant was established The covering of the Arke signifieth the Mercy-seate The Rock signifieth Christ The bread is a Sacrament of the body of Christ The cup is a Sacrament sealing the new Covenant Baptisme is a Sacrament of the washing away of sins and of our regeneration and salvation 2. As the cup is the New Testament so is the bloud of Christ the New Testament The cup is the New Testament Sacramentally that is it is a signe of the New Testament Therefore Christs bloud is a signe of the New Testament The Major is apparent because without doubt the words of Luke and Paul This cup is the New Testament in my bloud and the words of Matthew and Marke This is my bloud of the New Testament have all one meaning The Minor is proved before in the first argument and cannot be taken otherwise For the New Testament is no externall thing or ceremony but a free reconciliation with God promised in the Gospel through the bloud and death of Christ The cup then is either the thing promised or the seale of the promise but it is not the promise nor the thing promised Therefore it is the seale of the promise 3. The bread which we breake saith the Apostle is it not the communion of the body of Christ As bread is the communion of the body of Christ so also it is the body of Christ The reason is cleere because Pauls words and Christs have both one meaning seeing Paul interpreteth Christ But the bread is the communion of the body of Christ sacramentally that is it is a Sacrament or signe of our spirituall communion with Christs body For properly and literally bread cannot be termed a communion Therefore bread also is Christs body sacramentally that is it is a Sacrament or signe of Christs body Now that the communion or communication of Christs body is spirituall is thus proved 1. Paul speaketh of such a communion as whereby we being many are made one bread one body But we being many are one body spiritually Therefore the communion mentioned of Paul is spirituall 2. The communion of Christ whereof he speaketh cannot stand with the communion of Divels 1 Cor. 10.21 Ye cannot saith he drink the cup of the Lord and the cup of the Divels ye cannot be partakers of the Lords Table and of the table of the Divels The argument is not deduced from an inconvenience or an undecency as some
Lib. 4. Dut. 11. c. Quidam The age and parentage of Consubstantiation This opinion Lombard relateth and testifieth that it was before his time maintained by some but he calleth it a Paradox a strange or wonderfull opinion Guitmund fathereth it on Berengarius after his recantation and termeth it Impanation Others impute it to one Walrame against whom Anselme hath two books extant Some fasten it on Rupert Abb. Tuit who lived not long after Guitmond about the year of the Lord 1124. Petrus de Alliaco Cardinall of Cambray saith In lib. 4. sentent q. 6. art 2. that he had rather defend Consubstantiation the Transubstantiation unlesse the Church of Rome had defined the contrary He lived about the year of our Lord 1416. Lib. de Ca. Babyl At length Luther approving the judgement of this Cardinal of Cambray as himself witnesseth first thought it no article of faith to beleeve that the substance of bread remaineth or remaineth not but either point might be held without heresie Afterwards it seemed more probable unto him that the bread should remaine and the body of Christ should be under in and with the bread And this is now their opinion who name themselves Lutherans Wherefore they interpret Christs words This is my body thus In this with this under this bread is my body and they glory and boast no lesse then the Papists that they retain the letter without any trope or figure And so have they ranked themselves that if they combate with Papists then the particle This noteth with them bread only and the bread it self is the body of Christ If they bend their forces against us whom they call Sacramentaries then the particle This shall not signifie bread only but bread with the body of Christ lodged invisibly therein and the sense shall be This is my body that is This bread and my body lying hid in this bread is my body They illustrate this their glosse with vulgar similies as they call them that Christ when he gave his invisible body in the bread in like manner said This is my body as the Country-man saith of the graine in his sacke This is corne pointing at the sack or the Merchant of the money in his purse This is money pointing at his purse or the Mother of the Infant in his cradle This is my child shewing the cradle only or the Vintner of his wine This is Rhenish wine when he reacheth out the Goblet These formes of speech are noted and observed out of their books and disputations But good men they have that luck which the Poet alotteth unto fooles Fooles when they seeke to avoid an inconvenience Horat. Serm. lib. 1. sat 3. fall into an evill For in place of that absurd miracle of the subsisting of accidents without any subject they have induced another more absurd of the penetration of two bodies and whether we respect the letter or the sense they have wandred departed farther from Christs words then the Papists For the letter thus lieth This that is This bread is my body The sense standeth thus The visible bread broken and distributed is my true and essentiall body given for you It is my true body not by any change of essence and nature as the Papists would have it for bread was not assumed by the Word for us neither was bread given and crucified for us but it is my true body in a mysticall sense and Sacramentall kind of speech according to the interpretation of the sounder antiquity of Paul yea and of Christ himselfe The Transsubstantials glosse is farte wide of this the letter and meaning of Christs words As then the Papists retaine not the letter when in stead of Christs words This is my body they annex this seraphicall or super-angelicall glosse This thing or substance whatsoever undeterminate contained under these formes is my body so much lesse doe these reserve entire the letter and sense of Christs words when instead of them they place their own saying My body is in with under the bread or The bread and the body lying hid invisibly in the bread is my body For neither is the bread alone nor the bread with the body inclosed therein properly Christs body as an empty or full purse is not properly and without all figure of speech termed money Now the phrases they use are too improper and too much unfitting that they would expresse For as for the instances produced by them we know as soone as the Countrey-man Merchant Mother or Vintner speaketh that graine is in the sacke money in the purse an infant in the cradle and wine in the goblet But when these men tell us This is Christs body we know not forth-with that Christs body is in the bread neither can it be proved because an Article of the Christian faith testfieth that it is in heaven Of the Schisme of the Consubstantials LUthers foundation and maine ground at first was those words onely of Christ This is my body Afterwards in a disputation bad with the adversaries of this opinion pinion the 27. and 28. yeere he retired and fled to the Ubiquity and for that one foundation or ground afore-named he assumed four other 1. The personall union of the natures in Christ The right hand of God which is every where 3. The truth of God which cannot lie 4. The three fold manner of the existence of Christs body in any place But being at length repulsed from these holds he betook himselfe againe to Christs words and desired that all disputation of Ubiquity should quite be revoked Notwithstanding since his time some Lutherans by profession finding no sufficient warrant for their cause in Christs words have set Ubiquity on foot againe and at this day account it the best stake in their hedge Three sorts of Lutherans though others utterly disclaime it Hence arose a faction and division among the Consubstantials some are * 1. Simplices simply Lutherans who by Christs words only defend the being of Christs body in the bread and the eating it with the mouth some are * 2. Multipraesentiarii Omnipotentiarii multipresentiarie and omnipotentiarie Lutherans that is such as think Christs body to be present at once in many hosts by reason of the omnipotency really communicated therewith Lastly some are * 3. Omnipraesentiarii Ubiquitarii omnipresentiarie Lutherans who to assoile the presence of Christs body in the bread lay hold on the shield of Ubiquity and teach that Christs body is every where present by vertue of the union with the Word and therefore is present in the bread both before and after the use thereof in the Supper and that the right of consecration doth effect only that it be eaten in the bread Of this our young Divines for the understanding of this controverfie may not be ignorant For hereby they perceive that at this day there are two maine columnes or pillars erected to under-prop Consubstantiation namely The two principall
bloud is no remission Heb. 9.22 7. The Masse is repugnant unto the Articles of our faith concerning the true humanity of Christ concerning his true ascension into heaven and his returning from thence at the day of judgement For it fastneth on Christ a body made of bread it feigneth that Christ lieth hid corporally under the formes of bread and wine 8. The Masse is contrary to the communion of Saints with Christ For it imagineth an execrable invention which is that Christs body doth descend into our bodies and remaineth as long within our bodies as the formes remaine of bread and wine But the Supper teacheth that we are made members of Christ by the holy Ghost and ingraffed into him 9. The Masse is repugnant to the true worship of God because it maketh Christ to be there corporally present and so by consequent there to be worshipped Even as of old before his ascension it was not only lawfull but in duty required that Christ should be worshipped in whatsoever place he was and so also did his Disciples alwayes worship him when he was present as also when he ascended from them but after his ascension they did not from that time adore and worship him turning unto any one particular place more then other Wherefore seeing the Papists in their Masse tie the worship and adoration of Christ to a thing whereunto Christ himselfe by expresse word hath not tyed it They professe themselvs to be idolaters and doe no lesse absurdly and impiously in this then if they should worship Christ at a wall or if they should worship a pillar falling downe before it Hence it is evident that the Masse is an Idoll made by Antichrist out of divers and those horrible errours and blasphemies and substituted in place of the Lords Supper and for this cause is justly and rightly supprest Object 1. The Masse is an application of Christs sacrifice Therefore it is not to be taken away Ans I deny the Antecedent because we apply Christs merit by faith only as it is said Ephes 3.17 That Christ may dwell in your hearts by faith Object 2. There must be a perpetuall sacrifice in the Church Esay 66.23 Mal. 1.11 because Esay foretold that it should be from Sabbath to Sabbath and Mal. They shall offer a pure offering Ans The sacrifices of the new Church of the Gentiles is the Sacrifice of thanksgiving and the Prophets insinuate unto us such a Sacrifice perpetuall and pure Such a Sacrifice of thanksgiving the Fathers termed the Eucharist 1. Because it is a remembrance of Christs Sacrifice 2. Because almes were given in the Primitive Church after the Supper was ended which were a Sacrifice But that the Supper should be a propitiatory Sacrifice the Fathers never so much as once dreamed Quest 81. Who are to come unto the Table of the Lord Ans They only who are truly sorrowfull that they have offended God by their sins and yet trust that those sins are pardoned them for Christs sake and what other infirmities they have that those are covered by his passion and death who also desire more and more to go forward in faith and integrity of life But hypocrites and they who doe not truly repent doe eat and drink damnation to themselves a 1 Cor. 11.28 10.19 20 21 22. The Explication Here are three things to be handled and declared 1. Who ought to approach unto the Lords Supper 2. What the wicked receive if they come 3. What is the right and lawfull use of the Supper 1. Who ought to approach unto the Lords Supper THese are distinct questions Who ought to approach unto the Supper and Who ought to be admitted to the Supper The former concerneth the duty of the Communicants the latter the duty of the Church and Ministers The former is stricter the latter larger and more generall for touching the former the godly alone ought to come touching the latter not the godly onely but Hypocrites also who are not known to be such are to be admitted by the Church unto the Supper Wherefore all that ought to come ought to be admitted but on the other side not all that ought to be admitted Who ought to come unto the Lords Supper ought to come but they only ought to approach unto the Supper 1. Who acknowledge their sinnes and are truly sorry for them 2. Who have a confidence that they are pardoned and forgiven them by Christ and for his sake 3. Who have an earnest purpose and desire of profiting and going forward more and more in faith and purenesse of life that is they only ought to approach and draw neer unto the Lords Supper and are worthy guests of Christ who live in true faith and repentance Herein a mans true proof and examination consisteth whereof Saint Paul speaketh 1 Cor. 11.28 What it is to prove himselfe Let a man examine himselfe and soâ—let him eat of this bread To prove thy self is 2 Cor. 13.5 How we may be assured that we have true faith and repentance Rom. 1.1.5 To examine whether thou have faith and repentance according as it is said Prove your selves whether yee are in the faith whether Christ dwell in you But how shall a man know that he hath these things 1. By a confidence and tranquillity of conscience because Being justified by faith we have peace towards God Hope maketh not ashamed because the love of God is shed in our hearts by the holy Ghost which is given unto us 2. By effects that is by the beginnings of true outward and inward obedience and by an earnest purpose to obey God according to all his commandements They who have and perceive this in themselves ought to draw neere and partake of Christs Supper namely whoso have faith and repentance not in possibility only but also actually Therefore infants are not capable of the Supper because they save faith only potentially and in possibility not actually they have an inclination to faith or they have faith only by inclination but they have not an actuall faith But here is required an actuall faith which is both a knowledge and confidence or assurance on Christs merit a beginning of new obedience and a purpose of living godly also an examination of himselfe and commemoration or remembrance of the Lords death Foure causes why wicked men and hypocrites ought not to approach unto the Supper It is not lawfull for the wicked to approach unto the Supper 1. Because Sacraments are instituted only for the faithfull and those which are converted to seale to them the promise of the Gospel and confirm their faith The word notwithstanding is common to the converted and unconverted that the converted may heare it be confirmed by it and that the unconverted also may hear it and therby be converted But the Sacraments pertaine to the faithfull alone and Christ instituted his Supper for his Disciples alone Luke 22.15 as he said I have earnestly
covenant not to the impeachment of the Church or them that communicate with them but of themselves for they procure unto themselves damnation Neverthelesse it is the duty of the Church to observe diligently what manner of men it admitteth and the Minister of the Church is there excused where excommunication is not authorised yet so that hee give not willingly the Sacrament to the abusers thereof but be instant in warning and reproving them and wish them to take heed of and avoid their abuses For Matth. 5.6 Blessed are they that hunger and thirst after righteousnesse But the sin shall lie on others even on them who commit the abuse and on them who wink with both their eyes thereat OF THE PASSEOVER SEeing it is aforesaid that the Lords Supper succeeded the Passeover it shall not be impertinent to declare here in brief the doctrine of the Passeover The Questions concerning the Passeover are these 1. What it was 2. What were the ends and uses thereof 3. What are the allegories or resemblances of the rites of the Paschall lamb 4. Whether it be now abrogated and what succeeded in place thereof 1. What the Passeover was THe Passeover was a solemn eating of a Lamb enjoyned the Israelites by God that this ceremony being yeerly performed throughout every house might be a memoriall unto them of their deliverance out of Egypt but should especially signifie unto the faithfull their sparituall freedome from sin and death by Christ which was to be sacrificed or slain on the crosse and to be eaten by faith Or It was a Sacrament of the ancient Church which by Gods commandemeâ—t was to be celebrated with the yeerly slaying and eating in every family of the Jewes a lambe of a yeer old to be a remembrance unto hem of the benefits of their delivery out of Egypt and a seale of the promise of grace touching remission of sins for the sacrifice of the Messias Pascha the Greek word cometh from the Hebrew Pesach a Passeover derived of Pasach which signifieth To passe over This Sacrament and whole solemnity had his name from the passing over of the Angel who seeing the bloud of the Lamb on the Israelites upper door-posts passed over and spared their first-born when he slew all the first-born of the Egyptians The history of the institution of the Passeover is extant Exod. 12. God commanded that the killing of the Lamb should be executed with certain and divers ceremonies The rites and ceremonies of the passeover For A lamb of a yeer old a male without blemish was to be separated from the flocke the tenth day of the first moneth called Nisan or Abib according to the number of the families for every houshold a lamb and was to be slain four dayes after that is the fourteenth day at even and the posts and lintels or upper cheeks of the doors of their houses were to be sprinkled with his bloud then was hee to be rosted and eaten whole and in haste with unleavened bread and sowre herbs and they that did eat it stood with their loins girt their shooes on their feet and their staves in their hands Exod. 12 11 23. Of this ceremony saith God It is the Lords Passeover The bloud shall be a token for you upon the houses where ye are that when I see the bloud I may passe over you This feast God would have to be yeerly that is once every yeer seven whole dayes celebrated with great solemnity Exod. 12.14 15. And this day shall be unto you as a remembrance and ye shall keep it an holy feast unto the Lord throughout your generations yee shall keep it an holy ordinance for ever Seven dayes shall yee eat unleavened bread c. Look Exod. 23.15 Levit. 15.5 Deut. 16.1 2. What the ends and uses of the Passeover were FIve ends of the institution of the passeover are specified Exod. 12. To be a confirmation of the promise of the Angels passeover and of the saving of the Israelites first-born That the bloud of the lamb sprinkled on the posts might be a signe of the Angel-which should passe over the Israelites and save their first-born as it is said ver 13. And the bloud shall be a token for you upon the houses where you are that when I see the bloud I may passe over you This end after the first performance of the rite and execution of the passeover ceased forthwith although the analogie thereof remain for ever For God both heretofore spared and now spareth the faithfull for Christs bloud shed that is for it remitteth their sins as in the second end is declared To be a type of Christ That it might be a figure of the Messias his sacrifice to come or a sign of the deliverance to be performed by Christ and of Gods grace towards his Church this was the principall end of the yeerly passeover Exod. 12.45 John 19.36 This is thus proved It is said Ye shall not break a bone thereof This figure John saith was then fulfilled when Christs bones were not broken on the crosse therefore the lamb was a type of Christ and of his sacrifice Againe Christ our passeover is sacrificed for us 1 Cor. 5.7 Therefore the paschall lamb signified Christ and the sacrificing thereof represented the sacrificing of Christ Besides the Church understood the significations of other sacrifices that they were types of the sacrifices of the Messias for the Fathers of the old Church were not so brutish as to hope for remission of sins by the bloud of buls much more therefore did they by faith behold the Messias and his sacrifice in the Paschall lamb Finally John calleth Christ The Lamb of God Revel 13.8 and the Lamb which was slain from the beginning of the world to wit because he was prefigured by that lamb which was slain to be the passeover For a remembrance of their delivery out of Egypt Exod. 12.15 Deut 16.3 To be a memoriall of the first passeover and of the delivery out of Egypt For God would that the memory of so great a benefit should be preserved among his people lest their posterity should wexe unthankfull Seven dayes shalt thou eat unleavened bread even the bread of tribulation for thou camest out of the land of Egypt in haste that thou mayest remember the day when thou camest out of the land of Egypt all the dayes of thy life To be an occasion of publick concourse to praise God for this benefit Exod. 12.16 That it might be a bond of publick assemblies and maintenance of ecclesiasticall Ministery In the first day shall be an holy assembly To distinguish Israel from other people Exod. 12.43 48. That it might be a Sacrament whereby to distinguish Gods people from other nations No stranger shall eat thereof But if a stranger dwell with thee and will observe the passeover of the Lord let him circumcise all the males that belong unto him and then let
the Ministers with the Seniory should have and should exercise a power of convicting reproving excommunicating and executing any other point of Ecclesiasticall discipline on any offenders whatsoever even on Princes themselves 1. WHere the Word and Sacraments are rightly to be administred there must the authority of discipline be established But in the Primitive Church and at this day in well ordered Churches the authority of discipline is not established Therefore the Word and Sacraments are not rightly there administred But absurd were it so to say Therefore abjurd also to impose a necessity of discipline on the Church Ans These words To be rightly administred are doubtfull and have a diverse meaning 1. To administer rightly signifieth so to administer as that the administration wholly agree with the prescript of the Lord. 2. It signifieth To administer not according to the right perfect and exact observing of it but so that the administration be pleasing to God and profitable for the salvation of the Church In this whole world the Sacraments are not rightly administred according to the former signification but according to the later signification they are For albeit some blemishes by reason of the Churches weaknesse and imbecillity cannot be corrected and amended on a sudden yet the administration may please God and profit the Church albeit we are neverthelesse to acknowledge and bewail the defects for Mat. 5.6 Blessed are they that hunger and thirst after righteousnesse Except these things be granted there will be no pure Church in the world We may seem now to have sufficiently assoyled this objection but yet further also we deny the Minor For the authority of discipline was and continued in the Primitive Church and shall also continue in an ill ordered Church but with great abuse as amongst the Papists Repl. In our Churches and in the Helvetian Churches excommunication is not in force Therefore the Minor of the former objection is true Ans Although in some Churches it be not exercised yet is it not then ill exercised but the Minor is neverthelesse infringed because in those Churches the Word and the Sacraments are rightly administred according to the other signification whereof we spake before Here Ursine alledged a saying out of Chrysostome Chrysostome saith If any wicked person come unto the Lords Table give not unto him the Lords Sacrament the body and bloud of the Lord if he will not beleeve signifie it unto me I will rather lose my life then I will admit him Excommunication therefore was in force and was exercised in the Church many hundred yeers after Christ Object 2. That doctrine which hath neither Gods word nor approved examples Mat. 18.17 is not to be thrust upon the Church But this doctrine hath neither of these 1 Cor. 5.5 1 Tim. 1 20. Therefore it is not to be thrust upon the Church Ans It hath the word for it If he refuse to hear the Church let him be unto thee as an heathen man It hath approved examples Let such a one be delivered unto Sathan And Whom I have delivered unto Sathan Objections against the Word or Scriptures alledged for proofe of Seniory and Excommunication REpl No mention is made of the Seniory or of Excommunication in the place Mat. 18. Therefore this Scripture proveth nothing Ans I deny the Antecedent For although there be not the formall words yet the thing it self is contained in them For the Seniory is intimated in these words Tell it to the Church and Excommunication in these Let him be unto thee as an heathen or publican Rep. 2. The Church is not the Seniory That by the name of the Church is meant the Seniorie But Christ commandeth that signification be given to the Church and that admonition be given by the Church therefore not by the Seniory Ans I deny the Major albeit the whole reason notwithstanding may be granted namely that Christ understandeth not the Seniory but taketh properly the name of the Church both of the Jewish before Christ and of the Christian after Christ But there must be notwithstanding some order of the jurisdiction of the Church some must be appointed and ordained by the Church to oversee and direct mens actions else will there be a confusion of all things We cannot observe that which Christ saith without defining of circumstances Therefore by the Church is comprehended the Seniory and by consequent it is understood of a Councell or assembly of Governours Repl. 3. It is true indeed that signification cannot be given to the whole Church but to the Councell or assembly of Governours which yet is civill so that the meaning is Tell the Church that is the Senate of the City Ans Now then they confesse that it cannot be signified to the whole Church but to some Councell or assembly of Governours which yet must be civill not ecclesiasticall The question then is whether Christs words are to be understood of a civill Councell and assembly They prove therefore that this Councel is civill thus That Councell which punisheth with corporall punishment is civill The Councell which gave Paul power to put Christians to death punisheth with corporall punishment Therefore it was civill Ans That Councell which punisheth so according to right is civill but they who gave that power to Paul did it wrongfully because they had not that right and authority but usurped it Which also is to be thought of their putting Stephen to death because it was done tumultuously and further the Priests themselves were consenting to it but unjustly Rep. 4. S. Austin saith John 18.31 Tract 114. in Joh. that the Jewes did lie when they said It is not lawfull for us to put any man to death Ans The words of Austin are these Did they not put him to death whom they yeelded up to be put to death But we must understand that they meant they might not put any to death because of the solemnity of the day which they began now to celebrate Ye false Israelites are ye so hard hearted Have ye so lost all sense through your over-much malice that you think your selves undefiled from the bloud of the innocent because ye delivered him to another to be slain Therefore Austin saith not that they lied but only saith that they did that neverthelesse which they said was not lawfull for them to doe Rep. 5. S. Chrysostome also saith In Mat. Hom. 83. It is not lawfull for us that is because of the feast approaching Ans This is not true with the good leave of S. Chrysostome be it spoken because it is witnessed by their stories that their civill jurisdiction and lawes were taken from them by Herod the Great Lib. 4. Antiq. c. 8. and Josephus writeth that the whole Councell was put to death by him and Hyrcanus one Sameas only excepted Therefore the Jews in effect say this unto Pilate Thou hast the power of the sword it is not lawfull for us to put any man to
are not able to merit or deserve any thing But there cometh good rather unto our selves by good works For the good works which we doe are a conformity with God and therefore are Gods gift by which gift and benefit we are bound unto God but not God unto us Wherefore it is no lesse absurd to say that we merit salvation at Gods hands by good works than if one should say Thou hast given mee an hundred florens therefore thou oughtest also to give mee a thousand florens Howbeit God enjoyneth us good works and promiseth free recompence to them that doe them as a father promiseth rewards unto his sons ON THE 34. SABBATH Quest 92. Which is the law of God Ans God spake all these words a Exod. 20.1 Deut. 5.6 1. I am the Lord thy God which hath brought thee out of Egypt out of the house of bondage thou shalt have no other gods in my sight 2. Thou shalt make to thee no graven Image nor the likenesse of any thing that is in heaven above or in the earth beneath or in the water under the earth Thou shalt not bow downe to them nor worship them for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God and visit the sins of the Fathers upon the Children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate mee and shew mercy unto thousands of them that love mee and keep my commandements 3. Thou shalt not take the name of thy Lord thy God in vain for the Lord will not hold him guiltlesse that taketh his name in vain 4. Remember thou keep holy the Sabbath day six daies shalt thou labour and doe all that thou hast to doe but the seventh day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God in it thou shalt doe no maner of works thou and thy son and thy daughter thy man-servant and thy maid-servant thy cattell and thy stranger that is within thy gate For in six daies the Lord made heaven and earth the sea and all that in them is and rested the seventh day wherefore the Lord blessed the seventh day and hallowed it 5. Honour thy father and thy mother that thy daies may be long in the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee 6. Thou shalt doe no murther 7. Thou shalt not commit adultery 8. Thou shalt not steale 9. Thou shalt not beare false witnesse against thy neighbour 10. Thou shalt not covet thy neighbours house nor his wife nor his servant nor his maid nor his oxe nor his asse nor any thing that is his The Explication Now followeth the doctrine of the Law which is the Canon and Rule of good works The chief questions concerning the Law are 1. What the law is in generall 2. What are the parts of Gods law 3. How far the law is and is not abrogated by Christ. 4. In what the morall law differeth from the Gospell 5. How the Decalogue is divided 6. What is the true meaning of the Decalogue and of every commandement thereof 7. How far forth the law may be kept of the regenerate 8. What is the use of the law THe first foure of these questions pertaine to this 92. Question of Catechisme the fifth to the 93. Question the sixth to the 94. and to the rest which follow untill the 114. Question the seventh to the 114. Question the eighth to the 115. Question of the Catechisme 1. What the law is in generall THe Latine word Lex which signifieth the law is derived from Lego which signifieth to reade and publish or from Lego which signifieth to choose With the former derivation agreeth the Hebrew word with the latter the Greek word For in the Greek the Law is called 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which cometh from a word that signifieth to divide and distribute and therefore the Law is so called because it distributeth unto every one proper charges and functions In Hebrew the Law is called Thorah that is doctrine because Lawes are published unto all that every one may learn them And hereof is it that the ignorance or not knowing the Law doth not excuse nay rather they who are ignorant of those Laws which belong unto them doe even in that very respect sin because they are ignorant The Law in generall is a sentence or decree commanding things that are honest binding creatures endued with reason unto obedience with a promise of reward and commination or threatning of punishment It is a sentence commanding things that are honest otherwise it is no Law It bindeth creatures endued with reason for the Law was not made for them who are not bound to obedience With a promise of reward The Law freely promiseth blessings unto those who performe obedience because no obedience can be meritorious before God Object But the Gospell also promiseth freely good things and blessings Therefore the Law differeth not from the Gospel Ans The Law promiseth freely after one manner and the Gospel after another The Law promiseth freely with a condition of our obedience But the Gospel promiseth freely without the workes of the Law with a condition of faith not with a condition of our obedience Wherefore the Gospel doth not promise blessings freely without all condition but without such a condition as wherewith the Law promiseth blessings unto us And with a commination or threatning of punishment otherwise the Law were a vaine and empty sound and should effect nothing Plato saith A Law is a right forme of government directed to the best end by fit meanes proposing punishments to transgressors and rewards to the obedient Oftentimes by the word Law the course and order of Nature appointed by God is improperly signified So we say The Law that is the order of Nature requireth that fruit spring of a tree But more improperly doth S. Paul call originall sin the law of sin because as a law it constraineth us to sin 2. What are the parts of the Law LAwes are some divine and some humane Humane lawes are they which being established by men doe bind certain men unto certain externall actions whereof there is no divine commandement or prohibition expresly with a promise of reward and commination or threatning of punishments corporall and temporall These humane lawes are either Civill or Ecclesiasticall Civill lawes are such as are made by Magistrates or some whole body and corporation concerning a certain order of actions to be observed in civill government in bargaines and contracts in judgements and punishments c. Ecclesiasticall or Ceremoniall lawes are those which are made by the consent of the Church concerning some certain order of actions to be observed in the Ministery of the Church which are the limitations of circumstances serving for the Law of God Divine lawes that is the lawes of God partly belong unto Angels and partly unto men and partly unto certain speciall men And these doe not only bind unto externall actions but require further internall or inward qualities actions and motions neither propose they corporall and
sufficing for the true knowledge of God 13. Moreover although naturall testimonies teach nothing that is false of God yet men except the light of Gods word come thereto gather and conceive out of them nought else but false and erroneous opinions concerning God both because these testimonies shew not so much as is delivered in the word and also because even those things which may be perceived and understood by naturall judgement men notwithstanding by reason of that blindnesse and corruption which is ingendred in them take and interpret amisse and diversly deprave and corrupt 14. Wherefore in the first Commandement of the Decalogue the ignorance of those things is forbidden and condemned which God hath proposed unto the Church to be knowne of us concerning him in his word and in his works both of our creation and redemption Likewise all errours are condemned of such as imagine either that there is no God as the Epicures or moe gods as the Ethnicks Manichees and those that pray to Angels dead men and other creatures and the vanity of superstitious men which put their trust in other creatures or things diverse from him who hath manifested himselfe in the Church as Jews Mahumetists Sabellius Samosatenus Arius Pneumatomachists and such like who acknowledge not God to be the eternall Father with the Son and the holy Ghost co eternall Hitherto have we delivered certaine generall rules for the better understanding of the true meaning of the Decalogue Now we are to speake of the sense and meaning of the Decalogue in speciall that is of the meaning of every particular Commandement An exposition of the first Commandement THe first commandement hath two parts a preface and a commandement The preface goeth before being comprehended in these words I am Jehovah the Lord thy God which have brought thee out of the Land of Egypt out of the house of bondage This preface belongeth to the whole Decalogue because it describeth and discerneth God the Law-giver from all creatures Law-givers and false gods and further it containeth three severall reasons why the obedience both of this first Commandement Three reasons why obedience is to be performed unto God in this and in all the other Commandements and of the rest which follow is to be performed unto God 1. He saith he is Jehovah whereby he distinguisheth himselfe the true God from all creatures that he may shew himselfe to have the chiefe right of ruling I am Jehovah That is I whom thou hearest speaking and giving the Law unto thee am the true God who is and existeth from himselfe and by himselfe and giveth unto all other things their being and therefore hath chiefe authority and soveraignty over all Creatour of all things eternall omnipotent author and preserver of all that are good therefore obey me 2. He saith that he is the God of his people that through the promise of his bountifulnesse he might allure us to obey him God verily is the God of all creatures as touching both the creating and preserving and governing of them all but he is the God of his Church by the singular participation and manifestation of himselfe How God is said to be out God God then is our God when we acknowledge him to be such as he hath manifested himselfe in his word namely who imployeth his omnipotencie justice wisdome and mercy unto our salvation or who tendereth us with an especiall and peculiar favour in his Sonne For God is properly said to be their God whom he loveth and favoureth above all others Whereupon also the Prophet David affirmeth that Nation to be blessed whose God is the Lord Psal 33.12 even the people that he hath chosen for his inheritance 3. He saith Which have brought thee out of the Land of Egypt As if he should say I am he I am he who have manifested my selfe unto thee and bestowed all those blessings upon thee This he addeth that by the mentioning of his late and notable benefit he might declare unto them and admonish them that they were bound therefore to shew thankfulnesse and obedience unto him This also belongeth unto us because it doth figuratively comprehend and imply all the deliverances of the Church by the mentioning of so famous and notable a benefit And further also this was a type of our wonderfull deliverance atchieved by Christ Now when he saith that he Jehovah is this God and deliverer of the Church he opposeth himselfe both to all creatures and to Idols challenging all divine honour and obedience unto himselfe alone according to the exposition hereof delivered Deut. 6. Esa 43. and in other places Wherefore it followeth not onely that this Jehovah is to be worshipped but that he alone is to be worshipped and to be accounted for our God Some of the ancient made this preface to be the first Commandment and for the second Commandement they took the words following Hesychius Thou shalt have no other gods before me But it is manifest that these words I am the Lord thy God c. are not the words of commanding ought but of one recording or rehearsing something of himselfe Howbeit the words which follow Thou shalt have no other gods c. have the forme and nature of a Commandement The end of the first Commandement The Commandement then is Thou shalt have no other gods before me The end of this Commandment is the immediate internall or inward worship of God that is that we acknowledge the true God alone revealed in the Church and give due honour unto him with our whole minde will and heart Moreover this Commandement is in such wise a negative and denieth other gods as that it containeth also an affirmation thus Thou shalt have none other gods therefore thou shalt have me that Jehovah which have manifested my selfe in my Church thy God alone Now to have God What it is to have God is 1. To know and acknowledge God namely that there is a God that he is one God that he is such a God as he hath manifested himselfe in his Church and that he is such a God also towards us 2. To trust in God onely 3. With great humility and patience to subject and submit our selves unto God 4. To expect and looke for all good things from God onely 5. To love God 6. To reverence and worship God Herein consisteth the obedience of this Commandement whose parts are the vertues which follow immediatly after the explication of the words of the Commandement What is meant by the words other God What it is to have other gods An other God is every thing to which the properties and works of God are attributed though the thing it selfe have them not and they be not agreeable to the nature of the thing whereunto they are attributed To have other gods is not to have the true God that is either to have no God or to have moe gods or an other then the knowne God or not
to lye of God either in words or in gestures But wood or graven Images are lies of God because they cannot represent God yea because they swerve so farre and carry us with them from God as their figure and shape is unlike God and so consequently they cause us also to lye of God If then we will not lie of God we must needs neither make nor have any images or graven semblances For as Jeremie saith The stocke is a doctrine of vanity Cap. 10.8 Now in this sense we grant Images to be the books of the unlearned to wit because partly they teach and signfie false things of God and partly because through the reverence of the thing signified and the place when as they stand to the open view in the Churches and elsewhere they easily draw away others unto superstition and teach the people Idolatry as experience sufficiently beareth witnesse 3. It followeth not if it were so that Images did teach the unlearned that therefore they should be retained in the Church as profitable books For God will not have his Church to be taught by dumb Images but by lively preaching of his word because faith is not by the sight of Images but by the hearing of Gods word Object 2. The commandement concerning the abolishing of Images is ceremoniall Therefore it pertaineth not to Christians but to the Jewes Answ We deny the Antecedent For it is no ceremony to abolish Images seeing they are the instruments signes causes and occasions of Idolatry Neither are the causes for which this commandement was of ancient given any way changed or diminished as namely that the glory of God be maintained against Idolaters and the enemies of the Church and that God be not tempted through offering an occasion of superstition and of conceiving false and corrupt opinions of Gods worship unto weak and ignorant men which are of their owne accord inclining and prone unto Idolatry Wherefore this commandement of taking away and abolishing Images made for the representing of God or for divine worship is morall and dureth perpetually Three differences between the images in Salomons temple in ours Object 3. Salomon by the commandement of God set up Images of Cherubins Lyons Oxen Palme-trees c. Therefore Images may be tolerated also in our Temples Ans The examples are unlike They had Gods speciall warrant ours have not The figures and resemblances of divers things and living creatures as Oxen Lions Palme-trees Cherubins and such like painted in the Temple of Salomon were warranted by the word of God and by his speciall commandement But the word of God is flat against those Images which the Papists have in their Churches They could not easily be abused ours have bin and may be The Images which were painted in Salomons Temple were such as could not easily be drawne by any man into a superstitious abuse But the Images of God and of the Saints not onely may easily be used to superstition but alas have beene a long time hitherto the cause of too too filthie and shamefull Idolatry in Popery They were types of spirituall things ours can have no such use God had this cause for which he would have those Images to be painted in the Temple that namely they should be types of spirituall things But this cause is now taken away by Christ Therefore our Images cannot be patronised by this example rather we are to obey the generall commandement whereby we are forbidden to set up such Images which or in such a place where they may be a scandall to the members or enemies of the Church Object 4. Images and Pictures are not worshipped in the reformed Churches Therefore there they may be tolerated Answ 1. God not only forbiddeth Images to be worshipped but to be made also or to be had being made Thou shalt not make to thy selfe any graven image c. 2. They are alwayes an occasion of superstition and Idolatry to ignorant people witnesse the experience of former and of present times 3. They give occasion of scandall and matter of blaspheming the Gospel to Jewes Turkes Pagans and other enemies Object 5. Images are the ornament of Churches Therefore they may be tolerated Answ 1. The true ornament of the Churches is the sincere preaching of the Gospel the lawfull use of the Sacraments true prayer and worship according to the prescription and direction of Gods word 2. Churches were built that in them lively images of God might be seene not that they should become stalls of Idols and dumb blockish images 3. The ornament of the Church must not be contrary to Gods commandement 4. It must not be dangerous to the members of the Church nor scandalous to the enemies thereof Repl. The thing it selfe and the use thereof is not to be inhibited and taken away for the casuall abuse of it But Images by accident onely or casually become perilous and scandalous Therefore they are not hereupon upon to be abandoned our Churches Answ The Major is true if the thing of it selfe and in its own nature be good and the use thereof lawfull and if the accident inseparably concurring therewith be not precisely condemned by God For otherwise both the thing and the use of the thing is unlawfull and to be eschewed Now the Images of God and the Saints erected in Churches for Religions sake neither are good nor their use lawfull but forbidden by the expresse Commandement of God Besides and evill accident namely Superstition or Idolatry whatsoever the learned vaunt and boast of their knowledge alwayes attend these Images and accompany them amongst the unlearned sort and this accident Superstition and Idolatry is in like manner condemned in Gods Commandement Repl. It sufficeth that these Images by preaching of the word are rooted out of mens hearts Therefore it is not necessary they should be throwne and cast out of our Churches Answ 1. The Antecedent is false For God forbiddeth not onely that they be set up in our hearts but also that they be advanced in the sight of men seeing it is his will that not only we should not be Idolaters but also that we should not so much as seeme to be such Abstaine from all appearance of evill 2. Such is the perversnesse of mans heart and his pronenesse to superstition that Idols especially garnished trimmed and decked and so presented to the view of the eyes of themselves sink into and seate themselves in the hearts of simple and ignorant men what soever others teach to the contrary 3. We thus retort this argument They are to be rooted out of our hearts by preaching Therefore also to be cast out of our Churches For Gods word revealed from heaven commandeth us not onely not to adore and worship them but neither to make not have them And thus far have we insisted on the declaration of the Commandement The Exhortation added unto the second Commandement THe Exhortation which is annexed to the Commandement I am the Lord
necessary circumstance of those which are required to the lawfull and true invocation of God as Idolatrous invocation or prayer which either is directed unto false gods or to creatures or tyeth Gods hearing of us and his presence to a certaine place or thing without his word that is without the commandement or promise of God Such is the invocation and prayer of Pagans Turkes Jews and of all who imagine and make unto themselves another god besides him which hath manifested himselfe in his word by the Prophets and Apostles through the sending of his Sonne and his Spirit Ye know not what yee worship John 4.22 Likewise idolatrous is the Papists invocation who invocate on Angels or on the Saints departed because they attribute and give unto them the honour which is due unto God alone Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God and him onely shalt thou serve Mat. 1.10 I fell before the Angels feet to worship him but he said unto me See thou doe it not Revel 19.10 I am thy fellow servant and one of thy brethren which have the testimony of Jesus Worship God Praying for things contrary to Gods will James 4.3 A craving of such things at Gods hands as are contrary to his will and Law Yee aske and receive not because yee ask amisse that yee might consume it on your lusts Lip-labour or faithlesse and unrepentant prayer Lip-labour or vaine babbling that is prayers made without any true motion of the heart without a desire of Gods bountifulnesse onely in word or outward motion of the body or without true repentance without faith beleeving to be heard without a submitting of our will unto Gods will without the knowledge or cogitation of Gods promise without confidence and trust in Christ the Mediatour only and without acknowledgement of our owne weakenesse and infirmity Mat. 6.7 Esay 1.15 James 1.7 When ye pray use no vaine repetitions as the Heathen for they thinke to be heard for their much babbling When you shall stretch forth your hands I will hide mine eyes from you And though you make many prayers I will not heare Neither let that man think that he shall receive any thing of the Lord. Objections of Papists for invocation and prayers to Saints departed OBject 1. The Saints for their vertues and gifts are to be worshipped of us with the worship either of Adoration or of Veneration 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 But not with the worship of Adoration for this is due unto God onely as giving unto him to whom it is yeelded an universall and generall power providence and dominion Therefore Veneration is due unto them that is such honour wherewith we venerate and worship Saints for their holinesse and merits Ans 1. We deny the consequence because the enumeration of duty and reverence proposed in the Major is imperfect For besides the worship of Adoration and Veneration as they distinguish there is another kind of worship and honour due to the Saints What worship is due to Saints and beseeming them namely An agnising and celebrating of that faith holinesse and gifts which God hath bestowed on them and an obeying of that doctrine which they have delivered unto us from God and an imitating and following of their life and godlinesse whereof Augustine testifieth They are to be honoured saith he by imitation Lib. de vera Relig. not by adoration This worship is due unto the Saints neither do we detract or take it away from Saints either living or departed but with all willingnesse we yeeld it unto them Heb. 13.7 according to the Apostles commandement Remember them which have the oversight of you which have declared unto you the word of God whose faith follow considering what hath bin the end of their conversation 2. We deny the Major because the worship which they entitle 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is adoration and veneration are not diverse but one and the same not befitting Saints or other creatures but God onely because he heareth and understandeth in all places and at all times the thoughts groanes and wishes of such as call upon him and relieveth their necessities None but God can heare them which pray therefore this honour is to be rendred to God alone that it is he who heareth them that pray as also this honour agreeth to Christ alone that through his merit and intercession remission of sins eternall life and other blessings are given us of God This honour therefore cannot be translated unto Saints without manifest sacriledge and Idolatry whether it be called by the name of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifie but one thing Mat. 4.10 Mat. 6.24 Luke 16.13 1 Thes 1.9 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Rom. 16.18 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Levit. 7.21 Levit. 25.28 Valla in cap. 4. Mat. or any other name whatsoever For this distinction is very frivolous seeing the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifie indifferently the same thing both in Scripture and in profane Writers Of God it is said Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God and him only shalt thou serve Where the English word Serve is in the Greek Text 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And Yee cannot serve God and Mammon where the English word Serve is in the Greek Text 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 The same word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 is used in this sense in these places Yee turned from God to Idols to Serve the living and true God They that are such Serve not our Lord Jesus Christ And Paul every-where calleth himselfe the Servant of God In the Greek Text of the Bible servile and slavish businesse is commonly termed 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Suidas writeth that the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 importeth as much as to serve for hire or reward Valla sheweth that the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 signifieth to serve men as well as to serve God citing and alledging for proofe a place out of Xenophon where the husband saith that he is ready to adventure his life rather then his wife should Serve where Xenophon useth the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 And againe the wife saith that she would adventure her life rather then her husband should Serve which word Xenophon expresseth by the verb 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 So that the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 and 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 differ no more then meat and food that is they are two names of one thing Object 2. Whom God honoureth the same must we also honour God honoureth the Saints Mat. 19.28 Ye shall sit upon twelve thrones c. Therefore we also must honour them Ans We grant this concerning that honour which God giveth unto the Saints for therein invocation is not comprehended as being an honour due unto
an oath or keepeth not a lawfull oath For To forsweare is either to sweare that which is false as that thou art not guilty of murder when thou hast slaughtered a man or not to performe a thing lawfully sworne An idolatrous oath An idolatrous oath which is taken by another besides the true God An oath of an unlawfull thing An oath made of an unlawfull thing as was Herods to performe whatsoever Herodias daughter should aske A rash oath A rash oath made of lightnesse that is without any necessity or on great cause And hereof speake those places which forbid swearing Mat. 5. 23. and James 5. But the doctrine concerning Oathes is more largely amplified in the two questions next ensuing in the Catechisme ON THE 43. SABBATH Quest 101. May a man sweare also religiously and lawfully by the name of God Answ He may when as either the Magistrate exacteth it or otherwise necessity requireth by this meanes the faith and truth of any man or thing to be ratified and established whereby both the glory of God may be advanced and the safety of others procured For this kind of swearing is ordered by Gods word a Deut. 16.13 10.20 Esay 48.1 Heb. 6.16 and therefore was well used of the Fathers both in the Old and New Testament b Gen. 21.24 31.53 Josh 9.15 1. Sam. 24.22 2. Sam. 3.35 1. King 1.29 Ro. 1.9 9.1 2 Cor. 1.23 Quest 102. Is it lawfull to sweare by Saints or other creatures Answ No. For a lawfull oath is an invocation of God whereby we desire that he as the onely searcher of hearts beare witnesse unto the truth and punish the swearer if he wittingly sweare falsly a 1 Cor. 1.23 Rom. 9.1 But this honour agreeth to no creature b Mat. 5.34 35 36. James 5.12 The Explication In these two questions the doctrine touching swearing is expounded and set downe at large OF AN OATH OR SWEARING The chiefe questions concerning an oath or swearing are 1. What an oath is 2. By whom we are to sweare 3. Whether a Christian may sweare 4. Of what things we must sweare 5. Whether all oathes are to be kept The three last appertaine to the declaration of the 101. Question of the Catechisme the two former belong to the declaration and unfolding of the 102. Question 1. What an oath is AN oath is oftentimes understood and taken in Scripture for the whole worship of God The word Oath signifieth 1. Gods whole worship Deut. 10.10 Esa 19.18 45.23 65.16 Jerem. 12.16 as it is said of the worship of God in the Old Testament Thou shalt sweare by his name In that day shall five Cities in the Land of Egypt speake the language of Canaan and shall sweare by the Lord of Hoasts Every knee shall bow unto me and every tongue shall sweare by me And of the worship of God in the New Testament He that shall blesse in the earth shall blesse himselfe in the true God and he that sweareth in the earth shall sweare by the true God If they will learne the waies of my people to sweare by my Name then shall they be built in the middest of my people The reason is because by whom we sweare 2. An especiall invocating of God to give witnesse to the truth and punish the wiâ—full faâ—se swearer 2 Cor. 1.23 the same we professe to account for God But properly an oath is an Invocating on God whereby is desired that God who is the viewer of the hearts would give testimony unto the truth and punish him that sweareth if wittingly he deceive So doth the Catechisme define it and the definition is desumed or borrowed from that forme of swearing which the Apostle useth I call God for a record unto my soule that to spare you I came not as yet unto Corinthus It is said in the definition that God would give testimony namely by saving and doing good to him that sweareth if he sweare aright but by punishing and destroying him if he wittingly deceive For an Oath was ordained by God that it might be the bond of truth between men and a testimony or record that God is the Author and defender of the truth 2. By whom we must sweare WEe must sweare by the name of the onely true God Five causes why we must sweare by God alone Gods Commandement Deut. 10.20 Because God hath commanded us to sweare by him onely as he alone is to be feared and worshipped Thou shalt feare the Lord thy God thou shalt serve him and thou shalt cleave unto him and shalt sweare by his name Gods prohibition of swearing by any other besides himselfe God expresly forbiddeth that we sweare by any other name Ye shall make no mention of the name of other gods Because an Oath is a kind of invocation which invocation is due to God only God will have invocation to be used to himselfe onely and he condemneth such as in their oathes joyne the creatures with God Now an Oath is a kinde of invocation of God as appeareth out of the definition thereof Because God only is the viewer of hearts An Oath doth give and ascribe unto him by whom we sweare the inspection and viewing of hearts infinite wisdome and knowledge of all things presence in all places c. And indeed infinite wisdome and the searching of hearts is required in him by whom we sweare because in oathes we treat not of manifest matters or whereof there is good evidence but of hidden and uncertaine difficulties and in which he onely can judge whether men deceive who is the beholder of hearts But God alone is the searcher of hearts omniscient and every where present Hence issueth a proofe that Christ is true God and that we are to sweare by him John 2.24 25. 1 Cor. 2.10 Because he knoweth all men and hath no need that any should testifie of man for he knoweth what is in man So also is it said of the holy Ghost The spirit searcheth all things Because God alone is omnipotent and executor of punishment By whom we sweare unto him we give and ascribe the execution of punishment and unto him we attribute omnipotency as whereby he must maintaine the truth and punish him that lyeth But God alone is omnipotent and executor of punishment Mat. 10.28 Feare ye not them which kill the body but are not able to kill the soule but rather feare him which is able to destroy both body and soule in hell Men cannot be revengers of perjury because such as sweare falsely escape the judgement of men seeing men are not the intelligencers of mens hearts to see whether they who sweare deceive or no or because perjured persons are sometimes mightier then that they may be drawne to punishment by men Hence followeth it that such oathes that are sworne by Saints or other creatures are Idolatrous and forbidden of God Object
why the ceremoniall law belongeth not unto us are especially these 1. One part of this law of sanctifying the Sabbath is ceremoniall Col. 2.16 2. Paul saith Let no man condemne you in respect of an holy day 3. The Apostles themselves did change the Sabbath of the seventh day 4. From the end or purpose of the law It was a type of things that were to be fulfilled by Christ namely of sanctification and every type must give place to the thing thereby signified Likewise it was a severing or distinguishing the Jewes from other Nations but this severing and distinction was taken away by Christ Object 3. The Lord saith of the Sabbath day Exod. 31.27 It is a signe between me and the children of Israel for ever and an everlasting covenant Therefore the Sabbath of the seventh day is never to be abolished Ans 1. The ceremoniall Sabbath was perpetuall untill Christs coming who is the end of ceremonies 2. The Sabbath is eternall as concerning the thing signified which is a ceasing from sins and a rest in God for in this sense are all the types of the old Testament eternall even the kingdome of David also which yet was overthrown before the coming of the Messias Object 4. Wee grant the Mosaicall ceremonies to be changeable yet it followeth not thereof Look the question concerning the abrogating of the Law Ob. 1. Pag. 2. that the lawes which were made before Moses time are changeable in the number whereof also is the keeping of the Sabbath day Answ The ceremonies which were ordained of God before Moses are also changeable because they were types of the benefits of the Messias to come and therefore are by his coming abolished as circumcision which was given unto Abraham as also the sacrifices which were prescribed unto our first Parents Object 5. The lawes which were given of God before the fall are not types of the benefits of the Messias and binde all mankinde for ever for then was not given as yet the promise of the Messias and there was one and the same condition of all mankind But the Sabbath of the seventh day was ordained by God as soon as the creation of the world was finished before the fall of mankinde Therefore it is universall and perpetuall Ans The Major proposition is true concerning the morall law the notions whereof were imprinted in mans mind at the first creation but it is not true as touching the ceremony or observing of the seventh day as which after the fall was made a type of the benefits of the Messias in the Mosaicall law and therefore in like manner as other ceremonies which were either then or before instituted it became subject to mutation and change by the coming of the Messias For God would not have the shadowes of things to continue or remain the things themselves being once come and exhibited Wherefore albeit wee grant that the exercises of divine worship were to have been kept on the seventh day according to the commandement and prescript of the Decalogue as well if men had never sinned as now after they sinned yet notwithstanding seeing God hath enrolled this ceremony amongst the shadowes of the Messias to come he hath by this new law enacted by Moses made it changeable together with other ceremonies Object 6. The cause of the law being perpetuall doth make the law it selfe also perpetuall The memory and celebration of the creation and the meditation on the workes of God is a perpetuall cause of the Sabbath Therefore the Sabbath is perpetuall yea even after Christs coming Ans A law is made perpetuall or unchangeable by reason of an unchangeable cause that is if that cause it and doe necessarily or perpetually require this law as an effect or meane but not if at other times that end may be better come unto by other meanes or if the Law-giver may as well obtaine the same end by another law In like manner seeing also this law of sanctifying the Sabbath of the seventh day being repealed and abolished we may neverthelesse godlily and holily by other meanes meditate on Gods workes it followeth not that this law of the ceremoniall Sabbath is perpetuall although the memory and celebration of Gods creation and works ought to be perpetuall and therefore hath the Church by common consent according to Christian liberty well changed this ceremony of observing the seventh day being taken away by Christ and hath substituted in the place of the seventh day the first day of the week yet so that there is observed no difference of daies which is utterly forbidden in the Church seeing one day is not holier than another The Anabaptists also against the observation of the first day of the week Objecti against the observing of Sunday or the Lords day Col. 2.16 Galat. 4.10 Rom. 14.6 or the Lords day oppose those sayings of Scripture which forbid the putting of difference between daies and daies in the new Testament Let no man condemne you in respect of an holy day Yee observe daies and months and times and yeares Hee that observeth the day observeth it to the Lord and he that observeth not the day observeth it not to the Lord. Therefore say they the observation of the first day of the week or the Lords day is no lesse in these places reproved than the solemnizing of the Sabbath Ans We answer to the Antecedent that a putting difference between dayes and dayes is indeed forbidden amongst Christians but not simply or wholly but on this wise namely if it be done with an opinion of ceremonious worship or necessity Now the first day of the week or the Lords day is not so observed by the Church For there is a double difference between the Christian observing of the Lords day and the Jewish observing of the Sabbath or seventh day A double difference between the Christian observing of the Lords day and the Jewish observing of the Sabbath For 1. It was not lawfull for the Jewes to change the Sabbath or to omit it as being a part of ceremoniall worship and this they might not doe by reason of the expresse commandement of God to the contrary But the Christian Church retaining still her liberty allotteth the first day unto the Ministery without adjoyning any opinion of necessity or worship 2. The old ceremoniall Sabbath was in the old Testament a type of things to be fulfilled by Christ but in the new Testament that signification ceaseth and there is had regard only of order and comelinesse without which there could be either no Ministery or at least wise no well ordered Ministery in the Church 3. The causes for which the Sabbath day was instituted THe finall causes or ends for which the Sabbath day was instituted are these For publike service and worship of God in the Church The publike service and worship of God in the Church exercise of prayers confession and obedience in which consisteth the study of the knowledge of
the fall Repl. An affection or appetite even in nature now corrupted to desire good things and eschew hurtfull things is not sin because it is a thing made of God and a motion good in selfe But such is Concupiscence Therefore it is no sin Answ to the Major The appetites and motions of nature are good in themselves as they are meerly motions not as they are inordinate motions and are carried unto such objects as God hath forbidden as all motions and appetites of corrupt nature are because either they affect not such objects as they ought or affect them not in such sort and to that end which they ought and therefore are all vicious and very sins An evill tree cannot bring forth good fruit Mat. 7.18 To desire the fruit of a tree was naturall but To desire it contrary to Gods expresse Commandement as it was desired of Eve was a motion in its owne kind and nature corrupt and very sin Object 2. That which is not in our power to cause either to be in us or not to be in us is no sin Concupiscence is so in us that it is not in our power to shake and put it off Therefore it is no sin Answ The Major is false For sin is not to be esteemed by the liberty or necessity and bondage of our nature but by the will and law of God Whatsoever disagreeth herewith is sin whether men have power to avoid it or no and God requiring of us impossible things doth not injure us because he commanded them when they were possible Though we have now lost our ability of performing yet God hath not lost his right of requiring that of us which he left with us Object 3. Sin maketh men obnoxious to the wrath of God But Concupiscence doth not make the regenerate obnoxious to Gods wrath For there is no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus Therefore Concupiscence at least in the regenerate is no sin Rom. 8.1 Answ There is a fallacy of accident in the Minor For it is but by accident that concupiscence doth not make the regenerate obnoxious to the wrath of God that is by reason of the grace of God not imputing it to the faithfull But this cometh not thereof as if concupiscence were not sin for neither doe other sins condemne the regenerate not because they are no sins but because they are remitted by Christ Object In Baptisme Originall sin is taken away Therefore Concupiscence is not sin in those that are baptised Answ to the Antecedent Originall sin is taken away in Baptisme not simply but as touching the guilt of it but corruption and an inclination to sin remaineth in them that are baptised And this is it that the Schoolemen say The Formall of sin is taken away and the Materiall remaineth Repl. Where the Formall is taken away there also the thing it selfe is taken away because the forme of every thing is the cause of the being of it But in Baptisme the Formall of Originall sin is atken away Therefore Originall sin in it selfe is taken away in Baptisme Answ Here is a fallacy taking that to be generally meant of the whole which is spoken but in part The Formall of sin is taken away not simply but as touching the guilt of it For there is a double Formall of sin 1. A repugnancy with the law A double formality of sin and an inclination to sin 2. The guilt which is the ordaining of it to punishment The guilt is taken away but the inclination abideth I see another law in my members Rom. 7.23 rebelling against the law of my mind and leading me captive unto the law of sin which is in my members Quest 114. But can they who are converted unto God perfectly observe and keep these Commandements Answ No but even the holiest men as long as they live have only small beginnings of this obedience a 1 John 1.8 Rom. 7.14 15. Eccles 7.22 1 Cor. 13 9. yet so that they begin with an earnest and unfeigned desire and endeavour to live not according to some only but according to all the commandements of God b Rom. 7.22 Psal 1.2 The Explication THe Question here is How the law is possible and Whether regenerate men may perfectly keep it which was the seventh question proposed to be considered of concerning the Law That this Question may be the better understood we are to distinguish the nature of man 1. As it was first entire and uncorrupt and 2. Afterwards fallen and 3. Againe restored The law was possible to be fulfilâ—ed by man his nature being uncorrupt Vnto nature entire and uncorrupt the whole law as touching all parts and degrees thereof is possible as unto Angels for man was created unto the image of God in perfect holinesse and righteousnesse It is impossible to corrupt nature Gen. 6.5 8.21 Jerem. 13.23 Mat. 7.18 Rom. 14.23 Ephes 2.1 3. 2 Cor. 3.5 Vnto nature corrupted after the fall the fulfilling of the law is so impossible that it cannot so much as begin obedience acceptable to God according to these Scriptures All the thoughts of man are only evill continually even from his youth Can the Black moore change his skin or the Leopard his spots then may ye also be good that are accustomed to doe evill A corrupt tree cannot bring forth good fruit Whatsoever is not of faith is sin Wee are dead in our sins by nature the sons of wrath Wee are not able of our selves to thinke anything as of our selves How far forâ—h it is possibâ—e to restored nature Vnto the regenerate who have nature restored againe the law is possible 1. As concerning outward order and discipline 2. As concerning the imputation of Christs righteousnesse that is by the benefit of justification and regeneration both which benefits we obtaine by faith 3. As touching the beginning of inward and outward obedience in this life 1 John 5.3 This is the love of God that wee keep his Commandements c. Hee that without the beginning of obedience that is without regeneration glorieth that he knoweth and worshippeth God is a lyar But the law is impossible to the regenerate How it is impossible to restored nature Psal 143.2 in respect of God that is as touching the perfect inward and outward obedience of the law Enter not into judgement with thy servant O Lord for in thy sight shall no man living be justified For 1. They fulfill not the Law perfectly because they doe many things contrary to the law 2. And those things also which they doe according to the law are imperfect For in the regenerate are many sins yet remaining as originall sin many actuall sins ignorances infirmities which their sins notwithstanding themselves acknowledge and bewail Wee have all been as an uncleane thing Isa 64.6 A three fold difference between the regenerate and unregenerate sinning and all our righteousnesse is as filthy clouts Therefore regenerate sinners
Divinitie An. Dom. 1593. June 12. at 7. of the clock TO The noble and reverend President and Assistants of the holy Assembly his honoured Colleagues DAVID PARIE wisheth health THat saying of Solomon is both true and godly The heart of man disposeth its owne way but the Lord directeth his paths Of which by mine own example I have experience for although hitherto I have neither wanted faire occasions many times nor my friends exhortations nor other things which now draw me from mine opinion yet I entertained that firm resolution still never to doe that which now I undertake to doe From which not onely did the conscience of mine owne infirmity with-hold mee but also the unhappy condition of Divinity at this day For they who professe themselves Divines are either most bitter enemies to Divinity and cruell persecutours of the truth so that among these the nimbler one is in railing the greater Divine they account him Or if they will be truly that which they are reported to be they presently feele those mens madnesse and find their teeth are fastned in them to the great griefe and scandall of the Church to which end it seemes they were made and so I conceived But behold the Lord directing these things another way for what before deterred mee now hindereth mee not what before could not induce mee doth now strongly carry me forward The knowledge of mine infirmity indeed remaines but then I consider that there are differences of gifts and that every man prophesieth according to the measure of grace and faith given to him from God Divinity hath got a bad name as if it were a deceitfull and slanderous doctrine but this is given to it by bad men for that holy doctrine is often abused by Satans artifice and wicked mens malice Besides I know that our Lord hath been and is yet at this day the signe of contradiction By Gods appointment and the Magistrates I have now some yeares born that office in this famous Colledge which by its owne right and the examples of predecessours hath made me at last alter my resolution Before mee this place hath been honoured to the Churches good and to their owne praise by Olevianus Ursinus Sohnius Kimedoncius whom I name because I honour them for they were eminent men and some of them were my teachers or masters and some my reverend colleagues What shall I be the first that must impaire the dignity of so noble a function Shall I overthrow so commendable and so excellent an order in our Schoole Shall I leave to successours a precedent so dishonourable and injurious to our College Besides that now the Act is at hand wherein seventeen very learned men in Physick and in the Lawes are to receive their ensignes of honour the many exhortations of my friends and your most grave and serious reasons honoured Colleagues by which not onely have you approved my resolution but also have so strongly confirmed mee in it and perswaded mee that I am drawne to this taske by divine instinct I beseech our most mercifull God so to direct my pathes in his waies that they may never goe astray and that hee would be pleased to make these my endeavours profitable and wholesome to this Schoole first and then to the whole Church of God I am resolved to set downe out of Gods word not a full but a briefe repetition of our Churches doctrine concerning certaine heads which are at this day chiefly controverted that I might afford to young Students sufficient matter of disputation and that likewise the summe of our orthodox doctrine might be as it were in a briefe Epitome obvious to the enemies and calumniators of our Churches These my endeavours I consecrate to you honoured Sirs both because you are the most vigilant preservers of sound doctrine in these Churches and because you are most courteous favourers of my studies The Lord Jesus keep you in safety for his Churches good Amen At Heidelberge in the Colledge of Wisdome June 1. Anno Domini 1593. D. David Parie to the READER out of the Dutch Edition AT the entreatie of many holy men I have translated this Epitome of the orthodox reformed Christian Religion out of the Latine into our vulgar tongue not without some addition and a more full explication having added some Testimonies of Scriptures Creeds generall Councels and Fathers Therefore in this Epitome the Christian Reader may briefly understand which is the doctrine of the Schooles and Churches in the Archipalatinate and indeed of all the reformed Churches through France England Scotland the Netherlands Switzerland Moravia Bohemia Poland Hungarie and else-where Besides hee shall know whether or no this doctrine be Calvinian and hereticall as some injuriously stile it or not Apostolicall rather and Christian having its foundation in Gods word But such mad clamours will not I hope move those in whom is the zeale of pietie and are carefull of their soules health but will rather after the example of those noble Jewes of Thessalonica Act. 17.11 in the fear of God weigh this doctrine that from hence they may learne which is the true Christian Religion they will also examine the Testimonies of holy writ by which the doctrine of the orthodox reformed Religion is confirmed which we maintaine and which before a generall Councell lawfully assembled yea before the Tribunall of Jesus Christ that supreme and most just Judge we will not be ashamed to defend This was the practice of the people of Beroe observing what doctrine Saint Paul taught them and carefully searching if it was consonant to Gods word by which meanes it came to passe that many of them both men and women beleeved in Jesus Christ They are of another mind who at this day call every doctrine Calvinisme which is not consonant to their opinion by which intemperate speech they may easily refute Paul and Christ himselfe and I must not expect that any other name will be given to mine Aphorismes then this But surely if this be Calvinisme the whole Book of God yea the whole doctrine of the primitive Church must be called Calvinian for there are irrefragable testimonies which cannot be contradicted yea besides the learneder sort of Papists and Jesuits who follow the Schoole-mens doctrine must be called likewise Calvinists For even in the midst of Popery God for his Elects sake did preserve by the Schoole-men from corruption the doctrine Of Christs Person Death and Merit Of his Ascension into heaven Of his sitting at the right hand of God and Of Predestination most plainely as these points are explained by us in these Aphorismes But the other Articles to wit Of faith Of the Ministery of the Church Of the Sacraments were corrupted betimes in Popery But it is to be lamented that they who having laid aside the name of Christ and of Christians desire to be called by mens names have so farre departed from the consent of the Primitive Church in the handling of these Articles of faith and do
exalted him and hath given him a name above all names that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow of things in heaven on earth and under the earth and that every tongue should confesse that Jesus Christ is Lord to the glory of God the Father VI. The glory of Christ the Mediatour doth first consist in that high perfection and dignity of the person of the Mediatour even according to that nature which was assumed being adorned with unspeakeable excellencies of endowents with happinesse and majesty and with that sublime exaltation above all principality power and dominion all things being put under his feet that he might be the Head of the a Church by which the Father governes all things in heaven and b earth the natures remaining whole and unconfused as also the properties of nature in this glory Which as Austine saith gave to the flesh to be immortall but tooke not away the c nature Testimonies of Scripture and of some Ancient Doctors a Ephes 1.20 21. God placed Christ at his right hand in heaven far above all power c. b John 5.22 For the Father judgeth no man but hath committed all judgement to the Sonne Acts 17.31 God will judge the world in righteousnesse by that man whom he hath appointed c August Epist 57. ad Dardanum Doubt not then but the man Christ Jesus is now there from whence he will returne call to minde and hold faithfully the Christian Confession because he is risen from the dead hath ascended into heaven sitteth at the right hand of the Father nor from any other place but from thence will he come to judge the quick and dead and so he will come as the Angell witnesseth after the same manner that he was seene to go into heaven that is in the same forme and substance to whom he gave immortality but tooke not his nature away VII Secondly it consists in the glorious administration of his Propheticall Sacerdotall and Regall offices by which as Mediatour he declares himselfe even in his assumed humane nature that he is appointed Lord and Judge of all a things and that he rules most powerfully in heaven and b earth gathering to himselfe out of the race of mankinde a perpetuall c Church by the holy Ghost and the Word making intercession for d her and defending her by his divine power on e earth untill having freed her from all molestations and from her enemies he glorifie her in f heaven Testimonies of Scripture a Acts 2.36 Therefore let all the house of Israel know assuredly that God hath made that same Jesus whom ye have crucified both Lord and Christ Acts 5.31 God having exalted him at his right hand hath made him Prince and Saviour that he might give to Israel repentance and remission of sinnes See Act. 17.31 John 5.22 b Psal 110.2 Beare thou rule in the midst of thine enemies 1 Cor. 15.25 He must reigne till he hath put all his enemies under his feet c Ephes 4.11 He gave some to be Apostles some Prophets some Evangelists some Pastors and Doctors Rom. 1.17 The Gospell is the power of God to salvation to every one that beleeves Marke 16.21 The Lord did cooperate and confirmed the word with signes following d Rom. 8.34 Christ is at the right hand of God and maketh intercession for us Heb. 9.24 Christ hath now entred into heaven that he might appeare before God for us 1 John 2.1 We have an Advocate with the Father Jesus Christ the righteous e Mat. 16.18 The gates of hell shall not prevaile against her John 10.28 I give unto them eternall life and they shall never perish neither shall any man pluck them out of mine hand f John 17.24 Father I will that they whom thou hast given to me may be where I am that they may behold my glory VIII Lastly in the perfection of that honour and worship due a to the Mediatour gloriously reigning even in our humane nature to wit that he is acknowledged by Angels men and all creatures and by them is adored and celebrated as their head and Lord as it is written And let all the Angels of God worship him Also Psal 1.6 Psal 97.7 Phil. 2.10 At the Name of Jesus every knee shall bow of things in heaven on earth and under the earth Testimonies of Scripture a Acts 9.14 In this place he hath power from the High-Priest to binde all that call on thy Name 1 Cor. 1.2 To all that call upon the Name of our Lord Jesus Christ in any place c. Rev. 5.9 Thou art worthy to receive the booke and to open the seales thereof because thou hast beene slaine and hast redeemed us by thy bloud out of every Tribe Langue People and Nation See also Rev. 4.11 and 8.13 and 19.5 6 7. IX Therefore these and such like doctrines of the Ubiquitaries are false and prodigious 1. That Christs humanity presently in his conception when the Word was made flesh did sit at the right hand of God 2. That to sit at Gods right hand is nothing else but to be united personally to the Son of God who is the Fathers right hand 3. That it is all one with his ascending to heaven 4. That it is to be made man and to become God 5. That it is all one with Christs humanity filling heaven and earth and being every-where ARTICLE V. Of Predestination I. TO deny in God an eternall predestination of mankinde is to deny God himselfe and to give the lye to the holy Scripture for as Luther (a) De servo arb cap. 143. saith truly God being spoiled of his power and wisdome in electing what will he be else but the Idoll of Fortune by whose power all things are done rashly or at randome And at length it will come to this that men are damned and saved with the knowledge of God as who hath not discriminated by a certaine election those that shall be saved and damned but a generall lenity tolerating and hardning being proffered to all then a correcting and punishing mercy he hath left it to mens choice whether they will be saved or damned he himselfe perhaps being gone to feast with the Ethiopians as Homer saith Austine in his booke De bono persever c. 18. averreth That no man can dispute except he will fall into error against this predestination which saith he we defend according to the holy Scripture and cap. 21. Therefore it savours too much of contention saith he to contradict predestination or to doubt of it II. Therefore of predestination we must speake and be silent with the Scripture for what God will have concealed must not be enquired after and what he hath revealed must not be neglected lest in those we be found unlawfully curious in these damnably ungratefull as (b) l. 1. ad Monimum p. 8. Ambrose excellently III. Neither that we may give this caution with Fulgentius is there any coactive necessity of mans will to be expressed by the name of
which we are bound to God or by which God doth binde man to himself 102. By Cicero likewise Religion is that by which we are carefull by reverend Ceremonies to adore that supreme Nature which we call God 103. Religion differs from superstition saith Lactantius because Religion is a true worship superstition is a false one 104. Religion then given to creatures or to any thing besides God is false which the Scripture calls Superstition and Idolatry 105. For Idolatry is a fictitious or superstitious worship of God 106. Of which there are two principall kindes one is when a fictitious deitie is worshipped that is when instead of the true God or besides him religious worship due to God alone is exhibited either outwardly or inwardly to any thing that is existent or but fained 107. This is forbid in the first Commandement Exod. 20.3 Thou shalt have no other Gods but me 108. Such was the Gentiles Idolatry in their Religious worship of feigned gods inwardly by trusting in them outwardly by Ceremonies and erecting of Statues to them 109. Such Idolatry is covetousnesse with the Apostle when with inward confidence we worship money instead of God 110. The other Idolatry is errour in the kinde of worship when a worship is devised to be exhibited to God which either he hath not commanded or hath prohibited that is when we devise Statues and Ceremonies for him 111. This is forbid in the second Commandement Thou shalt make to thy selfe no graven Image c. Exod. 20.4 5. Deut. 12.30 31. 112. Which is expounded in Deuteronomy Do not seeke after the gods of the Gentiles saying As these Gentiles have worshipped their gods so will I. Thou shalt not do so to the Lord thy God for every thing that is abhomination to the Lord they did unto their gods which I hate 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 113. For what is properly will-worship in respect of the manner becomes Idolatry in respect of the object 114. For to worship God with a strange worship is to give him another will then he hath therefore it is to feigne another God or to worship an Idoll instead of God 115. Such Idolatry it is when God is painted and is fained to be worshipped in that picture 116. Such also is the worshipping of God by Statues and Images of creatures celestiall or terrestriall put up for the honour of God or of his Saints whether that worship be devised to be terminated or bounded within the Statues or Saints or to be emanent and transient to God 117. Against both these God speaketh Deuteronomy 4.15 16. thus Take heed to your selves for you saw no similitude in the day that the Lord spake to you in Mount Horeb lest you defile your soules and make to your selves any graven Image the similitude of any figure the Image of male or female c. 118. In the New Testament especially when God will be worshipped in spirit and truth wee are strictly commanded to flie from Idolatry and every kinde of superstition Beware of Idols Flee from Idolatry and every kinde of superstition 1 John 5.21 1 Cor. 10.7 Colos 2.8 Let no man seduce you with will-worship 119. All Idolaters are directly excluded from the kingdome of God Be not deceived neither whoremongers nor Idolaters shall inherit the kingdome of God Without are whoremongers Idolaters and witches 120. But Popery for now a thousand yeares is altogether made up of filthy superstitions and by impure Idolatry is every day more and more profaned 121. Who is able to reckon up the infinite vaine and impious superstitions to which daily men give themselves in Popery with great devotion to pacifie Gods anger to merit pardon for sins to redeeme sinnes and the paines of hell and purgatory devised to in rich the Priests Such are Prayers and watchings for the dead their yeerely septimes and trentals the treasure and suffrages of the Church for Purgatory pilgrimages to the Images of Saints to holy places to the bones and reliques of Saints their fraternities religious dedications of Churches and Altars their exorcismes consecrations of Images and graves the baptising of Bells using of God-fathers to that purpose the choise of meats their quarterly and Lent fasts their religious and consecrated cloathes canonicall houres devoute processions perambulations bacchanals consecrations of Priests anointing of the sâ—ck exorcising of Chrismes and Fonts clipping and shaving their hooded coats surplesses and quirerobes candlesticks consecrated waxe tapers lampes glasse viols torches tippets banners censers drums wafer coffers little bels holy waters with their exorcisings hallowed salt hallowed wafers exorcised herbs to chase away devils ringing of bels against thunder little Images of Saints wrapped up in clouts the Letanies of Saints confessions satisfactions rosaries consecrated palme branches Asses crowned with palmes kisses and adorations of the Crosse the Crosse laid up in the grave their Mattins at the Sepulchre their solemne tumults their wooden busling noise in the night the ridiculous ascending of an Idol instead of Christ upon the cieling of the Church their flinging downe of fire and water their carrying about of the consecrated host the innumerable Saints holy-dayes to be kept under paine of mortall sin indulgences washings of feet and of Altars the waxen Images of the Crosse their Agni Dei and innumerable such like toyes full of superstition Magick and Idolatry 122. Which the ambitious Bishops chiefly the Popes to please the people have borrowed from Gentilisme and that they might seeme to have the more divinity have transferred them from Judaisme to the Christian Religion all which our Saviour Mat. 15.9 Esay 29.13 14. in one word hath overthrowne saying In vaine do they worship me teaching for doctrines mens traditions 123. So much the more horrible is the Romish Idolatry in that it placeth in Temples Images and fictitious Statues to the most holy Trinity the most incomprehensible and invisible God which Images they worship with wax candles Incense geniculations groanings and vowes as religiously as they do God himselfe 124. That they hang up and againe crucifie Christ our Saviour now gloriously reigning in heaven and set up his Image of wood or stone in all their Churches and corners of their streets and high wayes to be worshipped devoutly by the faithfull under paine of death to the great scandall and mockery of Infidels 125. That they worship as devoutly the wood of the Crosse as Christ himselfe 126. That they account as sacred and venerable the signe of the Crosse in the forehead or in the aire or upon any thing as it is expressed by the finger against the power of the Devill and good for hallowing of themselves 127. That under the species of the Host they really offer sacrifice destroy that is kill and crucifie Christ being alive and glorious every day in the Host more wickedly then the souldiers did when they crucified him in his humility 128. That it exhibits the Host of bread being elevated in the Masse to be