by them guiding vs and beeing a law vnto vs. Rom. 8. 3. 14. Thirdly God by manifold afflictions nurtures and schooles vs partly to preuent sinnes to come and partly to humble vs for that which is past 1. Cor. 11. 32. Ier. 31. 18. The vse Seeing the law is abrogated as I haue said we must be a free and voluntarie people seruing God not of constraint but willingly as if there were no law to compell vs. All nations shall flow as waters to the mountaine of the Lord. Isa. 2. 2. Thy people shall come willingly in the day of assemblie Psal. 110. 3. In the daies of Iohn Baptist the kingdome of heauen suffered violence Ieremie saith they shall teach euery man his neighbour and his brother Ierem. 31. 31. because men shall learne freely without compulsion or calling vpon Here is the fault of our times Many say in heart to Christ Depart from vs we will none of thy waies and many againe are zealous for the things of this life but for duties pertaining to Gods worship and the saluation of their soules they are neither hot nor could This negligence and slacknes is full of danger and therefore with speede to be amended For cursed is he that doth the worke of God negligently and the Lord will spue out such persons 26 For ye are all the sonnes of God by faith in Christ Iesus 27 For all ye that are baptised into Christ haue put on Christ. 28 There is neither Iew nor Grecian there is neither bond nor free there is neither male nor female for ye are all one in Christ Iesus Paul had said before v. 25. that the beleeuing Iewes after the publishing of the Gospel were no more vnder the law as vnder a schoolemaster In this 26. v. he renders a reason hereof and it may be framed on this manner If we Iewes were still vnder the law as vnder a schoolemaster then we should be still after the manner of seruants but we are not after the manner of seruants because we are children for euen ye Galatians and that all of you are children of God not by Circumcision or by the keeping of the law but by faith in Christ. Againe that they are children of God he prooues it thus Ye are baptised into Christ and in baptisme ye haue put on Christ in that ye are ioyned with him and haue fellowship with him who is the naturall sonne of God therefore ye are sonnes of God It may be saide All children of God all baptised all put on Christ how can this be seeing some are Iewes some Gentiles some bond some free some men some women The answer is made v. 27. there are differences of men indeede but in Christ all are as one In these words I consider two things The first is the benefit or gift bestowed on the Galatians which is sonne-ship Adoption or the condition of Gods children The second is the description of this benefit by foure arguments The first is by the circumstance of the persons ye all are children of God The second is the inward meanes namely faith in Christ Iesus The third is the outward meanes or the pledge of adoption ye are all baptised into Christ. The last is the foundation of adoption and that is to put on Christ or to be one with him For the better conceiuing of the benefit three questions may be mooued The first is whose sonnes the Galatians were Ans. The sonnes of God It may be saide how the sonnes of God I answer againe God is called a father in two respects first he is a father in respect of Christ the essentiall word and then God signifies the first person Againe God is called a father in respect of men Elect to saluation then the name God is put indefinitly and it comprehends not onely the first person but also the sonne and holy Ghost For all three doe equally regenerate them that are adopted And Paul saith of the Godhead indefinitly there is one God and father of all Eph. 4. 6. And when we pray saying Our father c. we inuocate not onely the first person but also the Sonne and holy Ghost And the sonne of God is expressely called the Father of eternitie in respect of vs Isa. 9. 6. and he is said to haue his seede Isa. 53. 11. The second question is in what respect are the Galatians the children of God Ans. A childe of God is two waies by nature by grace The childe of God by nature is Christ as he is the eternall sonne of God A child by grace is three waies By creation thus Adam before his fall and the good angels are the children of God Secondly by the personall vnion thus Christ as he is man is the child of God Thirdly by the grace of adoption thus are all true beleeuers and in this text the Galatians are saide to be the children of God In this grace of adoption there be two acts of God one is Acceptation whereby God accepts men for his children The other is Regeneration whereby men are borne of God when the Image of God is restored in them in righteousnes and true holines The third question is what is the excellencie of this benefit Ans. Great euery way Ioh. 1. 12. he which is the child of God is heire and fellowheire with Christ Rom. 8. 17. and that of the kingdome of heauen and of all things in heauen and earth 1. Cor. 3. 22. he hath title in this life and shall haue possession in the life to come Againe he that is Gods child hath the angels of God to tend on him and to minister vnto him for his good and saluation Heb. 1. 14. The first argument whereby the adoption of Gods children is set forth is concerning the persons to whome it belongs in these wordes All ye are the children of God So Paul saith all the Ephesians are Elect. Eph. 1. 3. And Peter calls all them to whome he writes 1. Pet. 1. 1. Elect and Iohn 1. epist. 3. the children of God And herein they follow the iudgement of charitie leauing all secret iudgements to God Here I obserue one thing that euery grieuous fall doth not abolish the fauour of God and extinguish the grace of regeneration For the Galatians erred in the foundation of religion and had fallen away to an other Gospel and yet Paul saith that they were for all this the children of God and not some but all of them This truth may be seene by experience The child of God before his fall hath a purpose not to sinne in the time of temptation when he is in falling he hath a strife after he is fallen he lieth not in his fall as wicked men doe but he recouereth himselfe by new repentance And this shews that the child of God by his fall doth not returne againe to the estate and condition of wicked men When S. Iohn saith he that is borne of God sinnes not his meaning is this he that is borne of God
ignorance of the one and hinder the malice of the other and so to profitte the most beside the meaning he hath briefly drawne out such doctrines as naturally arise from the text shewing withall how they ought to be applied for confutation correction instruction consolation Which he hath donne with such dexteritie artificially matching together two things heretofore insociable Breuitie and Perspicuitie that the like I take it hath not beene performed heretofore by any Expositer vpon this Epistle which we may well call the key of the new Testament in that it handleth the waightiest points of doctrine whether we consider the necessarie knowledge thereof or the controuersies of these times Therefore Luther after he had once publikely expounded it toke in hand againe and interpreted it the second time beginning as himselfe saith where he ended according to the saying of Syracides When a man hath donne what he can he must beginne againe Which Commentarie seeing it hath found such good intertainement amongst vs beeing but a forrainer and hauing lost much of his strength and taken winde by changing from language to language as wine from one vessell to another I doubt not but this beeing a free-denizen will find the like fauour and acceptance therather if it will please your Honour to vouchsafe it your countenance To whose protection and patronage I here commend it as S. Luke did his Histories to the most noble Theophylus desiring hereby to testifie my humble dutie vnto your Honor and my thankfulnes to God for the riches of his grace bestowed vpon you in my sterie of the Gospell for your zeale of gods glory your loue of the truth and of all those that vnfainedly embrace the truth And thus fearing to hinder the course of your more serious cogitations actions I humbly take may leaue Desyring the Lord who hath promised to honour those that honour him that as he hath made you Honourable in your noble progenitors so he would make you thrise Honourable in your future successors and long continue you a notable instrument vnder his Highnes of the peace and welfare of your country as hetherto he hath done accomplishing all your desires for present prosperitie and future felicitie From Emanuell colledge in Cambridge August 10. 1604. Your Honours most humbly deuoted RAFE CVDWORTH TO THE COVRteous Reader I Here offer to thy view gentle Reader a Comment and a Supplement the Comment begunne by an excellent workeman and drawne in excellent proportion in all points suting to the analogie of faith and the doctrine of the Orthodoxe Fathers of the Church beeing the substance of his three yeares Lectures vpon the Lords day If his former workes either of Positiue Diuinitie in sundrie of his Treatises or Controuersall Diuinitie in his Reformed Catholike or Case-Diuinitie in his Cases of Conscience haue ministred any comfort vnto thee or giuen thee content I doubt not but these Commentaries will abundantly satisfie thy expectation For to omit the varietie of matter as also the breuitie and admirable perspicuitie in regard of the manner beeing the chiefest commendation of Oecumenius or any Interpreter in them as in a mirrour thou maist more clearely see his knowledge in the mysterie of Christ and his dexteritie in exemplifying that by practise which he had formerly taught by precept theÌ„ in any of his writings besides as hauing a double eminencie aboue the rest First in that they were penned the last of all his workes beeing come to ripenes of iudgement and that vpon mature deliberation after his Sermons as his manner was Secondly in that they were written with his owne hand whereas all his other writings except some short Treatises were taken by some diligent auditors and perused by himselfe Herein resembling the Epistle it selfe which was written with Pauls owne hand all the rest except that short one to Philemon by his â—â—ribes And as they doe exceede his other Writings so I might say perhaps more truly then discreetly that they surpasse in this kinde all the moderne writers that haue gone before them so that he which will vouchsafe to read them shall not greatly neede nor desire any other Interpreter vpon this Scripture the which I speake not as esteeming of Antiquitie no better worth then to be put vnder a bushell that Noueltie might be set vpon the candlesticke but for that I see not but that Iohn Baptist the last of all the Prophets was as goodly a burning and shining candle as any of the rest and that he pointed forth Christ more distinctly then the rest But I hope I shall not neede to vse many words in commendation either of the worke or of the Author beeing so well knowne and sufficiently commended by others for soundnes of doctrine and integritie of life which whilst he was liuing did parallel each other his doctrine beeing a patterne of his life and his life a counterpaine of his doctrine And now beeing dead his sauorie-writings which he hath left behind him breathing forth as it were the sweete smell of a sanctified spirit like a field which the Lord hath blessed hath got him a name neuer to be forgotten which giueth him after his death a second life I am further to aduertise thee good Reader that there were some places in the originall copie to which the Author would no doubt haue giuen some reuiew and correction if God had drawne out the line of his life but a little longer which I haue filed and polished according to my poore skill though very sparingly in such places onely as were obscure or had any phrase of doubtfull construction or otherwise seemed to be mistaken pointing and interlining the rest to fit it for the Presse It may be my vnskilfull handling of them hath depriued them of their due lustre yet sure I am it hath giuen them no tincture Touching the Supplement it was my purpose at the first to have made a supplie of that which was wanting out of the Authors owne writings as it hath beene done in Aquinas Summes and others but afterwardes perceiuing that his workes alreadie extant would not affoard me sufficient matter to furnish out that argument I was inforced to take an other course and to make a supplie with courser stuffe of mine owne as I could Which if it shall seeme not to sure the former in all points I shall desire thee to consider that it is not so easie a matter for Asâ—lepiodorus accustomed to draw with a cole or chaulke only to finish a picture he 〈…〉 nne by Apelles with so curious a pensill and that it is an argument wherein I confesse I haue not beene so much conuersant as perhaps in some other neither chosen out of purpose to make ostentation of witt reading or inuention but left as a necessary task to be performed by some for the perfecting of the worke and the good of the Church if this poore mite may conferre any thing to the Treasurie of the Lords
written in tables of stone is the law the same law of Moses written in the hearts of men by the holy Ghost is the Gospel But I say againe that the law written in our hearts is still the law of Moses And this ouersight in mistaking the distinction of the Law and the Gospel is and hath bin the ruine of the gospel We must here further obserue that beleeuing and doing are opposed in the article of our iustification In our good conuersation they agree faith goes before and doing followes but in the worke of our iustification they are as fire and water Hence I gather that to the iustification of a sinner there is required a speciall and an applying faith for generall faith is numbred among the works of the law and the deuills haue it This kind of beleeuing therefore and doing are not opposite Againe hence I gather that works of faith and grace are quite excluded from iustification because the opposition doth not stand betweene beleeuing and the works of nature but simply betweene beleeuing and doing Lastly it may be demaunded why the Lord saith He that doth the things of the law shall liue considering no man since the fall can doe the things of the law Ans. The Lord since mans fall repeates the law in his old tenour not to mocke men but for other waightie causes The first is to teach vs that the law is of a constant and vnchangeable nature The second is to aduertise vs of our weaknes and to shew vs what we cannot doe The third is to put vs in minde that we must still humble our selues vnder the hand of God after we haue begunne by grace to obey the law because euen then we come farre short in doing the things which the law requires at our hands 13 Christ hath redeemed vs from the curse of the law when he was made a curfe for vs for it is written Cursed is euery one that hangeth on the tree 14 That the blessing of Abraham might come to the Gentiles through Christ Iesus that we might receiue the promise of the spirit by faith Paul hauing prooued the truth of his doctrine by sundrie arguments in the former part of this chapter he here answereth an obiection the occasion whereof is from the 10. verse It may be framed on this manner If they be accused that continue not in all things written in the law to doe them then all men are accursed and the Gentiles are not partakers of the blessing of Abraham as you haue said Answer is here made that to them that beleeue there is full redemption from the curse of the law And Paul for the better inlightning of his answer here makes a description of our redemption by foure arguments The first is the author Christ hath redeemed vs from the curse of the law The second is the forme or manner of our Redemption in these words When he was made a curse for vs. And this forme is further declared by the signe in these words for it is written Cursed is euery one that hangeth on the tree The third argument is in the end in these words that the blessing of Abraham might come on the Gentiles The last is also an other ende that we might receiue the promise of the spirit Touching the Author in these words Christ hath redeemed vs from the curse of the law sundrie things may be learned First of all comparing these words with the 10. verse or comparing the answer and the obiection together we see and are to obserue that the threatnings of the law are to be vnderstood with an exception from the Gospel All are cursed saith the law that doe not continue to doe all things written therein Except they haue pardon and be redeemed by Christ saith the Gospel And thus are all curses of the law to be conceiued with a limitation or qualification from the Gospel Againe in that Christ hath redeemed vs from the curse of the law here is our comfort that neither hell nor death nor SataÌ„ hath any right or power ouer vs so be it we do vnfainedly beleeue in Christ. For we are bought with a price And for this cause we must be admonished not to feare any euill ouermuch as the reuilings and curses of euill tongues withcraft the plague pestilence famine the sword or death For the curse which makes all these and many other things hurtfull vnto vs is remooued from them that are in Christ. And therefore all immoderate feare should be restrained Thirdly our dutie is to glorifie God and Christ who hath redeemed vs and that both in bodie and soule The redeemed must liue according to the will of their redeemer 1. Cor. 6. 20. This is all the thankfulnes that we can shew to our Redeemer for his mercie Lastly here an obiection made by some may be answered If say they we were redeemed by Christ beeing captiues to the deuill the price of our Redemption was paid to him and not to God Ans. We were captiues properly to the iustice of God in the law to the order whereof we stand subiect and by this meanes we are captiues to the curse of the law and consequently to the deuill who is the minister of God for the Execution of the said curse And beeing captiues to the deuill no otherwise then as he is the minister of God for the infâ—â—cting of punishment the price must not be paid to him but to God who is the principall and hath a soueraigntie ouer him and vs. I come now to the forme of our Redemption Who was made a curse for vs. For the better vnderstanding of these words foure points are to be handled The first is what is this curse Ans. A double death the first of the bodie the second of the soule The first is the separation of the bodie and soule The second is the separation of the whole man from God not in respect of his vniuersall power and presence for the very damned haue their moouing and beeing from him but in respect of his fauour and speciall loue whereby God ceaseth to be their God And this is death indeede whereof the first is but a shadow and this is the curse of the law The second point is How Christ was a curse or accursed who is the fountaine of blessednes Ans. He is not so by nature for he is the naturall sonne of God nor by his owne fault for he is the vnspotted lambe of God but by voluntarie dispensation and therefore Paul saith he was made a curse And he was made a curse first because he was set a part in the eternall counsell of the Father Sonne and holy Ghost to be our redeemer and consequently to be a curse In this regard the father is said to haue sealed him Ioh. 6. 27. and he is said againe to be prcordained before all worlds 1. Pet. 1. 20. and giuen according to the counsell and foreknowledge of God Act. 3. 22. Secondly he was made a curse
on the Lords day But this doctrine seemes not to stand with the fourth commandement It seemes to be a truth more probable that euery seauenth day in the weeke must be set a part in holy rest vnto God for this is the substance of the fourth commandement And it is also very probable that the Sabbath of the new Testament is limited and determined by our Sauiour Christ to the Lords day For Paul and the rest of the Apostles obserued the first day of the weeke for a Sabbath day Act. 20. 7. and he saith Whatsoeuer ye haue heard and what ye haue seene in me that doe Phil. 4. 9. Againe it was the decree or constitution of Paul that the collection for the poore should be the first day of the weeke at Corinth now this collection in the Primitiue Church followed preaching praier sacraments and it was the conclusion of all other exercises in the assemblie 1. Cor. 16. 2. And this first day of the weeke is called the Lords day Apoc. 1. 11. and it is so called because it was dedicated and consecrated to the honour of Christ our Lord. And who is the author of this Dedication but Christ himselfe the Lord of the Sabboth It is alleadged that the Sabbath and the commandement touching the Sabbath is Ceremoniall and vpon this ground they take libertie keep no Sabbath at all But the truth is that the commandement touching the Sabbath is not wholly Ceremoniall It may be the first words Remember the Sabbath day to sanctifie it and the words In it thou shalt doe no manner of worke c. are spoken of the Iewes Sabbath but the wordes Sixe daies shalt thou labour and the seuenth day is the Sabbath of the Lord thy God are morall and containe a perpetuall truth Therefore the words of Paul must be conceiued with an exception of the Sabbath day which is the seuenth day in euery weeke which day Christ hath limited by his Apostles to the Lords day The vse This text of Paul discouers vnto vs a great part of the superstition of the Popish Church in the obseruation of holy daies First beside the Lords day they appoint many other sabbaths whereas it is the priuiledge of God to appoint an ordinarie day of rest and to sanctifie it to his owne honour Secondly they bind mens consciences to the obseruation of their holy daies which Paul here forbids and Col. 2. 16. Thirdly they place the worship of God in the obseruation of their holy daies but God is worshipped in vaine by mens precepts Matth. 15. Fourthly they place a great holines in their festiuall daies more then in other daies Fiftly they dedicate many of their holy daies to the honour of Saints and Angels whereas the dedication of ordinarie and set daies is a part of diuine or religious worship Lastly their holy daies for number are more then the festiuall daies of the Iewes and thus they bring people into their old bondage nay to a greater bondage then euer the Iewes indured in respect of daies and times It may be said that the Church of the Protestants obserue holy daies Ans. Some Churches doe not because the Church in the Apostles daies had no holy day beside the Lords day and the 4. commandement inioynes the labour of sixe daies Indeede the Churches of England obserueth holy daies but the Popish superstition is cut off For we are not bound in conscience to the obseruation of these daies neither doe we place holines or the worship of God in them but we keepe them onely for orders sake that men may come to the Church to heare Gods word And though we retaine the names of Saints daies yet we giue no worship to saints but to God alone And such daies as contained nothing in them but superstition as the conception and assumption of the virgin Marie we haue cut off Thus doth the Church with vs obserue holy daies and no otherwise Indeede the ignorant multitude among vs faile greatly in the obseruing of daies For they greatly solemnise the time of the birth of Christ and then they keepe few or no markets but the Lords day is not accordingly respected and men will not be disswaded from following of faires on that day Againe to obserue daies of good bad successe according to the constellations of the heauens is an heathenish fashion to be auoided For it is here condemned in the Galatians Here therefore we must be put in minde not to obserue the planetarie houres for men suppose that the houres of the daie are ruled by the planets and hereupon that some houres are good and luckie as they say and some vnluckie that men are taken with planets and borne vnder vnluckie planets But these are heathenish conceits Neither must we respect our Horoscope or the time of our birth and the constellation of the heauens thē as though we could hereby know what should befall vs to the end of our daies And we must not put difference of daies as though some were luckie vnto vs and some vnluckie according to the course of the starres The like I saie of the Criticall daies that is the 7. and the 14. daie after that a man beginnes to be sicke For they are groūded vpon the aspects of the moone which are not to be regarded And the Climactericall years are not to be obserued as dangerous and dismall The obseruatiō of the signes is of the same nature For the 12. signes are nothing els but 12. parts of the first mooueable which is but a supposed heauen Therefore there is no danger in the thing but in our conceit We are to feare God and not to feare the starres neither are we to make differences of daies in respect of them as though the affaires we take in hand should prosper the better or the worse in respect of their different operation Gods commandement is Feare not the signes of heauen Ierem. 10. 2. And good reason For no man can by learning knowe the operation of the starrs because their lights and operations are all mixed togither in all places vpon earth and therefore no obseruation can be made of this or that starre more then of this or that hearbe when all hearbes are mixed and compounded togither Againe the operation of the starres is by their light and light hath no operation but in heat or cold moisture or drinesse In this respect though we may well obserue the full and the change of the moone it is foolishnesse to ascribe the regiment of our affaires to the starres they beeing matters contingent which depend on the will and pleasure of man Lastly it is a great ouersight to hold sundrie of the starres to be malignant and infortunate in respect of vs whereas they are the creatures of God and their light serues for the good of man In a word we are not to make difference of daies neither in respect of holines nor in respect of good or badde successe V. 11. I am afraid
the law The aduocates of the Romish Church answer that our knowledge loue and obedience are perfect for the condition and estate of this life as we are viatores which is sufficient though they be not perfect for the condition of the life to come when we shall be comprehensores which is not required at our hands in this life for they make a double perfect fulfilling of the law one for the tearme of this life which is to loue God aboue all things and our neighbour as our selues The other after this life and that is to loue God with all the soule with all the powers and faculties of the soule and with all the strength and vigor of all these powers And this distinction they make to be the ground of their opinion touching the fulfilling of the law and iustification by workes c. But it is a sandie foundation and therefore that which is built vpon it cannot stand For besides that it is a fond and friuolous distinction forged by the Schoolemen without warrant of Scripture or consent of Antiquitie it is manifestly false For there is one onely rule of righteousnes and not two one onely generall sentence of the Lawe more vnchangeable then the lawes of the Medes Persians euen as vnchangeable as God himselfe which is that He which continueth not in all things written in the Law to doe them is accursed So that he which loueth not God with all his soule minde and might with all his valdè suo that is with all the faculties of his soule and all the powers of all these faculties and that in this life is accursed And it is absurd which they teach that a man is not bound for the tearme of this life thus to loue God but onely in the life to come For looke what man could doe by creation in the state of innocencie the same and so much the Law requires at his hands in the state of Apostasie But Adam by creation could loue God with all his soule with all the faculties of his soule and all the powers of all these faculties therefore the same perfect absolute and entire obedience is now required at his hands For the sentence of the law Cursed is he that continueth not in all things c. is not onely giuen to men glorified but to those that are in the state of grace And S. Paul doth so apply this sentence to men euen in this life t 〈…〉 he pronounceth all that are of the workes of the law to be vnder the curse Againe if this were so the Iewes had no cause to feare the seueritie and strictnes of the law as they did when they said If we heare the voice of the Lord any more we shall die considering they were able to keepe and fulfill it according to this Popish opinion Neither would God haue promised them a Messias or Mediatour to redeeme them from the curse of the law but would rather haue comforted them in that their so great feare and astonishment by giuing them to vnderstand that they were not bound to the full and perfect fulfilling of the law for the time of this life Besides the patheticall exclamation of Paul O miserable man that I am c. Rom. 7. 24. and that saying of Peter in calling the Law a yoke which neither we nor our fathers were able to beare Act. 15. should be childish and ridiculous if that which is impossible in the law as Paul speakes did not appertaine vnto vs. The third argument If a man could fulfill the Law he should not stand in neede of a Mediatour For if righteousnes be by the Law Christ died in vaine Gal. 2. 21. It is answered that Christ died in vaine if men by the strength of nature could fulfill the Law but the fulfilling of the Law is by grace and so his death is not in vaine for by vertue of the obedience of Christ we are enabled to fulfill the Law But this were to make Christ no Sauiour but onely an instrument whereby we fulfill the Law and are our owne Sauiours whereas the Scripture saith that he is made vnto vs righteousnes 1. Corinth 1. 30. not that we are made righteousnesse by him That we are made the righteousnesse of God in him 2. Corinth 5. 21. not by him as an instrument That we are complete in him Coloss. 2. 10. and not complete of our selues by him Lastly the Scripture shutteth vp all men vnder sinne euen the most sanctified Prou. 20. 9. 1. Ioh. 1. 9. Iob confesseth he cannot answer one of a thousand Iob 9. 3. and Dauid saith If thou Lord shalt marke what is done amisse who can abide it Psal. 130. 3. and Paul saith of himselfe that he found no meanes to performe that which is good Rom. 7. 18. He saith further that it is impossible to be kept by reason of originall corruption Rom. 8. 3. It is answered that all these places and examples must be vnderstood of veniall sinnes which make men sinners indeede yet are not against but beside the law and therefore though a man commit them yet he may fulfill the law for all that Ans. the coÌ„mon receiued opinion in Schooles that some sinnes are mortall others veniall of their owne nature is a witlesse distinction For if all sinnes deserue death as Paul teacheth Rom. 6. 23. either veniall sinnes are no sinnes or they must needes deserue death Moses saith that he that abideth not in all things written in this Law is accursed Deuter. 27. 26. where the wordes this Law may not be restrained onely to the Catalogue of great and hainous sinnes which are there reckened vp but extended to all sinnes as Paul applies it Gal. 3. 10. pronouncing him accursed that continueth not in all things written in the lawe not this law So that euery sinne euen the least sinne in thought makes a man subiect to the curse and so in rigour of diuine iustice deserues eternall death And it is but a poore shift to say that some sinnes are against the Lawe as all mortall sinnes and others besides the Lawe as veniall For the doing of that which God forbiddeth is a sinne not beside but against the Lawe But idle words iesting and gibing c. which the Popish Doctours account veniall sinnes are expressely forbidden in the word Matth. 12. 36. Of euery idle word that men shall speake they shall giue account at the day of iudgement And Paul forbiddeth all foolish talking and â—esting as things vncomely Eph. 5. 4. Therefore they are not beside but flatte against the lawe Secondly they answer that these places and the like are to be vnderstood of seuerall workes and actions of the Saints whereof some were good as Dauids sparing of Saul c. some euill as his adulterie murther and numbering of the people and not of the same particular workes Answ. It is false For Paul speaking of the same indiuiduall worke saith that it is partly good and partly euill I finde
wherewith to maintaine themselues And we must consider the reason why Paul commandeth all that are instructed in the word to make them that instructed them partakers of their goods to wit because in Pauls time and long after the Church was not endowed with lands or goods whereby the Ministerie might be vpholden neither had it publike Christian Magistrates but was vnder cruell tyrants in persecution and therefore those that were taught in the word were to maintaine their teachers by liberall cōtribution otherwise they might starue but now the Church beeing greatly inriched they may without contribution be sufficiently maintained of the Church goods And that it is much more conuenient for the Ministers to be maintained by set stipends arising from goods proper to the Church then by voluntarie contribution it may appeare by this in that it cuts off sundrie inconueniences which in voluntarie contributions either cannot be or are hardly auoided First slatterie and suspition of flatterie in beeing thought to haue some persons in admiration because of aduantage Secondly the poorer sort are no way disgraced by this meanes as they should be in contributions except they did giue ratably as the rest Thirdly dissembling and deceit in making as though they receiued little when as they haue much is cut off in a set stipend Fourthly the euill disposed would not so easily cast off their minister and seeke a new that would teach for lesse or would giue nothing at all if they were touched to the quicke and galled for their sinnes Fiftly ostentation in some in giuing much and disdaining those that giue lesse Sixtly suspition of couetousnes and filthie lucre in the ministers in seeming to take of those to whome they ought to giue Seauenthly disgrace of the ministerie in gathering themselues or sending others to gather the peoples liberalitie from dore to dore Lastly a set stipend comes nearer the order appointed by God in maintaining the Priesthood vnder the Leuiticall law In the next place I will answer the common obiections that are made to the contrarie by such as thinke it is as easie a matter to say seruice in the church as to do seruice in the house to stand at the altar of God as to follow their masters plough to preach in the pulpit as to talke in the tauerne I. Obiect 2. Thess. 3. 10. They which will not worke must not eate But Ministers neuer plow nor sow nor hedge nor ditch nor vse any painfull labour for of all men they haue the easiest liues their greatest paines is to read ouer a few bookes or to speake a few words once or twise a weeke Therefore they are not to be maintained Ans. There is a twofold labour one of the bodie another of the minde now albeit the ministers doe not wearie themselues in bodily labour yet they are not therefore idle for the labours of the minde doe faire exceede the labours of the bodie they are more painefull they spend the spirits more they consume naturall moisture and bring old age sooner The holy Ghost calleth the ministerie the worke of the ministerie Eph. 4. 12. nay a worthie worke 1. Tim. 3. 1. therefore Paul saith that those Elders are worthie double honour that labour in the word and doctrine 1. Tim. 5. 17. and he exhorts the Thessalonians that they would know them that labour among them and that they haue them in singular loue for their works sake 1. Thess. 5. 12 13. Hence it is that the Scripture doeth vsually compare the worke of the ministerie to the most toylsome labour that may be as to the work of the husbandman to setting to plowing to sowing to reaping to the labour in the vineyard and the minister to a builder to a shepheard that watcheth his flocke to a soldiour that fighteth in the warres c. Againe we may not iudge of the painfulnes of the calling by the outward appearance for so a man would thinke a King had the easiest life of all when as the truth is the toyle which he takes and the cares wherewith he is possessed doe exceede all other cares if a man knew the trauaile that is required to the welding of a scepter and the paine that is taken in wearing of a heauie crowne he would hardly stoope downe to take the one into his hands or to set the other vpon his head The master builder doth not hewe the stones nor worke the morter nor carrie the rubbish nor any such drudgerie but onely standeth by directeth the workemen yet his labour is double to any of theirs The master of the ship a man would thinke were idle and did nothing he stands not to the tackling he stirreth not the pumpe he driueth not the oares he soundeth not the deepe he rideth not the ropes but onely sitteth still at the sterne and looketh to the pole-starre and guideth the compasse yet his labour passeth all the rest were it not for him the shippe would runne her selfe vnder the water or strike vpon the rockes or be split vpon the sands or fall soule with another as marriners speake Euen so for all the world fareth it with the Ministers of the word they seeme to sit still to be at ease to doe nothing and yet their labour is double and treble to other mens bodily labour except they be vnfaithfull and doe the worke of the Lord negligently II. Obiect Paul laboured with his hands in making of Tents Act. 18. 3. that he might not be chargeable to any Act. 20. 34. 2. Thess. 3. 8. Therefore Preachers are to maintaine themselues by their handy labour not be chargeable to the Church Ans. Pauls example prooueth not that the minister ought to liue by the labour of his hāds for first himselfe receiued a contribution of the Philippians when he was absent frō them Philip. 4. 16. When I was in Thessalonica ye sent once and afterward againe for my necessitie Therefore if Paul receiued exhibition from other churches where he did not labour it is lawefull for the ministers to receiue of those whome they doe instruct Secondly consider the reasons why Paul would not take wages of the Church of Corinth some others I lest he should be a burden vnto them 2. Thess. 3. 8. We wrought with labour and trauell day and night because we would not be chargeable to any of you 2. Cor. 11. 9. In all things I kept and will keepe my selfe that I should not be grieuous vnto you II. That he might giue a president or example to others to tread in his steppes 2. Thess. 3. 9. Not but that we had authoritie but that we might make our selues an example to them to follow vs. III. That he might manifest what his end was in teaching the Gospel not to seeke himselfe but the saluation of his hearers 2. Cor. 11. 14. I seeke not yours but you And vers 19. We doe all things for your edification Philip. 4. 17. Not that I desire a gift but the fruit which may
neighbour let my wife grind vnto another man and let other men bow downe vpon her Iob 31. 10 11. Use. First here we see the iustice of God in awarding the last sentence nay his bountie and seueritie his bountie in recompencing men aboue their deserts his seueritie in punishing sinners according to their deserts For as he will denie any thing in iustice that denied to Diues a droppe of water to coole his tongue Luk. 16. 24. 25. so he will recompence any thing in mercie that will recompence a cuppe of cold water Math. 10. 42. This integritie in iudgement without partialitie is signified by the white throne Reu. 20. 11. and it serues as a patterne and example for all Iudges and Magistrats to follow in laying iudgement to the rule and righteousnes to the ballance Esa. 28. 17. that is in hearing causes indifferently and determining equally examining them as it were by line and square as the mason or carpenter doth his worke The Grecians placed Iustice betwixt Leo and Libra thereby signifying that there must not onely be courage in executing but also indifferencie in determining The Egyptians expresse the same by the hieroglyphicall figure of a man without hands winking with his eyes whereby is meant our vncorrupt Iudge who hath no hands to receiue bribes nor eyes to behold the person of the poore or respect the person of the rich And before our tribunalls we commonly haue the picture of a man holding a ballance in one hand and a sword in the other signifying by the ballance iust iudgement by the sword execution of iudgement For as the balance putteth no difference betweene gold and lead but giueth an equall or vnequall poise to them both not giuing a greater waight to the gold for the excellencie of the mettall because it is gold nor a lesse to the lead for the basenes of it because it is lead So they were with an euen hand to way the poore mans cause as well as the rich But it is most notably set out by the throne of the house of Dauid mentioned Psal. 122. 5. which was placed in the gate of the citie towardes the sunne rising in the gate to signifie that all which came in and out by the gate of the citie might indifferently be heard the poore as well as the rich and might haue accesse and regresse too and from the iudgement seate Towards the rising of the sunne in token that their iudgement should be as cleare from corruption as the sunne is cleare in his chiefest brightnes Secondly this confutes the common opinion of the Schoolmen who as they truly affirme that God rewardeth his Elect supra meritum aboue their desert so they erroniously teach that he punisheth the reprobate citra condignum lesse then they haue deserued For God powreth vpon the wicked after this life the full violls of his wrath punishing them in the rigour of his iustice without all mercie not onely according to their works in regard of the nature and qualitie but in respect of the measure and quantitie Lastly this doctrine seriously considered and thought vpon that we shall drinke such as we brew reape such as we sow and that men shall haue degrees of felicitie or miserie answerable to their workes answerable to the kind of their worke to the quantitie and qualitie thereof will make vs more carefull to auoid sinne and to be more plentifull in good workes then if with the Papists we should teach iustification by workes Againe in that euery one shall reape as he soweth that is shall be rewarded not according to the fruit and successe of his labour but according to his labour be it more or lesse better or worse it serues first of all to comfort the ministers of the word which are set ouer a blinde ignorant people who are alwaie learning and neuer come to the knowledge of the 〈…〉 th they must not be discouraged thogh after long teaching there be little knowledge or amendment after much paines 〈◊〉 little profiting but rather a coldnesse a backewardnesse a declâ—ning in all sorts and degrees They must remember that if their Gospell beeing deliuered with such simpheitie with such assiduâ—tie with such euidence and demonstration of the spirit be hâ—d at is hid to them that perish in whome the God of this world hath blinded the mindes of the infidells that the glorious Gospel of Christ should not shine vnto them 2. Cor. 4. 3 4. Besides let them consider that though they seeme to labour in vaine to spend their strength in vaine and that their words take no more effect then if they were spoken in the winde yet that their iudgement is with the Lord and their worke with their God Isa. 49. 4. remembring that God wil giue to euery man according to his worke according to the kind the quantitie the qualitie thereof and not according to the fruit or successe of his worke It may serue also as a cordiall to euery man that is painfull faithful in his calling thogh neuer so base seruile as to a shepheard which watcheth his flock or a poore drudge that atteÌ„ds vpon his masters busines he is to coÌ„fort himselfe with this that though he see no great good that comes by his labour and trauel yet if he be obedieÌ„t to him that is his master according to the flesh in all things not with eye-seruice as men-pleasers but in singlenes of heart seruing God and whatsoeuer he doth doing it heartily as to the Lord and not to men let him know and assure himselâ—e that of the Lord he shall receiue the reward of inheritance Coloss. 3. 22 23 24. And the promise is more generall Eph. 6. 5. Know ye that whatsoeuer good thing any man doth the same shall he receiue of the Lord whether he be bond or free It serueth further as a comfort against inequallitie whereas the wicked flourish in all manner of prosperitie and the godly lie in contempt and miserie for the time shall come when euery one shall reape euen as he hath sowne When God will punish the sinnes of the reprobate with eternall torment according to their deserts and crowne the good workes of his seruants with an eternall waight of glorie aboue their desert for pietie shall not alway goe vnrewarded neither shall impietie alway goe vnpunished for as the Psalmist saith The patient abiding of the righteous shall not perish for euer And againe doubtles there is a reward for the righteous doubtlesse there is a God that iudgeth the earth Againe this condemneth the damnable opinion of Atheists who thinke all things come to passe by nature or fortune and that doomes day is but a dreame and that sticke not to say It is in vaine to serue God and what profit is it that we haue kept his commaÌ„dements and that we haue walked humbly before the Lord of boasts as though good workes should neuer be rewarded nor sinne punished albeit the Lord hath said Behold
whether vpon compact or otherwise for the Scripture maketh mention of reward where there are no precedent workes as Gen. 15. 1. Feare not Abram I am thine exceeding great reward that is thy full content and happinesse Psal. 127. 3. The fruit of the wombe is a reward that is a blessing and a free gift of God In this sense I grant eternall life is a reward Yet it is no proper reward but so called by a catachresis which yet is not an intollerable catachresis as Bellarm. either ignorantly or malitiously affirmeth but easie and familiar for in the phrase of the Scripture eternall life is called a reward in a generall signification when it is vsed absolutely and not relatiuely to signifie the heele or ende of any thing and so the Hebrewe word which signifieth a heele signifieth also a reward because it is giuen when the worke is ended And eternall life hath this resemblance with a reward in that it is giuen at the end of a mans life after that his trauell and warfare is ended Thus the Greeke words which signifie a reward and an ende are vsed indifferently one for the other 1. Pet. 1. 9. Receiuing the end of your faith the saluation of your soules that is as Beza hath fitly translated it the reward of your faith for to translate it the ende of your faith cannot agree to the word receiuing for we receiue not an ende but a reward Thus reward signifieth a free gift or free remuneration as when the master giueth his feruant something for his faithfull seruice though done vpon dutie when as he oweth him not thanks much lesse reward Luk. 17. 9. Doth he thanke hat seruant because he did that which was commanded vnto him I trowe not Thus God giueth vs eternall life not because he is bound in iustice so to doe for he oweth vs neither reward nor thanks for our labour because when we haue done what we can we haue but done our dutie v. 10. but because his goodnesse and mercifull promise made thereupon doth excite him thereunto And yet eternall life is called a reward because it doth as certainly follow good works as though it were due And good workes are mentioned in the promise because they are tokens that the workers is in Christ for whose merit the promise shall be accomplished And it is further called the reward or fruit of our faith as here the haruest because it is the way and meanes of obtaining it II. Eternall life is called a reward of good workes not causally as procured by them but consequently as following them For abeit it be giuen properly for the merit of Christ apprehended by faith yet it is giuen consequently as a recompence of our labours as an inheritance is giuen to the heire not for any duty or seruice but because he is the heire yet by consequent it is giuen in recompence of his obedience He that forsakes father mother shall receiue a hundred fold more in this life and in the world to come eternall life Mark 10. 29 30. III. Reward doth not alway presuppose debt but is often free for whereas it is said Math. 5. 46. If you loue them that loue you what reward shall ye haue It is thus in Luk. 6. 34. What thāk shall ye haue by which we see that reward doth not alway signifie due debt but thankefull remembrance and gratious acceptance IV. Coloss. 3. 24. Eternall life is called the reward of inheritance whereby is signified that it is not giuen for our workes but because we are the sonnes of God by adoption Bellarmine answers that it may be both a reward an inheruāce a reward because it is giuen to labourers vpon compact an inheritance because it is giuen to none but those that are children But the word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 translated reward signifieth a gift freely giuen without respect of desert it beeing all one with 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as Bafil teacheth vpon the 7. psalme V. The Scripture teacheth that God giueth rewards foure waies First he giueth reward of due debt in respect of merit thus he giueth eternall life as a reward due not to our merits but to the merits of Christ for none can merit at the hands of God but he which is God Secondly he giues a reward in respect of his free and mercifull promise and thus he rewards onely beleeuers Thirdly he giueth rewards to hypocrites infidels heathen c. beeing neither bound by his owne promise nor by their merit whē they performe the outward works of the lawe and lead a ciuill life conformable thereto as when Ahab humbled himselfe before the Lord 1. King 21. And this God doth to the end he may preserue humane societie and cōcommon honestie and that he may testifie what he approoueth and what he disliketh Lastly he giueth good successe in interprises and attempts according to his owne decree and the order of diuine prouidence which metaphorically is called a reward Ezek. 29. v. 19. 20. because it hath a similitude thereunto as when wicked men through ignorance doe that wickedly which he hath iustly decreed shall come to passe suffering them to fill their houses with the spoyle of the poore which they haue for their work as a man hath wages for his honest labour Thus the spoyle of Iudea is called the hire or reward giuen to Tiglath Pelassat for his Syrian warre Isay 7. 20. and thus the spoyle of Egypt is said to be wages giuen Nhebuchodonosar for his seruice against Tyrus Further let vs here obserue the different manner of speech which the Apostle vseth in speaking of the flesh and of the spirit Of the former he saith He that soweth to his flesh c. Of the latter He that soweth to the spirit not to his spirit by which is signified that what good so euer a man doth in beeing beneficiall to the ministery in furthering the Gospel c. he doth it not by any goodnes that is in himselfe but by the spirit of god who in euery good motion workes in vs the will and in euery good action the deed Philip. 2. 13. therefore no man ought to flatter himselfe in this respect or to think highly of himselfe as though he had attained an extraordinary measure of sanctification either for affecting or effecting any thing that is good seeing whatsoeuer good thing is in vs is the gift of God as Ierome saith On the contrary what euill soeuer a man doth he doth it of himselfe God beeing neither the author the furtherer nor the abetter thereof Againe we hence learne that all vnregenerate persons are sowers to the flesh because that before their conuersion they do nothing but those things that are pleasing to the flesh so that dying in that estate they can reape nothing but corruption therefore it hence followeth that Philosophers heathen and all meere ciuill and naturall men being such as neuer sowed to the spirit shall
all not to be wearie or to persist continue but we must proceede on from strength to strength and bring forth more fruite in our age Psal. 92. 14. as the Church of Thiaiyra whose workes were more at the last then at the first for which shee is worthely praised by our Sauiour Christ Reuel 2. 19. It was the motto of Charles the fift Plus vltra and it ought to be euery Christiās motto to striue to perfectiō as the Apostle exhorts vs To be steadfast immoneable and not to make stay there but to be aboundant alwaies in the worke of the Lord. 1. Cor. 15. 58. And that we may doe this indeed we must set this downe as a certaine conclusion that we will not recoile nor giue backe come what will come and withall we must labour to quicken our dull and drowsie spirits to girde vp the loynes of our mindes to strengthen our weake hands and our feeble knees by publike and priuate exercises of reading praier meditation conference c. Thus much of the rule nowe followeth the reason of the rule or the motiue to incourage vs to the performance of this dutie for in due season we shall reape if we faint not as if he should say more fully thus Let vs be assured of this that continuing and increasing in well doing our labour is not lost nor spent in vaine 1. Cor. 15. 58. for though we imagine that we labour in vaine and spend our strength in vaine as the Prophet speaketh yet our worke is with the Lord and our labour with our God Esay 49. 4. And albeit we may seeme to our selues and others to cast away our goods in beeing beneficiall vnto some and as the wiseman speaketh to sowe vpon the waters yet after many daies we shall finde them againe Eccles 11. 1. In the motiue there be three things contained First the reason it selfe which is a promise of reward We shall reape Secondly the circumstance of time when this haruest shall be reaped we shall reape in due season Thirdly the condition that is required on our parts that we may reape if we faint not Of these in order and first of the reason or promise it selfe Whereas the Apostle to the ende we may not be wearie of a good course doth encourage vs to proceed on by setting before our eies the promised reward I gather that we may encourage animate and excite our selues to the performance of all good duties by the consideration of the heauenly haruest which we are to reape and the crowne of glorie we are to receiue after this life as the husbandman doeth sowe in hope that he shall reape and though seed time be painefull and chargeable vnto him yet he giueth not ouer for all that but comforteth himselfe with the expectation of the haruest which will fully quite his cost and recompence his labour That this is a truth it may appeare by sundrie arguments by precept by promise by practise by reasō For precept It is the cōmandemēt of Christ we should make vs friends of vnrighteous māmon or of the riches of iniquitie that when we shall want they may receiue vs into euerlasting Tabernacles Luk. 16. 9. For promise besides this place which is very pregnant to the purpose Paul exhorts seruants that whatsoeuer they doe they would doe it heartily as to the Lord and not to men knowing that of the Lord they shall receiue the reward of inheritance Coloss. 3. 23 24. And generally what good thing soeuer a man doth the same shall he receiue of the Lord whether he be bond or free Eph. 6. 8. He that forsakes father and mother c. for Christs sake shall receiue a 100. fold more in this life and in the world to come life euerlasting Math. 19. 29. These and the like promises were to no purpose if it were not lawfull for vs to looke to the reward if we might not by considering of it incite and stirre vp our selues to greater alacritie in the course of Christianitie in making vs more seruent and frequent in the duties of pietie Thirdly it may be prooued by the practise of the saints of God Abraham was contented to forsake his natiue countrie at the commaund of God and to dwell in a strange land yea and that in tents because he looked for a cittie hauing a foundation whose builder and maker is God Ebr. 11. v. 9. 10. Moses esteemed the rebuke of Christ greater riches then the treasures of Egypt because he had respect vnto the recompence of reward v. 26. Christ whose example is without all exception beeing exemplum indeficiens as the Schoole-men speake did sweeten the bitternes of the crosse with the consideration of the glorie which a little after he was to inioy for so the Apostle saith that for the ioy that was set before him he endured the crosse despised the shame Ebr. 12. 2. The Colossians are commended by the Apostle for that they continued and increased in faith to God and loue to mā for the hopes sake that was laid vp for them in heauen Coloss. 1. 5. And Paul shewes this to haue beene the practise and to be the dutie of all the saints of God so to runne that they may obtaine 1. Cor. 9. 24. Lastly it may be prooued by reason For first that which is the end of our actions ought to be considered of vs as a means to stirre vs vp to the attaining of this ende therefore seeing the ende of our faith and hope is eternall life Rom. 6. 22. Ye haue your fruit in holinesse and the end euerlasting life 1. Pet. 1. 9. Receiuing the reward of your faith the saluation of your soules Therefore we may nay we ought to cast our eies vpon it to direct all our actions for the attaining of it Secondly if the labourer worke not in regard of the common good onely but also with respect of his wages he that runneth a race to attaine the garland if the husbandmen set and sow plant and plowe in hope to reape a haruest to receiue some fruite of his labours It is lawfull for Christians also to doe good in regard of eternall reward for that is the Apostles reason 1. Cor. 9. 25. They that trie masteries abstaine from all things that they may obtaine a corruptible crowne but we for an vncorruptible It is Saint Iames his reason Iam. 5. 7 8. as the husbandman waiteth for the pretious fruit of the earth and hath long patience for it vntill he receiue the former and the latter raine So must we be patient and settle our hearts for the comming of the Lord draweth neare and he will recompence euery man according to his workes Thirdly if it be lawfull for a man to abstaine from sinne for feare of eternall punishment and torment in hell as we know it is Matth. 10. 28. then it is lawfull to doe good in hope of eternall reward It will be saide that it is the propertie of a
boasteth not but onely of his Apostolicall calling and his faithfull discharge thereof to the end he may stoppe the mouthes of the false Apostles Thus to confesse the good things we haue to the glorie of God beeing vrged thereunto is lawfull boasting nay it is sometime necessarie making much for the maintenance of the Gospell as Pauls boasting made much for the good of the Church of Corinth Againe there is a twofold lawfull boasting one before God another before men Rom. 4. 2. Of the former the Apostle speakes in this verse of the latter in the 2. Cor. 12. He gloried not in the testimony of a good conscience before god but onely before men Before God he glorified in nothing but in the sauing knowledge of Christ and him crucified And whereas it may besaide that this his boasting in regard of the false Apostles as also his glorying in the testimonie of his conscience 2. Cor. 1. 12. and in his infirmities 2. Cor. 11. 30. were not in the crosse of Christ. I answer they were for his glorying ouer the false Apostles in teaching freely was in the good and prosperous successe of the Gospel which is the doctrine of the crosse and his glorying in the testimonie of his conscience in that it was washed by the blood of the crosse as Paul speakes Coloss. 1. 20. In his afflictions in that they were the afflictions of Christ and he by them made conformable to him But it will be said that he gloried in his reuelations in his paines and trauell in preaching the Gospel and in the multitude of Churches which he had planted Ans. First he did it beeing vrged thereunto secondly he did it to defend his calling and the credit of the Gospel and therefore this boasting was not vnlawfull nay it was necessarie and in the Lord. For when we are compelled we may confesse the good things we haue if we doe it sparingly and for the edification of others that they may be bettered by our example and that they seeing our good workes may glorifie God our heauenly father Matth. 5. 16. Here we see what glorying is Vnlawfull namely when men ascribe vnto themselues either that which they haue not or more then they haue or as proceeding from themselues their wisdome strength industrie in sacrificing to their owne netts and burning incense to their owne yearne Habac. 1. 16. or in boasting of them without necessarie cause either for their owne vaine glorie as Nebuchodonosor did Dan. 4. or not for Gods glorie as Herod did Act. 12. And if this glorying be so greata sinne surely boasting in wickednes as Doeg did Psal. 52. 1. must needes be most damnable as when the greatest swearers and swaggerers count themselues the best companions the greatest Idolaters and superstitious persons most religious the greatest oppressours surfeters drunkards fighters most valiane and couragious c. Now this may be done three waies either ignoraÌ„tly as wheÌ„ Paul gloried in his cruel persecuting of the Saints before his coÌ„uersion Act. 26. 11. or presumptuously when men glorie in wickednes notwithstanding they be perswaded in conscience that it is euill and then it is the sinne of Sodom Isa. 3. 9. or malitiously to despite God and then it is the sinne against the holy Ghost The second point to be considered in the words is the thing wherein he will glorie called here the Crosse of Christ Sane in the Crosse of our Lord Iesus Christ. The words in the originall translated saue are exceptiue as if he should say I will glorie in nothing except in the crosse of Christ and exclusiue onely in the crosse of Christ and in nothing els Albeit they are sometime aduersatiue as Gal. 2. 16. and Apoc. 21. 27. There shall enter into it no vncleane thing 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 but they that are written c. where the words are not exclusiue for then it would follow that some which worke abomination should enter into heauen but aduersatiue as Matth. 12. 4. and Luk. 4. 20. which may serue by the way to cleare the text Ioh. 17. 12. Those thou gauest me haue I kept and none of them is lost but the child of perdition that is but the child of perdition is lost For the words 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 as I take it are not so well translated by the exceptiue coniunction nisi as by the aduersatiue sed seeing here is no exceptioÌ„ made of Iudas as though he had beene giuen to Christ afterward had fallen away which exposition must needes be made if the words be read nisi filius perditionis Further by the Crosse of Christ the Apostle vnderstandeth synecdochically the all sufficient expiatorie and satisfactorie sacrifice of Christ vpon the crosse with the whole work of our redemption in the sauing knowledge where of he professeth he will glorie and boast For Christ is made vnto vs wisdome righteousnes that as it is written He that glorieth should glorie in the Lord euen to make boast of him all the day long as the Psalmist speaketh And the reason why Paul professeth that he will glorie onely in the Crosse of Christ is because Christ crucified is the treasurie and storehouse of the Church seeing that in him are hid not onely the treasures of wisdome and knowledge Coloss. 2. 3. but of bountie and grace Ioh. 1. 16. and of all spirituall blessings Eph. 1. 3. For first by Christ crucified we haue reconciliation with God remission of sinns acceptation to eternall life Secondly we haue the peace of God which passeth all vnderstanding peace with God with Angels with men with our selues with the creatures Thirdly we recouer the right and title which we had in the creation to all the creatures and blessings of God 1. Cor. 3. 22. Fourthly all afflictions and iudgements cease to be curses and punishments and become either trialls or corrections Lastly death it selfe is no death but a sleepe for all that die in the Lord are said to sleepe and to rest vpon their beddes Isa. 57. 2. Indeede if we looke vpon death through the glasse of the Law it is the very downefall to eternall destruction but if we consider it as it is changed by the death of Christ it is but a passage from this transâ—torie life to eternall life Christ by his death hath taken away sinne the sting of death so that though it seaze vpon vs yet hauing lost it sting it cannot hurt vs. So that in a word in Christ crucified are all things that a man can glorie of If we would glorie in knowledge and wisdome He is the wisdome of the father seeing that all treasures of wisdome and knowledge are hid in him and therefore Paul desired to know nothing among the Corinthians but brist and him crucified 1. Cor. 2. 2. for this knowledge is eternall life Ioh 17. 3. If in the loue and fauour of great men by him we are highly aduanced into the loue fauour of god Eph. 1. 6. If in
vnderstood albeit the soule principally be ment because it is the proper subiect of grace for grace beeing a spirituall thing is placed immediately and properly in the spirit or mind of man and in the bodie accidentally where it doth bewray it selfe by outward actions Secondly for that as the seate of grace is in the mind so the sense and apprehension of it is there likewise not in the bodie Thirdly as Theophilact saith Non ait vobiscum quid ita abigens eos à rebus hisce arguensque non à lege bos spiritum sed à gratia accepisse So that it is all one as if he should haue said the grace of our Lord Iesus Christ be with you all as it is Philip. 4. 23. and 2. Thess. 3. 18. as it may appeare by the like for that farewell which Paul giues Timothie in his latter Epistle The Lord Iesus Christ be with thy spirit 2. Tim. 4. 22. is all one with that in his former Grace be with thee 1. Tim. 6. 21. And that salutation Philem. 15. The grace of our Lord Iesus Christ be with your spirit is all one with that Coloss. 4. 18. Grace be with you Hence that phrase and forme of speech in our English Liturgie or Common praier booke though misliked by some and cauilled at by others hath his warrant and ground when the Minister saith The Lord be with you and the people answer And with thy spirit wishing the same to him that he to them that God would be with his spirit that is with him Againe marke how the Apostle as he did beginne with grace chap. 1. 3. so he doth ende with grace to teach vs first of all that our saluation is placed in it alone for the beginning the progresse and the accomplishment thereof for election is of grace Rom. 11. 5. and vocation is of grace 2. Tim. 1. 9. and iustification Rom. 3. 24. and glorification Rom. 6. 23. Secondly that Christ is to haue all the glorie of this grace whereby we are so highly aduanced into the fauour of God both for the beginning continuance and ending without ascribing any part thereof to our selues or any other creature Thirdly that all our salutations and greetings our adieues and fare-wells ought to be grounded in the grace of Christ otherwise they are but carnall and therefore the Apostle biddeth the Christians to salute one another in a holy kisse or as Peter speakes with the kisse of loue 1. Pet. 5. 14. This confutes the Popish Doctors who doe not onely ascribe the beginning of their saluation to themselues in co-working with God in their first conuersion but also the ende and accomplishment of it by workes of condignitie which as they say are meritorious of eternall life Further obserue with what emphasis the Apostle concludes his Epistle First opposing Christ the Lord of the house to Moses who was but a seruant in the house Secondly the grace of Christ to inherent iustice and merits of workes Thirdly the spirit in which he would haue grace to be seated to the flesh in which the Apostles gloried so much Lastly brotherly vnitie one with another implied in the word brethren to the proud and lordly carriage of the false Apostles ouer them The Conclusion In the ende of all it is added in the Greeke and Siriacke copies that this Epistle was written to the Galatians from Rome Which post-script seemes to be erroneous and false for first there is not a tittle in the whole Epistle that giueth the least inkling that it should haue beene written from Rome whereas in all the rest which are written from thence Paul makes mention of his bonds and imprisonment Secondly the varietie of copies argues the vncertentie of it seeing in some copies it is said to haue been sent from Ephesus as Caietan and Hyperius affirme in their Commentaries vpon this place Thirdly Baronius if his authoritie be of any waight in this case affirmeth that it is not likely or credible that it was written from thence But be it graunted that this post-script were true indeede yet it is no part of Canonicall Scripture as not beeing written by the Apostle but added afterwards by the Scribes which copied out the Epistles Neither is this onely true of post-scripts but also of Inscriptions or Titles prefixed before Epistles they are no part of holy writ This may easily be prooued in particular for first touching Post-scripts the Greeke copies agree in this that the first Epistle to the Corinthians was written from Philippi and sent by Stephanas Fortunatus Achaicus and Timotheus when as it is certen it was written from Ephesus For first chap. 16. 5. he saith He will come to them when he shall go through Macedonia Therefore Paul was not then at Philippi a chiefe citie in Macedonia Secondly in the 19 of the same chapter he saith All the Churches of Asia salute you which shewes plainly that when Paul writ this Epistle he was at Ephesus in Asia not at Philippi in Europe Thirdly v. 8. he saith he will abide at Ephesus till Pentecost therefore he was not then at Philippi Fourthly that it was written before the tumult in Ephesus raised by Demetrius and his complices and so consequently before his comming to Philippi as also that it was sent by Timotheus and Erastus it is manifest v. 10. of that chapter beeing compared with Act. 19. v. 21 22. Lastly the Syriacke translatour agreeth with me in affirming that it was written from Ephesus and so doth Baromius Annal. tom 1. pag. 494. l. 39. Againe the post-script of the 2. to the Corinthians hath it was written from Philippi of Macedonia and sent by Titus and Luke whereas the Rhemists if we may giue any credit to their testimonie who elsewhere make titles part of the Canonicall scripture say it was written at Troas as it is thought And Baron annal â—om 1. pag. 590. l. 51. Antuerp thinkes it was written at Nicopoli vpon this occasion that in his former Epistle from Ephesus promising to come vnto theÌ„ as he passed through Macedonia coÌ„ming not 1. Cor. 16. he doth in this excuse himselfe 2. Cor. 15 16 17. compared with the 2. Cor. 7. 5. Neither is it a good reason to prooue that Titus carried this Epistle as it is in the postscript because Paul saith he sent Titus to them and another with him 2. Cor. 8. 18 22. and 12. 18. for Paul speakes of Titus his comming vnto theÌ„ before that time neither may it be thought that Tâ—tus was sent the second time vnto them considering that departing from Macedonia and taking Titus with him he left him in Creete See Cesar Baron annal tom 1. Antuerp p. 591. l. 40. Besides the Rhemists controll the subscription of the first Epistle to the Thessalonians which hath it thus The first Epistle to the Thessalonians written from Athens For in their preface they are bold to affirme that it seemeth rather to haue bin written at Corinth then