the Socinians I do still confess That as the Reasonable Soul and Body is One Man so He that is God and Man is One Christ. And whether this will give Satisfaction to an Implacable Adversary or no I value not knowing my Conscience Clear in the Sight of Him who Judgeth Righteously which I am sure this my Unjust Judge and False Accuser is not who presently after he has stiled me Honest George unjustly Brands me with Infamy as Sophistry Delusion Depths of Satan Mystery of Iniquity Equivocation Jesuitical Confession c. Oh! Rank Malice Bitter Envy c. As for my Confession in the 7th Art alledged against me it stands good and true viz. We own no such saying as that the Holy Doctrine or Divine Precepts of Scripture is either Dust Death or the Serpent's Meat but truly profitable to us by the Assistance of God's Holy Spirit given to us c. And this was in direct Opposition to F. Bugg's saying These Quakers who pretend to own the Precepts and Doctrine of the Bible to be Holy and Blessed yet say 't is Dust and Death the Serpent's Meat c. Apol. Introd p. 18. to his New Rome We do not believe any of these Quakers ever so said of the Precepts and Doctrine nor do they own any such Saying I wholly disown it But then to beg the Question What was it you called Dust and Serpents Meat Was it nothing else but the Ink and Paper Did any Body ever say That these were not Dust Or Is that any part of the Controversie betwixt us Snake p. 177. Here he yields the Point he grants the Ink and Paper to be Dust. I said Will decay and turn to Dust but so will not the Word the Gospel nor the Holy Doctrine contain'd in Scripture And it has been confess'd by F. B. and others That Holiness is not ascrib'd to the Paper and Ink or Inky Characters that will decay but to the Holy Doctrine and Precepts which will not decay but be permanent and endure and therefore are called the Holy Scriptures with respect to the Holy Matters therein contained That the Books and Writings in Ink and Paper will wear out so will not the Word is evident Jehoiakim King of Judah could burn Jeremiah the Prophet's Roll or Book writ with â—nk by Baruch but not the Word of the Lord nor properly the Words thereof for the same Word caused all the former Words to be written again after the Roll was burnt Jer. 36. If then the Books the Paper and Ink be combustible or will decay and turn to Dust but not the Word nor the Doctrine where 's then the Controversie indeed when the same thing is granted on both sides He quotes Gr. Myst. p. 302. as saying Paper and Ink is not Infallible that will come to Dust unto which the Word Christ and the Spirit is preferred in the same place quoted And in the said Gr. Myst. p. 78. by Letter he there means Paper and Ink but the Scripture the thing it speaks of is Spiritual the Word is Spirit And further p. 127. the Scripture or Writing it self without the Spirit that gave it forth is a dead Letter in it self The Spirit is that that gave forth the Scriptures For my part as I am not in the least conscious to my self of the least Contempt of Holy Scripture nor yet of the Bible for I have always preferr'd it to all other Books extant in the World and more affected Reading therein than any other Book even from my Childhood and often bless Divine Providence for preserving to us the Scriptures So I know of none among us guilty of contemning them Neither is what 's said from any Contempt of Scripture no more than it is of the Earth and the Heavens to say They shall wax old and perish but the Word that made them endureth Psal. 102.25 26. Heb. 1.11 12. But say what we can in this Case to clear our selves of any Contempt to the Holy Scripture this our uncharitable Judge and Accuser will not believe us He 's bent to asperse he has swallow'd down so much of the sour Leven of the Malice of a few false Brethren Persecutors and Apostates from whom he derives much of his Authority and thus scurrilously and most falsly imposes upon me viz. And therefore George notwithstanding all thy meally Modesty it is it is indeed George it is the very Doctrine of the Scriptures which you blaspheme as Dust and Death and Serpents Meat on purpose to bring Men off from trying your pernicious Heresies by those Sacred Oracles Ibid. This is a pernicious Abuse and Calumny against my self and others of us to out-face us against our very Sense and Consciences and in good Conscience I Testifie against it it never entred into my Intention or Thoughts so to blaspheme the Doctrine of the Scriptures as to term or deem it Dust Death or Serpents Meat the Lord rebuke this lying envious Spirit Neither do I vilifie the written Doctrine and Precepts of God in comparison of our New Light as he falsly calls it p. 177. but reverently esteem them The Man makes no Conscience of Defaming us Neither do we quarrel with the Law and the Testimony nor yet with Writing or Scripture as 't is in Ink and Paper but distinguish between the Writing and the Things written which is no contempt to either We are thankful to Divine Providence for both the Scripture or Writing and the Holy Doctrine and Divine Precepts therein written for they testifie unto Christ our Light and our Light to the Truth of them And to what he saith If any do not teach the same i. e. according to the Law and the Testimony or written Word it is because there is no Light in them Isa. 8.20 And then puts this Emphasis upon it No Light George Mark that Your false Pretences to the Light within are here over-rul'd Ibid. I deny that our Pretences to the Light within is either false or are here over-rul'd if they speak not according to this Word it is because there is no Morning to them If he 'll see the Note from the Hebrew in some Bibles he may see no Morning in the Margin over against no Light Then let him Mark that But is there no Light in the Creation before Morning either inward or outward pray Did not the Light shine in Darkness before it shined out of Darkness And had not the Believers a more sure Word of Prophecy whereunto they did well to take heed as unto a Light shining in a dark place until the Day dawned and the Day-star arose in their Hearts 2 Pet. 1.19 And are not many reproved by the Light in them for telling Lies and speaking contrary to the Word c. And therefore there was some true Light in them before the Morning appeared to them And though my Accuser says Ibid. These and such-like Texts detect and explode the miserable Ignorance and Blasphemy of these Pretenders to Light For which we have
of the Fathers first Book p. 194. Whilst they beat down one Error they seem to run into the contrary Error In like manner as those who would streighten a crooked Plant are wont to bow it as much the contrary way that so having been worked out of its former bent it may at length rest in a middle posture Now if our Friends have formerly met with those in the Priesthood whose crooked expressions did need streightning they are not to be wondred at or condemned in their Christian endeavours for that end And whether there were such or not I will now joyn Issue with the Snake and shew from a much narrower compass than the extents of the Snake's Challenge which is That there never were in any place such Priests I shall at present only give some few instances out of the Book Great Mystery which the Snake does so often quote which take as follows P. 16. John Timson did affirm that the Holy Scriptures alone is to be the object of Faith P. 38. Tho. Collier did affirm that the Scriptures shall be our Judge one day which we call the Letter P. 111. Jeremy Ives did affirm it to be an Error to say the Letter of the Scriptures was Carnal P. 247. Christopher Wade affirmed The Written Word is the Sword of the Spirit P. 261. Roger Atkinson affirmed That the Letter of the Scripture was God Ibid. Richard Stoakes affirmed That the Scripture is God P. 280. Edw. Price affirmed The Scriptures is the Power of God and that all Men shall be Iudged by them Now Reader upon the Issue joyned in this little space whether appears the Arrant Lyar G. Whitehead in saying There were in the North where most of these did live Priests who had so affirmed of the Letter of the Scriptures or the Snake in saying That neither there nor any where else were such Priests For it cannot be allowed I suppose That the Written Word and Letter of the Scripture as above affirmed is either God or the Power of God or the Iudge of the World or Spiritual or the Sword of the Spirit These and the like crooked Expressions of some in the Priesthood it was the necessary work of our Friends to oppose and straiten according to the Authority of Holy Writ not that we then did or now do charge all the Men with whom these so affirming have held fellowship to have the same Sentiments tho' this be the Practice of the Snake against us notwithstanding his distinction in the Title page of his Libel Ibid. p. 88. How comes it that since they are such bitter Enemies to the Letter they yet make a Conscience of saying Thee and Thou instead of You in the Singular because these were old English words in the first Translations I need not ask How comes it That envy and prejudice is Blind and Ignorant We are not bitter Enemies to the Letters of which the Books of Scripture are composed No Sober Reader that which we have opposed and for our so doing have the Authority of the Scriptures is that Men should only from them gather some account of the dealings of God with the Holy Men in past Ages and from their Declarations therein nay sometimes contrary to them make to themselves Creeds and herein Copy after those to whom our Saviour says Ye search the Scriptures in them ye think to have Eternal Life but ye will not come unto me that ye may have Life This we have opposed and directed Men to the Spirit of God in them to which as they are obedient they will find it to open the Scriptures to them and give comfort in the reading of them Thee and Thou instead of You in the Singular are as well Modern English Words as Old from the Essential difference that there is between the Signification of One and Many and upon this account it is according to the best Information I can get that there is hardly any Nation whose Language does not differently express that different Signification And that which engages us Conscientiously to this Practice is not that they are Old English Words but that the same Holy Spirit in us at this day leads to that same Simplicity of Language which it did lead the Servants of God into in former Ages And in all Ages of the World it hath been the Language of the Holy Spirit to Man And accordingly before our day at the beginning of the Reformation Erasmus and others whose Language was not Old or Modern English did reprove that Vanity of Mind which did practice and acccept the contrary Ibid. p. 88. Is there any Immorality or Iniquity in these Letters Y. o. u. more than in T. h. o. u Foolish Question Which may serve to please and tickle the Wanton But Sober Reader I doubt not thou wilt perceive the Vanity of the Querist The Alphabet which with us according to its various joynings does serve to express the thoughts of our Minds cannot have Immorality or Iniquity in the Letters Yet whosoever in evil Mind by joyning them does express words either Blasphemous Profane Hypocritical Unjust as this Snake or any other way bad in their Signification of these Men do pronounce accordingly And thus it is if any to shun the Cross of our Lord Jesus tho' in this small matter of the plain Language and to please the vain Mind contrary to the Convictions of the Spirit of Truth in themselves shall say You instead of Thee and Thou such will find that disobedience their Burden In p. 89 90. Snake has gathered many instances from G. F's Writings wherein he saith This is the Word of the Lord which the Snake puts in opposition to G. F's Answer to Christopher Wade Great Mystery p. 246. They the Scriptures are not the Word of God But this soon vanishes for upon Examination of Christopher Wade's words they seem to imply as if he affirmed of the Scriptures that they were the Eternal and In-dwelling Word of God and therefore and thereupon G. Fox opposed him and asserted Christ to be the Word of God p. 247. Great Mystery which is true and from him the Eternal Word the Servants of God have often said to the People Hear the Word of the Lord. And the meaning of it both in the Prophets and since is only this Hear from the Eternal Word a Declaration of his Will Ibid. p. 91. They knew that the Holy Scriptures could not be discarded openly and above-board nor all at once That the World has been long in the possession of them and of a just Veneration of them and therefore would not part with them nor accept of any Fox 's Inspirations instead of them That the World hath been long in the possession of the Books of Scriptures we well know but for want of being in possession of the Holy Spi-the Power of God they have erred not knowing the Scriptures and therefore could not have a just Value or Esteem for them And God who knoweth the Sincerity of
he sheweth that the Devil on a time Assaulted him not in visible Form but by dreadful Suggestions in his Conscience as it were thus calling him to remembrance These many Years thou hast said Mass thou hast shew'd up Bread and Wine to be Worshipped as God yet now thou knowest it was a Creature and not God thereof follow'd Idolatry and thou wert the Cause thereof All these things he saw to be true by the Testimony and Light of his own Conscience and therefore confess'd he had offended and yielded himself unto God The Devil's purpose was to lead him to Despair but God mercifully deliver'd him If he think it so heinous a Matter for a Godly Man to be vex'd by the Devil perhaps he will also find some fault with Christ who was carried by the Devil into the Mount or with St. Paul that had the Angel of Satan to buffet him Thus the Bishop who seems to have had another Sense of this Matter than this our Adversary I shall only add to this before I come to his particular Instances to my Reader That if any Person Professing Unity with us in whom was began the work of Reformation hath not abode Faithful but run into the Temptations of the Enemy and hath had freakish Actions and Gestures and loose and wild Imaginations and have Falsly and Blasphemously Ascrib'd them to be the Operations of the Spirit of God We are not accountable for them as the Apostle was not for those in his time who were given up to strong Delusion because they receiv'd not the Truth in the Love of it All that we find the Apostle did to them that we have done to such that is testifie against them and their ways For we do not own such Inspirations as have not for their Origen the Holy Spirit and are warranted by the Scriptures of Truth I come now to the Snake's Instances His first is thus p. 288. John Gilpin of Kendal in Westmerland has given us a strange and wonderful account of his own Possession by the Devil while he was a Quaker in a Book which he Entituled The Quakers shaken Printed 1653. In Answer to this there was Published in that same Year 1653 a Book Entituled The Standard of the Lord c. to which Book E. Burroughs writ the Epistle to the Reader In which speaking of this same John Gilpin p. 2. he saith By hearing of the Truth declared through the Witness in his own Conscience he was Convinced of the Everlasting Truth c. This was very well but it seems he continued not under that Convincement for he ran out into Airy Imaginations and Imitations as E. B. saith who speaking further of him says I was mov'd to go to see him and his Will was at liberty got above the Judgment though the Judgment was upon the head of the Beast in him and a true Power working but his Will not being kept in Subjection it led him into Impatiency and into Rebelling against the Lord who was made manifest to destroy the unruly Will and wandring Mind And then I did declare against him and shewed him the deceit where it lodged in him Thus E. B. who it hereby appears did shew the Man his state and did also deny him and his doings But the Matter issu'd thus This Gilpin continu'd to go on in that same Rebellion of which E. B. speaks so that he quite run from under the Judgment and Gilpin in this his worst Estate endeavoured with the help of the then Priest of Kendal in a Book Publish'd under Gilpin's Name to charge the Wicked and Blasphemous Actions and Sayings which he had been guilty of upon that Principle of the Light of Christ in Men which the Quakers Profest though Gilpin being Charg'd with it did deny it in these Words I have neither written nor spoken any thing against the Quakers So that by this it should seem the Book was writ by the Priest and Gilpin's Name put for a Cover And if it had not been so but that Gilpin did really write it there was a fair opportunity given them to have prov'd it because the Words above-mentioned spoke by Gilpin were Publish'd in the Answer before-mention'd Entituled The Standard of the Lord c. which came forth in the same Year which that Book Subscrib'd by Gilpin did Ibid. Attested by the then Mayor of Kendal the Minister of Kendal and several other Persons It was not strange that the Mayor of Kendal should be procur'd to Subscribe what the Priest had so eminent a Hand in though he owns it no further than a Fellow Subscriber But as this was an early Instance viz. 1653. wherein the Priest did lead the Civil Magistrate into such a Mistake which a prudent Inquiry wou'd have prevented so we have often since found they have endeavoured to Ride the Civil Power blindly into Mistakes and Prejudices against us and where such have been able to Hood-wink a Magistrate we have seldom found so little disadvantage from it as is the setting his Name to Partial and Untrue Relations of Fact In fine the Case is thus Gilpin as before related was once under a Convincement of Truth but he abode not under the Judgment of God manifested in him for Sin but started aside as a broken Bow He got into Wild Blasphemous and Airy Whimsies and Notions In all this he was presently denied and testified against For Edw. Burroughs did while this Gilpin was under these Extravagancies deny him and we were sufficiently discharg'd of him And what may further shew the Degeneracy of the Man was the Dissoluteness of his After-time for some Actions of which a Warrant was it seems Issuâ—d out for his Apprehension but he like this Snake ran away from it as is express'd in the Book aforesaid which was writ in Answer to him The Snake's next Story is of one James Milner mention'd p. 66. fore-going This Man and some others did as the former start aside from under the Judgment but the Event was not the same as is seen in G. F's Journal p. 103. where speaking of this Man and his Condition he saith James Milner and some of his Company had true Openings at the first but getting up into Pride and Exaltation of Spirit they run out from Truth I was sent for to them and was mov'd of the Lord to go and shew them their Goings forth And they came to see their Folly and Condemn'd it and came into the way of Truth again That he did see and condemn his Folly was very well and it was yet better for him that he return'd into the way of Truth Ibid. p. 289. But then as an Excuse for his false Prophesies and his Blasphemies in calling himself Christ c. he G. F. makes this Comical Apology In some things his mind runn'd out and that he Condemns and yet these wicked Men will go tell the Nation of it Great Mystery Page 298. It is not very Comical but very Provoking to find one who
p. 23. Fox having produced so particular a Charge of Gross and Abominable Blasphemies against himself and Partners did it on purpose that he might the more exactly and in terms most express and plain Renounce and Disown them The end for which G. Fox did in that Book entituled Saul's Errand c. set down the Petition of some Priests and others of the County of Lancanster to the Council of State together with the Crimes mentioned in their Schedule was indeed that he might fully answer them in shewing the Quakers Belief in opposition to those false Charges And this is done in that Book in terms so express and plain as leaves no room for doubt unless to such whom nothing will satisfie For to each particular Objection he gives a distinct Answer and that in Scriptures quoted for that purpose But this same Adversary seems to be dissatisfied with such Answer as no doubt he would have been with that of our Saviour to the Captious Jews Mark 11.33 and 12.17 and with many others of the like kind which he may be pleased to say are not in terms sufficiently express and plain Ibid. p. 24. Nay he down-right owns and justifies the greatest part of them as their preternatural Convulsions and Quakings Foamings and Swellings of their Bellies which seiz'd them at their Meetings even Little Children who could not counterfeit It is an unaccountable degree of Impudence for a man with so much assurance as this Snake does to say G. Fox owns and justifies Preternatural Convulsions Foamings and Swellings of Bellies and that of Little Children When G. Fox has not in that Book one such word That I may not herein impose upon the Reader as the Snake has done I will here give intire G. Fox's Answer to that Objection and then the Reader may find whether I or the Snake be the Lyar the page the Snake quotes is p. 5. of Saul's Errand which is thus Answ. The Meetings of the People of God were ever strange to the World for it was as though some strange thing had happened to the Saints as we read in the Scripture Psal. 71.7 1 Pet. 4.12 Which shews they are in the same Generation wondring and stranging at the Work of the Lord despising and casting Scandals Slanders and false Reports upon them And where the Works of God are now Acts 13.41 they think them strange things now as was then who are alive in the Flesh. It would be a strange thing now to see one fall down as Paul fell down and trembled and as Daniel fell down and trembled Dan. 10.9 And to see one as Habakkuk his Belly to tremble and his Lips to quiver Hab. 3.16 And as David to lye roaring all the Day long who cryed till his sight was grown dim and his Flesh fail'd of fatness and till he could number his Bones And to see one as Isaiah to rent his Garment and his Mantle and to pluck his Hair off his Head and off his Beard and sit down astonished And would it not be strange to see such an Assembly as came to Isaiah Isa. 66.5 Which had all trembling Hearts Hear the Word of the Lord all ye that tremble at his Word work out your Salvation with fear and trembling Before their faces the people shall be much pained all faces shall gather blackness Joel 2.6 The Prophets and Ministers of God have all one Spirit according to measure and did encourage those that did tremble Wherein it shews that you have not the same Spirit but seek to persecute and fix Scandals and accuse them falsly Here Reader thou mayst see the injustice and falshood of this Adversary in so boldly asserting what there is not a word of tho' he says p. 24. The Matter of Fact Fox owns p. 5. Thou hast here G. Fox's answer from p. 5. Pray see if it be as the Snake says it is The Snake has one Hiss more In this Section with which he concludes it and that is at James Milner of whom I have reserved to speak in answer to the Snake's 21st Section As I have already hinted p. 66. Wherefore I now come to the Snake's 4th Section of the Quakers Pretence to a sinless Perfection SECT III. We do own and believe that it is our Duty to press on to Perfection which by the assistance of the Spirit of God we believe it possible to attain unto REader I have already shewn thee in Sect. 1. p. 43. what we mean and understand by the Light within viz. Jesus Christ as testified of in Holy Writ where the Apostle testifies 2 Cor. 5.19 That God was in Christ reconciling the world to himself and we say that as Man through obedience to the Holy Spirit comes to witness a being reconciled to God through Jesus Christ he will more and more witness a growing into that Holy Oneness that Spiritual Union and Communion which our Saviour hath prayed his Disciples might witness as is already shewn Sect. 2. p. 64. tho' misinterpreted by our Adversaries to be an aspiring to Equality c. with God And all who in their several degrees of growth in Grace do witness the going on of this Work of Reconciliation must witness a going on to Perfection And I cannot see any absurdity in this Scriptural Doctrine For if I through the Power of Christ have witnessed a Being by him set free from one vile Affection or one inordinate Lust. Have I not good reason to hope that he that hath began this good work is able to finish it and so of the rest of Humane Infirmities which cannot be overcome but by the assistance of a Divine Power which being altogether Perfect in it self will lead on to Perfection all who are obedient to it Yet this Plain and Scriptural Doctrine professed by us from the first hath met with great opposition and perversion as now by this Snake Snake p. 25. After having shewed the Quakers claim to an Equality with God to be part of him of one Soul Being Person and Essence with him It may seem a saying less and going backward to say that they pretend to a sinless Perfection How idle and false is it in the Snake to say we pretend to be one Person with God when we reject the word Person as too gross to be applied to God or Christ or the Holy Spirit But after having shewn the falsity of that Charge as is plentifully done in the foregoing Section I shall go forward to shew also as is above hinted that the Sinless Perfection we contend for is only in the Holy Spirit and no further ours than we come into obedience to it and through obedience to it 't is possible 2 Pet. 1.4 To be partakers of the Divine Nature But because our Modern Quakers are abated somewhat from the Loud Blasphemies to which they at first pretended c. Here Reader Is an Instance of the Hypocrisie and Confusion of this Man He had charged us Sect. 1 2 3. that at our first setting up
send them forth in the Work of the Ministry their Degrees of Immediate Revelation are much higher than that Degree of Immediate Revelation which I have above spoken of And in these higher Degrees of Revelation God may give One to Prophesy or foretell things to come and send Another with a Message as shall seem good in his Sight and all this by the Immediate Revelation of the same Holy Spirit which reproves the World of Sin tho' in a Higher Degree and by the Higher Degrees of this Immediate Revelation it may please God by his Servants for God hath not in his revealed Will declared that he would not to work Miracles But as his Ministers at this Day have no New Gospel to Preach so it is not necessary that the Work of the Ministry should be commonly attended with such external Credentials if so I may call Miracles Ibid. p. 28. And to this G. F. pretended even to Outward Visions and Revelations as in his Blasphemous Journal particularly upon a High Mountain in Yorkshire where he tells of his receiving Commission to Preach That G. F. had Visions and Revelations some of which might be Outward and did receive a Commission from God to Preach he hath given more â—nd better Proofs than the Snake hath that G. F's Journal is Blasphemous For of this I find no Proof but the Snak's own confident averring of it But among the Proofs of G. F's having received Commission to Preach none of the smallest are the many who instrumentally by him were turned from Darkness to Light and from the Power of Satan to the Power of God To which Power of God as they did attend and grow up in they were the Living Seals of his Ministry And for the Visions and Revelations which G. F. hath declared he had there are none of them that are repugnant to the Holy Scriptures but are consistent with and agreeable to the special Manifestations of God to his Children mentioned therein which nothing that is Blasphemous can be Nay further God hath promised Joel 2.28 That in the pouring forth of his Spirit He would give Prophecy Dreams and Visions and that it is fulfilled in the Gospel Dispensation the Holy Apostle Peter hath testified Acts 2.16 Ibid. p. 21. Fox does plainly distinguish betwixt the Ordinary Experiences of the Inward Operations of the Spirit of God upon our Hearts and the being sent Immediately from God with such a Message as the Prophets and Apostles had And this plain Distinction of G. F's is warranted from Scripture it being wholly in the degrees of Operation but the Holy Spirit which does so diversly Operate is the same The Faith of the Woman cured of a Bloody Issue Mat. 9.20 was begotten in her by a degree of the Operation of the Holy Spirit and by a much greater Degree of the Operation of the same Holy Ghost Philip was bid Acts 8.29 Go near and joyn thy self to this Chariot And abundance of Instances of these kinds might be produced in Holy Writ which do as plainly distinguish as any of us can betwixt the Ordinary and Extraordinary Inward Operations of the Holy Spirit upon our Hearts yet both truly and properly Immediate Ibid. p. 29. These are his Words And shew plainly what he meant by Immediate Revelation and how it distinguish'd him from the Professors Yes Snake it is very plain what G. F. meant by Immediate Revelation when he asked Four or Five Priests Journal p. 83. Whether any one of them could say he ever had the Word of the Lord to go and speak to such or such a People viz. that this is a Higher Degree of the Inward Operation of the Holy Spirit than that by which it Reproves the World of Sin This Higher Degree of Immediate Revelation none of those Priests could say they had had and therefore might well be deem'd such of whom the Prophet says They run and the Lord never sent them And to G. F's Question foregoing the Priest made no proper answer when he said He could speak his experiences Because every operation of the Holy Spirit does give some experience to the Heart in which it works And if a Man thereby reproved of Sin be obedient to that reproof he shall witness a forsaking that for which he was so reproved And this is a good Degree of Experience But this Experience barely is no call to the Ministry To which those whom Christ doth Choose Prepare Fit Furnish and Qualifie as it is by a higher Degree of the Inward and Immediate Operations of His Holy Spirit so it does distinguish them from those who can only speak of Experiences as is above declared Ibid. p. 29. And he Vouches this by a company of Vile and Sensless Miracles to which he pretends in his Journal How shews the Snake that the Miracles mentioned in G. F's Journal are Vile and Sensless They are not therefore so because an Enemy says it And yet he has given no other reason And now having gain'd what he meant by Revelation and Immediate Revelation I will shew you that he attributes it not only to his own Worthiness but to the Quakers in General They are says he in his Great Mystery p. 242. in the same Power Understanding Knowledge and Immediate Revelation from Heaven that the Apostles were in There is no dificulty to gain either what G. F. did mean or any of us do mean by Revelation it being in short this 1 Cor. 2.11 The things of God knoweth no Man but by the Spirit of God And whosoever doth know and understand the Gospel of Christ which is Rom. 1.16 The Power of God unto Salvation must receive that knowledge and that understanding by Immediate Revelation from the same Spirit from which the Apostles had theirs The Apostles have declar'd that themselves did receive their Knowledge of the things of God by it and that without this Spirit no Man can know them Yet we do not from hence say nor hath G. F. said that the Gospel of Christ is not to be understood but by the same Degree of Power Understanding Knowledge and Immediate Revelation which the Apostles were in or that himself or any other Quaker as the Snake does falsly suggest are in that same Degree in which the Apostles were The Apostle Peter was in the same Power Understanding Knowledge and Immediate Revelation when he gave Testimony to the Divinity of our Saviour Mat. 16.16 Thou art Christ the Son of the Living God in which he was when he said Acts 2.22 23. Ye Men of Israel hear these Words Jesus of Nazareth a Man approved of God among you by Miracles Wonders and Signs which God did by him in the midst of you as ye your selves also know him being delivered by the Fore-knowledge and Counsel of God ye have taken and by wicked hands have crucified and slain c. But I suppose the Snake will hardly affirm he was in the same Degree of Power c. And after all it is false in
whatever thou mayst read on in the Scriptures of Truth and do not abide in the Light and feed on the Body of Christ whence the Gift springs but feed on the Gift thou mayst be up for a while in thine own sight but certainly thou wilt wither and die to God and Darkness will come upon thee and thy Food will turn to Condemnation in the Sight of God And this I have learned in the Deep and in Secret when I was alone and now declare openly in the Day of thy Mercy Glory to the Highest for evermore who hath thus far set me free to praise his Righteousness and his Mercy and to the Eternal Invisible Pure God over all be fear obedience and glory evermore Amen James Naylor Ibid. p. 48. These are much more Dreadful Failings than those of the Flesh than of Hallelujah Fisher of W. W. the Saints know who I mean and several others whom I could name All those dreadful failings which Men are overtaken with whether the Lust of the Flesh the Lust of the Eye or Pride of Life they all happen to Men when they are gone off their watch and are departed from the guidings of the Grace of God This Hallelujah Fisher did and this others may do not through any shortness in God or weakness in his Grace but through their own default and all that can be done by a Community professing Christianity is after endeavours to restore in the Spirit of Meekness and their impenitency to reject that Brother who thus walks disorderly this was done by H. F. and is by any other whatsoever when known Ibid. p. 48. But tho' God Omnipotent and Infallible did create all things that are yet there is weakness error and sin in the World Did God create Weakness Error and Sin as the Snake here insinuates If he dare so say let him speak in plain terms The Scripture says otherwise for Gen. 1.31 it is said God saw every thing that he had made and behold it was very good Tho' it is true that through Disobedience to that Power which made all things very good Weakness Error and Sin are entred into the World Yet it is as true that the end for which Jesus Christ came into the World Suffered and Died for Man was according to the Vision which Daniel saw Chap. 9.24 To finish Transgression and to make an end of Sin And as many as come through obedience to his Spirit to witness the Power of his Resurrection may measurably say they know him to be Binding and Casting out the Strong Man and spoiling his Goods I come now to his Seventh Head of Distinction VII But let such consider that it is a just Judgment from God c. It might indeed with some shew of probability be objected against us by this Snake that the Defection and Failings of particular Persons pretending to be of us were a Judgment from God upon the whole Body Nay and it might probably be that that Judgment came upon that Body because of their Separation from the Church If that Church he pretends Membership in could boast she had none such but the contrary is too true in the several instances which may be given as of himself and some others Scandalous Members who in their ill Practices are no Credit to the Church of England which they may pretend to be of Yet this by the Snake's Argument is a Judgment upon the Church of England Who they are the Snake's words of their own Heads durst to leave those Guides the Bishops of the Church under whose Government God hath placed them and to rend the Body of Christ by a causless and desparate Schism of which see more p. 16 17. foregoing This Reader is another Stroak at the Reformation and will it not be a pretty Argument for the Romanists against it Ibid. p. 49. So that even their Error may in this sense come from God that is as a Judgment upon them I suppose truly much in the same degree for that it is a Judgment upon us to have naughty Persons under our Profession and that it is not a Judgment upon the Church of England to have at least as many in her Communion may be boldly and impudently as the Snake says p. 16. averred but not proved and as he cannot prove it a Judgment so I have already proved it no Error in Principle of Us because I have abundantly shewn that the Grace of God is sufficient for the purposes for which God hath given it viz. the Salvation of Man Ibid. p. 49. And for this cause says St. Paul 2 Thes. 2.11 God shall send them strong Delusion that they should believe a Lye And if the Prophet be deceived Ezek. 14.9 I the Lord have deceived that Prophet And it was the Lord who put a Lying Spirit into the Mouths of Ahab's Prophets 1 Kings 22.23 Now whether it be such a Spirit or not which is in the Mouths of the Quaker Prophets we have a plain rule whereby to know Deut. 18.2 22. the Prophet which shall presume to speak a word in my Name which I have not commanded him to speak even that Prophet shall Dye And if thou say in thine Heart How shall we know the word which the Lord hath not spoken When a Prophet speaketh in the Name of the Lord if the thing follow not nor come to pass that is the thing which the Lord hath not spoken but the Prophet hath spoken it presumptuously thou shalt not be afraid of him Here is a plain touch-stone which cannot be mistaken c. Thus the Snake But the Snake is much mistaken in applying this touch-stone for the first text viz. 2 Thes. 2.11 He has done by that as he does by our Books cut off the Conclusion For the Apostle does there give the reason why they were given over to strong Delusion because they received not the Love of the Truth that they should be Saved And for the other texts it is not to be concluded from them that every Prophesie spoken in the Name of God is therefore false because not fulfilled in the terms pronounced for then should those Prophesies mentioned Exod. 32.10 14. 2 Sam. 24.16 Psal. 106.40 44 45. Jer. 26.18 Amos 7.3 Jonah 3.10 be false and the Prophets that gave them forth be false Prophets but that is not so And the reason why the Prophets and their Prophesies are true is given by Jer. 18.7 8 9 10. At what Instant I shall speak concerning a Nation and concerning a Kingdom to pluck up and to pull down and destroy it if the Nation against which I have pronounced turn from their evil I will repent c. And accordingly God hath as is recorded in Holy Writ often repented himself of the Evil he hath threatned and in great Mercy and Compassion upon Sinners relenting hath lengthned out their day of Visitation Ibid. p. 50. And the case of the Quakers is so hard that if we can prove but one false Prophet among them the
Infallibility of all and every one must be a Deceit because the Infallibility is asserted to belong to every one of them FestÃna Lentè may be a useful Caution to one that makes such hasty and false Conclusions The Infallibility of all and every one is the Holy Spirit and if every one that make profession of it should fall from it and turn from the Grace of God into Wantonness or Delusion yet the Holy Spirit would be no Deceit I will give that Memorable Instance of the two Prophets mentioned 1 Kings 13. where both of them had true Prophesies yet by giving way to Error both fell the first ver 24. lost his Life And of the last it 's said ver 18. He lyed Yet it cannot be but falsly and wickedly concluded that because the Prophesy of one of them was false and the other thereby led into Error therefore the Infallible certainty of all and every one of the Prophesies of the Prophets in the Old and New Testament was a Deceit Nay from hence Holy Writ does not conclude against but confirm the Prophesies of them two Prophets which they delivered in their Obedience to God This brings me to his 8th Head of Distinction of Prophesies which he says are false VIII But here in this place let me give two or three instances to shew their false and wicked pretence to Infallibility And I will not travel far for an example But I will be as merciful in exposing them as I can I will see the Instances before I make the like Conclusion The first instance is of as he calls him a Quaker Glover in Cheapside The Snake did tell us he would not travel far for an Example This is some small hint that he Sculks about the City But if in his next he will be more particular as to his place there is a Poor Man formerly the King's Messenger would gladly speak with him but at present to return to the Mercy of the Snake in Exposing Mercy when properly spoken I know what it means but when it proceeds from an Adversary so Profane Unjust and Hypocritical as is this Snake it cannot have fewer alias's added to it than hath his proper name it may be alias this or alias that but that it is not Mercy in the true Signification of the word will in a few words be seen The Snake calls it Mercy in that he spares names but that it is no such thing may be seen by this he calls one p. 51. Prophet John and there was no such Person of that name and the true reason why he forbore others was because he might err as much in them But be all this as it may the Relation and Story is false and to shew that his Mercy is rejected the Quaker Glover speaks for himself and subscribes his name The Glover replies for himself thinking it no favour to have his name conceal'd under a true state of the Case and minds his Author it is not safe nor warrantable to publish by hear-say for his account is almost in every part false containing at least twelve plain mistakes at best A natural consequence of being over officious and medling in other Mens affairs which he is the readier to let him know that if he will please to appear Face to Face and hath two Ears may be better inform'd by him who is willing to joyn Issue with him in his great many more instances as he saith Nat. Markes Reader I have transcribed this out of G. W's Antidote which he wrote in Answer to the first Edition of the Snake that I might not want an Answer to a Story pompously tho' falsly set out in 3 or 4 Pages His second Story of Prophesies is p. 54. of Solomon Eccles who he says did denounce concerning John Story that he should Dye within one Year and that he meant it of a natural Death The Snake who Glories in the miscariages of them that fall does apply this to the whole Body tho' it can be with no more Justice or Strength of Argument so apply'd than the Lye of that Prophet 1 Kings 13.18 which he spake in the name of the Lord can be apply'd to all the Faithful Prophets in the Messages which from the Lord they did in faithfulness deliver But further S. E. did himself find his words his Burden and did under his own hand condemn that Hastiness Anger and Darkness of Spirit in which he does confess he spake those words and it is not unlikely but the Snake hath either seen or heard so much and if he hath either it is a manifest Lye in him to lay that to the Quakers which they then did deny and which also the Person offending did truly and justly take to himself His Words are these in Babylonish Opposer c. p. 8. As I was sitting waiting on the Lord on the 29th instant these things rose in my Heart that I should acknowledge my Offence to all the Brethren in London and thereabouts and Bristol and to all the Brethren North and South that had been witnesses against the Spirit of Separation and am to let you know that it doth truly Repent me and sorely Grieve me that you that do bear a faithful Testimony for God should have any Prophesie thrown at you which I spoke to John Story in an angry Spirit I do therefore acknowledge as I have signified in my last Paper about two Years ago that I have had little rest Day nor Night at times ever since I spoke these words to John Story That it was the word of the Lord that he should dye that Year which were mine own words and soon became my Burden and were spoken in the Dark and Darkness was upon my Spirit and so under a strong Temptation which I was suffered to fall into I not standing in the Counsel of God for which I bore God's Indignation But I soon saw I should have gone to him in a meek Spirit to beseech him to be reconcil'd to his Brethren But I do judge and condemn that hasty Spirit that set a time for his dying and called it the word of the Lord. And do desire this may go as far as where-ever it may have a service for Truth Solomon Eccles. His Third Instance is p. 55. A Prophecy of W. Penn 's against one Tho. Hicks So sure as the Lord liveth and I testifie to thee from the Lord 's Living Spirit If thou desist not and come not to deep Repentance the Lord will make thee an example of his Fury and thy Head shall not go down to the Grave in peace Ibid. p. 55. Now Tho. Hicks did go down to the Grave in Peace and no Visible Example of God's Fury was shewn upon him And which the Snake has not mentioned Tho. Hicks did desist and did not as I have heard as the Snake falsly says he did p. 56. remain to his Death an Opposer of the Quakers which was the terms of the Denunciation So that the Quakers may
be true Prophets still His Fourth and last Instance here is of whom in Scorn he calls the Great Edw. Burroughs p. 57. quoted from p. 540 535 536 537. of his Works the words he quotes are these and stand in this order The time is come their Church meaning Rome cannot stand long And as sure as the Lord lives so shall it come to pass Here the Snake is himself to some purpose having in as deceitful and false manner as well can be represented the words of E. Burroughs in the pages quoted I will give thee Reader the several Instances from the several pages quoted by the the Snake The first page he here quotes it 540. where the Snake says he advises the Army to carry their Arms to the Gates of Rome But minds not that he there tells the Army That might be a work honourable in its day and season And that there is a Victory more honourable to wit the Victory over Sin and Death and the Devil in your selves and that you are to mind And at the bottom of p. 535. speaking of the Romish Church But their Weapons are Carnal and Devilish and by Murders Oppressions and Tyrannies they do defend themselves and when these things are broken down then their Church cannot stand long He continues p. 536. And as sure as the Lord lives so shall it come to pass a Generation shall accomplish it and in the Generation of the Righteous it shall be finished And in p. 537. E. B. saith thus Whether the Lord will revenge the grievous blood-guiltiness that lies upon them by himself without an Instrument or whether by you speaking to the Army or others as an Instrument Whether this way or another that God will do it I determine not But this I know that the time is not long that he will one way or other avenge and revenge the Blood of the Just upon the Murderers Head By all this Reader it abundantly appears that E. B. doth not assign Time or Means by or in which it shall be accomplished and so much any Good Man may warrantably speak concerning the finishing and putting an end to those Carnal and Devilish Church-Weapons of Murder Oppression and Tyranny Which tho' this Adversary would hug yet thanks be to God they are out of his power So that this Prophecy if the Snake will have it one must doubtless in its season be accomplished I come now to his Ninth Head of Distinction which is little else than one vehement Invective against the Authority of the Reformation I will briefly consider its parts p. 58. Extraordinary Inspirations are not to be credited unless vouched by Miracles which God always sent to attest his Extraordiry Commissions The Inspirations of the Prophets Joel Amos Obediah Micha and others mentioned in the Old Testament and of Agabus Acts 21.11 were all of them Extraordinary Inspirations But I find no Miracles that these their Extraordinary Inspirations were vouched by John the Baptist the Greatest Prophet born of a Woman his Mission was very extraordinary yet not attested by Miracles Now let us see where the Doctrine of the Snake will lead us Why he says Extraordinary Inspirations are not to be credited unless vouched by Miracles These Inspirations I have now spoken of are not to us so vouched are they therefore not to be credited This will break an Article of the Snake's pretended Faith and make imperfect the Scriptures which he says are a perfect Rule of Faith and Manners Ibid. p. 58. Let us take this one mark more to judge when such Inspirations are from God or from the Devil Yes we will Those from the Devil generally tend to Schism and Rebellion as in that of Jeroboam and the Ten Tribes who broke off from the Priesthood of Aaron as well as from the House of David and set up opposite Altars to that at Jerusalem This does deserve to be mark'd in that it First gives the Lie to the Scriptures and then kicks against the Reformation It gives the Lie to the Scripture for that God by his Prophet Shemiah 2 Cron. 11.4 when Rehoboam would have fought against Israel that he might have brought the Kingdom from Jeroboam to himself and that they were ready to fight they were of God forbid and the reason God by his Prophet gives is For this thing is done of me But the Snake says it 's done of the Devil Thus much for the Kingdom now for the Priestood That they broke off from the Priesthood of Aaron and set up opposite Altars is a mark applicable at this day or to what purpose does the Snake make it And say that separation from the Priesthood at this day is from the Devil And now if the Snake please let him prove how many of these separations which have been made within three hundred years from the Priesthood of the Roman Pontiff have been made by the Devil and let him not forget the Reformation in England But of this kind of arguing we have more Ibid. p. 58. But as they paid all Dutiful Obedience to their persecuting Kings and suffered Martyrdom under them without Resistance So did they always keep in the Communion of those same Priests whom they had provoked and reproved c. That Dutiful Obedience was paid by the Holy Prophets to persecuting Kings in their Days and hath been paid by us to persecuting Kings in our Days is very true But as for the Doctrine of Resistance if that be it the Snake quarrels at he may find Opponents enough in the Communion of that Church he pretends Membership in as he also may have the Voice of the Church of England against him Justifying themselves in that they did not keep the Communion of the Roman Priesthood but did set up a Separate Communion and Opposite Altars See Reader this Doughty Champion as he pretends for the Church of England under the false pretences of esteeming and valuing her Communion does in truth and reality as much as in him lies scandalize the Reformation by putting upon it very gross imputations as if it were from the Devil But worse yet Ibid. p. 59. And when our Saviour himself came into the World he did not separate from the publick Worship and Communion of the Jewish Church And to shew that the receiving of Christianity it self was no exemption from paying all Obedience to them he commands his own Disciples as well as the Multitude to pay them all manner of Obedience Our Saviour is declar'd Rom. 10.4 the end of the Law Then he must of necessity be the end of that Worship and Communion which was grounded on the Law And that the receiving of Christianity was an exemption to Obedience in that Worship and Communion The Apostle Paul is positive Gal. 5.2 for Christianity was not to be blended with Judaisims And when our Saviour said Matt. 23.3 Whatsoever they bid you observe that observe and do He did not thereby continue the observance of the Ceremonial Law beyond the date of
so many Meetings and so great stir among theâ— For G. Keith was not so much as accused for Preaching any thing else but this But now Snake who mumblâ—â—â—â—istles was not he accused of very many Turbulent and Indecent Actions and Expressions as is at large seen in The State of the Case which I have above quoted and which the Snake also quotes with perversion as I have before shewn Snake p. 67. Here is a many forked and involved Infallibility one Meeting Justifying another Condemning G. Keith and all for the very same Doctrine Ibid. p. 68. This will not only overthrow the Infallibility in each particular Person but even of their Churches or Meetings That particular Persons may make Defection from the Guidings of the Spirit of Truth and may Apostatize from that Union and Fellowship which they had once with the Friends of it I have already largly shewn and what particulars may do Assemblies made up of such particulars may also do Floods and Parties as the Snake expresses it may Apostatize as well as particulars nay a whole Community may Apostatize and yet the Infallibility of the Guide of any one particular Person who continues Faithful and Obedient to the Holy Spirit remains firm and sure Thus 1 Cor. 10.4 The Apostle testifies of the Jews They all Drank the same spiritual Drink for they Drank of that Spiritual Rock that followed them and that Rock was Christ. Now this Rock could have as Infallibly preserved the whole Tribes of Israel from Egypt thro' the Wilderness to the promised Land had they been Obedient to it as it did Caleb and Joshua who were the only two of all the Thousands that left Egypt and entered in But further that Assemblies or Churches may Apostatize and Backslide the Holy Spirit is sufficient Warrant by the particular reproofs or cautions it gives to the seven Asiatick Churches mentioned Rev. 2.2 and 3. And sure the Snake will not be so hardy as to say that the Holy Spirit was able only to give Reproof and Caution suitable to their wants and defects but not to have preserved them blameless and to have guided them Infallibly in that way he appointed them to go Ibid. p. 68. Besides this first proof in Pensilvania there is yet another more express and positive called The Barbadoes Judgment c. And besides the detecting the Snake's false conclusion in that I have to say to this that according to his usual Injustice he herein makes use of an Adversary's Book Babel's Builders c. without taking notice of the Answer which was published to it Intituled A Babilonish Opposer of Truth reproved c. By S. C. I. P. and R. R. as he also passes over in Silence tho' mentioned in that Adversaries Book a Letter of G. â—'s and others writ to Barbadoes concerning this very thing wherein they are shewn their cause is not right that they had taken which Letter and the matter it relates to is fully spoken to in our Answer above mentioned wherein is also S. E's condemnation of his rashness in those words spoke by him to J. S. mentioned p. 125. foregoing Ibid. p. 69 70. I was told by one present at the Quaker Meeting at Ratcliff on Sunday the 17 th of February 1694 5 That Mr. Penn having Preached and after G. Keith rising up and expounding some Scripture in another manner than Mr. Penn had done Mr. Penn stop'd him and solemnly denounced these words against him In the Name of the Lord I pronounce him an Apostate over the Head of him Vpon which occasion I have these few Questions to ask Q. Whether this was a Sentence from Mr. Penn himself or from their Church Whether by an Ordinary Commission of Succession to Christ and the Apostles Whether by an Extraordinary Commission such as the Prophets and the Apostles had To the first W. Penn being in Unity with the Church declared this of one who had broken Unity by making defection from that term of Union which in time passed he had declared he was by the Light of Christ in him led to profess and believe Secondly All who are kept living by the Spirit of Truth in that bond of Union which that did at first lead into such have ordinary Commission therefrom to testifie against Apostates And this not by such falsly pretended Succession as the Papal Chair or others may pretend to from the Apostles But by succeeding in a measure of that same Light and Holy Spirit which they were in To the Last W. Penn tho' then knowing G. K. to have broken Union as is before expressed he might at that time in the Openings of the Spirit of Truth have a larger and fuller Sight of his Apostacy and so a Warrant to Declare it And for this there needed no new Credentials viz. Miracles it being no more than what hath been confirmed by those the Apostles wrought Ibid. p. 72. But for the present I only apply it to the point of their Church Authority over the Light within particular Persons their original and great pretence The Light within particular Persons is as much our Characteristick now as ever and we have no Church Authority over it or repugnant to it and that in the case of G. K. no such Authority was used Consider the following Lines G. Keith hath often Printed and Declared that he did believe and profess the same Doctrines and Principles of Faith with us and that he was led so to do only by the Light of Jesus Christ shining into his Heart Through and by which Light he did profess to have true union and fellowship with us and accordingly he so was denominated and distinguished Now the Light of Jesus Christ is not contrary to it self and if by the inshinings thereof and his obedience to it it was that G. K. did profess as above Then it naturally follows G. K's innovation to the contrary of what he hath so professed cannot proceed from that Light of Jesus Christ from which the above profession of Unity and Fellowship did Therefore to give Judgment against G. K. is not to give Judgment against the Light of Jesus Christ but agreeable to it even in G. Keith against himself The like is to be said of J. Story c. and others who have innovated and made defection as these did whose Works being bad the issue is the same with what Gamaliel shews Acts 5.28 They are come to naught And therefore after all the Boast which the Snake makes about Separation and Faction We may concerning all of them now declining and towards their end hope and have ground to believe that as many as are yet in a Spirit of Separation in whom are any true desires towards God for his guidance in the Truth such he will restore to the Fold they have strayed from And he will scatter them whose end is not his Honour agreeable to what the Psalmist said concerning the Wicked Psal. 37.36 He is gone I sought him but he could not be
our Hearts he knoweth that our earnest Endeavour since a People hath been to direct to the Holy Spirit to which as the World comes to be obedient it will certainly raise in them a just value and esteem for the Scriptures and a love and desire to be conversant in the reading of them by which through Faith they may receive comfort as we can abundantly testifie we have found And therefore the Insinuation is false and envious that we have ever sought either openly or secretly to discard them or to set up the Inspirations of any instead of them Ibid. p. 91. They have taken upon them not only to abrogate the most express Ordinances of the Gospel But to set up and institute new ones as Womens Preachings directly contrary to 1 Cor. 16.35 and the Prelacy of the Womens Meetings an Invention never heard of in the World till G. F. Cobled it out 'T is false that we have abrogated any Ordinances of Divine Institution And it is also false that we have set up and instituted new ones For under the Law and in the Apostles days there were Women Prophetesses and Fellow-helpers in the Gospel As for the Prelacy of Womens Meetings we know of no such thing but for the good ends of looking after the Poor and seeing after such things as are Comely Decent and of Good Report do they meet as the Holy Women in ancient times did And as it is no discouragement to us so it will not be of weight with the Sober Reader that this practice is profanely said by the Snake to be Cobled out by G. Fox Ibid. p. 92. The Scripture remains of no Authority with them because if what the Scripture command be a-new required by their Spirit they are bound to obey it because required by their Spirit But if the Scripture command the thing they are by their Principles not bound to obey it unless it is required by their Spirit a-new None may at this day upon the Authority of Scripture walk naked as Isaiah 20.2 3. nor go to the King's Chappel as Amos 7.13 nor do any of these special and particular things which many of the Prophets by the Special Command of God did do unless they are thereunto commanded and required by the same Holy Spirit which did require them This is what Edward Burroughs had formerly said and which W. Penn repeats and maintains though very falsly quoted by the Snake who injuriously quotes W. P. in his Reason against Railing p. 150. in the following manner That what was a Commandment to any Servants of God in Old Time That such are not Commandments to us unless required by the same Spirit a-new But W. P's words as they lye in the Book and Page quoted are thus From our asserting that what was a Commandment to any Servant of God in Old Times is not so to us because so to them that is such as Going to Pharaoh as Going Naked Going to the King's Chappel as Moses Isaiah and Amos did as also those Elementary Types Shadows and Figures appointed for a season and to pass off That such are not Commandments to us unless required by the same Spirit a-new It is not a little his endeavour unrighteously to infer that those Moral Perpetual and Eternal Holy Precepts here W. P. mentions the Laws of the First Table are not binding upon us c. Here Reader behold the subornation of the Snake who by a most unjust practice bites out so much of a Quotation as is not for his purpose and brings the remainder to speak against the sense of the Writer Ibid. p. 94. Thus it being Objected to G. F. that one of his Quakers had pretended to an Immediate Call from Heaven to commit Theft Robbery and Sacriledge in taking out of the Church an Hour-glass c. It is false it was not objected that any Quaker did commit Theft or Robbery or Sacriledge Nor does it appear by the Priest's words that the Hour-Glass was taken away That which appears from the Priest's words is That some Quaker had signified to the Priest that the Glass which he made the limit of his Carnal Preaching ought to be removed and that the Holy Spirit was only that by which they that spake from the Lord ought to begin and end their Preachings and G. F's answer is to the same purpose So that herein the Snake is egregiously abusive by perverting both the words of the Priest and G. F. and also in his false and scandalous insinuations concerning what he calls the Communion Plate Ibid. p. 95. Have they not by the same Light rebelled from Episcopacy Not unless it be prov'd by the Holy Scriptures that Episcopacy at this day be in the same Spirit and Government which the Apostles were in Ibid. p. 95. It is true indeed the Church cannot subsist without Government But it is as true that the Quakers pretence to the private Light in particular Persons as a principle over-ruling Scripture and all outward Ordinances is Inconsistent to the Government either in Church or State It is false that we have ever pretended that the Particular Manifestation of the Light of Christ in any of us did over-rule the Scriptures or Ordinances There cannot be Contradiction in the Spirit of God By the movings whereof it was that the Scriptures were given forth 2 Pet. 1.21 Nor do the Movings of the same Spirit privately working in particular Persons at this day over-rule or contradict what it did give forth as above And as the Light and Spirit of Christ is thus agreeable to it self So it is well consistent with the Government of the State in that it leads all that obey it to be loving and peaceable not Seditious or Tumultuous It leads to give Caesar the things that are Caesar's and unto God the things that are God's This it hath taught us to be our Duty and our Practice hath been agreeable of which the whole Kingdom are our witnesses And it is not less consistent with the Government in the Church when the Government in the Church hath its beginning and foundation from it as described p. 135 136. foregoing But it cannot be consistent with Government in the Church when the Church is not govern'd by the Spirit of him whom she says is her Spiritual Head Ibid. Or any Security from all the Dismal and Enthusiastical Murthers Rapines and Outrage of the Zealots among the Jews who went upon the same principle The Holy Spirit of God which by the coming of Jesus Christ is given to Men is the Principle that we profess and is the most effectual Security that can be against wickedness and violence of all sorts because where that is obeyed it will finish Transgression and make an end of Sin Now did the Zealots among the Jews go upon the same Principle No no more than the late Horrid Assassines in Communion with the Snake and with him in Separation from the Church could be said to do Murthers Rapines and Outrage are the
once owing to the Father These Reader are some of those Consequences which W. P. shews do naturally follow that strange and rigid Notion That it is altogether Impossible for God to remit or forgive without a plenary Satisfaction and that God could not by any other way obtain Satisfaction or save Men without inflicting the Penalty of infinite Wrath and Vengance on Jesus Christ. And if the Consequences are Blasphemous it is owning to the Doctrine not W. P's natural deducing of them from it any more than the Glass that is truly Cut and Ground can be in fault to reflect the Deformities that are set before it But whether true or false the Snake says p. 151. His Arguments are the old Socinian Job-trot But if in the reverse the Job-trotting proves the Non-jurors W. P's Arguments may be good still and I think it will hardly pass for sufficient reason that Arguments are therefore bad because either Socinian or Non-juror may have used such like to other purposes If this be so then why not further and reject all the true Articles which they may believe as well as the Arguments which they may use And if the Snake is resolved to keep at this distance from us and disbelieve an Article because we believe it he must resolve to deny God and Jesus Christ and all hopes of Salvation by him Together with all the Holy Doctrines which the Scriptures teach and which we firmly Believe But how shy soever he may be of us herein yet himself is a notable Job-trotter for that his Arguments his Accusations his Stories and numerous Perversions are no other than what have often from Adversaries of many Names been objected against us and as often answered by us Yet as false and as often rebuffeted as this Job-trot has been The Snake hath licked it up and improv'd it as is commonly observed Lies do improve by carrying Ibid. p. 153. But upon the Socinian and Quaker Scheme one of God's Attributes must fight with and conquer the other And his Justice must quit the Field to his Mercy This is great Nonsense as well as Blasphemy and utterly inconsistent with the first Notions of a God 'T is true that they who believe and say that God's Attributes combate and conquer each other do believe and say Nonsense and Blasphemy because all Jarr and Strife is utterly inconsistent with the Unity of his Being But that the Quakers have ever so believed or said is false and does yet remain to be prov'd Which it can never be for we as well as the Snake p. 152. do say That God's Justice is greatly exalted in that it did require and accept the full and compleat Satisfactory Offering which Christ did give of himself to offended Divine Justice And that God's Wisdom and Mercy is also greatly exalted in finding out and affording that means And we say also That these are fulfilled Infinitely in the wonderful Oeconomy of our Salvation in that compleat Satisfactory Sacrifice All this and more to the like purpose we believe as well as the Snake But the Snake tho' with his false Glossings he would represent W. P. and the Quakers as deniers hereof yet does not declare himself to believe the Article as it was propounded by Wâ— P's Opponents and opposed by him Tho' insinuatingly and Snake-like he says p. 151. W. P. denies the Satisfaction What Satisfaction Why The Satisfaction Which the Snake has not declared himself to believe That it is altogether impossible for God to remit c. as above p. 231. Now Reader Whether exceeds in Impudence the Snake in this his liberal Character and Charge that we deny this most Fundamental Doctrine c. or himself in refusing them same terms which are the matter of his Charge This shews the Snake did by his own practice make that Judgment which he hath falsly given of us p. 143. They He it must now be read can upon a pinch subscribe the whole Creed and not mean one word of it c. For the present we have done with his Charge from Sandy Foundation shaken c. and the Snake next quotes p. 154. a passage from W. P. but names neither Book nor Page it is I suppose from Reason against Railing c. p. 91. If it is our Duty to forgive without a Satisfaction receiv'd and that God is to forgive us as we forgive them then is a Satisfaction totally excluded That is such a Satisfaction as his Opponents contended for Yet of this the Snake declares He hath exposed the poorness of this Argument in Satan Disrob'd A poor shift that his Reader must take his word But to shew that W. P's Argument is not so poor as the Snake does suggest Please to take some more of W. P's Argument which the Snake has by a poor cunning left out It is thus Christ farther Paraphrases upon that part of his Prayer v. 14. For if you forgive their Trespasses your heavenly Father will also forgive you Where he as well argues the Equity of God's forgiving them from their forgiving others as he encourages them to forgive others from the Example of God's Mercy in forgiving them Now if this Exposer can also shew the poorness of our Saviour's words not only in this of Mat. 6.14 but also in that of Mat. 18.23 to the end of the Chapter he may then be deem'd a thorough pac'd Exposer Till then I must think that his Exposing is much more poor than the Arguments which W. P. does shew do arise from Christ's words The Snake's last Quotation from our Books in this Section he makes from Serious Apology p. 148. in very false and injurious sort he thus says and quotes p. 154. W. P. speaking of our Justification by the righteousness which Christ hath fulfilled in his own Person for us But here the Snake hath left out these words in a Parenthesis wholly without us which is all that W. P. did oppose in the place above refer'd to in these words And indeed this we deny and boldly affirm it in the Name of the Lord to be the Doctrine of Devils and an Arm of the Sea of Corruption which does now deluge the whole World Yes Exposer it is still true that we do deny and boldly affirm it to be the Doctrine of Devils That Men are justified by the Righteousness which Christ hath fulfilled in his own Person for us wholly without us And for our so denying and affirming we have the warrant of Holy Writ wherein is abundantly testified of the Spirit of Christ in Man to which he must be obedient in order to his Justification and the Apostle in express words speaking of the Righteousness which is of Faith which is Christ's saith Rom. 10.8 The word is nigh thee even in thy mouth and in thy Heart that is the word of Faith which we preach And to the same purpose see Rom. 3.24 28. Rom. 5.1 Tit. 3.7 Then not wholly without us Ibid. p. 155. See this further enlarg'd upon in
outward But the end of that teaching was to the Soul the inward Man and against Spiritual Wickedness in high places Eph. 6.12 And this outward Teaching in its end and in its continuance is that it may bring People in their several Generations to witness the Spiritual Baptism of Christ with the Holy Ghost whereby they may be brought to witness that they are begotten to God Ibid. p. 168. This outward Baptism with Water was an Ordinance instituted as a means of Grace whereby the Inward Baptism with the Holy Ghost was conveyed This is saying but not proving We deny that Baptism with Water was Instituted as a means of Grace for then had the far greater number of those who were converted to Christianity by the Ministry of Paul wanted the means of Grace Because they were very few as himself testifies that he did Baptize with Water And to them whom he did so Baptize is was not the means of Grace Because if it had been so it must have perpetually attended his Ministry in that Grace and Truth which comes by Jesus or otherwise the Apostle Paul was not compleatly as the rest of the Apostles a Minister of the Spirit which I think this Snake will hardly venture to affirm But himself declares it did not perpetually attend his Ministry 1 Cor. 1.17 For Christ sent me not to Baptize but to Preach the Gospel Ibid. p. 168. Vpon all which accounts it was necessary even where the inward Baptism with the Holy Ghost was already attained as St. Peter said Acts 10.47 If where the inward Baptism with the Holy Ghost be attained the Outward Baptism with Water be still necessary because the Holy Apostle Peter commanded Acts 10.48 Cornelius and his Family to be Baptized Then why is not Circumcision also necessary because the same Apostle did compel the Gentiles in general to be Circumcised and concerning which at that time when Cornelius was Baptized it was not determined whether they should be Circumcised This sufficiently shews that the Apostles words in this place cannot be understood to Intend or Command Outward Baptism with Water to be a standing and perpetual Ordinance in the Church Ibid. p. 169. It is very Observable that among those things wherein St. Paul was instructed thus immediately from Christ he tells us 1 Cor. 11.23 That one was the Institution of the Lord's Supper Vpon which he lays so great stress that he charges grievous Diseases sent among the Corinthians and Death it self vers 30. upon their Neglect and Abuse of this Holy Mystery It is very observable that this Snake by begging every matter in question takes them for granted which we deny And then in usual assurance runs on in his Doughty Manner without so much as offering at any Authority to prove what he says or disprove what we have often said upon this Subject Thus he will have the Apostle 1 Cor. 11.23 delivering to that People the Institution of the Lord's Supper Yet has not proved from the words that they are any Institution at all The words of the Apostle are these vers 23. For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you that the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was betrayed took Bread These words of the Apostle are plainly a Narration of somewhat done by our Saviour but contain not any Institution or Command as the observing Reader may find And had the Apostle herein intended to deliver an Institution or Command of something that was to be perpetually obligatory in the Church and not to deliver singly an account of matter of Fact he had no doubt deliver'd it in words whose import could not be questioned But he saith not For I have received of the Lord that which also I delivered unto you That as the Lord Jesus the same night in which he was deliver'd took Bread So c. The Apostle saith not thus but the contrary and when he repeats the imperative words of Christ to his Disciples on this Head he seemeth of set purpose so to have placed them that they do not import any Command For he saith vers 25. This do ye as oft as ye drink it in remembrance of me vers 26. For as often as ye eat this Bread and drink this Cup ye do shew the Lords death till he come These I say do not import any Command or Institution which because the Snake will have that they do let him shew wherein If he thinks the words as often to have some imperative force let him see if he can prove that that imperative Force is more than if one should say to him As often as thou goes to Westminster call upon John Thompson late one of the King's Messengers I easily think the Snake will conclude the imperarative Force of these words none at all and will go as occasion calls to Westminster and not think himself obliged to make that Visit. But the Snake goes on with wonderful assurance and will have the Apostle lay so great stress upon this Institution That he charges grievous Diseases sent among the Corinthians and Death it self vers 30. upon their Neglect and Abuse of this Holy Mystery But from the place it self it does not appear that the Apostle lays any such stress upon it For first as I have already shewn the Apostle makes a narration of Fact Tells what our Lord did do that Night in which he was betrayed but gives no Command does not declare it to be instituted makes no Mystery of it as the Snake would suggest Secondly The Apostle redargueth the Corinthians evil practices of Drunkenness and Unseasonable Eating even then when they were pretending to have in remembrance the Death of Christ. And queries of them vers 22. What! have ye not houses to eat and drink in or dispise ye the Church of God and shame them that have not What shall I say unto you Shall I praise you in this I praise you not Thirdly The Apostle does in the 30th verse shew them some of the Consequences which had attended their Irreverent Greedy and Drunken practices and tells them For this cause many are weak and sickly among you and many sleep And a very natural Consequence it is and nothing strange that Intemperance should bring Weakness and Sickness and finally Death But the Snake would put the Apostles words upon the Tenters and stretch them to signifie grievous Diseases All Weakness and Sickness may in some sense be said to be grievous But when we say Grievous Diseases are sent among a People it does at least imply something more than the common Infirmities which usually our Nature is subject to by way of Eminence as a Judgment This the Snake seems to suggest but offers not to prove neither can he or that those Corinthians were more Weak and Sickly c. than what might be the natural effect of the Intemperance above spoken of Ibid. p. 169. How then would he have censured the Preaching down this and the other
agreement or likeness to Her in our Sense and Declaration thereof as I have already largely shewn Sect. 5. foregoing to which it is unnecessary to add more for the conviction of him whose Character is in nothing so eminent as in a Dogmatical Falshood of which a Notorious Instance now next follows Ibid. p. 189. The Snake doth implicitly charge Josiah Cole with Reprinting and Publishing with great Approbation a most violent Invective of the Church of Rome against the Protestants and chiefly against the Church of England in a piece of his Entituled The Whore Vnvailed Now Reader for thy more particular Information and the discovery of the Hypocrisie and Falshood of the Snake herein I shall acquaint thee That there was a Book Writ and Subscribed A. S. a Roman Catholick against the Church of England and other Potestants among which by the way the Quakers were included which he Entituled The Reconciler of Religions or a Decider of all Controversies in Matters of Faith In which Book there was divers Reflections upon our Principles as well as upon others who he pretended to Reconcile Josiah Cole writ an Answer to it which he Entituled The Whore Vnvailed or The Mystery of the Deceit of the Church of Rome Revealed By this Title it should not seem to be Repinted by J. C. with Great Approbation nor indeed was it For Josiah Cole as he quotes several parts of it he subjoins his own Answer detecting the Deceit of its Author A. S. very particularly And there being in this Book of A. S's a part which he made his 14th Chapter that did more particularly reflect upon and relate to those who in the Title of his Chapter he calls Protestant or Sectarian Ministers charging them not to be true Preachers or sent by God Josiah Cole with intent that the Persons charged might answer that which related to themselves does put it at the end of his Book and declares concerning it in his Title Page I thought meet to publish this herewith that the Sectarians or Episcoparians may answer for themselves This Reader is the Reality of that Business of which the Snake with so great Confidence and Falshood grounds that manifest Slander of his in saying The Quakers have more barefac'd than any openly sided with the Papists against the Protestants And I defy the Snake to produce any one piece written about that time which J. C's was that does more particularly detect and lay open the Deceit and Falshood of the Romanists than that of J. C's does So little reason had this Snake falsly as he does to bring in J. C. saying this Charge viz. the 14th Chapter against their Bibles and Ministers whose Cause says he I am not engaged in When J. C. hath no where said that he was not engaged in the Cause of the Bible But said he was not engaged in the Cause of them who A. S. had called Sectarian Ministers This briefly is the true state of that Matter on which the Snake makes near two pages of most false and scandalous Insinuations and Charges Ibid. p. 190. They have exceeded them in every thing and improv'd the Errors which they had learn'd from them Here the Snake will have the Quakers exceed the Romanists and that they have improv'd their Error even in a Question which himself determines p. 32. that our simplicity has depriv'd us of every one of these helps which the Romanists have But we having been from p. 32 to p. 190. under the Snakes hand it is no wonder if his Viparous Fancy having formed a Monster at first that he should think the proportions encreas'd Ibid. p. 190. G. W. asserts that the Righteousness which God affects in us is not Finite but Infinite Voice of Wisdom p. 36. And the reason which the Snake has left out is this For Christ is God's Righteousness and Christ is formed in us Gal. 4.19 and so that Righteousness which God works in us by his Spirit it 's of the same kind and nature with that which worketh it for the Saints are made partakers of the Divine Nature 2 Pet. 1.4 Ibid. p. 191. But if you will ask how could Infinite Righteousness fall G. Fox will answer you who wrote That he was beyond the state of the first Adam that Fell in the state of the second Adam that never Fell. But where G. Fox hath so writ the Snake tells not yet if he hath so writ what is it more than the Apostle 1 Cor. 15.22 45. hath said concerning our Death by Sin through the first Adam and our Regeneration through obedience to the Quickning Spirit the second Adam the Lord from Heaven And they who through the Operation of his Quickning Spirit have witnessed a being regenerated and born again may truly say that they are beyond the state of the first Adam that Fell. Ibid. p. 191. And in a Printed General Epistle of his to the Quakers which I have now here before me he says Who hath any thing against my way who never fell nor changed And he concludes This is the word of the Lord God to you all and spread this abroad The truth of the words is not less General than the Epistle for it is a General and a Standing Truth that the second Adam that never Fell Jesus Christ the Just Man's Path is the Everlasting Way to the Father which did never Fall nor never Change Therefore G. Fox might well ask who hath any thing against this Way And the Word and Command of the Lord through all Generations by his Servants hath been to call People to walk in this Way But that I may not forget I would now ask for that Answer which the Snake hath just now said G. Fox will give to the Question How could Infinite Righteousness Fall The Snake was willing to start some strange thing but not being then furnish'd with a seemingly probable Lie or forgetting to add such an one he hath omitted to say any thing which he calls G. F's Answer to that Question But the Snake is not more forgetful in this than he was in adapting the Matter treated of in this Section to the Title of it The Title he gives it is That Popish Emissaries set up Quakerism in England And to prove his Title he brings in G. F. saying That he was beyond the State of the first Adam that fell in the state of the second Adam that never fell That is He was born again by the Operation of the Quickning Spirit of Christ Jesus our Lord. See Reader How far this proves that Popish Emissaries set up Quakerism in England If this Argument be insufficient he hath others of like sort of which one is That G. Fox hath said of Jesus Christ his Way Who hath any thing against my Way who never fell nor changed A fine Argument that Popish Emissaries set up Quakerism in England He hath also given a Quotation from G. W's Voice of Wisdom p. 36. That the Righteousness which God effects in us is
was not to whom the Quakers did prefer themselves but whom they did Damn The Snake is not herein shorter in his Proof than he is false in his Charge when he says They have equalled Themselves to Adam in his Innocency as is above shewn The Snake hath indeed as is observed p. 290. foregoing said that G. F. Wrote but where he hath not told us That he was beyond the State of the First Adam that Fell But if G. F. hath so Writ it follows not that he hath equalled himself to Adam in his Innocency Cannot the Snake see a Difference between the State of Adam in the Fall and before the Fall Beyond the State of Adam in the Fall it is the Duty of all Men to come else they cannot witness the being born again by the Power of the Quickning Spirit the second Adam the Lord from Heaven This I say is our Duty and Interest and they who measurably do witness this Regeneration do not therefore Equal Themselves to Adam in his Innocency nor prefer themselves to all Others since the Fall Ibid. p. 192. Thus while they themselves pretend to Infallibility of Discerning and Infinity in Righteousness as shewn before they Arraign the Apostles of Gross Error and Delusion even where they speak from the Mouth of the Lord and in his Name That Infallibility Discerning and Righteousness which we own and contend for is that which is of the Operation of the Spirit of God and which he gives as pleaseth him to all those who through Obedience follow on to know his Will And which may be a strange thing to the Snake they are necessary to Man's Salvation For First Our Saviour speaking of his Faithful Followers John 10.4 5. They know his Voice and a stranger they will not follow But they could not thus chuse to follow Christ and not the Devil if there were not an Infallible Evidence in the Voice of Christ to testify that it is his Voice but such Evidence there is and they who persevere to be Workers together with the Grace of God shall by the Infallible Evidence of the Holy Spirit have a true Discerning between the Voice of Christ and the Voice of the Evil One And as they shun the one and follow the other they will come to witness a being clothed in their Measure with the Righteousness of Christ which is Infinite The Snake is not more false in his Charge concerning Infallibility Discerning and Infinite Righteousness as is above declared than he is grosly abusive and false in saying we Arraign the Apostles c. as will be seen by examining the Instance which he brings It is this P. 192 193. When St. Paul said 1 Thes. 4.17 We which are alive shall be caught up in the Clouds c. tho he said vers 15. This we say unto you by the Word of the Lord Yet T. Elwood in his Answer to G. K 's Narrative c. p. 162. supposes that St. Paul expected to be caught up in the Clouds himself and that the day of Judgment would come in his time while he was Alive And that the same was the meaning of St. Peter when he said The End of all Things is at Hand 1 Pet. 4.7 This Reader is the Snake's Instance that the Quakers do Arraign the Apostles of Gross Ignorance But that there is nothing more in the Charge but this Adversary's Gross Lye what follows will shew G. K. had in a piece of his Entiuled Gross Error and also in the Narrative of 1696. said in opposition to G. W. The Apostles using the word We there We that remain is an Enallage Personae putting We for They like that of James Therewith Bless we God and therewith Curse we Men James 3.9 To which Tho. Elwood replies Though he G. K. delivers it Possitively and like a Dictator yet I see not why he must needs be believed Why might not the Apostle speak in the first Person We As supposing that great and extraordinary Appearance and Coming of Christ the certain time of which no Man knew Matth. 24.26 was so near at Hand that it might probably fall out in his Life time For as the Apostles accounted the Times they liv'd in the Last Days or Last Times and ordinarily called them so Heb. 1.2 and 9.26 1 Pet. 1.20 1 John 2.18 so they thought the End of the World was not far off What else made Paul when he had told the Corinthians that the things he had related were written for our Admonition add Vpon whom the Ends of the World are come 1 Cor. 10.11 Why else did Peter say The End of all Things is at Hand 1 Pet. 4.7 Thus Thomas Elwood whose Querying the Snake calls Arraigning tho' by a very Gross abuse in that the words have no such thing in them For T. E. does here Query Why might not the Apostle speak in the first Person c. What else made Paul when he had the Corinthians c. Why else did Peter say c. It would have been more to the purpose if the Snake had answered the Questions and shewn why the Apostle might not speak in the first Person c. why and what else than the conjecture offered by T. E. did occasion the Apostles so to express themselves as is above quoted But this he drops and stands at a distance from the Questions and for answer flings Gross Lyes Ibid. p. 193. And at a Meeting or Council of their Ministers about the Year 1678. which will be told hereafter Hereafter when the Snake shall tell the Story at Large I shall then particularly reply to it and for the present shall here only reply to his False and Scandalous Insinuations hereon where he says They the Quakers prov'd themselves greater than Abraham because Abraham was before John and that the least in the Kingdom i. e. the least of the Quakers was greater than John Here the Snake by an i. e. does in most abusive manner insinuate his Base and Viper-like Exposition of the Text Matth. 11.11 to be our sense of the place which it neither is nor ever was And I do Charge him with Forgery herein and notorious Falshood unless he be able to prove that the Quakers have said they were greater than Abraham or that the least of the Quakers were greatter than John Which they I am well satisfy'd have never said Ibid. p. 193. Now they having treated the Prophets and Apostles at this rate we cannot expect that they should pay any great respect to the Ancient and Holy Fathers of the Church no they run them down by wholesale Having hitherto detected the falsity of the Snake's Insinuations and Charges in that no such treatment is given the Prophets and Apostles as is by him suggested I shall shew he is not less false when he pretends to give an account of the respect pay'd to them he calls Ancient and Holy Fathers From T. Ellwood's Answer to G. K's Narrative afore-mentioned G. K. had in that Narrative
Answer to that Common Objection against the Quakers that they Damn all but themselves The words are these This then is the sum of our Answer in this respect We are not against the Life and Power of Godliness where-ever it hath appeared or yet appears under the Vail of any form whatsoever Nay all persons who singly wait upon the Lord in the simplicity and sincerity of their Hearts whether under any form or out of forms that matters little to us are very dear unto us in the Lord. But we are against all Forms Images Imitations and Appearances which betray the simplicity and sincerity of the Heart keep the Life in bondage and endanger the loss of the Soul And too many such now there are which hold the Immortal Seed of Life in Captivity under Death over which we cannot but mourn and wait for the breaking of the Chains and its rising out of all its Graves into its own pure Life Power and Fulness of Liberty in the Lord. This Testimony which has been published now near 40 years and others of like tendency which I could produce but that I would be as brief as may be shews that from the first we have not Damn'd all the Christian World as is falsly said by this Adversary SECT XV. The Holy Spirit Professed by the Quakers proved to be neither Venemous or Nasty as charged by the Snake but prov'd to be his own True Character HAving thus shewn the falsity of the Snake's Charge of our Damning all the Christian World and on the contrary prov'd that Love and Charity which we have from the first had and shewn to all the sincere hearted under any Form So herein I hope to make appear that the respect wherewith we have treated Men hath been according to it and that if Words and Language may be allowed to discover the Furious Spiteful and Envious Ebullitions of a distorted Soul that then the Snake hath discovered so much Ibid. p. 198. Kind and Sweet Expressions are natural to Love and Good Nature as Furious Spiteful Envious and other Grating and Violent Passions do naturally vent themselves in the like wicked and hateful Ebullitions of a Distorted Soul Love and Good Nature have no doubt expressions suitable to their Quality and Occasion which in their utterance are always Kind but may sometimes not be otherwise Sweet than as Reproof and Rebuke may be said to be when properly and seasonably given And on the contrary Fury Spight and Envy have ever Expressions suitable to their Wicked and Hateful Nature and are level'd against Men in order to their Hurt and Destruction and have falshood for their original but are not always tho' often in violent manner for they are sometimes cover'd with Hypocrisie Instances of both Violent and Hypocritical I shall anon shew in the Snake after that I have told my Reader that as Words and Language are the Servants of the Mind so they are to be varied as the occasions thereof require Hence Kind and Sweet Expressions are properly to be given to Men and Actions that are Good and Honest And it is as proper by a Sharp and Kind Severity to express the Just Indignation of the Mind against the Evil Actions of Wicked Men. A multitude of Examples in both kinds we have in Holy Writ where the Dejected the Disconsolate the Mourner and the Penitent are comforted by the Kind and Sweet Expressions of the Holy Spirit speaking through the Holy Prophets and Apostles as does also our Lord himself It being the way of the Holy Spirit by Love unfeigned to seek and to save Mankind But on the contrary to the Hypocritical the Wicked and Impenitent it hath been the way of the Holy Spirit by sharp and severe expressions even such sometimes as in ordinary discourse might not be seemly or convenient to reprove them How severely doth God both in the Law and in the Prophets threaten the punishment of Idolaters even in terms which the Rabinnical Scholiasts have thought fit to alter in obedience to that foolish rule in their Talmud that all words which in the Law are writ obscenely must be chang'd to more civil words Milton's Apology Printed 1642 p. 25. Much so foolishly wise wou'd this Snake appear in refusing to allow what God at times as occasion did require hath thought fit to speak thro' his Servants Thus the Holy Prophet Elijah hath pronounced from the Lord concerning Jezabel the Daughter of Eth-baal King of Zidon as mentioned 2 Kings 9.37 And the Carcass of Jezabel shall be as Dung upon the Ground Thus also the Lord by his Prophet Jeremiah threatneth the Inhabitants of Jerusalem Jer. 8.2 That they should be as Dung upon the Earth And the Prophet Malachi 2.3 Behold I will cast Dung upon your Faces even the Dung of your Solemn Feasts and you shall be like unto it And the Prophet Isaiah rebuking the Wickedness of the Priests and Prophets telleth them all Tables are full of Vomit and Filthiness so that there is no place clean Isai. 28.8 The Prophet Habakkuk when he objected to the People their Secret Nakedness he tells them The Cup of the Lords right hand shall be turned unto thee and shameful Spuing shall be upon thy Glory These with abundance more Instances there are in the Holy Scriptures which are sufficient to shew that Love and Good Nature for such is the Holy Spirit doth not always use such as in the account of this Snake are to be called Kind and Sweet Expressions No for tho' the Spirit of God is Purity and Meekness it self yet in the reproving the Iniquities of Men it hath often used severe expressions Thus John the Baptist calls the Hypocritical Jews a Generation of Vipers Our Saviour calls Herod a Fox and told the Wicked Jews they were of their Father the Devil The Proto Martyr Stephen detects their Hypocrisie as Paul does the injustice of the High-Priest The Snake will surely not be so Blasphemous as to say these were in them the marks of Fury Spight or Envy c. Nor will it be answer sufficient for him to say of all these and others of like sort recorded in Holy Writ that he believes them to be the immediate Dictates of the Spirit of God But that all such Speeches since that time are the effects of Fury Spight and Envy and that they are the wicked and hateful Eubullitions of a Distorted Soul unless he can shew that God hath promised that he will no more through his Servants in like manner rebuke the iniquities of Men. This as denied by the Snake puts him upon a worse Dilemma for all those in him which are not Kind and Sweet Expressions And some such I think he has They must of necessity be Furious Spightful and Envious and the wicked and hateful Ebullitions of his Distorted Soul of which I will give some Instances when I have first shewn that if it be denied that the Instances above are Authorities for us to build on Yet that
Quaker-Spirit No it can't because it is not only Cloudy but it is Dark and False to say that words are Furious Venemous or Nonsensical and not give any Proof that they are so It is no help to the Snake to say as he does There needs no Argument to Discern betwixt Perfume and Stench Because that if the Nose can Discern as his Philosophy expresses it without Argument yet the Mind is not established but by Arguments drawn from true Judgment and Reason and none such nay none at all does the Snake offer The Snake for Conclusion to this Section has brought in two texts from the Psalms which he does improperly apply to the Quakers as he has before falsly charged them with Venom Fury Spite Envy and Nonsense And till he can prove that the words spoken by our Friends which whether these quoted were so or not remains to be proved being only taken from Adversaries were in their Original from Fury Spite and Envy and in their delivery Nonsense The Texts of Scripture are but abused by him as a Text in the same Book Psal. 91.11 was by the Devil when he repeated it to our Saviour Luke 4.10 and it will be answer sufficient if after the Example of our Lord we answer in the words of Scripture Psal. 101.7 There shall no deceitful Person dwell within my House he that telleth Lyes shall not remain in my sight SECT XVI Of Fighting and Loyalty I Have hitherto shewn the falsity of the Snake's Charges and his perversions of our Words Doctrines and Principles and how Unduly and Unrighteously he would endeavour to inferr from them Meanings and Consequences which neither are nor ever were ours but which we Abominate as destructive of and contrary to those Doctrines and Principles of the Christian Religion which the Spirit of Truth teacheth and leads into and which we do sincerely Believe And what is thus already in the foregoing Sections made appear will be further manifested in this and the following Sections for that in these as in those he hath not shewn what we are but what he would have us appear to be under the disguise which himself has put upon us In the pulling off which disguise there is at least this accidental Help and Advantage that the disguise in which he has represented us is exceedingly unlike our true Features I call it an accidental Advantage because if his Malice could have been satisfied in accusing us with only an abundance of improbable things they might have found some unthinking People who might have been misled into a too easy belief of them But as that could not be satisfied but by charging us with a number of Absurd and Impossible things So all that shall consider the ground and nature of our Principles and the nature of his Charge will with little difficulty be satisfied of their Contrariety and Inconsistency And tho' from this Consideration the sober Reader might and would have ground sufficient to determine the Question in this particular Yet for the detecting his particular Charges Perversions and Abuses I shall as in the former follow him through them And for his more full and plain Confutation herein I will briefly hint our Principles as Influencing Men with respect to Fighting and Loyalty The first of which the Snake most falsly does Charge us to approve and use and that in the last we are short and defective And first as to Fighting We say the end of the coming of our Lord Jesus as is prophesied of him Dan. 9.24 was to Finish the Transgression and to make an end of Sin And in the Room thereof to establish Truth and Righteousness in the Earth And as many as do witness the Power of his Coming by the Operation of his Holy Spirit in them do know that the work thereof is to take away and cleanse from all the Fleshly Lusts that War against the Soul 1 Pet. 2.11 which the Apostle makes to be the ground of Outward Wars and Contentions James 4.1 and as the Holy Spirit in all those in whom it does effectually work does destroy and purge away the very root from whence unjust Wars do proceed so it prevents in them the occasion of all outward Wars And this our Saviour did Teach in that Sermon of his upon the Mount Matth. 5.21 22. Ye have heard that it was said to them of old time Thou shalt not kill c. But I say unto you whosoever is angry with his Brother c. vers 38 39. Ye have heard it said an Eye for an Eye and a Tooth for a Tooth But I say unto you that ye resist not Evil but whosoever shall Smite on thy right Cheek turn to him the other Vers. 43 44. Ye have heard it hath been said thou shalt love thine Neighbour and hate thine Enemy But I say unto you Love your Enemies c. And if Anger Resistance and Hate be taken away What then can remain to occasion Wars Surely nothing From a sight of this Gospel Dispensation it was that the Prophet in the Holy Vision did foretel the peaceable practice of those who should come under the peaceable Government of Jesus Christ They shall beat their Swords into Plow-shares and their Spears into Pruning-hooks Nation shall not lift up Sword against Nation neither shall they learn War any more Isa. 2.4 And they who thus are redeemed out of the Grounds and Occasions of Wars by the workings of the Holy Spirit in them Such if they continue obedient cannot any more take the Sword into their hands Hitherto with respect to those who are in and under the Administration of the Gospel of Peace concerning whom we have from the first since we were a People declared that God hath taken the Sword out of their hands But tho' God hath thus disarm'd his peculiar People of the outward Sword that he might bring them to have a full and entire Dependance upon him for their safety Yet he hath never disarm'd himself of the outward Sword and as he is as well Soveraign of the World as of the Church and ought to have the command of all Mankind so he may put the Sword into the hands of those who are not yet brought under the Administration which I have above spoken of and he can make them Instrumental in his hand to Chastize his and his Peoples Enemies Thus Cyrus who many years before he was born was by name foretold of by the Prophet Isa. 44.28.45.1 is there called in the Word of the Lord Cyrus is my Shepherd he is the Lord 's Anointed These Titles were given with respect to the Services which God had fore-appointed he should do viz. be instrumental in the delivery of Jacob his Servant his Elect. In like manner and to the like purposes the Prophet Jeremiah in the Word of the Lord does in three places call Nebuchadnezzar the Lord's Servant but neither of these were of the peculiar People of God but it pleased him to appoint the Sword into their
oppose his Church whether his own Kings or others Whence else did proceed that Seditious Libel which I have before observed to be written in answer to Dr. King c and if it be not a Principle owned by the Communion he pretends Membership in yet one and he no small Member did once publish a Sheet intituled An Enquiry into the Measures of Submission to the Supream Authority In which is declared something to this purpose as it seems to me His Words in that Sheet are these p. 5. Here is the true Difficulty of this whole matter viz. of Submission and therefore it ought to be exactly considered First all general Words how large soever are still supposed to have a Tacit Exception and Reserve in them if the Matter seems to require it Children are Commanded to Obey their Parents in all things Wives are declared by the Scripture to be Subject to their Husbands in all things as the Church is unto Christ And yet how Comprehensive soever these Words may seem to be there is still a Reserve to be understood in them and though by our Form of Marriage the Parties Swear to one another till Death them do part yet few doubt but that this Bond is dissolved by Adultery though it is not nam'd for odious things ought not to be suspected and therefore not named upon such occasions but when they fall out they carry still their own force with them 2. When there seems to be a Contradiction between two Articles in the Constitution we ought to examine which of the two is the most Evident and the most Important and so we ought to fix upon it and then we must give such an accommodating Sense to that which seems to contradict it that so we may reconcile those together Here then are two seeming Contradictions in our Constitution The one is the Publick Liberty of the Nation the other is the Renounâ—ing of all Resistance in case that were invaded â—â—is plain that our Liberty is only a thing that we enjoy at the King's Discretion and during his Pleasure if the other against all Resistance is to be understood according to the utmost extent of thâ— Words Therefore since the chief Design of our whole Law and of all the several Rules of our Constitution is to Secure and Maintain our Liberty we ought to lay that down for a Conclusion that it is both the most Plain and the most Important of the two And therefore the other Article against Resistance ought to be so softned as that it do not destroy this Thus he Now I shall not hereupon Inquire Whether herein is asserted a Principle of Resisting by Arms such as oppose their Church whether their own Kings or others Nor whether they have so soften'd the Article against Resistance as not sometimes to lay it aside These I shall leave to the observing Reader and only ask Whether by the Declaration of the Lords Spiritual c. at Guild-hall 11 December 1688. this same Article against Resistance was not soften'd or as the Snake words it Whether those Spiritual Lords did not Sign it from a Principle of Resisting by Arms such as oppose their Church whether their own Kings or others That some few of them did afterward go back and grow stiff is nothing to the purpose for as that uncertainty of Conduct in them could not abate the Validity and Legality of the Present Established Government so neither could it clear them of having that viz. Resistance in Principle which some did first practise and then deny and others in the same Communion did first deny and then practise Reasons for which hath been I think by both sides given Ibid. P. 205. Nay farther they embrace the Principle of Mahomet that they may force their Religion upon others by the Sword When the Snake thus Painted the Heathenism of Persecution by calling it the Principle of Mahomet sure he forgot past Practices when they endeavoured to Dragoon us to Church and force their Religion upon us and others by the Sword Nay and to this Day there are that embrace this if it be a Mahometan Principle of which there are Instances of them that go to the utmost of their Power in point of Force tho' they cannot now use the Sword to cut the way for their Religion And the Snake was not more forgetful in this than he is false in the Charge upon us considering his own Words P. 204. Our so much cry'd up Principle against using outward Force for they are in direct Opposition and Contradiction How can they who in Word and Practice have always to use the Snakes Term much cry'd up a Principle against using outward Force at all soften the Article against Resistance much less force their Religion upon others by the Sword No it cannot be nor was it ever our Practice but by those whose Practice and Endeavour it hath been we have often deeply suffered So that if this be the Principle of Mahomet which the Liberty the Turks give to others to retain and exercise their own respective Religions and Ways of Worship even in and under their Dominions does not bespeak it is evident the Quakers have never embraced it Ibid. Let me first begin to shew how Active they were against their own Natural Prince joyning with all the Vsurpations upon him from their first Rise in 1650 to his Restauration 1660. That They the Quakers did act against the King and join with all the Vsurpations upon him from 1650 to 1660 is most notoriously false for that there is not any Instance to be given of such who after they became Quakers did so Act or Join But the Charge is as well Malicious as False for there were but few Quakers in the Year 1650. And E. B. Dating his Epist. Prefixt to G. F's Great Mystery in the Ninth Month 1658 says P. 7. It is now about Seven Years since the Lord raised us up in the North of England c. And Id. p. 13. he says In the beginning we were but few in Number And P. 17 he says It was in the Year 1654 that they enter'd into the South Parts What Quakers then were there in 1650 to act against the King or Join with Vsurpations upon him Ibid. They approv'd of the Murther of his Father and Glory'd in it and justified all the Rebellions before their own time as they joined with all afterwards 'T is false they the Quakers did not approve the putting the King to Death neither were they a gathered People when that was done nor did they ever Glory in it tho' sometimes they had occasion to mention it to those who came afterwards into Power by way of caution and warning to them not of Exprobation to the former That they might not oppress the Righteous and be cut off also as if they refused to Hear and Redress they were plainly told they should be And if the Snake will needs have such remembrances of that Fact to be approving of and
Glorying in the Murther of the King Pray Reader consider whether he does not bring this Charge upon his Son Charles the Second who in his Declaration Given at his Court at Dunfirmlin the 16th day of August 1650. and in the Second Year of his Reign as it is there dated hath in the Second Section of that Declaration there said Though His Majesty as a Dutiful Son be obliged to Honour the Memory of his Royal Father and have in Estimation the Person of his Mother yet doth he desire to be deeply humbled and afflicted in Spirit before God because of His Father's heakning to Evil Councils and his opposition to the Work of Reformation and to the Solemn League and Covenant by which so much of the Blood of the Lord's People hath been Shed in these Kingdoms and for the Idolatry of his Mother The King doth here acknowledge very grievous Crimes Evil Council Bloodshed and Idolatry for which with all the Sins of his Father's House he there Craves Pardon as he says himself But in the Language of the Snake thus to object Wickedness to his Father's House and to remember the the Judgments that came upon it because of the above-said Evils is to approve of the Murther of His Father and Glory in it I question not but the Sober Reader will have another sense of this Matter for that remembrances of the Evils that have befallen Princes and denunciations of Evils that should befall them because of iniquity are most frequent in the Prophets of which I shall have occasion to mention some And here it may be fit to ask the Snake whether Elisha the Holy Prophet did Approve of and Glory in the Murther of Ben-hadad King of Aram when he told Hazael the King's Servant who did afterwards commit the Murther 2 Kings 8.10 Go and say unto him thou shalt recover howbeit the Lord hath shewed me he shall surely Die Ibid. They fought as Rome with Double Arms the Spiritual Thunder as well as the Carnal Sword If by the they the Snake speaks of he means the Church he claims Membership in It is then too true that they Fought as Rome with Double Arms viz. Excommunicato's Capiendo's as well as the Carnal Sword and by both we have deeply suffer'd But if by they he means they the Quakers it is notoriously false as hereafter in his particular Instances will be found I come now to the Snake's Instance p. 206. from E. B's Trumpet of the Lord in the first Edition of which Book there is as the Snake says a Part thus directed To all you who are and have been always Enemies to the very Appearance of Righteousness who are call'd Delinquents and Cavelliers And out of this as if it were allowable for him an Enemy to Quote and Mangle as he pleases He leaves out all the Explanatory Part and gives the rest by piece-meal yet not but under the direction and explanation of his Perverse Expositions and i. e's In which whether he has done justice to E. B. herein We will first see and examine by giving the place entire as it is and next it may be consider'd from the Nature and Matter of it whether it be Hellish Thundrings from a Cursed Spirit and like the very opening of the Infernal Pit as the Snake has very Imperiously and as I hope to shew Falsly Asserted The words are as follows Thus saith the Lord My Controversie is against you even my Hand in Judgment is upon you already and you are become cursed in all your Hatchings and Endeavours and from time to time my Hand hath been against you in Battle and you have been and are given up as a Prey to your Enemies for the purpose and intents of your Hearts have been known always to be against the Form of Truth and much more against my Powerful Truth it self And because you attempted to take my Throne Conscience therefore I rose in Fury against you and will have War with all your Followers herein for ever And tho' my Hand hath been evidently against you yet to this day you remain in Rebellion in your Minds in hatching Murder and Cruelty in your wicked Hearts and tho' your Kings and Princes and Nobles have been cut off in Wrath and your cruel desperate Inventions and Plots of Wickedness conceived in your Cursed Womb have been broken and you cut short in your Desires yet you repent not nor will see how you are given to be a Curse and a Desolation and a Prey in Houses and Lands and Persons to them whom I raised up against you and gave Power over you yet you are hardned and your Cruelty in the persecution of my Servants cannot be measured where you have any Power you smite with the Fist of Wickedness and count it your Glory to despise my Name In the Vallies of vain Hopes you feed and on the Mountains of Foolish Expectations and conceive in your Cruel Womb of Tyranny the overthrow of the Nations but in the bringing forth your selves are overthrown and it is not for well-doing that you suffer but my Hand is against you and my Judgments are upon you and except you repent shall continue upon Earth with you and follow you and persue you to the Lake of Destruction where there is no Repentance and you and your Kings and Lordly Power by which you have thought to exercise Lordship over my Heritage shall be enslaved by the Devil in the Pit of Darkness in Everlasting Bondage where he shall reign your King and Lord for evermore Thus E. B. who in this place does not otherwise speak than against those same evil practices which King Charles the Second in the Declaration forementioned did desire to be deeply humbled for and by means of which the Judgments that did overtake were brought And where E. B. saith You are become cursed in all you Hatchings and Endeavours It was not as the Snake falsly Glosses with his i. e. to Restore the King But as E. B. saith himself because you have attempted to take my Throne Conscience And this is so true a saying that all who shall attempt to take the Throne of God viz. the Consciences of Men will sooner or later find that those their attempts will be rewarded with manifest oppositions and overthrow from the Hand of God But further E. B. in this Book did not speak only or chiefly against the wickedness of that Party No but he also speaks against the same Wickedness in Oliver Cromwell and tells him as plainly from the Lord Thou hast broken Truce with me and now thou suffers grievous and Heinous Oppression and Cruelty And to the Generals Colonels and Commanders and Officers he speaks as plainly concerning their Wickedness and tells them You are abundantly waxed fat and exalted through Victories and Deliverances and now you kick against the Lord that hath handled you as Instruments in his Hand to do his Will and many of you who have been raised out of the Dust are set down
in your high Nest of Liberty in the Lust and Pride and Filthiness of the Flesh. And in like manner he goes through many of the then Parties into which the People were divided and faithfully tells them their Trangression and admonishes to Repentance that so their then impending Destruction and which did come might have been averted And this is so far from being the effects of a Cursed Spirit or Hellish Thundrings and the opening of the Infernal Pit that it hath many Examples in Holy Writ in which God by his Prophets hath denounced and foretold grievous Desolations and Destruction which should come because of Transgression Thus the Prophet Amos 8.11 Jeroboam shall die by the Sword and Israel shall be led away Captive out of their own Land And the treatment he met with was much such as the Snake gives for we read in the 10th vers Then Amaziah the Priest of Bethel sent to Jeroboam King of Israel saying Amos hath conspired against thee in the midst of the House of Israel the Land is not able to bear all his words Thus Amaziah and our Snake are of the same Mind who when a Prophet from the Lord declares his Will concerning the Disobedient these will have such a Prophet to Approve of and Glory in their Destruction Which horrid Imputation cannot appear in any thing to be more false than that these same Men with many of the Prophets of the Lord who have been concerned in like Messages have called in the Word of the Lord to Repentance and Amendment by which the Impending Judgments that they foretold should come might have been turned away and that there was need of Repentance King Charles in the Declaration before-mentioned has abundantly testified but of that I care not to be more large at present The Snake p. 208. next carps at a Book Entituled Good Council and Advice but mentions no more of the Title lest it should betray and destroy the purpose he quotes it for and testifie that the Writers of it were true Prophets it is thus Rejected by Disobedient Men. And the days of Oliver Cromwell 's Visitation passed over and also of Richard Cromwell c. Printed 1659. From which Book p. 27 36. the Snakes quotes thus and begins Oh Oliver arise and come out which is an abuse and false Quotation for these words in that Book do stand twelve Lines assunder and begins thus Oh Oliver hadst thou been Faithful And of this the Snake declares they did blow the Trumpet to Oliver effectually But it is very false for from the Title of the Book their Visitation passed over and from the event viz. Oliver's Death and Richard's being Cast out it appears otherwise Ibid. p. 208. And he further charges Oliver not to turn Sober Men and True Hearts out of his Army And a very good Charge it was Ibid. So it seems they esteem'd Fighting a Lawful and a Good Thing in a Good Cause because they thought it consistent with Sober Men and True Hearts According to what I have before observed p. 138. God not having disarmed himself of the Outward Sword he may and often hath for Causes seeming Good in his Sight put the Sword into the Hands of such whom he hath appointed to be the Ministers of his Anger against wicked Men and among these his Ministers we believe there very often is and hath been Sober Men and True Hearts according to those Discoveries of the Will of God which they have had And this we also know that if Sober Men and True Hearts who have been raised up by the Lord and made Instrumental in his Hand by the outward Sword to Castise His and His Peoples Enemies do humbly wait upon God to have further discoveries of his Will and thereby come into greater degrees of Obedience to the Holy Spirit of Christ the Peaceable Saviour they may at length come to see concerning them against whom God raised them up as Joshua in the word of the Lord recounts to Israel concerning their Enemies Jos. 24.12 And I sent Hornets before you which cast them out before you even the two Kings of the Amorites and not with thy Sword nor thy Bow For it is certainly true that those 〈◊〉 do come to that Spiritual Marriage with the Lord spoken of by the Prophet Hosea 2.9 they will witness the compleating of that Prophecy mentioned in the 18th verse of this Chapter And in that Day will I make a Covenant for them with the Wild Beasts and with the Fowls of the Heavens and with that that creepeth upon the Earth And I will break the Bow and the Sword and the Battle out of the Earth and will make them to sleep safely Ibid. p. 209. But since 1660. it is an Antichristian Doctrine Before and since 1660 even ever since we were a People it hath been our Principle and Practice not to use the outward Sword Ibid. One of the Orders given forth by their Yearly Meeting 1693. Commands that none should carry Guns in their Ships Our Yearly Meeting did never give forth any Commands but in Brotherly sort hath caution'd against those things which are not consistent with our Holy Profession of which this is one Ibid. p. 209. They presented G. K. as endeavouring to Subvert the Government which by their Law is Death because that in the 9 th and 10 th Articles of a Paper there Published called an Appeal from the 28 Judges c. he queried whether it was consistent with their Principle against using the Carnal Sword c. That it was not Because he Queried c. as the Snake falsly says he was presented but because of his indecent and tumultuary Behaviour the Declaration of the Sessions it self will best shew which I shall here quote from S. J's State of the Case p. 50 51. Their words are these Therefore for the undeceiving of all People we have thought fit by this Publick Writing not only to signify that our Procedure against the Persons now in the Sheriffs Custody as well as what we intend against others concerned in its proper place respects only that part of the said Printed Sheet viz. The Appeal which appears to have the tendency aforesaid that is Sedition Disturbance Subversion of the Government or aspersing the Magistrates and not any part relating to Difference in Religion c. Ibid. p. 210. But it is plain that they are not against Force of Arms when they like the Quarrel for they did not only encourage Oliver c. but they fought themselves against the King if you will believe G. F. who complains of many Quakers being Disbanded out of the Army and that for being Quakers tho' they were good Fighters It is false G. F. does not complain that any Quakers were disbanded much less that they were disbanded for being Quakers That which G. F. does here complain of is the Pride and Haughtiness of them to whom he writ and as an instance of their Apostacy from that tenderness towards Religious and
Conscientious People which they once did profess to have He says thus p. 5. To the Council of Officers of the Army and the Heads of the Nation c. Many Justices of the Peace faithful to the Lord God to serve him in their Generations to keep Peace to do the thing that is Just and to keep down the Unruly and Rude you have put out whereby you have been the cause of letting all the Bruits upon them that matters not Religion nor Law That these Nations have been in many Places as though there were neither Law Government Teachers nor Ministers as tho' they never had God nor Scriptures taught among them And Here the Snake begins his Quotation many Valiant Captains Soldiers and Officers have been put out of the Army by Sea and Land of whom it hath been said among you That they had rather have had one of them than seven Men and could have turned one to seven Men who because of their faithfulness to the Lord God being faithful towards him it may be for saying Thou to a Particular and for wearing their Hats have been turned out from amongst you c. The Snake's remark upon this is p. 211. Here it is plain that they were Quakers while they were in the Army because by this they were turn'd off for being Quakers for saying Thee and not taking off their Hats And is it not here as plain that they were Quakers while in Commissions of the Peace But neither of them is plain as in the Snake's manner of suggesting Yet this is plain from the true natural meaning of the Words That as there then was an Apostacy in the Council of Officers c. from their first Religious Tenderness so there also was an encrease of that Religious Tenderness in the Hearts of many who in their Commissions of the Peace had well discharged their Duty And others who in their Martial Affairs had given proof of their Valour And some of both these had their Understandings so far opened as to see the Vanity and Evil of respecting Persons with Tongue or Hat tho such were not come so far as to see the evil of and deny Fighting yet they forthwith turned them out And if they were obedient to the Manifestation of God in these smaller things yet they were not therefore Quakers The noted Saltmarsh who never was nor pretended to be a Quaker refused from a Conscientious Tenderness to put off the Hat to Cromwell R. Eccleston used the plain Language to Oliver and was no Quaker and very many besides Quakers use the plain Language And therefore when G. F. says p. 6. as quoted by the Snake p. 211. Oh! How are Men fallen from that which they were at first when Thousands of Us went in the front of you c He does not nay it was impossible he should mean in them words Thousands of us Thousands of Quakers Because at the first of the War which is the time he speaks of which was 1642. there was no such thing as a Quaker spoke of or heard of for he who is willing on this occasion to make us as old as he can dates the first Rise of the Quakers 1650. therefore they could not be Quakers that then went in the Front of the Army Tho' 't is true that many of Them that at the First ingaged in that cause and were forward and zealous in it did afterwards come to be of Vs and so did some also that fought for the King and were as forward and bold in his Cause But as they came to be really of us they left off to Fight with Carnal Weapons as George Fox does plainly shew in the very next lines to those last Quoted by the Snake and which he maliciously left out they are these p. 6. Oh! The Lord's Truth the Lord's Power and the Lord's Arm is more dear to us than all who are not sat down in the Spoil of our Enemies who are come to the Lord who hath given us Victory and hath brought us to the Light that takes away the occasion and root of Wars Here G. F. shews plainly that those whose understandings God had opened and did grow up in Obedience to the Manifestations of God to them they did according to their gradual growth in his Grace first leave off one thing and then another And thus God discover'd his Will to Men not all at once that they might not be discouraged with the sight of too much work or too great difficulty Thus they refused first to set down in the Spoils to pull off their Hats or to use other than the plain Language And this their Conscientious Tenderness tho' despised by Men as they did continue in it it did please God to open their Understandings to see and know the peaceable Dispensation of the Gospel of Christ. And by giving them Victory over their Sins did bring them into it whereby they could at last say The Lord hath given us Victory and hath brought us to the Light that takes away the Occasion and Root of Wars And indeed so it is for as many as through the coming of our Lord Jesus by his Spirit in their Hearts do witness their Spirits to be subjected to him So as not to be Angry with his Brother Not to resist Evil and to Love Enemies do know the Root and Occasion of Wars taken away Ibid. p. 211. But if you would know in whom they make it unlawful to use the Sword he tells p. 4. where he threatens that God will overturn the World and all the Powers of the Earth and all Sword-men that be not in his Power That is the King and the Cavaliers whom they damn to the Pit of Hell as I have shewn But Reader if thou wouldst know the greatness of this Adversaries Injustice Perversion and Falshood please to consider G. F's words immediately foregoing these last quoted by the Snake they are these But the Lord is risen who will plead the cause of the Innocent not by Sword nor by Spear but by his Power in which he will overturn the World c. What plainer Testimony could a Man give against his dependence upon an Arm of Flesh and his deliverance by it But further to shew the foolish Malice of the Snake in this false suggestion it could not be the King and Cavaliers that G. F. meant in those words and all Sword-men that be not in his Power because this was printed in 1659. and they were overthrown before that But the Sword-men here mentioned were those G. F. then wrote to who had once felt and known something of the Power of God with them but were then departed from it Ibid. So that instead of their disowning the use of the Sword their true meaning is that none have a right to it but themselves Upon all the foregoing the inference is Malicious and without all ground There is no mention in the Sentence of Vs or the Quakers or that the threatned overturn should be
of God in the Consciences of them that without prejudice and with an equal mind do read them But if he denies the Thesis viz. That God can speak and make known his Mind now to Men Immediately by the same Spirit in and by which he spake to the Holy Prophets and Apostles Let him shew when and where God hath imposed that Silence upon himself and bound himself to speak no more in that Immediate manner by his Spirit to Men. Ibid. p. 246. And from the same Mouth of the Lord Tho. Ellwood denounces that they who pay Tythes c. How knows the Snake that Thomas Ellwood did not say he delivered it from the Mouth of the Lord Yet what he there delivered is true But if T. E. did not deliver it from the Mouth of the Lord but laid it down as a plain proposition deduced from Scripture and this abdicated Snake positively says he did From whose Mouth did the Priest denounce that Lye Unless from the Mouth of him who is the Father of them which is the more likely in that he wrongs T. E. in the Quotation also which he gives thus T. E. denounces That they who pay Tythes thereby deny Christ to be come in the Flesh which is a Mark of Anti-christ But T. Ellwood's words are They who pay Tythes do therein uphold a Legal Ceremony abrogated by Christ and thereby deny Christ to be come in the Flesh which is a Mark of Anti-christ 1 John 4.3 The Snake by leaving out those words do therein uphold a Legal Ceremony abrogated by Christ hath conceal'd from his Reader that part of T. E's proposition on which the remaining parts depended which he hath also done in p. 254. and repeated the same again with some addition in p. 273. to make the more noise for the proposition consists of three parts 1. That they who pay Tythes do therein uphold a Legal Ceremony abrogated by Christ. 2. That by upholding a Legal Ceremony abrogated by Christ they deny Christ to be come in the Flesh. 3. That to deny Christ to be come in the Flesh is a mark of Anti-christ for proof of which Tho. Ellwood quoted 1 John 4.3 Now if the Snake can without nibling and taking T. E's words by piecemeal disprove them or the Authority on which they are built it may answer his purpose otherwise the Conclusion is Firm. Ibid. G. Fox in his decretal Epistle bearing date the 3 d. Month 1677. commands Severely that the Friends Testimony against Tythes be kept up with Vigor And yet none of these words Command Severely nor Vigor are in that Epistle which this Scoffing Snake calls Decretal The Quotation he gives out of that Epistle begins thus For any to cry against the Priests in words and yet to give them means and put into their Mouths he has left out here that they may not prepare War against you as not willing to publish that their Unchristian Practice is a Contradiction And is it not so Then he goes on And therefore take heed for if the Lord God do bless you with outward Creatures and you do bestow them upon Baal 's Priests the Lord may justly require the Outward Things from you again Here the Snake stops and covers with a what follows in the Epistle thus Who i. e. the Lord saith that his Christian Ministers should freely give as they have freely received of Jesus Christ. This the Priests don't love the People should hear of no by no means giving Freely is what they care not for And if for a Reason they offer and say they have not freely received though it be Truth yet it will be of no great Advantage But it seems by the Snake's quarrelling with this Quotation that he would have God's Creatures bestowed upon Baal 's Priests for which I should want a reason had I not this viz. That he himself might hope to get a share of them But we have not yet done with G. F's Epistle The Snake goes on with the Quotation thus So all the Preachers for Tythes and Mony and the Takers and Payers of Tythe must be testified against in the Lord's Power and Spirit Here he leaves off again dashing out several lines which mention the Spoil that had been made by the Tythe-mongers upon such as refused to pay them and the Judgments that have come upon those Persecuting Spoilers And therefore said G. F. in the next words In the Power of the Lord maintain the War against the Beast that is that Persecuting Spirit in the Priests and do not put into his Mouth c. To pervert this passage the Snake has printed it Beasts in the Plural that he might make way for a false and wicked Comment of his own that is says he as well Payers as Receivers of Tythes and that adds he is the whole Kingdom King and Parliament Whereas by those words and do not put into his Mouth c. which the Snake has left out it is very plain that G. F's words in that place related to those that exacted not to those that pay'd Tythes But as he hath perverted this Quotation to render the Quakers Obnoxious to the Government by insinuating as if they set up an Outward Authority against it So he craftily but falsly says G. F. concludes his Epistle abovesaid with these words Keep your Authority and Dominion Whereas that is not the Conclusion but after those words Keep your Authority and Dominion it follows in the Power and Spirit and Name of Jesus Which shews the War before mentioned was a Spiritual Warfare to be maintained by a Suffering Testimony and this also shews the Malice and Falshood of this Adversary Ibid. p. 247. There they wou'd perswade us that all they have said against the Payment of Tythes was only meant by them against the Payment of them to the Popish Clergy But by no means against the Right of the Church of England to their Tythes as settled upon them by the Civil Government This is false and the words he quotes from that Paper Signed on the Behalf of Friends and their Yearly Meeting do not say or imply it There is not in them any acknowledgment of any Right the Church of England hath to Tythes He goes on and quotes from that Paper We are not convinced that it can be against the Fundamental Laws of the Land either to deny Tythes What when the Law enjoyns them The Law and that made in the same Reign and not much after that which was the first express Statute-Law for Tythes enjoyn'd owning of the 6 Articles viz. Transubstantiation in the Sacrament of the Altar Auricular Confession c. Was that a Fundamental Law of the Land The Martyrs that then chose rather to suffer Death in Flames of Fire than keep it did not think so Again are not all Acts of Parliament though made in Popish Times Fundamental Laws of this Realm Tho' such as were made about Religion for if they had either the Popish Religion must have yet
Bread or Perish'd for want for any Care or Pity these Priests who call themselves the Clergy of the Church of England took of them or shewed to them Ibid. p. 250. They did not think it sufficient to Preach and Print against Tythes but they went about and got Subscriptions of many Thousand Quakers throughout all England against Tythes and sent them to the Parliament in a Humble Threatning Manner By this he must mean That this was Subscriptions of Men For he adds And as if this had not been sufficient the Women too must be Assembled And they too must sign the like Subscriptions Yet this Subscription of the Men which he says they sent up in an Humble Threatning Manner he confesses in the next Page he had not seen I have not yet seen the Subscriptions of the Men p. 251. So that he throws out his Scoffing Lye of an Humbling Threatning at a venture on hear-say from others or his own bare Surmise of which when he brings truer Proof it may be further considered And for the Subscriptions of the Women I have already spoken to it p. 345 346 fore-going Yet for further Discovery of the Malice and Falshood of this Adversary herein I will Remark upon his Quotations from those Papers of the Women's Subscriptions against Tythes concerning which he says p. 251. The Women do positively declare for Annulling of Tythes if the Parliament wou'd not alter the same He begins his Quotation thus The Commands of Men say they p. 3. must be Annulled that takes Tythes and not be obeyed by them that live in the Covenant of God Here he stops and dashes out what follows as he left out what went before these Words The Commands of Men must be Disannulled How By the Covenant of Life which Abrogates the Levitical Law that gave Tythes And if the Covenant of Life hath Abrogated the Levitical Law that gave Tythes which Law was given by God Shall it not also Annul the Commands of Men upon that Abrogated Law I think it must But how Must it be as the Snake says If the Parliament wou'd not alter the same Insinuating that they then wou'd Rebel which is a most false Insinuation Yes if they wou'd not it must be Annulled to as many as are in the Covenant of Life because such Witness as the Words in p. 3. immediately foregoing the Snake's Quotation are the End of the Command of God to the Jews that gave Tythes Thus much for the Words left out at the beginning which sufficiently shews the Malice of the Snake Now for what he hath dash'd out at the end of this Quotation which is this Now if you the then Parliament act in the same Power that hath held up Tythes since the Apostles Days which hath taken away many of our Friends Lives that have been Imprison'd till Death in nasty Holes and Corners for bearing their Testimony against that unjust Oppression of Tythes This the Snake Conceals it is not with him worth minding if Quakers are Imprison'd till Death But whether he will mind it or not I think it did very highly concern them who were exposed to such Sufferings for their Testimony against an Abrogated Jewish Law to represent as they did to the then Powers their Case and warn them that they stood not in that same Power by and from which they had known such Sufferings The Snake continues thus And they tell p. 4. That they bear their Testimony for the Lord Jesus Christ in Opposition to Tythes against the Commands of Man set up in Opposition to him since the Days of the Apostles c. which to you say they is the Word of the Lord God In the Compass of this short Quotation here are three Abuses which the Snake was willing to do to this Place that thereby he might twine it to his purpose The first is he gives for our Friends Words Bear their Testimony c. Whereas it is Printed Bearing But that would not suit his purpose therefore it must be chang'd for that wou'd have spoil'd his Connection and given cause to suspect that it was Relative to something that went before which he was very desirous should be conceal'd but now it must out It is this There are many in Prison at this Day in nasty Holes bearing their Testimony c. I find the Snake wou'd have us lye so close in Nasty Holes as neither to be seen nor heard of His Second Abuse is his Parenthesis in Opposition to Tythes which he puts as looking with a better Grace than the Words which really are in a Parenthesis in this Quotation in the Book it self for they are these That Disannulled the Command that gave Tythes But he thought that it was not proper to have it seen that the Reason why our Friends did lye in Nasty Holes was for bearing their Testimony for the Lord Jesus Christ that Disannulled the Command that gave Tythes His Third Abuse is after these Words since the Days of the Apostles c. he adds which to you is the Word of the Lord God Now these last Words stand not thus in that Page but five or six Lines higher and are a Warning from the Lord to that Parliament in these Words Let not the Nation be ruin'd and the People Prison'd to Death and the Blood of the Innocent be drunken as abundance of it hath been within these few Years which lies upon the Heads of some therefore keep it clear from off your own Heads we warn you which to you is the Word of the Lord God c. The Snake now takes for his Quotation from p. 21. these Words The shout of a King is amongst us the Lord God omnipotent And then gives a Dash instead of these Words which follow Who will throw down all that is come up since the true Church went into the Wilderness And it is no doubt a great Truth That when Jesus Christ the Spiritual Head of the true Church comes to take that Power which of Right belongs to Him He will throw down and deliver his Church from all that Deceit and Oppression which hath come up since his Church went into the Wilderness And it is the Duty of all true Christians to bear their Testimony accordingly Ibid. p. 252. He quotes thus from those Papers of the Womens Subscriptions p. 40. This Priesthood which takes Tythes now this was not the Popish Priesthood says the Snake we in the Power of the Lord God deny them And a very good Reason is in this p. 40. given why we do deny them which is Because there was never no Priesthood that took Tythes who was made by the Law of God but what was in the time of the Law c. And if the Priest-hood now taking Tythes are not so Constituted by the Law of God under the Gospel Is there not very great and good Reason why it should be denied Ibid. He goes on and quotes from the aforesaid Papers page 63. We Declare with our Hands and
think that Outward Institutions were not necessary to Guard to Preserve and to Improve the Inward and Spiritual part of Religion That a Steeple-House cannot be God's House I have above-shewn to which I may add that 't is below Christianity and the Gospel-Dispensation to talk of and call one of these God's House now since the Legal Temple is forsaken and destroy'd The Saints are now his House 1 Cor. 3.16 and 6.19 so for Outward things dedicated to God's Service they did belong to the Legal Dispensation and if Christ had judged Outward Institutions necessary to Guard Preserve and Improve the Inward and Spiritual part of Religion he would not have abolished those which God had so Divinely and Solemnly Commanded The talking of Tythes and Tribute due to God now under the Gospel for which that affords no Warrant is a meer Artifice and Knack of Priest-Craft Our detecting and opposing of which is the chief Ground of the Priests pouring forth their Rage and Fury upon us and indeed it is no wonder for it is not easie for them to part with what the Snake calls the Baal of Tythes What he prates Ibid. of Sacrilege Robbing of God in this Gospel-Day seizing his Tythes and Tribute due to him c. Is only a noise of Words without Sense and the Course of his Jewish Expressions shew that he understands not the Gospel-Day They who were not to appear empty before the Lord were to bring Outward Sacrifices and Offerings Oxen Sheep Turtles Flower Wine Oyl c. If they must not now appear in that Sense empty before the Lord but must have something to offer must that be Outward as under the Law If so why not the same Pray where did Christ or his Apostles appoint any Commutation of those for these now in use as Easter Offerings Womens Churching as it is call'd with a whole Train of such Ceremonial Fragments from which there is no need to produce any discharge until he shall have shewn how they became obligatory in the Church at this Day And after all his Idle Tattle how little does or rather did he because of his Abdication or do too many of the Priests regard how empty of the Spiritual Sacrifice the People appear before the Lord provided they appear full-handed to them They may Sacrifice to the Lord that which cost them nothing if Prayers ready made and read out of their Book or repeated by rote may be said to cost them nothing so they do but offer to the Priest that which will yield him something if he may but have a Calf from the Stall it 's much better to him than the Calves of their Lips if he may but have the Sweat of their Brows it will serve such Priests turn tho God be not in all their thoughts Ibid. p. 263. No not so much as a tenth part tho' we acknowledge that to have been God's Tribute universally paid to him both before and under the Law That the Tenth was universally paid c. Is but begging the Question which never was nor can be prov'd Before the Law it was never paid nor but once given as appears and then expressy call'd a Gift Gen. 14.20 Heb. 7.2 4. Under the Law it was paid by virtue of a Legal Command for it which extended to none but those that were under the Law and to them only for the Tythes of Canaan and that only during that Law and Priesthood We can and have produced a fair and full discharge from it under the Gospel viz. Heb. 7.12 tho' there was no need of an express discharge for that which was instituted but for a certain time Ibid. Yet they are afraid of the Face of Man c. There is indeed little sign of it for had they been affraid of the Face of Man they had not been Quakers nor had ever been able to hold out in their Testimony against what he calls the Baal of Tythes as it 's well known they have done Ibid. It was said of Hannibal that he never Fought without an Ambush so the Quakers never write without a Reserve It is said of a Slanderer He that hideth Hatred with Lying Lips and he that uttereth Slander is a Fool Prov. 10.18 This Snake has made sure of that Title to himself for his Hatred has opened his Lying Lips to expose his Folly by uttering a Slander against the Quakers of such a nature as every Body that reads our Books may Convict him of nothing being written more plainly singly and free from reserve or double meaning than our Writings and that in the case of Tythes wheresoever they are treated of Ibid. p. 264. I see the starting Hole that they have left whereby to escape from what I have before quoted viz. That their Testimony against Tythes does rather affect a Popish Clergy than a Protestant Civil Government True it does so and yet affects both It does rather affect a Popish Clergy as 1st reputing every Clergy however otherwise denominated which exacts Tythes in that and so far Popish And 2 dly it affects the Clergy principally as those that have abused the Civil Governments and drawn them to Spoil their Honest and Peaceable Protestant Subjects for not feeding the Clergy with Tythes But that we never endeavoured to Smooth it to the Government as he words it or to persuade them that we refused Tythes to one sort of Priests or of Men only our constant practice in denying to pay Tythes to any and therefore Suffering does sufficiently disprove Ibid. They grievously accuse F. Bugg in that he most shamefully Quarrels with the Quakers for renewing and asserting his Wickliff's and other Famous Protestants and Martyrs Testimonies against the Corruption and Priests and Popish Imposition and Oppression of Tythes And not without very good reason for Wickliff's Testimony as ours is was against the Corruption of the Priest both in Life and Doctrine against the Imposition of Tythes or any forced Maintenance which he would have had left free Ibid. p. 265. But will the Quakers be ty'd to the Opinion of those Men in other things No surely Why then should they think to tye us to their Opinion as to Tythes This is extreamly Shallow will the Priests of any sort or this Snake himself who quote the Opinions of those they call Fathers as Origen Tertullian Cyprian Chrysostome Augustine Jerome c. be ty'd to the Opinions of those Men in all things If not why then should he think to tye others against whom they alledge the Opinions of those Men to those Opinions for which they alledge them Ibid. p. 266. Tythes were paid to Melchisedec long before Levi c. Tythes were not paid to Melchisedec but given that 's the word used both by Moses Gen. 14.20 and by the Apostle Heb. 7.2 4. and that but once viz. by Abraham Gen. 14.20 and that not of Corn c. but of the Spoil of War Ibid. The Evangelical Priesthood is after the Order of Melchisedec and therefore they claim
Tythes as being due to that Order of Priesthood That Tythes were due to Melchisedec or to the Order of his Priesthood is gratis Dictum a begging of the Question which I deny the Snake to prove That the Evangelical Priesthood is after the order of Melchisedec is a false Notion deny'd and disprov'd by some of great Note in the Church of England I instance for the present Andrew Willet in his Synopsis of Popery fifth General Controversy p. 315. where writing against the Popish Priests who claim'd by this same Plea which the Snake now claims says It is great Blasphemy to say that every Popish Priest is after the order of Melchisedec And that none may think he says this only of Popish Priests because they are Popish he afterwards adds The Scripture maketh this difference between the Priesthood of Aaron and the Priesthood of Melchisedec that the Priests of the Law were many because they were taken away by Death But Christ 's Priesthood is Eternal he Dyeth not Heb. 7.23 But if there should be many Priests after Melchisedec 's Order there should herein be no difference at all Wherefore seeing Melchisedec's Priesthood only resteth in Christ and is not translated to any other c. Thus far he which plainly shews that he excludes all Priests even the Gospel Ministers from being of the Order of Melchisedec which he confines to Christ only and herein he hath the Warrant of Heb. 7.24 Where the Apostle speaking of the Priesthood of Christ after the order of Melchisedec saith But this Man because he endureth ever hath a Priesthood which cannot pass from one to another To the same purpose Edw. Reynolds Bishop of Norwich in his Works printed 1658. p. 528. speaking of the Priesthood of Christ and shewing that the Popish Priests who as well as the Priests in the Reformation pretend to the Evangelical Priesthood were not after the order of Melchisedec saith thus The Priesthood of Melchisedec as Type and of Christ as the Substance was 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 a Priesthood which could not pass unto any other either as Successor or Vicar to one or the other and it was only by Divine and Immediate Vnction But the Papists make themselves Priests by Humane and Ecclesiastical Ordination Thus he And if the Snake follow his own Principle viz. That a Bishop be to be follow'd as Christ's Vicegerent I see not how he will avoid throwing away his idle and false notion That the Evangelical Priesthood is after the order of Melchisedec because the Priests of England are made such by Humane and Ecclesiastical Ordination Thus Reader by the Testimony of two Eminent Doctors of the Church of England one of them a Bishop is refuted his bold but groundless Assertion that the Evangelical Priesthood is after the order of Melchisedec and consequently his Claim to Tythes as due to that order does of necessity fall to the Ground with it Ibid. p. 267. Nor is Melchisedec 's Tything of Abraham mentioned as the beginning or first rise of Tythes but it is told only occasionally and as a thing well known and received in those early Ages How proves the Snake that it is not there mentioned as the beginning of Tythes or that it was then well known and received since this of Gen. 24.18 is the first mention of Tythes in the Bible But it may here be observed that tho' the Snake would place himself and the rest of the Priesthood Blasphemously as Dr. Willet aforequoted stiles it to be Priests after the order of Melchisedec yet he would have Tythes given them after the order of Aaron Why else would he by a little piece of Priest-craft persuade us that these Scriptures Numb 18.24 Deut. 18.1 and Levit. 27.32 33. which appointed the Tyâ—he to Aaron's Priesthood are now payable to his falsly pretended Evangelical Priesthood after the order of Melchisedec But further if we should suppose according to his Blasphemous as before observ'd pretence that the Evangelical Priesthood were after the order of Melchisedec and that Tythes were payable to them after the order of Aaron which is most absurd and ridiculous to believe let us a little see how the payment of Tythes at that day quadrate with the Exaction of Tythes in this For the better clearing of which I will set down those four Texts which the Snake quotes but gives not the words because that would have done him Disservice as we shall see anon for this purpose The first Numb 18.24 But the Tythes of the Children of Israel which they offer as an heave-Offering unto the Lord I have given to the Levites to Inherit Therefore I have said unto them among the Children of Israel they shall have no Inheritance The second is Deut. 18.1 The Priests and the Levites and all the Tribe of Levi shall have no part nor Inheritance with Israel They shall eat the Offerings of the Lord made by Fire and his Inheritance The third and fourth are Levit. 27.32 33. And concerning the Tithe of the Herd or of the Flock even of whatsoever passed under the Rod the Tenth shall be Holy unto the Lord. He shall not search whether it be good or bad neither shall he change it at all then both it and the change thereof shall be Holy it shall not be redeem'd From these Texts of Scripture it appears First that the Tythes were Ceremonial in that they were not given to the Levites till they were first offered as an Heave-offering unto the Lord. Secondly The Priests and Levites who had a portion of the Tythes for their use after they had been so offered as an Heave-Offering had not that portion only for their Service in the Tabernacle c. but because Among the Children of Israel God said they shall have no Inheritance And when thus by a particular Command of God concerning them they were cut off from their portion of Land a twelfth among the Tribes it pleased God to appoint them a Tenth for that their Deprivation But then it is also further to be considered that Tythes were of two sorts 1 st those of every Year Deut. 14.23 24 25 26. of these every one that paid them was also to eat his share ver 23. Thou shalt eat before the Lord thy God in the place which he shall chuse to place his Name there the Tythe of thy Corn of thy Wine and of thine Oil c. And if by reason of distance from the Tabernacle or Temple the Person paying his Tythes cou'd not bring them in kind he was then at Liberty to turn it into Money ver 25. and bestow that Money ver 26. for whatsoever his soul lusteth after for Oxen or for Sheep or for Wine or for strong drink And thou shalt eat thereof before the Lord thy God and thou shalt rejoice thou and thine Houshold This for the Tythes of every Year Then Secondly There was those of every Third Year and they were not only given to the Levite but also to the Stranger
who received the Office of the Priesthood had a Command to take Tythes of the People What can be plainer Yet more if needed might be urged from vers 18 where it is said There is verily a disannulling of the Commandment going before for the weakness and unprofitableness thereof What Commandment was this which was disannulled That Carnal Commandment mentioned vers 5 16. after which the Levitical Priesthood was made and maintain'd Here then that Law that Commandment by which the Levitical Priesthood took Tythes of that People is declar'd to have been chang'd and that Change explain'd by the word Disannulled If this be not one word against Tythes or any thing like it Let the Reader Judge Ibid. But on the Contrary there are plain Intimations in the Gospel of their Continuance particularly 1 Cor. 9.13 14. Intimations Oh! Oh! is it come to that must the world be Decimated by Intimations Does God's Right God's Due God's Tythes depend upon Intimations at last Must all our Kings and Parliaments from Hen. 8. till now all the Nobility Gentry and others concern'd in with-holding Impropriations from the Priests be Damn'd for Sacrilege upon Intimation only This sufficiently Intimates what sort of Fellow this Snake must be Well let us see how plain his Intimations are 1 Cor. 9.13 14. The words of the Text are Do ye not know that they which Minister about Holy Things live in the Margin feed of the things of the Temple And they which wait at the Altar are Partakers with the Altar Even so hath the Lord ordained that they which Preach the Gospel should live of the Gospel Here 's not so much as the Name of Tythes and will he call this a plain Intimation that Tythes should be continu'd So far from it that this place neither speaks of Tythes nor the Levites who took them For to the Levites were the Tythes given Numb 18.21 not to the Priests they were to have but the Hundredth Part the Tythes of the Tythes vers 26 27 28. and the Levites were so far from Ministring about the Holy Things that they were not permitted to touch them Numb 4.15 No nor to see them vers 20. on pain of Death But Aaron and his Sons the Priests were commanded to take down the Tabernacle upon any remove and to pack up and cover close all the Parts and Utensils therof vers 5 c. before the Levites might come near to take up and carry their Burdens which was the service of the Tabernacle they were appointed to But it is evident that the Apostle 1 Cor. 9.13 spake not of the Levites but the Priests them that Ministred about Holy Things them that waited at the Altar them that Liv'd Eat or Fed of the Things offer'd on the Altar and so partook with the Altar Hence this place is so far from Intimating a continuance of Tythes that if a continuance of any thing were intimated here it must be a continuace of those Offerings at the Temple and at the Altar which belonged to the Ceremonial Law which as on all occasions the Apostle shews was abrogated so he would in no wise Intimate the continuance of it But further if the Apostle had spoke of the Levites and mentioned the Name of Tythes in his comparison yet his Allusion to those Legal and Shadowy things wou'd still have as what he mentions hath served his purpose very well to convince the Corinthians that since Christ had ordained Luke 10.7 8. that they who preach the Gospel should live of the Gospel as well as they who under the Law ministred about Holy Things and waited at the Altar were then to partake with the Altar And thus he and the rest of the Apostles might freely and without blame live of the Gospel while they preached the Gospel by receiving such necessaries as were freely offered them by those that received and embraced the Gospel Ibid. p. 271. But we need no new Commandment for them in the Gospel if they are not forbidden and abrogated by Christ. The contrary way of arguing is of more force viz. There needed not a positive or express Prohibition or verbal Abrogation of Tythes in the Gospel For if they are not expresly Commanded to be continu'd under the Gospel they are not of force that Law being temporary by which they were Commanded and now expired It was adapted to the Oeconomy of the Jews made to answer that Dispensation appropriated to that Levitical Tribe and Typical Priesthood restrained to the Land of Canaan no other spot of Ground under the Sun being Tythable by vertue of that Law and all this limitted to the Time of Reformation Heb. 9.10 The coming of Christ in the Flesh and offering up himself to his Father on the Cross an Attonement for Mankind So that an Express Abrogation of Tythes in the Gospel was no more necessary than an Express Repeal of an Act of Parliament which was but Temporary and would expire of course at the end of that Term for which it was appointed Ibid. They are no part of the Typical or Ceremonial Law and nothing else of the Law was abrogated by Christ. Indeed Snake this is striving against the Stream and giving the Lie to Protestant Writers both at home and abroad For the Readers satisfaction I shall mention some Dr. Fulk on Heb. 7. § 4. says The payment of Tythes as it was a Ceremonial Duty is obrogated by Christ. Dr. Willet in his Synopsis of Popery before quoted Fifth General Controversie p. 314. arguing against the Rhemists who with the Snake affirm'd that the payment of Tythes is a Natural Duty that Men owe to God in all times and to be given to his Priests in his behalf for his Honour says St. Paul saith in flat words If the Priesthood be changed of necessity also there must be a change of the Law Heb. 7.12 But the Priesthood of the Law is altered and changed ergo also the Law of the Priesthood and so consequently the Ceremonial Duty of Tythes Thomas Wilson in his Christian Dictionary on the word Tythes tho a zealous contender for them acknowledges that they were a Shadow and Figure as other Oblations were figuring Christ. Among Foreigners I shall first instance Chemnitius in Harm Evang. C. 109. He having distinguished Tythes into Political and Ecclesiastical says of the Ecclesiastical Tythes thus Porro quia ex hac Disputatione Christi cum Pharisaeis patet Christum decimarum solutionem inter Ceremoniales Leges rejecisse opponit enim iis Judicium Charitatem Dei hoc est forenses morales Leges Ceremonialis autem Lex per adventum Christi est sublata ideo non inepte quaeritur c. Moreover seeing by this Dispute of Christ with the Pharisees it appears that Christ threw off the payment of Tythes among the Ceremonial Laws for to them he opposes Judgment and the Love of God that is the Judicial and Moral Laws and the Ceremonial Law is taken away by the Coming of Christ therefore
it is not unfitly inquired c. I shall next Instance Peter Martyr of great Note in the Reformation who in his Common Places Clas 4. l. 13. De Magistratu § 18. says Primum debemus Intelligere Decimas olim pertinuisse ad Ceremonias idque tam in Melchisedech quam in Levitis i. e. First we ought to understand that Tythes did of old belong to Ceremonies and that as well in Melchisedec as in the Levites Then having shew'd how and wherein Tythes were Typical and having also declared that the Ministers now do not receive Tythes by the Ceremonial Law but upon a Moral Account as a Compensation for work he says Proinde Ministris sive persolvantur ex agris sive ex aedibus sive pecunia numerata sive in Decimis nil refert Modo non sordide sed honeste sustententur i. e. Therefore whether their Wages or Maintenance be paid out of the Feilds or out of the Houses or in ready Mony or in Tythes it is all one to the Ministers so they be maintained creditably not meanly To this he adds Retinent quidem alicubi Mercedes istae vetus nomen Decimarum in multis autem Locis non appellantur Decime sed Stipendia Salaria Et sane potius revera sunt Mercedes quae Laboribus Ministrorum debentur quam Decime i. e. In some Places those Wages retain the old Name of Tythes but in many Places they are not called Tythes but Stipends and Salaries And truly they are in reality rather Wages which are due for the Ministers Labours than Tythes Of all which this appears to be the Sum Peter Martyr tho' he thought Ministers Maintenance might be given them in that Proportion of a Tenth Yet he positively concludes Tythes as Tythes and in their own Nature to be a part of the Ceremonial Law abrogated by Christ. The third Witness from abroad which I shall bring is Zanchius Tom. 4. l. 1. c. 116. De Cultu Dei Externo Where distinguishing between the Quota and the Alliquota of Maintenance between Maintenance in General and Maintenance particularly by Tythes c. He says Considerari enim possunt omnes illae Leges de Primitiis Decimis Votis bifariam quoad Substantiam Accidentiam seu Circumstantias Ad Substantiam quod attinet ad nos etiam pertinent Nam summa finis illarum Legum haec erat ut Populus Gratitudinem suam erga Deum harum rerum Oblationibus declararet idque in utilitatem Ecclesiae Ministerii silicet Ecclesiastici Ministrorum Pauperum quemadmodum jam ex Legibus ipsis ostendimus Annon autem Lege Naturae jubeamur idem facere Ut Ministri sustententur sumptibus fidelium Ecclesiae demonstrat Apostolus non solum ex Lege Mosis sed etiam ex Lege Naturae Ut Viduae alantur Pauperes Perigrini passim Docetur in Novo etiam Testamento Nec minus liquet ex iisdem Libris conservandum esse totum Ministerium Ecclesiasticum Quomodo autem ista fiant Contributione bonorum sive sub nomine Primitiarum sive Decimarum sive Votorum sive alio nil refert Ergo ad Substantiam quod attinet finem harum Legum de Primitiis Decimis Votis illae Leges tanquam naturales at nos etiam pertinent i. e. All these Laws concerning First-Fruits Tythes and Vows may be considered in a twofold respect as to the Substance and as to the Accidents or Circumstances As far as concerns the Substance they belong to us also For the sum and end of those Laws was this That the People might declare their thankfulness to God by the offering of these things and that for the profit of the Church that is of the Ecclesiastical Ministry the Ministers and the Poor as we have now shewed out of the Laws themselves And are we not commanded by the Law of Nature to do the same That the Ministers should be sustain'd at the Costs of the Faithful Members of the Church the Apostle demonstrates not only from the Law of Moses but from the Law of Nature also that the Widows the Poor and the Strangers should be maintain'd is frequently Taught in the New Testament too And as clear it is from the same Books that the whole Ministry of the Church ought to be kept but how shall all this be done By a Contribution of Goods whether under the Name of First-Fruits or of Tythes or of Vows or under any other name it matters not Therefore as to what concerns the Substance and End of these Laws of First-Fruits Tythes and Vows those Laws as Natural belongs also to us Thus Zanchius who in all this pleads only from the Equity of the Law for a Sufficient Maintenance to the Ministers from the Faithful of the Church And of what Nature he accounts Tythes may be easily seen by his coupling them with First-Fruits and Vows which none I think doubt to have belong'd to the Ceremonial Law But if any shall yet suppose that he did not suppose Tythes to be part of the Ceremonial Law he puts it beyond doubt that he did so esteem them For he says At vero Circumstantiae considerentur illarum Legum Leges illae nihil ad nos ut qui Legibus Ceremonialibus Politiis istius Populi non Sumus Subjecti i. e. But if the Circumstances of of those Laws be considered those Laws do not at all belong to us who are not Subject to the Ceremonial and Political Laws of that People And treating further upon the same subject p. 485. he saith De Decimis etiam solvendis Mandatum certum est fuisse abrogatum per Christum i. e. Certain it is that the Law concerning the paying of Tythes also was abrogated by Christ. This with more to the same purpose the Inquiring Reader may find in him and which I omit not being willing to be too prolix And besides the Testimonies above cited I could also add from Oecolampadius on Ezek. 44. from Melancton De Libertate Christianae with others whose joynt Testimonies do overthrow the false and bold Assertion of this Snake who is so remarkably Eminent in a Confident Assurance as to say of Tythes They are no part of the Typical or Ceremonial Law And tho' to the knowing Reader it might seem superfluous to bring witnesses further to prove Tythes a part of the Ceremonial Law Yet I shall take leave to add one witness more if not for his Information in so known and received a Truth yet for the more full detecting of this our Adversary This Witness is the Snake against the Snake who in p. 267. says expresly They were part of the Offerings to God under the Law for which he cites Numb 18.24 as I have observ'd p. 403 404 405. Where they are indeed call'd an Offering and an Heave-Offering unto the Lord the words of that Textare But the Tythes of the Children of Israel which they offer an Heave-offering unto the Lord I have given to the Levites to inherit
false Prophets did also speak in his Name and say Thus saith the Lord when he sent them not Ibid. p. 281. This is the Prince of the Spirits of Delusion and this Prince they worship for God who mistake his Inspirations for God's Very well I say so too but that the Quakers are they who mistake his Inspirations for God's is Gratis Dictum 't is saying but not proving as more particularly will appear upon the several Instances which the Snake brings The first Instance in this Section is what he calls a Prophetical verse of George Whitehead's with which he says G.W. pursued George Keith after he was denied by us He gives it in these words Thus saith the Lord Because thou hast poured out great Contempt and Reproach upon my Servants and People I will assuredly pour out and bring great Contempt and Confusion upon thee Of this the Snake says p. 282. Copies were given out amongst the Friends that they might admire these Prophetical Gifts and if any thing unfortunate should in all George Keith 's Life-time befall him that it might certainly be esteemed as the Consequence of this Curse What Proof is this that what he calls G. W's Prophetical Verse did proceed from Rage Malice or Folly Or that G. Whitehead hath therein mistaken the Inspirations of the Prince of the Spirits of Delusion for God's See Reader how forward the Snake is to give hard words and how backward to prove them That G. Keith hath with great Contempt and Reproach treated the Quakers is very certain and not only so but hath Contemptuously and Reproachfully spoken many things of that way of Truth which they profess and which himself did also for many years profess with them which practices as it is an apparent mark of Confusion in him so it nâ—â—essarily draws after it Contempt upon the Actor from all Observing Men. So that the Prophetick Verse as the Snake calls it of G. W.'s carries with it many evidences of Truth which plainly shew he did not therein mistake the Inspirations of the Prince of the Spirits of Delusion for God's And which is further seen in that there is no proof given by the Snake that it did proceed from Rage Malice or Folly in G. W. as is falsly and maliciously suggested by the Adversary And as there can nothing more unhappy fall out to G. K. in all his Life-time than to continue and go on from one degree of Confusion to another so that Confusion is not the Consequence of what the Snake calls George Whitehead's Prophetick Verse But that Verse was the Consequence of Confusion began in G. K. Ibid. Mr. Penn did own before the Yearly Meeting That the Glorious Power of God which he felt did so transport him that he was carried beyond himself and knew not whether he was Sitting Standing or Kneeling when he pronounced that Sentence of Apostacy concerning G. K. This was like St. Paul's whether in the Body or out of the Body he could not tell Well! Suppose it is like it I would ask the Snake whether he dare affirm that at this day it is altogether impossible for the Spirit of God to influence any to that degree of Extasie or Rapture If he will deny that or which will answer the end of our Present Inquiry if he will allow that but deny this to be so it will then be necessary for the Snake to produce the marks by which he proves it to be what in p. 283. he hath so confidently said it is viz. the Violent Transports of Passion But if the Force of this Mad Spirit of Malice had not govern'd the Snake he might have seen that while he does acknowledge what he there says W. P. does speak of himself to be like the Apostle This was like says he St. Paul whether in the Body c. and calls W. Penn's words The force of this Mad Spirit of Enthusiasm He does then Intimate that the Apostles words proceeded from the like force And how far this may expose Religion and the whole Scriptures to Loose and Atheistical Wits may concern some to see who are more truly concern'd for the honour of both than he who while he is inquiring How great is the force of this mad Spirit of Enthusiasm Observes not how great is the force of the mad Spirit of Atheism in himself But further I do own with the Snake that this Extasie or Rapture of W. P's is like that of Paul Whether in Body or out of Body he knew not That is they are a-like in Kind but not Degree W. Penn's as the Snake says did relate to the Posture of the Body but the Apostle's was much higher even so as to forget the Body Ibid. p. 283. And he is thus far towards it that he must either make out his own Inspirations to be from God in as High a Degree as those which were given to the Prophets and Apostles or otherwise that he has no Authority to inscribe the name of God upon them as they did The Snake does here as before allow the Inspiration to be the same but falsly supposes W. Penn under a necessity to make it out to be in as High a Degree which he is not because the Operation of it on W. Penn the Snake says was not in so High a Degree as on the Apostle And while the Snake does falsly suppose that the Inspirations from God at this day must be made out to be in as High a Degree as those which were given to the Prophets and Apostles Or else his name is not to be inscrib'd on them Besides that the Snake does hereby overthrow what in Pref. p. 31. he calls The greatest Flights and Extasies of Devotion and which he there advises to let Rise as High as they can the Higher the better He does also overthrow all that Enthusiasm which he says the Church of England owns for these he hath acknowledged to be Revelations and in some sense immediate too Yet here he says they are not so to be inscrib'd unless they are in as High a Degree as those given to the Prophets and Apostles Which I think he will hardly presume to affirm But altho' this Adversary is thus Contradictory to himself by denying and affirming the same thing yet Truth remains unmoveable and the Inspirations of the Holy Spirit at this day in what Degree soever they are given are truly the same in kind with those given to the Holy Prophets and Apostles In that now as then God by the divers Gifts of his Spirit doth fit furnish and qualifie his Children and Servants to the several Duties and Services in his Church to which he calleth them Ibid. He must likewise justifie all the False Lying Prophesies before told or otherwise he must unherd W. P. is not obliged to defend False Lying Prophesies but deny them nor doth he Herd as the Snake scornfully speaks with any such Ibid. p. 284. Gives two Quotations one for G. F's Answer to The Westmerland
every True Son of the Church an Enthusiast Yet in p. 98. he says Enthusiasts indefinitely have no Principles they have no Rule but their own Fancy which is strongest in Mad-men Reader Is it not very Comical to see this Adversary dealing his Blows with so much blindness and malice thus to wound himself while he thinks he is hitting of others which is a very great Argument that whatsoever Inspiration he may pretend to believe to be in the Church yet that he has little benefit from any because of his repeated Contradictory Assertions in the same thing But besides the propense Malice herein Legible it 's like he used less guard and caution and car'd not how he put upon us since he declares his Assurance p. 32. That the Simplicity of our Quakers has depriv'd them of every one of these helps which others might have to detect him But be that as it will let me here add one Observation to shew yet plainer if plainer can be whether this blindness has led him He would have us believe nay he says p. 319. We are assured that it the Inspiration of the Holy Ghost will lead us to all Truth that is requisite and necessary for our Eternal Salvation Now if the Snake does here speak both the Churches Sense and his own I will shew that notwithstanding he has writ a Section of Tythes as payable to her yet he has absolutely cut them up by the Root while he doth positively affirm that Teaching does cease nay that it 's inconsistent with the Sufficiency of the Light within But if this Light within or Inspiration of the Holy Ghost Leads us to all Truth requisite and necessary for our Eternal Salvation as both himself and as he says the Church do confess I think it hath Sufficiency enough for all the wants of Men. For Proof that this Sufficiency supersedes all Teaching and necessarily Tythes which are the Reward of it turn to p. 166 167. where speaking against us upon this very Head of the Sufficiency of the Light within he saith Teaching does in its own Nature cease when Men are sufficiently Taught therefore to those who hold the Sufficiency of the Light within outward Preaching must be wholly Inconsistent How far this agrees or contradicts what I have above quoted from him in p. 319. the Reader may easily Judge Now again to Quotations and the first is from p. 38 of W. P's Preface to G. F's Journal and is this We have seen the Fruit of all other Ministries by the few that are turn'd from the evil of their ways And let the Snake think as he please it will always be one good Mark to Judge of a Ministry by its Fruit those that are turn'd by it from the evil of their ways It was the end of the Commission which God gave to his Apostles to turn Men from Darkness to Light and it is the end of the Commissions which he gives at this Day and where this end is not Answer'd there Fruit is not brought forth His Objection p. 320. is besides the Point where he says Mens being evil may proceed from their own perverseness For I know none that doubts it But what is to the present Case is That Men's continuance in Evil is often too much owing to the deadness of the Ministry they are under as in Hosea 9. And there shall be like People like Priest Ibid. And to Justifie rather the Ministery of Theudas Acts 5.36 37. who got above 400 to follow him No it is to Justifie rather the Ministry of Peter from the Holy Spirit Acts 2.41 by which there was at one Sermon added to the Church about 3000 Souls Ibid. p. 320. quoted from p. 21. of the Preface before mention'd where the Snake has given a notable Stroak of his Art in I will give the Quotation first as he has made it and then from the Preface it self They the many Ministers in the World declare of Religion say many things true in Words of God Christ and the Spirit of Holiness and Heaven c. but which of them all ever directed a Man to a Divine Principle or Agent plac'd of God in Man to help him c. Thus the Snake has given it but in the Book it self it is thus They declare of Religion say many things true in Words of God Christ and the Spirit of Holiness and Heaven that all Men should Repent and mend their Lives or they will go to Hell c. But which of them all pretend to Speak of their own Knowledge and Experience Or ever directed Men to a Divine Principle or Agent plac'd of God in Man to help him and how to know it and wait to feel its Power to work that good and acceptable Will of God in them Thus he So that when the Snake Answer'd the Question as himself had split it and said p. 321. Not one of them as I know of He did but Answer one half of it But if he will Answer the Question as it lies above in W. P's Words and say Not one of them Ministers but have so directed Men as is above-mentioned there may Thousands be able to Confront him and say his Answer is false In like manner he abuses a Passage in p. 39. of the fore-mention'd Preface Where W. P. directing his Words to those in the Ministry saith For even those that have receiv'd the Word of the Lord had need wait for Wisdom that they may see how to divide the Word aright which plainly implieth that it is possible for one that hath receiv'd the Word of the Lord to Miss in the Division and Application of it which must come from an Impatiency of Spirit and self-working c. What the Snake carps at in this is the Word Miss and among other things says p. 321. Hâ—w did he know they cou'd Miss but by their having Missâ—d I Answer Very well For as the Apostle does not Charge Timothy with having miss'd when he gave him that Caution 2 Tim. 2.15 to which W. Penn has respect in them Words which plainly implieth c. So I think the Snake will not be so hardy as to say That either the Apostle or Timothy had miss'd in the Division of the Word Ibid. p. 322. Will they give no body leave to miss but themselves We give none leave to miss in the Division and Application of the Word W. Penn hath truly said as above it is froâ— an Impatiency of Spirit and Self-working And if the Snake will not allow of that to be missing it is easie to know that himself does miss exceedingly Ibid. p. 324. The Snake makes a Quotation from p. 83. of G. F's Journal which is but a Repetition of what he has before quoted in p. 28. and which I have already Answer'd in p. 76 77 fore-going and therefore need not here repeat it Ibid. p. 325. But when p. 29. of his Preface before-mention'd Mr. Penn wou'd persuade us that this Fox had outward Revelations and
his own ipse dixit and much such Raillery but know no plain Texts of Scripture yet produced by him that so detects us but his own Falshood and great Ignorance about the Light is very apparent Again he falsly defames and reproaches me from p. 28. Of Innocency Triumphant with excusing and justifying Diabolical Suggestions in the Quaker-Refuge he saith against the Authority of the Sacred Scripture by saying That it questioned but some not all This Accuser has a most odious injurious course of defaming and perverting as well as curtalizing our Words wherein he has taken part with his famous Author F. Bugg to whom the Answer was given on which he grounds his black Charge against me Of Justifying Diabolical Suggestions c. In which Answer I expresly declare thus viz. His Accusation that the Quakers Insinuate in a Book called The Quakers Refuge That What the true Prophets spake was false and What the false Prophets spoke was true p. 47. New Rome Vnm. p. 23. We disown these Expressions and I think they are not duly inferred from the said Book questioning whether some Words were not spoken by wicked Men some by wise Men ill applied some by good Men ill expressed c. Now at my saying Yet this questioned but of some Words in Scripture not all he takes occasion to Rail fearfully against me as a Justifier of Diabolical Suggestions When my Answer was not with the least intent to oppose or lessen the Authority of the Sacred Scriptures but in direct opposition to F. Bugg's Calumny in these general odious and false Expressions viz. That the Quakers insinuate that What the true Prohets spake was false Which Expressions we utterly deny as both in themselves grosly false against the true Prophets and falsly charged on the Quakers to defame them And as to the Questions cited out of the Quak. Refuge at which Offence is taken 1. They are not mine 2. I do not believe they are the Author 's of that Quak. Refuge though Cited by him 3. It is apparent he does not espouse them as his own Judgment nor make them the Matter in that present Controversie nor resolve them in the Affirmative but seems to recite and wave them as Originally proceeding from some other Person as I understand The furthest that can be drawn from my said Answer to F. B. that may seem offensive which I should be sorry for if 't were really so is my seeming to grant the Question That in some Words some true Prophets were mistaken And if this be made an Offence I think 't is no real one for I designed none However I still confess I believe the Record of Scripture to be true Good Men and some true Prophets also have been and may be mistaken in some things and have had their Weaknesses and Failings truly recorded in Scripture and also their Deliverances for good Ends and Admonition to others Was not Samuel a good Man and a Prophet and yet mistaken when he took Eliab for the Lords Anointed 1 Sam. 16.6 7. And in the Argument upon Job in the ancient Bible is marked That Job maintaineth a good Cause but handleth it evil Again his Adversaries have an evil Matter but they defend it craftily Moreover he was assured that God had not rejected him yet through his great Torments and Afflictions he burst forth into many Inconveniences both of Words and Sentences See the Argument at large And was not the Prophet Elijah mistaken when he thought himself alone or none in Israel but himself that was zealous for the Lord God of Hosts But what saith the Answer of God unto him I have reserved unto my self seven thousand Men that have not bowed the knee to Baal 1 King 19.10 18. Rom. 11.3 4. And to say but little of the Old Prophet that persuaded the Young Prophet contrary to the Word of the Lord 1 King 13. I could instance Jonas David and several others that were good Men who had some Weaknesses and Mistakes in Words and Actions yet the Lord was good to them and helped them according to the Integrity of their Hearts towards him And these Things being truly recorded in Scripture for Instruction and Admonition we truly esteem the Scripture-Record thereof And even where the Words Lies Blasphemies and Actions of the Devil wicked Men and Persecutors and the Judgments which befel them are recorded in the Scriptures we own the Record or History thereof to be true and highly esteem it for Instruction and Warning to Men. And to distinguish between the Words of God in Scripture and the Words of the Devil is but what the Scripture it self doth which can be no Contempt to it for I have known some stumble by some of the Priests making no distinction but calling all that 's written in Scripture the Word of God as one that was the Mayor of Thetford near forty Years ago told me That a Priest wanting Induction into the vacant Benefice and preaching there for Approbation took his Text out of the Words wherewith the Devil tempted Christ Mat. 4. And bidding the People hearken to the Word of God as they should find it written in such a Chapter and Verse whereupon this Person that told me of it was so offended that he would not give his Voice to chuse the said Priest because he had told them that was the Word of God which was the Words of the Devil Now let none be so disingenuous as to take this as in Contempt of the Holy Scripture Doctrine or Precepts therein for where either the Words Blaspemies wicked Actions or Persecutions of the Devil or Men are therein mentioned the Record thereof is true and in Testimony against them and the intent of such Record holy just and good Farther my Accuser tells me Nor is my Salvâ— more ingenuous in the Eleventh Article And why so It is really say I contrary to our Faith and Principle to make Christ Jesus himself Only a Figure a Veil or Garment p. 178. Which was in direct opposition to his Author F. Bugg's falsly saying The Quakers would make Christ only a Figure a Veil a Garment implied by way of Question p. 58. New Rome Ar. Here he quarrels with the word Only as with the word Amply and accuseth me with Equivocating and that this is but a Negative Confession But really George quoth he this is not re-assuming your Christian Testimony in the Affirmative as thou didst promise c. still hiding your self in the Dark in Negatives But we would know affirmatively what it is you do profess and this thou didst promise and this thou hast not perform'd p. 179. Here he accuseth me with breach of Promise but very falsly as in the said 11th Article it is plain that my Confession of Christ Jesus himself is not only Negative but affirmative namely He being the Substance and End of all Figures Types and Shadows Is not this Affirmative pray And as remote from Truth is his accusing the Quakers Books of calling
them in that Catalogue beginning at Page 93 of his Preface to the Snake and before that I begin at Page 7 8 9 17. of the first Edition of the Snake and was so far from passing by his said Objection of manifest Possessions by the Devil c. that I declare his great Injustice false Reflections black Characters and Charges upon the Quakers therein together with his absurd way of Arguing and Falacy to prove the same as evidently appears in my Answer i. e. my Antidote from the second to the twelfth Page thereof to which I refer the Reader for Satisfaction and how far short he is of Proof that either we or our Preachers are Possess'd by the Devil because of any of their Quaking or Trembling alleadg'd against them as both Holy Prophets and other Saints and Christians have done by the Word and Power of God and not from any Diabolical Possession And he can no more prove such Exercise among us to proceed from the Devil than he can prove the visible Possessions of many Quakers by the Devil as he falsly stiles his 21. Sect. or than his Mr. Firmin or Thomas Tillam whose Story is quoted in the same Section p. 297 298 299. could demonstrate his seeing the Devil shake the Quakers like as a Dog doth shake a Hog c. But if this Author has ever seen any visible Possessions of Quakers by the Devil I would ask him in what Shape or Form he saw the Devil at any time so visibly Possess or Act them I never heard that T. Tillam could tell when questioned about it at Colchester tho' he raised the Story as Richard Thomas of Hartford who was present can give further account II. As to all he objects in his 18th Sect. of The Quakers manifold Treasons against the King of their taking Arms and Fighting against him for Oliver and the Rump c. their vigorous opposing the Restauration of King Charles to the very last c. p. 352. Hereupon G. W. is blamed for Answering all this in a few words p. 24. of his Antidote viz. We need but answer these with Negation and Detestation as being most foul Raileries proceeding from a Spirit of Persecution and deadly Malice which the Righteous Lord will Rebuke Which I am still perswaded he will though the Snake-Author hereupon thus Reviles viz. They cannot refrain their Trade in blasphemous and cursed Prophecies which among many other odious Revilings I leave to the just cognizance of the Great and Righteous Judge of all The Man 's charging manifold Treasons taking up Arms and Fighting c. upon the Quakers I still deny as a general and gross Calumny upon that People yet supposing some before they were Quakers or so reputed and before they were in Society with that People were in Arms against the King as many of other Persuasions were and yet some were dissatisfied with Monarchy or afraid of the consequence thereof whilst they were under a Common Wealth 's Government and Principles it follows not that the People called Quakers must be concluded thereby as either guilty of manifold Treasons Fightings Murder or Regicide such absurd kind of unnatural Inferrences against the Quakers I had reason to give my Negation against as neither Just nor Reasonable but altogether the contrary And the Truth of it is I looked upon his said 18th Sect. so extreamly Malicious and so Repugnant to the Act of Indempnity even that of King Charles the Second and divers others since if any charged were culpable And much of the Substance of the said 18th Sect. being answered in my Book Entituled Christ's Lambs defended from Satan's Rage That I thought my self the less concerned again to enter into the Particulars of the said extreamly Malicious Section but to refer him and the Reader to my Treatise of Christ's Lambs c. However in my Antidote referring thereto there 's more of Answer in this case than is cited in the Snake being full of Partiality and Curtailizing in Citation as well as of Perversion and Absurd Defamation And if no authority of Bugg's be quoted at all for the charges before mentioned as he saith it is for divers others which are very false I find in his said 18th Sect. Quakers Vnmask'd p. 4. Is quoted on the same Subject And if this Quaker's Vnmask'd was John Peâ—nyman's and not F. Bugg's then 't was my oversight which I shall not excuse which might easily happen from the near resemblance they have upon the same subject J. P. begun it against us and the other follows it in divers Books upbraiding us about O. C. and his Army and the Government And the Snake in his 8th Sect. quotes F. Bugg's New Rome Arraign'd and New Rome Vnmaskâ—d p. 109.111 and note that two Years after F. B. left our Communion and joyn'd himself to the Church of England he published a Book stiled The Quakers Detected wherein he confesses to the Truth of our Doctrine and Ministry of the Light as a Dispensation of the Love of God sent as a Visitation to Mankind and to our Christian Communion Love and Conversation and that God blessed our Meetings with the comfortable enjoyment of his Presence c. But being gone from the same he complained against our Friends p. 8. as if they had Sold him into Egypt as Joseph was applying to himself his words to his Brethren Gen. 50.20 and 45.4 5. viz. But can say i. e. F. B. can say as Joseph did to his Brethren Gen. 50.20 But as for you ye thought Evil against me but God meant it unto Good now therefore be not Grieved nor Angry with your selves that ye Sold me hither Thus F. Bugg after he was turn'd into the Church of England And finding both J. P. Bugg and Crisp run much in one strain of Enmity against us and their Authorities quoted and so much valued in the Snake 't was the more easie to mistake one for another as to the Titles of their Angry Books However their work so much agreeing and resembling to take one for another in Writing quick as 't is no great Crime so 't is no great Damage to any of them supposing Quakers Vnmasked be put for Quakers Detected or for New Rome Vnmasked And so Bugg's authority for J. Pennyman's his excuses not his Partial credulity of either of them wherein they are a-like invective But a greater Injury than this is done the Quakers in Quotation I find a Pamphlet stiled Some of the Quakers Principles over and over quoted against us in the Snake Sect. 7. Which being thus quoted as The Quakers Principles some may therefore take it to be a True and Real Account of our own when that Pamphlet as I take it to be the same is but a nameless Libel to abuse us with Partial Quotations and Perversions and it is answered in my Just Inquiry Printed 1693. And that I have not endeavoured to deceive the Reader as p. 354. in that I did not perceive he took notice of my
God go forth with their Armies then What was the cause of Israel's Fleeing before their Enemies when they Fled Was it not their having forsaken the Lord that he went not forth with their Armies Psal. 44.9 But saith the Man The Clergy of the Church of England then suffer'd for their King and with him Did they so how many of them pray Did not many of them turn Presbyterian and from Episcopacy And many of them since from Presbytery to Episcopacy to save their Benefices Are such then steady Pillars or Martyrs of Jesus Christ under any Suffering Or did the Suffering of some few for and with the King prove them such Martyrs And if any Quakers have told the World they were always Loyal and True I don't believe that they as a People are justly chargeable with Lying or Dissimulation therein but that they were sincere in their Minds and Intentions and do bear no Ill-will Hatred or Treachery in their Hearts towards the King or any Man else but Love and Good-will This Adversary thus Query's But what means George by bringing me under the Lash of the Act of Indemnity What Quaker or Quakerly affected Council drew up this Answer for him p. 356. Answ. 1. I meant ad hominem to shew this pretended Loyal Person how disloyal he is in violating the Act of Indemnity in case any among us were Indemnified thereby from any former Misdemeanours Let him retort as he pleaseth I look on 't as a very unwarrantable Act in him without occasion given him by us to violate that Act and the Reason and good Intention thereof in his Strenuous Endeavours to stir up Animosities against us as a People from those old Transactions and Offences though not ours which were Indemnified or Pardon'd long since 2. And I had no Quaker or Quakerly affected Counsel as he scornfully calls it in my Lashing him with the Act of Indemnity but singly I argued Secundum Hominem to shew and check the Man's Presumptuous Folly and Envy against us as a People when we had given no real occasion of Offence or Provocation And as to his retorting viz. But if past Faults must not now be so much as remembred was it not as great an Incroachment upon the Act of Indemnity for the Quakers to upbraid the other Dissenters the Presbyterians Independents c. with their Treasons and Rebellions fighting Principles the Quakers being as Guilty in all these as themselves c. p. 356 357. Rep. The Quakers still he must needs shew his Spite and Venom against the Quakers still in general and without exception suppose any one formerly either upon some Provocation or Occasion of this kind given as by some enviously charging the Quakers with Justifying the late War against the King hath somewhat Retaliated upon them their Fighting Principles c. This is not justly chargeable upon the Quakers without Exception neither do they own those Fighting Principles nor do I allow of upbraiding others with those former Transactions of War which are Legally Indemnified unless it be upon occasion first given to stop their upbraiding others when they themselves were more deeply guilty and concern'd or upon occasion of their former Persecutions against us and putting our Friends to Death in New-England which Blood-sheding for Religion no Act of Indemnity can justly Indemnifie But First As I deny that the Quakers do so upbraid the other Dissenters with Treasons and Rebellions 2. So I deny that the Quakers themselves are guilty in all these i. e. Seditions Treasons Fighting Principles c. as we are unjustly aspersed Though his Beloved Confederate Associate G. K. in his Way cast up p. 23 52 53 54. In p. 23. He tells of Presbyterians so much using the arm of flesh and blood to carry on that which they judged a Reformation And how much Garments were rolled in Blood by the Instigation of the Presbyterian Teachers the whole Nation was a Witness so that many thousands were made Widows and Fatherless by that War they stirred up the People unto expresly contrary to the Nature of the Gospel And in p. 52. he farther chargeth them thus viz. And the Presbyterian Nonconformist Teachers have generally manifested base and unchristian Cowardize in running away from their Flocks through Fear of Suffering and exposing them to those they judged Wolves and some of them are fled beyond Sea others lurk in Corners here and there and keep private Conventicles where many times they Preach Sedition against their Lawful Prince by Instigation of whom that Insurrection happened 1666. And in p. 53. He further addeth viz. And some of them have Printed Books in Defence of the Lawfulness of making War against the Supream Magistrate in order to Re-establish the Presbyterian Government a way flat contrary to the nature of the Gospel to the express Commands of Christ. And in p. 54. G. K. goes on with a more general and very high Charge viz. And in very Truth quoth he the Presbyterian Church will never be able to purge her self of the Iniquity of the Killing of many Thousands in the Three Nations by the Occasion of a most bloody War raised up through the Instigation of the Presbyterian Teachers I am fully persuaded of it that the Presbyterian Church hath as much blood-guiltiness lying on her Head unwashed off as any People called a Church that I know of in the World next unto the Bloody Church of Rome Thus far G. Keith against the Presbyterian Ministers and Church However seeing the Snake-Author does not deny but such kind of remembring former Animosities and Offences as are Indemnified by the Acts of Indemnity must needs be to offend and incroach upon the said Acts How then does he save himself from Self-condemnation in the case for his own Presumptuous and Insolent Incroachment and Violation thereupon Is not the Snake herein as deep in the Mire as he thinks others are in the Mudd but enough of this as he says As to that great Charge of the Snake against us That the height of our Self-advancement is to be equal even to God to be one Person Substance and Soul with God c. p. 357. To this he renders my Answer also defected as not denying one of the Quotations when he has produced no Quotations out of the Quakers Writings that either say they so advance themselves to be one Person with God or one Substance with God or that they themselves are one Soul with God I asked him when did ever the Quakers so advance themselves to be One Person Substance Soul with God We positively deny the Charge and the words themselves but only as we are United or Joyned to the Lord we are one Spirit This Parenthesis of my Answer the Snake now leaves out to make my Answer deficient and his Charge seem good against us But I further Challenge him to prove where we the People or Persons called Quakers have so advanced our selves in these words namely that we our selves are One Person and
travelling Friends that went abroad c. It is not good manners to name Names upon such an occasion Yet if the Friends will plead Ignorance something may be done for their Satisfaction That Women as well as Men may forsake the Guidings of the Spirit of God and run into Wickedness is very true but that any who have so run into Wickedness are Preachers or as such Travelling Friends as he in scoffing Mood calls them and intimates is very false and I dare him to name any that are such I come now to his 6th Head of Distinction which is a continuation of Stories of particular Failings VI. But we may make a little more bold with the Mens Infallibility And I will not go to mean Ones The Great James Naylor was brought upon his knees before their Church where G. F. presided to acknowledge his Failings This James Naylor suffered himself to be Hosannah'd into Bristol as Christ was into Jerusalem Of this Adversaries Boldness and Scoffing we have great Proof but of his Honesty and Truth we have none of his Lyes here is also fresh Proof For it never was the Practice of any Church or Meeting of ours to bring any Transgressor upon their knees nor did G. F. ever preside in them or any other Person We neither have nor own in our Assemblies any Headship of Man or Men the only Head of them being Christ Jesus who dignifies whom he pleases with fit qualifications by his Holy Spirit for the Service of his Church and they that continue faithful in their Gifts such we with the Apostle esteem worthy of double Honour But now as to James Naylor of whom the Snake often makes mention I shall here at once speak concerning him J. N. was a Man who had been highly favoured of God with a good degree of Grace which was sufficient for him had he kept to its teachings For while he did so he was exemplary in Godliness and great Humility was Powerful in Word and Doctrine and thereby Instrumental in the hand of God for turning many from Darkness to Light and from the Power of Satan to the Power of God But he Poor Man Became exalted above Measure through the abundance of Revelations And in that Exaltation did depart from the Grace and Holy Spirit of God which had been his sufficient Teacher Then blindness came over him and he did suffer himself to be accounted of above what he ought Here he slipt and fell but not Irrecoverably For it did please God of his Infinite Mercy in the Day of his Affliction to give him a sight and sense of his outgoings and fall and also a place of Repentance And he did with the Prodigal weep bitterly and humbled himself for his Transgression and he besought God with true Contrition of Soul to pardon his offences through Jesus Christ God I firmly believe forgave him for he pardons the truly Penitent His People received him with great Joy for that he who had gone astray from God was now returned to the Father's House and for that he who had separated himself from them through his Iniquity was now through Repentance and Forsaking of it returned into the Unity of the Faith and their Holy Fellowship in the Gospel of Christ. And I do hereby testify that I do esteem it a particular mark of God's owning his People in bringing back into Unity with them a Man who had so dangerously fallen as did James Naylor And here let none Insult but take heed least they also in the hour of their Temptation do fall away Nor let any boastingly say Where is your God Or Blasphemously suppose his Grace is not sufficient for Men in Temptation because the tempted may go from and neglect the teachings of it David and Peter as their Transgressions came by their departing from this Infallible Guide the Holy Spirit So their recovery was only by it And for the Reader 's further satisfaction concerning James Naylor's Humiliation and Repentance I here subjoin his own Testimony Glory to God Almighty who ruleth in the Heavens and in whose Hands are all the Kingdoms of the Earth who raiseth up and casteth down at his Will who hath ways to Confound the Exaltation of Man and to Chastise his Children and to make Man to know himself to be as Grass before him whose Judgments are above the highest of Men and his pity reacheth the deepest Misery and thâ—s Arm of his Mercy is underneath to lift up the Prisoner out of the Pit and to save such as trust in him from the great Destruction which vain Man through his folly brings upon himself who hath delivered my Soul from Darkness and made way for my Freedom out of the Prison-house and ransomed me from the great Captivity who divides the Sea before him and removes the Mountains out of his way in the day when he takes upon him to deliver the Oppressed out of the Hand of him that is too mighty for him in the Earth let his Name be exalted for ever and let all Flesh fear before him whose Breath is Life to his own but a Consuming Fire to the Adversary And to the Lord Jesus Christ be Everlasting Dominion upon Earth and his Kingdom above all the Powers of Darkness even that Christ of whom the Scriptures declares which was and is and is to come the Light of the World to all Generations Of whose coming I testifie with the rest of the Children of Light begotten of the Immortal Seed whose Truth and Vertue now shines in the World unto Righteousness of Eternal Life And the Saviour of all that believe therein Who hath been the Rock of my Salvation and his Spirit hath given Quietness and Patience to my Soul in Deep Affliction even for his Name 's sake Praises for ever But condemned for ever be all those False Worships with which any have Idolized my Person in the Night of my Temptation when the Power of Darkness was above all their casting of their Clothes in the way their Bowings and Singings and all the rest of those Wild Actions which did any ways tend to dishonour the Lord or draw the Minds of any from the measure of Christ Jesus in themselves to look at Flesh which is Grass or to ascribe that to the Visible which belongs to Christ Jesus all that I condemn by which the pure Name of the Lord hath been any ways blasphemed through me in the time of Temptation or the Spirits of any People grieved that truly loves the Lord Jesus throughout the whole World of what state soever This Offence I confess which hath been sorrow of heart that the Enemy of Man's Peace in Christ should get this Advantage in the Night of my Trial to stir up Wrath and Offences in the Creation of God a thing the simplicity of my Heart did not intend the Lord knows who in his endless Love hath given me Power over it to condemn it and also that Letter which was sent me to Exeter by John
Stranger when I was in Prison with these words Thy Name shall be no more James Naylor but Jesus This I judge to be written from the Imaginations and a Fear stroke me when I first saw it and so I put it in my Pocket close not intending any should see it which they finding on me spread it abroad which the simplicity of my Heart never occasioned So this I deny also that the Name of Christ Jesus is received instead of James Naylor or after the Flesh for the Name is to the Seed to all Generations and he that hath the Son hath the Name which is Life and Power the Salvation and the Unction into the which Name all the Children of Light are Baptized So the Name of Christ I confess before Men but not according to Men which Name to me hath been a Strong Tower in the Night and in the Day And this is the Name of Christ Jesus which I confess the Son and the Lamb in the Seed where he speaks in Male or Female but who hath not this in himself hath not Life neither can have by Idolizing my Person or the Person of any Flesh but in whom the Heir is born and hath spoken or doth speak there he must not be denied the Mouth to spake by who is Head over all and in all his own God blessed for ever And all those Ranting Wild Spirits which then gathered about me in that time of Darkness and all their Wild Actions and Wicked Words against the Honour of God and his pure Spirit and People I deny the Spirit the Power and the Works thereof and as far as I gave advantage through want of Judgment for that Evil Spirit in any to arise I take shame to my self justly having formerly had Power over that Spirit in Judgment and Discerning where-ever it was which Darkness came over me through want of Watchfulness and Obedience to the Pure Eye of God and diligently minding the Reproof of Life which condemns the Adulterous Spirit So the Adversary got advantage who ceases not to seek to devour and being taken Captive from the True Light walked in the Night where none can work as a wandring Bird fit for the prey And if the Lord of all my Mercies had not rescued me I had perished for I was as one appointed to Death and Destruction and there was none could deliver me And this I confess that God may be justified in his Judgment and magnified in his Mercies without end who did not forsake his Captive in the Night even when his Spirit was daily provoked and grieved but hath brought me forth to give Glory to his Name for ever And it is in my Heart to confess to God and before Men my Folly and Offence in that day Yet was there many things formed against me in that day to take away my Life and bring Scandal upon the Truth of which I am not Guilty at all as that accusation as if I had committed Adultery with some of those Women who came with us from Exeter Prison and also those who were with me at Bristol the Night before I suffered there of both which Accusations I am clear before God who kept me at that day both in Thought and Deed as to all Women as a little Child God is my Record and this I mention in Particular hearing of some who still cease not to reproach therewith God's Truth and People that the Mouth of Enmity might be shut from evil speaking though this touch not my Conscience And that Report as though I had raised Dorkas Erbury from the Dead carnally this I deny also and condemn that Testimony to be out of the Truth tho' that Power that quickens the Dead I deny not which is the Word of Eternal Life And this I give forth that it may go as far as the Offence against the Spirit of Truth hath gone abroad that all Burthens may be taken off with the Truth and the Truth cleared thereby and the True Light and all that walk therein and the Deeds of Darkness be condemned and that all that are in Darkness may not Act in the Night but stay upon God who walks in the Light who with the Workers of Iniquity hath not fellowship which had I done when first Darkness came upon me and not been led by others I had not run against the Rock to be broken which so long had born me and of whom I had so largely drank and of which I now drink in measure to whom be the glory of all and to him must every Tongue confess as Judge and Saviour God over all blessed for ever And this further is given me to say to every particular Person to whom this Writing shall come Whatever is thy Condition walk in the Light which lets thee see it there is thy Counsel and thy strength to be received to stay thee and recover thee Art thou tempted to Sin Abide in that which lets thee see it that there thou mayst come to feed on the Right Body not on the Temptation for if thou mind the Temptation it will overcome thee but in the Light is Salvation Or having Sinned art thou tempted to despair or to destroy thy self mind not the Temptation for it's Death that Sin hath brought forth feed not on it nor mind it least thou eat Condemnation for that 's the Wrong Body The Body of Christ is felt in the Light in which is Life from Death Grace and Truth to Feed on which will overcome for thee being followed but if thou follow the Temptation Fear and Condemnation will swallow thee up If there appear to thee Voices Visions and Revelations feed not thereon but abide in the Light and feel the Body of Christ and there wilt thou receive Faith and Power to judge of every appearance and Spirit the Good to hold fast and obey and the False to resist Art thou in Darkness mind it not for if thou do it will fill thee more but stand still and Act not and wait in patience till Light arise out of Darkness to lead thee Art thou wounded in Conscience feed not there but abide in the Light which leads to the Grace and Truth which teaches to deny and put off the Weight and removes the Cause and brings Saving Health to Light Yea this I say to thee in the Name of Jesus Christ that tho' thou has made thy Grave as deep as the nethermost Hell or were thy Afflictions as great as Job's and thy Darkness as the Depths of the Sea yet if thou wilt not run to vain helps as I have done but stay upon the Lord till he give thee sight by his word which commands Light to shine out of Darkness from thence will he bring thee forth thy Eye shall guide thee and thou shalt praise his Name as I do this day glory for evermore and this word is nigh thee which must give thee Light tho' Darkness Comprehends it not And hast thou Gifts Revelations Knowledge Wisdom or
be known which is also a very great Truth that we have towards all Governours utterly denied all Fase Dealing and have dealt faithfully and plainly with every one without favour or partiality reproving and blaming every one for their Faults shewing every one their Dangers and warning every one by the Fall of others that went before them to beware of shun and turn from those Evils which brought ruine upon the former But they never joined with fell in with acted with sought or accepted Places of Profit or Trust from any of them which the Fawning Priests and some Professors did and therefore as with very great Truth and Boldness they might and did say all that the Snake has quoted above So with like Truth and Boldness they say more which the Snake has cut out least while he remember'd their Faithfulness his relucting Mind should object his own past Treachery The words as they stand in the place he quotes from are these Treason Treachery and False Dealing we do utterly deny False Dealing Surmising or Plotting against any Creature upon the Face of the Earth and speak the Truth in plainness and singleness of Heart If the Snake could for himself in truth say so much it would be a brave Testimony I come now to a Book of George Bishops Entituled The Warnings of the Lord to the Men of this Generation Printed 1660. Under the Title of which Book because of Directions to two Places at which it was then sold the Snake says they did industriously spread their Treasons But I would know of him why a Warning to Peace Love and Vnity and Caution against Persecution and such this Book is may not at least be disposed of at as many publick Places as his Defamatory Libels or as his Seditious ones was at private Places But now from the Manner of its Disposal we come to the Matter of the Book The Snake begins with p. 27. of this Book and quotes thus p. 228. Beware of falling under this Spirit or of thinking the Breach between you can be healed for I declare it to you from the Lord That it is irreconcileable it cannot it will not be healed Thus far the Snake quotes and by a dash strikes out about three following Lines which are these Yea the day will come and now is wherein it will be said we would have healed Babylon but she would not be healed let us depart every one to his own place And now upon a Consideration of these Lines what more can be the meaning than that that separation and distance which was between the Spirits and Interest of the Conquerors and Conquered was irreconcileable And the Breach of their Contention was such as could not be healed with the peaceable and quiet possession of those who were then uppermost viz. in the Year 1659. which some might then either foolishly hope or wish But now the Snake after his Dash at which he left out the Lines above-mention'd continues his Quotation thus Therefore in the Power and Dread of the Almighty stand and bear over it viz. that Spirit of Persecution which would vainly hope a Reconciliation Crush it to pieces for that Spirit of which G. Bishop is here speaking had persecuted and afflicted and in many ways made Men to suffer for their Tender Consciences Stamp it to Powder i. e that Spirit of Persecution But the Forgery of the Snake is remarkable here for that after the words last above-quoted he puts an c. and then goes on as if what followed in his Quotation did follow in the same order in the Book from which he quotes it but it is far otherwise for the Lines which he here makes to follow do in that Book precede the beginning of his Quotation eleven or twelve Lines and by the like packing and transposing of Lines which this Snake uses a Man may make the Decalogue or the Lords-Prayer speak to answer any purposes which the wicked Projector shall design Ibid. p. 229. Yet in their Declaration to Him the King after his Return p. 7. they Gravely tell Him We are a People that follow after those things that make for Peace and Vnity and which the Snake has left out it is our Desire that others Feet may walk in the same and here the Snake goes on do deny and bear our Testimony against all Strife and Wars and Contentions c. that is says the Snake when they were beaten and cou'd fight no longer First It is notoriously false that the Quakers did Fight or bear Arms in the Year 1659. or any other Year to the opposing of the Restauration Nor indeed was the Restauration brought to pass by Fighting but there was more immediately the Hand of God in it in that without outward Strength the Powers which then were crumbled and broke to pieces as they were often by our Friends foretold they should having in their several Days and Times of Trial been found to encrease that Yoak which was the Original Pretence of their First Opposition to the King And that it was always our Principle to follow after those things that make for Peace and Unity and have desired that others might walk in the same and did bear our Testimony against all Strife and War and Contention c. George Bishop does in this Book of his the Warnings of the Lord testifie where in p. 10. speaking to O. Cromwell and shewing him in what and how far he had regard to him He saith in behalf of Liberty of Conscience which Oliver had before declared to be a Natural Right yet was herein so far darkned as not to establish this Right which once was in his power to have done and therefore G. B. enumerates some of the Sufferings of our Friends to him herein and at the same time tells him what was the nature of that Dispensation which the Quakers were come to which he tells him in these words We who through the unspeakable love of the Father are come to Witness the end of the Wars the Son of God made manifest in the Flesh whose is the Kingdom and the Glory and the Dominion for ever even his Immortal Seed raised and raising up in us by which we are brought to testifie against the World and all the Deceivers therein and against the Fashions and Customs and Works and Deeds thereof that they are Evil as by his Light we have been shewn and by his Blood redeemed therefrom in our own particulars c. And in p. 14. G. B. enumerating some Instances of those whom the Spirit of Persecution had overthrown and the pretences on which they went as Haman to Ahasuerus the Informers against Daniel and the Three Children and the Pretences of the Elders Chief Priests and Scribes against our Saviour as also their pretences against the Apostles under which they would cloak their wickedness hath these words This is what that Spirit viz. of Persecution suggested throughout all Ages on Record in the Scriptures of Truth and with this
that Spirit blinded the Kings Princes and Rulers and set them against the Lord and against his Anointed which prov'd in the Issue their destruction This is that the Bishops said of the Puritans to the Late King this is that which brought forth the Law in those days against their Meetings to seek the Lord upon pretence of Conventicles and with this the Late King they blinded and set him against these People which became the overthrow of Him his Posterity and Followers and of that Generation and of those that joined with them And this is that Spirit that is now blinding of thee viz. Oliver Cromwell who wast the Lord's Battle-Ax and Weapon of War to the cutting down of him and those whom after this manner it blinded and set against the Lord and his People and which is now setting Thee against the Seed of God which in this fulness of the Dispensation of times he is raising up to reign for ever and ever unto which Spirit if thou continue to hearken and to follow and to be guided by thou shalt be cut off the Mouth of the Lord of Hosts hath spoken it This is part of a Letter which is in that Book and which G. Bishop did send to Oliver as it is there dated the 16th of the 5th Month 1656. By which and much more such plain Dealing in the said Letter wherein he tells him p. 17. Because thou hast hardned thy Heart and turned against him He God hath turn'd from thee his Presence Wisdom from thy Councils Spirit from thy Men of War and Success from thine Vndertakings and is Stripping of thee of thy Fence and Guard and making thee naked and bare and is coming against thee c. It appears from all this according as our Friends in their Declaration to King Charles upon his Restauration had said That the Quakers even in the Days of Oliver c. were a People that did follow after those things that made for Peace c. in that they did faithfully warn the then Powers against that Spirit of Persecution which was as they had foretold their overthrow And that they did not fight but were redeemed out of all outward fighting and through the Vnspeakable Love of the Father were brought to the end of the Wars So that it is false and malicious in the Snake to say the Quakers were Beaten and could Fight no longer when they gave that Testimony in their Declaration that they did Deny and Bear their Testimony against all Strife and Wars and Contentions c. For had they been in that Warring Nature there was space and time when that Letter of G. Bishop to Oliver Cromwell before-mentioned was writ wherein he testifies that the Quakers did witness the end of the Wars it being near four years before the Restauration of the King But tho' there was time and space yet the Quakers did never joyn with them or fall in with them nor were they concerned in places of Trust or Profit under them but when those who were in such places or in the Army did in their own particulars come to be redeem'd out of all outward Wars and to be obedient to that Convincement they laid down such their Places or Arms which is more than can be truly said of many fawning Priests and Professors And what is more the Quakers from the first even all the time of those several Changes in Government before the Restauration were great Sufferers by them because of that Truth and Plainness which they witnessed forth both to Governors and Governed And thus G. Bishop not soothingly but plainly told O. C. in his time wherein his safety and danger stood Thus he told R. Cromwell in his time wherein his safety and danger stood Thus he told the General Council of the Army wherein their safety and danger stood Thus he told the then Parliament wherein their safety and danger stood Thus he also told the Council of State wherein their safety and danger stood viz. In Establishing that equal and just Liberty and Freedom of Conscience in matters of Worship which near all of them in their turns promised and engaged to do but did it not therefore were they as he shews overthrown And when the King was Restored George Bishop did also Warn Him and his Parliament as in his piece A Book of Warnings c. p. 2 it is seen where after having recounted the Mercies of God to the King and Them he says And now what doth the Lord require of you That you take not upon you to rule over his Kingdom or to prescribe to his Dominion whose Kingdom is an Everlasting Kingdom and his Dominion that which shall never have end that of him in the Conscience Thus Reader under the different Governments his Advice was that Persecution might be taken away and in great Plainness without Soothing or Flattering of any to whom his Messages were he did it appears deliver them Ibid. p. 232. But after all this Sweetness as soon as ever the King was Restored Anno. 1660. the Quakers stoutly deny that ever they had Complemented Oliver or they had forgot it What the Snake calls Sweetness that We the Quakers did shew to Oliver we take to be our Duty as required by the Lord to shew to all whom it shall please God come to have Government That is to Advise that they Govern for God and his Truth that all Profaness Immorality and all Wickedness may be discouraged in which the Blessing both of Governors and the Governed doth consist This O. C. was frequently admonished of but he rejecting his Vows to God his Pretences to Men and the Admonition which God by his Servants did frequently send Several of our Friends in great Truth and Plainness did foretel him of his Overthrow which none of those his Soothing and Flattering Priests did dare to do The same plain Dealing our Friends did use to the other Changes in Government and also to Richard Cromwell not Complementing nor Flattering any And when W. Caton in his Truth 's Character of Professors said that the Priests and Professors did Sooth and Flatter O. Cromwell and his Son and made great Promises to him the Proof was apparent by their Addresses to him which in that Book he does briefly give What less than Flattery was it when the Priests c. of Suffolk in their Address to Richard Cromwell upon the Death of his Father told him Although our Sun is Set no Night hath ensued And what less was it in the Priests of Norfolk who did solemnly Promise and Engage Faithfully to serve and obey his most serene Highness for so they then called R. Cromwell as his Leige People in the Defence of his Person and Government with their Lives and Estates It 's true they did afterwards so soften the terms of their Allegiance that they found themselves ready to embrace another Shelter when the Gourd was withered and thus they turn'd to the Rising Side But after all if all this was
in Christ as without them without all other Men Ibid. Not to be Critical upon his Variation and Uncertainty as to the Terms I Answer to both states of the Question First Yea Secondly We believe in Christ both as he is without us and all other Men and as he is within us Thirdly And that though He our High-Priest is set on the Right Hand of the Throne of the Majesty in the Heavens He is a Minister of the Sanctuary and of the true Tabernacle which the Lord Pitched and not Man Heb. 8.1 Such an High-Priest became us who is holy harmless undefiled separate from sinners and made higher than the Heavens Heb. 7.26 Quaery 6. Is Christ now at this day and for ever to come truly and really a Man in true and proper humane Nature without all other Men. Answ. 1. To the first part Yea I Believe Jesus Christ is now at this Day to come truly and really a Man as he is the Heavenly Glorified Man without all other Men even the Man Christ Jesus the great and only Mediator between God and Men. 2. And no doubt his coming will be in his own proper Nature in whose else should he come but his own When as the Son of Man he cometh in his Father's Glory and all his Angels with him 3. But to the Words in the Question Is Christ for ever to come c. How shall we say Yea to this For if we should say Yea he is ever to come truly and really a Man might not some Reflect and question us and say Do you believe he will never so come then For how is that ever done that 's ever to do But this Man can impose Questions in what Terms he pleases and if we don't Answer directly Yea or Nay then it must with him be Falacious Dodging and we insincere and unsound in the Faith such is his Test and he and such Quaerists caâ— scarce fix or please themselves in Wording their Quaeries or Tests as they are not content with the Question Is Christ to come truly and really a Man So as to accept our Yea to the same but also they must add In true and proper Humane Nature As if he might come truly and really a Man and yet not in his true and proper Nature as Man if by Humane they mean proper to Man What sincere Christians will be bound to have these Men's Quaeries the Test of their Faith or Sincerity Men may spend their time in doting about Questions and strife of Words and be far remote from proving themselves in the Faith of Christ thereby And though we as well as many others believe and own the Man Christ as without us and all Men yet how can we or any else know or prove that we are in the Faith but by truly knowing Jesus Christ as he is in us they being Reprobates that do not so know Christ in them 2 Cor. 13.5 Yet Christ is but one and not divided though both without us and within us But I cannot see any Pretence for these Men so much to Question our Belief of Jesus Christ as without us and all Men unless they imagine that we do not believe the Man Christ who was Crucified to be in Being or that they think we suppose Him Annihilated which was ever far from us so to imagine of Him who is our Glorious Head and High-Priest But let 's draw towards a Conclusion passing by many of the Man 's bitter Smitings Aspersions Drolls and Jeers VIII I must tell him again 'T is a great and gross Untruth That the Quakers damn all the World to Hell all since the Days of the Apostles but themselves He has minced this his false Aspersion and my Answer I told him 'T is Men's own wickedness in hating the Light which carries them to Hell and that we believe there were many good Men and Saved since the Apostles Days Antidote p. 59. In my Answer to this Scandalous Charge of taking the very Attributes of God to themselves i. e. the Quakers there 's more to detect the Falshood thereof than only Retortion as he minces the Matter had he been so honest as to have given the Reader a true Specimen of my Answer to that and other Aspersions he might have seen how fairly his Author F. Bugg and himself were Answer'd and Detected of Falshood in this their black Charge as in others as in my Antidote p. 99 100 101. But instead of clearing himself and Brethren from what he says I Retort as the Titles of Your Grace and my Lord given to Bishops leaving out their going down upon their Knees to them as their Reverend Fathers in God And to my asking thereupon Do these import Divine Honour and Divine Attributes or Earthly pray He puts me off with Scoffs Flouts and Detraction as Some Charitable Body help this poor Petitioner in this difficult Point which puzzles his Vnderstanding I would advise thee George to go to thy Friend William who understands Courts better than thee c. p. 378. And further upon the same Point before about their Homage to the Bishops I asked Where did ever Christ's Ministers or Apostles do such Homage to Timothy or Titus or call either of them My Lord Timothy or My Lord Titus or Your Grace c. And what thinks he of God-Fathers and God-Mothers Are not these Divine Attributes and very high ones too To all which I have no sober or rational Answer from the Snake but a sort of Hissing Contempt and Scorn under a feigned Pretence of Pity in such Expressions as these viz. The Lord help him and restore him to his Wits Reader What shall I do with such a Man as this Greater Extravagance is not in Bedlam And Men may be mad secundum quid p. 367. But Reader his pretence of Praying in Compassion for me as a mad Man does not hang well together with his Reproaching and Vilifying of me as he has often done nor yet with his Intention to follow me by Reply through every single Point that I touch c. as he pretends p. 358. What! by reply follow such a Mad-man as he renders me what Reputation will he gain by that upon his own Proposition trow he I hope his black Charge of Idolatry and Transferring Divine Attributes and Worship to themselves i. e. the Quakers p. 379. As it is utterly rejected by us 't will be farther detected and the Malice thereof I supposing 't is already Answer'd by another I do at present forbear Publishing a Full and Particular Answer I have to his Eighth Sect. about that Point as I have so many others at large besides he being a Lurking Adversary that lies hid smiting in the dark I am not willing to spend over-much time about him he being also fallen into another hand to deal with who I doubt not has traced the Snake in his crooked Windings and Turnings IX In this last Article of his Specimen he recites these Words as he saith out of
a Quaker's Book Intituled The Sword of the Lord drawn p. 5. viz. Your Imagined God beyond the Stars your Carnal Christ is utterly denied That Christ is God and Man in one Person is a Lie To which he saith G. Whitehead does not deny the Quotation but says p. 145. We do not affect the Terms Then he adds Was not this a Terrible Rebuke a full Condemnation of the Author and such damnable Heresie p. 357. See how grosly Abusive and Partial this Snake Author is as if we do not affect the Terms were my whole Answer to those fore-going Expressions quoted by him wherein he appears as in many other things very unjust and injurious for I call them offensive Words in my Answer i. e. as quoted by him saying As to those Offensive Words your Carnal Christ your Imagined God c. we do not affect the Terms neither are they proper to the True Christ or Omnipresent God Antidote p. 145 146. but his Falacy in the Quotation I refer to the fore-going Treatise p. 204. I further add That an Imagined God and Imagined Christ is not the true God nor the true Christ which all meer Imaginations fall short of and of the true Knowledge thereof However I neither liked the said Offensive Words nor the Person that wrote them i. e. C. A. for he neither writ all he did in true Reverence toward God neither did he abide in His Fear or Council but was disown'd by us Therefore the Snake's Insinuation against me That he was a Friend in saying of them and had a good Intention as if I would so excuse him and his said offensive Words is utterly false for I never design'd to excuse or plead for him therein or in any other rash or irreverent Expressions And the Snak's Inferences against the Quakers in general As that all the World cannot excuse them from being the most Outragious and Blasphemous Heresie And that all Men must look upon the Quakers as Monsters and no Christians and their Ancient Friends with Blasphemies Heresies Treasons and damnable Doctrines c. p. 368. Thus concluding with a Storm of Railery when he has taken occasion to Calumniate and Condemn us all by Whole-sale from a few rash and offensive Expressions of one Person and perhaps from some other Words or Passages which many Thousands of us were never concerned in besides his many foul Perversions and partial and false Quotations and Citations And lastly he makes this Apology He must not surfeit the Reader with a Breakfast lest he lose his Stomach to his Dinner But should the Reader be so unwary as to make his Breakfast of such Cookery as the Snake's Railery Foul Abuses and dirty Stuff as he has Cooked against the People call'd Quakers 't would be enough not only to Surfeit but to Poison the Reader Now that I would not seem to conclude with harsh but mild Expressions as well as Matter of Moment I may a little farther take notice of his Profound Questionary Test to try if we are sound in the Faith viz. Whether they i. e. the Quakers believe in Christ as without them without all other Men Seeing our Adversary and his Confederates so much Insist upon the words without us Christ as without us and sometimes gives him the Character of an Outward Christ as if he were not an Inward Christ Inwardly Anointed I may take leave a little to follow them in their terms yet with a real Respect and Honour to the True Messiah the Very Christ the Anointed of God of whom all his Holy Prophets gave Witness Acts 10.4 namely we believe and confess that this very Christ of God the Only Begotten Son of God was conceived by the Holy Ghost and Born of the Virgin Mary without us that he was Born in Bethlehem of Judea without us that he liv'd an Innocent Sinless Life preached most Blessed and Excellent Doctrine without us that he wrought most Eminent and Wonderful Miracles without us that he went about doing Good without us that he was Crucified and put to Death by wicked hands without the Gates of Jerusalem without us that by the Power of God he revived and rose again the third day without us that after he was raised from the Dead he shewed himself Alive after his Passion by many Infallible Proofs unto his Disciples without us being seen of them forty days after which he Ascended into Heaven being seen to Ascend without us and a Cloud received him out of their sight who beheld him Ascend Unto whom it was said by the 2 Angels present This same Jesus which is taken up from you into Heaven shall so come in like manner as ye have seen him go into Heaven Acts 1.3 9 10 11. and doubtless when he so comes and all his mighty Angels with him it will be in great Glory and open Triumph and he will in that day be greatly glorified in his Saints and admired in all them that believe 2 Thes. 1.7 8 9 10. But now I must not stop here we must not leave this same Jesus Christ all without us we must humbly consider and own him as He is within us also As Christ is the Word of God that true Light which enlightens every Man coming into the World John 1.9 He is within us As in Him was Life and the Life was the Light of Men He is within us his Life as the Light of Men is within us John 1.4 As Christ is the Light of the World given to lead Men out of Darkness and to give the Light of Life to all who follow him John 8.12 He is within Men within us to lead us out of that Darkness and Corruption that was in us As Christ is given for the Light of the Gentiles and for a Covenant unto the People and to be God's Salvation to the Ends of the Earth Isa. 42.6 49.6 Acts 13.47 He must be known as such within them Seeing his coming was that we might have Life and that we might have it more abundantly John 10.10 This Life we must have within us Jesus said If a Man love me he will keep my Words and my Father will love him and We will come unto him and make our abode with him John 14.23 which must be within us Abide in me and I in you saith Christ as the Branch cannot bring forth Fruit of it self except it abide in the Vine no more can ye except ye abide in me John 15.4 Therefore if we abide in Christ he abides in us The Branches must abide in the Vine to partake of the Life and Virtue thereof in them to cause Fruit. John 14.18 I will not leave you comfortless I will come to you said Christ. Ver. 20. At that day ye shall know that I am in my Father and you in me and I in you Therefore we must know Christ within us if we be his true Followers John 17.22 23. Where Christ saith And the glory which thou gavest me I have given them that they may be one even as we are one I in them and thou in me that they may be made perfect in one that the world may know that thou hast sent me and hast loved them as thou hast loved me And Ver. 26. And I have declared unto them thy Name and will declare it that the love wherewith thou hast loved me may be in them and I in them What 's more clear than Christ's own Testimony for his Being within us i. e. within all his true Followers especially 2. Cor. 13.5 Examine your selves whether ye be in the Faith prove your own selves Know ye not your own selves how that Jesus Christ is in you except ye be Reprobates Therefore they who are not Reprobates but in the Faith know that Jesus Christ is within them Colos. 1.27 To whom God would make known what is the Riches of the Glory of this Mystery which is Christ in you the hope of glory Therefore the Saints know Christ within them to be the Hope of Glory to them Gal. 4.6 And because ye are Sons God hath sent forth the Spirit of his Son into your hearts crying Abba Father The Son of God is therefore by his Spirit within us who are Sons of God Galat. 4.19 My little Children of whom I Travail in Birth again until Christ be formed in you Rom. 8.29 For whom he did fore-know he also did predestinate to be conformed to the Image of his Son that he might be the first-born in many brethren 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 In multis fratribus Therefore the Son of God is within them Rev. 3.20 Behold I stand at the door and knock if any Man hear my Voice and open the door I will come In to him and will sup with him and he with me Was not this the Son of God the Faithful and True Witness who thus spake ver 14 And where is that Door that must be opened unto him Many more Instances might be shewn for the nearness of Christ with and In his Faithful Followers and Members And Blessed are they who truly Believe in his Name and follow him in the Regeneration FINIS Ibid p. 6. Acts 5.36 37. Josephus p. 426 532. Printed 1683. Great Mystery p. 224. Snake p. 31. John 10.3.14.6 Luke 22.28 Mark 1.13 Mat. 4.6 7. John 7.49 Apologia Ecclesiae Anglicanae p. 21. art 51. Foot yet in the Snare Printed 1656. p. 6. Jam. Nayler Vid. Hierom. Apol. adv Ruff. ad Pammach Marcel Ep. 141. ad Marcel