were it that after so many threats warnings from heauen from earth from God from men from their foes abroad and their frinds at home they should not yet once not once descend into a dutifull consideration of this their heauy trespasse and so with a speedy industrie and assiduitie reenter and recouer those their forsaken charges which a long while haue languished and worne awaie for want of pasture and ly now the deer lambs of Christ Iesus stretched on the ground for faintnes fetching their groanes deepe and their pantes thicke as readie to giue ouer and to yeelde vp the Ghost O Lord are not thine eies vpon the truth Ierem. 5.3 thou hast striken these men but they haue not sorrowed thou hast consumed them but they haue refused to receiue correctiō they haue made their faces harder thā a stone haue refused to return Not the losses and vnsupportable calamities of Christs people not the miserable apostasie grieuous falling awaie woe to vs therefore of multitudes of the ignorant and vnlettered men from the Apostolicke faith and the Church of Christ not the certaine daungers and hazards of their owne persons Wiues Children and Kinsfolkes with all which rods of his fatherly chastisement God hath latelie in his iustice tempered with surpassing mercy visited them can awake or rouze them out of that dead and deadlie slumber wherby they haue as much as in them lieth betraied to the powers and forces of Satan Gods sacred enheritance and laid open the precious flock of Christ to the mouthes and teeth of Woolues But would God the burden of this sin rested onelie on the neckes of these rechlesse persons whose extreme barbaritie yet in letting through their profane absence their harmlesse sheepe to drop awaie by famine of the word hath raised a louder cried and clamour against them in the eares of God than any we are able to make by our most iust cōplaint in the eares of men Another swarme of Caterpillers there are the very trash and rifraffe of our nation who deeming it a more easie life to say seruice in the church than do seruice in the house and to stand at the altar of God than to followe the plough of their Master haue like men of idle dissolute quality only moued thereto in a lazie speculation laide their wicked sacrilegious hands on the Lords Arke vnreuerently entred with shooes and all into his Temple taken his vndefiled Testimonies in their defiled mouthes disgraced defaced and diffamed the glorie maiesty of diuine rites and mysteries through their beggarly entring into base demeaning thēselues in so high an office Gape not these men trow you for new miracles to rain out of heauen As if Christ must needs for their sakes lay the foundation of his Church again cal again from the net the receit of custom and other trades of this world such as hee would dispatch abroad for this holy Message that so these artisans might be inuested with Apostleships Doctorships and the rooms of Prophets as ready men after a nights sleepe or an hours trance to turn the book of God menage the keies of Heauen But my frind be not deceiued awake out of sleep dream no more Zach. 13. ◅ Thou art no Prophet thou art an husbandman taught to be an heardman from thy youth vp Get away therefore with speed from the Lords house if thou be a cleauer to thy wedge and ax if a hind to thy Masters plough but meddle not with Gods affaires least he break out vpon thee and destroy thee But in vain spend I words to brasse and Iron who though the Lord hath held in his hand for a long time the ful viol of his wrath and is now wearie with holding it any longer and about to poure it out vpon them for this their horrible transgression yet staggar they not a whit at it but run on like hūgry cōpanions with an eie only to the flesh pots and so sel both themselues their people for a morsel of bread a messe of pottage to the diuel Shal I not visit for these things saith the Lord Ierem. 9. ◅ Or shal not my soule be auenged on such a nation as this Yes doubtlesse hee who is able to muster the cloudes and winds and to fight with heauenly powers against vs shal and wil if wee leaue not off to make such hauok of his children be auenged on vs he shal raise vp the standard and make the trumpet blow nether shal suffer the sight of the one to passe our eies nor the soūd of the other to forsake our ears vntil destruction come vpon destruction death vpon death plague vpon famine and sword vpon both to the vtter ouerthrow both of our selues Country perpetually Nay rather O God if there bee any place for mercy and why should wee doubt of mercy with thee the God of mercy looke not vpon this drosse and filth wherewith thy holy house hath bin polluted but sweep them out but looke O Lorde with thy tender eie of compassion vppon thy silly people for what haue they done and stirre them vp daiely for Pastors and Prophetes wise and skilfull men whose lips may keepe knowledge and whose hands may break vnto them the bread of life Now that this may haue a more mature happy successe I am humbly to beseech and solicite if so this my simple work come vnto their hands the Reuerend Fathers of this Land to whom I acknowledge al duty submission in the Lord whom with al reuerence I solicit in this the Lords cause that if their authority be not able to stretch so far as to the throwing out of these dum deafe and blind watch-men out of Gods tabernacle into which they haue been shuffled against manie of their Honors wils by those accursed Simoniacal Patrons who haue sodred simoned the wals of their houses with the verie bloud of soules yet it may please their wisedoms to constraine and compell these wheresoeuer they shal find them in any of their Dioceses to the reading and diligent studying of those books which their owne country-men moued with mere pittie towardes them and their flocks haue painfully deliuered vnto them in a tongue familiar and common to them all And if it shal seeme so good and expedient to their Honours to adioine these my labours vnto the paines and trauels of many the seruants of God who haue with great praise endeuored in the like matter on the like respects heretofore I make no doubt but that out of this short yet ful Summe of Christian Religion God adding his blessing thereunto they may in short time receiue such furniture and instruction as they shal saue both themselues and others who both else are in case to perish euerlastingly But if their feete wil walke on in the way of blindnes and themselues refuse to come out of the darknes of ignorance into the bright light of Gods knowledge
enchanters request 4 Superstition which is to attribute such effectes to certaine things or obseruations of gestures or woordes as depend not ether on natural or moral reason or on the word of God and either doe not at all follow and fall out or are wrought by the Diuels and other causes than those wherby they were thought to haue bin done Vnder this vice of superstition are comprehended South-saieng Leuit. 19.26 Isay 44.25 47 13. obseruations of dreames diuinations signes and predictions or foretellings of Wyzardes all which are by expresse wordes condemned in the Scriptures 5 Al trust and confidence which is reposed in creatures For this is manifestly repugnant to the true knowledge of one god to faith hope For trust and confidence is an honour due vnto god alone which who so translateth vnto creatures dooth in very deede imagine moe gods Wherefore god in his word doth vtterly condemne those Psal 46.2 Ier 17 5. Mat. 6.24 Eph. 5 5. who repose trust and confidence in things created as in men And also hee condemneth those which put their trust in their owne workes and in riches which al couetous men do and so vnder the name of this vice is couetousnes also comprehended 6 Jdolatrie which is most of all repugnaunt vnto the true knowledge of god and to faith Now there are two kinds of Jdolatrie 1. When another is woorshipped than that one true God This kinde of Idolatrie doth properly belong vnto the first commandement 2. When albeit the true God is worshipped yet neuerthelesse he is worshipped after another manner than God himselfe hath in the second commaundement and also commonlie in his word prescribed either by internal worship or by external worship or external rites and ceremonies This other kind of Idolatrie is forbidden in the second commaundement 7 The contempt of God which is to know those thinges of God which are true but not to bee moued thereby to loue him Vnto faith are repugnaunt of one side which offendeth in the defect of faith 1. Vnbeliefe which assenteth to such doctrine as is heard known concerning God 2. Doutfulnes which neither assenteth stedfastly to the doctrine of God neither dooth altogether gainsay it but beeing floting and wauering hath a weake inclination nowe to one part and now to another 3. Distrust which applieth not vnto it selfe the knowledge which it hath of God and his promises and doth through feare of Gods forsaking vs surcease the dooing of that it should doe 4. A dissembling or hypocritical faith 5. Temporarie faith or a reuolting from faith which is to yeeld an assent to the doctrine of the Church and to reioice in the knowledge thereof and to embrace it for a season but without any applying or full persuasion of the promise of Gods grace and without regeneration and therefore to be ouercome through temptations or other causes and so to cast away againe that assent and profession of godlines Mat. 13.20 He that receiued seed in the stonie ground is he which heareth the woorde and incontinentlie with ioy receiueth it Yet hath he no roote in himselfe and dureth but a season for as soone as tribulation or persecution commeth because of the word by and by hee is offended Acts. 8. Simon also beleeued and was baptized Heb. 6.4 Jt is impossible that they which were once lightened and haue tasted of the heauenlie gift c. Nowe amongest those which are repugnaunt vnto faith of the other side which offendeth in the excesse are 1. Tempting of God which is through an vnbeliefe or distrust or contempt of God and a trust or loue of our owne wisedome iustice or power and glorie to depart from gods woord or order and so to make trial of gods truth or power and stubbornly and proudly to prouoke god vnto anger Deut. 6 Mat 4. Thou shalt not tempt the Lord thy god Exod. 17.2 Moses saide vnto them why contend yee with me Wherefore doe ye tempt the Lord 1. Cor. 10.22 Do we prouoke the Lord to anger 2. Carnal securitie which is to liue without thinking of god and his will or of our owne infirmitie and daungers and without acknowledging or bewailing of our sinnes and without the feare of god and yet to promise vnto our selues an indemnitie from the anger of god and from punishment without faith or repentance This is often and most grieuously accused in the scripture Mat. 24. Christ speaketh of that securitie and carelesnes which shal bee at his second comming Psalm 36. Wickednes saith vnto the wicked man euen in mine heart that there is no feare of god before his eies For hee flattereth himselfe in his owne eies Psal 94.7 They saie the Lord shall not see neither wil the god of Jacob regarde it But this carnal securitie differeth from spiritual securitie because the carnal persisteth in sinnes and feareth not the anger of god and punishment because either it knoweth not mans weakenes and sinne and gods wrath or contemneth it But the spiritual securitie is a faith and hope which being ioined with true repentance without sinne and in feare of gods chastisements doth not yet fear gods forsaking because it is assured of gods vnchāgeable fauour towardes it Whereof it is spoken Rom. 8.31 Jf god be on our side who can be against vs Vnto Humilitie is opposed in the extremitie of excesse Pride or arrogancie which is to ascribe his giftes not to god but to his owne worthines or abilitie and therefore to stand in admiration of himselfe and his gifts not truely to feare god neither to acknowledge and bewaile his defects and so further to be aspiring to higher place and calling standing not vpon god but vpon his owne giftes to attribute also to himselfe those thinges which hee hath not to attempt thinges aboue his power and not belonging vnto his calling to contemne and debase others in respect of himselfe to beleeue none but to couet to excel and be eminent aboue others to referre his gifts and counsels principallie to his owne glorie to be angrie with god and men to fret and sume against god when his desires and counsels are hindered and also to accuse God of errour and vniustice if Gods counsels agree not with the iudgements and affections of men Vnto humility is opposed in the extremity of defect A faigned modestie or humility which is a double pride and it is to hunt after the praise and commendation of humility by denying of those thinges outwardly which yet a man dooth in his minde attribute vnto himselfe either truely or falsly and by refusing of those thinges which he most of all desireth and couertly laboreth to compasse Vnto patience in the extremity of defect impatience is contrary which is through the not knowing and distrust of Gods wisedome prouidence iustice and goodnes not to bee willing to obey God in suffering such aduersitie as he willeth vs to suffer and through griefe to fret against God or to do somewhat against
vnto him alone to be translated vnto others and in the second commaundement forbiddeth any other worship of his name and God-head to be vsed besides that which himselfe ordained So in this third commandement he forbiddeth the profession of both namely both of the worshipping of any other besides the true God and of any other worship besides the true worship of God and therefore condemneth al such adoration and worship For inuocation ascribeth vnto him vnto whom it is made infinite wisedome and power as who in all places and at all times vnderstandeth and heareth euen the secret groanes of them that call and inuocate on his name and is able to help and preserue al euen besides and against the order of second causes and to giue them those good things which can be giuen onely of him who is the Almighty creatour gouernor Lord of al things Wherefore idolatrous and vaine is the inuocation of Pagans Turkes Iewes and of all who imagine and make vnto themselues another God besides him which hath manifested himselfe in his worde by Prophets and Apostles through the sending of his Sonne and his holy spirite likewise idolatrous is their â—nuocation that inuocate on Angels or on the Saintes departed because they attribute and giue vnto them the honor which is due to God alone Matth. 4. Thou shalt worship the Lord thy God and him onelie shalt thou serue Reuel 19.10 I fel before the Angels feete to worship him but he said vnto mee See thou doe it not I am thy fellow seruant and one of thy bretheren which haue the testimonie of Iesus Worship God So Actes 14. Paul and Barnabas refuse diuine honours to be done vnto them by the men of Lystra The obiections of the Papists which vse inuocation and praier vnto the Saints departed 1 VNto God onely is due 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is adoration which giueth vnto God an vniuersal and general power prouidence and dominion but 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 that is veneration and honour is due vnto Saints wherewith we venerate and worship the Saints for their holinesse and merites Aunswere This is but a friuolous shifting For wee detract not neither take away from Saintes either liuing or departed such honour and woorship as is an agnising and celebrating of that faith holines and giftes which God hath bestowed on them and an obeying of that doctrine which they haue deliuered vnto vs from God and an imitating and following of their life and godlines But this honour that they vnderstand and heare in euery place and time the groanes thoughts and wishes or desires of them that inuocate and relieue their necessities is due vnto God only and likewise that through their intercession and merites is giuen vnto vs remission of sins eternal life and other blessinges from God this honour is due vnto Christ onely and therefore cannot be translated vnto Saintes without manifest sacrilege and idolatry whether it bee called by the name of 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 or by any other name whatsoeuer 2 Whom god honoureth the same must we also honour God honoureth the Saintes Therefore we also must honour them Aunswere We graunt this concerning that honour which god giueth vnto the Saints for therein inuocation is not comprehended as beeing an honour due vnto God alone who saith Jsai 42.8 That he wil not giue his glory to another 3 God heareth vs by his owne power and vertue the Saintes heare vs by grace or by the vertue of God Aunswere God doth not communicate these properties vnto others whereby he wil be discerned from others 2. Chro. 6.30 Thou only knowest the hearts of the children of men And Actes 1. and 15. It is ascribed vnto God as proper vnto him to be the searcher and beholder of harts 4 The Saintes haue by the grace of God wrought miracles whereby also God is discerned from creatures Therefore God hath communicated some of his prerogatiues and properties vnto the Saintes and by consequent the knowledge of the thoughts and affections of al that praie vnto them Answere This reason is doubly faulty First the consequence is not of force from a general particularly put vnto a certaine special Wherefore it followeth not that God hath communicated with his Saints a knowledge of harts vniuersally or of the hearts of all that make inuocation albeit it were true which yet we graunt not to be true that hee did communicate some of his prerogatiues or essential properties with the Saintes except it may bee prooued by certaine testimony of Scripture that amongest those some communicated prerogatiues this is also conteined But the contrary hereof hath been already proued Secondly the proofe of the Antecedent drawen from the example of miracles is of no force For there is not any power of working miracles transfused by god into the Saintes neither doe the Saints work these by their owne vertue or by any vertue communicated vnto them by God but are onely ministers of the external works that is of foretellinges or tokens which when the Saints do god doth manifest vnto them that he will by his owne vertue not transfused into them nor by the like vertue created in them but by his owne proper vertue beeing and remaining in himselfe alone work those woonderfull woorks and proper vnto an omnipotent nature and if wee speak truly and properly he it is alone that worketh them The Saints are said to work them by a * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 figure of speech as being the ministers of the outward work which god addeth vnto the working of the miracle as a signe of his presence power and wil. Wherefore it doth not hereof follow that either the infinite wisedome and vniuersall knowledge of hearts or other essential properties prerogatiues of god are communicated with the Saintes 5 Ahijah knew the thoughtes of Jeroboams wife 1. King 14. Eliseus knew the thoughtes of the King of Syria 2. King 6. Peter knew the coosinage and fraud of Ananias and Sapphyra Actes 5. Therefore God hath communicated the knowledge of mindes and hearts vnto Saintes Aunswere A fewe extraordinary examples make not a generall rule They knewe these thinges by the gift of prophecie wherewith they were endued by reason of their office and calling which they had and bare for the edifieng of the Church neither yet did they know alwaies neither the thoughtes of al neither by any power within them to behold hearts and minds but through a diuine reuelation from god they knew onely at such a time and such things as was requisite for the profite and vtilitie of the church to be reueiled vnto them But hereof it doth not follow that the Saints departed also are endued with the gift of Prophecy because there is no need thereof in the life to come and they bear no longer that office which they bare in this life neither doth it follow that they behold the minds and hearts of men or vnderstand from god the thoughts affections and
THE SVMME OF CHRISTIAN RELIGION Deliuered by ZACHARIAS VRSINVS in his Lectures vpon the Catechism autorised by the noble Prince FREDERICK throughout his dominions Wherein are debated and resolued the Questions of whatsoeuer points of moment which haue beene or are controuersed in Diuinitie Translated into English by HENRIE PARRIE out of the last best Latin Editions together with some supplie of wāts out of his Discourses of Diuinitie and with correction of sundrie faults imperfections which ar as yet remaining in the best corrected Latine AT OXFORD Printed by IOSEPH BARNES are to be sold in Pauls Churchyard at the signe of the Tygres head 1587. TO THE RIGHT HONORABLE HENRIE EARLE OF PENBROOKE LORD HARBERT OF CARDIFF MARMION AND S. QVINTINE KNIGHT OF THE MOST NOBLE ORDER OF THE Garter and Lord President of WALES Grace and peace with encrease of Honor. IF in this time of trouble and disorderlie age of the world it may not seeme right Honorable ouer-great boldnes in mee to presse your Honour with these my labours who are already ouer-pressed with your owne which with continual and vncessant care watchfulnes you vndertake for the quiet repose of this our Church Countrie I shal humbly craue of your Honor to lend a fauourable eie vnto this litle work to reach your hand of approbation vnto it that so beeing fenced with your honourable protection countenance it may the more securely freely put it self in the view beare the face countenance of others The reasons causes which haue induced mee to presume thus farre are such as I make no doubt but vpon declaration of them to obtaine and finde your Honour most ready and easie in yeelding your assent For were it that your auncient fauour and good will manifoldly extended to my father who long since departed this mortality had not at all stretched to met his sonne but had with him alone both liued died Yet might not I without some skar of impiety commit that euer the memory of that should die in mee the profit pleasure whereof I knew in him so long to liue But seeing it hath further also as I lately was giuen to vnderstand so pleased your Honour that this happy course of your fauor should not begin end in one but should continue lineally run on that the force vertue thereof should passe continuately from the root vnto the brāches much more blameable verily would be my silent forgetfulnesse double would the fault be where dutie doublie is required In which considerations if I should haue made any distrust of your good acceptatiō or should any way haue with-drawen this small present by misdoubting the welcome it should receiue at your Honours handes I might haue beene most iustly arraigned condemned of an vndutiful vngrateful cogitation being without al either colour of excuse or shadowe of pretence to free acquite mee from it And that especially seeing the Author whom I interprete the matter which hee conteineth are both of that qualitie as if I stoode to waite expect a fit time a worthy person for them no time might seeme fitter than this for which I should reserue them no person worthier than your selfe to whom I might present them For this beeing the time these the euill daies wherein Satan the powers of darcknesse haue broken loose vpon the chosen of God the broode of Antichrist hatched long agoe but neuer flush vntill now haue by the cōmission of their Dam taken their flight out of their nests in which they roosted for a season are flowen in flocks abroade into all coasts countries christian to charm with sweet but false notes of hereticall melodie the hearts of silly people the wits euen of the Gallants of this worlde what greater opportunity more fit occasion in respect of these the like occurrences could haue offered it selfe vnto me or I haue wished for the bestowing of either my paines on this Booke or this Booke on my deare Country Which as it giueth place to no Realme nor Region of the earth in the constant loue fast embracing of the booke of books the Volume of the highest the blessed trueth of God almighty so is it not behind them in beeing assaulted shaken euerie way what by the casts complots of forrainers what by Diuelish practises conspiracies proditions of Domesticals that some-way at least it might be throwen down clogged with a yoke of seruitude enthralled to the slauery of the man of sin For the better effectuating of which their purposes more cunning currant bringing them to passe how of late yeares yea daies many fugitiue persons of this our Country ordained sacred by their Superiours to this good end haue made their returne in swarmes vnto vs with outlandish minds Doctrine to inspire the people with heresie rebellion none so farre in any course of life remooued estrainged from publicke action whose eares haue not beene mooued his verie heart wounded with these tidings No time or season which they haue omitted no place no creeke no corner in this land which they haue not sought out no person from almost the highest potentate to the lowest woorme whom they haue not felt except hee hath beene too sound sounded wagged lifted at too that they might plant supplant set vnset roote in roote vp D. Allen in his Apologie of their two Seminaries and in other his treatises of like tragedie all as one of their old whining Prophets soothly solemnly with teares full often telleth the Christian world to bring vs home vnto the lap of our mother holie Church of which their Lorde the Pope is holy father Well may hee be her father but then such a father doubtlesse hath he beene vnto her as is recounted by ancient Historie Aruntius a Romane to haue bin vnto his virgin daughter Medullina Plutar. in Parallel with whom in the darke rapt with a pang of drunkennes he committed incest But were the Church of that remorse of conscience resolute courage in reuenging herselfe for this spiritual villanie as was that virgin for suffering that corporall force rauishment Shee would burne within her inflamed with a fiery zeale of holie indignation drawing out this incestuous Romane who hath defiled her in the darknes of Idolatrie himselfe drunken with the cup of fornication would bring him vnto the altar euen that altar of the Lord which hee hath made a witnesse of so many his hateful pollutions incests there slay him before God for the appeasing of his ire wrath towards her for the washing away of this so grieuous a blot high reproch of her Virginity The which that the poore seduced people of our land may bee the better enabled more throughlie animated to take in hande put in execution who nowe as shaken shattered
conuicted by the force of the trueth to haue stubbornely sought after error and blindnes The difference of this true doctrine from others 1 This doctrine was deliuered from God other Sectes are sprung from men and haue beene inuented by Diuels 2 True Religion hath firme testimonies diuine such as quiet consciences The Law by nature known yet darckened and conuince al other Sects of error 3 In the doctrine of the Prophets and Apostles is deliuered the whole Lawe of God rightly vnderstood and vncorrupt and both the Tables of the Law are perfectly kept As for other Sects they cast away the principal parts of Gods Law that is to say the doctrine concerning the true knowledge and worshippe of God which is contained in the former Table of the Decalog as also they do reiect the inward and spirituall obedience of the second Table That little good and true which they haue is a part of the commandement concerning the discipline conteined in the second Table or concerning the outwarde and ciuile duties towardes men The Gospel by nature not knowen 4 The whole Gospel of Christ that rightly vnderstood is in the true church alone taught and in this true doctrine alone is it contained Other sects either are clean ignorant of it as the Ethnickes Philosophers Iewes Turkes who also are as very enemies of the Church or they doe patch some litle part of it out of the doctrine of the Apostles vnto their owne errors of which part yet they neither know nor perceiue the vse as the Arrians Papists Anabaptists and al other Heretikes of whom some concerning the person others concerning the office of our mediator maintaine errors Al these though they arrogate vnto themselues the title of the Church and professe the name of Christ yet since that they depart from that onely foundation of the Church which is Christ that is since they do not acknowledge Christ either to be true God or true man neither do seek for righteousnes and saluation wholy in him they are not the members of the true Church not so much as in outward profession as it is said 1. Iohn 4. Euery spirit which confesseth not that Iesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God and this is the spirit of Antichrist The difference of this true Doctrine from Philosophie It is true that wee studie Philosophie and not the Doctrine of other sectes but yet there is a very great differēce between these twoo Doctrines 1. Philosophie is whollie naturall but the principall part of this doctrine that is the Gospel is reuealed from aboue euen from God 2. Only this doctrine declareth the Gospel Philosophie is quite ignorant of it 3. The Doctrine of the Church sheweth the originals of our miseries Philosophie doth not so 4 This doctrine whereas it doth assure vs of eternal life it doth minister comfort vnto our consciences and sheweth vs the way how to wade out of dangers Philosophie teacheth vs not so much as this 5. Of this we are taught the whole Law Philosophie letteth passe the chiefest partes Indeede Philosophie conteineth two partes profitable for mans life as Logick Mathematikes others which God would not deliuer in this doctrine But as concerning this doctrine Philosophie hath but a little part of the Law that obscurely and that taken out but of a few preceptes of the Law It hath certain common comforts those that are not common it hath not as being proper vnto the Church Commō comfortes are these 1 The prouidence of God or the necessitie of obaying him 2. A good conscience 3. The woorthines of vertue 4. The final causes or the endes which vertue proposeth 5. The examples of others 6. Hope of reward 7. A comparing of euentes because a lesse euil is compared vnto a greater Those comforts which are not common but proper vnto the Church are 1. Remission of sinnes 2. The presence of God in miseries themselues 3. Our finall deliuerie Certaine notes or markes by which the Church is distinguished from others The marks which distinguish the Church or the professors of true doctrine from others are these 1. Puritie of doctrine 2. The right vse of the Sacramentes 3. Obedience towards God and his doctrine both in life and maners Many times truly great vices do grow in the Church but they are not maintained as falleth out in other Sectes For the true Church is the first her selfe that doth comprehend and condemne them before any other As long as this remaineth so long remaineth the Church OF THE THIRD QVESTION Whence it may appeare that this Religion alone was deliuered of God which is conteined in the Scripture GOD in the very creation of the woorld put this bridle in the mouth of all reasonable creatures that no man without extreme and manifest impudencie such as was the Diuels in paradise durst saie that anie thing if it were once apparantly knowen to haue beene spoken or commaunded by God might be called into question or that any man might refuse to obey it Here-hence are those things so often inculcated in the Prophets Hearken O heauens hearken O earth For the Lord hath spoken Thus saith the Lord. The woorde of the Lord came to Esaias Ieremias c. Since therefore it appeareth that the bookes of the olde and new Testament are the wordes of God there is no place left of doubting whether that bee the true Religion and doctrine which is conteined in them But whether these bookes were written by diuine instinct and by what proofes and Testimonies we are certaine of so great a matter this is a question not to be let passe of vs. Wherefore this question is necassary For except this aboue all other things remain stedfast and immoueable that whatsoeuer we read in the bookes of the Prophets and Apostles doth as truely declare the wil of God vnto vs as if wee did heare God openly speaking to vs from heauen it cannot chuse but that the very foundation and whole certainty of Christian Religion must bee weakned Wherefore it is a consideration worthy those who are desirous of the Glory of God and do seeke for sure comfort to enquire whence it may appeare vnto vs that the holy Scripture is the word of God To this question now long since answere hath bin made by the Papists that forsooth it is not otherwise certain The first part The autority of the Scripture doth not depēd of the Church then because the Church doth confirme it by her Testimonie But we as we neither reiect nor contemne the Testimony of the true Church so we doubt not but their opinion is pestilent and detestable who often saie that the holie Scriptures haue not their authoritie else-where then from the woorde of the Church For first wicked is it and blasphemous to say 1. Reason The reproch of God that the autority of Gods woord dependeth of the testimonie of man And if it be so that the chiefest cause why
following it But God suffereth them for a while to haue their swinge and to florish that by the scandal of the crosse the faith and patience of the godly may be more exercised and tried vnto the wicked there may be left a time of repentance and when they abuse the long-suffering of God that then at length so much the iuster and heauier plague may light on them And therefore the holy Scripture in so many places as in the Psalmes 37.52.57.58 often elsewhere comforteth the godly against this kind of tentation foretelling vnto them defence and deliuery but destructiō Obiection 2 vnto their enemies Not all Neither is thereby the force of this proofe weakned because that all the persecutours of the Church are not in Tragicall manner taken out of this life For whiles God doth take vengeance on most of them in this life he doth sufficiently shew what he would haue to be thought of the rest verily that they are his enemies whom without they repent he will plūge into aeternal plagues the beginning and feeling of the which is desperation in which all the enemies of Christian Religion end their daies yea they who are not oppressed with any other calamities of this life To conclude that it may be manifest Not for this cause Answere Yea for this cause that they are Obiection 3 not onely for other transgressions so punished of God God doth so often denounce in his worde that such shal bee the ends of his enemies and that for this very cause because they go about to extinguish the people and true worship of God Yea furthermore they are not a few frō whom while they lie in torments their cōscience wresteth out this confession that they haue drawen these miseries vpon themselues by persecuting the godly as from Antiochus Epiphanes Iulian the Apostata And since that al the aduersaries of the Church in their calamites and death are destitute of comfort it is manifest that they suffer as the enemies of God and therefore are far from true Religion Now that which the wicked alone doe there is no doubt but that is in the number of their Sinnes for which they suffer punishment Wherefore the ouerthrowes of the enemies of the Church are no obscure Testimony of the wrath of God against them euen as God himself saith of Pharao To this same purpose haue I stirred thee vp Exod. 9. Rom. 9. that I might shew my power in thee and that my name might be declared throughout all the earth 10 The consent of true doctrine 10 The consent of the parts of doctrine 11 The confession and constancy of Martyrs and the iarring of others euen about the chiefe pointes 11 The testimonies and confessions of Martyrs who sealing with their blood this Doctrine doe shewe euen in the middest of death that they indeede doe so thinke as they taught and that they drawe that comfort out of it which they did preach vnto others And hence also it appeareth Obiection 1 that the certainty of this holy doctrine dependeth not on mens record Doth the certaintie of doctrine depēd of men though the constancy of Martyrs and other godly men giue comfort vnto vs. For albeit the Testimony of the Saintes too doth concur as a lesse principal proofe vnto our confirmation yet in their examples is seene a far other euē the testimony of God himself who strengthneth and comforteth them so that they are ready to sustaine any thing for his name sake Neither ought that to mooue vs a whit if other sectes also tel vs of their Martyrs For first Obiection 2 they are far behind that number of Martyrs Others are Martyrs also which the Church hath Answere They differ Againe there is not that alacritie and cheerfulnes found in them in suffering punishmentes which is in most of the martyrs of Christ so that it may easily appeare that they neuer feele that security of conscience and ioie of hart in God which the Godly feele And thirdly which is chiefely to bee considered the defenders of wicked doctrine suffer as being cōuicted of their errors But the godly no falshood being shewed in their confession are Tyrannically by their persecutors drawen vnto punishment whereas the persecutors themselues are conuicted of their impiety and iniurie euen as the Lord promiseth I wil giue you a mouth and wisedome where-against al your aduersaries shal not bee able to speak or resist Wherefore albeit sometimes some men suffer for their doctrine the certainty whereof they are not able to confirme neither to themselues nor to others yet doe they it not fenced by any diuine strength and comfort but being blinded by their owne stubburnes or pride and the illusions of the Diuel they run headlong to destruction contrariwise it is saied of the godlies Martyrdome Philip. 1. It is giuē vnto you for Christ not onely to beleeue in him but to suffer for his sake 12 The godlines and holines of those of whom the sacred Scriptures haue been written and who truely embrace this doctrine 13 Their plaine dealing in detecting of vices 14 The Testimonie of the holy Ghost 13 Their ingenuitie and plaine dealing in opening faults committed either by them or theirs whom the holy ghost hath vsed in committing this doctrine to writing 14 The testimonie of the holy Ghost which crieth in the hartes of the godly Abba father This testimonie doth not onely prooue which all the former also do but it perswadeth too For faith is nothing els then a firme assent by which wee agree vnto all the woord of God deliuered vnto vs and a confidence by which euery one of vs do know resolue that God according vnto the tenor of this Scripture is mercifull good vnto vs. Which confidence there followeth ioyfulnes resting in God and calling on him with an assured hope of obtaining those good things which according to the prescript of his woord wee begge of him Nowe that both of these that is both this assent or assurance of our doctrine and the liuely consolation which thence springeth neither do rest vpon the testimony of mē nor of any creature but is inflamed and strengthned by no other doctrine then of the Prophets and Apostles read heard and meditated of by them this euery one of the godly through a liuely and certain feeling of their hearts haue experience of This spirit therefore God adioyneth as a witnes vnto his woord Esai 19. This is my couenant with them saith the Lord my spirite that is vpon thee and my woordes which I haue put in thy mouth shall not depart out of thy mouth nor out out of the mouth of thy seed saith the Lord from hencefoorth euen for euer This spirite also Christ promiseth as the chiefe witnesse of his doctrine vnto his Disciples Iohn cap. 15. When the comforter shall come hee shall beare witnes of mee And cap. 16. When he is come which is the spirit of truth hee will lead
not knowing the scriptures neither were they the true Church though they seased vpon the name and place of it 2 Answere Vniuersallie Secondly the true Church indeede erreth not vniuersallie For alwaies the light of the truth especially concerning the foundation of doctrine is preserued in some mens minds wherupon the Church is called the pillar and ground of truth But yet neuertheles some also of the godly oftentimes fall into errors through ignorance and infirmitie yet so that they hold the foundation neither doe they defend their erronious opinions contrarie to their conscience and at length they forsake them euen as it is said If anie man builde vpon this foundation gold 1 Cor. 3. Ephes 4. 1 Cor. 12 siluer c. And Philip. 3. If ye bee otherwise minded God shal reueile euen the same vnto you Last of al there is giuen vnto euery man grace according vnto the measure of the gift of Christ And the spirit distributeth to euerie man seuerallie as he wil. The Apostles before they had receiued the holie Ghost at Whitsontide were the liuely members of the Church yet erred they concerning the kingdom office of the Messias There were of the Chiliasts opinion great men in the Church as Pasias Irenaeus Apollinarius Tertullian Victorinus Lactantius Methodius Martyr And therefore although the Church er not vniuersallie yet oftentimes some of her members erre when as they swarue from the woord which God suffereth not seldome to happen vnto them for to keepe vs beeing warned of our weakenes and blindnes in modestie and his true feare and in daily inuocating of him and withal to teach vs that the truth of doctrine is not to be measured by the title of the church but by the woord deliuered of him by the handes of the Prophets and Apostles as it is said Thy woord O Lord is a lanterne vnto my feet Psalm 119. and a light vnto my pathes Likewise 1 Tim. 6. Keepe that which is committed vnto thee and auoid profane and vaine bablinges This ground beeing once laied 7 Obiection The Church ought to obey Bishops by the commandement of God that so far foorth the Church erreth not as it doth not swarue from the written woord of God it is easy to answere to that which they make shew of to the contrarie that the Church is ruled by Bishops and therefore must obey them as it is saied Act. cap. 20. Take heede vnto all the flocke whereof the holy Ghost hath made you ouerseers to gouerne the Church of God And Mat. 18. If hee refuse to heare the Church let him bee vnto thee as an heathen man and a Publicane Luc. 10. Hee that heareth you heareth mee and hee that despiseth you despiseth mee And to the Hebrewes 13. Obey those who beare rule ouer you For both they must rule and the Church must obey them according vnto the prescript of Gods woord as it is said If any man preach any other doctrine let him bee accursed Aunswere Necessarilie in those 〈◊〉 things which belong to the ministery frely in traditions Gal. 1. Whatsoeuer therfore the ministers propound out of the woord of God vnto the Church wee must of necessity obey it that which the Lord teacheth Matt. 23.2 when hee saieth The Scribes the Pharisees sit in Moyses chaire All therefore whatsoeuer they bid you obserue that obserue and doe For they sit in Moses chaire who teach Moses doctrine in the Church If also they ordaine any thinges indifferen◠and of a middle sort which are profitable these also are to be obserued for maintaining of order and auoiding of offence But if they require vs to beleeue or obserue thinges repugnant to the woord of God or thinges that are in their owne nature indifferent with putting an opinion of necessitie in them and of woorshipping of God they sit no longer in Moses chaire but in the chaire of scorners and of them it is said Iohn 10. The sheepe heard them not Likewise 1. Tim. 4. In the latter times some shall depart from the faith and shal giue heed vnto the spirites of error And that the decrees of the Bishops also are not to bee receaued among the precepts and decrees of the Church is confirmed by the example of the ciuill magistrate whose iust good Lawes binde the cōsciences of the subiects 1 Inst For the dissimilitude of the examples consisteth in that that God himselfe by expresse woorde hath decreed a necessitie of obedience to the Lawes and commandements of the ciuil magistrate 1 Instance The magstrate doth bind the consciences therfore Bishops which are not repugnant vnto his Law but hath giuen a liberty of conscience in traditions of the Church so that he pronounceth himselfe to be angrie with him who obeieth not ciuil magistrats as long as they command nothing repugnant to his Lawes but not with them which without offence do contrarie to the constitutions of Bishops For of the magistrate it is said Rom. 13. We must obey him for conscience sake But of thinges indifferent in the Church Coloss 2. Let no man condemne you in meat or drink or in respect of a holy daie 2 Instance The higher power doth more bind 1 Answere Likewise Gal. 5. Stand fast in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made vs free Now if againe they reply that the office of Bishops is aboue the ciuil power and therefore hath greater force then that to bind men to obey first we graunt that more obedience is due vnto the superior power then to the inferiour as long as it commaundeth nothing contrarie to Gods woorde As long therefore as the ministers propound the word of God vnto the Church and for auoiding of offence commaund such thinges to be obserued as appertaine to decencie and order they do not now offend against them but against God whosoeuer obey them not But if they require their lawes concerning thinges indifferent to be obserued with putting an opinion of necessitie in them and of the worship of God and do make them necessarie when there is no danger of offence to ensue Because this charge is contrarie to the word of God no obedience is due vnto it Further we confesse that greater obedience is due vnto the superiour power in those things in which it is superiour that is in which God would haue other powers to obey it But the ministerial power is superiour vnto the ciuil in those things which belong properly vnto the ministerie that is which are of God deliuered commaunded and committed vnto the ministers that by them they may bee declared vnto the Church But of matters indifferent concerning which nothing is either commanded or forbidden of God the ciuil power is superiour by reason of the authoritie which God in these matters hath giuen vnto the ciuil magistrate and not to the ministers of the Church Obiection 8 But against this they returne againe That wee also doe alleadge the Testimonies of councels fathers in
confirming the doctrine of the Church which were but in vaine for vs to doe Fathers and councels ar cited if their sentences had not the force and authoritie of Ecclesiastical doctrine But we neither bring nor receaue the Testimonies of the ancient Church with that mind as if without the authority of the holie Scripture they were sufficient for confirmation of anie point of doctrine Neither yet is the regard had of them in vaine For both they which are rightlie minded after they are instructed by the voice of the Scriptures concerning the truth are yet more confirmed by the Church as by a Testimonie of lower degree and they which attribute more authoritie vnto them then they should or abuse their sayings against the trueth are very wel refuted by the testimonie of them whom they have made their iudges Also they say That order decencie in the Church is necessary Obiection 9 by the commandement of God according as it is said Traditions are order 1 Cor. 14. Let al thinges be done comelie and in order For God is not the author of confusion Now the order and discipline of the Church doth a great part consist in traditions Ecclesiasticall wherefore they conclude that by the violating of these mens consciences are wounded and God offended But as God commaundeth some order to be appointed and kept in the Church Answere Of mere particulars there is no concluding so hath he given a double libertie in it vnto his Church first that it be arbitrarie for the Church to appoint as may bee most commodious for it what order shal be in euerie place and at euery time obserued Then that also after any thing is certainelie ordained may be kept or not kept without hurt of conscience both of the whole Church and of euerie one of the godly if there bee no danger of offence For it is necessarie that euer a difference be put betwixt the commaundements of God by the obseruing whereof God is worshipped and offended by the breaking of them and those things which God hath left to men to appoint neither is worshipped or offended as himselfe pronounceth either by the altering or omitting of them so long as there is no cause or danger of offence And the same Apostle Gal. 5. who commandeth all things to be done comelie and in order willeth vs to stand fast in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made vs free and that we should bee condemned of no man in meate or drink or in respect of an holy day Wherefore not they who without contempt of diuine things or wantonnes or danger of offence doe something otherwise in there things then is appointed but they rather offend against the commaundement of God concerning keeping order who either woulde haue no order in the Church or trouble that which is wel appointed Obiection 10 Obscure things do not suffice without interpreration Aunswere The minor is false if they respect the ground These men find fault also with the obscuritie of the holy Scriptures which they proue both by exāples of hard places of Scripture also out of the second epistle of Peter cap. 3. where it is said That there are some thinges hard to be vnderstood in the epistles of Paul And therefore since that thinges darckly spoken without they bee expounded can not suffice to perfect and wholesome doctrine they vrge that the interpretation of the Church also is necessarily to bee receaued with the Scripture But here aboue all thinges they iniurie the holie Ghost ascribing darkenes obscuritie vnto him who of purpose endeuoured to applie himselfe in simplicitie of speech to the capacitie of the common people and the rudest For those thinges which appertaine to the ground of doctrine which is necessarie to be knowen of all as are the articles of our beleefe the tenne commaundementes they are so plainly recited so often repeated so plentifully expounded in the Scriptures that they are open and easie to any but to him who will not learne euen as the 119. Psalm teacheth Where the woorde of the Lord is called a Lanterne to our feete and a light to our pathes Againe The enterance into thy woordes sheweth light and giueth vnderstanding to the simple And 2. 1 Instance The ground of doctrine is vnknown to manie Peter 1. The woorde of the Prophets is called a light shining in a darke place To which yee doe well saith hee that yee take heede as vnto a light that shineth in a darke place vntill the day dawne and the day starre arise in your hartes And Salomon in the first of the Prouerbes affirmeth that hee writeth to giue the simple sharpnesse of witte and to the child knowledge and discretion Again that wisedome crieth without uttereth her voice in the streetes Paul also 1. Cor. 1. saith that Christ sent him to preach the Gospell not with wisedome of woordes least the crosse of Christ should be made of none effect The ground therefore and summe of doctrine is not obscure except it bee vnto the reprobates who contemne the truth or stubburnlie reiect it as the Apostle saith 2. Cor. 4. If our Gospell bee hid it is hid to them that are lost in whom the God of this world hath blinded their mindes that is of the infidels that the light of the glorious Gospell of Christ should not shine vnto thē And the prophet Esai 65. and the Apostle Rom. 10. All the day long haue I stretched foorth my handes to a disobedient and gainsaying people And Psalm 36. The woordes of his mouth are iniquitie and deceite he hath left off to vnderstand and to doe good And Mat. 11. I giue thee thankes o Father Lord of Heauen and Earth because thou hast hidde these thinges from the wise men and men of vnderstanding and hast opened them vnto babes Now if they replie againe 2 Instance Diuine matters are obscure vnto al men that diuine matters are hard and obscure to all men as it is said 1. Cor. 2. The naturall man perceiueth not the thinges of the spirit of God for they are foolishnesse vnto him neither can he know thē because they are spiritually discerned they should first haue called to mind that this ignorance and hardnes riseth not of the obscuritie of the scripture but of the blindnes of mans mind and furthermore that this obscuritie since in verie deed it is not in the Scripture but seemeth to bee the fault of our nature doth not alwaies remaine in those who are regenerate but is remoued from them by the illumination of the holie Spirite according to those sayinges Luc. 8. It is giuen vnto you to know the secrets of the kingdome of God but to others in parables that when they see they should not see when they heare they should not vnderstand And 2. Cor. 3. Vntil this day when Moses is read the vaile is laid ouer their hartes Neuerthelesse when their hart shall be turned vnto the Lord the vaile shal
honesty But the good worke in the godly is freely adorned not only with temporall but also with eternall benefites that also because it pleaseth him in our mediator Math. 5.16 not only thereby to inuite others to honestie according to that of Christs So let your light shine before meÌ„ that they may see your good works glorifie your father which is in heauen Wherefore the good works of the godly are ofteÌ„times in the old testameÌ„t shadowed by an acceptable incense wherewith God is honored pleased And godlines as the Apostle saith hath the promise of this life the life to come 7. Good works in the vnregenerat make only to the mitigatioÌ„ of their punishments that they may not suffer more grieuous pains as other wicked persons doe but the good workes of the godly doe not only serue for this that they may suffer lighter and easier punishments but also that they may be quite freed from all euill Thinges indifferent in themselues may bee also sinnes by an accident that is How things in themselves indifferent by an accident become sinne if they be done with offence or without faith For whatsoeuer is done without faith is sinne Vnto the pure all thinges indeede are pure but it is euill for the man which eateth with offence Out of these and the like places is this diuision taken For when the Apostle saith that all thinges are vncleane to the vncleane and wicked he intimateth also that those thinges which of themselues are good are notwithstanding vncleane or sinnes vnto the wicked In all these diuisions it is affirmed that also in the â—aintes of God is sinne Wherefore we must hold the difference betweene the sinnes of the regenerat and the vnregenerat There are diuers sinnes truely in the Saintes as 1. Originall sinne 2. Many actuall sinnes as of ignoraunce omission infirmitie 3. Some also fall into errors which fight with the foundation it selfe or into sinnes against their conscience for which they leese a good conscience comfort many giftes of the holy Ghost and should be condemned except they did repent But neuertheles very much doe the regenerate in sinning differ from the wicked 1. Because the purpose of God is to keepe the godly for euer 2. In the godly there is assured certain repentance in the ende 3. In the very sins themselues is the true beginning of faith sometimes more sometimes lesse and the godly so resist and striue against sinne that they fall not without repentance into errors against their conscience and repugnant to the foundation 4. What are the causes of sinne 1 SOme deriue the original of sin from the destinie of the start Men seeke the cause of sinne any where rather than where it is saying I sin because I was borne vnder an vnlucky Planet 2 Others when they sinne and are rebuked for their sinne they make answere Not I but the Deuill was in fault that I committed this deede 3 Others leauing excuses directly cast the fault vpon God saying God would haue it so for if he would not I should not haue sinned 4 Others when God say they might haue hindered me and yet did not himselfe is the author of my sinne It is no newe thing for men to sharpen their blasphemous tongue against God For our first Parentes when they had sinned and were accused of their sinne by God they translate and passe ouer the fault committed from themselues to others neither ingenuously confesse the truth Adam returneth the fault not so much vpon his wife as vpon God himselfe The woman saith he which thou gauest to be with me she gaue me of the tree and I did eate as if hee shoulde say except thou hadst ioined her to me I had not sinned But the Lord gaue him not his wife that shee shoulde be an occasion of euill vnto him but that it might be the better and more comfortable for him The woman simply imputeth the fault to the Deuill saying The Serpent beguiled me and I did eate These are the most false and corrupt iudgements concerning the originall of sinne impious and detestable whereby the maiestie truth and iustice of God is grieuously offended Destinie no cause of sinne 1. They who make destinie a cloake for sinne 1. define destinie to bee a linked order thorough all aeternitie and a certaine perpetuall necessitie of intents and workes according to the counsailes of God or according to the euill planets Now if you aske them who made the planets they haue not ought to aunswere but God Therefore these men lay their euill to Gods charge But such a destinie did not all the founder Philosophers maintain much lesse ChristiaÌ„s 2. S. Austine against two epistles of the Pelagians vnto Boniface lib. 2. cap. 6. They saith he who hold destinie maintain that not only actions euents but also our willes themselues depend of the position of the planets at the time of euery ones conception or natiuitie which they call constellations But the grace of God surpasseth not onely all the starres and all the heauens but also all the Angels Let vs conclude these things with the word of the Lord by his Prophet Ieremy pronouncing to this sense Thus saith the Lorde Learne not the way of the heathen bee not afraid for the signs of heauen though the heathen be afraid of such for the customes of the people are vaine Wherefore that the Astrologers call the planet of Saturne vnmercifull sharpe and cruell and the planet of Venus fauourable and gentle it is the vanity of vanities For the starres haue no force of dooing good or ill And therefore the fault of sinners ought not to be imputed vnto them 2. That the Deuill is not the onely author of sinne who when as we commit sinne shoulde beare alone the blame of the sinne and our selues be free from fault The Deuill not the onely autor of sinne it is most of all declared in this that he is able to induce and entice a man to euill but not to compell him For God keepeth vnder the Deuill by his power that he cannot doe what he will but onely what and so much as God permitteth him Nay he hath not so much as power ouer filthie swine much lesse ouer the most noble soules of men He hath indeede a subtilty and great force in perswading but God is stronger who also neuer ceaseth himself to put good motions into mans minde Neither permitteth he more to Satan than he maketh profitable for man Which we may see in that most holy man Iob in the example of Paul and in his wordes God is faithfull which will not suffer you to be tempted aboue that you be able Wherefore they are vain men who vnloade the blame of their wickednes on the Deuils shoulders It remaineth that we shew God no cause of sinne that also God is not the author of sin Gen. 1. 2. God saw those things which he had made and they
sinnes are the causes of all that follow The reasons 1. Because by one man sinne entred into the world 2. Because man and the Deuill are able by their owne nature to sinne against the lawe And that first sinne or first fall in Paradise is the cause of originall sinne both in Adam who fell and in others who haue their discent from him Originall sinne is the cause preparatiue as it were of all actuall sinnes according to that of Paul Sinne that dwelleth in me doth it and euill and corrupt inclinations doe carry me to euill actions Causes impulsiue of sins are those obiectes which sollicite men to sinne Yea actuall sinnes are the causes also of those sinnes that follow them Former actuall sinnes cause of others which follow after not onely in them which first sinned but also in others Furthermore whereas the scripture teacheth that the sinnes which followe are the punishmentes of those that went before and the fault or desert is an impulsiue cause of punishment it is manifest that actuall sinnes which goe before are the causes also of those that follow them euen as of other punishments or calamities which are purchased by our sinnes And that is to bee vnderstood aswell of the falles of those that commit the sin as of others fals with which aswel they are punished whose falles they are as they who first sinned as the sinnes of the Parents are punished by the sinnes of the children the sinnes of the subiects by the sinnes of the Magistrates or contrariwise as cap. 1. to the Romans of purpose is declared Wherefore God gaue them vp to their hartes lusts vnto vncleannes And 2. Thes 2. Whose comming is by the working of Satan with al power and signs and lying wonders in all deceiuablenes of vnrighteousnes among thē that perish And Exod 2. I the Lord thy God am a iealous God visiting the sinnes of the fathers vpon the children vnto the third and fourth generatiō of them that hate me And 2. Sam. 12. Thus saith the Lord behold I will raise vp euill against thee out of thine owne house and will take thy wiues before thine eies and giue them vnto thy neighbour God the causer of sinnes as they are punishmēts but not as they are sinnes If humane reason doe here obiect That God is the author causer of punishmēts If therefore sins be the punishments of sins it followeth that God is the cause of sinnes We answere that there is a fallacie of the accident in the Minor For it commeth to passe by an accident that is by the fault of those who sinne that when by the iust iudgement of God either themselues or others are punished by euil men they in the meane season God permitting that is not shewing them that he would haue those things to be done by them for to punish them which things yet he hateth and which he will punish both in this life and the life to come do fulfill their desires swaruing from the law of God estrainging themselues more and more from God by sinning doe purchase more grieuous punishmentes vnto themselues Or if we will distinguish the Maior it is in effect the same For punishments come from god as author and causer of them as they are punishmentes but in asmuch as they are sinnes so they come God neither willing them nor approuing them nor causing but onely permitting For to permit this kinde of punishments which sinners by sinning inflict ether vpon themselues or others is nothing else than not to cause that euill men shoulde doe this which God woulde haue done for punishment to the same ende that they may obey this will of God So also we answere to that Argument The priuation or want of righteousnes and diuine wisedome god inflicteth as a punishment vpon men but that priuation is sinne Therefore god is the causer of sinne For this priuation is not sinne as by the iust iudgement of God it is inflicted but as it is of men themselues voluntarily brought vpon them by their owne misdeedes and demerites and is admitted or receiued into the minde will and hart euen as euill actions are not sinnes as they are gouerned by god but as they are done by men They say further He that mindeth the end mindeth also the meanes God mindeth the ends of sinne Punishment and the manifestation of Gods glory and iustice are not the endes of sinne because men are not by them moued to sinne that is punishment and the shewing of his iustice and wrath in punishment Wherefore he mindeth sinnes also by which those ends are come vnto But the Minor is to be denied that punishment the manifestation of the glory of god are the endes of sinne For the end is that which moueth the efficient cause to bring forth an effect but punishment or the manifestation of the glory of god do not moue the sinner to sinne These cannot therefore bee saide to bee the ends of sinne But those are the proper ends of sinne which the Deuils and men respect in sinning that is the destruction of men the fulfilling of euill desires the oppression and reproche of God and his truth God respecteth those as ends not of mens sin but of his permission of their sinne If they reply that men indeede haue not those endes but that god respecteth them For that which god permitteth to shewe his iustice by punishing it the end which god proposeth thereof is the punishment of the sinners and his owne glorie But he permitteth sin to punish it and to declare himselfe iust by punishing it therefore these are the endes of sin in respect of the purpose intent of god we deny the Maior For God suffering sin to be committed respecteth as the end not of an others worke that is of the sin of Deuils or mē but of his own work that is of his permission of sinne the punishment of sinnes and the manifestation of his owne iustice For sin is one thing and the permission of sinne another whereof is spoken Exod. 9. For this cause haue I appointed thee to shew my power in thee and to declare my name throughout all the world Prouerb 16. The Lorde hath made all thinges for his owne sake yea euen the wicked man for the day of euill Roman 9. God being willing to shew his truth and to make his power knowen hath suffered with long patience the vessels of wrath prepared to destruction Wherefore punishment is not the end but the consequent or proper effect of sinne and an accidentary effect thereof is the manifestation of the glorie of God as Paul sheweth Rom. 3. For if the veritie of God hath more abounded thorough my lie to his glorie c. If here againe they reply He that will the consequent will also the antecedent How God is said to will punishment which is the consequent of sinne and not sinne it selfe which is the antecedent But God will these things which are
inward senses are adioined to the vnderstanding and the affections to the will The image of God in man The description of the image of God is a vertue knowing aright the nature will and workes of God and a will freelie obeying God and a correspondence of all the inclinations desires actions with the will of God and in a word a spiritual and vnchangeable puritie of the soule and the whole man perfect blessednes ioy resting in God and the dignitie of man and maiestie whereby hee excelleth and ruleth other creatures Or The image of God in man is 1. The soule it selfe together with the faculties thereof endewed with reason and will 2. In the soule wisedome and knowledge of God his will and workes euen such as god requireth of vs. 3. A conformity with the lawe of god or holinesse and righteousnesse vnder which wee comprehende the heart and all affections 4. Felicitie without miserie and corruption perfect blessednesse ioie aboundance of all good thinges and glorie wherewith the nature of man was adorned 5. The rule and dominion of man ouer the creatures as fishes foules and other liuing creatures In all these thinges the creature after some sort resembleth his creator yet can he by no meanes be equalled vnto his Creator For in God all thinges are immense and without measure and euen his essence infinite Ephes 4.24 The Apostle Paul putteth Righteousnesse and holinesse as the chiefe partes of this image which yet doe not exclude but presuppose wisedome and knowledge For no man can worship God vnknowen But neither doth Paul exclude perfect blessednes glorie for this according to the order of Gods iustice is necessarily coupled with perfect holinesse or conformitie with God Whereupon it foloweth that where true righteousnesse and holinesse is there is the absence of all euils whether of crime and offence or of paine and punishment Righteousnesse and holinesse in this text of the Apostle may be taken for one and the same or distinguished So that Righteousnesse may be meant of the actions and Holinesse of the qualities Righteousnesie that is a conformitie and congruitie of the will and heart with the minde iudging aright that is according to the word of God 1. Cor. 15.47 The first man was of the earth earthlie the second man the Lord from heauen As the earthlie was such are they that are earthlie and as is the heauenlie such are they also that are heauenlie And as wee haue borne the image of the earthlie so shall wee beare the Image of the heauenlie The Apostle doth not here take away the image of the heauenlie man from Adam when he as yet stoode but compareth his nature estate aswell before as after his fall with that heauenlie glorie into which wee are restored by Christ that is not onely the nature of man corrupted through sin by death but the degree of the image of God in mans nature before the fall before glorification with that which foloweth his glorification 2 How far forth the image of god was lost and how farre it remaineth The remnants of the image of god THe image of god in man was not wholy lost but for the greatest part For there remaineth in all as well the vnregenerate as regenerate 1. The incorporeall substance of the soule together with the power thereof likewise libertie in his will which whatsoeuer it will it will freely 2. Manie motions as of those things which we know by sense as are naturall principles some motions also of god his will and workes 3. Some prints of vertues and an ablenes concerning outwarde Discipline and behauiour 4. The fruition of manie good thinges 5. The Dominion also ouer the creatures is not wholy lost He is able to rule many and to vse them Why God preserueth these remnants in vs. These remnants are therefore preserued of god 1. That they might be a testimonie of the bountie of god towards those who were vnworthie of it 2. That god might vse them to the restoring of his image in man 3. That he may leaue the reprobate without excuse Now the image of god remaineth not 1. What is lost of the image of God in vs. In respect of the true sauing sufficient knowledge of god his will 2. The integritie perfectiō of the knowledge of gods workes a dexterity of discerning the truth 3. Rightnes cōformitie of al inlinations desires and actions in our will hart and outward parts by the losse whereof ensue actuall sinnes and merite eternal damnation 4. Whole and perfect dominion ouer the creatures For those beastes which feared man before now assault him his enemies are hurtfull vnto him and doe not obey him The fieldes bring forth thornes and thistles 5. The right and interest of vsing these creatures was lost because hee graunted it to vs his children not to his enimies 6. Life euerlasting was lost and in place thereof is come death both temporal and eternal with calamities of all sortes that is we lost the felicity and happines both of this life and of the life to come Obiection The Heathen haue many great vertues and atchieue great workes Therefore it is not true that the image of god is lost in them Answere All these workes are not pleasing to god because they proceed not from the true knowledge of god neither are wrought to that end that all the glorie may redound to god Those their vertues are onely of outward behauiour discipline but not from the hart thereby to obey god whom they flie and to whose glorie they can doe nothing 3. How the Image of god is repaired in vs. THe repairing of it is wrought by god alone The repairing of the image of god in vs is the work of all three persons who gaue it vnto men For in whose power it is to giue life in his also it is to restore it being lost The maner of restoring it is this 1. The Father restoreth it by his Son 2. The Son by the holy Ghost immediately regenerating vs. We are changed into the same image 1. Cor. 3.18 from glorie to glorie as by the spirite of the Lord. 3. The holy ghost restoreth it by the word the gospel is the power of god vnto saluation 4. This is so done by god Rom. 1.16 as that in this life it is onely begunne in the chosen and then is confirmed and augmented vnto the end of their life is made perfect in the end of this life as cōcerning the Soule but as concerning the whole man at the resurrectiō of the bodies Wherefore it is to be obserued who is the author what the order and maner of this repairing How the Image of God is in Christ and how in vs. Christ both essentiallie the image of the father according to his Diuinitie and according to his humanitie a created image of God though in far more excellencie than Saints and Angels NOw if it
then and deliuerer must wee seeke for Such a one verily as is verie man perfectly iust and yet in power aboue al creatures that is who also is verie f 1. Cor. 15.21 25. Ier. 23.6 Isai 53.11 2. Cor. 5.14 Heb. 7.16 Isa 7.14 Rom. 8.3 God 16 Wherefore is it necessarie that he be verie man and that perfectly iust too Because the iustice of God requireth that the same humane nature which hath sinned doe it selfe likewise make recompence for sinne But hee g Ro. 5.12 17. that is himselfe a sinner h 1. Pet. 3.18 cannot make recompence for others 17 Why must he also be verie God That he might by the power of his Godhead i Isay 55.3 18. Acts. 2.24 1. Pet. 3.18 sustaine in his flesh the burden of Gods wrath and k 1. Iohn 1.2 49.10 Act. 20.28 Ioh. 3.16 might recouer restore vnto vs that righteousnesse and life which we lost 18 And who is that Mediatour which is together both very God and a very perfectly iust man Euen our Lord Iesus Christ l Mat. 1.23.1 Tim. 3.16 Ioh. 14.16.1 Tim. 2.5 Luk. 2.11 who is made to vs of God wisedome righteousnesse sanctification and m 1. Cor. 1.30 redemption 19 Whence knowest thou this Out of the gospell which God first made knowen in n Gen. 3.15 Paradise afterwards o Gen. 22.18 49.10.11 Rom. 1.2 Heb. 1.1 Act. 3.22 c. 10.43 did spread it abroad by the Patriarks Prophets p Ich. 5.46 Heb. 10.7 shadowed it by sacrifices other ceremonies of the law lastly q Rom. 10.4 Gal. 4.4 3.24 Heb. 13.8 accōplished it by his only begotten Son 20 Is then saluation restored by Christ to all men who perished in Adam Not to al but to those only who by a true faith are engraffed into him r Ioh. 1.12 3.36 Isa 53.11 Psal 2.12 Rom. 11.20 Heb. 4.2 10 39. receiue his benefits 21 What is faith It is not only a knowlege whereby I surely assent to al things which God hath ſ Heb. 11.13 Ia. 2.19 Gal. 2.20 reuealed vnto vs in his word but also an assured t Rom. 4.16 5.1 10.10 c. Iac. 1.8 trust kindled in my u Rom. 1.16 10.17 1 Cor. 1.21 Mar. 16.16 Act. 16.14 heart by the holy x Mat. 16.17 Ioh. 3.5 Gal. 5.22 Phil. 1.19 ghost thorough the gospel whereby I make my repose in God being assuredly resolued that remissiō of sins euerlasting righteousnes life a Hab. 2.4 Mat. 9.2 Eph. 2.7.8.9 Rom. 5.1 is giuen not to others only but to me also and that freely through the mercy of God for the b Rom. 3.24.25 Act. 10.43 merit of Christ alone 22 What are those thinges which are necessarie for a Christian man to beleeue All things which are c Ioh. 20.31 Mat. 28.10 promised vs in the gospel the sum whereof is briefely comprised in the Creed of the Apostles or in the Articles of the Catholick vndoubted faith of all Christians 23 Which is that Creede I Beleue in God the father almighty maker of heauē earth And in Iesus Christ his only Son our Lord which was cōceiued by the holy ghost born of the virgin Mary suffered vnder Pontius Pilate was crucified dead buried he descended into hell the third day he rose again frō the dead he ascended into heauen sitteth at the right hand of God the father almighty from thence shal he come to iudge the quick the dead I beleue in the holy ghost the holy catholick church the communion of saints the forgiuenes of sins the resurrection of the body and the life euerlasting AMEN 24 Into how manie parts is this Creede diuided Into three parts The first is of the eternall father our creation The second of the Sonne our redemption The third of the holie ghost our sanctification 25 Seeing there is d Deut. 6 4. Ephes 4.6 Esa 44.6 45.5 1. Cor. 8.4 but one onlie substance of God why namest thou these three The Father the Sonne and the holie Ghost Because God hath so e Esa 61.1 Luc. 4.18 Psal 110 1. Mat. 3.16.17 28.19 Io. 14.26 15.26 Tit. 3.5.6 Eph. 2.18 2. Cor. 13.13 Gal. 4.6 1. Ioa. 5.7 manifested himselfe in his woorde that these three distinct persons are that one true euerlasting God OF THE FATHER 26 What beleeuest thou when thou saiest I beleeue in God the Father almightie maker of heauen and earth I beleeue the euerlasting father of our Lord Iesus Christ who a Gen. 1. 2. Psal 33.6 Iob. 33.4 Act. 4.24 14.15 c. Isa 45.7 hath made of nothing heauen earth with all that are in them who like-wise vpholdeth and b Psa 104.3 115.3 Mat. 10.29 Heb. 1.3 Rom. 11.36 gouerneth the same by his eternal Counsel and prouidence c Ioa. 1.12 Rom. 8.15 Gal. 4.5.6.7 Eph. 1.5 to bee my God my Father for Christes sake and therefore I doe so trust in him and so relie on him that I make no doubt but he will prouide all things d Psal 55 23. Mat. 6.26 Luc. 12.22 necessarie both for my soule and bodie And further whatsoeuer euils he sendeth on mee in this troublesome life hee will e Rom 8 28. turne them to my safety seeing both he is able to doe it as beeing f Isa 46 4 Rom. 10 12. 8.38 c. God almightie and willing to doe it as beeing g Mat 6. 7.9.10.11 a bountifull father 27 What is the prouidence of God The Almighty power of God euery where present h Act. 17.25 c. Psal 94 9. c. Is 29.15 c. Ezec. 8.12 whereby hee doth as it were with his hand vphold i Heb. 1.2.3 gouerne heauen earth with all the creatures therin So that those thinges which growe in the earth as likewise raine and drouth fruitfulnes barrainnes meat k Ier. 5.24 Acts. 14.17 drink l Ioh. 9.3 health and siknesse m Prou. 22.2 riches and pouertie in a woord all things come not rashly or by chance but by his fatherly counsell and will 28 What doth this knowledge of the Creation and prouidence of God profite vs That in aduersitie n Rom. 5.3 c. Iac. 1.3 Iob. 1.21 c. wee may bee patient and o Deut. 8.10 1. Thess 5.18 thankfull in prosperitie p Rom. 5.4.5 haue hereafter our chiefest hope reposed in God our most faithfull father beeing sure that there is nothing which may q Rom. 8.38.39 withdrawe vs from his loue for as much as all creatures are so in his power that without his will they are not r Iob. 1.12 2.6 Prouer. 21.1 Acts. 17.25 c. able not only to do any thing but not so much as once to moue OF THE SONNE 29 Why is the Sonne of God called Iesus
Crosse and of all his benefites Because Christ hath commaunded me and all the faithfull to eate of this breade broken and to to drinke of the cup distributed in remembrance of him with this promise g Mat. 26.27.28 Mar. 14.22.23.24 Luc. 22.16.20 1. Cor. 10.16.17 11.23.24.25 12.13 adioined First that his bodie was as certainly broken and offred for me on the Crosse and his bloud shed for me as I behold with my eies the bread of the Lord broken vnto me and the cup communicated to me and further that my soul is no lesse assuredly fed to euerlasting life with his bodie which was crucified for vs and his bloud which was shedde for vs than I receiue and tast by the mouth of my bodie the bread and wine the signes of the bodie and bloud of our Lord receiued at the hand of the Minister 76 What is it to eate the bodie of Christ crucified and to drinke his bloud that was shed It is not onely to imbrace by an assured confidence of minde the whole passion and death of Christ and thereby to h Ioh. 6.35.40.47.48.50.51.53.54 obtain forgiuenes of sins and euerlasting life but also by the holy Ghost who dwelleth both in Christ and vs so more and more to bee a Ioh. 6.56 vnited to his sacred bodie that though he be in b Act. 3.21 Act. 1.9 c. 1. Cor. 11.26 heauen and we in earth yet neuerthelesse are wee flesh of his flesh and bone of his c Eph. 5.29.30.32 1. Cor. 6.15.17.19 1. Ioh. 3.24 4.13 Ioh. 14 23. bones and as all the members of the bodie are by one soule so are wee also quickened and d Io. 6.56.57.58 Io. 15.1.2.3.4.5.6 Eph. 4.15.16 guided by one and the same spirite 77 Where hath Christ promised that he will as certainely giue his bodie and bloude so to bee eaten and dronken as they eate this breade broken and drinke this cup In the institution of his supper the wordes whereof are these e 1. Cor. 11.23 c. Mat. 26.26 c. Mar. 14.22 c. Luc. 22.19 c. Our Lord Iesus Christ in the night that he was betraied tooke bread And when he had giuen thankes he brake it and said Take eate this is my bodie which is broken for you this doe you in remembrance of me Likewise also he tooke the cup when he had supped and saide f Exod. 24.8 Heb. 9.20 This cup is the Newe Testament in my bloud g Exod. 13.9 this doe as often as yee shall drinke it in remembrance of me For as often as ye shal eat this bread and drinke this cup ye shewe the Lordes death till he come This promise is repeated by Saint Paul when he saith The cup of thankesgiuing wherewith we giue thankes is it not the Communion of the bloud of Christ The bread which we breake is it not the communion of the bodie of Christ h 1. Cor. 10.16.17 For wee that are manie are one bread and one bodie because wee all are partakers of one bread 78 Are then the bread and wine made the verie bodie and bloud of Christ No verily But as the water of baptisme is i Math. 26.29 Mar. 14.24 not turned into the bloud of Christ but is only a sign and pledge of those thinges that are sealed to vs in Baptisme So neither is the bread of the Lords Supper the verie bodie of k 1. Cor. 10.16 c. 11.26 c Christ Although according to the manner of Sacramentes and that i Gen. 17.10 c. Exod. 26.27.43.48 13 9. Act. 7.8 Exo. 24.8 Le. 16.10 17.11 Isa 6.6.7 Tit. 3.5 Act. 22.16 1. Pet. 3.21 1. Cor. 10.1 forme of speaking of them which is vsuall vnto the holy Ghost the bread is called the body of Christ 79 Why then doth Christ call breade his bodie and the cup his bloud or the new Testament in his bloud and Paul also calleth bread and wine the Communion of the bodie and bloude of Christ Christ not without great consideration speaketh so to wit not onely for to teach vs that as the bread and wine sustaine the life of the body so also his crucified body and bloudshed are indeed the meat drinke of our soul whereby it is a Iohn 6.51.55.56 nourished to eternall life but much more that by this visible signe and pledge he may assure vs that wee are as verily partakers of his bodie and bloud through the working of the holy ghost as wee doe b 1. Cor. 10.16.17 perceiue by the mouth of our bodie these holie signes in remembraunce of him and further also that his suffering and obedience is so certainely ours as though we our selues had suffered punishments for our sinnes and had satisfied God 80 What difference is there betweene the Supper of the Lord and the Popish Masse The Supper of the Lord testifieth to vs that we haue perfect forgiuenesse of all our sinnes for that only Sacrifice of Christ which himself once fully c Heb. 7.27 9 12.26.28 10.10.12.14 Iohn 19.30 Mat. 26.28 Luc. 22.19.20 wrought on the Crosse Then also that we by the holie Ghost are graffed into d 1. Cor. 6.17 10.16 12.13 Christ who now according to his humane nature is onely in heauen at the right hand of his e Heb. 1.3 8.1 c. Father and there will be f Ioan. 4.21.22.23 20.17 Luc. 24.52 Act. 7.55.56 Col. 3.1 Phil. 3.10 1. Thes 1.9.10 worshipped of vs. But in the Masse it is denied that the quicke and the dead haue remission of sins for the onely passion of Christ except also Christ bee daily offered for them by their Sacrificers Further also it is taught that Christ is bodilie vnder the formes of breade and wine and therefore is to bee a In canone Missae item de consecrat distin 2. worshipped in them And so the verie foundation of the Masse is nothing else than an vtter denyall of that onelie Sacrifice and passion of Christ Iesus and an accursed Idolatrie 81 Who are to come vnto the Table of the Lord They onely who are trulie sorrowfull that they haue offended GOD by their sinnes and yet trust that those sinnes are pardoned them for Christes sake and what other infirmities they haue that those are couered by his passion and death who also desire more and more to go forward in faith and integritie of life But hypocrites and they who doe not truely repent do eate and b 1. Cor. 10.21 11.28 c. drinke damnation to themselues 82 Are they also to be admitted to this supper who in confession and life declare them-selues to bee Infidels and vngodlie No. For by that meanes the couenaunt of GOD is profaned and the wrath of GOD is c 1. Cor. 11.20.34 Is 1.11 c. 66.3 Ier. 7.21 c. Ps 50.16 c. stirred vp against the whole assemblie Wherefore the Church by the
fall Therefore perseuerance dependeth not of God promising but of our selues and therefore is doubtful standing vpon a doubtfull ground Aunswere This is a fallacy reasoning from that which is no cause as if it were a cause For by this verie exhortation hee goeth about to nourish make perfect and preserue the safetie of the faithfull For God vseth such threatninges thereby to retaine the godly in their dutie that they may not waxe proude and please themselues But hereof it doth not followe that hee permitteth the perseuerance of the godly in faith grace to their owne strength and arbiterment Moreouer Paul in that place speaketh not to particular men but to the bodie of the Church of Corinth in which many were hypocrites Wherefore they who truely bâ—leeue must certainly resolue that God wil saue them For if he will haue vs assured of his present fauour gâ—ace towards vs he will also haue vs assured of that which is to come because God is vnchangeable Reply 4. Salomon saith Man knoweth not whether he be worthy of loue or hatred Therefore we cannot be assured of the election of God neither resolue any thing of Gods present fauor s by consequent neither of that which is to come Answere To the Antecedent 1. Man knoweth not true as concerning second causes or by euents of thinges bee they good or euill For external and outward fortune is no certaine token whereby to iudge of Gods fauour 2. Againe man knoweth it not of himselfe but he knoweth it God reuealing it and certifiyng vs aboundantly of his loue towards vs by his word and spirite Replie 5. But no man hath knowen the mind of the Lord. Rom. 11.34 Aunswere No man hath knowen it that is before Gâ—d hath reuealed it neither after hee hath reueiled it doth any man perfectly know it for so much know we of god as himselfe hath reuealed vnto vs It is the spirit which reuealeth and witnesseth vnto vs that we are the sonnes of God 2. Cor. 1.22 Rom. 8.16 2 Obiection Ezech. 18.24 The iust man is said to perish if he turne himselfe out of the right way I herefore beleeuers also may defect from godlines and fall from euerlasting saluation Answere He in that place is called iust not who is truely iust but who seemeth vnto men iust For the sonnes and heires only are indewed with true conuersion and godlines Rom. 8.14 As many as are led by the spirite of God they are the sonnes of God And if sonnes then also heires 1. Cor. 2.12 We haue receiued the spirite which is of God that we might know the things which are giuen vnto vs of God vers 16. Wee haue the minde of Christ Eph. 1.13 2. Cor. 1.22 and 5.5 The spirite is called the earnest of our deliuerie which is to come 3 Obiection Paul 2. Cor 6.1 exhorteth the Corinthians that they receiue not the grace of God in vaine so Christ likewise biddeth vs watch and pray Aunswere Thereby carnal securitie is forbidden and certainety of saluation as also faith tranquillity watchfulnes and praier is commaunded For these are the necessary and proper effects of our election an infallible Argument of saluation For al beleeuers are elected and Eph. 1. Paul teacheth that by faith wee are made partakers of Gods adoption 4 Obiection Saul failed and fell away finally Saull was one of the godlie Therefore the godly also fall away Aunswere We denie the Minor that Saul was one of the godly Replie But he had the giftes of the holie ghost Aunswere Hee had such giftes of the holie Ghost as are common to the godly with the reprobate he had not the gifts of regeneration and therefore neither shall hee the holy Ghost sanctifiyng him which is proper to the elect 5 Obiection The doctrine of the certaintie of our saluation breedeth securitie Aunswere It breedeth indeede a spiritual securitie by it selfe in the elect alone and a carnal by an accident and that onely in the wicked and reprobate but not at all in the godly Conclusions comprising the summe of the doctrine of Faith 1 FAith if wee take the word amply and largelie signifieth a certaine knowledge rising from the asseueration of witnesses who are thought not to deceiue 2 In the doctrine of the Church mention is made of fower sortâ— of faith Historicall Temporarie working miracles and Iustifieng 3 Historicall faith is a knowledge resoluing those thinges to be true which are deliuered in the bookes of the Prophets and Apostles 4 TeÌ„porary faith is the knowlege of the doctrin of the church ioined with a ioy for the knowledge of the truth or for other either true or apparent good thinges without any applying of the promise of grace to the beleeuer and therefore without either true conuersion or finall perseuerance 5 Faith which worketh miracles is a certaine knowledge by especiall reuelation of the will of God of working some certain miracle according to the petition or foretelling of him by whom it is to be wrought 6 Iustifieng faith is a knowledge whereby a man doth firmly assent to euery word of God reuealed vnto him and resolueth that the promise of gods grace through christ belongeth to him further it is a ful persuasion and coÌ„fidence in this fauor of god towards him ouercomming al fear and pensiuenes 7 For the confidence of iustifieng faith is a motion of the will heart consisting of a ioy conceiued for the certainty of the present grace of God towardes vs and of a hope of our future deliuery from al euils 8 There is no faith therefore but which resteth on the wil of God reuealed in his word 9 All faith is wrought in men by the holie Ghost either by the voice of Gods heauenly doctrine or by immediat reuelation 10 Seeing God wil kindle frame and confirme ordinary faith in vs by the doctrine of the Church al are bound to hear it and meditate thereon 11 Temporarie faith befalleth to manie hypocrites which are in the Church Historical and the faith of miracles is common to the godly and vngodly Iustifieng faith is giuen in this life to all those only who are chosen vnto euerlasting life 12 Iustifieng faith doth not alwaies comprise Historicall neither is alwaies ioined with the faith of miracles As also the faith of miracles hath alwaies either historicall or temporarie faith ioyned therewith but Iustifieng it hath not alwaies 13 Faith also in the Saintes is imperfect in this life and languishing but yet whosoeuer feeleth in his hart an earnest desire of beleeuing and a strife against doubts arising in his mind he maie and ought certainely to resolue that hee is endewed with true faith 14 True faith being once kindled in our hearts albeit often it languisheth and is darkned for a time yet is it neuer wholy extinguished 15 But after this life it shall attaine vnto a more certaine and ful knowledge of God diuine matters euen to a feeling and experience with all the blessed
purposed from euerlasting And seeing god both foreseeth all things vnchangeable and his counsailes concerning the euent and end of thinges are certaine and vnchangeable it must needes be also that the second causes and meanes or Antecedents without which those euents were not to followe must bee certaine and vnchangeable And because in things created especially in humane affaires there is great vncertaintie and mutabilitie neither is there any cause of vnchangeablenesse but the will of god God could not haue appointed any thing certaine or vnchangeable concerning the euent and end except hee had also made all the meanes by which the end is attained vnto and which as concerning their owne nature are most vncertaine and chaungeable by his euerlasting counsaile and decree certaine and vnchangeable Wherefore it is saide Isay 14.27 The Lord of hostes hath determined it and who shall disanull it Thirdly the whole vse and force and declaration of the promises threatnings and examples of Gods goodnesse power iustice mercie and wrath both olde and newe to teach vs and to erect vs with comfort or by feare to holde and keepe vs in our duetie and the feare of God dependeth of Gods vnchaungeable nature For all those do then affect vs when wee thinke that the same nature and will of God which was in times past is nowe also and is and will bee such to vs repenting or persisting in our sinnes as wee see it was in times past and nowe is towardes others And then doe wee truelie relie vpon the promises of God when wee knowe that his counsell shall neuer bee chaunged Fourthlie This doctrine inclineth mens mindes to obedience and subiection which is necessarie in asking thinges at Gods handes that wee desire not GOD to doe those thinges for vs or others which hee hath before time assuredlie toulde vs that hee will not doe and further that wee submit and leaue with reuerence those thinges to his pleasure whereof hee would not as yet haue knowen vnto vs what hee hath decreede Fiftlie The vnchaungeablenesse of Gods will is the grounde and foundation of the hope and comfort of the godlie in this life For it is most absurd to conceiue of GOD that nowe hee loueth and nowe hee hateth vs nowe hee will assuredlie giue vnto vs euerlasting life and a little after againe hee will not And therefore when once true faith and conuersion vnto GOD is begunne in our heartes and the spirite of God hath begunne to witnesse to our spirite that wee are the sonnes of GOD and heires of euerlasting life God will haue vs certainlie to resolue that as hee had this his will towardes vs from euerlasting so to euerlasting hee will not change it but will assuredlie bring vs at his pleasure out of this wicked and miserable life through al tentations and daungers what-soeuer to eternall and euerlasting life according to that article of our Faith I beleeue life euerlasting When as Omnipotencie is attributed to GOD What is signified by gods omnipotencie thereby is first vnderstoode That whatsoeuer hee will or whatsoeuer not impairing his nature and maiestie hee is able to will he is also able to perfourme Secondie That he is able to performe all those thinges without anie difficulty labour euen with his only beck will Thirdly That all the force power of working and effecting anie thing is so in god only that there is not the least abilitie or efficacie of anie creature but what he continuallie imparteth preserueth at his pleasure And therefore the power of God is to bee considered of vs not as beeing idle but as creating sustaining mouing and ruling al thinges The reasons are 1 God is the first cause of all thinges Therefore he hath all thinges in his power and their abilitie is so much as he giueth vnto them 2 Hee dooth such thinges as can bee done by no created finit power as are the creation gouerning of all thinges the preseruation of common weales the deluge the deliuerie out of Aegypt all his miracles 3 He is vnchangeable Therefore in him to be able to do and to doe is the same which to will and so of the contrary But although al men affirme God to be omnipotent yet there is a double difference betweene the sacred Doctrine of the Church How the doctrin of the church and philosophie differ in conceiuing of Gods omnipotencie and Philosophie concerning gods omnipotency For first without the doctrine of the Church men only know the vniuersall and generall power of god whereby hee createth preserueth and gouerneth the whole world but they know not that power whereby he saueth men and restoreth the world by his sonne gathering and preseruing an euerlasting Church and deliuering it from sin and death and endowing it with life and glory euerlasting by which works God especially sheweth forth his power as it is said Hag. 2.7 Yet a litle while I wil shake the heauens the earth and the sea and the drie land Secondly neither doe they professe of the generall power of god so much as is sufficient For albeit they are enforced to confesse that God is the author and preseruer of the woorld yet are they not able to saie that al things were created of nothing by the woorde of God alone for as much as they are ignorant fo the cause of sin confusion they cannot affirme al things so to be administred and gouerned by gods omnipotency as that al which is good is done by the powerful working of Gods will but they attribute many things to chance fortune humane wisdome or vertue and so imagine the power of god to be idle in these and doing nothing Furthermore that god cannot either sinne or wil and allowe of sinne or be changed or diminished or suffer any thing or make things doone vndoone or wil thinges flat repugnant and contradictorie or create another god or some nature equal to himselfe or bee perceiued by bodilie senses or doe other thinges proper to a create or finite nature or admit the same into himselfe this doth not diminish or weaken but rather augment strengthen his power For that is the greatest and most perfect power which can neither be destroied nor weakned nor diminished and that none susteining it but only by it selfe But contrariwise to be able to be corrupted impaired is a token of imbecillity and imperfection of exceeding immense wisedome Gods exceeding wisedome whereby both hee knoweth all thinges perfectly and is the fountaine of all knoweledge and vnderstanding That we may rightly and with profit and commoditie know the power of God it is necessarie not to consider it but as it is ioyned with his immense wisedome and goodnesse which moderateth it Further of his diuine wisedome first we learne That God doth of himselfe in one act or view vnderstand and behold perpetually and most perfectlie in maruellous manner and that vnknowen to vs himselfe and the whole
god and through their owne blindnes malice reuolting frō gods diuine manifestations frō the doctrine of our first fathers hath in horrible madnesse forged a multitude of gods yeelding diuine honours partly to creatures partly to imaginarie gods and forgetting the true god or desiring to ioine and couple other gods with him And whereas there is no greater bond than whereby the creature is bound to honour his Creator and therefore no more griuous sinne than to obscure the glorie due vnto god or to conuey it ouer to any other god that he might meete with this sacrilege hath often testified and witnessed in his word that there is but one god not manie That is that there is but one diuine essence eternal of infinite power wisedome and goodnes Creator preseruer and ruler of all thinges As Deut. 6.4 Heare O Israel the Lord our god is Lord onely And cap. 32.39 Behold now for I I am he and there is no gods with me Isai 44.6 I am the first and I am the last and without me is there no god And cap. 45.5 I am the Lord and there is none other there is no god besides me 1. Cor. 8.4 Wee knowe that an Idole is nothing in the world and that there is no other god but one Eph. 4.5 One Lord one faith one baptisme one god and father of all which is aboue all and in vs all See also Deut. 4.35 2. Kings 22.32 Psalm 18.32 Isai 36.5 Reasons to shew that there is but one God 1. But one onely manifested by sufficient testimonies of miracles and prophecies and other workes 45.21 47.8.10 Hose 13.4 Mat. 2.10 Marc. 12.32 Rom. 3.30 Galat. 3.20 1. Tim. 2.10 c. There are not wanting reasons and arguments also vnto which the iudgement of reason assenteth and yeeldeth that there are no more true gods but one 1 We are to hold so manie for gods as haue manifested their diuinitie by certaine and vndoubted testimonies But there is but one onlie manifested by miracles prophecies other works which cannot be done but by an omnipotent nature Isai 44. Psalm 86. Therfore but one is to be held for god euen he whō the Church adoreth Obiect Other gods haue wrought miracles vttered prophecies Ans 1. Those miracles were no other thā might be done by creatures not proper to an omnipotent nature 2. They confirmed some manifest impietie or turpitude and therefore were not true miracles 2 His authoritie and Maiestie is greater 2 The maiestie of God admitteth no fellowes who alone raigneth ouer all and alone gouerneth all thinges than his who hath a fellow partaker of the rule and gouernement with him that is it is a point of the greatest maiestie to raigne alone but the Maiestie of god is so great that no greater can either bee or bee imagined Therefore there is but one God The Maior is prooued Because hee who is not Lord alone vnto him greater Maiestie may bee added but the greatest and highest Maiestie is that whereunto nothing can be added And the Minor is prooued by the perfectnes omnipotencie blessednes and surpassing goodnes of god by natural iudgement Exod. 34.14 Thou shalt bowe downe to none other god Isai 42.8 I am the Lord this is my name my glorie wil I not giue to another 1. Tim. 1.17 Vnto god onelie wise be honor Apoc. 4.11 Thou art worthie O Lord to receiue glorie and honor power for thou hast created all thinges 3 That which hath greatest perfection can bee but one 3. That which is most perfect is but one for the whole is greater and perfecter than anie part thereof Therefore he is perfect who hath the whole alone and they imperfect who haue anie thing diuided and distributed amongst them Furthermore the verie euidence of the thing it selfe doth so inforce vs to confesse the greatest perfection of goodnes wisedome and power to be in god seeing he is the cause of al that good is in nature that nothing is more absurd than to imagine anie thing to be god which is not most great and most perfect Wherefore there is but one only diuine essence for that the diuinitie beeing dispersed into more gods would be al and whole in none and so none of them would bee perfect therefore none the true god And herehence appeareth the vanity of that deuise and imagination whereby it fained that there is but one supreme god but to this are added other minor demy gods Whatsoeuer i◠God is Soueraigne and Supreme as subiect and vnder-powers to the highest For seeing it is impious to conceiue of the diuinitie otherwise than as being most great most perfect and such wherto nothing may be added which is subiect to none therfore neither that which is distributed into more gods neither any thing which commeth short neuer so little of the greatest perfection and surpassing al mans cogitation can be the true god as it is often saide Lord who is like vnto thee Whether therefore the others bee equall or inferiour yet would there be in none the whole diuinitie For in him that is supreme or soueraigne the rest iointly together is more of the diuinitie than in that one supreme onely Therefore neither in the supreme soueraign god should the whole deitie be And further those inferiour powers can not bee gods because they are not most perfect nor supreme 4 But one chief good 4 God is of infinite goodnes and the verie chief good But there ought to be one onelie chief good For if besides that there were another chief good also that should be either greater or lesser or equal If greater then should it also be god which were contumelious against god if lesser it should not be god if equall then neither the one nor the other should be god 5 But one Omnipotent 5 There is but one Omnipotent God is Omnipotent Therefore he is but one The Maior is proued thus He against whose will any thing may be done or whom another can hinder from doing that he would cannot be truely omnipotent but if there be more at one the same time put to be omnipotent then shall they be able to do anie thing though the others bee against it and one shall necessarilie haue the power to hinder another and to let his action and to doe any thing contrarie to the others wil for otherwise hee should not be able to doe all thinges for it is proper to him that is omnipotent that no man be able to resist him but should haue his power bounded and limited within a certaine compasse None of them therefore would be indeed omnipotent but in word onely and by intreatie each of other and therefore there cannot bee imagined more gods except omnipotencie be withall taken from them Obiection But they may agree all Wherefore omnipotencie hindereth not why there shoulde not bee moe omnipotent Aunswere Omnipotencie is not onely not to be hindered
distinct Answere The Maior is true of finit persons but not of infinite Obiect 7. The diuine Essence is incarnate The three persons are the diuine Essence Therefore the three persons are incarnate Aunswere Here also are meere particulars whereof nothing can be concluded For the Maior speaketh not of the Diuine Essence generally but particularly as it is the Sonne Obiection 8. The Sonne is Mediatour vnto Iehoua But the Sonne is Iehoua Therefore hee is Mediatour to himselfe Aunswere Here also are meere particulars and therefore nothing concluded For not all that is Iehoua is Mediator Obiect 9. Christ hath a head aboue him Therefore hee is inferiour to GOD and by a consequent hee is not of one and the same essence with GOD. Aunswere Hee hath indeede a Head but that first in respect of his Mediatourshippe secondly in respect of his manhoode Obiection 10. This is saith Christ life euerlasting that they do know thee to bee the onelie verie God Therefore the Sonne and the holie Ghost are not true God Aunswere In this place is opposed not the father to the son and the holy ghost but God to Idoles and creatures Moreouer the particle onelie dooth not belong to the subiect thee but to the predicate God which the greeke Article sheweth Obiection 11. Iehoua is the Trinity The father is Iehoua Therefore he is the trinity Aunswere Iehoua is not taken for the same but varieth in this Syllogisme For Iehoua in the Maior is meant of all three persons in the Minor of one only Reply The father is Iehoua one in number Therefore the father is the Trinitie Heere those diuerse manners of beeing are of no force Aunswere He is one in number of essence not of persons Obiection 12. Where are three one there are four But in god are three one namelie three persons and one essence Therfore there are four in God Aunswere Where there are three and one reallie distinct there are foure But in God the persons are not really distinct from the essence for the three persons of the Diuinity are one and the same essence Obiection 13. The same works are atributed to the Father and the Sonne and the holy Ghost in the Scripture Aunswere This hindereth not the distinction of persons For mo persons may concurre to one action the distinct order of woorking beeing obserued Obiection 14. Christ saith Iohn 14. He that seeth me seeth the father Aunswere Christ meaneth not hereby that he is the father but that he sheweth and resembleth the person wisedome omnipotency goodnes and wil of the father in his doctrine and woorkes as it is saide The Sonne which is in the bosome of the father hee hath shewed Againe Who is the inuisible image of GOD. And as himselfe addeth here The father in mee and I in the father Obiection 15. The wisedome and power of the father are not distinct persons from the father but are the father himselfe as also mercie goodnesse chastitie trueth and other properties of God But the Sonne and the holie Ghost are the wisedome and power of GOD Therefore they are not persons distinct from the father but the father himselfe wise and powerful Aunswere There is an ambiguity in the woordes wisedome and power which in the Maior signifie the wisedome and power whereby not only the father but the Sonne also and holy Ghost is wise and forcible or effectuall that is the common nature or essence of the father and the Sonne and the holy Ghost But in the Minor they signifie the persons of the Sonne and the holy Ghost the Son beeing called the wisedome and the holy Ghost the power of GOD because by them the Deitie sheweth foorth and declareth the wisedome and power thereof OF CREATION NEXT vnto the Doctrine concerning God the Doctrine of the woorkes of GOD is most fitly placed as we see to be done also in the Creede The woorks of God are of two sortes Generall and Speciall The general are diuided into the works 1. Of creation the works whereof are read in Genesis to haue bin accomplished in 6. daies are by daily increase furthered and multiplied in the world 2. Of preseruation whereby God still susteineth the heauens and earth and the things that in them are that they fal not to ruine and decay 3. Of administration whereby through his immense and great wisdome he administreth and gouerneth all things These two latter are comprehended vnder the name of his prouidence And therefore next vnto creation is annexed the place concerning Gods prouidence The Special woorkes of GOD are those which are wrought in the Church and company of his elect and chosen to iustifie sanctifie and glorifie them and are either works of Reparation or restoring whereby hee repaireth al things which for the sinne of man are subiect to corruption or of perfection and accomplishment whereby hee bringeth all things to their certaine appointed end The principall questions of creation are these 1 Whether the world were created of God 2 How it was created 3 For what cause it was created 1 WHETHER THE WORLD WERE CREATED OF GOD. THE name of the world is diuerslie vsed in the Scripture 1. It signifieth the vniuersal frame of all thinges namelie Heauen and Earth and al thinges which are them visible and inuisible besides God himselfe 2. Woorldlie concupiscences 3. All mankind 4. The wicked or those that are not regenerate in the world 5. The elect Here we consider it in the first sense To create signifieth 1 to ordaine or constitute as the latines vsed it creare Consulem to create a Consul 2 To make something of nothing without any motion with a becke or woorde only So is it taken in this place 3 The continuating of creation or creation continued Which is the prouidence of God That the worlde hath not beene from euerlasting but had when it seemed best to the creatour according to his eternal counsel and wil a beginning once and was created of that only true God who hath manifested himselfe in the Church that he is the eternal Father and Sonne and Holy Ghost we know First by testimonies of holy scripture as by the whole historie of the creation set downe by Moses Likewise out of other testimonies of Scripture verie many Psalm 33 6.9 By the woorde of the Lorde were the heauens made and all the host of them by the breath of his mouth Ps 104.113.124.136.146 Isay 44. Act. 4. 17. He spake and it was doone he commaunded and it stood or was created There are other places also in the Psalmes where more largely and amply the wonderfull woorkes of God and the principall partes of the woorlde created by God are proposed to be considered of vs that through the consideration thereof wee may learne to put our trust and confidence in God For to this purpose did the Lord himselfe propose vnto Iob his marueilous and incomprehensible woorkes conspicuous in heauen Iob. 38. 39. and earth other thinges also
is the withdrawing of Gods grace Further that God doth in such sort permit sinne as that he doth not illighten their minds with the knowledge of his will or doth not bend their harts and wils which by his arcane and secrete efficacie he inclineth whither himself listeth vnto this as for the obeying of God to pursue or flie these or those obiectes that is doth not conforme the wils of sinning creatures to his will these sayinges of scripture witnes Rom. 14. Whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne Deut. 13. If there arise among you a Prophet or a dreamer of dreames saying let vs go after other gods thou shalt not hearken vnto the words of the Prophet for the Lord your god prooueth you Deut. 29.2 Yee haue seene all that the Lord did before your eies in the land of Aegypt c. Yet the Lorde hath not giuen you an heart to perceiue and eies to see and eares to heare vnto this daie 1. Sam. 24.14 Wickednes proceedeth from the wicked but mine hand be not vpon thee Lastly in the description of prouidence it was said God directeth all both good and euil vnto his glorie and his chosens saluation that it directeth all things both good and euil to gods glorie that is to the manifesting and magnifiyng of his diuine iustice power wisedome truth mercie and goodnes And to the safetie of his chosen that is to the life ioy wisedome righteousnes glorie and felicitie euerlasting of his Church And that to these ends euen to the glorie of god safetie of his chosē al the counsels works of God in them also the punishments of sinne are referred of God ought to be out of controuersie seeing in al of them is beheld the glorie of god his fatherly care towards his Church Psalm 19.1 The heauens declare the glorie of god and the firmament sheweth the work of his hands Isai 48.9 For my names sake wil I differre my wrath Rom 8.28 We know that all things worke together for the best vnto them that loue god Iohn 9 3. Neither hath this man sinned nor his parents but that the works of god should be shewed on him God vseth also sinne or corruption it selfe which yet himselfe worketh not but suffereth to concurre with his owne action in the wicked 1. To shew forth both his iustice in punishing it and his mercie in remitting it 2. To woorke in vs a hatred of sinne true humilitie and an imploring of gods grace and thankefulnes of our deliuerie from sinne and death Prou. 16.4 The Lorde hath made all things for his owne sake yea euen the wicked but not wickednes for the daie of euill Exod. 9.16 Rom. 9.17.22.23 Ezech. 16.61.62.63 Gal. 3. We are further to consider the degrees of gods prouidence The degrees of Gods prouidence whereby hee tendereth the whole world mankind his chosen For he respecteth indeede and gouerneth all his creatures but especiallie mankinde as being the chiefe and principall amongst his woorkes and which beeing created according to his image he hath adorned with verie manie benefites aboue all other creatures And in mankinde especiallie those whom he hath elected and chosen to eternal life whom with the blessed Angels he maketh one euerlasting Church that in them he may dwell as in his Temple and habitation and therefore doth so guide and rule them in the whole race of their life as that all things must serue for their safetie Now haue we explicated and made plaine the definition of gods prouidence The prouidence of God is the gouerning and guiding of euery particular thing whereout ariseth a Question greatly to be considered which is whether gods prouidence extendeth it selfe to all things Aunswere Yea to euery little thing dooth the prouidence of GOD extende it selfe And that all thinges both the greatest and the smallest of them are ruled by the prouidence of GOD and that his prouidence is extended to all actions and motions of all creatures euen of those that sinne so that all thinges whatsoeuer are done come not to passe but by the eternall counsell and purpose of GOD either woorking them as they haue a respect and qualitie of good in them or permitting them as they are sinnes but moderating and gouerning all thinges euen sinne it selfe and directing them to his glorie and the safetie of his chosen is confirmed both by verie manie testimonies of Scripture and also by reasons drawen from the nature of God Testimonies Of the testimonies which may be alleadged for confirmation hereof there are certaine orders and rankes For some are vniuersall and generall which teach that all euents vniuersally are subiect to Gods prouidence Some are particular which speake both of some particular and certaine euents as also of the whole specials and generals thereof For the Scripture doth often transferre that to the whole specials generals which it speaketh of particular singular examples Wherefore it will haue all the indiuiduals singulars of the whole specials generals to be subiect to the diuine prouidence of God Of particular testimonies some belong to reasonable creatures or such as haue a wil in working be they good or bee they bad some to those which are without reason whether they be thinges liuing or not liuing Some likewise intreat of thinges contingent fortuning and casuall which soothly are such in respect of vs Some speake of necessarie thinges Nowe to all these heades as it were and principals adde we some such testimonies as are most cleare and famous for there are infinite Gods general prouidence confirmed The vniuersal and generall prouidence of God is witnessed by these Eph. 1.11 Hee woorketh all thinges after the counsell of his owne will Actes 17.25 Hee giueth to all life and breath and all thinges Num. 23.19 Hath hee saide and shall hee not doe it And hath hee spoken And shall be not accomplish it Nehem. 9.6 Thou hast made heauen and earth and all things that are therein the seas and all that are in them And thou preseruest them all Esai 45.7 I forme the light and create darkenes I make peace and create euill I the Lord doe all these things Of the prouidence of God ouer reasonable creatures the historie of Ioseph yeeldeth vs notable testimonies Gene. 45.18 Gods particular prouidence ouer creatures indued with reason You sent not me hither but God Gene. 50.20 When ye thought euill against me God disposed it to good Likewise the indurating and hardening of Pharao Exodus 3.4.7.8.9.10.14 Exodus 4.11 Who hath giuen the mouth to man or who hath made the dumme or the deafe or him that seeth Haue not I the Lord Therefore goe now and I will bee with thy mouth Iohn 9.3 it is saide that GOD woulde that hee shoulde bee borne blinde to whom CHRIST restored his sight Ios 11.6 The LORD saide vnto Iosua bee not afraide for them for to morrowe about this time will I deliuer them all slaine before Israel Iosua 21.45
The wicked are not ruled of God so manifestly as the godly and they withstand gods reâ—eâ—â— wil but not his secret will 2 Obiection They who are against God are not ruled and guided by GOD. Diuels and wicked men are against GOD. Therefore they are not ruled and guided by his diuine prouidence Aunswere Wee graunt the whole reason in some respect namely that Diuels and wicked men are not ruled of God by his speciall prouidence that is by his holy spiritual lightning their minds with the knowledge of Gods wil and inclining their harts not to respect and execute in their actions their owne lustes but the knowen will of God and so themselues to woork well together with God who by them woorketh well But they are ruled and gouerned of GOD by his generall and secret prouidence or gouernement so that they cannot doe any thing but what GOD hath decreed to doe by them and are the instrumentes of his punishmentes and benefites though themselues think and respect some other thing Dan. 4.32 According to his will hee woorketh in the armie of heauen and in the inhabitantes of the earth and none can staie his hard nor say vnto him what dost thou Prouer. 21.1 The Kings heart is in the hande of the Lorde vs the riuers of waters hee turneth it whithersoeuer it pleaseth him Gen. 45. God moueth enclineth and ruleth the wicked wil of Iosephs brethren in such wise as not to kill Ioseph but freely to sell him to the Ismalites that by this meanes he might transport the family of Iacob into Aegypt nourish and multiply them and beeing oppressed by long seruitude and boundage gloriously deliuer them Isai 10. Assur though a wicked and proud King yet is called the rod of the Lords wrath Likewise the Assyrians are called the sanctified of GOD his hired souldiours dooing seruice to God whom yet their own ambition cruelty and couetousnesse carried to take weapons against the Iewes Likewise euery where in Scripture God is said to infatuate besot the wicked to strike them with a giddines to mad and amase them to effeminate them to fil them ful of fear so that their spirits faile them at the â—oice of the falling of a leafe to rule the swords of the wicked with his hand to obdurate and harden their hearts By those and the like it is manifest that euen the deliberations counsels actions of the wicked are subiect to his diuine prouidence and gouernement and that it is not an idle permission in them but an effectuall woorking of God inclining their wils and guiding their actions at his good pleasure The second sophisme of the cause of sinne 1 OBiection All the actions and motions of all creatures are done by the wil and working of God Manie actions as the selling of Ioseph the Assyrians warring against the Iewes are sinnes Therefore sinnes are done by the wil and working of god Actions are not sinnes in them selues but by an accident Aunswere There is a fallacy of the accident in the Minor proposition Actions are sins not in themselues and as they are actions but by an accident by reason of the corruption of the instrument in those actions which God woorketh most iustly by him he not respecting this as to obey therin the knowen wil of God This corruption or defect of the creature the action which god worketh by the creature concur together by an accident For neither is essentiall to other neither the cause of other but each is to other accidentary For both god could haue wrought that selfesame punishment which hee inflicted iustly on the Iewes by the Assyrian sinning by an instrument not sinning and the Assyrian if it had pleased god to correct his wil might haue been notwithstanding the instrument of gods wrath and yet good how great soeuer seueritie hee had exercised towarde the Iewes As when GOD by his good Angell slaieth the wicked host of the Assyrians Sinne therefore which is in the actions of the creature is not doone by the will and woorking of GOD but by an accident to witte as God will and woorketh those actions which are sinnes by the fault of the creature The summe of all commeth to this The most good action of GOD exercised by an euill and corrupt instrument is no otherwise the sinne of the bad instrument than water which commeth pure out of the fountaine is made impure running thorough vncleane places or the best wine comming out of a good vessell waxeth sowre and eger being put in a corrupt vessell according to that of Horace Lib. 1 Epist. 2. Vnlesse the vessell bee pure whatsoeuer thou powrest in sowreth or further than the good woorke of a good iudge is the euill woorke of an euill seruant or minister or the riding of a good horse man is the haulting of a lame horse In al these is a Paralogisme or fallacy of the accident that is there is a proceeding from the essence or thing it selfe to that which is but an accident to the thing and dooth but by an accident concurre with it after this manner The going of a lame horse is a plain haulting The horse-man will and woorketh the going of the lame horse Therefore hee will and woorketh the haulting In like sort the Diuell is created and susteined by God The Diuell is wicked Therefore the wickednesse of the Diuel is from God as the author and effector thereof Both which reasons are a like sophisticall false Many thinges in respect of the creatures are sinnes in them selues 1 Reply Those thinges which are in their own kind sinnes or vnto which the definition of sin agreeth they are in themselues sinnes Many actions are in their own kind sinnes as theft lying adulterie murder Therefore they are sinnes in themselues Answer It is a fallacie reasoning from that which is in some respect so to that which is simply so For the whole argument is graunted concerning actions prohibited by God in respect of the creature as they are committed by them against the will of God knowen vnto them either by generall or speciall commaundement or as they are not doone to that end principally as thereby to doe and execute the knowen will of God The reason thereof is certaine and expresse in the Scriptures because the wil of God reueiled in his word is the only and surest rule of goodnesse rightnesse in the creatures Wherefore whose motions and actions accord with the wil of god they are in themselues good pleasing to God but those actions which disagree from his will are in themselues sinnes which God abhorreth and punisheth Rom. 14.23 Whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne that is whatsoeuer resteth not vpon the certaine commaundement of God neither is doone to that end as thereby to obey the knowen will of God No action euil in it selfe in respect of God But the argumeÌ„t on the other side is false if we respect the wil of god moouing and woorking all the motions and
he was borne of the substance of the Virgin pure from al stain or corruption and so was personally vnited with the Word Obiection Euerie sonne is either natural or adopted Christ according to his humanitie is not the naturall sonne of god hee is therefore the sonne of god by adoption Aunswere The Maior of this reason albeit it may be graunted according to ciuil constitutions yet is it false in diuinitie because it compriseth not a perfect and sufficient enumeration of the sonnes of God For there are sonnes of God by grace as the Angels Iob. 1.6 likewise Christ according to his humanity which yet are not adopted sonnes Replie Grace is adoption Christ according to his humanitie is the sonne of GOD by grace therefore hee is the sonne of GOD by adoption Answere The Maior of this reason either is particular and so nothing is inferred thereby or if it be generallie taken it is a fallacie For grace is more large in signification then is adoption and is in respect of adoption as a generall in respect of a speciall For besides the grace of adoption there is also the grace of creation in respect of God creating and conforming Angels and men vnto himselfe the grace of conception and vnion in respect of God the Father the sonne and the holy Ghost forming and fashioning after a singular maner the flesh of CHRIST in the wombe of the Virgine and vniting it vnto the sonne 3 Why Christ is called the onelie begotten and first begotten sonne of God Christ is the onely begotten sonne of God according to his Godhead onely CHrist is called the onelie begotten sonne of God according to his diuine nature Because according to this he alone onely was from euerlasting begotten of the substaunce of his father and therefore hath no brethren of this generation and nature For of no other it is saide that the father giueth him to haue life in himselfe and again that in him dwelleth all the fulnes of the godhead bodilie Obiect He that hath brethren is not the onelie begotten Christ hath brethren Therefore he is not the onelie begotten sonne of god Aunsw The Maior is to be distinguisted He that hath brethren to wit of the same generation and nature hee is not the onely begotten Christ hath brethren but not of the same generation and nature because not any haue been begotten from euerlasting of the substance of God the father Therefore he is the onely begotten son of God in respect of his Godhead Replie He that hath a generation or begetting vnlike to the generation of other sonnes is in respect thereof said to be the onelie begotten Christ according to his humanity hath a generation vnlike to the generation of other sonnes of God Therefore Christ is called not in respect of anie eternall but of this temporall and miraculous generation the onelie begotten Aunswere The Maior is true of such a son as hath a generation vnlike in the whole kinde that is both in nature and in the manner of the generation But Christ according to his humanitie hath a generation diuers from vs not as concerning his nature the terme or ende of his generation but onely in respect of the manner For hee is true man Why Christ according to his manhood cannot bee called the onely begotten hauing a humane nature the same altogether with ours in kinde but borne after a singular manner of the virgin by the operation of the holy Ghost Wherefore according to his humanitie hee cannot bee called the onely begotten sonne of GOD. 1. Because according to this nature hee hath brethren of the same generation and nature Heb. 2.11.14 2. Because neither the scripture neither the Church vseth anie such forme of speech 3. Because the word onelie begotten doth not designe the peculiar manner of his conception and generation but the verie nature or essence it selfe which by generating that is by begetting and by waie of birth is produced The first begotten not the first created hee is called according to both natures Christ called the first begotten according to both natures According to his godhead both in respect of time and of worthines because he before all was begotten from euerlasting of the father and is perfect God and all were made by him and by and for him are deliuered and receiue the right of sonnes According to his humanitie also he is called the first begotten in respect of his worthinesse onelie and right 1. Because he was begotten after a singular manner 2 Because he hath his subsistence in the person of the Word to the vnitie whereof the humanitie was assumed 3. Because he hath by his merite purchased the right of sonnes for others 4. Because in gifts workes maiestie authoritie he vnspeakablie excelleth all the sonnes of God euen Angels themselues and it Lord and head of thē all Vnto Christ therefore in respect of his humanitie agreeth this which of old was signified by the type of the first born For after the decease of the father the first-born took two portiōs of his fathers goods when as the rest had each but one Now the cause of that right was his office and function For hee succeeded into the roome of his father so that hee had authoritie ouer his family and the rest of his brethren and did beare rule ouer them Gen. 27. 29. 37. So Christ the sonne of GOD hath also right according to his humanitie ouer the rest of his bretheren and all the sonnes of God and he but one hath receiued moe and more excellent giftes than haue all the rest because hee is the Lord of his fathers house the rest are his ministers Nowe because wee cannot beleeue that Christ is the only begotten son of God and much lesse can beleeue in this only begotten son of God vnlesse withal we beleeue that Christ is true God euen that euerlasting Word of the same substaunce dignitie power and nature with the father it remaineth therefore that herein brieflie we deale against the heretiques who impugne it 4. WHETHER CHRIST BE THE SONNE COETERNAL WITH GOD THE FATHER OR OF CHRISTS DIVINITIE WHen the question is made whether Christ be the eternall sonne of god or Whether he be that one true and eternall god these sower thinges are demaunded The first is whether the sonne of god or the Word be a subsistent or hipostasis or person in the flesh before the flesh that is whether in christ man there be besides his soule and body a spiritual nature or substaunce which was also existing before Christ borne of the Virgin and wrought and accomplished the workes of god and is the sonne of god and is so called in scripture That he is a subsistent the church beleeueth and proueth against Samosatenus Photinus Seruetus and others The second is whether hee bee a person truely distinct from the father Wee are to holde that the Word is a person distinct from the father against Noetus and Sabellius who
the true God and eternal life Rom. 9.5 Who is God ouer al blessed for euer Amen Actes 20.28 God hath purchased his Church with his owne bloode Hebr. 1.8 The Scepter of thy kingdome is a Scepter of righteousnesse and verse 10. Thou Lorde in the beginning hast established the earth and the heauens are the workes of thine handes And cap. 3.3 Christ is counted woorthy of more glorie than Moses in asmuch as hee which hath builded the house hath more honor than the house and hee that hath built all thinges is God 10. He is said to haue come downe from heauen yet so that hee remaineth in heauen to come vnto his together with his Father to bee with them vnto the end of the world Therefore he is of an infinite essence euerie where present and working both in heauen and earth But his humane nature is finit Therefore he is God in respect of another nature The Godhead is after another sort communicated vnto Christ than vnto Creatures Now to that which hath bin obiected concerning the communicating of the Deitie vnto others whereby they are called gods we aunswere by distinguishing the diuersitie thereof For vnto others it is communicated by a created similitude of the Deitie either of nature that is by diuine properties created which are not equall with the creatour so are the Angels or of office So Moses is called God and all Magistrates But vnto the Sonne Christ it is communicated by the nature or essence it selfe so that the verie Deity is his substaunce Which wee thus prooue 1. Hee is the only begotten and proper Sonne of God the Sonne of the most High who also is himselfe the most High Luk. 1.32 But hee is the proper Sonne to whome the substaunce of the father is communicated 2. Iohn 5.26 As the father hath life in himselfe so likewise hath he giuen to the Sonne to haue life in himselfe Therefore the Son also is GOD of himselfe liuing and the fountaine of life Wherefore this communicating of the Deitie maketh him equall with God and THE SAME God with the Father so far off is it from prouing the contrarie Reply 1. Power was giuen to him beeing man Iohn 5.27 Therefore it was not giuen him by eternall generation Aunswere It was giuen to the Woorde by generation to man by vnion of the Woorde Replie 2. It was giuen him after his resurrection Aunswere Then was giuen him the full authority and liberty of vsing that power which he had alwaies All thinges were made by it Al thinges made by the Word and without it was made nothing Wee interprete That all creatures were made by him in the beginning and that also by him is gathered out of mankinde and regenerated thorough the woorking of the holie Ghost an euerlasting Church They conster it That by AL things are meant those thinges which are wrought in the newe creation that is in the collection and regeneration of the Church by the gospel which is called the second creation Vnto which our aunswere is 1. by granting this point by graunting I meane not the whole interpretation but onely this point of the creation And if this were the sense yet heereof woulde it also followe that Christ were verie God and by nature God The second creation also which is regeneration proueth Christ God The first reason which wee yeelde heereof is Because to worke the first and second creation by his owne vertue power and operation is the proper work of one the same verie God 1. Cor. 3.6 GOD gaue the encrease So then is neither hee that planteth anie thing neither hee that watereth but god that giueth the increase And in the same Chapter v. 9. Yee are Gods husbandrie and gods building Heb. 3.4 Hee that hath built all things is god And Christ woorketh this new creation not as an instrument but by his owne proper vertue Heb. 3.6 Eph. 1.23 which is his bodie euen the fulnesse of him that filleth all in all thinges Eph. 4.8 Hee ascended vp on high hee gaue giftes vnto men hee ascended farre aboue al heauens that hee might fill all thinges Hee gaue some Apostles and some Prophetes and vers 16. By whom al the bodie receiueth encrease Iohn 10.28 I giue vnto them eternall life Ephes 5.29 Hee sanctifieth the Church and clenseth it by the washing of water through the word The second reason is Because no man can giue the holie ghost but he that is verie god whose proper spirite it is But the second creatioÌ„ is not wrought but by the holy ghost whoÌ„ Christ the worker effectour of this creation sendeth Therefore he is verie god and Lorde The third reason Because the newe creation is the regeneration of the elect to eternall life This beganne euen from Adam albeit it was wrought in regard of the Mediator which was to come And it was wrought by the same Mediatour the Sonne in regarde of whome or for whose sake it was wrought euer since the beginning For CHRIST as by his merit so by his efficacie and vertue is Sauiour not onelie of a part but also of his whole Church and bodie which consisteth of al the elect and sanctified euen from ADAMS time Ephes 4.16 By whome all the bodie receiueth increase Isay 9.6 The euerlasting Father author preseruer propagatour and amplifier of his Church through all ages of the world Mich. 5.2 The ruler that should come forth out of Bethelem was giuen from euerlasting to bee the head and sauiour of the Church Hee shall bee peace euen before hee came out of Bethelem and the sauiour of his Church against the Assyrians and all her enimies Gen. 3.15 The seede of the woman shall bruise the Serpentes head This victorie and conquest ouer the Diuell beganne euen from the beginning of the world Psalm 110. Dauid acknowledgeth the Messias also to bee his LORDE a Priest and a King not onelie that was to come in the flesh but euen nowe present to whome nowe long before GOD had saide Thou art a Priest that is whome he had alreadie ordained to this office liuing woorcking and preseruing the elect 1. Timoth. 2.5 There is one GOD and one Mediatour betweene GOD and Man which is the man Christ I sâ—s Therefore this man is the Mediatour of all from the very beginning he is the Mediator obteining giuing the blessinges which he hath obtained vnto all I giue vnto them eternall life Ephes 1.22 He hath appointed him ouer all things to be the head to the church 1. Pet. 1.11 The spirit of Christ in the Prophetes 1. Pet. 3.19 By the spirite hee went and preached vnto the spirites that nowe are in prison which were in time passed disobedient Ephes 2.20 Yee are built vpon the foundation of the Apostles and Prophets IESVS CHRIST himselfe being the chiefe corner stone Which place is diligentlie to bee obserued For then either Christ is the heade foundation sanctifier and Sauiour of a part of the Church only which
is most absurd or hee was this from the beginning of the worlde Heb. 3. Hee is made the builder of the house whereof Moses also was a part Hebr. 13. Iesus Christ yesterdaie and to daie and the same for euer Our Second aunswere is by denying their interpretation For Saint Iohn there speaketh of the first creation Which we shewe First Because he speaketh of the second afterwardes As manie as receiued him to them hee gaue power to be the Sennes of God Likewise Of his fulnesse haue all wee receiued and againe Grace and trueth came by Iesus Christ Now he therefore setteth down the first creation before because both creations are the worke of the same That therefore he might shew that the second creation was wrought by the woorde it was necessarie for him to teach that the first also was wrought by it For the same is the Creatour and repairer of the worlde Secondly Because he saith the world was made by him Reply The woorlde heere is taken for the Church Aunswere No for hee addeth And the woorlde knewe him not The same woorlde which was made by him knewe him not Therefore hee meaneth the wicked whether elect or reprobate Thirdly other places demonstrate the same Iohn 5.17 My Father woorketh hitherto and I woorke Wherefore both of them from the beginning of the woorlde woorke the workes of both creations In the same place verse 19. Whatsoeuer thinges the Father dooth the same thinges dooth the Sonne also And vers 20. The Father sheweth him all thinges whatsoeuer hee himselfe dooth Therefore not onlie the workes of the second creation but also of the first creation preseruation and administration of the world In the same place it is said As the Father quickeneth so the Sonne quickeneth whom he wil. But the Father was from the very beginning the giuer of corporal spirituall life Col. 1.16.17 By him were all things created which are in heauen and which are on earth thinges visible and inuisible whether they be thrones or dominions or principalities or powers all thinges were created by him and for him And hee is before al thinges and in him al things consist Thus farre of the first creation that which followeth speaketh of the second creation Reply 1. All these speake of the instauration of the Church Answer No. Because that comprehendeth also the Angels Reply 2. The Angels also were restored by Christ and ioined to their head Auns But the new creation is called a restoring from sinne death to righteousnesse and life this agreeth not to the Angels Reply Heb. 1.2 By whom also he made the worldes The worlds that is the new Church Aunswere 1 God made the old also by him because it is one Church hauing one head and foundation 2 The Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 which is vsed in that place signifieth in Scripture the world not the Church And faâ—der when it is there added Bearing vp al thinges by his mighty worde those words speak of the preseruation not only of the Church but of al things And moreouer he rendereth a cause why he is the heire not only of the Church but of all Creatures namely because he is the creatour preseruer of all thinges Heb. 1.10 Thou Lord in the beginning hast established the earth the heauens are the works of thine hands Reply In these wordes he conuerteth his speach to the Father to prooue that he was able by his power to lift vp the Sonne to diuine maiestie Aunswere This is â—â—â—mpudent shift and elusion 1 Because it is saide before But vnto the Sonne which appertaineth to both places of the Psalme cited by the Apostle 2 Because the Psalme dooth entreat of Christes kingdome and therefore those words which there are spoken of the Lord are to be vnderstood next immediatly of his person secondarily and mediately of the father Reply 1. If he made all thinges then then father made them not by him Aunswere Both he made them and they were made by him Ioh. 5. Whatsoeuer things the Father dooth the same dooth the Sonne also And yet the father dooth them by him Reply 2. The creatour cannot be compared with the creatures But Christ is there compared with the Angels Therefore creation of thingeâ—â—s not attributed vnto Christ Aunswere He is not comparâ—d with the creatures in any proportion but without proportion This the place it selfe of the Psalme prooueth â—he heauens shall perish but thou doost remaine Reply 3 Iâ— hee were creatour and equall with the Father hee could not sittâ— at his right hand Aunswere Wee may inuert this and saâ— of the contrarie rather if he were not equal he could not sitte at his right hand Because none but the omnipotent and true God is able to administer the kingdome of heauen earth Phil. 2.6 who beeing in the forme of god thought it no robberie to be equal with God Isay 45.23 Thus saith the Lorde that created heauen Euerie knee shall bowe vnto me This is saide of Christ Rom. 14.11 Phil. 2 10. Againe Isay 48.12 I am I am the first and I am the last My hand hath laide the foundation of the earth and my right hand hath spanned the heauens when I call them they stand vppe together These wordes Christ applieth vnto himselfe Reuelat. 1.18 and 22.23 In it was life In the word was life and the life was the light of men Wee interpret That the sonne of God is by himselfe the life as is the Father and the fountaine giuer and maintainer of al life as wel corporall and temporall as spirituall and eternall in all from the verie beginning of the world Iohn 5. He hath giuen to the Sonne to haue life in himselfe as the father hath life in himselfe They conster it That the man Iesus is the quickener or giuer of life because in him is the life of all that no man without him and all by him are saued These are their words Vnto which we reply If hee giue eternall life to all so that no man hath is without him Therefore either no man was quickened before hee was borne of Mary which were absurd or hee was the quickner giuer of life from the beginning Euen as Ioh. affirmeth this of him as beeing verified in him also before hee was made fleshe Neither can this be vnderstood onely of his merit whereby hee deserued this life for men For that life is in him signifieth that hee is by his efficacie and effectuall woorking the quickner and reuiuer as himselfe expoundeth it Iohn 5. and 10. and the aduersaries themselues confesse So are wee also to vnderstand his illightening of men that is the knowledge of God the author whereof hee was in all euen from the beginning as himselfe saith No man knoweth the Father but the Sonne and hee to whome the Sonne will reueile him And Iohn Baptist saith No man hath seene God at ANY TIME the Sonne hath declared him And the light shineth in the darckenes
attributed vnto the sonne differ so from the diuine properties which are attributed vnto him as the effectes from their causes so that then his properties woorke them 5 The equalitie of honour and woorshippe Hee hath equal honour giuen him dependeth of the equalitie of Essence properties and woorkes Isai 42.8 I will not giue my glorie to anie other But the Scripture giueth equall honour and woorshippe to the Father and the Sonne therefore they are truelie equall in God-head and in all the perfections thereof The Minor is confirmed first by Testimonies Psalm 97. Heb. 16. Let all the Angels of god woorshippe him Iohn 5.23 That all shoulde honour the sonne as they honour the father Reue. 5.13 c. Secondly Hee is called God absolutelie and simplie as is the Father Psalm 45.7 and Hebrews 1.8 Acts. 20.28 1. Timothy 3.16 Thirdly the Epithets or titles of Diuine honour which are euerie where in the scriptures attributed vnto the sonne As God blessed for euer The great god and Sauiour The Lord himselfe from heauen The Lord of glorie The Lord of Lords and King of Kings Power and eternall kingdome Sitting at the right hand of the Father The Bride-groome husband head of the Church god of the temple which are all the elect Trust and Beliefe in him Inuocation for hee is woorshipped of the Church as GOD and Bride groome of the Church at all times and in all places Thankesgiuing for his Diuine benefites Furthermore albeit the name of GOD especially beeing put absolutely and without restraint dooth euidently prooue the sonnes equalitie with the Father as it hath beene saide yet seeing that signifieth moe thinges and is also applied to others who are not by nature God wee are diligently to collect and haue in a readines those Testimonies in which thinges proper to the true God only are attributed to the sonne which agree to none else who are called Gods and whereby God himselfe discerneth himselfe and will haue him selfe discerned from other creatures and forged Gods For vnto whom the essential properties of any nature or essēce doe truely and reallie agree vnto him the essence it selfe must needes bee giuen The sonne hath all thinges from the Father not by grace but by nature 1. Obiection He that hath all things of another is inferiour to him of whom hee hath them The sonne hath all thinges of the Father Therefore hee is inferiour vnto the Father Aunswere The Maior holdeth and is true of such a one as hath any thing by the grace and fauour of the giuer for hee might not haue it and therefore is by nature inferiour but it is false of him who hath al those thinges by his owne nature which hee himselfe hath of whom hee receiueth them For seeing he can not not haue them it can not be that he should bee inferiour or should haue lesse than hee of whom hee receiueth them But the sonne hath all thinges of the Father which the Father hath and that by nature and absolute necessitie that is in such sort as that the Father can not but communicate vnto him all thinges which him selfe hath belonging to his diuine nature and maiestie Therefore hee is equall vnto the Father in all thinges The sonne doth all thinges with the consent of the Father in like manner as the Father doth 1. Obiection Hee that doth whatsoeuer he doth by the will of another interposed and going before is inferiour vnto him The sonne will and doth all thinges by the will of his Father going before Therefore he is not equal vnto the Father in vertue dignitie and essence Aunswere The sonne doth all thinges his Fathers will going before not in time and nature but in order of persons so that hee will or doth nothing which the Father also will not and doth and whatsoeuer the Father will and doth the same also the sonne will and dooth likewise that is with equall aucthoritie and power Wherefore the societie order of the diuine operations doth not take away but doth most of al settle establish the equalitie of the Father and the sonne as also of the holy Ghost THE FOVRTH CONCLVSION The word is con-substantial with the Father THE woordes con-substantiall and like-substantiall differ For * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 like-substantiall signifieth mo persons and like essences as three men are like-substantial For they are both three persons and three essences of like nature that is agree in humane nature But * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 con-substantial signifieth one essence mo persons In the god-head is not like-substantial because there are not three gods but con-substantial because there are three persons of one and the same diuine essence For there is but one Iehoua that is one diuine essence which is the same is wholy in euery of the three persons therefore euery of thē are that one God besides which essence whatsoeuer is it is a creature not God The Latine church turneth the Greek word 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 con-substantial taking substance for essence It is therefore the same that coessentiall that is of one and the same essence Furthermore these three thinges beeing declared and set downe namely that the Sonne is subsisting or a person that he is distinct frō the Father that he is equall with the Father the fourth is easilie gotten and obtained against the newe Arrians to wit that he is con-substantial with the Father which is also in like manner to be vnderstood concerning the holy Ghost For either this must be granted or of necessity there are made three gods which they though in words they deny it yet in very deede affirme when they frame and faine three essences and spirits The Arguments which shew The Father the Son to be of one the same essence are these 1. Iehoua is but one essence The English translations reteine not the worde it selfe IEHOVA but vse the Lord in steed thereof which is the signification of IEHOVA and therfore in effectuall one or one god Deut. 6.4 But the eternal Father and the Sonne coeternal with the father are that Iehoua Therfore these two are one essence and one God The Minor is proued first by those places of Scripture which cal the sonne Iehoua Ier. 23.6 This is the name whereby they shal cal him Iehoua or the Lord our righteousnes Isai 25.6 The expected God and Sauiour is called Iehoua But Messias is the expected god Sauior Therefore Messias is that Iehoua whereof the Prophet speaketh Za. 2.8 The deliuerer of the Church sent from Iehoua which is the Messias onely is called Iehoua Mal. 3.1 He is called Jehoua whose fore-runner was Iohn Baptist. But Iohn Baptist was the fore-runner of the Messias or the Sonne of God Christ Hee therefore is called Iehoua Hither belong al the places in which are giuen to the Angell or messenger of Iehoua both the name of Iehoua the diuine properties and honours But that Angell was the Sonne of
Iehoua is one in number of essence not of persons 12 Where are three and one there are foure But in God are three one to wit three persons and one essence Therefore there are foure in God Answere The Maior is to be distinguished Where are three and one reallie distinct there are foure But these three in God are not another thing distinct in the thing it selfe from the essence but each is that one essence the same and whole and they differ from their essence onely in their manner of subsisting or being The manner of existing is not a diuers substance from the existence being or essence 13 Christ according to that nature according to which in scripture he is called Son is the Son of god But according to his humane nature onely hee is called Sonne Therefore according to that onely and not according to his diuine also hee is the sonne of god and so by a consequent the sonne is not verie god Aunswere The minor is false For Christ is called the onely begotten and proper sonne of the Father and equal with the Father Iohn 3.16 Iohn 5.18 Rom. 8.32 The father hath created all thinges by the sonne The sonne from the verie beginning worketh all things likewise which the Father doth Iohn 5.17.19 The sonne reueiled the Fathers wil of receiuing mankinde into fauour vnto the Church before his flesh was borne Iohn 1.18 The sonne was sent into the worlde descended from heauen and tooke flesh Heb. 2.16 Iohn 3.13.17 But the Word which is God is the onely begotten and proper sonne of God and tooke flesh Iohn 1.14 And not the humane but the diuine nature of Christ is creatres and worketh with equal autoritie and power with the Father and descended from heauen Therefore God or the Godhead or diuine nature of Christ is both called in the scripture and is the sonne and by a consequent the sonne is that one true and verie God I BELEEVE IN CHRIST OVR LORD THree diuerse speeches are heere to bee obserued 1. To beleeue that Christ is Lord. To beleeue this is not sufficient for we beleeue also that the diuel is Lord but not of al nor ours as wee doe beleeue Christ to bee Lorde of vs all 2. To beleeue that Christ is Lord and that of al and also ours Neither is it enough to beleeue this For the Diuels beleeue also that Christ is their Lord as he hath ful right and autority not only ouer all other thinges but ouer them also to determin of them whatsoeuer pleaseth him 3. To beleeue in Christ our Lorde that is so to beleeue Christ to bee our Lorde that in him wee place our trust and confidence and bee thoroughly perswaded that by him wee are wholy freed and deliuered from all euill and are defended and safegarded against all our enemies and this is it which we especiallie ought to beleeue Whenas therefore we saie that wee beleeue in our Lorde we beleeue 1. That the Sonne of GOD Christ is Lorde of all creatures 2. But especiallie of his Church which beeing purchased with his owne bloode hee guideth defendeth and preserueth by his spirit 3. And that I am also one of his subiectes whom beeing redeemed from the power of the Diuell he mightilie preserueth ruleth maketh obedient vnto him and at length enricheth with eternal glorie that is I beleeue that hitherto I haue bin by and for Christ preserued and shal hereafter be preserued of him thorough al eternitie lastly that he vseth wil vse his dominion power which hee hath as ouer all other creatures so ouer me vnto my saluation and his owne glory But for the better vnderstanding of this that hath bin spoken wee are to obserue these two things 1 In what sense Christ is called Lord. 2 For what causes he is our Lord. 1 IN WHAT SENSE HE IS CALLED LORD TO bee a Lord is to haue right and power granted by Lawe either diuine or humane ouer some thing or person as to vse and enioie it and to dispose thereof at thy owne will and pleasure Christ therefore is our Lord First because he hath care of vs that is ruleth preserueth and keepeth vs as his owne to eternall life and glorie as beeing bought with his precious bloode Iohn 17.12 None of them is lost whom thou gauest me Ioh. 10.28 None shal plucke them out of my hand Secondlie because wee are bound to serue him both in bodie and soule that hee maie bee glorified by vs. 1. Cor. 6 20. Yee are bought with a price therefore glorifie God in your bodie and in your spirite for they are Gods Hereof also wee maie vnderstande that the woorde Lorde in the Creede is not a name of the diuine essence but of his office and is referred to both natures of Christ like as the names of Priest King and Prophet Christ then is our Lorde not onely in respect of his Diuinitie which created vs but also in respect of his humanity which redeemed vs. For the humane nature of Christ is the price of our redemption his diuine nature dooth giue and offer that price vnto the Father and dooth by the vertue of his spirite effectuallie applie it vnto vs sanctifie rule saue and defend vs against our enemies and dooth al these thinges the humane nature beeing priuie thereunto and most earnestlie willing it Yea further as hee is man also hee hath power not only ouer men but also ouer all creatures and therfore ouer the Angels themselues For the names of the office benefits dignity of christ are affirmed of his whole person to speak simply properly by communicating but not by confounding the properties of both natures 2 For what causes he is our Lord. CHRIST is Lord. 1. By right of creation gouernment Christ our Lord 1 By right of creation Of this rule and dominion it is said Al things that the father hath are mine Ioh. 16.15 For by him in him are al things created and by his mighty word that is by his forcible pleasure and wil or prouidence they are susteined and gouerned and whatsoeuer good is in al the creatures that wholy proceedeth from him And this is a most generall dominiō which extendeth it self vnto al creatures euen vnto diuels wicked men albeit not altogether after the same maner to vs to al the wicked diuels For. 1. he created vs to eternal life but them to destruction 2. The dominiō which christ hath ouer the wicked diuels cōsisteth in the right of requiring cōmanding of exercising his power bridling his enimies that is hee hath right power ouer the diuels and the wicked to doe with them what him listeth so that without his wil and pleasure they cannot so much as moue themselues And he permitteth them by bereauing and destituting them of the grace of his spirit to run headlong into sin and eternal destruction Hee hath also ouer vs right and power to do with vs what him listeth
but hee furthermore keepeth and gardeth vs as his owne flocke and proper people whome hee hath purchased with his bloode hee gouerneth vs also and guideth vs by his spirite hee woorcketh in our heartes faith and obedience that wee maie doe things acceptable vnto him and so fenceth vs against all the temptations of the Diuel and the flesh that we may neuer fal from him Therefore he is our Lord after a farre other sort than the Diuels and the reprobates 2 By right of redemption 2 Hee is our Lorde by right of redemption For hee alone paying the raunsome for vs deliuereth vs from the power of the Diuel by his spirit regenerateth vs and causeth vs to beginne to serue him and in this liberty whereunto hee hath brought vs by his merite and power hee also preserueth vs against al both outward and inward enemies euen to the end and being raised from the dead he fully enfreeeth and deliuereth vs from all sin and miserie and endoweth vs with eternal blisse and glorie And seeing hee hath deliuered freed vs it is manifest that we were Seruants and truely so wee were and are by nature Seruantes and bound-slaues of the Diuell from whose tyrannie Christ hath deliuered vs and heereupon nowe are wee the Seruants of Christ because vs who were by nature his enimies and deserued to be destroied of him hee notwithstanding preserued and deliuered For * The reason of this deriuation of the name Seruant could not be expressed in English as it is in latine from whēce our English word commeth Serui which signifieth seruants commeth from Seruando that is saued or preserued serui or seruants were first so named by the Romans from seruando which is in signification preserued bicause whē in the wars they might haue bin slain of their enemies they were preserued But this dominion of Christ ouer vs is speciall that is extendeth it selfe onely to the Church Obiection Jf we bee redeemed from the power of the Diuel therefore a ransome hath bin paid him for our redemption For from whose power wee are redeemed vnto him is the price and ransome due But God gaue not him the raunsome Therefore wee are not redeemed from the power of the Diuel Answer From whose power we are redeemed as hauing bin supreme Lord ouer vs and holding rightly his dominion ouer vs vnto him the price ransome is due But the diuel is no supreme Lord but the executioner of the supreme lord Wee are saide to bee redeemed in respect of god wee are deliuered in respect of the Diuel which is God who alone hath and holdeth by right dominion ouer vs. Wherefore in respect of God Christ redeemed vs for vnto him he hath paid the price But he hath deliuered vs or set vs at liberty in respect of the Diuell For wee are giuen vnto Christ our redeemer to bee his owne neither hath the Diuell nowe anie more right or power ouer vs. And this christs dominion and power ouer vs cost him enough who therefore also hath care of it and preserueth it Of that Dominion we dispute especiallie in this place For the Diuell dooth not acknowledge Christ to bee such a Lorde vnto him as wee confesse him to bee vnto vs because hee hath redeemed vs and because hee guideth vs with his spirite 3 In respect of our preseruation Christ is our Lorde 3 By right of preseruation because he defendeth vs vnto the end keepeth safegardeth vs to eternall life not only by defending our bodies from enimies but our soules also from sins Of this Dominion himselfe speaketh None of them are lost which thou gauest mee No man shal pluck my sheepe out of my hands He keepeth the wicked to destruction and defendeth their bodies only 4 In respect of Gods ordinance 4 In respect of Gods ordinance because the Father ordeined the woord and this person Christ vnto this that by him hee might woorke all thinges in heauen and in earth The Father gaue vs vnto him manifested him vnto vs to bee our Prince King Head hath made him heire of al. Now whereas he is our Lorde after a farre more excellent manner than others we also are far more bound to his allegeance obedience For he is so our lord that he doth indeed with vs what he wil and hath full right and power ouer vs but yet he vseth that his power to our saluation only For wee receiue dailie of this Lord moe and by infinite partes more excellent benefites than doe any other thoroughout the whole world And therefore wee ought alwaies to acknowledge the dominion and power which Christ hath ouer vs. Which acknowledging of his dominiō is 1. A profession of so great a benefit of christ as that he hath vouchsafed to be our lord to set free vs his enimies into this so fruitfull glorious a liberty 2. A confession of our bond duty For christ being so merciful a Lord vnto vs we ought both in word and life to professe our selues as his seruantes to bee bound to faithfull subiection and obedience vnto him in all thinges that he may bee magnified of vs for euer WHICH WAS CONCEIVED BY THE HOLY GHOST BORNE OF THE virgin Mary In the conception three thinges to bee obserued 1 The forming of Christs flesh First christ is said here to haue bin conceiued by the holy ghost Whereby three thinges are signified 1. That the masse of his humane nature was created or formed in the wombe of the Virgin miraculouslie and beside the order of thinges disposed of God in nature by the immediate working operation of the holy Ghost without the seede and substance of man Obiection But we are also formed and made of God Answere We mediately Christ immediately 2 The sanctifieng of his flesh 2. That the Holy Ghost did in the same moment and by the same operation cleanse this masse and from the verie point of the conception sanctifie it that is he caused that originall sinne should not issue into it and that for these causes First that hee might bee a pure sacrifice and a sufficient ransome for our redemption 2. Cor. 5.12 He hath made him to be sinne for vs which knew no sinne that we should be made the righteousnes of god in him Secondly That he might also sanctify vs by his sanctitie and holynesse For if Christ had beene a sinner hee could not haue satisfied for vs but himselfe should haue remained in death Therefore could he not haue bin our sanctifier neither by merit nor by his power and efficacie Heb. 2.11 For he that sanstifieth and they that are sanctified are all of one Heb. 7.26 Such an high Priest it became vs to haue which is holy harmelesse vndefiled separate from sinners Thirdly Iohn was not agreeable vnto the Word the eternall sonne of god to vnite personallie vnto him humane nature being stained defiled where in hee dwelleth as in his owne temple For God
the verie essence it selfe of the God-head c. Therefore if Gods omnipotencie bee really communicated to Christs humanitie so that this also is by reason of the omnipotency communicated vnto it reallie omnipotent of necessity then by reason of the same omnipotency really communicated Christes humanitie shall bee indeed an essence subsisting of it selfe and by it selfe incorporeall eternall immense creatres of all thinges that is God himselfe blessed for euer and so by consequent the diuine person For an essence intelligent subsisting by it selfe which also is God must needs be the person And these are the fruits of reall communicating of properties in natures The participation of the God-head exaltation and maiestie of the flesh and such like is not a real communicating of the essentiall properties of the God-heade made into the humane nature or an omnipresence omniscience omnipotency that is a God-head of the man-hood For such a communicating should not perfect but destroy the man-hoode and conuert it into the God-head and dissolue the personal vnion of distinct natures but it is First the verie vnion of the humanitie with the Word in such sort as it being created finite doth together with al the essential properties therof subsist not in a created person of the same humane nature but in the increate and eternal person of God the Word by reason of which vnion God the Word but not the God-head is is called trulie man and contrarie man but not the manhood is and is called truly eternall God No dignitie eminence can be imagined greater than this neither doth it agree to anie but to the flesh of Christ onely Secondly Jt is the excellencie of gifts For these christs humanitie receiued without measure that is all whatsoeuer and most great and most perfect that maie fall into a created and finite nature Thirdly The office of the mediator to the perfourming whereof the vnited but yet distinct properties and operations of both natures doe necessarily concur Fourthly The honor and worship which by reason of the Mediatorship agreeth is giueÌ„ to whole christ according to bâ—th natures keeping still as was before saide the difference of properties and operations in natures Now whatsoeuer testimonies some bring either out of the Scriptures or out of the Fathers which were sound in faith thereby to proue that their Eutychian transmutation and a third kind of communicating forged by themselues that is exequation or equalling of natures all those testimonies indeed belong either to the grace of vnion of the natures which is signified by the communicating of properties or to the grace of Christes Headship which compriseth the office and honour of the Mediatour which are affirmed of whole Christ by waie of communicating or to the habituall grace that is the created giftes which Christ receiued without measure which are properly affirmed of the flesh or humanitie These giftes which are also called graces are not properlie effectes of the personal vnion as are the attributes or properties of the natures and office First because they are communicated to the manhoode as well of the Father and the Holie Ghost as of the Word or Sonne For he is said to haue receiued of the Father the spirite without measure that is aboundauntlie likewise to be annointed with the Holy Ghost And if the giftes were effects of the vnion it would follow of necessity that the flesh was vnited not to the Son only but to the Father also and the holy Ghost Secondlie The vnion of the flesh with the Woord was from the verie moment of the conception alwaies most perfect But the consummation and perfection of giftes was not vntil the accomplished time of his resurrection ascension For hee was indeede humble weake and contemned he was indeede ignorant of some things he did indeede encrease in wisedome stature and in fauour not with men onely but also with God himselfe Thirdly The flesh when it was in the state of humility had not immortality or a nature not subiect to sufferings or the like and yet remained it alwaies vnited with the Woorde Wherefore the habitual giftes or graces of the humanitie for which it is also in it selfe reallie wise mighty iust holie follow not the personal vnion in respect of dependency as the effect followeth and dependeth of this cause but onely in respect of order Because namely the humane nature was first to subsist and bee before it were enriched with giftes and it subsisteth vnited to the Woord in the very first moment of the conception But after what maner the humanitie is vnited vnto the Sonne of God hath beene said before For by the special and miraculous working of the holy Ghost in the womb of the virgine of her blood was the flesh of christ formed sanctified and vnited according to subsistence or personally vnto the Wâ—ord 4 Why it was necessarie that the two natures should bee vnited in the person or subsistence of the sonne of God FOR what cause Christ our Mediatour was to bee together both a true and perfect iust man and true that is by nature GOD hath beene declared of vs before in the common place of the Mediatour in the 4 question pag. 237. For the woorke of our redemption could not haue bin compassed and finished by the Mediator without the concurrence of diuers natures operations in the same person For albeit he suffred died in the flesh yet his passion and suffering would not haue that force and efficacy to redeeme iustifie sanctifie vs neither could christ haue applied those benefites vnto vs except he had bin withal true and natural God Of the Incarnation of the Word the confession made by the Fathers of Antioch against Paulus Samosatenus TAKEN OVT OF THE ACTES OF THE FIRST EPHESINE COVNCEL VVEE confesse our Lord Iesus Christ begotten before all worlds of his Father but in the last times borne according to the flesh of the Virgine by the holy Ghost subsisting in one person onely made of the celestiall God-head and humane flesh Whole God and whole man Whole God also with his bodie but not according to his body god Whole man also with his God head but not according to his God head man Againe whole adorable also with his bodie but not according to his bodie adorable Whole adoring also with his Godhead but not according to his godhead adoring Whole increat also with his body but not according to his body increated Whole formed also with his Godhead but not according to his godhead formed Whole consubstantial with god also with his body but not according to his body consubstantiall as neither also according to his Godhead he is coessentiall with men but hee is according to the flesh consubstantiall vnto vs existing also in his Godhead For when wee say hee is according to the spirit consubstantiall with God wee doe not say hee is according to the spirit coessentiall with men And contrarily when wee affirme him to bee according to the
vnworthinesse dooth not hurt or impaire their saluation 13 Some sacramentes are to bee receiued but once in our life others more often Some are to be giuen to those of vnderstanding onely others to infants also Euen as they were instituted by God either in once making his couenaunt with all the Elect and those which were to be receiued into his church as circumcision and baptisme or after sundry falles and combates of temptations for the renuing of his couenant and for the fostering and preseruing of the vnity and assemblies of his Church as the Arke the Passouer and other sacrifices and so likewise the Lords Supper 14 Those thinges agree in common to the sacramentes of both the old and new couenaunt which haue been spoken of in the definition But their differences are these that the oulde shewe Christ who was after to be exhibited the newe Christ already exhibited with his benefites The rites of the old were diuerse from ours and moe in number as circumcâ—sion sacrifices oblations the Passeouer the Sabboth woorshipping at the Arke Christians haue others and those only two Baptisme and the Supper The oulde were darker the newe are clearer and more manifest The olde were proper and peculiar to Abrahams posterity and their seruauntes the new are commanded to the whole church which is to bee gathered both of Iewes and Gentiles 15 The sacramentes and the preaching of the gospell agree in this that they are the work of God which hee exerciseth towardes his church by his ministers who teach promise and offer vnto vs the same communion of Christ and all his benefites and also they agree in this that they are the externall instrumentes of the holy ghost by which he mooueth our harts to beleeue and so by the comming and meanes of faith maketh vs partakers of Christ and his benefits Neither yet is the working and operation of the holy ghost to be tied here neither doe these profite but rather hurt them who applie not vnto themselues by faith that which the woordes and rites signifie 16 The sacramentes differ from the word because the woorde doth by speech and they by gestures and motions signifie the will of god towardes vs. By the word faith is both begunne confirmed By these it is confirmed only in the lords supper The word also teacheth and confirmeth without the sacraments But the sacraments doe not without the word Without the knowledge of the word they who are growen to vnderstanding are not saued But men may both be regenerated and saued without the vse of the sacraments if it be not omitted through contempt The word is preached also to the vnbeleeuers and wicked men Vnto the sacraments the church must only admit them whom God willeth vs to account for members of the church 17 Sacraments and sacrifices agree in this that they are works commanded of God to be done in faith A sacrament differeth from a sacrifice in that God by sacraments signifieth and testifieth vnto vs his benefits which he performeth for vs. By sacrifices we yeeld and offer our obedience vnto God 18 Wherefore also one the same ceremony may be coÌ„sidered both as a sacrament and as a sacrifice as whereby God in giuing vs visible signes testifieth his benefits towards vs and we in receiuing them testifie againe our duty towards him And this testification of our faith thankefulnesse dependeth of that testifâ—cation of gods benefites towardes vs as of the chiefe and proper ende and vse of the sacramentes and is thereby raised in the mindes of the faithfull The confirmation of such of the former conclusions as most require it THE confirmation of the second conclusion The definition therein deliuered of sacraments is expressed Gen. 17.11 Exod. 20.10 Exod. 31.14 Thou shalt keep my sabbothes Now that sacraments are rites commanded and prescribed to the church by God is apparent by the instittuion of theÌ„ as also that they are rites adioined vnto the promise as visible signes and tokens thereof Because al sacraments are necessary duties towards GOD. But chiefly and principallie they are gods benefites towardes vs as circumcision did portende and shew remission of sinnes and mortification Deut. 30.6 Heb. 8 9.10 Neither onely doe we signifie them in confessing and celebrating them but chiefely God himselfe dooth signifie them vnto vs testâ—fieng and confirming them vnto vs by the ceremonies of sacrameÌ„ts For the Ministers as well in the administration of the sacraments as in the preaching of the woord â—eaâ—e the person possesse the place of God to the Church Mat 28.19 Teach and baptise all nations Iohn 4.2 Iesus did baptise when yet not hee himselfe but his disciples did baptise So of the signe and ceremonie of inauguratioÌ„ or anointing one to be King it is saide 1. Sam. 10.1 The Lord hath anointed thee When yet Samuel was sent to anoint Saul They furder are therefore saide to confirme our faith because the scripture witnesseth them to be the signes and tokens of the mutuall euerlasting couenant between God and the faithfull which God signifieth vnto vs in the bestowing of his benefits promised vs in the Gospell But God is alike to be beleeued whether by signes or by words which signifie his will because not onely our sacrifices and obedience but also the signes of grace deliuered vnto vs by God haue in their right vse the promise of grace adioyned vnto them As He that shall beleeue and shall bee baptised shall bee saued And lastly because the scripture to signifie the receiuing or want of the things signified alleageth the receiuing or want of the signs As Ps 51.7 Purge me with hysop I shal be clean Deut. 30.6 The Lord will circumcise thy heart Rom. 6.3 All wee which haue bin bapitised 1. Cor. 10.16 The bread which we break is it not the coÌ„munion of the bodie of Christ And hereof also follow the other ends specified in the definition in this second conclusion As That the sacraments discerne seuer the church from other sects This is manifest both by effects and by Testimonies Exod. 12.45 A strainger shall not eate thereof Rom. 3.1 What is the profit of circumcision Much euery maner of way because vnto them were committed the Oracles of God Eph. 2.11 Ye being in times past Gentiles called Vncircumcision of them who were at that time without Christ and were aliants from the common-wealth of Jsraell and were straingers from the couenants of promise and had no hope and were without God in the Worlde Gen. 17.11 Is shall bee a signe of the couenant betweene mee and you and it shall bee my couenant in your flesh Another ende is that they preserue the memorie of Gods benefits 1. Cor. 11.26 As often as yee shall eate this bread yee shew the Lords death vntill hee come Exod. 12.14 This day shall bee vnto you a remembrance Deut. 6.8 Thou shalt binde them for a signe vpon thine hand and they shall bee as signes of remembrance betweene thine eyes
posteritie Vnto other Nations but not vnto the Iewes it was free to be circumcised or not to be circumcised Wee must here obserue that they of the olde testament were of three sorts 1. Jsraelites which were of Abrahams posteritie and were necessarily bound by the Lawe to obserue circumcision the ceremonies 2. Proselytes who of the Gentiles were conuerted vnto the Iewes did more more for cōfirming of their faith submit thē selues vnto circumcision and the whole ceremonial lawe 3. Those of the gentiles who were conuerted vnto the Iewes but did not obserue the ceremonies For vnto the gentiles and Prosylites it was free to keepe or not to keepe circumcision and the ceremonies These latter were called also Religious men who embraced onely the doctrine and promises of god Obiect The males onelie were circumcised therefore the women were shut out from the couenant of grace Aunswere The women were comprehended in the circumcision of the males And God spared the weaker sex And it sufficed for them to come of godly progenitors 2 What are the ends of circumcision CIrcumcision was instituted 1. That it might bee a signe of the grace of God towardes Abrahams posteritie and that doubly First that God woulde receiue the beleeuers by the Messias who was to come Secondly that he would giue them the land of Canaan and graunt his church a certaine place there vntill the comming of the Messias 2. That it might be a bond to bind Abraham and his seede vnto thankefulnes or to faith and repentance and so to keepe the whole law 3. That it might bee a marke to distinguish the Iewes from other Nations and Sects 4. That it might bee a sacrament of initiating and receiuing them into the church 5. That it might bee an accusation and a signification of vncleannes For that rite did shewe that all men were subiect to sinnes and vnclean 6. That it might bee a signe which shoulde shewe and signifie that the meanes of their deliuerance through Christ which was to come shoulde not come elsewhence than from the bloud of Abraham 3 Why circumcision is abolished CIrcumcision is abolished 1. Because the thing signified is exhibited For among other things it signified that the Messias promised vnto the Fathers should come at length in his appointed time and should in our behalfe take our nature 2. Because circumcision was instituted for the seuering of the Iewes from all other Nations but now the church that difference being abolished is collected and gathered out of al Nations And now the sacrament of baptisme performerth the same vnto vs which circumcision did vnto them Moreouer as circumcision was a signe vnto them of their receiuing into the people of God So is baptisme vnto vs the first mark which seuereth the church from the wicked 4 Why Christ was circumcised CHrist was circumcised 1. That hee might signifie that hee was also a member of that circumcised people 2. That hee might shew that he receiued and tooke our sinnes on himselfe that he might satisfie for them 3. That he might testifie that he did entirelie and fullie fulfill the law in our behalfe 4. The circumcision of Christ was a part also of his humiliation and Ransome OF THE LORDS SVPPER THE chiefe questions 1 What the Supper of the Lord is 2 What are the ends thereof or wherefore it was instituted 3 What is differeth from Baptisme 4 What is the sense and meaning of the words of the institution 5 What is the difference betweene the Lords Supper and the Papists Masse 6 What is the right vse of the Supper 7 What the wicked receiue in the Supper 8 Who are to come and to be admitted vnto the Supper 1 WHAT THE SVPPER OF THE LORD IS FIrst we wil see by what names the Supper of the Lorde is called then wee wil in few woordes define what it is This action or ceremony or rite instituted by a Christ a little before his death is called A supper Why it is called a Supper from the first institution of it that is in respect of the originall or first beginning of this rite or in respect of the time wherein this ceremony was instituted which circumstance of time the church hath chaunged Jt is likewise called Synaxis that is Why a conuent a conuent in respect of the assembly and conuent of the church because some either few or many assemble and meete together in celebrating of the supper For in the first celebration the Disciples were present Take this and diuide it among you Wherefore it must needs be that there was some number there which also appeareth by the Apostle repeating the first institution 1. Cor. 11. where in the end he addeth When ye come together to eat tarry one for another And further that moe ought to come together to celebrate the supper this end of the supper doth euidently enough shew in that it was instituted to be a token and euen a bond of loue For we that are many are one bread and one bodie It is called also the Eucharist Why the Eucharist Why a sacrifice Why Missa because it is a rite and ceremony of thankesgiuing Last of all it is called also a sacrifice because it is the commemoration of christs propitiatory benefit And at length it was also called Missa frō the offering or from the dimissing of the rest who might not communicate after the sermō which went before the celebration was finished Now let vs come to define the Lords Supper The definition of the Lordes Supper THE Lords supper is a ceremonie or sacrament instituted and appointed of christ vnto the faithfull for a memorial of him whereby christ dooth certainly promise and seale vnto mee and all the faithfull first that his body was offered and broken on the crosse for mee and his bloode shed for me as truely as I see with my eies the bread of the Lord to be broken vnto me and his cup distributed and moreouer that hee doth as certainlie with his body crucified and his blood shed feed and nourish my soul vnto euerlasting life as my body is fed with the bread the cup of the lord receiued from the hand of the minister which are offered to me as certaine seales of the body blood of Christ It may be also more briefly defined on this wise The lords supper is a distributing receiuing of bread and wine commaunded of Christ vnto the faithfull that by these signes he might testifie that hee hath deliuered and yeelded his body vnto death and hath shedde his bloode for them and dooth giue them those thinges to eate and drinke that they might be vnto them the meate and drink of eternall life and that thereby also he might testifie that he would dwel in them for euer And againe that of the otherside hee might by the same signe bind them to mutuall dilection and loue seeing Christ spareth not to giue his body and bloode for vs. This
the signe of his renewing or regeneration is baptisme Afterwards when he is once renewed and borne again he must be fostered and nourished by the bodie and bloude of Christ the signe of which nourishing is the supper Now it is one and the same Christ who both regenerateth and nourisheth vs to eternal life And albeit it is the same participation of christ namely both the Washing away of sins by the bloud of christ The same thing is sealed in Baptisme and the Supper but the manner of â—eâ—ling is diuers which is represented in Baptisme and the Eating and drinking of the body and bloud of Christ which is confirmed vnto vs in the Supper yet notwithstanding that signification of our new birth is sealed by the dipping of our bodie into the water of Baptisme and this of our maintenance and preseruation is dâ—painted and sealed by the eating and drinking of bread and wine in the Supper And therefore the thing signified of the sacramentes is not diuerse because it is the same to bee washed with the bloud of christ and to drinke the bloud of Christ But the manner of sealing one and the sâ—me thing is diuerse 3 In baptisme is required confession of faith and repentance in the Elder sort in Jnfants it is sufficient if they be borne in the church seing they that are born in the Church are therefore reputed for regenerate or members of the church because they haue an inclination to faith repentance But in the supper is added a further cond tiâ—n of examining himselfe and of remembring the Lords death Doe this in remembraunce of mee Let a man examine himselfe Baptisme therefore is due vnto the whole Church vnto infants who are the children of faithfull Parents no lesse than the elder sort enrolling themselues and giuing their names to Christ The supper is graunted to such onely as are beleeuers and repentaunt 4. Baptisme must goe before and the supper follow Whereupon in the auncient church after the Sermno wâ—re dimissed such as were excommunicated likewise those that were possessed or troubled with an euill spirite and the Catechumens that is such as old not as yet vnderstand the gâ—ounds and principles of râ—ligion or were not as yet baptised So of old they who were not yet circumcised did not obserue the sacrifices or ceremonies Nowe if they who were baptised before they haue made confâ—ssion of their faith and repentaunce are not as yet to bee admitted vnto the supper much lesse are they who being baptised liue after the manner of swine and dogges 5. Baptisme is not to bee reiâ—erated but once onely to bee receiued in our life time The supper is often to be receiued of vs Because baptisme is a signe of our receiuing into the church and couenaunt and the couenaunt once made is not againe vndoone or made voide to those that repent but remaineth ratified and firme for euer The supper is a confirmation of our faith concerning the eternall continuance of the couenant which confirmation is necessary and therefore the supper is often to be iterated Hereof it is that the Apostle saith of the supper As often as ye shall eat this bread and drinke this cup yee shew the Lords death til he come But of baptisme he saith That al wee which haue beene baptized into christ haue beene baptized into his death And Christ Hee that shal beleeue and shal be baptised shal be saued And seeing also the supper was therefore to be instituted that in it shoulde be made a publique remembrance recounting shewing of Christs death it is often to be celebrated 6 What is the sense or meaning of the words of the institution of our Lordes supper HEre are both those very odious questions conteined concerning the sense of Christes woords in his supper The Transubstaâ—â—â—â— and Consubstantiaries relie not on the simple meaning of Christes words The Transubstantiaries together with the Consubstantiaries doe bost and glorie that they vnderstand the woords of Christ simply and aright But neither perfourme that which they brag and boast of For that is the true simplicity and propriety of the woord whereunto for the iust vnderstanding and interpretations thereof nothing is to bee added neither ought to be taken from it neither any thing altered For as many as hold that the body of Christ is With Jn or Vnder the breade they adde vnto the woordes of Christ and depart from true simplicity For if that which Christ said is simply to be reteined that is not to be admitted which he said not as is The bread is both bread and the body of Christ but simply this only The bread is the body of christ He said not My body is with or in or vnder the bread or the bread is both bread and my body together neither added he as these ad of their owne really substantially corporally but he vttered these bare words of the bread This is my body Neither haue the Traunsubstantiaries their opinion drawen from the woordes of Christ simply vnderstoode namely that of the bread is made the body of Christ or the bread is chaunged into the bodie of Christ For this is their owne forgery and inuention For Christ said not That the bread was now made or was a making or should be made but simply said The bread is his body where no chaunge coulde come betweene so that the words of christ be simply vnderstood Therefore falsely doe they persuade the people that they simply rest on the propriety of christes woords when as manifoldly and most farre they swarue and depart from it Wherefore the true sense and meaning of the woordes is diligently to be considered The holy Euangelistes Matthew Marke and Luke doe most specially of al others describe the institution of the Lords supper and besides them the Apostle also declareth it no lesse plainly and luculenâ—ly who thus speaketh 1. Corint 11. vers 23.24.25.26 I haue receiued of the Lord that which J also haue deliuered vnto you that the Lord Iesus in the night that he was betraied tooke bread And when he had giuen thanks he brake it and said Take eate this is my body which is broken for you this doe yee in remembraunce of me After the same maner also he took the cup when he had supped saying This cup is the new testament in my bloud this doe as oft as yee drinke it in râ—membrance of me For as often as ye shal eate this bread drink this cup ye shew the Lords death til he come These words of the Apostle we wil briefly expound and then we will demonstrate them by true and firme arguments In the night that he was betraied This circumstance is specified by the Apostle to giue vs to vnderstande that Christ would at the last supper of the Passeouer institute this his supper to shew 1. That now an end was made of al the old sacrifices he did substitute a new sacrament which should sâ—cceed should be
cup is the new testament Or the couenant as both the * Berith greeke and * 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 〈◊〉 Hebrue word admitteth Now it is called the new couenant that is renewed or to speake it in a woord fulfilled And this new couenant is our reconciliation with God the communion and participation of Christ and all his benefites by faith in the sacrifice of Christ now fulfilled finished without any obseruation of the ceremonies of the old Passeouer The supper is called the new couenaÌ„t because it is a signe and a seale of this couenant signing and sealing vnto vs our reconciliation with God and our coniunction with Christ which is wrought by faith Now in calling the supper the new couenant first he comprehendeth both the promise and the condition which is expressed in the promise namelie faith and repentance Whereof also it foloweth that the supper was for this cause also instituted that it might bee a bond to bind vs to lead a christian life Secondly hee maketh an opposition betweene the new couenant and that couenant which was the Passeouer together with the rites thereof For the supper signified Christ offered The Passeouer signified Christ who should bee offered There is notwithstanding no small similitude and agreeing of both For both signifie our reconciliation with God and coniunction with Christ Jâ— my bloud which is shed for you for remission of sinnes The shedding of Christs bloud is the merite for which beeing apprehended of vs by faith we receiue remission of sinnes For as often as yee shall eate The supper therefore is often to be iterated and celebrated 1. Because of the woordes of the institution 2. In respect of the ende and purpose of the institution because it must bee done in remembranuce of Christ Shewe the Lordes death That is beleeue that Christ died and that for you and then professe it also publiquely before all Till hee come Therefore it must bee obserued vnto the worlds end neither is any other externall forme to be looked for vntill the day of iudgement The words of the institution which haue beene hitherto expounded may be made more plaine and cleare by these wordes of the Apostle The cup of blessing which we blesse is it not the communion of the bloude of Christ The bread which wee breake is it not the communion of the bodie of Christ The cup of blessing that is the cup of thankesgiuing which is receiued namely to this end that wee may yeeld thankes to Christ for his death and passion The communion of the bodie likewise the communion of the bloud is to be made through faith partaker of Christ and all his benefites the same spirit being in vs which is in Christ and woorking the same in vs which he worketh in Christ Bread and wine is the communion that is it is the signe of our communion with Christ Now our communion as the Apostle briefly declareth consisteth in this that wee who are manie are one bodie Whence it is most easie to collect that this communion is not a corporall eating For it is wrought onely by faith and the holy Ghost Christ is the heade and wee the members and all wee who are members haue also a communion of all Christs benefites Therefore the heade is common the benefites common and so the members also common among themselues wherefore their loue and dilection is common and mutual We vnderstand nowe what is the true meaning of the words of the institution especiallie of those about which is greatest coÌ„trouersy which are these This is my body that is to repeat in few wordes the true sense of them This bread broken of me and giuen to you is a signe of my bodie for your sakes rent and deliuered vnto death and a certaine seale of your coniunction with me so that he who beleeueth and eateth this bread doth truelie and reallie after a sort eat my bodie This our iudgement and interpretation or Christs rather is most true and vnto the truth of the Gospell most agreeable Here especially resistâ—unce is made and the greatest controuersie is about the word or vnderstanding of the word For our aduersaries vnderstand those wordes so as tâ—ey maintaine thereof to folow that Christes bodie is present and eaten corporallie But in the meane season they consider not that those wordes are sacramentallie to bee taken or that the speech is sacramental and therefore is not to be taken as proper and simple as it shoulde bee if thence were gathered that the bread is changed into Christs bodie Now to the signe here is attributed the name of the thing signified both for the coniunction which the thing signified hath in the right vse of the supper with the signe and also for the proportion which the signe hath with the thing signified Come wee now to those arguments whereby wee may confirme our interpretation and opinion to bee true The arguments which wee will vse are of three sorts such as are wont to bee also in like controuersies 1. Some are taken from the nature of the thing or subiect that is by vnderstanding the speech as the thing it selfe doth beare and suffer 2. Some are drawen from an analogie of the articles of our faith or from a conference of places or parts of christian doctrine for the holy spirite is the spirite of truth 3. Some are taken from other like places of scripture where the same thing is deliuered in such words as are manifest and whereof there is no controuersie The first sort of Arguments which are taken from the nature of the sacraments THE verie manner and forme of speaking yeeldeth vs a firme and strong argument Breade is the bodie of Christ but bread is not in it owne proper substance his bodie for by reason hereof haue they inuented consubstantiation therefore it is a figuratiue speeche euen such a one as is vsual vnto sacraments and is declared in the institution 2 Sacraments confirme exhibit promise seale no other thing than the woorde doth In the woorde is promised no corporal eating Therefore neither is anie such thing confirmed by the sacrament 3 In all sacraments when the names or properties of the things are attributed vnto the signes there is not signified the corporal presence of the thing but first a similitude of the things with their signes then a coniunction and vnion of the things with their signes in the right vse but in this sacrament Christ attributeth the name of the thing which is his bodie to the signe therefore there is not thereby signified a corporal presence of his bodie 4 The communion of Christ which is promised in his woorde and sacraments is not corporal but the communion of Christ which is giuen in the supper is the same with that which is giuen in the word and in all sacraments therefore the communion of Christ in the supper is spiritual 5 There is one and the same signification of all the Sacraments of the old and new testament
vnto vs of christs body euen as also it is coÌ„manded in the words of the institution Shew the Lords death til he come 5 The Analogie proportion of the sign the thing doth manifestly enough refel transubstantiatioÌ„ For in euery sacrament ar these two the sign the thing signified but the sign should perish if the bread should be transubstantiated that is if there shold be a change of the bread into christs body for so should remaine the thing signified onlie and not the signe therefore no sacrament Oâ—iection But the Accidents of bread and wine doe still remaine as whitenesse softnesse and such like Aunswere But so wil there not bee a proportion betweene the signe and the thing signified because accidents doe not nourish You can not say as the accidents of bread and wine nourish the body so the body of Christ nourisheth my soule vnto euerlasting life And further also the promise of God would by this meanes be made voide and frustrate For God promised that hee would giue the Messias not of the substaunce of wheat and wine but of the seede of Dauid Reply But we saie not that the bread and wine are conuerted into the substaunce of Christs bodie but that the substaunce of the bread and wine vanisheth quite awaie in place thereof succeedeth the substance of the bodie and bloud of Christ Aunswere Of this bread christ speaketh That it is his body and the same bread both before and in and after the administration of it is called bread Christ saith not this which is vnder the forme of bread is my body but he saith this that is this bread is my bodie And Paul saith The bread whith we breake is the communion of the bodie of Christ And againe For we that are many are one breade and one body Againe As often as yee shall eate this bread c. And a little after Whosoeuer shal eate this bread vnworthilie c. Moreouer Let a man examine himselfe and so let him eate of this bread Wherefore it is plaine and euident that the substaunce of bread and wine neither is changed neither perisheth neither lieth hid vnder a forme but remaineth stil the same bread and the same wine Nowe that there is no transubstantiation or conuersion of the substaunce of the breade and wine into the bodie of Christ is thus prooued If there bee anie transubstantiation christes institution is peruerted for it abolisheth and bringeth to nothing the substaunce of the bread which is the verie thing that in this ceremony is the body of christ For seing the bread is the body of Christ then doubtlesse if the bread remaine not neither doth the bodie of christ remaine in the supper and so christs woordes are no longer true when hee saide that that bread is his bodie and that wine his â—loud The Transubstantiaries if they be demaunded what thing it iâ— that they call the bodie of christ in the supper certainely they will not aunswere it is bread for they haue no bread left in the supper because it is transubstantiated but they will send vs to the very substance of christs body absolutely coÌ„sidered couered on the altar with the accidentes of bread Wherefore all they er who obiect and present the bodie of christ beeing considered by it selfe in it own proper matter and subiect to the external actions of the supper These and the former reasons refell consubstantiation also wherefore neither wil we bring any moe reasons seuerally against it Onely some certaine obiections of the Consubstantiaries themselues we will refute A refutation of obiections framed to confirme consubstantiation 1 OBiection Christ said This is my bodie But Christ is true Therefore we must beleeue him setting apart all Philosophicall subtiltie and sharpenes and so by consequent bread is not a signe of his bodie Aunswere Wee graunt their argument if they prooue that Christ putteth this to bee his meaning namely that Jn Vnder and With the bread is his bodie Replie But it is said here This is my bodie Aunswere In other sacramentes also are the like speeches as The Paschal Lambe is called the Passâ—ouer Bapâ—isme the washing of the newe-birth Circumcision the couenant Replie But we say not that the bread is the bodie of Christ reallie as the Papists say but that the bodie is in the bread Aunswere But in this respect the Papists seeme more to keep the word whom yet the Apostle expressely refuteth calling it bread both before the eating and in the eating and after the eating 2. It is no where saide either by Christ or by Saint Paul That the bodie of Christ is in the bread vnder the bread with the bread neither any where in scripture is this expressed But the true sense and meaning of those wordes is expressed in the text it self namely that the bread is the bodie of Christ symbolically that is as a symbole or tokeÌ„ of it For in the text it is plainly said Do this in remembrance of me So Paul also calleth the bread the communion of the bodie of christ Wherefore the bread is the representing or symbolical signifieng body of christ The bread is a sign of christs bodie but not a couert wherein his bodie it self remaineth 2 Obiection Christ is omnipotent Therefore his bodie may be there and so because he said it it is there Answere The reason is of no force which will conclude a thing to bee done because it may bee done Replie Whatsoeuer is at the right hand of God is euerie where Aunswere It is false For the sitting at the right hand of God signifieth the vnion of both natures in Christ his power and rule and excellencie of gifts Now although he rule all thinges yet is it not necessarie that hee shoulde bee present in bodie It is sufficient that his person is euery where and is present in dignitie As also hee sustained all thinges euen then when hee hung on the Crosse neither yet was his bodie euery where Therefore to say that christ sitteth at the right hand of the Father signifieth that christ is the person by whom the Father mediately gouerneth ruleth al things especiallie the church But no part of this Sitting is the vbiquitie of christs bodie it sufficeth that christs person is euery where 3 Obiection That which quickeneth and nourisheth vs is receiued into vs the bodie and bloud of christ doe quicken vs therefore they are receiued into vs. Aunswere The Maior is but meere particular and therefore false in general for not whatsoeuer quickeneth and nourisheth vs must necessarily be receiued into vs. That only must be receiued into vs necessarily which quickneth nourisheth naturally that is by a ioint-touching of our bodie This meate which so nourisheth vs after a naturall manner dooth not nourishe vs except thereby the substaunce of our bodie bee increased But wee speake farre otherwise of the nourishing of the soule which is spirituall Christes bodie doth not at all nourish vs naturally
gift of thine hand Nowe that offering was called so beeing as it were a yearely tribute which yet was no exaction but giuen freely Others interprete it to bee a sufficiency which is that there shoulde bee giuen so much as was sufficient and perhaps this is the truer because Deut. 15. The Lord commaunded the Jsraelites that they shoulde open their hande vnto the poore and should lend him sufficient for his neede This the Chaldee Paraphrast interpreteth to be Missah Hereof our men thinke that it was called Missa as if it were a tribute and free offering which shoulde bee euerie where offered vnto God in the church for the liuing and the dead But this is not of any likelihood to be true It is manifest indeede that the church hath borrowed some words from the Hebrews as Satan Osanna Sabaot Halleluia Pascha and such like But those words came not to the Latin church but by the greeke church and those woordes are found in the greeke testament when first it was written in greeke And therefore we haue no Hebrue woords deriued vnto our Church which the greeke church had not before vs. If also wee will search the greeke Fathers the woorde Missa will neuer be found to haue bin vsed by them Therefore I think not that the woord Missa was taken from the Hebrewes But Missa which doubtlesse is a latin woorde by original Tertul. li. 4. contra Mar. Cypr. de bono patient epist 4. li. 3. seemeth to haue beene taken from the Fathers who vsed Remissa for Remissio as Tertullian We haue spoken saith he of a de remissa peccatorum remission of sinnes And Cyprian He that was to giue b daturus remissam peccatorum remission of sinnes did not disdaine to bee baptized And againe hee vseth the same word Hee that blasphemeth against the holie ghost hath not remission of sinnes Wherefore as they said Remissa for Remissio so they seeme also to haue said Missa for Missio And therefore they called that Missa which was don after the missioÌ„ or sending away of the catechuments We reiect both the name and the thing For this woorde dooth not agree vnto the Lords Supper because the Lords Supper hath nothing common and agreeing with the name of Missa albeit it was vsed of the auncient writers Moreouer we haue no need of this name For we haue other words for this pvrpose most conuenient and agreeable The repugnancie of the Masse with the Lords supper NOW let vs see the differences of the Supper the Masse those most contrarie one to another such as in respect whereof the Masse ought to be abolished 1 The Popish Masse is a manifold chaunging or abolishing rather of the rite instituted by Christ. For it taketh away the cup from the people and addeth manie toies when as notwithstanding no creature hath anie power to institute anie sacraments or to change or abolish the constitutions and ordinances of God 2 The Masse transformeth the signe into the thing signified For it denieth that there is anie breade and wine remaining but saith it is the flesh and bloud of Christ substantiallie which is flat repugnant to the nature of the Lords supper 3 In the Masse the Papists make other heauenlie gifts to be than which are found in the word and other sacraments or in the promise annexed vnto them As where the Masse-Priestes faigne that the Masse doth merite euen by the work it selfe wrought that is through the external rite and action both for him that celebrateth and for others not onelie remission of sinnes but the healing also of men oxen swine and cattle diseased and so withall they coine this too that forsooth those signs of bread and wine are a sacrament euen without the vse also and administration Likewise they wil haue other things to be in the Masse than are in anie sacrament which is the very carnal descending abiding of Christs bodie therein which is contrarie to the nature of al sacraments 4 The Masse is repugnant to the sacrifice of Christ the supper confirmeth and testifieth that we are iustified for the alone sacrifice of Christ wrought and finished on the Crosse but the Masse contrarie to the testimonies of scripture maketh moe propitiatorie sacrifices this is their treading and trampling Christs bloud vnder foote when they say it hath not merited perfect remission of our sinnes Obiection The Masse is called a sacrifice of the Papistes and likewise the supper is called a sacrifice by the Fathers therefore the Fathers were Papists Auns The Papists call the M sse a propitiatorie sacrifice The fathers cal the supper a sacrifice and so it is but an Eucharistical or thankesgiuing sacrifice Againe it is euen that same sacrifice which Christ offered in such sort as the bread is the bodie of Christ The Papists will haue it to bee a diuers sacrifice whereby is obtained remission of sinnes Nowe it is one thing for the same sacrifice to bee often offered and an other thing for one sacrifice to bee once offered and that sufficient to take away all sinnes This sacrifice alone is sufficient for remission of sinnes and this sacrifice with others is offered for sinnes these speeches are contradictorie 5 The Masse is repugnant to Christes Priesthoode because hee is the onely high Priest who hath power to offer himselfe The Pope with his companions most impudently pulleth this honor to himselfe For these deceiuers and lying men feigne with great contumely and despite to christ that they offer again christ vnto the Father and that they alone are worthy men to offer christ vnto his Father when yet no man no Angel neither any creature is of that dignity and worthines as that hee may sacrifice the sonne of God For the Priest is abooue the sacrifice they therefore who will bee the Priestes to offer christ mount and lift themselues aboue him Obiection The Priâ—stâ— staie not but offer onelie and present the sonne vnto the father that for his sake he may remit vs our sinnes and so they onelie applie that one and onelie sacrifice of christ Aunswere It is inough that they say that they offer Christ with their hands For 〈◊〉 â—emaineth that they make themselues Priests Neither is it materiall that they deny that they slay Christ Many thinges were offered of olde by the Priests which were not slaine neither were of that qualitie but were onely offered as cakes liquid offrings burnt offrings such like The Iewes indeede slew Christ but they did not sacrifice him but Christ himselfe was willingly slaine therefore sacrificed himselfe Heb. 9.14 Christ through the eternal spirite offered himselfe without spot to God and verily hee offered himselfe once a sacrifice vnto his father for vs. Heb. 9.28 Christ was once offered to take away the sinnes of manie and to them that looke for him shall hee appeare the second time without sinne vnto saluation Heb. 10.12 Christ after he had offered
to become his members 2. They differ in their speciall vse because Baptisme is the testimonie of our regeneration and of the couenant made betweene vs and God and of our receiuing into the Church But the Lords supper testifieth that wee are euer to bee nourished by Christ remaining in vs and that the couenant made betweene God and vs shall euer be established and ratified vnto vs and that we for euer shall abide in the church and bodie of Christ 3. They differ in the persons to whom they are to be giuen Baptisme is giuen to all those who are to bee accounted for members of the church whether they be of yeares and vnderstanding or infants The Lords Supper is to bee giuen to them onely who are able to vnderstand and celebrate the benefits of christ and to examine themselues 4. They differ in the often celebrating of them Baptisme is to bee receiued but onc◠onely because the couenant of God being once made is alwaies firme and of force to the penitent But the Supper is often to bee receiued because an often renewing and recalling of that couenant to our remembrance is necessarie for our faith 5. They differ in the order which is to bee obserued in vse of them Because Baptisme is to bee giuen before the Supper and the supper may not be giuen vnto any except hee be first baptised 14 They come worthily to the Lords Supper who examin themselues that is are endewed with true faith and repentance They who finde not this in themselues ought neither to come without it least they eate and drink their owne iudgement nor to differ repentance wherewith they should come least they draw vpon themselues hardnes of hart and eternal pains 15 The church ought to admit all those vnto it who professe themselues to embrace the ground and foundation of christian doctrine and to haue a purpose to obey it but those must bee repelled who wil not desist either from their errors and blasphemies or from manifest sinnes against their conscience beeing admonished by the church and conuicted of error 16 The Pope hath corruptlie taken awaie the breaking of the bread from the rite of the supper and bereaued the people of the vse of the cup Corruptly also hath hee deformed the supper of the Lord with adding so manie ceremonies not deliuered by the Apostles into a theatricall or pageant-like Masse that is into a Iewish superstitiō stagelike rounds conueiances But more wicked idolatrous inuentions are these That the Masse is a propitiatory sacrifice wherein christ is offered by the Masse-priests for the quick and dead and is by the force of consecration substantiallie present and abideth so long as those formes of bread and wine remaine vncorrupted and further dooth bestow the grace of God and other benefits vpon them for whom he is offered of whom also he is eaten with the mouth of their body yea though they haue no good inward motion in them and lastly is being treasured and laid vp and carried about vnder those formes to be worshipped Jn respect of these foule monsters it is necessary that the Masse be quite and cleane abolished out of the christian church In summe they are these 1. Transubstantiation 2. Bread-worship 3. Sacrifice 4. Maiming of Christes Supper THE APPENDIX OR ADDITION ADIOINING VNTO THE FORMER TREAtise of the Supper Certaine principal arguments of the Consubstantiaries against the syncere doctrine of the Lordes Supper the Sacramentaries as they cal them together with a refutation of them 1 THE errours of the Sacramentaries say they are that there are but bare signes and Symboles onelie in the supper Answere We teach that the things signified are together with the signes in the right vse exhited and communicated albeit not corporally but in such sort as is agreeable vnto sacramentes 2. The Sacramentaries saie That christ is present onlie according to his power and efficacie Aunswere Wee teach that he is present and vnited with vs by the holy Ghost albeit his bodie bee farre absent from vs like as whole Christ also is present with his ministerie though diuerslie according to the one nature 3. The Sacramentaries say they affirme that an imaginarie figuratiue or spiritual bodie of christ is present not his essentiall bodie Answere Wee neuer spoke of an imaginarie bodie but of the true flesh of Christ which is present with vs although it remaine in heauen Moreouer wee say that wee receiue the bread and the body but both after a maner proper to ech 4. The Sacramentaries saie they affirme that the true bodie of Christ which hung on the crosse and his verie bloud which was shed for vs is distributed but is spirituallie receiued of those onelie who are worthy receiuers as for the vnworthy they receiue nothing besides the bare signes vnto their condemnation Aunswere Al this wee graunt as beeing agreeable vnto the woorde of God the nature of sacraments the analogy of faith the communion of the faithful Certaine arguments of the Consubstantiaries whereby they goe about to ouerthrow our doctrine of the Lords Supper together with the refutations of them 1 THE words of the institution are open and plain This my bodie this is my bloud Answere They alleadge these woordes against them-selues For they saie That the bodie of Christ is receiued reallie in vnder with the bread when christ saith that the very bread is his body Wherefore they doe a double iniury vnto the church first while they thrust vpon the church their owne words for Christs Secondly while they imagine that the church perceiueth not these speeches to be diuerse In the bread is my body and The bread is my bodie They accuse Christ also for a lier for they deny that the bread is his body but that his body is in the bread Let them looke therefore vnto it how they wil aunswere Christ at the last iudgement for this blasphemy and reproch The Papistes also doe more retaine the very words of Christ But these retaine not the woord but follow the sense and meaning We must see therfore which part followeth it Ours shal be prooued in the end Replie Christ addeth an exposition of his minde Which is giuen for you and Which is shed for you Answere First this is a begging of that which is in question For they take as graunted that the bread is properly called the bodie which yet lieth vpon them to prooue For it is a sacramental maner of speaking Secondly we returne their own reason vpon them by inuerting it thus The bodie of Christ properly so called was giuē for vs. But the bread was not giuē for vs Therfore the bread is not the body properly so called Likewise as the bread is the body broken so the breaking of the bread is the breaking of the bodie But the breaking of the bodie is the crucifieng thereof Therefore the breade broken is but sacramentally and by representation the bodie broken 2 They reason from the autor who said
it and is true Aunswere This is also a begging of that which is in question They must proue that Christ said his bodie was in vnder with the bread And further a man may speake figuratiuely and yet speake perspicuouslie and plainly Reply He is also omnipotent Therefore he is able to be eueriewhere and so in the bread Aunswere Albeit he were able to bring to passe that two flat repugnaunt thinges should be true together yet wil he not doe it Againe God is not able to woorke contradictories or thinges flat repugnaunt because he is true Now to wil those thinges which are contradictorie argueth a lier Wherefore wee deny not the trueth and omnipotency of God but these mens lies nay rather we defend gods truth affiming that God doth that which he spake But they oppugne it making contrary wils to be in God Replie Christs bodie hath manie prerogatiues not agreeable to our bodies as that he was borne of a Virgine walked on the sea was at one time and together in the graue in Hel and in Parâ—dise and passed through the gates when they were fast shut Aunswere These examples are partly not matches partly false For this may agree vnto a creature to walke on the waters as it did vnto Peter to passe through the gates shut as is agreeable to the nature of a spirit Againe These examples are not matches nor of the same qualitie with that which is in question Because these doe not â—mply a contradiction For when hee is saide to bee borne of a Virgine he is not said withal not to be borne of a Virgine But to be both finite and infinite as they wil haue Christs body who consubstantiate it with the bread these implie a contradiction Now it is false that they saie that hee passed thorough the gateâ— shut whereas the gates might yeelde and oâ—en vnto him as also that he passed through the doore or stone of the graue when as it is said that the Angell did open it and lastly when they saie that Christes bodie was at once and together in moe places which they seeme to haue taken out of Austine But Austine said That his bodie was in the graue his soule in hel and his Godhead eueriewhere 3 They reason from a circumstance of the time The same night in which hee was betraied No man which speaketh seriously speaketh figuratiuely Christ instituting his supper spake seriously Therefore without any figure Aunswere I denie the Maior because by that position no man that speaketh seriously should speak figuratiuely which is most false God speaketh in all sacraments though figuratiuely yet seriously I haue earnestly desired saith Christ to eate this Passeouer with you Wherefore I aunswere that he vseth not iesting or obscure figures This figure is perspicuous because it is vsual and his disciples speak so Where wilt thou that wee goe and prepare that thou maiest eate the passouer It is vsuall also in all sacraments It is forcible and emphaticall because it expresseth the similitude of the signe and the thing signified and the certainetie of the coniunction of both in the right vse and administration Againe we inuert their reason and say Because christ spake seriously therefore he vsed a figure which doth well expresse and declare the thing Replie Christ sayd This cup is the new testament Jn wils and testaments men speake properly Christ here instituteth a sacrament therefore c. Answere I denie the Maior and inuert the reason for seeing hee would institute a sacrament therefore hee spake figuratiuely calling his Supper the new Testament which is figuratiuely to be vnderstoode for these two reasons 1. Because otherwise there should be two couenants the one proper and the other the supper 2. Otherwise also they should be shut out from Gods couenant who cannot come to the supper and all who came to the supper should be in the couenant Obiection Christ saith In my bloud Therefore the real bloud of christ is in the supper and is drunke by the mouth Aunswere Wee conclude the contrarie rather by those woordes of Christ Because the newe testament was made by Christs bloud shed on the Crosse and applied vnto vs by faith not drunke by the mouth for otherwise they shoulde bee excluded from the testament and couenaunt who were not able to come to this sacrament Replie There is a great force in the woord Newe That which was doone in the old testament typicallie is done in the new reallie Aunswere If they adde Therefore doone by the mouth of the bodie they bring in more in the conclusion than was in the antecedent For there was no type in the olde testament which did signifie the eating of Christ with the mouth 2. We inuert their reason Christs bodie was no otherwise eaten in the new testament than in the olde But in the old it was eaten spirituallie onely Therefore in the new also it is so eaten Reply The newe testament differeth from the olde because in that were types in the newe is the bodie it selfe Heb. 9. Col. 2. Aunswere This difference of the old and new testament is no where set downe in holy scripture that Christ is eaten in the old not really and in the newe corporally by the mouth In the places which are alleadged out of the Apostle the bodie signifieth that the shadow was onely of the old testament and was accomplished and fulfilled by Christ Because there the bodie is opposed to those shadowes and further because he calleth it the bodie of christ which kinde of speech sheweth that by Christ was wrought the accomplishment fulfilling of the types or shadowes of the Old Testament Moreouer albeit wee haue Christ exhibited in the newe testament and hee is there borne man yet notwithstanding it dooth not therefore folow hereof that his bodie is in the bread but onely that it is in the new testament 4 They reason from the consent of the Euangelists and sainâ— Paul Matthew as Theophylact calculateth writ his gospel eight yeares after christs assension Marke ten yeares Luke fifteene yeares Paul twentie yeares And all vse the same words A speech that is often vttered with the same wordes is not figuratiue Such is the speech of the Lordes Supper Therefore it is not figuratiue Answere It is false that a speech often vttered in the same words is not figuratiue because when a figure is conspicuous knowen and forcible as this it is reteined Againe the Euangelists repeat the woordes of Christ because hee spake figuratiuely Often though it bee figuratiue is this repeated He shal baptize with the holie Ghost and with fier Ioh. 1. Matth. 3. Moreouer we denie that this speech of Christs Supper was repeated by all in the same wordes 1. Because Matthew and Mark say This is my bloud of the new testament Luke saith This cup is the new testament in my bloud 2. Matthew and Marke say This is my bodie Luke addeth which is giuen for you Paul which is broken for you 3.
in outward appearance and imagination 4. Hee ascended not truely into heauen but it shall be saide to haue beene onely a vaine and imaginarie and phantasticall spectacle if hee were in his bodie substantiallie there before hee visiblie ascended thither and after he was ascended thither he remained yet in the substantiall presence of the same bodie no lesse truely than before on the earth yea and in the verie bodies also of the faithfull If these thinges so fel out in the truth of the thing it will follow that the same bodie of Christ was indeede at once and together both weake and omnipotent base and glorious subiect to sufferinges and not subiect dead and aliue limited and vnlimited which is horrible to affirme For auoiding therefore of these prodigious and impious absurdities they will except that he was not as touching his body otherwise than limited weak subiect to passions and mortal in the time of his humiliation because he had debased himselfe and would not shew forth that maiestie communicated vnto his bodie before his resurrection Aunswere They interpret amisse that debasing of himselfe of all the glorie and maiestie of his humanity hidden and kept close for a time whereas it is to bee vnderstoode in respect of the diuinitie of the Worde in that hee woulde take the forme of a seruant that is the masse of our nature and become man Moreouer it will folow that christ did shew forth the communicated power and maiesty of his flesh euen then when he was indeed weak and limited or circumscribed in bodie as when shedding teares he raised Lazarus from the dead and when being apprehended by the Iewes hee healed Malchus whom Peter wounded Now what is it else to raise the Marcionites vp againe from hell or in the greatest matter of all others impiously to blaspheme if this bee not THE SECOND ARGVMENT THE blasphemie of Samosatenus Arrius the late Antitrinitaries is this That Christ man is not properlie and by nature God but onlie by an accidental participation of diuine properties maiestie honour power and vertue The Vbiquitaries also maintaine the same consideration of the God-heade of Christ man while they define the personall vnion by his communicating alone of properties whereby the flesh of Christ is made omnipotent and euerie where So that now that man is and is called God not that he is properlie by nature God but because infinit power maiestie and glorie is giuen him from God and all the gifts of the holie Ghost are bestowed on him without measure Now this accidentall bestowing of the Godhead and all the properties doth not make christ to be properlie and by nature God but onelie by diuine grace or God vnproperlie so called Because it is not the verie essential God-head of the Word but a certaine participation thereof in vertue and effâ—cacie And therefore was it obiected by the sounder Fathers vnto the Arrians that they tooke awaie the true and eternall God-head of christ when they made him a God not by nature but by grace by participation onlie of dignitie and maiestie Therefore seeing the Vbiquitaries also equalling our Immanuel with God by participation of properties onlie take awaie his true and eternal God head wee doe disclâ—me and accurse this their doctrine as blasphemous and heretical And that they doe this Brentius in recog p. 20. Andrae Thes 20. disp Tubing and Thes 25. and 26. And Apol. Ing. 26. their owne words and opinions witnesse as Brentius and Iacobus Andraeas and others of them in their writings Whence wee conclude that the Vbiquitaries holde the same opinion with the Arrians and Antitrinitaries of the God-head of Christ manâ— that is that all these esteem him for God not by nature but onely by grace of participation new temporarie created adopted If these thinges bee true Christ shal not bee God and man but a diuine man such as the Vbiquitaries also repute him who as Seruetus Lib. 1. de Trinicate hold this opinion That God can communicate the fulnes of his God-heade giue his diuinitie maiestie power and glorie vnto man But wee execrate and detest the same blasphemie of both THE THIRD ARGVMENT NEstorius taught That the vnion of God the Word with man was wrought by the participation onelie of equality as touching maiesty honour power vertue and operation Neither doth he make the differeÌ„ce of the dwelling of the Word in mans nature which himselfe tooke and in other Saintes to consist in anie other thing than in those giftes and graces bestowed by God on man The selfe same also doe the Vbiquitaries teach because they crie that there is no difference betweene the inhabiting and dwelling of the God-head in Peter and in Christ except it bee taken from the communication of the giftes or properties of the God-heade And they contend that by this means this man which was takeÌ„ by the Word is God because the Word doth nothing without him but al things by him This is nothing els than to make christ man onelie God by an accident Wherefore the doctrine of Vbiquitie is altogether the same with Nestorius heresie Tertullian saith Tertul. lib. de Trinit p. 610. Jf Christ be man onlie how then is he present eueriewhere being called vpon and inuocated seeing this is not the nature of man but of God to be able to be present in al places By this testimony is refuted the Vbiquity of the human nature in Christ Obiect But the vnion of the diuine human nature in Christ is vnseparable Therefore wheresoeuer the diuine nature is there is also the humane nature Aunsw It is true which is said that the vnion is vnseparable The Worde neuer forsaketh the nature once assumed and taken But the Word is not in the humane nature as the soule is included in my bodie Wheresoeuer my bodie is there must my soule needes be neither is my soul at the same time without my bodie But the Worde is not so in Christ man but hee is so vnseparably and personally in the humane nature as that he is together also without the humane nature in all the partes of the world as hee filleth al and in holy men and Angels by his special presence The personall vnion of both natures dooth not euert the general action and woorking of his presence and maiestie neither doth it let or hinder the speciall woorking of his presence because the Word is effectual and worketh forcibly in the regenerate The generall points wherein the churches which professe the Gospell agree or disagree in the controuersie concerning the Lordes Supper They agree in these points FIRST that as wel the Supper of the Lord as Baptisme is a visible pledge and testimonie annexed by Christ himselfe to the promise of grace to this ende chiefly that our faith in this promise might be confirmed and strengthned Secondly that in the true vse of the supper as well as in al other sacraments two things are giuen by god vnto vs
of shutting and opening which the Lord noteth out by the name of the keies saying J will giue thee the keies of the kingdome of heauen the keies that is the office or power of shutting and opening the kingdome of God It is a Metaphour or borrowed speech taken from the stewardes of mens houses 2. King 18 18. Esai 22.22 because the steward of the house is saide to haue the keie of it to open and to shut it 2 Vnto whom the power of the keies is committed VNto whom the declaration and denouncing of Gods worde is committed to them also is committed the power of the keies The denouncing and publishing of the anger and fauour of god which is perfourmed in the preaching of the gospel is committed vnto the Ministers For the preaching it selfe also of the gospel is committed to them alone But that denouncing which is exercised in church discipline belongeth to the whole church For vnto the whole church doth Discipline spiritual iurisdiction belong But the denouncing and declaration which is vsed in the ministerie of Gods word is done after another manner than in church discipline Jn the ministerie of the word the anger of god the word going before is by euery Pastor alone or Minister of the word priuately denounced against al vngodly vnbeleeuing and vnrepenting persons namely that they are exiled from the kingdome of Christ as long as they repent not neither liue according to the prescript rule of the Gospel And againe if they repent the grace and fauour of God and remission of sinnes is by the same Pastours and Ministers signified and declared out of the worde of God vnto them Obiection Then haue men power to condemne Aunswere They haue ministerial power that is the charge and-function of denouncing vnto men according to Gods woord that God remitteth or not remitteth their sinnes and this is done two waies First and in general when in the preaching of the Gospel they declare That al beleeuers are saued and that all vnbeleeuers are condemned Secondlie when as they exercise this function of declaring Gods wil priuatlie vnto particular men and towards euerie one in seuerall as when remission of sins is promised to some certain person repenting and when likewise the anger and displeasure of God is denounced against any one person not repenting as long as he continueth in that mind So was it said to Simon Magus Thou hast neither part nor fellowship in this busines The same is to bee said in particular to euerie one as often as neede requireth neither must we doe it at our owne pleasure but according to the woorde of God And this is the power of the keies graunted vnto Pastours and annexed to the ministerie of the word But to execute this sentence declared belongeth to God alone Jn ecclesiasticall iurisdiction or church-iudgement the denouncing of the fauour and wrath of God is not done by any one priuately but by the whole church or in the name of the whole church by such as are deputed thereunto by common consent of all And this denouncing is vsed for some certaine causes and towardes some certaine persons hauing also accompanying it a debarring excluding from the vse of the sacraments when neede requireth 3 Why the power of the keies is necessarie THE power of the keies is necessary 1. In respect of the commandement If hee refuse to heare the Church let him bee vnto thee as an heathen man and a publicane And vnto such a one the Lorde will not communicate or impart his sacraments which hee ordained and instituted for the faithfull onely 1. Cor. 5.5 Let such a one be deliuered vnto Satan for the destruction of the flesh that the spirit may bee saued in the day of the Lord Iesus 1. Cor. 11.28 Let a man examine himselfe and so let him eate of this bread and drinke of this cup. And seeing Christ doth not institute his sacramentes but for the faithfull therefore neither can wee bee partakers of the table of the Lord and of Diuels For what concord hath christ with Belial But all those that professe corrupt doctrine and persist in wickednesse are at the table of Diuels Christ therefore willeth Matt. 5.24 That thou leaue thine offering before the altar and goe thy way and first bee reconciled to thy brother and then come and offer thy gift Wherefore he will haue them to submit them-selues first vnto God according to all his commandementes before they approch to any sacrament For by the name of Altar here are vnderstoode any sacraments whatsoeuer Num. 15.31 It is saide Because hee hath despised the word of the Lord and hath broken his commaundement that person shall be vtterlie cut off And Deut. 17.12 That man that will doe presumptuouslie not hearkening vnto the Priest that standeth before the Lord thy God to minister there or vnto the Iudge that man shall die and thou shalt take away euil from Israel By these two places God will haue those cut off which are rebellious against this law and that euen from the ciuil state and common wealth neither doth he permit them to be anie members of his people much lesse then will he haue them to be accounted members of his visible church The ciuil or iudicial law indeede is taken away as also are the ceremonies but that especial difference betweene the citizens of the church others is not taken away Wherevpon christ which place wee alleaged before wil haue no man to offer his gift before he be reconciled vnto his brother and so doth hee manifestly declare that hee will not that they who repent not lay hands on those sacraments which are appropriated to the penitent and beleeuers only whereby withall hee putteth a great difference betweene beleeuers and vnbeleeuers the obstinate and repentaunt So Peter also beholding the hypocrisie and impietie of Simon the Sorcerer dooth openly distinguish and part him from the faithful denouncing that he hath neither part nor fellowship in this busines that is in the doctrine of the gospel which Peter taught 2. The power of the keies is necessarie in respect of gods glorie For God is reproched and despited if without difference the wicked and blasphemers goe in the number of his children 3. It is necessarie least the sacraments be prophaned and that bee giuen to the wicked in the Supper which is denied them in the word 4. It is necessary For the safetie of the Church which shall be punished if shee wittingly willingly prophane Christs sacraments 5. For the safetie of the sinners that they beeing often admonished may return to repentāce 6. For auoiding of offēce in the church that others bee not corrupted 1. Cor. 5.6 Know yee not that a litle leauē leaueneth the whole lump 7. For auoiding of offence among those that are without least they who are not as yet members of the church come not to it 8. That the name of God may not be blasphemed euil spoken of by others
Therefore that iudgement is not committed vnto the church whereby the godlie maie be distinguished from the vngodlie Aunswere The church doth not iudge of such as are hidden or secrete but of those that are manifest namely of those who shew them selues in outward life profession and this she doth when concerning such she subscribeth to the iudgement of god that is when shee iudgeth of them according to the prescript of Gods word as when out of the woord of God shee pronounceth the obstinate to be condemned as long as they continue such when out of the word of God she absolueth them which shew repentance But to discerne from others such as are close hidden as the church is not able so neither doth she take it vpon her 3 Obiection Christ saith in the Parable of the tares let both grow together vntil the haruest Therefore none ought to bee excluded Aunswere 1. Christ speaketh there of hypocrits who cannot be discerned alwaies from the true seruers of God Therefore his meaning is that hypocrites ought not to be cut off or separated frō the church as whom we know not to be such but that the Angels shall doe this at the last daie 2. Christ distinguisheth there the office of the Magistrate and of ministers Let them grow that is put not to death any which are estrāged from the church For the Ministers may not vse corporal force against any man as may the Magistrate Now if this difference be put the difference which is between the church and the kingdome of the Diuell shal not be taken awaie 4 Obiection Men are to bee forced and compelled vnto good workes The vse of the sacraments is a good worke Therefore they are to be forced and compelled to the vse of the sacraments Aunswere 1. The Minor is not true except it be vnderstoode of that vse which is celebrated by the faithfull otherwise when vnbeleeuers vse the sacraments their vse is no good work The vse of the sacraments is a good work when good moral works goe before this vse And then is it truly called the vse of the sacramentes otherwise it is rather an abuse and prophaning of the sacramentes For when the wicked take the sacramentes they abuse them whence it is that Christ expressely dehorteth the wicked from this good work when he saith Leaue there thine offring before the Altar and goe thy waie 2. The Maior proposition is to be distinguished Men are to bee compelled vnto good woorkes but in their order so that there goe before an enforcing to moral woorks and then follow after an enforcing to ceremoniall works and so is that to bee vnderstood which Christ saith Luk. 14 23. Compel them to come in 5 Obiection We haue no examples of this excluding The Prophets Apostles and Iohn excluded none nay Iohn Baptised a generation of vipers Aunswere The Prophets albeit they could not exclude the wicked from the sacrifices sacraments yet they condemned that wickednesse of theirs in approching thither and made oftentimes long sermons both against the wicked who did approch and against the Church which admitted them vnto the sacrifices But that the Apostles did exclude Paul alone doth sufficiently shew by his example as we saw before and John Baptised them onlie who promised faith and repentaunce he baptized a generation of vipers when now they did repent Wherefore although they were a vipers broode whome Iohn baptised yet were they not any longer vipers when they were baptised For Iohn baptised none but such as confessed their sinnes As also he preached the Baptisme of repentance for the remission of sinnes 6 Obiection Jf they are to bee admitted vnto the sacraments which professe faith and repentance the vnbeleeuers and wicked are to be excluded the same shall bee doone after the same manner as it was done by Iohn But John by himselfe alone admitted them who professed faith and repentance vnto baptism and he alone also reiected he impenitēt Therefore it shall be lawful for one minister alone either to admit them who professe the Doctrine and repentance or to reiect the obstinate Aunswere The reason is not like For Iohn was endued with a Propheticall and Apostolicke authoritie Againe at that time the gathering of the new Church was respected and not the excluding of them who were in the Church and had reuolted from it Certaine argumentes assoiled whereby some haue endeuoured to abolish excommunication 1 WHERE the woorde and Sacraments are rightly to be administred there must the authorite of discipline be established But in the primitiue Church and at this day in well ordered Churches the authoritie of discipline is not established Therefore the woord and Sacraments are not rightly there administred But absurd were it so to say therefore absurd also to impose a necessity of discipline on the Church Aunswere These wordes To be rightly administred are doubtfull and haue a diuerse meaning 1. To administer rightlie signifieth so to administer as that the administration wholy agree with the prescript of the Lorde 2 It signifieth to administer not according to the right perfect and exact obseruing of it but so that the administration be pleasing to God profitable for the saluation of the Church In this whole world the Sacramentes are not rightly administred according to the former signification but according to the latter signification they are For albeit there be some blemishes which by reasō of the churches weaknes imbecillity cannot be corrected amended on a sodain yet the administration may please God and profit the Church Albeit wee are neuerthelesse to acknowledge bewail the defects For blessed are they which hungre and thirst after righteousnesse Except these thinges be graunted there will be no pure church in the world We may seeme now to haue sufficiently assoiled this obiection but yet furder also we deny the Minor For the autority of discipline was cōtinued in the Primitiue church shal also continu in an il ordred church but with great abuse as amongst the Papists Reply Jn our Churches in the Heluetian churches Excommunication is not in force Therfore the Minor of the former obiectiō is true Ans Although in some Churches it be not exercised yet is it not then ill exercised but the Minor is neuerthelesse infringed Because in those churches the woord the Sacraments are rightly administred according to the other signification whereof we spake before Chrysostome saith If any wicked person come vnto the Lords table giue not vnto him the Lordes Sacrament the body bloud of the Lord if he wil not beleue signifie it vnto me I will rather leese my life than I will admitte him Excommunication therefore was in force many yeares after Christ 2 That Doctrine which hath neither Gods woorde nor examples is not to be thrust vpon the church But this doctrine hath neither of these Therfore it is not to be thrust vpō the church Ans It hath the word for it Mat. 18.17
prooued by Paules words I haue deliuered saith he Hymenaeus and Alexander vnto Satan But our Ministers and Pastours of churches cannot do this Therefore it must needes be that Paul did it by special autoritie Aunswere This whole reason I graunt Wee must not follow his example if he did it alone But hereof it followeth not Therefore we maie not excommunicate For so more is in the conclusion than in the premisses And againe the Minor may bee denied because in the text alleadged it is reported only that Paul did it not in what sort and maner he did it THE THIRD PART OF MANS THANKFVLNES 86 Whenas wee are deliuered from all our sinnes and miseries without any merit of ours by the mercy of God onlie for Christes sake for what cause are we to doe good-workes BEcause after that Christ hath redeemed vs with his bloud he renueth vs also by his spirite to the Image of himselfe that wee receiuing so great benefits should a Rom. 6.13 12.1.2 1. Pet. 2.5.9.10 1. Cor. 6.20 shewe our selues all our life-time thankefull to God and b Mat. 5.16 1 Pet. 2.12 honour him Secondly that euery of vs may bee c 2. Pet. 1.10 Mat. 7.17.18 Gal. 5.6.22 assured of his faith by his fruite And lastly that by our honest and good conuersation wee may d 1. Pet. 3.1.2 Mat. 5.16 Rom. 14.19 winne others vnto Christ 87 Cannot they then be saued which be vnthankefull and remaine still careleslie in their sinnes and are not conuerted from their wickednesse vnto God By no meanes For as the Scripture beareth witnesse neither vnchast persons nor Idolaters nor adulterers nor theeues nor couetous men nor drunkardes nor slaunderers nor robbers shall e 1. Cor. 6.9.10 Ephes 5.5.6 1. Ioh. 3.14.15 enter into the kingdome of god 88 Of what parts consisteth the conuersion of man vnto God It consisteth of the a Rom. 6.4.5.6 Ep. 4.22.23.42 Col. 3.5.6.7.8.9.10 1. Cor. 5.7 2. Cor. 7.11 mortifieng of the oulde man and the quickning of the new man 89 What is the mortifieng of the old man To bee truely and hartily sorry that thou hast offended god by thy sinnes and daily more and more to hate and b Rom. 8.13 Ioel. 2.13 Ho. 5.15 6.1 eschew them 90 What is the quickening of the new man True ioy in God through c Rom. 5.1 14.17 Isa 57.15 Christ and an earnest and ready desire to order thy life according to gods will and to d Rom. 6.10.11 Gal. 2.20 doe all good woorkes 91 What are good-workes Those only which are done by a true e Rom. 14.23 faith according to f 1. Sam. 15.22 Eph. 2.10 gods law are g 1. Cor. 10.31 referred only to his glorie and not those which are imagined by vs as seeming to vs to be right and good or which are h Deut. 11.32 Ezec. 20.18.19 Js 29.13 Mat. 15.9 deliuered and commanded by men 92 Which is the Law of God God spake all i Exo. 20. Deu. 5. these wordes 1 I am the Lorde thy God which hath brought thee out of Aegypt out of the house of bondage Thou shalt haue no other Gods in my sight 2 Thou shalt make to thee no grauen Image nor the likenes of any thing that is in heauē aboue or in the earth beneath nor in the water vnder the earth Thou shalt not bowe downe to them nor worship them for I the Lord thy God am a ielouse God and visit the sins of the fathers vpon the childrē vnto the third fourth generatiō of thē that hate me shew mercy vnto thousands of them that loue me and keepe my commandementes 3 Thou shalt not take the name of the Lorde thy God in vaine for the Lorde will not holde him guiltlesse that taketh his name in vaine 4 Remember thou keepe holy the sabboth day sixe daies shalt thou labour and doe al that thou hast to doe but the seuenth day is the sabboth of the Lord thy God in it thou shalt doe no maner of works thou and thy son thy daughter thy man-seruant thy maid seruāt thy cattle the stranger that is within thy gate For in six daies the Lord made heauen earth the sea all that in them is and rested the seuenth daie wherefore the Lorde blessed the seuenth daie and hallowed it 5 Honor thy father thy mother that thy daies may be long in the land which the Lord thy God giueth thee 6 Thou shalt doe no murther 7 Thou shalt not commit adultery 8 Thou shalt not steale 9 Thou shalt not beare false witnesse against thy neighbour 10 Thou shalt not couet thy neighbours house nor his wife nor his seruant nor his maide nor his oxe nor his asse nor any thing that is his 93 How are these commandements diuided Into two a Exo. 34.28 Deut. 4.13 10.3.4 tables whereof the former deliuereth in foure commaundementes how we ought to behaue our selues towards God The latter deliuereth in sixe commaundements what duties we b Mat. 22.37.38.39 owe vnto our neighbour 94 What dooth God require in the first commaundement That as dearlie as I tender the saluation of my own soul so earnestlie should I shun flie all c 1. Cor. 6.9 10. 10.7.14 Idolatry sorcery enchantmēts d Leu. 19 31. Deut. 18.11 superstitiō praying to Saints or anie other e Mat. 4.10 Apoc. 19.10 22.8.9 creatures should rightly f Joh. 17.3 acknowledge the only true god g Ier. 17.5 trust in him alone h Heb. 10.36 Col. 1.11 Rom. 5.3.4.1 Cor. 10.10 Phi. 2.14 submit subiect my self vnto him with al i 1. Pet. 5.5.6 humility patience k Ps 104.27.28.29.30 Js 45.7 Iac. 1.17 look for all good things from him alone and lastly with the entire affection of my hart l Deu. 6.5 Mat. 22.37 loue m Deu. 6.2 Ps 111.10 Prou. 1.7 9.10 Mat. 10.28 reuerence n Mat. 4.20 Deu. 10.20 worship him so that I am ready to renounce and forsake al creatures rather thā to o Mat. 5.29.30 10.37 Act. 5.29 commit the least thing that may be against his wil. 95 What is Idolatrie It is in place of that one God or besides that one and true God who hath manifested himself in his word to make or imagin and account any other thing wherein thou reposest thy a 1. Para. 16.26 Phi. 3.19 Eph. 5.5 Gal. 4.8 Eph. 2.12.1 Ioa. 2 23.2 Ioan. 9. Jo. 5.23 hope and confidence 96 What doth the second cōmandement require That wee shoulde not b Deut. 4.15 c. Is 40.18 c. Rom. 1.23 c. Act. 17.29 expresse or represent god by any image or shape figure or worship him anie otherwise than he hath commaunded in his word himselfe to be worshipped 97 Maie there then at all anie images or resemblances of things be made God neither ought nor can be represented by
1. Cor. 15.33 forbiddeth 110 What doth God forbid in the eight commaundement Not onely those f 1. Cor. 6 10. thefts g 1. Cor. 5.10 robberies which the magistrate punisheth but by the name of theft he comprehendeth whatsoeuer euil craftes fetches and deuises whereby we seek after other mens goods endeuour by force or with some shewe of right to h Luc. 3.14 1. Thes 4 6. conueie them ouer vnto our selues of which sort are false i Prou. 11.1 16.11 weightes false els vneuen k Ezech. 45.9 c. Deu. 25.13 c. measures deceitfull merchandise couÌ„terfet coine l Psal 15.5 Luc. 6.35 vsurie or any other way or meanes of furthering our estate which God hath forbidden To these we may adde all m 1. Cor. 6.10 couetousnesse and the manifolde waste and n Prou. 5.16 abusing of Gods gifts 111 What are those thinges which God here commaundeth That to my power I help and further the commodities and profit of my neighbour and that I so deale with him as I would o Mat. 7.12 desire to be dealt with my selfe and that I doe my owne woorke painefully faithfully that I p Eph. 4.28 may thereby help others also who are distressed with any neede or calamitie 112 What doth the ninth commandement exact That I beare no false q Prou. 19.5 â— 21.28 witnesse against any man neither r Psal 15.3 falsifie any mans wordes neither backbite or Å¿ Rom. 1.29.30 reproch any man nor t Mat. 7.1 c. Luc. 6.37 condemne any man rashly or vnheard but auoid and u Joh. 8.44 shun with all carefulnesse all kind of lies and deceipts as the a Prou. 12.22 13.5 proper works of the Diuel except I mean to stir vp against mee the most grieuous wrath of god And that in iudgements and other affaires I follow the truth and freely and constantly b 1. Cor. 13.6 Eph. 4.25 professe the matter as it indeede is And moreouer defend and c 1. Pet. 4.8 encrease as much as in me lieth the good name and estimation of others 113 What doth the tenth commandement forbid That our hearts be not at any time moued by the least desire or cogitation against any commaundement of God but that continually and from our heart we detest all sinne and contrarily d Rom. 7.7 c. delight in all righteousnesse 114 But can they who are conuerted vnto God perfectly obserue and keepe these commaundementes No But euen the holiest men as long as they liue haue onely smale beginnings of this e 1.10.1.8 c. Rom. 7.14.15 Eccle. 7.22 obedience yet so that they f Rom. 7.22 Jac. 2.10 begin with an earnest and vnfained desire and endeuour to liue not according to some onely but according to all the commaundements of God 115 Why will God then haue his law to bee so exactly seuerely preached seeing there is no man in this life who is able to keepe it First that al our life-time wee more and more g Joh. 1.9 Psal 22.5 acknowledge the great pronenes of our nature to sin and so much the more greedily h Rom. 7.24 desire remission of sinnes and righteousnesse in Christ Secondly i 1. Cor. 9.24 c. Phi. 3.12.13.14 that wee be doing of this alwaies and alwaies thinking of that and implore and craue of the father the grace of his holy spirit whereby wee may daily more and more bee renewed to the image and likenesse of God vntill at length after wee are departed out of this life wee may ioyfully attaine vnto the perfection which is proposed vnto vs. OF PRAIER 116 Wherefore is praier necessarie for Christians Because it is the cheife part of that a Psal 50.14.15 thankfulnesse which God requireth of vs. And also because God giueth them onely his grace and holy spirit who with vnfained groninges begge them continually of him and b Mat. 7.7.8 Luc. 11.9.13 Mat. 13.12 Psal 50.15 yeelde him thankes for them 117 What is required vnto that praier which shal please God be hearde of him That we aske of the onely true God who hath c Joh. 4.22 c. manifested himselfe in his woorde all thinges which he hath commaunded to be d Rom. 8.26 1. Ioh. 5.14 asked of him with a true affection and desire of our heart and through an inwarde e Ioh. 4.23.24 Psal 145.18 feeling of our neede and miserie f 2. Par. 20.12 cast our selues downe prostrate in the presence of his diuine maiestie and g Psal 2.11 34.19 Is 66.2 builde our selues on this sure foundation that wee though vnworthily yet for Christes sake are certainely h Rom. 10.14 8.15.16 Iac. 1.6 c. heard of god euen as hee hath i Io. 14.13 15.16 16.23 Dan. 9.17.18 Mat. 7.8 Psal 143.1 promised vs in his worde 118 What are those thinges which hee commaundeth vs to aske of him All things k Iac. 1.17 Mat. 6.33 necessary both for soule and body which our Lorde Iesus Christ hath comprised in that prayer which himselfe hath taught vs. 119 What praier is that OVr l Mat. 6.9.10 c. Luc. 11.2 c. Mat. 7.9.10.11 Luc. 11.12.13 Father which art in heauen hallowed be thy name thy kingdome come thy will bee done in earth as it is in heauen Giue vs this day our daily bread And forgiue vs our trespasses as wee forgiue them that trespasse against vs And leade vs not into temptation but deliuer vs from euil For thine is the kingdome the power and glorie for euer and euer AMEN 120 Why doth Christ teach vs to cal God our father That presently in the verie entraunce and beginning of the praier he might stir vp in vs such a reuerence and confidence in god as is meete for the sonnes of god which must bee the ground foundatioÌ„ of our praier to wit that god through Christ is made our father and will much lesse denie vnto vs those thinges which wee aske of him with a true faith than our earthly Parents a Mat. 7.9.10.11 Luc. 11.11 denie vnto vs earthly things 121 Why is that adâ—ed which art in heauen That we b Ier. 23.24 Act. 17.24.25.27 conceiue not basely or teâ—â—enely of gods heauenly maiestie And also that we c Rom. 10.12 looke for and expect from his omnipotencie whatsoeuer things are necessarie for our soule and bodie 122 What is the first petition Hallowed bee thy name that is graunt vs first to d Ioa. 17.3 Jer. 9.23.24 31.33.34 Mat. 16.17 Iac. 1.5 Psal 119.105 know thee aright to worship praise e Psal 119.137.138 Luc. 1.46 c. 68. c. Psal 145.8.9.17 Exod. 34.6.7 Psal 143.1.2.5.10.11.12 Ier. 31.3 32.18.19.40.41 33.11 20. Mat. 19.17 Rom. 3.3.4 11.22.23 2. Tim. 2.19 magnifie thy almightines goodnesse iustice mercie and truth shining in al thy works
doubtfulnesse and corrupt inclination in the Saintes they stand in neede not only of the continuall conduct of gods word but also of the spurres and prouokements of exhortations and of meditation on gods will least either they er in their purpose and counsail or also seeing that which is good be neuerthelesse carried the quite contrary way Psalm 1.2 His delight is in the Law of the Lord and in his Law doth he meditate day and night Psal 19.7 The Law of the Lord is perfect cōuerting the soul the testimony of the Lord is sure giueth wisdome to the simple The statutes of the Lord are right reioice the heart the commandement of the Lorde is pure giueth light vnto the eies Moreouer by them is thy seruant made circumspect and in keepeing of them there is great reward Psalm 119.50 Thy worde is a lanterne vnto my feete and a light vnto my path Ier. 31.33 J will put my Law in their inward partes and write it in their hartes Wherefore wee see also that Christ and the Apostles propound the commaundementes and explication of the law not so much to prophane and wicked men as to the regenerate godly Against this vse of the Law some obiect that place Rom. 7. Ye are dead to the law by the body of Christ that yee should be vnto another euen vnto him that is raised vp from the dead that ye should bring forth fruite vnto God And Gal. 2 I through the lawe am dead to the lawe and that I might liue vnto God I am crucified with Christ Thus I liue yet not I now but Christ liueth in me and in that that J nowe liue in the flesh I liue by the faith in the Sonne of God Hence they conclude If we be dead to the law and are Christs who now liueth in vs then is not our life nowe schooled and ruled by the direction of the lawe but by Christ only But seeing the Apostle himselfe saith Rom. 3.31 That the lawe is not made voide but established by faith this phrase to die vnto the law dooth not signifie to bee exempted from the obedience of the Lawe but to bee freed from condemnation and from the prouokement of sin which the Lawe worketh in the vnregenerate whereas we beeing engraffed into Christ enioy in him both a full satisfaction for our sinnes for which the Lawe condemned vs and the spirit of regeneration bending inclining our heartes not to an hatred of the Lawe wherewith they first did burne but to the studie and desire of obedience and righteousnesse Therefore he addeth Rom. 7.4 That yee should bee vnto another who is raised vp from the dead that wee should bring forth fruite vnto God Againe wee are deliuered from the Law beeing dead vnto it wherein we were holden that we should serue in newnesse of spirit and not in the oldnesse of the letter In the other place Gal. 2. this is the Apostles meaning J through the Law to wit which accuseth sinnes and terrifieth the consciences of men am dead to the Lawe that is cease to seeke for righteousnesse in the Lawe and begin to seeke for it in Christ For this is it which he addeth J am crucified with Christ namely by the participation of Christs merit and the mortification of sinne that J might liue to God according to the will of God expressed in the Lawe For he liueth to God who obeieth God and honoreth him through his obedience But this the doctrine of the Lawe doth not woorke in nature nowe corrupted except wee passe from the Lawe to Christ by faith that hee maie liue in vs and wee in him that is that he may be effectual in vs through the working of his holy spirit first by suggesting speaking cōfort in our hearts of the remission of our sins then by making vs like vnto himselfe by regeneration that the Law may no longer condemne vs and cause wrath but wee may dilight in the law of God concerning the inner man Rom. 7. So then are wee deliuered from the Lawe and die to the Law so Christ liueth in vs that wee beginne to delight in the Law and to order our life according to the prescript thereof For Christ doth not restore any other righteousnesse or any other image of God in vs by his spirite than which was created by our nature darkened and ecclipsed by sinne and described in the law neither is there another spirite author of Gods lawe and worker of our conformity with God in our nature vncorrupted and restored They alleadge also that which is said Ier. 31.31 I wil make a new couenant with the house of Israel not according to the couenaunt that I made with their Fathers Heere they saie That God promiseth not to renue the old couenaunt which is the Law but to make a new which is the gospell Wherefore not the Law but the gospel onelie is to be taught in the church of Christ But it is manifest that the new couenant is not diuerse from the ould as touching the substantiall but onely as touching the accidental partes or conditions and circumstances thereof For although the old shadowes and darke types are taken awaie and a most cleare Doctrine of the prophecie and figures fulfilled by Christ hath succeeded the grace of the holy ghost is shed more plentifully on men in the new Testament than in the old yet notwithstanding there was one and the same manner and waie both of obtaining saluation and of gods spirituall worship in times past that now is Vnto this beare witnesse the wordes themselues of the Prophet Ier I will write in their hearts my Lawe hee saith not another Lawe but the same which in times past I gaue them I wil be their God and they shal be my people J wil forgiue their iniquitie and wil remember their sinnes no more For these conditions of the couenaunt are found as well in the ould as in the new The difference only is that these are not the proper benefits of the Lawe but of the gospel which two parts of the old and new Testament the Prophet here opposeth one to the other calling the lawe the oulde couenaunt and the Gospel the new couenant as beeing the principal part of the couenant and therefore he ascribeth these blessings vnto the newe couenaunt because thereon depended whatsoeuer grace of God befel vnto the olde church and therein are those things more fully manifested exhibited by Christ which were also promised graunted in the old for Christ If then God will write the Law which was first written in tables of stone in the hearts of men in his new couenaunt he doth not abolish but establish the Law by the preaching of the Gospel whereby the harts of men are regenerated that they may begin to obey the Law and therefore hee deliuering heere a difference betweene the Law the Gospel doth so substitute the new couenant vnto the old as that he saith that that part of
Decalogue in speciall that is of the meaning of euery particular commaundement THE FIRST COMMANDEMENT I AM Iehoua the Lord thy god which haue brought thee out of the land of Aegypt out of the house of bondage Thou shalt haue no other gods before me This commandement hath two parts a preface and a commandement The preface goeth before being comprehended in these words I am Iehouah the Lord thy god which haue brought thee out of the land of Aegypt out of the house of bondage This preface belongeth vnto the whole Decalogue because it describeth and discerneth God the Lawe-giuer from all creatures Law-giuers and false gods and farder it conteineth three seuerall reasons why the obedience both of this first commaundement and of the rest which followe is to be perfourmed vnto God First he saith that he is Iehouah whereby he distinguisheth himselfe the true god from all creatures that he may shew himselfe to haue the chiefe right of ruling I am Iehouah That is I whom thou hearest speaking giuing this Law vnto thee am the true God who is and existeth from himselfe and by himselfe giueth vnto other things their being Creator of al things eternall omnipotent author and preseruer of all that are good Therefore obay me Secondly he saith that he is the god of his people that through the promise of his bountifulnesse he might allure vs to obay him God verilie is the God of all creatures as touching both the creating and preseruing and the gouerning of them al but he is the God of his Church by the participation and manifestation of himselfe God then is our God when we acknowledge him to be such as he hath manifested himselfe in his word namely who emploieth his omnipotency iustice wisdome and mercy vnto our saluation or who tendereth vs with an especiall peculiar fauour in his Son For God is saide to be their god whom he loueth fauoureth aboue al others Psal 33.12 Whereupon also the Prophet Dauid affirmeth that nation to bee blessed whose God is the Lord euen the people that hee hath chosen for his inheritance Thirdly he saith Which haue brought thee out of the land of Aegypt as if he should say I am hee who haue manifested my selfe vnto thee and bestowed all these blessings vpon thee This he addeth that by the mentioning of his late and notable benefit he might declare vnto them and admonish them that they were bound therfore to shew thankfulnesse and obedience vnto him This also belongeth vnto vs because it dooth figuratiuelie comprehend implie all the deliueraunces of the church by the mentioning of so famous and noble a benefit And further also this was a type of our woonderful deliuerance atchieued by Christ Nowe when hee saith that hee Iehoua is this god and deliuerer of the Church he opposeth himselfe both to all creatures to Idols challenging all diuine honour obedience vnto himselfe alone according to the exposition hereof deliuered Deut. 6. Jsa 43. and in other places Wherefore it followeth not only that this Iehoua is to be worshipped but that he alone is to be worshipped to be accounted for our God Next enseweth the commaundement Thou shalt haue none other Gods before me The end of this commaundement is the inward or internal woorship of God that is that due honour may bee giuen vnto God in the minde will and heart of man Moreouer this commaundement is in such wise a negatiue and denieth others as that it conteineth also an affirmation Thou shalt haue none other gods Therefore thou shalt haue me that Jehoua which haue manifested my selfe in my Church thy god alone Now to haue god is 1. To know and acknowledge God namelie that there is a god that he is one god that hee is such a god as hee hath manifested himselfe first in himselfe and then towardes vs. 2. To trust in god onelie 3. With great humilitie and patience to subiect and submit our selues vnto god 4. To expect and looke for all good thinges from god onelie 5. To loue god 6. To reuerence and worship god Thou shalt then haue none other gods that is besides me the onely true god And thou shalt not haue them before mee that is in my sight therefore neither shalt thou haue straunge gods in the closet of thy heart which is not close or hidden in my sight but lieth wholy open is altogether manifest vnto me the searcher of the hearts reines The most ready and easie way of explicating each commaundement is to distribute the obedience of euery commandemēt into his vertues as parts adioining afterwards those vices which are opposite vnto the same vertues Here then in the first commandement are signified seuen vertues The knowledge of god Faith Humilitie Patience Hope the loue of god the feare of god These vertues as beeing the partes of the obedience of the first commaundement wee will brieflie and in few wordes vnfolde and declare 1 The knowledge of god is so to iudge of God as hee hath manifested himselfe in his worde and workes and to bee mooued and stirred vp by that knowledge to a confidence loue feare and woorship of the true God Rom. 10.14 How shall they beleeue in him of whom they haue not heard Ioh. 17.3 This is life eternal that they know thee to be the onelie verie god and whom thou hast sent Jesus Christ 2 Faith is a sure and certaine persuasion whereby wee assent vnto euerie woorde of God deliuered vnto vs and whereby we are resolued that the promise of the free mercy of God for Christes sake dooth belong vnto vs and further also it is a confidence receiuing this benefite of God and resting therein being kindled of the hole ghost by the word in our mindes will and hearts and working in them a reioicing in God inuocation and praying vnto God and obedience according to all his commaundements 2. Chron. 20.20 Put your trust in the Lord your god and ye shall be assured 3 Humilitie is to acknowledge all those good thinges which are in vs are doone by vs not to come from any worthines or abilitie of our owne but from the free goodnes of god so by the acknowledging of gods diuine Maiestie our infirmitie vnworthines to subiect submit our selues vnto god to giue the glorie of all good thinges which are in vs to him alone truely to feare god to acknowledge bewaile our owne defects vices not to couet any higher place or condition neither trusting in our owne gifts but in the helpe and assistance of God to hold our selues contented with our owne vocation and calling not to despise others in comparison of our selues neither to let or hinder them in the discharging of their duety but to acknowledge that others also are and may bee made profitable instruments of god and therefore to giue place and honour vnto them not to attribute vnto our selues thinges aboue our force and power not to
affect an excellencie aboue others but to bee well contented with those gifts which God hath giuen vs and to employ all our gifts studies to the glorie of God the safetie of our neighbours euen those which are of the baser and vnwoorthier sort neither at anie time to murmour against GOD if wee faile of our hope or if wee bee despised but in all things to ascribe the praise of wisdome iustice vnto God 1. Cor 4.6 These thinges I haue figuratiuelie applied vnto mine owne selfe and Apollos for your sakes that yee might learne by vs that no man presume aboue that which is written that one swell not against another for anie mans cause For who separateth thee And what hast thou that thou hast not receiued 1. Pet. 5.5 God resisteth the proud and giueth grace to the humble Humble your selues therefore vnder the mightie hand of god that he may exalt you in due time Matth. 18.4 Whosoeuer shal humble himselfe as this title child the same is the greatest in the kingdome of heauen Phil. 2.3 Doe nothing through contention or vaine glorie but in meekenesse of minde euerie man esteeme other better than himselfe 4 Patience is the knowledge agnising of Gods Maiestie wisedome iustice goodnesse resoluing through a confidence in gods promises and so in hope of gods assistance deliuering to obey god in suffering those euils aduersities which he sendeth on vs willeth vs to suffer neither in respect of the griefe which they bring to murmur against God or to doe any thing against his commandements but in our dolor griefe to retaine still the confidence and hope of gods assistaunce and to aske deliueraunce of him and by this knowledge and ful persuasion of Gods will to mitigate and assuage our griefe and paines Humilitie and Patience belong vnto the first commaundement not onely because they are partes of that internall obedience which god requireth immediately to be performed vnto him but also because they follow and accompany the true knowledge confidence loue and fear of god as necessarie effects of the same 5 Hope is a sure and certaine expectation of euerlasting life freelie to be giuen for Christes sake and of a mitigation or assuagement of present euils and of a deliueraunce from the same euils of this life and lastly an expecting and looking for al blessinges necessarie vnto saluation according to the counsell and will of God Now hope springeth from faith Because he that is certain of the present wil of God towardes him hath also certaine and assured promises of the time to come For God is not changed and the giftes and calling of God are without repentance Moreouer Faith and Hope differ in these considerations Faith embraceth the present benefites of god and his wil towardes vs. Hope embraceth the effectes and fruites which are to come of this present and perpetual wil of god Heb. 11.1 Faith is that which maketh those things to be which are hoped for and which sheweth those thinges which are not seen Hope that is seene is not hope for how can a man hope for that which he seeth 6 The loue of god is to acknowledge God to bee exceeding good and exceeding bountifull and mercifull not only in himselfe but also in vs and towards vs and that therefore he dooth employ his power wisedome iustice mercy goodnes to our saluation so through the acknowledging of this his infinit goodnes towards vs to loue God as that we more couet and desire our conioyning and conformity with him and the execution of his will than all other things whatsoeuer and further had rather leaue and relinquish all thinges than be bereaued of his communion and fellowship or offend him in any thing and are ready to part with all other thinges which wee loue for his sake nothing is more cared for of vs than how we maie doe thinges acceptable and gratefull vnto him 7 The feare of God is to acknowledge the infinit anger of God towards sinne his great power to punish sinne his wisedome and iustice and that right and dominion which he hath ouer al creatures and of the contrary to acknowledge our owne corruption and infirmity and therefore to submit our selues to god according to all his commaundementes and to account for the greatest euil our offending of God and estranging from him and in respect thereof highly to hate and detest al sinne and to bee ready rather to suffer al other euils whatsoeuer than that we will offend god in any thing Leuit. 14 19. Thou shalt fear the Lord thy god because J am the Lord. Ier. 10.7 Who would not fear thee O King of natiōs For to thee appertaineth the dominion for among al the wise men of the Gentiles and in all their kingdomes there is none like thee The feare and loue of god differ For the loue of god ariseth from a knowledge of gods goodnesse The fear of god ariseth from a knowledge of gods iustice and of his power to punish sinnes and of that right which he hath ouer al creatures Againe Loue pursueth good to wit god and our coniunction with him wherefore the loue of god is not to abide to be bereaued of god who is the chiefe good But fear flieth euill to wit the displeasure and wrath of god and our separation from him Wherefore also the fear of god is to beware that we offend not god Moreouer the fear of god which was in the nature of man vncorrupt differeth from that which is now in the regenerate in this life and which is in the blessed Angels and Saintes in the celestial life The feare of god which is in the blessed in euerlasting life is a high detestation of sinne and punishmentes without griefe because neither anie sinne is in them or any punishment of sin and they are assured that they shall neuer sinne or be punished Jsa 25.8 Hee wil destroie death for euer and the Lord God wil wipe awaie the tears from al faces The feare of god which is in the regenerate in this life is an acknowledging of sinne and the wrath of god an earnest griefe for the sinnes committed for the offending of god and for those calamities which by reason of sinnes both we and others susteine and a feare of future sins and punishments and an earnest desire of flying and shunning these euils by reason of the knowledge of that mercy which is shewed vnto vs through Christ Matth. 10.28 Feare yee not them which kil the bodie but are not able to kil the soule but rather feare him which is able to destroie both soule and bodie in hell Luk. 23.40 Fearest thou not god seeing that thou art in the same condemnation This feare is commonly called Sonne-like feare because it is such as Sonnes beare towardes their parents who are sorrie for the anger and displeasure of their father and yet notwithstanding are alwaies persuaded of the loue and mind of their father
of their ancestours 5. He saith that he is a god which sheweth mercie vnto thousandes in them that loue him and keepe his commaundementes And heere hee extendeth his punishment vnto the fourth generation but his mercy vnto thousandes thereby to signifie that he had rather shewe mercy than anger and so by this meanes to allure vs the more to loue him But vnto this promise are opposed manie examples of the godlie whose children and posteritie haue perished Whereunto god himself answereth Eze. 18. That he wil blesse the posterity of the godly if they continue in the good cōuersation godlines of their auncestours but wil punish them if they depart from it If here it be demaunded why hee dooth not conuert their posteritie seeing without his mercy they are not able to follow the godlines of their parentes We answere first Because this promise is not vniuersal but indefinite and therefore God doth not therein bind his mercie vnto euerie particular one of the godlies posteritie but reserueth his Election free vnto himselfe So that as of the posteritie of the wicked he conuerteth and saueth some in like manner also he leaueth of the posterity of the godly some in their naturall corruption and in destruction which all by nature deserue and this he doth to shew that his mercy is free as wel in chusing the posterity of the godly as of the wicked Secondly because he bindeth not himselfe to perfourme the same benefites or all the benefites vnto all the posteritie of the godlie Wherefore he satisfieth this promise when he dooth euen vouchsafe of corporall benefites the wicked and reprobate posterity of the godly Thirdly because he promiseth this felicitie of the posteritie vnto them that loue him and keepe his commandmentes that is to those which are indeede godly and of good conuersation But because the loue of God obedience is euen in the holiest Saintes in this life vnperfect therefore the reward also promised vnto them is vnperfect and ioined with the crosse chastisements among which the wickednesse and vnhappinesse of their posteritie is not the last as maie appear in Dauid Salomon and Iosias Obiection They who keepe Gods commaundementes obtaine mercie Therefore we merit somewhat of God Aunswere God saith J wil shew the mercie Therefore it is not of merit or desert Therefore the obiection is a fallacy putting that for a cause which is no cause For when God addeth this promise that he will shewe mercie vnto the thousand generation of them that loue him and keepe his commaundements he sheweth that he had rather shew mercy than anger thereby to allure vs to loue him This promise and commination is belonging verily to the obedience of the whole Decalogue but is therefore especially annexed vnto this commaundement both that we might know the first and second commandement to be the foundation of al the rest also that God might shew that he is especially angry with the deprauers and corrupters of his worship and punisheth this kinde of sin both in them and in their posterity and contrarily doth blesse also the posterity of them which diligently regard and keepe pure religion or the true seruice and worship of God By this declaration and exposition of the woords of this commandement it appeareth that by the naming of one kind al false worships of God are condemned and contrariwise is commaunded the obseruation of the true and vncorrupt worshippe which is euery internal or external work commaunded of God doone in faith which is persuaded that both the person and the woork please God for the Mediatours sake the chiefe end where of is that due honour may be giuen vnto god whereby we may shew that we acknowledge him alone for the tru god who hath willed this worship to be thus done to him And then is this worship done vnto him when he is so worshipped as himselfe hath manifested in his word that he will be worshipped And these may suffice as touching the exhortation which is adioined to the commaundement nowe wil wee declare those things which belong vnto the commandement it selfe In this second commaundement is forbidden all false worship and the true worship of God is commaunded And this is the end or scope of this commaundement that the true god alone who commaundeth himselfe to bee worshipped in the first commaundement bee rightlie worshipped of vs namely with such worship wherewith it is right and meete he should be worshipped of intelligent or vnderstanding creatures and such as pleaseth him God therefore in this commaundement prescribeth the rule of true diuine worships He forbiddeth not only that creatures or Images be not reputed or woorshipped for God but also that himselfe be worshipped by Images and at Images and when he condemneth the chiefe and grossest and most euident kinde of false woorshippes namely the woorshipping of God at or by Images it is manifest that hee forbideth also the other kindes of false woorshippes seeing this is the heade and fountaine of all the rest Wherefore all woorshippes whatsoeuer are instituted by men not by God in which the same cause of prohibiting or forbidding appeareth are forbidden by the forbidding of this the grossest kinde of the rest and withall a rule is giuen that wee holily and religiously conteine and holde our selues within the lists and tarriers prescribed by God neither ad ought to that woorshippe which God himselfe hath instituted Ios 1.7 Prouer. 30.6 Reuel 32.1 nor maime the same so much as in the least point which also we are in other places expresselie enioyned by the Lorde This commaundement is different from others for that in others the parts of themselues or specialties of diuine woorship are rehearsed but in this al adding maiming and altering of them is forbidden and a rule prescribed that wee keepe our selues within the bonds by god appointed And this studie endeuour and care to worship God after that manner which himselfe hath commanded is the poper peculiar obedience of this commaundement Which is also required in these sayings Deut. 4 Ye shal put nothing to the word which I command you neither shal ye take ought therefrom that yee may keepe the commaundementes of the Lorde your God which I command you Deutr. 12. Whatsoeuer J command you take heed you do it thou shalt put nothing thereto nor take ought therefrom Now as concerning the wordes of the commandement wee are to obserue that there are two parts of this Second commandement The former part forbiddeth Jmages to bee made The second part forbideth to woorshippe them with diuine honour Of the first part we will first speake The first part of the second commandement where is intreated of Images The chiefe Questions concerning Images 1 How far Images may be allowed to be made 2 Why they are to be abolished in Christian Churches 3 How they are to be abolished 1 HOW FARRE IMAGES MAYBE ALLOWED TO BE MADE IMAGES or Pictures are not here simply forbidden because the
is agreeing vnto the true god only This kind of Idolatry is especially forbidden in the first commandement and furder also in some part in the third commandement 2 When mē er in the kind of woorshippe that is when worship or honour is imagined to be doone vnto the true god by some such woorke which himselfe hath not commanded This kind is properly condemned in this second commandement and is called will-worshippe or superstition They are saide to be superstitious whosoeuer ad humane inuētions to the commandements of God 2 Hypocrisie which is a pretending or faining true godlinesse and worship of God doing the external works commaunded by god whether morall or ceremoniall without true faith and conuersion This vice is depainted and described in these woordes by the Prophet Isaias This people come neere vnto me with their mouth and honour mee with their lips but haue remooued their heart far from me and their fear toward me was taught by the preceptes of men In the same words and those that followe and also euery where thoroughout the whole Scripture is hypocrisie condemned of the Lord. 3 Prophanenes which is a voluntary letting goe or contempt of all religion and of the whole worship of God both internal external or else of some part of diuine worship This prophanenes is repugnant also to the whole worship of God in the first and second table Now let vs entreate a little more at large of superstition That Wil-worship whereof we before made mention is reprehended of the Lord in many places of holy Scripture So by Moses it is forbidden Deut. 12.8 Yee shall not doe after al these things that we do here this daie that is euerie mā whatsoeuer seeemeth good in his owne eies And in the end of the same chapter he saith Whatsoeuer I commaund you take heede you doe it thou shalt put nothing thereto nor take ought there-from It is also reprehended by Isaias whose woords before recited are alleadged by Christ himselfe Matth. 15.8 for the condemning of superstition or Wil-woorshippe The same is condemned also by Paul Col. 2.8 Beware least there be any man that spoile you through Philosophy and vaine deceite through the traditions of men according to the rudimentes of the world and not after Christ Obiection Such places and saiengs speak of the wicked and vngodlie commaundementes of men and of Mosaical and Jewish ceremonies Aunswere That this is false which is replied some demonstrances which are added vnto certaine places declare which also reiect those humane Lawes and ordinaunces that commaund any thing in regard of diuine worshippe which is not commaunded by God although the same be a thing in his own kind not forbidden of God So Christ reiecteth the Iewes tradition of washing of handes whereof he saith Matth. 15.11 That which goeth into the mouth defileth not the man but that which commeth out of the mouth that defileth the man Hither also may that be referred which Christ speaketh 23.25 Wo be to you Scribes Pharisees Hypocrites for ye make cleane the vtter side of the cup and of the platter but within they are ful of briberie and excesse Now that these and the like thinges are lawful setting aside of an opinion of superstition in them the Apostle in sundry places doth shew Roman 14.6 He that obserueth the daie obserueth it to the Lord and he that obserueth not the daie obserueth it not to the Lord Hee that eateth eateth to the Lord for hee giueth god thanks and he that eateth not eateth not to the Lord and giueth God thankes Againe 1. Corinth 10.25 Whatsoeuer is sold in the shamble eate yee and aske no question for conscience sake For the earth is the Lords and al that therein is Wherefore they are not simplie so condemned but onely so far as they are prescribed for diuine worship In the same respect is single life also condemned especially seeing the same is not a thing indifferent but to those only who haue the gift of continēcy according as it is said of Christ Matth. 19 12. He that is able to receiue this let him receiue it For al men as in the same place Christ saith cannot receiue this thing saue they to whom it is giuen And this is the difference between things indifferent or of middle qualitie and those things which are properly the worshippe of god Which difference we must diligently obserue 1. Bicause when men faigne other worships of god in them they faigne another wil of god which is to faigne another god 2. Because by confounding of the true worshippe with false worships the true god is confounded with Idoles Rom. 14.23 which are worshipped with those worships inuēted by men 3. Because whatsoeuer is not of faith is sinne And when any man doth a thing as thereby to worship God his conscience not knowing whether God wil be worshipped after this manner or no he doth it not of faith but is ignoraunt and doubteth whether God be pleased or displeased with his work and therefore he presumeth to do that albeit it may displease god Wherefore hee dooth not thereby worship but contemne god OF TRADITIONS MOreouer that wee may make that difference of diuine worship and of things indifferent fully and wholy manifest and answere to an obiection of theirs who defend worshippes inuented by men with such places of Scripture as where god willeth vs to obey the commandements of mē we wil note and obserue that there are foure sorts of those things which men commaund 1. The ordinaunces of god which god wil that men propose vnto others to be obserued but not in their own name but in the name of god himselfe as being themselues the ministers and messengers not the autors thereof So the ministers of the church propound the heauenly doctrin of god to the church parents to their children Maisters to their scholers so Magistrates propound the commaundements of the Decalogue vnto their subects The obedince of these commaundementes is and is called Gods woorship because they are not humane ordinances but diuine which are necessarily to bee obeied although no autoritie or commaundement of any creature came thereto yea although all creatures should commaund the contrary Hither appertaine many places of Scripture As Prouer. 6.20 My Sonne keepe thy Fathers commaundement and forsake not thy Mothers instruction 1. Thessal 4.2 Yee know what commaundementes we gaue you by the Lord Iesus He therefore that despiseth these despiseth not man but god Matth. 23.2 The Scribes and Pharisees sit in Moses seate Al therefore whatsoeuer they bid you obserue that obserue and doe These and the like sayinges will vs to obey men as the ministers of god in these thinges which belong vnto the ministery that is which god by expresse commaundement hath testified that hee will haue published and commaunded by them but they graunt not authority vnto any to institute newe worshippes of god at their owne pleasure according as it is said Prouer. 36. Put
and which is belonging vnto the office and function of teaching in the church and whereof mention also is made in the fourth commaundement but this propagation of true doctrine is that instituting and instructing which appertaineth to euery one because euery one priuatly in his place is bound to bring others to the knowledge worship of God Deu. 4.9 Teach them thy Sonnes and thy Sonnes Sonnes Deut. 6 20. When thy Sonne shal aske thee in time to come saying what meane these testimonies and ordinaunces and Lawes which the Lorde our God hath commaunded you Then shalt thou saie vnto thy Sonne wee were Pharaohs bondmen in Aegypt but the Lord brought vs out of Aegypt with a mighty hand Deut. 11.19 Yee shal teach them your children speaking of them when thou sittest in thine house when thou walkest by the waie and when thou liest downe and when thou risest vp Luke 22.32 When thou art conuerted strengthen thy brethen Coloss 3.16 Let the woord of Christ dwel in you plenteouslie in al wisedome teaching and admonishing your owne selues in Psalmes Hymnes and spiritual Songs 1. Thess 5.11 Exhort one another and edifie one another 2 The celebration lauding or magnifieng of God which is a commemoration and recounting of Gods woorkes and properties ioyned with a liking and admiration of them before God and his creatures to this end that we may signifie and declare our liking or approbation and reuerence towardes God that God may excell aboue all thinges and that so our subiection vnto him may appeare and be manifested They therefore which ban and curse sinne against this commaundement because they sin against the praising and magnifieng of God when they speak impious things of God as if he forsooth were their executioner to reuenge their quarell and they sinne against praier and inuocation when they craue of god those thinges which are flat against his word Some man wil here reply Vnto whō God doth imprecate wish euil to thē we maie also wish euil Vnto this we answer 1. All imprecations or euil-wishinges which are made absolutelie without some prophecy or special reuelatiō are sins 2. They must be done without priuate hatred and desire of reuenge 3. They must be done in respect of gods glorie onlie and the preseruation of the true church 4. Wee must not imprecate or wish euill as it is an euill that is as it is the destruction of them against whom wee wish it 3 The confession of the truth which wee knowe concerning GOD which is the shewing of our iudgement and opinion concerning god and his will certainely knowen out of gods word because according as our duty bindeth vs we signifie and declare our minde and knowledge for the setting forth of gods glory for the furthering of the saluation of others Rom. 10.10 With the heart man beleeueth vnto righteousnesse and with the mouth man confesseth to saluation 1. Pet. 3.15 Bee readie alwaies to giue an aunswere to euerie man that asketh you a reasō of the hope that is in you with meeknes and reuerence And hence it appeareth that they who lead a vitious and bad life sinne against this commaundement because they sinne against the confession of the truth when as they boast themselues to bee Christians and shewe the contrarie in their life and maners These three partes or vertues of the right and lawful vsage of the name of god which haue bin now proposed agree in this that they are a commemoration of the truth concerning god again they differ in this that the doctrine or propagation of true doctrine tendeth to the instruction of others The celebration of God respecteth our liking and subiection The confession of the knowen trueth betokeneth the certainty of our opinion and iudgement 4 The zeale of god which is an ardent loue of god and a griefe for any reproch or contempt which is done to god and an endeuour to put awaie that reproch from the name of god and to auoide sinnes our selues and to banish them from others This zeale is required of euery one that euery one according to his place and calling and as hee is in duetie bound doe vindicate and maintaine the glorie of God 5 Jnuocation which is praier whereby we craue of the true God none other blessinges than God hath commanded vs to aske of him onely which praier and petition proceedeth from a desire in vs of gods bountifulnesse and liberality and is made in true conuersion and in a full persuasion of gods promises for the Mediatours sake Psal 105.1 Praise the Lord and cal vpon his name Matth. 7.7 Aske and it shal be giuen you seeke and yee shal find knocke and it shal be opened vnto you 1. Iohn 5.14 This is the assuraunce that wee haue in him that if we aske any thing according to his wil he heareth vs. 6 Thankes-giuing which is to acknowledge and confesse what and how great benefites blessings we haue receiued of god vnto what obedience towards god we are in respect of them bound and ready or prepared and that therefore we wil yeelde vnfaigned obedience vnto him to the vtmost of our power Colos 3.17 Whatsoeuer ye shall do in word or deed doe all in the name of the Lord Jesus giuing thanks to god euen the father by him 1. Thess 5.18 In all thinges giue thanks for this is the wil of God in Christ Jesus toward you Psal 107.1 Praise the Lord because he is good for his mercie endureth for euer 7 Right and lawful swearing which is comprehended vnder Inuocation as a special vnder the general The chiefe questions concerning an oath or swearing 1 What an oath is 2 By whom we are to sweare 3 Of what things we must sweare 4 Whether al oathes are to be kept 5 Whether a christian maie take a right lawful oath 1 WHAT AN OATH IS AN oath is an inuocating on god whereby is desired that god who is the viewer of the harts would bee a witnesse vnto him that sweareth that he wil not lie or deceiue in that matter whereof he sweareth and that God would punish him that sweareth if he doe lie or deceiue In this definition are the other foure questions also comprehended Furthermore an oath was ordained by God that it might be the bond of truth betweene men and a testimonie or recorde that god is the authour and defender of the truth An oath is oftentimes vnderstoode and taken for the whole worship of God because by whom a man sweareth the same himselfe professeth to account for god 2 By whom we must swear WE must sweare by god onlie 1. Because god hath commanded vs to sweare by him onlie as he alone is to bee feared and worshipped 2. God wil haue inuocation to be vsed vnto himselfe onelie Therefore hee will haue vs to sweare also by himselfe only because an oath is an inuocating on god 3. An oath doth giue and ascribe vnto him by whom wee sweare the inspection and
and ouerthrow of the Citie Aunswere They er that restraine Christs benefit to those things or promises only without the performance whereof the promise made vnto Dauid concerning the Messias could not haue beene kept For all the benefits blessings of god both corporall and spirituall both before and after the Messias was exhibited as well those without which the promise of the Messias could as those without which it could not be fulfilled are all perfourmed vnto the Church for the Messias sake 2. Cor. 1.20 For all the promises of god in him are Yea are in him Amen And so doth the Scripture expound the like kinds of speaking as 2. Kings 13. Deut. 7. Lastly the benefits which god also performeth vnto the wicked posterity of the godly are attributed vnto the godlinesse of their godly parents not of merit but of mercy for the truth of gods promises As Exod. 20. 32. Deut. 4.16 Gen. 48.16 Iacob saith of Iosephs sons Let my name be named vpon them and the name of my fathers Abraham and Jsaacke Here Iacob willeth himselfe and his fathers to be called vpon after his death Therefore it is lawfull to call vpon the Saints departed Aunsw It is an Hebrue phrase which signifieth an adopting of Sons so that the sense is let them be called by my name or let them take their name from mee that is let them be called my Sonnes hauing the dignitie title of Patriarks that two tribes of Israell may come therein The like phrase is in Isaiah Cap. 4.1 In that daie shal seuen weomen saie to one man * According to the old Latin LET THY NAME BE CALLED VPON VS Let vs be called by thy name that is let vs bee called thy wiues 17 Iob 5. Call now if anie will aunswere thee and to which of the Saints wilt thou turne Heere Elephas exhorteth Iob to craue the aid of some Saint Aunswere The words which go before doe shewe that these wordes belong to a comparison of men with Angels whom he saith so farre to excell men in purity that they doe not so much as make aunswere or appeare being called by men Wherefore this place doth more make against than pleade for the inuocation of Angels 18 * This is translated according to the old Latin translation the words whereof the Papists vrge Iob 33. Jf there be an Angel one of a thousand to speake for him to declare mans righteousnesse He will haue mercie vpon him and will saie Deliuer him that he go not downe into the pit J haue found one in whom I am reconciled vnto him Ans Here the old translation speaketh vnproperly For the woordes are thus Jf there be an Angel with him or an interpreter one of a thousand to declare vnto man his righteousnesse Then will hee haue mercy vpon him and will say Deliuer him that hee go not downe into the pit for I haue found a reconciliation Now then albeit this were the sense that Angels pray for men distressed and in affliction yet this made nothing for their inuocation But it is manifest that this is the sense If a man diseased or afflicted be in his calamitie instructed of the will iustice and goodnesse of god either by an Angell or by a Prophet or by some teacher for these also are called Angels and repenteth him of his sinnes and assenteth vnto the Doctrine and comfort ministred vnto him him will God deliuer by their ministerie by whom he doth instruct him 19 Matth. 25.40 Jn as much as saith Christ ye haue done it vnto one of the least of these my brethren yee haue done it to me Therefore what honour of inuocation we giue vnto the Saints the same is also giuen vnto Christ himselfe Answere That honour of the creature maie and ought to bee referred vnto God which God willeth to bee done vnto him but that honour of the creature which God forbiddeth to bee giuen vnto the creature is not honourable but reprochful and contumelious vnto god Now the reason is sottish whereas they wil seem to draw it from the words of Christ when Christ speaketh of the duties of charitie which god willeth vs to perfourme in this life towardes those that stand in neede of our aide and help 20 Jf the Angels vnderstanding our necessities praie for vs and so are to be praied vnto it is lawful also to praie vnto Saints But that the Angels pray for vs is confirmed by the woords of Zacharie 1.12 The Angel of the Lord aunswered and said O Lorde of hostes how long wilt thou be vnmerciful to Ierusalem and to the citties of Judah Aunswere The Maior is not wholy to bee graunted namely that all the Angels vnderstand all the wantes and necessities of al men For the calamities of Iurie were open not onely to the sight of Angels but also to the sight of men 2. We denie the consequence which they frame from the Angels vnto the Saintes departed For vnto the Angels god committeth the care and protection of his Church in this life Therefore they beeing also here on earth see and know our miseries which the Saints see not vnto whom this charge is not committed they pray particularly for many which we cannot affirme of the Saints by any testimonies of Scripture 3. There is another fault in the consequence in concluding that wee must pray to them because they pray for vs because not euerie one who praieth for vs is straight waies to be inuocated as was before declared The same is to be answered of the dreame of Iudas Maccabeus 2. Macab 15. Wherein hee sawe Onias the High-Priest and Ieremias the Prophet praying for the people As for that which is said in the booke of Baruch cap. 3.4 Hear now the praier of the dead Israelites the Israelites are there said to be dead which were yet liuing and inuocating on god in this life but by reason of their calamities like vnto those that are deade Wherefore this sentence standeth true and certaine that the inuocation of whatsoeuer thing besides the true God manifested in the church is idolatrous and is repugnaunt vnto the honour of Gods name which God in true inuocation will haue exhibited and done vnto him THE FOVRTH COMMANDEMENT REmember thou keepe holy the sabboth day six daies shalt thou labour and doe all that thou hast to do but the seuenth daie is the sabboth of the Lorde thy God in it shalt thou doe no manner of work thou and thy Sonne and thy daughter thy man-seruaunt and thy maide-seruaunt thy cattel and the straunger that is within thy gate For in six daies the Lord made heauen and earth the sea and al that is in them and rested the seuenth day wherefore the Lord blessed the seuenth day and hallowed it The parts of this fourth commaundement are in number two A commaundement and a reason of the commaundement The parts of the commandement are also two The first is Moral That the sabboth be sanctified that
of thinges that were to bee fulfilled by Christ namely of sanctification and euery type must giue place to the thing thereby signified Likewise it was a seuering or distinguishing of the Iewes from other nations but this seuering and distinction was taken away by christ 3 The Lord saith of the sabboth daie Jt is a signe betweene mee and the children of Jsrael for euer and an euerlasting couenaunt Aunswere 1. The ceremonial sabboth was perpetuall vntil Christes comming who is the end of ceremonies 2. The sabboth is eternal as concerning the thing signified which is a ceasing from sins and a rest in God for in this sense are all the types of the old testament eternal euen the kingdome of Dauid also which yet was to be ouerthrown before the comming of the Messias 4 We grant the Mosaicall ceremonies to be changeable yet it followeth not thereof that the Lawes which were made before Moses time are changeable in the number whereof also is the keeping of the Sabboth daie Aunswere The ceremonies which were ordained by God before Moses are also changeable because they were types of the benefites of the Messias to come and therefore are by his comming abolished as circumcision which was giuen vnto Abraham as also the sacrifices which were prescribed vnto our first Parents 5 The lawes which were giuen of God before the fall are not types of the benefites of the Messias and binde all mankind for euer for then was not giuen as yet the promise of the Messias and there was one and the same condition of all mankind But the Sabboth of the seuenth daie was ordained by God assoone as the creation of the world was finished before the fall of mankinde Therefore it is vniuersal and perpetual Aunswere The Maior proposition is true concerning the morall lawe the notions whereof were imprinted in mans minde at the first creation but it is not true as touching the ceremonie or obseruing of the seuenth day as which after the fall was made a type of the benefites of the Messias in the Mosaicall lawe therfore in like maner as other ceremonies which were either then or before instituted it became subiect to mutation change by the comming of the Messias For god would not haue the shadowes of thinges to continue or remaine the thinges themselues being once come and exhibited Wherefore albeit we graunt that the exercises of diuine woorship were to haue beene kept on the seuenth day according to the commaundement prescript of the Decalogue as well if men had neuer sinned as nowe after they sinned yet notwithstanding seeing god hath enrolled this ceremonie amongest the shadowes of the Messias to come he hath by this new law enacted by Moses made it changeable together with other ceremonies 6 The cause of a law beeing perpetual doth make the lawe it selfe also perpetual The memorie and celebration of the creation and the meditation on the works of God is a perpetual cause of the Sabboth Therefore the Sabboth is perpetual Aunswere A law is made perpetuall or vnchaungeable by reason of an vnchangeable cause that is if that cause it doe necessarily or perpetually require this lawe as an effect or meane but not if at other times that ende may bee there come vnto by other meanes or if the Law-giuer may as wel obtaine the same ende by another Law In like maner seeing also this Lawe of sanctifieng the Sabboth of the seuenth day being repealed abolished we may neuertheles godlily holily by other means meditate on gods works it foloweth not that this law of the ceremonial Sabboth is perpetual although the memorie celebration of Gods creation workes ought to be perpetual and therefore hath the Church by common consent according to Christian libertie well chaunged this ceremonie of obseruing the seuenth day being taken away by Christ hath substituted in the place of the seuenth day the first day of the weeke yet so that there is obserued no difference of daies which is vtterly forbid in the Church seeing one day is not holier than another Wherefore also great difference is there betweene the Christian obseruing of the Lords day and the Iewish obseruing of the seuenth daie For 1 It was not lawfull for the Iewes to change the saboth or to omit it as being a part of ceremoniall woorship The christian church retaining still her libertie alotteth the first day vnto the Ministerie without adioyning any opinion of necessitie or woorship 2 The olde ceremoniall Sabboth was a type of things to be fulfilled in the new Testament by christs but in the new Testament that signification ceaseth and there is had regard onlie of order and comelinesse without which there could be either no ministerie or at at least-wise no well ordered ministerie in the church OF CEREMONIES The speciall Questions 1 What Ceremonies are 2 Howe the Ceremoniall Lawes differ from the Morall Lawes 3 How manie sortes of Ceremonies there are 4 Whether the Church maie ordaine Ceremonies 1 WHAT CEREMONIES ARE. CEremonies are external solemne actions ordained in the Ministerie of the Church either for order sake or for signification 2 How the ceremoniall Lawes differ from the Morall 1 CEremonies are temporarie the Morall are perpetuall 2 The Ceremonies are done all alike The Morall are not doone alwaies alike 3 The Ceremonies signifie The Morall are signified 4 The Morall are as the generall The Ceremoniall are restrained in speciall 5 The Ceremoniall serue for the Morall The Morall are the end or scope of the Ceremoniall 3 How manie sorts of Ceremonies there are CEremonies are of two sorts some commaunded by God some ordained by men Those that are commanded by god cannot be changed but by God only and those are either sacrifices or Sacraments A sacrifice is an obedience which wee performe to God A Sacrament is a token whereby God testifieth somewhat to vs. Those ceremonies which are ordained by mē may be changed by the aduise of the church if there bee good causes for the changing and alteration of them 4 Whether the church may ordaine ceremonies THE church maie and ought to ordaine ceremonies because without defining and determining of circumstaunces the Moral cannot be kept There are notwithstanding certaine conditions to bee obserued by the Church in ordaining ceremonies namely They must bee such ceremonies as are not impious but agreeable to the word of the Lord. Secondly they must not be superstitious so that wee must not thinke them necessarie to be done nether must they be done with offence Thirdly they must not be too many 4. They must not be idle and vnprofitable but must al tend to edifieng OF THE MINISTERIE The chiefe Questions 1 What the Ministerie is 2 What are the degrees of Ministers 3 For what end and purpose the Ministerie was instituted 4 Vnto whom the Ministerie is committed 5 What are the duties and functions of Ministers 1 WHAT THE MINISTERY IS THE Ministerie is a function by God ordained of teaching
but of Christ who hath fully satisfied him for vs. Reply Then is not yet this freely because wee haue merited it in Christ Aunswere That merit is not our merite because the father gaue vs his sonne freely who meriteth without any merit of ours comming between and that merit of Christ is imputed vnto vs through grace therefore freely for that merit are our sinnes remitted vs whereupon also it is truely and wel added that for Christs satisfaction our sins are not imputed to vs. For we desire not that god would do contrary vnto his iustice would not account vs in mind for sinners but that he would impute vnto vs anothers righteousnes that is the righteousnes of Christ wherewith we being clothed our sins also may be couered 3 Why we are to desire remission of sinnes WE are to desire remission of sinnes 1. That we maie be saued because without remission of sinnes we cannot be saued And this benefite God giueth not but onely to those that desire it 2. That we may be put in minde of the remnauntes of sinnes which are euen in the holiest men and that to this ende that repentaunce maie euermore encrease Wherefore wee are daily also to beg and desire remission of sinnes 3. That wee maie desire and receiue the former blessings because without remission of sins those blessings either are at al not giuen or are giuen to our destruction So the wicked doe indeed often receiue them but not for their saluation as turning rather to their condemnation Obiection What wee haue that we neede not desire But the godly haue remission of sinnes Therefore the godly haue no need to desire it Ans The godly indeed haue remission but not wholy neither also as concerning continuaunce but only as touching the beginning thereof This remission must verily be continued and God also doth continue it to them vnto whom hee remitteth their sinnes in his sonne yet with this condition that they daily pray for and desire that continuaunce Although then god hath remitted vnto vs our sinnes yet hee will notwithstanding that we aske and desire pardon for them and therefore we desire that what sins wee commit or shal commit the same god would remit vnto vs. 4 How our sinnes are remitted vnto vs. OVR sinnes are so remitted vnto vs as wee forgiue and remit our debters And this Christ added 1. That we may rightlie desire remission of sinnes and so that we may come to pray with true faith repentance a signe and token whereof is the loue of our neighbour 2. That when wee finde in our selues true faith and repentance we may so haue a certain argument and comfort in vs that we are of the number of them vnto whom remission is promised and that therefore wee shal doubtlesse obtaine remission of sins when as we may be certainly assured by this that we our selues remit vnto others from our heart their trespasses against vs that we please God albeit many remnaunts of sinne are dwelling as yet within vs. Obiection 1. He that remitteth not is not remitted We remit not Therefore we are not remitted Aunswere He that remitteth not fully and perfectly is notwithstanding remitted so that hee remitte truely and sincerely Obiection 2. Christ willed vs to desire that God will so remitte vs our sinnes as wee remitte our debters But wee doe not perfectlie remit our debters Therefore he willed vs to desire that god wil not perfectly remitte vs our sinnes Ans This is a fallacy of speech deceiuing by miscōstring a word For the particle as in this petition dooth not signifie the degree of remission or a comparison of our remission with that remission wherewith God remitteth vs our sinnes but it signifieth the kinde of remission namely the trueth and sincerity of our remission whereby wee forgiue others from our hart and with a readie wil of forgiuing them or to speak shorter heere is not made a comparison according to degrees but according to the truth of the thing or according to the trueth of remission so that the meaning is so perfectly God remitteth vs our sinnes as we truly and certainely remitte and forgiue our neighbour or Forgiue vs our debts because we forgiue our debters Reply Then is our remission of others the cause why God remitteth vs. Answere This a fallacy putting that for a cause which is no cause For our remission wherwith we forgiue others though not perfectly yet sincerely is only an argument and testimony vnto vs that god wil remit vs our sinnes For our remission and forgiuing of others cannot merit 1. Because it is vnperfect 2. Albeit it were perfect yet should it not merit because what we now perfourme that we owe vnto god For were it so that we did now perfourme perfect obedience to god yet were wee bound of duty to perfourme it Reply But neuertheles yet here is betokened an equalitie of remission in vs and god Aunswere Not an equality but a likenesse and similitude of the kinde of remission Obiection 3. He that remembreth iniuries and is desirous of reuenge doth not truly remit and forgiue But we all remember iniuries and are desirous of reuenge Therefore we doe not truly remit and forgiue Aunswere They that remember iniuries that is without a resistance and dislike of this remembraunce or with a yeelding thereto doe not truely remit If then wee withstand and resist the remnauntes of sinnes which as yet cleaue fast vnto vs and doe not yeelde vnto them nothing hindereth why wee maie not bee saide to remitte others truelie and from our heart and so also to attaine vnto that in regarde where-of this particle as was added of Christ to wit which before also we mentioned to desire and pray rightly Now we rightly pray and desire in faith and repentance both which this petition confirmeth Faith is confirmed and strengthned by this petition because when we truely remit our neighbour we may and ought certainly to resolue that our sins are also remitted vs and so haue we a good conscience are assured that we are heard according to this promise of Christ Math. 6.14 Jf ye doe forgiue men their trespasses your heauenlie father will also forgiue you True repentance also is confirmed and increased in vs by this petition For by this petition we are prouoked and incited to true repentaunce the chiefe part whereof is the loue of our neighbour For if we will be forgiuen we must forgiue others Both causes are conteined in the word of Christ before alleaged out of Matthewe as also in the rest which are presently added in the same place in Matthewe by way of opposition If yee doe forgiue men their trespasses your heauenlie father will also forgiue you that is assure your selues also that your heauenly father heareth you In which worde is comprehended the confirmation of our faith But if yee doe not forgiue men their trespasses no more will your father forgiue you your trespasses In these words is added a spurre to
repentance Obiection 4. Paul obtained remission neither yet did he forgiue al of them their trespasser because he saith 2. Tim. 4.14 Alexander the Copper-smith hath done me much euil the Lord rewarde him according to his woorkes Therefore it is not necessarie that we shoulde forgiue Answere There is a threefold remission or forgiuing 1. Of reuenge This belongeth to all men because all men ought to remit and forgiue reuenge Hereof speaketh this petition and this Paul did forgiue Alexander 2. Of punishment This as all can not inflict so neither can all remit but neither they also vnto whom yet the same otherwise is committed ought alwaies to remit this but onely for certaine causes For God will haue the execution of his iustice and Lawe But Paul forgaue Alexander the punishment also as much as concerned himselfe yet hee will notwithstanding haue him punished of God but with a condition that is if hee persist in sinne 3. Of iudgement This is not alwaies remitted because it is written Mat. 10.16 Bee yee simple as Doues and wise as Serpents that is let vs not call him good who is euil or contrarily Wherefore we are also to reteine a true iudgement concerning others For God who forbiddeth lying will not haue vs to iudge of knaues that they are honest men but hee will haue vs to discerne the good from the bad THE SIXT PETITION AND leade vs not into temptation But deliuer vs from euill Here some make one some two petitions but we are not to striue so that nothing of the doctrine be taken away but that this be made plaine Now they are rather two partes of one petition Leade vs not into temptation is a petition of deliuerie from future euil Deliuer vs from euil is a petition of deliuerie froÌ„ present euil The special questions 1 What temptation is THERE are two causes of temptations The one is from God the other from the Diuel and the flesh The temptation wherby God tempteth vs is a tryal of our faith godlines and obedience by the Crosse and other encumbrances which are opposed to euery one that our faith patience and constancie may be manifested and made knowen both to our selues and others So God is said to haue tempted Abraham Ioseph Job Dauid The temptation whereby the Diuel and our flesh and the wicked also tempt vs is euerie soliciting to sinne which soliciting it selfe also is sinne So the Diuel tempted Iob that hee might seduce and withdrawe him from God whom hee had before loued and serued albeit the matter fell out otherwise than the Diuel would haue it Here is vnderstood by the name of temptation that temptation of God that is the trial of our faith godlines and patience which God worketh by whatsoeuer lets or hinderances of our saluation as by all euils by the Diuel the flesh our lusts the world afflictions calamities the crosse that our faith constancie and hope may bee made knowen vnto our selues others Obiection But God tempteth no man Aunswere God tempteth no man that is by soliciting him to sinne or euil but hee tempteth by proouing and trying vs. The Diuels the woorld our flesh tempt vs that is solicite vs to euils and withdrawe vs from God But God as he tempteth no man and yet is said to haue tempted Abraham Iob Dauid that is to haue tried their faith and constaâ—â—ie by afflictions the crosse so by the same he trieth our faith hope patience loue inuocation constancy whether we wil or no worship serue him also in afflictions Hereby we easily vnderstand seeing temptation is attributed vnto the Diuel to the corrupt lusts and inclinations of men in what sense God maie bee saide to tempt or not to tempt men For Satan tempteth both offering occasions of sinning without and instigating within to sinne thereby to drawe men headlong into destruction and to reproch God Corrupt inclinations tempt because they bend and are prone to actions by god forbidden But god tempteth not to destroy vs nor to cause vs to sin but to trie exercise vs when either hee sendeth calamity vpon vs or permitteth the Diuel or men or our flesh to prouoke inuite vs to sin hiding for a while his grace efficacy in preseruing ruling vs that our faith constaÌ„cy may be made more known apparant not verily vnto god himself as who froÌ„ euerlasting knoweth what how much it is and how much also hereafter it shall bee by his fauour and blessing but vnto our selues and others that so also a trust full persuasion of gods presence protection may be confirmed in vs by the examples of our deliueraunce and in others a desire of folowing our example may be kindled through the beholding of our perseuerance and that in al of vs maie be raised and stirred vp true gratitude and thankefulnes towards god who deliuereth his out of temptations So Gen. 22. God tempteth Abraham commaunding him to sacrifice his sonne Jsaack Exod. 15. He is said to haue tempted the people with want of water Exod. 16. Hee commandeth Manna to be gathered as much as was sufficient for euery daie that hee might tempt or prooue the people whether they woulde walk according to his Lawe or no. Deutr. 13. Hee is said to tempt the people by false Prophetes that he might know whether they loued him with al their heart and with al their soule 2. Chron. 32. Jn the embassage of the Princes of Babel god left Hezechia to tempt or try him and to know al that was in his heart Wherefore this praier which christ taught vs Lead vs not into temptation but deliuer vs from euil speaketh not simply of al trial manifestation of our faith and godlinesse vnto which also Dauid offereth himselfe of his owne accord Psal 26. saying Proue me O Lord and trie me examine my reines and mine heart And Saint Iames speaketh not of our triall but of our incitement to sinne cap. 1.13 Let no man saie when hee is tempted J am tempted of God for God cannot be tempted with euil neither tempteth he anie man But euery man is tempted when he is drawn awaie by his owne concupiscense and is entised Then when lust hath conceiued it bringeth foorth sinne and sinne when it is finished bringeth forth death It is also hereby manifest how god punisheth the wicked or chastiseth or tempteth the godlie by euil spirites neither yet is hee the cause or partaker of those sinnes which the diuels commit For that by the wicked the wicked are punished or the good chastised or exercised it is the righteous and holy work of Gods diuine will but that the wicked execute the iudgement of God by sinning that commeth not so to passe by any fault of god himself but through the proper corruptioÌ„ of the wicked and such as themselues haue purchased god neither willing nor allowing nor working nor furthering their sinne but in his most iust iudgement only permitting it when exequuting